August 13, 2025 • 31 mins
For thirty-seven years, the unsolved murder of Shannon Rose Lloyd remained a chilling mystery — until modern DNA testing unveiled a name that initially eluded investigators. In this gripping episode, follow Detective Karen Holt as she reopens the cold case, tracks down the elusive suspect, and finally brings him face-to-face with justice. This investigation highlights not only the significance of forensic evidence but also the relentless pursuit of truth in the face of a haunting past. From the groundbreaking lab revelations to the dramatic arrest, experience how science and determination untangled this decades-long hunt for a ghost.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
By twenty twenty, the murder of Shannon rose Lloyd had
lived in the cold case files for thirty six years.
Most people in Garden Grove barely remembered her name. The
neighbors who had whispered about it in nineteen eighty four
had moved away or passed on. The crime scene had
been repainted, re rented, and folded back into the rhythm
of the city, but the box with her case number
(00:21):
was still there, sealed. Patient and waiting. Detective Karen Holt
didn't know Shannon personally. She was only a child when
Shannon died. But when she took over the city's newly
revived cold case unit, Shannon's file kept pulling her back.
It wasn't just the crime itself, it was the evidence.
So many cold cases from the nineteen eighties had been destroyed, contaminated,
(00:43):
or lost, Shannon's had survived. Inside the envelopes were finger
nail scrapings, hair fibers, and clothing swatches, all still sealed
from nineteen eighty four. Back then they were useless. Now
they could speak if the right person was willing to listen.
The first time Holt held the envelope containing the fingernail scrapings.
She knew what it meant. This, she told me, is
(01:06):
probably the last conversation Shannon will ever have with the world,
and it's my job to make sure someone's listening. In
early twenty twenty one, the evidence went to the Orange
County Crime Lab. The technicians handled it like it was
made of glass. DNA testing in cold cases is a
high wire act. Too aggressive and you destroy the sample.
Too cautious and you get nothing. Weeks past, then months,
(01:31):
On a gray Tuesday morning, the match appeared. It wasn't
a suspect already in custody, It wasn't a man on
the run. It was someone living an ordinary life whose
DNA had been collected in a separate, unrelated case years
after Shannon's death. When Holt saw the name on the screen,
she didn't shout, she didn't smile. She just sat back
in her chair and stared at it. This was the
(01:53):
moment every cold case detective dreams of and fears, because
a DNA match is only the beginning. It doesn't explain motive,
It doesn't tell you where the suspect was that night,
and it doesn't prepare you for what happens when you
knock on their door for thirty seven years. The killer
had been a shadow. Now he had a name. So
if you think you've heard it all, you haven't, hit
(02:15):
follow on your favorite platform and leave a comment. The
next story might change your mind. Don't miss a single turn.
Chapter six, A Detective returns. When Detective Karen Holt stepped
into the Garden Grove Police Department's evidence room in early
twenty twenty one, she wasn't looking for Shannon rose Lloyd's file.
She was there to get acquainted with the cold case
(02:36):
backlog she had just inherited more than two hundred boxes,
some dating back to the nineteen sixties. The room smelled
faintly of dust and cardboard. Metal shelves stretched from floor
to ceiling, each row labeled in black stenciled numbers. Holt
moved slowly scanning the spines of the case boxes. Some
were neatly stacked, others sagging under decades of weight. The
(02:59):
older the boxes were covered in scrawled handwriting from detectives
who had long since retired or passed away. Shannon's case
caught her eye for one reason. It was complete. So
many older files had gaps, missing evidence logs, photographs that
had faded beyond recognition, envelopes split open by time, But
here every item was intact. The crime scene photos were
(03:22):
still sharp, the evidence envelopes were still sealed, their labels legible.
Even the autopsy report was crisp, as if it had
been printed yesterday. Holt carried the box to a small
table in the corner and began flipping through the contents.
The first layer was photographs Shannon's apartment, the doorway, the
coffee table, pushed askew, the tipped over lamp. Holt lingered
(03:45):
on the image of Shannon herself, taken from the crime
scene before the coroner arrived. In her years of working homicide,
Holt had learned to keep a mental distance when looking
at victims, but this one stayed with her. The position
of Shannon's body, almost peaceful, as if she had been
caught midrest, clashed violently with the reality written in the
autopsy report. Beneath the photos were the interview transcripts. They
(04:09):
painted a picture Holt knew well too many witnesses with
too few details, suspects with shaky alibis, and a set
of detectives doing their best with limited tools. She could
see the points where the investigation had run out of road,
And then she found the envelopes, two of them, each
sealed with brittle masking tape and marked in a blocky
nineteen eighty's hand fingernail scrapings Lloyd SR. Fibers Lloyd SR.
(04:35):
Holt picked them up carefully. In thirty seven years, they
had never been opened since the original forensic techt sealed
them in nineteen eighty four. There had been no way
to extract DNA from material this small without destroying it entirely. Now,
with modern testing, even a few skin cells could tell
a story. She set the envelopes aside and went back
(04:55):
to the file. The notes from twenty eleven caught her attention.
A cold case audit marking the evidence as viable for
future testing. Yet somehow no one had followed through. I
asked Holt later why she thought it had been overlooked.
She shrugged. Sometimes these cases are like orphan children. Everyone
means to help them, but they keep getting passed over
(05:16):
because someone else always seems more urgent. That wasn't going
to happen on her watch. Holt had joined the Force
in the late nineties, just as DNA was becoming a
standard investigative tool. She'd seen firsthand how a cold case
could be resurrected with a single match. She also knew
the emotional toll of telling a family there was finally
news after decades of silence. Her first step was to
(05:38):
get approval to test the evidence. In most departments, this
isn't as simple as sending it to the lab. The
request goes up the chain of command, weighed against budget,
backlog and the perceived solvability of the case. In twenty
twenty one, Garden Grove's backlog was heavy, but the pandemic
had slowed new case flow enough to make room for
old ones. Holp prepared a formal memo outlining the case history,
(06:03):
the preserved evidence, and the potential for a DNA hit
in state or national databases. She included copies of the
original evidence logs and photographs of the sealed envelopes to
prove their condition. She ended the memo with a single line,
this is the last opportunity we may have to identify
Shannon Lloyd's killer. It worked. Approval came within two weeks.
(06:25):
The evidence was couriered to the Orange County Crime Lab
and a locked container signed for it. Each handoff Holt
went with it, not because she had to, but because
she wanted to be there when it arrived. It felt
like I was delivering something priceless, she told me, And
in a way I was. At the lab, a forensic
analyst named Paul Rivera took custody of the evidence. Rivera
(06:47):
had been working in forensics for nearly two decades. He
understood the stakes of testing samples this sold. The trick,
he said, is to balance the risk. You can't go
at it like you at a fresh sample. You have
to co the DNA out. Rivera explained the process to
Holt's step by step. Carefully open the original envelope to
avoid contamination, transfer the material to a sterile workspace, use
(07:11):
a low copy number DNA extraction technique to maximize recovery.
Amplify the sample through PCR polymerase chain reaction without degrading
what's left. It could take weeks before they knew if
they even had a viable profile. Holt returned to the station,
knowing she was now in a waiting game, one she
couldn't control. In the meantime, she began digging into the
(07:33):
original suspect list, cross referencing it with modern databases. She
pulled criminal records, employment histories, and address changes. Some of
the original suspects were dead, others were still living in California. None,
as far as she could tell, had ever been charged
with anything similar. When the call from Rivera finally came,
(07:53):
it was early morning. Holt was in her office working
through another cold case file when her phone rang. We
got a profile. Rivera said his tone was calm, but
Holt could hear the undercurrent of excitement, and we got
a hit. It wasn't a partial match, it was a
full direct hit in the combined DNA index system Cody's.
(08:14):
The name attached to it was one Holt didn't recognize,
someone who had never been on the original suspect list.
When she typed the name into her computer, the first
thing she found was an address not far from Garden Grove.
The ghosts she'd been hunting for thirty seven years had
just stepped into the light. Chapter seven, The DNA Breakthrough.
(08:34):
The thing about a DNA match is that it's both
a finish line and a starting gun. When the lab
told Detective Karen Holt they had a name, it wasn't
a solve case. It was an open door to an
entirely new investigation. The name on the report was Stephen
Richard Hensley, born in nineteen fifty eight, lived most of
his life in southern California. Arrested in twenty nineteen for
(08:57):
a felony DUI during which his DNA was elected and
entered into Cody's That entry, sitting quietly in the database
for two years, was now the reason his life was
about to change. Holt stared at the name on her
screen for a long time before she clicked further. There
was no mention of Shannon in his history, no violent convictions.
(09:17):
In fact, his record was sparse, a few minor offenses
in the eighties and nineties, mostly related to alcohol. He'd
work construction, then maintenance. Nothing in the file screamed killer,
and yet his DNA matched the profile pulled from the
fingernail scrapings taken from Shannon's body in nineteen eighty four.
I asked Holt what that moment felt like. She leaned
(09:39):
back in her chair, thinking it's electric but dangerous. You
want to run into the street and yell we got him,
but you can't. You have to slow down. You have
to verify. DNA doesn't lie, but people can get the
wrong idea if you don't build the rest of the
case carefully. The first step was to confirm the match
through an independent lab rever RAAH. The forensic analyst split
(10:02):
the remaining sample and sent it to a private lab
for verification. While they waited, Holt began the kind of
deep dive that only modern tools allow. She pulled every
address Hensley had ever lived at and mapped them out.
In nineteen eighty four, he'd been living less than four
miles from Shannon's apartment. She found his employment records. At
the time of Shannon's murder, he'd been working odd jobs
(10:24):
and living alone. She checked marriage and divorce records, noting
that he'd married in nineteen eighty six and divorced in
nineteen ninety two. There was no direct link to Shannon
in any public record, but that didn't mean there wasn't one.
Holt began looking at his social circles in the early eighties.
Did he know anyone in Shannon's building? Had he ever
been to the clothing store where she worked? Did he
(10:46):
frequent the bars and restaurants near her home. Holt also
pulled the original witness statements from nineteen eighty four one
in particular stood out, the man who claimed to see
a silhouette near Shannon's window. The description was vague, but
the height, estimate and build could fit Hensley. It was
the kind of detail that wouldn't hold up in court alone,
but in the context of a DNA match, it carried
(11:09):
new weight. The independent lab came back with the same result.
The DNA from the finger nail scrapings matched Stephen Richard Hensley,
with a probability so highat might as well have been certain.
With the match confirmed, Holt began working with the Orange
County District Attorney's office to plan the next steps. They
needed to approach Hensley without tipping him off. If he
(11:30):
suspected he was being investigated for murder, he could flee,
destroy evidence, or worse. They started with surveillance. Plain clothes
officers parked near his current home, a modest, one story
house in a quiet neighborhood. They watched his routines, morning
coffee runs, weekly trips to the grocery store, evenings on
the porch smoking cigarettes. He seemed unremarkable, the kind of
(11:53):
neighbor you not to but never really know. One officer
told me he was friendly enough waived at people chatted
with the mailman. You'd never look at him and think
he was capable of killing someone. Holt's challenge was to
connect the dots between this mild mannered man in twenty
twenty one and the violent act committed in nineteen eighty four.
The DNA was the bridge, but she still needed motive,
(12:17):
opportunity and a narrative a jury could follow. She dug
into his background further, speaking with people who had known
him in the eighties. Some remembered him as quiet, others
as a drinker. One woman recalled a party where he'd
made inappropriate comments to several women, but nothing that would
have led her to suspect murder. Still, it was a
piece of character evidence that began to fill in the edges.
(12:40):
The d'ie's office decided they had enough to move forward
with an arrest warrant, but they wanted to do it
in a way that minimized risk. Hensley wasn't known to
own fire arms, but no one wanted to take chances.
The plan was to arrest him in a public place
where he'd be less likely to resist. Holt co ordinated
with a local patrol unit. They'd wait until he left
(13:00):
home for one of his coffee runs, then intercept him
in the parking lot. She would be there in person,
not because it was necessary, but because, after thirty seven years,
she wanted to look him in the eye when he
heard Shannon's name. The morning of the arrest was overcast.
Hensley came out of his house wearing jeans and a
faded baseball cap. He got into his pickup truck and
(13:22):
drove to a strip mall cafe. He parked, got out
and started walking toward the entrance. That's when two officers approached,
identified themselves, and told him he was under arrest for
the murder of Shannon rose Lloyd. According to Holt, he froze,
no denial, no anger, just a long, blank stare, then
quietly who It was either an act or he'd buried
(13:45):
Shannon's name so deep in his memory that hearing it
now was like opening a locked door. Either way, the
ghosts they'd been chasing for nearly four decades was no
longer a shadow. He was standing in the daylight, surrounded
by police, with his past finally catching up to him.
Chapter eight, The arrest. The moment Stephen Richard Hensley was
handcuffed in the parking lot. The thirty seven years shadow
(14:08):
over Shannon rose Lloyd's case shifted into something tangible. For decades,
the idea of the killer had been abstract, a faceless
presence in old files and fading memories. Now that presence
had a height, a weight, a face, and a heartbeat.
Detective Karen Holt was there, watching from a short distance.
She'd insisted on being part of the arrest, not for
(14:29):
the thrill, but for the accountability. This was her case now,
and she wanted to see the man who had left
Shannon lifeless on her living room floor. The officers moved quickly.
One secured Hensley's wrists behind his back, another took his
wallet and keys. He didn't fight, He didn't ask why
they were arresting him until they guided him toward the
patrol car. Murder of Shannon rose Lloyd, the officer repeated,
(14:54):
loud enough for Holt to hear. Hensley's head turned slightly,
just enough to catch Holt's gaze. She said nothing. In
her experience, the first words exchanged between detective and suspect
could set the tone for everything that followed. She wanted
his first conversation to be inside the interrogation room, where
every word could be recorded and every reaction preserved. Once
(15:16):
Hensley was in the back seat, Holt followed the patrol
car to the Garden Grove Police Department. The route was familiar,
she'd driven at countless times with other suspects, but this
time every street light felt like a checkpoint in a
race that had taken nearly four decades to run. Inside
the station, Hensley was processed like any other arrestee. His
(15:37):
finger prints were taken, his mug shot captured in a
series of clicks. He was allowed to use the restroom,
then placed an interview room three, a small, windowless space
with cinderblock walls painted in neutral gray. The table was metal,
the chairs heavy and plain. A video camera in the
corner recorded silently. Before entering, Holt and her partner, Detective
(16:00):
Luis Moreno, reviewed the strategy. Moreno would start with small talk,
ease into the conversation, then let Holt take the lead
when it came to the crime. The goal was to
keep Hensley talking, not to push him into immediate silence
with aggression. When they walked in, Hensley was sitting still,
hands flat on the table. He looked older than his
(16:20):
sixty three years, his skin weathered, his eyes guarded but
not hostile. He wore a plain T shirt and jeans,
the same clothes from his coffee run. Moreno started casually, Stephen,
thanks for talking with us. We know it's been a
long time since nineteen eighty four. Hensley raised his eyebrows
but said nothing. You were living in Garden Grove back then.
(16:41):
Moreno asked, yeah. Hensley replied, his voice low. Couple miles
from here. Holt leaned forward. Do you remember Shannon rose Lloyd.
There was a pause, not long, but long enough to
notice No, he said, finally, should I. Holt slid a
photo of Shannon across the table, not the crime seen photo,
a smiling picture from her family. She was killed in
(17:04):
her apartment in May of eighty four. We have reason
to believe you were there that night. Hensley glanced at
the photo, then looked away. I don't know her. Moreno
kept his tone even Stephen, we have your DNA from
her finger nail scrapings. That means she scratched you during
the struggle. There's no mistake about this. Hensley's jaw tightened.
(17:24):
That's impossible. I never met her. Holt let the silence
stretch an interrogation. Silence can be more powerful than any question.
She watched his hands. They twitched once, then flattened again.
People forget things after thirty seven years, she said finally.
But DNA doesn't forget, It doesn't get old, it doesn't change,
(17:45):
and it's telling us you were the last person to
see her alive. For the next hour, Hensley alternated between
denial and vague claims that maybe we crossed paths somewhere.
He offered no explanation for how his DNA ended up
under Shannon's nails. He didn't ask for a lawyer immediately,
but he also didn't give a confession. Holt had expected
(18:05):
this in her experience. Most suspects in decades old cases
didn't break in the first interview. The shock of the arrest,
the unfamiliarity of being back in police custody, it made
them cautious. The goal today wasn't a confession. It was
to gauge his reactions, to note his tells, and to
lock him into statements that could later be challenged with evidence.
(18:27):
When Hensley finally asked for an attorney, the interview ended.
Holt stood collected the file from the table and left
the room without another word. In the hallway Moreno exhaled,
He's not going to admit it, not today, Holt said,
But he doesn't need to. We have the science now,
we build the rest. Building. The rest meant retracing Hensley's
(18:48):
life from nineteen eighty four onward. Detectives searched his old residences,
talked to former landlords, and tracked down people he'd known
in the early eighties. Some recalled him as quiet, others
as all. One woman described him as the kind of
guy who stood too close when he talked to you.
They also dug into his work history, looking for connections
(19:08):
to Shannon's neighborhood. A faded time card from nineteen eighty
four showed he'd been doing maintenance work for a company
that serviced several apartment complexes, one of them less than
two blocks from Shannon's building. Meanwhile, the DA's office began
preparing the case for court. They knew the defense would
attack the age of the evidence, the possibility of contamination,
(19:30):
and the reliability of DNA from decades old samples. Every
step of the chain of custody from nineteen eighty four
onward had to be air tight for Holt. The arrest
was both a victory and a warning. In cold cases,
arresting the suspect is not the end. It's often the
point where the ray all fight begins, and if Shannon's
family was finally going to see justice, they couldn't afford
(19:52):
a single misstep. Hensley was booked into the Orange County
Jail on a charge of murder. Baale was denied. He
was placed in a st andered holding cell, surrounded by
men half his age. In the eyes of the law,
he was now an accused killer. In the eyes of
Shannon's family, he was the man they had been waiting
to face for thirty seven years. Chapter nine, Confronting the Past.
(20:15):
The morning after Stephen Richard Hensley's arrest, the phones in
the Garden Grove Police Department started ringing before the sun
was up. By nine a m. Every major news outlet
in southern California had the story arrest made in nineteen
eighty four murder of Shannon rose Lloyd DNA breakthrough after
thirty seven years. For most people reading those headlines, Shannon's
(20:37):
name was just another in a long list of crime victims.
But for her family it was a moment they'd been
imagining and dreading for nearly four decades. Detective Karen Holt
insisted on telling them in person. She called Shannon's younger brother, Mark,
now in his late fifties, and asked if the family
could meet her at their mother's house. Patricia Lloyd was
(20:58):
eighty one years old, still living in the same modest
home she had when Shannon died. She moved slower now,
her hair completely white, but her mind was sharp. When
Holt arrived, Patricia was sitting at the kitchen table with
a mug of tea in front of her. The table
was the same one from nineteen eighty four, worn smooth
in the middle from decades of use. Mark sat beside her,
(21:20):
his hands clasped tightly. Holt began gently, Patricia, Mark, we've
made an arrest in Shannon's case. His name is Stephen
Richard Hensley. We have his DNA from Shannon's fingernail scrapings.
He was living in the area in nineteen eighty four.
Patricia closed her eyes for a long moment. I prayed
for this, she said. Finally, I prayed I'd be alive
(21:41):
to hear it. Mark's reaction was quieter. Do you know
why he did it not yet, Holt replied, but we're
going to find out. Patricia reached across the table and
took Holt's hand. Promise me you won't let him talk
his way out of this. Promise me he won't get
away again, Holt promised. News crews set up outside the
police department that afternoon. They wanted footage of the detectives,
(22:03):
shots of the building, any scrap of information they could
turn into a sound bite. By evening, the case was
leading broadcasts in Los Angeles, Orange County, and even San Diego.
The public reaction was immediate and intense. Social media lit
up with comments from people who had lived in Garden
Grove in the eighties. Some remembered Shannon personally, a neighbor,
(22:25):
a classmate, a co worker. Others admitted they'd nearly forgotten
about her until the headline jolted the memory back. But
not all the reactions were supportive. Some questioned how it
could have taken thirty seven years. Others speculated about whether
the right man had been arrested. A few even accused
the police of using the case for good pr In
the middle of other controversies, Holt ignored the noise she
(22:48):
knew public opinion would swing back and forth until the
trial and possibly even after. What mattered now was building
the case. I reached out to several of Shannon's old
friends for interviews. Many declined, saying the arrest had reopened
wounds they weren't ready to talk about. But one woman,
Lisa Gutierrez, agreed she'd been Shannon's co worker at the
(23:09):
clothing store in nineteen eighty four. When I saw his
face on the news, I didn't recognize him, Lisa told me.
But I kept thinking maybe he came into the store once,
maybe Shannon helped him pick out a shirt. That's how
close this all feels like. He could have been right
in front of us and we didn't know. Meanwhile, Holt's
team began tracking Hensley's movements in the weeks before his arrest.
(23:33):
They wanted to know if he'd heard about advances in
DNA testing, or if he'd been acting nervous. Surveillance reports
showed no signs of panic. He'd been living quietly, as
if confident his past would stay buried. One of the
most poignant moments came a few days later, when Patricia
visited Shannon's grave for the first time since the arrest.
(23:53):
A local reporter captured a photo from a respectful distance,
Patricia standing at the headstone, one hand read on it,
the other holding a small bouquet of daisies. The headline
the next day read mother stands where justice may finally arrive.
That image became the emotional anchor of the case in
the media. It wasn't about the suspect anymore. It was
(24:14):
about the family, about the cost of waiting thirty seven
years for an answer. Behind the scenes, Holt knew the
hardest part was still ahead. DNA was powerful, but it
wasn't enough on its own. The prosecution needed to show
the jury how Hensley could have been in Shannon's apartment
without forced entry, why she would have led him in,
and what motive he might have had. That meant confronting
(24:37):
the past head on, digging into Shannon's life, her social circle,
and every possible intersection with Hensley's. Some of those answers
would come from documents and records. Others would come from
people who had been silent for decades. Holt braced herself
for what those conversations might reveal. The past had finally
stepped into the light. Now it was time to see
(24:57):
if it would speak. Chapter ten, Trial and Verdict. The
trial of Stephen Richard Hensley began on a cool Monday
morning in the Orange County Superior Court. Outside the court house,
steps were crowded with reporters, photographers, and curious onlookers. It
had been thirty seven years since Shannon Rose Lloyd's murder,
but now her name was on every news banner in
(25:19):
southern California. Detective Karen Holt arrived early, walking past the
cameras without stopping. She'd been through dozens of trials, but
this one carried a weight unlike any other. It wasn't
just about securing a conviction. It was about proving that
time hadn't eroded the truth. Inside the court room, the
atmosphere was tense but orderly. The prosecution table was stacked
(25:43):
with thick binders and Manila folders, each one containing pieces
of a puzzle that had taken decades to complete. Across
the aisle, the defense team sat with Hensley, who wore
a dark suit and tie. His hair was neatly combed,
his face calm. If you didn't know the charges, you
might think he was there for a business dispute. Judge
Ellen Vargas, a seasoned jurist known for her no nonsense demeanor,
(26:07):
took the bench promptly at nine a m. The jury,
twelve men and women ranging in age from their late
twenties to their sixties, filed and quietly they knew this
was no ordinary case. The prosecution opened with a time
line that stretched from May twenty first, nineteen eighty four
to the present. Deputy District Attorney Michael Rayes spoke plainly,
(26:28):
his voice steady for thirty seven years. This case waited
for science to catch up, and when it did, the
evidence pointed to one man, the defendant, Stephen Richard Hensley.
His DNA was found under Shannon Lloyd's finger nails. That means,
in her final moments, she fought him, and she left
behind the truth of who killed her. He moved quickly
(26:48):
through the history, the discovery of the body, the lack
of forced entry, the preservation of the finger nail scrapings.
He explained the evolution of DNA testing, showing the jury
photo graphs of the sealed envelopes and describing the chain
of custody in meticulous detail. Every step was documented. Every
hand that touched the evidence accounted for When the defense
(27:10):
took the floor, attorney James Corcoran went on the offensive,
Ladies and gentlemen, this is not a case about murder.
This is a case about contamination, about unreliable evidence from
almost four decades ago. The police had no idea what
they were doing with DNA in nineteen eighty four, because
DNA testing didn't even exist. Now they want you to
(27:31):
believe that these old, degraded samples can tell you what
happened that night. They can't, and they certainly can't prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that my client is guilty. From
the start, it was clear the defense would attack the
science and the time gap, hoping to plant seeds of
doubt about the reliability of the evidence. The prosecution's witnesses
(27:52):
included the original crime scene technicians, now gray haired and retired,
who testified about how the evidence was collected and stored.
They admitted that in nineteen eighty four they didn't anticipate
DNA testing, but emphasized that they had followed the best
evidence handling procedures of the time. Then came the forensic experts.
Paul Rivera, the analyst who tested the finger nail scrapings,
(28:15):
in twenty twenty one, explained the process in detail. Using
charts and diagrams. He showed how even small amounts of
DNA could be amplified without altering its integrity. He also
testified that the probability of the DNA belonging to some
one other than Hensley was less than one in several trillion.
The defense cross examined aggressively. They asked about the possibility
(28:37):
of transfer, DNA contamination in storage and lab error. Rivera
remained composed, acknowledging that contamination is always a theoretical risk,
but stressing that in this case, the controls showed none.
The most emotional testimony came from Patricia Lloyd, sitting in
the witness box. Her voice trembled as she described getting
(28:58):
the call in nineteen eighty four and the decades of waiting.
She didn't look at Hensley while she spoke, but her
words hung heavy in the court room. I prayed for
this day, she said. I prayed that someone would have
to answer for what they did to my daughter. I
don't know why he killed her, but I know he did.
When it was time for the defense to present their case,
they called only a handful of witnesses. One was a
(29:20):
forensic consultant who criticized the handling of evidence in the eighties.
Another was a former co worker of Hensley's who testified
that he had never seen him act violently. The defense
did not put Hensley on the stand. Closing arguments brought
the trial into sharp focus. Rayes addressed the jury directly,
This case isn't about what the police didn't know in
(29:41):
nineteen eighty four. It's about what we do know now.
Shannon fought for her life, and in doing so, she
told us exactly who killed her. Don't let thirty seven
years erase her voice, corkor encountered. The state wants you
to ignore the gaps, the uncertainties, the fact that memories
fade and evidence degrades. This case is built on sand,
(30:02):
and you cannot send a man to prison for life
on sand. The jury deliberated for two days. Those hours
stretched painfully for everyone involved. Holt stayed at her desk
working on other files, but her mind kept drifting back
to the jury room. On the afternoon of the second day,
the bailiff's voice came over the intercom. We have a verdict.
(30:22):
The court room filled quickly. Patricia sat in the front row,
marked beside her. Holt stood near the back, close enough
to see, but far enough to stay out of the
family's moment. The jury filed in the four person handed
the verdict form to the bailiff, who passed it to
Judge Vargas. She read it silently, then looked up. We
the jury find the defendant, Stephen Richard Hensley, guilty of
(30:45):
murder in the first degree. A gasp escaped from Patricia.
She covered her mouth, tears streaming down her face. Hensley
showed no reaction, his gaze fixed on the table in
front of him. Holt exhaled slowly. Thirty seven years of waiting,
of false starts and dead ends had led to this moment.
The judge thanked the jury for their service and scheduled
(31:07):
sentencing for the following month. As the court room emptied,
Patricia approached Holt. She didn't say anything. She just hugged her,
holding on for a long time. For the first time
since nineteen eighty four, the Lloyd family had an answer,
and soon they would have a measure of justice.
By twenty twenty, the murder of Shannon rose Lloyd had
lived in the cold case files for thirty six years.
Most people in Garden Grove barely remembered her name. The
neighbors who had whispered about it in nineteen eighty four
had moved away or passed on. The crime scene had
been repainted, re rented, and folded back into the rhythm
of the city, but the box with her case number
(00:21):
was still there, sealed. Patient and waiting. Detective Karen Holt
didn't know Shannon personally. She was only a child when
Shannon died. But when she took over the city's newly
revived cold case unit, Shannon's file kept pulling her back.
It wasn't just the crime itself, it was the evidence.
So many cold cases from the nineteen eighties had been destroyed, contaminated,
(00:43):
or lost, Shannon's had survived. Inside the envelopes were finger
nail scrapings, hair fibers, and clothing swatches, all still sealed
from nineteen eighty four. Back then they were useless. Now
they could speak if the right person was willing to listen.
The first time Holt held the envelope containing the fingernail scrapings.
She knew what it meant. This, she told me, is
(01:06):
probably the last conversation Shannon will ever have with the world,
and it's my job to make sure someone's listening. In
early twenty twenty one, the evidence went to the Orange
County Crime Lab. The technicians handled it like it was
made of glass. DNA testing in cold cases is a
high wire act. Too aggressive and you destroy the sample.
Too cautious and you get nothing. Weeks past, then months,
(01:31):
On a gray Tuesday morning, the match appeared. It wasn't
a suspect already in custody, It wasn't a man on
the run. It was someone living an ordinary life whose
DNA had been collected in a separate, unrelated case years
after Shannon's death. When Holt saw the name on the screen,
she didn't shout, she didn't smile. She just sat back
in her chair and stared at it. This was the
(01:53):
moment every cold case detective dreams of and fears, because
a DNA match is only the beginning. It doesn't explain motive,
It doesn't tell you where the suspect was that night,
and it doesn't prepare you for what happens when you
knock on their door for thirty seven years. The killer
had been a shadow. Now he had a name. So
if you think you've heard it all, you haven't, hit
(02:15):
follow on your favorite platform and leave a comment. The
next story might change your mind. Don't miss a single turn.
Chapter six, A Detective returns. When Detective Karen Holt stepped
into the Garden Grove Police Department's evidence room in early
twenty twenty one, she wasn't looking for Shannon rose Lloyd's file.
She was there to get acquainted with the cold case
(02:36):
backlog she had just inherited more than two hundred boxes,
some dating back to the nineteen sixties. The room smelled
faintly of dust and cardboard. Metal shelves stretched from floor
to ceiling, each row labeled in black stenciled numbers. Holt
moved slowly scanning the spines of the case boxes. Some
were neatly stacked, others sagging under decades of weight. The
(02:59):
older the boxes were covered in scrawled handwriting from detectives
who had long since retired or passed away. Shannon's case
caught her eye for one reason. It was complete. So
many older files had gaps, missing evidence logs, photographs that
had faded beyond recognition, envelopes split open by time, But
here every item was intact. The crime scene photos were
(03:22):
still sharp, the evidence envelopes were still sealed, their labels legible.
Even the autopsy report was crisp, as if it had
been printed yesterday. Holt carried the box to a small
table in the corner and began flipping through the contents.
The first layer was photographs Shannon's apartment, the doorway, the
coffee table, pushed askew, the tipped over lamp. Holt lingered
(03:45):
on the image of Shannon herself, taken from the crime
scene before the coroner arrived. In her years of working homicide,
Holt had learned to keep a mental distance when looking
at victims, but this one stayed with her. The position
of Shannon's body, almost peaceful, as if she had been
caught midrest, clashed violently with the reality written in the
autopsy report. Beneath the photos were the interview transcripts. They
(04:09):
painted a picture Holt knew well too many witnesses with
too few details, suspects with shaky alibis, and a set
of detectives doing their best with limited tools. She could
see the points where the investigation had run out of road,
And then she found the envelopes, two of them, each
sealed with brittle masking tape and marked in a blocky
nineteen eighty's hand fingernail scrapings Lloyd SR. Fibers Lloyd SR.
(04:35):
Holt picked them up carefully. In thirty seven years, they
had never been opened since the original forensic techt sealed
them in nineteen eighty four. There had been no way
to extract DNA from material this small without destroying it entirely. Now,
with modern testing, even a few skin cells could tell
a story. She set the envelopes aside and went back
(04:55):
to the file. The notes from twenty eleven caught her attention.
A cold case audit marking the evidence as viable for
future testing. Yet somehow no one had followed through. I
asked Holt later why she thought it had been overlooked.
She shrugged. Sometimes these cases are like orphan children. Everyone
means to help them, but they keep getting passed over
(05:16):
because someone else always seems more urgent. That wasn't going
to happen on her watch. Holt had joined the Force
in the late nineties, just as DNA was becoming a
standard investigative tool. She'd seen firsthand how a cold case
could be resurrected with a single match. She also knew
the emotional toll of telling a family there was finally
news after decades of silence. Her first step was to
(05:38):
get approval to test the evidence. In most departments, this
isn't as simple as sending it to the lab. The
request goes up the chain of command, weighed against budget,
backlog and the perceived solvability of the case. In twenty
twenty one, Garden Grove's backlog was heavy, but the pandemic
had slowed new case flow enough to make room for
old ones. Holp prepared a formal memo outlining the case history,
(06:03):
the preserved evidence, and the potential for a DNA hit
in state or national databases. She included copies of the
original evidence logs and photographs of the sealed envelopes to
prove their condition. She ended the memo with a single line,
this is the last opportunity we may have to identify
Shannon Lloyd's killer. It worked. Approval came within two weeks.
(06:25):
The evidence was couriered to the Orange County Crime Lab
and a locked container signed for it. Each handoff Holt
went with it, not because she had to, but because
she wanted to be there when it arrived. It felt
like I was delivering something priceless, she told me, And
in a way I was. At the lab, a forensic
analyst named Paul Rivera took custody of the evidence. Rivera
(06:47):
had been working in forensics for nearly two decades. He
understood the stakes of testing samples this sold. The trick,
he said, is to balance the risk. You can't go
at it like you at a fresh sample. You have
to co the DNA out. Rivera explained the process to
Holt's step by step. Carefully open the original envelope to
avoid contamination, transfer the material to a sterile workspace, use
(07:11):
a low copy number DNA extraction technique to maximize recovery.
Amplify the sample through PCR polymerase chain reaction without degrading
what's left. It could take weeks before they knew if
they even had a viable profile. Holt returned to the station,
knowing she was now in a waiting game, one she
couldn't control. In the meantime, she began digging into the
(07:33):
original suspect list, cross referencing it with modern databases. She
pulled criminal records, employment histories, and address changes. Some of
the original suspects were dead, others were still living in California. None,
as far as she could tell, had ever been charged
with anything similar. When the call from Rivera finally came,
(07:53):
it was early morning. Holt was in her office working
through another cold case file when her phone rang. We
got a profile. Rivera said his tone was calm, but
Holt could hear the undercurrent of excitement, and we got
a hit. It wasn't a partial match, it was a
full direct hit in the combined DNA index system Cody's.
(08:14):
The name attached to it was one Holt didn't recognize,
someone who had never been on the original suspect list.
When she typed the name into her computer, the first
thing she found was an address not far from Garden Grove.
The ghosts she'd been hunting for thirty seven years had
just stepped into the light. Chapter seven, The DNA Breakthrough.
(08:34):
The thing about a DNA match is that it's both
a finish line and a starting gun. When the lab
told Detective Karen Holt they had a name, it wasn't
a solve case. It was an open door to an
entirely new investigation. The name on the report was Stephen
Richard Hensley, born in nineteen fifty eight, lived most of
his life in southern California. Arrested in twenty nineteen for
(08:57):
a felony DUI during which his DNA was elected and
entered into Cody's That entry, sitting quietly in the database
for two years, was now the reason his life was
about to change. Holt stared at the name on her
screen for a long time before she clicked further. There
was no mention of Shannon in his history, no violent convictions.
(09:17):
In fact, his record was sparse, a few minor offenses
in the eighties and nineties, mostly related to alcohol. He'd
work construction, then maintenance. Nothing in the file screamed killer,
and yet his DNA matched the profile pulled from the
fingernail scrapings taken from Shannon's body in nineteen eighty four.
I asked Holt what that moment felt like. She leaned
(09:39):
back in her chair, thinking it's electric but dangerous. You
want to run into the street and yell we got him,
but you can't. You have to slow down. You have
to verify. DNA doesn't lie, but people can get the
wrong idea if you don't build the rest of the
case carefully. The first step was to confirm the match
through an independent lab rever RAAH. The forensic analyst split
(10:02):
the remaining sample and sent it to a private lab
for verification. While they waited, Holt began the kind of
deep dive that only modern tools allow. She pulled every
address Hensley had ever lived at and mapped them out.
In nineteen eighty four, he'd been living less than four
miles from Shannon's apartment. She found his employment records. At
the time of Shannon's murder, he'd been working odd jobs
(10:24):
and living alone. She checked marriage and divorce records, noting
that he'd married in nineteen eighty six and divorced in
nineteen ninety two. There was no direct link to Shannon
in any public record, but that didn't mean there wasn't one.
Holt began looking at his social circles in the early eighties.
Did he know anyone in Shannon's building? Had he ever
been to the clothing store where she worked? Did he
(10:46):
frequent the bars and restaurants near her home. Holt also
pulled the original witness statements from nineteen eighty four one
in particular stood out, the man who claimed to see
a silhouette near Shannon's window. The description was vague, but
the height, estimate and build could fit Hensley. It was
the kind of detail that wouldn't hold up in court alone,
but in the context of a DNA match, it carried
(11:09):
new weight. The independent lab came back with the same result.
The DNA from the finger nail scrapings matched Stephen Richard Hensley,
with a probability so highat might as well have been certain.
With the match confirmed, Holt began working with the Orange
County District Attorney's office to plan the next steps. They
needed to approach Hensley without tipping him off. If he
(11:30):
suspected he was being investigated for murder, he could flee,
destroy evidence, or worse. They started with surveillance. Plain clothes
officers parked near his current home, a modest, one story
house in a quiet neighborhood. They watched his routines, morning
coffee runs, weekly trips to the grocery store, evenings on
the porch smoking cigarettes. He seemed unremarkable, the kind of
(11:53):
neighbor you not to but never really know. One officer
told me he was friendly enough waived at people chatted
with the mailman. You'd never look at him and think
he was capable of killing someone. Holt's challenge was to
connect the dots between this mild mannered man in twenty
twenty one and the violent act committed in nineteen eighty four.
The DNA was the bridge, but she still needed motive,
(12:17):
opportunity and a narrative a jury could follow. She dug
into his background further, speaking with people who had known
him in the eighties. Some remembered him as quiet, others
as a drinker. One woman recalled a party where he'd
made inappropriate comments to several women, but nothing that would
have led her to suspect murder. Still, it was a
piece of character evidence that began to fill in the edges.
(12:40):
The d'ie's office decided they had enough to move forward
with an arrest warrant, but they wanted to do it
in a way that minimized risk. Hensley wasn't known to
own fire arms, but no one wanted to take chances.
The plan was to arrest him in a public place
where he'd be less likely to resist. Holt co ordinated
with a local patrol unit. They'd wait until he left
(13:00):
home for one of his coffee runs, then intercept him
in the parking lot. She would be there in person,
not because it was necessary, but because, after thirty seven years,
she wanted to look him in the eye when he
heard Shannon's name. The morning of the arrest was overcast.
Hensley came out of his house wearing jeans and a
faded baseball cap. He got into his pickup truck and
(13:22):
drove to a strip mall cafe. He parked, got out
and started walking toward the entrance. That's when two officers approached,
identified themselves, and told him he was under arrest for
the murder of Shannon rose Lloyd. According to Holt, he froze,
no denial, no anger, just a long, blank stare, then
quietly who It was either an act or he'd buried
(13:45):
Shannon's name so deep in his memory that hearing it
now was like opening a locked door. Either way, the
ghosts they'd been chasing for nearly four decades was no
longer a shadow. He was standing in the daylight, surrounded
by police, with his past finally catching up to him.
Chapter eight, The arrest. The moment Stephen Richard Hensley was
handcuffed in the parking lot. The thirty seven years shadow
(14:08):
over Shannon rose Lloyd's case shifted into something tangible. For decades,
the idea of the killer had been abstract, a faceless
presence in old files and fading memories. Now that presence
had a height, a weight, a face, and a heartbeat.
Detective Karen Holt was there, watching from a short distance.
She'd insisted on being part of the arrest, not for
(14:29):
the thrill, but for the accountability. This was her case now,
and she wanted to see the man who had left
Shannon lifeless on her living room floor. The officers moved quickly.
One secured Hensley's wrists behind his back, another took his
wallet and keys. He didn't fight, He didn't ask why
they were arresting him until they guided him toward the
patrol car. Murder of Shannon rose Lloyd, the officer repeated,
(14:54):
loud enough for Holt to hear. Hensley's head turned slightly,
just enough to catch Holt's gaze. She said nothing. In
her experience, the first words exchanged between detective and suspect
could set the tone for everything that followed. She wanted
his first conversation to be inside the interrogation room, where
every word could be recorded and every reaction preserved. Once
(15:16):
Hensley was in the back seat, Holt followed the patrol
car to the Garden Grove Police Department. The route was familiar,
she'd driven at countless times with other suspects, but this
time every street light felt like a checkpoint in a
race that had taken nearly four decades to run. Inside
the station, Hensley was processed like any other arrestee. His
(15:37):
finger prints were taken, his mug shot captured in a
series of clicks. He was allowed to use the restroom,
then placed an interview room three, a small, windowless space
with cinderblock walls painted in neutral gray. The table was metal,
the chairs heavy and plain. A video camera in the
corner recorded silently. Before entering, Holt and her partner, Detective
(16:00):
Luis Moreno, reviewed the strategy. Moreno would start with small talk,
ease into the conversation, then let Holt take the lead
when it came to the crime. The goal was to
keep Hensley talking, not to push him into immediate silence
with aggression. When they walked in, Hensley was sitting still,
hands flat on the table. He looked older than his
(16:20):
sixty three years, his skin weathered, his eyes guarded but
not hostile. He wore a plain T shirt and jeans,
the same clothes from his coffee run. Moreno started casually, Stephen,
thanks for talking with us. We know it's been a
long time since nineteen eighty four. Hensley raised his eyebrows
but said nothing. You were living in Garden Grove back then.
(16:41):
Moreno asked, yeah. Hensley replied, his voice low. Couple miles
from here. Holt leaned forward. Do you remember Shannon rose Lloyd.
There was a pause, not long, but long enough to
notice No, he said, finally, should I. Holt slid a
photo of Shannon across the table, not the crime seen photo,
a smiling picture from her family. She was killed in
(17:04):
her apartment in May of eighty four. We have reason
to believe you were there that night. Hensley glanced at
the photo, then looked away. I don't know her. Moreno
kept his tone even Stephen, we have your DNA from
her finger nail scrapings. That means she scratched you during
the struggle. There's no mistake about this. Hensley's jaw tightened.
(17:24):
That's impossible. I never met her. Holt let the silence
stretch an interrogation. Silence can be more powerful than any question.
She watched his hands. They twitched once, then flattened again.
People forget things after thirty seven years, she said finally.
But DNA doesn't forget, It doesn't get old, it doesn't change,
(17:45):
and it's telling us you were the last person to
see her alive. For the next hour, Hensley alternated between
denial and vague claims that maybe we crossed paths somewhere.
He offered no explanation for how his DNA ended up
under Shannon's nails. He didn't ask for a lawyer immediately,
but he also didn't give a confession. Holt had expected
(18:05):
this in her experience. Most suspects in decades old cases
didn't break in the first interview. The shock of the arrest,
the unfamiliarity of being back in police custody, it made
them cautious. The goal today wasn't a confession. It was
to gauge his reactions, to note his tells, and to
lock him into statements that could later be challenged with evidence.
(18:27):
When Hensley finally asked for an attorney, the interview ended.
Holt stood collected the file from the table and left
the room without another word. In the hallway Moreno exhaled,
He's not going to admit it, not today, Holt said,
But he doesn't need to. We have the science now,
we build the rest. Building. The rest meant retracing Hensley's
(18:48):
life from nineteen eighty four onward. Detectives searched his old residences,
talked to former landlords, and tracked down people he'd known
in the early eighties. Some recalled him as quiet, others
as all. One woman described him as the kind of
guy who stood too close when he talked to you.
They also dug into his work history, looking for connections
(19:08):
to Shannon's neighborhood. A faded time card from nineteen eighty
four showed he'd been doing maintenance work for a company
that serviced several apartment complexes, one of them less than
two blocks from Shannon's building. Meanwhile, the DA's office began
preparing the case for court. They knew the defense would
attack the age of the evidence, the possibility of contamination,
(19:30):
and the reliability of DNA from decades old samples. Every
step of the chain of custody from nineteen eighty four
onward had to be air tight for Holt. The arrest
was both a victory and a warning. In cold cases,
arresting the suspect is not the end. It's often the
point where the ray all fight begins, and if Shannon's
family was finally going to see justice, they couldn't afford
(19:52):
a single misstep. Hensley was booked into the Orange County
Jail on a charge of murder. Baale was denied. He
was placed in a st andered holding cell, surrounded by
men half his age. In the eyes of the law,
he was now an accused killer. In the eyes of
Shannon's family, he was the man they had been waiting
to face for thirty seven years. Chapter nine, Confronting the Past.
(20:15):
The morning after Stephen Richard Hensley's arrest, the phones in
the Garden Grove Police Department started ringing before the sun
was up. By nine a m. Every major news outlet
in southern California had the story arrest made in nineteen
eighty four murder of Shannon rose Lloyd DNA breakthrough after
thirty seven years. For most people reading those headlines, Shannon's
(20:37):
name was just another in a long list of crime victims.
But for her family it was a moment they'd been
imagining and dreading for nearly four decades. Detective Karen Holt
insisted on telling them in person. She called Shannon's younger brother, Mark,
now in his late fifties, and asked if the family
could meet her at their mother's house. Patricia Lloyd was
(20:58):
eighty one years old, still living in the same modest
home she had when Shannon died. She moved slower now,
her hair completely white, but her mind was sharp. When
Holt arrived, Patricia was sitting at the kitchen table with
a mug of tea in front of her. The table
was the same one from nineteen eighty four, worn smooth
in the middle from decades of use. Mark sat beside her,
(21:20):
his hands clasped tightly. Holt began gently, Patricia, Mark, we've
made an arrest in Shannon's case. His name is Stephen
Richard Hensley. We have his DNA from Shannon's fingernail scrapings.
He was living in the area in nineteen eighty four.
Patricia closed her eyes for a long moment. I prayed
for this, she said. Finally, I prayed I'd be alive
(21:41):
to hear it. Mark's reaction was quieter. Do you know
why he did it not yet, Holt replied, but we're
going to find out. Patricia reached across the table and
took Holt's hand. Promise me you won't let him talk
his way out of this. Promise me he won't get
away again, Holt promised. News crews set up outside the
police department that afternoon. They wanted footage of the detectives,
(22:03):
shots of the building, any scrap of information they could
turn into a sound bite. By evening, the case was
leading broadcasts in Los Angeles, Orange County, and even San Diego.
The public reaction was immediate and intense. Social media lit
up with comments from people who had lived in Garden
Grove in the eighties. Some remembered Shannon personally, a neighbor,
(22:25):
a classmate, a co worker. Others admitted they'd nearly forgotten
about her until the headline jolted the memory back. But
not all the reactions were supportive. Some questioned how it
could have taken thirty seven years. Others speculated about whether
the right man had been arrested. A few even accused
the police of using the case for good pr In
the middle of other controversies, Holt ignored the noise she
(22:48):
knew public opinion would swing back and forth until the
trial and possibly even after. What mattered now was building
the case. I reached out to several of Shannon's old
friends for interviews. Many declined, saying the arrest had reopened
wounds they weren't ready to talk about. But one woman,
Lisa Gutierrez, agreed she'd been Shannon's co worker at the
(23:09):
clothing store in nineteen eighty four. When I saw his
face on the news, I didn't recognize him, Lisa told me.
But I kept thinking maybe he came into the store once,
maybe Shannon helped him pick out a shirt. That's how
close this all feels like. He could have been right
in front of us and we didn't know. Meanwhile, Holt's
team began tracking Hensley's movements in the weeks before his arrest.
(23:33):
They wanted to know if he'd heard about advances in
DNA testing, or if he'd been acting nervous. Surveillance reports
showed no signs of panic. He'd been living quietly, as
if confident his past would stay buried. One of the
most poignant moments came a few days later, when Patricia
visited Shannon's grave for the first time since the arrest.
(23:53):
A local reporter captured a photo from a respectful distance,
Patricia standing at the headstone, one hand read on it,
the other holding a small bouquet of daisies. The headline
the next day read mother stands where justice may finally arrive.
That image became the emotional anchor of the case in
the media. It wasn't about the suspect anymore. It was
(24:14):
about the family, about the cost of waiting thirty seven
years for an answer. Behind the scenes, Holt knew the
hardest part was still ahead. DNA was powerful, but it
wasn't enough on its own. The prosecution needed to show
the jury how Hensley could have been in Shannon's apartment
without forced entry, why she would have led him in,
and what motive he might have had. That meant confronting
(24:37):
the past head on, digging into Shannon's life, her social circle,
and every possible intersection with Hensley's. Some of those answers
would come from documents and records. Others would come from
people who had been silent for decades. Holt braced herself
for what those conversations might reveal. The past had finally
stepped into the light. Now it was time to see
(24:57):
if it would speak. Chapter ten, Trial and Verdict. The
trial of Stephen Richard Hensley began on a cool Monday
morning in the Orange County Superior Court. Outside the court house,
steps were crowded with reporters, photographers, and curious onlookers. It
had been thirty seven years since Shannon Rose Lloyd's murder,
but now her name was on every news banner in
(25:19):
southern California. Detective Karen Holt arrived early, walking past the
cameras without stopping. She'd been through dozens of trials, but
this one carried a weight unlike any other. It wasn't
just about securing a conviction. It was about proving that
time hadn't eroded the truth. Inside the court room, the
atmosphere was tense but orderly. The prosecution table was stacked
(25:43):
with thick binders and Manila folders, each one containing pieces
of a puzzle that had taken decades to complete. Across
the aisle, the defense team sat with Hensley, who wore
a dark suit and tie. His hair was neatly combed,
his face calm. If you didn't know the charges, you
might think he was there for a business dispute. Judge
Ellen Vargas, a seasoned jurist known for her no nonsense demeanor,
(26:07):
took the bench promptly at nine a m. The jury,
twelve men and women ranging in age from their late
twenties to their sixties, filed and quietly they knew this
was no ordinary case. The prosecution opened with a time
line that stretched from May twenty first, nineteen eighty four
to the present. Deputy District Attorney Michael Rayes spoke plainly,
(26:28):
his voice steady for thirty seven years. This case waited
for science to catch up, and when it did, the
evidence pointed to one man, the defendant, Stephen Richard Hensley.
His DNA was found under Shannon Lloyd's finger nails. That means,
in her final moments, she fought him, and she left
behind the truth of who killed her. He moved quickly
(26:48):
through the history, the discovery of the body, the lack
of forced entry, the preservation of the finger nail scrapings.
He explained the evolution of DNA testing, showing the jury
photo graphs of the sealed envelopes and describing the chain
of custody in meticulous detail. Every step was documented. Every
hand that touched the evidence accounted for When the defense
(27:10):
took the floor, attorney James Corcoran went on the offensive,
Ladies and gentlemen, this is not a case about murder.
This is a case about contamination, about unreliable evidence from
almost four decades ago. The police had no idea what
they were doing with DNA in nineteen eighty four, because
DNA testing didn't even exist. Now they want you to
(27:31):
believe that these old, degraded samples can tell you what
happened that night. They can't, and they certainly can't prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that my client is guilty. From
the start, it was clear the defense would attack the
science and the time gap, hoping to plant seeds of
doubt about the reliability of the evidence. The prosecution's witnesses
(27:52):
included the original crime scene technicians, now gray haired and retired,
who testified about how the evidence was collected and stored.
They admitted that in nineteen eighty four they didn't anticipate
DNA testing, but emphasized that they had followed the best
evidence handling procedures of the time. Then came the forensic experts.
Paul Rivera, the analyst who tested the finger nail scrapings,
(28:15):
in twenty twenty one, explained the process in detail. Using
charts and diagrams. He showed how even small amounts of
DNA could be amplified without altering its integrity. He also
testified that the probability of the DNA belonging to some
one other than Hensley was less than one in several trillion.
The defense cross examined aggressively. They asked about the possibility
(28:37):
of transfer, DNA contamination in storage and lab error. Rivera
remained composed, acknowledging that contamination is always a theoretical risk,
but stressing that in this case, the controls showed none.
The most emotional testimony came from Patricia Lloyd, sitting in
the witness box. Her voice trembled as she described getting
(28:58):
the call in nineteen eighty four and the decades of waiting.
She didn't look at Hensley while she spoke, but her
words hung heavy in the court room. I prayed for
this day, she said. I prayed that someone would have
to answer for what they did to my daughter. I
don't know why he killed her, but I know he did.
When it was time for the defense to present their case,
they called only a handful of witnesses. One was a
(29:20):
forensic consultant who criticized the handling of evidence in the eighties.
Another was a former co worker of Hensley's who testified
that he had never seen him act violently. The defense
did not put Hensley on the stand. Closing arguments brought
the trial into sharp focus. Rayes addressed the jury directly,
This case isn't about what the police didn't know in
(29:41):
nineteen eighty four. It's about what we do know now.
Shannon fought for her life, and in doing so, she
told us exactly who killed her. Don't let thirty seven
years erase her voice, corkor encountered. The state wants you
to ignore the gaps, the uncertainties, the fact that memories
fade and evidence degrades. This case is built on sand,
(30:02):
and you cannot send a man to prison for life
on sand. The jury deliberated for two days. Those hours
stretched painfully for everyone involved. Holt stayed at her desk
working on other files, but her mind kept drifting back
to the jury room. On the afternoon of the second day,
the bailiff's voice came over the intercom. We have a verdict.
(30:22):
The court room filled quickly. Patricia sat in the front row,
marked beside her. Holt stood near the back, close enough
to see, but far enough to stay out of the
family's moment. The jury filed in the four person handed
the verdict form to the bailiff, who passed it to
Judge Vargas. She read it silently, then looked up. We
the jury find the defendant, Stephen Richard Hensley, guilty of
(30:45):
murder in the first degree. A gasp escaped from Patricia.
She covered her mouth, tears streaming down her face. Hensley
showed no reaction, his gaze fixed on the table in
front of him. Holt exhaled slowly. Thirty seven years of waiting,
of false starts and dead ends had led to this moment.
The judge thanked the jury for their service and scheduled
(31:07):
sentencing for the following month. As the court room emptied,
Patricia approached Holt. She didn't say anything. She just hugged her,
holding on for a long time. For the first time
since nineteen eighty four, the Lloyd family had an answer,
and soon they would have a measure of justice.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.