August 14, 2025 • 26 mins
In this gripping episode, we explore the unresolved cold case of Shannon Rose Lloyd, now brought back to light after thirty-seven years thanks to new DNA evidence. Join us as we follow the emotional courtroom showdown against Steven Richard Hensley, the man charged with her murder. Witness the tension between hope and heartbreak as the verdict comes in, promising justice at last for a family long haunted by uncertainty. This riveting chapter in California’s cold case history uncovers not just a crime story, but the enduring quest for truth championed by investigative journalism. What will justice look like after a lifetime? Tune in to find out!
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The arrest of Stephen Richard Hensley sent a shockwave through
Garden Grove. For thirty seven years, he had lived as
an ordinary man, working jobs, paying bills, blending into the
background of southern California life. But now the DNA beneath
Shannon rose Lloyd's finger nails had pulled him into the
harsh light of a court room. Detective Karen Holt had
(00:20):
spent months preparing for this moment. The evidence was air tight,
but the case was anything but easy. Prosecutors knew the
defense would attack every detail, the age of the samples,
the chain of custody, the possibility of contamination. The trial
would be a battle not only over facts, but over
the idea that justice can still stand after decades. For
(00:42):
Shannon's family, walking into the court house was like reopening
an old wound that had never fully healed. Her mother, Patricia,
had waited most of her life to see the man
accused of killing her daughter held accountable. Every step through
the marble halls brought back nineteen eighty four, the phone call,
the police cars, the endless nights of not knowing. Inside
(01:03):
the court room, Hensley sat at the defense table in
a dark suit, hands folded, expression unreadable. The jury, twelve
strangers tasked with deciding his fate, would hear about the
violent knight Shannon was killed, the evidence sealed away for decades,
and the science that had finally broken the silence. The
trial would test everyone, the investigators who had carried the
(01:25):
weight of the case, the forensic experts defending their methods,
and a family determined not to let time dull the truth.
And even when the verdict came, there would still be
one more step, sentencing day, when the court would decide
how the rest of Hensley's life would be spent. This
is the final act in a story that began in
a quiet apartment on a May night in nineteen eighty four.
(01:47):
It's about what happens when science, persistence, and the refusal
to forget finally collide with the justice system, and whether
after a lifetime of waiting, justice still feels like enough.
So if you think you've heard it, you haven't, hit
follow on your favorite platform and leave a comment. The
next story might change your mind. Don't miss a single turn.
(02:08):
Chapter eleven. Sentencing Day. Sentencing days are quieter than verdict days.
The crowds are smaller, the tension less, about uncertainty and
more about finality. For families like the Lloyd's, it's the
last official chapter in a case that has consumed decades
of their lives. On the morning of Stephen Richard Hensley's sentencing,
(02:28):
the Orange County Superior Court was calm. The media presence
was still there, but without the crush of cameras that
had filled the steps during the trial. The headlines had
already been written. Convicted in nineteen eighty four, murder man
faces life in prison. Now it was a matter of
hearing the words from the judge's mouth. Detective Karen Holt
arrived early. She didn't have to be there, her job
(02:51):
was technically done, but she knew the Lloyds would want
to see her. Patricia and her son Mark were seated
in the front row, dressed in black. Patricia Suha's hands
were clasped tightly in her lap, the way they had
been on verdict day. She'd told Holt the night before,
I just want to hear it set out loud. I
wanted on the record forever. Hensley was brought in wearing
(03:11):
the standard orange jail jumpsuit. He looked older than he
had during the trial. The weeks in custody, carving new
lines into his face. His hands were cuffed in front
of him, his gait slow but steady. He glanced briefly
toward the gallery, but didn't acknowledge the family. Judge Ellen
Vargas took the bench promptly. At nine a m. The
case was called and the clerk read the charge aloud,
(03:34):
count one murder in the first degree, verdict guilty. Before sentencing,
the court allowed for victim impact statements. Patricia stood first.
She walked to the podium with a folded sheet of
paper in her hand, but when she began speaking, she
didn't look at it. Shannon was my daughter, She was
my best friend. She was taken from me in the
(03:55):
most violent way imaginable. For thirty seven years, I woke
up every day wondering if her killer was still walking free,
wondering if I'd pass him in the grocery store or
at the gas station. I prayed for this day. I
prayed that someone would have to answer for what they
did to her, and now you will, mister Hensley. Her
voice didn't shake, but her eyes stayed locked on Hensley
(04:17):
the entire time. He didn't look back. Mark spoke next.
His statement was shorter, but no less direct. When you
killed my sister, you took more than her life. You
took every holiday, every birthday, every moment our family could
have had with her. You stole decades from us, and
for what you can never give them back. But today
(04:37):
you will lose your freedom the way you took hers.
The prosecutor, Michael Rayes, made a brief statement urging the
court to impose the maximum sentence allowed by law. This
was a senseless act of violence against a young woman
in her own home. The defendant lived his life for
nearly four decades, while the victim's family lived with a
wound that never healed. The only just outcome is life
(04:59):
and prison without the possibility of parole. When it was
the defense's turn, Hensley's attorney, James Corcoran, asked the court
for leniency, citing his client's age and lack of prior
violent convictions. Mister Hensley has maintained his innocence from the beginning.
We asked the court to consider his advanced years and
the fact that he has lived peacefully for much of
(05:20):
his life. Judge Vargas listened without interruption, then turned to Hensley.
Mister Hensley, you have been convicted by a jury of
your peers of the murder of Shannon Rose Lloyd. The
evidence against you was strong, and the jury found it compelling.
You took the life of a young woman in her
own home, a place where she had every right to
feel safe. For thirty seven years, you lived free while
(05:43):
her family lived in pain. That ends today. She sentenced
him to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Patricia exhaled audibly. It was the sound of something leaving
her after decades. Not joy, not relief exactly, but a release.
Hensley was escorted out of the court room without speaking.
He didn't look back at the Lloyd's. He didn't ask
(06:04):
for a final word. Outside the court house, Patricia and
Mark stood with Holt and Reyes for a brief press conference.
Patricia spoke, first, justice is never late. If it comes today,
we got it for Shannon. I want other families with
cold cases to know, don't stop asking, don't stop calling.
Your loved one's case matters. The cameras clicked, reporters shouted questions,
(06:27):
but Patricia didn't take any. She had said what she
came to say. Back inside the court, staff began clearing
the docket for the next case. For them, it was
just another day's work, But for the Lloyd family, it
was the end of a thirty seven year fight and
the start of life after justice. Holt told me later
that sentencing days are bittersweet. You get the win, but
(06:49):
you also know it doesn't bring the person back. It's closure,
but not the kind that fills the hole. That night,
Patricia lit a single candle on her kitchen table beside
a framed foot photo of Shannon. She didn't celebrate, she
didn't cry. She just sat there, quiet, letting the wait
of the day settle. The trial was over, the sentence
was handed down, and for the first time since nineteen
(07:12):
eighty four, the case file could be stamped closed. Chapter
twelve Lessons in Justice. Every cold case that finally ends
in a conviction leaves behind more than just a closed file.
It leaves a trail of lessons, some about the law,
some about science, and some about people. In the weeks
after Stephen Richard Hensley was sentenced to life in prison
(07:33):
without parole for the murder of Shannon Rose Lloyd, I
spent hours in conversation with Detective Karen Holt. She was
still decompressing from the trial, still adjusting to the fact
that she'd actually achieved what every cold case investigator dreams of,
taking a file that was older than her police career
and turning it into a conviction. It's funny, she told me.
(07:55):
You think the lesson is going to be about DNA,
and sure, the science is huge, but the real lesson
here was persistence. If Shannon's evidence had been thrown out
in the nineties, if her file had been lost in
one of the department moves, we'd have nothing. This case
only got solved because somebody, every step of the way,
kept it alive. That chain of somebody stretched back to
(08:16):
nineteen eighty four, the first officers who collected the evidence
and sealed it properly, the cold case auditors in twenty eleven,
who noted it was viable for future testing, and Holt herself,
who pushed it to the top of the priority list
when she took over in twenty twenty one. Without any
one of them, the chain would have broken. The science
did matter, of course. In talking with Paul Rivera, the
(08:39):
forensic analyst who handled the DNA testing, I learned just
how fragile the process was. You're talking about thirty seven
year old skin cells. He explained, that's not a lot
to work with. We had to use low copy number
DNA methods and handle it in a sterile environment, and
even then you hold your breath until the profile comes
up on the screen. Rivera said, the second lab's verification
(09:02):
was the real game changer. The defense can argue contamination
all day, but when two labs get the same result independently,
that's bullet proof in court. But lessons and justice aren't
always about the technical wins. Some of the biggest takeaways
from Shannon's case were about patience and expectation for her family.
The decades of waiting were almost as punishing as the
(09:25):
crime itself. Patricia Lloyd had to live in a world
where her daughter's killer was a free man. That shaped
every holiday, every anniversary, every casual interaction with a stranger
who might, for all she knew, have been the one.
People think closure means you feel better, Patricia told me
after the sentencing. It doesn't. Closure means you can stop
(09:45):
asking the same question every day, that's all. Holt took
something else from this case, the need for systematic cold
case prioritization. If you've got evidence in good condition, it
needs to be tested now. Don't wait for a better
time or more funding. The longer you wait, the more
you risk losing Her department is now in the process
(10:05):
of creating a database to track every unsolved homicide by
evidence viability, not just by case age. Shannon's case is
being used internally as an example of why that matters.
The DA's office learned a lesson too, how to try
a case with evidence that pre dates DNA testing entirely.
Deputy District Attorney Michael Reyes told me, we had to
(10:27):
educate the jury on nineteen eighty four police work and
twenty twenty one forensic science in the same breath. It's
not easy to explain why something wasn't tested for DNA
in nineteen eighty four without making it sound like a mistake.
We had to frame it as the reality of the time,
and then show how the evidence survived long enough for
us to get to it. Even the defense's strategy had lessons.
(10:50):
By attacking the age of the evidence and the possibility
of contamination, they were trying to chip away at the
certainty that DNA usually carries in modern juries. It didn't
work this time, but it underscored the need for air
tight chain of custody documentation in any cold case brought
to trial. There was one final lesson, though, the one
that stuck with me most. It came from something Patricia
(11:13):
said during our last interview for this story. We were
sitting at her kitchen table, the same table where Holt
had told her about the arrest months earlier. The candle
she'd lit on sentencing night was still there, unburned. Since
you know what I learned, Patricia said that time isn't
what kills cases. People giving up is what kills them.
Time can help you if you let it. New science,
(11:36):
new detectives, new ways of looking at the same old thing.
You just have to hold on long enough for your
turn to come. Shannon's turn came thirty seven years after
her last breath. For the Lloyd family, justice was a long,
uneven road that ended in a court room with a
single word guilty. And for every detective still working the
cases that seem impossible, Shannon's case now sits as proof
(11:58):
that impossible doesn't mean forever. Chapter thirteen, The ripple Effect.
When the verdict came down in the murder of Shannon
Rose Lloyd, the headlines were immediate, but what happened in
the months afterward was quieter and in some ways more important.
Shannon's case didn't just bring closure to one family. It
shook loose a wave of change that rippled through law
(12:20):
enforcement agencies across southern California and beyond. The same week
Stephen Richard Hensley was sentenced, I received an email from
a detective in San Diego who'd been following the case closely.
His message was short, We've got a box just like yours.
Time to open it. Detective Karen Holt wasn't surprised. The
moment you prove a thirty seven year old case can
(12:42):
be solved, every other cold case detective looks at their
shelves differently. She told me. It's not just a theory anymore.
It's a road map. The road map, as Holt described it,
had three main points. Preservation matters if evidence is stored correctly,
decades old samples can still yield rest. Prioritize by viability,
(13:02):
not age. Focus first on cases with preserved biological evidence,
regardless of when the crime occurred. Push for testing now.
Waiting for the right time risks losing the opportunity altogether.
In the months following Hensley's conviction. Garden Grove PD submitted
eight other cold cases for DNA testing. Two of them
(13:23):
came back with hits and codies. Both are now active investigations,
though the department hasn't released details. The ripples spread beyond
Garden Grove. The Orange County District Attorney's office created a
dedicated cold case task force, bringing together prosecutors, forensic analysts,
and detectives from multiple cities. Holt was asked to be
(13:43):
one of the lead advisors, using Shannon's case as the
blueprint for building airtight prosecutions on decades old evidence. One
of the biggest impacts came from a surprising place, budget meetings.
City councils and county boards, often reluctant to spend on
cold case wars, now had a tangible success story to
point to. Shannon's case showed that funding forensic testing wasn't
(14:06):
just throwing money into the wind. It could deliver results
that mattered to real families. But the ripple wasn't limited
to law enforcement. Shannon's story began appearing in advocacy circles
focused on unsolved homicides. Patricia Lloyd was invited to speak
at a national conference for families of murder victims. She
stood on stage in front of more than two hundred people,
(14:28):
most of them still waiting for answers, and told them
not to stop calling their detectives. Be the voice that
keeps your case alive. She said. If I could wait
thirty seven years and still get my answer, you can.
Two forensic labs took notice as well. Rivera, the analyst
who worked Shannon's evidence, told me his lab used the
case as part of training for new hires. We show
(14:50):
them the original envelopes from nineteen eighty four, he said.
We talk about chain of custody, about low copy DNA techniques,
about the importance of double verification. It's a lesson in
both science and patients. Of course, the ripple wasn't purely positive.
Defense attorneys began preparing for a new wave of cold
case prosecutions, sharpening their strategies for attacking old evidence. In
(15:14):
workshops and seminars, they discussed contamination risks, witness memory decay,
and the challenge of reconstructing crime scenes. Decades later, Shannon's
case had proven the state could win, but it also
gave the defense bar a template for how to fight back.
Holt understood that reality. Every case after this will be harder,
she said. The defense will point to any weakness, any
(15:37):
gap in the timeline, any missing page from the file.
That's why we have to be better. We have to
know these cases inside out before we ever walk into court.
The ripple even reached the public. True crime forms dissected
Shannon's case, debating how DNA technology had evolved and whether
similar breakthroughs were likely in other cold cases. On social media,
(15:59):
hashtags like hashtag test the evidence began circulating, driven by
families urging police to re examine old files. One story
that stuck with me came from Riverside County. A woman
named Carol messaged me after reading an article I had
written on the case. Her sister had been murdered in
nineteen eighty nine and for years, the police told her
(16:19):
there was nothing left to test. After seeing Shannon's case,
she pushed again. This time, the department agreed to recheck
the evidence. Two months later, Carol called me, her voice shaking.
They found DNA their sending it to the lab. Now,
not every ripple ends in justice, but each one creates
the possibility, and in the world of cold cases, possibility
(16:42):
is often the most precious thing a family can have.
Shannon's case also sparked an internal culture shift in Garden Grove,
PD Holt started a monthly cold case review meeting where
detectives present their dormant files and brainstorm fresh strategies. The
room has a rule, no case is too old to matter,
and no suggestion is off the table. The lesson Holt
(17:03):
said is that the value of a solved case isn't
measured only in convictions. It's measured in momentum. When you
show people it's possible, they start to believe again, and
when they believe, they work harder. The ripple effect of
Shannon's case is still moving outward. Some waves will reach
other cities, other families, other court rooms. Some will fade quietly.
(17:24):
But the fact that they began at all in a
dusty evidence room with an envelope sealed in nineteen eighty
four is proof that justice doesn't have to be quick
to be real. And maybe that's the biggest ripple of all,
the reminder that time, for all its cruelty, can also
be the thing that brings the truth to the surface.
Chapter fourteen, A Mother's resolve. When I think about the
(17:46):
case of Shannon Rose Lloyd. One image stays with me
more than any crime scene photograph, courtroom exchange, or forensic report.
Patricia Lloyd sitting at her kitchen table with a spiral
bound notebook in front of her. The note book wasn't
anything special, lined pages, a bent cover, the edges softened
from years of turning, But inside was thirty seven years
(18:08):
of persistence, dates of phone calls to detectives, names of
people she'd spoken to, newspaper clippings folded between pages, sometimes
just a single sentence scrawled in her neat slanted handwriting.
No news this year. Patricia started it in nineteen eighty four,
the week after Shannon's funeral. It was the only way
I could keep track of what they told me, she said.
(18:30):
I didn't want to forget, and I didn't want them
to forget me. For the first year, the entries came
almost weekly. As the investigation slowed, the space between notes
grew longer months than years, but she never stopped. Every
May twenty first, the anniversary of Shannon's death, she would
call the police, even if there was nothing new. She
(18:51):
wanted them to hear her voice, to know she was
still waiting. Patricia's resolve didn't come from optimism alone. It
came from a deep, steady refuse usual to let her
daughter's name slip quietly into the past. People think grief fades,
She told me, it doesn't. You just learn how to
carry it. But if you're not careful, the world will
(19:11):
try to bury it for you. I wasn't going to
let that happen. Her persistence sometimes put her at odds
with the police. In the nineties, when DNA was first
making headlines, Patricia asked if Shannon's evidence could be tested.
The answer was cautious but firm. Not yet. The samples
were too small, the technology not reliable enough. She accepted
(19:32):
the explanation, but she wrote it down. Years later, when
she asked again, she reminded them of that conversation. If
you write it down, they can't tell you they never
said it, she said, with a smile that was half pride,
half defiance. When detective Karen Holt took over the cold
case unit in twenty twenty one, one of her first
calls was to Patricia. Holt expected a wary reception. Families
(19:55):
in long unsolved cases often greeted new detectives with polite skepticism. Instead,
Patricia welcomed her. If you think you can do something,
I'll help you in any way I can. She told
Holt That help came in the form of memories Patricia
had kept sharp through repetition. She knew exactly what Shannon
had worn the last time she saw her. She remembered
the names of friends and co workers from nineteen eighty four.
(20:18):
She could list without hesitation the neighbors who had lived
in Shannon's building that year. Many of those names had
never made it into the official file. You'd be surprised
how often that happens, Holt told me later. Families remember
details that got missed the first time. Sometimes those details
make all the difference. But for Patricia, the fight wasn't
(20:39):
only about the case. It was about making sure Shannon's
life was remembered beyond her death. She organized small memorials
on anniversaries, gathering family and friends at the cemetery to
share stories. She donated to domestic violence shelters in Shannon's name,
even though Shannon's murder didn't fit that category. It was
about helping women stay safe, Patricia said. When the arrest
(21:02):
finally came in twenty twenty one, Patricia was ready in
a way few people could be after thirty seven years.
She knew the trial would be draining. She knew the
defense would try to undermine the evidence, but she also
knew she'd finally get to look the man accused of
killing her daughter in the eye. That moment came on
the first day of the trial. Patricia sat in the
(21:22):
front row as Hensley entered the court room. She didn't
avert her gaze. She wanted him to know who she
was and why she was there. I didn't feel anger,
she told me afterward. I felt steady. I thought, this
is the man who took my daughter, and he's not
walking away this time. Throughout the proceedings, Patricia was a
constant presence. She didn't miss a single day of testimony.
(21:45):
She sat quietly, hands folded, listening as strangers described the
most intimate and violent moments of her daughter's final night.
She didn't flinch at the crime scene photos, though others
in the courtroom looked away. After the verdict, when Hensley
was found guilty, Patricia allowed herself a long, quiet exhale.
She didn't celebrate in the court room. She saved that
(22:07):
for home, where she lit a candle by Shannon's photo
and let it burn into the night. At sentencing, Patricia
delivered her impact statement without notes. Her voice was calm
but unshakable. For thirty seven years, I wondered if you'd
ever be caught. I wondered if you'd ever have to
answer for what you did. Now you will. She didn't cry,
(22:27):
she didn't raise her voice. She spoke as someone who
had been preparing for this moment for more than half
her life. When I asked her later how she had
kept going, she pointed to the same spiral notebook. This
she said, I wrote it all down, every no, every
maybe every scrap of hope. You do that long enough,
you build something that can't be erased. Patricia still keeps
(22:49):
the note book, though the last entry is dated the
day of the verdict. She hasn't decided if she'll keep
adding to it. I guess that depends on whether I
feel like the fight is really over. Because for Patricia,
justice wasn't just about the arrest or the trial or
the sentence. It was about making sure Shannon's name would
never be just another unsolved file in a dusty evidence room.
(23:11):
And in that she succeeded. Chapter fifteen, the final word.
Every case has an ending, but not every ending feels
like it closes the story. Shannon rose Lloyd's case is
one of those rare few where the ending, though far
from perfect, carries a sense of completion. When I sat
down to write this final chapter, I went back over
my notes from the past two years, interviews, trial transcripts,
(23:35):
forensic reports, and late night conversations with Detective Karen Holt.
I wanted to understand what this journey meant to each
person who lived it. For Holt, the case was both
a professional triumph and a personal awakening. It reminded me
why I became a detective. She told me, not for
the easy cases, but for the ones that every one
else has given up on. It's easy to think of
(23:57):
a thirty seven year old murder as unsolvable, but every
time you say unsolvable, you're making a choice to stop looking.
This case taught me never to stop looking. For forensic
analyst Paul Rivera, the case was a testament to the
resilience of evidence. We handle thousands of samples in a career,
he said, Most don't mean anything to us personally. They're
(24:18):
just numbers on a form. But this one. Every time
I saw Lloyd shannonar on that envelope, I thought about
how long her family had been waiting. That kind of
responsibility changes how you work. Deputy District Attorney Michael Reyes
reflected on the challenge of bridging the past and present
in the court room. We had to put the jury
in two worlds at once, nineteen eighty four, when DNA
(24:41):
didn't exist as a tool, and twenty twenty one, when
it's one of the strongest forms of evidence we have.
The defense wanted to make those worlds incompatible. Our job
was to show they were part of the same story,
and that the story ended with the defendant in that chair.
And then there was Patricia Lloyd. When I visited her
one last time, she was in her garden, tending to
(25:02):
the small patch of flowers she'd kept for decades. Shannon's
favorite daisies bloomed near the walkway. Patricia's spiral notebook, the
one that documented her decades of calls, questions, and refusals
to let the case fade, sat on the porch table.
She had added one more line since I last saw it.
Just as served. It doesn't bring her back, Patricia said, softly,
(25:25):
But it means I can sleep at night without wondering
if anyone will ever pay for what happened. It means
I can put down the phone and stop asking. And
it means Shannon's name will always be tied to the
fact that we didn't give up. The ripple effects of
Shannon's case are still unfolding. Other departments are testing old
evidence because of it. Other families are finding their voices again,
(25:47):
And in Garden Grove, the cold case unit now reviews
every dormant homicide annually, a policy that didn't exist before
Holt pushed for it. But perhaps the most important legacy
is less tangible. It's the reminder that time doesn't erase truth,
it only buries it. The truth is still there, waiting
for the right combination of persistence, science, and people willing
(26:08):
to keep the light on. As I close my note
book on this case, I'm left with one final image.
It's not the crime scene, or the court room, or
even the verdict. It's Patricia in that garden. Her hand's
in the soil, tending to something that will outlast her.
She knows the flowers will need care again next season,
but for now they're blooming, and that's enough.
The arrest of Stephen Richard Hensley sent a shockwave through
Garden Grove. For thirty seven years, he had lived as
an ordinary man, working jobs, paying bills, blending into the
background of southern California life. But now the DNA beneath
Shannon rose Lloyd's finger nails had pulled him into the
harsh light of a court room. Detective Karen Holt had
(00:20):
spent months preparing for this moment. The evidence was air tight,
but the case was anything but easy. Prosecutors knew the
defense would attack every detail, the age of the samples,
the chain of custody, the possibility of contamination. The trial
would be a battle not only over facts, but over
the idea that justice can still stand after decades. For
(00:42):
Shannon's family, walking into the court house was like reopening
an old wound that had never fully healed. Her mother, Patricia,
had waited most of her life to see the man
accused of killing her daughter held accountable. Every step through
the marble halls brought back nineteen eighty four, the phone call,
the police cars, the endless nights of not knowing. Inside
(01:03):
the court room, Hensley sat at the defense table in
a dark suit, hands folded, expression unreadable. The jury, twelve
strangers tasked with deciding his fate, would hear about the
violent knight Shannon was killed, the evidence sealed away for decades,
and the science that had finally broken the silence. The
trial would test everyone, the investigators who had carried the
(01:25):
weight of the case, the forensic experts defending their methods,
and a family determined not to let time dull the truth.
And even when the verdict came, there would still be
one more step, sentencing day, when the court would decide
how the rest of Hensley's life would be spent. This
is the final act in a story that began in
a quiet apartment on a May night in nineteen eighty four.
(01:47):
It's about what happens when science, persistence, and the refusal
to forget finally collide with the justice system, and whether
after a lifetime of waiting, justice still feels like enough.
So if you think you've heard it, you haven't, hit
follow on your favorite platform and leave a comment. The
next story might change your mind. Don't miss a single turn.
(02:08):
Chapter eleven. Sentencing Day. Sentencing days are quieter than verdict days.
The crowds are smaller, the tension less, about uncertainty and
more about finality. For families like the Lloyd's, it's the
last official chapter in a case that has consumed decades
of their lives. On the morning of Stephen Richard Hensley's sentencing,
(02:28):
the Orange County Superior Court was calm. The media presence
was still there, but without the crush of cameras that
had filled the steps during the trial. The headlines had
already been written. Convicted in nineteen eighty four, murder man
faces life in prison. Now it was a matter of
hearing the words from the judge's mouth. Detective Karen Holt
arrived early. She didn't have to be there, her job
(02:51):
was technically done, but she knew the Lloyds would want
to see her. Patricia and her son Mark were seated
in the front row, dressed in black. Patricia Suha's hands
were clasped tightly in her lap, the way they had
been on verdict day. She'd told Holt the night before,
I just want to hear it set out loud. I
wanted on the record forever. Hensley was brought in wearing
(03:11):
the standard orange jail jumpsuit. He looked older than he
had during the trial. The weeks in custody, carving new
lines into his face. His hands were cuffed in front
of him, his gait slow but steady. He glanced briefly
toward the gallery, but didn't acknowledge the family. Judge Ellen
Vargas took the bench promptly. At nine a m. The
case was called and the clerk read the charge aloud,
(03:34):
count one murder in the first degree, verdict guilty. Before sentencing,
the court allowed for victim impact statements. Patricia stood first.
She walked to the podium with a folded sheet of
paper in her hand, but when she began speaking, she
didn't look at it. Shannon was my daughter, She was
my best friend. She was taken from me in the
(03:55):
most violent way imaginable. For thirty seven years, I woke
up every day wondering if her killer was still walking free,
wondering if I'd pass him in the grocery store or
at the gas station. I prayed for this day. I
prayed that someone would have to answer for what they
did to her, and now you will, mister Hensley. Her
voice didn't shake, but her eyes stayed locked on Hensley
(04:17):
the entire time. He didn't look back. Mark spoke next.
His statement was shorter, but no less direct. When you
killed my sister, you took more than her life. You
took every holiday, every birthday, every moment our family could
have had with her. You stole decades from us, and
for what you can never give them back. But today
(04:37):
you will lose your freedom the way you took hers.
The prosecutor, Michael Rayes, made a brief statement urging the
court to impose the maximum sentence allowed by law. This
was a senseless act of violence against a young woman
in her own home. The defendant lived his life for
nearly four decades, while the victim's family lived with a
wound that never healed. The only just outcome is life
(04:59):
and prison without the possibility of parole. When it was
the defense's turn, Hensley's attorney, James Corcoran, asked the court
for leniency, citing his client's age and lack of prior
violent convictions. Mister Hensley has maintained his innocence from the beginning.
We asked the court to consider his advanced years and
the fact that he has lived peacefully for much of
(05:20):
his life. Judge Vargas listened without interruption, then turned to Hensley.
Mister Hensley, you have been convicted by a jury of
your peers of the murder of Shannon Rose Lloyd. The
evidence against you was strong, and the jury found it compelling.
You took the life of a young woman in her
own home, a place where she had every right to
feel safe. For thirty seven years, you lived free while
(05:43):
her family lived in pain. That ends today. She sentenced
him to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Patricia exhaled audibly. It was the sound of something leaving
her after decades. Not joy, not relief exactly, but a release.
Hensley was escorted out of the court room without speaking.
He didn't look back at the Lloyd's. He didn't ask
(06:04):
for a final word. Outside the court house, Patricia and
Mark stood with Holt and Reyes for a brief press conference.
Patricia spoke, first, justice is never late. If it comes today,
we got it for Shannon. I want other families with
cold cases to know, don't stop asking, don't stop calling.
Your loved one's case matters. The cameras clicked, reporters shouted questions,
(06:27):
but Patricia didn't take any. She had said what she
came to say. Back inside the court, staff began clearing
the docket for the next case. For them, it was
just another day's work, But for the Lloyd family, it
was the end of a thirty seven year fight and
the start of life after justice. Holt told me later
that sentencing days are bittersweet. You get the win, but
(06:49):
you also know it doesn't bring the person back. It's closure,
but not the kind that fills the hole. That night,
Patricia lit a single candle on her kitchen table beside
a framed foot photo of Shannon. She didn't celebrate, she
didn't cry. She just sat there, quiet, letting the wait
of the day settle. The trial was over, the sentence
was handed down, and for the first time since nineteen
(07:12):
eighty four, the case file could be stamped closed. Chapter
twelve Lessons in Justice. Every cold case that finally ends
in a conviction leaves behind more than just a closed file.
It leaves a trail of lessons, some about the law,
some about science, and some about people. In the weeks
after Stephen Richard Hensley was sentenced to life in prison
(07:33):
without parole for the murder of Shannon Rose Lloyd, I
spent hours in conversation with Detective Karen Holt. She was
still decompressing from the trial, still adjusting to the fact
that she'd actually achieved what every cold case investigator dreams of,
taking a file that was older than her police career
and turning it into a conviction. It's funny, she told me.
(07:55):
You think the lesson is going to be about DNA,
and sure, the science is huge, but the real lesson
here was persistence. If Shannon's evidence had been thrown out
in the nineties, if her file had been lost in
one of the department moves, we'd have nothing. This case
only got solved because somebody, every step of the way,
kept it alive. That chain of somebody stretched back to
(08:16):
nineteen eighty four, the first officers who collected the evidence
and sealed it properly, the cold case auditors in twenty eleven,
who noted it was viable for future testing, and Holt herself,
who pushed it to the top of the priority list
when she took over in twenty twenty one. Without any
one of them, the chain would have broken. The science
did matter, of course. In talking with Paul Rivera, the
(08:39):
forensic analyst who handled the DNA testing, I learned just
how fragile the process was. You're talking about thirty seven
year old skin cells. He explained, that's not a lot
to work with. We had to use low copy number
DNA methods and handle it in a sterile environment, and
even then you hold your breath until the profile comes
up on the screen. Rivera said, the second lab's verification
(09:02):
was the real game changer. The defense can argue contamination
all day, but when two labs get the same result independently,
that's bullet proof in court. But lessons and justice aren't
always about the technical wins. Some of the biggest takeaways
from Shannon's case were about patience and expectation for her family.
The decades of waiting were almost as punishing as the
(09:25):
crime itself. Patricia Lloyd had to live in a world
where her daughter's killer was a free man. That shaped
every holiday, every anniversary, every casual interaction with a stranger
who might, for all she knew, have been the one.
People think closure means you feel better, Patricia told me
after the sentencing. It doesn't. Closure means you can stop
(09:45):
asking the same question every day, that's all. Holt took
something else from this case, the need for systematic cold
case prioritization. If you've got evidence in good condition, it
needs to be tested now. Don't wait for a better
time or more funding. The longer you wait, the more
you risk losing Her department is now in the process
(10:05):
of creating a database to track every unsolved homicide by
evidence viability, not just by case age. Shannon's case is
being used internally as an example of why that matters.
The DA's office learned a lesson too, how to try
a case with evidence that pre dates DNA testing entirely.
Deputy District Attorney Michael Reyes told me, we had to
(10:27):
educate the jury on nineteen eighty four police work and
twenty twenty one forensic science in the same breath. It's
not easy to explain why something wasn't tested for DNA
in nineteen eighty four without making it sound like a mistake.
We had to frame it as the reality of the time,
and then show how the evidence survived long enough for
us to get to it. Even the defense's strategy had lessons.
(10:50):
By attacking the age of the evidence and the possibility
of contamination, they were trying to chip away at the
certainty that DNA usually carries in modern juries. It didn't
work this time, but it underscored the need for air
tight chain of custody documentation in any cold case brought
to trial. There was one final lesson, though, the one
that stuck with me most. It came from something Patricia
(11:13):
said during our last interview for this story. We were
sitting at her kitchen table, the same table where Holt
had told her about the arrest months earlier. The candle
she'd lit on sentencing night was still there, unburned. Since
you know what I learned, Patricia said that time isn't
what kills cases. People giving up is what kills them.
Time can help you if you let it. New science,
(11:36):
new detectives, new ways of looking at the same old thing.
You just have to hold on long enough for your
turn to come. Shannon's turn came thirty seven years after
her last breath. For the Lloyd family, justice was a long,
uneven road that ended in a court room with a
single word guilty. And for every detective still working the
cases that seem impossible, Shannon's case now sits as proof
(11:58):
that impossible doesn't mean forever. Chapter thirteen, The ripple Effect.
When the verdict came down in the murder of Shannon
Rose Lloyd, the headlines were immediate, but what happened in
the months afterward was quieter and in some ways more important.
Shannon's case didn't just bring closure to one family. It
shook loose a wave of change that rippled through law
(12:20):
enforcement agencies across southern California and beyond. The same week
Stephen Richard Hensley was sentenced, I received an email from
a detective in San Diego who'd been following the case closely.
His message was short, We've got a box just like yours.
Time to open it. Detective Karen Holt wasn't surprised. The
moment you prove a thirty seven year old case can
(12:42):
be solved, every other cold case detective looks at their
shelves differently. She told me. It's not just a theory anymore.
It's a road map. The road map, as Holt described it,
had three main points. Preservation matters if evidence is stored correctly,
decades old samples can still yield rest. Prioritize by viability,
(13:02):
not age. Focus first on cases with preserved biological evidence,
regardless of when the crime occurred. Push for testing now.
Waiting for the right time risks losing the opportunity altogether.
In the months following Hensley's conviction. Garden Grove PD submitted
eight other cold cases for DNA testing. Two of them
(13:23):
came back with hits and codies. Both are now active investigations,
though the department hasn't released details. The ripples spread beyond
Garden Grove. The Orange County District Attorney's office created a
dedicated cold case task force, bringing together prosecutors, forensic analysts,
and detectives from multiple cities. Holt was asked to be
(13:43):
one of the lead advisors, using Shannon's case as the
blueprint for building airtight prosecutions on decades old evidence. One
of the biggest impacts came from a surprising place, budget meetings.
City councils and county boards, often reluctant to spend on
cold case wars, now had a tangible success story to
point to. Shannon's case showed that funding forensic testing wasn't
(14:06):
just throwing money into the wind. It could deliver results
that mattered to real families. But the ripple wasn't limited
to law enforcement. Shannon's story began appearing in advocacy circles
focused on unsolved homicides. Patricia Lloyd was invited to speak
at a national conference for families of murder victims. She
stood on stage in front of more than two hundred people,
(14:28):
most of them still waiting for answers, and told them
not to stop calling their detectives. Be the voice that
keeps your case alive. She said. If I could wait
thirty seven years and still get my answer, you can.
Two forensic labs took notice as well. Rivera, the analyst
who worked Shannon's evidence, told me his lab used the
case as part of training for new hires. We show
(14:50):
them the original envelopes from nineteen eighty four, he said.
We talk about chain of custody, about low copy DNA techniques,
about the importance of double verification. It's a lesson in
both science and patients. Of course, the ripple wasn't purely positive.
Defense attorneys began preparing for a new wave of cold
case prosecutions, sharpening their strategies for attacking old evidence. In
(15:14):
workshops and seminars, they discussed contamination risks, witness memory decay,
and the challenge of reconstructing crime scenes. Decades later, Shannon's
case had proven the state could win, but it also
gave the defense bar a template for how to fight back.
Holt understood that reality. Every case after this will be harder,
she said. The defense will point to any weakness, any
(15:37):
gap in the timeline, any missing page from the file.
That's why we have to be better. We have to
know these cases inside out before we ever walk into court.
The ripple even reached the public. True crime forms dissected
Shannon's case, debating how DNA technology had evolved and whether
similar breakthroughs were likely in other cold cases. On social media,
(15:59):
hashtags like hashtag test the evidence began circulating, driven by
families urging police to re examine old files. One story
that stuck with me came from Riverside County. A woman
named Carol messaged me after reading an article I had
written on the case. Her sister had been murdered in
nineteen eighty nine and for years, the police told her
(16:19):
there was nothing left to test. After seeing Shannon's case,
she pushed again. This time, the department agreed to recheck
the evidence. Two months later, Carol called me, her voice shaking.
They found DNA their sending it to the lab. Now,
not every ripple ends in justice, but each one creates
the possibility, and in the world of cold cases, possibility
(16:42):
is often the most precious thing a family can have.
Shannon's case also sparked an internal culture shift in Garden Grove,
PD Holt started a monthly cold case review meeting where
detectives present their dormant files and brainstorm fresh strategies. The
room has a rule, no case is too old to matter,
and no suggestion is off the table. The lesson Holt
(17:03):
said is that the value of a solved case isn't
measured only in convictions. It's measured in momentum. When you
show people it's possible, they start to believe again, and
when they believe, they work harder. The ripple effect of
Shannon's case is still moving outward. Some waves will reach
other cities, other families, other court rooms. Some will fade quietly.
(17:24):
But the fact that they began at all in a
dusty evidence room with an envelope sealed in nineteen eighty
four is proof that justice doesn't have to be quick
to be real. And maybe that's the biggest ripple of all,
the reminder that time, for all its cruelty, can also
be the thing that brings the truth to the surface.
Chapter fourteen, A Mother's resolve. When I think about the
(17:46):
case of Shannon Rose Lloyd. One image stays with me
more than any crime scene photograph, courtroom exchange, or forensic report.
Patricia Lloyd sitting at her kitchen table with a spiral
bound notebook in front of her. The note book wasn't
anything special, lined pages, a bent cover, the edges softened
from years of turning, But inside was thirty seven years
(18:08):
of persistence, dates of phone calls to detectives, names of
people she'd spoken to, newspaper clippings folded between pages, sometimes
just a single sentence scrawled in her neat slanted handwriting.
No news this year. Patricia started it in nineteen eighty four,
the week after Shannon's funeral. It was the only way
I could keep track of what they told me, she said.
(18:30):
I didn't want to forget, and I didn't want them
to forget me. For the first year, the entries came
almost weekly. As the investigation slowed, the space between notes
grew longer months than years, but she never stopped. Every
May twenty first, the anniversary of Shannon's death, she would
call the police, even if there was nothing new. She
(18:51):
wanted them to hear her voice, to know she was
still waiting. Patricia's resolve didn't come from optimism alone. It
came from a deep, steady refuse usual to let her
daughter's name slip quietly into the past. People think grief fades,
She told me, it doesn't. You just learn how to
carry it. But if you're not careful, the world will
(19:11):
try to bury it for you. I wasn't going to
let that happen. Her persistence sometimes put her at odds
with the police. In the nineties, when DNA was first
making headlines, Patricia asked if Shannon's evidence could be tested.
The answer was cautious but firm. Not yet. The samples
were too small, the technology not reliable enough. She accepted
(19:32):
the explanation, but she wrote it down. Years later, when
she asked again, she reminded them of that conversation. If
you write it down, they can't tell you they never
said it, she said, with a smile that was half pride,
half defiance. When detective Karen Holt took over the cold
case unit in twenty twenty one, one of her first
calls was to Patricia. Holt expected a wary reception. Families
(19:55):
in long unsolved cases often greeted new detectives with polite skepticism. Instead,
Patricia welcomed her. If you think you can do something,
I'll help you in any way I can. She told
Holt That help came in the form of memories Patricia
had kept sharp through repetition. She knew exactly what Shannon
had worn the last time she saw her. She remembered
the names of friends and co workers from nineteen eighty four.
(20:18):
She could list without hesitation the neighbors who had lived
in Shannon's building that year. Many of those names had
never made it into the official file. You'd be surprised
how often that happens, Holt told me later. Families remember
details that got missed the first time. Sometimes those details
make all the difference. But for Patricia, the fight wasn't
(20:39):
only about the case. It was about making sure Shannon's
life was remembered beyond her death. She organized small memorials
on anniversaries, gathering family and friends at the cemetery to
share stories. She donated to domestic violence shelters in Shannon's name,
even though Shannon's murder didn't fit that category. It was
about helping women stay safe, Patricia said. When the arrest
(21:02):
finally came in twenty twenty one, Patricia was ready in
a way few people could be after thirty seven years.
She knew the trial would be draining. She knew the
defense would try to undermine the evidence, but she also
knew she'd finally get to look the man accused of
killing her daughter in the eye. That moment came on
the first day of the trial. Patricia sat in the
(21:22):
front row as Hensley entered the court room. She didn't
avert her gaze. She wanted him to know who she
was and why she was there. I didn't feel anger,
she told me afterward. I felt steady. I thought, this
is the man who took my daughter, and he's not
walking away this time. Throughout the proceedings, Patricia was a
constant presence. She didn't miss a single day of testimony.
(21:45):
She sat quietly, hands folded, listening as strangers described the
most intimate and violent moments of her daughter's final night.
She didn't flinch at the crime scene photos, though others
in the courtroom looked away. After the verdict, when Hensley
was found guilty, Patricia allowed herself a long, quiet exhale.
She didn't celebrate in the court room. She saved that
(22:07):
for home, where she lit a candle by Shannon's photo
and let it burn into the night. At sentencing, Patricia
delivered her impact statement without notes. Her voice was calm
but unshakable. For thirty seven years, I wondered if you'd
ever be caught. I wondered if you'd ever have to
answer for what you did. Now you will. She didn't cry,
(22:27):
she didn't raise her voice. She spoke as someone who
had been preparing for this moment for more than half
her life. When I asked her later how she had
kept going, she pointed to the same spiral notebook. This
she said, I wrote it all down, every no, every
maybe every scrap of hope. You do that long enough,
you build something that can't be erased. Patricia still keeps
(22:49):
the note book, though the last entry is dated the
day of the verdict. She hasn't decided if she'll keep
adding to it. I guess that depends on whether I
feel like the fight is really over. Because for Patricia,
justice wasn't just about the arrest or the trial or
the sentence. It was about making sure Shannon's name would
never be just another unsolved file in a dusty evidence room.
(23:11):
And in that she succeeded. Chapter fifteen, the final word.
Every case has an ending, but not every ending feels
like it closes the story. Shannon rose Lloyd's case is
one of those rare few where the ending, though far
from perfect, carries a sense of completion. When I sat
down to write this final chapter, I went back over
my notes from the past two years, interviews, trial transcripts,
(23:35):
forensic reports, and late night conversations with Detective Karen Holt.
I wanted to understand what this journey meant to each
person who lived it. For Holt, the case was both
a professional triumph and a personal awakening. It reminded me
why I became a detective. She told me, not for
the easy cases, but for the ones that every one
else has given up on. It's easy to think of
(23:57):
a thirty seven year old murder as unsolvable, but every
time you say unsolvable, you're making a choice to stop looking.
This case taught me never to stop looking. For forensic
analyst Paul Rivera, the case was a testament to the
resilience of evidence. We handle thousands of samples in a career,
he said, Most don't mean anything to us personally. They're
(24:18):
just numbers on a form. But this one. Every time
I saw Lloyd shannonar on that envelope, I thought about
how long her family had been waiting. That kind of
responsibility changes how you work. Deputy District Attorney Michael Reyes
reflected on the challenge of bridging the past and present
in the court room. We had to put the jury
in two worlds at once, nineteen eighty four, when DNA
(24:41):
didn't exist as a tool, and twenty twenty one, when
it's one of the strongest forms of evidence we have.
The defense wanted to make those worlds incompatible. Our job
was to show they were part of the same story,
and that the story ended with the defendant in that chair.
And then there was Patricia Lloyd. When I visited her
one last time, she was in her garden, tending to
(25:02):
the small patch of flowers she'd kept for decades. Shannon's
favorite daisies bloomed near the walkway. Patricia's spiral notebook, the
one that documented her decades of calls, questions, and refusals
to let the case fade, sat on the porch table.
She had added one more line since I last saw it.
Just as served. It doesn't bring her back, Patricia said, softly,
(25:25):
But it means I can sleep at night without wondering
if anyone will ever pay for what happened. It means
I can put down the phone and stop asking. And
it means Shannon's name will always be tied to the
fact that we didn't give up. The ripple effects of
Shannon's case are still unfolding. Other departments are testing old
evidence because of it. Other families are finding their voices again,
(25:47):
And in Garden Grove, the cold case unit now reviews
every dormant homicide annually, a policy that didn't exist before
Holt pushed for it. But perhaps the most important legacy
is less tangible. It's the reminder that time doesn't erase truth,
it only buries it. The truth is still there, waiting
for the right combination of persistence, science, and people willing
(26:08):
to keep the light on. As I close my note
book on this case, I'm left with one final image.
It's not the crime scene, or the court room, or
even the verdict. It's Patricia in that garden. Her hand's
in the soil, tending to something that will outlast her.
She knows the flowers will need care again next season,
but for now they're blooming, and that's enough.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
Football’s funniest family duo — Jason Kelce of the Philadelphia Eagles and Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs — team up to provide next-level access to life in the league as it unfolds. The two brothers and Super Bowl champions drop weekly insights about the weekly slate of games and share their INSIDE perspectives on trending NFL news and sports headlines. They also endlessly rag on each other as brothers do, chat the latest in pop culture and welcome some very popular and well-known friends to chat with them. Check out new episodes every Wednesday. Follow New Heights on the Wondery App, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to new episodes early and ad-free, and get exclusive content on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And join our new membership for a unique fan experience by going to the New Heights YouTube channel now!