WAS HANNIBAL LECTER A PSYCHOPATH

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:02):
Welcome to the Psychopath Podcast, a podcast that discusses everything
about psychopathy. Here's your host, doctor Carlos.

Speaker 2 (00:39):
Have you ever wondered what your furry friend is really thinking? Well,
let me introduce to you my new book, Dog Psychology
by doctor Carlos Vasquez. As a psychology professor with over
ten years experience, I've unlocked the secret of the canine psyche.
I will teach you how to understand your dog's body language,
to code their barks and wines. It's all behavioral and

(01:00):
strengthen your bond like never before. With Dog Psychology, you'll
see the world through your dog's eyes. Don't just be
a dog owner, become a dog whisperer. So go get
Dog Psychology by doctor Carlos Vasquez, available now on Kendle
or paperback on Amazon.

Speaker 3 (01:25):
But they will look at Hannibal Lecter. A lot of
people say he was the quintessential psychopath. Or was he? Yes,
we know Hannibal Electric poured a glass of kiante and
a candlelit room, his eyes gleaming with a predatory calm
to the world. He was a cultured psychiatrist, a connoisseur
of arts and cuisine, Beneath this polished mask of persona

(01:46):
lies a mind that devours not just fine meals, but people.
So let's look at the shadow of the repressed, dark
aspects of the seulth we deny, and they look at
it as through a sun Youngian lens. You can picture
Lecter in the Sons of the Lambs, taunting Clarisse, starling
from his cell. His words are precise as demeanor, aristocratic.

(02:07):
You can see Lecter as an archetype, unbounded figure who
has integrated his shadow, not to heal, but to dominate.
Unlike most who fear their darker impulses, Lecter embraces his
He kills not out of chaos, but with purpose, crafting
each murder. It's for a grotesque work of art. Yet
Lecter is more than a shadow. According to Young, He's
also a trickster, as a boundary crosser, a figure of

(02:29):
cunning who defies norms and exposes hypocrisies. Young believed the
path the wholeness of individuation required facing the shadow and
integrating its lessons. Lecter, however, perverts the journey. He does
not seek balance, but transcendence through destruction. He wants the
shadow to dominate, but his Hannibal lecter a good representation

(02:51):
of psychopathy. Well, let's find out his charisma is undeniable.
In Red Dragon, he captivates Will Graham with his intellect
even as he probes for weaknesses. His polished manners encyclopedic
knowledge make a magnetic so it's a high score in
the PCR. His grandiose sense of self worth is also
a high score. You can see awa sels he's views

(03:12):
himself as superior and predatory among prey. He also kills
without hesitation, so there's a lack of remorse and guilt,
which is also a high score in the PCL. He
expresses no regret, only satisfaction. Shallow affect has also included
cal and callousness and lack of empathy as chilling cruelty,
I mean his cruelties and chillingly impersonal. He orchestrates murders

(03:34):
like those in Hannibal. There's another high score in the
PCLR manipulative of deceitfulness. That's easy, self said, that's high.
Also the only thing he's started to score a little
in mind, he scored moderate arm would have been impulsivity
and poor behavior controls Here electro diverges a little bit.
His actions are calculated that impulsive. However, his risk taking

(03:55):
and taunting the FBI hints it a little bit of
a thrill seeking streak. After if you were to score
him and you, according to what we based it on,
Lecture would likely score near the maximum of forty. Yet
he defies the stereotype of the chaotic psychopath. His intelligence
and discipline make him high functioning psychopath thriving in society's
blind spots. Just to give you an idea, Bundy was

(04:17):
about a thirty four thirty five. So Hannibal Lectra a psychopath? Yes,
he was.