August 7, 2025 • 31 mins
Imagine stepping into a virtual world that evolves in real-time, where you control every character and element like a master puppeteer — welcome to the future with Google’s groundbreaking Genie 3 world model. This isn’t just another AI upgrade; it’s a revolution in interactive, controllable virtual environments that blend video game realism with cinematic magic and robotic precision.
In this episode, we unpack how Genie 3 pushes the boundaries of AI by creating dynamic, consistent worlds that respond instantly to your commands. From transforming video games and movies to revolutionizing robotics training, this technology offers an unlimited Code Playground for AI agents to learn and adapt. Curious about how real-time prompting and emergent capabilities set Genie 3 apart from its predecessors and other generative models? We’ve got you covered.
Whether you’re a tech enthusiast, gamer, filmmaker, or AI skeptic, this podcast will thrill you with the possibilities and controversies surrounding the next frontier of AI-driven virtual worlds. Tune in, and prepare to have your mind blown.
Keywords: Google Genie 3, AI world model, interactive virtual environments, real-time AI, generative AI, AI in video games, AI in movies, robotics training AI, dynamic virtual worlds, AI scene control, emergent AI capabilities, real-time prompting, AI evolution, virtual reality AI, advanced generative models.
Ready to explore the future of AI-powered virtual worlds? Subscribe now and share this episode with anyone fascinated by the next wave of technology!
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/tech-threads-sci-tech-future-tech-ai--5976276/support.
You May also Like:
🎁The Perfect Gift App
Find the Perfect Gift in Seconds
⭐Sky Near Me
Live map of stars & planets visible near you
✔Debt Planner App
Your Path to Debt-Free Living
In this episode, we unpack how Genie 3 pushes the boundaries of AI by creating dynamic, consistent worlds that respond instantly to your commands. From transforming video games and movies to revolutionizing robotics training, this technology offers an unlimited Code Playground for AI agents to learn and adapt. Curious about how real-time prompting and emergent capabilities set Genie 3 apart from its predecessors and other generative models? We’ve got you covered.
Whether you’re a tech enthusiast, gamer, filmmaker, or AI skeptic, this podcast will thrill you with the possibilities and controversies surrounding the next frontier of AI-driven virtual worlds. Tune in, and prepare to have your mind blown.
Keywords: Google Genie 3, AI world model, interactive virtual environments, real-time AI, generative AI, AI in video games, AI in movies, robotics training AI, dynamic virtual worlds, AI scene control, emergent AI capabilities, real-time prompting, AI evolution, virtual reality AI, advanced generative models.
Ready to explore the future of AI-powered virtual worlds? Subscribe now and share this episode with anyone fascinated by the next wave of technology!
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/tech-threads-sci-tech-future-tech-ai--5976276/support.
You May also Like:
🎁The Perfect Gift App
Find the Perfect Gift in Seconds
⭐Sky Near Me
Live map of stars & planets visible near you
✔Debt Planner App
Your Path to Debt-Free Living
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Okay, imagine stepping into a digital realm, and it's so vivid,
so utterly responsive that when let's say, a virtual jet
ski slices through a beam of light, the light itself
dynamic while it parts, it actually flows around the rider,
almost like it was a physical shimmering current or something.
Or think about a scene where a mirror on a
(00:20):
virtual vehicle doesn't just show some static image, No, it
reflects the precise, consistent world behind it, no matter where
you navigate, just like real glass wood. And what if
you could pick up a brush in the simulated environment
and actually paint on a wall, and you watch the
pigment accumulate layer by layeries the texture building up the
consistency exactly like real paint does. Now, these aren't just
(00:43):
you know, meticulously crafted animations or pre recorded sequences trying
to fool your eye. Know, these are fully controllable, fully
immersive digital environments. You the user are really at the helm.
You're steering, exploring, even reshaping these worlds in real time.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
Okay, let's unpack this. This feels genuinely revolutionary.
Speaker 1 (00:59):
Today we're taking a deep dive into a really exciting
leap forward in artificial intelligence. Google's latest world model, known
as Genie three. And this isn't just about generating stunning visuals,
though it certainly does that. It's really about conjuring entire
interactive realities, worlds you can step into manipulate an experience
with well, frankly unprecedented freedom.
Speaker 2 (01:20):
Yeah. And what's truly fascinating here, I think is that
this technology is being talked about as a pretty profound
step towards AGI, you know, artificial general intelligence, which hints
at a future where AI doesn't just process information but
actually understands and simulates complex realities. It has these really
far reaching implications for how we interact with digital content,
everything from say, training incredibly advanced AI agents in hyperrealistic sims,
(01:45):
to completely revolutionizing entertainment movies, games, even how we design
the very fabric of future virtual spaces. So we're going
to explore these incredible capabilities, yeah, and delve into the
fascinating technical challenges Google had to overcome to get here,
and sort of ponder what this all means for our
future as you know, digital citizens, creators, learners, Yeah, everything.
Speaker 1 (02:06):
So, right out of the gate, the most crucial distinction
about Genie three, the thing you really need to grasp
is that we're not talking about passive viewing experiences. Forget
static images, forget even linear videos. This is about being
in the driver's seed. When we talk about GENI three,
we're talking about dynamic worlds where you are in control.
You're not just watching, you are actively navigating, making decisions,
(02:27):
shaping the experience, much like you know, a cutting edge
video game or some incredibly advanced simulation exactly.
Speaker 2 (02:34):
And if we connect this to the bigger picture, this
really represents a fundamental paradigm shift in generative AI. It
lifts us beyond just creating visual content like a movie
or pre defined animation, to enabling true, real time, dynamic
interaction within a simulated environment. This isn't just like an
incremental improvement. It feels like a quantum leap. It unlocks
(02:56):
this unprecedented diversity of interactive experiences. Imagine being able to
build a digital playground where the basic rules, physics, causality,
even material properties are just intrinsically understood and applied by
the AI itself. Yes, rather than needing a human developer
to painstakingly program every single interaction. Sort of like having
(03:16):
an AI that just gets how the world works instinctively.
Speaker 1 (03:19):
Okay, to really wrap our heads around this, let's take
a kind of virtual tour through some of the most
striking examples Google has shown. Picture this scene. There's a gorilla, right,
and he's wearing the surprisingly fancy suit, and he's strolling
through this complex network of interconnected buildings. Now, as you
observe you're not just a spectator, you can almost feel
the input. You see these things on screen that look
(03:39):
like arrow keys, indicating that a user is actively providing
commands guiding the gorillas every step. What immediately jumped out
of me, and what's truly remarkable, is the absolute consistency.
Every single frame is generated so consistently. It's not pre stitched.
Each new frame is dynamically conjured based on all the
previous frames and the precise real time control input from
(03:59):
the US user. The gorilla turns a corner, the environment
just seamlessly unfolds, objects stay solid. The sense of a consistent,
explorable space is just maintained perfectly, no flicker. It's almost
like having a highly intelligent real time puppeteer for an
entire digital world.
Speaker 2 (04:16):
That consistency is absolutely foundational. Yeah, and it carries through
even in really complex scenarios. Think about the mountain biker example,
navigating this rugged, hilly landscape. You can really sense the
user's agency pushing forward to accelerate, steering left or right
down the path yea, even you know, momentarily looking down
at the ground right in front, then back up to
(04:36):
scan the horizon, or turning to look at the view
to the side right.
Speaker 1 (04:40):
Total control.
Speaker 2 (04:41):
And what's astonishing is that throughout all these rapid intuitive
inputs and perspective shifts, everything just stays perfectly coherent and
the quality is high. They mentioned seven to twenty p
which honestly, for a fully interactive, dynamically generated environment responding
in real time, that's pretty impressive.
Speaker 1 (04:58):
It really is.
Speaker 2 (04:59):
It's not a static bagdrop. The terrain feels genuinely traversible.
It responds to the biker's movements and perspective shifts in
a physically plausible way. It really suggests there's an underlying
understanding of topography and momentum.
Speaker 1 (05:13):
But for me, the true magic, like where my understanding
of what AI can do really shifted, it's in the
subtle details. Let's go back to that jet ski example
for a second. As the writer speeds along this brightly
lit river, there's this incredible moment a distinct beam of
light crosses the water, and as the jet ski passes
through it, the lake doesn't just disappear or clip through.
(05:35):
It dynamically moves out of the way. Wow, it shifts
and flows around the writer's presence, reacting like it was
a physical wave. Now this might seem like a minor,
subtle detail, but I think it is so important for realism.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
Absolutely.
Speaker 1 (05:48):
It's these tiny emergent physical interactions where the AI isn't
just painting pixels, but simulating how light behaves in a
moving world, that make a virtual environment feel genuinely alive
and responsive, not just a clever illusion.
Speaker 2 (06:01):
Yeah, it implies an emergent graph of environmental physics, doesn't
it totally? And that profound level of physical plausibility goes
even further. If you look closely at the jet ski itself,
you can clearly see a crisp, real time reflection of
the environment behind the rider in its mirror.
Speaker 1 (06:17):
Yeah, I saw that.
Speaker 2 (06:18):
It's not a static texture. It's a dynamic, accurate reflection
of the generated world as it unfolds, and what happens
when the jetski hits something. Oh yeah, it doesn't just
stop dead or clip through unnaturally. Yeah, the jet ski
actually moves backward. It reacts with a realistic physical recoil
to the impact.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Huh.
Speaker 2 (06:38):
These aren't just visual flourishes, right. There are powerful demonstrations
of the model's inherent understanding of things like object permanence,
collision physics, the complex interaction of light, all generated seamlessly
on a fly.
Speaker 1 (06:53):
That's incredible, and.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
It really begs the important question, how does an AI
model learn such complex nuanced physic interactions causal relationships without
being explicitly programmed for every single scenario. It's not just
about what it looks like, what it understands about how
things interact.
Speaker 1 (07:08):
It truly is astounding. There's another demo too, a man
in a smart suit walking through a green field and
as he walks, the flowers in the field gently move
out of his way. They're displaced by his legs, just
like they would be in reality.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
Subtle but effective.
Speaker 1 (07:21):
It's such a small thing, but it immediately grounds the scene.
And then there's a spaceship in the background, which, as
the man walks closer, gets bigger, reflecting the correct perspective.
Now I did notice a tiny bit of blurriness around
the flowers sometimes shows there's always room for refinement with
cutting edge tech, sure always, but the overall effect is
(07:42):
incredibly impressive. It shows the model is generating not just
the main subject, but also the environment and its nuanced reactions,
keeping perspective and depth consistent. And speaking of impressive interactions,
let's talk about the painting demo. That one really highlights
the model's grasp of material properties.
Speaker 2 (08:01):
Ah. Yes, that one's fascinating from a technical standpoint.
Speaker 1 (08:03):
Yeah. So you see someone painting a wall blue. As
the brush touches the wall, paint goes on. But more
than that, as the person applies another layer over the
existing one, the paint becomes more consistent. It builds up
just like real paint wood on a surface.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
It's simulating the accumulation exactly.
Speaker 1 (08:21):
It beautifully illustrates how the model understands not just object interaction,
but material properties like viscosity, accumulation, even opacity. You can
even see that if the paint brush isn't touching the wall,
nothing happens, which sounds obvious, but but.
Speaker 2 (08:35):
It's critical for a simulation.
Speaker 1 (08:36):
Yeah right, It's like a real time dynamic simulation of
fluid dynamics and material application. Now, there was maybe some
slight awkwardness with the painter's movement, and I think a
reflection was missed in a window nearby.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
Minor glitches, Yeah, but the.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
Core capability dynamic layered painting. That is a truly massive
step forward in generative realism.
Speaker 2 (08:59):
And what's also really compelling and hints at the huge
creative potential here, is that Genie three isn't just about hyperrealism.
While it clearly excels at that, the model shows remarkable versatility.
It can generate worlds with very distinct stylized artistic looks.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
To That's a crucial point. Yeah, you can definitely opt
for a very different artistic style. For instance, there's this
demo of a little firefly flitting through what looks like
a charming, almost cartoonish forest, you know, whimsical little houses,
cute story book trees. It looks great, and it clearly
shows the model isn't just good at mimicking reality. It
can conjure these highly stylized imaginative worlds that still maintain
(09:39):
their own consistent esthetic and internal logic.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
Right. That versatility is absolutely critical for future uses. Extending
way beyond pure simulation into creative storytelling totally, or think
about it. Another example, this really cute, almost childish looking
raccoon character exploring a village.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
Yeah, that one was adorable.
Speaker 2 (09:59):
That kind of a esthetic immediately makes you think of,
I don't know, future animated films, maybe something Pixar like,
or a whole new generation of video games where the
visual style can be completely separate from photorealism but still
be fully interactive and internally consistent. It suggests this huge
creative palent right generating worlds across the whole spectrum of
(10:19):
visual design, hyperreal, abstract, fantastical. This is where AI shifts
from just being a tool for replication to more like
a partner in artistic creation.
Speaker 1 (10:29):
And speaking of creating whole environments, there's that dramatic scene
of a tropical island getting hit by a storm.
Speaker 2 (10:35):
Oh yeah, the weather effects.
Speaker 1 (10:36):
You see waves splashing dynamically realistically over barriers and concrete roads,
Palm trees swaying violently in the wind.
Speaker 2 (10:45):
It looks incredibly real.
Speaker 1 (10:46):
It really does. It showcases the model's ability to render
complex environmental dynamics weather effects in a consistent, immersive way.
It's not just static scenery. The world itself is alive,
reacting to forces within it.
Speaker 2 (11:01):
Changing, which opens up possibilities for dynamic storytelling and gameplay
where the environment itself almost becomes a character definitely. And
then finally there's that beautiful hike through a mountainous landscape
really evokes places like you know, Lake Tahoe.
Speaker 1 (11:14):
Stunning.
Speaker 2 (11:15):
Yeah, And what's particularly impressive there is the ability to
just turn all the way around seamlessly view the whole
expanse of landscape from every angle, and everything stays perfectly consistent.
The spatial integrity is just impeccably maintained even with drastic
rapid changes in.
Speaker 1 (11:32):
Perspective, right, no weird warping or objects disappearing exactly.
Speaker 2 (11:36):
And that level of environmental fidelity and long term consistency
is absolutely critical for truly immersive exploration, whether it's for
virtual tourism or planning simulations, even military training.
Speaker 1 (11:49):
Yeah, I could see that.
Speaker 2 (11:50):
It means the model has this robust internal representation of
the three D space, even if it's not explicitly built
like a traditional game engine map. So this tech is
part of what Google calls the Genie theories of models,
and it really is a significant evolution from the earlier ones,
Genie one and Gen two. It's absolutely crucial, I think,
to understand the fundamental difference that makes Genie three such
(12:11):
a breakthrough. Earlier generative AI models like Veo, which was
impressive in its own right, could generate stunning video sure,
but they weren't controllable in this dynamic real time way
we've been discussing. They just produced a linear preset video output.
Speaker 1 (12:24):
Right, you just watched it exactly.
Speaker 2 (12:26):
Genie three, by contrast, is fully controllable. This isn't just
like an incremental improvement adding a bit more polish. It's
a fundamental shift in capability that opens up a whole
new dimension of interaction. It's really the difference between watching
a movie and actually being in the movie, making your
own choices as you go.
Speaker 1 (12:44):
Okay, so, if I'm getting this right, it's not just
a fancy video player, it's acting more like a real
time dynamics simulator, almost like a physics engine being generated
on the fly. Am I on the right track there?
Or is there an even deeper technical layer we need
to because that's where it gets really interesting, right, the
tech behind it.
Speaker 2 (13:03):
You're absolutely on the right track and the core technical challenge.
The real sort of herculean task lies in what's known
as autoregressive generation, coupled with this unwavering commitment to consistency.
See when gen three generates each new frame of the environment,
it's not just looking at the frame right before it.
Simpler models might do.
Speaker 1 (13:21):
That, and that would lead to problems.
Speaker 2 (13:23):
Yeah, if it only did that, you'd quickly see visual inconsistencies, glitches,
things drifting away from a coherent reality over time. Instead,
the model has to consider the entire previously generated trajectory,
the full history of the world state, the user actions, which,
as you can imagine, grows enormously complex over time. Think
(13:46):
of it like a master chess player. They don't just
consider the last move. They have to consider the whole
history of the game to figure out the best next move.
Speaker 1 (13:54):
That makes sense. Or like that analogy they used about
a kid throwing a ball exactly to accurately predict where
that ball will be at any moment, the model needs
to know its entire path from when it was released,
its initial speed, angle, any skin, air resistance, all that stuff.
If it only looked at the last few moments, it
couldn't possibly predict the full realistic trajectory, it loses the
(14:15):
crucial context the physics applied earlier. It's like trying to
remember a complex hour long conversation. You can't just recall
the last sentence someone said and respond intelligently. You need
the whole context. And in a dynamic world, if I
the user decided to walk back to a spot I
was at a minute ago after exploring somewhere else, entirely
(14:36):
the model has to accurately remember everything about that spot
from a minute ago to make sure it's exactly as
it should be, reacting just like it did before.
Speaker 2 (14:45):
That's a huge memory challenge, Yeah, monumental, And that's exactly
where the computational burden comes in. For real time interactivity.
This incredibly complex calculation considering the entire history all user actions. Yeah,
it has to happen multiple times per second, dynamically responding
to new user inputs as they arrive. This is why
they say it's extremely computationally expensive at that think about it.
(15:07):
To maintain that perfect memory and real time responsiveness, Gene
three is doing like trillions of calculations every single second.
It's not just running a powerful game, it's basically recalculating
the universe's rules with every tiny user input, ensuring every pixel,
every shadow, every interaction is perfectly consistent with everything they
(15:28):
came before. Wow, that level of processing demand is just staggering.
It's a real testament to the engineering and algorithmic breakthroughs
maintaining that consistency, especially when you're moving fast through a
detailed environment like that hiking scene.
Speaker 1 (15:42):
Where you turn around, see the lake, turn back.
Speaker 2 (15:44):
Yeah, and everything has to be perfectly consistent. That is
a very, very difficult problem for traditional generative methods without
that deep contextual understanding, inaccuracies just pile up, leading to
glitches or the whole simulation breaking down.
Speaker 1 (15:57):
What's truly mind boggling about this is how they actually
achieve that consistency. It sounds almost impossible to program every
single interaction, every tiny detail, every physical reaction to line
up perfectly over long stretches of time and complex, unpredictable
user inputs. It almost feels like the AI is figuring
out how the world works rather than being told step by.
Speaker 2 (16:18):
Step, and that observation gets right to one of the
most remarkable aspects of GENI three. Its consistency is described
as an emergent capability emergent meaning meaning it's not something
explicitly pre programmed or hard coded into the model by engineers.
It's not like a giant list of if then rules
for every possible physical law or interaction. Instead, it just
(16:39):
sort of appears as a property of the model with
quote more training scaling up.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
So just by training it on massive amounts of data.
Speaker 2 (16:46):
Essentially, yes, as Google feeds the model truly vast amounts
of diverse data, maybe real world videos, maybe game engine physics, data,
animation sequences. Who knows exactly what scales up the computational training,
the model basically learns the underlying physics. It learns the
causal relationships, the very structure of the world on its own.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (17:07):
It figures out how things should behave, how they should react,
how they should stay consistent, rather than being explicitly told
how to do it. This is a really profound concept
in AI development. It's not just clever statistics. It's a
deeper form of learned intelligence, almost like intuition about how
reality works.
Speaker 1 (17:24):
So the AI is building its own internal mental model
of the world.
Speaker 2 (17:27):
That's a great way to put it.
Speaker 1 (17:29):
That's absolutely fascinating. So It's not like they're sitting down
and building a traditional three D game engine, you know,
with pre defined assets and physics rules they coded line
by line. This is something else, entirely more flexible, maybe
more profound.
Speaker 2 (17:41):
Precisely, Google draws a very clear contrast here between GENI
three and other really cutting edge tech like neuro radiance
fields and gassiensplatting. Now, those technologies are incredible at creating
highly consistent, controllable.
Speaker 1 (17:55):
Three D environments, right, We've talked about those.
Speaker 2 (17:58):
But they fundamentally rely on being given an explicit three
D representation. Think of it that like needing a pre
existing three D blueprint, maybe from scanning an object or
meticulously reconstructing a three D space. Okay, And while that's
super effective for static or predefined spaces, it inherently limits
dynamic interaction and spontaneous generation. By contrast, the world's Gene
(18:20):
three generates are described as far more dynamic and rich.
Why because they are created frame by frame based on
the world description and actions by the user, rather than
needing that fixed three D model beforehand.
Speaker 1 (18:31):
So it's making it up as it goes along based
on the rules it learned.
Speaker 2 (18:34):
In a way, Yes, It's essentially generating the world as
you explore it, which makes it inherently more adaptable, responsive,
and capable of truly novel scenarios. It's almost like the
world is being born around you in real time based
on your imagination and interaction.
Speaker 1 (18:51):
And just when you think you've kind of grasped the
scope of this, it gets even wilder. Imagine you're just
like casually walking down a street in this generated world
and you suddenly decide, hmm, I wish it were raining.
You don't need to exit, open a menu, find a
weather setting. You can just say it or maybe type
of simple command and the environment just responds.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
This is where the concept of prompt events comes in,
and yeah, it's a truly transformative feature for interactive content.
It means you can dynamically alter the scene in real
time using high level natural language.
Speaker 1 (19:23):
Commands like give me an example.
Speaker 2 (19:25):
Okay, so in one striking demo, someone's exploring this beautiful
scene along some canals. Then a prompt literally appears on
screen to add a man in a chicken suit. Yes,
and promptly, this guy in a chicken suit emerges from
the left side of the shot and just runs down
the path perfectly integrated into the scene.
Speaker 1 (19:43):
That's hilarious and amazing, right.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
Or you can prompt a man on a jet ski
to suddenly emerge from the water, or for something really
out there, conjure a crimson dragon to appear majestically in
the scene. Wow. And the model doesn't just PLoP these
objects down, It integrates them coherently into the existing environment.
It respects perspective, lighting, immediate physical interactions. It's like having
(20:07):
a director AI on call who can instantly change the
scene based on your whims.
Speaker 1 (20:13):
That pushes the boundaries of interactive storytelling and digital exploration
to a whole new level.
Speaker 2 (20:18):
Absolutely, this isn't just about controlling a character anymore. It's
about controlling the very fabric of the reality around you.
Speaker 1 (20:24):
Okay, So for anyone who's been sort of tracking the
rapid progress in AI, you might remember earlier versions like
Google's own Genie two, but the progress from Gen two
to GENI three is well, it's truly stunning. It's going
to utterly blow your mind when you see the comparison.
The advancements are so significant it genuinely feels like a
whole different generation of technology, not just a simple upgrade Oh.
Speaker 2 (20:46):
Indeed, let's do a quick side by side to really
grasp this monumental leap. If we look at a similar
scene from Geni two and in Gene three, the difference
in visual quality and detail is just immediately obvious. In
typical gen twos, for instance, something basic like buttons on
a sidewall might look blurry, indistinct, almost merged together, clearly
(21:07):
lower resolution, maybe even less than seven to.
Speaker 1 (21:08):
Twenty p right, kind of mushy looking exactly.
Speaker 2 (21:11):
Yeah, on the Geni three side, those exact same buttons.
They're individualized, distinct, rendered with sharp edges, much higher fidelity.
And this isn't just about pixel count. It's about the
model's ability to render fine details with much greater precision
and consistency. It makes the world feel far more tangible,
more believable.
Speaker 1 (21:28):
Yeah, that level of granular detail totally transforms the feeling
of immersion. It's a difference between looking at a world
and feeling like you could reach out and touch things
in it. But like you said earlier, it's not just visuals,
it's the very nature of the world's being created. I
remember with Genie two, if a character walked through a
door that was often kind of it, the end of
the generated sequence or.
Speaker 2 (21:49):
The generation might just stop.
Speaker 1 (21:50):
Yeah, the world beyond that door didn't really exist, or
if it did, it wasn't consistently generated or explorable. But
with Genie three, a character walks through that same door
and they say they're there's an entire world back here
waiting to be explored. You can keep navigating, discovering new areas,
interacting with the environment, and it maintains consistency for what
(22:11):
feels like, well, potentially an infinite expanse.
Speaker 2 (22:14):
It's a huge contextual shift from finite generated clips to
truly explorable, expansive, persistent digital spaces exactly.
Speaker 1 (22:23):
It's the difference between a pre recorded path and a
genuinely open world, and.
Speaker 2 (22:27):
That fundamental difference in persistence and expansiveness. It changes everything
for interactive experiences. Think about an RPG dungeon scenario comparing
the two Gene three consistently delivers not only higher visual quality,
but also much greater consistency over significantly longer generations and
far more realistic.
Speaker 1 (22:47):
Dynamics like what kind of dynamics well, For.
Speaker 2 (22:49):
Example, as a character jumps, the shadow underneath them expands
and contracts realistically, it stretches and shrinks as they move
through the air.
Speaker 1 (22:56):
Oh nice detail.
Speaker 2 (22:57):
And maybe even more impressively, the lighting across the walls
and floor responds dynamically to light sources in the scene.
It casts accurate shadows reflections that adjust in real time.
These are the kinds of subtle but critical physical details
that elevate a generated environment from just being a visual
display to a believable, explorable world where causality is maintained.
(23:18):
And that level of consistency, especially over long periods of
complex user interaction, is absolutely crucial for say, game developers
or filmmakers who need reliable, adaptable virtual assets that behave predictably.
Speaker 1 (23:31):
Reduces the need for tons of manual asset creation.
Speaker 2 (23:35):
I imagine immense amounts potentially.
Speaker 1 (23:37):
So Okay, Beyond the cool demos and the promise of
future video games, what does this all mean for the
bigger picture? Google makes this really strong claim, almost audacious
world models are a key stepping stone on the path
to AGI artificial general intelligence. This is not just marketing fluff, right, Yeah,
(23:57):
it sounds like a profound statement about where AI is heading.
What do they mean by that? Why is it so significant?
Speaker 2 (24:03):
Right? If we connect this to the bigger picture. Google
is essentially saying that Genie three and future even more
advanced world models like it provide what they call an
unlimited curriculum of rich simulation environments for AI agents to
train in.
Speaker 1 (24:18):
Unlimited curriculum. Okay, unpack that.
Speaker 2 (24:20):
So, Traditionally, training AI agents, especially for really complex stuff
like robotics, or navigating intricate, unpredictable environments, or even developing
advanced social intelligence, it requires massive amounts of real world
data or meticulously hand crafted simulated.
Speaker 1 (24:33):
Environments, which are both expensive and limiting.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
Exactly. Both are incredibly expensive, time consuming, and often limited
in scope of variety. But with a world model like
Gene three, you can dynamically generate an infinite variety of scenarios, challenges,
environments basically on demand. This gives AI agents what amounts
to an unlimited playground.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
An unlimited playground I like.
Speaker 2 (24:56):
That where they can interact, experiment, learn from mistakes, achieve successes,
and continuously improve themselves at a pace that's just unprecedented, unimaginable. Really,
it's the ultimate learning lab.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
That's a profoundly powerful idea and unlimited playground. It immediately
makes me think of the Alpha Go analogy we've talked
about before. The AI that mastered Go.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
Precisely, it draws a direct, compelling parallel to Alpha Go.
AlphaGo achieved that superhuman performance not by studying human games primarily,
but by essentially playing with itself. It generated millions upon
millions of games against itself, meticulously learning from each outcome,
refining strategies, discovering novel approaches no human had ever thought of.
Speaker 1 (25:38):
Right, taking humans out of the loop accelerated it massively.
Speaker 2 (25:41):
Exactly when we remove humans from the feedback loop in
AI training. When the AI can generate its own training
data and get immediate, precise feedback with an assimulated world,
the learning process becomes incredibly fast and scalable. The only
real constraint then becomes the amount of compute power you
can throw at it. If you can put an a
agent into a dynamically generated, physically consistent world where it
(26:03):
can experiment, fail safely learned without constant human supervision or
tedious data labeling, it can achieve a level of learning
that's just orders of magnitude faster and more comprehensive than
traditional methods.
Speaker 1 (26:15):
So this is the path to more general AI.
Speaker 2 (26:18):
It's seen as a fundamental path, Yeah, towards building truly robust, adaptive,
general purpose AI that can learn and function and diverse, complex,
unpredictable environments, mimicking or maybe even surpassing human adaptability. It's
potentially how AI could develop a kind of common sense
understanding of reality.
Speaker 1 (26:35):
Okay, so beyond the more conceptual, almost philosophical implications for AGI,
where does this tech hit the ground running? Where does
it directly impact our lives, our industries, maybe in the
near future. What are the practical, tangible applications we might see?
Speaker 2 (26:49):
Well, the applications are incredibly broad and via potentially transformative
across multiple sectors. First and foremost, Gene three clearly points
towards nothing less than the future of video games.
Speaker 1 (27:00):
Seems obvious.
Speaker 2 (27:01):
Yeah, imagine games where every environment is dynamically generated on
the fly, every interaction is physically accurate down to tiny details.
Storylines adapt and evolve in real time based on player
actions in ways we can barely imagine now. It could
lead to truly unique, procedurally generated gaming experiences that are
instantly replayable, totally responsive, no two play twos, ever, the same.
Speaker 1 (27:24):
Games that literally create themselves as you play Wow.
Speaker 2 (27:28):
Beyond gaming, its potential for movies and television shows is immense.
Creators could generate entire scenes, intricate backdrops, even complex characters
and their interactions basically on the fly, allowing for incredible
creative freedom, rapid prototyping, unparalleled efficiency and content production.
Speaker 1 (27:48):
A director could just say, give me a medieval castle
under siege by robotic dragons.
Speaker 2 (27:52):
And the AI generates a fully interactive, explorable scene in moments.
Speaker 1 (27:57):
I'm incredible, And.
Speaker 2 (27:58):
As we discussed, its utility and robotics in agent training
really can't be overstated. Providing these safe, scalable, endlessly varied
training grounds for AI agents to learn complex behaviors in
diverse virtual environments. That's a critical, maybe indispensable step towards
deploying intelligent robots and autonomous systems safely and effectively in
our unpredictable real world.
Speaker 1 (28:19):
Letting them make all their mistakes in the simulations so
they don't make them out here exactly.
Speaker 2 (28:23):
Let them crash the virtual car a million times before
they drive a real one.
Speaker 1 (28:27):
That's inspiring to think about the possibilities. But with all
this incredible potential, this groundbreaking capability, what are the current limitations?
What's still missing from the picture, at least for now, Well.
Speaker 2 (28:39):
For the time being, the most significant limitation for eager developers, creators,
even just curious folks like us, Yeah, is that GENI
three is currently only internal at Google.
Speaker 1 (28:51):
Ah right, no public access, no.
Speaker 2 (28:53):
Public release, no testing date mentioned, which is definitely a
bit of a tease given how incredible these demos look.
We only hope that changes relatively soon.
Speaker 1 (29:01):
Okay, what else?
Speaker 2 (29:02):
Another current limitation, at least in the demos we've seen
so far is the lack of sound generation.
Speaker 1 (29:07):
Ah yeah, they were silent, right.
Speaker 2 (29:09):
While the visuals and interactivity are stunning, profoundly immersive, the
environments themselves are quiet. However, it is worth noting that
the underlying V three models Google has developed are technically
capable of generating sound. Oh interesting, So it seems highly
probable that it's only a matter of time before sound
is generated in real time as a reaction to the
interaction within these environments, which would add yet another crucial
(29:33):
layer of sensory immersion in realism.
Speaker 1 (29:36):
Yeah, imagine hearing the Jeski's engine roar, the waves splashing,
the rustle of those flowers as the man walks through them.
All generated in perfect sync exactly.
Speaker 2 (29:45):
That would be the next big step for immersion hashtag
tag tag outro.
Speaker 1 (29:49):
So we've taken a really fascinating deep dive today into
Google's Genie three, a world model that feels like it
fundamentally shifts our understanding of generative AI. It doesn't just
show you a video. It genuinely invites you into a
truly interactive, dynamically consistent, and surprisingly detailed environment that responds
to your every command. The potential for training advanced AI agents,
(30:11):
for creating entirely new forms of entertainment and interact to storytelling,
and just for pushing the very boundaries of what's digitally possible.
It feels immense. It really is a breath taking leap
forward in AI's journey to where it is understanding and
simulating our reality.
Speaker 2 (30:24):
Yeah, and what's truly fascinating here, I think, beyond just
the immediate applications, is that we're witnessing the emergence of
truly adaptive, responsive digital realities. Yeah. These aren't built on rigid,
predesigned blueprints, right, They're built on a deep, almost emergent
understanding of physics, causality, the intricate dance of interaction within
a world. This technology really forces us to question our
(30:46):
basic assumptions about what's possible in virtual spaces, and how
profoundly an AI can understand and replicate the complex, nuanced
rules of our physical world without being explicitly told. How
it really hints at a future where reality, maybe in
a digital sense, could be conjured and explored almost on demand.
Speaker 1 (31:03):
So, given that incredible consistency, the real time interactivity, the dynamic,
almost organic nature of these generated worlds, what does this
mean for the very definition of reality when we're talking
about a digital context, And maybe more provocatively, if AI
agents are learning and improving at these unprecedented rates within
these unlimited playgrounds, mastering complex skills, understanding causality at a
(31:26):
superhuman pace, what new challenges and yeah, what new opportunities
will emerge for us, the users outside of them, as
these highly trained intelligences start to interact with and maybe
even shape our own world. It's a pretty mind betting
thought to end on
Okay, imagine stepping into a digital realm, and it's so vivid,
so utterly responsive that when let's say, a virtual jet
ski slices through a beam of light, the light itself
dynamic while it parts, it actually flows around the rider,
almost like it was a physical shimmering current or something.
Or think about a scene where a mirror on a
(00:20):
virtual vehicle doesn't just show some static image, No, it
reflects the precise, consistent world behind it, no matter where
you navigate, just like real glass wood. And what if
you could pick up a brush in the simulated environment
and actually paint on a wall, and you watch the
pigment accumulate layer by layeries the texture building up the
consistency exactly like real paint does. Now, these aren't just
(00:43):
you know, meticulously crafted animations or pre recorded sequences trying
to fool your eye. Know, these are fully controllable, fully
immersive digital environments. You the user are really at the helm.
You're steering, exploring, even reshaping these worlds in real time.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
Okay, let's unpack this. This feels genuinely revolutionary.
Speaker 1 (00:59):
Today we're taking a deep dive into a really exciting
leap forward in artificial intelligence. Google's latest world model, known
as Genie three. And this isn't just about generating stunning visuals,
though it certainly does that. It's really about conjuring entire
interactive realities, worlds you can step into manipulate an experience
with well, frankly unprecedented freedom.
Speaker 2 (01:20):
Yeah. And what's truly fascinating here, I think is that
this technology is being talked about as a pretty profound
step towards AGI, you know, artificial general intelligence, which hints
at a future where AI doesn't just process information but
actually understands and simulates complex realities. It has these really
far reaching implications for how we interact with digital content,
everything from say, training incredibly advanced AI agents in hyperrealistic sims,
(01:45):
to completely revolutionizing entertainment movies, games, even how we design
the very fabric of future virtual spaces. So we're going
to explore these incredible capabilities, yeah, and delve into the
fascinating technical challenges Google had to overcome to get here,
and sort of ponder what this all means for our
future as you know, digital citizens, creators, learners, Yeah, everything.
Speaker 1 (02:06):
So, right out of the gate, the most crucial distinction
about Genie three, the thing you really need to grasp
is that we're not talking about passive viewing experiences. Forget
static images, forget even linear videos. This is about being
in the driver's seed. When we talk about GENI three,
we're talking about dynamic worlds where you are in control.
You're not just watching, you are actively navigating, making decisions,
(02:27):
shaping the experience, much like you know, a cutting edge
video game or some incredibly advanced simulation exactly.
Speaker 2 (02:34):
And if we connect this to the bigger picture, this
really represents a fundamental paradigm shift in generative AI. It
lifts us beyond just creating visual content like a movie
or pre defined animation, to enabling true, real time, dynamic
interaction within a simulated environment. This isn't just like an
incremental improvement. It feels like a quantum leap. It unlocks
(02:56):
this unprecedented diversity of interactive experiences. Imagine being able to
build a digital playground where the basic rules, physics, causality,
even material properties are just intrinsically understood and applied by
the AI itself. Yes, rather than needing a human developer
to painstakingly program every single interaction. Sort of like having
(03:16):
an AI that just gets how the world works instinctively.
Speaker 1 (03:19):
Okay, to really wrap our heads around this, let's take
a kind of virtual tour through some of the most
striking examples Google has shown. Picture this scene. There's a gorilla, right,
and he's wearing the surprisingly fancy suit, and he's strolling
through this complex network of interconnected buildings. Now, as you
observe you're not just a spectator, you can almost feel
the input. You see these things on screen that look
(03:39):
like arrow keys, indicating that a user is actively providing
commands guiding the gorillas every step. What immediately jumped out
of me, and what's truly remarkable, is the absolute consistency.
Every single frame is generated so consistently. It's not pre stitched.
Each new frame is dynamically conjured based on all the
previous frames and the precise real time control input from
(03:59):
the US user. The gorilla turns a corner, the environment
just seamlessly unfolds, objects stay solid. The sense of a consistent,
explorable space is just maintained perfectly, no flicker. It's almost
like having a highly intelligent real time puppeteer for an
entire digital world.
Speaker 2 (04:16):
That consistency is absolutely foundational. Yeah, and it carries through
even in really complex scenarios. Think about the mountain biker example,
navigating this rugged, hilly landscape. You can really sense the
user's agency pushing forward to accelerate, steering left or right
down the path yea, even you know, momentarily looking down
at the ground right in front, then back up to
(04:36):
scan the horizon, or turning to look at the view
to the side right.
Speaker 1 (04:40):
Total control.
Speaker 2 (04:41):
And what's astonishing is that throughout all these rapid intuitive
inputs and perspective shifts, everything just stays perfectly coherent and
the quality is high. They mentioned seven to twenty p
which honestly, for a fully interactive, dynamically generated environment responding
in real time, that's pretty impressive.
Speaker 1 (04:58):
It really is.
Speaker 2 (04:59):
It's not a static bagdrop. The terrain feels genuinely traversible.
It responds to the biker's movements and perspective shifts in
a physically plausible way. It really suggests there's an underlying
understanding of topography and momentum.
Speaker 1 (05:13):
But for me, the true magic, like where my understanding
of what AI can do really shifted, it's in the
subtle details. Let's go back to that jet ski example
for a second. As the writer speeds along this brightly
lit river, there's this incredible moment a distinct beam of
light crosses the water, and as the jet ski passes
through it, the lake doesn't just disappear or clip through.
(05:35):
It dynamically moves out of the way. Wow, it shifts
and flows around the writer's presence, reacting like it was
a physical wave. Now this might seem like a minor,
subtle detail, but I think it is so important for realism.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
Absolutely.
Speaker 1 (05:48):
It's these tiny emergent physical interactions where the AI isn't
just painting pixels, but simulating how light behaves in a
moving world, that make a virtual environment feel genuinely alive
and responsive, not just a clever illusion.
Speaker 2 (06:01):
Yeah, it implies an emergent graph of environmental physics, doesn't
it totally? And that profound level of physical plausibility goes
even further. If you look closely at the jet ski itself,
you can clearly see a crisp, real time reflection of
the environment behind the rider in its mirror.
Speaker 1 (06:17):
Yeah, I saw that.
Speaker 2 (06:18):
It's not a static texture. It's a dynamic, accurate reflection
of the generated world as it unfolds, and what happens
when the jetski hits something. Oh yeah, it doesn't just
stop dead or clip through unnaturally. Yeah, the jet ski
actually moves backward. It reacts with a realistic physical recoil
to the impact.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Huh.
Speaker 2 (06:38):
These aren't just visual flourishes, right. There are powerful demonstrations
of the model's inherent understanding of things like object permanence,
collision physics, the complex interaction of light, all generated seamlessly
on a fly.
Speaker 1 (06:53):
That's incredible, and.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
It really begs the important question, how does an AI
model learn such complex nuanced physic interactions causal relationships without
being explicitly programmed for every single scenario. It's not just
about what it looks like, what it understands about how
things interact.
Speaker 1 (07:08):
It truly is astounding. There's another demo too, a man
in a smart suit walking through a green field and
as he walks, the flowers in the field gently move
out of his way. They're displaced by his legs, just
like they would be in reality.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
Subtle but effective.
Speaker 1 (07:21):
It's such a small thing, but it immediately grounds the scene.
And then there's a spaceship in the background, which, as
the man walks closer, gets bigger, reflecting the correct perspective.
Now I did notice a tiny bit of blurriness around
the flowers sometimes shows there's always room for refinement with
cutting edge tech, sure always, but the overall effect is
(07:42):
incredibly impressive. It shows the model is generating not just
the main subject, but also the environment and its nuanced reactions,
keeping perspective and depth consistent. And speaking of impressive interactions,
let's talk about the painting demo. That one really highlights
the model's grasp of material properties.
Speaker 2 (08:01):
Ah. Yes, that one's fascinating from a technical standpoint.
Speaker 1 (08:03):
Yeah. So you see someone painting a wall blue. As
the brush touches the wall, paint goes on. But more
than that, as the person applies another layer over the
existing one, the paint becomes more consistent. It builds up
just like real paint wood on a surface.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
It's simulating the accumulation exactly.
Speaker 1 (08:21):
It beautifully illustrates how the model understands not just object interaction,
but material properties like viscosity, accumulation, even opacity. You can
even see that if the paint brush isn't touching the wall,
nothing happens, which sounds obvious, but but.
Speaker 2 (08:35):
It's critical for a simulation.
Speaker 1 (08:36):
Yeah right, It's like a real time dynamic simulation of
fluid dynamics and material application. Now, there was maybe some
slight awkwardness with the painter's movement, and I think a
reflection was missed in a window nearby.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
Minor glitches, Yeah, but the.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
Core capability dynamic layered painting. That is a truly massive
step forward in generative realism.
Speaker 2 (08:59):
And what's also really compelling and hints at the huge
creative potential here, is that Genie three isn't just about hyperrealism.
While it clearly excels at that, the model shows remarkable versatility.
It can generate worlds with very distinct stylized artistic looks.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
To That's a crucial point. Yeah, you can definitely opt
for a very different artistic style. For instance, there's this
demo of a little firefly flitting through what looks like
a charming, almost cartoonish forest, you know, whimsical little houses,
cute story book trees. It looks great, and it clearly
shows the model isn't just good at mimicking reality. It
can conjure these highly stylized imaginative worlds that still maintain
(09:39):
their own consistent esthetic and internal logic.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
Right. That versatility is absolutely critical for future uses. Extending
way beyond pure simulation into creative storytelling totally, or think
about it. Another example, this really cute, almost childish looking
raccoon character exploring a village.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
Yeah, that one was adorable.
Speaker 2 (09:59):
That kind of a esthetic immediately makes you think of,
I don't know, future animated films, maybe something Pixar like,
or a whole new generation of video games where the
visual style can be completely separate from photorealism but still
be fully interactive and internally consistent. It suggests this huge
creative palent right generating worlds across the whole spectrum of
(10:19):
visual design, hyperreal, abstract, fantastical. This is where AI shifts
from just being a tool for replication to more like
a partner in artistic creation.
Speaker 1 (10:29):
And speaking of creating whole environments, there's that dramatic scene
of a tropical island getting hit by a storm.
Speaker 2 (10:35):
Oh yeah, the weather effects.
Speaker 1 (10:36):
You see waves splashing dynamically realistically over barriers and concrete roads,
Palm trees swaying violently in the wind.
Speaker 2 (10:45):
It looks incredibly real.
Speaker 1 (10:46):
It really does. It showcases the model's ability to render
complex environmental dynamics weather effects in a consistent, immersive way.
It's not just static scenery. The world itself is alive,
reacting to forces within it.
Speaker 2 (11:01):
Changing, which opens up possibilities for dynamic storytelling and gameplay
where the environment itself almost becomes a character definitely. And
then finally there's that beautiful hike through a mountainous landscape
really evokes places like you know, Lake Tahoe.
Speaker 1 (11:14):
Stunning.
Speaker 2 (11:15):
Yeah, And what's particularly impressive there is the ability to
just turn all the way around seamlessly view the whole
expanse of landscape from every angle, and everything stays perfectly consistent.
The spatial integrity is just impeccably maintained even with drastic
rapid changes in.
Speaker 1 (11:32):
Perspective, right, no weird warping or objects disappearing exactly.
Speaker 2 (11:36):
And that level of environmental fidelity and long term consistency
is absolutely critical for truly immersive exploration, whether it's for
virtual tourism or planning simulations, even military training.
Speaker 1 (11:49):
Yeah, I could see that.
Speaker 2 (11:50):
It means the model has this robust internal representation of
the three D space, even if it's not explicitly built
like a traditional game engine map. So this tech is
part of what Google calls the Genie theories of models,
and it really is a significant evolution from the earlier ones,
Genie one and Gen two. It's absolutely crucial, I think,
to understand the fundamental difference that makes Genie three such
(12:11):
a breakthrough. Earlier generative AI models like Veo, which was
impressive in its own right, could generate stunning video sure,
but they weren't controllable in this dynamic real time way
we've been discussing. They just produced a linear preset video output.
Speaker 1 (12:24):
Right, you just watched it exactly.
Speaker 2 (12:26):
Genie three, by contrast, is fully controllable. This isn't just
like an incremental improvement adding a bit more polish. It's
a fundamental shift in capability that opens up a whole
new dimension of interaction. It's really the difference between watching
a movie and actually being in the movie, making your
own choices as you go.
Speaker 1 (12:44):
Okay, so, if I'm getting this right, it's not just
a fancy video player, it's acting more like a real
time dynamics simulator, almost like a physics engine being generated
on the fly. Am I on the right track there?
Or is there an even deeper technical layer we need
to because that's where it gets really interesting, right, the
tech behind it.
Speaker 2 (13:03):
You're absolutely on the right track and the core technical challenge.
The real sort of herculean task lies in what's known
as autoregressive generation, coupled with this unwavering commitment to consistency.
See when gen three generates each new frame of the environment,
it's not just looking at the frame right before it.
Simpler models might do.
Speaker 1 (13:21):
That, and that would lead to problems.
Speaker 2 (13:23):
Yeah, if it only did that, you'd quickly see visual inconsistencies, glitches,
things drifting away from a coherent reality over time. Instead,
the model has to consider the entire previously generated trajectory,
the full history of the world state, the user actions, which,
as you can imagine, grows enormously complex over time. Think
(13:46):
of it like a master chess player. They don't just
consider the last move. They have to consider the whole
history of the game to figure out the best next move.
Speaker 1 (13:54):
That makes sense. Or like that analogy they used about
a kid throwing a ball exactly to accurately predict where
that ball will be at any moment, the model needs
to know its entire path from when it was released,
its initial speed, angle, any skin, air resistance, all that stuff.
If it only looked at the last few moments, it
couldn't possibly predict the full realistic trajectory, it loses the
(14:15):
crucial context the physics applied earlier. It's like trying to
remember a complex hour long conversation. You can't just recall
the last sentence someone said and respond intelligently. You need
the whole context. And in a dynamic world, if I
the user decided to walk back to a spot I
was at a minute ago after exploring somewhere else, entirely
(14:36):
the model has to accurately remember everything about that spot
from a minute ago to make sure it's exactly as
it should be, reacting just like it did before.
Speaker 2 (14:45):
That's a huge memory challenge, Yeah, monumental, And that's exactly
where the computational burden comes in. For real time interactivity.
This incredibly complex calculation considering the entire history all user actions. Yeah,
it has to happen multiple times per second, dynamically responding
to new user inputs as they arrive. This is why
they say it's extremely computationally expensive at that think about it.
(15:07):
To maintain that perfect memory and real time responsiveness, Gene
three is doing like trillions of calculations every single second.
It's not just running a powerful game, it's basically recalculating
the universe's rules with every tiny user input, ensuring every pixel,
every shadow, every interaction is perfectly consistent with everything they
(15:28):
came before. Wow, that level of processing demand is just staggering.
It's a real testament to the engineering and algorithmic breakthroughs
maintaining that consistency, especially when you're moving fast through a
detailed environment like that hiking scene.
Speaker 1 (15:42):
Where you turn around, see the lake, turn back.
Speaker 2 (15:44):
Yeah, and everything has to be perfectly consistent. That is
a very, very difficult problem for traditional generative methods without
that deep contextual understanding, inaccuracies just pile up, leading to
glitches or the whole simulation breaking down.
Speaker 1 (15:57):
What's truly mind boggling about this is how they actually
achieve that consistency. It sounds almost impossible to program every
single interaction, every tiny detail, every physical reaction to line
up perfectly over long stretches of time and complex, unpredictable
user inputs. It almost feels like the AI is figuring
out how the world works rather than being told step by.
Speaker 2 (16:18):
Step, and that observation gets right to one of the
most remarkable aspects of GENI three. Its consistency is described
as an emergent capability emergent meaning meaning it's not something
explicitly pre programmed or hard coded into the model by engineers.
It's not like a giant list of if then rules
for every possible physical law or interaction. Instead, it just
(16:39):
sort of appears as a property of the model with
quote more training scaling up.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
So just by training it on massive amounts of data.
Speaker 2 (16:46):
Essentially, yes, as Google feeds the model truly vast amounts
of diverse data, maybe real world videos, maybe game engine physics, data,
animation sequences. Who knows exactly what scales up the computational training,
the model basically learns the underlying physics. It learns the
causal relationships, the very structure of the world on its own.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (17:07):
It figures out how things should behave, how they should react,
how they should stay consistent, rather than being explicitly told
how to do it. This is a really profound concept
in AI development. It's not just clever statistics. It's a
deeper form of learned intelligence, almost like intuition about how
reality works.
Speaker 1 (17:24):
So the AI is building its own internal mental model
of the world.
Speaker 2 (17:27):
That's a great way to put it.
Speaker 1 (17:29):
That's absolutely fascinating. So It's not like they're sitting down
and building a traditional three D game engine, you know,
with pre defined assets and physics rules they coded line
by line. This is something else, entirely more flexible, maybe
more profound.
Speaker 2 (17:41):
Precisely, Google draws a very clear contrast here between GENI
three and other really cutting edge tech like neuro radiance
fields and gassiensplatting. Now, those technologies are incredible at creating
highly consistent, controllable.
Speaker 1 (17:55):
Three D environments, right, We've talked about those.
Speaker 2 (17:58):
But they fundamentally rely on being given an explicit three
D representation. Think of it that like needing a pre
existing three D blueprint, maybe from scanning an object or
meticulously reconstructing a three D space. Okay, And while that's
super effective for static or predefined spaces, it inherently limits
dynamic interaction and spontaneous generation. By contrast, the world's Gene
(18:20):
three generates are described as far more dynamic and rich.
Why because they are created frame by frame based on
the world description and actions by the user, rather than
needing that fixed three D model beforehand.
Speaker 1 (18:31):
So it's making it up as it goes along based
on the rules it learned.
Speaker 2 (18:34):
In a way, Yes, It's essentially generating the world as
you explore it, which makes it inherently more adaptable, responsive,
and capable of truly novel scenarios. It's almost like the
world is being born around you in real time based
on your imagination and interaction.
Speaker 1 (18:51):
And just when you think you've kind of grasped the
scope of this, it gets even wilder. Imagine you're just
like casually walking down a street in this generated world
and you suddenly decide, hmm, I wish it were raining.
You don't need to exit, open a menu, find a
weather setting. You can just say it or maybe type
of simple command and the environment just responds.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
This is where the concept of prompt events comes in,
and yeah, it's a truly transformative feature for interactive content.
It means you can dynamically alter the scene in real
time using high level natural language.
Speaker 1 (19:23):
Commands like give me an example.
Speaker 2 (19:25):
Okay, so in one striking demo, someone's exploring this beautiful
scene along some canals. Then a prompt literally appears on
screen to add a man in a chicken suit. Yes,
and promptly, this guy in a chicken suit emerges from
the left side of the shot and just runs down
the path perfectly integrated into the scene.
Speaker 1 (19:43):
That's hilarious and amazing, right.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
Or you can prompt a man on a jet ski
to suddenly emerge from the water, or for something really
out there, conjure a crimson dragon to appear majestically in
the scene. Wow. And the model doesn't just PLoP these
objects down, It integrates them coherently into the existing environment.
It respects perspective, lighting, immediate physical interactions. It's like having
(20:07):
a director AI on call who can instantly change the
scene based on your whims.
Speaker 1 (20:13):
That pushes the boundaries of interactive storytelling and digital exploration
to a whole new level.
Speaker 2 (20:18):
Absolutely, this isn't just about controlling a character anymore. It's
about controlling the very fabric of the reality around you.
Speaker 1 (20:24):
Okay, So for anyone who's been sort of tracking the
rapid progress in AI, you might remember earlier versions like
Google's own Genie two, but the progress from Gen two
to GENI three is well, it's truly stunning. It's going
to utterly blow your mind when you see the comparison.
The advancements are so significant it genuinely feels like a
whole different generation of technology, not just a simple upgrade Oh.
Speaker 2 (20:46):
Indeed, let's do a quick side by side to really
grasp this monumental leap. If we look at a similar
scene from Geni two and in Gene three, the difference
in visual quality and detail is just immediately obvious. In
typical gen twos, for instance, something basic like buttons on
a sidewall might look blurry, indistinct, almost merged together, clearly
(21:07):
lower resolution, maybe even less than seven to.
Speaker 1 (21:08):
Twenty p right, kind of mushy looking exactly.
Speaker 2 (21:11):
Yeah, on the Geni three side, those exact same buttons.
They're individualized, distinct, rendered with sharp edges, much higher fidelity.
And this isn't just about pixel count. It's about the
model's ability to render fine details with much greater precision
and consistency. It makes the world feel far more tangible,
more believable.
Speaker 1 (21:28):
Yeah, that level of granular detail totally transforms the feeling
of immersion. It's a difference between looking at a world
and feeling like you could reach out and touch things
in it. But like you said earlier, it's not just visuals,
it's the very nature of the world's being created. I
remember with Genie two, if a character walked through a
door that was often kind of it, the end of
the generated sequence or.
Speaker 2 (21:49):
The generation might just stop.
Speaker 1 (21:50):
Yeah, the world beyond that door didn't really exist, or
if it did, it wasn't consistently generated or explorable. But
with Genie three, a character walks through that same door
and they say they're there's an entire world back here
waiting to be explored. You can keep navigating, discovering new areas,
interacting with the environment, and it maintains consistency for what
(22:11):
feels like, well, potentially an infinite expanse.
Speaker 2 (22:14):
It's a huge contextual shift from finite generated clips to
truly explorable, expansive, persistent digital spaces exactly.
Speaker 1 (22:23):
It's the difference between a pre recorded path and a
genuinely open world, and.
Speaker 2 (22:27):
That fundamental difference in persistence and expansiveness. It changes everything
for interactive experiences. Think about an RPG dungeon scenario comparing
the two Gene three consistently delivers not only higher visual quality,
but also much greater consistency over significantly longer generations and
far more realistic.
Speaker 1 (22:47):
Dynamics like what kind of dynamics well, For.
Speaker 2 (22:49):
Example, as a character jumps, the shadow underneath them expands
and contracts realistically, it stretches and shrinks as they move
through the air.
Speaker 1 (22:56):
Oh nice detail.
Speaker 2 (22:57):
And maybe even more impressively, the lighting across the walls
and floor responds dynamically to light sources in the scene.
It casts accurate shadows reflections that adjust in real time.
These are the kinds of subtle but critical physical details
that elevate a generated environment from just being a visual
display to a believable, explorable world where causality is maintained.
(23:18):
And that level of consistency, especially over long periods of
complex user interaction, is absolutely crucial for say, game developers
or filmmakers who need reliable, adaptable virtual assets that behave predictably.
Speaker 1 (23:31):
Reduces the need for tons of manual asset creation.
Speaker 2 (23:35):
I imagine immense amounts potentially.
Speaker 1 (23:37):
So Okay, Beyond the cool demos and the promise of
future video games, what does this all mean for the
bigger picture? Google makes this really strong claim, almost audacious
world models are a key stepping stone on the path
to AGI artificial general intelligence. This is not just marketing fluff, right, Yeah,
(23:57):
it sounds like a profound statement about where AI is heading.
What do they mean by that? Why is it so significant?
Speaker 2 (24:03):
Right? If we connect this to the bigger picture. Google
is essentially saying that Genie three and future even more
advanced world models like it provide what they call an
unlimited curriculum of rich simulation environments for AI agents to
train in.
Speaker 1 (24:18):
Unlimited curriculum. Okay, unpack that.
Speaker 2 (24:20):
So, Traditionally, training AI agents, especially for really complex stuff
like robotics, or navigating intricate, unpredictable environments, or even developing
advanced social intelligence, it requires massive amounts of real world
data or meticulously hand crafted simulated.
Speaker 1 (24:33):
Environments, which are both expensive and limiting.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
Exactly. Both are incredibly expensive, time consuming, and often limited
in scope of variety. But with a world model like
Gene three, you can dynamically generate an infinite variety of scenarios, challenges,
environments basically on demand. This gives AI agents what amounts
to an unlimited playground.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
An unlimited playground I like.
Speaker 2 (24:56):
That where they can interact, experiment, learn from mistakes, achieve successes,
and continuously improve themselves at a pace that's just unprecedented, unimaginable. Really,
it's the ultimate learning lab.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
That's a profoundly powerful idea and unlimited playground. It immediately
makes me think of the Alpha Go analogy we've talked
about before. The AI that mastered Go.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
Precisely, it draws a direct, compelling parallel to Alpha Go.
AlphaGo achieved that superhuman performance not by studying human games primarily,
but by essentially playing with itself. It generated millions upon
millions of games against itself, meticulously learning from each outcome,
refining strategies, discovering novel approaches no human had ever thought of.
Speaker 1 (25:38):
Right, taking humans out of the loop accelerated it massively.
Speaker 2 (25:41):
Exactly when we remove humans from the feedback loop in
AI training. When the AI can generate its own training
data and get immediate, precise feedback with an assimulated world,
the learning process becomes incredibly fast and scalable. The only
real constraint then becomes the amount of compute power you
can throw at it. If you can put an a
agent into a dynamically generated, physically consistent world where it
(26:03):
can experiment, fail safely learned without constant human supervision or
tedious data labeling, it can achieve a level of learning
that's just orders of magnitude faster and more comprehensive than
traditional methods.
Speaker 1 (26:15):
So this is the path to more general AI.
Speaker 2 (26:18):
It's seen as a fundamental path, Yeah, towards building truly robust, adaptive,
general purpose AI that can learn and function and diverse, complex,
unpredictable environments, mimicking or maybe even surpassing human adaptability. It's
potentially how AI could develop a kind of common sense
understanding of reality.
Speaker 1 (26:35):
Okay, so beyond the more conceptual, almost philosophical implications for AGI,
where does this tech hit the ground running? Where does
it directly impact our lives, our industries, maybe in the
near future. What are the practical, tangible applications we might see?
Speaker 2 (26:49):
Well, the applications are incredibly broad and via potentially transformative
across multiple sectors. First and foremost, Gene three clearly points
towards nothing less than the future of video games.
Speaker 1 (27:00):
Seems obvious.
Speaker 2 (27:01):
Yeah, imagine games where every environment is dynamically generated on
the fly, every interaction is physically accurate down to tiny details.
Storylines adapt and evolve in real time based on player
actions in ways we can barely imagine now. It could
lead to truly unique, procedurally generated gaming experiences that are
instantly replayable, totally responsive, no two play twos, ever, the same.
Speaker 1 (27:24):
Games that literally create themselves as you play Wow.
Speaker 2 (27:28):
Beyond gaming, its potential for movies and television shows is immense.
Creators could generate entire scenes, intricate backdrops, even complex characters
and their interactions basically on the fly, allowing for incredible
creative freedom, rapid prototyping, unparalleled efficiency and content production.
Speaker 1 (27:48):
A director could just say, give me a medieval castle
under siege by robotic dragons.
Speaker 2 (27:52):
And the AI generates a fully interactive, explorable scene in moments.
Speaker 1 (27:57):
I'm incredible, And.
Speaker 2 (27:58):
As we discussed, its utility and robotics in agent training
really can't be overstated. Providing these safe, scalable, endlessly varied
training grounds for AI agents to learn complex behaviors in
diverse virtual environments. That's a critical, maybe indispensable step towards
deploying intelligent robots and autonomous systems safely and effectively in
our unpredictable real world.
Speaker 1 (28:19):
Letting them make all their mistakes in the simulations so
they don't make them out here exactly.
Speaker 2 (28:23):
Let them crash the virtual car a million times before
they drive a real one.
Speaker 1 (28:27):
That's inspiring to think about the possibilities. But with all
this incredible potential, this groundbreaking capability, what are the current limitations?
What's still missing from the picture, at least for now, Well.
Speaker 2 (28:39):
For the time being, the most significant limitation for eager developers, creators,
even just curious folks like us, Yeah, is that GENI
three is currently only internal at Google.
Speaker 1 (28:51):
Ah right, no public access, no.
Speaker 2 (28:53):
Public release, no testing date mentioned, which is definitely a
bit of a tease given how incredible these demos look.
We only hope that changes relatively soon.
Speaker 1 (29:01):
Okay, what else?
Speaker 2 (29:02):
Another current limitation, at least in the demos we've seen
so far is the lack of sound generation.
Speaker 1 (29:07):
Ah yeah, they were silent, right.
Speaker 2 (29:09):
While the visuals and interactivity are stunning, profoundly immersive, the
environments themselves are quiet. However, it is worth noting that
the underlying V three models Google has developed are technically
capable of generating sound. Oh interesting, So it seems highly
probable that it's only a matter of time before sound
is generated in real time as a reaction to the
interaction within these environments, which would add yet another crucial
(29:33):
layer of sensory immersion in realism.
Speaker 1 (29:36):
Yeah, imagine hearing the Jeski's engine roar, the waves splashing,
the rustle of those flowers as the man walks through them.
All generated in perfect sync exactly.
Speaker 2 (29:45):
That would be the next big step for immersion hashtag
tag tag outro.
Speaker 1 (29:49):
So we've taken a really fascinating deep dive today into
Google's Genie three, a world model that feels like it
fundamentally shifts our understanding of generative AI. It doesn't just
show you a video. It genuinely invites you into a
truly interactive, dynamically consistent, and surprisingly detailed environment that responds
to your every command. The potential for training advanced AI agents,
(30:11):
for creating entirely new forms of entertainment and interact to storytelling,
and just for pushing the very boundaries of what's digitally possible.
It feels immense. It really is a breath taking leap
forward in AI's journey to where it is understanding and
simulating our reality.
Speaker 2 (30:24):
Yeah, and what's truly fascinating here, I think, beyond just
the immediate applications, is that we're witnessing the emergence of
truly adaptive, responsive digital realities. Yeah. These aren't built on rigid,
predesigned blueprints, right, They're built on a deep, almost emergent
understanding of physics, causality, the intricate dance of interaction within
a world. This technology really forces us to question our
(30:46):
basic assumptions about what's possible in virtual spaces, and how
profoundly an AI can understand and replicate the complex, nuanced
rules of our physical world without being explicitly told. How
it really hints at a future where reality, maybe in
a digital sense, could be conjured and explored almost on demand.
Speaker 1 (31:03):
So, given that incredible consistency, the real time interactivity, the dynamic,
almost organic nature of these generated worlds, what does this
mean for the very definition of reality when we're talking
about a digital context, And maybe more provocatively, if AI
agents are learning and improving at these unprecedented rates within
these unlimited playgrounds, mastering complex skills, understanding causality at a
(31:26):
superhuman pace, what new challenges and yeah, what new opportunities
will emerge for us, the users outside of them, as
these highly trained intelligences start to interact with and maybe
even shape our own world. It's a pretty mind betting
thought to end on
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.