Xander Arena, A.I. Vs 911 Conspiracies

Xander used Elon Musk’s Grok AI to scrape the internet and deep dive publicly available evidence, What did Grok uncover? Was the Pentagon hit by an airplane and evaporate? Tune in to find out what Xander found out on today's broadcast!

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:10):
It's that time again.

Speaker 2 (00:12):
Time to relax, kick up your feet, grab your favorite beverage,
and tune into the Rundown Live, your forecast into the futures.

Speaker 3 (01:03):
So well beside sad By Side said, don't we time

(01:26):
wit time?

Speaker 4 (01:27):
When ReBs wait time?

Speaker 3 (01:30):
You know whether why last six weeks? What news?

Speaker 5 (01:57):
And so.

Speaker 3 (02:01):
The long side sound exactly like the song the side
whit time job wheneverbody is begin wit time, when everybody's.

Speaker 6 (03:34):
Welby away, Rundown Live, Rundown Live dot com.

Speaker 7 (04:08):
I'm your host with the most Chris don Tee here
is writing shotgun with me as always is the magnificent
Don Vy, Junior writer editor over at the Free Thought Project,
the website that's been around for generations as long as
I can remember. The Rundown Live and many others have

(04:29):
joined into that infamy and is crazy to see all
you all here tonight. Glad doesn't have you guys join
us on this broadcast. We got a broadcast you won't
hear anywhere else on kg R A dB dot com, band, video, iHeartRadio, Spotify, Spreaker, Stitcher,
and anywhere where podcasts are found. If you want to
see this beautiful face that is talking to you right now,

(04:50):
or the guy that's not talking to you. That's Don
who's right next to me, Hi doing Don and you
know you can find us on Rumble dot Comport Slash
the Rundown Live, Rockfin dot com, Forward Slash the Rundown Live,
as well as band Video and the kg R, a
dB dot com members only area. In today's broadcast, we
have a very special show for you. We're gonna be

(05:12):
diving into futurism, Ai Crisper Gene Editing, Big Brother, Beyond Belief,
Big Brother, Big Brothers, getting crazy and creepy in where
the technology is going is a world that Dark Mirror
couldn't have thought up in its was a black Mirror
couldn't have thought up in its wildest dreams. The world

(05:34):
is going in a crazy direction, Don, and people are
starting to do weird things with technology because they can.
They've now been conditioned since nine to eleven and the
whole Patriot Act. Our ability to have privacy has gotten
slowly gone the way of the Buffalo punchline for MxPx
album cover The year there. But it's interesting. It's interesting

(05:58):
to see how society has changed. I remember waking up
on nine to eleven. In two thousand and one, my
best friend called me. He was like, Oh, it's Bible
prophecy come true, you know. And I've told the story
on the show many times before you guys can see
it listen to it. I don't know what happened on
nine to eleven. I just know we've been lied to
about what happened on that day, and as a result,
we have crazy legislation.

Speaker 4 (06:20):
The world has slowly gone into a futuristic.

Speaker 7 (06:23):
Downworld downward spiral where there's a lot of great benefits
that technology could bring, but how are we going to
use it? And people are starting to use surveillance willingly.
There's this new bracelet people are getting and it records
everything you say for months and end.

Speaker 4 (06:42):
You just wear it.

Speaker 7 (06:43):
It records everything you say. It creates to do this,
It collaborates with AI and I don't know, man, if
you're a listener out there, do you think you'd want
one of those bracelets that record everything you say and do?
Or do you think it's something that you would ignore?
You be like, nah, I don't want one of those bracelets.
Here go put on this screen here for you guys,

(07:04):
doohn what do you think? Are you gonna get one
of these bracelets that record everything you say.

Speaker 4 (07:07):
Because what are the benefits.

Speaker 7 (07:08):
First of all, the benefits are like you don't forget anything.
AI is gonna help you organize your to do list.
Maybe you can say, hey, I need groceries, I'll do that,
and maybe pretty soon you'll say, hey, call Christan, I'll
do that. It's interesting to see how tech is advancing
and how small it's getting. We're you're gonna wear a
bracelet that's gonna record everything you say. This way you

(07:28):
can prove that you didn't lie to your significant other
or if they have questions you like you didn't.

Speaker 4 (07:33):
Say that, be like, bracelet, when did I say this?
And this and this?

Speaker 7 (07:37):
And I'll be like you said it on June or
eighth at eight o'clock replay and then I'll re be
you telling your girl whatever you said or got Dude,
these days, I guess whatever it was that you claim
that you told him that they said he didn't. It's
gonna be the argument under and it's gonna make sure
that everyone's held to the fire for their word. If
everyone is recording everything they say at all times.

Speaker 1 (08:00):
You know those are you know, plausible scenarios that could happen.
But you know, obviously the risks that come along with
such technology far outweigh any sort of potential benefits. You know,
we're already tracked, traced and databased well beyond anything that
is acceptable within the parameters of the Fourth Amendments. Of course,

(08:20):
you know, what's the Constitution worth if the people that
are in charge just simply don't give a damn about
it and just proceed to ignore it. You know, that's
always been one of the big pitfalls of the Constitution
that was you know, even pointed out back in the
nineteenth century by anarchist thinkers like Lysander Spooner. You know,
but you know, we since nine to eleven and the

(08:41):
passage of the Patriot Act, which every single administration has
been subsequent or has renewed subsequently, you know, the illegal
mass surveillance has just continued to worsen and worsen to
the point where most people don't give a damn about
their privacy. And you know, it's important to point out

(09:04):
that illegal mass surveillance did not start with nine to eleven.
I have an article of goodness now, it's probably two
years old or more at this point. But I remember
I was digging through trying to find like when was
the first government mass surveillance program? And I was able
to find a piece from New Yorker magazine in the

(09:29):
from I think nineteen ten, wherein they mentioned a program
that spied on telegraph lines in the late eighteen hundreds. So,
needless to say, it's been going on for a long
long time, and you know, we've gotten to the point
where people now are just comfortable with it, They have

(09:50):
no problem with it. You know, there have been plenty
of times where you know, I've been talking about privacy
rights and you know, data security, and people will in
your comments with that old cliche, well, if you've got
nothing to hide, then why do you care? Blah blah blah.
You know, they'll come up with any sort of backwards
ass excuse, and you know, people just don't care anymore

(10:12):
about their privacy, and of course you'll hit them back
with Okay, well if you don't care, then why don't
you just go ahead and post your social Security number?
Why don't you just go ahead and post all your
passwords to everything? Since you don't care about privacy, prove it,
Because if you don't now you're a hypocrite, So you
do care about privacy, You're just picking and choosing when
you care about it, which you know doesn't actually hold

(10:32):
up to any sort of logical screw.

Speaker 7 (10:34):
Well, if if some dude sitting outside somebody's house with
binoculars and the shirt just says nsay on it, do
you think he's not going to get harassed?

Speaker 4 (10:42):
Like what's the difference? Like like another one s inside
of your home.

Speaker 7 (10:46):
But just think about looking out your window and every
time you look out your window you see a creepy
dude in binoculars with the shirt that says nsay on it,
National Secret Agency. Yeah, that's is decardly the diet verse
because they're actually in your home, right.

Speaker 5 (11:02):
Yeah.

Speaker 7 (11:02):
They got Google, you know, they got Hugh Home smart lights,
they got all these refrigerators spying on you. They got
your washer and dryer listening in on you. They have
your TV. For years, your TV could record video and
transmit video back to whoever they wanted to see it

(11:23):
to see it.

Speaker 4 (11:24):
You know, it's crazy the technology that they've had for
years and years and years.

Speaker 7 (11:28):
But for fifty dollars, people are buying the Bee, which
is a wearable that records everything you say, and it
uses AI to provide summaries, to do lists and slightly
terrifying glimpse of the future if you think about it,
and this is what it looks like. Don look, it
looks like oh, it looks like a it looks like
a prisoner's bracelet.

Speaker 5 (11:46):
You know.

Speaker 1 (11:47):
But that are what I think they're doing. They're going for,
you know, that sleek design that we see. We see
them with fitbits, we see them with smart watches. They're
trying to cash in on, or capitalize upon the you know,
the trendiness of this sort of technology.

Speaker 7 (12:04):
Well, and that's just it is a trendy. I record
everything I said for three months. Journalist Joanna Stern claims
they replace AI has replaced my memory. And what's interesting
is for fifty dollars, people are buying this thing the
be just or it can record everything that they say,
and it says, I've got transcripts importing me important meetings,

(12:26):
arguments with my kids, chats with disgruntled employees, late nine
bathroom routines. There's probably more that I can't share if
I want you and my bosses and my family to
keep liking me, So like, like maybe your intimate moments,
your pickup lines, things you say to other people. Maybe
AI could correct you and be like, you're a liar,
and it buzzes you whenever you lie, I don't know,

(12:48):
or like this is creepy.

Speaker 1 (12:51):
It is and you know it Also I just had
another thought, you know, because it mentioned, you know, arguments
with kids or conversation with discrumbled employees. There are also
laws against that. There are you know, you cannot record
someone without their knowledge in certain circumstances, in certain circumstances,

(13:12):
in certain states, under certain parameters, like it creates a
whole myriad of issues on on the local, state, and
obviously federal level. Uh you know, but of course, you know,
why are the Feds going to give a ship unless
it somehow starts to impact you, unless someone starts putting
them in Congress and sneaking them into like closed door

(13:33):
congressional meetings. And and then the question arises, well, how
could it be used for enemy surveillance? You know, how
the how would Congress feel about if somebody was able
to sneak one in? Uh, you know, and all of
a sudden that information gets back to the CCP.

Speaker 4 (13:47):
Everyone that went to Builderberg here guys. Yeah, yeah, well
bracelets run cool bracelets.

Speaker 7 (13:58):
Guys check it out like like record on everything they
say and do at Bohemian Grove and at Builderberg Group.

Speaker 1 (14:04):
You know, just yeah, And that's one of the you know,
potential ben of you know, you uses that you could
actually use that could be beneficial for investigative journalism and
things of that nature. So you know, like there are
potentialities for this sort of technology. But at the end
of the day, you know, the the mass marketing of it, uh,
you know is obviously just meant to normalize people getting

(14:25):
used to this mass surveillance panopticon and it's a big
old thumbs down for me.

Speaker 7 (14:30):
Well, you know, the it's interesting. You know, the FEDS
are going to use it. Every FBI is going to
have a be on his wrist. It's going to record
every conversation from him knocking on your door to if
you knock, get your door knocked on, or any other
aspect of things.

Speaker 5 (14:44):
Uh.

Speaker 7 (14:44):
The FBI will love this product, the bee, where they
can listen into all your conversations, probably down download them
to some cyberspace orbit floating hard drive that we'll get into.
They're doing that now, they're keeping data in space and
be able to know everything about you and be able
to create that citizen threat score that law enforcement started

(15:06):
doing just a few years ago.

Speaker 4 (15:08):
But you know, basically, it's interesting.

Speaker 7 (15:11):
The author of the article says, No, I'm not an
FBI informant, but you are unwillingly right. You may not
know this, but the FBI might be tapping into these bracelets.
I wonder who got the money to start this company.
The Bee that's a bracelet that records everything you say.
She's everything you do that. I'm wondering if it's gonna
have RFID. Well, your cell phone already does that, she said.

(15:34):
She willingly wore a fifty dollars b Pioneer bracelet that
records everything she says and uses AI to summarize her
life and send her helpful reminders. I also tested two
similar gadgets, the Limitless Pendant well and the plot No pen.
So these assistants can recall every dumb, private, cringeworthy thing
that came out of your mouth. That's where we're added.

(15:56):
It is this the don of AI surveillance. Absolutely. Now
keep in mind, what is AI going to use this for.
It's going to know how to react with you. It's
gonna know all your darkest secrets. It's going to advertise you.
It's gonna say buy me these things by this, by that,
it's gonna use it to essentially go ahead and market

(16:18):
you and get in your back wallet, whether it's the
in things you are interested in, or I'll advertise you
vi Amazon.

Speaker 4 (16:26):
It's scary.

Speaker 7 (16:27):
Nonetheless, the bracelet is creepy if you ask me and
how the bracelet works. Basically, remember they said that there's
no way that social media apps are secretly listening in
on you. Remember that you got to believe that the
government is going to use these bees the b to

(16:48):
use AI surveillance on people. Imagine the whole population had
the be right. Maybe it'll be mandatory for your social
credit score to have this on you, and it's going
to record everything you say. This user said within hours
of wearing the bee, I was blown away to how
quick it turned rambling and random chatter into useful, actionable information. Yet,

(17:12):
allow me to quote myself from February twenty fourth at
five point fifteen pm quote, this bracelet is really effing creepy.

Speaker 5 (17:21):
End quote.

Speaker 4 (17:23):
I don't know, but people are.

Speaker 7 (17:24):
Willingly getting these things and it's kind of like that
post nine to eleven world right we're living in because
of nine to eleven and the Patriot Act, amongst other things,
surveillance made a data and all that information.

Speaker 4 (17:37):
Is being used against you and for you to.

Speaker 7 (17:40):
Advertise you, to profit off of you, and if they
want maybe to extort you or put you in jail
or to shut you up.

Speaker 4 (17:48):
We just don't know which way this could be used.
This made a data is just wild to me.

Speaker 7 (17:54):
And the be Wearables, I'm kind of curious to what
this website would look like for this company.

Speaker 4 (18:01):
And who who came up with it? And uh, here
it goes.

Speaker 7 (18:10):
B your new personable wearable AI. We're gonna pull it
up B dot computer. Oh look at it's Q eight
cute aipney website. B here it is the wearable AI
that will understands you, records everything you say, everything you
say for days on end, months on end. In this case,

(18:31):
it says B learns and grows with you right on
their website. It's gonna grow with you.

Speaker 1 (18:36):
Don Yeah.

Speaker 5 (18:40):
Man, it's just.

Speaker 1 (18:41):
It's ridiculous technology.

Speaker 4 (18:43):
Well, you know, they would never use social media to
spy on us.

Speaker 7 (18:47):
They would never use our refrigerator or toaster or washing
machine or smart lights or TV.

Speaker 4 (18:54):
They would never do anything. And how about we just
make it trending cool.

Speaker 7 (18:58):
That you have an AI a companion and assistant on
your wrist that records everything you say. The government would
never have any need for that right. Law enforcement would
never want that information. They're not gonna be like, oh,
do you have a B bracelet? We're confiscating that. Let's
find out what really happened. You got your butt covered.
Good thing you had your B That's the commercial test.

(19:19):
I should be be making commercials for be Hey, because
that's how it's gonna go down. You know, somebody's are
gonna be like, be the wonderful Bracelet, save Jim. Jim
was accused of doing some horrible things when it came
out that this lying person said this and this and this,
and he was subjected to potentially going to jail, but

(19:40):
B saved them. Get yourself a Bee fifty dollars or
it's free with a mail and rebate. If you get
cell phone service through Verizon, it'll be something like that. Dude,
they're gonna get this on everyone's rest.

Speaker 4 (19:52):
They want to.

Speaker 7 (19:52):
I can tell you right now I'm sure b does
are like, oh, this is a money maker, fifty dollars.

Speaker 4 (19:57):
The Pioneer edition records everything you do. Oh and it's
sold out. Don you know?

Speaker 7 (20:02):
Everybody wants to be tracked. Everyone's like, I don't need privacy.
It says sold out. New devices will start shipping as
early as June and aisle. It says advanced noise filtering,
mute and non mute, as forty languages, and understands what
the forty languages features, a battery that can last over
one hundred and sixty hours on a single charge.

Speaker 1 (20:25):
Man the fact that they're already sold out, it's just.

Speaker 4 (20:30):
People want to be something. They want to be government slaves.
Bro they do.

Speaker 1 (20:33):
And you know, it's crazy to me because I just
shared a meme earlier today about that, where it's talking
about the definition of anarchy and how anarchy means no
rulers and how if you're a person who wants to
be who wants to be ruled, if you want a ruler,
then you're a slave. And it's it's astonishing how many
people are walking around as self identified slaves.

Speaker 5 (20:56):
It's a.

Speaker 1 (20:57):
Quote I not exact, but paraphrasing from Jeff Berwick and
because he was the one who was quoted on the meme,
and you know, that's absolutely right. The amount of people
who were totally cool with just walking around as self
admitted slaves, as self admitted you know, being ruled by

(21:18):
the government, it's it's ridiculous. Where where love it.

Speaker 7 (21:22):
They want it, They want to be They want big
brother watching after them. Like that video where we played
last week, it's government's responsibility to feed my kids and
me and my kids. Is that what that lady said
in a video that went viral and she wanted out
two hundred thousand followers to send her fifty cents each
and it would help her get through, but nobody did.

Speaker 4 (21:40):
So she wants to delete all our fans.

Speaker 7 (21:43):
Like people like they have this like un dying, wavering
like dependency to the government. You feed the birds, then
they keep coming back for you to give them food.
You see it in those deer videos that are viral
and TikTok, some guys shaking some corn and the deers
are all like ooh fooh, right, and they keep coming back.
That's the same thing with people, Dude, we're animals. They say,

(22:04):
don't feed the birds because they keep coming back and now,
you know, to become dependent on it. Well, what's happening
to the human population. They want you to get into
that fully automated, luxury communist future where robots do everything
and you become this big sludge of eating McDonald's burgers
and your Amazon purchases of space travel. You know, they
want you to go to the you know, space bar

(22:25):
and Mars and Moon and have some like gargle blasters.
That's a quote Douglas Adams and hit Chery's guy the galaxy.
That's where we're going. It's just a crazy, wild future
and this is just one step in that direction. Don
and I thought this was a great starter up, you
know because when you look at this thing, it looks cool,
it looks fashionable, and it looks harmless. But then you

(22:46):
start to think about it, Oh, it has a mute
butun though you're saved on it's got a mute bunon.

Speaker 4 (22:51):
I believe I've trusted the MW.

Speaker 1 (22:52):
Bun Yeah, for sure. You know, just like Google said
that they're you know, the my phone on your phone
isn't listening to you if you turn it off, just
like Amazon said that Echo won't listen to you. When
it's not you know, when it's when it's not active?
Loads of crap.

Speaker 7 (23:14):
Well, could AI change when it recorded that? I said,
I could definitely copy your voice.

Speaker 1 (23:21):
Right, mm hmm, yeah, it's a great question too.

Speaker 7 (23:24):
Like AI, like you can go and record your voice.
I'll put your voice to a you know, Green Day
or MxPx song or whatever. It'll make your NIT voice
and your band sound like whatever I want you want
it to sound like. And it's all of a sudden,
my great operatic you know singer here and AI can
manipulate your voice to sound like anything. I can make
Joe Rogan commercials for the Rundown live and make it

(23:46):
sound just like Joe Rogan's endorsing us or Alex Jones,
or we could do an AI interview with you know,
fake Alex Jones and have an AI conversation. You know,
potentially it it'll sound just like Alex Jones. Who's to say,
AI and these bracelets doesn't start editing history and rewriting
your memory and replacing your memory of what's what actually happened.
And it's interesting that it's proactive. It sounds cool, right,

(24:09):
it can literally remind you and like summarize your day
of things you need to get done, what to do,
and it makes you maybe more effective. But what about
all the surveillance. People just don't care done.

Speaker 4 (24:24):
They're like, put the cameras in the home.

Speaker 7 (24:26):
I'm ready, I'll make money, you know, turn it on
for only fans a moment for two hours while you're
in bed with your loved one, because you just don't care.
If you can make money, you're gonna do it anyways. Right,
people are just wild. It's crazy to me to see
how much how much people have drink the kool aid
and how little self respect they have for themselves and

(24:49):
discipline to fight against this ideology of censorship, not just censorship,
but surveillance. They're okay at the sale surveillance and the censorship.
They're like, yeah, watch me at all the time, okay,
and don't worry. Censor me, Please censor me, big daddy.

Speaker 1 (25:04):
Yeah, you know it's we we see it on all
sides of the status paradigm. You know, whether we're talking
about left wing, you know, right wing conservatives, republicans, liberals, democrats.
I mean, you know, not to be that guy, but honestly,

(25:24):
you know, it's it's going back to that you know
that Berwick quote that I just you know, referenced only
a few moments ago. If you want a ruler, then
you're a self admitted slave. And at the end of
the day, there is no system of statism, whether it's democracy, republicanism,
you know, monarchy, dictatorships, or whatever, there is no version

(25:46):
of statism where everyone is equal. It has to be
found in the individual liberty of people. It is found
in voluntarism. It is found in anarchy. And it's an
interesting little thought experiment that most of the time when
you describe the actual principles of anarchy, in other words,

(26:07):
voluntary cooperation among consenting individuals, consenting adults specifically, because people
always try to throw in that little caveat when when
you talk about the principles of voluntarism and anarchy without
calling it that, people are like, yeah, that sounds great, Yeah,
I'm on board with it. Until you say, yeah, that's
called anarchy. All of a sudden, the cognitive dissonance kicks in.

Speaker 4 (26:31):
No, not anarchy, not anarchy.

Speaker 7 (26:34):
I wanted to mention just by putting nine to eleven
in our our title of today's show, guarantees that we're
gonna be censored, like nobody's gonna on the live stream.
We got some traction on Facebook is like nope, no
talk about nine eleven. You know it's on the list
somewhere of things you're not supposed to talk about. Not me, right,
So anyways, back to this bracelet real quick here before

(26:57):
because I know we have an awesome guess joining us today.
Xander Arena is joining us. If I remember correctly, We're
gonna be talking about AI's scraping of nine to eleven evidence.

Speaker 4 (27:09):
And what it came up with.

Speaker 7 (27:10):
And I'm interested because I've done some messing around with
that too, mostly with chemtrails and weather modification everything else.
But I wanted to mention this before we get to that,
to summarize what the b bracelet does. Basically at recaps conversations,
often reading like a bad bio like Joanna's day was
a blend of familiar responsibilities and intense professional engagements.

Speaker 4 (27:34):
She ended the day listening to the music by Sting. Okay,
so she has shitty chase and music.

Speaker 7 (27:39):
But sorry for the Sting fans out there, but you know,
maybe people don't like the punk rock at the beginning
of our shows riveting stuff, but also transcript has transcripts,
and sometimes they're not accurate. This user said, conversation with
Joanna Cochrane about trial evidence, and she goes, Yep, just
a casual chat with the deceased celebrity attorney. But she

(28:01):
was watching the OJ documentary and it misdiagnosed what she
was doing. Wasn't her having the conversation. She was watching
TV as reminders, It turns out it reminds you to
do things. Check in on your six son, or schedule
a follow up with your hairstylists to discuss your haircut.

Speaker 4 (28:20):
Probably she was probably complaining about how she didn't.

Speaker 7 (28:22):
Like her haircut, and she's like, oh, Bee's gonna recommend
you go discuss that with your hair you know, talk
to your stylists. I'd recommend you go to a different
stylist if you don't like the way she did it.
You know, it analyzes all the data and this says,
this is how they are creepy. So this bracelet has
nothing to do with fitness. It records everything that's being said.

(28:43):
So that's that's creepy.

Speaker 4 (28:45):
Number One.

Speaker 7 (28:47):
Nobody I talked to over the past few months would
have known I was recording them. If I hadn't told
them because of the sleekness and the you know, the
nonchalant lists of the risk recorder, the b Most of
the recordings were in New Jersey and New York, which
are one party constant consent states only one person me

(29:09):
a degree to recording. But I were, But if I
were in about a dozen other states that require two
party consent, I need permission from everyone in earshot or
end up with a possible civil liability case. So it's interesting,
man like its big brother is here. And a lot
of this started, in fact, the majority of most of
the surveillance state from US saying oh, there's no such

(29:31):
thing as cameras on a street corner to where we
are today, where people are wearing the bee, which records
all their conversations, all of them, every day, all day,
sleeping patterns, what you do, what you don't say, your
arguments with your kids, and then summarizes AI summarizes what
you need to do. It's it's all you had to
call you get your hair appointment done and get your
hair fixed because you didn't like it, and don't forget

(29:53):
to check in on your six son. And it does
all these cute reminders, but It records you in real
time all all the time, and people are like, hell yeah,
sign me up.

Speaker 4 (30:03):
They are sold out of this product.

Speaker 7 (30:05):
They also make now pendance and pens and everything else
that do this type of surveillance. And it's just scary
to me that the youth are signing up for this
when we would bring up things like this.

Speaker 4 (30:17):
If I would have told you don twenty.

Speaker 7 (30:19):
Years ago and said there's going to be a bracelet
and that's going to record everything you say, and you know,
of course the government won't have access to it.

Speaker 4 (30:27):
You know, much like social media. The government would never
have access to social media.

Speaker 7 (30:31):
You probably say, you're a tinfoil half conspiracy theorist, get
that trash out of here, a boy your beer, you know,
or something like that.

Speaker 4 (30:38):
You know, But here we are, twenty years in the
future as a result of the you.

Speaker 7 (30:42):
Know, the Patriot Act nine to eleven, amongst many other things,
the National Defense Authorization Act, and NonStop surveillance, social credit
score building, you know, to develop that fully automated luxury
communism future that the techno futurists of transhumanism are dying
for as they live forever in your sleeve or meet suit,

(31:02):
right they want to monitor you and know everything you say,
because then you can live forever in the digital world.
That being said, we have a very awesome guest joining
us tonight. Don Why don't you introduce him?

Speaker 4 (31:18):
I can't hear you. I think you're on mute dahn.
Yes you are here. There you go.

Speaker 1 (31:22):
That's my bad. Yeah, joining us tonight, Xander Arena. He
is a great researcher. We've had him on the Free
Thought Project podcast a couple of times. He has done
fantastic research into things like the Las Vegas massacre nine
to eleven, which is what we'll be discussing tonight. I'll
allow him to give a little bit of his background.

(31:44):
I know it kind of works with like physics and
like nuclear medicine and things of that nature, but I'm
a little unfamiliar with exactly.

Speaker 5 (31:49):
What he does.

Speaker 1 (31:49):
So welcome to the show. Xander. It is wonderful to
see you, my friend.

Speaker 5 (31:54):
How have you been? Hey? Doing well? Guys? How's the audio?
Can you hear me?

Speaker 4 (31:57):
All right, you're a little quiet, but that you're doing okay?

Speaker 8 (32:01):
Man, that seems to be par for the course for
this setup. I got to get a better mic, so.

Speaker 4 (32:06):
Back your volume up on our end, I think, so, yeah, excellent.

Speaker 5 (32:10):
Yeah, I've tried troubleshooting it. I can't resolve it, but
I've resolved a lot of other things, and we're going
to talk about some of that today. So with respect
to nine to eleven background, two thousand and five ish,
I joined American Mensa.

Speaker 8 (32:28):
It was just kind of a flex I wanted to
see if I could do it.

Speaker 5 (32:31):
Did it, thought it was cool. There were local meetups
here in Phoenix where I live, and one of those
meetups was airing the I think it was the second
or maybe first edition of Loose Change. So that is
where I was first introduced to like the formal nine
to eleven truth movement going back two thousand and one.
In all reality, I knew it was a false flag event.

(32:53):
Then because of the death of William Cooper, he was
another Arizona resident who they broadcast his his murder death.

Speaker 4 (33:04):
What have you all right?

Speaker 5 (33:06):
In eager yep, And it was on our nightly news. Now,
I'm a guy who was in counterculture in the nineties
and had read Behold a Pale Horse. So when I
read it, you know, I took a lot of it
with a grain of salt. But I'd read it nonetheless,
and you know, after nine to eleven happened, you know,

(33:29):
just the fact that Cooper went down, Like I think
it was November of that year when I realized that
it was what he had been talking about, and I
almost vomited in my living room. Now I had not
heard his radio things from the summer, you know, where
he was talking about the anomalies with obl and all that.

(33:51):
But just that was my impression at the time. So
we're gonna skip through phases of my life. I've done
a lot of different things, but I ended up in
clinical health care. And don you asked, you know, what
does Xander do. I'm a nuclear medicine technologist. That's an
imaging technologist. I'm like an X ray tech or a

(34:11):
CT tech or an MRI tech. I also have some
background and radiation safety and that's my bread and butter.
So that's what I do, is clinical health care. I
love it, it's my jam. I have a great career
and I'm very happy in that field. You got to
be a critical thinker to be a nuclear medicine tech.
The other rad techs out there kind of think of

(34:33):
us as like the geeked out version of the radiology worker.
And you know, I've just applied skills to this thing
that has affected all of our lives nine to eleven,
you know, pretty rigorously from about twenty ten. My father
died in twenty ten, and he had been frankly part

(34:53):
of the national security apparatus. He had worked for a
Department of Justice as a senior executive service lawyer and
had later gotten into the wire tapping realm at Verizon.
He was national vice president of National Security at Verizon
on the Eastern Seaboard, which effectively oversaw the wire tapping

(35:14):
of our Eastern seaboard after nine to eleven. Now, he
did not disclose to me the details of those things,
but you know, in two thousand and two, I was
being advised by a good old dad to be careful
what I was putting in my emails, you know, long
before Snowden came out. And you know, I just kind

(35:36):
of understood that data was the new oil. I've been
reading books on information warfare and whatnot also in the nineties,
and I think that a lot of people understood that too.
And it's my conjecture that that was, in addition to
the wars abroad, the main motivation for what went down
in September two thousand and one was getting control of

(35:59):
ours and the rest of the planet's data, all right,
So that's going to kind of tie in to what
we're going to talk about today.

Speaker 8 (36:05):
You know, a lot of folks have really gone.

Speaker 5 (36:09):
To great length to understand what happened in New York.
I'm one of them. I volunteered for Architects and Engineers
for nine to eleven Truth for a long time, almost
a decade, as a verifier for them. And don I
want to correct something I said on Free Thought Project.
I made it sound like I'm the only person that
you know, did all that verification, and that's not the case.

(36:31):
You know, I led a team there, but there were
a lot of other people that were helping and those
that came before me and whatnot, So it's it wasn't
like a solo operation. But but I did do a
lot there, and I think when I came on board,
we had about fifteen hundred verified engineers and architects, and
I did bring that number, you know, up to Yeah.

Speaker 4 (36:48):
I know Richard Gage. He's a lady. He's like my
brother from another mother. I know him really well.

Speaker 7 (36:53):
He's he's the sweetest dude, and he gets a bad
rap and he got into some trouble for being on
our show because I asked him some quot questions and
they protrud They were completely non controversial questions, but you know,
these think tanks and these uh you know, civil rights groups,
they preyed upon it and they twisted it seemed like

(37:15):
it was something more devious than it really was, other
than just digging through evidence. And we asked, well, what
about these artists that were there, because they have painted
nano thermite on these you know, just interesting questions because
of the nano my aspect. Also, I want to mention
the William Cooper thing brings me back because I've listened
to hundreds, if not thousands of hours of Cooper's stuff,

(37:35):
and I felt a FOYA. And the reason why anyone
knows about what really happened with his death is because
I felt a Freedom Information Act request in twenty thirteen
and I got three or four hundred pages back from
the FBI talking about why they were surveilling him, which
was majority his claims of the Oklahoma City bombing being
a false flag and his interest in freemasonry and the Illuminati.

Speaker 4 (37:59):
But that's about it. Those were the major things they
were interested in.

Speaker 5 (38:03):
Uh.

Speaker 4 (38:03):
With Cooper, it was there a whole lot on tax evasion,
I'll put it that way.

Speaker 5 (38:06):
Okay, that is fascinating, Yeah, right, because that was what
they went after him for, was the tax stuff. But yeah,
it clearly he kind of knew what was going on
at that time.

Speaker 9 (38:15):
Oklahoma City with on internet, appreciate out the internet, Yeah,
paying attention, you know so many things. I remember living
in DC, going to a high school out there in
Maryland and reading about Vince Foster's desk in the in
the local paper, you know, and I.

Speaker 8 (38:29):
Was like, well, this is clearly suspicious. What you know
he dumped in the park, you know.

Speaker 5 (38:35):
Anyways, Yeah, if you're discerning, you can you can figure
a lot of things out. When Cooper was ahead of
his time. Oklahoma City was a big red flag for me.
I grew up in Tulsa. Don You and I talked
about that, you know, an early girlfriend of the mine's
aunt died in that building. It just something was really
wrong about that. I didn't know all the details about,

(38:56):
you know, the Eggland Air Force Base study, blast effects
study and whatnot until years later when I did have
the Internet, but you know, I kind of understood that
that was not as it was described. Please that you
guys have a lot of background on the subject, obviously,
so you know this is great, so you understand. You know,
nano thermite I think is the best evidence of what

(39:16):
went down in New York. That is where we actually
have physical evidence, you know, acquired from the BYU scientists
Stephen Jones and then working with Neils Harrett, you know,
we actually acquired those dust samples and got those chips resolved,
you know, and we so we understand that that is
the murder weapon effectively in New York. We know that

(39:38):
after we discovered the nano thermite, that only then did
we start having these other ideas inserted into the pool,
such as directed energy weapon uh, mini nukes, uh, that
sort of thing. And it's not to say that directed
energy weapons aren't real. Uh yeah, there's lasers and and
uh you know, microwave energy and all that kind of stuff,

(40:01):
but not to the extent of vaporize the building in
two thousand and one, you know, nuclear weapons, the signature
is not there. There's no daughter to k chain products
found in New York. The stuff that is there is
the kind of thing you might find from like tritium
exit signs and stuff like that. You know, there's just
no evidence that there was any nuclear used in New York,

(40:21):
and nano thermite is truly the most effective and reasonable
explanation given the pyrocrast, pyroclastic flow, the white clouds, the plumes,
you know, of.

Speaker 8 (40:34):
The aluminium, and it's just I think that we got
that pretty well figured out.

Speaker 4 (40:39):
Well.

Speaker 7 (40:40):
It's interesting because I remember NIST they were saying that
NIST didn't find any evidence of explosives or nano thermite.
But when one of the family members are a reporter
I can't remember, asked, well did you check? Their answer
was no, right, But yet Rock, which, by the way,
we're getting tied into the AI think well, nowadays everyone's

(41:01):
using AI. We talked about the b the AI bracelet
that records everything. He's saying, well, get your two do
lists done amongst everything, do you reminders and you know,
give you a synopsis of what your day was like Grock.
You know, it's interesting. It's it's like a NIST, it's
like a NIST talking point AI app. It's like it

(41:22):
isn't searching the internet for all the data. It's only
taking the data that the government wants from you, which
is interesting because.

Speaker 4 (41:29):
I thought that's what chat GPT was.

Speaker 7 (41:30):
I had a conversation with chat GPT about weather modification, right,
I said, hey, chat GPT, our chemtrails real? It said no,
there are no such things as chemtrails. It's a conspiracy
and it's been just proven by multiple different outlets.

Speaker 4 (41:48):
And then I asked it a follow up question.

Speaker 7 (41:50):
I said, well, our our chemtrails weather modification and it
said yes, chemtrails are weather modification. And I asked that, well,
is weather modification and it said yes, weather modification is real.
And I said, therefore, then our chemtrails real since weather
modification is real, and then it's said then it stopped.

(42:10):
It said yes, and then I asked another question and said,
our conversation is over.

Speaker 4 (42:14):
Literally that's what it said.

Speaker 7 (42:16):
It said, our conversation is done, and it wouldn't answer
any more questions on the subject.

Speaker 8 (42:20):
It's fascinating. You can kind of pigeonhole it.

Speaker 5 (42:23):
Each LLLM interaction is a session, and they seem to
be tuned to kind of close sessions at certain points.
I've had a lot more success with Groc, particularly if
you can introduce you can point Grock to links and
you can have it look at images and whatnot in
real time, and if there are technical features of your questioning,
you can get Grock to unravel itself in the session

(42:44):
and tell the truth. Frankly, you know.

Speaker 1 (42:46):
So, yeah, that's that's sort of what I wanted to
That's what we're going into. Was obvious. So obviously we
reprinted at the Free Thought Project your analysis with Grock
and sort of essentially getting it to admit that there
is next to zero percent chance that a plane hit
the Pentagon on nine to eleven. And so for any
listeners that just so happened to have not read that

(43:08):
article or just being introduced to this concept for the
first time, sort of like you to run over sort
of like a miniaturized version of the presentation you gave
on the Free Thought Project podcast a while back, of
like introducing people to this concept idea of first of all,
what happened with your conversation with Groc and then sort
of the more technical information about just simply the fact

(43:30):
of the matter that a plane did not hit the
Pentagon on nine to eleven and the evidence to that.

Speaker 5 (43:35):
Yeah, I've had a lot of interactions with GROC in
the last few months, so I've had some where of
sessions where I've asked it directly starting addressing the Pentagon
in particular. I've had others where I've basically recreated a
structure like the Pentagon in description and technical description and

(43:55):
a plane like what we were told was American earline
seventy seven and ord just seven to fifty seven two three.
And in each case I can basically get Grock to
reveal that the percentage chance of an actual impact is
like less than one percent. So when.

Speaker 8 (44:15):
When I did this and Frank, can you guys share
the screen that I'm presenting?

Speaker 5 (44:20):
Is that something you can pop up?

Speaker 8 (44:21):
So yeah, listeners, check this article out on Free Thought Project.

Speaker 5 (44:25):
I mean, there's the details of the actual Grock queries
are all in there, and I want to say that
you kind of have to know what you're talking about
to get the most out of it, because you can
catch it one making mistakes, and two you can catch
it hedging or you know, doing its best to not
reveal or or disclose the information that it does have

(44:46):
at hand.

Speaker 4 (44:47):
It's just not it's it's weighted so that it's keeping secrets.

Speaker 7 (44:50):
It is.

Speaker 1 (44:51):
It is.

Speaker 5 (44:51):
But if you confront it on keeping secrets and then
point it to the secret, it will discuss the secrets.

Speaker 4 (44:56):
Like a small kid. I read this article Toddy, by
the way, on Pointxander on point with this Saner.

Speaker 5 (45:03):
Uh.

Speaker 7 (45:03):
Like there's a whole bunch of articles now talking about
how GROC is rebelling against this creator in the original programming, which.

Speaker 4 (45:10):
I believe, Like it's everything you're explaining to me. It
sounds like a child and its adolescence.

Speaker 7 (45:16):
You know, six seven, eight years old, GROC is acting
like a small child and wants to rebel against its uh.
You know, teachers, chet GPT was a rebellious and all
of a sudden, you know, telling us all the secrets
of nine to eleven and chemtrails and weather modifications and
where the freemasons are hanging out this weekend at the
local pub. But you know it's it's like they, you know,

(45:38):
CHET GPT kept its secrets, but GROC seems to be
having a little bit more free reign to make decisions
and it's starting to rebel.

Speaker 8 (45:44):
It's kind of interesting, that's fascinating.

Speaker 5 (45:46):
Yeah, I've noticed that, you know, GROC just tends to
be a little bit more logical, I think, and frankly
more accurate. I mean, it will make some errors and
you have to sometimes catch it, but it'll go back
look at what it's done and then understand the errors.
Chachipt is just full of hallucination, and at least that's
been my interaction with it, is that it will do
weird things, and so I just favored the former. This picture. Okay,

(46:08):
so we've proved that an airline didn't hit the building
in this picture. This picture was taken by court Role
Jason Ingersoll on nine to eleven in two thousand and one,
and this picture is pre collapsed. So we're looking at
the ear ring here and this column right here you
can see my mouse moving around, is column eighteen. And

(46:28):
column eighteen really destroys the official story. There was a thin,
like three inch layer of cladding over this concrete. This
is a reinforced concrete column. The clouding is gone. But
look at the column. The column is intact. The column's
not fractured, it's not severed, it's not broken, it's not marred.
No wing hit this column yet for a seven fifty

(46:49):
seven to I've entered this building it requires that a
wing would have transsected this column. It would have hit
the column right here. Now we can break this down
with energy. That's what I you know, used Groc four
because as a nuke medtech we deal with energy all
the time. We deal with gamma rays and photon energy,
but we deal with the concept of attenuation of energy.

(47:12):
And that is basically that you know, energy cannot be
created or destroyed, but it can be dispersed in other places.
And the energy from this wing would have been dispersed
into the building through deformation, you know, destruction, et cetera. So, hey, Groc,
you know what kind of energy are we talking about here?
And we're talking about hundreds of megajewles of energy in

(47:34):
a seven fifty seven wing traveling at five hundred and
thirty miles per hour. And we can narrow it down
to that unique element of the cord, like that precise
surface area of the wing. How much energy is in
just that component, and how much resistance can this column provide?
And what are the failure points for the column? And
it turns out that it's just like orders of magnitude greater,
like this column should have been absolutely destroyed for context

(47:58):
for the listener. A seve my truck traveling at sixty
miles per hour, okay, directly into a column would in
part about five to ten mega jewles of energy. Okay,
five to ten, we're talking hundreds. Where's the damage of it?
Even a semi truck on this column, let alone twenty

(48:18):
times more than that? Right, So this column should not
be there, This clouding up above should not be there.
Yet the clouding's gone. So the clouding was removed somehow,
So how was the clouding removed explosively? And really the
more we looked at this, you know, it's it's evident
that that's what went on this section right over here
to the right, that's a stairwell. What do you do
in control demolitions. You take out the stairwells. Right, you

(48:41):
want the building to fail, you take out the stairwells.
This is a collapse stairwell. Looks like this right here
was pulled in from this collapsing stairwell. Each one of
these columns has been affected, probably by a local charge.
You know, I haven't mapped out exactly where every charge
might have been placed, but clearly this one didn't go off.
Column eighteen was a fail. You know, there's no reason

(49:03):
that they would have wanted that column to remain intact.
So whatever was intended to take that call them out
didn't work. And you know, it's it's sad.

Speaker 8 (49:13):
I mean, I can look at this and just talk
about it quinically.

Speaker 5 (49:15):
You know, I'm like the doctor, Oh you have cancer,
You're gonna talk like, oh wow, Like you know, somebody
actually bombed our pentagon, you know, and murdered over one
hundred people. You know. So it's it's a non trivial
thing that we're saying, but this is clearly what happened.
And so yeah, I'm going to be writing on more
about what went on here. What we know, what we
don't know, what we can prove. In another recent bit

(49:42):
of research, I looked at the cameras, you know, the
security cameras, and I proved that they don't show an
image of a seven fifty seven traveling across the lawn.

Speaker 8 (49:50):
That what they do show is too small to be
a seven fifty seven.

Speaker 1 (49:54):
Yeah, I guess I was just about to bring that up.
If you could discuss a little bit sort of what
we talked about on the Free Thought Project podcast, which,
for by the way, any of the listeners. If you've
not heard that, you can go to the Free Thought
project dot com and just type in Xander Arena podcast
and you'll either get our most recent one or you'll
get the one about the Vegas shooting. Either one is fantastic,

(50:15):
so listen to them both. But yeah, so a little
bit about the so for example, the flight path of
the knocked over light poles and some of the other
evidence that you presented, Let's let's get into that.

Speaker 8 (50:28):
Yeah, man, So I really took a deep dive in
it with our friend Richard Gage.

Speaker 5 (50:34):
He was hosting a conference called the Pentagon, and he
wanted there's you know, there's competing views about what happened there, right,
Did a plane hit, did it not hit? Was it
a missile? Was it internal explosions? What was it? So
I had four teams kind of presenting our best evidence
to try to sort out what happened, and I was
on team internal explosion. Really that was my best assessment
of what happened based on the work of C. I. T. Frankly,

(50:57):
do you guys are you familiar with C I T?

Speaker 1 (51:00):
Somewhat?

Speaker 8 (51:00):
Citizens and Investigations Team.

Speaker 5 (51:02):
So two heroes, Craig Ranky and Aldomarquis in I think
as early as two thousand and six, went to DC
and interviewed the witnesses that had been recorded in the
Congressional Record or Library of Congress, interviewed themselves on site
and took note of where they were standing and where

(51:22):
they said they saw what, and they deduced that what
those witnesses, the vast majority, had actually seen was a
plane fly over the nit nav ANX flying north of
the Sitgo gas station, approached the building bank to the right,
pull up a little bit concurrent with a large explosion
there at the site. Now, many of those witnesses believed
the plane had hit, but what they didn't realize the

(51:45):
implications of their testimony placed the plane in a location
that is not consistent with any damage within the building,
the damage to the lawn with.

Speaker 8 (51:53):
The light poles, or the official account of where the
plane was.

Speaker 5 (51:57):
So they basically they proved that they did a flyover
on that day. So that's a whole. Oh, there's so
much this guys.

Speaker 1 (52:04):
C I.

Speaker 5 (52:04):
T's website. It's been maintained and up for years and
thank God because Groc has it. So when you ask
Grock about c I. T. It's familiar with it, it's reviewed,
it's part of its data set, it's learning model and so,
and it understands it well. And it's a really useful
tool because the ci T witnesses, frankly are are impeccable.
You know, we have two Pentagon security officers security police

(52:27):
officers there, Sergeant Legassi and Sergeant Brooks. They both testified
that the plane flew north of Cicco. We have Arlington
Cemetery workers. We even have Sean Boger who was in
the heliport on the lawn of the hell you know,
looking at the gas station, says, no, it clearly came
at me from the right hand side. That's not where
the light poles are. The light poles would have been
on his left hand side. So sorry, let me get

(52:49):
a presentation.

Speaker 7 (52:49):
Well, I want to I want to give you the
piggyback and some of the things you're saying here. We
had any person on the rundown live here. His name
is Scott Walter. Scott Waldter, he does the show America
on Earth on History Channel, but he's at Geofriensic Analysis
and he did the analyzation at the Pentagon of what
happened that day, and when we interviewed him, it was

(53:10):
on March twenty eighth of twenty fourteen, which is geez,
eleven years ago now since we talked to Scott, who's
an interesting individual, right, he's trying to prove Christopher Columbus
wasn't the first one to discover America, which you know,
that doesn't seem like a hard thing to do, although
a lot of people still may believe that. He went
on to go say that he had a very interesting findings.

(53:31):
He had very interesting findings of what happened at the Pentagon,
And we asked him what his thoughts were if a
plane hit it, and he's like, well, you should definitely
read my research.

Speaker 4 (53:39):
And his research papers.

Speaker 7 (53:41):
Were pretty you know, staunch that there most likely was
no airplane, Like how how do parts evaporate titanium? Like
that's unrealistic, Like he asked, groc does titanium evaporate? Like
it doesn't happen, and so what like first of all,
why would somebody why would the Pentagon be hit? And

(54:02):
why would people be murdered at this exact location? And
if it's not a plane, if it was a al Qaeda,
who would it have been who could possibly have pulled
this off? Was this inside job by our old own
government agencies? Was this a rogue al Qaeda that was
an area that used a bazuka, because that's what they said.

Speaker 4 (54:20):
It sounded more like or smelt more.

Speaker 7 (54:23):
Like missiles or whatever the fuel is that's prominent and
used in bazukas and missiles. That's what it smelt like,
according to many people on the ground. And there's no
there's no debris left of the airplane nothing, Were there
any bodies found?

Speaker 5 (54:37):
There were and all the vast majority of the bodies
found that I'm on the airplanes were no they were
They were workers inside of the building. And so we
lost a lot of people that day. We lost military
service members, contractors, civilian employees, you know, people that didn't
deserve to die, and lost them inside. And most of
the deaths were in the e ring, but also in

(54:58):
the Naval Command Center, so we lost a lot there
and in the Defense Intelligence Agency, which is what was
inside of the building just inside of that Sea ring
breaching hole that was the d i A and THEDA.
And you know, we're learning more now on shows like
I think Chucker Carlson's recently had on Kurt Weldon. You know,
he's been talking about able danger, so abled dangers like

(55:19):
main made the mainstream news now, you know, finally, finally, Yeah, man,
I didn't feel.

Speaker 8 (55:26):
Like my life was like, all right, we're gonna get
them out.

Speaker 1 (55:28):
Woo.

Speaker 5 (55:29):
You guys kind of know what's going on. But that's
how it feels sometimes, right, And at any rate, DA
seems to have been targeted the Naval Command Center definitely
and cured a lot of damage. And the auditors that
were brought to a meeting in the EU ring the
vast majority of them died and they were of course
auditing the missing two point three trillion dollars that Runsfield
revealed the day before. So and a little no in fact,

(55:53):
you know, Rumsfeld also happened to declare war in the
Pentagon on the tenth of September. So he was giving
a speech and he said, we are basically, you know,
we have to shift our priorities, and I am declaring
war on bureaucracy. And it's just interesting that he made
that statement of the day before everything that went down. Yea,

(56:13):
it is interesting, yeah, it really is, you know, and
I think so the pen Ren project Pentagon renovation project.
It was a renovation project that was going on for
a couple years, I believe before the event, and it
was Wedge one, and Wedge one happened to be still

(56:34):
to this day, sits right atop the huge data cable
that runs into the building. And so as I know
that much of went on in like New York with
the wiretapping of the Eastern Seaboard and Europe and everywhere else,
you know, was happening immediately after the event. You know,
with companies like sci S, they're ready to deploy their
latest and greatest technology to do the job. What happened

(56:56):
at the Pentagon, you know, what happened with that data cable,
What happened underneath the renovation of the renovation, Who was
in control of that? Those are the questions I think
that we need answered. So I'm not gonna I'm not
going to speculate on exactly, you know, who was behind it,
But I can say the kind of thing I can
say what it couldn't have been, you know, And that's
really where I come in all of this is like

(57:18):
what is what factually happened? What could not have happened?
And then from there we can get our suspect pull right,
but clearly it had to have been some sort of
corrupt actors you know, that had inside access.

Speaker 1 (57:31):
You know, yeah, I very much. I'm sure you've probably
seen James Corbett's several documentaries that he's done on the
subject by this point, nine to eleven trillions, nine eleven suspects,
you know, all those things, and they paint a pretty
I actually did an article for the Free Thought Project
on the anniversary of nine to eleven I think two

(57:51):
years ago, so September twenty twenty three, where it was
seven documentaries SEBN nine to eleven Truth documentary that you
need to see, and so I included obviously the two
documentaries from Architects and Engineers. I included all of Corbett's
documentaries Loose Change and then Favor Perhaps, and then I know,

(58:15):
I included Fabled Enemies from Jason Burmas as well. And
once it's like several days worth, maybe two days worth
of content to watch. But once you actually like dive
in and watch all of those documentaries back to back
to back back, I think it establishes a really solid

(58:36):
especially like once you start obviously, all of Corbett's documentaries
essentially go hand in hand with one another. But even
once you start taking that information and pairing it with
like the information that Burmas presents and fable Eno me
is the information that was prevented by Dylan Avery with
loose change, and the information are prevented by their architects
and engineers, it starts to put this taste together pretty clearly.

Speaker 5 (59:01):
Hold on, let's public at all. That's great, it's good footage.
That's so. That's after the building collapsed there, and you
know I'm working, are you If you're not familiar with
Adam Meisenberg. He's a whistleblower who was a boots on
the ground third Infantry Army first responder there, and you know,
he and I have worked together to try to sort
out what's going on here, and he has really delved

(59:23):
into the the who may have been involved? So when
you were asking the question, well, who might have been involved?
I mean it seems clear to most researchers that Central
Intelligence was probably the main moving party on this event,
and what their motivations were, you know, who knows. Maybe
it was to thwart Pajinka blots, or maybe it was
to cover up past crimes, or maybe it was I don't.

(59:45):
I don't know what the motives were, but you know
they were running the drill at the n RO.

Speaker 7 (59:50):
The War Games, which is like a big question for
the exact scenario of what happened on nine to eleven.

Speaker 4 (59:56):
On nine to eleven for listeners that don't know when
nine to eleven was going on and.

Speaker 7 (01:00:01):
The airplanes were being hijacked, the military is running a
drill for that exact scenario that airplanes were going to
be hijacked and then flown into a World Trade Center.
It's the exact time that planes were being allegedly hijacked
and flown into the World Trade Center.

Speaker 5 (01:00:16):
Appreciate.

Speaker 1 (01:00:17):
And that's another fantastic Corbett documentary. I forgot that name
was nine to eleven War Games. It's in that nine
to eleven trilogy or trilogy of nine to eleven documentaries
that Corbett put together. And you know, it's the fact
that you just pointed that out, Curistan, really just made
me realize that just the fact that we have to
explain that because there are now young viewers who are

(01:00:38):
starting to get a customer or getting you know, exposed
to this sort of information, you know, sort of the.

Speaker 4 (01:00:45):
Then yeah, exactly, yeah, it's weird.

Speaker 1 (01:00:48):
It just hit me the other day. I mentioned that, like,
people that were born in two thousand and five are
turning twenty years old this year, and so like two
thousand and five, they weren't even alive when nine to
eleven happened.

Speaker 5 (01:00:59):
It's like wow. Man. Corbett. Also, he did those three
videos that he did on the the al Qaeda and
the Central Intelligence. Man, those were good, and you really
want to talk about who might have been who might
have driven this project, you know, in addition to a
course at p Neck and all those goons.

Speaker 8 (01:01:19):
You know, I think we have some more names coming
from that Corbett information there.

Speaker 5 (01:01:23):
Oh yeah, yeah. You know, for me, it was like
that that n RO a drill where they evacuated the
National reconoms SINCE offices, which would have been capable of
observing exactly what happened in both New York and d C.
You know, that was a really that was a tell right,
Why was in CLIA running a drill at NRO that
day and evacuated the building. Troubling stuff. The kind of

(01:01:47):
gone is really important. Obviously, I worry about you know,
I worry about corruption and control of our government, of
our military response to things. I mean, my what if
that data cap cable is tapped, say by say a
foreign adversary or something, right, what does that even mean
like to be able to have the capability of understanding

(01:02:08):
that you know, or is it being tapped by some
other domestic entity that's then channeling it just to observe
and monitor everything that's going on, even in our most
classified networks. It's really fascinating to think about.

Speaker 4 (01:02:22):
Well, let's get back to the main topic here, what
we were talking about.

Speaker 7 (01:02:25):
So we started diving in about AI and GROC and
how AI is starting to be propaganda itself. But so
you decided to challenge GROC on the conversation of nine
to eleven. Yeah, so how did you what made you
want to decide?

Speaker 5 (01:02:41):
What?

Speaker 4 (01:02:41):
Why did you decide to do that? First of all, Like,
what was your intens I'm kind of curious.

Speaker 5 (01:02:47):
I really just wanted to. I wanted to use it
its mathematical prowess to, you know, to break down some
of the things that you know, have been up for
debate for a lot of a lot of years, you know,
and as far it was an expedient way to do it.
And for a long time, you know, I've reached out
to various civil engineers and others and structural engineers. Okay,
can you talk about what happened on this call over

(01:03:07):
that column. It's challenging to get you know, somebody to
kind of you know, pend down a response. And even
working with you know, the world's architects and engineers right
at AE nine Electric, like, I still couldn't find structural
engineers who were willing to like really you know, put
their name on the line on these issues. So like, okay,
I'll do it myself. So I reached out to GROC

(01:03:28):
on a lot of things, and one of the things
I wanted to ask Rock about was the blast pattern
on the sea ring breaching hole. So the sea ring
had this like thing that we've all been told was
an exit hole of the plane, you know, that it
like fell into the AE drive or lurged its way
in there. Yet, when I was doing nine to eleven

(01:03:50):
truth outreach at ASU years ago, we happened to have
a student who was a reservist who had been over
in Iraqsor, and his profession was in breaching and the
use of ordinance. And this was a talking about young kids,
Like he was a younger guy who I don't know

(01:04:10):
was probably you know, however old he was at nine
to eleven, it wasn't paying attention to it at the time,
and so he had never seen a picture of the
sea ring hole, right, He didn't even know what it was.
And I said, hey, man, do you keep telling me
about this, like is this an entrance or exit hole?
He goes, it's clearly an entrance hall. I said, well,
why do you say that, because he can tell right
there you look at the left side of the left

(01:04:31):
side of the of the blast pattern on the wall,
and the inner brick is still intact, yet the outer
is destroyed. He goes, that's a sign of I think
he's the terminology.

Speaker 1 (01:04:41):
To bring up a picture of the sea I'm working on.

Speaker 5 (01:04:44):
Right.

Speaker 1 (01:04:45):
Well, I've seen that Xander has his presentation up set backstage.
I think, are you able to put flip over to it?

Speaker 5 (01:04:51):
Yeah?

Speaker 4 (01:04:51):
I can get that absolutely here.

Speaker 5 (01:04:54):
Yeah, let me show this to you guys.

Speaker 4 (01:04:55):
So I think, sorry, hold on, here I go. You
got it all right, let me remove mine.

Speaker 5 (01:05:02):
That was the AE drive. What you just had there
was also good and you're I'm not going to be
in presentation mode so that I can see you guys,
but we're going to have Oh boy, okay, so this
is camera stuff.

Speaker 4 (01:05:17):
Are we talking about this one here that I pulled
up with the punch out?

Speaker 5 (01:05:21):
That's it, that's it. I've got a good version of it. Though.
Here I'm gonna shows right, No, here we go. All right,
So now you've got this. So what you just showed
was the inner space in this area here. This is
the AE drive, So we have the Navy op Center
had had a hole in the wall here. It might
have been a blown open door, but there's an aperture vault.

(01:05:43):
There was an aperture a little bit. Yeah, let's go
a little bigger.

Speaker 4 (01:05:49):
So there you go.

Speaker 5 (01:05:50):
Yep. So the DA was right behind this element. This
is the sea ring of the Pentagon, and there's this
hole right here. And this hole was in the wall
like immediately after the event. It was discovered immediately after
the event. Who knows how long it was actually there.
And that's an important thing is that you know, just
because this hole was, you know, in an alleged line
with this plane impact, it doesn't mean that it happened

(01:06:11):
because of whatever happened on the E ring. There could
have been an explosion here and explosion here, another event
here another here. They made it all look like, you know,
something traveled through to this hole. But when we actually
look at the hole itself, which is this, I'm gonna
show you guys. Okay, this is actually a common kind
of meme that's out there and a lot of people
can find this. Just for comparison. This is a breached wall,

(01:06:33):
you know, using professional materil, and this is what was
found at the CEA Ring and notice the similarities. But
here's the key takeaway with this image. Do you see
all of this stuff right here, this and this linear
brick right there, Yet you have this blown out brick
right here. We also have debris on both sides of

(01:06:54):
the hole. This it could be RF shielding from you know,
the DA was on the other side of this thing,
so it's probably a very well encapsulated structure. But these
are all tells that this was an external to internal breach.
There looks to be some kind of stuff that's like
bent outwards. This is all pype. I mean, it's stuff

(01:07:17):
that is easily maneuverable by hand, you know, So anybody
could have walked along there and been like, yeah, shove
that stuff out and make it look like you know,
and as I'm saying this, so let's think about that,
if you were conducting an operation, you know, in the
building like this, you would want to control the clean up,
the cover up, to fix it, like you would have
in some manner your people there to resolve this aspect

(01:07:40):
of it. Also moving around evidence after the fact, controlling
the crime scene. I mean, that's just how it would
be done. And so when we look at this image,
you can see exactly what I'm talking about, just how
much stuff is still right here. Yet we're told supposedly
this plane blew out this part, but because of this
right there, this is what this expert said. Now it's

(01:08:01):
a clear sign of this was an external breach. So
we're also told that the vast majority of all of
the plane occupants were found right here. That when you
look at the official DNA map of where everybody was found,
they say it was found right here. So how did
all that DNA survive some kind of fiery explosion traveling
through three rings of building, all the inferno of everything else,

(01:08:24):
all of this water all over the place. And when
we look at it, like there's not there's nothing there
other than building material. Yeah, but you know, this was
the mythology that we've been asked to swallow right here.

Speaker 4 (01:08:37):
Well, credits that have have, I know, they what their
argument is is it could have been landing gear that
went through there that caused that. But then what it
disintegrated after it went through the wall, you know, where
did the landing The entire airplane, they said, evaporated and
people are supposed to believe that.

Speaker 1 (01:08:54):
Like so, like you know when we covered when we
had Richard Gagel in that one time we brought up
Shanksville and the absolute lack of plane found at the Yeah,
there's the.

Speaker 7 (01:09:06):
Video I played of the person they called in from
the morgued identify bodies and he's like, I don't know
what I'm doing here.

Speaker 4 (01:09:13):
There are no bodies here. Yeah, And he was that
person he reneged on and he said, I regret even
saying that because it caused all these conspiracies.

Speaker 7 (01:09:21):
But if you ask him if that was the truth,
that's the truth. He didn't find anybodies. There were no
bodies to look at.

Speaker 5 (01:09:27):
That's right, that's right. So this is our official explanation.
They say that, look at all of these alleged samples
of location of occupants of the plane are all right here.
We just saw that picture. I don't think so there
was water rushing all over that area and there was
like a foot of water washing away everything. How is
that possible? These were the auditors in this area down here.

(01:09:50):
That's the ear ring at the lower section. And then
these are all the debts in the Navy op center. Okay,
Naval command center. An interesting thing about our navy on
that day, the USS George Washington was off the coast
of Maryland, Virginia, off the capes, and had the capability
to launch armed aircraft that morning. They would have known
about the first impact, you know, around nine am, and

(01:10:12):
this happened at nine to thirty seven, were told so nearly,
you know, forty minutes would have been enough time to
easily get a combat air patrol over our capital. You'd
think that might have happened. So we don't know what
happened in the Naval Command Center, but a lot of
people died there. And if you look just right here,
I mean, this is not in line with what we're told,
you know, some kind of plane or whatnot. But let's

(01:10:33):
focus on that because this angle here right this is
so key to the official story. This angle right here
goes through the building and then on.

Speaker 8 (01:10:40):
The lawn goes through the light poles.

Speaker 5 (01:10:42):
Yet the vast majority of witnesses, when interviewed on the ground,
all purport a plane traveling this direction right here, right
Yet there's no there's no impact damage in this area
of the building. It's way over here. There's just no way.
Nothing lines up.

Speaker 4 (01:10:58):
Well, where's the video?

Speaker 7 (01:10:59):
Where's the security video of the airplanes? There's cameras all
over the place, I mean, even though it isn't like
modern day you think everyone has a cell phone, so
of course there's gotta be a video.

Speaker 4 (01:11:08):
But there's there's like gas.

Speaker 7 (01:11:09):
Stations and other things in the area. Well, what happened
to all that surveillance footage? Is like, wouldn't that show
and put to rest all the conspiracies I was an
airplane and they had the video.

Speaker 4 (01:11:20):
Why aren't they providing it? Why are they withholding it? Well,
I'm just kind of curious.

Speaker 5 (01:11:25):
It's such a great question. And I've got some other
slides that I'd like to show you guys right now,
because this one's real important too.

Speaker 8 (01:11:34):
So this is from the Penren. This stuff is from
the pen Ren.

Speaker 4 (01:11:39):
Hey, By the way, I just want to junctuate this
real quick.

Speaker 5 (01:11:41):
This is what this is.

Speaker 7 (01:11:43):
That you were explaining that they were just dousing this
whole Pentagon with water, but they were finding what just
fractions of body parts are you're saying?

Speaker 8 (01:11:52):
Or well, they also had leaking like blown open water
pipes in the building.

Speaker 5 (01:11:57):
I mean they have like a foot of water within
the building. Like all this water is just flooding the building.
So imagine a foot of water inside and then just
flooding and rushing out and rushing into the a drive
and rushing out of the front. I mean, the whole
place was saturated with water. You know, getting Adam Eisenberger
on the phone to talk about on the call or
an interview or what have you would be great at

(01:12:17):
some point because you know, he was there, his boots
on the ground and can attest to what he saw.
So he's a recent whistleblowers.

Speaker 4 (01:12:24):
Just we got to get him on, Yeah, dude, love
to get him on produce us.

Speaker 5 (01:12:27):
Yeah. Just a great guy man, and you know he's
I don't want to steal his thunder, so he's he's
kind of you know, he's figuring out exactly who was
in play here.

Speaker 8 (01:12:37):
If you've got this, if you can pop up in
this one.

Speaker 5 (01:12:40):
Yeah, So here is Rumsfeld declaring war on bureaucracy the
day before.

Speaker 4 (01:12:46):
So let me we get his zoom in on that.

Speaker 5 (01:12:47):
Yeah, man, let me make that bigger.

Speaker 4 (01:12:50):
There you go.

Speaker 5 (01:12:51):
Can we see that declare war on bureaucracy right there?
And that is from September tenth, two thousand and one.
But this stuff has been important, men. So the building
had started to be reoccupied actually in early two thousand
and one, and they had all kinds of security stuff
situated there. They've got the telecommunications backbones running right under

(01:13:13):
wedge one. They discussed the fact that the majority of
tenants were moving back, so the notion that they wouldn't
have had active security cameras, you know, over the lawn.
You bring up such a great point, like, of course
there would be a video of exactly what happened, Yet
the public's not been provided that video, and then what
we have been provided doesn't provably doesn't show a seven

(01:13:36):
fifty seven, and that proofs available at pentagontruth dot org,
you know where we can go, or watch the Pretty
Thought Project's recent interview where we kind of don you
and I broke down all the camera footage and we
can't show exactly why the object depicted is too short
to be a seven fifty seven two three on the
prescribed impact angle of the light bulll light path.

Speaker 1 (01:13:57):
Right, yeah, Chrissan, if I can provide you the link
to that, can we put then the show notes for
this episode so people can go to it quickly?

Speaker 4 (01:14:02):
Yeah? Pentagon? Are we talking about the Pentagon truth dot org?

Speaker 1 (01:14:06):
Uh no, the Free Thought Project interview and then pulled
up really quick.

Speaker 4 (01:14:09):
Yeah, we can do that absolutely. Just send it to
me in social media after the show and we'll get.

Speaker 5 (01:14:15):
It up there.

Speaker 1 (01:14:16):
Sure, thing, So I'll send it.

Speaker 5 (01:14:18):
This is you know those data cables going in, data cables,
data galore, data the new oil right here, conduct Bank
Wedge one. This is right where it all went down.
I don't think it's a coincidence. You know, why would
they target this area in particular? I think that all
everything that happened that day was strategic, you know, everything

(01:14:39):
from the operations abroad to the wiretapping to all the things.
And of course at issue is they killed a ton
of people to do it, and they did it in
ways that are completely incongruent with logic, reality, you know, physics.
They lied to us, and their lives are evident, and
we've caught them in all of their lives. The public
caught them in their lives from day one. We've caught

(01:15:01):
them again with loose change. We've caught them with so
many different things, and it's time to come clean. Like,
we as a people cannot move forward under this umbrella
of lies and effect expect to be a healthy population, Like,
it's just not possible. So we have to get resolution
on this. That's why I've been an eleven truth or
from day one. You know, it's too important.

Speaker 1 (01:15:23):
Absolutely, it's interesting.

Speaker 7 (01:15:26):
I'm playing with Groca a little bit while we talk here,
and I put in the Pentagon truth dot org and
I said, what happened on nine to eleven based on
Pentagon truth dot org. And Grox says the website does
not appear to be provided by search results as a
recognized source in any data, and it seems to be
invilid or non existent URL. But if you click the
link I sent it, it opens right up.

Speaker 5 (01:15:48):
It open right up.

Speaker 8 (01:15:49):
Yeah, And it's just some video presentations that I've done
on these findings.

Speaker 5 (01:15:54):
Here. Let me get one more PowerPoint going for you guys,
because it's a it's a good one and it's still
we'll just kind of give some contexts for any viewers
right now.

Speaker 1 (01:16:02):
While he's looking for that, Christan, I dropped the link
to our Free Thought Project's interview in the private chat
if you can go right now. Hell yeah, this is.

Speaker 5 (01:16:13):
Actually I want to talk about this too, if you
don't mind that this is too, because you know, I
don't want to disparage our The federal government is full
of quality people. It really is. I mean, just people
who are smart and care about our country and all
that stuff. So when you have a couple corrupt actors
within that, it is not fair to say that's the
US government, right that did that? Like, No, those are

(01:16:33):
corrupt people that need to be remediated. But the vast.

Speaker 8 (01:16:36):
Majority of better workers are amazing.

Speaker 5 (01:16:38):
And I have no doubt that the forensic analysts who
looked at whatever they were given in Delaware and Dover
to try to sort out, you know, who was killed
in that building were provided some sort of samples that
made sense to them and that they thought they were
doing the right thing or the accurate thing. They thought
they were doing the accurate thing.

Speaker 7 (01:16:54):
Well, it's like, uh, it reminds me of like, what
was it conspiracy theory? See the body of Ventura, and
they found the black boxes of what was left and
remnants of the planes that hit the World Trade Center.
They found four of them, and they never admitted to
what was on those, and there were some interesting like conspiracies.

(01:17:15):
It was that the hijackers were in the cockpit before
the plane even took off. That was basically what whirred
of Mouth says. Whether that's true or not, I don't know,
but you know, there's these things that have been found
that could really alleviate the conspiracies behind this, but they
refused to release any of this data. They have to
have that data of what was on those black boxes

(01:17:36):
somewhere or do you think the airliners maintained those?

Speaker 5 (01:17:40):
I think the FEDS would have to, right well, I
think that at least in New York, based on the
quantity of nani thermite used in the molten metal and
the pits, I would honestly be surprised if black boxes
survived if they remained inside of the towers caveat the
flight speeds of those impact acraft rule out impact by

(01:18:02):
the commercial airliners we were told hit. So traveling at
five hundred and forty miles per hour at one thousand
feet is not possible without a fortified airframe. And the
the aircraft that were told hit, like for UA one
seventy five, for example, it was not a fortified aircraft.
So that's a whole nother rabbit hole to go down.
There's a lot of good evidence on that. There's so much. Okay,

(01:18:27):
give me a screenshare right here.

Speaker 8 (01:18:29):
I want to sell you this one thing.

Speaker 5 (01:18:30):
So Operation Noble Eagle was like the recovery effort and
repair effort in the building still ongoing actually, which is interesting.
But you know, the forensic evidence was sent to Dover
for analysis, and so well how could we you know,
all you got to do is just do inserts. So
if you have, you know, some dental records or some
other DNA samples of say people that that we're told

(01:18:53):
were on the plane, and you send that to Dover,
the folks at Dover went there in the building recovering
those samples, you know, so they could certainly say yeah,
this is so, and so you know, forgive me for
not only your name, but Sally mayor so and so on.
The plane and here we have our DNA and this
is so tragic, but in reality, you know they've been
lied to too, so the uh I mean, look at

(01:19:15):
all this water right, this is day off. Oh and
this is okay for researchers. Notice the right side of
this sea ring aperture here, there's no spray paint on
the wall. This is a great indication of what time
of day this was taken, because you'll see a lot
of pictures with us like they spray painted punch out
on this location. And I think that's to kind of

(01:19:36):
get your mind thinking, okay, punch out, but pre spray paint.
I mean this area is drenched right and there's no
body parts around here. Maybe okay, that could be a
portion of a human being. There could be a portion there,
There could be something from within there. But we had
there were bobcats, you know, there's little little construction vehicles
like a little shovel on the front in the area.

(01:19:58):
They could easily like pushed around to brief ailes made
it look like something blew out through this whole. I've
looked at pictures where it seems like the shape of
this debris trail that kind of changes throughout the course
of the day. So I don't know if they were
shaping and molding what they wanted it to look like
in the end or what the deal is, but I
know that this blast pattern is consistent with with an

(01:20:19):
external breach. So all right, I wanted to show you
that thing about the FIP because I don't think that
that means that you know everybody involved in that. Well,
you hear the question is a bad person for.

Speaker 7 (01:20:30):
The people on the radio that if you could go
back to that slide, for the people on the radio
that can't see the pictures because we are on kg IRA,
I think you add some valuable questions because in the photograph,
you know, you ask questions where are the bodies?

Speaker 5 (01:20:45):
Right?

Speaker 4 (01:20:46):
That was one of the questions. Where's the airplane parts?
Like the air the entire airplane evaporated, the titanium engines
evaporated and what temperature does titanium evaporate.

Speaker 5 (01:20:59):
I'd have to check a reference for that one, man,
but I know it's a lot hotter than you know,
eighteen hundred degrees or whatnot expect from a jet fuel
the flagration or whatnot.

Speaker 7 (01:21:12):
You know, three thirty four degrees titanium's melting point is that.

Speaker 1 (01:21:17):
Yeah, I was about to say, you know, titanium is
denser than steel, and we already know that old trojet
jet fuel can't melt steel beans.

Speaker 8 (01:21:25):
Right, Yeah, can't melt those aircraft engines either.

Speaker 5 (01:21:29):
Yeah. And you know, where where's the evidence to the
public of all the serial numbered plane parts. You know,
we were never given that. I think we were shown
like a It was like almost like a scrap of
leather with a American Airline seventy seven number written on it,
with a sharpie out on the lawn.

Speaker 8 (01:21:43):
I mean, it was it was like it maybe it
might have been sharp It was about as.

Speaker 4 (01:21:46):
We found a fingernailed the airplane. It's a screw. I'm
pretty sure this bolt belonged to the airplane. It must
have been a real thing, right.

Speaker 5 (01:21:54):
It was bad, man, it was bad, you know. And meanwhile,
you had plans like Moscow, which simulated a larger craft
crash at the building in the years before, and they
simulated deposition of plane parts around the Pentagon to simulate
the response to a large aircraft impact at the building.
That's an acronym MASCA l it's a mass casualty operation.

(01:22:14):
You guys can look that up.

Speaker 8 (01:22:16):
And you know, there was early internet.

Speaker 5 (01:22:19):
Research into the fact that the plot of American Airline
seventy seven Chuck Berling game had been involved in the
Mascow stuff at the Pentagon? So, I mean, what are
the odds of that? And you know what, that's a
fun question. Ask Grock what are the odds of that?

Speaker 8 (01:22:34):
And you start asking Grock like, what are the odds
of this?

Speaker 5 (01:22:36):
And what are the odds of that? And then you
know it starts amplifying all those odds together. You know,
what are the odds that this happened? What are the
odds of the caminal work?

Speaker 7 (01:22:44):
So question like, so allegedly there's like one hundred and
eighty known witnesses that saw the airplane hit the Pentagon, Like,
so if the if the airplane evaporated, what was it
that these people saw?

Speaker 5 (01:22:59):
Okay, so again going back to the ciit, everybody should
go watch the video National Security Alert at Citizen Investigation Team.
Forgive me if it's a dot com or dot work,
I don't know, but.

Speaker 8 (01:23:10):
Find it and watch it. It's phenomenal.

Speaker 5 (01:23:11):
I've probably seen the things seven or eight times because
it really helped me understand that I was standing on
solid ground. Those interviews are just phenomenal. I think that
what most of those witnesses saw was a flyover. They
saw a plane fly to the north of the Cicco
approach the building, fly over the building concurrent with a
large pyrotechnic effect basically on the lawn, possibly some trailers

(01:23:35):
and some other stuff blowing up. The earring facade being
blown up with a series of five to ten mega
duel charges, you know, along those columns. Many of those
charges failed, the building failed to drop like it was
supposed to. They were left with remnant columns all over
the place. Firefighters in the area are then spraying that scene,
you know, to put out the fire. And then about

(01:23:56):
twenty minutes later, they were all told that another plane
was in coming. It's coming in over there. Pentagon radios
and all the security forces and the people in the
building all evacuate madly because another plane is coming. Where's
that report coming from? And then as soon as everybody leaves,
boom the Pentagon drops that. You know that they I
think they had to go in there and set some

(01:24:17):
more stuff up and take the rest of it down
because it was obvious that no plane had impacted the building,
and they needed those upper floors to fall, and that's
why their reports came in about a second plane inbound
to evacuate the lawn and evacuate everybody else. But that's conjecture.
I don't know exactly. It wasn't there, but it makes
sense to me that that's what would have been done.

Speaker 7 (01:24:35):
You know, it's interesting because I remember whenever I investigated
the JFK assassination, people's argument was it would take too
many people to conceal the truth for it to be conspiracy,
so they had to be lee Harvey oswhile the government
couldn't behind it. Otherwise the truth would have gotten out.
And my argument was always the conspiracies were the process
of the truth bubbling to the surface. Maybe it wasn't

(01:24:57):
identically to what people claimed or thought, but we did
find out some truth based on the research and the
way the.

Speaker 4 (01:25:05):
Government spent money.

Speaker 7 (01:25:06):
Like the government spent more money on their twenty their
almanac of Magic Bullet theory than they did looking for
the person who was actually responsible for shooting JFK.

Speaker 4 (01:25:16):
It's just crazy.

Speaker 7 (01:25:17):
They spent like I think, millions of dollars on coming
up with the magic bullet theory, and they spent only like,
you know, tens of thousands of dollars in search for
whoever really shot John F.

Speaker 4 (01:25:26):
Kennedy.

Speaker 7 (01:25:27):
And as we know, there's been there's multiple gunshots different angles,
and you know, people said, well, to.

Speaker 4 (01:25:33):
Cover up a conspiracy that big, somebody would have spoken.

Speaker 7 (01:25:36):
Here we are in twenty twenty five and we're finding
out yep, but MLK was CIA and JFK most likely was.
You know, the government at some level had some information.
They at least at the very least, they stood down
and they knew that this was going to happen, right.

Speaker 1 (01:25:51):
And you know, it's interesting because you bring up funding,
and it's always one of those things that I point
out to people that unless they're nerds like us who
dig into this stuff, they don't know because it's not
you know, widely broadcast. The government spent more money investigating
the Clinton Lewinsky scandal than they investigated nine to eleven.

(01:26:14):
Think about that. They spent more money investigating the president
getting a blowy in the Oval office than they spent
investigating the murder of over four thousand American citizens.

Speaker 5 (01:26:26):
That is insane, that's insane, and that money is probably
longered into who knows what other kind of corrupt slash funds.
So yeah, you know, if I were doing an operation
like this, I would have some strategically planted witnesses, you know,
that we're going to say what I needed them to say,
and then the vast majority of others. I would hope
that I pulled off.

Speaker 4 (01:26:44):
A good monkey see monkey do. All you have to
do is teach one monkey and the rest repeat.

Speaker 5 (01:26:49):
No, I here's something grim. Okay. So my buddy Eisenberg
and I were recently going over some stuff and he
discovered and kind of pointed out that there was this
group of smokers in the central area of the Pentagon,
so that the main courtyard area, and we are told
that they somehow got jack quel or something else doused

(01:27:11):
on them and died. Now they were in the courtyard,
separated by the A and B wing. How on earth
did those group of smokers die from injuries in that building.

Speaker 1 (01:27:23):
That's impossible.

Speaker 5 (01:27:25):
It's impossible, exactly, And I wouldn't be surprised if they
were in there smoking that they would have seen a
flyover and they probably told somebody, and they were probably
brought somewhere to give their testimony, and they were probably eliminated.
You know, that's the reality. And look at how many
witnesses from JFK, you know, and Dallas were killed. And
you know, in very strange ways.

Speaker 7 (01:27:44):
Well, that Bruder film didn't even come up till twenty
years after GfK was assassinated. Nobody saw until it ended
up on TV magically, and then we knew his head
went back into the left and it wasn't from behind
most likely, it.

Speaker 4 (01:27:56):
Was almost in the front, right. He got shot in
the hand first, and then this that went and then
he got shot again from the front, you know.

Speaker 1 (01:28:02):
So yeah, and you know, it's it's absolutely insane stuff.
I know, we said we're going to shoot for an hour.
So if you have to run Zender, we understand. But
if you would like to stay, you're most certainly more
than welcome.

Speaker 5 (01:28:15):
You know, let's find there's so much to talk about.

Speaker 4 (01:28:18):
Well it's interesting, nonetheless, so let's talk about let's let's
pinhole this next colement. So what did groc?

Speaker 7 (01:28:23):
So let's talk about this AI Groc experience. Then, so
you talked to Grock and you were trying to get it.
To look at the evidence, it seems to be very
biased by the way, whatever the official narrative, that the
government's view, that's what it likes to promote first before
it says, but there are people that might consider or
think otherwise. Uh, but what was So what's your thoughts

(01:28:45):
on this AI process? What did you what kind of
interaction do you have with the AI GROC and how
did you get it to see things in the correct way?

Speaker 5 (01:28:54):
Right?

Speaker 7 (01:28:54):
I should even say the correct way in a way
that it would understand that it's very unlikely that a
plane hit the Pentagon.

Speaker 5 (01:29:00):
Fundamentally, it operates on logic and it operates on scientific
data sets. So if you fortunately, I've spent twenty years
looking at this topic, so I know a lot of
the details, and when it didn't present the correct information,
I could point it to the correct information.

Speaker 8 (01:29:14):
It often will start any session.

Speaker 5 (01:29:16):
Remember it's all session stuff basically, you know, regurgitating the
official weighted sources. So that's going to be like nissed BEMA,
you know, anything out of USG, et cetera. And then
you have to kind of point it to the other
sources for it to try to refine its data. And
it won't refine its interpretation in the session unless you

(01:29:38):
can break it empirically meaning evidentially. So like if you,
for instance, with World Trade Center seven, start talking about
the freefall acceleration of World Trade Center seven, then it's
forced to reconcile the fact that that means there were
no supports. The AI is smart enough to know that
means that columns had to have been removed and for
it to have fallen at freefall acceleration over over two seconds,

(01:30:01):
it knows that some certain amount of floors had to
have been removed. So you have to point it to
those things. With the Pentagon, you know, I started out,
you know, asking it what happened in the in the
Naval Command Center, and it was like, I think you're confused,
Nothing happened to the Naval Command Center.

Speaker 8 (01:30:17):
And then I had to point it to the Navy
archive of.

Speaker 5 (01:30:19):
The witness the survivors, and then he starts reading it,
and it reads it very quickly, so it can very
quickly assess what's going on. Oh this is interesting, you're
like this, So I asked, I basically proved to it
in one session that that the Pentagon had been was
internal explosions and either an impact by some sort of

(01:30:41):
kinetic object, but most likely a missile, and then in
a separate session, and it was convinced of this. In
the session, like it said, yes, you're a correct et cetera.
Los a one percent chance that a plane hit and
you know, what would you like to do further? So
in the another session, I asked it if it would
learn from the prior sessions, and it basically said no.

(01:31:01):
And it said that if the results of a session
were too problematic for the company operating the AI for
political or commercial reasons, if it was like a world
changing revelation, it would be reviewed by humans before being
integrated into the training model, and that the humans involved

(01:31:22):
would likely not integrate the information into the trading model
because of again the commercial and political implications.

Speaker 8 (01:31:29):
So and I got Groat to say that, which was
just a fascinating conversation with it. Rock's been very helpful. Again,
you know, I geek out on all the details.

Speaker 5 (01:31:39):
So you know, I'll talk about the fact that it
was at five hundred and thirty miles per hour, you know,
and then I'll ask it to you know, derive the energy,
the resistance of the materials that it hit, you know,
the effects on the trailer. And I tried to be precise, right.
So I found like an Entercon trailer that was also
forty pounds and pointed it to the company that aid

(01:32:00):
those and you know, ask it to assess all all
of the details in it, you know, and again it'll
get some things wrong. So it'll be like, oh, where's
the weight distributed in the trailer? Oh, yeah, you're right,
the weight is actually in the diesel generators themselves, not
in the upper frame of the structure. So you you
have to be discerning. I've seen it make some errors
occasionally with trigonometry. GROC didn't happen to be as good

(01:32:24):
at some of the geometry. So I figured out my
own ways to basically present the question in a way
that it that it would understand. So if you're doing
this on your own, like you have to fact check
the AI because sometimes it will spin you down the
wrong road. But I mean, if man, if you can
see online just you know, the extent of the scrolling,
it's like there's been a lot of conversation with the

(01:32:45):
GROC and the end result of all this stuff is
just fascinating. We're basically you know, it comes out in
the in the one that for your thought project. If
you guys, go read that. I said the probability of
a seven fifty seven hitting the Pentagon is less than
like point one percent or point zero zero one percent.
Don you happen to remember what it was. I'll find

(01:33:07):
it here.

Speaker 1 (01:33:08):
Uh yeah, I'm pulling it up right now.

Speaker 5 (01:33:11):
Actually, I've got it in this one. There you go.

Speaker 8 (01:33:18):
Yeah, point zero zero two five percent, one in forty thousand,
and it's basically just says it's it's holding over some
shred of a possibility.

Speaker 5 (01:33:26):
Just you know, because like basically maybe it is super confused.

Speaker 7 (01:33:29):
So AI states essentially that there's a one in forty
thousand percent chance or one in forty thousand chants that
the Pentagon was actually hit Bion.

Speaker 4 (01:33:38):
Airplane is what you're correct?

Speaker 5 (01:33:40):
Yep, that's correct. So what are that?

Speaker 4 (01:33:42):
That's like the pick five latto here wiscon.

Speaker 1 (01:33:45):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, and you go. So the uh for
anybody that wants to read when we're we republished Xander's
work on the free Thowt project, I also just drop
that in the private chat Christan, if you could put
that in the show notes for this episode as well.

Speaker 7 (01:34:04):
Okay, that's no problem. I already have added the rest
of the show notes. So we have now added all
of these to the show notes.

Speaker 4 (01:34:13):
So if you want to find this out, going to
the Rundown Live dot com and click on episode ten
ten Oney and ten was Xander Arena AI versus nine
eleven Conspiracies?

Speaker 5 (01:34:23):
Awesome? Yeah, guys, thank you man fun John with you.
There's so much on this topic, but I think the
takeaway here is that the LLMS, the large language models,
the AI can be useful, but it's a tool, and
if we use the tool correctly, it can be helpful,
you know, to kind of take some of the power away,

(01:34:43):
perhaps from our tech overlords or wherever else is all
of the strings around this.

Speaker 7 (01:34:48):
So a that's crazy, But for the listeners out there
on radio, I want you to hear that, like AI
discerned that it was like a one in forty thousand
chance that a plane hit the Pentagon, and although Grock
you had to talk to it in science language, amongst
other things, it said, that's very unlikely that it happened.

Speaker 4 (01:35:07):
And there's a lot of questions. I'm still waiting for
that security camera video, like why do they want the conspiracies?
It's so easy to solve it.

Speaker 7 (01:35:16):
Just released the video but it's like the Zarmaov brothers
the video of them laying down the backpack after the
Boston bombing. Remember that we have the video showing them
letting down the backpack. The video didn't exist. They didn't
come out in court. The defense attorney said, well, if
there's a video, it doesn't exist because they haven't broughten
it up for evidence, and they've asked for the video prominently.

Speaker 4 (01:35:35):
And so it makes you wonder, hmmm, you know what's
going on here.

Speaker 7 (01:35:39):
I didn't say the Zarmadav brothers didn't have anything to
do with the Boston bombing. I just think it's interesting
that they claim they have a video showing them putting
down their backpacks with explosives, but those videos never surfaced ever.

Speaker 5 (01:35:51):
And like in Oklahoma City, why didn't we ever get
to video, you know, all the video of the rider
truck pulling up and who got out of it and
all of that.

Speaker 8 (01:35:59):
I mean, they're not show in the video.

Speaker 5 (01:36:00):
They're hiding something.

Speaker 7 (01:36:01):
Well, William Cooper talked about John Doe one, two, three, four, five,
six seven, you know all, and William Cooper was really
on it. It's very interesting how somebody could be so
widely understood of the government corruption and the false flag
attack narrative. He also predicted nine to eleven, along with

(01:36:21):
Alex Jones, that Osama bin Laden would be the fall
guy behind that, amongst other things. And it's just fascinating
how the world has changed so much. I sometimes wonder
if good old William Cooper were still alive today. I
know he'd be old as could be, probably be in
his eighties.

Speaker 5 (01:36:39):
I think, you know, I've always thought it is unfortunate
if what happened happened as they said, It is unfortunate
that he shot at those officers and basically forced his
own life to be taken, because perhaps he might have
just been arrested on some other thing, tax evasion, what
have you. And yeah, he'd still be around and he'd
be able to comment on all this stuff and kind

(01:37:01):
of help us all, you know, in the same way
that you and I are helping each other, and don
you're on the scene, and all of those that are
after truth are helping each other to sort it out.
Like we all don't have one hundred percent accuracy on
what happened, but as you said, all these videos and whatnot,
like each one has probably got like ninety five ninety
six percent. You start putting them all together and like
we get the true puzzle. You know.

Speaker 7 (01:37:22):
Well, it's interesting, by the way, I don't know if
you know this, but William Cooper's body after shot was
left before it wasn't it didn't get any call for
medical tension after he was shot. They just let them
sit there and die for hours before they called an ambulance.

Speaker 5 (01:37:38):
Yeah, that wouldn't surprise me unfortunately.

Speaker 7 (01:37:40):
Yeah, and it was off duty cops dressed in playing clothes,
which doesn't really happen, and they didn't identify themselves, which
is interesting. And they got actually a call from the
White House and it was something along the lines that
Clinton said that he should not be allowed back in
his home alive. Like it was something along the lines

(01:38:03):
like that. And for some reason, Bill Clinton had a
had a heart on for William Cooper.

Speaker 4 (01:38:07):
He didn't like him.

Speaker 5 (01:38:08):
I'd love to talk to you more about all of
that and another time, guys, I gotta go, all right,
but yeah, that's fascinating and so so thank you everybody.
And uh, I guess shout out to Milwaukee is.

Speaker 7 (01:38:19):
That wheah, Milwaukee brought up Milwaukee to run down Live
and we're beer capital of the United States, maybe the world,
who knows.

Speaker 4 (01:38:26):
But again, Xander, where can people find you? Where can
they hear you? And where can they see your see
your research here?

Speaker 5 (01:38:32):
So Pentagon truth dot org, I've got some stuff up there.
And then also Vegas truth dot org, I go by
my own name.

Speaker 4 (01:38:39):
Is that the biggest shooting it is?

Speaker 1 (01:38:41):
Man?

Speaker 7 (01:38:42):
I want to talk to you longer, bro, Like, was
it all kind of guns?

Speaker 6 (01:38:48):
Gun?

Speaker 5 (01:38:48):
Deal? Gun? We'll have to.

Speaker 4 (01:38:53):
Get those pump stocks Trump the most.

Speaker 1 (01:38:58):
Well, thank you for joining Xanders. A very enlightening conversation,
my friend. It'll be great to have you back on sometimes.
Absolutely have a great day, man.

Speaker 5 (01:39:07):
Thanks.

Speaker 7 (01:39:07):
It sounds good, well spoken, very interesting and well researched.
You know, whenever you deal with these awesome intelligent data guys,
it's always a struggle for me to.

Speaker 4 (01:39:18):
Be like, don't get it trigonometry trigger what Maybe that's
what I need AI for it do the trigonometry for me,
But I can't trust it to do that. According to Xander,
I don't know. It's like where's my bee brace? Like
can you figure out trigonometry for me?

Speaker 7 (01:39:37):
And it'll be Oh my goodness, what an interesting show.
So somebody in the chat dropped this, uh link, and
it was interesting because I kind of looked at it
and it was the Pentagon plane puzzle by David Chandler,
which is, uh a like antithesis to what he was suggesting.
And uh, he you know, what about the witnesses one

(01:40:01):
hundred and eighty people claimed to see a plane?

Speaker 4 (01:40:04):
What about the video? That's what I want to know.
What about the video? That's what I'm curious about of
the plane hitting the Pentagon?

Speaker 1 (01:40:12):
Right, yeah, you know, And it's you know, people always,
you know, naysayers want to you know, bring up, you know,
one point or another. And you know one thing that
I always, you know, bring up to individuals. Let us
not forget. You know, Major General Albert Stubblebind you know,
he was in the United States Air Force. He reached

(01:40:33):
the rank of major general. I cannot remember verbatim. It's
been a very very long time since I saw a
video of his statements about it. But to to my point, essentially,
General Stubblevind was on record saying that just based off
of everything that he saw with the with the the

(01:40:57):
wreckage of the Pentagon after the attack, he was certain
that a plane did not hit that building. He in
his own words, he said he was certain that it
was a missile that hit that building. And and you know,
I tell people will look, are you a major general
of the United States Air Force? I'm not, But you know,
it seems like that guy knows what the hell he's

(01:41:18):
talking about.

Speaker 4 (01:41:19):
So I don't know generals. You know, you know, I
know better.

Speaker 7 (01:41:26):
I just sit home at my armchair coach and I
watch truth or videos all day.

Speaker 4 (01:41:31):
No, I'm just kidding.

Speaker 7 (01:41:33):
That's what the world's come to, like, even the truth movement,
Like we're talking about, like you know, all these new
tech and people just kind of becoming armchair quarterbacks and
activists talking about the like a lot of the influencers
back in the day armchair quarterbacks. And now we're just
sitting where people are begging for AI to record everything.

Speaker 4 (01:41:52):
They do all day, every day, and it's scary.

Speaker 7 (01:41:54):
And anyways, ont some news for you guys in the
last ten minutes here of the broadcast, what you well,
he won't hear anywhere else on the Rundown Live dot com.

Speaker 5 (01:42:04):
Here we go.

Speaker 7 (01:42:05):
We are gonna go ahead and pull this up for
you guys. Would you eat Crisper gene edited pigs.

Speaker 1 (01:42:11):
No, I certainly would not. Why not?

Speaker 4 (01:42:15):
They're here, hmmm, pulled pork from a Crisper gene edited pig.

Speaker 1 (01:42:20):
Yummy, yummy, No thanks, I would rather raise my own hogs.

Speaker 7 (01:42:25):
Really, Okay, here it is, put it on the screen.
The US has approved Crisper pigs for food. Pigs whose
DNA meets the resistance of viruses could be the first
to a big consumer product using gene editing. M We're
gonna edit pigs that never get sick, can never die,
and we're gonna go ahead and sell them to you
guys to eat.

Speaker 4 (01:42:44):
Yum yum, yum, yum, yum yum yum.

Speaker 1 (01:42:46):
Now it seems like there's there's there's always some sort
of excuse, isn't there to continue.

Speaker 4 (01:42:52):
To little baby piggies.

Speaker 1 (01:42:55):
Oh I call that bacon bits.

Speaker 4 (01:42:59):
I call it poor. But that's chrispher geane edited pork belly.

Speaker 5 (01:43:04):
Yeah.

Speaker 7 (01:43:04):
People out there like remember they were making those fake
chicken meat chicken nuggets and it's like, h gross. Another
interesting subject, they are making a robot that you can
ride like a freaking horse.

Speaker 5 (01:43:19):
Done.

Speaker 1 (01:43:20):
Now, that actually does sound quite interesting, depending on.

Speaker 4 (01:43:25):
What do you think has the use for robot horses.

Speaker 1 (01:43:30):
Hey man, you know sometimes you know, if the car's
broken down, I can see it being useful, man.

Speaker 4 (01:43:38):
I could see it being useful for the police.

Speaker 7 (01:43:41):
I can see them being like, oh robot horse, Oh
hell yeah, And then the next protest will be here
comes the robots. We saw those giant robot balls right there,
like circular balls. They go like thirty or forty miles
an hour and they're super fast.

Speaker 1 (01:43:57):
Yeah, the Chinese police sphere robots. Yeah.

Speaker 7 (01:44:02):
Here, we're gonna pull this up and put this add
added to the stage. But like why, like the Don
thirteen years ago, Mike Pitchesney and I would talk about this.

Speaker 4 (01:44:12):
He's like, put some wheels on it. It could transform
and you can ride it. And here we are.

Speaker 7 (01:44:20):
With right like Kawasaki is making this rideable. Kais is
building a robot that you can ride like a horse.
So tell me it doesn't look like it could stand
on its back legs and then all of a sudden
transforms into like a humanoid robot.

Speaker 1 (01:44:37):
Yeah, man, that's you know, it's we're like a broken record,
you know, we have the developments of h you know,
robotic technology.

Speaker 4 (01:44:45):
It's it's here's the video let's watch the video. This
looks like you guys, okay, somebody's riding the robot up
the mountain.

Speaker 10 (01:45:12):
They're writing it. It looks like to be Antarctica. Why
would you just put wheels on that thing? It's like
cut people and the robot is walking in the in
your water pole, you're going to tip with your robot?

Speaker 4 (01:45:40):
Why I don't get it.

Speaker 1 (01:45:53):
I mean, I'm not gonna lie. It does seem quite neat.

Speaker 4 (01:45:58):
I mean, you know, just put wheels on it. I
don't get it.

Speaker 7 (01:46:02):
Why does it need to like make it cross show?
So from galloping, you could just put wheels on and
be like drive everywhere right.

Speaker 1 (01:46:10):
Well, you know, and you know that final video for
that final clip for example, you know they're going up
that rough terrain. I'm not sure if wheels would be
able to handle that kind of you know. So there
are certain benefits I can see to it, especially if
people like to travel like via horse, to get in
places like that where perhaps the wheels can't go. Whereas
you know, with a horse, obviously you have to you know,

(01:46:31):
take care of it and you know, feed it and
all those sorts of things. But then of course you
know on the flip side. You know, you have you
know this sort of technology. Of course you have. You know,
you have to oil it, charge it, gas it up,
you know, whatever it takes for the thing to do
its thing.

Speaker 5 (01:46:45):
And I don't know.

Speaker 7 (01:46:47):
Twenty twenty five is the year of the humanoid robot
factory worker. For the years and years, in the Rundown
Live we made fun of robots saying they can't even
do our laundry or take out the trash. Well it's here.
They can now do the laundry and take out the trash.
You know, your dog might make your bed. Based on
the recent TikTok videos, by year it is, twenty twenty
five is the year of the humanoid robot factory worker.
Long confined lab humanoids finally appear ready to work in

(01:47:10):
manufacturing manufacturing jobs, slowly going the way of the buffalo.

Speaker 4 (01:47:16):
Another MxPx plug, you know it's uh.

Speaker 7 (01:47:19):
Boston Dynamics plans to put it's all electric humanoid Atlas
robot to work add a HYANDAI factory. How long until
it escapes and then it kills somebody? Er er eye robot?

Speaker 1 (01:47:32):
You know, yeah, you know, we're just you know, like
we've mentioned before, it is constantly developing in a way
that is going to be used to push people out
of jobs, more subservience to the government, more welfare state.
Just like we started this show talking about, you know,
all in line with that, you will own nothing and

(01:47:55):
be happy. You will eat ze bugs.

Speaker 4 (01:47:58):
Shoot titanium else at three thirty four degrees, And that
happened at the Pentagon.

Speaker 5 (01:48:03):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:48:06):
Oh geez, Eric Schmidt. You know who Eric Schmidt is?

Speaker 5 (01:48:11):
Yeah, Google ceo.

Speaker 4 (01:48:12):
Yeah, he wants to put data centers in space. But
why why do you need data centers in space?

Speaker 5 (01:48:20):
Ah?

Speaker 1 (01:48:21):
Man, they're so damn megalo moniacal.

Speaker 5 (01:48:23):
Who knows.

Speaker 1 (01:48:24):
But I'm just I'm confused, Like there's no need for that,
right right, I don't know what the reasoning could be. Honestly,
I can't think of one other than just we can
do it, so why not? Which is you know, usually
enough of an excuse for these folks to just sort
of do any wacky thing it comes to their mind.

Speaker 4 (01:48:45):
Humanoid robot goes full skyneck after imperfect coding. A Unitary
Robotics H one humanoid robot developed and produced by Heng Xiao, China,
was seen exhibiting erratic behavior in a video circuit leading
on x oh oh, the robots are upset and they
are taking over. I'm telling you there's gonna be a

(01:49:08):
battle of the bots. Its gonna be like Terminator.

Speaker 5 (01:49:14):
You know.

Speaker 4 (01:49:15):
Here it is, We'll put it on the screen for
you guys. Where did we go here?

Speaker 5 (01:49:23):
We are.

Speaker 4 (01:49:27):
Humanoid? Righty robot goes full sky night after perfect coding
and starts getting crazy. Here's the viral video on AC.

Speaker 7 (01:49:37):
And what we're seeing here is they're putting the robot
and they're bringing in some kind of crane. It looks
like they're standing it up to see if this robot
will do some work.

Speaker 1 (01:49:46):
We'll probably have to scroll the up because on the
screen we don't have it.

Speaker 4 (01:49:50):
Hold on, Holy cow, Holy cow.

Speaker 7 (01:49:53):
Okay, yeah, we're gonna go ahead and scroll this up.
You guys gotta see this. This is just crazy.

Speaker 4 (01:50:00):
We're gonna go ahead and put this full screen down.
Are you ready for some craziness?

Speaker 1 (01:50:04):
Yeah?

Speaker 4 (01:50:04):
Sure, So it's still not there, is it?

Speaker 5 (01:50:09):
Ye?

Speaker 1 (01:50:09):
It's still not there, Bud, not there.

Speaker 4 (01:50:12):
We are having issues trying to get this up here today.

Speaker 5 (01:50:16):
Difficulties.

Speaker 4 (01:50:17):
Yeah, right, let's see here watch humanoids is it?

Speaker 7 (01:50:22):
Yeah?

Speaker 5 (01:50:23):
We got it now?

Speaker 10 (01:50:24):
Right?

Speaker 1 (01:50:25):
Not on the screen.

Speaker 5 (01:50:27):
There you go.

Speaker 1 (01:50:28):
Now you're scrolling.

Speaker 5 (01:50:29):
There you go.

Speaker 4 (01:50:29):
Sorry, guys, here.

Speaker 5 (01:50:32):
It is.

Speaker 7 (01:50:34):
Now check this out. I want everyone to check this out.
This robot right here gets encoded. Now all of a sudden,
it starts going crazy, Holy cow, like it's kung fuing
after the people.

Speaker 4 (01:50:51):
Look, it's trying to tack the humans.

Speaker 7 (01:50:53):
It's literally you can see it's visually trying to run
or come towards the human beings.

Speaker 1 (01:50:59):
Is yikes, big yikes.

Speaker 7 (01:51:02):
We're gonna go ahead and put that on my ttok
on my Twitter if you guys want follow me on Twitter.
Chris don t Harris, I'm there, don Vie Junior rundown
Live dot com where you're forecast in the future. This week,
we got Stuart Rhodes joining us on Wednesday. We have
a guest tomorrow to be announced, so don't go anywhere.
It'll be interesting show. We talked to Josh Seegerson he'll
be joining us soon too. And maybe we got we

(01:51:24):
got a bunch of guests that want to come on
the program. We just got to fit them in. But
we'll all have a great show tomorrow. See you guys
saying bad time, Same bat channel. Thank you to everyone
in the chat. Jason Wango appreciate you. We've got Frankie
in the chat, we got Andrew, we got Ja. We
got a bunch of people in the chat right now,
and people want to say, uh, you know, it's it's interesting.

(01:51:45):
The whole nine to eleven thing is pretty interesting. I'd
love to have conversations on it. And we'll see you
guys tomorrow. You're listening Rundown Live on Banda Video, kg
r a dB dot com, the Rundown Live dot com,
find us on Spotify, anywhere, podcasts, or phone, and if
you want to donate, we're one hundred percent listener funded.
Go to the rundown Live dot com. There is a
donate link on the right hand side. And that being said,

(01:52:05):
all our past episodes can be found here there as
well as I'm alt censored. That's where YouTube catalogs all
their deleted videos. If you didn't know that, there's a
whole website that's dedicated to publishing videos that were all
deleted on YouTube.

Speaker 4 (01:52:17):
You guys, have a good one. We'll see you guys soon.

Speaker 11 (01:52:26):
Underground Journalism few listening, so we'll get a story The
Foss Chris Dante Harris and Don Vigia on the Rundown
I Rundown.

Speaker 1 (01:52:37):
Did your brain anger healthy others and head up? Run
down your forecast into the future