In 1984, 23-year-old Shannon Rose Lloyd was brutally murdered in her Garden Grove apartment, leaving behind a haunting mystery that the community struggled to comprehend. For decades, the case remained a cold case, a chilling testament to the unsolved murders of our time. However, recent advancements in DNA technology have sparked a shocking breakthrough, bringing a potential suspect back into focus and reviving the pursuit of justice.
In Episode 1, we delve into the crime scene and explore the city’s collective panic, the initial investigation efforts, and the years of silence that followed this tragic true crime story. Join us as we uncover the hidden narratives and dark histories embedded within this gripping saga, marking the beginning of a relentless fight for justice that spans 37 years.
In Episode 1, we delve into the crime scene and explore the city’s collective panic, the initial investigation efforts, and the years of silence that followed this tragic true crime story. Join us as we uncover the hidden narratives and dark histories embedded within this gripping saga, marking the beginning of a relentless fight for justice that spans 37 years.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The night air and Garden Grove, California, was still in
the spring of nineteen eighty four. Neon from a corner
liquor store flickered against the quiet streets, and the hum
of passing cars faded into the distance. In an upstairs apartment,
twenty three year old Shannon Rose Lloyd closed her eyes
for the last time. By dawn, her body would be
found and the city would never sleep the same way again.
(00:23):
Shannon wasn't famous, she wasn't wealthy. She wasn't the kind
of woman who made enemies. She worked, paid her bills,
saw her friends, and lived her life in a way
that should have kept her safe. But someone, someone who
knew how to get close, changed everything. The violence was brutal, deliberate.
Detectives arriving at the scene spoke quietly, but their eyes
(00:44):
said what no one wanted to hear. This wasn't random.
In nineteen eighty four, police had no DNA technology, They
had finger prints, witness statements, and instinct, and instinct told
them this was personal. For weeks, detectives chase leads, but
every tree went dark, Witnesses forgot details, Evidence degraded, files
(01:05):
piled up in an evidence room until the case became
another unsolved folder in a cold metal cabinet. For Shannon's family,
the silence was worse than the loss. Birthdays passed, holidays
came and went, friends stopped asking. Her parents clung to
the same photo Shannon smiling under the California sun, because
it was all they had left. Then, nearly four decades later,
(01:28):
something shifted. A retired detective returned to the case, armed
with tools that didn't exist. In nineteen eighty four, evidence
was tested again. This time, the results didn't fade into silence.
This time a name appeared. The suspect had been living
in plain sight. This is the story of a city's
sleepless nights, a family's decades long fight for answers, and
(01:50):
the science that caught a killer thirty seven years too late.
It is about what happens when time doesn't erase the truth,
only buries it until someone is willing to dig deep
enough to find it. So, if you think you've heard
it all, you haven't, hit follow on your favorite platform
and leave a comment. The next story might change your mind.
Don't miss a single turn. Chapter one, The Night in
(02:12):
Garden Grove. Garden Grove, California, May twentieth nineteen eighty four.
I still remember the way the street looked that night,
though I wasn't there in nineteen eighty four. I've seen
it so many times in photographs, old police video, and
yellowed clippings that it feels like a memory. A narrow
strip of asphalt lined with modest apartment buildings, the kind
(02:34):
of place where people keep their curtains drawn halfway. A
street light burned out on the corner, leaving part of
the block in shadow. The police photographer's flash lit it
all up. The doorway, the stairwell, the window where a
light never came on again. Shannon rose Lloyd lived alone
in a second floor apartment on this street. She was
twenty three. She worked at a local clothing store and
(02:57):
was known for her warm laugh and the way she
always remembered people's names. Her friends described her as steady,
not the kind of person who jumped into drama. The
few possessions she owned were neat and tidy, a coffee
table stacked with magazines, a sofa she'd bought second hand,
and a framed picture of her with her parents in
front of Disneyland. That Sunday night, Shannon came home from
(03:20):
a quiet dinner with a friend. Nothing unusual, no frantic calls.
No one followed her up the stairs. At least that's
what the surviving witnesses said. The police would later note
there were no signs of forced entry, suggesting she either
knew her killer or trusted them enough to open the door.
The first call to police came at six forty eight
a m. On May twenty first, nineteen eighty four. A neighbor,
(03:44):
a woman in her late fifties, had knocked on Shannon's
door to see if she wanted to share a cup
of coffee before work. When there was no answer, the
neighbor assumed she'd left early. It wasn't until another neighbor,
a man delivering the newspaper, notice Shannon's door jar, that
concern began to spread. He peeked in and saw her
lying motionless in the living room. By the time Garden
(04:06):
Grove PD arrived, the scene was already compromised. Two neighbors
had stepped inside, calling Shannon's name, leaving footprints and partial
handprints on the carpet and furniture. One of them touched
her shoulder, hoping she was unconscious. She wasn't. The medical
examiner would later estimate her time of death between ten
p m. And midnight. The crime scene photos show the
(04:28):
apartment in eerie stillness. The coffee table had been pushed
several inches off its usual spot, a lamp lay on
its side, the bulb shattered. One of Shannon's ear rings
was found under the couch, as if it had been
torn off. The signs of a struggle were subtle but undeniable.
The cause of death, blunt force trauma, came from a
single decisive blow followed by strangulation. Police believed it was
(04:53):
over within minutes. Detective Robert Malley, one of the first
un scene later described the apartment as quiet, but charre urged.
He noticed an untouched plate of food in the kitchen sink,
pasta now dried and cracking at the edges. There was
a glass of red wine next to it, still half full.
Whoever had killed Shannon either hadn't stayed long after or
(05:14):
they'd been careful to touch very little. The investigation began immediately.
Officers canvassed the neighborhood, asking if anyone had heard anything unusual.
One resident recalled a muffled thud around eleven p m,
but thought nothing of it. Another remembered seeing a man
silhouette near Shannon's window around nine p m. But couldn't
describe his face. These scraps of memory would be all
(05:37):
police had to work with in the early days. At
the time, Garden Grove wasn't a high crime city, but
the murder sent a ripple of fear through the community.
Women began locking their doors earlier. Parents warned their daughters
not to walk alone after dark. Local news aired daily updates,
replaying the same grainy exterior shot of Shannon's building over
(05:58):
and over. The pressure on police was immediate and unrelenting.
Evidence was collected carefully for nineteen eighty four standards, hair fibers, fingerprints,
and a small swab from under Shannon's finger nails were
logged and sealed. Without DNA technology, those samples sat in storage,
their value limited to what could be matched visually or chemically.
(06:19):
At the time, police pinned their hopes on finger prints,
but weeks later, when the analysis came back, none matched
anyone in the state's database. What struck me most going
through the original case filed decades later was the margin
of error in every step. Witness statements contradicted each other,
The neighbor who swore she saw a man near Shannon's
(06:40):
window later admitted she'd been drinking that night. The man
who found the door open changed his story about what
time it was, and yet the core fact Shannon was
killed in her home by someone she likely knew never changed.
The autopsy report paints the final clinical picture a single
head injury consistent with being struck by a blunt object,
(07:00):
followed by manual strangulation. No defensive wounds beyond light bruising
on her forearms, suggesting she was caught off guard. Toxicology
showed no drugs or alcohol beyond the half glass of
wine in her system. For the police, the case began
here with a young woman's life ended in a quiet
apartment and a handful of clues that refused to speak.
(07:22):
For me. This was the start of a question that
would last thirty seven years. Who walked into Shannon's apartment
that night? And why did they think they could get
away with murder? Chapter two, A City on Edge. When
a murder happens in a small or mid sized city,
the first wave of impact is shock, the second is paranoia.
By the summer of nineteen eighty four, Garden Grove had both.
(07:44):
The day after Shannon rose Lloyd's death, the Orange County
Register ran the headline young women found dead an apartment.
Police suspect foul play. Below it was a black and
white photo of Shannon, taken from her driver's license. It
was the kind of image that strips away personality, flat lighting, unsmiling, utilitarian.
But for her family and friends, that photograph was an
(08:07):
injustice in itself. Shannon had been vibrant, warm and full
of life, and now the public would only know her
as the face in that tiny rectangle on the front page.
The Garden Grove Police Department held a press conference that
morning in the cramped basement of city Hall. The lead detective,
Robert Malley, spoke for three minutes. He confirmed Shannon's name,
(08:28):
her age, her address, and that her death was being
treated as a homicide. When pressed by reporters for details
about how she was killed, Mallie shut it down. Were
not going to release specifics at this time. That refusal
to give details only fueled speculation. Talk radio hosts guessed
out loud whether this was the work of a stranger,
a jealous boyfriend, or a serial predator. Local bartenders, barbers,
(08:53):
and grocery store clerks swapped rumors that morphed with each telling.
One version claimed Shannon had been stalped for weeks. Another
claim she'd been seen arguing with a man outside her
apartment two nights before. None of it was confirmed, but
all of it was repeated. I interviewed residents who were
children back then. They remember their parents locking windows they'd
(09:13):
always left open. People began to check their back seats
before getting into cars. The phrase don't walk alone after
dark became more than parental advice. It became a rule
of survival. The city's population in nineteen eighty four was
about one hundred and forty thousand. Most people worked blue
collar or service jobs. Crime rates were moderate. Burglaries, car thef's,
(09:36):
the occasional assault. A brutal murder in a young woman's
home was different. It wasn't something people could write off
as gang violence or a bad drug deal. This felt targeted, intimate,
and that made it worse. By week two, the police
presence was impossible to miss. Uniformed officers walked apartment complexes,
stopping to chat with residence asking if they'd seen anything unusual.
(10:00):
Detectives went door to door with clipboards taking statements that
would later fill dozens of binders in the case file.
Patrol cars circled slowly through neighborhoods, lights off, but visible
enough to remind every one they were there. Not all
of the community's attention was supportive. There was frustration, even anger,
at the lack of progress. Flyers with Shannon's picture, this
(10:22):
time a smiling snap shot her family provided, appeared on
telephone polls and in shop windows, but with each passing day,
fewer people stopped to read them. I found a surviving
copy of a Los Angeles Times article from June fourth,
nineteen eighty four. The headline read two weeks later, no
leeds in Garden Grove slaying the peace, quoted a woman
(10:44):
who lived in Shannon's building. We thought they'd have some
one in custody by now. You can't tell me they
don't have anything. Behind the scenes, detectives were chasing down
every name that came up in interviews. Shannon's co workers
were questioned, her landlord was questioned. Ex boyfriends were located
and interviewed, some more than once. All of them denied involvement,
(11:06):
and none could be tied to the crime. Seen through
the limited forensics available. Shannon's funeral was held on May
twenty sixth at a small Catholic church in Santa Anna.
Nearly two hundred people attended. The service was quiet, heavy
with disbelief. Detectives attended in plain clothes, scanning the crowd.
They watched for unusual behavior, someone who wouldn't meet their eyes,
(11:28):
someone crying too hard, someone not crying at all. They
saw nothing that led anywhere. In neighborhoods far from Shannon's,
the murder became a cautionary tale. A college student told
me her mother started sleeping with a baseball bat by
the bed. A grocery store cashier said she carried pepper
spray for the first time. Even people who had never
met Shannon felt exposed, vulnerable. The longer the investigation went
(11:52):
without an arrest, the bolder the rumors became. There was
talk of a suspect list pinned to a board in
the police department with a dozen and names. Whether that
was true or not, it kept the gossip alive, and
while some neighbors avoided talking to police for fear of
getting dragged into something, others called in constantly with tips,
most of which went nowhere. One thing was certain the
(12:15):
city would never be the same after that May night.
Garden Grove, for all its palm lined streets and family
run businesses, now carried the weight of a murder that
didn't fit into any neat box. The killer was still
out there, and no one knew if or when he
might strike again. By Midsummer, the case had already begun
to slip from front pages. Other stories took its place,
(12:37):
a local election, a freeway expansion, a heat wave. But
for Shannon's family and for the detectives still working the case,
the pressure only grew heavier, and as I would learn later,
this pressure would play a dangerous role in what came next,
an investigation that moved fast, maybe too fast, and began
steering toward the wrong suspects. Chapter three, the first investigation.
(13:01):
The first weeks after Shannon's murder were a blur for
the Garden Grove Police Department, a mix of urgency, public scrutiny,
and blind corners. From my review of the original case files,
it was clear they were determined to catch the killer quickly,
but determination doesn't guarantee accuracy. The official investigative timeline began
on May twenty first, nineteen eighty four, the morning her
(13:24):
body was found. By noon that day, the lead detectives
had compiled a preliminary suspect list. It wasn't long, just
six names, but it included anyone who had been in
Shannon's orbit within the past six months. They started with
the ex boyfriend. His name appeared in several of Shannon's
friend's statements. They dated for a year, broken up three
(13:45):
months earlier. According to her friends, there had been no
major fights, no restraining orders, no late night calls. But
the detectives couldn't ignore him. When they brought him in
for questioning, he came willingly. His alibi dinner with his
sister cross Town was verified within twenty four hours. The
problem was that alibi ended around ten thirty p m.
(14:07):
And the medical examiner's time of death range stretched as
late as midnight. They pressed him on whether he'd been
near Shannon's apartment that night. He denied it. They asked
if she'd ever seemed afraid of anyone. He said no.
The interview notes reveal a telling line from Detective Malley,
doesn't seem nervous enough. In nineteen eighty four, that instinct
often carried as much weight as hard evidence. Still without
(14:31):
finger prints or a witness placing him at the scene,
he was released. The next name was the upstairs neighbor,
a man in his forties who had been living in
the building for about two years. He was the one
who claimed to have seen a man's silhouette outside Shannon's
window on the night of the murder. Detectives quickly realized
his account had inconsistencies. At first, he said the figure
(14:53):
was tall and wearing a hat. Later he said it
might have been medium height and bareheaded. When asked to
describe were exact bactly he was when he saw this,
he said he'd been on the balcony. The balcony, as
the crime scene photos confirm, faced the opposite side of
the building from Shannon's unit. The only way he could
have seen her window was by leaning dangerously far over
(15:14):
the railing. Detectives began to wonder if he was inventing
the sighting to insert himself into the case. They checked
his alibi. He'd been at home watching television alone. No corroboration.
Then came the coworker Shannon had worked with her at
the clothing store. This woman claimed Shannon had recently complained
about a customer who lingered too long and asked personal questions.
(15:36):
The coworker described him as creepy and too interested in
her life. Detectives took this seriously, interviewing the store manager
and pulling sales records to try to identify him. Nothing
panned out. The customer was never found, and the lead fizzled.
By the third week, detectives were widening the net. They
looked at a maintenance worker for the building, noting his
(15:58):
master key could have opened in Shannon's apartment without force.
He denied any involvement and passed a polygraph test in
nineteen eighty four that carried weight. Today we know polygraphs
are unreliable, but back then a pass could shift focus
away from a suspect entirely. Perhaps the most frustrating dead
end came from an anonymous tip line call. On June third.
(16:20):
A man claimed to have overheard two people at a
bar talking about the girl in Garden Grove. He said
one of them mentioned she didn't see it coming and laughed.
The caller refused to give his name. Detectives checked bars
in the area but came up with nothing. The tip
was logged, then left to gather dust. Reading through the interviews.
What stands out is how many people wanted to help
(16:42):
and how many seemed to enjoy the attention of being
connected to a murder case. Even loosely false memories, embellishments,
and outright fabrications tangled the investigation. Forensic evidence wasn't giving
detectives much to work with either. The fingerprints collected from
Shannon's apartment belonged mostly to her and known visitors. A
(17:03):
few unidentified prints were found on the kitchen counter, but
without a match in the state database, they were useless.
The hair fibers collected from the crime scene were analyzed
for color and texture, but without DNA they could only
narrow them down to dark brown, possibly male. Still, detective
Malle and his partner pushed forward. They conducted fifty seven
(17:24):
interviews in the first month. They worked long days, often
into the night, chasing down every possible lead, but by
late June the reality was setting in. They didn't have
enough to arrest anyone. In my conversations with surviving members
of the original investigative team, the frustration is still there.
One retired officer told me we were working blind. We
(17:47):
didn't have the tools, and every day that passed made
it harder. Another said, I still think about the ones
we ruled out too fast. It's easy in hindsight to
point to mistakes, but in the summer of nineteen eighty four,
they were doing what they could with what they had,
and what they had wasn't much. Each lead faded, each
suspect was eliminated or left hanging without enough evidence. By July,
(18:11):
the file on Shannon rose Lloyd's murder was getting thick,
but the space for primary suspect remained blank. That blank
space would stay that way for decades. But before it did,
the detectives would take one more shot, a last push
before the case began to cool, a push that would
prove both desperate and dangerous. Chapter four, The case grows cold.
(18:33):
The turning point came quietly. There was no dramatic announcement,
no press conference declaring failure. One day the detectives were
working Shannon's case full time, and the next it was
just another file in the stack. It was late summer
nineteen eighty four when the momentum truly slowed. The early
flood of tips had thinned to a trickle. The news
(18:53):
coverage that had once run daily was now buried on
page five if it appeared at all. Other crimes newer, louder,
more so were taking priority. In the Garden Grove Police department.
The walls of the homicide unit told their own story.
Each case had a whiteboard with names, times, and leads
scrawled across it. Shannon's board had been crowded in May
(19:14):
and June. By August, half the writing was erased, the
rest had gone stale. The persons of interest list was
now a list of people we talked to. The once
promising theories had been crossed out with thick black marker.
The decision to scale back wasn't malicious, it was practical.
Detective Robert Malley was assigned a new homicide in September,
(19:34):
a double shooting in a motel parking lot. His partner
was pulled to work on a series of armed robberies.
The unofficial message was clear, unless something big breaks, this
case is on hold. For Shannon's family, the change was devastating.
Her mother, Patricia, kept a spiral notebook of every phone
call with police. In the early days, there were daily updates.
(19:57):
By the fall, the entries were weeks apart. On oct
Toober second, she wrote, detective says nothing new asked again
about the wine glass, he says, they're still waiting on
the lab. The lab results, when they came were useless,
no fingerprints clear enough to match anyone outside the people
already known to have been in the apartment. Evidence handling
(20:17):
in nineteen eighty four was a different world. The murder weapon,
if it existed, was never found. The hair fibers, fingernail scrapings,
and clothing were stored in paper envelopes, sealed with tape
and labeled by hand. The storage facility was climate controlled,
but not by today's standards. There were no tamper proof barcodes,
no digital chain of custody logs. Items were checked in
(20:40):
and out with pen and paper. Years later, a forensic
expert would tell me it's a miracle the sample survived
in usable condition. At the time, though no one was
thinking about decades. They were thinking about the next week,
maybe the next month. In nineteen eighty five, there was
a brief flicker of renewed interest. A man in Sand
Diego was arrested for a string of assaults that bore
(21:02):
some similarities to Shannon's case. He targeted women in their homes,
often entering without forced entry, and attacked late at night.
Detectives compared notes, even drove down to interview him in person.
He denied ever being in Garden Grove. Without DNA, they
couldn't tie him to the crime scene. He was eventually
convicted for the assaults in San Diego, but any link
(21:25):
to Shannon was speculative at best. By nineteen eighty six,
the investigation was effectively dormant. It wasn't officially closed homicides
never are, but it had joined the growing list of
cold cases that sat in storage, waiting for a break
that might never come. The file was thick enough to
fill a banker's box. On the side, written in black
(21:46):
marker were the words Lloyd Shannon Are homicide. May twenty first,
nineteen eighty four. That box would follow the department through
three building moves. Over the next three decades. It would
sit on shelves in evidence rooms and file archives, gathering
dust but never disappearing entirely. For the family, the years
that followed were measured not by milestones, but by absences,
(22:08):
birth days, holidays, weddings. Each one was a reminder that
Shannon wasn't there. Patricia called the police at least once
a year, usually on the anniversary of her daughter's death.
She was polite but persistent. Each year, the answer was
the same, nothing new. The case's cold status also meant
the rumors took on a life of their own. People
(22:29):
whispered that the killer had moved away. Others said he
was still in town, hiding in plain sight. Some believed
the police knew who it was, but couldn't prove it
without answers. Speculation became its own form of folklore. In
nineteen ninety, a small article ran in the Orange County Register.
Six years later, no arrest in Garden Grove Murder. It
(22:50):
was a single column with a grainy reprint of Shannon's
smiling photo. The peace quoted Patricia, who said, simply, we're
not giving up. We can't. By the time the nineteen
nineties ended, the world had changed. DNA was becoming a
tool for solving crimes, but only in the most clear
cut cases, usually when biological evidence was fresh and abundant.
(23:12):
Shannon's case didn't seem like a good candidate. The samples
were old, minimal, and possibly contaminated. Testing them in those
early days would have consumed all the material with no
guarantee of results, and so the box stayed sealed when
I first saw it decades later. The tape was brittle,
the handwriting fading, but it was all there, the photographs,
(23:33):
the reports, the diagrams of the apartment, the tiny envelopes
holding the evidence. At the time, I didn't know that
those same envelopes would one day hold the key to
solving the case. In nineteen eighty four, they didn't have
the science, In nineteen ninety four, they didn't have the funding,
and in two thousand and four they didn't have the will.
But in twenty twenty one, all three would finally align.
(23:57):
Until then, Shannon's murder was a wound the city learned
to lie live with, quietly, painfully, and without closure. Chapter five.
New tools, Old wounds. The mid nineteen nineties brought a
quiet revolution to law enforcement. For the first time, detectives
had a tool that could do what no witness, polygraph
or hunch ever could, DNA testing it began making headlines
(24:19):
in high profile cases. In nineteen ninety four, DNA helped
convict O J. Simpson in the court of public opinion,
long before a jury reached its controversial verdict. Around the
same time, a man named Kirk Bludsworth became the first
American death row inmate to be exonerated by DNA evidence.
These stories made the technology sound like magic, a perfect,
(24:41):
unbreakable link between suspect and crime scene inside police departments,
though the reality was less glamorous. The tests were expensive, slow,
and prone to failure if the evidence was degraded, and
in a cold case like Shannon rose Lloyd's, degradation was
almost a given. I met retired forensic analysts Linda Carver
in her small Orange County home in the late nineties.
(25:04):
She'd worked in one of the few California labs capable
of processing DNA for criminal cases. She remembered when Shannon's
file crossed her desk, not for testing, but for review.
It was nineteen ninety eight, she told me. Flipping through
her personal scrap book of solved and unsolved cases, I
saw the note that there were fingernail scrapings and some fibers.
(25:25):
The problem was, back then we needed a lot more
material than we do now. If we tested it and failed,
that was it. There'd be nothing left for future testing.
So the decision was made to hold off. The evidence
stayed in storage, still sealed in its original envelopes. It
wasn't unusual. Departments all over the country were sitting on
old cases, waiting for technology to catch up to their evidence. Meanwhile,
(25:50):
DNA was making headlines for its role in solving other
decades old murders, a nineteen seventy six case in San Diego,
a nineteen eighty one murder in Sanford, Cisco. Each success
sent a jolt of hope through the families of other victims,
including Shannon's. Her mother, Patricia, called the department after each one.
Can't you do the same for Shannon? She'd ask? Each time.
(26:13):
The answer was cautious. Maybe someday, not yet. The nineteen
nineties were also the era of California's DNA database expansion.
The state began collecting DNA from convicted felons and later
from those merely arrested for certain crimes. The database grew
slowly at first, then exponentially. Detectives knew that even if
(26:33):
they didn't have a suspect in mind, one could emerge
if their DNA ended up in the system. But there
was a darker side to the progress. Cold cases were
being prioritized based on likelihood of success and public interest.
Cases with famous victims or multiple unsolved killings got funding first.
Shannon's case, tragic but quiet with no other known linked crimes,
(26:55):
often fell to the bottom of the list. In two
thousand and two, there was another close call. A detective
new to the cold case unit pulled Shannon's file and
submitted a request for partial DNA testing on the finger
nail scrapings. The request made it through two layers of
approval before being denied for budget reasons. The money went
instead to a case with two child victims, which had
(27:18):
a higher chance of yielding usable DNA. Patricia never knew
about the denied request. She kept calling every year, marking
the anniversary with a fresh plea to look at it again.
Her persistence became part of the case's unofficial time line.
Detectives knew the call was coming each May. Some took
it as a reminder of their unfinished business. Others saw
(27:39):
it as a burden they couldn't lift. By the late
two thousands, the forensic landscape was shifting again. Newer testing
methods like str short tandem repeat analysis required less material
and could produce results from older samples. Still, the backlog
was immense. California's crime labs were drowning in requests, Shannon's
(28:00):
case sat in line year after year. When I asked
retired Detective Mallely about that period, he sighed, it wasn't
that we didn't care. We did, but I had cases
stacking up on my desk every week. Unless something came
in that put her case back in the spotlight, it
stayed where it was. And yet even in limbo, the
case wasn't entirely forgotten. In twenty eleven, an evidence review
(28:23):
team audited the department's cold cases. Shannon's was flagged as
having viable biological evidence, a note that would prove critical
years later. The review also confirmed that the envelopes containing
the fingernail scrapings and fibers were intact, still bearing their
original nineteen eighty four seals. That same year, another shift began,
(28:44):
the rise of familial DNA searching. It was controversial, raising
privacy concerns, but it also opened a door for cases
like Shannon's. Even if the killer wasn't in the database,
a relative might be. By twenty fifteen, technology had reached
to point where the old samples could finally be tested
without destroying them, but the process required a dedicated cold
(29:06):
case unit to prioritize the work. Garden Grove didn't have one.
What it did have by then was a new generation
of detectives, people who had grown up with DNA as
part of policing, who understood its potential. One of them,
a detective named Karen Holt, first read Shannon's file in
twenty sixteen. She told me she was struck by how
(29:27):
solvable it seemed. You had preserved evidence, You had a
crime scene with no forced entry, You had a victim
who almost certainly knew her killer. That's not nothing. Still,
Holt's request to test the DNA went nowhere. The lab
backlog was still years long, and the city had more
recent homicides to process. It wasn't until twenty twenty, nearly
(29:47):
thirty six years after Shannon's murder, that the cold case
unit was formally reactivated, with Holt at the helm. By then,
technology had advanced to the point where even degraded samples
could yield results. The tools that had once seemed out
of reach were now standard, and in the middle of
a pandemic, with crime rates shifting and budgets being reshuffled,
(30:08):
Holt found her opening. The finger nail scrapings were sent
to the lab in early twenty twenty one. Three months later,
the results came back for the first time in thirty
seven years, the name of a living suspect was linked
to Shannon's murder. But before the arrest, before the headlines,
there was the moment that changed everything, a quiet click
of a mouse in a dim lab and the appearance
(30:31):
of a match that no one had expected.
The night air and Garden Grove, California, was still in
the spring of nineteen eighty four. Neon from a corner
liquor store flickered against the quiet streets, and the hum
of passing cars faded into the distance. In an upstairs apartment,
twenty three year old Shannon Rose Lloyd closed her eyes
for the last time. By dawn, her body would be
found and the city would never sleep the same way again.
(00:23):
Shannon wasn't famous, she wasn't wealthy. She wasn't the kind
of woman who made enemies. She worked, paid her bills,
saw her friends, and lived her life in a way
that should have kept her safe. But someone, someone who
knew how to get close, changed everything. The violence was brutal, deliberate.
Detectives arriving at the scene spoke quietly, but their eyes
(00:44):
said what no one wanted to hear. This wasn't random.
In nineteen eighty four, police had no DNA technology, They
had finger prints, witness statements, and instinct, and instinct told
them this was personal. For weeks, detectives chase leads, but
every tree went dark, Witnesses forgot details, Evidence degraded, files
(01:05):
piled up in an evidence room until the case became
another unsolved folder in a cold metal cabinet. For Shannon's family,
the silence was worse than the loss. Birthdays passed, holidays
came and went, friends stopped asking. Her parents clung to
the same photo Shannon smiling under the California sun, because
it was all they had left. Then, nearly four decades later,
(01:28):
something shifted. A retired detective returned to the case, armed
with tools that didn't exist. In nineteen eighty four, evidence
was tested again. This time, the results didn't fade into silence.
This time a name appeared. The suspect had been living
in plain sight. This is the story of a city's
sleepless nights, a family's decades long fight for answers, and
(01:50):
the science that caught a killer thirty seven years too late.
It is about what happens when time doesn't erase the truth,
only buries it until someone is willing to dig deep
enough to find it. So, if you think you've heard
it all, you haven't, hit follow on your favorite platform
and leave a comment. The next story might change your mind.
Don't miss a single turn. Chapter one, The Night in
(02:12):
Garden Grove. Garden Grove, California, May twentieth nineteen eighty four.
I still remember the way the street looked that night,
though I wasn't there in nineteen eighty four. I've seen
it so many times in photographs, old police video, and
yellowed clippings that it feels like a memory. A narrow
strip of asphalt lined with modest apartment buildings, the kind
(02:34):
of place where people keep their curtains drawn halfway. A
street light burned out on the corner, leaving part of
the block in shadow. The police photographer's flash lit it
all up. The doorway, the stairwell, the window where a
light never came on again. Shannon rose Lloyd lived alone
in a second floor apartment on this street. She was
twenty three. She worked at a local clothing store and
(02:57):
was known for her warm laugh and the way she
always remembered people's names. Her friends described her as steady,
not the kind of person who jumped into drama. The
few possessions she owned were neat and tidy, a coffee
table stacked with magazines, a sofa she'd bought second hand,
and a framed picture of her with her parents in
front of Disneyland. That Sunday night, Shannon came home from
(03:20):
a quiet dinner with a friend. Nothing unusual, no frantic calls.
No one followed her up the stairs. At least that's
what the surviving witnesses said. The police would later note
there were no signs of forced entry, suggesting she either
knew her killer or trusted them enough to open the door.
The first call to police came at six forty eight
a m. On May twenty first, nineteen eighty four. A neighbor,
(03:44):
a woman in her late fifties, had knocked on Shannon's
door to see if she wanted to share a cup
of coffee before work. When there was no answer, the
neighbor assumed she'd left early. It wasn't until another neighbor,
a man delivering the newspaper, notice Shannon's door jar, that
concern began to spread. He peeked in and saw her
lying motionless in the living room. By the time Garden
(04:06):
Grove PD arrived, the scene was already compromised. Two neighbors
had stepped inside, calling Shannon's name, leaving footprints and partial
handprints on the carpet and furniture. One of them touched
her shoulder, hoping she was unconscious. She wasn't. The medical
examiner would later estimate her time of death between ten
p m. And midnight. The crime scene photos show the
(04:28):
apartment in eerie stillness. The coffee table had been pushed
several inches off its usual spot, a lamp lay on
its side, the bulb shattered. One of Shannon's ear rings
was found under the couch, as if it had been
torn off. The signs of a struggle were subtle but undeniable.
The cause of death, blunt force trauma, came from a
single decisive blow followed by strangulation. Police believed it was
(04:53):
over within minutes. Detective Robert Malley, one of the first
un scene later described the apartment as quiet, but charre urged.
He noticed an untouched plate of food in the kitchen sink,
pasta now dried and cracking at the edges. There was
a glass of red wine next to it, still half full.
Whoever had killed Shannon either hadn't stayed long after or
(05:14):
they'd been careful to touch very little. The investigation began immediately.
Officers canvassed the neighborhood, asking if anyone had heard anything unusual.
One resident recalled a muffled thud around eleven p m,
but thought nothing of it. Another remembered seeing a man
silhouette near Shannon's window around nine p m. But couldn't
describe his face. These scraps of memory would be all
(05:37):
police had to work with in the early days. At
the time, Garden Grove wasn't a high crime city, but
the murder sent a ripple of fear through the community.
Women began locking their doors earlier. Parents warned their daughters
not to walk alone after dark. Local news aired daily updates,
replaying the same grainy exterior shot of Shannon's building over
(05:58):
and over. The pressure on police was immediate and unrelenting.
Evidence was collected carefully for nineteen eighty four standards, hair fibers, fingerprints,
and a small swab from under Shannon's finger nails were
logged and sealed. Without DNA technology, those samples sat in storage,
their value limited to what could be matched visually or chemically.
(06:19):
At the time, police pinned their hopes on finger prints,
but weeks later, when the analysis came back, none matched
anyone in the state's database. What struck me most going
through the original case filed decades later was the margin
of error in every step. Witness statements contradicted each other,
The neighbor who swore she saw a man near Shannon's
(06:40):
window later admitted she'd been drinking that night. The man
who found the door open changed his story about what
time it was, and yet the core fact Shannon was
killed in her home by someone she likely knew never changed.
The autopsy report paints the final clinical picture a single
head injury consistent with being struck by a blunt object,
(07:00):
followed by manual strangulation. No defensive wounds beyond light bruising
on her forearms, suggesting she was caught off guard. Toxicology
showed no drugs or alcohol beyond the half glass of
wine in her system. For the police, the case began
here with a young woman's life ended in a quiet
apartment and a handful of clues that refused to speak.
(07:22):
For me. This was the start of a question that
would last thirty seven years. Who walked into Shannon's apartment
that night? And why did they think they could get
away with murder? Chapter two, A City on Edge. When
a murder happens in a small or mid sized city,
the first wave of impact is shock, the second is paranoia.
By the summer of nineteen eighty four, Garden Grove had both.
(07:44):
The day after Shannon rose Lloyd's death, the Orange County
Register ran the headline young women found dead an apartment.
Police suspect foul play. Below it was a black and
white photo of Shannon, taken from her driver's license. It
was the kind of image that strips away personality, flat lighting, unsmiling, utilitarian.
But for her family and friends, that photograph was an
(08:07):
injustice in itself. Shannon had been vibrant, warm and full
of life, and now the public would only know her
as the face in that tiny rectangle on the front page.
The Garden Grove Police Department held a press conference that
morning in the cramped basement of city Hall. The lead detective,
Robert Malley, spoke for three minutes. He confirmed Shannon's name,
(08:28):
her age, her address, and that her death was being
treated as a homicide. When pressed by reporters for details
about how she was killed, Mallie shut it down. Were
not going to release specifics at this time. That refusal
to give details only fueled speculation. Talk radio hosts guessed
out loud whether this was the work of a stranger,
a jealous boyfriend, or a serial predator. Local bartenders, barbers,
(08:53):
and grocery store clerks swapped rumors that morphed with each telling.
One version claimed Shannon had been stalped for weeks. Another
claim she'd been seen arguing with a man outside her
apartment two nights before. None of it was confirmed, but
all of it was repeated. I interviewed residents who were
children back then. They remember their parents locking windows they'd
(09:13):
always left open. People began to check their back seats
before getting into cars. The phrase don't walk alone after
dark became more than parental advice. It became a rule
of survival. The city's population in nineteen eighty four was
about one hundred and forty thousand. Most people worked blue
collar or service jobs. Crime rates were moderate. Burglaries, car thef's,
(09:36):
the occasional assault. A brutal murder in a young woman's
home was different. It wasn't something people could write off
as gang violence or a bad drug deal. This felt targeted, intimate,
and that made it worse. By week two, the police
presence was impossible to miss. Uniformed officers walked apartment complexes,
stopping to chat with residence asking if they'd seen anything unusual.
(10:00):
Detectives went door to door with clipboards taking statements that
would later fill dozens of binders in the case file.
Patrol cars circled slowly through neighborhoods, lights off, but visible
enough to remind every one they were there. Not all
of the community's attention was supportive. There was frustration, even anger,
at the lack of progress. Flyers with Shannon's picture, this
(10:22):
time a smiling snap shot her family provided, appeared on
telephone polls and in shop windows, but with each passing day,
fewer people stopped to read them. I found a surviving
copy of a Los Angeles Times article from June fourth,
nineteen eighty four. The headline read two weeks later, no
leeds in Garden Grove slaying the peace, quoted a woman
(10:44):
who lived in Shannon's building. We thought they'd have some
one in custody by now. You can't tell me they
don't have anything. Behind the scenes, detectives were chasing down
every name that came up in interviews. Shannon's co workers
were questioned, her landlord was questioned. Ex boyfriends were located
and interviewed, some more than once. All of them denied involvement,
(11:06):
and none could be tied to the crime. Seen through
the limited forensics available. Shannon's funeral was held on May
twenty sixth at a small Catholic church in Santa Anna.
Nearly two hundred people attended. The service was quiet, heavy
with disbelief. Detectives attended in plain clothes, scanning the crowd.
They watched for unusual behavior, someone who wouldn't meet their eyes,
(11:28):
someone crying too hard, someone not crying at all. They
saw nothing that led anywhere. In neighborhoods far from Shannon's,
the murder became a cautionary tale. A college student told
me her mother started sleeping with a baseball bat by
the bed. A grocery store cashier said she carried pepper
spray for the first time. Even people who had never
met Shannon felt exposed, vulnerable. The longer the investigation went
(11:52):
without an arrest, the bolder the rumors became. There was
talk of a suspect list pinned to a board in
the police department with a dozen and names. Whether that
was true or not, it kept the gossip alive, and
while some neighbors avoided talking to police for fear of
getting dragged into something, others called in constantly with tips,
most of which went nowhere. One thing was certain the
(12:15):
city would never be the same after that May night.
Garden Grove, for all its palm lined streets and family
run businesses, now carried the weight of a murder that
didn't fit into any neat box. The killer was still
out there, and no one knew if or when he
might strike again. By Midsummer, the case had already begun
to slip from front pages. Other stories took its place,
(12:37):
a local election, a freeway expansion, a heat wave. But
for Shannon's family and for the detectives still working the case,
the pressure only grew heavier, and as I would learn later,
this pressure would play a dangerous role in what came next,
an investigation that moved fast, maybe too fast, and began
steering toward the wrong suspects. Chapter three, the first investigation.
(13:01):
The first weeks after Shannon's murder were a blur for
the Garden Grove Police Department, a mix of urgency, public scrutiny,
and blind corners. From my review of the original case files,
it was clear they were determined to catch the killer quickly,
but determination doesn't guarantee accuracy. The official investigative timeline began
on May twenty first, nineteen eighty four, the morning her
(13:24):
body was found. By noon that day, the lead detectives
had compiled a preliminary suspect list. It wasn't long, just
six names, but it included anyone who had been in
Shannon's orbit within the past six months. They started with
the ex boyfriend. His name appeared in several of Shannon's
friend's statements. They dated for a year, broken up three
(13:45):
months earlier. According to her friends, there had been no
major fights, no restraining orders, no late night calls. But
the detectives couldn't ignore him. When they brought him in
for questioning, he came willingly. His alibi dinner with his
sister cross Town was verified within twenty four hours. The
problem was that alibi ended around ten thirty p m.
(14:07):
And the medical examiner's time of death range stretched as
late as midnight. They pressed him on whether he'd been
near Shannon's apartment that night. He denied it. They asked
if she'd ever seemed afraid of anyone. He said no.
The interview notes reveal a telling line from Detective Malley,
doesn't seem nervous enough. In nineteen eighty four, that instinct
often carried as much weight as hard evidence. Still without
(14:31):
finger prints or a witness placing him at the scene,
he was released. The next name was the upstairs neighbor,
a man in his forties who had been living in
the building for about two years. He was the one
who claimed to have seen a man's silhouette outside Shannon's
window on the night of the murder. Detectives quickly realized
his account had inconsistencies. At first, he said the figure
(14:53):
was tall and wearing a hat. Later he said it
might have been medium height and bareheaded. When asked to
describe were exact bactly he was when he saw this,
he said he'd been on the balcony. The balcony, as
the crime scene photos confirm, faced the opposite side of
the building from Shannon's unit. The only way he could
have seen her window was by leaning dangerously far over
(15:14):
the railing. Detectives began to wonder if he was inventing
the sighting to insert himself into the case. They checked
his alibi. He'd been at home watching television alone. No corroboration.
Then came the coworker Shannon had worked with her at
the clothing store. This woman claimed Shannon had recently complained
about a customer who lingered too long and asked personal questions.
(15:36):
The coworker described him as creepy and too interested in
her life. Detectives took this seriously, interviewing the store manager
and pulling sales records to try to identify him. Nothing
panned out. The customer was never found, and the lead fizzled.
By the third week, detectives were widening the net. They
looked at a maintenance worker for the building, noting his
(15:58):
master key could have opened in Shannon's apartment without force.
He denied any involvement and passed a polygraph test in
nineteen eighty four that carried weight. Today we know polygraphs
are unreliable, but back then a pass could shift focus
away from a suspect entirely. Perhaps the most frustrating dead
end came from an anonymous tip line call. On June third.
(16:20):
A man claimed to have overheard two people at a
bar talking about the girl in Garden Grove. He said
one of them mentioned she didn't see it coming and laughed.
The caller refused to give his name. Detectives checked bars
in the area but came up with nothing. The tip
was logged, then left to gather dust. Reading through the interviews.
What stands out is how many people wanted to help
(16:42):
and how many seemed to enjoy the attention of being
connected to a murder case. Even loosely false memories, embellishments,
and outright fabrications tangled the investigation. Forensic evidence wasn't giving
detectives much to work with either. The fingerprints collected from
Shannon's apartment belonged mostly to her and known visitors. A
(17:03):
few unidentified prints were found on the kitchen counter, but
without a match in the state database, they were useless.
The hair fibers collected from the crime scene were analyzed
for color and texture, but without DNA they could only
narrow them down to dark brown, possibly male. Still, detective
Malle and his partner pushed forward. They conducted fifty seven
(17:24):
interviews in the first month. They worked long days, often
into the night, chasing down every possible lead, but by
late June the reality was setting in. They didn't have
enough to arrest anyone. In my conversations with surviving members
of the original investigative team, the frustration is still there.
One retired officer told me we were working blind. We
(17:47):
didn't have the tools, and every day that passed made
it harder. Another said, I still think about the ones
we ruled out too fast. It's easy in hindsight to
point to mistakes, but in the summer of nineteen eighty four,
they were doing what they could with what they had,
and what they had wasn't much. Each lead faded, each
suspect was eliminated or left hanging without enough evidence. By July,
(18:11):
the file on Shannon rose Lloyd's murder was getting thick,
but the space for primary suspect remained blank. That blank
space would stay that way for decades. But before it did,
the detectives would take one more shot, a last push
before the case began to cool, a push that would
prove both desperate and dangerous. Chapter four, The case grows cold.
(18:33):
The turning point came quietly. There was no dramatic announcement,
no press conference declaring failure. One day the detectives were
working Shannon's case full time, and the next it was
just another file in the stack. It was late summer
nineteen eighty four when the momentum truly slowed. The early
flood of tips had thinned to a trickle. The news
(18:53):
coverage that had once run daily was now buried on
page five if it appeared at all. Other crimes newer, louder,
more so were taking priority. In the Garden Grove Police department.
The walls of the homicide unit told their own story.
Each case had a whiteboard with names, times, and leads
scrawled across it. Shannon's board had been crowded in May
(19:14):
and June. By August, half the writing was erased, the
rest had gone stale. The persons of interest list was
now a list of people we talked to. The once
promising theories had been crossed out with thick black marker.
The decision to scale back wasn't malicious, it was practical.
Detective Robert Malley was assigned a new homicide in September,
(19:34):
a double shooting in a motel parking lot. His partner
was pulled to work on a series of armed robberies.
The unofficial message was clear, unless something big breaks, this
case is on hold. For Shannon's family, the change was devastating.
Her mother, Patricia, kept a spiral notebook of every phone
call with police. In the early days, there were daily updates.
(19:57):
By the fall, the entries were weeks apart. On oct
Toober second, she wrote, detective says nothing new asked again
about the wine glass, he says, they're still waiting on
the lab. The lab results, when they came were useless,
no fingerprints clear enough to match anyone outside the people
already known to have been in the apartment. Evidence handling
(20:17):
in nineteen eighty four was a different world. The murder weapon,
if it existed, was never found. The hair fibers, fingernail scrapings,
and clothing were stored in paper envelopes, sealed with tape
and labeled by hand. The storage facility was climate controlled,
but not by today's standards. There were no tamper proof barcodes,
no digital chain of custody logs. Items were checked in
(20:40):
and out with pen and paper. Years later, a forensic
expert would tell me it's a miracle the sample survived
in usable condition. At the time, though no one was
thinking about decades. They were thinking about the next week,
maybe the next month. In nineteen eighty five, there was
a brief flicker of renewed interest. A man in Sand
Diego was arrested for a string of assaults that bore
(21:02):
some similarities to Shannon's case. He targeted women in their homes,
often entering without forced entry, and attacked late at night.
Detectives compared notes, even drove down to interview him in person.
He denied ever being in Garden Grove. Without DNA, they
couldn't tie him to the crime scene. He was eventually
convicted for the assaults in San Diego, but any link
(21:25):
to Shannon was speculative at best. By nineteen eighty six,
the investigation was effectively dormant. It wasn't officially closed homicides
never are, but it had joined the growing list of
cold cases that sat in storage, waiting for a break
that might never come. The file was thick enough to
fill a banker's box. On the side, written in black
(21:46):
marker were the words Lloyd Shannon Are homicide. May twenty first,
nineteen eighty four. That box would follow the department through
three building moves. Over the next three decades. It would
sit on shelves in evidence rooms and file archives, gathering
dust but never disappearing entirely. For the family, the years
that followed were measured not by milestones, but by absences,
(22:08):
birth days, holidays, weddings. Each one was a reminder that
Shannon wasn't there. Patricia called the police at least once
a year, usually on the anniversary of her daughter's death.
She was polite but persistent. Each year, the answer was
the same, nothing new. The case's cold status also meant
the rumors took on a life of their own. People
(22:29):
whispered that the killer had moved away. Others said he
was still in town, hiding in plain sight. Some believed
the police knew who it was, but couldn't prove it
without answers. Speculation became its own form of folklore. In
nineteen ninety, a small article ran in the Orange County Register.
Six years later, no arrest in Garden Grove Murder. It
(22:50):
was a single column with a grainy reprint of Shannon's
smiling photo. The peace quoted Patricia, who said, simply, we're
not giving up. We can't. By the time the nineteen
nineties ended, the world had changed. DNA was becoming a
tool for solving crimes, but only in the most clear
cut cases, usually when biological evidence was fresh and abundant.
(23:12):
Shannon's case didn't seem like a good candidate. The samples
were old, minimal, and possibly contaminated. Testing them in those
early days would have consumed all the material with no
guarantee of results, and so the box stayed sealed when
I first saw it decades later. The tape was brittle,
the handwriting fading, but it was all there, the photographs,
(23:33):
the reports, the diagrams of the apartment, the tiny envelopes
holding the evidence. At the time, I didn't know that
those same envelopes would one day hold the key to
solving the case. In nineteen eighty four, they didn't have
the science, In nineteen ninety four, they didn't have the funding,
and in two thousand and four they didn't have the will.
But in twenty twenty one, all three would finally align.
(23:57):
Until then, Shannon's murder was a wound the city learned
to lie live with, quietly, painfully, and without closure. Chapter five.
New tools, Old wounds. The mid nineteen nineties brought a
quiet revolution to law enforcement. For the first time, detectives
had a tool that could do what no witness, polygraph
or hunch ever could, DNA testing it began making headlines
(24:19):
in high profile cases. In nineteen ninety four, DNA helped
convict O J. Simpson in the court of public opinion,
long before a jury reached its controversial verdict. Around the
same time, a man named Kirk Bludsworth became the first
American death row inmate to be exonerated by DNA evidence.
These stories made the technology sound like magic, a perfect,
(24:41):
unbreakable link between suspect and crime scene inside police departments,
though the reality was less glamorous. The tests were expensive, slow,
and prone to failure if the evidence was degraded, and
in a cold case like Shannon rose Lloyd's, degradation was
almost a given. I met retired forensic analysts Linda Carver
in her small Orange County home in the late nineties.
(25:04):
She'd worked in one of the few California labs capable
of processing DNA for criminal cases. She remembered when Shannon's
file crossed her desk, not for testing, but for review.
It was nineteen ninety eight, she told me. Flipping through
her personal scrap book of solved and unsolved cases, I
saw the note that there were fingernail scrapings and some fibers.
(25:25):
The problem was, back then we needed a lot more
material than we do now. If we tested it and failed,
that was it. There'd be nothing left for future testing.
So the decision was made to hold off. The evidence
stayed in storage, still sealed in its original envelopes. It
wasn't unusual. Departments all over the country were sitting on
old cases, waiting for technology to catch up to their evidence. Meanwhile,
(25:50):
DNA was making headlines for its role in solving other
decades old murders, a nineteen seventy six case in San Diego,
a nineteen eighty one murder in Sanford, Cisco. Each success
sent a jolt of hope through the families of other victims,
including Shannon's. Her mother, Patricia, called the department after each one.
Can't you do the same for Shannon? She'd ask? Each time.
(26:13):
The answer was cautious. Maybe someday, not yet. The nineteen
nineties were also the era of California's DNA database expansion.
The state began collecting DNA from convicted felons and later
from those merely arrested for certain crimes. The database grew
slowly at first, then exponentially. Detectives knew that even if
(26:33):
they didn't have a suspect in mind, one could emerge
if their DNA ended up in the system. But there
was a darker side to the progress. Cold cases were
being prioritized based on likelihood of success and public interest.
Cases with famous victims or multiple unsolved killings got funding first.
Shannon's case, tragic but quiet with no other known linked crimes,
(26:55):
often fell to the bottom of the list. In two
thousand and two, there was another close call. A detective
new to the cold case unit pulled Shannon's file and
submitted a request for partial DNA testing on the finger
nail scrapings. The request made it through two layers of
approval before being denied for budget reasons. The money went
instead to a case with two child victims, which had
(27:18):
a higher chance of yielding usable DNA. Patricia never knew
about the denied request. She kept calling every year, marking
the anniversary with a fresh plea to look at it again.
Her persistence became part of the case's unofficial time line.
Detectives knew the call was coming each May. Some took
it as a reminder of their unfinished business. Others saw
(27:39):
it as a burden they couldn't lift. By the late
two thousands, the forensic landscape was shifting again. Newer testing
methods like str short tandem repeat analysis required less material
and could produce results from older samples. Still, the backlog
was immense. California's crime labs were drowning in requests, Shannon's
(28:00):
case sat in line year after year. When I asked
retired Detective Mallely about that period, he sighed, it wasn't
that we didn't care. We did, but I had cases
stacking up on my desk every week. Unless something came
in that put her case back in the spotlight, it
stayed where it was. And yet even in limbo, the
case wasn't entirely forgotten. In twenty eleven, an evidence review
(28:23):
team audited the department's cold cases. Shannon's was flagged as
having viable biological evidence, a note that would prove critical
years later. The review also confirmed that the envelopes containing
the fingernail scrapings and fibers were intact, still bearing their
original nineteen eighty four seals. That same year, another shift began,
(28:44):
the rise of familial DNA searching. It was controversial, raising
privacy concerns, but it also opened a door for cases
like Shannon's. Even if the killer wasn't in the database,
a relative might be. By twenty fifteen, technology had reached
to point where the old samples could finally be tested
without destroying them, but the process required a dedicated cold
(29:06):
case unit to prioritize the work. Garden Grove didn't have one.
What it did have by then was a new generation
of detectives, people who had grown up with DNA as
part of policing, who understood its potential. One of them,
a detective named Karen Holt, first read Shannon's file in
twenty sixteen. She told me she was struck by how
(29:27):
solvable it seemed. You had preserved evidence, You had a
crime scene with no forced entry, You had a victim
who almost certainly knew her killer. That's not nothing. Still,
Holt's request to test the DNA went nowhere. The lab
backlog was still years long, and the city had more
recent homicides to process. It wasn't until twenty twenty, nearly
(29:47):
thirty six years after Shannon's murder, that the cold case
unit was formally reactivated, with Holt at the helm. By then,
technology had advanced to the point where even degraded samples
could yield results. The tools that had once seemed out
of reach were now standard, and in the middle of
a pandemic, with crime rates shifting and budgets being reshuffled,
(30:08):
Holt found her opening. The finger nail scrapings were sent
to the lab in early twenty twenty one. Three months later,
the results came back for the first time in thirty
seven years, the name of a living suspect was linked
to Shannon's murder. But before the arrest, before the headlines,
there was the moment that changed everything, a quiet click
of a mouse in a dim lab and the appearance
(30:31):
of a match that no one had expected.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
Football’s funniest family duo — Jason Kelce of the Philadelphia Eagles and Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs — team up to provide next-level access to life in the league as it unfolds. The two brothers and Super Bowl champions drop weekly insights about the weekly slate of games and share their INSIDE perspectives on trending NFL news and sports headlines. They also endlessly rag on each other as brothers do, chat the latest in pop culture and welcome some very popular and well-known friends to chat with them. Check out new episodes every Wednesday. Follow New Heights on the Wondery App, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to new episodes early and ad-free, and get exclusive content on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And join our new membership for a unique fan experience by going to the New Heights YouTube channel now!