Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
Hello, and welcome to the History of the show for
anyone who flunked history but still wants to impress at
Trivia Night. Each day we take one topic, an object,
a place, a job, a trend and uncover the weird, messy,
and sometimes ridiculous truth behind it. No homework, just history
you'll actually want to tell people about. Ready, let's get
(00:30):
into it, the history of the fork. Let's begin with
a question, why did it take humans thousands of years
to accept the fork. We've been shaping tools since the
Stone Age. We figured out how to make fire, build pyramids,
and even invent indoor plumbing before we collectively agreed that
maybe it's okay to stab your food with a tiny
(00:52):
metal trident. The fork, arguably one of the most practical
tools at the table, had a surprisingly awkward and controversial
journey into everyday life, and it all started in the
ancient world. The earliest versions of the fork weren't for eating.
They were for cooking. If you go back to the
Bronze Age, you'll find long, two pronged tools used for
(01:14):
spearing meat over fire or lifting slabs of food out
of pots. These were useful, but no one thought to
bring them to the dining table. They were like the
tongs in your kitchen drawer, handy but not invited to dinner.
Ancient Egypt had a version two Archaeologists have found elegant
two pronged forks made of bronze and ivory, but these
were usually found in tombs or ritual contexts. In other words,
(01:37):
they were fancy, symbolic, reserved for the afterlife, where presumably
even pharaohs didn't want greasy fingers. The Greeks and Romans
also used fork like tools, again mostly for cooking or serving.
The Greeks, who gave us democracy and drama, somehow drew
the line at table forks. They ate with their hands,
(01:58):
spoons and knives. Romans, always up for luxury, had silverware
for serving meat, but still preferred to eat with fingers.
High status Romans reclined on couches while servants sliced food
into small, manageable pieces. A fork would have been redundant.
Why bother with a tool when you have a kitchen
staff and someone else to wipe your hands. It's important
(02:19):
to understand that in the ancient world, eating with your
hands wasn't considered uncivilized. It was the norm. If anything,
It showed you were human, alive and participating in the
glorious mess that is communal dining. Bread could act as
a scoop, Knives were used to cut, spoons took care
of liquids, and fingers, well, fingers did the rest. The
(02:41):
idea of stabbing your food lifting it to your mouth
like some kind of utensil wielding wizard just hadn't caught on.
But that started to change slowly and somewhat awkwardly, thanks
to trade travel and a little help from Byzantium. By
the fourth century, the Byzantine Empire, what was left of
the Eastern Roman world was ex ernamenting with dining customs
(03:01):
that seemed bizarre to outsiders. Among the nobility, small personal
forks began to appear at the table. These weren't cooking tools.
They were dainty, refined, and used for eating soft fruits, pastries,
or delicate bites that one did not want to smear
all over one's robes. The fork, at this point was
less about utility and more about elegance. It showed that
(03:24):
you were wealthy enough to care about not getting your
fingers sticky. You weren't just eating, you were performing the
act of dining gracefully, daintily, and without wiping your hands
on the tablecloth. The fork's big entrance into Western Europe
came by marriage. In the eleventh century, a Byzantine princess
named Maria Arjaropolina married into Venetian nobility. As part of
(03:46):
her grand entrance, she brought a collection of gold forks.
The local Italians were not impressed. They watched her use
her fancy foreign tool to eat dainty little bites, and
they judged her hard. The Venetian court, despite being deeply
involved in trade with the East, found her table manners
deeply suspicious. Religious figures scolded her behavior. One priest reportedly
(04:07):
declared that God, in his wisdom, has provided man with
natural forks his fingers. This wasn't just culinary conservatism, it
was moral panic. The fork, to some Europeans, seemed decadent, artificial,
even unholy. Maria died young, possibly from the plague. Her
critics saw this as divine punishment for her pride and
(04:29):
her forks, because, of course, when a woman dies of
disease in medieval Europe, it's probably because she used the
wrong cutlery. For a while, that was enough to keep
forks out of favor. They lingered in the margins, a
curiosity in some aristocratic circles, a scandal in others. Most
people kept using knives, spoons, and hands. Why mess with tradition?
(04:50):
Forks were seen as affected, fancy, something foreign, and vaguely threatening. Meanwhile,
in the Islamic world and parts of Asia, people were
developing their own approaches. Chopsticks, for example, were widely used
in China and neighboring regions. They emphasized a very different
style of eating, smaller pieces, shared dishes, minimal cutting at
(05:11):
the table. Chopsticks weren't forks, but they served a similar
purpose food delivery with minimal mess, and they were accepted
without drama. Europe, however, remained stubborn for centuries. Forks were
mostly limited to elite households in places like Venice or Florence.
Even then, they were more novelty than necessity. The real
(05:32):
turning point came with the Renaissance, because if there's one
thing the Renaissance loved more than art and plague outbreaks,
it was showing off. As trade and travel increased, so
did exposure to new customs. Wealthy Europeans, especially Italians, began
to adopt the fork, not just as a tool, but
as a fashion statement. Silver and gold forks with carved
(05:52):
handles appeared at banquets. Paintings showed noble families delicately twirling
spaghetti with them, and slowly the idea that using a
fork might actually be practical began to take hold. The
shift wasn't instant, nor was it universal. Fork still carried
the whiff of foreigness and aristocratic silliness, but by the
sixteenth century something was changing. People were beginning to notice
(06:16):
that eating with a fork kept your hands clean. You
didn't have to pass the bread with grease covered fingers,
you didn't leave your seat with gravy from wrist to elbow. Hygiene,
it turned out, was persuasive. One person who helped speed
things along was Catherine de Medici. Born into a powerful
Florentine family, she married King Henry the second of France
(06:37):
and brought her Italian habits with her, including her love
of forks. French court culture was highly influential. If Catherine
used a fork, others paid attention. They might have rolled
their eyes at first, but they copied her anyway. By
the seventeenth century, forks were becoming common at upper class
French tables. Then English travelers brought the habit home. At first,
(07:00):
they were mocked. Thomas Coryate, an English writer who praised
fork use in Italy, was ridiculed for years. His nickname
became Furchefer, which literally means fork bearer. This was not
meant as a compliment, but Correate had a point. He
argued that using a fork helped avoid greasy fingers and
prevented people from getting sick. This was centuries before germ theory,
(07:23):
but even then people could connect the dots between sticky
hands and mysterious illnesses. Over time, the fork made its slow,
stubborn climb from luxury to standard. It crept from Italy
to France, to England, and eventually across Europe. Designs changed.
The two tined fork gave way to three, then four
curved times made twirling pasta easier. Specialized forks emerged, fish forks,
(07:46):
desert fork's salad forks. The whole cutlery drawer began to
fill up with variations on what had once been considered
a crime against God. By the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries,
the fork had arrived in the West. It was no
longer a curiosity or a scandal. It was just part
of the table. A quiet revolution had taken place, one
(08:06):
bite at a time. And here's the thing we barely
noticed today. We reach for a fork without thinking. We
don't consider the centuries of resistance, the debates, the panic
over decadence, the religious outrage, the princess who scandalized the
city by refusing to touch her figs with her fingers.
We just eat. So next time you pick up a fork,
(08:28):
remember what it represents. It's not just a bit of
polished steel. It's a story about culture, class, superstition, and
resistance to change. It's a reminder that even the smallest
innovations can take a very long time to feel normal,
and that apparently it's possible to be accused of heresy
for not wanting sticky hands at dinner. That's the history
(08:48):
of the fork's ancient origins, and we've only just scratched
the surface. In the next chapter, we'll dive into how
the fork nearly became the devil's cutlery in medieval Europe
and why it took so long for people to stop
freaking out over a glorified prong. Chapter two, The Devil's
cutlery fork panic in Medieval Europe. In theory, the fork
(09:11):
should have caught on pretty quickly. It's practical, it keeps
your hands clean, it lets you avoid looking like a
raccoon digging through garbage at the dinner table. And yet
for centuries in medieval Europe, the fork was treated less
like a helpful tool and more like a suspicious foreign
object sent by Satan himself to poke holes in Christian morals.
If you've ever wondered how long it can take people
(09:32):
to accept a new idea, just remember the fork. It's
one of the best examples in culinary history of how
deeply weird humans can be about change. Let's rewind to
where we left off. In the Byzantine Empire, around the
tenth and eleventh centuries, small two pronged table forks were
making cautious appearances in upper class households, mostly among the elite,
(09:55):
mostly for soft or sticky foods, and mostly just in
the East. But even that limited use was enough to
raise eyebrows in the West, and when a Byzantine princess
brought her gold forks to Venice in the one thousands,
it caused a miniature scandal. The Princess Theodora do Kina
married Domenico Selvo, the Doge of Venice. As part of
(10:17):
her imperial swag bag, she brought along her own refined tableware,
including forks, not giant cooking ones, but little elegant ones
for personal use. She used them daintily to avoid getting
her fingers dirty. That alone was enough to offend her hosts.
A Venetian monk named Peter Damien was especially horrified. He
wrote scathingly that this woman would not touch her food
(10:40):
with her fingers, but used a little golden fork. He
followed that with a warning that God had punished her
vanity with a sudden illness and death. In other words,
she died because she used the wrong utensil. Case closed.
This wasn't just local gossip. The notion that forks were extravagant, unholy,
or straight up sinful spread like hot gossip at a
(11:01):
wedding banquet. Forks were considered unnecessary at best and decadent
at worst. After all, the logic went, God gave humans fingers.
Using an extra tool to eat was a sign of
pride and unwillingness to accept the natural gifts of your
own body, and pride of course, was a sin. Keep
in mind, this wasn't just a few cranky monks with
(11:21):
bad dinner manners. The broader culture genuinely viewed forks as
part of a dangerous luxury trend. Europe in the Middle
Ages had a deep suspicion of anything that looked like opulence.
The Church in particular warned against vanity and excess fancy. Forks,
especially gold ones from a foreign land, didn't exactly scream humility,
(11:42):
so the fork got lumped in with all the other
suspicious Eastern habits too refined, too soft, too different. While
some nobles in Italy and parts of the Mediterranean started
using forks occasionally, the majority of Europe clung to knives, spoons,
and fingers. The fork didn't stand a chance. It had
arrived too early and in the wrong social climate. Even
(12:03):
when forks were used, they were often ceremonial. Ornate serving
forks might appear at feasts, used by servants to serve
meat from platter to plate, but not by the guests themselves.
Diners still use their knives to cut and their hands
to eat. Napkins soaked up the mess. Washing your hands
after a meal was more common than using a fork
during it. The resistance to the fork wasn't purely moral.
(12:27):
There were also practical habits at play. For example, the
knife was both a utensil and a personal item. People
carried their own knives to meals. It was common for
a guest to arrive at a banquet, pull out their
own knife and use it to carve food off a
shared platter. Spoons were provided, Fingers did the rest. This
worked fine. The idea of using a separate tool to
(12:50):
transfer food from plate to mouth just didn't seem necessary. Culturally,
this resistance to change is fascinating. You can draw a
straight line from this attitude to modern moments of We've
always done it this way, whether it's food, fashion, or technology.
Humans tend to clutch their traditions like heirlooms, even when
they're messy or impractical. The fork was a clear improvement
(13:13):
in terms of cleanliness and ease, but it had to
overcome centuries of skepticism, moral judgment, and habit. That said,
not everyone was against it. In the Italian city states,
especially among the wealthy merchant class, forks slowly crept back
into the picture. Italy was more exposed to Eastern trade
and culture, than most of Europe, and Italian nobles liked
(13:36):
to show off. The Medici family, one of the most
powerful dynasties in Florence, helped popularize the fork in their
social circles, but even then forks remained a niche item.
They were used for specific dishes like sticky sweets or fruit,
and more as a status symbol than a standard tool.
A fork said look at me, I'm rich enough to
(13:56):
avoid touching my own food. Not everyone a preciated that message.
To many, it still seemed ridiculous to use a fork
when perfectly good fingers were right there, ready to do
the job. In England, the fork didn't make much of
an impression at all. During the medieval period. British dining
culture was especially hands on. Bread served as a plate,
(14:17):
meats were carved and scooped, sauces were mopped up with crusts.
Even spoons were often shared. The idea of an individual
fork seemed wildly unnecessary. Plus there was the added bonus
of moral superiority. Using a fork could make you look foreign, vain,
or worse French. Still, change was creeping in. By the
fifteen hundreds, more European travelers were heading south to Italy
(14:40):
and coming back with stories of strange table habits. One
of these travelers was Thomas Coryate, an English writer who
toured Italy in the early sixteen hundreds and came back
raving about forks. He liked them, he said, they kept
your fingers clean. He even adopted the habit himself. His
reward years of public mockery. People called him a pretentious
the show off. His nickname Fersafer literally meant fork bearer,
(15:04):
and it wasn't meant kindly. Yet Corierate was onto something.
As trade, diplomacy, and intermarriage continued, more and more European
nobles encountered the fork. Slowly, grudgingly, they began to use it.
France in particular, started shifting its attitude during the Late Renaissance.
Part of that was due to exposure to Italian court life,
(15:26):
where forks had become more fashionable. Part of it was
Catherine de Medici. Catherine, born into the powerful Medici family,
married King Henry the Second of France in the sixteenth century.
When she arrived at the French court, she brought with
her Italian cooks, Italian recipes, and Italian table manners, including
the fork. This wasn't a subtle influence. Catherine helped reshape
(15:49):
French dining culture from the inside out, and although the
French still took their time, the fork began to find
a place at the table. By the early seventeenth century,
forks were making regular appearances in France and Italy. England
followed a bit later. Adoption was still uneven. In some households,
forks were used for certain foods but not others. In
(16:11):
others they were reserved for guests or formal occasions, and
in plenty of rural areas nobody bothered with them at all.
But the tide had turned. The fork was no longer
seen as evil or absurd. It had become acceptable. Still fancy,
still a bit extra, but acceptable. This whole saga says
a lot about how culture works. The fork's rejection wasn't
really about the object itself. It was about what it symbolized, foreignness,
(16:36):
vanity change. Once those associations faded, the fork could just
be a fork, and when people finally embraced it, they
went all in. Forks with two times became forks with
three or four handles, got carved. Materials shifted from wood
to metal to silver. By the eighteenth century, forks had
found their forever home in the cutlery drawer. They were
(16:58):
finally safe from scandal. In the next chapter, we'll look
at how the fork didn't just survive, it conquered from
royal banquets to fast food joints. The fork's rise is
a story of transformation. But for now, let's give some
credit to all those people in the Middle Ages who
stared at this weird pronged tool and thought, you know what,
that's probably the devil's work. They were wrong, but they
(17:20):
were committed. Chapter three, A Seat at the Table, The
fork goes mainstream. By the end of the Renaissance, the
fork had successfully gone from being a suspicious Eastern oddity
to a fashionable, if slightly pretentious, utensil used by nobles
to impress each other and avoid greasy fingers. But it
still hadn't reached the dinner tables of regular people. For
(17:42):
most of Europe, and for quite a while, the fork
was something rich people used when they wanted to feel
fancy and superior. But slowly, quietly, over the next few centuries,
the fork clawed its way into the mainstream. The real
breakthrough came during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in society
was shifting. Trade was booming, cities were growing, middle classes
(18:05):
were emerging, and with this came a gradual obsession with manners, refinement,
and cleanliness. Suddenly it wasn't just aristocrats who cared about
how they looked while they ate. Merchants, lawyers, and even
upwardly mobile farmers wanted to keep up appearances. They didn't
want to eat like medieval tavern dwellers anymore. They wanted
to look polished, civilized, respectable. Enter the fork. It started,
(18:29):
as so many things do in France. French dining culture
during the seventeenth century began to emphasize etiquette in a
big way. Everything had a rule, where to sit, how
to hold your spoon, when to dab your lips with
a napkin. And into this world of table choreography came
the fork four times slim handle, matching your knife and spoon.
(18:50):
If you were hosting at dinner and you had forks
on the table, it told your guests something important. It
said you had taste, and more importantly, it said you
had money. By the seventeen hundreds, forks were becoming more
common in England too, slowly but surely, the British began
to embrace them, not with wild enthusiasm, but with the
(19:10):
kind of resigned politeness you might reserve for a cousin
who insists on bringing their own cheeseboard to family dinners.
There were still holdouts, of course, some folks grumbled that
forks were unmanly or unnecessary, but by the Georgian era
you could expect to find forks at formal meals in
upper class homes and increasingly in middle class ones as well.
(19:32):
Part of what helped the fork go mainstream was its makeover.
Early forks had two straight times, good for spearing food,
not great for anything else. But by the eighteenth century,
fork designers got creative. The times curved slightly to better
scoop food. Three tined models gave way to four. That
extra time made a big difference. Suddenly you could not
(19:54):
only stab your food, you could balance it, twirl it,
even nudge it around on your plate with something resembled grace.
And then there was the Industrial Revolution. Once factories got
involved in the production of flatwear, everything changed. Forks could
be mass produced. That meant they became cheaper, which meant
more people could afford them, which meant more forks on
(20:17):
more tables in more places. You didn't have to be royalty,
you didn't need a noble title. You just needed a
bit of spare cash and an interest in not looking
like a medieval barbarian at lunch. This democratization of the
fork didn't just change dining habits, it created an entire
culture around cutlery. Suddenly there wasn't just a fork. There
(20:37):
were forks, plural salad forks, dessert forks, fish forks, oyster forks,
forks with curved handles, forks with engraved initials, forks shaped
like tiny rakes. You could argue this was excessive, and
you'd be right, but that's how social signaling works. Once
a tool becomes normal, the only way to make it
feel special again is to invent five more versions of it. Meanwhile,
(21:02):
in America, things moved at their own pace. Colonial Americans
inherited their eating habits from the British, which meant forks
were a late addition to the table. Throughout the seventeen hundreds,
forks were used here and there, mostly by the well
to do. But it wasn't until the eighteen hundreds that
the fork truly took hold across the United States. As
(21:22):
American factories began producing affordable flatwear, the fork spread like wildfire.
By the mid nineteenth century, it was standard issue in
American dining sets. Of course, not everyone agreed on how
to use it. Even today, there's a slight transatlantic divide.
Europeans tend to use the fork in their left hand
and the knife in their right, cutting food and eating
(21:44):
in one continuous motion. Americans often cut their food, then
switched the fork to their dominant hand before taking a bite.
Why no one knows, Possibly just to be difficult. But
the result is that the fork, despite becoming universal, still
has regional quirks. As the twentieth century arrived, the fork's
reputation settled. It was no longer exotic or elite. It
(22:07):
was just part of the table. Whether you were eating
roast beef in London, spaghetti in Rome, or meat loaf
in Kansas, the fork was there. It was unremarkable, invisible,
like the air or your third cousin at Thanksgiving. Then
came the spork. Yes, we have to talk about the spork,
that hybrid utensil with a spoon's bowl and a fork's
(22:28):
times beloved by fast food chains and school cafeterias. It
sounds like a joke, it looks like a joke, but
it's real. The spork is what happens when someone tries
to out fork the fork. It was patented in the
late nineteenth century, though similar designs existed earlier, and while
it's never fully replaced the traditional fork, it's carved out
a weird little niche in the utensil world. The fork
(22:50):
has also taken on symbolic weight. Think of how often
we refer to it in metaphor a fork in the road,
to stick a fork in it when something's done to
be fork tongued. The fork has entered language, art and
culture in ways no one could have predicted when it
was just a strange gold trinket on a Byzantine prince's plate.
(23:11):
And through it all we've managed to mostly forget the long, awkward,
deeply judgmental road it took to get here. Most people
have no idea the fork was once seen as sinful
or ridiculous, or foreign or effeminate or all of the above.
We just use it because it's there, because it works,
which honestly is kind of beautiful. It's a reminder that
(23:32):
progress doesn't always arrive in grand speeches or dramatic moments.
Sometimes it shows up quietly at dinner. Sometimes it takes
a few centuries to catch on, and sometimes it's disguised
as a shiny little tool that nobody wanted until suddenly
everybody did. So next time you sit down to eat
and automatically reach for a fork, pause for a second.
(23:53):
Appreciate the fact that you're holding a piece of history,
a piece of resistance, ridicule, innovation, and stubborn practicality. It's
not just a fork. It's a very old idea that
finally found its place.