JFK Files, MLK Files, Lab-grown Babies, Executive Orders

Today we deep dive into Trumps executive orders, what will the JFK Files/MLK Files expose, Lab Grown $p3rm/babies, Robots to race humans, E.P.A. Tells More Than 1,000 They Could Be Fired ‘Immediately’, A New Atlantis and the New World Order.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
They have to cheat in order to beat us, because
the truth is more powerful than their lives. And this
is a small battle in God's war. And I'm telling you,
when you're on the side of God, who can stand
against you? No one can't. And we're in the fight
and we can't give up. This is time for over
drive home.

Speaker 2 (00:27):
So the destroys and shows me.

Speaker 3 (00:30):
Chris daunt Harris and on the run down life.

Speaker 4 (00:41):
Make my everyday dose mushroom coffee with me. You might
be skeptical, However, it boost focused the stain's energy, improves
the health and more. Use one tablespoon of everyday dose
and two tablespoons of water and then I froth it.
I like to make it really well, just to make
sure that it's all mixed together. Add some ice. Oh oh, come,
pavamcoomer all it's so pretty.

Speaker 1 (00:57):
I love it and it's so a rundown life Today.
Click on our link and your purchase will support this
broadcast of these two lovable guys.

Speaker 5 (01:10):
It's that time again.

Speaker 6 (01:12):
Time to relax, kick up your feet, grab your favorite beverage,
and tune into the Rundown.

Speaker 5 (01:18):
Live your forecast into the future. Now you don't know it, Yes,
but you are listening to history the making while you
are listening to this show.

Speaker 6 (01:39):
We know now that in the early years of the
twentieth century, this world was being washed closely by intelligence
is greater than man, yet as mortal. As result, I
want you to get up now.

Speaker 1 (01:57):
I want all of you to get up out of
your chairs.

Speaker 6 (02:01):
I wanted to get up right now, or to go
to the window, open it and stick your head out.

Speaker 5 (02:07):
And yell.

Speaker 1 (02:09):
As hell.

Speaker 7 (02:10):
But I'm not gonna take this anymore, censored by the
mainstream media. The destroyer of fake news and your host
of The Rundown Live, Chris don T Harris.

Speaker 1 (02:28):
Rundown dot com.

Speaker 5 (02:30):
I'm your host.

Speaker 1 (02:31):
Here is broadcasting live from Milwaukee, Wisconsin with my co
host don Vy Junior on kg r A, k g
r A dot com, k g R i dB dot
com as well kg R Radio dot Com. All these
websites for your station, you guys can check it out.
And we are live also on all the social medias,
so if you're not there, go there, Rumble dot Com, Forward, Slash,

(02:55):
The Rundown Live, iHeartRadio, Spotify, Speakers, Stitcher, and anywhere you
can find broadcasts.

Speaker 8 (03:00):
You can find the Rundown Live.

Speaker 1 (03:02):
Thank you guys for tuning in tonight, and we have
a great show lined up for you guys today. As
you guys know, I have been busy, busy, busy, busy,
and so has Don v Junior. Of course, Don Vi
Junior has been very busy doing things and being involved
in things as well. So we've both had our hands
kind of full. And it's pretty interesting because, you know,

(03:23):
for the last week I've been covering the inauguration. I
went over to DC. I flew out there whatever the
airplane sound is, and I landed and it was kind
of crazy from the get go because when I landed
in DC, don the people in the crowd in the airplane,
I shouldn't say the crowd people on the airplane started
chanting USA, USA, upon landing, and everyone was excited, and

(03:49):
obviously a large amount of the people on the airplane
were heading to DC for the inauguration. But upon my arrival,
as I arrived, there was a lot of chaos that
went on, and you see that really wasn't seen. We
caught some of it behind the scenes because people who
were given tickets to what was it the Cellular Arena

(04:10):
out there where the Washington hockey team plays out there,
the DC Hockey team, I think they're called the Capitals.
They actually over gave out tickets and so there was
like tens of thousands of people waiting in line who
could not have gotten in, and they ended up the
lines ended up breaking down. They rushed towards security, and
police had to come out and form a line and

(04:31):
push people back because they were going to insurrect their
very own rally, you know, the Don Trump What was
a Donald Trump victory rally on the first night, which
was Sunday night, the day before the inauguration, And it
was wild to me because we got there at ten
o'clock to get in line and it was freezing in DC.
Who the uncold just thinking about it, it was probably

(04:51):
like twenty degrees. And I went there with a bunch
of other reporters who I'm not going to name their
names because I don't know if they like to be
affiliated with somebody as crazy as christ On t Hears.

Speaker 8 (05:00):
But if I did.

Speaker 1 (05:02):
Name them, they would probably be other big independent names
out there that do great programs that I've worked for
before or done stuff like the American Journal and which
I ended up being on the American Journal if you
guys haven't noticed on Info Wars and the War Room
with Owen Troyer, which was really cool, you know, and
a bunch of other things. But after the inauguration, I

(05:23):
happened to have this idea that I'm gonna go to
the prisons in case Trump actually holds true in his promises,
because we didn't know what we're gonna get.

Speaker 8 (05:31):
With Donald Trump, right.

Speaker 1 (05:32):
He said he's going to do all these things, just
like Hillary for prison but is he gonna actually do
what he says he's gonna do, and is he gonna
sign these executive orders and do anything that he claims
he's gonna do. Right, And it wasn't long until the
January sixers started getting freed, and you know what, I
got video. I got video of them getting released. I

(05:54):
had video of people gathered around the DC Incarceration Tension
Center where a lot of these January sixth what people
were calling political prisoners were held. It depends on which
view or which side of the aisle you're on, per se,
some people believe their political prisoners. I think that overall
that the verdicts given by the local, you know, judiciary

(06:19):
system was very heavy handed in most of the cases,
and the inn some cases they weren't heavy handed at all,
which made you go, hmm, I wonder who these individuals
are and start digging right don So it was pretty
interesting to me what we saw there, and I got
some video I like to present with you guys, because
it was a very emotional, heartstrings moment for a lot
of these people. And there's people out there there like

(06:40):
screw the January six ers, and I get it. I
get your sentiment. What you saw on TV was a
bunch of insurrectionists trying to break the into the capitol
that they told you police officers died that day, which
wasn't true. In fact, for protesters or rally goers or
whatever you want to call them, did die that ding shooting.
One being shot by a cop, Ashley Babbitt, And I

(07:03):
still stand in my cop locked boots there and say,
you know what, shooting unarmed females never justified in that
case scenario. But it was a very interesting thing. Here's
a little video, a little snippet we'll share with you
guys of what I got there in d C.

Speaker 8 (07:17):
While I was out there.

Speaker 1 (07:18):
And by the way, there's prowd boys there they're doing
that aok symbol, which people are always you know, they're
always saying, well, that means white supremises, which it doesn't means.

Speaker 8 (07:27):
Everything is okay.

Speaker 1 (07:50):
Here and play the song there and we're gonna mute
it so we don't get pulled off of all this
social media immediately. But they took phone calls from within
the prison. I got to interview a couple of people
that got out. You can find out on our Facebook,
the Rundown Live Facebook, of course.

Speaker 2 (08:11):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (08:11):
And they sang the national anthem. They literally called in
the day, I'm doing it for the last time. And

(09:52):
that was the last time many of those fifteen hundred
prisoners saying the national anthem. In fact, a lot of
them were out already before this happened. This was the
last prison to release anyone in DC. And there was
a lot of communication and talk on why the DC
Incarceration Detention Center took so long to release their prisoners.

(10:12):
Not a lot of people know, and we were all,
you know, there's a lot of behind the scenes things
that are going on. There's people that haven't gotten to
court yet and they were held because they didn't get
extradited or they didn't get let go or their pardon
didn't come through because they haven't even been you know,
verdict hasn't come in that they needed to go to
jail yet. So they didn't know what to do with
a lot of them because there's like technicalities. It was

(10:34):
kind of interesting and kind of crazy. It was kind
of a lot of the family members that were there
were waiting for their loved ones to get out. The
first night I was there after the inauguration, there is
a mother and father waiting outside the prison for their
son to be pardoned, And I kind of wondered what
would have happened if Trump didn't keep his promise. The
media would have ran with it. I'm sure, of course.

Speaker 5 (10:57):
You know, it's one of those things where I mean
obvious he has an incredible incentive to at least keep
some of the promises that you know, sort of rile
up his base. You know. It was sort of the
same thing with Ross albrit I mean, if if he
had not kept his promise to free Ross, surely there
would have been, you know, a massive backlash you know

(11:19):
against that.

Speaker 1 (11:19):
So so for listeners out there, they know who the
January sixers are. Unless you've been like living under a rock,
and you haven't tuned into the Rundown Live in four
Years or any other political program or even looked at
a TV right. Everyone knows who the January sixers are.
For listeners, don why don't you explain to him, give
him one on one on who Ross Albricht is and
why it was important that he get released.

Speaker 5 (11:42):
So I'll give you a very quick, like a cliff
Notes breakdown of it, because it is a bit of
a long story, but I do highly encourage everyone to
actually look into it. You can go to the Freethought
Project dot com and just type in Ross's name and
I'm sure we have an article about it somewhere. We've
covered his story numerous times. But the short version is that,

(12:02):
I think about eleven twelve years ago were also created
a website called the Silk Road, which is essentially just
a free market online place for people to get together
and exchange involuntary commerce, you know, very libertarian, free market
sort of centered. And because of that and because essentially

(12:23):
it gave people the ability to exchange goods and services
without having to deal with the nonsense of the federal
government being involved. The federal government didn't like that very much.
They trumped up a bunch of charges against Ross. They
decided to charge him with something in regards to drug
trafficking and conspiracy, alleging that people were using Silk Road

(12:46):
to traffic drugs at firearms and contract hitmen and all
this other stuff that had been very heavily debunked and
challenged in court. But it's the whole thing. Yeah, So
the whole thing. Yeah, and so essentially, you know, the
whole thing was just a kangaroo court you know, trumped
up against him. Uh and he ended up getting hit
with I think it was two life sentences plus forty years.

(13:09):
He was he was going to rot in prison for
the rest of his life. And you know, thankfully, you know,
Donald Trump decided to keep his word, you know, to
an extent. The primary part of his word was freeing Ross.
Albrick didn't happen day one. He decided to you know,
free his you know, his political cronies and and you
know the guys in there, which you know, I I

(13:30):
agree you know with you Christan me being a very
anti prison industrial complex, anti police state. Anybody that's being
held on you know, non violent charges is a political prisoner.
You know, anybody from the you know, the January six
ers that did not commit a violent act, which most
of the people were being held, did not commit a

(13:50):
violent act, should not have been there. It was a
total weaponization of the Biden administration Department of Justice, or
as I refer to it, the Department of Injustice for
many many years, no matter what administration it's under. Uh,
you know, it was a completely politicized, weaponized move. So,
you know, very good thing that those guys did get free.

(14:11):
I still, of course, being a very strong critic of
any politician in office, I say that he could have
easily freed Ross at the exact same moment he freed
all the January sixth guys. Just sign another executive order.
But we got Ross free on day two, So I'm
not going to bitch too much. The important coming is Harden, right,
complete Harden.

Speaker 3 (14:28):
Yeah.

Speaker 9 (14:29):
No.

Speaker 1 (14:29):
And it's like a lot of people because I was
having this conversation with my girl and she's like, well,
they used this platform to do bad, and I thought
about it, but I'm like, that's like saying at points
like and we She didn't say like he deserved those
things or anything like that, but we had a conversation,
and she's like, but you know, there's a lot of
bad things that went on on the silk Road or
the silk Web, And you know that might be true.

(14:52):
His platform might have been used for bad things. But
that's like blaming the guy from who'd invented telephones for
all the bad things that happen over the phone.

Speaker 8 (14:59):
You know what I'm san saying. Don I call and
I do something illegal over the phone.

Speaker 1 (15:03):
Should the person who invented telephone telephones go to jail
or host the platform? Should we energies go to the
people do like the local lecture company go to jail
because electricity is used to do bad you know those
things that it's you know, guilt by association is something
that's very common and it's really hard to cut through sometimes.

(15:25):
But we got to look at these things and dive
in and ask the hard questions. You know, do a
lot of these j sexters belong to jail? Probably not?
To be honest, A lot of them got like hardcore
Gestapo police state like activity that happened to him. One
guy was just on bumble who were gonna probably have
on the show Robert Right, The cops came to his house,

(15:47):
broke down his front door, right raided his home because
he was said he was inside the Capitol in January
sixth on bumble to a late girl who turned him
in on the dating app, and he threw him on
the ground, probably in front of his kids and family,
and my gunpoint took him away for what trespassing.

Speaker 8 (16:05):
He just was in the key, did nothing.

Speaker 1 (16:06):
He was just Sydney Capital. He took a video, it
took some photos, you know, and does that solitude? You know, Hey,
this guy's gonna cause damage. He's an insurrectionist? Was do
one of the guys the cops let in?

Speaker 8 (16:18):
What was it? You know?

Speaker 1 (16:19):
Not only that, there's other people that I know that
got pardoned. I know like three or four people that
have gotten parted that were covering the event as a
citizen journalists that day, you know, so they all got
that kind of like treatment as well. The cops coming
out twenty of them swatted, breaking down the front door,

(16:40):
throwing them on the ground and arresting them and taking
them out. You know, it's just wild to me to
think that all they did is trespass and instead of
mailing them ticket, they brought them in and put them in.

Speaker 5 (16:50):
Jail, right, and you know, one of the main points
that we can look to to exemplify just how ridiculously
excessive that kind of treatment is for trespassing. Well, look
at all the cases of swat teams and other police
units raiding someone's house on a mistaken warrant, or you know,

(17:10):
raiding the wrong house, busting in, messing people up, throwing
them on the ground, killing them even and nothing happens
to these cops, you know, even though you know they're
supposed to be held to the highest standard. You know,
these cops were trespassing, They kicked in people's doors, they
killed innocent people, all because oh, well, we got the
address wrong on the warrant, or we had the right

(17:30):
address on the warrant, but we showed up to the
wrong house, the neighbor's house or something. It happens all
the time, and yet none of these cops get held accountable.
But because an American citizen walks inside the people's building,
the Capitol building, we're all that should be allowed to be.
You know, they get you know, busted in, swatted, thrown
in the grounds. It's ludicrous.

Speaker 1 (17:53):
So this is an interesting article that came out shortly
after a while was in DC, and obviously for a
lot of people, they know that I flew to Florida
and did a presentation out there. We'll probably have that
for tomorrow's show. But this is something I thought that
was interesting was senior FBI leaders ordered to retire, resign,

(18:14):
or be fired by Monday, which this was from about
four days ago.

Speaker 8 (18:20):
And I'm not sure.

Speaker 1 (18:22):
Exactly the outcome of everyone that may have been let go,
but the FBI needed a cleaning, like is that a
good thing? Is that a bad thing? It depends on
who Trump puts in charge and who did he put
in charge of the FBI.

Speaker 5 (18:38):
Well, let's be honest, the FBI needs to be outright abolished.
There are many federal agencies that need to be outright abolished.
You know, this conversation has been going on since the
weaponization of the FBI, going after the January six ers
about political weaponization of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. We'll
got news for you, folks. The Federal Bureau of Investigation

(18:59):
has always been politically weaponized. It should not have ever
existed in the first place. You know that the conversation
became more paramounts after January sixth, but I mean, we
can look back at things like Cohen telpro and the
way that they went after civil rights leaders like Martin
Luther King Junior, which we will be getting later, getting
into later in this broadcast, or you know, even going

(19:20):
back to the way that Woodrow Wilson used it and
weaponized it against his political opponents, that the whole damn
agency needs to go.

Speaker 8 (19:28):
Well, that's an interesting point.

Speaker 1 (19:29):
So senior FBI official of forcefully resisted Trump administration firings forcefully,
and so yeah, there's a lot of cleaning. The question
is is, well, what's going to happen? In my prediction
in the what if game? Christan Thierres thinks that Trump
is going to put in probably a bunch of people
that might be more liberty minded, but that are beneficial,

(19:50):
that are beneficial for the Trump administration. Now I'm not
saying that they are completely liberty minded, don I'm saying
that they're not going to be as bad as before.
But we're gonna wait and see, because at the same time,
part of me says Donald Trump might be the perfect
candidate to lead us into the new World Order, which
we've talked about.

Speaker 5 (20:10):
Well, of course, and you know when we look at
all the ways, and I won't dig into the weeds
of it too much here because I do know. We
plan on discussing the expansions of the police state currently
happening under Trump in an episode later this week with
another guest. But we just look at the ways that
the police state, you know, are being expanded right now

(20:32):
with these excessive orders, you know, again scapegoating the immigration issue,
you know, and all these sorts of other things, biometric
surveillance at the border.

Speaker 10 (20:42):
You know.

Speaker 1 (20:43):
It's stay right, that's everything we've been talking about on
this show. Drones surveillance, right, those drones that are popping
up all the over the place. Did you see what
I taked you on earlier? Was it earlier this week
that Mark d Antonio our guests that came on, that
came on the show like a week or two ago
to talk about the drones. He posted an update which,
by the way, we can give you right now. That
update is right here, the new Jersey drone updates which

(21:06):
he's been on. He said, hello, folks, So I had
said some weeks back that the DoD contacted me that
the drones were being flown by a group known to
the government for reasons as of that time unknown. I
also had stated that no, they were not looking for
a dirty bomb, as had been theorized, because they would
also be operating in the middle of the day, since
radiation doesn't sleep during the night. In such a case,

(21:30):
the cover story could have been simply that the government
was testing a new urban mapping drone system like Google Earth.
From the lower altitude. It would have been perfect cover
for cover, but this is not what it was. The
first major hint came when I was looking at the
no tams and otams associated with appearances of the drones.
No tams are the notice two airmen. That means they

(21:54):
have to let the airport. No remember done when I
said I saw the drone by me, it landed where
at the airport, and local airports and others will be
notified of the flights using Theation Service Notification Service. In
this case, there were no temps issued, meaning that the
FAA knew that they were going to be flying and

(22:14):
also approved the flights. So right away we know that
they are ours and today. A short time ago, President
Trump stated that the FAA is fully aware of what
these are and that they are doing specific research. Although
no further details are yet available. The veil of secrecy
is lifting. Huh, that's the drone issue, you know, getting

(22:36):
close to that solution. So not exactly what we thought
it would be, but we know that the conspiracy people
out there really loved it and it made for a
lot of good material for a few days. Wo drones,
they live, but it's who knows what they're still doing
with it. They could be mapping out things like for
Google or for the government, but why are they operating

(22:56):
at night? Only the lack of air planes you know
in the area, right.

Speaker 5 (23:03):
Right, Yeah, just a whole lot of questions and whatnot.
But I mean I figured it would be something, you know,
simple along those sort of lines. I mean, the main
hypothesis that I was going with was simply that I
can't remember what it was now, but there was some
sort of house build that came up in Congress with
regard to expansions of FAA abilities to regulate civilian owned

(23:25):
drones and things of that nature, and it just seemed
like it was very conveniently timed that this whole drone
hysteria in the media came up at the same Yeah, exactly.
So that's sort of what I was going with, and
maybe that was still the case, who knows, But yeah,
I didn't really expect it to be anything big.

Speaker 1 (23:42):
So here we have a Trump with draws from the
World Health Organization.

Speaker 3 (23:45):
Done.

Speaker 8 (23:45):
Is this a good or bad thing?

Speaker 5 (23:48):
Well, uncategorically it's a great thing.

Speaker 11 (23:51):
You know.

Speaker 5 (23:51):
The World Health Organization is just another one of those
massive bureaucratic entities that has allays lorded its power over
sovereign nations. I mean, and you know, we've been doing
reporting since COVID, and especially since the end of COVID
about how the World Health Organization has been, you know,

(24:11):
attempting through all of these back channel ways to create
this sort of international treaty which would essentially give it
and by proxy of the United Nations, because the World
Health Organization is a part of the United Nations, you know, essentially,
it would eviscerate national sovereignty for any who would sign
on to this international pandemic treaty, which thankfully has been

(24:32):
experiencing a whole mess of pushback and is slowly hemorrhaging
to death thankfully. But yeah, so as much trash as
I talk about, Trump, very deservedly, so this one is
a rare w it's it's you know, I'm with it.
It's a good, good move.

Speaker 1 (24:49):
I think it's a good move. So I got another
really interesting one I saw that I grabbed and I
wanted to get your opinion. And the reason why I'm
having Don talk about a lot of these ideas and
things that Trump is doing is because I agree with
Don and I support his rights to his beliefs. We
slightly see different on some subjects, and there's some things

(25:09):
I think that Don definitely is more knowledgeable about, but
this one is also one that could be interesting. The
EPA tells more than a thousand that they could be
fired immediately.

Speaker 5 (25:20):
So this is one of those issues. So first of all,
admittedly I haven't looked too much into this particular executive order,
but just on a broad stroke, So this is one
of those things that is a little bit nuanced behind it.
Because while the EPA in some regards does actually serve
and in some ways actually administer its function as the

(25:44):
quote Environmental Protecting Agency, there's also a whole lot of
shenanigans that have been going on at the APA for many,
many years, particularly with regards to I think her name
was Sharon Lerner. She did a fantastic series of investigative
reports for The Intercept a couple of years ago exposing
rampant corruption throughout the EPA and how numerous EPA scientists

(26:08):
were coming forward saying, hey, look, we've done the tests.
A lot of these chemicals that the APA is approving
are incredibly dangerous, incredibly carcinogenic, They're a danger to American health.
And yet higher ups at the EPA are going in
and they're changing, you know, a lot of the data
with regard to these chemicals, and they're approving them anyway
because they're essentially in bed with a lot of these

(26:29):
chemical companies. So a lot of bad shit happening at
the EPA as well. So I'm not necessarily against a
bunch of folks getting fired, but I think it should
be more specifically targeted towards the portions of the upper
apparatus that are responsible for that corruption. Because if you're
letting go a thousand good scientists who genuinely care about

(26:50):
protecting the environment in America's health, that's a problem, right,
But if you're letting go a thousand corrupt corporate stooges,
well that's a great thing. So you know, it depends
on actly who's getting let go.

Speaker 8 (27:02):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (27:03):
Also, the EPA was it during Fukushima. It was interesting
because I'm trying to remember the guy's name. There's a
guy in Madison, Wisconsin to ground ground samples and the
amount of radiation that was in those ground samples was
like fifteen hundred percent higher than what was allowed for
health safety by the EPA.

Speaker 8 (27:21):
And when they mentioned that.

Speaker 1 (27:25):
The fish from Fukushima area that they were gathering where
safety eat, somebody asked them, well, did you check them
for radiation?

Speaker 8 (27:31):
They said no.

Speaker 1 (27:32):
That made me go, what's the purpose of the EPA
bro in the FDA?

Speaker 12 (27:37):
You know.

Speaker 5 (27:39):
Exactly? You know? And you know another one of these
things that we recently covered on the Free Thought Project.
Actually it's an article from the new Lead Trump withdrawals
proposed limits on toxic PFAZ chemicals. For people who don't
know what p fas are, there's essentially it's the acronym
for forever chemicals and whatnot. And I'm trying to load

(27:59):
the art up. Yeah, here we go. Let me just
pop my screen up here really quick. Yeah, So we
covered this about a week or so ago. Says the
draft rule, which the EPA sent to the White House
for review in June of twenty twenty four, was seen
as a precedent setting move by reducing allowable discharges of

(28:21):
per and polyflorical substances say that five times fast, a
class of chemicals that have been linked to multiple health problems.
So you know, this is one of those things that's
sort of what I was just talking about. So when
we have the Trump administration that is, you know, rolling
back these things that are actually meant to safeguard the

(28:42):
health of the American people to favor essentially the bottom line,
the bottom dollar of these chemical companies. Well that's a problem.

Speaker 1 (28:51):
No, absolutely, you know, there's always some kind of multinational
corporatus and money to be gaining. As you know, A
drill baby drill was like one of Trump's things. He's like,
we're going drill drilled. I was like, yeah, I'm gonna drill.

Speaker 8 (29:03):
People are really crazy. I'll cheering it on.

Speaker 1 (29:06):
And I got to see Elon Musk do his little
things little dance and we didn't even get into the
weird salute he gave amongst other things. Uh, you know,
the media had a heyday with it. And whether he's
trolling or not. He's a little autistic, a little weird,
and a little out there. So I don't know what
how what to take.

Speaker 5 (29:22):
And I'm what I'll say about that, because for the
viewers that don't know, I've probably mentioned this before in
the program, but maybe not, who knows. I myself am
on the autism spectrum very much. So it's been one
of these things that a lot of UH people with
ASD have been pointing out since Elon's little stunt. Now, granted,

(29:46):
I don't know whether it was, you know, a publicity stunt,
whether he did it on purpose, wasn't thinking or whatever,
but he.

Speaker 1 (29:52):
Was saying from my heart to you, from my.

Speaker 5 (29:55):
I saw the clip, trust me, I saw the clip allegedly.

Speaker 1 (29:58):
I wonder if he did that after he realized they
look like He's like, well.

Speaker 5 (30:02):
Right, well, I mean he did it twice, so you know,
everybody knows exactly what the hell it looks like. And
then he even tried to excuse it away by saying, oh,
it was a Roman salute. Well for all of us
who actually bother to study history, well, you know where
the Nazis adopted their salute from the Roman, So saying
it's a Roman salute is just a way of pissing

(30:23):
on you and saying that it's raining.

Speaker 1 (30:26):
So and one of the questions is I was gonna say,
real quick, one of the questions I was asking while
in DC is to what level should Elon must be
involved in the Trump administration and her politics? Like you know,
it's it's like, I I I understand what is that
the Department of Efficiency or what adage? The government Department
of Government efficiency? Like, but if they get rid of

(30:48):
some things like the E p A or the you know,
what are they doing? They're giving back education of the
States is get getting rid of the federal Department of Education,
which I agree with. I think that that's trash. It's
another thing that's going on that I grew not ever. Like, listen,
we're gonna dive into some dirty things that I don't
agree with that Trump's doing. We're just talking. We're just
talking some of the stuff we really agree with. Here's
another one of the ones that we agree with.

Speaker 10 (31:08):
It.

Speaker 8 (31:08):
We're gonna talk about this.

Speaker 5 (31:09):
One well really quickly. Really we'll go back, yeah, because
let me bounce back, really me because there was a
point that I was gonna make so with the excuses
being thrown around. Oh, he's socially awkward because he's autistic.
Pretty much every single person, uh, such as myself with
autism with some common sense to saying no, don't say that.
Do not give this man that excuse. Do not infantalize

(31:32):
a grown adults who are capable right and wrong, because
it's an incredibly dangerous narrative that then puts all other
autistic adults in danger of being considered Oh, well, you know,
might just throw up a Nazi salute all of it. No,
that's that's not what happens. Everybody knows with you know,

(31:53):
is able to discern between right and wrong. So we
cannot give that excuse to Elon Musk. He knew what
he was doing, whether or not it was purposeful or
if it was well, obviously it was purposeful, but whether
or not it was just a media stunt or what,
who knows. But we know that the guy comes from
a lineage of fascists. His grandfather was a technocratic fascist,

(32:13):
these you know, referred to as such by people who
knew him personally, and I think even you know self
described you know he comes from an apartheid family. The guy,
you know has heavily endorsed the Zionist regime of Israel,
which is you know, still despite the so called ceasefire,
still slaughtering Palestinians, deeply tied the Zionist lobby is and

(32:36):
the Zionist movement in general, deeply tied to fascism, despite
the mainstream narrative to the contrary. You know, and the
guy has also multiple times publicly endorsed the AfD, the
Alternative for Deutschlen the Alternative for Germany, which is an
openly neo Nazi connected far right party in Germany. I mean,
he did it literally right after you know, this little

(32:56):
incident here.

Speaker 1 (32:57):
So they say it's hypocrisy from the media, But do
you want to be in the picture with.

Speaker 8 (33:02):
All these other people?

Speaker 1 (33:04):
That's all I'm saying, Like, listen, I know that there's
plenty of other people that have done this right, and
people are like.

Speaker 8 (33:10):
Oh, you know Elon must conservative Odd's terrible. Well, I know, he.

Speaker 1 (33:13):
Would say, aoc Bush, They've all done that.

Speaker 5 (33:16):
I would say this. So what I would say to
this anybody who is incapable of differentiating between someone doing
a wave and then pausing that wave at the perfect
time to make it look like that, and a full
on video of a man with his whole chest is
either deliberately lying or the biggest idiot on the planet.

Speaker 1 (33:38):
We're gonna go with the fact that some people are
like because I saw some actual videos of people like
AOC who are really flailing it around, almost just like him.
And I'm not saying that there are politicians that haven't
done that, just I don't think since it wasn't as
deliberate or it wasn't as key of a moment and
a place where everyone was watching. These are rallies, and

(33:59):
this was a rally that Musk was that, but there
is not There's a media hypocrisy, I get it. But
at the same time, do you really want to be
in this class of group of citizens here we got
Barack Obama, George Bush, Hillary Clinton, you know, Kamala Harris,
Like that makes it any better? Even?

Speaker 8 (34:17):
Does that make it feel me?

Speaker 1 (34:18):
And I'm sorry, I'm just saying, I'm just throwing it
out there. The media drives me nuts, you know. I
get it that Maria says that drives or nuts. I
totally get it, and I don't. I don't disagree that
there's a hypocrisy here, but what I really wanted to
talk about today, where we really wanted to go with
all this. All right, we're gonna stop sharing this screen.
We're gonna bring this up to the screen. Is the

(34:40):
topic that of the moment, and we're gonna dive in
and this is gonna be We're gonna release something on
the Rundown Live today that nobody's ever seen. This is
gonna be newsworthy video that I recorded, and the video
is gonna be groundbreaking for a lot of people out
there that want evidence of the JFK documents and what's

(35:01):
going to be in them. The reason being is ten
years ago to the year, I spent a week with
Lee Harvey Oswald's former lover, Judith Baker, and she introduced
me to Saint John Hunt.

Speaker 8 (35:13):
Saint John Hunt is E.

Speaker 1 (35:14):
Howard hunts Kid, the guy who was in charge of
the CIA at the time, and I recorded a confessional
and we're gonna air it here for the first time ever.
But before we do that, we're gonna play a couple
of different videos. The first thing is is the JFK
assassination has gripped people for years and years and years.
It was always the epitome of how ludicrous conspiracy theorists are,

(35:35):
and the fact the term conspiracy theorists was invented by
the CIA exactly for the purpose to explain away people
who questioned the JFK official narrative. It's crazy to me
that they spent US ocean's beds worth of money to
write a encyclopedia around a magic bullet, but they spent

(35:55):
very little, if almost no money trying to find out
or figure out who actually shot you. Now we know
that there's been multiple shooters, amongst other things, but the
idea of the JFK assassination has gripped Americans for years
and years and years, and so now we may get
some transparency, or it might be just a limited hangout.
Maybe all the people that were involved will get scrubbed.

(36:17):
But all that being said, I'm kind of curious. I'm
kind of curious to see what will be in there, because,
first of all, there's a lot of weird conspiracies out
there that I've found interesting over the years. The first
one is the JFK MLK ritualistic assassination. Have you ever
heard about this? Done? That all these assassinations are done
in a ritualistic format and in locations that have obelisks

(36:41):
and pyramids, and it just so happens that these major
assassinations are done in a ritualistic format and a location.
And here's a video that gives a support for this.
I'm not saying that you know the reason behind is
because it was a Masonic ritual, but a lot of
people find this interesting. This is a really interesting video
I captured at a JFK convention.

Speaker 13 (37:11):
Okay, I'm gonna do a quick one. We come to
these free militionary geometric things. Here's the so called Queen
Day massacre. It happened right there with an oblisk in
the top. If you look at the street design, you
have the Martin Luther King where he was.

Speaker 2 (37:31):
He wasn't killed at the Lorraine Hotel.

Speaker 13 (37:33):
He was shot there, but he was actually murdered at
the hospital Saint Joseph's.

Speaker 2 (37:38):
He was suffocated. You can listen.

Speaker 13 (37:41):
I done several interviews on Jim Fence's program.

Speaker 2 (37:44):
Where we go into great details all over.

Speaker 14 (37:47):
So right in front of the hospital where he was suffocated,
this massive free Masonic pyramid.

Speaker 2 (37:55):
I mean it's like six floor high. This is the view.

Speaker 13 (37:59):
Massive is right there. When or a parler the Swedish
prime minister was killed. He was killed right there. There's
an obelisk right there. When you look from there to
where the killer ran, you look straight at the obelisk.
And in the courtyard inside there there's a massively pyramid glass,
a pyramid that cannot.

Speaker 14 (38:19):
Be seen from the screens. So the jfk assassination, we
have Dally Plaza, okayd This was where the first Masonic.

Speaker 13 (38:31):
Lodge were placed in this exactly you got the also
you got the obelisk here that's where he was killed,
and so on. So since these people I know how
they think, I'm learning how they think.

Speaker 2 (38:46):
Please have a look at this geomagic thing. If you
see this.

Speaker 13 (38:50):
Pyramid can be the top of the experiment, can be
in different locations depending on which way.

Speaker 2 (38:57):
You look at.

Speaker 13 (38:58):
If you look at that, if that is.

Speaker 2 (39:00):
The bottom of the pyramid, you pull a straight line
through it. You get straight to this tower, which when you.

Speaker 13 (39:08):
Look at it is very similar to a modern type
opalist with an eternal fire on the top. This is
the symbol of Dallas that can be seen from everywhere.

Speaker 2 (39:18):
Okay.

Speaker 13 (39:19):
And also the open list that is standing here has
the flame on top as well.

Speaker 2 (39:27):
We go back to this.

Speaker 13 (39:28):
Okay, if you stand there at the triple ungerpath, now
ask then this is the exact angle. Do you see
anything weird with this image? Anyone see anything real?

Speaker 14 (39:47):
Red?

Speaker 2 (39:50):
What about nas? Can you see that?

Speaker 13 (39:59):
It is only in that exact position at the top
of the pyramid where they do these things that you
see this pyramid?

Speaker 2 (40:07):
So what is that?

Speaker 13 (40:10):
It's not discreet really what you call it. It's this
building with the pyramid inside of it, outside of it.
It's do you see how they're doing? It's right in
our face. And now to finish this off, I feel
that it's very important for us to make a stand

(40:32):
against the so called elite and so on.

Speaker 1 (40:37):
Anyways, it's interesting to see that there's all these like
Masonic ties and it always seems to be a place
where there's a pyramid and or a obelisk when these
assassination attempts historically were taking place. And it's no secret
that the Bushes were involved with Skull and Bones. Daddy
Bush was a CIA. I said, I'm not saying George
Bush Senior was involved, but I think he was seen

(40:57):
there on the ground. And what's going to be interesting
in these couple of videos that we're gonna play next.
There's gonna be a lot of data surrounding the GfK
Assassin Nation. Don What did you think about that? It
could be a lot of hogwashed. I just think it's
a lot of coincidence and correlation.

Speaker 12 (41:12):
Uh.

Speaker 5 (41:12):
Well, in regard to the potential you know, ritualistic aspect
of the whole thing. Yeah, yeah, So admittedly I haven't
looked into it that much. I do think it's it's
probably likely that there is something there, you know, that
whole that that old adage where it says where there's smoke,
there's fire. I mean, we know for a fact that
secret societies have played a part in the creation of

(41:35):
not just this nation, but you know, the many nations
around the world, England, you know, and whatnot, but especially
America from the very beginning. You know, we we've got
the Freemasons very heavily involved in our founding. Uh you know,
the Black Hat Society with which Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson was
involved in. Uh, you know, the Illuminati itself, you know,

(41:56):
founded May May first.

Speaker 1 (41:58):
Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, we're all at interested in the Illuminati, sympathizers.

Speaker 10 (42:03):
And all this thing.

Speaker 5 (42:04):
You know, we have the Knights of Columbus and all
the things that happened during the American Civil War, you know, so,
and not to mention the numerous presidents either connected to
Bohemian Grove Buildeberg Group, which is a glorified secret society
not so secret anymore, skull and bones, things of that nature.
So I think there's definitely an aspect to it. To

(42:29):
what the extent that aspect is, I'm unsure.

Speaker 1 (42:33):
Yeah, me too, but it's interesting. So I went on
Shots Fired, which is a TV program, and I discussed
this very thing with the host, which was Dianna Loraine.
She used to be an Info Wars host for many
years on Alex Jones Network, and she asked my opinion
on what would be released in the JFK files. And

(42:53):
we're gonna break that down before we place Saint John's
Saint John Hunt's video to give support to what I'm
about to say here. But I think it's really important
that you guys listen to this. It's pretty interesting interview.
Share this live stream while we share this, and let
me know what you guys think in the chat. By
the way, we're going to open up phone lines at
the end of this and you guys can call in,
we can talk about this all these different subjects. I

(43:14):
see a bunch of people in the chat drops and
keep dropping comments in the chat and check this out, guys.

Speaker 8 (43:18):
Here I am on shots fired.

Speaker 15 (43:23):
So next up on the list is this massive declassification
dump that Trump is going to be doing. He just
signed a couple executive executive disorders executive orders saying that
he's going to be releasing the JFK files and you
know the other Kennedy files, MLK files, the Epstein files,
So lots of information that has been kept hidden and

(43:46):
concealed are soon going to be available to the public.
What do you think about, you know, all these different
declassification dumps, the JFK files, the Epstein files. Do you
think that they're really going to be accurate and true
or do you think this could potentially be just another
means of kind of propaganda. It could be tainted with

(44:09):
the files, could the information could be then could be
skewed so that we would have sort of a correct
version of events. But it's really just going along with
their same narrative and there's going to be nothing new
that's going to be revealed.

Speaker 13 (44:21):
What are you thought?

Speaker 1 (44:22):
I mean, it could be a limited hangout. That's the
catch CIA term that they use, or FBI term excuse me,
that they use for propaganda and giving a little bit
of the truth. A limited hangout a lot of times
is there to mislead or direct people. But if it
is true, I spent a week with Lee Harvey Osweald's
former lover, Judith Baker, as well as a weekend with

(44:42):
Saint John Hunt, Howard Hunt's son. Howard Hunt was the
head of the CIA during the assassination of GfG, who
allegedly gave his deathbed confessional recorded to his son, and
it's through the communication. What I would expect to see,
if accurate, if their testimonies are true, is the fact
that Lee Harvey Oswald was a patsy. He was working

(45:04):
as a double agent for the CIA running procastro material
here in the United States. Just like the heads of
most extremist groups, whether it's Anti Power prow Boys or
KKK or Black Panthers, are always informants for the government
that it would be something of that nature. And they
were worried about that coming out because of the fact
that Judith Baker said that she believed that. Now, if

(45:26):
that's accurate, that's what I would expect to see there.
There's been a little rumbling with Saint John Hunt a
little different conversation that the CIA was indeed responsible for
the assassination of JFK, who was under the guise of
national security. Now what would that be. I'm not quite
sure what GfK had in mine, except for the fact
that he wanted to dismantle the CIA, that he wanted

(45:47):
to take down the Federal Reserve, and both of those
organizations of CIA's rogue, and there's deep state projects that
are rogue.

Speaker 8 (45:54):
The Federal Reserve is not federal.

Speaker 1 (45:56):
My good friend Jedward Griffin, you know who I've broke
red and wine with at his house, who wrote a
book called The Creature from Jackal Island talking.

Speaker 8 (46:04):
About the destruction the Federal Reserve.

Speaker 1 (46:06):
Has had on our banking system and has put us
in the bankruptcy And the reason why we're so much
in debt is in majority because of these international bankers
who applauded against this nation and gather global control and
established global government. You know, it starts to it all starts.
It all works, and you know all works and gels together.
There's many moving parts here. The Martin Luther King drop.

(46:28):
I think it's a lot of stuff we might know,
and I think there's gonna be shocking things. It's like me,
I filed a POI on a guy named William Cooper,
and the reason why anyone knows what happened to William
Cooper and his death is because I filed a Freedom
of Information Act and got three hundred pages back from
the FBI. The reason why I bring that up is
because there's a lot of things in there that were personal.

Speaker 8 (46:49):
I didn't know.

Speaker 1 (46:49):
I didn't know William Cooper was smoking pot and drinking
a bottle of jack every day, and he was having
domestic issues, you know, that they were fighting and stuff
like that. Like, there's gonna be a lot of personal
information I think in both the JFK drop and the
MLK drop that might make us think differently of these
individuals than what we originally thought. And how much of
it is accurate how much is misinformation? I'm not sure

(47:12):
because a lot of it is just people they interviewed.
Maybe they rented out apartments across the street, maybe the
bug places and they heard it firsthand. Maybe we'll be
able to find all that out through these documents, but
I wouldn't be surprised that it comes out that our
government is responsible for both of those assassinations and that
in the hindsight, that our government was corrupt. The reason

(47:34):
why I feel our government would be behind the GfK
assassination is because international bankers and multinational corporatists try to
overthrow our government in nineteen thirties under the guise of
the Bonus Army March, where they sent five hundred thousand
troops into DC who wanted to cash in or war
bonds that they were supposed to get for fighting in
World War One early to deal with the depression, and

(47:55):
Smellley Butler, who was a decorated marine, was offered loads
and loads, like a life changing amount of money to
lead this so they could instill their own puppet government,
and maybe in nineteen sixties they hoped to do so
or did something similar. And what we're seeing now is
the people finally overwhelmingly voting and changing things.

Speaker 15 (48:16):
Yeah, I mean, I have no doubt it was the government,
our government that orchestrated these false flags, pretty much every
false flag, and outside outside operatives as well. Nine to eleven. Obviously,
I think, you know, January sixth has been proven, so
I think that they just I think they probably responsible

(48:36):
for every major false flag and assassination.

Speaker 8 (48:40):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (48:40):
Also along the lines of the Jeffrey Epstein trial, this
is an intimate topic for me because I was one
of the only reporters there every day of the trial
of Gallade Maxwell, and I crowdsourced that. So no media
outlet wanted to hire me for correspondence were except for
the BBC had me call in one night to give
an update.

Speaker 8 (48:59):
I couldn't find anyone.

Speaker 1 (49:00):
I was doing tons of correspondence work for the Kenosha Unrest,
which I was a key figure and was a witness
in the Kyle Reynhouse trial. It was very interesting to
see in the whole Ghlaine Maxwell trial how these people,
how the extortion and things of that nature work. These
young children that Jeffrey Epstein came and groomed at a

(49:22):
young age was most most of grooming was done by
Gallaine Maxwell or Galon depending on who you talk to,
Glon Maxwell and she would literally take them in a
room so they could give Jeffrey a massage, and it
eventually led into something more intimate weeks and months down
the road, each one of these girls who were abused
and got Stockholm syndrome, and you know, they literally were

(49:44):
there and Jeffrey Epstein was their guy. They got prominent
parts in Hollywood. Some of them are famous actors, some
of them are famous musicians, and some of them did
nothing with their life because they were so traumatized. But
I can tell you one of the key witnesses was
the was the star of days of our lif She
was there. Another one was an actress, or not an
actress but a model. Another one was a musician. So

(50:07):
these women were for exchange, were given a lucrative career
because of their devakriy and their involvement with Jeffrey Epstein.
They were abused at a young age and then rewarded
as a trauma bond, as we find an mk ultra programming,
when you program anybody the trauma bond and taking them,
traumatizing them and then rewarding them helps you build that

(50:28):
multiple personality that allows the abuse. So they become then
friends with their abuser, and they feel like they're rewarded,
and they feel like they can bring out that personality
anytime through some kind of MK Ultra ritual.

Speaker 15 (50:41):
Yeah, yeah, I mean I believe all of that.

Speaker 5 (50:49):
Incredibly, you know, fascinating stuff.

Speaker 8 (50:51):
Man. Yeah, it's definitely interesting.

Speaker 1 (50:54):
And I don't know if I'm frozen on the screen
by you guys there, But okay, cool, cool, it's interesting.
And I thought that a lot of those points are
really important. But I made a lot of claims right,
and I wanted to be able to back them up, don,
I wanted to be able to back them up.

Speaker 8 (51:11):
So I went through all these old hard drives.

Speaker 1 (51:12):
I had old old hard drives, and I went ahead
and I looked for the video I had of Saint
John Hunt giving that testimony. So, don if you could
do me a favor and start that video. Because my
screen is frozen at the moment, and.

Speaker 5 (51:31):
I do not have the controls to access a moment here,
I won't be right back.

Speaker 8 (51:37):
Cal hang in there, guys.

Speaker 5 (51:39):
Sure thing. I'll go over a bit of an article
I have here about the JFK stuff and piggyback off
it later. So my essentially, my hypothesis or idea of
you know what we're going to get with these leaks.
I think it's no secret essentially that I am a

(52:04):
big critic of the federal government, and I do not
think we're going to get a whole lots. There is
a great oracle by Jacob Hoornberger who recently Okay, we
just had two of you on the screen.

Speaker 8 (52:20):
Yeah, sorry about that. I don't know. For some reason,
the screens got weird.

Speaker 1 (52:25):
But I have this video I wanted to use to
support what I said and what we were talking about
in my interview there on shots fired, which people in
the chat were saying.

Speaker 8 (52:34):
It was a great interview. It was a good interview.
It's very interesting.

Speaker 1 (52:36):
I try to be informative, give as much information and
accurate information. But I wanted to play this video, this
has never seen before video of Saint John Hunt. That
this is Howard Hunt. The CIA is his son giving
an admission of the CIA being responsible for the JFK
assassination verbatim his father who told him when he was
near death. So let's go ahead. Are you okay with

(52:56):
playing that real quick? We could play that real quick?

Speaker 8 (52:59):
Done?

Speaker 1 (53:00):
Yep, All right, here we go, guys.

Speaker 3 (53:11):
He's something to me down and he goes there's some
very serious things. I don't have long to live that
I'm going to tell you talk to you about. And
one was the assassination of President Kennedy. Now I k
who obviously from all the books tell the publicity that
he was accused of being one of the three tramps.
And I certainly say that the old short tramp with

(53:32):
a funny looking hat.

Speaker 2 (53:34):
Was he wearing a hat?

Speaker 3 (53:35):
I can't remember now, but us Yeah, looked sure, look
like my dad. I mean, really, he's got very unusual
features in this guy. They did an overlay in this
book called Coody Todd America by Alan Weberman and Michael Camfield.
You laid the clear taxi glass across the picture of
my dad and it had like an etching of the
old tramp, and wow, that's my dad. And it's like

(53:58):
I couldn't deny that, but I said, knew nothing about it.
Osball acted alone. And if you believe this bitch story,
I'll tell you another one about another rooster. So he
told me that he had advanced knowledge of the assassination
of President mc kennedy. And I mean he was his
body was weak, was given out, but he his mind

(54:22):
was extremely extremely strong. Guy's mind was like a computer.
You could ask him about anything and he'd have dates
of memories and such. So this whole Reagan thing with Alzheimer's,
he wasn't going for that, and he told me he was.
He laid out some things for me over the next
couple of days and we made a deal. We made

(54:43):
it well. We had an idea we needed to bring
this to the public because it's important. He said he
was a benchwarmer in the assassination of President mckennedy, and
a benchwarmer, and he was very specific about that word.
Although he never we will never allowed the time to
completely gets a story from him. But a bench warmer
is someone that's at the game right they're on the bench.

(55:05):
They're not like in DC while the game's going on.
In Dallas, that's not a bench warmer. Bench warmer is
at the football field as the game's going on. So
he was there in Dallas. That's the way he told me.
He was there in Dallas. There's one picture I've seen
of a guy with a of a fedora and a
trench coat. Some of you people may have known a

(55:25):
picture I'm talking about. He's in the middle of the street.
It's probably the only guy wearing a trench coat doesn't
look like a CIA agent at all, you know, you
could have a neon sign on him Cia, you know,
they would would be more no more obvious. And he
told me, you know, the little story of the information
about being someone to a safe house on two occasions

(55:48):
and discussing the assassination with the team, and that there
was another team at the ready in another location in
the United States that must have been the Chicago team,
perhaps sort of the Tampa team or something like that.
I don't know. He didn't he really knew what he
knew about it, and that's and he didn't know about
about the assassination that was that was upcoming. He gave

(56:09):
me names, he gave me a chain of command in
his own hand, and then well, we didn't really know
what to do about information at the time, so I
went back to California. I had to go back to
my job, and and another year or so passed. But
during that year I got a tape from him in
the mail and UH, and it outlined that that he

(56:33):
knew Linda Johnson was a co conspirator in the assassination
of President Kennedy and that and that some of the
other co conspirators he named them as well. UH, David
Morales was at the meeting. Uh there was a guy
named uh So who was the psycho with the alcoholic

(56:55):
cycle with part thank you. All I have to do
is alcoholic and psycho and people that know Goo Bill Harvey. Anyways, Yeah,
he was. He was, you know, a crazy kind of guy.
But I guess working for the CIA and doing stuff
like that, you might get a little crazy. Anyways, I'm
running out of time, but he did outline these many
things which I put in my first book, Bottom of Secrecy,

(57:16):
and my father's was going to release this information and
fulfill it too. It's for this extent while he was alive.
But he got under so much pressure from his attorney,
who was being handled by William F. Buckley Junior, who
has massive CIA connections, to keep my father from going
public with this. They they would, you know, they said

(57:38):
that he was going to be arrested. He was going
to you know, he prosecuted, even in his advanced age
and his declining medical state. So and plus they and
it was true. It would have ruined his his second family,
and he knew he already ruined his first family with Watergate.
And I respected that and I appreciated that. But he
told me after he passed away to do with this information,

(58:01):
do what I thought was necessary to bring it to
the public. I have to add that my father was
not ashamed or felt guilty of Indie participation or advanced
knowledge in the Kennedy assassination. He truly felt that JFK
was a security threat to this country, as it did
just about everybody else in the military industrial complex. It
was the people that loved JFK. Other people in government

(58:24):
hated it, you know, And maybe he was a security risk.
I real they don't know what would have happened if
he would have lived, and we would have had early
gutent with Russia. Who knows, we would have revealed our
alien secrets way back then and all this kind of stuff.
But that never came about because they got rid of him.
They were acted, and that's the way the CIA does

(58:44):
these And that was when this country was taken over
against its knowledge, against its will, and nothing's ever really
been the same since then. And Eisenhower warned us very honestly,
very openly, and I'm just sorry that my father didn't
live long enough and wasn't strong enough to bring this

(59:05):
information out himself, as the plan was and Kevin Costner
the movie After had a hand in that too. He
was going to provide a dad with three million dollars
and all this kind of stuff. This is a whole
package deal going on because he wanted to film in
who constantly wanted to bring it out.

Speaker 16 (59:22):
This is all in the Bond of Secrecy book.

Speaker 1 (59:36):
And that was Saint John hunt giving his testimony about
what his father all said and told him. And when
it comes to the JFK documents and the release, I
wouldn't be surprised that a lot of that stuff is
in there. It could completely be hogwash, right what aliens?
Like he said aliens like ten years later? This is

(59:56):
ten years ago though when it wasn't okay to talk
about the term aliens. Inner's a lot of actually FOYA
documents surrounding GfK and UFOs and aliens, which is interesting.
I just don't understand why, say, John Hunts said aliens
when you think that would discredit him. But now here
we are in the future and it's okay to talk
about these programs and things of that nature. What do

(01:00:17):
you know anything about JFK and UFOs and aliens done?
Or is that like I was, like, what aliens.

Speaker 5 (01:00:23):
So there is some sort of you know, alleged speculation
that JFK was going to reveal, you know, intimate government
secrets regarding knowledge of extraterrestrials and you know, perhaps something
to do with Roswell or something like that. For the
most part, from what I've looked into, completely unsubstantiated. But

(01:00:44):
then again, you know, I'm just one guy, so there
could easily be something that I missed, you know, something
along those lines, but more specific to you know, this
supposed upcoming release and you know, sort of what I
was using to kill time while while you were getting
your computer fixed, you know. Bouncing back to that, there's

(01:01:06):
a really good article written by Jacob Hornberger, who is,
you know, very well known in libertarian circles. He's the
founder of the Future at Freedom Foundation, and you know,
he's a long, long time JFK assassination researcher, and he
put up this article just a few days ago called
will Trump really release the long the long secret JFK

(01:01:27):
assassination related records? And you know, without you know, sounding
like a robot reading to you, the entire article essentially,
Hornberger explains precisely why in his professional opinion as a
lifelong JFK researcher, that he is extremely skeptical that will
actually get anything of substance. You know, he essentially just

(01:01:50):
goes into, you know, explaining. I'll just read off his
first bullet point, because he gives three bullet points as
to what he believes to occur, and I think number
one is probably the most important. It says one there
will be no smoking gun, i e. No confession that
the CIA orchestrated the assassination of President Kennedy, no audio

(01:02:11):
tape in which Lyndon Johnson admitted his participation in the
assassination or any other similar thing. From the very beginning,
it has been standard policy of the CIA to never
put anything in writing relating to its state sponsored assassinations.
That policy would be even more emphasized in state sponsored
assassination of a US official, especially a president. And I

(01:02:35):
think that that's probably one of the biggest things that
people need to pay attention to when it comes to
this stuff. So at another point in that article, mister
Hornberger goes over all of the like a bunch of
big headlines from back in twenty seventeen when Trump made
this exact same promise, oh, we're gonna, you know, release
all the files and you know all these redactions, and

(01:02:58):
Jacob points out very clearly that at some point obviously
the agency had to get in Trump's ear and say, well, no,
we're not actually going to release everything. And it's it's
quite presumed that the exact same thing will happen here.
Now we may get some things that continue to flush
out the picture of what precisely happened, is, as Jacob

(01:03:19):
also points out in this article, but highly unlikely that
we will get any smoking gun. Highly unlikely that any
smoking gun actually even exists. Why would an agency that
prides itself on its secrecy, that is so insidiously entrenched
in the deep state just keep, you know, a blanket

(01:03:40):
confession of well, yeah, here's the hair's exactly how we
murdered the president of the country just lying around in
a file to be declassified doesn't make any sort of sense.
But what people should primarily keep in mind is that
we don't need a smoking gun. We already know who
the killed John F. Kennedy. We know why the US

(01:04:03):
government killed John F. Kennedy. Jacob Bornberger points out in
a couple of books that he wrote as well as
a couple of articles, and I even rehash it in
my article from November twenty twenty three called Revisiting Camelot
JFK sixty years on towards the or four, or rather

(01:04:23):
the anniversary of his assassination, pointing out some of the
points that had been made previously. I had it pulled
up here and now here it is. Thankfully I was
able to find it again. One of the main things
that people need to recall about the main body of
evidence about the entirety of the JFK assassination is this

(01:04:43):
particular paragraph here where I write. The most recent addition
to this body of evidence came just last week in
the form of a new documentary, JFK What the Doctors
Saw in It. For the first time since the that
fateful day sixty years ago in Parkland Hospital, the surgeons

(01:05:04):
that tended to the wounds of a dying president provided
their first hand account of the immediate aftermath of the shooting.
Their testimony leads to one resolute conclusion Oswald did not
act alone. This assertion falls directly in line with and
provides even more corroboration for previously presented evidence demonstrating the

(01:05:27):
fraudulent nature of the JFK autopsy, as diligently covered by
former Libertarian presidential candidate Jacob G. Hornberger, The evidence that
the military and the Secret Service were complicit in a
fraudulent autopsy immediately following the death of President Kennedy is irrefutable, and,
as Hornberger asserts, there is quote, there is no innocent

(01:05:50):
explanation for a fraudulent autopsy. It automatically equates to guilt
in the assassination itself.

Speaker 8 (01:05:58):
Okay, done.

Speaker 1 (01:05:59):
I gotta stop you right there, because when I got
video evidence of the guy that was in the room
when they did the autopsy, I have a recording of him.
He died six months later, and he said that they
weren't allowed to touch the body, to flip it around
to look at his brain was scooped out of his head. Yeah,
prior prior to the autopsy, the body was tampered with,

(01:06:21):
completely tampered with.

Speaker 5 (01:06:22):
Yeh.

Speaker 8 (01:06:23):
I mean, you have everything you need to know there
like that alone.

Speaker 5 (01:06:26):
Yeah, And that's precisely, and that's precisely what Jacob goes
over in a couple of his articles and in the
books that he's written about it. You know, just irrefutable
mountains of evidence showing the way that the military and
the Secret Service completely defrauded the JFK autopsy. And as
pointed out, there's only one reason why the US military

(01:06:46):
and the CIA in the Secret Service would commit a
fraudulent autopsy of a president who had just been shot.
Because they did it they didn't want people to know.

Speaker 8 (01:06:56):
No, they didn't want people to know. That's exactly it.

Speaker 1 (01:06:59):
And we're going to open up the phone lines if
you guys want to call into the Rundown Live. The
phone number here is one eight five five four seven
two fifty four eighty three. One eight five five four
seven two fifty four eighty three, and our producer, a
lovely producer, Chanelle, will pick up the phone and put
you through to us if you guys want to talk
about this dive in getting the conversation here. We're lucky

(01:07:21):
to have open lines today and we would love to
hear from you guys. Longtime listeners, first time callers, all
of you are all welcome to call into this broadcast.
And you know, JFK, a lot of people weren't alive then,
just like a lot of people now haven't been alive
during the dull whole nine to eleven debacle, which blows
my mind because it just seems like yesterday, I remember
nine to eleven happening, right. GfK was that situation the

(01:07:44):
shot heard around the world. Was our government responsible?

Speaker 8 (01:07:47):
Was it?

Speaker 1 (01:07:49):
You know, a matter of national security? What would be
that national security? Was it alien? It's probably not highly
doubt it maybe had something to do with him pulling
out of Vietnam, the military industrial comp Who knows what
else was going on behind the scenes. It was interesting
because Saint John Hunt said that GfK was loved by
the people by hated by everyone in government, which you know,

(01:08:10):
we can equate to that. We got somebody in office
that's kind of like that right.

Speaker 5 (01:08:13):
Now, I certainly wouldn't go that far.

Speaker 1 (01:08:17):
That far. You don't think he You don't think he would.
He I should say, deifies himself as a GfK like president,
more so than him actually being one.

Speaker 5 (01:08:26):
Tries to But I mean, right right, we're in the
midst of that fifth generation warfare where you know, psychological
operations are running rampant. But we you know, I've I've
bitched about that rep hole enough.

Speaker 1 (01:08:38):
We need not No, it's totally understandable. So now let's
fast forward to Martin Luther King Junior, who killed MLK?

Speaker 8 (01:08:47):
What do we know about MLK?

Speaker 1 (01:08:48):
We got a video we're gonna lead with, and then
we'll Don, who seems to be very well versed in
the MLK assassination. You got me at the JFK. You ha, Don,
who has done a lot of research on the MLK research.
We're gonna dive into all of this right here. Me
go ahead and start by playing this great video titled
the Top five Secrets of Who killed jf K.

Speaker 5 (01:09:09):
And here we go, this courtesy of the Free Thought Project.

Speaker 8 (01:09:14):
Yes, the Free Thought Project.

Speaker 10 (01:09:18):
Very sad news for all of you, and I think
sad news for all of our fellow citizens and people
who love peace all over the world, and that is
that Martin Luther.

Speaker 5 (01:09:32):
King was shot and was killed tonight.

Speaker 9 (01:09:39):
We have been told our entire lives that Martin Luther
King Junior was killed by a lone gunman, single bullet,
and that this lone gunman, James Earrol Ray, had no
outside help and because of his streets, marts and Cohnman background,
he was able to make it on a journey all
the way to Europe in the two months after he
killed King before he was arrested in London. Here are

(01:10:04):
five facts that dispute that official story. Number five. Martin
Luther King Junior's family proved in a civil trial that
his death was the result of a conspiracy. Jurors took
only fifty nine minutes to deliberate after listening to seventy
witnesses over the thirty day trial, Lloyd Jowers was found

(01:10:26):
guilty for his role in the killing of Reverend King.
Jowers was the owner of Jim's Grill, a restaurant that
was next to the infamous Lorraine Motel where King was shot.
A waitress named Betty Spates said she saw Jowers come
in from the back door of Jim's Grill with a
literal smoking rifle just after she heard the gunshot. In

(01:10:47):
the end, the jury found Jowers, as well as the
Dixie Mafia, federal, state, and local authorities, were all involved
in a vast conspiracy to kill King. According to the
King attorney, during the trial, the media was only present
to film the testimony of members of the King family
before actual evidence was introduced, they left the courtroom. He

(01:11:10):
also says that Court TV pulled out of their full
coverage commitment at the last minute without explanation number four.
Almost everything we've been told by the media about James
Earl Ray is a lie or half truth. The mainstream
narrative of James Earl Ray is that he was a
con man who escaped from prison because of his cunning,

(01:11:32):
wit and street smarts with no job or money. We
are told he was able to make a trans continental
trip to Europe, where he was finally captured. Shortly afterwards,
he admitted to killing King by pleading guilty, so there
was no trial, open and shut right. In reality, there
is much more to it. James Earl Ray, in fact,

(01:11:52):
never confessed to killing King. He was given an ultimatum
by his attorney, who wanted it out of the assignment.
He told Ray to plead guilty and the attorney would
send Ray's brother five hundred dollars. Then Ray could use
the money to get a new attorney and a new trial.
We know that is not how things work, but Ray
agreed anyway and never got a trial entered doctor William Pepper.

(01:12:17):
Doctor Pepper was a close friend of Doctor King. The
year before the assassination, he met with James Earl Ray
and listened to his story. In nineteen eighty eight, Pepper
became James Earl Ray's attorney. Later on, he represented the
King family in the civil suit we mentioned before. One
thing is for sure, James Earl Ray is not the

(01:12:37):
criminal genius that the media and government made him out
to be. During his life of crime, Ray had many
blunders like failed escape attempts, He fell out of a
getaway car, and once even shot himself in the foot.
Doctor Pepper believes James Earl Ray was unequipped to carry
out the assassination like he was alleged to have done.

(01:12:59):
According to William Pepper's forty plus year investigation, James Earl
Ray was an unknowing patsy. He didn't escape out of jail.
The Dixie Mafia, working alongside the FBI, paid off the
Wooden and busted James Earl Ray out on a bread truck.
This is known because of a key witness in the
Dixie Mafia that actually helped carry out the plan. Ray

(01:13:20):
was then handled by a shadowy figure named Raoul, who
made sure Ray was in the right place at the
right time. Surrounding the months of King's death. Number three,
the bullet didn't match the gun. This is perhaps the
most smoking gun, solid direct evidence that it could not
have been Ray that took the shot. Judge Joe Brown

(01:13:44):
was the arms expert in the civil trial, testifying that
it's absolutely impossible that the bullet recovered from the scene
was a bullet that came from the murder weapon.

Speaker 12 (01:13:54):
Well, for me, that was a small impact. I wound
up being the last judge hearing the James Earl Ray matter.
Did he in fact assassinate doctor Martin Luther King?

Speaker 7 (01:14:04):
And had he not died and his local attorney Night
died in closed succession, it would have been my finding
that he was not the gunman.

Speaker 12 (01:14:15):
That Remington's seven sixty game Master they've gotten the Civil
Rights Museum is not the murder weapon. It's not even close.
The thing the state relied upon was the rifle, but
modern scientific methodology excluded that rifle from being the murder weapon.
The bullet they pull out a King's body has a

(01:14:35):
rate of rifling twist of one turn in every eleven
and a quarter inches. The rifle that Ray had had
a rate of rifling twist of one turn in every
ten inches and a bad manufacturing defect that is not
apparent on the death slug. He was shot with an

(01:14:56):
XM twenty one. It's a seven sixty two by fifty
one Melome the NATO caliber weapon with a special stainless
steel barrel, a three to nine telescopic site modified by
a company on his leatherwood. It was a redfield site

(01:15:16):
and they used special subsonic ammunition with a suppressor on
the end. It reduced the velocity of the bullet to
below supersonic to confuse the sound signature.

Speaker 9 (01:15:31):
So who killed King? William Pepper's investigation found that two
witnesses saw James Earl Ray drive away from the scene
before the shot had been fired. Pepper says it is
well known in his investigation who killed King. Frank Strauser
was the shooter, the top rifleman on the Memphis PD.

(01:15:52):
The janitor at the Memphis PD saw the rifle and
saw Strouser practicing with it all day the day of
the killing, Henastrauser being driven away with the rifle just
before the killing took place. Another top Memphis police officer,
Earl Clark, was the spotter and was seen running from
the smoke filled bushes behind Jim's grill after the shot

(01:16:14):
was fired number two. The testimony of Lula May Shelby,
a surgical nurse in the room where King died. Missus
Shelby worked at Saint Joseph's Hospital and says the King
was clinging onto life and they were trying to save him,
that is until doctor breen Bland, the head of neurosurgery,

(01:16:36):
and two other men kicked everyone out of the room.

Speaker 11 (01:16:38):
The head of neurosurgery of the hospital, doctor breen Bland,
came into the emergency room with two other men in suits,
and he said to the people in the emergency room,
stop working on that and let him die. Then he said,
after a pause, get out of here. All of you

(01:17:01):
leave this room. Get out, and he emptied the room.
And as he was emptying the room, a surgical nurse
was the last one out, and she heard them do
this like picking up for water in their mouths, and

(01:17:24):
that caught her attention, and she turned and she saw
them spit on the body of doctor King. The three men.
Then she saw blond doctor Blande take a pillow and
put it over his face and suffocate him, and that's
how Martin King was killed.

Speaker 9 (01:17:46):
The nurse's testimony was confirmed by her son, who explained
how upset his mother was when she got home the
morning after King's death and how she told the entire family.
This was also backed up by another witness that will
be revealed in our number one spot. But before we
get to number one, here are a few honorable mentions.

(01:18:07):
James Earl Ray's alias at the time surrounding the King assassination,
Eric Starvo Gault, was the identity of a munition specialist
with the high level security clearance. Pepper's investigation, aligned with Ray's,
claimed that Raul, the likely government agent that handled Ray,
gave him this alias. The JFK connection weird enough, the

(01:18:31):
mafia government link in the King case parallels with some
of the same activity JFK assassination researchers have found. Doctor
Pepper is also the attorney for Robert F. Kennedy's alleged assassin,
Sirhan Sirhan, another assassin who is widely claimed by many
experts to be innocent. Another strange coincidence found in the

(01:18:52):
car of James Earl Ray was a phone number to
Jack Ruby. Truth is many times stranger than fiction. The
other thing worth mentioning is the bundle of incriminating evidence
found close to the scene where King was assassinated, the
contents of which were used to incriminate Ray, yet how
they got there was never really scrutinized. Another disturbing fact,

(01:19:15):
the police security detail, which had been assigned to King
on his previous visit to the city, was withdrawn without explanation,
the day before the assassination. And the last mention we
will make is that in the iconic photo at the
Lorraine Motel, the one cradling Doctor King while he lay dying,
that's actually an undercover cop and military intelligence agent named

(01:19:39):
Merrill McCullough. Number one. The biggest witness in doctor William
Pepper's investigation didn't come around until ten years after the
nineteen ninety nine civil trial. His name Ron Tyler Atkins,
the son of Russell Atkins, who was the head of
the Dixie Mafia. Atkins wanted to come clean after a

(01:20:01):
diagnosis of cancer. His testimony is a conspiracy theorist wet dream,
as he puts the FBI in the same room as
the Dixie Mafia, plotting to kill the greatest civil rights
leader in US history.

Speaker 17 (01:20:17):
Doing it and for me, the test is the evidence.
Not only has doctor Pepper amassed a considerable body of
what we call circumstantial evidence, but he has also developed
a considerable body of direct evidence in the form of
the son, Ron Atkins, of the father, Russell Atkins, where

(01:20:43):
the assassination was planned at the home. So doctor Pepper
has accumulated not only direct evidence through the testimony of
the son that the murder was planned at his father
in the family home, but the connection between Clyte Tolson,

(01:21:03):
who was the number two man in the FBI next
to Jago Hoover, organized crime figures who were present in
the home, and the Dixie Mafia which was headed by
his father Russell, the local chief of police Holloman, as
well as the mayor. They were all in the family

(01:21:24):
home plotting them.

Speaker 5 (01:21:25):
Talking about that's what they were going to.

Speaker 17 (01:21:28):
That's right, and who was going to do it and
who was involved. So, you know, as doctor Pepper says,
we look at evidence, we look at facts. This is
not speculation now. And for me, when I see the
deposition of a sixteen year old son who was present,
who was involved in and at the planning of the assassination,

(01:21:49):
it leads to a very strong conclusion that the FBI
and the federal government, the mafia, the Dixie Mafia, which
is a ku klux Klan, the mayor and others were
in the assassination of this great man.

Speaker 9 (01:22:02):
Atkins also backed up the Saint Joseph's story by the
nurse and her son. He said that doctor bring Bland
was their family doctor, and he overheard doctor Bland say, quote,
make sure if the bullet doesn't kill him, to take
him to Saint Joseph's hospital and will make sure that

(01:22:23):
he doesn't leave there alive. Pepper maintains that he has
been blacklisted by the mainstream media and says that they
are complicit in the cover up of the truth of
the King assassination.

Speaker 1 (01:22:43):
Time when you saw what an interesting video, don uh so,
what's your take on the whole MLK assassination. There was
a good breakdown by police. The police in the Free
Thought project, you provide the video of the MLK assassination.
There's no doubt that there's a lot of similarities between

(01:23:05):
JFK and MLK. And obviously for a long time we
knew that the MLK was a plot buy our government.
Now it sounds like they brought it in the KKK
because who else would want to kill a civil rights
leader of the popularity as Martin Luther King, other than
a white supremacist organization made up of a bunch of
liberal frontmen who hated him, you know.

Speaker 5 (01:23:25):
So exactly. And you know, it's no secret that the
federal government had such a disdain for doctor King and
for many civil rights leaders. I mean, he's not the
only one that was killed. I mean, we talk about
Malcolm X, we can also talk about guys like Fred Hampton,
who is the leader of the Chicago Black Panthers, who
was equally assassinated by you know, coordinated effort by the

(01:23:48):
FBI and Chicago Police Department, killed in his bed while
he slept, riddled with bullets. I mean, I've seen the
crime scene photos of Fred Hampton's killing and it's it's
an egregious abhorrent how many pools, holds were just you know,
riddled throughout his room. You know, we look back at
the history of things like co intel pro, which is

(01:24:10):
a shorthand for counter intelligence program, was a program ran
by the FBI. We know this because members of the
Black Panther Party broke into the I believe, the Memphis
FBI headquarters and stole a bunch of documents which were
then leaked to the Washington Post exposing this ongoing operation

(01:24:32):
by the FBI to infiltrate the Black Panthers, to infiltrate
anti war groups, to infiltrate other black liberation movement groups,
you know, pretty much anybody attempting to hold the government
to account as a means of sabotaging them, subverting them, this, that,
and the fourth and it shows the egregious links that
they went to. And since then, you know, we've we've

(01:24:53):
had even more information come out. I mean, their confirmed
reports that the FBI worked directly with the Ku Klux
Klan in places like Alabama to firebomb uh, you know,
the Freedom Writers as they were, uh, you know, driving
along through through their you know historic trip. You know.
So there have been so many instances of federal and

(01:25:17):
local law enforcement working with groups like the Dixie Mafia,
which is just an offshoot of the clan, or the
clan itself, or you know, any of these other groups.
I mean, even to this day, I mean, we have
white supremacist groups that are just riddled with Feds all
over the place. And so and it's not even just that,
I mean, it's it's literally any sort of political agitator group,
whether it's the prow Boys or Antifa. Uh, you know

(01:25:39):
the high ranks of Black Lives Matter. We know there
are FEDS embedded in there, you know. So it's it's literally,
any political agitator group that you know poses some sort
of concern to the status quo always ends up getting
infiltrated by Feds and and and co opted. So it's

(01:26:00):
certainly not any sort of shock that, you know, the
information showing that, you know, the FBI specifically Jed or
Hoover himself gave the green light. There was another article
we put out on the Free Thought Project back in
September out of Covert Action magazine, just sort of commemorating
the life of.

Speaker 1 (01:26:20):
The Well, that's the hate against Martin Luther King for though,
why do they despise this man? Is it because he
removed the lines of segregation? That because you would think
that they would want to use somebody of that power
and try to commandeer or control the movement at some level.

Speaker 5 (01:26:36):
Right, Well, before I get to that, the point that
I was making is that unfortunately doctor Pepper passed away
last last year, and so in September, there's a great
article from Covert Action magazine about his life and a
documentary about his life that we aggregated on the Free
Thought Project, and it goes into a much more detail
of doctor Pepper's investigation and what he found. But to

(01:27:01):
your point, the reason that the federal government was so
against King and Malcolm X, and you know, people like
Fred Hampton and so many others is the uncomfortable truth
that so many people tend to want to avoid, even
in the conspiracy community, they tend to want to avoid
this subject. And it's that this nation, and the political

(01:27:24):
establishment of this nation specifically, is founded in white supremacy.
It's founded in racism. You know, this nation was built
on shadow slavery and indigenous genocide. The status quo of
the system that's been put in power from the very
beginning benefits one very specific group of people, heterosexual, white,

(01:27:46):
rich Christian men. If you don't fall inside that very
specific circle of people, it doesn't matter who you are,
they don't give a shit about you. But particularly if
you happen to fall outside of that into their minority groups,
the black community, the brown community. We're seeing, you know,
flagrant racism against the brown community right now. The Hispanic community,

(01:28:10):
which we'll be discussing later this week, you know. And
so these are some of the deeper things that people
don't like to talk about because they're uncomfortable, and you know,
because of the way that the left has weaponized these
accusations of racism. Oh, everybody I don't like is a racist,
everybody that disagrees with me, as Hitler. And so people
have gotten to this point of they're sick and tired

(01:28:31):
of hearing about racism, which, in my opinion, was done deliberately,
because if a bunch of racists want to make it
easier to be racist, so what are they going to do.
They're going to start pumping into the mainstream media a
whole bunch of crap to make people sick of hearing
about that, because, oh, well, just because you voted for
the different guy, now you're a racist. I'm so sick

(01:28:53):
of hearing this crap. So when people get desensitized to
things about systemic white supremacy and institutionalized racism, it makes
it that much easier to get away with things of
that regard. And you know, to the point you know
that we're making here. The murder of doctor King was
just one of those many things, and you know, we

(01:29:14):
still see to this day attempts to you know, smear
his name and many other people. I still to this day.
I had a friend of mine message with me. He's like, hey, man,
I've been, you know, don't going down the Martin Luther
King assassination rabbit hole, and I found some people talking about,
you know, he's supposedly secretly a communist and all this
sort of business. And you know, I told him, I

(01:29:36):
was like, you know, the FBI had been trying to
spin that narrative for so long, but the fact of
the matter is doctor King was a registered Republican. You know,
he's the farthest thing from a communist. But they want
to try to spend that narrative, especially during the nineteen sixties,
because what else was happening in the nineteen sixties. It
was the Cold War, it was the Red Scare, so

(01:29:56):
of course, you know, the Big Baddie or the communists,
so yeah, all of that, yeah, exactly, So anybody that
the US government didn't like at that time while you
were a communist, because it was an easy way to
demonize somebody. I mean, you know, we could see here
for an hour and talk about.

Speaker 1 (01:30:13):
Oh well, first of all, I think it's interesting that
I have this up right now, and it's basically a
document by Marvin Antelman in his book called Eliminate the
Opiate One where Communism comes from. First of all, real quick,
we can bring this up and put this on the screen.
It's just dumb luck that I wanted to dive into

(01:30:33):
this and you brought up communism. But you know, communism
doesn't have its foundation. And you know, Carl Marx was
paid to do a service.

Speaker 8 (01:30:41):
Essentially. Most people don't know that.

Speaker 1 (01:30:43):
But in this book by a Jewish Rabbi named Marvin Antleman,
he talks about communism and where it came from with
his Contrary to popular opinion, Carl Marx did not originate
the Communist Manifesto. He was paid for his services by
the League of the Just.

Speaker 8 (01:30:57):
Do you remember hear.

Speaker 1 (01:30:57):
The Justice League and comic books? What color are they? Oh?

Speaker 8 (01:31:00):
Red? And no yelo?

Speaker 1 (01:31:01):
I wonder why that is? Which was known in the
country an origin of Germany as the Bundergaruchten or the
Bun Society, which existed as a secret society, was later
to become known as the International Communist Party. But get this,
the actual origin of the bun seems to be lost
in obscurity, but it is believed by many political scientists

(01:31:22):
have been influenced largely by another secret organization, the Illuminati,
the brainchild of the Bavarian intellectual named Adam Weissapt, who
is believed to have been in ex jesuit. Illuminati was
founded in May first of nineteen seventeen seventy six, and
it is for this reason that many scholars believe that
may Day has achieved prominent status and Marxist Leninists organizations

(01:31:43):
and other socialist communist coalition groups throughout the world. By
the way, Adam Weishap's Illuminati Manifesto was the guidelines for
the Communist Manifesto because he wanted the new world order
government run world. You know, essentially, when Vice hop Fers
conceived of a new social order in the world, he
was guided by the model of the republic by Plato.

(01:32:04):
Weis Hopt was a professor of canon law and englistatt Bavaria.
The Illuminati was known in Germany as the perfect Billitzen
Billiston and had the parallel with Plato's Republic. Just as
Plato provided for three classes of people in the Republic,
so too did the Illuminati. But I just wanted to
point out where did the communism come from? It's Illuminati

(01:32:26):
plan everyone. No, I just wanted some evil, wicked for second.
But what's interesting is Marvel Annelman, which a lot of
people are like, well, it's in a Zionis book all
this other jazz about it. Well, I want you guys
to know that Marvin Anselman is one of the sole
reasons why none other than Henry Kissinger got excommunic unicated

(01:32:51):
from Judaism. Did you know that nineteen seventy six New
York Hilton Hotel, Hell Hall, excuse me Antheman, chief Justice
of the Supreme Rabbinic Court of America, presided with four
other Rabbi judges and performed a solemn excommunication of Henry

(01:33:11):
Kissinger from Judaism an account of anti Jewish and anti
American institution that the actions anti American actions that the
council alleged. So there you have it, just a little
interesting interesting stuff about history and communism real quick. But yeah,
I guess during the Red Stare Scare McCarthyism all that

(01:33:35):
it would have been an easy way to paint Martin
Luther King oh, use the commune as a matter of
national security.

Speaker 5 (01:33:41):
And let's not forget just how manufactured the Red Scare was,
first of all. So first we have to look back
at Operation paper Clip when the United States just following
World War two, President Human President Truman all.

Speaker 1 (01:33:54):
Henry Kessinger was in charge of that program, by.

Speaker 5 (01:33:56):
The way, correct, you know President Truman all for rised
Project paper Clip, which brought over about fifteen hundred to
two thousand high ranking Nazi officials, put them to work
in the State Department inside the OSS, which is the
predecessor to the CIA, NASA. You know vone von Braun
and all of our rocket technology essentially came from Nazi

(01:34:19):
research on the V two rocket program and all of
these sorts of things. Well, some of the officials that
they put inside of the State Department were responsible for
creating this sort of Red Scare narrative that became the
Cold War. But even more pertinent history in regard to that,
everyone should certainly read the works of Professor Anthony C. Sutton.

(01:34:42):
He's actually has a trilogy of books called the Wall
Street Trilogy. The three titles of these books individually are
Wall Street and FDR wall Street. In the rise of
Hitler and wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution. His book
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution particularly lines out the
evidence from a forensic investigation that Professor Sutton did showing

(01:35:04):
that the Bolshevik Revolution was in fact facilitated by the
United States government and other corporate powers. The UK government, Canada,
Wall Street corporatists, of course, essentially bankrolling the Bolshevik Revolution
and the rise of communism in the in the creation

(01:35:26):
of the USSR in nineteen eighteen. Why did they do this?
Of course, Well, anybody who has any sort of common sense,
you study the economic impacts of communism and you realize, well,
it destroys economies. So why, of course then would capitalists
and corporatists want to prop up communism in the part

(01:35:48):
of the world it is essentially the biggest rival of
the Western corporate empire. Well, because if you prop up
a regime and a political ideology that creates a captured
market and then proceeds to collapse that market, well then
capitalists can go in behind it and buy up everything

(01:36:09):
dirt cheap for pennies on the dollar, Which is it
precisely what happened after the fall of the Soviet Union.
And of course, you know, Professor Sutton's work goes into
this way more in depth than we even have time
for with like I think fifteen minutes of this show left.
But you know, to the point being that the whole
rise of communism, the rise of the Soviet Union and

(01:36:29):
the spread of communism throughout Asia and whatnot, was was
directly facilitated by Western capitalists on Wall Street and in
the United Kingdom. And you know, it's one of those
instances of America essentially creating its own enemies, and it
comes back to bide it in the ass the same
way they created Isis and al Qaeda, in the same

(01:36:50):
way that they armed all of the cartels that they're
suddenly so fond of trying to fight against. And you know,
all these things, it's an American tradition.

Speaker 1 (01:37:00):
False flags, right, false flags, blaming it on patsyeing, ruining
somebody else's life. And you can you go back to prohibition,
amongst other things. The government working alongside organizations that don't
have the best interests but are dirty enough to do
the things that they want has been long written in

(01:37:21):
the past. You know, Boston Tea Party, all that fun stuff,
you know, you can get into all the crazy stuff
our government and people have been involved with all over
the years, and people are like Boston Tea Party is
about opiates and attacks and who knows what it was
really about. But like, it's interesting when you start taking
a look at the history of all these you know,
remember the main tell of Spain. We sink our own ship,

(01:37:44):
Pearl Harbor. We knew that the attack was coming. You know,
Operation what is it, geez, I can't remember it now,
Northwoods Project, Northwoods, Operation Northwoods, you know where we were
gonna under the JFK and or attack our own nation
and then blame it on Cuba just by going to

(01:38:04):
war with Cuba, all these different things. You know, I wonder,
if you know, JFK did everything they wanted, we probably
Cuba woud probably be part of the United States right now,
and maybe Trump would have to you know, invade.

Speaker 8 (01:38:14):
Greenland or whatever he's trying to do. Just joking about it.

Speaker 1 (01:38:19):
But you know, it's crazy, it's interesting, and I think
that we discovered that throughout the years that our government
is not an honest, good government. I think they've known
this for quite some time. But now the Internet, all
this data all these old video clips, all these foyas
are accessible to everybody for everyone to see. And I
think that's why people are so quick to jump on

(01:38:39):
the Trump train, is because he wanted to drive or swamp,
which he really didn't do the first time around. Yeah,
he did a bunch of cool executive orders. Now he's
got everyone hooked, and now he's got that mRNA vaccine
coming out that you know, he's talking about what five
hundred was a five hundred billion with a B or
a five hundred million under the bill because he wants

(01:39:01):
us to lead a nanotech and healthy imagine, because they
just want to live forever. Let's call it what it is,
it's transhumanism exactly.

Speaker 5 (01:39:07):
I mean, anybody who can look at Trump partnering with
guys like Larry Ellison and Sam Altman.

Speaker 8 (01:39:14):
And who are these people? For our listeners who don't know.

Speaker 5 (01:39:16):
Larry Ellison, he is the head of Oracle Industries. It's
a partner firm with the CIA. Sam Altman is the
CEO of Open AI. He's a former associate of Elon Musk.
They had a bit of a tiff and a falling
out and whatnot. You know, basically, you know Whitney Web
actually has a fantastic series breaking down a lot of
their connections and whatnot. I would definitely recommend, you know,

(01:39:38):
going to Unlimited hangouts dot com, which is her website
and is typing their names into the search bar and
see what comes up. We'll get plenty of articles breaking
down all of their ties to technocracy, transhumanism, a whole
bunch of nasty shit. So the fact that we have
Donald Trump singing their praises, giving these guys five hundred
billion dollars to start a program that they're calling Project Stargate,

(01:40:01):
that I find very interesting because for researchers of what
you know, other nasty stuff the government has done looking.

Speaker 1 (01:40:07):
At trying to build humans to go through space.

Speaker 5 (01:40:10):
Yeah, you know, looking back at Project Stargate from the eighties,
there's a lot of interesting stuff that happened there. But
you know, so there now they're pushing through this digitized
healthcare you know AI created, you know mRNA cancer vaccines,
you know, which it's essentially Operation warp speed two point zero.
Anybody who looks at just even that, aside from everything else,

(01:40:34):
there's plenty of other bad things, but just that alone,
Anyone who looks at that and is still on the
Trump train. I'll just be Frank is a delusional idiot.

Speaker 1 (01:40:46):
I think it's pretty interesting because this is where it's
gonna all lead lab growing sperm. That's right, swimmers and
eggs may soon allow parents to customize future children. It's
the Rundown live coming true. Like we've talked about these
things for years and years about uh, you know, designer babies.
Maybe you'll want to make your little bit bathroom at baby. Oh,

(01:41:07):
Google got a little bathroom at baby. Come here, Gucci,
Gucci coo. Or you'll be able to make yourself a
little elf baby or you know that, because that's where
it's gonna go.

Speaker 8 (01:41:16):
People.

Speaker 1 (01:41:16):
There's some goth check out there and be like, I
want pointy ears on my baby. Can I get myself
some dRIT stewardan from you know, the crystal shard? Or
can I get some self myself a froto Bagan So
I want a cute little like halfling baby or whatever,
you know centars, minitars, mermaids, merman. I don't know where
this is going. I'm just saying designer babies are coming,

(01:41:38):
artificial womb facilities, and yeah, it's gonna be painted out
as a nice thing at first, and yeah, people are
gonna be able to do it. There's gonna be people
we are gonna go and heck to technology. You're gonna
have people like babies grown with super strength. You know,
that's all about super soldiers in the military. Maybe you know,
growing super soldiers and the ones have muscles that never
get fat, and their DNA automatically eats GMOs or bioengineered

(01:41:59):
food or live off of like, you know whatever, whatever cockroaches.
You can make it taste like chicken for you. Right,
they'll make sure your DNA does all of that. And
then this is where we lead to postgenderism. Right, there's
no need for you to have sex anymore with a
person you love. Right, you can just procreate in a
lab and the baby won't have any diseases, no side effects,

(01:42:23):
and it can pick out the color, the hair, the eyes,
how tall.

Speaker 8 (01:42:27):
The skin tone, the gender.

Speaker 1 (01:42:29):
You know, if it's a hairy baby, not so hairy baby,
if it'll love or lose hair if it not, If
you want it to have Wi Fi hair so it
can get the Internet straight to its brain.

Speaker 8 (01:42:38):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (01:42:39):
They canna have all these different things and I'm making
up the Internet hair, you know, the Wi Fi hair.
But you know, well we talked about electronic tattoos. How
far will it be until they just integrate the electronics
right into the body and nanotech so they can do
their brain cloud interface and just download data into the
noggin of the brain of the child, and this child
will have adult like consciousness and a small, little like

(01:43:00):
eight year old body walking around.

Speaker 8 (01:43:01):
You know whatever.

Speaker 1 (01:43:02):
This is craziness, This is this is real topic, real news.
Lab grown spurmags may soon allow parents customize their future children.

Speaker 5 (01:43:10):
It's absolutely insane. And you know, let's not forget here,
you know, because I think that people often sow or
people so often focus on the technology side of transhumanism
that that there's one underlying aspect that you know, we
have talked about on the show quite often, but most
others tend not to. Is that what transhumanism is and

(01:43:32):
what it does by merging man and machine and doing
all this sort of nonsense, it separates you from your soul.
It separates humanity from its spiritual aspects. And and you know,
of course, why would these nefarious groups want to do though,
Because your connection with your spirit your connection with your

(01:43:53):
God whomever, so that may be in your eyes, whether
that's Yeshua, whether it's Odin, whether it is Earth, Zeus,
whomsoever you choose to follow as a human, spiritual connection
with the divine and with this planet Earth is the
most important aspect of our existence in my personal opinion,
and seems to be in the opinion of many of

(01:44:15):
these other powerful elitists, which is why they're working so
damn hard to separate people from that in numerous aspects.

Speaker 8 (01:44:24):
And they don't want to die.

Speaker 1 (01:44:25):
They want to get the funding to save themselves. Do
you think you and I will have access to technology
that will keep us looking young and regenerative? And you know,
you know, Okay, this comes down to the Matthew James
Bailey debate.

Speaker 8 (01:44:38):
I wasn't able to get them for our show.

Speaker 1 (01:44:40):
But when I was filling into the American Journal because
of the platform and how much larger the Info Wars
platform is, he was able to come on there. And
he works on think tanks for NASA and everything else,
and he talked about that the difference between a mechanical
transhumanism and a biological transhumanism and a biological transhumanism is
not necessary fairly a bad thing. Take keeping our existing

(01:45:02):
meat suit, slowing down aging, learning how to like you know,
make it so we can eat healthier, live longer, stay rejuvenated,
be younger. And yeah, there might be some technology needed
along the way. Maybe somebody loses the limb, they need
a robot foot, you know, the idea of replacing your
heart with a robot heart. Hmmm, you know, emp that once.
Let me know how that.

Speaker 5 (01:45:22):
Works out for you, right, exactly. Yeah, So, I mean,
of course, you know, we we we spent what was
it a whole week last year tech Transhumanist Week talking
to experts in the field, guys like Tom Ross and yeah,
you know, and so there's obviously, yes, there's there's very
many upsides to it. But the nefarious side of the
whole transhumanist agenda that that you know that we have covered, uh,

(01:45:44):
you know, is it's multifaceted. But also you know, to
to my point, you know, it's all about separating humanity
from its soul. And you know that's at the end
of the day, that's why it's so important too.

Speaker 8 (01:45:58):
Still get downloaded into a computer dome.

Speaker 1 (01:46:00):
Is that what happens we're all like an upload and
then we can never get on of this computer because
our soul is downloaded into it doesn't go back to
the ether like it's supposed to. Here it is humanoid
robots to race against humans, and first ever of its kind.
I wanted to race a robot. Run against the robot.

Speaker 5 (01:46:19):
I already got bad knees.

Speaker 8 (01:46:20):
I'm good, run against Optimus.

Speaker 1 (01:46:24):
Friends, Can we put aload Decepticon stickers on these robots?
That's gonna be my thing whenever I see a robot. Oh,
speaking of which, I saw a robot. I saw like
ye remember did I send you that video?

Speaker 2 (01:46:35):
Don?

Speaker 11 (01:46:35):
Yeah?

Speaker 1 (01:46:36):
In Miami where I gave a presentation on the magic
behind words and programming humans and the future of transhumanism
and programming humans and ancient occultism and programming humans and
mom Kay Ultra and drama Bonds and all those other
jazz and it was a great conversation. But while I
was in Miami, everywhere I turned there was these little robots, right,

(01:47:00):
And I'm like, what the heck is going on here?
And I'm gonna go ahead and pull up these ropes
this video I got of these roads and I want
you guys to take a look at this because I
literally jumped in front of the robot and guess what happened.

Speaker 8 (01:47:13):
The robots stopped and it went around me.

Speaker 1 (01:47:15):
I couldn't believe what I was seeing, and I sent
it to my dad. I'm like, Dad, you're not gonna
believe this. You gotta check this out. They got pizza
delivering robots here, and these robots are just driving around
delivering pizzas. It was just wild to me, crazy. I
couldn't believe what I was seeing. And they have little hearts,
little hearts for eyes because you know, they don't want

(01:47:37):
you to be scared of these things, so they want
you to go ahead and welcome these things. It's so
convenient that you don't have to tip a robot. Robot
comes and delivers you your food, your Panera, your whatever
it might be, and you don't have to worry about it. Well,
I can't show it to you guys right now because
at the moment, the Facebook is down. It's just not working.

Speaker 8 (01:47:59):
Like it's a.

Speaker 1 (01:47:59):
Post do for me and oh, here we go, I
got it, Here you go. We're gonna we're gonna put
this on the large screen for everyone, so everyone.

Speaker 5 (01:48:08):
Probably go and wrap the show after this as well.

Speaker 1 (01:48:10):
Yeah, absolutely, guys, check this out. This is the robot
that we're talking about. For the listeners on the in
the chat, you'll be able to hear it or go
to rumble dot com Ford Slash the Rundown Live to
see what.

Speaker 8 (01:48:22):
Me and Donn are gonna go. Ooh that's cool. Ah,
that's cool about you know. So that's what this is about.

Speaker 3 (01:48:30):
Here.

Speaker 5 (01:48:31):
I have to try to pull it up on the
screen here.

Speaker 1 (01:48:34):
Yeah, give me a second here, it's not it's not
pulling up for me. So maybe we won't do it.
We'll give it when we're shot.

Speaker 5 (01:48:42):
Good old Facebook.

Speaker 8 (01:48:43):
Yeah, here we go. We got it, We got it.

Speaker 5 (01:48:49):
Yeah, I remember I said, these things remind me of
R two D two, did you?

Speaker 8 (01:48:54):
Yeah?

Speaker 1 (01:48:55):
Is the way it goes here, you go, guys. Christanti
hears on the scene robot. Ward's me giant heart on it,
jump jumped out in front of it. Oh hi, how

(01:49:17):
are you?

Speaker 3 (01:49:17):
What are you doing?

Speaker 1 (01:49:19):
What are you trying to do? You're just gonna go
row with Okay. So that was one of my experiences.
This is the other one. This isn't crossing a busy street, bro,
Look at that face. How do you not love that?
Giant heart faced robot. Look at just crosses the street.
It knows to cross the street that there's no traffic,

(01:49:39):
and it knows to use them the walkway. It doesn't
go over the ledges or anything. It just blew my
mind at how like cool and neat this kind of
is look at watch It does a reverse turn and
then it comes and it sees cars are coming and
there's a guy behind it. Look at the guy behind
it doesn't even notice that He's just walking like it's
no big deal. He's like, no, I don't see no

(01:49:59):
roll there. I'm sitting here.

Speaker 8 (01:50:01):
I'm like, whoa. Look at there.

Speaker 1 (01:50:03):
It is two hearts and a smiley face. That's what
has two eyes for his hearts and a smiley face,
and its colored pink, and it delivers your phone just
like the rundown Live predicted guys. You guys will see
guys tomorrow, same bad time, same bat channel, KGr a
dB dot com. Check out the rundown Live dot com.
If you want to donate and support us, there's ways
to do that. You can find that go to the

(01:50:23):
rundown Live dot com. You can message us any way
you can support this broadcast where one hundred percent listener funded.
If you're on Rockfan Watching right now, you can drop
some rate token. You can do some donations on Rumble
whatever it is you guys do venmos cash app us.

Speaker 8 (01:50:37):
We take it.

Speaker 1 (01:50:38):
We're covering a lot of crazy stuff. We're doing a
lot of awesome stuff. And h Channel says, reminds me
of the del Tron thirty thirty. Whatever the hell that is.
All right, guys, have a good night. You listen Rundown Live.
We'll see you guys tomorrow, and tell your friends to
tune in, share the live link, let them know this
is where it's at.

Speaker 8 (01:50:56):
All right, guys, deuces

Speaker 4 (01:51:00):
H you will listen to see Talky Chris, Dante Harris
and Amagia on the Rundown Nive your forecast into the future.