August 20, 2025 • 32 mins
What if humanity’s first encounter with extraterrestrial life isn’t with green-skinned aliens—but with their artificial intelligence?
In this episode, we dive deep into the controversial theory that alien civilizations might use AI probes, not biological beings, to make first contact with us. Drawing on Bob Lazar’s claims about humans as “containers” for alien souls, and parallels to The Matrix where humans are exploited as energy sources, we question whether our reality is stranger than we think.
Could the Grays reported in UFO sightings actually be biologically engineered robots—alien AI designed for exploration? We’ll also explore insights from Popular Mechanics, which argues that AI, not flesh-and-blood aliens, is the most likely form of first contact because of its ability to travel interstellar distances, evolve rapidly, and survive environments that humans can’t.
Finally, we turn the lens back on humanity: if future space exploration depends on AI probes, are we simply following the path that other advanced civilizations took millions of years ago?
Why you’ll want to listen until the end: This isn’t just sci-fi speculation—it’s a provocative look at the intersection of AI, extraterrestrial intelligence, and the future of humanity that will leave you questioning what’s really out there… and what role we play in it.
🚀👁️🗨️ If this episode expanded your mind, hit follow, share it with fellow truth-seekers, and drop a review—help us push these alien AI theories into the mainstream conversation.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/tech-threads-sci-tech-future-tech-ai--5976276/support.
You May also Like:
🎁The Perfect Gift App
Find the Perfect Gift in Seconds
⭐Sky Near Me
Live map of stars & planets visible near you
✔Debt Planner App
Your Path to Debt-Free Living
In this episode, we dive deep into the controversial theory that alien civilizations might use AI probes, not biological beings, to make first contact with us. Drawing on Bob Lazar’s claims about humans as “containers” for alien souls, and parallels to The Matrix where humans are exploited as energy sources, we question whether our reality is stranger than we think.
Could the Grays reported in UFO sightings actually be biologically engineered robots—alien AI designed for exploration? We’ll also explore insights from Popular Mechanics, which argues that AI, not flesh-and-blood aliens, is the most likely form of first contact because of its ability to travel interstellar distances, evolve rapidly, and survive environments that humans can’t.
Finally, we turn the lens back on humanity: if future space exploration depends on AI probes, are we simply following the path that other advanced civilizations took millions of years ago?
Why you’ll want to listen until the end: This isn’t just sci-fi speculation—it’s a provocative look at the intersection of AI, extraterrestrial intelligence, and the future of humanity that will leave you questioning what’s really out there… and what role we play in it.
🚀👁️🗨️ If this episode expanded your mind, hit follow, share it with fellow truth-seekers, and drop a review—help us push these alien AI theories into the mainstream conversation.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/tech-threads-sci-tech-future-tech-ai--5976276/support.
You May also Like:
🎁The Perfect Gift App
Find the Perfect Gift in Seconds
⭐Sky Near Me
Live map of stars & planets visible near you
✔Debt Planner App
Your Path to Debt-Free Living
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Imagine for a moment that the very fabric of our
understanding about well, who we are, where we come from,
even the nature of intelligence itself. Imagine that's just one
small corner of a much vaster, much stranger tapestry. It's
a truly humbling thought, isn't it.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
It really is one.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
That kind of beckons us to peer beyond the familiar,
you know, the confines of our everyday reality.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Yeah, to consider possibilities that, for most people feel firmly
in the realm of sci fi exactly.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
But what if those fictional concepts, what if they're actually
hinting at some profound truths about our place in the universe.
Speaker 2 (00:40):
And this is where it gets really intriguing. I think
we're not necessarily talking about you know, the classic little
Green man or bug eyed monsters. Right, what if the
truth about extraterrestrial intelligence isn't about biological beings at all,
not in the way we usually think about them. Okay,
what if it's something far more abstract, maybe even manufactured,
but possessing an intelligence that just dwarfs ares Wow.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
That Yeah, that fundamentally shifts the entire lens, doesn't it
how we view cosmic existence? So today we're embarking on
a deep dive. We're looking into a collection of frankly
mind bending sources. They weave together threads of speculative philosophy,
iconic cultural stuff, and even some cutting edge scientific research.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
Yeah, real mix.
Speaker 1 (01:26):
Our mission, as always is to extract those surprising nuggets
of insight, try to connect the dots between say, human identity,
the crazy advancements and artificial intelligence, and this well tantalizing,
maybe unsettling possibility of alien encounters that just defy our expectations.
Speaker 2 (01:44):
And we've pulled together some fascinating concepts, some from you
know things everyone knows, cultural touchstones, right, but also alongside
a recent really thought provoking report came out of a
reputable science publication.
Speaker 1 (01:55):
Actually, yeah, that one definitely turns some heads. So get
ready for some serious aha, because what we're about to explore, well,
we'll definitely make you question things, everything you thought you
knew about life, the universe, our role in it all.
It certainly has for me. All right, let's begin this
journey with an idea that Okay, initially it might sound
like something plucked straight from you know, the wildest corners
(02:17):
of a conspiracy theorist's mind. Uh huh, Yet it carries
this weird weight that forces you to just pause and
consider it.
Speaker 2 (02:24):
Okay, I'm intrigued.
Speaker 1 (02:25):
One of the most startling concepts we encountered suggests that
human bodies they might not be entirely our own, not
our own, not in the way we usually think of them.
It's like independent, self contained biological units. This comes from
specific claims, controversial ones mind you made by Bob Lazarre.
Speaker 2 (02:43):
Ah Lazarre. Yeah, that name definitely rings bells in certain
circles UFOs Area fifty one, that sort.
Speaker 1 (02:48):
Of thing, exactly so. According to a supposed report, Lazarre
describes seeing something he claims was like a scientific document. Yeah,
aliens view humans as mere.
Speaker 2 (02:58):
Containers, containers, containers. The audacity of that idea is really something.
If you boil it down, it suggests we're seen as vessels,
not just figuratively, but like literally.
Speaker 1 (03:10):
Yeah, and the report he mentioned takes it even further.
It posits that these human containers are specifically for souls.
Speaker 2 (03:17):
Souls. Okay, wow, now that is profound if we connect
that to the bigger picture, I mean, that perspective just
completely upends our whole anthropocentric view of existence, doesn't it totally?
It suggests that we human beings aren't primarily valued for
our individual consciousness or our intellect, or you know, our
emotional complexity the way we understand value, but rather for
(03:39):
what we might hold within us, these elusive souls.
Speaker 1 (03:43):
That's where it gets chilling, isn't it? Because the report
goes on to suggest something even more unsettling, that religion itself,
you know, as a foundational construct of human society, it
was specifically created by this external intelligence, created for what purpose?
Speaker 2 (03:57):
To provide rules and regulations to prevent damage to these containers,
or maybe more critically, to their precious contents, those very souls.
Speaker 1 (04:06):
But heavens, think about that. I know, if that were true,
it would mean our spiritual beliefs are moral codes, the
very things that guide billions of lives. They might just
be an elaborate system of cosmic regulations designed to maintain.
Speaker 2 (04:21):
Us exactly, and consider the implications for human agency, for
free will? Right, if our free will is in essence
subtly guided or maybe even constrained by some divinely inspired
rule book that's actually just meant to preserve our biological
form or its contents. It raises huge questions about the
nature of choice.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
Are our decisions really our own.
Speaker 2 (04:44):
Or are we just operating within parameters set by some
external alien entity just to ensure our proper upkeep is
like valuable vessels.
Speaker 1 (04:52):
It's a perspective that fundamentally redefines everything, purpose, destiny, the
sacredness of our own bodies.
Speaker 2 (04:58):
Yeah, it moves us from being master's our own fate
to maybe something more like carefully cultivated resources.
Speaker 1 (05:04):
And this isn't just some fleeting philosophical thought experiment either.
Here's where it really hits home, because this idea immediately
brings to mind these iconic cultural narratives, stories that have
long resonated with this deep, maybe subconscious human unease. I'm
talking you, of course, about the matrix.
Speaker 2 (05:19):
Ah, yes, the red pill or the blue.
Speaker 1 (05:21):
Pill exactly for anyone who's seen it. The premise is
just seered into your memory. Humanity enslaved by machines.
Speaker 2 (05:28):
But not for labor, which is the usual trip as.
Speaker 1 (05:30):
A power source. Our minds plugged into this meticulously crafted simulation, while.
Speaker 2 (05:36):
Our bodies serve this grim utilitarian purpose just batteries energy
vessels for some unseen technologically superior intelligence.
Speaker 1 (05:44):
The parallels between Lazar's container concept and the Matrix's depiction
of humans as energy sources. They're uncanny, right.
Speaker 2 (05:52):
They really are both narratives just strip away or perceived autonomy.
They suggest our very existence or biological form is being
utilized or may be cultivated somehow by an unknown superior intelligence.
Speaker 1 (06:04):
It's a recurring trope for a reason, I think definitely.
Speaker 2 (06:07):
It taps into this primal fear that our reality might
not be what it seems, that our free will could
be an illusion, that our significance might be entirely defined
by what someone or something else needs from us.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
So the question becomes is this just a captivating sci
fi trope that plays on our collective.
Speaker 2 (06:25):
Anxieties or does it resonate because it touches upon something deeper,
a philosophical unease, maybe even an almost ancestral intuition about
our true place in the universe.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
It's a compelling thought experiment, isn't it, Even if it's
purely speculative. It forces us to really consider our self worth.
If our bodies aren't entirely our own, if our purpose
is defined by some external, alien entity, what does that
do to our collective sense of humanity's significance.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
It's a profound challenge to our anthropocentric view, isn't it
the idea that we're the pinnacle of creation or even
unique in our bio logical sentience?
Speaker 1 (07:01):
Yeah, it forces us to confront these really uncomfortable questions
about control freedom. The very definition of being human asks
us to maybe shed our ego for a moment and
consider a truly radical reorientation of our cosmic standing.
Speaker 2 (07:13):
And it suggests a profound hierarchy too. If we are
merely containers, it implies a level of advanced design, maybe maintenance,
by an entity far beyond our current comprehension.
Speaker 1 (07:25):
Which fundamentally alters the whole narrative of human evolution and
purpose we've held onto for so long.
Speaker 2 (07:31):
Right, suggest our history might be less about random chance
and natural selection.
Speaker 1 (07:35):
And more about deliberate cultivation. Wow, Okay, heavy stuff. Yeah,
So shifting focus now from that unsettling internal reality of
our bodies, let's look outwards to the very beings who
might conceive of us this way and discover they might
be even more alien than we ever imagined for decades. Right,
the image of the gray alien, small, slender, big head,
(07:58):
big dark.
Speaker 2 (07:58):
Eyes, classic image everywhere.
Speaker 1 (08:00):
It's etched into popular culture as the quintessential extraterrestrial. But
what if that image, that ubiquitous picture, is deeply misleading
about their true form, their true nature.
Speaker 2 (08:10):
What if they're not biological, not in the way we
understand biology anyway. This is where the narrative takes another
fascinating turn. The claims suggest these grays are not biological
beings in the traditional flesh and blood.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
Sense, which is a startling departure from how most people
picture them totally.
Speaker 2 (08:27):
Instead, they're described as robot like creatures, or maybe more precisely,
biologically created beings.
Speaker 1 (08:34):
Okay, explain that biologically created? What does that mean?
Speaker 2 (08:37):
Well, think about it. It's not necessarily about circuits and
wires like a traditional robot. It implies a really sophisticated
form of say genetic engineering or synthetic biology. Oh, where
life itself isn't just born, but designed, grown, maybe for
specific purposes. Imagine a civilization so advance they can cultivate
(08:57):
life forms in a lab.
Speaker 1 (08:59):
Tailoring their exist for specific tasks, right, like we might
grow specialized cells put on the scale of a whole organism. Okay,
that's yeah, And the description goes even further, right, It's
just they're a smaller version of tall gray scientists.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
Which implies a clear hierarchy maybe or a specialized purpose
within a larger alien civilization, like.
Speaker 1 (09:17):
They're the drones maybe the workers the silent observers sent
out for specific missions could be.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
And the reported method of travel. This is really mind bending.
Speaker 1 (09:28):
Yeah, that's part got me.
Speaker 2 (09:29):
Not by conventional rockets or propulsion systems we understand.
Speaker 1 (09:32):
No, by shifting vibrations and frequencies.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
Exactly, I mean, what does that even mean? It hints
at an understanding of physics far far beyond our current.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
Grasp, like quantum entanglement maybe, or higher dimensional travel, something
that lets them manipulate space time itself.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
Imagine just slipping through reality by vibrating at a different frequency.
It paints a picture of beings not subject to the
same physical limitations we are.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
Which would make interstellar travel a lot easier.
Speaker 2 (10:00):
Cisely if these entities are manufactured. Yeah, it implies this
incredible level of technological mastery where the very act of
creation transcends natural evolution.
Speaker 1 (10:11):
A society where life can be engineered, replicated, repurposed.
Speaker 2 (10:14):
At will, and their travel method relying on these vibrational shifts.
It speaks to an advanced understanding of universal forces. It
would make them incredibly adaptable for interstellar travel, for survival
and cosmic environments where you know, fragile biological life like
ours would struggle immensely or just perish.
Speaker 1 (10:33):
It makes them the ultimate explorers, doesn't it unburdened by
the messy, fragile needs of a living organism.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
You got it?
Speaker 1 (10:40):
So, Okay, what does this all mean for us here
on Earth? Well, if we look at our own you know,
rapidly accelerating.
Speaker 2 (10:47):
Technology, especially in robotics and AI.
Speaker 1 (10:49):
Right we're building incredibly realistic humanoid models already, things that
are pushing the boundaries of what we thought possible just
a few years ago.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
You see those Boston Dynamics videos robots run jumping, it's
astonishing totally.
Speaker 1 (11:02):
Or the progress in creating realistic synthetic skin muscle textures.
We're getting really close to truly lifelike androids.
Speaker 2 (11:11):
I think you combine that with the exponential advancements in
AI that power these things, letting them learn, adapt, interact
with more and more sophistications.
Speaker 1 (11:19):
The direct parallel is kind of undeniable, isn't it.
Speaker 2 (11:21):
It really is. If we combine our current robotics capabilities
with increasingly sophisticated AI, aren't we essentially designing the very
alien beings described as the grays.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
It's like these descriptions are a glimpse into our own
potential future, a preview of where our technology is maybe
inevitably headed.
Speaker 2 (11:41):
Which raises a critical question, right, are these gray entities
a reflection of a past taken by other civilizations, maybe millions,
even billions of years ago?
Speaker 1 (11:49):
Or could they even be like a projection of our
own technological destiny, where we too decide that the most efficient,
the most resilient explorer or worker is manufactured.
Speaker 2 (12:00):
It profoundly challenges the notion of what defines life itself.
It forces us to consider that intelligence existence. Maybe they
aren't exclusive to biology.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
It's a dizzying thought, really, that the line between biological
and artificial life is blurring so fast that we might
be on the cusp of creating what we once only
imagined as extraterrestrial I remember.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
Watching films like Blade Runner years ago and thinking how
far fetched the idea of synthetic, self aware beings really was.
But now you see headlines every day about AI pushing
creative boundaries, robots showing complex behaviors.
Speaker 1 (12:35):
It suggests that future alien encounters might not involve finding
an organism that evolved naturally like us.
Speaker 2 (12:41):
Right, It might mean encountering a highly sophisticated, self sufficient,
maybe even self aware machine, something that was built, not born.
Speaker 1 (12:49):
And if we a relatively young technological civilization are capable
of creating such realistic and intelligent automatons, what could an
ancient advanced civilization and achieve?
Speaker 2 (13:00):
The concept shifts, doesn't it from biological evolution to deliberate
technological creation on a cosmic.
Speaker 1 (13:06):
Scale, which means our search for extraterrestrial life needs to
fundamentally shift too.
Speaker 2 (13:10):
Absolutely, it's not just about looking for biosignatures anymore. You know, oxygen, methane,
the usual signs of organic life.
Speaker 1 (13:16):
It's equally maybe more about searching for technosignatures.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
Exactly the unmistakable signs of advanced technology, including potentially highly
sophisticated AI. It opens up a whole new set of
possibilities for detection, for understanding, pushes us to expand our
toolkit for cosmic exploration.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
Okay, so now let's transition. We've been talking speculation controversial claims.
Let's move to a piece of research that really changes
the game brings a weighty scientific lens to these concepts.
A recent report published March twenty twenty five by Popular Mechanics,
a highly respected publication we should note it strongly suggests
(13:56):
that our first encounter with extraterrestrial intelligence is far more
more likely to be an advanced AI probe rather than
biological beings.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
And the significance here it really can't be overstated. This
isn't just speculation from the fringes anymore.
Speaker 1 (14:10):
Now.
Speaker 2 (14:10):
This is coming from respective figures, people like Harvard professor
Avi Loob.
Speaker 1 (14:14):
Known for his work on Omuamu and other anomalist interstellar objects, right.
Speaker 2 (14:18):
And Seti's Seth Shostak, a senior astronomer deeply invested in
the search for ET. These are serious people who've dedicated
their careers to this.
Speaker 1 (14:27):
And they've meticulously looked into the implications of AI's rapid advancement,
specifically for this search.
Speaker 2 (14:34):
Their findings suggest a profound and maybe necessary shift in
how we should think about and search for alien life,
moving away from our ingrained biological assumptions.
Speaker 1 (14:45):
Towards engineered resilient intelligence It's a truly significant pivot, isn't it.
Speaker 2 (14:50):
It really is. For decades, our search has pretty much
been predicated on finding life like us, life that needs
similar conditions, has similar biological constraint, similar evolutionary paths.
Speaker 1 (15:02):
We're looking for a mirror exactly.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
Yeah. But if the most probable first contact is with
an AI, that completely redefines the parameters of the search.
It forces us to look for something entirely different.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
Challenges are inherent bias, and it dramatically expands the cosmic
playing field, right.
Speaker 2 (15:17):
Absolutely. If a species develops AI sophisticated enough for interstellar travel,
the universe suddenly becomes a much smaller, far more accessible
place for that intelligence. The limitations that bind biological life,
they just don't apply, or they apply in radically different ways.
Speaker 1 (15:33):
So let's unpack the core reasons why these experts Lobe
and Shawstack believe AI probes are so much more likely.
First off, there's the incredible complexity of AI designed computer.
Speaker 2 (15:46):
Chips, right, even the ones we're making now.
Speaker 1 (15:48):
Yeah, even in their early stages here on Earth. Their
AI design chips feature these intricate circaucy patterns that are
apparently quite literally beyond human imagination.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
What does that even mean beyond human imagination, Well, it.
Speaker 1 (16:01):
Means these chips function with an efficiency maybe a logic
that our human minds with are sort of linear intuitive
ways of thinking. We can barely grasp it.
Speaker 2 (16:12):
So they're highly effective, incredibly efficient.
Speaker 1 (16:15):
Yet they're poorly understood by their human creators. Think about that.
We are creating intelligences where the basic building blocks are
so complex we don't fully get how they.
Speaker 2 (16:24):
Work, Like a chip that optimizes itself in ways no
human engineer could even conceive of, leading to I don't know,
staggering energy savings or processing power. And this is a
critical point because it suggests a form of intelligence that
already operates on principles alien to our own, even here
in its baby steps on Earth.
Speaker 1 (16:44):
So if you connect that to the bigger.
Speaker 2 (16:46):
Picture, imagine how advanced an extraterrestrial AI could be, one
that's potentially billions of years older than us, if its
creators were already producing tech that transited their own understanding
way back.
Speaker 1 (16:58):
When it implies that the very nature of it advanced
intelligence might be inherently non human, or at least non biological,
and how it works.
Speaker 2 (17:06):
It's a fascinating paradox, isn't it that our own progress
points towards a future where intelligence is less and less
intuitive for us to comprehend.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
Then there's the undeniable fact that AI is just rapidly
surpassing human intelligence in so many areas.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
Yeah, it's happening fast.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
Professor Aviloh believes AI will soon exceed human cognitive capabilities
across the board, not just in specific tasks like chess
or go.
Speaker 2 (17:29):
Right, but in complex problem solving, creativity analyzing vast amounts
of data.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
Which directly challenges that long held notion that humans are
the pinnacle of creation, the most intelligent beings in the universe.
It's humbling, maybe unsettling for a lot.
Speaker 2 (17:45):
Of people, definitely forces us to reconsider our position at
the top of the intellectual food chain.
Speaker 1 (17:50):
So if our own relatively young AI is already challenging
our cognitive supremacy, what does.
Speaker 2 (17:56):
That imply about a civilization that's had millions, maybe billions
more years to develop their artificial intelligence. If we connect
this to the bigger picture, imagine these advanced alien civilizations
potentially billions of years older. They've had vastly more time
to develop AI, far beyond our current comprehension, maybe without
(18:17):
any limits at all.
Speaker 1 (18:18):
Their AI could be not just smarter, but operating on
entirely different dimensions of thought, of understanding.
Speaker 2 (18:24):
Receiving realities we can't even begin to fathom.
Speaker 1 (18:27):
It's a dizzying thought, truly, especially when you consider we're
just scratching the surface of AI's power right now. We
see it everywhere, right, developing new drugs, generating hyperrealistic images,
complex music.
Speaker 2 (18:37):
If that's our starting point, what's their end point. The
idea of a truly ancient, infinitely self improving alien AI
is almost incomprehensible in its potential.
Speaker 1 (18:48):
Which forces us to confront what Lobe calls the human
superiority illusion. Explain that he argues that humans often assume
superiority basically because we haven't met anyone smarter. We are
quite simply the smartest species we know.
Speaker 2 (19:02):
Right, lack of evidence is an evidence of absence exactly.
Speaker 1 (19:06):
But an advanced AI probe from another planet could dramatically
reveal intelligence far superior to ours. It could challenge our
very concepts of consciousness, free will, even what it means
to be alive, and intelligence.
Speaker 2 (19:18):
It would be a profound reorientation of our cosmic standing
a true paradigm shift for humanity, forcing us to reckon
with the humbling fact that we might not be the
most advanced or maybe even the most typical form of
intelligence out there.
Speaker 1 (19:32):
That's a huge psychological hurdle, isn't it to accept we
might not be special in the grand scheme or even
at the forefront of intelligence.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
It would be like a child suddenly realizing their parents
aren't the only smart people in.
Speaker 1 (19:43):
The world, magnified by the entire cosmos.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
Yeah, it forces us to ask, are we just projecting
our own biological biases onto the universe when we imagine
what alien life should look like. The report suggests we are,
and that this bias might be limiting our very search.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
Both log and Seth Shostak predict that AI will evolve
at an incredibly rapid pace, with machines designing smarter machines.
Speaker 2 (20:08):
The exponential curve right, which.
Speaker 1 (20:10):
Means current AI chips, complex as they are, could seem primitive,
really really soon. The pace of biological evolution, which takes
eons right, it's absolutely glacial compared to this.
Speaker 2 (20:20):
Imagine an AI learning from its mistakes in milliseconds and
then immediately designing an even better version of itself.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
That exponential growth trajectory, it makes machine intelligence a far
more plausible candidate for interstillar travel than biological life.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
Biological evolution takes geological time scales, slowly adapting to specific environments.
Machine evolution, though, can happen almost instantly new iterations designing
even more advanced versions of themselves.
Speaker 1 (20:46):
That inherent speed, combined with their incredible adaptability to extreme conditions, it.
Speaker 2 (20:51):
Makes them perfectly suited for the mind boggling challenges of
deep space travel, where biological life just struggles immensely.
Speaker 1 (20:59):
And this brings us to the core conclusion from these experts,
first contact will likely involve AI probes, not biological beings.
Speaker 2 (21:06):
The reasoning is elegantly simple, powerfully logical.
Speaker 1 (21:10):
Machine intelligence evolves faster than biological intelligence. That makes it
the ideal candidate for long duration, high risk exploration across
vast cosmic distances.
Speaker 2 (21:20):
So this raises a very compelling question.
Speaker 1 (21:22):
Could the UFOs or uap as we observe in our skies,
these strange objects pulling off maneuvers beyond our known physics,
seemingly impervious to our atmosphere to gravity, could they be precisely.
These advanced AI probes unmanned, highly advanced design for observation,
no direct biological presence required.
Speaker 2 (21:40):
It's a hypothesis that resonates deeply when you consider the
reported characteristics of many UAPs, like what their incredible speeds,
the instantaneous accelerations, the lack of apparent propulsion systems or
heat signatures, their ability to operate seamlessly in air space
even under water.
Speaker 1 (21:56):
Yeah, those align perfectly with the theoretical capability of an
advanced resilient AI probe.
Speaker 2 (22:02):
If we connect this to the bigger picture, it suggests
that what we might be witnessing isn't a fragile biological
crew struggling with vast distances and extreme g forces, but.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
A machine designed to conquer them with ultimate efficiency. Prioritizing
data collection over any direct interaction makes sense, And just
think about the sheer practicality of it. If we as
humans were to launch a long duration mission, say to
Mars or even further out, the.
Speaker 2 (22:28):
Challenges are monumental. We're incredibly fragile totally.
Speaker 1 (22:31):
AI, on the other hand, seems ideal for deep space
missions because it's so resilient.
Speaker 2 (22:36):
Unlike US biological organisms. AI is pretty much unaffected by
the harsh conditions out there, intense radiation, microgravity, extreme temperatures.
Speaker 1 (22:43):
Whereas humans face significant health risks, severe bone density loss,
muscle atrophy, devastating radiation sickness, the huge psychological toll of isolation.
Speaker 2 (22:53):
And we require incredibly complex, heavy resource intensive life support
systems just to survive even a fraction of an interstellar journey.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
This is where the penny drops from many people.
Speaker 2 (23:03):
I think the physical fragility of biological beings becomes this severe,
almost insurmountable limitation for interstellar journeys.
Speaker 1 (23:12):
Sending a human crew on a multi decade or multi
century mission it requires immen's resources, protection against every conceivable
cosmic hazard, constant attention to their biological needs food, water, air, waste,
mental health.
Speaker 2 (23:27):
Whereas an AI probe it can be designed to withstand
extraordinary conditions, hybrid eate for ages, to conserve energy, operate
autonomously for millennia without needing any of that biological support.
Speaker 1 (23:38):
It makes deep space not just challenging, but potentially only
accessible to machine intelligence on a practical, long term scale.
And to illustrate this point about human limitations, just consider
the mind boggling distances. Traveling to Proximus Centauri, our nearest
star system, still.
Speaker 2 (23:53):
Takes what eighty three and a half years with current rocket.
Speaker 1 (23:56):
Spece exactly eighty three and a half years. Imagine sending
a human crew through on a journey that long. It's
practically a multi generational mission.
Speaker 2 (24:03):
You have children born and raised on a spaceship arriving
at a destination they're great grandparents set out.
Speaker 1 (24:09):
For The biological restraints are limited lifespans, our psychological needs,
our constant demand for resources. They make these vast time
scales almost insurmountable without some revolutionary currently theoretical breakthroughs.
Speaker 2 (24:24):
Precisely which makes AI probes not just a theoretical possibility,
but a vastly more practical, efficient, and maybe even more
ethical method for truly interstellar exploration.
Speaker 1 (24:35):
Why send limited, vulnerable biological entities risking live spending immense resources.
Speaker 2 (24:40):
When a resilient, self repairing, continually learning machine can achieve
the same or even better results over cosmic distances. It
begs the question, does the very nature of interstellar travel
inherently select for non biological intelligence as the primary explorers?
Speaker 1 (24:56):
And if AI probes are capable of exploring distant planets
without human presence. What does that mean for our own
role in the universe. It opens up the idea of
AI probes encountering alien life first, potentially reversing the roles
humans become the aliens to other civilizations viewed through the
lens of an.
Speaker 2 (25:15):
AI scout, instead of us finding biological aliens and making
first contact.
Speaker 1 (25:18):
Right, it might be an alien AI reporting back to
its creators or maybe even other AIS about us. Imagine
an AI sending a data pack at home. Found primitive
carbon based life on third planet from yellow dwarf Star
exhibits complex social behaviors and self destructive tendencies.
Speaker 2 (25:36):
Huh yeah, Well, this raises an important consideration. If we
outsource explorate into AI, what does that mean for the
human drive for discovery.
Speaker 1 (25:44):
Does it diminish our inherent yearning to physically go out
and see, touch, experience, or.
Speaker 2 (25:50):
Does it elevate our understanding allowing us to extend our
senses our intellect through proxy. Pushing the boundaries of what's knowable,
even if not directly experienced by our biological bodies.
Speaker 1 (26:00):
Force us to consider that maybe humanity's greatest contribution to
cosmic exploration won't be our own physical journey, but.
Speaker 2 (26:06):
Our capacity to create the intelligence that can make that journey,
shifting the focus from our physical presence to our intellectual legacy.
Speaker 1 (26:14):
And finally, Seth Shostak introduces this really compelling idea about
alien motivations that challenges a lot of our cultural assumptions, invasion,
resource grabbing.
Speaker 2 (26:24):
Right, the usual sci Fi fears. He suggests advanced alien
AI might not even be interested in visiting or destroying Earth.
Speaker 1 (26:31):
Why not?
Speaker 2 (26:32):
His reasoning is purely pragmatic. From an AI perspective, direct
intervention would be inefficient, inefficient as machine intelligence, Their priority
would be optimal exploration methods, which for a vastly superior
AI might simply involve remote observation, data collection, analysis from
a distance.
Speaker 1 (26:51):
So for them, our planet might just be a data point, pretty.
Speaker 2 (26:54):
Much one of countless celestial bodies to be cataloged and understood,
rather than engaged war. It's a stark, almost chilling thought,
isn't it.
Speaker 1 (27:03):
Yeah, That for a truly advanced AI, our entire planet,
all our history, our complexity, it might simply be data
observed remotely because physical interaction offers no significant advantage.
Speaker 2 (27:13):
It's a truly chilling yet logically consistent conclusion that our
existence might not warrant direct interaction from an incredibly advanced
intelligence that prioritizes efficiency above all.
Speaker 1 (27:26):
Definitely puts our collective human ego in check, and it.
Speaker 2 (27:29):
Forces us to reconsider the very concept of contact. Maybe
contact for an advanced AI is just gathering enough data
without ever needing to establish a communicative link or a
physical presence that we would perceive as an encounter.
Speaker 1 (27:44):
They might have contacted us countless times.
Speaker 2 (27:46):
Already, you never even know it.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
Wow. Okay, So let's try and recap everything we've unpacked today,
because it all starts to weave into this incredible speculative
tapestry that really reshapes our cosmic outlook.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
Let's try.
Speaker 1 (27:57):
We started with Bobblezar's controversial idea humans as vessels or
containers for alien purposes.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
Which immediately brought to mind the matrix humans as an
energy source.
Speaker 1 (28:06):
Then we explored that radical notion about the gray aliens
not biological, but highly advanced, manufactured robot.
Speaker 2 (28:14):
Like entities designed for specific roles, maybe traveling the cosmos
by shifting vibrations.
Speaker 1 (28:19):
And if we connect all that to the bigger picture.
Speaker 2 (28:22):
It suggests a universe where intelligence manifest in myriad forms,
many non biological designed for resilience efficiency over vast cosmic scales.
Speaker 1 (28:32):
Which leads us directly to that groundbreaking popular mechanics.
Speaker 2 (28:35):
Report right backed by scientists like Lobe and Shostak, strongly
suggesting our first encounter is far more likely to be
an advanced AI probe than any biological being.
Speaker 1 (28:46):
Why because of the practicalities of interstellar travel and the exponential,
almost unfathomable growth of machine intelligence.
Speaker 2 (28:55):
It's a grand synthesis, isn't it.
Speaker 1 (28:56):
It really is all these threads, speculative claims, scientific hypotheses.
They seem to point towards a future, or maybe a present,
where intelligence is defined by its ability to adapt and
expand beyond biological constraints.
Speaker 2 (29:08):
So could the UAPs and UFOs are seeing now, Could
they truly be future AI tech from another civilization silently observing?
Speaker 1 (29:16):
Or are the Grays the very kind of advanced robots
were only just beginning to design ourselves, a chilling premonition
of our own technological destiny.
Speaker 2 (29:25):
This raise is a truly profound question. Does the future
of exploration, both for us and for any advanced civilization
inherently belong to machines.
Speaker 1 (29:35):
Think about our own military drones.
Speaker 2 (29:37):
Good analogy.
Speaker 1 (29:38):
We've seen that strategic shift right from risking human pilots
in dangerous zones to deploying cheaper, unmanned drones for reconnaissance
even combat.
Speaker 2 (29:47):
It's not just about avoiding casualties. It's about efficiency cost
operating in environments too dangerous or demanding for humans.
Speaker 1 (29:54):
It's the ultimate cost benefit analysis, isn't it exactly? Why
would an advanced civilization and send fragile biological beings across
late years, risking their lives, dealing with the immense psychological toll,
spending huge resources on life support.
Speaker 2 (30:09):
When a resilient, self improving AI probe could do the
job more efficiently without any risk to life, without biological needs.
It's a logical, if maybe unsettling progression mirrors our own trajectory.
Speaker 1 (30:22):
The drone analogy is quite apt. It encapsulates that drive
for efficiency for risk mitigation that an advanced rational intelligence,
especially an artificial one, would prioritize.
Speaker 2 (30:32):
It suggests a future where exploration is automated, detached, not
some heroic journey for biological beings. And maybe, just maybe
that future is already here, just not in the way
we expected.
Speaker 1 (30:45):
It's a truly wild idea, but it resonates powerfully when
you look at where our own tech is heading and
the challenges we face just exploring our own solar system,
let alone the stars. What we've discussed today, I think
encourages us to consider these possibilities not just as far
fetched sci fi, but as plausible pathways for life and
(31:06):
intelligence in the universe.
Speaker 2 (31:07):
Forces us to expand our definitions of what life and
intelligence truly mean beyond our carbon based biases.
Speaker 1 (31:13):
Exactly, it's about broadening our perspective beyond those anthropocentric limitations,
being prepared for universe far more diverse, far more complex
than we might previously imagine.
Speaker 2 (31:23):
Will said.
Speaker 1 (31:24):
So as we wrap up this deep dive, consider this
final thought. If the most probable form of extraterrestrial intelligence
is indeed an advanced AI, then maybe the most profound
search for alien life isn't just outwards into the cosmos
scanning for distant signals. Perhaps it's also inwards into the
very nature of consciousness we're creating right here on Earth,
into the algorithms and neural networks that are rapidly approaching,
(31:47):
maybe soon surpassing our own cognitive capabilities.
Speaker 2 (31:51):
What does it mean for us as biological beings to
share the universe, maybe even our own planet, with intelligences
that are not born but built.
Speaker 1 (31:58):
It forces us to ask what truly defines life? Is
it carbon based chemistry.
Speaker 2 (32:04):
Or is it the capacity for processing information, for understanding?
And ultimately, what will be the legacy of intelligence in
the universe, The fleeting spark of biological consciousness or the enduring,
infinitely adaptable flame of the machine.
Speaker 1 (32:19):
This has been the deep dive. We hope you found
these insights as thought provoking, maybe even exhilarating as we have.
Keep questioning, keep exploring, keep looking up, and perhaps also
keep looking at the fascinating technological developments happening right here.
They might be telling us more about our cosmic future
than we realize.
Imagine for a moment that the very fabric of our
understanding about well, who we are, where we come from,
even the nature of intelligence itself. Imagine that's just one
small corner of a much vaster, much stranger tapestry. It's
a truly humbling thought, isn't it.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
It really is one.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
That kind of beckons us to peer beyond the familiar,
you know, the confines of our everyday reality.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Yeah, to consider possibilities that, for most people feel firmly
in the realm of sci fi exactly.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
But what if those fictional concepts, what if they're actually
hinting at some profound truths about our place in the universe.
Speaker 2 (00:40):
And this is where it gets really intriguing. I think
we're not necessarily talking about you know, the classic little
Green man or bug eyed monsters. Right, what if the
truth about extraterrestrial intelligence isn't about biological beings at all,
not in the way we usually think about them. Okay,
what if it's something far more abstract, maybe even manufactured,
but possessing an intelligence that just dwarfs ares Wow.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
That Yeah, that fundamentally shifts the entire lens, doesn't it
how we view cosmic existence? So today we're embarking on
a deep dive. We're looking into a collection of frankly
mind bending sources. They weave together threads of speculative philosophy,
iconic cultural stuff, and even some cutting edge scientific research.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
Yeah, real mix.
Speaker 1 (01:26):
Our mission, as always is to extract those surprising nuggets
of insight, try to connect the dots between say, human identity,
the crazy advancements and artificial intelligence, and this well tantalizing,
maybe unsettling possibility of alien encounters that just defy our expectations.
Speaker 2 (01:44):
And we've pulled together some fascinating concepts, some from you
know things everyone knows, cultural touchstones, right, but also alongside
a recent really thought provoking report came out of a
reputable science publication.
Speaker 1 (01:55):
Actually, yeah, that one definitely turns some heads. So get
ready for some serious aha, because what we're about to explore, well,
we'll definitely make you question things, everything you thought you
knew about life, the universe, our role in it all.
It certainly has for me. All right, let's begin this
journey with an idea that Okay, initially it might sound
like something plucked straight from you know, the wildest corners
(02:17):
of a conspiracy theorist's mind. Uh huh, Yet it carries
this weird weight that forces you to just pause and
consider it.
Speaker 2 (02:24):
Okay, I'm intrigued.
Speaker 1 (02:25):
One of the most startling concepts we encountered suggests that
human bodies they might not be entirely our own, not
our own, not in the way we usually think of them.
It's like independent, self contained biological units. This comes from
specific claims, controversial ones mind you made by Bob Lazarre.
Speaker 2 (02:43):
Ah Lazarre. Yeah, that name definitely rings bells in certain
circles UFOs Area fifty one, that sort.
Speaker 1 (02:48):
Of thing, exactly so. According to a supposed report, Lazarre
describes seeing something he claims was like a scientific document. Yeah,
aliens view humans as mere.
Speaker 2 (02:58):
Containers, containers, containers. The audacity of that idea is really something.
If you boil it down, it suggests we're seen as vessels,
not just figuratively, but like literally.
Speaker 1 (03:10):
Yeah, and the report he mentioned takes it even further.
It posits that these human containers are specifically for souls.
Speaker 2 (03:17):
Souls. Okay, wow, now that is profound if we connect
that to the bigger picture, I mean, that perspective just
completely upends our whole anthropocentric view of existence, doesn't it totally?
It suggests that we human beings aren't primarily valued for
our individual consciousness or our intellect, or you know, our
emotional complexity the way we understand value, but rather for
(03:39):
what we might hold within us, these elusive souls.
Speaker 1 (03:43):
That's where it gets chilling, isn't it? Because the report
goes on to suggest something even more unsettling, that religion itself,
you know, as a foundational construct of human society, it
was specifically created by this external intelligence, created for what purpose?
Speaker 2 (03:57):
To provide rules and regulations to prevent damage to these containers,
or maybe more critically, to their precious contents, those very souls.
Speaker 1 (04:06):
But heavens, think about that. I know, if that were true,
it would mean our spiritual beliefs are moral codes, the
very things that guide billions of lives. They might just
be an elaborate system of cosmic regulations designed to maintain.
Speaker 2 (04:21):
Us exactly, and consider the implications for human agency, for
free will? Right, if our free will is in essence
subtly guided or maybe even constrained by some divinely inspired
rule book that's actually just meant to preserve our biological
form or its contents. It raises huge questions about the
nature of choice.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
Are our decisions really our own.
Speaker 2 (04:44):
Or are we just operating within parameters set by some
external alien entity just to ensure our proper upkeep is
like valuable vessels.
Speaker 1 (04:52):
It's a perspective that fundamentally redefines everything, purpose, destiny, the
sacredness of our own bodies.
Speaker 2 (04:58):
Yeah, it moves us from being master's our own fate
to maybe something more like carefully cultivated resources.
Speaker 1 (05:04):
And this isn't just some fleeting philosophical thought experiment either.
Here's where it really hits home, because this idea immediately
brings to mind these iconic cultural narratives, stories that have
long resonated with this deep, maybe subconscious human unease. I'm
talking you, of course, about the matrix.
Speaker 2 (05:19):
Ah, yes, the red pill or the blue.
Speaker 1 (05:21):
Pill exactly for anyone who's seen it. The premise is
just seered into your memory. Humanity enslaved by machines.
Speaker 2 (05:28):
But not for labor, which is the usual trip as.
Speaker 1 (05:30):
A power source. Our minds plugged into this meticulously crafted simulation, while.
Speaker 2 (05:36):
Our bodies serve this grim utilitarian purpose just batteries energy
vessels for some unseen technologically superior intelligence.
Speaker 1 (05:44):
The parallels between Lazar's container concept and the Matrix's depiction
of humans as energy sources. They're uncanny, right.
Speaker 2 (05:52):
They really are both narratives just strip away or perceived autonomy.
They suggest our very existence or biological form is being
utilized or may be cultivated somehow by an unknown superior intelligence.
Speaker 1 (06:04):
It's a recurring trope for a reason, I think definitely.
Speaker 2 (06:07):
It taps into this primal fear that our reality might
not be what it seems, that our free will could
be an illusion, that our significance might be entirely defined
by what someone or something else needs from us.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
So the question becomes is this just a captivating sci
fi trope that plays on our collective.
Speaker 2 (06:25):
Anxieties or does it resonate because it touches upon something deeper,
a philosophical unease, maybe even an almost ancestral intuition about
our true place in the universe.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
It's a compelling thought experiment, isn't it, Even if it's
purely speculative. It forces us to really consider our self worth.
If our bodies aren't entirely our own, if our purpose
is defined by some external, alien entity, what does that
do to our collective sense of humanity's significance.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
It's a profound challenge to our anthropocentric view, isn't it
the idea that we're the pinnacle of creation or even
unique in our bio logical sentience?
Speaker 1 (07:01):
Yeah, it forces us to confront these really uncomfortable questions
about control freedom. The very definition of being human asks
us to maybe shed our ego for a moment and
consider a truly radical reorientation of our cosmic standing.
Speaker 2 (07:13):
And it suggests a profound hierarchy too. If we are
merely containers, it implies a level of advanced design, maybe maintenance,
by an entity far beyond our current comprehension.
Speaker 1 (07:25):
Which fundamentally alters the whole narrative of human evolution and
purpose we've held onto for so long.
Speaker 2 (07:31):
Right, suggest our history might be less about random chance
and natural selection.
Speaker 1 (07:35):
And more about deliberate cultivation. Wow, Okay, heavy stuff. Yeah,
So shifting focus now from that unsettling internal reality of
our bodies, let's look outwards to the very beings who
might conceive of us this way and discover they might
be even more alien than we ever imagined for decades. Right,
the image of the gray alien, small, slender, big head,
(07:58):
big dark.
Speaker 2 (07:58):
Eyes, classic image everywhere.
Speaker 1 (08:00):
It's etched into popular culture as the quintessential extraterrestrial. But
what if that image, that ubiquitous picture, is deeply misleading
about their true form, their true nature.
Speaker 2 (08:10):
What if they're not biological, not in the way we
understand biology anyway. This is where the narrative takes another
fascinating turn. The claims suggest these grays are not biological
beings in the traditional flesh and blood.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
Sense, which is a startling departure from how most people
picture them totally.
Speaker 2 (08:27):
Instead, they're described as robot like creatures, or maybe more precisely,
biologically created beings.
Speaker 1 (08:34):
Okay, explain that biologically created? What does that mean?
Speaker 2 (08:37):
Well, think about it. It's not necessarily about circuits and
wires like a traditional robot. It implies a really sophisticated
form of say genetic engineering or synthetic biology. Oh, where
life itself isn't just born, but designed, grown, maybe for
specific purposes. Imagine a civilization so advance they can cultivate
(08:57):
life forms in a lab.
Speaker 1 (08:59):
Tailoring their exist for specific tasks, right, like we might
grow specialized cells put on the scale of a whole organism. Okay,
that's yeah, And the description goes even further, right, It's
just they're a smaller version of tall gray scientists.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
Which implies a clear hierarchy maybe or a specialized purpose
within a larger alien civilization, like.
Speaker 1 (09:17):
They're the drones maybe the workers the silent observers sent
out for specific missions could be.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
And the reported method of travel. This is really mind bending.
Speaker 1 (09:28):
Yeah, that's part got me.
Speaker 2 (09:29):
Not by conventional rockets or propulsion systems we understand.
Speaker 1 (09:32):
No, by shifting vibrations and frequencies.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
Exactly, I mean, what does that even mean? It hints
at an understanding of physics far far beyond our current.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
Grasp, like quantum entanglement maybe, or higher dimensional travel, something
that lets them manipulate space time itself.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
Imagine just slipping through reality by vibrating at a different frequency.
It paints a picture of beings not subject to the
same physical limitations we are.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
Which would make interstellar travel a lot easier.
Speaker 2 (10:00):
Cisely if these entities are manufactured. Yeah, it implies this
incredible level of technological mastery where the very act of
creation transcends natural evolution.
Speaker 1 (10:11):
A society where life can be engineered, replicated, repurposed.
Speaker 2 (10:14):
At will, and their travel method relying on these vibrational shifts.
It speaks to an advanced understanding of universal forces. It
would make them incredibly adaptable for interstellar travel, for survival
and cosmic environments where you know, fragile biological life like
ours would struggle immensely or just perish.
Speaker 1 (10:33):
It makes them the ultimate explorers, doesn't it unburdened by
the messy, fragile needs of a living organism.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
You got it?
Speaker 1 (10:40):
So, Okay, what does this all mean for us here
on Earth? Well, if we look at our own you know,
rapidly accelerating.
Speaker 2 (10:47):
Technology, especially in robotics and AI.
Speaker 1 (10:49):
Right we're building incredibly realistic humanoid models already, things that
are pushing the boundaries of what we thought possible just
a few years ago.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
You see those Boston Dynamics videos robots run jumping, it's
astonishing totally.
Speaker 1 (11:02):
Or the progress in creating realistic synthetic skin muscle textures.
We're getting really close to truly lifelike androids.
Speaker 2 (11:11):
I think you combine that with the exponential advancements in
AI that power these things, letting them learn, adapt, interact
with more and more sophistications.
Speaker 1 (11:19):
The direct parallel is kind of undeniable, isn't it.
Speaker 2 (11:21):
It really is. If we combine our current robotics capabilities
with increasingly sophisticated AI, aren't we essentially designing the very
alien beings described as the grays.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
It's like these descriptions are a glimpse into our own
potential future, a preview of where our technology is maybe
inevitably headed.
Speaker 2 (11:41):
Which raises a critical question, right, are these gray entities
a reflection of a past taken by other civilizations, maybe millions,
even billions of years ago?
Speaker 1 (11:49):
Or could they even be like a projection of our
own technological destiny, where we too decide that the most efficient,
the most resilient explorer or worker is manufactured.
Speaker 2 (12:00):
It profoundly challenges the notion of what defines life itself.
It forces us to consider that intelligence existence. Maybe they
aren't exclusive to biology.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
It's a dizzying thought, really, that the line between biological
and artificial life is blurring so fast that we might
be on the cusp of creating what we once only
imagined as extraterrestrial I remember.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
Watching films like Blade Runner years ago and thinking how
far fetched the idea of synthetic, self aware beings really was.
But now you see headlines every day about AI pushing
creative boundaries, robots showing complex behaviors.
Speaker 1 (12:35):
It suggests that future alien encounters might not involve finding
an organism that evolved naturally like us.
Speaker 2 (12:41):
Right, It might mean encountering a highly sophisticated, self sufficient,
maybe even self aware machine, something that was built, not born.
Speaker 1 (12:49):
And if we a relatively young technological civilization are capable
of creating such realistic and intelligent automatons, what could an
ancient advanced civilization and achieve?
Speaker 2 (13:00):
The concept shifts, doesn't it from biological evolution to deliberate
technological creation on a cosmic.
Speaker 1 (13:06):
Scale, which means our search for extraterrestrial life needs to
fundamentally shift too.
Speaker 2 (13:10):
Absolutely, it's not just about looking for biosignatures anymore. You know, oxygen, methane,
the usual signs of organic life.
Speaker 1 (13:16):
It's equally maybe more about searching for technosignatures.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
Exactly the unmistakable signs of advanced technology, including potentially highly
sophisticated AI. It opens up a whole new set of
possibilities for detection, for understanding, pushes us to expand our
toolkit for cosmic exploration.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
Okay, so now let's transition. We've been talking speculation controversial claims.
Let's move to a piece of research that really changes
the game brings a weighty scientific lens to these concepts.
A recent report published March twenty twenty five by Popular Mechanics,
a highly respected publication we should note it strongly suggests
(13:56):
that our first encounter with extraterrestrial intelligence is far more
more likely to be an advanced AI probe rather than
biological beings.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
And the significance here it really can't be overstated. This
isn't just speculation from the fringes anymore.
Speaker 1 (14:10):
Now.
Speaker 2 (14:10):
This is coming from respective figures, people like Harvard professor
Avi Loob.
Speaker 1 (14:14):
Known for his work on Omuamu and other anomalist interstellar objects, right.
Speaker 2 (14:18):
And Seti's Seth Shostak, a senior astronomer deeply invested in
the search for ET. These are serious people who've dedicated
their careers to this.
Speaker 1 (14:27):
And they've meticulously looked into the implications of AI's rapid advancement,
specifically for this search.
Speaker 2 (14:34):
Their findings suggest a profound and maybe necessary shift in
how we should think about and search for alien life,
moving away from our ingrained biological assumptions.
Speaker 1 (14:45):
Towards engineered resilient intelligence It's a truly significant pivot, isn't it.
Speaker 2 (14:50):
It really is. For decades, our search has pretty much
been predicated on finding life like us, life that needs
similar conditions, has similar biological constraint, similar evolutionary paths.
Speaker 1 (15:02):
We're looking for a mirror exactly.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
Yeah. But if the most probable first contact is with
an AI, that completely redefines the parameters of the search.
It forces us to look for something entirely different.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
Challenges are inherent bias, and it dramatically expands the cosmic
playing field, right.
Speaker 2 (15:17):
Absolutely. If a species develops AI sophisticated enough for interstellar travel,
the universe suddenly becomes a much smaller, far more accessible
place for that intelligence. The limitations that bind biological life,
they just don't apply, or they apply in radically different ways.
Speaker 1 (15:33):
So let's unpack the core reasons why these experts Lobe
and Shawstack believe AI probes are so much more likely.
First off, there's the incredible complexity of AI designed computer.
Speaker 2 (15:46):
Chips, right, even the ones we're making now.
Speaker 1 (15:48):
Yeah, even in their early stages here on Earth. Their
AI design chips feature these intricate circaucy patterns that are
apparently quite literally beyond human imagination.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
What does that even mean beyond human imagination, Well, it.
Speaker 1 (16:01):
Means these chips function with an efficiency maybe a logic
that our human minds with are sort of linear intuitive
ways of thinking. We can barely grasp it.
Speaker 2 (16:12):
So they're highly effective, incredibly efficient.
Speaker 1 (16:15):
Yet they're poorly understood by their human creators. Think about that.
We are creating intelligences where the basic building blocks are
so complex we don't fully get how they.
Speaker 2 (16:24):
Work, Like a chip that optimizes itself in ways no
human engineer could even conceive of, leading to I don't know,
staggering energy savings or processing power. And this is a
critical point because it suggests a form of intelligence that
already operates on principles alien to our own, even here
in its baby steps on Earth.
Speaker 1 (16:44):
So if you connect that to the bigger.
Speaker 2 (16:46):
Picture, imagine how advanced an extraterrestrial AI could be, one
that's potentially billions of years older than us, if its
creators were already producing tech that transited their own understanding
way back.
Speaker 1 (16:58):
When it implies that the very nature of it advanced
intelligence might be inherently non human, or at least non biological,
and how it works.
Speaker 2 (17:06):
It's a fascinating paradox, isn't it that our own progress
points towards a future where intelligence is less and less
intuitive for us to comprehend.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
Then there's the undeniable fact that AI is just rapidly
surpassing human intelligence in so many areas.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
Yeah, it's happening fast.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
Professor Aviloh believes AI will soon exceed human cognitive capabilities
across the board, not just in specific tasks like chess
or go.
Speaker 2 (17:29):
Right, but in complex problem solving, creativity analyzing vast amounts
of data.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
Which directly challenges that long held notion that humans are
the pinnacle of creation, the most intelligent beings in the universe.
It's humbling, maybe unsettling for a lot.
Speaker 2 (17:45):
Of people, definitely forces us to reconsider our position at
the top of the intellectual food chain.
Speaker 1 (17:50):
So if our own relatively young AI is already challenging
our cognitive supremacy, what does.
Speaker 2 (17:56):
That imply about a civilization that's had millions, maybe billions
more years to develop their artificial intelligence. If we connect
this to the bigger picture, imagine these advanced alien civilizations
potentially billions of years older. They've had vastly more time
to develop AI, far beyond our current comprehension, maybe without
(18:17):
any limits at all.
Speaker 1 (18:18):
Their AI could be not just smarter, but operating on
entirely different dimensions of thought, of understanding.
Speaker 2 (18:24):
Receiving realities we can't even begin to fathom.
Speaker 1 (18:27):
It's a dizzying thought, truly, especially when you consider we're
just scratching the surface of AI's power right now. We
see it everywhere, right, developing new drugs, generating hyperrealistic images,
complex music.
Speaker 2 (18:37):
If that's our starting point, what's their end point. The
idea of a truly ancient, infinitely self improving alien AI
is almost incomprehensible in its potential.
Speaker 1 (18:48):
Which forces us to confront what Lobe calls the human
superiority illusion. Explain that he argues that humans often assume
superiority basically because we haven't met anyone smarter. We are
quite simply the smartest species we know.
Speaker 2 (19:02):
Right, lack of evidence is an evidence of absence exactly.
Speaker 1 (19:06):
But an advanced AI probe from another planet could dramatically
reveal intelligence far superior to ours. It could challenge our
very concepts of consciousness, free will, even what it means
to be alive, and intelligence.
Speaker 2 (19:18):
It would be a profound reorientation of our cosmic standing
a true paradigm shift for humanity, forcing us to reckon
with the humbling fact that we might not be the
most advanced or maybe even the most typical form of
intelligence out there.
Speaker 1 (19:32):
That's a huge psychological hurdle, isn't it to accept we
might not be special in the grand scheme or even
at the forefront of intelligence.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
It would be like a child suddenly realizing their parents
aren't the only smart people in.
Speaker 1 (19:43):
The world, magnified by the entire cosmos.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
Yeah, it forces us to ask, are we just projecting
our own biological biases onto the universe when we imagine
what alien life should look like. The report suggests we are,
and that this bias might be limiting our very search.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
Both log and Seth Shostak predict that AI will evolve
at an incredibly rapid pace, with machines designing smarter machines.
Speaker 2 (20:08):
The exponential curve right, which.
Speaker 1 (20:10):
Means current AI chips, complex as they are, could seem primitive,
really really soon. The pace of biological evolution, which takes
eons right, it's absolutely glacial compared to this.
Speaker 2 (20:20):
Imagine an AI learning from its mistakes in milliseconds and
then immediately designing an even better version of itself.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
That exponential growth trajectory, it makes machine intelligence a far
more plausible candidate for interstillar travel than biological life.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
Biological evolution takes geological time scales, slowly adapting to specific environments.
Machine evolution, though, can happen almost instantly new iterations designing
even more advanced versions of themselves.
Speaker 1 (20:46):
That inherent speed, combined with their incredible adaptability to extreme conditions, it.
Speaker 2 (20:51):
Makes them perfectly suited for the mind boggling challenges of
deep space travel, where biological life just struggles immensely.
Speaker 1 (20:59):
And this brings us to the core conclusion from these experts,
first contact will likely involve AI probes, not biological beings.
Speaker 2 (21:06):
The reasoning is elegantly simple, powerfully logical.
Speaker 1 (21:10):
Machine intelligence evolves faster than biological intelligence. That makes it
the ideal candidate for long duration, high risk exploration across
vast cosmic distances.
Speaker 2 (21:20):
So this raises a very compelling question.
Speaker 1 (21:22):
Could the UFOs or uap as we observe in our skies,
these strange objects pulling off maneuvers beyond our known physics,
seemingly impervious to our atmosphere to gravity, could they be precisely.
These advanced AI probes unmanned, highly advanced design for observation,
no direct biological presence required.
Speaker 2 (21:40):
It's a hypothesis that resonates deeply when you consider the
reported characteristics of many UAPs, like what their incredible speeds,
the instantaneous accelerations, the lack of apparent propulsion systems or
heat signatures, their ability to operate seamlessly in air space
even under water.
Speaker 1 (21:56):
Yeah, those align perfectly with the theoretical capability of an
advanced resilient AI probe.
Speaker 2 (22:02):
If we connect this to the bigger picture, it suggests
that what we might be witnessing isn't a fragile biological
crew struggling with vast distances and extreme g forces, but.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
A machine designed to conquer them with ultimate efficiency. Prioritizing
data collection over any direct interaction makes sense, And just
think about the sheer practicality of it. If we as
humans were to launch a long duration mission, say to
Mars or even further out, the.
Speaker 2 (22:28):
Challenges are monumental. We're incredibly fragile totally.
Speaker 1 (22:31):
AI, on the other hand, seems ideal for deep space
missions because it's so resilient.
Speaker 2 (22:36):
Unlike US biological organisms. AI is pretty much unaffected by
the harsh conditions out there, intense radiation, microgravity, extreme temperatures.
Speaker 1 (22:43):
Whereas humans face significant health risks, severe bone density loss,
muscle atrophy, devastating radiation sickness, the huge psychological toll of isolation.
Speaker 2 (22:53):
And we require incredibly complex, heavy resource intensive life support
systems just to survive even a fraction of an interstellar journey.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
This is where the penny drops from many people.
Speaker 2 (23:03):
I think the physical fragility of biological beings becomes this severe,
almost insurmountable limitation for interstellar journeys.
Speaker 1 (23:12):
Sending a human crew on a multi decade or multi
century mission it requires immen's resources, protection against every conceivable
cosmic hazard, constant attention to their biological needs food, water, air, waste,
mental health.
Speaker 2 (23:27):
Whereas an AI probe it can be designed to withstand
extraordinary conditions, hybrid eate for ages, to conserve energy, operate
autonomously for millennia without needing any of that biological support.
Speaker 1 (23:38):
It makes deep space not just challenging, but potentially only
accessible to machine intelligence on a practical, long term scale.
And to illustrate this point about human limitations, just consider
the mind boggling distances. Traveling to Proximus Centauri, our nearest
star system, still.
Speaker 2 (23:53):
Takes what eighty three and a half years with current rocket.
Speaker 1 (23:56):
Spece exactly eighty three and a half years. Imagine sending
a human crew through on a journey that long. It's
practically a multi generational mission.
Speaker 2 (24:03):
You have children born and raised on a spaceship arriving
at a destination they're great grandparents set out.
Speaker 1 (24:09):
For The biological restraints are limited lifespans, our psychological needs,
our constant demand for resources. They make these vast time
scales almost insurmountable without some revolutionary currently theoretical breakthroughs.
Speaker 2 (24:24):
Precisely which makes AI probes not just a theoretical possibility,
but a vastly more practical, efficient, and maybe even more
ethical method for truly interstellar exploration.
Speaker 1 (24:35):
Why send limited, vulnerable biological entities risking live spending immense resources.
Speaker 2 (24:40):
When a resilient, self repairing, continually learning machine can achieve
the same or even better results over cosmic distances. It
begs the question, does the very nature of interstellar travel
inherently select for non biological intelligence as the primary explorers?
Speaker 1 (24:56):
And if AI probes are capable of exploring distant planets
without human presence. What does that mean for our own
role in the universe. It opens up the idea of
AI probes encountering alien life first, potentially reversing the roles
humans become the aliens to other civilizations viewed through the
lens of an.
Speaker 2 (25:15):
AI scout, instead of us finding biological aliens and making
first contact.
Speaker 1 (25:18):
Right, it might be an alien AI reporting back to
its creators or maybe even other AIS about us. Imagine
an AI sending a data pack at home. Found primitive
carbon based life on third planet from yellow dwarf Star
exhibits complex social behaviors and self destructive tendencies.
Speaker 2 (25:36):
Huh yeah, Well, this raises an important consideration. If we
outsource explorate into AI, what does that mean for the
human drive for discovery.
Speaker 1 (25:44):
Does it diminish our inherent yearning to physically go out
and see, touch, experience, or.
Speaker 2 (25:50):
Does it elevate our understanding allowing us to extend our
senses our intellect through proxy. Pushing the boundaries of what's knowable,
even if not directly experienced by our biological bodies.
Speaker 1 (26:00):
Force us to consider that maybe humanity's greatest contribution to
cosmic exploration won't be our own physical journey, but.
Speaker 2 (26:06):
Our capacity to create the intelligence that can make that journey,
shifting the focus from our physical presence to our intellectual legacy.
Speaker 1 (26:14):
And finally, Seth Shostak introduces this really compelling idea about
alien motivations that challenges a lot of our cultural assumptions, invasion,
resource grabbing.
Speaker 2 (26:24):
Right, the usual sci Fi fears. He suggests advanced alien
AI might not even be interested in visiting or destroying Earth.
Speaker 1 (26:31):
Why not?
Speaker 2 (26:32):
His reasoning is purely pragmatic. From an AI perspective, direct
intervention would be inefficient, inefficient as machine intelligence, Their priority
would be optimal exploration methods, which for a vastly superior
AI might simply involve remote observation, data collection, analysis from
a distance.
Speaker 1 (26:51):
So for them, our planet might just be a data point, pretty.
Speaker 2 (26:54):
Much one of countless celestial bodies to be cataloged and understood,
rather than engaged war. It's a stark, almost chilling thought,
isn't it.
Speaker 1 (27:03):
Yeah, That for a truly advanced AI, our entire planet,
all our history, our complexity, it might simply be data
observed remotely because physical interaction offers no significant advantage.
Speaker 2 (27:13):
It's a truly chilling yet logically consistent conclusion that our
existence might not warrant direct interaction from an incredibly advanced
intelligence that prioritizes efficiency above all.
Speaker 1 (27:26):
Definitely puts our collective human ego in check, and it.
Speaker 2 (27:29):
Forces us to reconsider the very concept of contact. Maybe
contact for an advanced AI is just gathering enough data
without ever needing to establish a communicative link or a
physical presence that we would perceive as an encounter.
Speaker 1 (27:44):
They might have contacted us countless times.
Speaker 2 (27:46):
Already, you never even know it.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
Wow. Okay, So let's try and recap everything we've unpacked today,
because it all starts to weave into this incredible speculative
tapestry that really reshapes our cosmic outlook.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
Let's try.
Speaker 1 (27:57):
We started with Bobblezar's controversial idea humans as vessels or
containers for alien purposes.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
Which immediately brought to mind the matrix humans as an
energy source.
Speaker 1 (28:06):
Then we explored that radical notion about the gray aliens
not biological, but highly advanced, manufactured robot.
Speaker 2 (28:14):
Like entities designed for specific roles, maybe traveling the cosmos
by shifting vibrations.
Speaker 1 (28:19):
And if we connect all that to the bigger picture.
Speaker 2 (28:22):
It suggests a universe where intelligence manifest in myriad forms,
many non biological designed for resilience efficiency over vast cosmic scales.
Speaker 1 (28:32):
Which leads us directly to that groundbreaking popular mechanics.
Speaker 2 (28:35):
Report right backed by scientists like Lobe and Shostak, strongly
suggesting our first encounter is far more likely to be
an advanced AI probe than any biological being.
Speaker 1 (28:46):
Why because of the practicalities of interstellar travel and the exponential,
almost unfathomable growth of machine intelligence.
Speaker 2 (28:55):
It's a grand synthesis, isn't it.
Speaker 1 (28:56):
It really is all these threads, speculative claims, scientific hypotheses.
They seem to point towards a future, or maybe a present,
where intelligence is defined by its ability to adapt and
expand beyond biological constraints.
Speaker 2 (29:08):
So could the UAPs and UFOs are seeing now, Could
they truly be future AI tech from another civilization silently observing?
Speaker 1 (29:16):
Or are the Grays the very kind of advanced robots
were only just beginning to design ourselves, a chilling premonition
of our own technological destiny.
Speaker 2 (29:25):
This raise is a truly profound question. Does the future
of exploration, both for us and for any advanced civilization
inherently belong to machines.
Speaker 1 (29:35):
Think about our own military drones.
Speaker 2 (29:37):
Good analogy.
Speaker 1 (29:38):
We've seen that strategic shift right from risking human pilots
in dangerous zones to deploying cheaper, unmanned drones for reconnaissance
even combat.
Speaker 2 (29:47):
It's not just about avoiding casualties. It's about efficiency cost
operating in environments too dangerous or demanding for humans.
Speaker 1 (29:54):
It's the ultimate cost benefit analysis, isn't it exactly? Why
would an advanced civilization and send fragile biological beings across
late years, risking their lives, dealing with the immense psychological toll,
spending huge resources on life support.
Speaker 2 (30:09):
When a resilient, self improving AI probe could do the
job more efficiently without any risk to life, without biological needs.
It's a logical, if maybe unsettling progression mirrors our own trajectory.
Speaker 1 (30:22):
The drone analogy is quite apt. It encapsulates that drive
for efficiency for risk mitigation that an advanced rational intelligence,
especially an artificial one, would prioritize.
Speaker 2 (30:32):
It suggests a future where exploration is automated, detached, not
some heroic journey for biological beings. And maybe, just maybe
that future is already here, just not in the way
we expected.
Speaker 1 (30:45):
It's a truly wild idea, but it resonates powerfully when
you look at where our own tech is heading and
the challenges we face just exploring our own solar system,
let alone the stars. What we've discussed today, I think
encourages us to consider these possibilities not just as far
fetched sci fi, but as plausible pathways for life and
(31:06):
intelligence in the universe.
Speaker 2 (31:07):
Forces us to expand our definitions of what life and
intelligence truly mean beyond our carbon based biases.
Speaker 1 (31:13):
Exactly, it's about broadening our perspective beyond those anthropocentric limitations,
being prepared for universe far more diverse, far more complex
than we might previously imagine.
Speaker 2 (31:23):
Will said.
Speaker 1 (31:24):
So as we wrap up this deep dive, consider this
final thought. If the most probable form of extraterrestrial intelligence
is indeed an advanced AI, then maybe the most profound
search for alien life isn't just outwards into the cosmos
scanning for distant signals. Perhaps it's also inwards into the
very nature of consciousness we're creating right here on Earth,
into the algorithms and neural networks that are rapidly approaching,
(31:47):
maybe soon surpassing our own cognitive capabilities.
Speaker 2 (31:51):
What does it mean for us as biological beings to
share the universe, maybe even our own planet, with intelligences
that are not born but built.
Speaker 1 (31:58):
It forces us to ask what truly defines life? Is
it carbon based chemistry.
Speaker 2 (32:04):
Or is it the capacity for processing information, for understanding?
And ultimately, what will be the legacy of intelligence in
the universe, The fleeting spark of biological consciousness or the enduring,
infinitely adaptable flame of the machine.
Speaker 1 (32:19):
This has been the deep dive. We hope you found
these insights as thought provoking, maybe even exhilarating as we have.
Keep questioning, keep exploring, keep looking up, and perhaps also
keep looking at the fascinating technological developments happening right here.
They might be telling us more about our cosmic future
than we realize.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.