Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:09):
Welcome to the Real Story. I'm your host, Riley Lewis.
Thank you for joining us. Today's top story brings us
to Iran. See Tensions between Iran and the Western world
continue to escalate, and it all centers around Iran's nuclear
program and their ambitions. Now there's a solid foundation of
distrust between the most powerful Western countries on Earth, including
(00:33):
the US, the UK, France and Germany and the current
authoritarian regime in Tehran, and the distrust seems to be
growing worse by the day. And this whole breakdown of
trust really stems from a mix of historical grievances, ideological
clashes in contentious geopolitical rivalries. However, ongoing disputes over Iran's
(00:56):
domestic policies, there are regional activities and nuclear ambitions have
created this delicate yet volatile situation that's garnering attention from
leaders all over the planet. Now in the modern era,
much of it pertains to around support for terrorist organizations
like Hamas has Belah and even the Huthis and Yemen,
(01:17):
But the source of it all really dates back to
nineteen fifty three. That's when the US and the UK
orchestrated a coup that overthrew the country's democratically elected prime minister,
Mohammad Mosadae. Mosaday nationalized the country's oil industry, threatening Western
interests and ending foreign control over the country's oil fields.
(01:39):
Western forces then swiftly responded by removing him from power,
engaging in an unprecedented regime change to protect economic interests,
and then after the coup, Mosaday was sentenced to three
years in prison for treason and then place under house
arrest for the remainder of his life, all while the
Shah returned to power with the support of the West
(02:01):
until nineteen seventy nine, when his government was ousted in
the Islamic Revolution that led to the rise of an
authoritarian theocracy that still rules the country today. From that
point onward, tensions between Iran and the West have skyrocketed,
leading to sanctions, proxy conflicts, and even direct confrontations, with
(02:22):
the US military striking three nuclear sites inside of the
country earlier this year and a mission dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer.
That was when B two stealth bombers dropped bunker buster
bombs weighing thirty thousand pounds each to decimate their nuclear infrastructure,
and a move that was predicated on the belief an
(02:44):
unconfirmed belief that Iran was close to reaching the ability
to manufacture nuclear weapons. Whether or not that's really true
is still debated to this day, but in the meantime,
Western forces are turning up the pressure on the Ayatola
So to that point, Britain, France and Germany have fired
the starting gun on the UN snapback mechanism, slapping a
(03:07):
thirty day countdown to revive punishing sanctions on Tehran's regime
that were lifted under a former President Barack Obama's twenty
fifteen nuclear deal. This step, detailed in their recent letter
to the UN Security Council, targets Iran's violations of the
deal's terms, like enriching uranium beyond limits and stonewalling UN inspectors,
(03:29):
violations that exploded after President Trump's pull out from the
deal in twenty eighteen. Now the Europeans are demanding Iran
restore full access for inspectors, explain its vanished enriched uranium stockpiles,
and jump into direct talks with the US by September's end, or,
of course, watch the economic hammer fall hard. However, with
(03:52):
Iran now holding fuel for multiple bombs if pushed to
weapons grade. This isn't diplomacy as usual. It's a wake
up call to an aggressive regime that seems to be playing.
Speaker 2 (04:02):
The world for fools.
Speaker 1 (04:04):
Iron's mulas are howling in response, though, bringing the EUS
move as illegal and regrettable. In fact, a top official
from the country told Reuters they won't buckle under pressure,
dangling vague promises of continued talks but warning of a
harsh response if sanctions snap back, including the nuclear wildcard
(04:24):
of ditching the non proliferation treaty all together, which is
very interesting, but amid economic turmoil and internal squabbles, Iran's
defiance rings hollow. They've ramped up enrichment to dangerous levels,
although it's unclear if they've actually reached the exact levels
needed to produce nukes. Now, on top of it all,
(04:45):
they're demanding ironclad guarantees against US or Israeli strikes just
to sit at the table, a move which comes after
new talks in Geneva this week about that nuclear program fizzled.
So where exactly does that leave things as of now?
Well here with the answer to that question is Alireza Jafarzada,
(05:05):
the deputy director of the National Council of Resistance of Iran.
He's also the author of The Iran Threat. Ali Reza,
thank you for joining me.
Speaker 3 (05:15):
Thank you so much, Riley. Always a pleasure to be
on your show.
Speaker 1 (05:18):
So what do you make of this current situation, as
volatile as it is.
Speaker 3 (05:23):
Well, I think you summed it up very well. It
dates back to many years ago in nineteen fifty three
Coup Dettai against the democratically elected Nationalist government of Doctor
Mosader and interestingly, the clergy, the Mosque, the predecessors of
(05:44):
Romeni were actually the collaborators to bring down a mossadare
really and the alliance between the monarchy and the clergy
dates back to those years. And that's why one of
the reasons that actually you saw the revolution, which was
a very genuine revolution in nineteen seventy nine stolen by
(06:06):
the clerics because the Shaws suppressed the nationalist movement, suppressed
the intellectuals, created the secret police Savak, and created the
notorious ev in prison, putting everyone who were intellectuals who
wanted freedom and democracy in jail, and then at the
same time empowering the clergy the Mosque, giving them money
(06:30):
and resources. So when the time came for change, the
SHAW had already uprooted the nationalist movement, the true democratic forces,
or they were already in jail. And then the Molas,
using the network of the Mosque, managed to steal a
genuine revolution which they really had no role in that revolution.
(06:51):
Homeny was sitting idle in Iraq until four months before
the success of that revolution. And I think that's where
you can see the story. But the focus should be
really on the desire of the people. As you mentioned earlier,
the people of Iran don't want nuclear weapons, they don't
want terrorism, they want they don't want killings, they don't
(07:12):
want to threaten their neighbors, they don't want to missile
a program whose goal is just to threaten the region,
and as part of the nuclear weapons program. That's where
really the focus should be, and that's really the root
of the conflict. The real conflict is actually between the
people of Iran and the ruling regime. And of course,
(07:34):
now the good thing is that we now finally have
some of these Western nations who used to be on
the side of the Molas in Tehran distancing themselves, snapping
back sanctions on the Iran regime. But this is just
a starting point. It's a very important starting point. It's
a sharp, important departure from the policy of appeasement in
(07:58):
the past, but there are still many steps that needs
to go until you actually truly eliminate the nuclear threat
of the runner regip.
Speaker 1 (08:07):
Okay. So with that said, what is the next step
in that process?
Speaker 3 (08:12):
Well, technically speaking, when it comes to the View and
Security Council, as you mentioned earlier, there are thirty days
period that if nothing happens between these thirty days, the
sanctions will automatically come back by the end of September.
(08:33):
And by sanctions I mean all of those sanctions as
a result of six UN Security Council resolutions dealing with
their arms a program, their missile program, their nuclear their
terrorism visa ban, all of those. It's a very powerful
set of sanctions. And by the way, these were the
(08:53):
sanctions that brought the Ietolos to the negotiating table. But
what happens after that, if we make sure that the
process goes properly, then you know the focus has to
be how to follow up in terms of the desire
of the people. Remember, this is a regime that is
(09:15):
extremely weak very vulnerable. This is not the same regime
of five years ago.
Speaker 1 (09:20):
Six years ago.
Speaker 3 (09:21):
The majority of the population are against it. There have
been several rounds of major uprisings in Iran since twenty eighteen.
The allies of the regime in the region, you know,
you mentioned Hesbala, you know, a whole host of them,
including their big ally Assad in Syria. They're either badly
shattered or gone. And this is the time for the world.
(09:43):
Without foreign boots on the ground, without appropriation of money,
without arms, sending arms to the opposition or anything like that,
they can see, they can have the opportunity to see
change in Iran by the people of Iran, by the
organized resistance. This is the new reality of Iran that
I think, this is a historic opportunity the outside world
(10:06):
need to take up.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
That's really interesting. I guess only time will tell Ali Reza,
but it sounds like the days for the it Tools
regime are numbered. It's only a matter of time. And
again we're talking about what the people of Iran want,
and that's really what's most important, not what the West
wants or their interests, but the interests of the Iranian
people themselves. People who should be able to choose their
own leaders, so we'll see what happens. But Ali Reza,
(10:28):
thank you for your time today and your insight. I
appreciate that. Thank you so much.
Speaker 4 (10:33):
Riley.
Speaker 3 (10:34):
You know you mentioned the people of Irania. Keep in
mind that a vast majority of these nuclear size were
exposed by the organized opposition in Iran. Just come by
next week September sixth, Saturday, there's a huge rally of
tens of thousands of Iranias gathering in Brussels to support
(10:54):
the snapback, to support the free democratic republic form of government,
and to free the ten point platform of the Irana
Resistance led by a woman, interestingly, missus Malliam Radja Vi,
and to tell the world that, as you said, the
people of Iran have already made up their mind. It's
(11:15):
the rest of the world that need to stand on
the on their side and and and and see the
outcome of a genuine change in how it would impact
the whole region and the whole world.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
Wow, that's really interesting. We'll have to bring you back
for more updates about that after it happens, but in
the meantime, thank you for being here today, Ali Reza,
Thank you so much.
Speaker 3 (11:37):
As a pleasure.
Speaker 1 (11:38):
Coming up next, the liberal media establishment is once again
trying to defeat the MAHA movement and divide President Trump's
base once again by exploiting some recent changes at the CDC.
Doctor Robert Malone joins us to discuss, so stay tuned
for more details.
Speaker 5 (11:55):
After the break, watch an live on cloudtv dot com
and see what you're missing. Download the cloud tv app
and watch one America News Network wherever you go, visit
klowd tv dot com Today. That's klowd tv dot com Today.
Speaker 1 (12:21):
Welcome back to the real story. Another day, another Democrat
scheme to divide the movement to make America healthy again.
Why Democrats want the MAHA movement to suffer is quite obvious,
because it's far easier to control people who are sick
than it is to control people who are healthy and strong.
But even still, their latest attempt to divide the MAHA
(12:43):
coalition is just sad. Whether or not this latest attempt
will actually work also remains to be seen. However, it
all centers around a significant shakeup this week at the
CDC and a decisive strike against what looks like some
sort of deep state style obstruction from our own health agencies.
(13:04):
Susan Monterez, the now former CDC director who was confirmed
less than four weeks ago by the Senate, was fired
this week. It comes amid her open refusal to advance
the administration's reforms under the guidance of HHS Secretary RFK Junior.
Now Monarez reportedly clashed with him, specifically over limiting vaccine eligibility,
(13:27):
a long overdue curb on the endless jab mandates that
defined Joe Biden's overreaching era. But now her own attorney,
Mark Zaid, is crying foul. In fact, he claims that
she was asked for refusing to rubber stamp unscientific, reckless
directives and fire dedicated health experts. However, on the flip side,
(13:50):
White House spokesperson pushed a sigh laid it bare, saying
that she isn't aligned with the President's agenda to make
Americans healthy, again, confirming her firing after he balked at
resigning despite earlier signals to HHS leadership. But interestingly, this
whole purge didn't stop there. In fact, the agency has
(14:10):
recently seen a mass exodus of entrenched bureaucrats, including Chief
Medical Officer Deborah Howry, Immunization Director Dmitri Dasalikis and Daniel
Jernigan from the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases.
Howry wailed in her resignation email that vaccines save lives,
(14:32):
saying this is an indisputable, well established scientific fact, while
Descilakis dramatically warned of a pre vaccine era where only
the strong will survive, exposing the hysteria these officials peddled
under the old regime. But meanwhile, Monterez even tried roping
in Rhino Senator Bill Cassidy to shield her after Kennedy
(14:54):
demanded her resignation, but the whole thing backfired, highlighting the
resistance from far I'm a funded insiders. What happens from
here is unknown, but this whole situation raises a serious
and urgent question for today's next guest, is the CDC
the enemy of the American people? Now Here with his
(15:15):
thoughts and insights is doctor Robert Malone, an author, physician,
and scientist who also serves as an advisor on the
CDC's Vaccine Recommendations Committee. Doctor Malone, thank you for being here, sir.
Speaker 6 (15:27):
Thanks a lot, Rayley, and I'm just going to quick
get in this disclaimer, I'm representing my own point of view,
not those of the CDC, the ACIP, or the US government.
Just to be clear on that.
Speaker 1 (15:39):
I appreciate that clarification. Thank you so. Having said that,
what are your thoughts about the shakeup this week at
the CDC?
Speaker 6 (15:47):
So it's fascinating. What is a secretary to do if
somebody that reports to him decides to go to a
sitting US Senator and complain. I see how the administration
had any other choice than to assist her in finding
new employment outside of the US government. The fascinating thing
(16:13):
was the cascade of resignations once it became clear that
she was no longer going to be serving as CDC director.
And you've named some of the names now the report
of the six hundred approximately employees that were also terminated
just about at the same time. That's a little bit
(16:33):
misleading because these were people that were actually made redundant,
let's say, using a British term is common quite a
while ago when DOAGE was deep in its budget cutting
activities and they appealed their redundancy to the court system,
(16:55):
and just recently the courts decided that yes, in fact,
the president had the right to terminate these individuals or
make them redundant, and so that's why they're all leaving.
But then that doesn't explain this exodus of the top
tier people just under Monterres. And these are folks that
(17:18):
mostly were appointed under Biden. And what I can tell
you that, you know, I'm not supposed to speak about
things that are going on on the inside, but there
has been a whole lot of slow walking going on
for weeks and weeks and weeks now and obstructionism over
whether basically the core issue has been whether the CDC
(17:41):
staff are able to control what the Remember, this is
a federal advisory committee chartered to provide independent advice to
the Director of the CDC. That's what the ACIP is.
And these CDC bureaucrats that we're appointed under Biden largely
(18:03):
to my eyes, through DEI channels in many cases. For instance,
one of them notoriously is a poster child for the
S and M movement and labels himself the activist doctor.
That would be that gentleman, and that's one of the
most gentle images on the web right now of him
(18:25):
he is. And there's another one, yeah, there they are
so he has been objecting to and attempting to block
the ability of the COVID Subcommittee to decide the things
that it should look at in terms of the safety
associated with the various COVID quote vaccine products, and insisting
(18:51):
that it is the right of the CDC staff to
determine what the ACIP staff are allowed to look at,
what data they're allowed to look at. And this came
to a head in the form of this obscure document
that is basically a definition of scope of work. And
(19:15):
there was a very active attempt to block the ability
of the ACIP subcommittee to investigate the things that it
thinks needs to be investigated and to appoint the people
to testify to them that it thought ought to be appointed.
So the effort was made to only appoint to the
(19:35):
subcommittee for testimony those people that were affiliated with these
various professional societies. In other words, the same old people
that were in before that are associated with things like
the American Academy of Pediatrics that notoriously now has been
outed as receiving big bucks from all four major vaccine companies,
(19:59):
and oh, by the way, also the one really pushing
the gender reassignment surgery agenda. So the you know, to
his credit Retsuf Levy, and this is fairly public now
so I can talk about it. This statement of work
associated with the scope of what the COVID's working group
(20:22):
is going to be looking at, is now published. That's
kind of what triggered this whole cascade. And doctor Levy
has a RETSU of Levee, a full professor at MIT
specializing in risk analysis and risk mitigation. Yes, he happens
to be Israeli, uh, and he is deeply committed to
(20:46):
the science of risk analysis. Who's setting up the subcommittee?
He has put his foot down and said, no, I'm
not going to allow the CDC staff to determine what
it is that we're allowed to look at, talk about
consider as we assess what we would advise the CDC
(21:08):
director regarding these products in their use.
Speaker 1 (21:13):
Yes, as villains are something all for wanting to make
this country happy and healthy and strong. It's just disgusting, doctor, truly,
but I thank you for your time today and for
your your insights into this because it's so oppressing and
so important, So really thank you. Thanks for having me
on coming up next planning to take a road trip
for Labor Day weekend, well, it looks like gas prices
(21:35):
will be lower for those that are planning to hit
the road, and it's all thanks to common sense energy policy.
More details about it after the break.
Speaker 5 (21:49):
Watch AM Live on cloudtv dot com and see what
you're missing. Download the cloud tv app and watch One
America News Network wherever you go. Visit k l owd
tv dot com Today. That's klowd tv dot com Today.
Speaker 1 (22:09):
Welcome back to the real story. Labor Day weekend is
right around the corner, and as millions of Americans actively
prepare for barbecues, celebrations, and much needed road trips across
this great land, there's some encouraging news at the pump.
Average gas prices are projected to drop to just three
(22:30):
dollars and fifteen cents per gallon, the lowest price scene
since the scandemic lows of twenty twenty and that's a
very welcome drop from last year's average of three dollars
and twenty nine cents per gallon. It's also a stark
contrast to the crippling five dollars highs that Americans suffer
through in June twenty twenty two, under the Biden regimes
(22:52):
regulatory stranglehold. Now, this news alone is fantastic or should
I say fuel task, But here's the real kicker. Experts
are crediting this relief to the Trump Administration's aggressive energy agenda,
which has unleashed over two hundred pro energy actions since
(23:13):
President Trump took office. Again, that means this isn't some fluke.
It's also not some matter of rocket science or great mystery.
It's really just the Trump effect in action yet again. So,
while refinery outages have nudged prices higher recently in several
different states, and as California braces for potential eight dollars
(23:36):
gas by twenty twenty six as refineries actively flee Democrat regulations,
Trump's focus on fossil fuels has already pushed electricity generation
from these sources to a nine year monthly high. But
now the very important question is does this trend signal
a long term return to affordable energy? Now here with
(23:59):
his answer to that question is Mark Morano, the founder
of climatedepot dot com. Mark, thank you for being.
Speaker 7 (24:05):
Here, Thank you, Riley, happy to be here.
Speaker 1 (24:07):
So, first of all, happy almost Labor Day weekend to you,
and what a way to celebrate with record low gas prices.
Tell us more about it.
Speaker 7 (24:15):
Mark, Well, here's there's a couple things there. First of all,
Donald Trump, when you come in on day one and
you just unleash American energy through the regulatory system, he
declared an emergency. He declared two hundred actions in two
hundred days, opening up oil gas, returning to coal, putting
(24:36):
all sorts of strategic mining off, short drilling, everything into action,
to the point where since George Washington was the first president,
we've never seen this much oil and gas production in
the United States. It's the highest level ever recorded by
the summer of twenty twenty five. So everything's booming. And
if you know about the way gas markets work, and
(24:58):
I think the reason the prices are now dropped into
these five year lows is simple because they these are
futures markets. And when you look at the price barrow,
when you look at all, it's almost like a feeling.
They go by this, and so this is what affects
the energy prices, and the future is looking very dominant,
energy dominant, and I think that is one of the
reasons gases coming down. Plus the record production and this
(25:21):
plus the continuation of these policies. So if you go back,
as a contrast, Biden's first term was day one shutting
down the Keystone pipeline, day one, getting us back into
the United Nations Climate Serty and zero, and the Green
New Deal. So just the signal you send to the
marketplace is phenomenal. Now, we have a lot of work
(25:42):
to do because utility electric prices for consumers are still high.
But there's other issues there. There's also that AI demand,
and it's also a lot of equity asset now buying
up people like black Rock and Blackstone buying up utility
starting in Minnesota and other places. And there's a great
fear here because of that AI boom that they're going
(26:03):
to buy up these utilities and create monopolies and keep
prices artificially inflated. So that's not a good development, and
that's something that's not coming from the federal government. That's
coming from the private equity asset world understood.
Speaker 1 (26:16):
So, now that we have gas prices dropping, energy is
more affordable, Please walk us through some of the implications
for what that means for the cost of business and
the overall cost of living in this country.
Speaker 7 (26:27):
Well, I think we're just getting started with this. I mean,
I think in the next six months to a year
to two years, we're really going to start seeing the
impact of this, because energy is the backbone of every
the entire economy, of every sector of the economy, whether
you're talking food and the transportation of food, whether you're
talking the transportation from agriculture, whether you're talking any sector.
(26:50):
The economy is going to have a base of energy.
How cheap is it to transport things, how cheap is
it to live? And I think this is going to
be the great legacies and the key here. This is
actually the key because we just talked about the futures
and how the markets feel and how the companies. The
Donald Trump two point zero is blowing away Donald Trump
(27:12):
one point zero on climate, energy in the environment one
point oh was great as far as it went. He
did a lot of great things, but they didn't go
after two goals. They didn't go after well, they didn't
go after the umbrella of permanence. Everything they did was
undone by Biden and within a few months of a permanence, Yeah,
the permanent effect. So I'm giving you the larger picture
is Trump two point zero is going after permanence. They're
(27:35):
going after getting us out of the UN Climate Treaty process,
which began in nineteen ninety two under George H. W.
Speaker 4 (27:41):
Bush.
Speaker 7 (27:41):
If they do, that makes it very hard to get
back in. And they're going after the CO two endangerment
findings set up by Obama's EPA, which says carbon dioxide
is a pollutant which can be regulated under the Clean
Air Act, something the Clean Air Act never intended to do.
And by the way, humans exl carbon dioxide, which means bingo, yes,
you got it. We've been regulating our breath as a
(28:02):
human pollutant under the Clean Air accents President Obama. And
so this is this is the things that if you
get rid of the underlying assumption of that and the
regulatory scheme of that, and you get us out of
the UN, that requires a new treaty to get us
back in for the next president AOC or Gavin Newsom
or whoever you know, climate disaster we would end up
with theoretically down the road. That is the big difference
(28:24):
with Trump two point zero. So if he can make
those changes permanent, then you hamstring the ability of future
administrators administrations to get us back in to that energy
quagmire we were in under both Obama and Biden.
Speaker 1 (28:38):
Okay, So speaking of Biden for a moment, let's reflect
on what he did, because, as you just said very brilliantly,
energy is the backbone of the US economy and the
US way of life, and fossil fuels these are the cheapest,
most reliable energies on planet Earth, and yet Joe Biden
and his EPA administrator waged war on them. I want
(29:00):
to get your thoughts about the motivation behind that war.
Was it ideological, was it political? Or was it about
propping up the so called renewable energy business just to
stuff their own coffers at the expense of millions of Americans.
Speaker 7 (29:13):
Well, I mean I think it was all of the above.
You have this entire climate agenda essentially is you know,
it actually picked up great steam with the collapse of
the Soviet Union. And in our film Climate Uscle too,
we actually explored these connections. This is the international globalist left,
the Great Reset, the World Health Organization, the United Nations,
(29:36):
the billionaire class, from everyone from Soros to Bill Gates.
This is their idea of how to sort of rain
in US the unwashed masses. Riley In other words, if
we're left to our own devices, we create you know, racism,
and you know of control viruses, and we can create
a climate catastrophe. We all need to be managed. So
(29:57):
there's an ideological and a power control aspect there. There's
also just a money making scheme. I mean, when you
talk about President Obama's green stimulus eighty billion even I
think with CBS News reported like seventy eighty percent of
that money went to Democratic donors, the tens of billions
of dollars. Same thing with Biden's. We saw what happened
(30:17):
as Biden's leaven office going to Stacey Abram, money going
to John Podesta, all these Democrat advisors just you know,
rake it in the money with no experience in any
of these fields. But they were cashing in on these
government handouts. That's a big part of it. And of
course you have you know, the whole world is invested
in this again for control. You have corporate world, international,
you have academia, you have government class, the bureaucratic class
(30:41):
around the world. You have all the international organizations just
harping on this ideology. It's as old as human nature itself.
The idea is they will invent reasons why we can't
be free, and they're always looking for new reasons, whether
it was a COVID, whether it's terrorism, whether it's climate change.
They're always going to have some reason why we have
to give up our rights. That's as old as the
(31:03):
impulse to control of the human beings. So that's why
this isn't going away as a struggle. But the key
with Donald Trump two point zero's to make it difficult
for these great resettters to come back in and try
to undo all of his great work like they did
his first term. They really did. Biden undid Trump's first
term in large.
Speaker 1 (31:21):
Part completely with climate and energy, with the border, with
foreign policy, and the real progress we've made on the
world stage. That much is perfectly obvious. Mark, So very
good point. But now looking to the future, you said
there's more work to be done here in unleashing America's
energy dominance, bringing down costs of that the American people
can thrive again. Tell us more about that.
Speaker 7 (31:42):
Well, a couple things. The biggest thing, and Trump administration
is on top of this right now. So long battle
in the nineteen nineties, nineteen ninety seven, I've visited a
rare earth mine in the Mojave Desert in California outside
of the Nevada border. At that time, we were getting
ninety percent of our rare earth mining from US domestic minds.
(32:08):
Fast forward, seventy to ninety percent is now overseas, chiefly
from China. One of the things we need to do,
and this is critical because this is critical minerals. This
is for national security. This is for all the rare earths,
everything that from lanthanines which are used in catalytic converters
and computers and chips, all these different elements. We have
(32:28):
to restake our claim. And the mining we have to
restake our claim, and oriel gas we have to restake
our claim. And nuclear all these things that we've been
prevented for decades from doing. Not some well nuclear because
of the Left was just always afraid, irrationally afraid of
new energy, but all the other stuff was under the
guise of a climate emergency. We can't allow this. We
(32:50):
need in Trump administration is setting the stage for that.
And here's the number one thing. And I think this
might answer your question in an unexpected way. Not only
did that Trump administration doing permanence, but two point zero.
Trump is doing something that addresses exactly what you asked,
shifting the narrative. We now have a president and an
EPA leader, Leez Elden, who openly talked about the climate scam,
(33:12):
the climate cult, the climate religion, and they ridicule it.
Changing that narrative globally. This is what led Argentina to
pull out of the UN Climate Summit last year. This
is why France didn't send the delegation. This is why
al Gore is frustrated. This is why there's no US
delegation going in a cop thirty in Brazil. I'll be
going by the way Riley. I can do live reports
(33:33):
from the Amazon. But this is why. It's because we've
shifted the narrative globally now and they're openly mocking it
as a scam and a cult from government leaders. And
we have, for the first time since nineteen eighty eight
from the United Nations Climate Panel formed a official government
document from first government anywhere in the world to push
back a science document on the UN and that's the
(33:55):
Department of Energies Climate Assessment Report, which is the first
time ever a government around the world, for some of
the US government or any government has issued a rebuttal
to the UN climate reports, laying waste to all their
climate alarmism and fear monitoring nonsense, and top scientists from
NASA in Georgia Tech Institute and former Obama administration scientists
(34:15):
is another one. So all of that, that narrative shift
makes it much harder in the future for again a
president Gavin Newsom or President AOC to come in and
try to shift all that around. It's going to be hard.
Unlike the past when Trump one point zero, most of
his cabinet was like, oh, we're not going to touch
the narrative a climate. You go with every other Republican,
Romney McCain, George W. Bush, all of them accepted the premise.
(34:40):
So they were weak Republicans when you look back at that,
and this is why if you're strong and you say
absolutely not, and you call it a scam, and you're
in their face and you have scientific documents and official
government reports and you're changing the underlying regulations to make
permanent the changes, then you actually can look at the
future and say this is how you do it. The
(35:00):
old song, this is how we do it, This is
how we do it. Trump two point oh is how
we do it. We'll learned a lot.
Speaker 1 (35:09):
I just love the hustle and the focus so much.
And you're right though, the whole thing about this is
going after the narrative and the propaganda that's been untouched
for decades by You call them weak Republicans. I call
them fake Republicans. But either way, I love this so
much and I thank you for your time today, Mark truly.
Speaker 7 (35:26):
All right, Thank you, Riley, appreciate it.
Speaker 1 (35:28):
Coming up next, one of my own producers joins me
for a power ranking of the best and worst people
in all of Hollyweird. More details after the break.
Speaker 5 (35:43):
Watch AM Live on cloudtv dot com and see what
you're missing. Download the cloud tv app and watch one
America News Network wherever you go, visit klowd tv dot
com Today. That's klowd tv dot com Today.
Speaker 1 (36:03):
Welcome back to the real Story. As the Great Andrew
Breitbart once famously said, politics is downstream from culture, and
with that in mind, Hollywood's elite, commanding a staggering seventy
five percent of the global film market as of twenty
twenty five, aren't just acting. They're actively molding American society,
(36:24):
influencing everything from political views to family morals on billions
of screens worldwide. And while sometimes it's overt, like the
mobilization of Swifties registering to vote for Kamala Harris in
twenty twenty four, oftentimes it's more insidious, like say, putting
homosexual themes and overtones into films aimed at children, and
(36:47):
in this liberal dominated dream factory where box office hits
raking in over two thirds of international receipts, push agendas.
The real drama is how celebs weaponize their fame. Some
preach far left doctrines that erode traditional values, while others
champion decency, faith, and even kindness. Owen, let's not overlook
(37:10):
Hollywood's dark habit of shielding pedophiles until the spotlight turns inconvenient,
as we've actually pointed out on this program before. For example,
fugitive Roman Polanski, who pleaded guilty in nineteen seventy seven
to unlawful sex with a thirteen year old, actually snagged
a standing ovation at the two thousand and three Oscars
(37:31):
for the Pianist. Or how about Woody Allen, accused by
adopted daughter Dylan Farrow of childhood molestation in the nineteen nineties,
who kept collecting awards like his twenty twelve Oscar nod
or what about, of course, none other than Kevin Spacey,
dodged by underage assault claims from multiple men before his
twenty seventeen downfall, who was feted with two oscars amid
(37:55):
industry whispers. It's a cultural battlefield where creeps somehow get cheers.
Many Hollywood celebs have a large following, a big megaphone,
and they use it in the worst ways possible. However,
to be fair, there are some in Hollywood who actually
use their platform to promote good things like faith, family, freedom,
(38:19):
and patriotism. So with that in mind, now my next
guest will highlight the best of the best and the
worst of the worst when it comes to Hollywood A
listers who use their platform to shape society. So here,
with his insight, is the producer for this program and
now our resident pop culture nerd, or as he prefers, analyst,
(38:40):
Chris Cella. Chris, thank you for joining me.
Speaker 2 (38:43):
Always a pleasure.
Speaker 1 (38:44):
So walk us through the best of the best and
more importantly, the worst of the worst.
Speaker 2 (38:49):
Well, so I would have to start with Let's start
with the worst, and I'll end on end, on a
good note. It's a Friday. So Pedro Pascal, he is
everywhere right now. He had three films in theaters simultaneously
this past summer, and he's known as the Daddy of Hollywood.
That's what he refers to himself as there's only one
(39:12):
Daddy in America, and we know who that is. But
he's an effeminate, you know, pan sexual weirdo who, according
to Dakota Johnson, likes to wear women's clothing. He enclculates,
encapsulates kind of everything the Left wants men to be. Soft, effeminate, weird, confused, diverse, compassionate,
(39:33):
you know, kind of the perfect fit for their suicide
by empathy mold that they have. And he was. This
is a great example. Here's him at the con Film Festival,
looking so sad and sounding so morose, as if he
was at a funeral when he's at a press conference
for a film.
Speaker 8 (39:51):
So keep telling the stories and keep expressing yourself, and
keep fighting.
Speaker 3 (39:55):
To be who you are.
Speaker 8 (39:57):
And and I don't know the people that try to
make you scared, you know, and and and fight back.
Speaker 1 (40:07):
Wow yeah wow.
Speaker 2 (40:09):
So Pedro Pascal, the you know, the immigrant from Chile,
who you know, just his family, wanted a better life.
Now goes on social media after he's made it, become
a Hollywood A List millionaire. Talking about our country after
the election, he said, a dissent into total chaos, and
(40:30):
he's surrounded by neighbors who hate so deeply. So he
is just again wants to come to the United States
for a better life, and he's here trashing it. And
he's done that more than once. He equated Trump supporters
to Confederates and Nazis, with the text the Confederates were losers,
the Yatzis were losers, and the maga hat people are losers.
Speaker 1 (40:51):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (40:51):
He did not defend his co star on the Mandalorian
Gina Carano, when she made some tweets about COVID action interference.
You know her pronouns as well, exactly that, and he
would the way he Yeah, he behind the scene said
you should probably put a hashtag trans thing in your profile,
(41:12):
and she refused to do it because she has self respect.
But of course he immediately threw her aside, did not,
you know, threw her under the bus, did not defend
her at all, which is not surprising, and you know,
just continued about his ways, so he has a selective silence,
but then he will speak out and praise people like
(41:34):
our next person on this list, Rachel Zegler. So Rachel
arguably probably one of the most toxic, toxic women on
the planet, a whiny, entitled soulepsyst a brat who never
takes responsibility for her actions. She was she's adapting the
snow a remake of the classic beloved snow White film.
(41:57):
She goes on and says, it's weird, the prince is
a stalker. All of this just nonsense, And how do
you think it's really a kind of masterclass in how
to destroy any chances for a movie to make a
profit by you know that interview? Just watch that. And
of course the film did lose one hundred million dollars.
(42:20):
And what did she do. She blamed it on misogyny,
toxic fans. Same with Pedro Pascal Fantastic Four, which is
actually a good film. He said, you know, it lost money,
and he blamed Maga troll's review bombing all these other things. No,
maybe they just have you know, Marvel fatigue, superhero movie fatigue,
(42:42):
or possibly Pedro Pascal fatigue. You know that camp that
couldn't possibly be the case, of course, So you know,
Disney actually had to hire this as hilarious a social
media guru in twenty twenty five to monitor Rachel Zegler's
posts on social media because she is running around at
every single you know, event junket for the for this
(43:04):
movie screaming free Palestine, Free Palestine, while her you know,
her coworker, Gail Gadot, was a former IDF trainer, and
so there was a little bit of tension there obviously,
and then when the movie flopped, she of course, you know,
was dismissive of anything that could have been her fault,
(43:26):
and the producer, one of the producer's sons, actually blamed
it directly on her, not only her acting, but the
way she acted up the kill the film. So let's
move on to the good please. Chris Pratt an awesome guy.
This is his speech from the twenty eighteen MTV Award
speech where he lays out his rules for life. There
are nine of them, but here are a few that
(43:46):
really stood out to me.
Speaker 9 (43:48):
Don't be a tird. If you're strong, be a protector,
and if you're smart, be a humble influencer. Strength and
intelligence can be weapons and do not wheel them against
the weak. That makes you a bully.
Speaker 8 (44:02):
Be bigger than that.
Speaker 9 (44:04):
Number five doesn't matter what it is.
Speaker 1 (44:07):
Earn it.
Speaker 5 (44:10):
A good deed.
Speaker 9 (44:11):
Reach out to someone in pain, be of service. It
feels good and it's good for your soul. Number six,
God is real. God loves you. Number eight, Learn to pray.
It's easy and it's so good for your soul. And finally,
(44:33):
number nine, nobody is perfect. People are gonna tell you
you're perfect just the way you are. You're not. You
are imperfect, you always will be. But there is a
powerful force that designed you that way. And if you're
willing to accept that, you will have grace. And grace
is a gift. And like the freedom that we enjoy
(44:54):
in this country, that grace was paid for with somebody
else's blood.
Speaker 1 (44:58):
Do not forget it.
Speaker 2 (44:59):
We need more Chris Pratts. We need more John Voyds
and Hollywood agreed. Less Rachel Zeglers and less Pedro Pascals.
Speaker 1 (45:07):
Well said Chris, and truly thank you for bringing the
heat today. This is it's more than just wokeness. I mean,
you're saving lives with this kind of this kind of
messaging that you're hearing from Pratt and Void and others. Truly,
so I firmly believe in that message and thank you
very much for highlighting that for us today.
Speaker 2 (45:21):
Absolutely my pleasure.
Speaker 9 (45:22):
Thank you.
Speaker 6 (45:23):
Now.
Speaker 1 (45:23):
Coming up next Thursday, mark the sixty second anniversary of
Martin Luther King's I Have a Dream speech, and we'll
walk through that transformative, world changing moment in history to
honor it. More details after the.
Speaker 5 (45:36):
Break, watch OM Live on cloudtv dot com and see
what you're missing. Download the cloud tv app and watch
One America News Network wherever you go, visit klowd tv
dot com Today. That's klowd tv dot com Today.
Speaker 1 (46:05):
Welcome back to the real story. You know, this country
was founded on certain truths, truths that are universal and timeless,
immutable truths about the equality of all men and the
destiny that has been chosen for them by their creator,
not by man, not by institutions, certainly not by government,
(46:27):
but by God. And while man is certainly imperfect, God
is infallible, and he has given us everything we need
to understand how to treat each other on this earth.
That is exactly why I am extremely grateful to live
in a country that was founded on the idea that
it is self evident that all men, regardless of race
(46:51):
or status, are created equal in His image and likeness,
and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.
And while we know this to be true, history hasn't
always been so kind. In fact, people have had to
fight for their freedoms and their liberties time and time again,
(47:12):
even in this great country of ours now. Our founding
fathers like Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, John Jay, George Washington,
and Alexander Hamilton stood in this fight, but more recent
figures like the Honorable Martin Luther King Junior, stood steadfast
in this fight too. So it was this week, way
(47:35):
back in the year nineteen sixty three, that MLK gave
us famously rousing I have a dream speech right on
the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, and the world was
changed forever for it. Sixty two years ago, the country
was finally waking up to the self evident truth that
we are all brothers and sisters in Christ and created
(47:57):
equal by Him. MLKA even share these words on that day.
Speaker 4 (48:03):
So even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow,
I still have a dream. Yeah, it is a dream,
deeply rooted in the American dreams.
Speaker 9 (48:18):
I have a.
Speaker 4 (48:19):
Dream that one day this nation will rise up and
live out the true meaning of its creeds. We hold
these choos to be self evident, that all men are created.
(48:45):
I have a dream that one day, on the red
hills of Georgia, sons of farmer slaves and the sons
of farmer slave owners will be able to sit down
together at the table of brotherhood. I have a dream
that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state
(49:10):
sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat
of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom
and justice.
Speaker 6 (49:23):
I have a.
Speaker 4 (49:23):
Dream, but my four little children will one day live
in a nation where they will not be judged by
the color of their skin, but by the content of
that character.
Speaker 8 (49:38):
I have a dream today.
Speaker 1 (49:42):
Wow, really, really well said talk about a profound truth,
someone who is so brilliant and so visionary for this
entire country, a country that has come a very long
way because of the civil rights movement and the dream
that MLK shared with not just America, but the entire world.
(50:02):
His belief and truth that this country was founded on
sparked a change in America and certainly the entire planet.
All of human civilization was profoundly impacted by that speech.
To that point, his words still hold the hearts and
minds of millions and millions of Americans today, and we
will continue to remember his words and to honor them
(50:24):
in our own lives for ages to come. And that
concludes today's broadcast. We truly hope you enjoyed it, and remember,
we always want to hear from you, So please email
your feedback and any news stories you'd like us to
cover to the Real Story atann dot com and follow
us on social media at the Real storyan. So until
(50:48):
we meet again, God bless you, God bless our troops,
and God bless America.
Speaker 5 (51:00):
Watch o AN live on cloudtv dot com and see
what you're missing. Download the cloud tv app and watch
One America News Network wherever you go, visit k l
o w d tv dot com today. That's k l
o w d TV dot com Today.