Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
I hope you're enjoying this big exclusive. Don't forget to subscribe to this channel.
Now. Now back to the show, because in a second, I'm
going to invite quote unquote white boyRick Um to join the conversation. What
else is in the news that weneed to talk about? Because I want
(00:22):
to invite you, but we're takinga conversation regarding the status of the dollar,
the US dollar in particular. Um, is there anything else? I
mean, we can take that rightthere. It was the status of the
dollar, you know, people.I just wanted to clear something enough for
people. People keep saying the dollarsgoing to be worthless, get you some
(00:44):
bit, get you some that thedollar's going to be trash, But then
they say, oh, things aregoing to be more expensive. So I
wanted to break that down for people. Yes, the dollar has always been
trash. That's why we spend moreof those dollars. So I don't dollar
is never gonna be worthless that you'regonna have people throwing it in the street.
The dollar is going to be lessvalue, meaning I used to sell
(01:07):
cars for you know, thirty thousanddollars. Now because of the dollars and
decline that cars two hundred thousand dollars, if that makes sense, using those
same dollars, So that car valueis going to be the same. And
if you come to me with somenew some new money, it's still gonna
(01:30):
be two hundred thousand, you know. So I want people to just get
that through their brain. Don't godump in your cash. I mean,
if you want to dump it,give it to me. I'll take it,
you know, I'll take it offthe hand, give it to me.
I'll tak it for you. Youknow, because people like me in
a lot of these countries, alot of these states, they're they're they're
not gonna they're gonna fight this.Just like you saw Florida. They stepped
up first and said we're going tokeep taking dollars, We're not going with
(01:53):
this digital currency, and textans isgoing to follow as well. So that's
telling me. I've been telling peoplethat next thing, you know, Florida
said they're not getting on board withthat. They're going to keep their cash,
They're gonna keep using that dollars.So now you're gonna have a shift
of people like myself saying, oh, I guess I'll be moving to Florida
because I can keep using my dollarsthere because I understand what's going on.
(02:21):
That's something we need to go onand shout out your social media and your
contact information again because I'm about toplay an audio clip and open up Ricks,
Mike. Okay, My my socialmedia is all Thomas TJ lofton,
my Instagram, my TikTok, myYouTube, TJ lofton. I'm also live
(02:47):
on there now Thomas TJ lofton LFTIand on my website is TJ lofton dot
com, where they can get acopy of my hit best selling book Monetizing
Gentrification, Building Black Ownership, ofwhich I talked a lot about that stuff
of what's going on all around thecountry from a futurist perspective. They because
(03:07):
they called me the economic futurists,So yeah, I talk a lot about
that in that book. Get youa copy, signed copy, uh at
tjlofton dot com. Thank you,all right, TJ. Listen to this
and when we come back, Iam going to invite Rick to the conversation.
(03:30):
I just cannot keep up with theseaudio clips today. But here here's
here's this. So Russia announced wewill conduct business in Asia African and Latin
America in Chinese currency. Brazil,which has a brand new government supported by
the Biden administration, announced it willdo the same thing. Brasil, largest
economy in the Hemisphere after ours,Pakistan, is doing the same thing.
(03:53):
That's a long time US ally.India and Malaysia, two the biggest economies
in the world, announce they'll besetting their trade in their own currencies,
not the dollar. Even France,which we liberated, is using Chinese currency
in a new liquefied nancial gas trade. Trying in Saudi Arabia are now major
business partners, and again, etc, etc, et cetera. This is
(04:17):
happening around the world, and allof it is shutting out the US dollar,
and it's happening a lot faster thananybody could have predicted, and yet
no one in Washington seems aware thatit is happening. All right, So
super short cliff, And now youguys are not used to me playing super
short cliffs, but that's it,all right. But this time, what
(04:39):
I'd like to do is welcome,Welcome Rick through the conversation. How are
you doing today, sir, I'mdoing well. When I make sure you
continue the okay to set up themoney right now, hold on one second,
because I think you're muffled. Um, TJ. Can you hear him?
(05:02):
Because it's maybe me. Yeah,he's he's a little buffle. Can
you hear me? Now? Howabout no, I don't know. Let's
do a mic check, mic check. Are you there all right? Can
you hear me? Okay, yeah, I think that's better. Um,
(05:24):
still a little muffled, but that'sbetter than what we had, So we're
gonna kind of roll with that.Um, how are you doing well?
It's been a little bit And oneof the reasons for the different equipment is
they didn't realize when I switched toa new phone, didn't come up with
some of the didn't it came witheverything. Now let's be bluetooth. There's
no audio jacks. Yeah, theyhave done away with the audio jacks.
(05:50):
I'll tell you, I don't knowwhat's happening now. That's so nice of
them. I'm glad they're looking outfor us. Oh man, I'll tell
you. Don't you feel special?Oh my goodness, let's tell you be
doing very well and just been veryactive the last few months and been very
(06:11):
busy about your end. That's busy. It's good. It's it's just very
good. Um. Yeah, wedefinitely need to stay busy. UM.
I wanted to well, I invitedyou because I wanted you to share with
us, you know, the wantedto talk about the status of the dollar.
You know that. But what waswhat is near and dear to my
(06:32):
heart is cash apt because you knowthat's how I do most of my business.
So I was, you know,kind of taken back. Um,
I don't know what happened. I'lllet you guys. You know, I
don't like to script stuff. I'mjust gonna play this audio and just get
your take. Just we'll be herein a few minutes, so we will
continue this conversation. But I dowant to talk about this. The quarter
(06:56):
appearance was very brief, only lasteda couple of minutes, but we do
know that the arrayment has been pushedback at least until April twenty fifth.
The suspect, Nina Momany Well,he was supposed to enter a plea this
morning, but again that has beenpushed back for several weeks. In the
meantime, he will remain in jailwithout bail at least until that date,
(07:19):
until a judge can decide bail orno bail. He is accused of killing
Bob Lee. He was arrested inEmeryville. Now. Bob Lee was staggering
through the streets of San Francisco lastTuesday, just off the Embarcadero at around
two thirty five in the morning.He is a tech icon, started an
(07:39):
app called cash app back in twentythirteen, among many other things. With
his resume. I can't tell youthat the San Francisco Police Department, as
well as the attorneys on both sideswe interview them. There are dozens of
reporters here locally and nationally. Boththe attorneys representing the suspect as all as
(08:00):
the prosecution. They did not gointo any detail as far as a motive
behind this. They didn't even saythat they have any evidence going into that
particular part. But the San FranciscoPolice Department, they did elaborate a little
bit yesterday saying that the suspect andthe victim knew each other, but would
not go into details. I evenasked the defense team were they friends,
(08:24):
were they co workers? They saidno comment basically about that. We do
know that the suspect is thirty eightyears old. His family and friends were
inside the courtroom. We're all waitingoutside hoping to interview them, but for
whatever reason, they were allowed toleave the courtroom through another door. So
we never got a comment from familymembers as far as what's going on with
(08:50):
this case, while a lot ofpeople closely watching this, of course,
especially in the tech industry, becausethe San Francisco Police Department did say that
the suspect work in tech, thathe did start a company called expand It.
So again, this has been pushedback for several weeks until April twenty
bit, and the suspect will remainbehind bars. Back you all right,
(09:16):
all right, So again this isvery very important to me because I don't
want this sad now payment system.I don't like it. I wish I
had have downloaded the trailer whatever,the little commercial that they have. I
know that it's on YouTube, butI forgot to download it. But I
(09:37):
would rather this and Zail and andyou know all the other apps that these
techs afford us versus the federal governmentapp. I don't like it. I
hate it. I just don't havea great feeling about it. So that's
why I wanted to talk to youguys. About it. So what are
(10:00):
your thoughts. Oh, I thinkfrom an investigator point of view, we
definitely have it cares to be acrime of passion. We have multiple stabbounds
that we're talking about the initial homicide, and most likely we're going to find
this a lot more to the relationshipsand obviously that people know, that's why
they keeping things close to the chest. As far as the currency aspect,
(10:24):
whether we wond it or not,it is coming and I agree with you
call her that. You know,there's a lot of things we need to
do to prepare for it, andI think we of course don't dump cash.
And I'm not, like you said, I don't like the idea of
us transferringto something that can be easilyabused not only by our government but other
(10:45):
organizations as well, even more sothan cash. But this hasn't coming since
the first inmitial release of cryptocurrency.Was it back in the mid two thousands
early two thousands That wasn't released byaccident, And this has all been just
a step closer to where certain partiesI wanted this to go. A lot
(11:07):
of people need to disagree, butthis is where we're going and trying to
stay ahead of it through investments andproperty ownership as long as it becomes possible
is important, and as is selfsufficiency and learning to basically trade with each
other. So we're outside the systemof currency too, I think is important,
(11:28):
sir. What are your thoughts?Thank you for those of you who
just joined us UM fed now.Fed now is a service UM a new
instant payment infrastructure launching July twenty twentythree, so that's this year again.
I don't like it. U fednow has been built to potentially serve a
(11:52):
number of business, consumer and governmentuse cases. For business that now in
streamline payments to customers, consumers,and employees, m fed now service will
help slide everyone. It's very redundant, but anyway, it's a payment system
infrastructure developed by the Federal Reserve thatallows financial institutions of every size across the
(12:18):
US to dad and they're trying tocancel out zail and cash happing all those
others. I can't say this enough. I don't like it. PJ.
Your thoughts, well, I justthink it's mighty convenient speaking about the FED
now coming in and of course they'regoing to get rid of they telling these
(12:39):
billionaires, hey, we don't needyou guys anymore. Nobody will be using
your task app. So all ofa sudden you think they're gonna just take
that laying down. No, thisguy built multi billionaire, he got money
to fight that stop them. Sofor him to conveniently get stabbed and murdered
outside somewhere that that just come on. Now, if that was anybody else
(13:00):
to be a serious case going oninvestigation, there will be someone paid and
paid that guy to go stab thisguy or something. You know that is
this way too convenient, you know, as far as they're fed now,
I don't like it purely based onthe fact that it's too much control.
You're giving the government too much control. Stuff, got it? You know,
I just think about myself, youknow, I think about anytime something
(13:24):
goes wrong. You know, mymoney's not there, something happens, you
know, your your credit cards notworking, or the ID don't look like
that might not be you. It'sjust too much. I liked having cash
in my pocket just in case somethinggoes wrong. Now all of a sudden,
you're telling me I'm not gonna beable to have that cash, you
know, for people. When peoplesay this is gonna happen. No matter
(13:45):
what I look at it. Theytried to make it happen. It's not
the first time the government has comewith something like this. The credit card
was actually supposed to replace the dollar. They we're gonna use the credit cards
to replace dollars, but just likewe knew, it did not work out
because people want to continue to usecash because I like knowing that I got
money under my mattress if something goeswrong. You know, the government is
(14:09):
telling us, hey, Russia's gonnacome in here and hit us with an
MP Paulson wipe out all electricity.We're preparing for that. But then at
the same time they're telling us,oh, we want all the cars to
be electric, and we want allthe money to be electric and digital.
I'm like, that does not addup. Why would why would we do
that? Why would we set ourselvesup? But then it goes back to
(14:30):
myself telling people that we need tonot just be dependent on the CAST or
the FED now money. We needto have trade because if they did hit
us with an MP post, youknow, how are you gonna eat.
You're not gonna be able to usethat FED. Now I think we can
look at what happened in Florida whenthey were flooded out. I said,
none of that digital. That bitcoindidn't work. Nothing worked that was digital.
(14:52):
Those people were over, they're struggling, you know. They had to
use the cash that they had intheir hand to buy goods. They had
to do barter and things like that. So this goes back to teaching people
about the trades. You gotta havea trade if you want to bother,
if you want to eat. Oneof the things the government does is to
maintain is something called plausible deniability.Look, a lot of this stuff,
(15:15):
we can argue is manipulated and manipulatedthrough different avenues to the people. The
average person, and you guys knowthis. The average person is swayed by
their emotions. So we can createfear in one area, anger and next
the next area, and it's easyto kind of push people a certain direction.
(15:39):
Whether we're talking about this homicide ortalking about other things that are occurring.
There's a lot of manipulation of themarket, a lot of people that
have openly committed crimes we're not doinganything about. And if we look at
even the overall agenda, agenda ourgovernment's already signed on to what is Agenda
twenty thirty, which is Agenda twentythree and you can even find it.
(16:02):
It's defined as the People's Money that'son the basically the UN's own website,
and they established it basically at peoplea universal money for the people of the
world. This is where things aregoing and I do think we do need
to stand up for it. Weneed to hold this back as long as
(16:22):
possible. But the biggest difficulty is, like you guys have already started,
the state is it gives them control. Our government's already stating, as has
the UN, that having digitized moneylike this, they can control what you
spend on where you don't. Solet's say you want to donate to an
organization that doesn't fit the government's agenda, you can't do that. They also
(16:47):
can hurt your credit score rating.You want to purchase basically items that maybe
the government, whatever's and whoever's inpower, doesn't agree with. You want
to donate to your local church,you want to home to school your child,
or bullets are guns. Yes,but they've said that that's how they've
they've openly said they're going to usethis to limit that exchange. So a
(17:12):
while, but what about them,like, as we winding back to twenty
twenty, what about them playing?Yeah, I just want to welcome Josha
Brown and his mic is open soI can fall back. But thank you,
DJ. You can finish your thought. I just won't let you.
Guys know, I opened Jog's mike. Well, I don't want Hey,
(17:33):
Judge, appreciate being here in theopportunity to share. Jo I'm here,
I'm listening. I've been mission fora while, long long time. You're
here, sir. Okay, wealways appreciate the opportunity to share. But
I wanted to say that people.I mean, like, for example,
I'm one of those guys that saidI don't want to do the job,
the jab thing, you know,and me being an entrepreneur, it didn't
(17:55):
affect me at all. I didn't. I wasn't under Indie pressure where I
saw people losing it job. Isaw people going through hell and hot water
because they did not want to takeit, but they were forced to take
it. But I could just imaginethem saying, oh, well, if
he doesn't want to take it,we're just gonna turn his money off there.
And that's something that they will do, you know. I've seen that
stuff happening before, as being thefather, and they're saying, okay,
(18:18):
well you you're behind on your childsupport. The next thing you know,
they turned off the access to themoney. You know, so I've seen
that being a black man, I'veseen them take money for various reasons.
So I just always will fall backon cash, having my money my cash.
But now to know that there's notany cash, you only have to
(18:40):
use this fed now that bids mecould not have any other way of paying
for something. You know, someonecould come up with something and say,
well, in two nineteen ninety five, you slap the female or you around
the female that was said she wassexually harmed, So we're gonna turn your
money off until this thing goes.You know, they're already doing that.
(19:02):
You're right, they're already doing that. Yeah, So why would we set
ourselves up for that difficulty? Sir? You're you're you're you're in ailate one
hundred percent. But the biggest difficultywe've already set ourselves up for. That
we've already got with we have alack of privacy, and we can go
all the way back to different lineeleven acts and everything that occurred, and
(19:25):
when metadata was given up, privacy, as far as what people think,
his privacy is gone. And youand I both know even in general conversations,
anything we have that's recorded though,let's in social media or whatever it
might be. Even mean emails,they if they're taken even in context,
because it was socially acceptable ten yearsago, fifteen years ago, twenty years
(19:47):
ago, not a little longer.Is he is going to be used against
this not only in a criminal court, but in civil litigation and in the
court of public opinion. And ifwe look at with what China is doing
this and we're following suit, theyhave the social credit score, where our
businesses already have a social credit score. Our government's behind moving the social credit
score to the average person, whichmeans that basically, the more favorable you
(20:11):
are to certain agendas, the higheryour social credit score is, the loan
discounts you get, it makes itcheaper to travel, you're able to travel
between states or in the countries you'reconsidered a citizen of the world, the
lower you or social credit score is. And this is what China's already been
doing for a while, and we'vesubscribed to it, and we've had several
government officials make it's a wonderful ideapublicly that the lower it is, the
(20:36):
more they're able to ostracize you frominteraction within society. And yeah, they
do control your funds, They controlyour exposure or chances to have higher education,
to be involved in entertainment, thesocialize with everybody. They actually publicly
post people's photos and names of saying, don't associate with this person because they
(20:59):
are a bad person. Because theydon't whatever they don't agree with, they're
gonna lower credit score. And peoplethey know if they associate with that person,
their social credit score. You knowwhat I look at, you know
what I look at. They canit's not going to happen if we don't
all agree with it. Just likethey said, oh you have to have
this, everybody's doing it. Thenthey find out everybody did not do it.
(21:22):
Everybody did not agree with it,and now it's like, oh,
it's not gonna work because everybody didn't. So it's this same thing applied me
being a coach an entrepreneur. I'vetraveled the country over twenty six state and
I'm dealing with business owners and I'mhearing things that people are being paid.
Companies are being paid, like Visawas paying people to only take credit cards.
(21:45):
You hear what I'm saying. True, it's trying to pay people to
only accept credit cards because people arestarting to stay No, we don't want
to use the credit card. Wedon't want to use this zil We want
to use the cash. Do youtie the step casting up? Now?
There's forcing businesses to a stepcast upnow, So this is that was leading
(22:06):
to be one of the biggest paymentforces. Now it's forced Apple to jump
up and they created their own Applepay now, and we were never going
to go with this credit card,so they started paying people to use it.
So it's gonna be the same exactthing with this h FED. Now
they're gonna have to convince everybody.If you own a business and you say
I'm not using that, I'm gonnasupport them because I'm not. Here's where
(22:32):
you have more faith in the averageperson than I do. And I commend
you for them. But we lookat look how many people were still walking
around with all the evidence has comeout, but it's still wanting their children
to get to the vaccine. Theyare still walking around with masks that they're
still panicking. It's not the ideaof obviously they would want a majority of
people to sign on with it,and they know that it's not. But
we have a silent majority that's remainingtoo silent, and we're not standing up
(22:57):
for a rights and when we do, we're called out. Is being all
these different things, and more andmore people are getting beat down. They're
trying to keep to themselves, whichis a mistake. Everything you're saying is
one hundred percent correct. Your rightto be concerned about government having too much
control, they already do. We'vegiven it up. Your right to be
concerned about the digital currency, yourright to be concerned about the force vaccines
(23:21):
and the issues going on with it. The manipulation goes on it. And
I'm sure you're concerned about our involvementin different wars in different countries and the
way we're doing it, and allthese things that people were concerned about.
But we have to look at overallthe bigger picture in the amount of manipulation.
It doesn't take a majority of peopleto sway the country. As long
as we get into the area oftwelve to fifteen percent of the people,
(23:45):
that gives them a lot of power. Once you get over thirty, there's
a huge paradigm shift that occurs withinour country. Whether we're talking about tech
and how it's occurred, we know, and you're saving investments, you know
that once a certain product reaches anywherefrom twelve to seventeen percent of the market,
we can argue even sooner that productis going to begin taking over market
share. Just by leasing downds,it's going to grow. And that's how
(24:07):
we start tracking investments. We canstart seeing as they start to reach a
certain thresholds. If because it nowbecomes part of the what the social consciousness,
for lack of better term, Iapologize I don't have one right now,
and that's the same thing. It'snot going to work out because we
have the same conversation. But ifthe fifteen percent of the people get this
credit card, it's over. They'regonna get rid of the dollar. Well,
(24:30):
you guys already know the credit cardis lingering around in the background,
but everybody's using cast app and ziland Google pay. We're gonna they're gonna
keep pushing this, but it's upto us because and then not on another
note, the people that are notaccepting it they've been suppressing their story.
That's why they're taking TikTok down becausethat's where you can see. That's the
(24:52):
main place where you can go findout. People were saying, I'm not
doing this and I'm not gonna everdo that. So now they're oh,
TikTok is a threat because that isthe only place that we can go through
to find out what was really goingon, to find out that, oh,
I'm not the only one that saysI'm not gonna take that, or
I'm not the only one that's that'snot gonna use this new form of cash.
(25:15):
So now they're gonna get They've gettingrid of that. So now it's
like, oh, okay, Iguess everybody else gotten it because the news
said it. The news says thateverybody's using fed now, so I guess
that's true. But if you areusing social media, they're using media and
social media against us, and you'reright. As long as people lay down
and be quiet, If more people, if people again stop being silent and
(25:40):
not worry about what people think aboutI'm just saying what's on their mind,
people going to realize they're not alonein their thoughts. People are not being
silent people are screaming, bloody murdered. They're going on TikTok and and explaining
them full detail of what's going on. So they're not they're in the struggling
banks that the banks are feeling aswell. How do you factor that into
(26:03):
this conversation. We look at theoriginal of what the Silicon Valley Bank and
we look at basically Charles Swabb situation. They were already contacting the shareholders of
that bank telling them to dump theirmoney because this is going to happen.
We actually had a criminal manipulation ofthe market. And then once they told
people to do that and they startedreleasing information that may or may not been
(26:27):
true, there was a run onthat bank and that began causing that bank
to drop. And interestingly enough,Charles Swab that organization, they reap the
benefits. And this is public record, so it's not one of those conspiratorial
theories that there's nothing to support it. This has already been made public,
so we've got the situation. DoI think that these banks closures are problematic
(26:51):
and they could cause more people topanic? Yeah, I think it's designed
to so I think that people aregoing to be getting money out of this
most definitely, And I'm agreeing whatyou're saying. We need to hold strong,
but we need to recognize and againthis is where I commend you.
You've got more respect for the averageperson than I do. The average person
that I speak to industry. Theaverage person. We're talking to the younger
(27:14):
person, not somebody's little life experience. The average younger person literally thinks socialism
is a wonderful idea. They thinkthe government is really there to help them,
even though they say they hate it. In one hand, they want
the government to take more control,which is hugely problematic. They want the
government to give them handouts. Let'sask for more. The government should be
taking care of problems. In myown backyard. We got different groups of
(27:37):
people. We hang in clearly,but normally people got huddle und we got
people going the government has too muchcontrol. I didn't get it. I
didn't get asked the vote to sendthat money to Ukraine, etcetera, et
But when we talked about let's talkabout the banks real quick, you brought
up the bank. The banks arenot struggling because of the reason that they're
(27:57):
telling us. The banks are strugglingbecause people are moving in to convince to
make their money off for interest.Well, if everybody's pulling their money off
the banks and we're using casts orwe're using cash, ap Apple paying all
of this stuff, and now they'relosing money off of that. And then
when paypals, PayPal had a greatrun, they had a head start of
(28:18):
two or three years before the banksdecided to come up with Zell made a
bunch of money after that. Sonow let's rewind and look at the banks
are really struggling purely based on thefact that people are not are not sick.
Was sixty percent of the home saleswere through cash. We're cash banks
make their money off of mortgage loans. A lot Bank of America was the
(28:41):
second biggest mortgage banker in America,you know what I'm saying. So now
they're there, they've lost sixty seventypercent of that because ninety percent of the
people buying houses are using cash.That's why banks are struggling. It's not
because of the individual balt Excuse me. There are some banks and struggling because
(29:03):
of that. But if we lookat the Silicon Valley Bank, the average
investor there had over two hundred andfifty thousand dollars per or more invested with
them. They were actually large investors, and the problem is they had too
many eggs in one basket. Theywere told about the run. It wasn't
a Silicon Valley bank and invested inreal estate and lost and people were buying
the cash that specifically had very littleto do with that bank's crash. It
(29:25):
was poor management that banks. Um. We could argue that their magic management
there was they didn't have a actuallya manager fund manager that was responsible.
And that's one of the things thatSchwab organization brought up, and they were
doing some very foolish things. Therewasn't the other bank. But if you
(29:48):
looked up, if you looked upthe market and see what's going on right
now, every bank JP, Morgan, all of these hues, Fun,
black Rock, UH, Vanguard,all of these companies are dove into real
estate investments serious because that's what allthe banks they're using their money with.
They've even got colleges that are puttingtheir money. Do you see colleges are
(30:12):
replaced put up two billion dollars tobuy up all of these houses that are
about to hit the market for sale. And during this crisis that they claimed
us coming. The banks are allinvesting in real estate serious that they're not
thoth the ones that are failing.Anybody that's not in real estate are failing.
Right now, You've got the governmentbringing hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians,
(30:36):
hundreds of thousands of Afghani, hundredsof thousands of Syrians over here, and
they're putting them in brand new homes. Come on now, while and they've
changed the platform. In America.It's no longer about ownership. They want
people to rent because they see sincethey came in with the sanctions and tariffs
saying that if you don't make itin America, you have to If you
don't make it in America, wedon't want you shipping into America. So
(31:00):
now you look at all the shipsthat are no longer pulling in sam Pedro,
California, These that used to coachin China, they're all making the
stuff here because they knew a longtime ago we're not going to be doing
business with China in the future.Me as a car parks manufacturer, I
saw that coming years ago, andthat's why I had to restructure and start
getting my things made here in America. But my whole point of bringing that
(31:22):
up is we got so many peopleinvesting in America, land to America,
buying up all the houses and buyingup all the commercial real estate that is
blocking out your average homeowner. Andthe bank makes their money from the homeowners
getting mortgages. But if you gotChina coming into America buying up millions of
(31:45):
acres in all the baking houses,and you got Canada coming into America,
you got all these foreign tountries,over seventeen foreign countries just over here buying
up the majority of farmlands here,and just go through the whole. They'll
Gates is the largest farmer in theUnited States right now, you're you're you're
you're under that. Definitely, I'mnot he's one of them. He's one
(32:10):
of them. We got foreign countriesthat brought up the majority that's buying up
the rest of it. Like Isaid, they know the long games since
they since America's gonna go, theysay, we're gonna go to the world
where no longer is going to befriends with China. We're no longer going
to be friends with these people.America has to manufacture things themselves. Now.
(32:30):
Now if America has to manufacture thingsthemselves. That means you need land
to build gig the factories. Ifyou need land to build gig the factories,
that means you're gonna be building houses. So if you're building houses,
and now you've got companies coming insaying, well, I own the land
and I'm gonna put up the money. Just like back in the days,
we were going to the bank toget more to get money to build these
(32:51):
houses. Now I know there's vanguardssay we'll pay for every house that you
guys want to build. You justcome to us, We'll put up the
money. Black Blockers said, we'rebursting all the developers. There's no longer
anymore. All right, t J, we're scars. I wanted to Big
(33:14):
Boundery. Oh no, I wasjust going to to scars. I was
going to ask them, um becausewe know that this is triggered by bad
risk management practices, UM. AndI just wanted to know if y'all thought
that the Americans would end up payingfor bank failures, um, before we
switch scars, before we get there. UM. America being what it is,
(33:40):
there's been a long standing observation thatcomes from inside America and also out
of it. And it's this.With a system like ours, we invariably
get the representation we deserve. Soif it's screwed up, we deserve screwed
up because we're screwed up. See, you're talking about little spikes in a
(34:07):
bigger picture, and a bigger pictureis embraced in sense of entitlement, participation,
ribbons. Nobody gets the trophy.Everybody's got to be protected from growing
up. And what happens is youget administrations put in that promote that.
(34:29):
So it's kind of like you havea football stadium, a football field and
stands. The population is sitting upin the stands watching this game. And
on the field, we have oneteam that has been controlling the ball.
It's determining whether they'll have runs orpast plays, and they're pretty much dominating
(34:55):
the game at this part. Andthe other team has problems because the coaching
is not right, so they can'tseem to get the defense together and they're
romping all of them down the field. Now, is something wrong with the
stadium, is something wrong with therules? Is something wrong with the layout
(35:21):
of the place, or something wrongwith the grass or the astro turf,
or does it have something to do, have something to do with the players
in that particular game, and I'mlooking at what we have, which is
the cast of characters for the lastsome years. It's been rather consistent in
(35:46):
this particular ball game, and theyhave become tied up with a consistently obvious
faction that is not even attempt tosupport what most humans would call normallysy It
(36:07):
seems to have an agenda and everythingis subservient to that agenda. Now I
will drop back fifty five years.I had an interesting professor that I had
teaching assistant status with back at UCLA. She was part of a professorial exchange
(36:32):
program, and she was a professoremeritus at the University of Moscow. A
good Communist, formerly the highest rankingwoman ever on a Soviet poet, dear
old year old, the soul ofthet Union at the Stalingrad See and interestingly
enough, formally in charge of propagandafor the KG being prior to that,
(36:55):
the KZD its predecessor. She said, on observations of what we had,
the group that was beginning to becalled hippie. Prior to that, their
predecessors had been known as Beatnis,and that's what you call them, She
(37:17):
said, America is in grave dangerof becoming a fascist nation, not through
the mechanism of jack boot wearing,goose step in uniformed political thugs, but
some cicifide pink panty wearing, longhaired beatnix who, in their ignorance would
(37:44):
gladly impose the worst aspects of fascismon the public to protect their deviant ways
and protects you from not understanding whywhat they want is supposed to be what
(38:04):
you want. And that's what we'vegot now associated with that. It's not
everybody in this stadium that is forthis game plan. It's just if you
look at the list of characters thatare involved, you can see along association.
(38:27):
And the other thing is we areso readily giving away our rights and
our privacy concerns and submitting to thisnation's nason fascism because we perceive not all
of us, but too many ofus, perceive a need to be protected.
(38:47):
They want gun controls, and theynever thought about the inherent dangerous on
disarming everybody in a place like this. In turning it over to these soon
to the jackboot wearing, goose steppingpolitical pugs. Ze Kylie in the name
(39:10):
of their particular liberties in excesses wherethere are no values, no standard,
no arts, only waters, andit's bad. They are for the destruction
of the traditional nuclear family and thehome trading that you could expect to come
(39:35):
out of that would socialize and acculturatehumans to get along with each other in
a process that's waters from cave tocondo. But they're not into that.
They want somebody to do it forthem so they can pay attention to their
particular brand of defancy, which youmight sharitably cause you got a right to
(39:57):
get your freak on in your bedroomfor it. But when you start getting
outside of it and you approach lifeand the same fashion, get problems.
Now we have turned over a lotof what we otherwise ought to pay attention
to. The people think that they'reentitled to sit on the couch, smoke
a blood, play good games.We don't want to have responsibility. And
(40:24):
the same people that are going tosuffer are the same people that want Facebook,
Instagram, Twitter and everybody to haveunlimited access to their lives. They
want smart household appliances that provide anideal intrusion point, so your privacy inside
(40:46):
your own home can be really andgratuitously violated. They want somebody to make
decisions for them. They want tohave cryptocurrency set up so nobody has money,
because they think they can just godown and make everything easier. They
don't pay attention to the necessity togo along with being a free person,
(41:10):
because being free is inherently dangerous,and they are too cowardly and lacking character
to understand that you have to makea stand, you have to do things
for yourself. So they want thesein truth, But as you're saying,
what the hell, all kinds ofthings can stop. And you know you've
(41:34):
got a power outage and you haveno money. You've got a storm and
a breakdown of the now decayed utilityinfrastructures in an area, and you have
no money. You've got something that'swide open to hacking, and you have
no money. This thing about it, well, let's put it this way.
(42:00):
I had a splurge of cases inmy courtroom almost thirty years ago when
people started nacently using the net,and they had a service that advertised itself
several It said, are you tiredof having to do things the old fashioned
way by paper, of writing outchecks where we can help you. So
(42:23):
we can bring your landlord, yourcard dealer, and the people that you
owe bills too, into the twentiethcentury and we can do that for you
now. They didn't have what theyrequired in the way of security, and
we had all kinds of lacious problems, ranging from they would sneak in and
(42:49):
look at the bosses check book andget the information such services need and have
money sent to themselves, to rippingoff relatives and friends. But I'm or
we have gotten beyond that these days. But it's there. What is inflation?
How does it work? What arethe advantages of an inflationary in the
(43:13):
economy? And who does that itbenefit? Is there matter with it's good
for certain interests in the economy wherethere is inflation, and if so,
how, why? What where doesit go down? So it is what
happens when you remove certain control,what happens when something takes over, Like,
for example, if you do acareful analysis of some financial realities,
(43:39):
you will find that the sovereign investorknown as the People's Republic of China very
much can be said to stabilize everystocky chain exchange in the world and every
active currency because of respute efforts thatthey have put into the mix over the
(44:00):
last fifty some years. Now,who's doing what When a communist country,
the People's Republic of China, hasto intervene to stop worldwide depressions from occurring
or inflation from getting too bad,or to stop recessions from moving too far.
(44:25):
What happens when you need a communistcountry, the People's Republic of China
moving into things to stabilize fluctuating occurrenciesand would probably be brought into the mix
to stabilize any electoral currency. Whathappens when they decide to go into bricks
Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and others and set up
(44:51):
an alternative What happens when we havea social program set that does not deal
with the realities of humanity and worldpolitics. We've got all kinds of problems
here. So maybe what needs tohappen is next election cycle, stop voting
(45:16):
reflexibly, come off the damn plantation, and don't just automatically vote the way
you have been conditioned for most ofyour life to vote, if not the
entirety of it. So you interjectsomething back into the American political scene where
there is consequence that occurs when youdon't pay attention to the people that are
(45:42):
supporting you by your votes, andwhen you are the putative voters, understand
that if you always vote a certainway, no matter what, that side
has no incentive to do a damnedthing for you. And if you can
always be counted on to vote againstsomebody no matter what they try to do,
(46:04):
then that side has no incentive todo anything for you. So you
don't get a damn thing out ofit, except somebody grinned while you put
them in place to act for thesurgeons. Now you can find a very
interesting connection between the likes of GeorgeSorrows and Kamala Harris im Hall, also
(46:27):
Joe Biden and that ilk. Youwill find that they are to a great
extent driving engines behind some of thethings that you gentlemen have been dogging about.
You will find this kind of thing. But then again, it's not
really just the billionaires. It's morethe idea of a billionaire, because a
billionaire is just one person and hehas to be able to influence people and
(46:51):
has only so far he can goto throw money at somebody. But what
they can do is to cause anidiot like one of my candidates for opponents
here from mayor in Memphis to saylast week at a forum, he said,
the problem with Memphis is we don'tpay gratuities to billionaires so they can
(47:15):
come in here and make money andmaybe some of it will trickle down to
the rest of us. See,when you get people thinking like that,
then they aren't prepared to, theyaren't fit to, and they won't have
any control over their lives. Andif we listen to them, we won't
(47:38):
either. But I just had tothrow that into the mix, and I'll
put the mic down and passage.That's time what we're going to do.
And Jose, I want to endon you. I want to go around
the table because we're in the secondhour. During the first hour, minus
what we discuss with TJ, wetalked about the US dollar bank failures,
(48:01):
bad practices, questionable affordability, depositmanagement, and interest rates. Okay,
so my last question, if youguys could do this as brief as possible,
I want to ask you guys.We know that the banks are FDIs
ensured to a certain point, butis our money safe? That's very,
(48:23):
very important, and I'd like toend on that to kind of put a
nice little bow on you know,today's conversation DJ, because you entered first.
We'll start with you and then Rickand then Judge. So is our
money? Saying not at all?And there's actually a clause and I'm sure
(48:45):
there's a judge's length here, Judge'sneighborhood, his wheelhouse. But there's actually
a clause in the bank right upthat state that if the government needs our
money, you know, to dowhatever it is they want to, that
they can take the money out ofyour account and do whatever they want to
in the case of wars, etcetera, et cetera. I'm sure Joe
(49:07):
does know more about that. Ido, possibly, And that's where we
are right now. We're in thestate where we might be going to war
in the next six months. Sothe government may say we need their money,
and now they've taken control of it, right they're trying to take control
of it. So the people needto know that. So I say,
no, it's not su at all. May I ask you a question,
(49:30):
we keep I keep war? Arewe really going to war? Jerny dangers
that or is what we're looking atan effort a president to eventually get a
favor returned to him by the Ukraineby having their Supreme Court dismissed a multipage,
(49:55):
multi acount organized crime that his nameis and himself frequently in pages.
The immediate effect of that is Articlesix of the Constitution that says ratified treaties
are the supreme law of the land. And a certain ratifying treaty negotiated by
(50:22):
President Bill Clinton sis Ukraine and theUnited States together, and they agreed to
participate in the apprehension, detention,and extradition of criminal elements wanted by the
other. And since Biden is indictedin multiple felony counts charging him with bribery,
(50:45):
extortions, solicitation of perjury, treason, and a number of other things
under the Constitution, which Article sixis required to be, they can't get
expect by nasty background noise. Guys. Um, that's that's I don't know
(51:12):
what. I don't want this heard, but that is the law. And
the problem is that right now,because of his official position, expediencies are
carrying into tradition that you do notprosecute a sitting president for something like this
(51:35):
while he's in office due to thefirst while the leader's effects on the security
of the country. But it iswhat it is, and I can't help.
I cannot escape in my mind thatwhat I saw when I reviewed the
transcriptions of the three Hunter Biden laptopI got a chance to go over when
(52:02):
Fox had this mock trial in NewYork involving a little New Jersey, actually
involving those laptops, wherein the repairmanwas brought in and his documents relative to
his authority to do what he didwere examined and found to be good and
(52:24):
hold, and we went over thedownloaded three laptops contents. One can't help
after looking at what one saw witha conclusion that there is a criminal enterprise,
(52:45):
a crucial element of which is nowsitting in the White House, that
has been unaddressed and is escaping Americanjustice. Now that is something I can't
help but energy because the last checkI took six separate oaths over the last
half sent free to support the USConstitution for one reason or another. I
(53:12):
hold myself to those oats. Now, I didn't mean intrude again, but
it's just background relevance. Well it'sit's the show is called the Judge Your
Brown Show. So We definitely loveit when you pontificate um will end on
you um rick um. We talkedabout fed now we know that drops this
(53:36):
yeared you lie, um because thewho I asked is our money safe?
Well do your final thoughts. Yeah, I'm on both the sides of Judge
in GT. The idea here GT. The idea is nowhere money is not
safe, has not been safe.We have too much reliance in the government
(53:57):
and not enough reliance on each otherin ourselves. But and also in that's
saying though we have to is asfar as going to war, there may
be individual scuffles. There may beindividual wars going on. I know and
acquainted with various contracting organizations and thathave been for a number of years,
have even been a part of differentcontracts. As far as going to other
(54:22):
countries and acquiring different assets. Theidea that we're dealing with it we think
that our federal government is antagonistic toChina or Ukraine or Russia is laughable.
We have been, especially this currentgovernment, have been an ally in many
(54:42):
aspects, and a lot of thingswe do may and the service look like
they're contrary to what one side orthe other wants. But realistically, these
things they've already been played out andmade deals that there's been deals long under
the table. We've got a governmentright now that is completely sold out to
China. Now the stave face isentirely possible that you might see skirmish's wars,
(55:06):
small wars or smaller scale wars oreven larger ones to cover up some
different aspects. Yeah. Does thatmean that individual governments haven't been partied to
this, No, it just meansthat we see there's a larger game going
over. It's occurring, a largerchess game about who's going to be in
power, who's going to have theability, who sold their souls literally to
(55:30):
these larger powers that be. There'sthis spear of the age that's going on.
You can argue a lot of differentthings with it. But if people
think that we're safe in any aspectand trust the government and no matter right
now who's in charge, I thinkthey're being foolish. We've seen time and
time again that every time the governmentcomes in and says we're here to help
(55:51):
you, we're your friends, youbetter watch your back, there's going to
be a knife somehow. And sincethey've proven to be an enemy. Anytime
you're becomes to you and they offeryou Boone's wonderful presence and friendship, you
need to be real careful. They'renot doing it for your good. There's
something that gives them a stronger position. Now we have the criminal activity that
(56:16):
many people in our government have beeninvolved in. As the judge mentioned with
Ukraine, we've also get some issuesand ties with Russia and with China,
and incidentally, those are the bigplayers that we're against right now. If
our government were to truly go againstChina, Russia or Ukraine, truly we
would see a lot more information beingreleased, a lot more Many of us
(56:42):
have some personal knowledge of some ofthat information. But the problem is right
now, no information that gets releasedis released by accident. So they have
to ask yourself what's the bigger picture. And again, so going back,
I don't want to turn this intopeople might deem as a conspiratorial show,
but you have to look to seeNumber one, follow the money. Who's
(57:06):
making money out of this? Wecan look at the Ukrainian president, how
do you really get in power?Who backed him? A little bit of
research shows you quite a bit ofevidence exactly what's going on there. The
war in Ukraine. The storm isbetween Russia. When I was in Ukraine
and Russia, even during the Obamaera, they were concerned that I was
(57:28):
there to help bring down the IronCurtain because they said they knew as soon
as they came down, Russia wasgoing to come in. That was not
why I was there. Now,the idea that when these things started to
occur, our government knew when andwhere Russia was first going to move.
We knew that ahead of time.We had the intel. We also knew
(57:51):
about the election, and you canread these intelligent documents that have already been
released. Information has been released,but there's a lot of things that can't
necessarily or won't go into right now. But there's nothing that surprising us right
now, especially if you have anyknowledge of some of the the international intel
that's been made available. So trustingthis government, and I'm arguing that we
(58:15):
should never trust any government so muchthat we give our rights up. But
I think trusting this government is afolly. And should we have backup plans?
Yeah? Not only should we beinvesting in property, but that can
still be taken away. We shouldbe investing in commodities, gold, silver,
Yes, those things still have someflaws, but they're good solid investments.
(58:36):
And should you be growing your accountkeeping cash on hands and tradeable goods
on hand, most definitely. Butthe biggest thing is we should not be
trading is our rights. And theaverage person, like the judge said,
is willing to roll over and giveup whatever rights had asked for as long
as they're promised that life is goingto get a little easier for them.
If you give us a few cookies, we're willing to give up everything.
(59:00):
If you give us a little bitmore money, We're willing to give up
our rights in social media. Togive us a free phone. We're willing
to let you listen to our conversations. If you give us discounts in our
houses. We're willing to you tolisten to our houses. If you give
us a discount in our car loanor give us a student loan break,
We're willing to give up our gunrights or whatever rights they may ask at
the time. Now a lot ofpeople may think this is too far fetched,
(59:22):
but these are things that are alreadybeing discussed openly about. How get
people to go along with a largerplan. There are many people in our
country that have always literally sold thesoul, and most of our country on
the lower level is willing to dothat if they're promised that life would get
a little easier for them. Butmaintain your rights and things being easy,
(59:45):
they don't go together. Thank youso much for that. We are out
of time, so we won't beable to talk about I know you wanted
to talk about the Daniel Perry case. The newly unsealed documents set show Daniel
Terry talked about killing people and sharedracist comments on social media. But maybe
(01:00:06):
this next audio is in the samevein. I doesn't think he said this
was about racism. I'm not sure. It's been so long, but these
guys are now speaking out, andthis is how we will end before we
open up the lines to allow colorsto join the conversation. So you finally
arrived at this destination. What wasit? It was? It was the
(01:00:28):
house, but a lot of themmake things out guns, putting the blow
mask, red plastic mask, theyput masks on. Yeah, I was
putting the guns to our head tellingus not to look up things like that.
Have you gotten any kind of medicaltreatment? The cartel took us to
(01:00:51):
a clanic after we left from thespot where they was questioning and that.
But they told us they was like, um, I guess after they kept
some that's our questions. Our answersnever changed. They said, UM,
well, we're gonna get We're gonnaget y'all some help. But what kind
of treatment did they give you?They put my leg on my tool by
(01:01:12):
far and then they spitched it up. All this time. I mean,
there's there's guys with guns around youguarding right. They was like they we
had to stay there for them toinvestigate us and different things. And like
one am was sitting us a chairlike where you're sitting too, and he
was looking at something on his phone. And I can remember the sound of
(01:01:34):
that day or when it happened,Like I could remember the gunshots, the
noise, and I heard it andI asked him, I said, excuse
me, is that us? Andhe said yes. I say, can
I see it? And he's like, hold on, and he turned the
phone around and he showed the videoof us being kidnapps and stuff like that.
The one of the gunmen actually showedyou the video that we've all seen
(01:01:58):
of you being kidnapped on the street. M that's surreal. I mean,
what did that? What was that? Like? I just thought of crying,
I can never go home. Didin any way help you to know
that this video is out there thatpeople at least knew, And though I
(01:02:19):
thought maybe it was just out inMexico, I didn't know that, and
I reached the States, right,So I felt a little bit because I
just didn't know our families knew anythingto happen to us. You're you're a
woman in custody with cartel gunmen.Were they threatening to you in violence and
sexual violence? I mean yeah,they said all this stuff, all that
(01:02:43):
they did. Hello, I MarkBrown. Get more great ABC seven content
by clicking the subscribe button for ourYouTube channel and download the ABC seven Los
Angeles Hello. Oh shoot, I'msorry, I was on mute. Um
(01:03:09):
I cut it off early. Um, but I'll read the copyright one oh
seven. I was reading that,so I'll just insert that in post production.
But anyway, the title, thetitle of that video was Americans kidnapped
by Mexican cartel reveal horrifying details.Again shout out to S and N and
(01:03:30):
uh the host. So you wantedto to talk about that? Um,
Ricky ray Tell everybody, your formercop and get gives the details just so
people know why you're in Ukraine,in Russia and why you're qualified to have
this conversation alright, former law enforcementofficer for just about fifteen years, I
(01:03:54):
specialized in major arcotics in towards inmy career anti terrorism. It was a
deep undercover off for while we're friendsand family. I thought it went bad.
Who caught new? I existed badging, gun, re locked away and
safe. But I did other variouslaw enforcement things later. It was into
my career, like I said,wire to surveillance expert, interviewing interrogation expert
(01:04:15):
as far as later after injuries INBand piece back together, I had my
investigation and contracting companies work everything.Primarily specialized in criminal defense, but also
contracts with local, federal and stategovernments as well as military organizations. I've
been involved in acquiring assets in variousareas inside and outside the country for various
(01:04:36):
portions of local, federal and stategovernments and other organizations. Even have been
hired by our federal government to investigatecertain kidnapping cases very similar to what was
just mentioned and to recover potential assetswhere individuals if possible by other organizations as
(01:04:57):
well, you know, so justkind of a little bit of those things,
primarily, like I said, dealingwith some a lot of defense cases.
That's where my start actually ended uplying recognizing that in our country and
in others, if a lot ofpeople believe that it's about race, but
quite often it's typically about how muchmoney you have. If you have the
(01:05:19):
money to afford a good defense,you're probably gonna get off. If you
don't, you're probably gonna get convicted. And once I realized that, I
understood that, that's where I beganprimarily specializing in. But I did take
other types of cases if I thoughtthere was a benefit to them. Thank
you. Um, can you respondto the audio that I just played in
(01:05:45):
what way? I don't know whyI thought you had details? Oh did
you have any details? Yeah?I just want to make sure that as
far as it details, this isn'tthe first time that's happened across their borders.
In fact, this has happened quiteoften. It's just this one happened
to get more publicity than some ofthem that occurred. In recent times.
(01:06:05):
There's been multiple shootings with our bordercommunities with Mexico cartels have been infiltrating deeper
and deeper, and our border patrolhas been overrun a number of occasions with
an inability to actually fight back therethey've been Keep mind, this isn't necessarily
blaming our border patrol. Quite oftenthey've been hamstrung, and even private citizens
(01:06:30):
who've chosen to try to protect thecities where they know these people that the
cartel members and in different organizations arecoming across, they've chose to patrol their
own cities, their own backyards,and our government has persecuted them and even
prosecuted them for doing that. Sothis has been going on for a little
bit. Am I surprised to hearthis happened, No, not at all.
(01:06:57):
Am I disappointed in that it didhappen, That we have the ability
to prevent it and we didn't doit. Yes, Am I disappointed in
our government's lack of response. Yes. And as far as this family,
my heart goes out to them now. As far as they're wearing the Diablo
mask and a lot of other thingsgoing on, wearing masks everything else is
(01:07:17):
common, But you have to understandthere's a great deal of benefits still for
the gangs to come over in tokidnap individuals, no matter what you think
is the people that are going afterthey do that for multitude of reasons.
And they also do this to testthe waters. They're going further and further
inland in our country to see wherethey can get away with, and they're
(01:07:40):
learning they can get away with quitea bit. So crime on that aspect
is on the rise. And bythe way, government agencies have been well
aware of their incursions in our interactionsin our country for a number of years
and have been told to stand downquite often. Thank you. Oh that's
a question for you. Why doyou think they've been told to stand down?
(01:08:05):
I can tell you even in someof the things that I've done,
because we're we're told because we're lookingfor the larger picture. We're looking to
see if we can go where thisgoes back. And even though there's officials
that are want to get involved lawenforcements at once to get involved, um,
they're getting smacked hard and being toldnot to, being ordered not to
(01:08:28):
in order to stand down. Ithink they're being told to stand down because
they got their hand involved in it. You know, we didn't wear about.
I'm gonna I'm an agreement, soI think the upper government. Look,
so this is going to probably infuriatea lot of people. One of
the largest commodities, one of thebiggest things that's still traded in the United
(01:08:49):
States and throughout the country isn't drugs. It's human traffedy. You can and
it's not white, black or Hispanic. We can get into that division all
over place. There's all these differentcamps. But I've seen it firsthand.
You know, drugs you can sellonce and they're done. Humans you can
traffic again and again and again andagain, and they're an easily replaceable resource
(01:09:14):
no matter how they're is how they'regotten in people um of a depray of
nature and now they're these humans areused for various things and you can use
your imagination. Do I think there'sa big part of it. Yeah,
I think that is a big partof it. Do I think our government
um doesn't want to stop it becausethere's a huge amount of money that many
of these people are involved in.Or do I think they're involved in some
(01:09:36):
of this yourself theirselves? Yes?Now do I have personal knowledge of people
actually within our government openly supporting humantrafficking? No, you know, but
you know, it's funny that TVshow Snowfall, the story of Freeway rate.
The season finale was last night.I believe that that literally is telling
(01:09:58):
you exactly what's going on, what'shappened in the past, what's still going
on currently. You know, theyneed that stuff to go on because they're
making all kinds of money. Bookoo, They're they're doing all type of ways
making money over there. It wasnot they never spoke on what those cartels
doing. Taliban. They accidentally droppeda bunch of supplies over on the Taliban,
like, oh wow, did wecreate the Taliban. So it's the
(01:10:19):
same thing with them, the military, that's just their own people over there
doing all of this stuff that theycontrol. That's why, you know,
you know, and that's when peoplegot to understand that. It was until
recently. It was recently when whenwhen what was it Mexico decided that they
(01:10:42):
want to join bricks and immediately oneof the politicians he rallied it, we
need to do something about those,uh, those militias over there in Mexico.
We need to go over there andstop all that stuff. It's like
they did not have no concerns aboutthem until they decided to join the bridge.
That's when it started addressing that theyneed to do something, meaning we
may be going to war with Mexicobecause they don't want that. I agree.
(01:11:11):
You can give your final thought.I'm gonna see if Judge has anything
to say, because we're at atime. But what what what were you
going to say? Can you saysomething? Um quick to say? This
should be another can of worms.I don't know if you're familiar with Operation
Northwoods and you know basically what occurredwith that. If not, you should
look that up. There's a lotof things we allow to occur to get
(01:11:33):
the people stirred up, and peopleare more than willing to play both sides.
Our government plays both sides of differentthings. Even one of the cases
I was involved in not too longago, where I was trying to again
protect and recover some assets, afederal task force contacted me and said that
there's a dark and a light horseside. I was warned that, hey,
(01:11:54):
look they're on my side and noteverybody out there is on my side.
And they were given me a warningand said they and protect me from
the other organization. You can takethis is bs or um or what is
it? Conspiracy, fear or not. There were witnesses to what happened.
And the biggest difficulty was, andreally one of the most disheartening thing was
(01:12:14):
is it was my own government,the own people there. It was actually
interfering with me trying to protect people. And when I tried to get this
in more federal aid and more judgesto help out, organizations to help out,
I was told I was on myown and to watch my back.
That makes things very difficult when itcomes down to fighting. Very few people
(01:12:35):
are willing to stand up with you, even if they know that it's wrong.
So now there's both sides. Youknow what's been on the guy the
people from this start, we're gonnahave to shift. Another reason why they
want to get rid of TikTok becausenow you have a lot of the nine
eleven survivors telling their stories. Yougot firefighters that they're telling them about all
(01:12:58):
the bombs going off, you know, and that they were running from not
the plane, but the bombs.And then you got a lady that was
just sitting there just this morning tellingher story about she worked there in the
bomb came through the wind, camethrough the wall right there by her office,
and she was one of the survivorsthat walked out of there and said
there was no plane. So TikTokis revealing. All of these people are
(01:13:19):
coming out with telling their stories,and it's like a lot coming up.
People were like, Wow, thishas been out for a while. You're
aware that we actually had the inteland we have proof not just a little
bits of intel, that an IsraeliMassad team was actually there. They were
a demo team. Were they involvedin it? I don't know. Were
(01:13:39):
they there? And did they haveblasting taps and thermite? Yeah, we
have evidence of that as well withthermite using that. Most of us that
are have been involved in EOD indifferent operations recognize what explosive materials do and
what a plane does. And Ican tell you there were two different things
that occurred, and with the newdifferent things and with the news set actually
happened. Let makes want to goup to the base, all right,
(01:14:02):
So yeah, we're going to haveto put a pin in that. Um,
you guys are definitely welcome to comeback next week. UM, I
think we're going to have a statesenator on next week. I'm not sure.
I need I need to confirm thatum and then the following week we
got Silk of Silk and Diamond comingback, so a lot of politics on
(01:14:23):
to discuss. Show. Please checkyour schedules so that we can continue this
conversation. The Judge Joe Brown Showpresented by Valerie Denise Jones Uncensored Truth with
a Legal Twist, Friday, fourpm Eastern Standard Times nine two nine four
seven seven one seven four. VisitMiss Valerie Denise Jones dot com for details.
(01:14:54):
Want to know more about big media, Tune in every Tuesday and Friday
at four pm Eastern, and don'tforget to subscribe to our channels
I hope you're enjoying this big exclusive. Don't forget to subscribe to this channel.
Now. Now back to the show, because in a second, I'm
going to invite quote unquote white boyRick Um to join the conversation. What
else is in the news that weneed to talk about? Because I want
(00:22):
to invite you, but we're takinga conversation regarding the status of the dollar,
the US dollar in particular. Um, is there anything else? I
mean, we can take that rightthere. It was the status of the
dollar, you know, people.I just wanted to clear something enough for
people. People keep saying the dollarsgoing to be worthless, get you some
(00:44):
bit, get you some that thedollar's going to be trash, But then
they say, oh, things aregoing to be more expensive. So I
wanted to break that down for people. Yes, the dollar has always been
trash. That's why we spend moreof those dollars. So I don't dollar
is never gonna be worthless that you'regonna have people throwing it in the street.
The dollar is going to be lessvalue, meaning I used to sell
(01:07):
cars for you know, thirty thousanddollars. Now because of the dollars and
decline that cars two hundred thousand dollars, if that makes sense, using those
same dollars, So that car valueis going to be the same. And
if you come to me with somenew some new money, it's still gonna
(01:30):
be two hundred thousand, you know. So I want people to just get
that through their brain. Don't godump in your cash. I mean,
if you want to dump it,give it to me. I'll take it,
you know, I'll take it offthe hand, give it to me.
I'll tak it for you. Youknow, because people like me in
a lot of these countries, alot of these states, they're they're they're
not gonna they're gonna fight this.Just like you saw Florida. They stepped
up first and said we're going tokeep taking dollars, We're not going with
(01:53):
this digital currency, and textans isgoing to follow as well. So that's
telling me. I've been telling peoplethat next thing, you know, Florida
said they're not getting on board withthat. They're going to keep their cash,
They're gonna keep using that dollars.So now you're gonna have a shift
of people like myself saying, oh, I guess I'll be moving to Florida
because I can keep using my dollarsthere because I understand what's going on.
(02:21):
That's something we need to go onand shout out your social media and your
contact information again because I'm about toplay an audio clip and open up Ricks,
Mike. Okay, My my socialmedia is all Thomas TJ lofton,
my Instagram, my TikTok, myYouTube, TJ lofton. I'm also live
(02:47):
on there now Thomas TJ lofton LFTIand on my website is TJ lofton dot
com, where they can get acopy of my hit best selling book Monetizing
Gentrification, Building Black Ownership, ofwhich I talked a lot about that stuff
of what's going on all around thecountry from a futurist perspective. They because
(03:07):
they called me the economic futurists,So yeah, I talk a lot about
that in that book. Get youa copy, signed copy, uh at
tjlofton dot com. Thank you,all right, TJ. Listen to this
and when we come back, Iam going to invite Rick to the conversation.
(03:30):
I just cannot keep up with theseaudio clips today. But here here's
here's this. So Russia announced wewill conduct business in Asia African and Latin
America in Chinese currency. Brazil,which has a brand new government supported by
the Biden administration, announced it willdo the same thing. Brasil, largest
economy in the Hemisphere after ours,Pakistan, is doing the same thing.
(03:53):
That's a long time US ally.India and Malaysia, two the biggest economies
in the world, announce they'll besetting their trade in their own currencies,
not the dollar. Even France,which we liberated, is using Chinese currency
in a new liquefied nancial gas trade. Trying in Saudi Arabia are now major
business partners, and again, etc, etc, et cetera. This is
(04:17):
happening around the world, and allof it is shutting out the US dollar,
and it's happening a lot faster thananybody could have predicted, and yet
no one in Washington seems aware thatit is happening. All right, So
super short cliff, And now youguys are not used to me playing super
short cliffs, but that's it,all right. But this time, what
(04:39):
I'd like to do is welcome,Welcome Rick through the conversation. How are
you doing today, sir, I'mdoing well. When I make sure you
continue the okay to set up themoney right now, hold on one second,
because I think you're muffled. Um, TJ. Can you hear him?
(05:02):
Because it's maybe me. Yeah,he's he's a little buffle. Can
you hear me? Now? Howabout no, I don't know. Let's
do a mic check, mic check. Are you there all right? Can
you hear me? Okay, yeah, I think that's better. Um,
(05:24):
still a little muffled, but that'sbetter than what we had, So we're
gonna kind of roll with that.Um, how are you doing well?
It's been a little bit And oneof the reasons for the different equipment is
they didn't realize when I switched toa new phone, didn't come up with
some of the didn't it came witheverything. Now let's be bluetooth. There's
no audio jacks. Yeah, theyhave done away with the audio jacks.
(05:50):
I'll tell you, I don't knowwhat's happening now. That's so nice of
them. I'm glad they're looking outfor us. Oh man, I'll tell
you. Don't you feel special?Oh my goodness, let's tell you be
doing very well and just been veryactive the last few months and been very
(06:11):
busy about your end. That's busy. It's good. It's it's just very
good. Um. Yeah, wedefinitely need to stay busy. UM.
I wanted to well, I invitedyou because I wanted you to share with
us, you know, the wantedto talk about the status of the dollar.
You know that. But what waswhat is near and dear to my
(06:32):
heart is cash apt because you knowthat's how I do most of my business.
So I was, you know,kind of taken back. Um,
I don't know what happened. I'lllet you guys. You know, I
don't like to script stuff. I'mjust gonna play this audio and just get
your take. Just we'll be herein a few minutes, so we will
continue this conversation. But I dowant to talk about this. The quarter
(06:56):
appearance was very brief, only lasteda couple of minutes, but we do
know that the arrayment has been pushedback at least until April twenty fifth.
The suspect, Nina Momany Well,he was supposed to enter a plea this
morning, but again that has beenpushed back for several weeks. In the
meantime, he will remain in jailwithout bail at least until that date,
(07:19):
until a judge can decide bail orno bail. He is accused of killing
Bob Lee. He was arrested inEmeryville. Now. Bob Lee was staggering
through the streets of San Francisco lastTuesday, just off the Embarcadero at around
two thirty five in the morning.He is a tech icon, started an
(07:39):
app called cash app back in twentythirteen, among many other things. With
his resume. I can't tell youthat the San Francisco Police Department, as
well as the attorneys on both sideswe interview them. There are dozens of
reporters here locally and nationally. Boththe attorneys representing the suspect as all as
(08:00):
the prosecution. They did not gointo any detail as far as a motive
behind this. They didn't even saythat they have any evidence going into that
particular part. But the San FranciscoPolice Department, they did elaborate a little
bit yesterday saying that the suspect andthe victim knew each other, but would
not go into details. I evenasked the defense team were they friends,
(08:24):
were they co workers? They saidno comment basically about that. We do
know that the suspect is thirty eightyears old. His family and friends were
inside the courtroom. We're all waitingoutside hoping to interview them, but for
whatever reason, they were allowed toleave the courtroom through another door. So
we never got a comment from familymembers as far as what's going on with
(08:50):
this case, while a lot ofpeople closely watching this, of course,
especially in the tech industry, becausethe San Francisco Police Department did say that
the suspect work in tech, thathe did start a company called expand It.
So again, this has been pushedback for several weeks until April twenty
bit, and the suspect will remainbehind bars. Back you all right,
(09:16):
all right, So again this isvery very important to me because I don't
want this sad now payment system.I don't like it. I wish I
had have downloaded the trailer whatever,the little commercial that they have. I
know that it's on YouTube, butI forgot to download it. But I
(09:37):
would rather this and Zail and andyou know all the other apps that these
techs afford us versus the federal governmentapp. I don't like it. I
hate it. I just don't havea great feeling about it. So that's
why I wanted to talk to youguys. About it. So what are
(10:00):
your thoughts. Oh, I thinkfrom an investigator point of view, we
definitely have it cares to be acrime of passion. We have multiple stabbounds
that we're talking about the initial homicide, and most likely we're going to find
this a lot more to the relationshipsand obviously that people know, that's why
they keeping things close to the chest. As far as the currency aspect,
(10:24):
whether we wond it or not,it is coming and I agree with you
call her that. You know,there's a lot of things we need to
do to prepare for it, andI think we of course don't dump cash.
And I'm not, like you said, I don't like the idea of
us transferringto something that can be easilyabused not only by our government but other
(10:45):
organizations as well, even more sothan cash. But this hasn't coming since
the first inmitial release of cryptocurrency.Was it back in the mid two thousands
early two thousands That wasn't released byaccident, And this has all been just
a step closer to where certain partiesI wanted this to go. A lot
(11:07):
of people need to disagree, butthis is where we're going and trying to
stay ahead of it through investments andproperty ownership as long as it becomes possible
is important, and as is selfsufficiency and learning to basically trade with each
other. So we're outside the systemof currency too, I think is important,
(11:28):
sir. What are your thoughts?Thank you for those of you who
just joined us UM fed now.Fed now is a service UM a new
instant payment infrastructure launching July twenty twentythree, so that's this year again.
I don't like it. U fednow has been built to potentially serve a
(11:52):
number of business, consumer and governmentuse cases. For business that now in
streamline payments to customers, consumers,and employees, m fed now service will
help slide everyone. It's very redundant, but anyway, it's a payment system
infrastructure developed by the Federal Reserve thatallows financial institutions of every size across the
(12:18):
US to dad and they're trying tocancel out zail and cash happing all those
others. I can't say this enough. I don't like it. PJ.
Your thoughts, well, I justthink it's mighty convenient speaking about the FED
now coming in and of course they'regoing to get rid of they telling these
(12:39):
billionaires, hey, we don't needyou guys anymore. Nobody will be using
your task app. So all ofa sudden you think they're gonna just take
that laying down. No, thisguy built multi billionaire, he got money
to fight that stop them. Sofor him to conveniently get stabbed and murdered
outside somewhere that that just come on. Now, if that was anybody else
(13:00):
to be a serious case going oninvestigation, there will be someone paid and
paid that guy to go stab thisguy or something. You know that is
this way too convenient, you know, as far as they're fed now,
I don't like it purely based onthe fact that it's too much control.
You're giving the government too much control. Stuff, got it? You know,
I just think about myself, youknow, I think about anytime something
(13:24):
goes wrong. You know, mymoney's not there, something happens, you
know, your your credit cards notworking, or the ID don't look like
that might not be you. It'sjust too much. I liked having cash
in my pocket just in case somethinggoes wrong. Now all of a sudden,
you're telling me I'm not gonna beable to have that cash, you
know, for people. When peoplesay this is gonna happen. No matter
(13:45):
what I look at it. Theytried to make it happen. It's not
the first time the government has comewith something like this. The credit card
was actually supposed to replace the dollar. They we're gonna use the credit cards
to replace dollars, but just likewe knew, it did not work out
because people want to continue to usecash because I like knowing that I got
money under my mattress if something goeswrong. You know, the government is
(14:09):
telling us, hey, Russia's gonnacome in here and hit us with an
MP Paulson wipe out all electricity.We're preparing for that. But then at
the same time they're telling us,oh, we want all the cars to
be electric, and we want allthe money to be electric and digital.
I'm like, that does not addup. Why would why would we do
that? Why would we set ourselvesup? But then it goes back to
(14:30):
myself telling people that we need tonot just be dependent on the CAST or
the FED now money. We needto have trade because if they did hit
us with an MP post, youknow, how are you gonna eat.
You're not gonna be able to usethat FED. Now I think we can
look at what happened in Florida whenthey were flooded out. I said,
none of that digital. That bitcoindidn't work. Nothing worked that was digital.
(14:52):
Those people were over, they're struggling, you know. They had to
use the cash that they had intheir hand to buy goods. They had
to do barter and things like that. So this goes back to teaching people
about the trades. You gotta havea trade if you want to bother,
if you want to eat. Oneof the things the government does is to
maintain is something called plausible deniability.Look, a lot of this stuff,
(15:15):
we can argue is manipulated and manipulatedthrough different avenues to the people. The
average person, and you guys knowthis. The average person is swayed by
their emotions. So we can createfear in one area, anger and next
the next area, and it's easyto kind of push people a certain direction.
(15:39):
Whether we're talking about this homicide ortalking about other things that are occurring.
There's a lot of manipulation of themarket, a lot of people that
have openly committed crimes we're not doinganything about. And if we look at
even the overall agenda, agenda ourgovernment's already signed on to what is Agenda
twenty thirty, which is Agenda twentythree and you can even find it.
(16:02):
It's defined as the People's Money that'son the basically the UN's own website,
and they established it basically at peoplea universal money for the people of the
world. This is where things aregoing and I do think we do need
to stand up for it. Weneed to hold this back as long as
(16:22):
possible. But the biggest difficulty is, like you guys have already started,
the state is it gives them control. Our government's already stating, as has
the UN, that having digitized moneylike this, they can control what you
spend on where you don't. Solet's say you want to donate to an
organization that doesn't fit the government's agenda, you can't do that. They also
(16:47):
can hurt your credit score rating.You want to purchase basically items that maybe
the government, whatever's and whoever's inpower, doesn't agree with. You want
to donate to your local church,you want to home to school your child,
or bullets are guns. Yes,but they've said that that's how they've
they've openly said they're going to usethis to limit that exchange. So a
(17:12):
while, but what about them,like, as we winding back to twenty
twenty, what about them playing?Yeah, I just want to welcome Josha
Brown and his mic is open soI can fall back. But thank you,
DJ. You can finish your thought. I just won't let you.
Guys know, I opened Jog's mike. Well, I don't want Hey,
(17:33):
Judge, appreciate being here in theopportunity to share. Jo I'm here,
I'm listening. I've been mission fora while, long long time. You're
here, sir. Okay, wealways appreciate the opportunity to share. But
I wanted to say that people.I mean, like, for example,
I'm one of those guys that saidI don't want to do the job,
the jab thing, you know,and me being an entrepreneur, it didn't
(17:55):
affect me at all. I didn't. I wasn't under Indie pressure where I
saw people losing it job. Isaw people going through hell and hot water
because they did not want to takeit, but they were forced to take
it. But I could just imaginethem saying, oh, well, if
he doesn't want to take it,we're just gonna turn his money off there.
And that's something that they will do, you know. I've seen that
stuff happening before, as being thefather, and they're saying, okay,
(18:18):
well you you're behind on your childsupport. The next thing you know,
they turned off the access to themoney. You know, so I've seen
that being a black man, I'veseen them take money for various reasons.
So I just always will fall backon cash, having my money my cash.
But now to know that there's notany cash, you only have to
(18:40):
use this fed now that bids mecould not have any other way of paying
for something. You know, someonecould come up with something and say,
well, in two nineteen ninety five, you slap the female or you around
the female that was said she wassexually harmed, So we're gonna turn your
money off until this thing goes.You know, they're already doing that.
(19:02):
You're right, they're already doing that. Yeah, So why would we set
ourselves up for that difficulty? Sir? You're you're you're you're in ailate one
hundred percent. But the biggest difficultywe've already set ourselves up for. That
we've already got with we have alack of privacy, and we can go
all the way back to different lineeleven acts and everything that occurred, and
(19:25):
when metadata was given up, privacy, as far as what people think,
his privacy is gone. And youand I both know even in general conversations,
anything we have that's recorded though,let's in social media or whatever it
might be. Even mean emails,they if they're taken even in context,
because it was socially acceptable ten yearsago, fifteen years ago, twenty years
(19:47):
ago, not a little longer.Is he is going to be used against
this not only in a criminal court, but in civil litigation and in the
court of public opinion. And ifwe look at with what China is doing
this and we're following suit, theyhave the social credit score, where our
businesses already have a social credit score. Our government's behind moving the social credit
score to the average person, whichmeans that basically, the more favorable you
(20:11):
are to certain agendas, the higheryour social credit score is, the loan
discounts you get, it makes itcheaper to travel, you're able to travel
between states or in the countries you'reconsidered a citizen of the world, the
lower you or social credit score is. And this is what China's already been
doing for a while, and we'vesubscribed to it, and we've had several
government officials make it's a wonderful ideapublicly that the lower it is, the
(20:36):
more they're able to ostracize you frominteraction within society. And yeah, they
do control your funds, They controlyour exposure or chances to have higher education,
to be involved in entertainment, thesocialize with everybody. They actually publicly
post people's photos and names of saying, don't associate with this person because they
(20:59):
are a bad person. Because theydon't whatever they don't agree with, they're
gonna lower credit score. And peoplethey know if they associate with that person,
their social credit score. You knowwhat I look at, you know
what I look at. They canit's not going to happen if we don't
all agree with it. Just likethey said, oh you have to have
this, everybody's doing it. Thenthey find out everybody did not do it.
(21:22):
Everybody did not agree with it,and now it's like, oh,
it's not gonna work because everybody didn't. So it's this same thing applied me
being a coach an entrepreneur. I'vetraveled the country over twenty six state and
I'm dealing with business owners and I'mhearing things that people are being paid.
Companies are being paid, like Visawas paying people to only take credit cards.
(21:45):
You hear what I'm saying. True, it's trying to pay people to
only accept credit cards because people arestarting to stay No, we don't want
to use the credit card. Wedon't want to use this zil We want
to use the cash. Do youtie the step casting up? Now?
There's forcing businesses to a stepcast upnow, So this is that was leading
(22:06):
to be one of the biggest paymentforces. Now it's forced Apple to jump
up and they created their own Applepay now, and we were never going
to go with this credit card,so they started paying people to use it.
So it's gonna be the same exactthing with this h FED. Now
they're gonna have to convince everybody.If you own a business and you say
I'm not using that, I'm gonnasupport them because I'm not. Here's where
(22:32):
you have more faith in the averageperson than I do. And I commend
you for them. But we lookat look how many people were still walking
around with all the evidence has comeout, but it's still wanting their children
to get to the vaccine. Theyare still walking around with masks that they're
still panicking. It's not the ideaof obviously they would want a majority of
people to sign on with it,and they know that it's not. But
we have a silent majority that's remainingtoo silent, and we're not standing up
(22:57):
for a rights and when we do, we're called out. Is being all
these different things, and more andmore people are getting beat down. They're
trying to keep to themselves, whichis a mistake. Everything you're saying is
one hundred percent correct. Your rightto be concerned about government having too much
control, they already do. We'vegiven it up. Your right to be
concerned about the digital currency, yourright to be concerned about the force vaccines
(23:21):
and the issues going on with it. The manipulation goes on it. And
I'm sure you're concerned about our involvementin different wars in different countries and the
way we're doing it, and allthese things that people were concerned about.
But we have to look at overallthe bigger picture in the amount of manipulation.
It doesn't take a majority of peopleto sway the country. As long
as we get into the area oftwelve to fifteen percent of the people,
(23:45):
that gives them a lot of power. Once you get over thirty, there's
a huge paradigm shift that occurs withinour country. Whether we're talking about tech
and how it's occurred, we know, and you're saving investments, you know
that once a certain product reaches anywherefrom twelve to seventeen percent of the market,
we can argue even sooner that productis going to begin taking over market
share. Just by leasing downds,it's going to grow. And that's how
(24:07):
we start tracking investments. We canstart seeing as they start to reach a
certain thresholds. If because it nowbecomes part of the what the social consciousness,
for lack of better term, Iapologize I don't have one right now,
and that's the same thing. It'snot going to work out because we
have the same conversation. But ifthe fifteen percent of the people get this
credit card, it's over. They'regonna get rid of the dollar. Well,
(24:30):
you guys already know the credit cardis lingering around in the background,
but everybody's using cast app and ziland Google pay. We're gonna they're gonna
keep pushing this, but it's upto us because and then not on another
note, the people that are notaccepting it they've been suppressing their story.
That's why they're taking TikTok down becausethat's where you can see. That's the
(24:52):
main place where you can go findout. People were saying, I'm not
doing this and I'm not gonna everdo that. So now they're oh,
TikTok is a threat because that isthe only place that we can go through
to find out what was really goingon, to find out that, oh,
I'm not the only one that saysI'm not gonna take that, or
I'm not the only one that's that'snot gonna use this new form of cash.
(25:15):
So now they're gonna get They've gettingrid of that. So now it's
like, oh, okay, Iguess everybody else gotten it because the news
said it. The news says thateverybody's using fed now, so I guess
that's true. But if you areusing social media, they're using media and
social media against us, and you'reright. As long as people lay down
and be quiet, If more people, if people again stop being silent and
(25:40):
not worry about what people think aboutI'm just saying what's on their mind,
people going to realize they're not alonein their thoughts. People are not being
silent people are screaming, bloody murdered. They're going on TikTok and and explaining
them full detail of what's going on. So they're not they're in the struggling
banks that the banks are feeling aswell. How do you factor that into
(26:03):
this conversation. We look at theoriginal of what the Silicon Valley Bank and
we look at basically Charles Swabb situation. They were already contacting the shareholders of
that bank telling them to dump theirmoney because this is going to happen.
We actually had a criminal manipulation ofthe market. And then once they told
people to do that and they startedreleasing information that may or may not been
(26:27):
true, there was a run onthat bank and that began causing that bank
to drop. And interestingly enough,Charles Swab that organization, they reap the
benefits. And this is public record, so it's not one of those conspiratorial
theories that there's nothing to support it. This has already been made public,
so we've got the situation. DoI think that these banks closures are problematic
(26:51):
and they could cause more people topanic? Yeah, I think it's designed
to so I think that people aregoing to be getting money out of this
most definitely, And I'm agreeing whatyou're saying. We need to hold strong,
but we need to recognize and againthis is where I commend you.
You've got more respect for the averageperson than I do. The average person
that I speak to industry. Theaverage person. We're talking to the younger
(27:14):
person, not somebody's little life experience. The average younger person literally thinks socialism
is a wonderful idea. They thinkthe government is really there to help them,
even though they say they hate it. In one hand, they want
the government to take more control,which is hugely problematic. They want the
government to give them handouts. Let'sask for more. The government should be
taking care of problems. In myown backyard. We got different groups of
(27:37):
people. We hang in clearly,but normally people got huddle und we got
people going the government has too muchcontrol. I didn't get it. I
didn't get asked the vote to sendthat money to Ukraine, etcetera, et
But when we talked about let's talkabout the banks real quick, you brought
up the bank. The banks arenot struggling because of the reason that they're
(27:57):
telling us. The banks are strugglingbecause people are moving in to convince to
make their money off for interest.Well, if everybody's pulling their money off
the banks and we're using casts orwe're using cash, ap Apple paying all
of this stuff, and now they'relosing money off of that. And then
when paypals, PayPal had a greatrun, they had a head start of
(28:18):
two or three years before the banksdecided to come up with Zell made a
bunch of money after that. Sonow let's rewind and look at the banks
are really struggling purely based on thefact that people are not are not sick.
Was sixty percent of the home saleswere through cash. We're cash banks
make their money off of mortgage loans. A lot Bank of America was the
(28:41):
second biggest mortgage banker in America,you know what I'm saying. So now
they're there, they've lost sixty seventypercent of that because ninety percent of the
people buying houses are using cash.That's why banks are struggling. It's not
because of the individual balt Excuse me. There are some banks and struggling because
(29:03):
of that. But if we lookat the Silicon Valley Bank, the average
investor there had over two hundred andfifty thousand dollars per or more invested with
them. They were actually large investors, and the problem is they had too
many eggs in one basket. Theywere told about the run. It wasn't
a Silicon Valley bank and invested inreal estate and lost and people were buying
the cash that specifically had very littleto do with that bank's crash. It
(29:25):
was poor management that banks. Um. We could argue that their magic management
there was they didn't have a actuallya manager fund manager that was responsible.
And that's one of the things thatSchwab organization brought up, and they were
doing some very foolish things. Therewasn't the other bank. But if you
(29:48):
looked up, if you looked upthe market and see what's going on right
now, every bank JP, Morgan, all of these hues, Fun,
black Rock, UH, Vanguard,all of these companies are dove into real
estate investments serious because that's what allthe banks they're using their money with.
They've even got colleges that are puttingtheir money. Do you see colleges are
(30:12):
replaced put up two billion dollars tobuy up all of these houses that are
about to hit the market for sale. And during this crisis that they claimed
us coming. The banks are allinvesting in real estate serious that they're not
thoth the ones that are failing.Anybody that's not in real estate are failing.
Right now, You've got the governmentbringing hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians,
(30:36):
hundreds of thousands of Afghani, hundredsof thousands of Syrians over here, and
they're putting them in brand new homes. Come on now, while and they've
changed the platform. In America.It's no longer about ownership. They want
people to rent because they see sincethey came in with the sanctions and tariffs
saying that if you don't make itin America, you have to If you
don't make it in America, wedon't want you shipping into America. So
(31:00):
now you look at all the shipsthat are no longer pulling in sam Pedro,
California, These that used to coachin China, they're all making the
stuff here because they knew a longtime ago we're not going to be doing
business with China in the future.Me as a car parks manufacturer, I
saw that coming years ago, andthat's why I had to restructure and start
getting my things made here in America. But my whole point of bringing that
(31:22):
up is we got so many peopleinvesting in America, land to America,
buying up all the houses and buyingup all the commercial real estate that is
blocking out your average homeowner. Andthe bank makes their money from the homeowners
getting mortgages. But if you gotChina coming into America buying up millions of
(31:45):
acres in all the baking houses,and you got Canada coming into America,
you got all these foreign tountries,over seventeen foreign countries just over here buying
up the majority of farmlands here,and just go through the whole. They'll
Gates is the largest farmer in theUnited States right now, you're you're you're
you're under that. Definitely, I'mnot he's one of them. He's one
(32:10):
of them. We got foreign countriesthat brought up the majority that's buying up
the rest of it. Like Isaid, they know the long games since
they since America's gonna go, theysay, we're gonna go to the world
where no longer is going to befriends with China. We're no longer going
to be friends with these people.America has to manufacture things themselves. Now.
(32:30):
Now if America has to manufacture thingsthemselves. That means you need land
to build gig the factories. Ifyou need land to build gig the factories,
that means you're gonna be building houses. So if you're building houses,
and now you've got companies coming insaying, well, I own the land
and I'm gonna put up the money. Just like back in the days,
we were going to the bank toget more to get money to build these
(32:51):
houses. Now I know there's vanguardssay we'll pay for every house that you
guys want to build. You justcome to us, We'll put up the
money. Black Blockers said, we'rebursting all the developers. There's no longer
anymore. All right, t J, we're scars. I wanted to Big
(33:14):
Boundery. Oh no, I wasjust going to to scars. I was
going to ask them, um becausewe know that this is triggered by bad
risk management practices, UM. AndI just wanted to know if y'all thought
that the Americans would end up payingfor bank failures, um, before we
switch scars, before we get there. UM. America being what it is,
(33:40):
there's been a long standing observation thatcomes from inside America and also out
of it. And it's this.With a system like ours, we invariably
get the representation we deserve. Soif it's screwed up, we deserve screwed
up because we're screwed up. See, you're talking about little spikes in a
(34:07):
bigger picture, and a bigger pictureis embraced in sense of entitlement, participation,
ribbons. Nobody gets the trophy.Everybody's got to be protected from growing
up. And what happens is youget administrations put in that promote that.
(34:29):
So it's kind of like you havea football stadium, a football field and
stands. The population is sitting upin the stands watching this game. And
on the field, we have oneteam that has been controlling the ball.
It's determining whether they'll have runs orpast plays, and they're pretty much dominating
(34:55):
the game at this part. Andthe other team has problems because the coaching
is not right, so they can'tseem to get the defense together and they're
romping all of them down the field. Now, is something wrong with the
stadium, is something wrong with therules? Is something wrong with the layout
(35:21):
of the place, or something wrongwith the grass or the astro turf,
or does it have something to do, have something to do with the players
in that particular game, and I'mlooking at what we have, which is
the cast of characters for the lastsome years. It's been rather consistent in
(35:46):
this particular ball game, and theyhave become tied up with a consistently obvious
faction that is not even attempt tosupport what most humans would call normallysy It
(36:07):
seems to have an agenda and everythingis subservient to that agenda. Now I
will drop back fifty five years.I had an interesting professor that I had
teaching assistant status with back at UCLA. She was part of a professorial exchange
(36:32):
program, and she was a professoremeritus at the University of Moscow. A
good Communist, formerly the highest rankingwoman ever on a Soviet poet, dear
old year old, the soul ofthet Union at the Stalingrad See and interestingly
enough, formally in charge of propagandafor the KG being prior to that,
(36:55):
the KZD its predecessor. She said, on observations of what we had,
the group that was beginning to becalled hippie. Prior to that, their
predecessors had been known as Beatnis,and that's what you call them, She
(37:17):
said, America is in grave dangerof becoming a fascist nation, not through
the mechanism of jack boot wearing,goose step in uniformed political thugs, but
some cicifide pink panty wearing, longhaired beatnix who, in their ignorance would
(37:44):
gladly impose the worst aspects of fascismon the public to protect their deviant ways
and protects you from not understanding whywhat they want is supposed to be what
(38:04):
you want. And that's what we'vegot now associated with that. It's not
everybody in this stadium that is forthis game plan. It's just if you
look at the list of characters thatare involved, you can see along association.
(38:27):
And the other thing is we areso readily giving away our rights and
our privacy concerns and submitting to thisnation's nason fascism because we perceive not all
of us, but too many ofus, perceive a need to be protected.
(38:47):
They want gun controls, and theynever thought about the inherent dangerous on
disarming everybody in a place like this. In turning it over to these soon
to the jackboot wearing, goose steppingpolitical pugs. Ze Kylie in the name
(39:10):
of their particular liberties in excesses wherethere are no values, no standard,
no arts, only waters, andit's bad. They are for the destruction
of the traditional nuclear family and thehome trading that you could expect to come
(39:35):
out of that would socialize and acculturatehumans to get along with each other in
a process that's waters from cave tocondo. But they're not into that.
They want somebody to do it forthem so they can pay attention to their
particular brand of defancy, which youmight sharitably cause you got a right to
(39:57):
get your freak on in your bedroomfor it. But when you start getting
outside of it and you approach lifeand the same fashion, get problems.
Now we have turned over a lotof what we otherwise ought to pay attention
to. The people think that they'reentitled to sit on the couch, smoke
a blood, play good games.We don't want to have responsibility. And
(40:24):
the same people that are going tosuffer are the same people that want Facebook,
Instagram, Twitter and everybody to haveunlimited access to their lives. They
want smart household appliances that provide anideal intrusion point, so your privacy inside
(40:46):
your own home can be really andgratuitously violated. They want somebody to make
decisions for them. They want tohave cryptocurrency set up so nobody has money,
because they think they can just godown and make everything easier. They
don't pay attention to the necessity togo along with being a free person,
(41:10):
because being free is inherently dangerous,and they are too cowardly and lacking character
to understand that you have to makea stand, you have to do things
for yourself. So they want thesein truth, But as you're saying,
what the hell, all kinds ofthings can stop. And you know you've
(41:34):
got a power outage and you haveno money. You've got a storm and
a breakdown of the now decayed utilityinfrastructures in an area, and you have
no money. You've got something that'swide open to hacking, and you have
no money. This thing about it, well, let's put it this way.
(42:00):
I had a splurge of cases inmy courtroom almost thirty years ago when
people started nacently using the net,and they had a service that advertised itself
several It said, are you tiredof having to do things the old fashioned
way by paper, of writing outchecks where we can help you. So
(42:23):
we can bring your landlord, yourcard dealer, and the people that you
owe bills too, into the twentiethcentury and we can do that for you
now. They didn't have what theyrequired in the way of security, and
we had all kinds of lacious problems, ranging from they would sneak in and
(42:49):
look at the bosses check book andget the information such services need and have
money sent to themselves, to rippingoff relatives and friends. But I'm or
we have gotten beyond that these days. But it's there. What is inflation?
How does it work? What arethe advantages of an inflationary in the
(43:13):
economy? And who does that itbenefit? Is there matter with it's good
for certain interests in the economy wherethere is inflation, and if so,
how, why? What where doesit go down? So it is what
happens when you remove certain control,what happens when something takes over, Like,
for example, if you do acareful analysis of some financial realities,
(43:39):
you will find that the sovereign investorknown as the People's Republic of China very
much can be said to stabilize everystocky chain exchange in the world and every
active currency because of respute efforts thatthey have put into the mix over the
(44:00):
last fifty some years. Now,who's doing what When a communist country,
the People's Republic of China, hasto intervene to stop worldwide depressions from occurring
or inflation from getting too bad,or to stop recessions from moving too far.
(44:25):
What happens when you need a communistcountry, the People's Republic of China
moving into things to stabilize fluctuating occurrenciesand would probably be brought into the mix
to stabilize any electoral currency. Whathappens when they decide to go into bricks
Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and others and set up
(44:51):
an alternative What happens when we havea social program set that does not deal
with the realities of humanity and worldpolitics. We've got all kinds of problems
here. So maybe what needs tohappen is next election cycle, stop voting
(45:16):
reflexibly, come off the damn plantation, and don't just automatically vote the way
you have been conditioned for most ofyour life to vote, if not the
entirety of it. So you interjectsomething back into the American political scene where
there is consequence that occurs when youdon't pay attention to the people that are
(45:42):
supporting you by your votes, andwhen you are the putative voters, understand
that if you always vote a certainway, no matter what, that side
has no incentive to do a damnedthing for you. And if you can
always be counted on to vote againstsomebody no matter what they try to do,
(46:04):
then that side has no incentive todo anything for you. So you
don't get a damn thing out ofit, except somebody grinned while you put
them in place to act for thesurgeons. Now you can find a very
interesting connection between the likes of GeorgeSorrows and Kamala Harris im Hall, also
(46:27):
Joe Biden and that ilk. Youwill find that they are to a great
extent driving engines behind some of thethings that you gentlemen have been dogging about.
You will find this kind of thing. But then again, it's not
really just the billionaires. It's morethe idea of a billionaire, because a
billionaire is just one person and hehas to be able to influence people and
(46:51):
has only so far he can goto throw money at somebody. But what
they can do is to cause anidiot like one of my candidates for opponents
here from mayor in Memphis to saylast week at a forum, he said,
the problem with Memphis is we don'tpay gratuities to billionaires so they can
(47:15):
come in here and make money andmaybe some of it will trickle down to
the rest of us. See,when you get people thinking like that,
then they aren't prepared to, theyaren't fit to, and they won't have
any control over their lives. Andif we listen to them, we won't
(47:38):
either. But I just had tothrow that into the mix, and I'll
put the mic down and passage.That's time what we're going to do.
And Jose, I want to endon you. I want to go around
the table because we're in the secondhour. During the first hour, minus
what we discuss with TJ, wetalked about the US dollar bank failures,
(48:01):
bad practices, questionable affordability, depositmanagement, and interest rates. Okay,
so my last question, if youguys could do this as brief as possible,
I want to ask you guys.We know that the banks are FDIs
ensured to a certain point, butis our money safe? That's very,
(48:23):
very important, and I'd like toend on that to kind of put a
nice little bow on you know,today's conversation DJ, because you entered first.
We'll start with you and then Rickand then Judge. So is our
money? Saying not at all?And there's actually a clause and I'm sure
(48:45):
there's a judge's length here, Judge'sneighborhood, his wheelhouse. But there's actually
a clause in the bank right upthat state that if the government needs our
money, you know, to dowhatever it is they want to, that
they can take the money out ofyour account and do whatever they want to
in the case of wars, etcetera, et cetera. I'm sure Joe
(49:07):
does know more about that. Ido, possibly, And that's where we
are right now. We're in thestate where we might be going to war
in the next six months. Sothe government may say we need their money,
and now they've taken control of it, right they're trying to take control
of it. So the people needto know that. So I say,
no, it's not su at all. May I ask you a question,
(49:30):
we keep I keep war? Arewe really going to war? Jerny dangers
that or is what we're looking atan effort a president to eventually get a
favor returned to him by the Ukraineby having their Supreme Court dismissed a multipage,
(49:55):
multi acount organized crime that his nameis and himself frequently in pages.
The immediate effect of that is Articlesix of the Constitution that says ratified treaties
are the supreme law of the land. And a certain ratifying treaty negotiated by
(50:22):
President Bill Clinton sis Ukraine and theUnited States together, and they agreed to
participate in the apprehension, detention,and extradition of criminal elements wanted by the
other. And since Biden is indictedin multiple felony counts charging him with bribery,
(50:45):
extortions, solicitation of perjury, treason, and a number of other things
under the Constitution, which Article sixis required to be, they can't get
expect by nasty background noise. Guys. Um, that's that's I don't know
(51:12):
what. I don't want this heard, but that is the law. And
the problem is that right now,because of his official position, expediencies are
carrying into tradition that you do notprosecute a sitting president for something like this
(51:35):
while he's in office due to thefirst while the leader's effects on the security
of the country. But it iswhat it is, and I can't help.
I cannot escape in my mind thatwhat I saw when I reviewed the
transcriptions of the three Hunter Biden laptopI got a chance to go over when
(52:02):
Fox had this mock trial in NewYork involving a little New Jersey, actually
involving those laptops, wherein the repairmanwas brought in and his documents relative to
his authority to do what he didwere examined and found to be good and
(52:24):
hold, and we went over thedownloaded three laptops contents. One can't help
after looking at what one saw witha conclusion that there is a criminal enterprise,
(52:45):
a crucial element of which is nowsitting in the White House, that
has been unaddressed and is escaping Americanjustice. Now that is something I can't
help but energy because the last checkI took six separate oaths over the last
half sent free to support the USConstitution for one reason or another. I
(53:12):
hold myself to those oats. Now, I didn't mean intrude again, but
it's just background relevance. Well it'sit's the show is called the Judge Your
Brown Show. So We definitely loveit when you pontificate um will end on
you um rick um. We talkedabout fed now we know that drops this
(53:36):
yeared you lie, um because thewho I asked is our money safe?
Well do your final thoughts. Yeah, I'm on both the sides of Judge
in GT. The idea here GT. The idea is nowhere money is not
safe, has not been safe.We have too much reliance in the government
(53:57):
and not enough reliance on each otherin ourselves. But and also in that's
saying though we have to is asfar as going to war, there may
be individual scuffles. There may beindividual wars going on. I know and
acquainted with various contracting organizations and thathave been for a number of years,
have even been a part of differentcontracts. As far as going to other
(54:22):
countries and acquiring different assets. Theidea that we're dealing with it we think
that our federal government is antagonistic toChina or Ukraine or Russia is laughable.
We have been, especially this currentgovernment, have been an ally in many
(54:42):
aspects, and a lot of thingswe do may and the service look like
they're contrary to what one side orthe other wants. But realistically, these
things they've already been played out andmade deals that there's been deals long under
the table. We've got a governmentright now that is completely sold out to
China. Now the stave face isentirely possible that you might see skirmish's wars,
(55:06):
small wars or smaller scale wars oreven larger ones to cover up some
different aspects. Yeah. Does thatmean that individual governments haven't been partied to
this, No, it just meansthat we see there's a larger game going
over. It's occurring, a largerchess game about who's going to be in
power, who's going to have theability, who sold their souls literally to
(55:30):
these larger powers that be. There'sthis spear of the age that's going on.
You can argue a lot of differentthings with it. But if people
think that we're safe in any aspectand trust the government and no matter right
now who's in charge, I thinkthey're being foolish. We've seen time and
time again that every time the governmentcomes in and says we're here to help
(55:51):
you, we're your friends, youbetter watch your back, there's going to
be a knife somehow. And sincethey've proven to be an enemy. Anytime
you're becomes to you and they offeryou Boone's wonderful presence and friendship, you
need to be real careful. They'renot doing it for your good. There's
something that gives them a stronger position. Now we have the criminal activity that
(56:16):
many people in our government have beeninvolved in. As the judge mentioned with
Ukraine, we've also get some issuesand ties with Russia and with China,
and incidentally, those are the bigplayers that we're against right now. If
our government were to truly go againstChina, Russia or Ukraine, truly we
would see a lot more information beingreleased, a lot more Many of us
(56:42):
have some personal knowledge of some ofthat information. But the problem is right
now, no information that gets releasedis released by accident. So they have
to ask yourself what's the bigger picture. And again, so going back,
I don't want to turn this intopeople might deem as a conspiratorial show,
but you have to look to seeNumber one, follow the money. Who's
(57:06):
making money out of this? Wecan look at the Ukrainian president, how
do you really get in power?Who backed him? A little bit of
research shows you quite a bit ofevidence exactly what's going on there. The
war in Ukraine. The storm isbetween Russia. When I was in Ukraine
and Russia, even during the Obamaera, they were concerned that I was
(57:28):
there to help bring down the IronCurtain because they said they knew as soon
as they came down, Russia wasgoing to come in. That was not
why I was there. Now,the idea that when these things started to
occur, our government knew when andwhere Russia was first going to move.
We knew that ahead of time.We had the intel. We also knew
(57:51):
about the election, and you canread these intelligent documents that have already been
released. Information has been released,but there's a lot of things that can't
necessarily or won't go into right now. But there's nothing that surprising us right
now, especially if you have anyknowledge of some of the the international intel
that's been made available. So trustingthis government, and I'm arguing that we
(58:15):
should never trust any government so muchthat we give our rights up. But
I think trusting this government is afolly. And should we have backup plans?
Yeah? Not only should we beinvesting in property, but that can
still be taken away. We shouldbe investing in commodities, gold, silver,
Yes, those things still have someflaws, but they're good solid investments.
(58:36):
And should you be growing your accountkeeping cash on hands and tradeable goods
on hand, most definitely. Butthe biggest thing is we should not be
trading is our rights. And theaverage person, like the judge said,
is willing to roll over and giveup whatever rights had asked for as long
as they're promised that life is goingto get a little easier for them.
If you give us a few cookies, we're willing to give up everything.
(59:00):
If you give us a little bitmore money, We're willing to give up
our rights in social media. Togive us a free phone. We're willing
to let you listen to our conversations. If you give us discounts in our
houses. We're willing to you tolisten to our houses. If you give
us a discount in our car loanor give us a student loan break,
We're willing to give up our gunrights or whatever rights they may ask at
the time. Now a lot ofpeople may think this is too far fetched,
(59:22):
but these are things that are alreadybeing discussed openly about. How get
people to go along with a largerplan. There are many people in our
country that have always literally sold thesoul, and most of our country on
the lower level is willing to dothat if they're promised that life would get
a little easier for them. Butmaintain your rights and things being easy,
(59:45):
they don't go together. Thank youso much for that. We are out
of time, so we won't beable to talk about I know you wanted
to talk about the Daniel Perry case. The newly unsealed documents set show Daniel
Terry talked about killing people and sharedracist comments on social media. But maybe
(01:00:06):
this next audio is in the samevein. I doesn't think he said this
was about racism. I'm not sure. It's been so long, but these
guys are now speaking out, andthis is how we will end before we
open up the lines to allow colorsto join the conversation. So you finally
arrived at this destination. What wasit? It was? It was the
(01:00:28):
house, but a lot of themmake things out guns, putting the blow
mask, red plastic mask, theyput masks on. Yeah, I was
putting the guns to our head tellingus not to look up things like that.
Have you gotten any kind of medicaltreatment? The cartel took us to
(01:00:51):
a clanic after we left from thespot where they was questioning and that.
But they told us they was like, um, I guess after they kept
some that's our questions. Our answersnever changed. They said, UM,
well, we're gonna get We're gonnaget y'all some help. But what kind
of treatment did they give you?They put my leg on my tool by
(01:01:12):
far and then they spitched it up. All this time. I mean,
there's there's guys with guns around youguarding right. They was like they we
had to stay there for them toinvestigate us and different things. And like
one am was sitting us a chairlike where you're sitting too, and he
was looking at something on his phone. And I can remember the sound of
(01:01:34):
that day or when it happened,Like I could remember the gunshots, the
noise, and I heard it andI asked him, I said, excuse
me, is that us? Andhe said yes. I say, can
I see it? And he's like, hold on, and he turned the
phone around and he showed the videoof us being kidnapps and stuff like that.
The one of the gunmen actually showedyou the video that we've all seen
(01:01:58):
of you being kidnapped on the street. M that's surreal. I mean,
what did that? What was that? Like? I just thought of crying,
I can never go home. Didin any way help you to know
that this video is out there thatpeople at least knew, And though I
(01:02:19):
thought maybe it was just out inMexico, I didn't know that, and
I reached the States, right,So I felt a little bit because I
just didn't know our families knew anythingto happen to us. You're you're a
woman in custody with cartel gunmen.Were they threatening to you in violence and
sexual violence? I mean yeah,they said all this stuff, all that
(01:02:43):
they did. Hello, I MarkBrown. Get more great ABC seven content
by clicking the subscribe button for ourYouTube channel and download the ABC seven Los
Angeles Hello. Oh shoot, I'msorry, I was on mute. Um
(01:03:09):
I cut it off early. Um, but I'll read the copyright one oh
seven. I was reading that,so I'll just insert that in post production.
But anyway, the title, thetitle of that video was Americans kidnapped
by Mexican cartel reveal horrifying details.Again shout out to S and N and
(01:03:30):
uh the host. So you wantedto to talk about that? Um,
Ricky ray Tell everybody, your formercop and get gives the details just so
people know why you're in Ukraine,in Russia and why you're qualified to have
this conversation alright, former law enforcementofficer for just about fifteen years, I
(01:03:54):
specialized in major arcotics in towards inmy career anti terrorism. It was a
deep undercover off for while we're friendsand family. I thought it went bad.
Who caught new? I existed badging, gun, re locked away and
safe. But I did other variouslaw enforcement things later. It was into
my career, like I said,wire to surveillance expert, interviewing interrogation expert
(01:04:15):
as far as later after injuries INBand piece back together, I had my
investigation and contracting companies work everything.Primarily specialized in criminal defense, but also
contracts with local, federal and stategovernments as well as military organizations. I've
been involved in acquiring assets in variousareas inside and outside the country for various
(01:04:36):
portions of local, federal and stategovernments and other organizations. Even have been
hired by our federal government to investigatecertain kidnapping cases very similar to what was
just mentioned and to recover potential assetswhere individuals if possible by other organizations as
(01:04:57):
well, you know, so justkind of a little bit of those things,
primarily, like I said, dealingwith some a lot of defense cases.
That's where my start actually ended uplying recognizing that in our country and
in others, if a lot ofpeople believe that it's about race, but
quite often it's typically about how muchmoney you have. If you have the
(01:05:19):
money to afford a good defense,you're probably gonna get off. If you
don't, you're probably gonna get convicted. And once I realized that, I
understood that, that's where I beganprimarily specializing in. But I did take
other types of cases if I thoughtthere was a benefit to them. Thank
you. Um, can you respondto the audio that I just played in
(01:05:45):
what way? I don't know whyI thought you had details? Oh did
you have any details? Yeah?I just want to make sure that as
far as it details, this isn'tthe first time that's happened across their borders.
In fact, this has happened quiteoften. It's just this one happened
to get more publicity than some ofthem that occurred. In recent times.
(01:06:05):
There's been multiple shootings with our bordercommunities with Mexico cartels have been infiltrating deeper
and deeper, and our border patrolhas been overrun a number of occasions with
an inability to actually fight back therethey've been Keep mind, this isn't necessarily
blaming our border patrol. Quite oftenthey've been hamstrung, and even private citizens
(01:06:30):
who've chosen to try to protect thecities where they know these people that the
cartel members and in different organizations arecoming across, they've chose to patrol their
own cities, their own backyards,and our government has persecuted them and even
prosecuted them for doing that. Sothis has been going on for a little
bit. Am I surprised to hearthis happened, No, not at all.
(01:06:57):
Am I disappointed in that it didhappen, That we have the ability
to prevent it and we didn't doit. Yes, Am I disappointed in
our government's lack of response. Yes. And as far as this family,
my heart goes out to them now. As far as they're wearing the Diablo
mask and a lot of other thingsgoing on, wearing masks everything else is
(01:07:17):
common, But you have to understandthere's a great deal of benefits still for
the gangs to come over in tokidnap individuals, no matter what you think
is the people that are going afterthey do that for multitude of reasons.
And they also do this to testthe waters. They're going further and further
inland in our country to see wherethey can get away with, and they're
(01:07:40):
learning they can get away with quitea bit. So crime on that aspect
is on the rise. And bythe way, government agencies have been well
aware of their incursions in our interactionsin our country for a number of years
and have been told to stand downquite often. Thank you. Oh that's
a question for you. Why doyou think they've been told to stand down?
(01:08:05):
I can tell you even in someof the things that I've done,
because we're we're told because we're lookingfor the larger picture. We're looking to
see if we can go where thisgoes back. And even though there's officials
that are want to get involved lawenforcements at once to get involved, um,
they're getting smacked hard and being toldnot to, being ordered not to
(01:08:28):
in order to stand down. Ithink they're being told to stand down because
they got their hand involved in it. You know, we didn't wear about.
I'm gonna I'm an agreement, soI think the upper government. Look,
so this is going to probably infuriatea lot of people. One of
the largest commodities, one of thebiggest things that's still traded in the United
(01:08:49):
States and throughout the country isn't drugs. It's human traffedy. You can and
it's not white, black or Hispanic. We can get into that division all
over place. There's all these differentcamps. But I've seen it firsthand.
You know, drugs you can sellonce and they're done. Humans you can
traffic again and again and again andagain, and they're an easily replaceable resource
(01:09:14):
no matter how they're is how they'regotten in people um of a depray of
nature and now they're these humans areused for various things and you can use
your imagination. Do I think there'sa big part of it. Yeah,
I think that is a big partof it. Do I think our government
um doesn't want to stop it becausethere's a huge amount of money that many
of these people are involved in.Or do I think they're involved in some
(01:09:36):
of this yourself theirselves? Yes?Now do I have personal knowledge of people
actually within our government openly supporting humantrafficking? No, you know, but
you know, it's funny that TVshow Snowfall, the story of Freeway rate.
The season finale was last night.I believe that that literally is telling
(01:09:58):
you exactly what's going on, what'shappened in the past, what's still going
on currently. You know, theyneed that stuff to go on because they're
making all kinds of money. Bookoo, They're they're doing all type of ways
making money over there. It wasnot they never spoke on what those cartels
doing. Taliban. They accidentally droppeda bunch of supplies over on the Taliban,
like, oh wow, did wecreate the Taliban. So it's the
(01:10:19):
same thing with them, the military, that's just their own people over there
doing all of this stuff that theycontrol. That's why, you know,
you know, and that's when peoplegot to understand that. It was until
recently. It was recently when whenwhen what was it Mexico decided that they
(01:10:42):
want to join bricks and immediately oneof the politicians he rallied it, we
need to do something about those,uh, those militias over there in Mexico.
We need to go over there andstop all that stuff. It's like
they did not have no concerns aboutthem until they decided to join the bridge.
That's when it started addressing that theyneed to do something, meaning we
may be going to war with Mexicobecause they don't want that. I agree.
(01:11:11):
You can give your final thought.I'm gonna see if Judge has anything
to say, because we're at atime. But what what what were you
going to say? Can you saysomething? Um quick to say? This
should be another can of worms.I don't know if you're familiar with Operation
Northwoods and you know basically what occurredwith that. If not, you should
look that up. There's a lotof things we allow to occur to get
(01:11:33):
the people stirred up, and peopleare more than willing to play both sides.
Our government plays both sides of differentthings. Even one of the cases
I was involved in not too longago, where I was trying to again
protect and recover some assets, afederal task force contacted me and said that
there's a dark and a light horseside. I was warned that, hey,
(01:11:54):
look they're on my side and noteverybody out there is on my side.
And they were given me a warningand said they and protect me from
the other organization. You can takethis is bs or um or what is
it? Conspiracy, fear or not. There were witnesses to what happened.
And the biggest difficulty was, andreally one of the most disheartening thing was
(01:12:14):
is it was my own government,the own people there. It was actually
interfering with me trying to protect people. And when I tried to get this
in more federal aid and more judgesto help out, organizations to help out,
I was told I was on myown and to watch my back.
That makes things very difficult when itcomes down to fighting. Very few people
(01:12:35):
are willing to stand up with you, even if they know that it's wrong.
So now there's both sides. Youknow what's been on the guy the
people from this start, we're gonnahave to shift. Another reason why they
want to get rid of TikTok becausenow you have a lot of the nine
eleven survivors telling their stories. Yougot firefighters that they're telling them about all
(01:12:58):
the bombs going off, you know, and that they were running from not
the plane, but the bombs.And then you got a lady that was
just sitting there just this morning tellingher story about she worked there in the
bomb came through the wind, camethrough the wall right there by her office,
and she was one of the survivorsthat walked out of there and said
there was no plane. So TikTokis revealing. All of these people are
(01:13:19):
coming out with telling their stories,and it's like a lot coming up.
People were like, Wow, thishas been out for a while. You're
aware that we actually had the inteland we have proof not just a little
bits of intel, that an IsraeliMassad team was actually there. They were
a demo team. Were they involvedin it? I don't know. Were
(01:13:39):
they there? And did they haveblasting taps and thermite? Yeah, we
have evidence of that as well withthermite using that. Most of us that
are have been involved in EOD indifferent operations recognize what explosive materials do and
what a plane does. And Ican tell you there were two different things
that occurred, and with the newdifferent things and with the news set actually
happened. Let makes want to goup to the base, all right,
(01:14:02):
So yeah, we're going to haveto put a pin in that. Um,
you guys are definitely welcome to comeback next week. UM, I
think we're going to have a statesenator on next week. I'm not sure.
I need I need to confirm thatum and then the following week we
got Silk of Silk and Diamond comingback, so a lot of politics on
(01:14:23):
to discuss. Show. Please checkyour schedules so that we can continue this
conversation. The Judge Joe Brown Showpresented by Valerie Denise Jones Uncensored Truth with
a Legal Twist, Friday, fourpm Eastern Standard Times nine two nine four
seven seven one seven four. VisitMiss Valerie Denise Jones dot com for details.
(01:14:54):
Want to know more about big media, Tune in every Tuesday and Friday
at four pm Eastern, and don'tforget to subscribe to our channels
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
Football’s funniest family duo — Jason Kelce of the Philadelphia Eagles and Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs — team up to provide next-level access to life in the league as it unfolds. The two brothers and Super Bowl champions drop weekly insights about the weekly slate of games and share their INSIDE perspectives on trending NFL news and sports headlines. They also endlessly rag on each other as brothers do, chat the latest in pop culture and welcome some very popular and well-known friends to chat with them. Check out new episodes every Wednesday. Follow New Heights on the Wondery App, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to new episodes early and ad-free, and get exclusive content on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And join our new membership for a unique fan experience by going to the New Heights YouTube channel now!
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.