Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:01):
I'll tell you who haven't vented,sawya ifone should hung by his nuts,
Kelly to do what they want.Ohs from the South coast of the Golden
State. It's Long Beach's most populartalk show, Live Talk with Alex Hexem
(00:22):
and now you're host for Live TalkAlex exon American Propaganda. That is the
title of today's show. Hi friends, I know we haven't spoken in a
while. It's nice to see youor hear you, or sent you.
(00:44):
I sent you there. You're listeningto the show with bated breath. Alex
Exam back on air after sabbatical.As you can tell, I'm excited to
see you. I'm like a Labradorretriever running up and sniffing your crotch.
How you doing, I'm doing okay. Gotta tell you I'm doing okay.
(01:06):
I've been blissfully unaware of the news, and I've had a little time off
doing some extracurricular activities, and Iwas able to catch up on the news
and my my, the propaganda.Now, at the end of the show,
I'm going to tell you what's goingon with the future of this show.
We have to talk about the futureof this show because it's a very
(01:26):
fluid situation. If you don't know, Spreaker has officially sent out notifications,
I've heard. I didn't get onebecause I already harassed support. But Spreaker
no longer has a live function.So if there's anyone out there you know
who you are and dah you havea Speaker account, let me know if
you can go live. Apparently they'vefinally pulled the trigger on everyone. I
(01:49):
was one of the first to findout Spreaker was no longer going live.
Screwed up a business plan. Ihad a complete business model for a new
project. To say that I've hadto put on the shelf. Some of
you know what it is. I'vementioned it, but it really put a
wrench in the monkey works. Sowhat did I just say? Can you
(02:15):
tell I haven't been on air fora while, I'm a little rusty.
Don't worry, we'll grind this thingout today. The old Gray Mayor just
ain't what she used to be.But you know, one of the funny
things is is when I've been offthe air for a while, I either
do the best show I've done ina while, or it's rusty and we
come. You know, we comeout of the gate jogging, not sprinting.
(02:38):
So we'll gear up. The showwill get better. I promise you,
not that it's bad. We've onlybeen two minutes into the show,
but I anticipate it's a heavy clipshow. So I anticipate, hopefully not
but some technical difficulties and a littlebit of a scattered brain show because I've
(03:00):
got so much I want to doin such a short amount of time.
Because I haven't been on air forwhat almost I don't even know. I
can't remember the last show I did. I'd have to look, and I
don't care. Frankly, right now, because we're here for the new show
American Propaganda, Why am I sayingthis. I'm gonna start off again.
There's gonna be a heavy clip show, but I need to start off with
probably one of the most outrageous clipsyou're gonna hear, possibly this year,
(03:23):
if not your lifetime. I justheard it right before I came on air.
Now I have a whole show Iwant to do on police interrogations.
It is a fantastic show. Ithink it breaks down everything I've been talking
to you about about not speaking tothe police, not because you're a criminal,
but because anything you say can andwill be used against you in a
(03:44):
court of law. Don't just whistleon by that when the cops say that
to you, if you're ever unfortunatelyin that situation. But I have an
amazing clip from of all places,NYPD Blue. You heard a clip at
the top of the show about theInternet. I was like, oh my
god, that's gold. I needthat for a SoundBite for my show talking
(04:04):
about the Internet. I mean,I'm sorry, not the Internet, cell
phones, talking about cell phones.And this is in nineteen ninety three,
when they're obviously well you don't knowthis obviously, but I'll tell you.
They were trying to solve a crime. Sipowitz the surly detective, and NYPD
(04:26):
Blue says, you know, theguy should be hung by his cohones.
And the reason, he says thatthey're trying to track a criminal who I
believe it's a kidnapper who's using acell phone to dodge them. And nineteen
ninety three, not many people hadthem. It wasn't as obviously prolific or
prolific as no, profound's not theright word, as incessant, well maybe
(04:50):
not everywhere. See even the vocabularyI don't have a dictionary in front of
me. My mind, as youknow, is a wide has a wide
see I can't even speak. Holdon, we need coffee. I just
woke up. Has a wide rangingI have a wide ranging vocabulary. The
(05:12):
show, the show, it's alreadya funny farm. Let's just get to
the clip. But what was gettingat the NYPD blue clip from nineteen ninety
three talking about cell phones? Yougo that predicted the future because I read
a report maybe a week ago abouthow social media, which we wouldn't have
(05:36):
if it wasn't for cell phones orthe Internet, Because frankly, I don't
think social media would be such anissue if we weren't accessing it on our
cell phones. If you had togo home and you had a big,
bulky computer like they used to be, no laptops, Remember when you had
it was a big old computer andyou had to have a separate, big
(05:56):
old monitor and keyboards and everything,nobody would be on it as much.
Yeah, some people would, butin the early days of the Internet,
most people were logging in from acomputer and a big booky machine. Then
we got laptops, then we've gottablets, now cell phones, and so
you're always connected. I don't thinksocial media would be such an issue if
it wasn't for the cell phones wesaw the Internet. I get it,
(06:18):
but it's a different thing when youhave it on you twenty four hours a
day, seven days a week.I was just at an event yesterday,
and in this conference of I'd haveto guess a hundreds, at least two
hundred, two hundred and fifty peoplemaybe including the speakers and everything. Guess
(06:38):
what everybody does any chance they getwhen they might not even be bored.
It might be an exciting presentation onthe stage, but for a second,
they're mind checked out. Now whatdid we used to do? We might
doodle on the page of notes we'retaking. If we have a notebook or
something. We're taking notes for aconference or whatever seminar. You might look
through the workbook or the material,the pamphlets and things they've given you.
(07:00):
All Right, you know you're stillkind of in the zone. You're still
thinking about what they're talking about.It only takes a fraction of a second
for your mind to jump to didI get an email? Did I get
a like on that post? Oryour phone could be silent and it vibrates.
You've got a little vibrator in yourpocket. Yeah, I said it.
(07:23):
And then you say, oh,well, what was that notice?
And it could be something like theweather update, it's going to be two
degrees warmer than it was yesterday.Doesn't matter. That slight distraction now has
you scrolling through Facebook, Instagram,Twitter, whatever you're on. I really
don't do social media. The onlysocial media I pretty much do now is
Instagram because I find it the leastinvasive, least political. And you have
(07:47):
a chance, not much. UnlessI've said this before, Unless you're a
hot chick or an insta stripper,you don't have much of a chance.
I didn't tell you about the experimentI did. You don't have much of
a chance of getting likes. Letme tell you the experiment I did.
It just this is going to beall over the place. This show has
a lot of information, and I'mgoing to play that hilarious clip at the
top. But I realize this theother day went on Instagram. Well I've
(08:13):
known this for a while, butI finally I said, you know what,
I'm just gonna do an ab testing. And what ab testing is?
It might be the same ad.This isn't really a b testing what I
did. But it's similar. Youmight have an ad. It could be
a blog post or let's say aFacebook post, Instagram, Twitter or whatever.
The Trump organization you may have heardof this because they used Facebook very
(08:35):
well. Everybody admits it, eventhe people who hate Trump, who despise
him. To test the man saidthat the brilliance of his campaign, and
frankly, it might be why hewon was the way that they used Facebook.
In particular. They didn't use allsocial media when you know, before
he was banned from Twitter and allthat crap. But the Trump campaign used
(08:58):
Facebook book so well that it mayhave won them the election. And people
have talked about this, and youknow, maybe one day, you know,
we'll have all the secret analytics andhow they did it. But we
know because the campaign basically told usthey did not. First of all,
they embedded people at Facebook. Sothey said, we're going to use Facebook
to sway people to vote for DonaldTrump. Launch our again propaganda campaign.
(09:24):
This is American propaganda, the wholeshow. And once they injected their people
into Facebook, look, we wantto learn how to use Facebook to the
best of our ability. And trustme, running Facebook ads Instagram ads is
a science. It's a science.You can just go run an ad and
do it all on autopilot. Okay, you'll have some results. But if
(09:48):
you get very granular and get intotheir system and use what it's called A
and B testing. What I meanby that. They might have the same
ad for Trump and one has Trumpon there saying vote Trump, and it
has a blue background. They mighthave another one that is a red background.
They'll run them both and see whichone does better. Okay, the
blue background did seventy five percent ofa click through rate whatever, and the
(10:09):
blue thirty five. So let's gowith the blue. Now they've got the
blue Trump background image. And whatdo they do Now? Now they change
the font or now they change theimage of Trump. Instead of him looking
very victorious, they have one wherehe looks a little more subdued and professional.
So they run those two. Whichone worked better well? The one
where he's a little you know,more energetic looking, that didn't work so
well. They like it when he'sa little calmer, so let's use that
(10:31):
one. So the blue background Trumpwith a very calm demeanor, looking very
regal or presidential. That one.Now, what do we change? Let's
change the text instead of vote Trump, let's put trumpet up. So which
one did better? Vote Trump didpretty well, but Trumpet up. We
got fifty percent more clickthroughs. Yousee what I'm saying. So ab testing
is very important and I've learned thisthrough digital marketing classes I've taken. And
(10:56):
then the Trump campaign used it verysuccessfully with the face Facebook campaigns that they
were running. And I said,wow, this is like proof of the
pudding, a real world example ofwhat I learned from a seminar class rather
years ago. This is like backin bike maybe two thy and nineteen or
eighteen somewhere around there, where hehad taken the class. And then we
(11:18):
had all the revelations and this cameout after Trump won several years we found
out, like people were saying,how the hell did he win? Everyone
said he didn't have a mathematic Rememberall the clips. I don't want to
start playing them the clips, WolfBlitzer, MSNBC. Everybody, it is
a mathematical impossibility for Donald Trump towin. There's no way he can win.
(11:39):
Remember all that. So they wereeither a lying to you, which
is probably the case. The propagandawas so thick during the Trump campaign it
was ridiculous. There's no way hecan win, mathematically impossible. The results
are already in, he's already lostbefore the election, and then he won.
(12:05):
So people were trying to dissect it. You better bet the Democrats,
the Hillary campaign, the Biden campaign, they were all studying what did he
do to pull this off? Well, one of the biggest factors, not
saying the only one, but oneof the biggest factors was the way they
used Facebook and this ab testing,using the same ad, tweaking it slightly
to see what's more effective, andthen run that for a few days than
(12:28):
this one fort few days and thenboom, we've got the perfect ad.
Run that all month up into theelection whatever, and it worked. Nobody
can deny because experts, people whohate Trump, people who don't even like
social media like me, said itwas brilliant. What they did was brilliant.
They were able to get the bestmessage they could concoct by basically beta
(12:50):
testing it several times, then pushingit out to the masses and having a
much better ad than the competition.It's not all about ads, right,
It's about policy. It's about likeability. So but look, if you're
looking to sway people who are inthe middle, who are on the fence,
undecided voters? Where do you wantto go? Where they are?
(13:11):
Where are they? Facebook? Instagram, Twitter, Now, TikTok okay,
So it works. So I did. I'm digressing here. Look I get
it, I get it. Youknow how this show goes? Right ten
minutes into the show, I haven'tgotten to the meat and potatoes, but
we're getting there. This is allthe same umbrella, under the same umbrella
(13:35):
of propaganda in America. American propagandashould be the title of the show.
I did my own ab testing onInstagram because I noticed when I do any
of my art, and you've seenall the wonderful if you don't, haven't
seen my art. I was justtalking to somebody about art. He's a
traditional artist like I am. Istarted drawing. That's how I I've got
(13:56):
a really cool catalog. I guessof stuff I did in high school.
I've had ex girlfriends, friends fromhigh school. This is when I was
on Facebook. I haven't seen themin a while. Who would send me
stuff I wrote on their books?Remember in high school, you had to
cover your books. You had bookcovers, and the cool people some people
(14:20):
wanted to buy the pre made bookcovers that you bought at the school supply
store. No the cool people.And I know it sounds ghetto, but
this was Encinitas, California, sothe kids could afford it. The parents
could afford it, right. Weused brown paper bags. You're like,
what does sound kind of ghetto?I know why because you could write on
(14:41):
them. I was an artist atthe time, still am, but back
then I really my identity was wrappedin being an artist. I drew all
the time. I would be sittingin class and drawing. I would when
I say doodling, yeah, Iguess I did doodle most of the time.
But I would always try and doart, draw a tableau, a
(15:03):
picture of what was going on inmy mind at the beach. That was
one of the things I used tolike to draw beat scenes or when I
was younger, it was all spaceshipsand aliens and I wanted to draw in
horror and I used to draw likekind of crazy stuff. And then in
high school it was more musical bandsand I would take like whoever I was,
(15:24):
like the Cult, for example,The Cult was a big band in
the late eighties, and I woulddraw like their logo with like, you
know, whatever, fire and smoke, and sometimes it would be like a
car or a motorcycle. These reallycool, intricate drawings, and people in
high school have sent those to me, like you drew this on my book
cover, or you say this wasin my yearbook that year. Remember when
(15:48):
everyone used to sign yearbooks. Iwould always put like a little picture or
something, or at least a drawingof me and like a funny face or
whatever. It's cool to see now. But anyway, I do all sorts
of art, especial with AI.Now. I love some I was just
talking to a guy at this conferenceI was at and he was doodling on
his paper and some downtime, andI said, oh, I didn't know
(16:10):
you're an artist. And we startedtalking. And I worked with this guy
before, so I'm like, well, I didn't know this. People need
to tell me these things. I'mlike, oh, I do art too,
and I quickly showed him my Instagram. He's like, holy crap.
I'm like, well, I doa lot of AI, dude, because
he's drawing something very basic that whoknows, could turn into another nice art
piece later. I do that too. But with AI, all you have
(16:32):
to do is imagine it and getthe prompts and all the prompts the key
and you have to know some ofit's very complicated. I'm not going to
get into it here, but Ishowed him some of my work. He's
like, wow, I said,so you're not doing AI And he was
like, you know, I feellike this and that, and I've heard
this from traditional artists before. AndI didn't give him my whole speech on
well, frankly, you don't knowwhat you're talking about, because he didn't,
(16:55):
because it sounded like someone who rejectedit out of hand and never tried
it, never played around with it, or he did maybe he downloaded an
app that sucked or went to awebsite that socked, he had to pay
all the money for credits on.So I'm like, dude, listen,
if you know the right way todo it and the platforms do use,
and how to actually construct a goodprompt, you know, some guy will
put a prompt in there I wanta nice landscape. Okay, you'll get
(17:18):
mediocre results. But if you havea prompt that's you know, five hundred
characters long, like some of myprompts are, you get some really cool
stuff and you just have to learnit. It's just it's almost like computer
programming. There's an art to aiart. I know it sounds silly, right
because a lot of artists like thisone. He's like, well, it's
kind of like cheating, and I'mnot sure if I really embrace it,
and blah blah blah. And Iget it. Not that he was,
(17:40):
But I understand. If you studiedart in college and you have a worthless
now four to six year degree andyou know everything about art, color theory,
you name it. I've taken alot of these classes, you find
out that it's virtually worthless when itcomes to aiart. Now it helps,
it helps, and you could eventell AI you want this particular color palette
(18:03):
or this particular style of art,so you will have a better grasp on
even creating aiart with a history inart, Does that make sense? But
most traditional artists who spend all thismoney and time learning this rejected out of
hand because they say it's cheating.And now people can do stuff that's amazing
that took me all this time tolearn. Look, folks, to be
(18:23):
a great painter, to be agreat whatever type of art you're doing,
acrylics sculptor, I don't care.It could take you a damn lifetime.
You could have a image in yourhead that you want to get out in
a sculpture, in a painting,in a drawing, it could take you
a damn lifetime. With aiart itcould take you twenty minutes. And additionally,
(18:52):
with aiart you may not be ableto get it correctly. You may
have to do it by hand.That's the rub people don't understand. There's
times I tried to generate something inparticular for it could be like a client.
It could be like, for example, I tried to do an album
cover for an artist who wanted one, so I can do that for you,
because you know I do music marketingand promotion right, So I could
(19:14):
not get exactly what they wanted.Now, I thought I nailed it,
but they kept changing. They well, I want it like this, back
and forth, and sometimes you willnot be able to create exactly the way
you see it or your client envisionsit. Just sometimes you can't. It's
just not working. You could generatea thousand images, keep going back with
(19:37):
new prompts, more detailed, moreless detailed. Sometimes you put too much
information. It doesn't give you whatyou want. There's a whole art to
prompt writing. I know it soundsstrange that people are like, well,
I can just put whatever I want, yeah, and you get whatever you
get. You got to know whatyou're doing. So sometimes and what I'm
getting at like, for this artist, we couldn't get it right and I
ended up using some AI some ofit the background. There was some AI
(20:04):
one of the characters in the background, but stock photography, stock backgrounds,
finding other stuff and compiling it almostlike almost like a collage is how it
came together. Then he loved it. So what I'm getting at is sometimes
you need to go back to traditionalart to complete it. There is one
(20:26):
point I was like, you knowwhat, I can't create what this guy's
looking for right now, and Ididn't have the time to do it myself.
I was like, I'm just goingto hire another artist to do this
one portion that I ended up beingable to do it eventually myself. But
do you see what I'm saying.You might have to bring in another artist
who is an expert on portrait orbackgrounds or fonts. That's a huge one.
(20:52):
I know. With Canva and othersystems, you can pretty much create
a logo and use the embedded fonts. But sometimes the font's not right.
Let's say you're doing a logo.They want an original font. They don't
want a font that everybody else hasgot. It's too some that everybody else's
font. I need something different.Now we're getting into typography, but it
can happen. Some clients are verypick Look if you're doing a logo for
FedEx or IBM or one of theseAmazon they don't want a font that everybody's
(21:18):
got that's recognizable from some of thebrand. You may have to create a
font. Now that's a whole otherworld. It's a whole another can of
worms. You see what I'm saying. So AI art can't solve all your
problems. But if you're a traditionalartist and you're not embracing AAR, you're
screwing yourself over big time, bigtime. Now that we've wasted twenty minutes,
I don't even know on something Ididn't even think about. Talking about
(21:41):
NYPD blue and the quote from nineteenninety three talking about whoever created cell phones
should be hung. It's true.We got around this whole thing, getting
into Instagram and the ab testing Idid, so what was the ab testing
I did? Well, as youknow, I do space art, landscape
(22:02):
artist, I'll do any kind ofart. I like art in all its
forms and all its genres, althoughI don't do sculptures and crap like that.
I have noticed if I post aportrait of a and it's got to
be a woman, I could doa portrait of like an amazing portrait of
an old man, highly detailed,perfectly rendered with mood lighting, you know,
(22:26):
magic hour light, that the shadows, the lighting. It looks like
it was taken in a studio.It almost looks like a real photo.
Some of this stuff's amazing, andI'll post it, going, God,
this is amazing, like this is. I remember posting what I had thought
it was one of the best portraitsI'd ever created. And if it's not,
(22:47):
I hate to say this, youguessed it. I mean, do
I have to ask You've heard mesay this a bunch of times. Do
you need to know If it's ahot chick hundreds of likes, if it's
an amazing portrait of an old manor woman, or of a beautiful landscape,
nobody cares. And I know you'relike, well, it's Instagram.
(23:07):
Would you would you expect you dumdum dum dumb drum dum dum d I
get it, but it's still frustrating. When you post a piece of art,
you're just like, people are gonnalove this, Nobody cares you.
You can do it yourself. Youdon't need to do ab testing like I
did. Right, so I post. I posted like five or six landscapes,
one or two, three likes herethere. Then I posted four or
(23:29):
five pin ups twenty fifty one hundredlikes comments. Then I post what was
the other one I did? Idid landscapes. Oh, I was doing
this kind of like coffee shop logoand for someone else that you know,
the one that they're gonna use.I set to the side, obviously,
but I have a bunch of otherrenders that weren't, you know, kind
of what they were looking for.But they're really cool, Like I could
(23:52):
use these for something. So Iposted some of those really cool. It
looks like a coffee cup with likea galaxy in it, and it looks
like it would be for a moderntype coffee shop logo, right without any
wording, no branding, but thebackground image that would be like be on
the sign, some with like aforest in the coffee cup, Like just
to picture a white go to myInstagram, Instagram, dot com slash alex
(24:15):
ExM. But maybe just like awhite coffee cup with a forest in it.
Another had a galaxy. Another hadkind of like a winter scene,
right, I figured that would becool too, for like if you're doing
you know, pumpkin spice lattes.Whatever the point is, nobody liked them.
I thought they were amazing. Theclient loved them that nobody else did.
(24:36):
And then I post another couple ofones of portrait art, tons of
likes, tons of hits. Idid vintage like femfatales, and these are
what I'm selling, canvases of rightnow, femfatale like film noir, some
black and white, but a lotof color, red lipstick, bright eyes,
(24:59):
vint hair styles, all that stuffright, tons of likes. Why
because there's hot women in it,I swear to God. The same posters
with men vintage like you know,Fedora's suits. They look like they're detectives
or you know, undercover cops ina film noir movie. Those posters I
post five or six likes, Nobodycares, so we all know if you
(25:21):
go to Instagram, just look inyour feed. If you're a guy,
you're going to be assaulted. Ithink women might be assaulted by like hot
mail models. I don't know.But on Instagram, if you're a man,
they've, you know, through theirdemographics, figured out you're a male
between you know, sixteen and onehundred. They go show them hot chicks
and that's what you see in yourfeed. Insta strippers, models, people.
(25:44):
You know, it could be somefitness models selling some fitness product.
I don't care. Those are theads that I see. You get inundated
with it racy stuff, some reallyracy stuff too, and frankly it's a
distraction. I I don't really followthose channels because they distract you. Anytime
you go to Instagram, you justwant to post something and hopefully sell some
(26:06):
art, promote your podcast or yourradio show, whatever you're doing. All
of a sudden, it's just TNAall over the place and you start clicking
around. It's a trap. It'sa trap. So anyway, my own
a b testing shows hot chicks,tons of engagement, anything else, bub
kiss nothing, You will get nothing. There's nothing there for you. Where's
(26:27):
the beef, where's the beef.Hey, where's the beat? So,
yes, Instagram is good for prepubescent masterbaters. I mean, I don't
know what anyways. I mean,can you do business on there? Can
(26:48):
you get likes and run ads?Yes? If you spend money and run
ads on Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, I'm sure too, but I don't
deal with those platforms. You'll getmore clicks if you just run ads,
so it could be a boring ad. Right. Let's say it's your radio
show, your podcast. You say, hey, check it out. Listen,
here's a little clip. Nobody willlisten, nobody will click on it,
nobody will care. Excuse me,let me get some coffee. But
(27:11):
if you pay for the advertising,there were both better. You'll see more
engagement. If you are a stripperchick, you don't have to advertise and
you'll see the engagement. So I'vebeen saying this for years. If you
do not advertise on Instagram, now, it's virtually workless. They're all charging,
(27:36):
it's all pay to play. Now, it's virtually worthless. And you
wonder, while you started a podcast, or you started your business, or
maybe it's art that you're trying tosell and promote, and you can't figure
out why you're not getting engagement.Well, I just told you. If
you're a hot chick, you've gotan advantage. If you're not a hot
chick, it's a disadvantage. Justyou look, you could be a mediocre
(28:03):
chick who's bosomy, and you'll stillget hits. Why because you've got big
boobs. Let's be honest. Youknow, you know and trust me,
the women who have that type ofa physique or they're just a beautiful girl
in general, they know how toplay the game. There's a reason they
have a low cut blouse when theytalk to you about fiscal conservancy mean,
(28:26):
there's a reason Fox News has abunch of leggy broads on the stage and
low cut revealing clothing and tight dresses. There's a reason they know you click
through you're gonna stick around. That'smy rant, un ins. You know,
I've done this rant a bunch oftimes, but it is getting more
(28:47):
and more profound. And when Idid the testing with my own art,
I mean this is you know,you would think some things are going to
do well, and they do.I guess right, beautiful art, you'll
still it clicks and likes. Iget it. I do. I have
an entire landscapes here. It's calledspace art, right, what was I
calling it? Inter Uh? No, interstellar interstellar galaxy. No, I
(29:12):
don't even remember that the collection.It was about a year ago that I
started it. They were basically NFTs, oh, Interstellar Sanctuary, and they're
beautiful and people like them. Igot quite a few likes. I made
a video about them and stuff,and so they did pretty well. I
was like, oh, that's good. Nothing compared to like pin up art
(29:32):
or beautiful women. It's just nothingcompares to it. It's off the Richter
scale when it's a beautiful woman orbeautiful pin up art, and then anything
else it could be. It couldbe a picture of God himself. And
if you don't put a hot chickin the background or pay for play,
(29:53):
it's gonna go nowhere. All right, I'm done. The title of the
show is called Well the American Propaganda. It took me twenty minutes to get
through Damn Instagram. I don't knowwhere we even how I got on that
topic. It was the A andB testing to bring it full circle because
we have a presidential election coming up, I want you to hear which I'm
(30:14):
just gonna play this two minute clip. I don't want to set it up
too much because you're you're gonna getit real quick. One of the most
when I say laughable, I wascracking up through this entire segment, like
just out loud, laughing, lolling. I know everyone says lol, and
it's a lie. Those of youwho text me and email me say LOL.
When I reply, don't do it. You're lying to be If this
(30:36):
clip doesn't make you laugh out loud, nothing well because they say it with
a straight face. I don't evenwant to prep this. I'm not eve
gonna tell you what it is.I'm just gonna play it because I don't
want to ruin the punchline, soto speak. Let me just play this
clip and I'll come back and twominutes and you tell me if you had
(31:00):
a gut laugh listening to this.And remember, I want you to picture
the anchors in studio in DC sayingthis with a straight face. And there
is a punchline. The whopper isat the end. But I'm just gonna
play it. I'm not even gonnacomment. I'm gonnamute myself. I'm gonna
(31:21):
mute myself right now and play thePresident Biden had his annual physical yesterday and
his doctor says the results show heis fit to serve in the White House.
Doctor Kevin O'Connor emphasized that quote andextremely detailed neurologic exam revealed no signs
of trouble, but the president didnot take a cognitive test. Nancy Cordis
(31:41):
is at the White House. Nancy, good morning. What more do you
know? What we know, Nate, is that doctor O'Connor, the President's
doctor, said that the only changeand the president's health since last year is
that he's now using a pat machineto help with his sleep apnea. Otherwise,
the doctor said the president is ahealthy, active, robust eighty one
year old. That this physical wasconducted at the Walter Reed Military Medical Center
(32:05):
yesterday. At least ten specialists weretold examined Biden. Doctor O'Connor said the
president's arthritis is moderate to severe,which causes him to walk with a stiffened
gait that many have noticed, butthe doctor said it isn't any worse than
last year and doesn't require any additionaltreatment. Now, one test, as
you mentioned, that the President didnot undergo, was any kind of cognitive
(32:29):
test. The White House Press Secretarytold reporters that a neurologist determined that mister
Biden did not need one. Thebottom line in this three page memo,
doctor O'Connor says that he has quoteno new concerns about Biden's health, despite
constant assertions by Biden's political opponents abouthis health. Gail Nancy, are you
(32:50):
hearing that people were surprised that hewas not asked to take a cognitive test?
Is that just no big deal?Now? I think people were wondering
about it, But apparently according tohis personal doctor and a neurologist, they
didn't believe it was necessary. Sohe had a whole host of other tests
and examinations, but that was somethingthey didn't feel that they needed to look
at. In fact, the WhiteHouse Press Secretary says he gets a cognitive
(33:14):
test every day in the Oval office, basically based on the job that he
does. Okay, now, ifyou did not have a gut laugh or
at least a snicker, and thechief propagandist at CBS Morning News, Gail
(33:37):
King, of course, comes inwith a softball question as if we're doing
real journalism. Gail who kisses AlbertBorla's big white ass from Pfizer Absolute.
One of the most disgusting shows you'reever going to see on CBS Morning News
(33:59):
is Gail King fawning all over AlbertBorla and saying, I'm a Phfiser girl.
You want to talk about propaganda,Gail? Have you? And I
hate to attack yo King. I'msure she's a nice person. She's just
an idiot, Gail. How canyou have Albert Borla and my estimation,
a diabolical, evil genius who injecteda faulty, fraudulent, totally ineffective and
(34:30):
possibly quite possibly very dangerous with allthe signs of myocarditis and other neurological issues
people have had since getting the vaccine. The evil Albert Borla on CBS Morning
News time and time again talking abouthow he's a god almost by getting his
team to work so hard on gettingthe ninety five percent effective vaccine, which,
(34:54):
by the way, it is not. It is less than one percent
effective when you use relative absolute riskreduction, not relative risk reduction like they
use. They use a formula relativerisk reduction where it's all smoke and mirrors,
and then you have a ninety fivepercent efficacy rate when you look at
the real numbers and use absolute riskreduction, which all vaccines should be judged
(35:17):
by. We find out it's lessthan one percent effective. I wrote a
book on it. I'm not goingto keep getting into it. Go on
Amazon and pick it up, Pfizer'sefficacy illusion. Go Google it or amazon
it. I hate Google. SoGail King and whatever Nimrod reporter was in
(35:38):
DC reporting on this are saying JoeBiden is in robust health, robust at
eighty one years old, and theysaw no need for a cognitive test.
A man who has his finger onthe bomb did matter. All we care
(36:05):
is if he can put two wordstogether, which he barely cannot. That
he can walk up a flight ofstairs, which he stumbles and falls.
So why would we need a cognitiveexam for a president again with his finger
on the bomb, who can launchwars? Don't tell me about Congress,
(36:27):
don't tell me about he can launcha war. And a man again stumbles
down stairs, stumbles upstairs. Thatthat's one you don't see often. He's
done it, can barely put twowords together, shakes hands with imaginary people.
(36:53):
No, he doesn't need a cognitiveexam. Look, I'm not attacking
Joe Biden because he's old. Ihad a grandmother who suffered from dementia.
I guess you would say at theend of her life, she just you
know, she couldn't remember sharp asa whip. If you ask her about
something that happened in the twenties thethirties. She could remember people, faces,
(37:14):
dates, names, but not somethingthat happened five minutes ago. Now,
should my grandmother have been president andnot received a cognitive test? That'd
be scary. But Joe Biden withthe propagandist machine of the Democrats, including
(37:35):
Gail King at CBS Morning News,And look, I know Gail just came
in for a little bit of thatreport. If she was a real journalist
or Nate the jock on the team, Nate Burliss Borless, it's more about
Nate's fashion. To Gail, shetalks about the way he dresses half the
(37:57):
time. So like, let's getreal, here are we giving the real
news? Does anyone believe? Again, the title of this show is probably
I've got some amazing clips that you'regoing to hear about the Ukraine War that
are gonna blow your mind about propaganda. Absolute one hundred percent pure wartime propaganda
like circa World War two, WorldWar One propaganda. It was even worse
(38:21):
then when did the war? Whendid World War two? Like nineteen forty
five. So if you go backbefore for let's say four years, let's
say like nineteen forty one through whenthe war ended, what nineteen forty five,
go look at the posters and theadvertising when they were trying to drum
people up to buy war bonds andthings like this. And watch some of
(38:45):
the absolute out white right racist ads. I mean, we had. Do
you want to talk about racist goesboth ways? Goes both ways the communists
do. Some of theirs are reallyoffensive. And see some of the ones
that you know how they depict Americansand European well, the French, but
(39:06):
I remember seeing one about the French. Actually I don't remember. I mean,
I'm assuming it was the Germans,but who knows. I just remember
seeing some really offensive ones. You'veseen the offensive ones about Asians, you
know, with the real slanty eye. It's just really over the top.
But anyway, there's ones about Americanstoo. Like wartime propaganda then was very
(39:27):
starking in your face. Now it'ssubtle. Now it's a softball report about
Joe Biden being in I'm robust.Is that the word that you would use
to describe like, I don't careif you are a Democratic Republican. I
know many Democrats, some in myown family. I would say majority Republicans,
(39:49):
but there are not that majority.I would say maybe, I don't
know, it's like forty sixty.I don't even know, but I know
I'd live in Long Beach, right. I know a lot of Democrats,
and even they are like I wishI had there's a better choice, because
they're not convinced Biden. Look what'shappened since he's been in office. Nothing.
Things have gotten worse now one ofthe most I don't have this clip,
(40:12):
but I heard this just this morningas well. I didn't have time
to find it before I came on. Here a clip of Joe Biden saying,
I want to secure the border,I cannot because of Donald Trump.
I said what And I don't knowif that was Biden is speaking again.
I think he meant to say,and I think he might have followed it
up later as he mumbled on inthe Republican Party. But it's almost like,
(40:34):
wait, Donald Trump, who triedto build a wall, you tore
down the wall. He built asmuch as he could with all the legal
wranglings. Why do you like thewall or not. What I'm saying is
Trump tried to get this wall up, and what did Joe Biden do?
He went in there to it down. They had You don't know this,
but I followed this kind of crap. They had millions and millions of dollars
(41:00):
of fencing and piping and you know, the underground cement and all this stuff
to complete the wall on site.They stopped all of that, stopped production
of the wall. No more building. First thing you did when you got
in the White House, Joe Biden. Then all of that stuff they were
selling for like pennies on the dollar. They were just it was like a
(41:22):
swap meet. Suddenly they said,we're not using it, we're not abilding
to sell it off, and theysold it off. They got rid of
it all. So now it's likeyou couldn't build the wall now if you
wanted to, unless you bought allthat the materials again, hauled them all
back to the border again, andwhich Joe Biden wasn't gonna do. We
(41:43):
have seen absolute lawlessness at the borderpeople being dropped off in Chicago, New
York. You've heard all the stories. All the sanctuary cities now freaking out
because they didn't care when it wasjust in California and Arizona, they didn't
care. When it comes to theircity and they get twelve hundred, fifteen
(42:04):
hundred, two thousand migrants dropped offevery week to their city, they're freaking
out. We can't handle this.A perfect example is the mayor of New
York. We're a sanctuary city,bring them on in. Then they start
showing up. They go, wecan't handle to stop this. This is
crazy. We're gonna it's gonna breakthe city within like a month. Oh
a month, You've got a lotmore coming, buddy. It's just laughable.
(42:29):
The propaganda is so crazy. Soanyway, I heard a clip of
Joe Biden saying if only Donald Trump, who is not in office, and
the Republicans would allow me to securethe border, and it's just you go,
are you freaking kidding me? Bro? I think people would have more
respect if Joe Biden said I wantedan open border. I got it.
(42:50):
Now it's time for the elections.I know it's not popular. Now I'm
gonna clean it up. I'd havemore respect for him if you did that.
That's exactly what happened. So what'sgoing on. He knows he's got
to do something about the border andblame it on someone else because he's gonna
lose the election. It's like oneof the number one concerns from Americans.
I think it is number one rightnow. And then it's the economy,
(43:10):
which is in the toilet. I'vegot clips on that. I'm not trying
to turn this in a political show. I don't I frankly don't even know
if I'm going to vote. Idon't know if it's worth a damn Who
knows if? First of all,Donald Trump, who the Republicans are all
hoping will be their nomination. Folksincluding family members and friends who I know,
love Trump. They just can't getenough of them. Do you realize
(43:34):
he may be in prison, youmay not be able to vote for him.
What's it gonna run the White Houseout at a sing sing like some
mob boss. It ain't gonna happen. And then other on the flip side,
you've got Biden, who they keeppushing on people. Nobody wants him,
even the Democrats are like, canwe get someone else? Now?
If you're smart, you know GavinNewsom is waiting in the wings. You
(43:58):
know that, forget Harris, itcan't happen. You know that. Michelle
Obama. I know you don't believeit, but Michelle Obama is waiting in
the wings. They're trying to gether prepared. I'm sure. So why
you haven't heard much for it fromher? I think she's preparing for something.
Newsom's doing all the things you wouldexpect for a White House run.
(44:19):
It might not be this year,but I can't see how they run Biden.
So you've got I think two parties, the Republicans and Democrats, who
both say we don't have any bettercandidates? Is there anyone else? And
so you're screwed. No, thereisn't for you. You're gonna get propaganda,
more propaganda, and more propaganda,and you will get what we give
you. There are only two peopleout of three hundred and what forty million
(44:49):
people in the United States, twopeople worthy of the White House, Donald
Trump and Joe Biden. Ah right, come on, come on, but
those are the two pigs they're goingto push across the finish line. They
(45:10):
don't care what you think. Thoseare your choices, schmuck, pick one,
six million days, six million waysto die, choose one Trump or
Biden. You have no other choices, and the propaganda will continue to make
you think you have no other choices. And frankly, if you vote for
any other third party, you basicallyare throwing your vote away if you even
(45:31):
believe the elections are fair. Iknow so many people who go, what's
the listen. I'm not talking aboutsome guy who hasn't voted and never you
know, who never voted anyway.I'm talking about people like carl my friend
Carlton. He's like, why whyvote? They're gonna steal it. He's
convinced the elections are stolen. I'vetold you, I don't believe that nonsense.
(45:52):
I don't think it was stolen.There's no proof, and if they
were, it's not the way everybodythinks. Dominion Vote China flipped the votes.
Yeah, okay. Rudy Giuliani learnedthe hard way. Mike Lindell from
My Pillow, The My Pillow Guylearned the hard way. Sidney Powell,
Trump's lawyer learned the hard way.They're all learning the hard way in court.
(46:15):
Why because to scream election fraud,you need ever dance. You have
a dance. Ain't got the evidence, don't have any proof. Where's the
beef? Where's the beef? Hey, where's the bet? Mike Lindell,
the pillow guy who put up acontact for forty minutes into this, I
(46:37):
gotta move on. Mike Lindell,the pillow guy, who it was a
million dollar bounty on anyone who coulddisprove this data dump. Basically of it
was basic data that he claimed wasthe data and the the tracking of votes
(47:00):
being flipped from Trump to Biden orI'm sorry, yes, I was thinking
Hillary, No, Trump to Biden. I can't. I still can't believe
Joe Biden is our president and hemay be again, which is so scary
because he's robust in health and hismental acuity is so good he doesn't need
(47:23):
a cognitive test. That was solaughable. I'm gonna play it again to
wrap this up and make a longstory short that I can ever do.
Mike Lindel, the pillow guy,put out a contest for a million dollars
for anyone who could disprove the datahe was claiming was from the elections improving
election fraud. Well, guess what. An IT expert came out, looked
(47:45):
at the data, said it's totalgibberish. This isn't even from the election.
It's just all made up. Itwas basically almost like a fake database,
just random numbers, random addresses,random names, apparently, and it
was all fake and he proved it. One the contest, Mike Lindell was
offering a million dollar bounty on andMike Lindell refused to pay the guy.
(48:07):
He then did a symposium Mike Lindellwith big screens and showing the data on
screens. Did all that fell flat? There were experts there. Now the
guy already claimed to have won thecontest, but there were other experts.
CNN did a whole report, whichwas of course bias, but the experts
seemed to be truthful, saying thisproved nothing. They had technical difficulties,
(48:31):
a lot of stuff didn't even workwhen they were trying to show the data
on screens and all of their supposedevidence. It fell flat. Even the
people you go watch the video,you don't have to watch CNN. Go
watch the videos of the people thatwere there that believed they were Trumpers.
Trump supporters loved Mike Lindell. Theyleft the thing going, I don't know
what that whole thing was about,Like, they didn't show any proof.
(48:52):
We kept hearing this proof, where'sa proof? These are supporters? So
the thing fell flat on its face. He proved nothing, lost millions of
dollars in suit, and now Wellnow has to but would not pay a
gentleman who won the contest proving thatdata was fake. I've said this a
thousand times. If Fox News,with all their resources, lost like a
(49:14):
billion dollars to dominion voting, trustme, you're gonna lose in court.
Rudy Giuliani, this is how stupid. Rudy Giuliani was a lawyer, for
God's sakes, and a mayor.Rudy Giuliani should have known he was doomed.
Mike Lindell should have known he wasdoomed. If Fox News can't beat
it, they can't beat it.They don't have the resources of Fox News.
(49:34):
You're kidding me. But they kepton doing it, and they screwed
themselves. They're paying a lot ofmoney, folks. Sidney Powell, she's
another one. Who else. Severalof the lawyers have since recanted what they
said originally about the elections and comeout and said, yeah, yeah,
yeah, it was all bs becausethey're so scared to lose their ods.
(50:00):
They're lively all their money from anotherlawsuit. You know, they're lawyers.
They could be disbarred from all this. It's it's nuts. It's all batpoop,
crazy pants. When it comes tothe fraudulent elections, I still have
yet seed the proof, no proof, So that would be the propaganda coming
from the Republican side of election fraud. You can't look And what's the point
(50:21):
of that if they're gonna scream atthe top of their lungs the election was
stolen, it was all fraud.What are the odds of people voting again?
Like, well, if they're justgonna steal it, why vote?
I don't see how it serves them. I've got and I'm just looking at
(50:43):
my playlist. Here we're at likean hour into the show almost. I've
got propaganda report after propaganda report.Now here's what I want to play right
now before I play say anything orplay this. According to American News,
how do you think the Russian UkraineWar is going? From everything you've seen
(51:04):
since the start I think most peoplewould say Ukraine's doing very well. They
might be a ragtag group against thisbig behemoth Russia. But man, they've
got those drones. They're smoking thoseRussians. Russians are having high casualties,
they're losing footage, losing foot footing, they're losing territory rather and wow,
(51:25):
they stopped the Russians at every turn. Yeah, they might've lost a few
cities and stuff, but man,they're kicking ass over there in Ukraine.
Yeah, okay, nothing could befurther than the true. By the way,
nothing the Russians are rolling over theUkrainians as expected. I guess you
would say they've had some hiccups,but when you look at the territory,
(51:46):
they've already gained in some of themajor cities that they've already controlled. They're
losing. Now, if you're wonderingwhy you've been hearing the Ukrainians are amazing,
they're doing, are fighting, andwhy you haven't heard what I'm about
to tell you in the clips,I'm about to tell you, Well,
it wasn't convenient. Now things aretrickling out because they want to give another
(52:10):
you know, gazillion dollars to Ukraineand guess who won't let them do it.
That's right, the Republicans, becausethey're saying, look, control the
border. Figure out how you controlthe border, and then maybe we'll send
money to Ukraine. Trust me,the Republicans are going to send the money
to Ukraine. Eventually. They're allon the same boat when it comes to
that. Rushes the enemy, Ukrainethe underdog. We have to support them.
(52:32):
Well, if you listen to newsoutside of the US BBC, it
doesn't matter, Al Jazeera wherever.RT of course propaganda, go go check
it out sometime. It's a totallydifferent story, totally different. I'm going
to play a quick clip about thecurrent state of the war, and you're
(52:53):
going to think, well, that'snot what I've been hearing in the news.
Of course not. It's been propagandizedagain America propaganda. That's the name
of the show, American propaganda.But you've been hearing about all these sanctions.
Well, we'll see what those areworth in a minute. I've got
a clip about that. And inthe end, who's Trump Who's going to
(53:14):
be blamed for this? Trump?You think I'm kidding, You're like,
well, Trump isn't in office,the Republicans control the White House. Trump,
I'm going to play a clip wherethey're going to say the reason that
Ukraine is losing the war is becauseof Donald Trump. I'm not kidding.
(53:35):
You can't talk about laugh out.You can't make this stuff up. It's
as laughable as Joe Biden. Iheard the clip. I don't have it.
Go find it. Joe Biden sayingthe reason the border is insecure and
has been for the last three yearsis because of Donald Trump. This is
the kind of double talk and straightin your face propaganda lies, pure lies
(54:00):
that I mean some of it.We can't even consider propaganda, although all
propaganda are lies, but we're justtalking about blatant, in your face lies.
The reason the border is insecure isDonald Trump. What wall did he
try to build? What do youmean I sold off all the materials to
finish the wall. I don't knowwhat you're talking about. It's Donald Trump's
(54:21):
fall. Oh okay, thank you, Joe. But this is the guy
that doesn't need a cognitive test.Okay, he's living in fantasyland. What
is going to happen during the debate? I forget it. I don't want
to get to go down that rabbithole. But I can't I can't picture
a debate with him in Trump.I just can't imagine it. It will
not happen. It won't I predictit won't happen. And if it does
(54:43):
happen, the only secret weapon isgiving Biden, like I suspect they did
in the previous debate, so muchmethanphetamine or adderall that he is so jacked
up. He has some amount oflife in him, and he'll be able
to spit out all of the propagandaand canned lines that they have because he's
(55:06):
so robust and his cognition should notbe questioned. Ah, let's take a
look at the state of the war. The White House today unveiling sweeping new
sanctions targeting Russia to mark the anniversary, but with the US funding now run
out, Ukrainian troops are now facingincreasingly dangerous ammunition shortages. Russia is pressing
(55:30):
its advantage last week, finally capturingthe key eastern city of Aldivka. Russia
still suffering tens of thousands of casualties, more than three hundred thousand Russian soldiers
now dead or wounded, according toWestern intelligence estimates, but Ukraine too estimated
to have lost more than one hundredthousand troops. That's a lie, by
(55:50):
the way Fox News interview, thosenumbers are completely skewed. Surrender but no
USA will mean far more dead.So will you gring us survive without Congress
support? Of course, but notall of us. And if we understand
this surprise, if the world isready for this, okay, you will
(56:15):
see it. But it's stregy there, you know. I am so are
you sick yet of Zelensky constantly comingwith his with the charity bag out,
passing around the collection plate, saying, oh yes, if more you can't
Cranians die, It's the American public'sfault. I'm so sick of this guy.
(56:36):
By the way, I believe he'son cocaine. You're like Alex he
thinks everyone's on metha cocaine. No, those are the reports. He's a
cocatine. I didn't say this.These are the things that I've heard,
and I've seen many, many,many instances of him doing press conferences,
doing the coke, doing the cokestuff, touching his nose, doing this
(56:57):
stuff. By the way, thefact that he was an actor doesn't help.
Let's be honest, I am sosick of hearing this guy talk about
if we lose this war, it'sAmerica's fault. It's all He ever says
that they will go. Pootin willnever stay, will never stop. He
will go through Eastern Europe because shewants it. Putin is projecting confidence this
(57:23):
week, flying in a bomber,Putin saying the US should force Ukraine to
negotiate on his terms. European countriestoo are now alarmed, fearful, and
emboldened. Putin could threaten NATO.Does anyone believe that statistic that the Russians
have lost three hundred thousand and theUkrainian's only one hundred thousand or so?
(57:44):
Does anyone believe that lie? Thatis the you know, there's clips and
them admitting the Ukrainians because now they'rebegging for more money, saying for every
ten eight to ten shells that theRussians send our way, we can send
one. They're out of bullets,they're out of artillery rounds, their machines
(58:07):
are old, their guns are old. I've got clips of these Ukrainian guys
talking about the equipment. They're usingold Russian rocket launchers that they got from
Russia that are like twenty thirty yearsold barely work. Sometimes they work,
sometimes they don't. But what doyou think of that? For every one
military bomb, let's say some ofthem are bombed. They're using drones over
(58:31):
there. But let's just say artillery. For every shell they fire a canon
boom into Russia, one goes over, ten more come back, they fire
one more, ten more come back. They've been saying they've been outgunned.
Russia has better equipment, more men, better tanks, better gun whatever,
tons of artillery. Russia has ratchetedup the production of bullets and bombs,
(58:57):
so they've got plenty, and they'rethem down in the Ukrainians. But now
the Ukrainians have lost about one hundredand something and the Russians have lost three
hundred thousand, and they're taking territoryright and left. You just heard the
big city they Does anyone believe thiscrap? Now, if we went to
Russia, they'd probably say, oh, we've lost one hundred thousand. The
Ukrainians have lost half a million.But you know, nobody's gonna listen to
(59:21):
the Russians. Not that I'm I'mfor Putin, Don't get me wrong.
I'm just I'm so sick of thelies of the American propaganda of CBS Morning
News having the gall, the outrightgall to lie to the American public and
say, a eighty one year oldJoe Biden who stumbles up and downstairs cannot
(59:44):
speak, makes you know, guffawafter guffaw sticks his foot in his mouth
every chance he can, shakes handswith imaginary people, is in robust health
and did not need a cognitive test. From his quack doctor's estimation, I
(01:00:08):
don't know who his doctor is.He's a quack. If he watches Joe
Biden and says you don't need acognitive exam, he's a quack doctor.
He should not be practicing medicine.In my estimation. Getting back to the
war again, it's the American public'sfault, according to Zelensky, or who's
(01:00:30):
the other scapgoat the war in Ukraine? Not Joe Biden, who's in the
White House. It's not his fault. But I'm not getting funding. Whose
is it? A man who isnot currently in any political position other than
maybe influence of the Republican Party.Now the war in Ukraine. If they
lose in Ukraine, it's Donald Trump'sfault. The Ukraine losing of Difka is
(01:00:51):
a blow to troop morale, andit's happening as Ukraine runs critically low on
ammunition and manpower, so just saidthey sometimes have to save ammunition and hold
fire even when Russian soldiers are intheir sites. National Security Council spokesman John
Kirby said the lack of shells ispartly to blame for the situation in Avdivka.
(01:01:13):
Russia sending wave after wave of conscriptforces to attack Ukrainian positions, and
because Congress has yet to pass thesupplemental bill, we've not been able to
provide Ukraine with the artillery shells thatthey desperately need to disrupt these Russian assaults.
Last week, the Democrat controlled Senatepassed an aid package with about sixty
billion dollars related to Ukraine, butnow the bill faces hurdles in the Republican
(01:01:36):
run house because of the influence offormer President Donald Trump, who opposes more
Ukraine aid. Ukraine's president said he'sprepared to show Trump what's happening in his
country and if Trump, mister Trump, if he will come, I am
ready even to go with him tothe front line. Now again we have
(01:02:00):
Zelensky and the media blaming US America. And if we don't give, in
my estimation, the cocaine sniffing Zelenskysixty billion dollars to kill more Russians,
well, it's our fault and somehowDonald Trump's fault. This is the kind
(01:02:25):
of crap that is being washed overthe American public day and night, night
and day. Pure propaganda. Itold you I have been blissfully unaware of
the news, been completely ignoring itfor several weeks, frankly, had better
things to do, make money.And I look at what's been going on.
And now the drips the dribbles ofwhose fault the border is, well,
(01:02:52):
that would be Trump. Whose faultthe war is? That would be
Trump. I'm not trying to protectTrump. I'm just saying, how can
you believe the crap? How cananyone believe this nonsense anymore? And then
we hear we need sixty billion dollarsto kill more Russians. That'll solve the
(01:03:17):
whole thing. Uh huh. Now, I thought we had multiple, multiple,
multiple sanctions against Russia that was devastatingtheir economy. Right, we've been
told that too. What is Bidengoing to say. There's two things He's
gonna say, our sanctions are cripplingRussia. I'm doing everything I can to
(01:03:40):
hurt Putin and stop the war.By the way, that's a lie,
A play eclip in a moment.This is from the BBC and not Russia
today. Right, This is BBCon the Russian economy. And then you're
gonna hear, which by the way, is doing better than you. How
does that? How does that workfor anybody? The Russian economy is doing
better and actually flourishing, and theAmerican economy is in the toilet. So
(01:04:04):
the answer is give sixty billion dollarsto Ukraine, not to build up the
infrastructure in the economy in America,which by the way, we need it
desperately, to give it to Ukraineto kill more Russians when we don't even
know where that money's going. That'sone of the reasons the Republicans are holding
back on this. Apparently they're like, there's no accountability for this money.
(01:04:27):
Half of the sixty billion dollars,maybe thirty billion might go what Zelensky's nose.
They want some accountability, they willnot get it. By the way,
it's all smoke and mirrors. SoBiden's solutions he has to you need
to give sixty billion. You haveto pass this. I want sixty billion
dollars to go in the pocket ofZelenski, or I'm going to give harsh,
(01:04:50):
brutal sanctions that are crushing putin hiswar effort and the economy. By
the way, that's a lie.Here's the proof the sanctions are not working.
Today's economic report from Russia bears thatout the economy has been hit with
sixteen and a half thousand sanctions targetingenergy, finance, defense, logistics,
aviation, but outperformed Europe and theUnited States in twenty twenty three, growing
(01:05:15):
by three point six percent. Directimports to Russia from Europe and the US
obviously fell, but Russia has foundnew suppliers in Asia and the Middle East
to fill the gap in imports.Ten percent of GDP is coming from war
related fiscal stimulus. The Polish ForeignMinister says the whole economy is now on
a war footing. Russia may havesuffered over three hundred and fifty casualties,
(01:05:41):
both dead and wounded, but aswe know, in dictatorships, human life
is cheap. Putin has crushed dissidence, murdered Alexey Navalni, moved the country's
economy to a war footing, boostedproduction of artillery shells, and around the
clock. Russia has started building morefactories and running its existing plants on triple
(01:06:05):
shifts. During my last trip toKiev in December, Ukrainians described how the
invaders were so much better equipped thatthey fired eight artillery rounds for every one
that the Ukrainians can muster. That'snot a way to win. Let's bringain
(01:06:27):
Maxime Cats. He's an opposition activistsand political strategist in Russia. Is here
in the UK. I think Maxim, I actually don't know where you are.
Maybe we shouldn't probably say where youare. But let's talk about what
we heard at the European Parliament today. Julia said that Alexi's work will continue.
Who carries the baton? Who isgoing to do that? I think
(01:06:50):
it's very good that she says thatshe will continue his work. It's very
important because the Russian opposition will havea leader. We had some thoughts about
what we will do now because Alexann Avanni was leader of Russian position.
But now she says that she willcontinue his work. So yeah, yeah,
But Alexei Dvani didn't just oppose VladimirPutin. He exposed him. He
(01:07:15):
lifted a lid on the corruption andthe criminality, all those kind of people
within the movement who can show theRussian people what he's up to. I
think this process of showing the Russianpeople is mostly is already done by Alexi
Navani. His movie about the palaceof that putting bill to himself has about
(01:07:41):
one hundred and forty million views onYouTube, which is almost the same number
as the population of Russia. SoI think everybody knows that Russian government is
corrupted. The next steps are makinga political action together, and the main
struggle is to bring together at leastthe opposition and the people who post put
(01:08:02):
In two act to make a politicalaction together. And I hope you will
be able to do that. Idon't know, but I hope. So
one presumes that she won't be ableto go to the funeral on Friday,
What sort of event is that goingto be and what is the risk to
those who attend. We don't noticeyet. The Russian government tried to do
(01:08:23):
everything that it can that this won'tbe a big public event. They tried
to pressure the mother of Alexander Alniso she will agree to quiet family funeralals,
some kind of things like this.She didn't agree to that. I
don't know yet what will happen therenow. As Moscow police started to issue
(01:08:46):
fines and even time in jail,like two weeks in jail for people who
came to put flowers on memorials inthe day of death of Alexander Avalni.
These kind of things can happen alsofor those who who will come to funeral.
But we don't know yet. Thatfigure on our screens at the moment,
(01:09:08):
the economy growing by three point sixpercent. I think that will surprise
a lot of people. Her messagetoday is that sanctions aren't working. The
European parliamentarians are not doing enough.Why why are they not working? This
is a long conversation, to putit short. I think the sanctions have
no goal, no strategy and noplan. Europe and the Western countries try
(01:09:32):
to, I don't know, holdaccountable Russia and put In and things like
this, but there is no practicalplan what these sanctions will do and how
it will affect Russian economy and inconsequences. The worst continue to send huge
amounts of money to Russia to putIn. There are no sanctions on buying
(01:09:53):
things from Russia, mostly not buyinga gas, buying oil. There are
some sanctions, but still huge amountof money is flowing into Russia and Putting,
using Putting, using this money forthe war and for for keeping his
economy running, Russian economy running.In the other hand, no effort to
(01:10:14):
uh make a brain drain from Russiais made. Because a lot of people
want to leave Russia. It's veryimportant people for Russian economy, but not
a lot of effort is being doneto offer these people a possibility to exit
Russia and live in somewhere else.So, in my opinion, these sanctions
has no firm strategy. No Westernleader leader can say what is the strategy
(01:10:40):
and what are the practical steps thatthese sanctions need to achieve. Not the
moral part of this story, notthe internal politics part of the story to
show your constituency that you're tough onRussia, but the practical how it will
affect rassianal It was nobody never discussedeven in even publicly, so well practically
(01:11:00):
speaking, I mean practically speaking,what they of course, have to do
is to stop the high tech equipmentgetting into Russia which is being used to
resupply the armed forces. So therewas a committee hearing yesterday before the Senate
Armed Services Committee in Washington. Dossierhanded over two hundred and eleven American manufactured
(01:11:21):
high tech products were used to killUkrainians on the battlefield. So American components
in the major US companies Intel,Texas Instruments, IBM, the chip manufacturer
AMD, all of their kit isgetting to Russia. How is it getting
there and do they know it's gettingthere? Yes, it is getting there
(01:11:45):
because Russia has a lot of money. In the modern world, in modern
economy of the twenty twenty four,you cannot stop things flowing anywhere if this
clan have money to buy it.You can take as an example of the
war on drugs, huge amount ofmoney is a huge huge prison terms are
(01:12:10):
are given to those who bringing drugsfor the for example, to the United
States, But the drugs still flowingin because there are people who has money
and want to buy them, andyou cannot do nothing with this. The
only thing you can do with thisin the case of Russia is making sure
that put in one have this money. If you're sending him dollars in euros
(01:12:31):
to buying gas and oil from himand other different stuff, he will be
able to get this money, allthis modern equipment, and you will won't
be able to do anything with it. And there you have it. You
need to learn about what's really goingon in Ukraine. Every time I look
into this, outside of the USand news agencies, even the BBC,
(01:12:53):
which is lockstep with the US,the reporting is a little a bit more
fair, and I think I thinkit's obvious that there's a different story going
on in Ukraine that we're being told. And the fact that it's Trump's fault,
an American's fault if they lose thewar in the Ukraine is ridiculous.
Nobody's buying it. Nobody's buying it. Friends. I will be doing more
(01:13:17):
shows, even if they're shorter showsand I have to parse them out.
It will happen. I have amassive show. I'm doing the Fuck the
Street Job. Hopefully soon it'll goout to my locals and Patreon subscribers.
First, I'm doing a whole showon why you should never speak to the
police. You need it for requiredreading is the book You Have the Right
(01:13:41):
to Remain Innocent by James Dwayne.I read that several years ago. It
came out in twenty sixteen, butI read that several years ago. It's
a quick read's about one hundred andfifty pages, and you will never speak
to the police again if you're interrogatedonce you read this book. It's a
fantastic book. And I'm going toplay a prime example from NYPD Blue.
(01:14:03):
Can you tell I've been watching thereen runs recently they're free on twob I
never actually watched the show when itwas on air, barely, but I
just happened to catch the pilot andit was so intriguing. I said,
my god, it's still edgy fortwenty twenty three or twenty four rather that
we're in and this was created nineteenninety three. So anyway, yeah,
(01:14:25):
I've got an amazing I was gonnasay, clip, but I'm gonna play
like part of the entire episode andit's broken down, and I'm gonna show
you because I thought it was brilliantwhen I watched it. I'm like,
this is exactly what James Dwayne,the author of the Right You Have,
You Have the Right Toy main silentsaid, And it's a perfect example filmed
the nineteen ninety three of how aninterrogation goes and how the cops absolutely screw
(01:14:47):
you. We're gonna play that.That's the next show. I don't know
how much more I can talk aboutpolitics and propaganda. Frankly, every time
I give myself a break from thenews, I feel much better. And
then I tune back into the newsbecause I'm like, let me do a
show, do some show prep,and I'm shocked about what I hear.
It's just it's all propaganda. Americanpropaganda. Will do a part two,
(01:15:09):
but for now, just know this. You're being lied to virtually all the
time. Oh the shoe shampoo cute, ain't no biggie. When a small
nigga drive Jimmy loose popping nigga andit's my poors killer's brother too, nigga
less ters pay nine years. That'sschool nigga trying to get the chase bloot Chick six