Drones, the Fog, A.I. Jesus, A.I. Police, Life on Mars

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
They have to cheat in order to beat us, because
the truth is more powerful than their lives. And this
is a small battle in God's war. And I'm telling you,
when you're on the side of God, who can stand
against you?

Speaker 2 (00:12):
No one can't.

Speaker 1 (00:13):
And we're in the fight and we can't give up.
This is time for over dry.

Speaker 3 (00:27):
Destroy me.

Speaker 4 (00:30):
Chris Daunte Harris, I'm budgie on a run down.

Speaker 5 (00:35):
Nie, make my everyday dose mushroom coffee with me. You
might be skeptical, However, it be focused. The stain's energy
improves about health and more. Use one tablespoon of everyday
dose and two tablespoons of water, and then I froth it.
I like to make it really well, just to make
sure that it's all mixed together. Add some ice. Oh,
welcome having met kromer A.

Speaker 1 (00:56):
It's so pretty.

Speaker 2 (00:57):
I love it, and it's so This is the Rundown
Life today.

Speaker 1 (01:01):
Click on our link and your purchase will support this
broadcast of these two lovable guys.

Speaker 3 (01:10):
It's that time again. Time to relax, kick up your feet,
grab your favorite beverage, and tune into the Rundown. Live
your forecast into the future. Now you don't know it, Yes,

(01:33):
but you are listening to history the making while you
are listening to this show.

Speaker 6 (01:39):
We know now that in the early years of the
twentieth century, this world was being watched closely by intelligence
is greater than man, yet as mortal as result.

Speaker 3 (01:51):
Thanks, I want you to get up now.

Speaker 1 (01:57):
I want all of you to get up out of
your chair.

Speaker 3 (02:01):
I want you to get up right now, or go
to the window, open it and stick your head out
and yell.

Speaker 1 (02:10):
As hell.

Speaker 2 (02:10):
But I'm not gonna take this anymore.

Speaker 3 (02:13):
Censored by the mainstream media. The destroyer of fake news
and your host of The Rundown Live, Chris don T. Harris.

Speaker 1 (02:31):
Welcome to another edition of the Rundown Live Rundown Live
dot com. I'm your host, critically acclaimed journalist, reporter, and
radio host Christan T.

Speaker 2 (02:41):
Harris.

Speaker 1 (02:41):
Joining me this year is Don Vy, junior sidekick and
co host and one of a wonderful mind to have
on the program. As you guys know, if you've listened
to any of our past programs we are live on
kg R A.

Speaker 2 (02:53):
KGRA is our syndication.

Speaker 1 (02:55):
Go check them out as well as hey check out
uh you know, Everyday Dose. That's one of our sponsors
that helps us out as well. You can find all
that at the rundown Live dot com. Share this live
link in the comment dressed on comments in the chat.
We're live on Facebook, Rumble, kgra in just about anywhere
where podcasts are found. Thank you guys so much for
tuning in. And there's a lot to go over and

(03:16):
a lot to unpack. Is the world has been really
kind of spinning out of control, and it seems like
a lot of people believe we're just starting to get
a grasp onto things, and there's a lot of negativity
in the world all around. In fact, when we do
our broadcast often we talk about all the craziness that

(03:38):
is going on in the world, and you know, the
main idea is to offer solutions. So we're here as
a broadcast to try to feed your brain, be your
forecast in the future. And everybody's talking about a lot
of different things out there. Don people are talking drones
in the sky. We're going to dive into that. We're
going to dive into AI being used to spy on

(03:59):
your children and police to your home in school. You know,
they're literally spying on your children in school, and AI
is being used as the tool to do so, and
is a lerning law enforcement and sending them to your
children's home so you're home.

Speaker 2 (04:14):
Per se.

Speaker 1 (04:15):
A lot of people are talking homeschooling these days. Might
not be a bad idea, don but this year is
going to be interesting. Twenty twenty five. Today's inauguration day,
January sixth, the infamous January sixth, And it wouldn't be
fair to start off the show without discussing the Great
Insurrection of twenty twenty one.

Speaker 3 (04:34):
Yeah, I find it interesting that today, of all days,
you know, a lot of channels are discussing that I
saw earlier. I did a chance to catch it because
I was so busy today, but I saw the wrong
Paul Liberty report. They were discussing January sixth today as well,
and man, a lot of wild developments. What is it now,

(04:54):
three four years on since that infamous day? Quote unquote.

Speaker 1 (04:59):
Well, and it's interesting also to think that this for
those that don't know, many of you must know. Everyone
knows Donald Trump is our next president of the United States.
And today's the day they actually voted on making the
transition of Trump into office, and there was concern that
might not happen smoothly, but it seems like, just like

(05:21):
the Republicans, the Democrats are going to go ahead and
bow and allow Donald Trump to go ahead and take
over and be in office here. So January sixth, he promised,
he promised that he would release all those people that
were unjustly put in jail, and in prison, some of
them commit suicide, if I remember right, And what is

(05:43):
it that a lot of these quote insurrectionists end quote
did and I'm not here in support of any theory,
was twenty twenty rigged?

Speaker 2 (05:51):
I think they're all kind of rigged.

Speaker 1 (05:53):
I'm starting to adopt the idea that there are puppet
masters out there right and potentially subscribed to the theory
that since JFK, most of our politicians that are in
the whole important offices have been selected selected by multinational corporatis,
international bankers, and when they look at shaking you know

(06:16):
the which hand that is, you know they're going to
be dealt, they kind of influence it, whether through lobbyism
one way or another, or through some form of rigging,
or they try their best to get the outcome that
they feel which would be beneficial for the outcome of
their business and their best interest. On and so Donald Trump,
who was elected eight years ago, is now taking office,

(06:39):
and everyone believes, not everyone, A lot of people are
starting to believe that it is a here all, a
solution to all the problems.

Speaker 2 (06:46):
And I'm kind of a skeptic on that point.

Speaker 1 (06:49):
I don't want to poopoo because I believe every president
has done some good things. Don whether it's just to
keep us at bay or give us some scraps on
the table, or give us a little bit more. I'm
kind of interested to see what this administration holds. Is
he gonna get rid of the tips, you know, taxes
on tips. Are they going to get rid of private
property taxes because then you'll actually own your property? Will

(07:09):
you do anything that he said like putting Hillary and
Clinton in prison? Where he did it right, you know?
And he built that wall like a whole like five
mile stretch or something like that. I don't remember how
long it was, So a lot of times, there's a
lot of unfinished things that go on. But January sixth,
as you guys know, is an insurrection in twenty twenty.
That insurrection basically was to try to prevent Congress from

(07:33):
go ahead and okaying the transition from Donald Trump to
Joe Biden, and instead of postponing it, the Congress ends
up barricading themselves into the White House right and making
it look like an insurrection because a pipe bomb was
left in from the Republican and Democrat branches of office
the day before. And by the way, they have camera

(07:55):
footage of just about every insurrectionist, but they can't seem
to identify for sure the person who left the pipe bomb.
All we are told now is that it was an
off duty police officer who found the pipe bomb.

Speaker 3 (08:06):
Yeah, I found it interesting. I was actually perusing through
Law and Crime their website the other day, and I
didn't read it because I was in the middle of work.
I was trying to find interesting articles to cover. But
I did see that they had published a piece that apparently, now, finally,
all these years later, there is surveillance footage of the

(08:27):
individual whom allegedly left the pipe bomb on January fifth.
So I've found that to be quite interesting. Another thing
I found quite interesting about the whole twenty twenty four
selection cycle is that, you know, we look back at
twenty twenty and we see, you know, all of the

(08:49):
you know, the red side of the political statust cult
crying about, oh, the election is rigged. They you know,
mules and ballots and all these sorts of things. And
now for yours, you know, fast forward four years later
as oh it's too big to rig. They couldn't rig
it with you know, it's such a victory. And you know,
now we have you know, Donald Trump talking about bringing

(09:11):
in the biometric surveillance grid and digital ID and all
these things because of those those nasty immigrants that they're
you know, the manufactured crisis on the border has brought
in just like many of us, myself, Derek Bros Whitney Webb,
you have predicted over the past several months, Josh Sigurdson another,
you know, to name several who pointed out the false

(09:35):
pied piper that is the mega movement bringing in the
you know, the next phase of the great research.

Speaker 2 (09:42):
Well, and that's just that, right.

Speaker 1 (09:43):
Donald Trump is talking now biometric scanning and the need
for biometric scanning, which you know, if you're a religious eliot,
maybe even if you're let's say you're a Christian, you
believe in this thing called the mark of the beast
because the Bible talks about it.

Speaker 2 (09:59):
And what is mark of the beast. You'll need it.

Speaker 1 (10:01):
It'll be controlled to a way to control you, what
you buy, what you sell. How you can't do anything
without this alleged mark of the beast. And it's crazy
that they actually predicted this so many years ago? Was
it thousands of years ago? They talked about this almost
as if the scripture? What is a script?

Speaker 2 (10:18):
On when you're writing a movie? What is a script?

Speaker 3 (10:22):
So I get where you're coming from, but I my
brain's not able to like connect the dots to exactly
the point you're taking.

Speaker 1 (10:28):
Well, the term is a script when you write a
movie script, it's something that is a played out it's
predistant to happen. It's a scripture, like a script for
a movie, script like Bible scripture.

Speaker 2 (10:38):
Why do they call it a scripture?

Speaker 1 (10:40):
And when you think about it, it's almost like, uh,
they want you to believe it, like they're using it
as a map to get mind control of a large
populace because a lot of people identify as Christians and
we're talking biometric scanning. I think you made a post,
right was it? On Twitter? About the whole Donald Trump thing?

Speaker 3 (10:56):
Facebook? Facebook?

Speaker 1 (10:57):
Actually, well, let's pull that up for a second, because
it's interesting, since we're talking about we're talking about the
whole insurrection thing and the way things are going, what
is it that we are really getting with Donald Trump?
And the answer is maybe somebody that's a little bit
not or maybe not as bad as last the candidate

(11:20):
we thought, which was Kamala Harris, or maybe it could
be worse depending on how the deep state and the
international bankers really hoist and condition and engineer things.

Speaker 2 (11:32):
Right, So here we go. We're gonna pull this up.

Speaker 1 (11:36):
This is your your page here, don And what's interesting
to me on your page is the fact that you
guys can follow us on Facebook too. Is here's Donald Trump,
you know, at as greatest right talking about this. We're
gonna go ahead and unmute this and we'll go ahead
and pull this up here. Let's see, do we have sound?

Speaker 3 (12:01):
No, we don't, all right, not at the current moment.

Speaker 2 (12:07):
Not at the current moment. Why don't we have sound? Guys,
it's a real up here.

Speaker 7 (12:12):
We will ensure that this system is a tracking system,
which we need desperately for years, Congress.

Speaker 8 (12:20):
We will finally complete the biometric entry exit visa tracking
system which we need desperately for years, Congress.

Speaker 7 (12:31):
Is required biometric entry exit visa tracking systems, but it
has never been completed. The politicians are all talk, no action,
never happens. In my administration, we will ensure that this
system is.

Speaker 9 (12:46):
In place, and I will tell you it will be
on land, it will be on sea, it will be
in air. We will have a proper tracking system.

Speaker 3 (12:58):
Because we're losing.

Speaker 2 (12:59):
A lot of because of the Internet, and we have
to do something.

Speaker 8 (13:02):
We have to go seatfield gates and a lot of
different people that really understand what's happening.

Speaker 2 (13:07):
We have to talk to them.

Speaker 8 (13:08):
Maybe in certain areas, closing that Internet up in some way.

Speaker 2 (13:12):
Somebody will say, oh, freedom of speech, freedom of speech.
These are foolish people. We have a lot of foolish people.
We have a lot of foolish people.

Speaker 8 (13:22):
We've got to maybe do something with the Internet because
they are recruiting by the thousand.

Speaker 2 (13:29):
But that's fascinating. Like here, we have a whole group.

Speaker 1 (13:33):
How do you guys feel about having a biometric signature?

Speaker 2 (13:37):
Everywhere you go down the banks.

Speaker 1 (13:39):
Will require your retina scan or your facial scan. Some
banks already. I remember listening to a really old Alex
Jones episode like of Info Wars and he's talking about
how they needed fingerprints.

Speaker 2 (13:50):
He's like, right, have a fingerprun. Scanner's not the bank.
You can make your departit with the fingerprunt, you know.

Speaker 1 (13:56):
And as like thirty years ago, but here we are
fast forward and they're talking about biometric scanning and that
Donald Trump is like, yeah, okay, we're gonna have a
biometric fingerprint everywhere you.

Speaker 3 (14:08):
Go, right, but you knew it.

Speaker 1 (14:11):
And that's like, nobody wants that, not Republicans, not Democrats,
Americans in general.

Speaker 2 (14:17):
And then the whole freedom of speech thing. Whoa.

Speaker 1 (14:19):
When you think about those things that are being said,
that's terrifying. And now, don't get me wrong, you know
those are that's just the way the society is moving.
But that doesn't make it right. Right, everyone's getting used
to being surveilled. We have our cell phones that track
everywhere you go. So the rationalist out there who rationalizes

(14:39):
their abuse because this is basically abuse of government, right,
they're abusing you by surveilling you at all times, that
it is okay, that's all right. If our government decides
that they're gonna just have biometric scanning, they're gonna know
your fingerprint wherever you go.

Speaker 2 (14:55):
Everywhere you go.

Speaker 1 (14:56):
We talked about this on the show maybe ten years ago,
called God's Eye techno. It was I think in one
of the Batman movies where Batman's like, we dode Godard. No,
it wasn't Batman, but Batman was one of those things
where he identified the Joker and what floor he was
on and everything like that using tech. But it was
a fast and furious movie where he's talking about God's
Eye technology where it just follows the person throughout their

(15:17):
entire day. Everyone has a drone that follows.

Speaker 3 (15:20):
Them, right, And you know what, what I find to
be so just incredibly on brand for the ridiculous state
of affairs that we're currently in now when it comes
to us politics is you know, Donald Trump now talking
about the biometric surveillance and we need the surveillance for
you know this, that or the third And this is
the same guy that during his term was bitching about, oh,

(15:43):
they're surveilling me with the illegal FISO warrants. Barack Obama,
he's illegally spying on my campaign. And it's like, what
are you even doing? Is there a logical consistency anything like?

Speaker 1 (15:55):
But we're gonna spy on all Americans, citizens, all Americans
that come in and out of the country.

Speaker 2 (16:00):
Is that really going to stop terrorism?

Speaker 1 (16:03):
Done?

Speaker 2 (16:04):
Because isn't a terrorist? Isn't it a duty?

Speaker 1 (16:06):
Isn't it their way to find a way around those
systems without using them? And what does that really do?
I mean, it would be the same issue we have
so real terrorists. It isn't stopping terrorism, right, it's allowing
them to collect made a data on you, which is
the new digital gold, right, that's the new oil is
made of data. We give it a way free to
our spectrum Internet. We give it away free to AT

(16:28):
and T, to Cox and all these other internet data
mining corporations that give us and provide us Internet, and
we pay for it.

Speaker 2 (16:37):
We paid them to monitor us. Done.

Speaker 1 (16:39):
And then the government siphons that made a data illegally
through their routes and connections, and then they create citizen
threat scores and social credit scores on you.

Speaker 2 (16:51):
They're already starting to do this.

Speaker 6 (16:53):
Now.

Speaker 1 (16:53):
Imagine if they knew everywhere you went and everything you did.
It's all about controlling your behavior done, because that's point.
Maybe you decide that you're gonna go to a pub,
maybe you're like, maybe somebody's being unfaithful to their loved one.

Speaker 2 (17:08):
They're gonna have that data.

Speaker 1 (17:09):
They're gonna have extortion on everyone, and all of a sudden,
we're gonna live in a society where people aren't gonna
be allowed or feel like they have free will to
make choices without repercussions because the government will be able
to have that data, filter through the data and know
exactly what is going on. Because once you walk into
that house that you're gonna fornicate and cheat on your
loved one with, well guess what they got Google home

(17:30):
or they got ring doorbell, or they got the TV on,
or the cell phone is in the room. They're gonna
know at all times all people to put in your
social Security number, and it's just gonna bring up where
you went, your footprint throughout the day, everywhere you go,
everyone you communicated, what you talked about, and they'll be
able to pull it all up.

Speaker 3 (17:49):
That's yeah. And you know, sadly, not only that, you know,
like I mentioned previously, I mean, you know, you know
Donald Trump is now you know, he's on record is saying, oh,
we got to get the CIA involved. You mean the
CIA that was so allegedly you know trying to sabotage
his first administration, which of course I don't buy at all.

(18:11):
And you know what, the people also really need to
keep in mind when it comes to the whole we
got to institute the biometric surveillance because of terrorism, Well,
who are the terrorists they're talking about? So they're usually
bringing up the two major scapegoats, al Qaeda and ISIS.
Let's not forget that these are products of the CIA.
Al Qaeda created nineteen seventy nine through nineteen eighty five

(18:33):
Operation cyclone, authorized by President Ronald Reagan, and even before
Reagan at the very tail end of the Carter administration.
So let's not been seeing a lot of posts Jimmy
Carter died trying to deify Carter, and it's like, yeah,
he might not have been the worst out of the
last handful that we've had, but let's not put the
guy on a pedestal where he doesn't belong.

Speaker 2 (18:54):
And then, of.

Speaker 3 (18:54):
Course the creation of ISIS, you know, going back to
two thousand and seven, you know, the Earth twenty tens,
Operation Timber Sycamore. You know, we have people like Jake Sullivan,
who's you know, currently sitting in the National Security apparatus somewhere.
I don't remember exactly which office he's working in right now,
but Sullivan, people like Victoria Newland's John McCain, may he

(19:17):
rest in Hell, you know, working on this program they created.
This group isis DASH, you know, which is then you know,
went into what Alnosra front jabots Alnosra, which you know,
just recently another offshoots HTS, which I can't pronounce the

(19:37):
whatever the acronyms for, uh, you know, just over through Syria,
ousting the Assad government, which has been you know, long
long desired by you know, Western colonialists ambitions, and you know,
it's literally just al Qaeda rebranded to Alonosra, rebranded to HTS.

(19:59):
And let's not forget that infamous document from Wiki leaks
al Qaeda is on our side in Syria. I believe
that was Jake Sullivan to Hillary Clinton back in the
twenty ten, twenty eleven something along those lines. And so
you know, the terrorists that they're saying we need to
protect ourselves from are a creation of US intelligence. And

(20:20):
then of course, you know, most recently I saw this
morning they had some former CIA government stooge go on
the Sean Ryan Show talking about all the Iran is,
you know, working with al Katta to try to bring
missiles across the southern border into the US, and it's
all a bunch of nonsense.

Speaker 1 (20:40):
Well, so this kind of leads me to what people
have been seeing across the United States. And yesterday I
hung out with my best friend, Missy, and Missy and
I were talking in her mother and her new boyfriend
because their father, pastoring COVID, witnessed a drone that they

(21:05):
said was car sized, with a quad copter drone right
that was car sized, And when he pulled out his
cell phone and lifted it up to sky to film it,
it shot straight up and hid in the clouds, and
they said, you couldn't make it up. It was like
it knew what they were doing. And people all over
the United States are now seeing these things. So in

(21:28):
my local community forum, all right, we're going to share
this on screen. I live in a city called Old Creek, Wisconsin.
This is what is going on, and people are asking
these questions. It says, oh, there's none in the Rundown
Live group.

Speaker 2 (21:42):
We don't need that.

Speaker 1 (21:43):
It says January twod around eight to fifteen on Putz Road,
east of hollow by the train tracks. Two small plane
sized crafts hovering above residential neighborhood. I assumed they were
in coming planes to the airport, but as I got closer,
I realized they were not moving. Red and green lights
on the wings and bright headlight on the front. The
third one was spotted above the field across from we

(22:05):
Energy's plant intersection, because it's right by the electric plant
is here in mice Town and there's section thirty two.
My boyfriend was with me and witnessed is also I
was driving and it wasn't safe to pull over for picks.
I'm assuming these are what people have been reporting seeing
it all over And of course I commented, and I
could be home insurance companies making sure your home is
up to date, because we talked about that on the.

Speaker 2 (22:26):
Show right right.

Speaker 1 (22:28):
And it's crazy how they use drones. But you know,
people are seeing drones all over the place. They're flying
all over the place. And when we're talking about biometric scanners,
a worldwide grid where it's the United States is constantly
under surveillance. This is like the movie They Live With

(22:48):
Roddy Roddy Piper, which is a great movie. By the way,
Any conspiracy lover out there has seen the movie They Live,
and if you haven't, you failed at being a conspiratored
you know, which. Basically, it's about this guy who gets
a magic pair of glasses and when he puts it on,
he sees the propaganda in the world around him, and
he sees drones in the sky. Whenever he looks up

(23:11):
at the sky, there's a drone. It's surveilling him. This
drone sees me. Maria in the chat says, it's there
is a great movie. Absolutely, you guys, go see it
if it's if you haven't seen it, right, But They
Live talks about this and people people are talking about this,

(23:32):
and it's not like it's starting to hit my community.
It's starting to hit my neighborhood where people are seeing
these drones. My friend's parents saw these drones and they
act mysteriously and it's mostly at night. Why is it
that it's at night? And so I phoned a good
friend of ours, Mark D'Antonio. Mark D'Antonio has worked on
top secret government programs and he's a personal friend of mine.

(23:56):
I know he's a decent man, all right. There are
good people that work for government. There are good people
that have contract out for government, and he'll be joining
us tomorrow to talk about this more. But he told
me that he spoke with two people that work for
the Department of Defense and they claim these drones are
private contractors. And he said, I asked them, well, why

(24:18):
are they coming, why are they flying just that night?
And he goes, that's the weird thing, he said, if
they're trying to hide it. Drones are even more noticeable
at night because they have to have flashing lights makes
them make them visual, so other airplanes around could see them, right,
And why is it that there's these drones going over
our electric power plant, over our airport? And it makes

(24:40):
me wonder a couple of things. Don There's a couple
of different ideas that come to mind. But if you
and I want you guys to think about this for
a second. I also want to give this a chance
right now to open up the phone lines for you guys.
If you guys want to call into this broadcast and
you've seen these drones, we want to hear from you.
You guys can give us a call on this broadcast

(25:03):
on eight five, five four seven two fifty four eighty three.
We have it scrolling on the bottom and that's one
eight five, five, four, seven, two fifty forty three.

Speaker 2 (25:11):
What are these drones? And what do you think they are?
And we're gonna I gonna tell you what Mark told
me here in just a moment, right.

Speaker 1 (25:17):
So it's conspicuous, don when you're coming out of your house,
you're just doing your daily deal and all of a
sudden there's a drone. It reminds me of the drone
spotting app that Joycamp did that video. We're like, oh,
drone spotting app. Instead of, you know, looking for birds,
they're out there looking for drones in the sky. And
they're like, oh, I can check that one off the list.
You know, the Barack Obama got that one.

Speaker 2 (25:37):
You know.

Speaker 1 (25:38):
It's like it's it's becoming a reality. And what are
these drones doing? Because at night they're more obvious to
the lights flicker. Why is it that they're only doing
at night? Is it because there's less people out to
see them?

Speaker 2 (25:50):
Per se? I don't know.

Speaker 1 (25:52):
I just have a couple ideas, don Or, is this
the police state wrapping up for surveillance? Obviously it's a
private contract, because that's what Mark told me. Mark City
talked a couple of people at the DUD and it's
a private contractor.

Speaker 2 (26:05):
But what is it that they're looking for?

Speaker 3 (26:08):
So I have my own hypothesis, and I think it's
sort of a mesh of a couple of different things.
And first and foremost, a big part of this might
just be how jaded I am now. I don't really
believe the official story for anything, which I mean, obviously,
if you're in the conspiracy community, it's sort of a
you know that that's your entry ticket, right, never believe
the official story. But I think when it first started

(26:33):
happening with those drones over New Jersey, I looked into
it a little bit, and what I found interesting was
that right around the time the Jersey drone fiasco, hysteria,
whatever you want to call it, started coming up, it
was right around the exact same time that Congress needed
to reauthorize a new bill with the FAA. Is called

(26:53):
House Bill eighty six tens HB eight six one zero,
if I remember correctly, and it's it's a basically all
about reauthorizing some provisions with the FAA and some other
government agencies and extending this that at the third and
in Layman's terms to cut to the chase about expanding
government control over private drone ownership. And I even saw

(27:16):
several days after that maybe it's connected, maybe it's not,
but right here in Virginia, our local Virginia State Police
posted to their Facebook page talking about, oh, you're getting
drones for Christmas, then you need to take that down
and get them registered, and you need to have a
drone license and we need to know this, that and
the other, and I just know how about no beyond that,

(27:43):
I do think that partially it could potentially be weaponized
for the big disclosure syop that's been going on that
we've discussed on this program multiple times, been going on
since at least twenty seventeen, you know, getting people spooked
about mysterious drones or potential UFOs or you know, what

(28:03):
have you who knows. And then again, as you mentioned,
I think it could also very much just be a
part of, you know, a surveillance control grid. We know,
and we have covered on this program before, as we
have also covered at the Free Thought Project, more and
more police departments are finding ways around the restrictions, saying, well,

(28:24):
in some departments, in some states, they're not allowed to
have drones, and they're finding ways around those restrictions to
get them, and then in places where they don't have restrictions,
they're just you know, getting drones and using them for
you know, more policing, which obviously, you know, rights groups
and privacy groups are you know, very understandably sounding the
alarm on that because of the threats to you know,

(28:46):
personal privacy and things of that nature. So I think
it's probably a combination of all three of those things,
and more than likely something that I'm either forgetting or
just unaware of as well.

Speaker 1 (28:56):
So I'm going to tell you what my thought is.
If the drones are hovering over the power plants, they're
hovering over key areas that are close to the airport,
which is a big no no. It has to be
you know, I think the local law enforcement and local

(29:17):
airport and everyone else has to know that this is
happening at some level.

Speaker 2 (29:22):
They have to make them aware, right.

Speaker 1 (29:25):
But I think maybe they're worried about a terror threat,
whether it be staged or not, you laugh. But they
could be searching for radiation, They could be searching for
all sorts of different things using these drones, heat signatures,
whatever it might be. But why else would you need
to use drones to patrol over a certain area. Now,

(29:50):
this could be a false flag. It could be used
for like you mentioned, mentioned the UFO program, per se
to get people to buy in that what they're seeing
in the sky's UFO is, in fact, majority ninety nine
point nine percent of all UFO sightings are some kind
of explainable phenomenon, whether it's top secret government aircraft, regular airplanes, meteors,

(30:14):
whatever it might be. I mean, there's those crazy floating
orbs or alls, the lightning that people see, and all
those weird natural phenomenon, right, you know, we don't really
know pasthma.

Speaker 3 (30:25):
Right because I remember when the when the Jersey drone
thing was happening. A friend of mine who was in
the US military, he's posting about it, talking about it,
and I just commented on there because he's also in
the whole truth you know, UFO disclosure sort of thing,
and I just happened to comment on her. I was like,
you know, this is to me seems quite striking that

(30:49):
it's you know, it seems that it could very well be,
you know, a predecessor to Project Bluebeam, because we've been
warning about this for however, many decades, that they're going
to fake some sort of extraterrestrial contact in order to
drum up some fear about X, Y and Z. And
there's some unnamed individual who I don't know decided to

(31:12):
reply to my comments saying how stupid that was, to
which point I said, well, it's a lot a lot
more believable than just thinking that. Well, I guess Christan
acidentally clicked out and you know, closed out of his browsers,
as does happen sometimes. But I mentioned that, you know,
it's a lot more believable than just thinking that one

(31:33):
day the US government is just going to roll over
and tell us the truth about this most profound secret
that they have been keeping up from us for decades
and decades and decades. I think it's a lot more
likely that there's some sort of shenanigans going on.

Speaker 1 (31:49):
Well that's just it. What kind of shenanigans are we
talking about? And what is really going on in the
world around us, as we don't really know, for say,
what the government is planning and what it is doing.
All we know is Project Gluebeam is something that I
think was that Werner von Braun word about on his
death bet where they're going to literally fake UFO sightings

(32:12):
to go ahead and try to convince the world, right,
convince the world that UFOs are real. It's pretty interesting,
and that we need to be saved by government and
establish a new world order. Isn't that funny? That's the
long lasting conspiracy. And yet it's you know, people ridicule

(32:34):
you if you talk about it, right, So it's wild
to think about.

Speaker 3 (32:41):
Yeah, it most certainly is, And of course I do
think there are multiple facets to it. One thing that
I found myself thinking about just the other day was
now that they're moving forward and have been moving forward
since about twenty sixteen, more specifically twenty seven twenty eighteen, uh,

(33:01):
with this whole false flag disclosure sort of sy op
that's going on. Of course, I've always been very much
involved in, you know, researching UFOs and extraterrestrials and disclosures,
something that I've always very much carried about because it's
just something that I've I've been fascinated by ever since
I was a child and I saw this weird, unexplained

(33:23):
anomaly in the sky that I've you know, I've told
the story here on the show A couple of times,
and there it goes again. But it got me thinking
whether or not, or rather how much of what has
been so called quote unquote declassified by the CIA or

(33:46):
some other agencies or the US military over the past
several decades, was not or was it disclosed or declassified
deliberately as sort of a primer setting us up for this,
you know, psyop program that they have been sort of

(34:08):
gaming us on. You know, so you start going over
and thinking about Project Bluebean, some of those documents, you
start going and thinking about some of the Roswell pieces
that may or may not have been disclosed by certain

(34:28):
aspects of the government. Of course, I've contended quite often
that Roswell is generally the one that they tend not
to touch with the twenty foot pole. And for those
of you who remember our episode that we did with
Donald Raymond Schmidt, the world's foremost expert on the Roswell

(34:52):
UFO crash, you'll remember the points that I have made
about that in regard to in my professional opinion as
well as his and some others, that it seems Roswell
was the real deal, legitimate event, and hints why they
don't cover that because it would open way too many

(35:13):
cans of worms, but instead they'll drip out. Uh, you know,
any of these other number of documents and things of
that nature. And so, you know, again go back to
thinking about some of the declassified documents we got from
the very end of World War Two. Uh, the allegation
that the German forces down in Antarctica discovered a crashed

(35:33):
craft in the ice of Antarctica called the Glace otherwise
the Bell. Right, as I was discussing with the audience,
as you were getting your computer to be more temperamental,
I was discussing how much of these documents that have

(35:53):
been declassified over the past a few decades were done
deliberately to muddy the waters to set up the pregame
for this sye up. How long have they planned to
actually run this fake disclosure scam that they've been doing
for the past several years. Was it a spur of
the moment, oh we're going to do this now, you know,

(36:14):
around twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen, or has it been something
that has been in the works for a few decades.
Because if that is the case, the ramifications or the
potential ramifications or the implications of that and any or
not any. Yeah, any of the information that we have
gotten from the disclosure community raises the possibility that it

(36:37):
was a false bill of goods, that was a deliberate plant,
and the implications of that are staggering, earth shattering if
we really want to go down that rabbit hole.

Speaker 1 (36:47):
Well, okay, so let's talk about this for a second, unpacking. Right,
we got drones flying all over the place. It helps
with the UFO initiative, Maybe will help some funding of
drones security bills. Maybe you say, hey, a lot enforcement
needs drones to counteract, you know, local terrorist drones or
local organization military drones. We already saw that years ago

(37:12):
of them talking about it. But the idea that a
uf full false flag, an alien false flag, might be plausible, right,
that they might want that to happen. I mean, if
you search up Project Bluebeam, it comes all over the internet.
Varner von Braun warned that they're gonna hoax an alien
invasion for us to establish a new world order. And

(37:32):
that's the playgro book. They're programming you to believe that,
whether it's true or not, or they can do it
through holograms or drones or whatever. Like somebody credible, said
some wacky stuff and people ran with it. Right, Project
blue Beam holographic aliens in the sky.

Speaker 2 (37:49):
We need a new world order.

Speaker 1 (37:50):
We need to sit out there and be ready for
this alien invasion. Now, bart Sebral, we had bart Sebrel
on the show. If you haven't checked the episode, go
to Spotify, look up the Rundown Live on KGIA. Go
to the Rundown Live dot com right and look up
our episode with barts Sebral. Bart Sebral was a moon

(38:10):
landing hoax activist, claiming that the photos that were taken
which were our fraudulent and I guess the government is
working on a government sponsored documentary that would say, yes,
some of the photos were indeed filmed in America, but
yes we still landed on the moon even though those
were fake and we based them as real for so
many years. But he said something that was really interesting.

(38:33):
He said that people want to believe in a good
conspiracy by that meaning that we landed on the moon.

Speaker 2 (38:41):
It was a proudful moment.

Speaker 1 (38:43):
It was everyone like, no, like, you can't say that
was fake, that was a hoax, because that was a
pivotal moment in history, in American history, right, and it
was a good conspiracy. People wanted to believe it. People
want to believe in aliens. Donople want to believe we
are not alone, that there is more life out there.

(39:04):
In fact, there's a CIA document which we're going to
talk about on this broadcast, and we'll segue to it
maybe in a little bit about the government CIA documents
suggesting that there was once life on Mars right, and
why they believe it is one of the most astounding
ways they claim to have found this information out, And

(39:25):
we can lol about it after we talk about the story.
But the ideas people want to believe, they want to
believe the truth is out there X files right. People
want to believe that aliens exist. And there's people that
have had experiences, and I don't mean to take that
away from you at all. I've never had those experiences,
but you have, and maybe you believe in UFOs are aliens.

(39:46):
And I'm not saying there aren't UFOs, and I'm not
saying that there aren't aliens. I'm just saying people want
to believe. Not So if there was a UFO right
and it landed and they just so happened to look
like Americans, what would you think you know, what would
people think out there, what would you know all of

(40:06):
a sudden you'd be worried about national security? Are the
aliens already here? How have they hijacked government? And was
the New World Order their plot?

Speaker 3 (40:12):
The whole way, right? I mean, there are so many
different angles that we could go down once we actually start,
you know, traversing down that rabbit hole. I mean, you know,
there is the plausibility that I've heard that you know,
from from Roswell on, from the Roswell incidents. You know,

(40:33):
whatever race of extraterrestrials was involved in that, you know,
got in touch with the Truman administration and you know,
the Soviet Union, and that our governments have been in
contact with them, you know since then, with secret agreements
and this that and the third and all sorts of
unverifiable claims. And another thing to keep in mind, even

(40:56):
when it comes to the Project Blue allegations, one thing
that comes up or that I think about it, was that,
you know, allegedly this came from Verona von Braun on
his deathbed. And whilst of course, in the annals of
American history of Verona von Braun is you know, celebrated
as the founder of NASA, and he helped us win

(41:18):
the space race and get to the Moon and all
these sorts of things. Let's not forget that von Braun
was brought over here via Operation paper Clip. The man
was a high ranking Nazi scientist who spent the majority,
if not entirety, of the Second World War working on

(41:39):
the Nazi rocket program, particularly the V two rocket program.
And it was actually V two rocket technology that helped
allegedly build upon what eventually became the Apollo program and
the space race that occurred later on. And so it

(42:00):
also begs the question, I mean, how much can we
actually trust the words of a Nazi, a full fledged Nazi,
or even you know, how much can we trust the
allegation that he even made said to deathbed confession in
the first place, Because as far as I'm aware, there
isn't a you know, a notarized confession or an audio

(42:24):
tape or a videotape. Maybe there is, and I'm just
not aware of It would be really cool if there was,
because that'd be you know, pretty solid. It's like, there's
all of these different angles that we can look at,
even going further, so, like one of the major points
that I contend with when I discuss the potentiality of
extraterrestrial life is the sightings from antiquity. So there's a

(42:51):
site called The Pulse formerly known as Collective Evolution, run
by Joe Martino, and their main editors are John Wally,
a great guy's wonderfuljournalists. They've been in this game for
a really long time and they have covered a lot
of you know, UFO et disclosure sort of news over
the past decade or so. And Ar June recently, and

(43:12):
by recently I mean within the past year, so it's
probably been a little over a year wrote an article
two of them, I believe, where he discusses UFO sightings
in antiquity. So we're talking fifteen fourteen, thirteen hundreds, well
before aircraft, well before anything should have been flying in

(43:35):
the sky, and yet we have credible, firsthand witness accounts
of strange objects making these odd movements in the sky, glowing,
coming down, coming, going up and down, left and right,
all these sorts of things that if are they are
to be believed, which there are enough that have been

(43:56):
verified to say, you know, probably at least some of them.
You know, it really makes you wonder what the hell
is all going on? And of course I'm not really
one to buy into the whole quote unquote ancient aliens theory.

Speaker 2 (44:10):
Why don't you think aliens help build the pyramids?

Speaker 3 (44:13):
Well, so that's a little multifaceted. So I do partially
believe that it's possible, hypothetically for human beings to have
been genetically seeded by an extraterrestrial race and are very
distant past. I don't I haven't seen any evidence to
actually confirm that, So I just say it's, you know,

(44:34):
maybe possible. But as far as like the whole History
Channel series, like, it's such a load of hogwash. And
I love the meme, right with uh with with what's
his names Georgio? Yeah, with the Aliens, love the meme, uh,
And but it seems like a whole bunch of you know, TV,
let's get the viewers hype, advertizing.

Speaker 1 (44:56):
People are gonna tune in, right, And I've been on
Ancient Aliens. Well, a photo of me has been on
the Ancient Aliens, And that's a whole nother story. So,
but it's interesting when we talk about how people perceive UFOs,
and some people think they're demons, some people think they're
spiritual beings some people like me if you believe they're physical,

(45:19):
maybe they're the watchers that Samerian texts talk about. Allegedly,
the Sumerian translations talk about the aunaki Inki and Lil
Marduk and these gods Gadriel and all these ancient deities
that created man on this planet to do their bidding
and they left us in control. And what are we
doing with it?

Speaker 2 (45:39):
Right?

Speaker 1 (45:40):
So the whole ancient alien thing, the whole idea of aliens.
I never thought the government would run with it, but
since Disclosure, and we're gonna have Stephen Bassett on next Monday,
So if you don't know who he is, he's one
of the people that's been involved with Disclosure in Washington, DC,
along with Stephen Greer and others that are heavily involved

(46:00):
in Are there Apollo Asteria or my friend? And I
don't know if she's been on the show. I believe
I might have had her on the broadcast once. She
actually just came out a documentary. It was involved in
a documentary that was number one on Amazon that I published,
which you know, dives into the fact that majority of
these UFOs are potentially just top secret government aircraft and

(46:23):
why couldn't they be Why like quad copter drones that
can fly straight up and disappear real fast.

Speaker 2 (46:29):
Well, you know how that's what we see that they have.
What is it that they're keeping from us? Right?

Speaker 1 (46:34):
The government's already you know, fifty or seventy years ahead
of what they're showing. They already have those aces in
the back pocket, and they're working on new technology. So
it's interesting the new world order, the establishment the biometric
scanning drones flying around. So the point I was going
to make is, who's to say that these drones aren't
mapping out local communities for patrols, for future patrols of

(46:57):
law enforcement, so that if they get the money for
the bills, it will be a lot more beneficial that
if you call the cops don they'll be there immediately
because they're at the station waiting for you, and the
drone will just mail out the speeding tickets.

Speaker 3 (47:12):
Right. That's always been one of the big concerns when
it comes to the use of not only drones, but
just robotics in general with excessive policing. I mean, I know,
just over twenty twenty four we covered so many stories
on this broadcast of police departments bringing in robot dogs

(47:32):
or drones or you know, some sort of new biometric
scanning technology. You know, I think a lot of it
is really reflective of the way that the ten thirty
three program, which for those that don't know, is the
program that the federal government uses to basically give surplus
military technology to police departments at discount prices, you know,

(47:55):
furthering that militarization of police that's been going on since
the Clinton era, actually since before that, but Clinton really
drove it into overdrive, you know, and I think that
that's really you know, part and parcel to you know,
this continued militarization of police that's that's still going on,

(48:18):
and you know, it's it's quite concerning when it comes
to from a privacy rights standpoint, and not to mention,
just an excessive policing standpoint in general, because of course,
you know, to quote the founding fathers, of course, they
are the standing army that we were so warned of
at the you know, the founding of our country. Uh,

(48:40):
you know, this force that now exists to they say
they protect and serve, but they more so protect the
state and serve the rich. You know as it were, Christan,
if you're speaking, I think your mike is muted there, brother.

Speaker 1 (48:58):
Yeah, I mean so when it comes to the drone fiasco,
I see a lot on the Chinese drones, people drones
over America. Why are there's so many unexplained drones flying
over the United States all of a sudden mystery drone
sightings continue a New Jersey and across the United States.
I think that there's a couple of reasons. Maybe they
need now more money for a bill, and they want

(49:20):
to get people scared to call into their local Congress
and be like, yes, we need money for drone protection
from other drones, right, because that's how they're going to
spin it. They have a drone army, terrorists have drones.
There's gonna be a drone attack. See That's what I'm thinking,
don There might be a drone attack, and then they
can get that funding, that drone funding that they need

(49:40):
for a bill to protect our nation, because of course,
we can never allow a drone attack on American soil, right,
So why is it that a drone so you know,
attacked America. It's a false flay. So that would be
my idea in my card that I think that the
government may play like if I was the government that
was crony, it was deep state and wanted to mess

(50:02):
things up in this administration. First thing that would happen
drone strike. Then you can blame it on China, right,
get involved there, and or blame it on somebody else, Russia.
And then all of a sudden, we need money for
this drone bill. It's that simple. Well, he needs one casualty.
We're talking billions of dollars. People kill people for less
than that, for tens of thousands of dollars or less.

(50:24):
I don't even know. I'm not in that market, but
I can tell you that when we're talking billions of dollars,
people are willing to do pretty crappy.

Speaker 3 (50:34):
Things, right, you know, And that's essentially unfortunately the premise
that the entirety of the US government is based off of.
You know, it's all pay to play, you know, especially
once we start looking at the way that the international
banking cabal works with the US government or the corporate

(50:55):
interests in the way that they've had their hooks in
the US government, you know, going back over a century.
You know, at this point, everything that happens is because
of corporate interests and wealthy donors and you know, intelligence apparatus,
you know what's what can make the rich richer while

(51:16):
continuing to screw over the rest of us. They just
want to be left the hell alone.

Speaker 1 (51:22):
Which kind of brings me to the next subject that
people are talking about, mystery drones and mystery fog don
mystery fog. People are scared about fog like it's wild.
It's one of those TikTok sensations where I just want
to spend a moment to talk about this because a
lot of people have been posting about this, including other
activists what is. I reached out to my friend industrial

(51:45):
hygienis from the military, Kristin Megan Kelly, to talk to
her a little bit about it, and it's interesting. Here's
a video of somebody on TikTok kind of explaining what
they saw in what they're seeing across the internet with
videos of what people are, you know, here's some footage
of what people are claiming as nanoparticles in fog. Right,

(52:06):
people are seeing fae fog and when they use their flashlights,
allegedly they're seeing particles float. Otherwise they don't see them
and see the reflecting unless they use flashlights, which I
have a couple thoughts on this, but before we do that,
let's play this video from TikTok.

Speaker 10 (52:21):
Sterious fog has been seen all over the United States
at early hours of the morning, and people are getting concerned.
Like in this video here you can see there's all
kinds of little particles floating around, and it doesn't act
or smell like normal fog. People are concerned that it
might be chemical fog. Forty states have reported seeing this fog,
and here you can see it kind of looks a

(52:42):
little bit more like normal fog. That's because it's being
lit by the light in the sky, but when it's
darker and you use a flashlight, then you can see
it's little particles that are floating around. It doesn't usually
come at night, but only in the early hours of
the morning, like from five am to nine AM. And
people are saying it's happened in cities where they've seen
the drones flying around, and they're kind of concerned that

(53:04):
it has something to do with it. But I think
the thing that's concerning most people is the fact that
it has a very distinct and weird smell, sort of
like chemicals. Dense fog is one thing, but when they
introduce a new smell, that raises reason for concern. But
it's this video right here that I find the most
frightening because those particles do not look normal to me.

Speaker 2 (53:24):
But what do you guys think?

Speaker 10 (53:25):
And have you seen any fog in your town?

Speaker 1 (53:28):
So first thing I have to say is if this
was the case in forty some states, the Internet would
be just labeled with these videos of weird fog with reflecting.
Everyone who's driving a car would be like, what the
hill's going on? There's no snow accumulating on my vehicle,
but I'm seeing these particles all over the place. And
like Florida has never seen snow before. In fact, it

(53:52):
has maybe not in a long time, but Florida has
seen snow.

Speaker 2 (53:55):
It's not completely unheard of.

Speaker 1 (53:57):
And that's where people are saying all this fog and
people are seeing the drones, they must be spraying chemicals
to their credibility. Though I remember in twenty fourteen I
wrote an article that David Iike aggregated, which of course
I remember it because of that. In particular is South
Dakota was using drones to you do weather modification, and
some of those ingredients and weather modification are aluminum oxide,

(54:22):
which normally is less than a half a million nanometer
in size, so the EPA doesn't test for it. So
that's why accumulatively people are worried about Alzheimer's and other
health disease for Wells box stratospheric aerosol injections, that's the
technical term Wells bach lwlsbach aero stratospheric aerosol injections where

(54:45):
they fly a plane or drone and then they spray
a mist of nanoparticles. It reflects the Sun and then
allegedly cools the Earth because of you know, global warming
and not like al Gore stands to make you know,
billions and millions of dollars off of carbon credits. Right
that it's a real concern and even though we can't

(55:06):
measure it, we know what's happening. It couldn't be just
our path through the Solar system and around the Sun.
Of course, the Earth is warming, so we need to
spray toxic chemicals to do this. And it's funny I
mentioned Krista Megan Kelly. She's the original chemtrail whistle blower
who we got to get on the show. Here have
her on again to talk about this. It's been a
while since she's been on the broadcast. And I'll be

(55:27):
seeing her in Miami when I go speak at the counterparty,
which by the way, Tatiana Moros will be joining us
this Thursday, talk about counter party in Florida. So if
you're in Florida and you want to get a chance
to meet me, see me. I'll be there. But the
idea is this fog which looks like snow to me,
don just to call it all that looks like snow
to me, and it looks like somebody used it to

(55:48):
make a point. Fake videos, that's what's going around. That's
what's viral. Could there be chemicals in nanoparticles in the fog. Absolutely.
They say that mega tons of aluminum oxide are being
shared and sprayed in the sky to formulate clouds, right,
cloud seating a little as well as silver eyed eyed
that's another metal that's used to make clouds. It's interesting

(56:14):
because here we have people claiming, oh, there's spraying chemicals
with these drones. I'm not completely bought into that, but
I wouldn't say I put a past our government to
do secret to programs and do testing in certain areas
with spraying certain chemicals.

Speaker 3 (56:30):
Yeah, I mean, they certainly do have a history of
doing that, And that's why I don't completely right off
that theory off rip. I do tend to concur that
it's probably something a little more explainable or maybe just
you know, outright hoaxing on the Internet for clicks and

(56:51):
views because of just the way that social media is.
You know, I know that because TikTok is allegedly getting
banned on January nineteenth, which I've been telling people is
probably not going to happen because it has to by
as soon as they attempt to implement that, it's going
to have to be kicked up to the Supreme Court
and you know, the appeals Court and all this other

(57:12):
sort of stuff, which is probably going to cause it
to get stretched out even further. But because of that
and a lot of people believing that it is going
to get banned on the nineteenth, they're sort of just
going balls to the wall with whatever they want on TikTok.
But when it comes to the potentiality of this actually
being some sort of a nefarious operation, there is a

(57:33):
bit of a historical precedent that suggests or at the
very least illustrates that it's not completely out there. So
we have things like Operation Sea Spray that took place
in San Francisco in the early nineteen fifties, is where
the United States Navy was using naval ships to blow

(57:55):
in fog quote unquote artificial fog off of these naval
ships into San Francisco, basically conducting biological warfare testing or
simulations or something of that nature. Allegedly, they were unaware
of the harmful nature of the chemicals that they were

(58:18):
using until like a few people in it going to
the hospital, and then they realized, oh, this actually harms people.
And then there was another program that happened from the
late fifties up until the mid sixties, So this went
on for a few years, actually called Operation Large Area Coverage,
or the United States Army Chemical Corps and a couple

(58:41):
of other departments from the Gulf of Mexico all the
way up into Canada, so throughout the entirety of the
midwest of the US would have planes flying through spraying
a series of chemicals. They would have sprayers set up
on tops of large building and the official story for that,

(59:02):
particularly in places like Saint Louis, where there's still to
this day people suffering from the effects of these very
damaging chemicals that the army sprayed on them without their knowledge.
The official story at the time was, oh, we're running
smoke screen tests in case we get attacked by the Soviets,
so like that was the big the big lie. What

(59:24):
they were actually doing is it was another similar to
Operation c Spray. It was like biological warfare testing on
American citizens, you know, using these these chemicals that were
incredibly harmful, and I think Corpus Christi, Texas, along with
Saint Louis, Missouri, and a few other places where some
of the areas hit the hardest. But as I said,

(59:47):
you know, it stretched throughout the entirety of the Midwest,
and it's certainly those aren't chert that excuse me, English
is hard. Sometimes those two instances aren't the only incidents
where they would conduct tests like this. I mean, you know,
we cover on the show plenty of times where there

(01:00:11):
is a very vast documented history of spraying things in
the sky for biological testing.

Speaker 2 (01:00:18):
This Popeye, they openly admit to it.

Speaker 1 (01:00:21):
They have weather modification websites as the derivative of government
websites all across the United States, including Texas. So like
weather modification is a real thing, the idea, the slang
term chemtrail has been weaponized to disapprove the fact that
you engineering is going on. But there is a whole
website geoengineering watch dot org. You guys can check out

(01:00:41):
Dean Wingington. He does a lot of research there. Kristen
mgkelly was in the original what Are They Spraying For
documentary which discusses ground samples and testing of all that
stuff that was going on. But these are real things
that the government says is going on, and Maria and
the chat says, this usually happened at night. So is
that why it's at night? Because they're spraying chemicals and

(01:01:05):
they're toxic chemicals and there could be side effects, and
they don't want people to notice that they're doing aerosol
injections in these local communities in these areas well, it's
a possibility and missing the chat says, that's what I'm saying.
Done people agreeing with you don So this brings me

(01:01:30):
to the idea of these drones, right, I think it's surveillance.
Either they're checking for terrorism, they're checking some kind of
ratings or readings, or they're setting up a grid for surveillance,
which I think is the most likely to police you
and police everything you do.

Speaker 2 (01:01:45):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (01:01:46):
And this wouldn't be the start, because we already got
it in the news that AI cameras are turning in
drunk drivers. Here it is in the news right here
and right on our screen. A I say, new AI
cameras which can tell if a driver is drunk are

(01:02:07):
rolled out on UK roads. And so they got them
on the roads and they have these cameras that TELP
you're drunk already just hanging there in the roads, and
they'll re you know, report you, or the cops will
come get you. Why not on drones?

Speaker 2 (01:02:20):
Done? Right, you know, I police, The AI police is here.

Speaker 3 (01:02:26):
Done.

Speaker 1 (01:02:26):
It's we don't have to wait for the AI cops anymore.
That's the new police brutality.

Speaker 3 (01:02:30):
AI exactly, you know. And it's it's such an egregious
violation of you know, people's privacy rights. You know, it
should be one of those things that is you know,
inherently safeguarded. Of course, we don't live in a society
anymore that really values the rights of the individual. It's

(01:02:51):
all about collectivism, it's all about bowing down to the state,
the government. Statism. Of course, me as an anarchist, I
statism wholeheartedly because of that reason, because of it being
a collectivist ideology that ultimately usurps the rights of the
individual to you know, be the arbiter of their own

(01:03:14):
freedom to have their own autonomy and individual sovereignty. You know.
But in a world where people actually did give about
those sort of things, personal privacy right should be one
of the things that we uphold the most, you know,
because it's every person has a right to be secure

(01:03:37):
in their effects, in their privacy, in their private matters
without you know, just having it, you know, just free
for the entire government to see and know about. And
you know, sadly, this is something that's been going on
for many, many, many years. I mean, I wrote an

(01:03:58):
article probably two years ago this point discussing a number
of conspiracies that were true, and one of them was
mass surveillance. And I remember mentioning that there was an
article written in The New Yorker all the way back
in the early nineteen hundreds, I believe nineteen oh five
where they were discussing wire tapping in telegrams and you know,

(01:04:24):
the Morse code devices that they would utilize to communicate,
so you know, before the creation of telephones and things
of that nature. So it's been going on for a
very very long time, and of course, you know, became
widely publicly known around twenty thirteen when Edward Snowden blew
the whistle on the nssay's PRISM program and the warrantless

(01:04:45):
collection of you know, user data and things of that nature.
So unfortunately, this is just the next evolution of that.
You would think that citizens after finding out about the
mass illegal surveillance it was revealed by Snowden and you know,
Glenn Greenwald a number of these other individuals, that people

(01:05:05):
would have been up in arms and you don't have
the right to take our private information to use it
against us, you know, But of course that never happened.
So sadly we have these you know, the next evolution
of this, just integrate it with artificial intelligence. Yeah, that's a.

Speaker 2 (01:05:22):
Well, we're going to get there.

Speaker 1 (01:05:23):
They keep that thought integrated with AI because they got
a story we're going to talk about like the about
that here in.

Speaker 2 (01:05:28):
Just a moment.

Speaker 1 (01:05:29):
But on the same topic, schools are using AI to
send police to students' homes. So now in schools are
implementing AI, and we talked. I warned about this early
in the twenty eleven twenty twelve when I was writing
about common Core curriculum, and I'm like publishing government documents
saying that they're going to use retina scanners, vertebrae, posture monitors,

(01:05:53):
all these different things for students and surveill them so
that it at the end of the day they can
have some kind of communist manifesto where it just prints
out what schools they qualify for scholarships and what schools
they don't, but also will monitor all their behaviors and
you know, you basically become some kind of surveillance stand.

Speaker 2 (01:06:12):
They said, oh, you're a wild.

Speaker 1 (01:06:13):
Conspiracy theorist Christantiers and I even let a revolt at
the rn C and twenty fourteen about Common Court curriculum
warning that would lead to this. Now we got CRT,
which is, you know, common court curriculum communitarianism, communitarianism because
speaking is easy on crack, which is basically communism. But

(01:06:35):
schools are now using AI to send police to your
students' homes. So what is it our kids? You know,
So how could AI be used? Maybe kids are talking
about mom and dad and something that they did. Maybe
they're smoking pot and they're talking about it at school,
or maybe mom and dad are finding or abusive. I'm
sure there's some way. For some reason, they want to
shine this as a good thing. Right, AI sent the

(01:06:56):
police to the students home. They're a hero. Thank God
for a because that's the new God.

Speaker 3 (01:07:02):
Yeah, you know, that's that's typically how they sell these
sorts of things, you know, of course, you know, hearkening
back to what we were talking about at the beginning
of this program with you know, the biometrics and you know,
the border surveillance and the digital IDs and all these
sorts of things that the new Trump administration is just
so willingly pushing for. You know, even when we get

(01:07:23):
to you know, the integration of AI with mass surveillance,
or using AI in schools to send police to parents' homes,
they always tend to sell it on a bill of convenience.
Oh look, how convenient it is that you can use
this technology for X, Y and Z purposes or in

(01:07:44):
addition to the convenience, of course, a lot of times
they'll hit us with that whole greater good or public
good narrative, you know, the social contract, which is a
total arbitrary construct nonsense. But that's how they will sell
these things to get people to buy into it. Oh

(01:08:05):
it's for the greater good. Oh it's going to help people. Because,
of course, you know, a lot of the mainstream folks,
a lot of the normies, the average individuals, they still
live under the mythology of American police actually protecting and
serving the public. So if you say something like, oh,
you know, the police are the standing army that our

(01:08:26):
founding fathers warned of, and give all of these instances
of how the police are the force that enforces the
tyranny of the state against the people, and how they
do not help us. They do not protect us, they
do not serve us. That's all. That's blasphemy. We need
the cops for this. That and the third and a

(01:08:47):
lot of what I've been seeing, a lot of that
applies with this sort of AI technology. People are so
and not just AI, but I mean, you know, I
remember when we did our episode last year talking about
Apple Vision pro very similar. People are so just on
board with the cool new thing, and they're just totally

(01:09:09):
willy nilly willing to sign away any of their rights.
And of course, and this has been going on since
like Facebook. You know, remember when Facebook came out in
two thousand and four, it was the cool new thing.
Of course, it was shortly after the CIA terminated their
Lifelog project, which coincidentally is very similar to what Facebook

(01:09:31):
was shortly thereafter. And of course Facebook was seeded with
a lot of money from in q Tel, which is
a CIA front corporation. So it makes you think. And
then of course you have those little terms and conditions,
let us collect your data, let us get that metadata,
that new age currency, and so you know, sadly, it's

(01:09:51):
much like the cameras on the roads in the UK.
It's just the next iteration of these agendas coming to fruition.

Speaker 1 (01:10:01):
So on the life or on the line of the story,
schools using AI to send police to students' homes, it
says it was one of the worst experiences of her life.
Worst experience students. Schools are employing dubious AI powered software
to accused their teenagers of wanting to harm themselves. So
it's looking for suicide, isn't that interesting and sending the
cops to their homes as a result, when often chaotic

(01:10:22):
and traumatic, with often chaotic and traumatic results. So as
The New York Times reports, software being installed in high
school students' school issued devices track every word they type.
So if your kid uses a school tablet or laptop,
they're monitoring.

Speaker 2 (01:10:43):
Everything they do.

Speaker 1 (01:10:44):
An algorithm and that should be a given, don But
I don't think most people think like that, right, But
an algorilgorithm then analyzes the language for evidence of teenagers
wanting to harm themselves. Unsurprisingly, the software can get it
wrong by wallfully misinterpreting what the students are actually trying
to say. A seventeen year old in Neosho, Missouri, for instance,
was woken up by the police in the middle of

(01:11:04):
the night. As it turns out, a poem she had
written years ago triggered the alarms of a software called
go Guardian Beacon, which is a make which its maker
describes as a way to safeguard students from physical harm.
It was it says it was the worst experience as
over life. The teenager mother told New York Times it
was a wellness check, you know, just a wellness check.

(01:11:27):
AI is going to decide whether you need a wellness check.

Speaker 2 (01:11:31):
Let's check out Go Guardian. Here it is.

Speaker 1 (01:11:33):
We're gonna pull it up on the screen. What do
they say about Go Guardian, Well, this is what it
has to say. Go Guardian has prevented an estimated eighteen,
six hundred and twenty three students from physical harm since
March of twenty twenty.

Speaker 2 (01:11:46):
How do they know that, don.

Speaker 3 (01:11:49):
Well, I mean, obviously they're, you know, scanning all of
their information. You know, they're you know, they have an
algorithm to check through you know, the message and this
that and the third and you know, I find it
interesting that you know that this thing started working in
March or twenty twenty. Maybe they implemented it years prior.

(01:12:10):
Maybe they implemented it in March or twenty twenty. I
don't know, But I do know that throughout the reporting
that I did during the COVID era, child self harm
among children in adolescents and even suicide among children and
adolescents spiked during the COVID lockdowns. It was one of

(01:12:32):
the many just absolutely catastrophic effects of these of the
lockdowns that they put in place. In addition to you know,
drug abuse spiking, domestic abuse, spiking, child trafficking, spiking, all
of these things that the government so readily ignored in
pursuit of implementing this quasi martial law for three years

(01:12:57):
for a fake disease that has never been isolated, never
been proven to exist, that even by the official standards,
had a ninety nine point nine percent survival rate. But
I digress. So it's not shocking that, you know, it
started getting a lot of use during the whole COVID

(01:13:17):
era because of these spikes and adolescent and childhood self
harm and things of that nature. And if I'm going
to play Devil's advocate, on the one hand, I can
understand and even appreciate to a degree, having some kind
of technology in place to help prevent self harm, especially

(01:13:40):
among children. You know, as a survivor of suicide attempt
to myself back when I was a very foolish young
man many many years ago, I can appreciate anything that
actually works to try to help people who are struggling
with those kinds of demon actually continue to live. I

(01:14:04):
just can't appreciate when obviously these technologies are being used
for nefarious purposes, you know, sort of abusing the necessary
aspect of trying to help people who actually need it.

(01:14:24):
But you know, like I said, if I'm playing Devil's
aditt at.

Speaker 1 (01:14:26):
The government's job, though, don is it the government's job
to monitor you at all times for suicide? Here all
Guardian teacher says, fourteen thousand schools implement the software. Fourteen
thousand schools. That's a lot of wonder how many schools
there are in the United States, but fourteen thousand seems
like a lot. That's almost you know, two hundred and

(01:14:48):
fifty schools per state.

Speaker 3 (01:14:50):
Right, And the big thing that actually should be addressed.
And then that's why I was only partially playing Devil's advocate,
because what this kind of technolology does, it's only a
band aid over a gashing wound. They're more so looking
to treat the symptoms when they should be addressing what's

(01:15:13):
actually causing it. Don't just put this in place and say, oh, yeah,
we're going to use it to help, you know, prevent
kids from harming themselves. Actually take a look, zoom out
and ask why the hell young adults, adolescents and children,
because it's up in all three of those categories. Why
are young people starting to self harm more? Why are

(01:15:38):
young people starting to commit suicide more, what is causing
this mental health epidemic in America, That is what should
actually be focused on. But instead, as I mentioned, of course,
they're abusing the necessity to actually help treat mental health
for their own nefarious purposes of instituting this new you know,

(01:16:00):
surveillance grid AI sort of nonsense. And that's the part
that actually, you know, does piss me off quite a lot,
that they are taking the mental health crisis and epidemic
in this country and instead of actually addressing it to

(01:16:20):
prevent the self harm from happening in the first place,
they're using it for these agendas.

Speaker 1 (01:16:26):
While justify surveillance. Right, that's where we're going with this.
It's not the government's job to keep you safe. It
can't keep you safe, nor can it prevent suicide they
say it does. Who knows how those stats are thought.
By the way, it says that Goguardian prevents suicide and
self harm. Alerts, customizedable escalation paths and twenty four to
seven review of alerts supports student safety by identifying online

(01:16:49):
activity indicates the risk of suicide, self harm and harm
of others, so they monitor all that they want to
know what your kids are up to. So that being said,
a publican is pushing a bill to shoot down these
mystery drones that may or may not start surveiling you
for suicide too, because well, maybe maybe the government wants
to take these mystery jrones and find out anyone that

(01:17:11):
might commit a crime eaka minority report aka pre crime
AKA where we're going, because that's where this is going.
This is exactly I'm not even making this up. This
is one hundred percent where the government would love to
go with this big contracts, big private contracts with this
different organization, so they can have drones flying everywhere across
the United States at all times, right to go ahead

(01:17:33):
and then monitor what you are doing in real time
all the time, all the time. So in twenty fifteen,
I wrote about a city that was all automated, all robots,
all drones. They built it out in New Mexico, right completely,
They built a huge city just to test how a
fully automated world would work. Done all right, And so

(01:17:57):
in the news today, in the news today in the
US sun Toyota Town, which is one of these futuristic
towns that they built, there's a couple of them that
they in the middle of deserts, in middle of nowhere.
They've built completely automated cities where robots basically rule the

(01:18:18):
night Right.

Speaker 2 (01:18:18):
They rule the world.

Speaker 1 (01:18:21):
It's all automation, all robots, all the time, all the time.
And so they test drone delivery, they trust self driving cars.
These cities are used for the government, probably to test
out their automation, robot dogs, all that stuff, patrolling cities.

Speaker 2 (01:18:36):
I'm sure it's really interesting.

Speaker 1 (01:18:37):
But Toyota Town, Roboville, top secret living lab, robot city
of the future built near volcano, will become the first
human residents later this year. We'll get its first human
residents later this year. So they are now integrating up
to two thousand people into a completely automated surveillance smart city.

Speaker 3 (01:19:00):
And it's so you're like, no, yeah, I hate it, dude,
because we've been I remember the first time I ever
heard about smart cities, there was an article published by
Activist Post back in twenty eighteen, and I had no
idea what the hell they were talking about. So wiver,

(01:19:21):
I went and started doing my research. And of course,
you know, subsequently, over the years, you know, we've had
you know, some great personalities like Dan Dix and Jason Burmas,
you know, really go in and talking about these agendas
to create these you know, fully automated smart cities. I

(01:19:43):
know James Corbett has also done a fantastic job discussing
that this stuff is coming down the pike, and man,
it's just it's any nightmare you can think of with
regard to like the Great Reset twenty thirty agenda, New
World Order, surveillance, pana opticon, fully automated luxury communism, that's
exactly what these things are.

Speaker 2 (01:20:05):
Well, look at this thing.

Speaker 1 (01:20:06):
So they're showing us on the screen what we've been
talking about all along, and that's self driving vehicles will
have their own road and humans will have a separate
road because the biggest unfactored variable is human random activity
is human nature. Right, So if they can control how
vehicles drive, how fast they go, which way they turn,

(01:20:29):
how they turn, when they turn, where they go, you
can get in your self driving car and never have
to worry about it crashing. Right, the health statistics go
way up. So they're building the city much like we
talked about for a long time, how they would have
to do it with the self driving automated you know.

Speaker 2 (01:20:45):
Vehicle lane and then a human lane.

Speaker 1 (01:20:49):
Completely separate, and they have all these like sustainable development
buildings where they have the plants growing on top and
you know, make it feel real, let's say tropical Amazonian
really and not really like a major city. And then
not only that, it's gonna have NonStop surveillance, it's gonna
have the trash bind Ai robots, you know, the ones

(01:21:12):
that know whether you throw away recyclables or not so
they can ticket you. They'll have like when you walk
into a barrow, know what drink you want because you
all have been talking about it. You're gonna say that
you want that margarito when you go to your favorite bar,
and when you get there, the margarito will be waiting
for you, because the bar will be alerted that you're
on its way and that they're already charged your card
and the margarita's on the bar waiting for you and

(01:21:32):
you get there, right, They're gonna know what you're buying,
where you're buying, where you go, who you're with, who
you're not with, if you cheat on your husband or
wife or not. If you are a pastor and you're
being disingenuous and hanging out at the porn.

Speaker 3 (01:21:44):
Star or not.

Speaker 1 (01:21:45):
And like, listen, people make mistakes. But the point is
the government can start you for all the evil things
you do. Right, they will know if you're dishonest, what
your percentage of truthfulness is, because it'll listen to you
at all times. Oh no, it'll be sand Clause in
real life, irl Santa Claus I r L. Well, no,
when you're sleeping, well, know when you're not well, know

(01:22:07):
when you're good, eat good or bad, and they'll be
able to literally monitor you at all times. This is
a smart city. And uh, you know when Donald Trump
talks about making new futuristic cities, this is what he's
talking about with biometric scanning.

Speaker 3 (01:22:24):
Yea. And you know the really scary thing about it
is we're already halfway there, you know, as it sits
because you know, when you think about you know, targeted
ads for example, you know this is a great example
because this is someone just happened to me. Uh probably
within the last week. I was over at a friend's

(01:22:45):
house and we're uh talking about food. We're like, well,
I could really go for some tacos, you know, some
some good spicy Mexican food, you know, just you know,
casual scroll on Facebook a few minutes later, and what
comes up except a sponsored targeted ad for all you know,
come get this new you know, spicy tacos. And we're like, man,
this has got to be listening to us. Dog, There's

(01:23:07):
no way it's a coincidence. And so you know, I'm
sure you can ask anybody. They've had those sorts of
experiences over and over again. And so you know, we're
we're already halfway there.

Speaker 2 (01:23:16):
Well look at this.

Speaker 1 (01:23:17):
So in this video for the listeners out there, there's
like drones flying all over the sky.

Speaker 2 (01:23:21):
Sky taxis right.

Speaker 1 (01:23:22):
They have that sky taxi that they want to build
in Tampa, these little hubs for flying vehicles, and you know,
they have their little restaurants that are all AI driven
robot pill basically the eight billion dollar plan for a
robot city that's going to have humans living in it
up to two thousand to see how they work alongside humans.

(01:23:44):
So I don't know, don what's your feelings about corporations
building cities because Toyota's building the city, Like, what's your
thought of Amazon building cities? Because or AI companies like
spox con building cities. They built a little city here
in Wisconsin that nobody uses it as their own little
police force and probably their own laws and legislature that
they police on their own you know, on their own property.

Speaker 3 (01:24:08):
So, uh, I don't dig it. I am very much
against it, mostly on the basis of, you know, these
corporations like maybe Toyota is not a prime example, but
Amazon definitely a prime example of these big corporate interests,
private interests tied to the government. You know, these big corporatist, capitalist,

(01:24:31):
industrialist entities that continue to privately consolidate power and of
course on a decentralized level, you know, you know, peer
to peer interaction, voluntaristic economy, AGORITHM, corporate competition. Privatization is
a good thing when it's not monopolized. When we have

(01:24:55):
these corporations that are creating monopolies, they're continuing to consolidate
more and more and more and more and more power,
and they're working with the federal government. They basically have
the federal government by the balls because they're lobbying them
so much. And lobbying is just another word for bribery,
you know, it's it just leads. It's a recipe for disaster.

(01:25:17):
And yeah, no, not a fan.

Speaker 2 (01:25:20):
Okay, So.

Speaker 1 (01:25:23):
My endgame on this is that surveillance NonStop, smart cities,
smart roads, smart world. This is they live in real action.
No one would have thought that George orwell would have
predicted the future, but here we are. The more we
see it, the more or Welly and it goes Ai
is you know, spying on your children in school, letting

(01:25:43):
you know if they're suicidal. Look, it's in the best interest,
but it's the government that is playing mom and dad. Right,
It's the parents' job to be involved in their children's life,
right it is. Yeah, And that's where it comes down to.
It is like, what is it that we should be doing.
They now have robot dogs, robot tanks, They got robots

(01:26:07):
working in the workforce. And how long will it be
until you know, essentially we do a way with owning
any homes down. You know, who will own the home
in the future done, black Rock, Amazon, black Rock, Toyota.
You'll have a job and guess what, you'll get a
discount living environment because of the fact that you live

(01:26:29):
for work for Ge or you work for one of
these major corporations, Microsoft and everyone will have a different
living environment. Maybe you want to go work for a
Northwestern mutual life and they treat their employees great. They
cover your rent completely, but then they pay you basically peanuts,
right or a little bit more, and they feed you
and you only eat whatever the government agency you work for,

(01:26:52):
the company that you work.

Speaker 2 (01:26:53):
For provides you.

Speaker 1 (01:26:55):
And I don't know how I feel about this, but
it's maybe the way America always has been, where some
major company has really helped build a city.

Speaker 2 (01:27:02):
Rockefellers build New York. That's no secret, right, So we.

Speaker 3 (01:27:06):
Have a bit of a historical precedent that actually exemplifies
just how bad these kinds of things can actually be.
So living out here in Virginia moreover towards West Virginia,
actually out in apple latches. Back in the day, there

(01:27:26):
are these things called coal miner towns where these corporations
would come in they buy up all these coal mines
and whatnot, and they would create these towns. They would
build houses, stores, you know what, you name it, and
you would get paid not in actual cash dollars, but

(01:27:50):
you would get paid in corporate credits that could only
then be used in the corporate store that the corporations
built inside the town that they built, which is directly
adjacent connected to the coal mines that you're working in.
So it's it was essentially a you know, an early
version of what we're discussing now, a much more primitive

(01:28:13):
version of what we're discussing now. And it was terrible.
It did not end well. It actually ended up in,
if I remember correctly, was called the Coal Wars. It
was one of the only times where the President of
the United States had to deploy the US military to
actually fight against American citizens because the people of these
towns got so pissed off and fed up that they

(01:28:35):
took up arms. A lot of them were World War
One veterans. They took up arms, and they said, we're
not going to allow you to treat us this way anymore.
And the military had to go in because originally the backtrack.
The reason the military went in because originally these corporations
outsourced to private security, you know, you know, like the
Pinkertons and you know, you know, private law enforcement essentially

(01:29:00):
to enforce these coal worker strikes. They went on strikes
and said we want better wages, we want this, that
and the third. Because the corporations are basically bleeding us
dry and you know, using us for cheap labor. We're
basically slaves. They basically own us. And so the privates,
the Piker Tens and some of these other private security

(01:29:20):
guys came in to try to break the strikes. They
took up arms, some folks got killed. Long story short,
the President had to send in the military to sort
of put the kibosh on all of this. And it
was one of the to my knowledge, the only time
in American history that bombs were actually dropped on American citizens,
one of the few times. I mean, of course there

(01:29:42):
was that the move bombing in nineteen eighty five. But
my point is, you know, this is actually a thing
that happened, and it wasn't good. It did not end well.

Speaker 1 (01:29:56):
Interesting stuff, guys. We'll check this out on this subject
of drones, UFOs aliens. While we were away and we
took some time off, this article hit and I'm like,
Don and I been talking about this, We've been talking
about this, and that's this article here. Hey, let's go,

(01:30:20):
and we got this right here.

Speaker 2 (01:30:22):
We'll pull us up.

Speaker 1 (01:30:23):
CIA docs claim life did exist on Mars and it
was population of very large people who built pyramids. Would
you be surprised if this was really true. I mean
that CIA does have documents it claims this. What do
they know that we don't done?

Speaker 3 (01:30:36):
And what is this about? So the point that I
made the day that you send this to me, because
I actually shared it on my Facebook page, your post
when you had originally posted the screenshot of this article,
The point that I made was that isn't it just
so convenient that they are now discussing this particular incident

(01:31:01):
which we have discussed for going on a decade now,
at least I know I've personally discussed this for going
on a decade now. The article here from the Daily
Mail is specifically discussing the incident during Project Stargate wherein

(01:31:21):
they had a remote viewer basically do some remote viewing
and you know, remote view back to you know, one
billion BC on Mars And I've talked about that on
this show before.

Speaker 2 (01:31:34):
What is remote viewing man like?

Speaker 1 (01:31:35):
For somebody out there that's listening to this proadcast and
has never dove deep into the psychology and weird conspiracies
and the weird like tests.

Speaker 2 (01:31:46):
That the government has done. What is remote viewing like?

Speaker 1 (01:31:49):
Is that like watching from a video TVV at home
and they can see what's going on someplace else.

Speaker 3 (01:31:56):
So essentially what remote viewing is in this context, it's
a alleged extra sensory ability that allows someone to in
their mind see the past or the future essentially and
in the most layman's terms, possible time travel. Well, no,

(01:32:16):
it's like sort of like psychic essentially, able to see
the past, you know, distant past, recent past, you know,
distant future, close future, whatever. And so what they had
done in this particular experiment part of Project Stargate, the
CIA brought in a number of these remote viewers who

(01:32:38):
allegedly possessed these abilities, and they tested them with you know,
we're going to have one of our agents hold the
sealed envelope.

Speaker 1 (01:32:46):
With this like Ghostbusters or Bill Murray's like holding up
a piece of paper and he's trying to hit on
the hot chick and he's like, she's like it's a
square and she had it wrong. He's like, absolutely right,
and then the other guy that's there nails that.

Speaker 2 (01:33:00):
He's like no, but then he shocks him. He's like,
this is forgetting it wrong.

Speaker 1 (01:33:04):
Remember that does Ghostbusters the first one nineteen eighty four.
Not everyone's seen that movie, which I can't believe it's
a classic love ghost, one of my favorite horror d
comedy in that weird paranormal horror comedy Vein great movie.

Speaker 3 (01:33:18):
Right. But anyway, so the point is, they went about
conducting this experiment and allegedly the remote viewer said that
what he saw because the envelope that they gave him
was a series of coordinates and a date and it
was sealed in the envelope and he wasn't aware of
it or something along those lines. I forget the exact details,
but it's literally in the Daily Mail piece that we

(01:33:40):
have up here. Essentially, he says that he saw, you know,
this civilization with these vast pyramids, and it's like it's
at the very end of their time and it's collapsing
and all this, this, that and the third and they
ultimately revealed to him that this was one billion BC

(01:34:01):
on Mars and a lot. This sounds incredibly science fiction,
of course.

Speaker 2 (01:34:06):
But this is tax money to do this, right.

Speaker 3 (01:34:09):
Well yeah, yeah, but of course it is a you know,
this is a legitimately declassified CIA document of something that
they alleged to have actually occurred. And the point that
I made when this article came out was that this
is old news. These documents have been out since the

(01:34:32):
early two thousands, and anytime you would dare talk about
it up until about a week ago, you were a
conspiracy nut, you know, even though you had the documents
to actually prove it, or you know, at least allegedly
prove it. But now, of course, and this was the
point that I made, was that now that it is
convenient for them, now that we're going into this UFO

(01:34:56):
disclosure syop sort of you know, limited hangout information warfare.
This's been going on that we've mentioned, now they see
it fit. They, being the intelligence assets of the corporate media,
mainstream media, mocking bird media, see fit to drip this

(01:35:19):
information out to implant it in public consciousness. Oh yeah,
by the way, there's these the classified CIA documents that
said there was life on Mars with pyramids and megastructures
a billion years ago, when you know, as I mentioned,
just a couple of weeks ago, you'd be a crackpod
conspiracy enough for even daring to try to talk about
these sorts of things. And so I very much believe

(01:35:42):
they have an agenda with planting this story out there
in the media. It's not new news. It hasn't been
for twenty years now, so why they suddenly find the
need to report on it?

Speaker 2 (01:35:56):
It certainly makes you wonder well.

Speaker 1 (01:35:58):
The classified project was conducted at Fort Mea, the real
government facility in Maryland, recruiting men and women who claim
to have extrasensory perception ESP to help uncover military domestic
intelligence secrets. The experiment subjects was transported to the planet
during the specified year reporting an oblique view of a
pyramid in a very large road with a monument similar

(01:36:20):
to those known among ancient Egyptians on Earth, and shut
down in nineteen ninety five. But it shut down. The
program shut down in nineteen ninety five, so it went
on for a while. But during its more than ten
years of existing, psychics known as REMO viewers participated in
a wide area of operations, from locating hostages kidnapped by
Islamic terrorist groups to tracing the paths of fugitive criminals

(01:36:43):
within the United States. Leading up to the closure. Was
Mars Exploration May twenty second, nineteen eighty four are document
classified in twenty seventeen that was recently resurfaced has recently
resurfaced online. The document is sparse, in detail, beginning with
methods of site acquisition, sealed envelope cooped with geographical coordinates,

(01:37:05):
and the envelope was provided to the subject before the
interview but was not open until afterwards.

Speaker 3 (01:37:10):
Is that how they.

Speaker 1 (01:37:12):
Verify their authenticity that they know what it says in
the in the envelope, what was written down?

Speaker 3 (01:37:17):
Yes, so the CIA agents know what's in the envelope.
The only person that doesn't know is the psychic. And
so then you know, the psychic comes back and says, yeah,
this is this is what I saw. They can then
sort of, you know, say, well, shit, it's that's what's
in the envelope. Only we knew it. Nobody told you.
So how do you know?

Speaker 1 (01:37:37):
Oh guess or not? I mean, do psychics exist? Like
if they did, would they not be more successful when
they all be rich? You know, there's all these questions
I have about psychics, you know, and like if they
wanted to, couldn't they use it for helping themselves to
be better off?

Speaker 2 (01:37:53):
Some people? You know, I don't know. I'm not sure
how it works. Man, I'm not doing anyone who claims it.
I'm not quite sure.

Speaker 1 (01:37:58):
I'm just saying, if your psychic then you you know,
you would think that you would use that in some
way to be prosperssed.

Speaker 3 (01:38:05):
So I interesting rabbit hole to go down. I pause
it that everyone has the ability to be psychic, because
once we really start digging into it, psychic abilities quote
unquote is literally just our intuition. It's our sixth sense.

(01:38:26):
Everyone has had some sort of incident where their gut
has told them to do this or to not do that,
and something has resulted in, you know, proving them right. Hell,
just the other day I got a gut instinct telling
me that somebody's about to shoot me. A text message
five seconds later thing with me with me, you know,

(01:38:50):
but that's that's happened multiple times. I mean, there's the
only car accident I ever got in my life was
back in October of twenty nineteen. All day I was
supposed to go up to King's Dominions, the local amusement
park that I used to work at, and so I
hat a lot of friends working at at the time.
That's all. I was going up there to visit them,
and all day long, my gut instinct was telling me,

(01:39:13):
don't go. Put it off, go another day, go tomorrow,
Do not go tonight. I decided to ignore it, because
of course I'm hard headed. I go. It had been
drizzling all day. But by the time I get on
I ninety five and I start heading north on ninety five,
the bottom drops out, man, and it's pouring down. It's

(01:39:33):
raining so hard it's like ten o'clock at night. I
can't see a damn thing. So I'm like, you know
what screwed, I'm going home. I pull off on this
exit that I had never taken before to loop around
to get on the opposite into the highway to head
back home. Going through the intersection, somebody from out of states,
not paying attention, boom slams right into me. Only car

(01:39:54):
accident I ever got into in my life, And if
I had listened to my gut and stayed home would
have happened. But you know, plenty of people have had
instances like that, and so that.

Speaker 1 (01:40:05):
We are women more like I wonder if women are
more because they always talk about female instinct like she like,
have you ever like left or broke up with some
girl and then you hung out with the new girl
and she blows you up all of a sudden, just
when you're hanging out with that girl like you hear
all these stories of female intuition or like it's a
real thing. Maybe they're just more sensitive to the vibrations
of the world and that's really what they're feeling, and

(01:40:27):
they feel those the energy that it's changing. And we've
all had those situations, or maybe a boyfriend, you know,
you know, is it being faithful or a girlfriend and
you've had that got instinct and it was completely on
whatever it is. So for you as an accident, people
have those intuitions. Does that mean that it's our brain
that can that's smarter than we think, subconsciously puts it

(01:40:49):
together and knows the answer and trying to tell you
in dreams in other ways, or is it really a
sixth sentth skill like being psychic?

Speaker 3 (01:40:57):
Uh? Well, you know that's why I don't necessarily categorize
it as quote unquote like being psychic. I think that
is being psychic. Now. Granted, I do put the caveat
on there that a lot of these professional psychics, I
think they're just griffers that are just you know, scam yeah,
you know. But but ultimately, once we get into the

(01:41:18):
actual phenomenon of of you know, extrasensory abilities, I one
believe that there is something there. Uh, and I absolutely
believe that everybody possesses these abilities. They're latent, they just
have to be exercised. They're like anything else. You have
to practice at them, you have to work at them. Uh.
You know, and I think a lot of it. You know,

(01:41:38):
it connects to our third eye, the pineal glend. And
you know that that's a whole other deep conversation to
get into.

Speaker 1 (01:41:45):
On well, Rath on access all people have the ability
essentially just puts all. I'm assuming he means all people
of the ability to be psychic, which might be some
truth to that. That all based off that article about
the CIA Myers program. What it was, it called our
Gate Operate Project Stargate here we have it in the news.
Don We've talked about this relentlessly about how AI is

(01:42:08):
going to run actors and actresses out of jobs other
than licensing how they look, right, because AI you can
build whatever kind of human you want, and you know,
you have the famous people, the Indiana Jones, where you
want to license his looks, Harrison Ford in his voice
and maybe use them to put out movies in the future,
and you'll just have AI development but tcl's new AI

(01:42:30):
short films range from bad comedy to ex essential horror. Now,
I believe if anything AI can do well, it will
be horror movies. Right if you ever joined the group
Cursed AI, it's all super creepy and bizarre, like nightmarish
esque style of video. And if I was going to

(01:42:51):
be in hell in a hell world, it would be
whatever Cursed AI conjures up.

Speaker 3 (01:42:58):
Yeah, I've seen those things. And I've all also seeing
a number of videos on YouTube. A number of the
content creators that I follow have done reactions to like,
you know, Cursed AI video or things of that nature,
and it's it's wild man. And I was reading through
this article earlier when you sent it to me, and

(01:43:18):
it's at least it's good to know that AI is
still far enough off to where we can clearly point
out that hey, this is AI generated garbage. But the
problem is it's constantly learning, and so there we're going
to get to a point where we stop seeing this
AI generated garbage, and then you're going to pause and be.

Speaker 1 (01:43:41):
Like, oh no, so here's We're gonna go ahead and
we can play some of these shorts. They actually have
them out of here and you guys can see them.
We won't play the audio, we'll talk over them, but
just so people in the background can see. These are
AI developed shorts and you know short films by TCL Studios,

(01:44:02):
and these are all AI generated and Mike, I wonder
how realistic they'll look, you know, and for you guys
out there. And this one it says sun in the
Day Sunday might be the name of the movie. And
it looks like, you know, basically computer generated, uh, you know,
digitally enhanced movies. But uh, you know, I like the

(01:44:23):
fact that AI and CGI is getting more realistic because
I couldn't handle things like the Hulk looking cartoonish and
X Men, you're an x Men Marvel Marvel universe. But
here we have it. See look at these, these are like,
this is a movie.

Speaker 2 (01:44:39):
It created.

Speaker 1 (01:44:40):
AI created this movie, and it's a futuristic movie with
futuristic cities and it's raining and you know essentially that
look at that those shoes look real done Like this
looks like real footage, really recorded, and it's all fictitious
generated by AI. Remember a year ago, we're like, oh,
that's fake. This is hard just stantiate that these aren't

(01:45:01):
real actors.

Speaker 3 (01:45:01):
And actresses, right, yeah, you know, And like I said,
eventually it's going to get to the point where the
quote unquote garbage AI stops showing up in our news feed,
and it's going to give people pause because then it's
going to realize, wait a minute, no, it is still here.
It's just gotten to the point where now we cannot differentiate.

(01:45:24):
That's when we're really going to enter this era of
just you know, information warfare. Time is a trillion you know,
because once videos can be produced that are indistinguishable from
real life, well, you know, to quote Thanos at least

(01:45:44):
I think that, you know, with stanos In, I think
endgame reality can be whatever I want.

Speaker 2 (01:45:51):
Well, that's where we're going with this.

Speaker 1 (01:45:52):
Remember the story that was in the news about students
in high school taking photos of girls that they men
and are girls and boys that they were interested in,
whether it's male or female. And then the AI was
creating virtual porn with those individuals, creating the fake body
and creating the pornographic film. Like that's that's where we're at.
Where you just take a picture of someone and it

(01:46:13):
puts them into pornal flick. Seriously, and kids in high
school are doing that that literally looking up that's a
news story we talked about about three or four months ago.

Speaker 2 (01:46:22):
Wasn't it done?

Speaker 3 (01:46:23):
Yep, it was.

Speaker 2 (01:46:24):
But this is almost you can't almost look at it.

Speaker 1 (01:46:26):
That looks completely real, looks like those like it minus
the purple rat.

Speaker 3 (01:46:29):
But my question is how much artwork from legitimate artists
did the AI rip off to make all of this junk? Because,
of course that's always been one of the biggest concerns
among those in the actual artistic community, is that AI

(01:46:53):
is learning from stuff that real people actually created. It's
using the art that real people actually created to generate
these images. So they're plagiarizing and ripping off the artwork
of real people without those actual artists getting So.

Speaker 1 (01:47:12):
At what point is it being influenced by versus actually
ripping off?

Speaker 3 (01:47:17):
Well, I think because of the nature of the technology,
I think it leeds over. I don't think you too.

Speaker 1 (01:47:23):
We've all heard a band that sounds like Green Day
and be like, oh, they ripped off green aa they
sound like green Day, but they can't be sued because
the material was.

Speaker 3 (01:47:29):
Original, right. But again, that's what I'm saying. With the
nature of this technology, it's not just oh it, you know,
it looks like that. They're literally you know, it'd be
one thing if okay, the band you know, sounds like
Green Day, but it's the original technology. But we're talking about,
you know, an original song or concept. But if that

(01:47:52):
band took a legitimate song written by Green Day or
even a record label and put out the song using AI,
an AI version of Billy Joel's voice, Billy Joel Armstrong's voice,

(01:48:12):
and they're using their lyrics that they wrote, it's no
longer just to rip off, you know, well exactly. And
that's what the AI is doing. It's it's not just
inspired by it's learning from the artwork of actual artists
and using that artwork within its own systems and processes

(01:48:34):
to create stuff from it. And and so that's that's
why you know, many in the art community have have
raised a lot of red flags about this because you know,
real people's work is getting ripped off.

Speaker 1 (01:48:47):
This is AI we're seeing on the screen right here,
don Wild looks just like real people, moves like real people.

Speaker 2 (01:48:54):
The mouse move it.

Speaker 1 (01:48:55):
Well, it doesn't look like a like a subtitle or
anything like that. Fascinating stuff. Man, it looks real, real
It looks good, it looks legitimate. That is scary stuff,
all right, For the final story I have for you
guys today, For those who are religious, a lot of
people put their faith in a higher deity, whether it
is the biblical Israeli God, the Jewish God, or it's

(01:49:20):
pagan gods, or if it's you know, Hindu or Buddhism
or whatever it is. People higher energy. People put their
beliefs into a lot of things. But how about AI.
A Swiss church has installed AI power Jesus. Why would
they install an AI power Jesus, it says The small

(01:49:43):
unadoring church has long ranked along the oldest churches in
the Swiss city in Switzerland. But Peter's chapel has become
synonymous with all of that, with all that is new,
after installed an artificial intelligence powered Jesus capable of dialoguing
in a hundred different waysages. It was really an experiment,
Marco Schmidt, a theologian with a Peter Scalpa church. We

(01:50:07):
wanted to see and understand how people react to AI Jesus.
What would they talk about with him? See, there you go,
You're gonna admit your sins to AI Jesus. Did you
form okate, Did you murder somebody? Did you have a
swinger party? Did you steal something? What did you do
to somebody? What did what is your guilty conscious? What
is it that are you a good person or not?
Ai Jesus will be able to tell you. And the

(01:50:29):
installation known as Doo Deos in Machina was launched in
August as the latest initiative in a long years collaboration.
So as we said, the Catholic Church was always the NSA,
but now Ai Jesus is going to go ahead and
take all your dirty sins and hang them out for
everyone to see.

Speaker 3 (01:50:48):
Yeah, man, it's uh.

Speaker 2 (01:50:51):
And they're gonna hate you if I tell you.

Speaker 1 (01:50:53):
I remember when I was hating on Ai Jesus before
people were saying I was like, why are you guys
thinking and praying? It says pray to me and I
will make your dream come true or whatever. And people
are saying, I prayed on the bottom of the TikTok
channel of Ai Jesus, because Ai Jesus also is on
TikTok has tens of millions of views. Because people are
praying the Ai Jesus. Why they're putting their faith into machines,

(01:51:16):
and it's gonna be hard to differentiate reality from fake world.
And kids are growing up outside of their parents. They're
no longer involved in their education common core. They don't
send home, you know, homework that much anymore. All the
work is done in school. They have no interaction and
know what their kids are being taught. They're being taught
to believe in AI and automation and robotics encoding. That's

(01:51:36):
the future, don But that being said, guys, tomorrow we
got a brand new show. Mark D'Antonio will be joining
us top astronomer. He is also the video forensic chief
video forensic officer at Muffan who distinguishes what is real
and what is not for UFO videos. He's worked on
top secret projects. We're gonna be talking drones in UFOs

(01:51:58):
and astronomy. Maybe won't get some astrology and stuff like that.
Mark D'Antoni will be our guest tomorrow, so don't go anywhere.
Make sure you guys tune in, same time, same channel,
kg r a dB dot com, The Rundown Live dot com.
Find us on Spotify, search the Rundown Live, kg RA,
We're there band dot video in just about anywhere where
podcasts are found. You guys, have a good night. We'll

(01:52:18):
see you soon. On Kristan T. Harris, don Vie Junior,
we're checking out. We'll see you guys next tomorrow. Tomorrow,
you guys, have a good night.

Speaker 4 (01:52:34):
Underground journalist you Asimes, the Destroyer, the Fake Chris Dante
Harris and on Virginia on the Rundown, I Rundown Fidel Brain.

Speaker 9 (01:52:46):
I'm very healthy.

Speaker 4 (01:52:47):
Audas down your podcast answered the Fetua

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

24/7 News: The Latest

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Drones, the Fog, A.I. Jesus, A.I. Police, Life on Mars

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

24/7 News: The Latest

All Episodes

Drones, the Fog, A.I. Jesus, A.I. Police, Life on Mars

Stuff You Should Know