December 7, 2025 • 12 mins
Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were not peripheral figures in Jeffrey Epstein’s world but central operators who helped build, maintain, and financially sustain his criminal enterprise. As Epstein’s longtime lawyer and accountant, they created and managed the complex web of trusts, shell companies, bank accounts, and legal entities that allowed money to move discreetly while obscuring its purpose. Lawsuits filed by survivors and the U.S. Virgin Islands government describe them as “indispensable captains” of the enterprise, alleging they facilitated payments to victims and recruiters, structured entities to shield assets, and continued working for Epstein even after his 2008 sex-crime conviction. Though they deny any knowledge of abuse, judges have allowed civil claims against them to proceed, ruling that allegations of aiding and abetting trafficking are legally plausible and worthy of full discovery.
After Epstein’s death in 2019, Indyke and Kahn were named co-executors of his estate, giving them control over key documents, assets, and settlement negotiations, including a $105 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands. Their continued gatekeeping role, combined with their status as beneficiaries of Epstein-linked trusts, has fueled criticism that the system has protected the very professionals accused of enabling his crimes. Despite being repeatedly named in court filings and investigative reports, they have largely avoided public scrutiny and congressional testimony. Critics argue that the failure to subpoena or question them under oath reflects a broader pattern of performative oversight, where political theater replaces substantive investigation into the financial and legal infrastructure that made Epstein’s long-running operation possible.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
After Epstein’s death in 2019, Indyke and Kahn were named co-executors of his estate, giving them control over key documents, assets, and settlement negotiations, including a $105 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands. Their continued gatekeeping role, combined with their status as beneficiaries of Epstein-linked trusts, has fueled criticism that the system has protected the very professionals accused of enabling his crimes. Despite being repeatedly named in court filings and investigative reports, they have largely avoided public scrutiny and congressional testimony. Critics argue that the failure to subpoena or question them under oath reflects a broader pattern of performative oversight, where political theater replaces substantive investigation into the financial and legal infrastructure that made Epstein’s long-running operation possible.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
Epstein Chronicles. Imagine, if you will, a crime so vast that,
even after the perpetrator is dead, the machinery keeps humming
along like nothing ever happened. And of course we all
argue about the headline villains, We yell at the most
obvious names, we fixate on faces everyone already recognizes. Meanwhile,
(00:21):
the architecture itself sits mostly untouched, politely labeled, technical, procedural,
or out of scope. At the heart of this story,
it's not about salacious details or recycled outrage. It's about
how power actually works when it wants to survive exposure.
It's about the difference between spectacle and accountability, and how
(00:43):
easily one is mistaken for the other. It's about why
some subpoenas generate cable news noise while others never seem
to get written at all. If you've ever wondered how
a criminal enterprise grows old, rich and insulated without tripping
every alarm in the system, this is where you need
to look, not at the chaos, but at the order,
not at the scandal, but at the structure. Because when
(01:05):
you follow the structure instead of slogans, the story changes
in ways that makes a lot of powerful people very
uncomfortable enter Darren Endyke and Richard Khan. Darren Endyke and
Richard Kahan were not side characters in Jeffrey Epstein's story.
They were structural beams holding the whole thing up. There
(01:26):
were the men who turned Epstein's appetites and ambitions into entities, accounts, trusts,
and contracts that can move quietly across borders and jurisdictions.
They sat at a nerve center where law, tax, and
finance intersected with a sprawling sex trafficking enterprise. Even as
they insist they never knew what was really going on.
(01:47):
Lawsuits from the US Virgin Islands and civil plaintiffs described
them as indispensable captains of that enterprise, not passive service providers.
For decades, they signed documents, wired money, created shell companies,
and positioned themselves as the institutional memory of Epstein's world.
After he died in twenty nineteen, they didn't fade into
(02:09):
the background. They inherited the keys as co executors of
his estate. They controlled assets, information, and the gatekeeping on
who sees what and who gets paid. That concentration of
power is exactly why keeping them out of the spotlight
has been so useful of people who want this to
stay a circus instead of an autopsy. Indyke's path into
(02:30):
Epstein's orbit runs through the world of elite law practice,
corporate structuring, and tax planning. He wasn't just Epstein's lawyer
in the casual sense. He was the in house architect
of entities, contracts, and legal strategies that made the machine run.
Core filings and investigative reporting show informing companies, drafting trust instruments,
(02:52):
and handling the paperwork for aircraft, properties and charities tied
to Epstein's network. When Epstein needed a vehicle to move
money to some new project or property in Dyke was
typically there on paper as the organizer or attorney of record.
His name appears across corporate registries in New York, the
Virgin Islands and beyond, next to entities that later show
(03:14):
up in trafficking lawsuits. He wasn't a visiting consultant who
dropped by once a year. He was embedded. By the
time the public even knew Epstein's name, Indyke had already
spent years inside the engine room Richard Kahn, meanwhile, brought
the accounting piece to the table and helped build the
financial scaffolding that kept Epstein's operation liquid and obscure. Lawsuits
(03:37):
describe him as the person who helped create a complex
financial infrastructure that could process large volumes of payments while
disguising their nature and beneficiaries. That meant layering bank accounts,
using different entities for payroll, rent, and consulting fees, and
routing money through corporate shells that look perfectly boring on paper.
(03:58):
When victims or recruiters were paid, the money often came
from apparently legitimate companies or nonprofits that Conn and Indyke
helped manage. To a casual bank examiner, they could look
like salaries, grants, or professional services. To the women who
lived it. It was the lifeblood of a trafficking network.
CON's roll was not glamorous, but it was absolutely essential.
(04:21):
The US Virgin Islands Attorney General amended complaint in twenty
twenty one crystallized the theory that had been swirling for years.
It didn't just sue the Epstein estate as a faceless
pot of money. It added Indike and Con personally and
labeled them indispensable captains of the Epstein enterprise. According to
that lawsuit, they facilitated payments to victims and recruiters, processed
(04:45):
reimbursements for travel and housing, and helped arrange sham marriages
to secure immigration status for women in Epstein's orbit. The
allegation wasn't that they glanced at this once in a while,
it was that they operationalized it. They all edgedly filed
financial statements that they knew or should have known, were
false in order to conceal the real nature of Epstein's activities.
(05:08):
The picture painted is of professionals who are not surprised
by the allegations in two thousand and eight or twenty
nineteen because they had been quietly managing the risk for
years now. They deny all of this, but the complaint
marks a turning point in how the system talks about them.
The case eventually produced a headline grabbing settlement in twenty
(05:29):
twenty two, when the Virgin Islands announced more than one
hundred and five million dollars from the estate, plus additional
land and profits from Epstein related businesses. The settlement documents
tie the estate, the co executors, and web of Epstein
entities together as part of a single law enforcement action
against a criminal enterprise based in the territory. The official
(05:51):
language draws a line from the little island of Little
Saint James to the professionals who helped Epstein run everything there.
It does not cant in Dyker Khan of crimes, but
it confirms that the territory's top law enforcement agency saw
them as more than neutral functionaries. They were litigated as
co defendants, not just as administrators struggling heroically to clean
(06:14):
up a mess someone else made. That's an important distinction
when we talk about accountability versus optics, And on a
parallel track, individual survivors have gone after them in federal court,
arguing that aiding and abetting liability reaches the professional enablers.
In twenty twenty four, a detailed lawsuit filed by Danielle
(06:35):
Benski and Jange Do three laid out a sprawling narrative
of what Endyke and Khan allegedly did over many years.
The complaint describes them as knowing about Epstein's prior conviction,
the avalanche of civil suits, and the NonStop media coverage,
yet continuing to process payments, manage entities and keep the
operational float. It dives into how they allegedly help move
(06:59):
money through the nineteen fifty three trust and other vehicles
in a way that keep assets accessible to Epstein while
insulating them from scrutiny. For the first time, the people
in the background were put at the center of the story.
A federal judge in New York refused to let them
simply walk away from that kind of scrutiny. In August
of twenty twenty four, the court denied key motions to
(07:21):
dismiss and ruled that victims could pursue claims that the
lawyer and accountant aided and abetted Epstein's trafficking. The judge
did not rule that they are liable, but said the allegations,
if proven, would fit within existing legal theories of complicity.
That matters for more than symbolism. It opens discovery into emails,
(07:42):
internal memos, and banking records that might otherwise stay buried.
It also sends the message that we just did the
books is no longer an automatic shield when the books
look like a crime scene. Their attorneys, for their part,
continue to issue flat denials and insists they had no
knowledge of any of the abuse. The litigation is where
(08:03):
those competing stories will finally be stress tested. Beyond the
core complaints. Investigative journalism has helped map the contours of
their involvement. A recent deep dive in The Wall Street
Journal describes how, starting in the late nineties and early
two thousands, and Dike and Khan gradually became the custodians
of Epstein's fortune and secrets. They handled the day to
(08:26):
day details, arranging cash withdrawals, wiring money at the hotels
and apartments, processing modeling or consulting payments that plaintiffs say
were really compensation for exploitation. The reporting describes entities that
owned aircraft islands, Manhattan mansions, and charitable foundations, with their
signatures appearing again and again. It also notes that they
(08:49):
received millions in fees, loans, and other benefits across the years,
making them not just employees but beneficiaries. The dual role
of architect and inheritor is what makes are positioned so
unusual and so consequential. Critically, they're not accused of participating
in the sexual abuse itself, and no prosecutor has charged
(09:10):
them with crimes. The US Virgin Island's complaint in the
civil suits are careful about that line, focusing on financial
and administrative conduct, not physical acts. Their lawyers have seized
on the gap to argue that they are being scapegoaded
for the sins of a dead man. They say they
handled legitimate legal and accounting work, but they relied on
(09:31):
what Epstein told them, and that they were as shocked
as anyone by the full scope of his behavior. That's
their story, and in the absence of criminal indictments, it
carries some weight in public debate. But the paper trail
emerging from court filings suggests the line between legitimate and
enabling was blurden ways that need answers under oath. The
(09:53):
absence the charges is not the same thing as the
absence of questions. To understand how central they were, you
have to look at the entities that sat beneath the headlines.
Epstein's world was a maze of LLC's trusts and foundations,
each with its own bank account and official purpose. Indict
typically handled the legal creation and maintenance of those vehicles,
(10:16):
drafting formation documents, and serving as the point of contact
with state authorities. Can't handle the accounting, reconciling statements, booking expenses,
and assuring banks and auditors that everything made sense. Together,
they gave the structure of veneer of legitimacy that is
extremely hard to pierce after the fact. When victims say
(10:37):
that money arrived from some company I didn't recognize, it
was often one of those shills. That distance between the
abuser and the payment was not an accident. It was
part of the infrastructure. The US Virgin Islands Complant goes
further and alleges that the co executors helped the stage
sham marriages for women in Epstein's circle. According to the suit,
(10:59):
these marriages were designed to secure immigration status and keep
victims under Epstein's control while maintaining a facade of consensual relationships.
Facilitating that kind of transaction is not standard corporate work.
It sits squarely at the intersection of legal paperwork and
human exploitation. The allegation is that they did not simply
(11:20):
watch this happen, but process the payments, housing, and documentation
that made it possible. Again, they deny knowledge of any wrongdoing,
but the complaint places their fingerprints on key decisions. If proven,
it would show them as active participants in the logistical
side of trafficking, even without a criminal case. That's a
(11:41):
devastating portrait of professional ethics. Then, of course, there's the
issue of cash. Epstein's operation depended heavily on untraceable money
for tips, massage payments, and spur of the moment travel,
and someone had to make sure the cash kept flowing.
Reports and core filings say that KHN and Indyke arrange
repeated bank withdrawals in structured amounts that attracted little attention
(12:05):
but added up over time. Those withdrawals were often tied
to entities and accounts that looked benign, like charitable foundations
or investment vehicles. The result was a steady cash pipeline that,
according to survivors, financed everything from plane tickets to hotel rooms.
Banks that saw regular withdrawals could chalk it up to
(12:26):
client entertainment or normal high net worth spending, particularly when
the paperwork came from an own lawyer and accountant. And
that is how you hide at a trafficking ring and
plain sight. All right, folks, that's going to do it
for episode one. In the next episode, we're going to
pick up where we left off. All of the information
that goes with this episode can be found in the
(12:48):
description box.
What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
Epstein Chronicles. Imagine, if you will, a crime so vast that,
even after the perpetrator is dead, the machinery keeps humming
along like nothing ever happened. And of course we all
argue about the headline villains, We yell at the most
obvious names, we fixate on faces everyone already recognizes. Meanwhile,
(00:21):
the architecture itself sits mostly untouched, politely labeled, technical, procedural,
or out of scope. At the heart of this story,
it's not about salacious details or recycled outrage. It's about
how power actually works when it wants to survive exposure.
It's about the difference between spectacle and accountability, and how
(00:43):
easily one is mistaken for the other. It's about why
some subpoenas generate cable news noise while others never seem
to get written at all. If you've ever wondered how
a criminal enterprise grows old, rich and insulated without tripping
every alarm in the system, this is where you need
to look, not at the chaos, but at the order,
not at the scandal, but at the structure. Because when
(01:05):
you follow the structure instead of slogans, the story changes
in ways that makes a lot of powerful people very
uncomfortable enter Darren Endyke and Richard Khan. Darren Endyke and
Richard Kahan were not side characters in Jeffrey Epstein's story.
They were structural beams holding the whole thing up. There
(01:26):
were the men who turned Epstein's appetites and ambitions into entities, accounts, trusts,
and contracts that can move quietly across borders and jurisdictions.
They sat at a nerve center where law, tax, and
finance intersected with a sprawling sex trafficking enterprise. Even as
they insist they never knew what was really going on.
(01:47):
Lawsuits from the US Virgin Islands and civil plaintiffs described
them as indispensable captains of that enterprise, not passive service providers.
For decades, they signed documents, wired money, created shell companies,
and positioned themselves as the institutional memory of Epstein's world.
After he died in twenty nineteen, they didn't fade into
(02:09):
the background. They inherited the keys as co executors of
his estate. They controlled assets, information, and the gatekeeping on
who sees what and who gets paid. That concentration of
power is exactly why keeping them out of the spotlight
has been so useful of people who want this to
stay a circus instead of an autopsy. Indyke's path into
(02:30):
Epstein's orbit runs through the world of elite law practice,
corporate structuring, and tax planning. He wasn't just Epstein's lawyer
in the casual sense. He was the in house architect
of entities, contracts, and legal strategies that made the machine run.
Core filings and investigative reporting show informing companies, drafting trust instruments,
(02:52):
and handling the paperwork for aircraft, properties and charities tied
to Epstein's network. When Epstein needed a vehicle to move
money to some new project or property in Dyke was
typically there on paper as the organizer or attorney of record.
His name appears across corporate registries in New York, the
Virgin Islands and beyond, next to entities that later show
(03:14):
up in trafficking lawsuits. He wasn't a visiting consultant who
dropped by once a year. He was embedded. By the
time the public even knew Epstein's name, Indyke had already
spent years inside the engine room Richard Kahn, meanwhile, brought
the accounting piece to the table and helped build the
financial scaffolding that kept Epstein's operation liquid and obscure. Lawsuits
(03:37):
describe him as the person who helped create a complex
financial infrastructure that could process large volumes of payments while
disguising their nature and beneficiaries. That meant layering bank accounts,
using different entities for payroll, rent, and consulting fees, and
routing money through corporate shells that look perfectly boring on paper.
(03:58):
When victims or recruiters were paid, the money often came
from apparently legitimate companies or nonprofits that Conn and Indyke
helped manage. To a casual bank examiner, they could look
like salaries, grants, or professional services. To the women who
lived it. It was the lifeblood of a trafficking network.
CON's roll was not glamorous, but it was absolutely essential.
(04:21):
The US Virgin Islands Attorney General amended complaint in twenty
twenty one crystallized the theory that had been swirling for years.
It didn't just sue the Epstein estate as a faceless
pot of money. It added Indike and Con personally and
labeled them indispensable captains of the Epstein enterprise. According to
that lawsuit, they facilitated payments to victims and recruiters, processed
(04:45):
reimbursements for travel and housing, and helped arrange sham marriages
to secure immigration status for women in Epstein's orbit. The
allegation wasn't that they glanced at this once in a while,
it was that they operationalized it. They all edgedly filed
financial statements that they knew or should have known, were
false in order to conceal the real nature of Epstein's activities.
(05:08):
The picture painted is of professionals who are not surprised
by the allegations in two thousand and eight or twenty
nineteen because they had been quietly managing the risk for
years now. They deny all of this, but the complaint
marks a turning point in how the system talks about them.
The case eventually produced a headline grabbing settlement in twenty
(05:29):
twenty two, when the Virgin Islands announced more than one
hundred and five million dollars from the estate, plus additional
land and profits from Epstein related businesses. The settlement documents
tie the estate, the co executors, and web of Epstein
entities together as part of a single law enforcement action
against a criminal enterprise based in the territory. The official
(05:51):
language draws a line from the little island of Little
Saint James to the professionals who helped Epstein run everything there.
It does not cant in Dyker Khan of crimes, but
it confirms that the territory's top law enforcement agency saw
them as more than neutral functionaries. They were litigated as
co defendants, not just as administrators struggling heroically to clean
(06:14):
up a mess someone else made. That's an important distinction
when we talk about accountability versus optics, And on a
parallel track, individual survivors have gone after them in federal court,
arguing that aiding and abetting liability reaches the professional enablers.
In twenty twenty four, a detailed lawsuit filed by Danielle
(06:35):
Benski and Jange Do three laid out a sprawling narrative
of what Endyke and Khan allegedly did over many years.
The complaint describes them as knowing about Epstein's prior conviction,
the avalanche of civil suits, and the NonStop media coverage,
yet continuing to process payments, manage entities and keep the
operational float. It dives into how they allegedly help move
(06:59):
money through the nineteen fifty three trust and other vehicles
in a way that keep assets accessible to Epstein while
insulating them from scrutiny. For the first time, the people
in the background were put at the center of the story.
A federal judge in New York refused to let them
simply walk away from that kind of scrutiny. In August
of twenty twenty four, the court denied key motions to
(07:21):
dismiss and ruled that victims could pursue claims that the
lawyer and accountant aided and abetted Epstein's trafficking. The judge
did not rule that they are liable, but said the allegations,
if proven, would fit within existing legal theories of complicity.
That matters for more than symbolism. It opens discovery into emails,
(07:42):
internal memos, and banking records that might otherwise stay buried.
It also sends the message that we just did the
books is no longer an automatic shield when the books
look like a crime scene. Their attorneys, for their part,
continue to issue flat denials and insists they had no
knowledge of any of the abuse. The litigation is where
(08:03):
those competing stories will finally be stress tested. Beyond the
core complaints. Investigative journalism has helped map the contours of
their involvement. A recent deep dive in The Wall Street
Journal describes how, starting in the late nineties and early
two thousands, and Dike and Khan gradually became the custodians
of Epstein's fortune and secrets. They handled the day to
(08:26):
day details, arranging cash withdrawals, wiring money at the hotels
and apartments, processing modeling or consulting payments that plaintiffs say
were really compensation for exploitation. The reporting describes entities that
owned aircraft islands, Manhattan mansions, and charitable foundations, with their
signatures appearing again and again. It also notes that they
(08:49):
received millions in fees, loans, and other benefits across the years,
making them not just employees but beneficiaries. The dual role
of architect and inheritor is what makes are positioned so
unusual and so consequential. Critically, they're not accused of participating
in the sexual abuse itself, and no prosecutor has charged
(09:10):
them with crimes. The US Virgin Island's complaint in the
civil suits are careful about that line, focusing on financial
and administrative conduct, not physical acts. Their lawyers have seized
on the gap to argue that they are being scapegoaded
for the sins of a dead man. They say they
handled legitimate legal and accounting work, but they relied on
(09:31):
what Epstein told them, and that they were as shocked
as anyone by the full scope of his behavior. That's
their story, and in the absence of criminal indictments, it
carries some weight in public debate. But the paper trail
emerging from court filings suggests the line between legitimate and
enabling was blurden ways that need answers under oath. The
(09:53):
absence the charges is not the same thing as the
absence of questions. To understand how central they were, you
have to look at the entities that sat beneath the headlines.
Epstein's world was a maze of LLC's trusts and foundations,
each with its own bank account and official purpose. Indict
typically handled the legal creation and maintenance of those vehicles,
(10:16):
drafting formation documents, and serving as the point of contact
with state authorities. Can't handle the accounting, reconciling statements, booking expenses,
and assuring banks and auditors that everything made sense. Together,
they gave the structure of veneer of legitimacy that is
extremely hard to pierce after the fact. When victims say
(10:37):
that money arrived from some company I didn't recognize, it
was often one of those shills. That distance between the
abuser and the payment was not an accident. It was
part of the infrastructure. The US Virgin Islands Complant goes
further and alleges that the co executors helped the stage
sham marriages for women in Epstein's circle. According to the suit,
(10:59):
these marriages were designed to secure immigration status and keep
victims under Epstein's control while maintaining a facade of consensual relationships.
Facilitating that kind of transaction is not standard corporate work.
It sits squarely at the intersection of legal paperwork and
human exploitation. The allegation is that they did not simply
(11:20):
watch this happen, but process the payments, housing, and documentation
that made it possible. Again, they deny knowledge of any wrongdoing,
but the complaint places their fingerprints on key decisions. If proven,
it would show them as active participants in the logistical
side of trafficking, even without a criminal case. That's a
(11:41):
devastating portrait of professional ethics. Then, of course, there's the
issue of cash. Epstein's operation depended heavily on untraceable money
for tips, massage payments, and spur of the moment travel,
and someone had to make sure the cash kept flowing.
Reports and core filings say that KHN and Indyke arrange
repeated bank withdrawals in structured amounts that attracted little attention
(12:05):
but added up over time. Those withdrawals were often tied
to entities and accounts that looked benign, like charitable foundations
or investment vehicles. The result was a steady cash pipeline that,
according to survivors, financed everything from plane tickets to hotel rooms.
Banks that saw regular withdrawals could chalk it up to
(12:26):
client entertainment or normal high net worth spending, particularly when
the paperwork came from an own lawyer and accountant. And
that is how you hide at a trafficking ring and
plain sight. All right, folks, that's going to do it
for episode one. In the next episode, we're going to
pick up where we left off. All of the information
that goes with this episode can be found in the
(12:48):
description box.
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.