December 30, 2025 • 14 mins
The missing 82-page federal charging document represents the single most consequential suppressed record in the Jeffrey Epstein case. Prepared by federal prosecutors in 2007, it reportedly laid out a sweeping case involving interstate sex trafficking, recruitment networks, and co-conspirator conduct that could have ended Epstein’s abuse years earlier. Instead, the Department of Justice abandoned the federal prosecution without a transparent explanation and replaced it with a narrowly constructed state plea deal that insulated Epstein and foreclosed broader accountability. Survivors and their attorneys have long argued that this was not a matter of weak evidence or prosecutorial caution, but a deliberate decision to contain exposure and protect institutional interests rather than pursue justice.
The DOJ’s continued refusal to release the charging document has become a central symbol of institutional self-protection overriding accountability. Despite Epstein’s death and repeated demands from victims invoking their rights under federal law, the department has declined to even formally acknowledge the document, signaling deep concern about what its contents would reveal. Critics argue that full disclosure is now essential to restoring credibility, as the suppression of the document not only obscured how close Epstein came to federal prosecution but also set a dangerous precedent that reputation management can supersede the rule of law. Without releasing the full record behind the Non-Prosecution Agreement—including the abandoned charging document—claims of transparency and reform remain hollow.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The DOJ’s continued refusal to release the charging document has become a central symbol of institutional self-protection overriding accountability. Despite Epstein’s death and repeated demands from victims invoking their rights under federal law, the department has declined to even formally acknowledge the document, signaling deep concern about what its contents would reveal. Critics argue that full disclosure is now essential to restoring credibility, as the suppression of the document not only obscured how close Epstein came to federal prosecution but also set a dangerous precedent that reputation management can supersede the rule of law. Without releasing the full record behind the Non-Prosecution Agreement—including the abandoned charging document—claims of transparency and reform remain hollow.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
Epstein Chronicles. The most consequential missing artifact so far in
the entire Jeffrey Epstein saga is not a photograph, a
flight log, or a deposition transcript, but the buried eighty
two page federal charging document that was prepared and then
deliberately discarded. This document was not speculative incomplete the way
(00:25):
the DOJ later pretended. It was a fully developed charging
instrument laying out a sweeping federal case that would have
ended Epstein's operation in two thousand and seven. Instead, it
was shelved without transparency and replaced with a state level
farce engineered to fill, and that decision a loan, reshaped
the next decade of abuse. The fact that the DOJ
(00:47):
still refuses to release it tells us everything about its contents.
As you all know, institutions led by Donald Trump don't
hide documents that vindicate them. And when people ask how
Epstein was allowed to continue trafficking girls after two thousand
and seven, the answer begins and ends with that charging document.
Federal prosecutors had jurisdiction, evidence, cooperating witnesses, and statutory authority
(01:12):
to proceed The documents were reportedly laid out patterns of recruitment,
interstate trafficking, payments, co conspirator facilitation, and obstruction. It wasn't narrow,
and it wasn't weak. It was dangerous to Ebstein and
anyone tied to them, and that danger is precisely why
it disappeared. The public was never supposed to know how
(01:34):
close the government came to dismantling the entire operation, and
instead of the federal accountability that we should have seen,
the DOJ opted for a grotesquely narrow state plea deal
that functioned as legal camouflage. The shift was not about
evidentiary weakness or legal prudence, despite what officials later claimed,
It was about containment. The state charges were designed to
(01:56):
isolate Epstein as a loan offender while shielding the broader
network from scrutiny. This move effectively amputated the conspiracy elements
that federal law would have required prosecutors to pursue. It
was not prosecutorial discretion, it was prosecutorial sabotage. Of course,
the official narrative has always relied on the same tired refrain,
(02:20):
limited evidence, reluctant witnesses, and strategic compromise. Survivors and their
attorneys have repeatedly dismantled those claims in public filings, sworn statements,
and interviews. The record shows cooperation, corroboration, and a pattern
of abuse that span years and jurisdictions. The federal government
(02:41):
did not lack evidence. It lacked institutional courage. Worse, it
lacked the will to confront the colateral damage exposure would
have caused. As I've told you, folks for a very
long time, if you want to understand the truth of Epstein,
you listen to the people who had the most to
lose by telling it. Survivors have been unwavering in their accounts,
(03:02):
despite intimidation, disbelief, and retaliation. Their lawyers have spent years
fighting not just Epstein's estate or associates, but the federal
government itself. They've requested this charging document through formal legal channels,
public appeals, and congressional pressure. Each time. The DOJ Stonwald
silence in this context is an admission, and that's because
(03:25):
the DOJ understands that it releasing it would expose the
mechanics of how Epstein operated with institutional blind spots working
in his favor. It would also force an accounting of
who knew what, when they knew it, and why nothing
was done. That is the nightmare scenario for an agency
obsessed with reputation management. Accountability threatens institution more than Epstein
(03:49):
ever did, and that calculus is becoming the real scandal.
The non prosecution agreement was not merely flawed. It was
structurally corrupt. It violated the Crime Victim's Rights Act by design,
not by accident. Survivors were deliberately excluded from the process
because their participation would have made the deal impossible. The
(04:10):
secrecy was not incidental. That shit was essential, and the
DOJ did not fail to notify victims. It chose not to,
and in my opinion, that distinction matters legally and morally.
Every subsequent DOJ explanation has been an exercise and narrative laundering.
Officials have admitted mistakes while carefully avoiding the word decision.
(04:32):
They framed the outcomes as unfortunate rather than engineered. This
rhetorical sleight of hand allows the institutions to express regret
without accepting culpability. But mistakes are accidental. This was deliberate.
The charging document was buried on purpose. The federal case
was abandoned on purpose. Look, we all know that institutional
(04:56):
self protection has always been the DOJ's primary motivator. In
this case, exposure would have triggered cascading consequences across agencies, offices,
and political administrations. The Department understood that prosecuting Epstein federally
would mean answering uncomfortable questions about prior intelligence, prior complaints,
(05:17):
and prior in action. That risk was deemed unacceptable, so
the case was strangled quietly, Epstein walked, and the DOJ
preserved its facade. What makes the situation worse is that
the DOJ knows it made the wrong choice. Internal acknowledgments,
post hoc apologies, and carefully worded statements confirmed that awareness.
(05:39):
Yet awareness without action is meaningless. The Department has had
years to course correct and has refused every opportunity. Each
refusal compounds the original wrongdoing. And the reason they want
you to move on is because time has not healed
this wound, it has infected it, and they continued withholding
of the charging document is now indefensible on any legal
(06:02):
or ethical ground. Epstein is dead, the case is closed,
and the public interest is overwhelming. Claims of prosecutorial sensitivity
no longer apply. What remains is fear, fear of institutional exposure.
But that fear is not a valid basis for secrecy
in a functioning society. As you all know, and as
(06:23):
I've said time and time again, transparency delayed becomes transparency denied.
So releasing the document would not be an act of charity.
It would be an act of obligation the doj OH
survivors the truth about how close justice came and why
it was denied. It owes the public of factual record,
unfiltered by institutional spin, and it owes itself a chance,
(06:47):
however small, to begin rebuilding trust without disclosure. Reform is performative.
Accountability cannot exist in darkness, and I think that it's
important to point out that the charging document is not
about the past. It's about precedent allowing its oppression signals
to future prosecutors that reputation outweighs justice. It teaches institutions
(07:11):
at burying evidence is survivable if done quietly enough. That
lesson corrodes the rule of law far beyond the Epstein case.
And that's why I think the document matters so deeply.
It's a test case for whether accountability has any meaning
left now. The DOJ often speaks about restoring faith in institutions,
yet refuses the one action that would actually advance that goal.
(07:34):
Faith is not restored through press conferences or internal reviews.
It's restored through truth, even when that truth is humiliating.
Taking responsibility does not weaken institutions, it legitimizes them. The
DOJ's refusal suggests it understands this and fears the outcome anyway.
Survivors have been forced to carry the burden of institutional
(07:56):
failure for nearly two decades. They've watched their abuse us
or received protections they were denied. They have watched officials
of aid scrutiny while preaching accountability. This asymmetry is not accidental.
That shits structural. The charging document represents the moment when
that structure could have collapsed. That's why it remains hidden now.
(08:18):
I've also heard some people argue that releasing the document
would reopen wounds. That argument is cynical and false. Wounds
do not heal when they're infected, they heal when cleaned.
Truth is not re traumatization or rasure is. Survivors are
not asking for vengeance. They're asking for acknowledgment. The DOJ
has denied them, even that this refusal is itself a
(08:42):
continuation of harm, and in my opinion, there is no
path forward that does not begin with full disclosure of
the MPa record. Partial transparency is not transparency. Redacted summaries
are not accountability. The public must see what federal prosecutors
were prepared to do and why they stopped. Anything less
(09:02):
is institutional gaslighting. If the Department truly believes in justice,
it must confront this head on, and that means admitting
the charging document existed, admitting why it was buried, and
releasing it in full. No euphemisms, no hedging, no scapegoats.
Accountability starts with ownership. Every day the DOJ delays, it
(09:24):
confirms the worst suspicions about its priorities. And this is
not just about punishing individuals. It's about exposing systems. Epstein
exploited girls, but institutions enabled them. The charging document would
show how close the system came to stopping them and
how deliberately it chose not to, and that knowledge belongs
to you, the public. Our republic can't function on selective memory.
(09:50):
Truth withheld is power abused. So the real road to
accountability is neither abstract nor complicated. It begins with the
release of the eighty two page federal charging document and
the full non prosecution agreement record. Everything else is noise.
The DOJ can continue to hide the decay, or it
(10:11):
can take the first painful step toward credibility. There's no
middle ground left. Transparency is not optional anymore. It's the
price of legitimacy. And to close this episode out, here's
an open letter to the DOJ, to the leadership, the attorneys,
the career officials, and the institutional conscience of the Department
(10:32):
of Justice. This letter is written without pleasantries because pleasantries
are not earned here. For over two decades, your department
is hidden behind procedure, euphemism, and silence, while the consequences
of your decisions have played out in real time on
the bodies and lives of survivors. You know exactly which
(10:52):
decision this letter addresses, You know exactly which document this
letter demands, and you know exactly why you have refure
used to release it. The eighty two page federal charging
document prepared against Jeffrey Epstein was not abandoned because it
was weak. It was abandoned because it was strong. It
was not discarded because it lacked evidence, but because it
contained too much of it, too much connective tissue to
(11:16):
many co conspiratal threads, too clear a picture of how
Epstein's operation functioned with institutional blind spots working in his favor.
That document represented a moment where justice was not only
possible but emminent, and you chose to walk away from it.
You replaced a sweeping federal case with a state level
(11:36):
plea deal so narrow it functioned as insulation, not prosecution.
You did not merely fail to protect victims. You actively
structured an outcome that excluded them, silenced them, and violated
their statutory rights. The non prosecution agreement was not a mistake.
It was a mechanism, and mechanisms have authors for year.
(11:59):
Survivors and their attorneys have asked you for one thing
above all others. The truth. Not your summaries, not your
internal reviews, not your carefully scrubbed explanations after the fact.
They asked for the document that shows what you knew,
when you knew it, and what you were prepared to
do before you chose not to do it. You have
(12:20):
refused them every time, you have not even had the
decency to acknowledge the request as legitimate. Your department has
shown far more urgency in protecting itself than in protecting victims.
You have admitted errors while refusing to name decisions. You
have expressed regret while avoiding responsibility. You have spoken about
(12:41):
transparency while practicing concealment. And I hate to break the
news to you, but that's not accountability. It's narrative management,
and it's failed. Confidence has already been destroyed by your
refusal to tell the truth. What remains now is distrust
layered with contempt. Institutions do not rebuild credibility by hiding
their worst moments. They rebuild it by confronting them. You
(13:04):
have done everything except that. There is no legal justification
left for withholding the document. Epstein's dead, the prosecution's over
the public interest is overwhelming. Congress passed the law. Claims
of prosecutorial sensitivity no longer apply if they ever did.
What remains is fear. Fear of exposure, fear of institutional embarrassment,
(13:27):
fear of consequences. None of those are valid reasons for
secrecy in a system that claims to operate under the
rule of law. You often speak about restoring faith and institutions.
Here's your opportunity. Release the eighty two page charging document
in full, Release the complete record of the non prosecution agreement.
Stop forcing survivors to beg for scraps of the truth
(13:50):
while the government that failed them hides behind closed doors.
The road to accountability does not begin with statements. It
begins with documents. You don't get to invoke justice while
burying evidence of its denial. You don't get to claim
reform while concealing the blueprint of your failure. And you
don't get to ask for public trust while you refuse
(14:11):
to trust the public with the truth. This is no
longer just about Jeffrey Epstein. It's about whether the Department
of Justice is willing to accept responsibility for what it did,
what it allowed, and what it hid. History is already
keeping score. The only question left is whether you will
tell the truth now or be remembered as the institution
(14:33):
that shows silence over accountability, even when it had one
last chance to do the right thing. Signed Everybody. All
of the information that goes with this episode can be
found in the description box.
What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
Epstein Chronicles. The most consequential missing artifact so far in
the entire Jeffrey Epstein saga is not a photograph, a
flight log, or a deposition transcript, but the buried eighty
two page federal charging document that was prepared and then
deliberately discarded. This document was not speculative incomplete the way
(00:25):
the DOJ later pretended. It was a fully developed charging
instrument laying out a sweeping federal case that would have
ended Epstein's operation in two thousand and seven. Instead, it
was shelved without transparency and replaced with a state level
farce engineered to fill, and that decision a loan, reshaped
the next decade of abuse. The fact that the DOJ
(00:47):
still refuses to release it tells us everything about its contents.
As you all know, institutions led by Donald Trump don't
hide documents that vindicate them. And when people ask how
Epstein was allowed to continue trafficking girls after two thousand
and seven, the answer begins and ends with that charging document.
Federal prosecutors had jurisdiction, evidence, cooperating witnesses, and statutory authority
(01:12):
to proceed The documents were reportedly laid out patterns of recruitment,
interstate trafficking, payments, co conspirator facilitation, and obstruction. It wasn't narrow,
and it wasn't weak. It was dangerous to Ebstein and
anyone tied to them, and that danger is precisely why
it disappeared. The public was never supposed to know how
(01:34):
close the government came to dismantling the entire operation, and
instead of the federal accountability that we should have seen,
the DOJ opted for a grotesquely narrow state plea deal
that functioned as legal camouflage. The shift was not about
evidentiary weakness or legal prudence, despite what officials later claimed,
It was about containment. The state charges were designed to
(01:56):
isolate Epstein as a loan offender while shielding the broader
network from scrutiny. This move effectively amputated the conspiracy elements
that federal law would have required prosecutors to pursue. It
was not prosecutorial discretion, it was prosecutorial sabotage. Of course,
the official narrative has always relied on the same tired refrain,
(02:20):
limited evidence, reluctant witnesses, and strategic compromise. Survivors and their
attorneys have repeatedly dismantled those claims in public filings, sworn statements,
and interviews. The record shows cooperation, corroboration, and a pattern
of abuse that span years and jurisdictions. The federal government
(02:41):
did not lack evidence. It lacked institutional courage. Worse, it
lacked the will to confront the colateral damage exposure would
have caused. As I've told you, folks for a very
long time, if you want to understand the truth of Epstein,
you listen to the people who had the most to
lose by telling it. Survivors have been unwavering in their accounts,
(03:02):
despite intimidation, disbelief, and retaliation. Their lawyers have spent years
fighting not just Epstein's estate or associates, but the federal
government itself. They've requested this charging document through formal legal channels,
public appeals, and congressional pressure. Each time. The DOJ Stonwald
silence in this context is an admission, and that's because
(03:25):
the DOJ understands that it releasing it would expose the
mechanics of how Epstein operated with institutional blind spots working
in his favor. It would also force an accounting of
who knew what, when they knew it, and why nothing
was done. That is the nightmare scenario for an agency
obsessed with reputation management. Accountability threatens institution more than Epstein
(03:49):
ever did, and that calculus is becoming the real scandal.
The non prosecution agreement was not merely flawed. It was
structurally corrupt. It violated the Crime Victim's Rights Act by design,
not by accident. Survivors were deliberately excluded from the process
because their participation would have made the deal impossible. The
(04:10):
secrecy was not incidental. That shit was essential, and the
DOJ did not fail to notify victims. It chose not to,
and in my opinion, that distinction matters legally and morally.
Every subsequent DOJ explanation has been an exercise and narrative laundering.
Officials have admitted mistakes while carefully avoiding the word decision.
(04:32):
They framed the outcomes as unfortunate rather than engineered. This
rhetorical sleight of hand allows the institutions to express regret
without accepting culpability. But mistakes are accidental. This was deliberate.
The charging document was buried on purpose. The federal case
was abandoned on purpose. Look, we all know that institutional
(04:56):
self protection has always been the DOJ's primary motivator. In
this case, exposure would have triggered cascading consequences across agencies, offices,
and political administrations. The Department understood that prosecuting Epstein federally
would mean answering uncomfortable questions about prior intelligence, prior complaints,
(05:17):
and prior in action. That risk was deemed unacceptable, so
the case was strangled quietly, Epstein walked, and the DOJ
preserved its facade. What makes the situation worse is that
the DOJ knows it made the wrong choice. Internal acknowledgments,
post hoc apologies, and carefully worded statements confirmed that awareness.
(05:39):
Yet awareness without action is meaningless. The Department has had
years to course correct and has refused every opportunity. Each
refusal compounds the original wrongdoing. And the reason they want
you to move on is because time has not healed
this wound, it has infected it, and they continued withholding
of the charging document is now indefensible on any legal
(06:02):
or ethical ground. Epstein is dead, the case is closed,
and the public interest is overwhelming. Claims of prosecutorial sensitivity
no longer apply. What remains is fear, fear of institutional exposure.
But that fear is not a valid basis for secrecy
in a functioning society. As you all know, and as
(06:23):
I've said time and time again, transparency delayed becomes transparency denied.
So releasing the document would not be an act of charity.
It would be an act of obligation the doj OH
survivors the truth about how close justice came and why
it was denied. It owes the public of factual record,
unfiltered by institutional spin, and it owes itself a chance,
(06:47):
however small, to begin rebuilding trust without disclosure. Reform is performative.
Accountability cannot exist in darkness, and I think that it's
important to point out that the charging document is not
about the past. It's about precedent allowing its oppression signals
to future prosecutors that reputation outweighs justice. It teaches institutions
(07:11):
at burying evidence is survivable if done quietly enough. That
lesson corrodes the rule of law far beyond the Epstein case.
And that's why I think the document matters so deeply.
It's a test case for whether accountability has any meaning
left now. The DOJ often speaks about restoring faith in institutions,
yet refuses the one action that would actually advance that goal.
(07:34):
Faith is not restored through press conferences or internal reviews.
It's restored through truth, even when that truth is humiliating.
Taking responsibility does not weaken institutions, it legitimizes them. The
DOJ's refusal suggests it understands this and fears the outcome anyway.
Survivors have been forced to carry the burden of institutional
(07:56):
failure for nearly two decades. They've watched their abuse us
or received protections they were denied. They have watched officials
of aid scrutiny while preaching accountability. This asymmetry is not accidental.
That shits structural. The charging document represents the moment when
that structure could have collapsed. That's why it remains hidden now.
(08:18):
I've also heard some people argue that releasing the document
would reopen wounds. That argument is cynical and false. Wounds
do not heal when they're infected, they heal when cleaned.
Truth is not re traumatization or rasure is. Survivors are
not asking for vengeance. They're asking for acknowledgment. The DOJ
has denied them, even that this refusal is itself a
(08:42):
continuation of harm, and in my opinion, there is no
path forward that does not begin with full disclosure of
the MPa record. Partial transparency is not transparency. Redacted summaries
are not accountability. The public must see what federal prosecutors
were prepared to do and why they stopped. Anything less
(09:02):
is institutional gaslighting. If the Department truly believes in justice,
it must confront this head on, and that means admitting
the charging document existed, admitting why it was buried, and
releasing it in full. No euphemisms, no hedging, no scapegoats.
Accountability starts with ownership. Every day the DOJ delays, it
(09:24):
confirms the worst suspicions about its priorities. And this is
not just about punishing individuals. It's about exposing systems. Epstein
exploited girls, but institutions enabled them. The charging document would
show how close the system came to stopping them and
how deliberately it chose not to, and that knowledge belongs
to you, the public. Our republic can't function on selective memory.
(09:50):
Truth withheld is power abused. So the real road to
accountability is neither abstract nor complicated. It begins with the
release of the eighty two page federal charging document and
the full non prosecution agreement record. Everything else is noise.
The DOJ can continue to hide the decay, or it
(10:11):
can take the first painful step toward credibility. There's no
middle ground left. Transparency is not optional anymore. It's the
price of legitimacy. And to close this episode out, here's
an open letter to the DOJ, to the leadership, the attorneys,
the career officials, and the institutional conscience of the Department
(10:32):
of Justice. This letter is written without pleasantries because pleasantries
are not earned here. For over two decades, your department
is hidden behind procedure, euphemism, and silence, while the consequences
of your decisions have played out in real time on
the bodies and lives of survivors. You know exactly which
(10:52):
decision this letter addresses, You know exactly which document this
letter demands, and you know exactly why you have refure
used to release it. The eighty two page federal charging
document prepared against Jeffrey Epstein was not abandoned because it
was weak. It was abandoned because it was strong. It
was not discarded because it lacked evidence, but because it
contained too much of it, too much connective tissue to
(11:16):
many co conspiratal threads, too clear a picture of how
Epstein's operation functioned with institutional blind spots working in his favor.
That document represented a moment where justice was not only
possible but emminent, and you chose to walk away from it.
You replaced a sweeping federal case with a state level
(11:36):
plea deal so narrow it functioned as insulation, not prosecution.
You did not merely fail to protect victims. You actively
structured an outcome that excluded them, silenced them, and violated
their statutory rights. The non prosecution agreement was not a mistake.
It was a mechanism, and mechanisms have authors for year.
(11:59):
Survivors and their attorneys have asked you for one thing
above all others. The truth. Not your summaries, not your
internal reviews, not your carefully scrubbed explanations after the fact.
They asked for the document that shows what you knew,
when you knew it, and what you were prepared to
do before you chose not to do it. You have
(12:20):
refused them every time, you have not even had the
decency to acknowledge the request as legitimate. Your department has
shown far more urgency in protecting itself than in protecting victims.
You have admitted errors while refusing to name decisions. You
have expressed regret while avoiding responsibility. You have spoken about
(12:41):
transparency while practicing concealment. And I hate to break the
news to you, but that's not accountability. It's narrative management,
and it's failed. Confidence has already been destroyed by your
refusal to tell the truth. What remains now is distrust
layered with contempt. Institutions do not rebuild credibility by hiding
their worst moments. They rebuild it by confronting them. You
(13:04):
have done everything except that. There is no legal justification
left for withholding the document. Epstein's dead, the prosecution's over
the public interest is overwhelming. Congress passed the law. Claims
of prosecutorial sensitivity no longer apply if they ever did.
What remains is fear. Fear of exposure, fear of institutional embarrassment,
(13:27):
fear of consequences. None of those are valid reasons for
secrecy in a system that claims to operate under the
rule of law. You often speak about restoring faith and institutions.
Here's your opportunity. Release the eighty two page charging document
in full, Release the complete record of the non prosecution agreement.
Stop forcing survivors to beg for scraps of the truth
(13:50):
while the government that failed them hides behind closed doors.
The road to accountability does not begin with statements. It
begins with documents. You don't get to invoke justice while
burying evidence of its denial. You don't get to claim
reform while concealing the blueprint of your failure. And you
don't get to ask for public trust while you refuse
(14:11):
to trust the public with the truth. This is no
longer just about Jeffrey Epstein. It's about whether the Department
of Justice is willing to accept responsibility for what it did,
what it allowed, and what it hid. History is already
keeping score. The only question left is whether you will
tell the truth now or be remembered as the institution
(14:33):
that shows silence over accountability, even when it had one
last chance to do the right thing. Signed Everybody. All
of the information that goes with this episode can be
found in the description box.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.