Black Rain & Standing Armies (10/1/25)

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hello, anybody home today, I want you to open your mind.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
I've almost tone the conclusion that the story is subdemning
that the massive Apple people can't deal with it.

Speaker 3 (00:14):
We are in process of developing a whole series of
techniques two good people actually to love their certitude. We
face a hostile ideology, global in scope, atheistic in character,
ruthless in purpose, and insiduous in methode.

Speaker 1 (00:32):
So we are opposed around the world by a monolithic
and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covet means for
expanding its sphere of influence to change the minds and
the attitudes and the beliefs of the people to bring
about one world socialist totalitarian government.

Speaker 3 (00:49):
The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists.
It is patterned itself after every dictator who's ever planted
the ripping imprint of a boot on the pages of history,
just the beginning of time. If you can get people
to consent to the state of affairs in which they
are living, then you have a much more easily controllable
society than you would if you were relying poorly on

(01:11):
clubs and firing squads and concentration camps and tools of
conquest that necessarily come with barnes and extortions and fiat.
There are weapons that re simply fight outs prejudices.

Speaker 1 (01:24):
As you connect the dots between different people, organizations, religions, history,
suddenly the picture starts to form. The Kingdom of God
is within men, not one man nor a group of men.

Speaker 2 (01:35):
Someone born in the United States is not more special
than someone born in Mexico.

Speaker 1 (01:40):
Someone who is white is not more special than someone
who is black. They're just vehicles for the consciousness to experience.
They do not want your children to be educated. They
do not want you to think too much. It was
learned that the aliens had men and were then manipulating
masters of people. Your secret society is witchcraft, magic, the occult,

(02:03):
and religion.

Speaker 3 (02:03):
They're reach into our children, music, television, books, right children'sistence.
How can I just advise that a stand with an efficiency,
So if you have.

Speaker 4 (02:12):
The opportunity to stand next to one of these machines,
it feels like an altar to an alien god.

Speaker 1 (02:18):
Genetic power is the most awesome force the planet's ever seen.
But you wielded like a kid that's found his dad's gun.
Beyond the airport. Who has an ounce but applying this
there is now in the prevess of the army. Too
many others know what's happening out there, and no one,
no government agency has jurisdiction over the truth.

Speaker 3 (02:33):
Any state, any entity, any ideology that fails to recognize
the worth, the dignity the rights of man, that state
is absoluting a case to be found under m from mankind.
In the Twilight ser.

Speaker 1 (02:46):
Long time, some of you got acquainted with the real
hard truth. It's the haw that says I will not acquiesce.

Speaker 3 (02:55):
Freedom is the privilege to be right, freedom from the
disast because in the state, if you.

Speaker 1 (03:00):
Don't connect the dots, it's just a mass of what's
all this about? You are listening to The Secret Teachings Radio.
I'm your host, Ryan Gable. If you'd like to contact
the show tonight, you can email urd Gable at yahoo
dot com and reach out to the show on social media.

(03:23):
The easiest way to do that is by visiting our
website www dot tst radio dot info or the Secret
Teachings dot info. Same website. You'll find the social media links.
You'll also find my books and our full show archive.
I know the advertisements in the free archive are very annoying,

(03:45):
but they finance this show. If you'd like to get
rid of them, you can subscribe on the website. We
have various tiers that you can subscribe to with different perks,
pretty cheap for all the content Monday through Friday, plus
my books. At the top tier, you also get access
to the digital versions of those, and you'll be supporting independent.

Speaker 3 (04:09):
Radio.

Speaker 1 (04:10):
Fifteen plus years of The Secret Teachings, and we are
i'd say for about half of that listener supported. The
first half was me directly supporting the show by working
one or two additional jobs. Now we are off the ground,
and for years and years now we've been supported by
you buying books and subscribing. You keep us on air,

(04:33):
you keep us independent, and I humbly thank you for
that as often as I have the opportunity on the
show to do so. Thank you so much for supporting
The Secret Teachings. And no matter where you're listening around
the world, welcome to the show. Whether you are in
Asia or you are in Africa, Europe, the Americas, Australia

(04:55):
doesn't really matter. It's amazing what we can do with
technology to be able to connect with each other there
around the world like this technology is great. Anytime we
have discussions on technology, there's always that extremist view that
there's no danger at all, or that it's the most

(05:16):
dangerous thing ever. And I think truth and reality exists
somewhere in between those two extremes. But there are certain
forms of technology, certain forms of developments, that are perhaps
universally agreeable that they're too destructive, that they're too dangerous,

(05:39):
and maybe we just should stop playing with them, And
there is I think a little bit of that sentiment
with artificial intelligence. There definitely is ongoing to this day,
agreement globally that nuclear weapons, whatever they actually are, because
there's a debate about what an atomic bomb is, but

(06:03):
that these weapons are perhaps too dangerous to have lying around,
we should decommission them. All that will probably never happen,
just the idea the threat of those weapons is enough
to control the International Chess Board nuclear submarine. Here a

(06:25):
missile pointed in one direction. There a military display in
China and Russia, North Korea. Even in the United States,
we don't really flaunt our nuclear weapons like maybe China
or Russia does, but we also don't keep them as secret,
as the Israelis do. But I was thinking about these
weapons for a couple of different reasons. Number one, I

(06:49):
just went back to Hiroshima again. It's one of my
favorite Japanese cities. It is for some reason, and it's
probably just the history of it, but for some reason,
it is a very, very energetically magnetically attractive city to me.

(07:09):
And I can't really put my finger on why that is,
but I just feel so drawn to Hiroshima. I even
speculated that maybe I lived there in a past life.
But I've been to Hiroshima three times for an extended
period of time, more than a few days, and I
just went back last week. And while I was there,

(07:32):
my wife had never been to the bomb Museum, which
is in the Peace Park. She had been to Nagasaki,
which is much further south. And I said, well, you're Japanese.
You've been to Hiroshima. We actually met in Hiroshima. As
a matter of fact, I said, you have to see
the museum. So we went to the museum. She wanted

(07:54):
to see it anyway, And although I had been there before,
most of them are free. One of them, the main one,
I think it's six hundred yen or less than that.
It might have been four hundred yen. It's two three
dollars American. So we go in and we when you
walk into the museum, you have to walk down this

(08:17):
corridor that circles until you get into the main basement area,
and there are these signs up in English and Japanese,
and I'm pretty sure there's like Korean and maybe Chinese.
It's definitely English and Japanese, and it just kind of
gives you the history of what was happening before, during,

(08:42):
and after in the nineteen forties, been nineteen forties. And
then it opens up at the bottom of this winding corridor.
It opens up into this large room. There's a peace fountain,
there's this artistic rendering of here Shima on the walls
that's painted. And then you go into the main area.

(09:08):
And one of the main areas is very graphic. They
have signs up that say if you are not that,
if you're squeamish, like it's a haunted house, but they
have signs up that say something to the effect of caution,
very disturbing imagery. You go down that hallway and you
go into the main where all the artifacts are. The

(09:31):
main hall with all the artifacts and whatnot, and you
see the clothes laid out that are tattered and bloodstained.
You see bent pieces of metal and concrete and debris.
You see fused glass, lots of fused glass. You actually

(09:52):
see things in the Hiroshima Bomb Museum that are really
similar to things that you find at Ground zero in
New York from nine to eleven. You find fused materials.
Now there's no fusion of dissimilar materials like wood and metal,

(10:13):
but you do find fusion of glass because.

Speaker 3 (10:16):
Of the heat.

Speaker 1 (10:18):
You find a lot of that little vials that are
fused together, broken glass that's fused together, some of the
more striking stuff. And then as you go more into
the museum you start to see some of the pictures.
You see people that have their skin falling off their bones,

(10:38):
which is described in that very very famous book that
I think everybody should read. I don't know why this
book is not read in the school, and maybe some
schools read it, but the famous book by John Hersey Hiroshima,
it's a small book. It should be read in every
history class. I don't think that it is. I never
read it and I never read it in history class.

(11:00):
I read it after the fact. I'm actually going to
read it again. I just got her a copy of
it too, so she could read it. She's practicing her English.
That's a perfect book to do that. And in that book,
one of the things that always stood up to me
was the descriptions of people's flesh melting off their bones,
and people being disoriented and not knowing where they were.

(11:22):
Most people had head trauma, people had been partially blinded
by the by the blast, and people just wandered around
very much like zombies, skin burned, face, deformed, skin falling off,
and you see all of that, and you see they

(11:44):
have they have like artifacts stuff that people were you
using at the time, like a binto box that has
this think they described it as like carbonized rice and
vegetables that this mother was prepared for her kid. You
go through and you look at all of that. One
of the more striking things that's not not as horrific

(12:05):
and maybe it's emotional, is the story of this girl
who got leukemia. She survived, but she got leukemi and
she died. And when she was in the hospital, she
made these tiny little origami cranes and they just get
smaller and smaller and smaller, and there's a I guess
you could say it's not a myth, it's more of
like folklore or maybe a legend that if you make

(12:29):
a thousand paper cranes or agami paper cranes, your wish
will be granted. And her wish was, of course, to
live and survive. So she made tons of these little
cranes and it's amazing because she made them with needles.
And then the museum progresses, and without going into a
full overview of it, if you ever get a chance

(12:49):
to come to Japan and go to the museum, it
would be a once in a lifetime thing, especially considering
that you don't find any museums or any displays or
artifacts about Hiroshima or Nagasaki anywhere else in the world,
particularly in the United States. There have been exhibits where

(13:14):
things have been brought to the United States from Japan,
notably in Los Angeles there have been exhibits. But I
was curious when I was walking through this museum and
the different side museums they have or memorials at the
Peace Park, I was wondering how many of these stories

(13:39):
of the people that survived for years, or people that
survived temporarily told their stories, later died. How many of
these stories are made up? How many of these people
who claimed to be in Hiroshima and survive. How many
of those people were actually living in say, Tokyo, or

(14:00):
perhaps maybe they were living in Brooklyn, New York. These
thoughts were going through my head. I kept thinking, how
many of these stories are made up? How many of
these stories are fabricated? And you might think that is
a legitimate question, you might think that's an absurd question.

(14:23):
Whatever you might think, though it's an important question. It's
an important question for one primary reason, because there are
historical events in which there's some horrific thing that happens,
and yet so many of the stories turn out to

(14:45):
be fake, and so many of the victims or survivors
turn out to not have They don't even have a
history in the city, they don't live in the area,
They were living in another country when they supposedly were
the victims of some horrible evil or some horrible tragedy.

(15:10):
So I kept thinking that how many Japanese made up
these stories, How many Japanese didn't actually live in Hiroshima
Nagasaki and just lied about it. How many of these
people tried to get famous and make money off of it.

(15:32):
How many Japanese were trying to get reparations after what happened,
how many were trying to get reparations in a way
that almost seemed more like greed than what reparations are

(15:53):
intended to be. And the answer to those questions, it's
pretty close to zero. There is, however, a very famous
case of five Japanese survivors who brought a lawsuit to

(16:15):
the Tokyo District Court about a decade after the bombing,
and they challenged the legality under international law of the
US dropping those bombs on Hiroshima, Nagasaki. Again, there were
five plaintiffs, and they did seek reparations from the Japanese government,
arguing that the state had waived those rights and had

(16:38):
waived their own rights as citizens at the nineteen fifty
one San Francisco Peace Treaty. In nineteen sixty three, almost
another decade later, the anniversary of Pearl Harbor. As matter
of fact, December seventh, nineteen sixty three, the courts in
Tokyo dismissed the plaintiff's claims for compensation due to the

(17:00):
nineteen fifty one treaty which forced the Japanese to waive
all claims against the Allied powers for actions taken during
the war. Of course, the Japanese were then forced to
pay reparations for what they had done, which a lot
of that money. You can imagine where it went to,

(17:21):
and it didn't go to fixing things. It went to
the pockets of the people that started the war to
begin with, the people that made up stories about tragedy
and lied about where they were and stole money under
the guise of let's help people. And so as part
of this treaty, citizens could not obtain anything from their government,

(17:46):
or certainly from a foreign government like the United States
that just indiscriminately bombed a city, two cities, well actually three.
They did the same thing in Tokyo. They indiscriminately bombed Tokyo.
That was the fire bombings a few months before what
happened in Hiroshima, Nagasaki. But this case became known as

(18:07):
the Shimoda case, and it was the first judicial decision
on the use of nuclear weapons. And yet unless you're
a historian, you probably don't know about the Shimoda case.
Not only was it the first judicial decision on the
use of nuclear weapons. The court ruled that these five

(18:29):
plaintiffs could not obtain reparations for what had happened. And
we could see these are legitimate claims to reparations, you know,
something that just literally happened, direct global evidence of it,
and these people's lives were destroyed and they would like
there to be some compensation they're lucky enough to be alive.

(18:53):
Court said, we can't do that because of the treaty.
But the court did issue a separate opinion, almost like
I believe it was considered an unofficial opinion. I'm a
little bit rusty on my legal terminology, haven't been looking
at that stuff for like four years now, but they
an unofficial opinion they issued, and this unofficial opinion was

(19:19):
that this was wrong, This was immoral, This was essentially illegal,
and it violated international law. It violated more than just
international law. It violated agreements on It's kind of weird

(19:40):
to say when there's like there's like agreements on what
is civil in terms of war, but they say that
it violated the Hague Conventions and the Hague Draft Rules
of Air Warfare, the Hague Conventions on Land and Naval Warfare,
and then the draft rules for air warfare, and the
court highlighted the indiscretion minute nature of the attacks on civilians,

(20:02):
marking the first acknowledgment anywhere in the world that the
atomic bombings of Japan were illegal and immoral, even in
a time of war. And this has been a key case,
a key decision, a key opinion issued by a high

(20:23):
court in a country that has really been the foundation
of movements to disarm nuclear weapons, to dismantle them, and
to just stop the proliferation of these weapons and the
potentiality for this type of warfare, which is probably why
you feel that it's almost like a bizarre sense of peace.

(20:47):
If you go to Hiroshima, there's always activism there, there's
always calls to ban nuclear weapons. There's always something. Three
times I've been there, well, actually maybe i've been there
four times. Three main times i've been there, there's always
something going on related to that. So there's this strange
sense of you can see people with their flesh piled

(21:10):
off and melting off of their bodies, and then you
see extremely peaceful demonstrations and calls for no more nuclear weapons.
It's a weird sense of like this is the most
horrifying thing I've ever seen in my life. But it's
also strangely peaceful. And I think what it is is

(21:31):
it's like very uniquely Japanese. Is I think that's the
reason it feels so kind of strange. Where you blend
together death and life, you blend together the unethical, immoral, illegal,
indiscriminate nature of one of the worst acts of I
think a war crime ever, and you blend that together

(21:54):
with this unique sense of waw of a society that
has always been based on peace, which is of course
how the Allies were able to subdue what's actually how
the Imperial government of Japan was able to subdue their
people in the first place, But it's also how the
Allies were able to subdue the Japanese in the second place,

(22:14):
by playing on that sense of wah and by creating
informing the new Japanese constitution around the idea of we
just renounced war. Because you know, after they dropped those bombs,
any person, so you could have been in the city
and survived. Luckily, your whole family was killed, but you survived.
And if you questioned the legality of it, or if

(22:39):
you questioned the indiscriminate nature of it. The Allies considered that,
particularly the US, considered that an act of aggression. Like
you could have been a peace activist. You could have
been against the Imperial government of Japan. You could have
been against the whole war. You could have just wanted
to live in a little hut in the middle of
the woods. But if you said, I think that it

(23:01):
was wrong that you bomb this city, they consider that
an act of aggression, militarism, imperialism, even if you were
against the imperial government, and they considered you an enemy
even post war. That's what the War Guilt information program,
with the War Guilt program did to Japan. They also
forced the Japanese government to essentially admit that they started

(23:22):
the war, which is bizarre because we always thought it
was Hitler invading Poland that started the war. But yet
the Allies forced the Japanese to admit that they started
the wars. It's a very strange history. But the Shimota
case is the base of this. And so I'm thinking
about all of this while I'm in Hiroshima again. And

(23:42):
it's also weird. If you're in Hiroshima, if you ever
go there, if you've ever been there, there's a lot
of museums. There's the Peace Park, of course, and there's
this tower. It's not rely a tower per se, it's
a tall building that's very close to ground zero. So
I don't know if you've ever read anything about this,

(24:02):
but the famous bomb dome is maybe a five minute walk,
or it's probably less than a five minute walk. It's
maybe like a two three minute walk from where ground
zero officially is where the bomb was detonated in the air.
And so if you if you are standing looking at
the bomb dome, or if you see pictures of the

(24:25):
bomb dome, just across the street from it, there's a
tower building it's called the Orizuru And then inside that
building they have a special room with a window built
into it so you can and it has has a
plaque and it shows you exactly where ground zero was,
which is kind of behind the building across the street

(24:47):
from where the bomb dome is. That's where the bomb
actually exploded. And it's weird that you can go and
see this, and then you can go into this the
law of this building, the Oreizuru building, and you can
get like the best ice cream that doesn't have any
milk you ever had, which for me, is a big thing.

(25:09):
I don't I don't eat milk, don't drink milk. I
don't like milk. It's gross and I'm also allergic to it.
But they have like this rice ice cream, and you
just think these people have to be lying. There's no
way this is just rice. It's like that old uh
Cat William's bit about marijuana. He said, you know, marijuana
is getting stronger, and he's like, you just hit it,

(25:30):
stare at it, and you're like, that ain't normal. Why
is it sparkling like that? That's what I think of
all the rice stuff here. There's like, there's no way
that's just rice. That's just rice. There's no way that's
just rice. So it's weird. You can do the sense
of like horror and history and then this sense of
I can just go across the street and get this
like ice cream doesn't have any milk in it, which

(25:51):
is really unique and it's not something you can even
really find often the United States, and Heroshima has so
much of that, probably because they cater to so many
tourists that come to see that the history of it,
so they've got restaurants that it's one of the reasons
that I think I'm attracted to Irashim. I almost wanted
to move there because they have so many places I
can eat, I can eat out like normal. It's interesting,

(26:12):
it's for me, but it's also weird that you can
just stand at ground zero and have this very modern,
non dairy ice cream and stare at the bomb dome.

Speaker 4 (26:23):
Now.

Speaker 1 (26:23):
I wanted to make a few other comments about this though,
before we move on. When you stand there and you
look at the bomb dome, my wife actually asked me
a really interesting question because she knows that I know
more about this particular history than she does, so she's
asking me these questions. And she knows more about Nagasaki
and her She loved at oh period history in school

(26:44):
and other parts of Japanese history, but this something she
hasn't done, so she's asking me a questions. She said,
this is the real bomb dome, right? They didn't rebuild this,
and I said, no, I'm pretty sure that it's the
original building. There were debates about whether or not they
should tear it down and just move on from the bombing.
There were others people that wanted to keep it there.

(27:05):
I mean, of course, they made sure it was stable
and wasn't going to collapse, and they put a fence
around it. But she asked me that, and it made
me laugh a little bit because I'm thinking, well, that's
what a lot of people think about Egypt. They think
that the pyramids, they think that the temples of Egypt
are fake and they were built in like the nineteen eighties.
So she asks me, is this real? And I said,

(27:29):
pretty sure it's real. I'm pretty sure. There's that question
of like in any museum too, are these real artifacts?
Normally they tell you if something is not real, But
I think we have such a problem with social media
and the internet where at least fifty percent of it's

(27:51):
fake and not real. Most of the people are not
real that you interact with that we start to question
everything like is this actually the bomb dome or all
the pictures fake? Is at fake? Which there are some people,
there's even a few that listen to this show. Some
of them maybe are being sarcastic, but some of them,
I'm pretty sure a sirious who genuinely don't believe that

(28:15):
Hiroshima was ever bombed, who don't believe that if it
was bombed, it was a nuclear weapon. Then again, it's
like define nuclear weapon. And I get it because initially
it was believed that Hiroshima was supposed to be uninhabitable
or mostly uninhabitable for seventy five years. That's a long time.

(28:40):
Seventy five years from nineteen forty five is two thousand
and twenty if I'm not mistaken. The estimate back in
the forties was you wouldn't be able to live there
until about five years ago, and it turns out that's
not the case. It turns out, well, you could live

(29:02):
there immediately in the aftermath, or at least relative in
terms of time, you could live there relatively more recently
in the aftermath. And maybe something similar is happening up
in Fukushima as well, the power plant disaster in the

(29:22):
tsunami over a decade ago. And this is why people
believe that nothing happened. But maybe the better question to
ask is maybe we don't know, or maybe we thought
we knew something about these weapons that maybe it just

(29:42):
turns out to not be as severe as we thought
or as bad as we thought. I mean, where do
you learn about a lot of this stuff? You learn
about it in pictures and videos, and where did they
make a lot of that weapons testing material. They made
it at a Hollywood Air Force studio called Lookout Mountain.

(30:07):
They made it at a US Air Force military installation
in Laurel Canyon, which is the home of fake bands
and the intelligence community. So, again, like disease, it's not
really a question of is something real or not real.

(30:29):
It's a question of maybe there's more details that we need.
You remember during twenty twenty twenty twenty one, where people
either believed that being in a six foot bubble was
going to get you sick, and then there were people

(30:51):
that believe that viruses didn't exist. And I was accused
of that and I said, no, no, no, A virus exists.
I don't know what it is, but there's something there.
Maybe it's an artifact on the slide, or maybe it's
an artifact on the microscope. But a virus exists. Bacteria exists.

(31:11):
It's a question of is the bacteria, which is pleaamorphic,
does it transform based on its environment? And does that
mean that you are responsible for your body in creating
the environment that makes it toxic or not for the
bacteria which then releases things that make you sick. Our
virus is real, Well, yeah, but what's a virus. Is

(31:32):
it alive? Is it dead? We're still debating that in
twenty twenty five. We were debating it five years ago too.
And it's not a matter of is it real or
is it not real. It's a matter of what causes
the disease that we attribute to the virus. I don't
think the virus causes the disease. That's different than not
believing the virus is real. The same thing with nuclear weapons.
Something blew up in Hiroshima in nineteen forty five, something

(31:56):
that was world changing, something that was devastating. And the
difference between Hiroshima and Auschwitz or Dakau or Buchenwald or
any of these camps was that the photographs from Hiroshima

(32:19):
were taken by Japanese photographers, many of them who were
on the ground when this happened. They were not Soviet
soldiers with a chip on their shoulder and with a

(32:39):
bias who came into the camps, and in order to
cover up their crimes in the Gulag system and the
fact that most of their leadership was also Jewish, they
put all the responsibility and the guilt on the Germans
and claimed that immigration with an e facilities were actually

(32:59):
death camps where they liberate Auschwitz in the winter and
there's no snow, so they have to recreate the liberation
and take photos and videos later. That didn't happen in Hiroshima,
That didn't happen in Nagasaki, that happened at Auschwitz, that

(33:20):
happened at Buchenwald, where you have these fake stories being
told to make sure that people just know how horrible
things really were. Well, if things were really that horrible,
why do you have to make up stories? Why do
you have to fabricate these stories? Remember, Bukenvald was the

(33:42):
ground zero for the US Military Psychological Warfare Division to
go in and launch a propaganda campaign against the Germans.
This is where Charles Douglas Jackson, a media expert in
Time executive, Time Magazine executive, Time Corporation executive, use his
background to oversee film production and districts for the PWD

(34:03):
with Billy Wilder, a Jewish filmmaker and US Army sergeant
who spoke fluent German, who went in and produced the
visual propaganda and fabricated much of what happened at that camp.
And this is where a lot of the more extreme
ridiculous narratives come from, including the very famous preps infamous

(34:25):
story of Elie Wesl who claimed that when he was
at this facility, he was always in line and just
never was chosen to be killed. It's a miracle. And
he also claimed that they had these big fire pits
where they threw babies like Molick, which I'm pretty sure

(34:46):
is a little bit of projectionism. And I'm pretty sure
Ellie Weasel didn't read the Ten Commandments, the one that
said thou shalt not bear false witness, because most of
his original stories are the bearing of false witness. So
you didn't have to have have psychological warfare divisions go
into Hiroshima. You didn't have to have Japanese on the

(35:08):
ground fabricating stories of what happened. They were too busy
dealing with family members who had just been murdered. They
were too busy dealing with head trauma. They were too
busy dealing with missing body parts or skin falling off
their bones. They were too busy trying to figure out
what just happened and photographing this massive mushroom cloud in

(35:28):
the sky. So I don't know what the bomb is.
Certainly the radiation is not at all what we assumed
it to be. But remember it's not so much a
conspiracy as it is just incorrect assumption. Because we thought
also that detonating the hydrogen bomb might start a chain

(35:49):
reaction that destroys the world. It was thought that with
the Trinity test, too, what are the chances I like
point zero one, there's still a chance that it destroys
the world or the Solar system or the universe. We
didn't know. In hindsight, that's an exaggeration. We went from

(36:10):
Trinity to the Czar bomb of the Russians that basically
the mushroom cloud went into space. We assumed the radiation
would last seventy five years. It turns out it didn't
last that long. So these things don't have to necessarily
be a conspiracy where nuclear bombs don't exist. Okay, well,

(36:31):
they blew something up. I don't know what it was,
but they blew something up. It had a big mushroom cloud.
People got burned, their skin fell off. There's millions of
photos of it, and there's people that were there on
the ground with cameras that took pictures of it who
luckily survived. It happened the following data that we accumulate

(36:56):
helps us to paint a picture of how it happened
in the same way that, Yeah, lots of people were
sent to concentration camps all across Europe. The thing is,
when we talk about that, we ignored the gulag system.
We ignore the Japanese, mostly Japanese, some Italians, some Germans

(37:18):
mostly Japanese because of racial distinctions, admittedly, that were put
into facilities, who were citizens in the United States. We
ignore the fact that the Russians, or rather the Soviets,
killed tens of millions of Christians, and they killed millions
of Muslims and Jews and everybody else for that matter,

(37:39):
including atheists. That's killed everybody indiscriminately. And we ignored the
fact that most of the German camps were prisoner of
wark camps work facilities, which were not abnormal. We still
have work facilities today, they're called prisons. Work facilities all
over Russia. That were places where people would be sent

(38:01):
to forcibly, mind for gold for the leadership. That's what
they did. They would force these people to mine for
gold like they were some kind of goblin, gargoyle leprechaun
that enslaved the human race to make them mind for gold.
That's what some of the original gulogs were for mine
for gold. Some goldbergs and goldsteins and silver bergs and

(38:23):
silver steins wanted that gold, so they made some. And
they also turned a religious facility into a slave camp
and they enslaved the religious officials there. Those were the
first gulags, the first German camps. Like the cow was
a prisoner of war camp, Buchenwald was a place, never
a death camp. It was a place where Antifa protested

(38:46):
outside because the criminals were locked up inside. A lot
of them were criminals, political dissidents, people that were terrorists, communists,
people that tried to undermine society, that were criminals that
were involved in the business of destroying civilization, just like
Antifa today does the same thing. They protest that people
are arrested for breaking the law and for being a

(39:06):
public nuisance, among other things. So looking at the history
of this, something happened there. It's like one of my
favorite movies of all time, Christmas Vacation. Well, something had
to break the window, something had to blow up the stereo,
and why is the carpet all wet?

Speaker 4 (39:23):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (39:25):
Something blew up the city, Something burned the flesh off
those people's bodies. Something blinded people and killed people, and
something gave these people leukemia and other cancers. Something did it.
Let's not get caught up on the it didn't happen
thing conspiracy. Something happened it as a matter of what

(39:47):
it was. Not to mention the the well documented and
preserved black rain from all the pollution and the stuff
that fell down in the subsequent weather after the bombing,
all the stuff that came down from the mushroom cloud.
I'd assume that's a very disturbing thing because people, you know,
wanted water. A lot of people died going down to

(40:08):
the river. A lot of people died looking up into
the heavens. They're tongue out trying to capture this black rain,
and then they got poisoned and died from that. It's
also really weird. You can you take like a river
boat to go to Miyajima Island and you're just on
the boat on the river where there's just all these
dead bodies back in the forth. It's weird to think

(40:30):
about history and the context of where we are now
in that way. Anywhere you are in the world. It
doesn't matter what country, what history it is. So anyway,
I say all of that because I'm not a fan
of war. I'm not a fan of destruction. I'm not

(40:51):
a fan of chaos, and I'm not a fan of
indiscriminately murdering people. And that's what always made me fill
like I was a little bit confused in my history
classes when we would be taught about how targeted Jews were.
But then I'd sit there and be like, yeah, but

(41:11):
weren't there millions of other people that also went through
the same conditions. And I also thought, as a kid
or high school or maybe it would be the better
way to say it, teenager, doesn't the indiscriminate murder in Hiroshima, Nagasaki,
let alone, what happened in Tokyo or Dresden for that matter.

(41:35):
Isn't that worse than the discriminate rounding up and murder
of people, isn't it? I think it's worse. I think
indiscriminately murdering people is worse than discriminately murdering people. It's
still murder. But I'm pretty sure if you just do
it indiscriminately, it's a little bit worse. Like if you

(41:55):
shoot someone you have a dispute with and there's like
a a conflict there and they pulled a gun on
you or a knife and you shot them. Okay, that's
a different situation than if you just go into a
business or you go into a store and or a
school you start spraying everybody, Like one is objectively worse
than the other. One might be in self defense, one

(42:18):
might be in a result of just psychosis and drugs
and god knows what else. I'm pretty sure one is
worse than the other. I mean, help me out here.
I think one is worse than the other. Hundreds of
thousands of people instantly dead in Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden,

(42:41):
upwards of a quarter of a million burned alive by
the Royal Air Force. We always learned about the Blitzkrieg.
You know how long Blitzkrieg was. Blitzkreig lasted almost a year.
Blitzkreg was like eight months. And they didn't kill the Germans,
didn't kill a fraction of the people that were killed

(43:04):
at Dresden alone, let alone all the other cities that
were bombed indiscriminately by the Royal Air Force and later
by the US, but the US did not engage in
those same bombings like the Royal Air Force did. In fact,
I'm pretty sure some of the Americans were very appalled

(43:26):
by what the Royal Air Force was doing. I mean,
I say this on any history show we do where
I talk a little bit about World War Two, it's
really important to understand the context of this. Dresden was
a city where people had fled to so this was

(43:47):
primarily a refugee city. People had nowhere to go, and
they lit it on fire and killed almost everybody. It
was an inferno. The fire bombing of Dresden is one
of the worst war crimes ever committed in the history
of documented warfare because it wasn't a military target. It

(44:11):
was a civilian target that was bombed indiscriminately, simply because
they were Germans. That was the main reason. That is sick.
The same thing in Tokyo. Tokyo was bombed indiscriminately. They
dropped experimental bombs on civilians. Now this helped me understand

(44:38):
this doesn't make much sense to me if you were
going to and we have another place where going with
the show tonight. For the record, this history is important
before we can get into the contemporary stories, the contemporary events.
But if you really wanted to take out a government,
why don't you just or stop a military? Why don't
you use that that firepower to bomb the military. Why

(45:02):
don't you use that firepower to bomb the imperial palace
in Tokyo? Why don't you use that firepower? Maybe okay,
you assume we don't know if the emperor is actually there. Well,
hit all the government targets. We tried that. It didn't work,
So you just murder indiscriminately civilians. See the thing about

(45:26):
the Tokyo fire bombing, just like Dresden, is that the
Dresden bombing involved mostly people that had nowhere else to go,
and people that were just German. That was their crime,
and they were burned alive by the Royal Air Force,
partly by the Americans, mostly by the British. What happened
in Tokyo was also a horrible war crime. Forty percent
of the city burned. You know what the Americans were doing.

(45:48):
The Americans were in Utah building Japanese homes out in
the desert and making fun of how they were built
out of wood and paper, and then lighting them on
fire and estimating how much of Tokyo they could burn.
Because the US military considered the Japanese to be lice,
they called them lice insects that needed to be exterminated.

(46:09):
Didn't have that view so much on the Germans, but
the British did on the Germans because the Germans were
an economic threat to the British, so they had their
own beef. You know, World War two really wasn't about
any of the stuff that we think it's about. Again,
the Americans said the Japanese started the war as part
of the WGP. They didn't. I thought Hitler started the
war with the invasion of Poland. Obviously nothing starts because

(46:32):
of a singular event, but come on, it's ridiculous. And
what they did to Tokyo is a war crime. What
was done to Hiroshima as a war This is indiscriminate,
But we're supposed to think Germans targeting a specific group
of people is worse than the indiscriminate murder of people

(46:52):
simply because they're German or simply because they're Japanese, which
is what happened, simply because they were German or Japanese.
And we can find cases of Italian as well. That's
the only reason. It wasn't because they were Nazis, it
wasn't because they were imperialists. It was because they didn't
have the right nationality, or in the case of Asians,

(47:18):
they didn't have the right genetics. You know, FDR was
a brazen, disgusting racist who hated all of the eastern
half of the world. He hated Asians. Period is well documented.
FDR used to make all kinds of disgusting jokes about
the Yellow people, their yellow monkeys, their inferior when in fact,

(47:43):
outside of Asia, other than the Germans, the Asians had
like the highest rates of reading and education any were
in the world. The Germans were really the only ones
that top that universally. The Germans were the most brilliant
of everything chemistry, engineering, math, science, philosophy, like everything was German.

(48:03):
The Germans were also some of the toughest tribes for
the Romans to defeat too. They were just ruthless. There's
probably another reason that Germans and Japanese get along so well.
They're very on time, and they're ruthless, and they work
hard and they don't stop. So anyway, I give you
a little bit of this history based on going to
hear Ashima again. Talk a little bit about this, because

(48:24):
there's two reasons why. Number one, I asked the question again,
how many of those stories of what happened in Hiroshima
are made up? How many of those people that were
there or in Nagasaki claimed to be there but actually
weren't there when the bombs detonated. How many Japanese have
sued or how many Japanese have used their influence in

(48:46):
the media or in economics to strip away money from
people that were responsible for not liking them or something.
And the answer is other than the Shimota case, which
was a legitimate claim to reparations, but it was also
largely a case largely motivated by the declaration that this

(49:11):
was illegal and indiscriminate and wrong. And the answer is
essentially zero. It's essentially zero. On the other hand, there
are countless cases I can name. I can name three

(49:37):
or four off the top of my head. A few
of them might have to look up because the names
are pretty long. Rosemary Kosky claimed to be a Jewish
survivor of Auschwitz. Turns out it's not true, but she
used it to sell artwork. Misha Defonseca, probably the most
absurd Holocaust story ever. She was seven years old, she

(50:01):
wandered across Europe, she was raised by wolves, she killed
a Nazi soldier, broke into the Warsaw ghetto, and in
reality she was a grammar school student who made all
that up. There's the Rosenblot hoax, the greatest love story ever,
Oprah called it, and turns out Rosenblot made it all
up for money. Fake Ellie Weasel also fabricated most of

(50:23):
his stories, and the proof of that is in his
own writings, because most of those narratives, like throwing babies
into a fire like the Pit of Molick, that turned
out to not be true. How many Japanese made up
their stories. How many made billions of dollars off of
stolen loot from Europe or America, even though America supposedly

(50:47):
helped them, and still still money from the Americans, the French,
the British, the Germans. How many were actually living somewhere
else when the bomb blew up in Hiroshimar Aagasaki. These
are really important questions because we have a series of
actual holocausts death by fire and we just kind of

(51:10):
ignore them and pretend like they don't exist. I went
to a museum, an art gallery museum. It was actually
above the Egyptian exhibit that I went to. We got
a free ticket with the Egyptian ticket to go to
this museum, and you go upstairs the second floor, and

(51:36):
you're looking through these art I'm not a big fan
of artwork, for the record, so I'm kind of bored
by a lot of it. Plus, they had some salvad
or Dolly Dolly. I'm just not really a fan of Dolly.
Plus I've been to another one of the art galleries
and seeing that stuff before. So anyway, we're walking around

(51:58):
and I came across a painting and the painting is
of Hiroshima on fire. And this painting of Hiroshima on
fire is called the Holocaust. And I stopped, and it's
a multi panel painting. I stopped and I looked at that,

(52:23):
and I thought, that's accurate. That is accurate. That is
a holocaust. The entire city is on fire, like Dresden.
That is accurate. Yes, even if you put people in
a gas chamber, that's not a holocaust. A holocaust is

(52:45):
murdering people by fire. That would be what we did
to the Germans and what we did to the Japanese,
among others. Those are not only war crimes in regard
to the indiscriminate murder of people, it's also a holocaust.
And that brings me to another question. How many Hiroshima museums,

(53:09):
which just for the historical aspect of what it was,
there should be some museums in the United States, and
there aren't. I checked. There's not a single Hiroshima museum
or a dedicated Hiroshima museum in the United States. There
have been exhibits, and unless that fact check is wrong,

(53:33):
maybe there's one I don't know in San Diego or something,
or maybe there's one in Hawaii. I don't think that
there is even if you can find one. I mean,
they just opened up a Jewish Holocaust museum in South Korea.
They're everywhere, and yet nothing on Hiroshima. Why nothing on

(53:55):
Dresden for that matter. I imagine if you go to Dresden, Germany,
you might find a note of it somewhere. I've never
been to Dresden, but you don't find that in the US.
That was a holocaust, a quarter million people gone. And
then you get the actual revisionist historians that are like, well,
because people are pointing out that we murdered a whole

(54:18):
bunch of people at Dresden. They were mostly civilians, they
were mostly people that didn't have anything, that's taking away
from the Jewish Holocaust, so we need to lower the number.
Now they tell people, well, you know, maybe it was
like twenty five thousand. We really don't know for sure,
because we burned everybody alive and killed them. I've I've

(54:41):
read the historical accounts written by the pilots. Some of
them were sick about it. Who said, they're flying over
the city. You know, it's an inferno. You can feel
the heat from your plane, and then you see people
fleeing to the river for water. And then they just
went and dropped a bomb on them too. Like, that
is evil. It's objectively take away the flag, take away,

(55:06):
the uniform, take away, the politics, take away the geography.
That is just pure evil. It's not nationalistic, it's not
defending freedom. It's just evil. And for some weird reason,
yes this is important, for some weird reason, people justify that, well, yeah,

(55:30):
they killed those kids running down to the water with
their mothers in Dresden because they had to protect the
Jews who were being attacked by the Nazis. Some people
believe that. Some people believe that we should have dropped
more atomic bombs on Japan. Why these were mostly citizens.

(55:54):
And even if you argued, even if you argued, okay,
the kids were pre pairing for war. They had air
raid sirens, they were prepared to fight.

Speaker 4 (56:06):
One.

Speaker 1 (56:07):
That's normal and natural. People on the West coast of
the US were preparing for a Japanese invasion too. There
was actually a Japanese submarine that hid an oil refinery.
A believer in oil was an oil refinery. It's the
only mainland attack on the United States during the war.
They don't tell you that either in history because it
would make the US look bad. Oh, look, we were attacked.
But the point is, even if that is the case,

(56:32):
then drop another bomb. Like even if if you're going
to Okay, there's a school here and they've got these
teenagers with guns and they hate America and they're gonna
blow us up. First of all, they're not a threat.
If you read Hiroshima the book, it describes Hiroshima, the
city as being prepared for a bombing because they had
heard the stories about the surrounding cities. But at that

(56:54):
point b Sun, I think is what they called it.
The B twenty nine had not visited Hiroshima and everything
else was being blown up, so they were prepared for
that to happen as a natural reaction. But even if
there were people ready to kill Americans, it's directly not
a threat. There aren't boots in the ground. It's not

(57:17):
directly a threat. And if it were then bomb it
with a conventional weapon, why drop an atomic bomb on it?
Because ultimately the bombing of Hiroshima and the bombing of
Nagasaki were an experiment. That's what it was. When we
went to the museum, we actually found we were going

(57:39):
to eat something after that, and we stumbled across this
little school that had been partly preserved. It was a
place where a few kids had survived. There were kids
in the playground playing, some kids were in the basement
getting their shoes or whatnot, and they survived the blast.
All their classmates die, and they had they had some

(58:02):
of the original writing on the wall where people had
written after the fact, like you know, I'm alive, come here,
you know, looking for so and so they preserved the
actual physical wall. They had it behind you know, probably
I don't know if it was like a climate control thing,
but they had behind this plastic plexiglass thing. I had

(58:23):
never seen that before. But you know, we went there
and looking at that and look look at everything else.
There's pictures in there in that building of school kids
lining up after. This is what was incredible, and this
is this is one of the arguments of why we
had to do this to the Japanese, and well, we

(58:44):
had to do this the Germans too. Was because even
after they bombed and destroyed not just with atomic weapons
but with any weapons, the Japanese went back to school.
It was a very short time after they went into
the bombed out buildings and still held classes because education
was one of the highest priorities. And that is some

(59:08):
solemn kind of like I suppose, if that's the idea
that the Americans had, you almost understand it, like these
people are relentless. You just blew up the school and
they just went and sat in the rubble and took
math class. I mean, that's hardcore. The Germans are like
that too, that's pretty hardcore. You see that as a

(59:30):
as an enemy. But I mean, even if it's not
what it seems like it acts as a piece of propaganda,
like you can't defeat us, We're still going to go
have class. You can see it both ways. The point is, though,
a lot of photographs like that were taken by the
US military, which means that it's probably not propaganda, because
the US military are going to produce propaganda to make

(59:52):
it look like the weapons didn't work or something, or
you know, the bombing, you know, campaigns didn't have any effect. Look,
they just lined up, went right back to class. But
a lot of this picture are taken by the military,
and we in the actual museum. Going back to the museum,
we saw this one picture. I think it's probably a
famous picture. There's there's several of them taken by the
same photographer where they're just doing experiments on these people

(01:00:13):
that had survived. It kind of reminds you of like
dog Way proving ground, or what they did in Saint
Louis by dropping metal particulate over the city in black neighborhoods,
or you know, help what they did to the US
soldiers where they experiment on them with vaccines, or you know,
sprain DDT everywhere, or the list goes on and on.
And on where you do something like detonate a bunch

(01:00:35):
of bombs, and then you go downwind and you offer
free medical screenings. But really it's the military dressed up
in doctor outfits and nurse outfits, and they're like, we'd
like to screen you for so and so disease. Oh
I feel fine. Well it's a free screening, ma'am. And
then they test you and to see if the bombs
they detonated ten miles down the road, if those had

(01:00:56):
any effect on you, which, of course, if you know
anything about downwinders, they did. That's what happened in Hiroshima.
They just sent the military in, probably full well knowing
that the radiation wasn't as bad as the people had
said it was, that was in and of itself, might
have been propaganda, and they just sent him into just experiment. Well,
let's see what happened here. Okay, So where were you

(01:01:18):
when it happened? All right? And and let's see, And
asked the other doctor what's the rate of the burns?
And oh, look he's got glass in his in his face,
and let's how deep are those cuts? How how powerful
was the explosion? They just documented all of it and
took it back to d C. It was an experiment
on human beings. That's what it was. That's what Hiroshima was,

(01:01:43):
That's what Nagasaki was. There was no reason to drop
those experimental bombs, just like they used Tokyo as a
site to drop experimental what essentially was I think a
napalm type explosive it and centerary device. But if you
think about it, they did that in Tokyo, so they've
already set the precedent a few months before Hiroshima Nagasaki.

(01:02:03):
Then they do it in hear Shimannagasaki experimental weapons. Again.
Paul Hamm wrote a really great book about this, called
Hiroshiman Nagasaki, and it's very objective, at least the first
part that I've read. It's a big book, very objective
about how the Japanese were taught to hate the Americans
and FDR, which you know, rightfully so hating FDR he
was a disgusting pig. And then how the Americans are

(01:02:24):
taught to hate the Japanese, and how the Germans and
everybody was taught to hate each other, like nobody's right,
everybody's kind of wrong, except for the hating FDR. In Churchill.
They were both fat, disgusting pigs. I mean, for that matter,
is like every leader that contributes to this kind of
thing is a disgusting, you know, pig. It's disgusting, subhuman really,

(01:02:48):
but they think they're more than human because they've got power.
They were all wrong, All of them are wrong. Anyway.
The the nature of the experiment in Tokyo was just
carried out further south with new weapons, different weapons in

(01:03:10):
Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And I think additional proof of that
comes not just from what happened with the experiment in Tokyo,
but also comes with what happened. Would you just scent
the military and immediately let's let's see what happened here.
I mean, yeah, you're probably gonna do that, and maybe
from a distance or with I don't know, reconnaissance, you
want to see, you know, how well it worked. But

(01:03:34):
they just did experiments on people. And every time I
talk about something like this, there's always someone that says
you just hate America and you never talk about Unit
seven three one. Well, yeah, Unit seven three one's pretty
horrific what those people did. That's the Japanese. The only
thing that would this is kind of the point of

(01:03:55):
the only reason I bring this up is because most
people don't know anything about Unit seven three to one.
They don't know much of anything about the rape of Nanking.
You know, most people don't know anything about any of
this because they've been conditioned to know Auschwitz and Joseph
Mangela the Angel of Death. But do you know who

(01:04:17):
Lieutenant General Sheiro is?

Speaker 4 (01:04:19):
She is?

Speaker 1 (01:04:23):
It's kind of when people bring that up to me,
it's kind of like you're proving my point. This is
the whole issue because the Japanese didn't make up stories
about Hiroshima. They didn't try to steal money from the
rest of the world, maybe rightfully reparations the five people
in the Shimoto case. They didn't lie about what happened.
At the worst, maybe somebody misremembered something because their skull

(01:04:46):
was almost crushed. But that is all over the Jewish Holocaust,
fabricated stories, people that weren't even there, people that stole
identifications to pretend like they were there. It's the whole point.
It's like, yeah, okay, Unit seven threey one was what
was was disgusting, but so was the US military experimenting

(01:05:08):
on their own people. So is the British bombing Dresden
and killing kids trying to get water on a river,
and it's like, you you should know about Shei Roihi.
The problem is you don't know about sheiro Ishi because
they want you to know about Joseph Mangel, the Angel
of Death, who experimented on poor Jewish kids. You start

(01:05:29):
digging into that story and you're like, oh, he wasn't
really the angel of death. He was more like just evil.
But you know, equally you could call shiro Ishi the
angel of death, but we don't because the image has
to be evil white Germans that did horrible things to
poor Jews, and that is a fabricated history. And then

(01:05:51):
I say that, and that gets me in trouble because
people don't have the capacity to think outside the context
of that specific statement, and they think Ryan believes it's
all made up. Not what I said. I said the
narratives of lamp shades and soap are fake. The stories
out of Buchenwald are fake, the stories out of Auschwitz
are fake. The mainstream narratives are fake. The cat and

(01:06:15):
Forest massacres blamed on the Germans, it was actually a
Soviet atrocity. What the Germans did to Britain was nothing
compared to what the British did to Dresden or any
other German city. It was like seventy German cities that
were bombed in a similar way. Nothing as bad as
Dresden or what the Americans did with experimental napalm in
Tokyo or experimental nuclear weapons and Hiroshima and Nagasaki indiscriminately

(01:06:39):
murdering hundreds of thousands of people in an instant and
in the weeks and months and years that followed. Yeah,
I know all about Unit seven three to one. You
don't have to tell me about Unit seven three one.
I know about shiro Ishi. But that's the point. Do
most people know about shiro Ishi?

Speaker 4 (01:06:56):
Know?

Speaker 1 (01:06:56):
Because they're too brainwashed with Joseph Mangela? Do you know
about the Jewish press in the US that launched a
boycott against Germany before the Germans ever boycotted, rioted against
Jewish businesses? Do you know about that? The Jewish Congress?
You know about the Madison Square Garden rally, No, not
the Nazi one, the Jewish one plus sixty something other

(01:07:19):
American cities where they just organized people essentially overnight to
boycott Germany when most Americans we learned in film school
didn't learn anything really in the late thirties early forties
about the war for weeks or months because they didn't
have the kind of information networks that we have today.
So they had to send film reells back from Europe
that you had to go to a movie theater to see.
And somehow the Jewish media in the US back in

(01:07:40):
the early thirties that was running in Tifa. On top
of that, they were pushing for war against Germany before
Hitler ever opened his mouth and said a damn thing
in power. These are just facts of history. Yeah, Unit
seven three one is a whole show in and of itself,

(01:08:02):
but the fact that most people don't know about it
is part of the point of proof that I'm making.
Hiroshima was a Holocaust and we ignore it. There's no museums.
The stories are real, the pictures are real, the fused
glass is real. What's not real are Soviet photos and
videos of Auschwitz being liberated. Those are fake. The US

(01:08:26):
military psych warfare with Jewish filmmakers about Buchenwald is fake.
Those fake Jewish stars they found, or rather they're real
quote Jewish stars that they found at some of those camps.
Turns out those were from German porcelain factories. The lampshade
stories are fake. The soap is fake. The Rosenblat love

(01:08:48):
story fake. The Elie weasel stories about fire pits where
they threw babies fake. You don't get that when you
go to Hiroshima. So why aren't there hire Shima museums everywhere?
Why aren't there Nagasaki museums everywhere? We were dragged to

(01:09:08):
Holocaust museums as kids. I went to the one in Tampa.
I've been to the one in Dallas. I've been to
the one in where they had memorials in Arizona. I've
been to another one somewhere I forget where it was.
There's now I can fly to one in South Korea
in a couple of hours. If I want to go
to another one, They're all over the place. It's not
any more special or any more unique. The overwhelming amount
of actual direct evidence taken by like Japanese photographers at

(01:09:31):
the time destroys the narrative of those Jewish Holocaust stories.
It's nonsense. What happened to Dresden is it's nonsense that
isn't that there's not museums for that. I mean, it's
one of the worst acts of aggression in military history.

(01:09:51):
It's one of the most destructive, murderous, indiscriminate killings in
history of modern warfare. And it's like we don't even
most peopn't even know that it happened, don't even know
that it happened. And kind of the irony of it
is that Churchill and Hitler had very similar goals and motivations.

(01:10:16):
It's just the case of the winner is the writer
of history. I suppose you could put it that way.
Why do I explain all of this? Why do I
go into the history of all this in the first hour.
It's important because if you don't have that history, then
you're not going to understand what I'm about to say next,

(01:10:38):
the context, or what I'm about to say next. Hold
that thought. I'll remind you that you're listening to the
Secret Teachings. I'm Ryan gable Tstradio dot Info is our website.
Listen very carefully because it's sometimes confusing when you hear
advertisements during this show. Those are through our spreaker feed, Apple, Spotify,

(01:11:00):
et cetera. Spreakers. The main platform. Those ads finance this show.
If you don't like the ads, I don't put them
in there, the platform puts them in there. If you
don't like the ads, which who does? You Go to
the website tstradio dot info. Click the links below. There's
links to everything, and you can subscribe to the advertisement

(01:11:21):
free show. If you're having trouble finding it, email me
Alreadygable at yahoo dot com. I'll send you a link
to the subscription page. There's also links below to buy
me a coffee. There's also links below to cash app, PayPal,
and some other platforms other things like social media and whatnot.

(01:11:43):
Whatever you want or need to know about the show, though,
email me or just visit our website. It's pretty simple
and pretty straightforward, pretty basic website. I try to keep
it really basic because I don't like things to be
that complicated. You see all of our promo pictures. Every
show is a new promo picture.

Speaker 4 (01:12:00):
Well.

Speaker 1 (01:12:01):
Also wanted to think Kevin Weaver, who just recently became
buy me a coffee. I guess they call that a member.
I suppose that's membership. Thank you Kevin for signing up.
I thanked everybody else who had signed up last week.
I think that was last Monday. All right, thank you

(01:12:21):
so much for supporting the show. However, you do for
becoming a subscriber tstradio dot info. So that history is
critical to understand what's happening today for a couple of
different reasons. Do you remember. I remember this because this
is really my first introduction to what's going on in

(01:12:41):
the world. Remember George Bush and the Patriot Act. Remember
the Patriot Act, which was already on the shelf. They
just brought it down to vote on it after nine
to eleven. Patriot Act defined what terrorism was, or define
what extraism was, domestic terrorism, and it defined acts that

(01:13:05):
are dangerous to human life. It defined it as acts
that are used to intimidating course a civilian population, which
would be whatever the Bush administration did. That's pretty much
what the administration was was a terrorist organization trying to
coerce the civilian population acts to influence government policy. Which

(01:13:26):
is a strange thing to put in the Patriotet considering
that that statement is essentially illegal or unlawful under the
Constitution because protest is meant to influence government policy, and
the Bush administration didn't like protest, and so they put
that into the Patriot Act that essentially protests. If you're
trying to influence government policy, like no More War, well

(01:13:50):
that would be considered an act of terrorism under the
Bush administration. You could certainly interpret it that way, which
kind of reminds me of that. I was watching a
Dave Chappelle stand up the other day and he was
talking about the Dixie Chicks. I'm trying to remember exactly

(01:14:15):
what that story entailed. I think it was they had
they had flown overseas to the UK maybe, and they
they said that they disagreed with the Bush policies, like
we don't support this war and this violence. We're ashamed

(01:14:38):
that the president is from Texas. I should play the
Dave Chappelle bit, because Dave Chappelle said he I was
thinking about criticizing the war and I saw what happened
to those Dixie Dixie Chicks. I thought, that's what they'll
do to a couple of white bitches from Texas. What
are they going to do to my black ass? It's
totally right, totally true. Yeah, I remember the Dixie Chicks

(01:15:01):
in a foreign country overseas, couldn't express their opinions about
not wanting to go to war. The Bush administration came
after them. They were radical opinions, which is why the
Bush administration to the Patriot Act, labeled that as an

(01:15:24):
act of terror. The Dixie Chicks were terrorists because of that,
even though the US Patriot Act primarily said, these are
things that happened in the United States, but even if
you say them overseas, you don't have any free speech.
Don't have a right to free speech. And then Barack
Obama took it a step further. And Barack Obama remember

(01:15:47):
this story when Obama killed anwar all Ol Lackey without
due process and just murdered him. And people said, yeah,
well he was like a terrorist or something. And you
have to explain to these people, how do you define terrorism?

(01:16:08):
And even if someone is a terrorist by some definition,
if you just go murder them, because the States said
they're terrorists, they'll expand the definition so that the Dixie
Chicks are terrorists and we can just drone bomb the
Dixie Chicks on stage and then we move on to
the next People that criticize the president any more questions

(01:16:29):
anybody have, any other criticisms, doesn't matter if you're a band,
doesn't matter, if you're a journalist, doesn't matter. If you're
a protester with a sign, We'll just use drones to
kill you. Yeah, but that a Lackey dude was an
American you mini Islamic cleric, and he was an evil terrorist,

(01:16:52):
but he was also an American citizen. And if you
can just kill an American citizen like that anywhere in
the world, then you can do that is to anybody anytime.
It's like you saw that clip on seeing in recently.
I think the guy was a rabbi. He said, wherever
you are, will kill you. We will just kill you.
It doesn't matter where you are. If here in Europe,
if you're in the Middle East, will kill you. We'll
find you and kill you if you're an enemy. That's

(01:17:14):
the Barack Obama platform. And then do you remember the
National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism unveiled on June. It
was June first. Is in June of twenty twenty one,
this is when the Bided Administration releases their list of

(01:17:36):
terrorists domestic violent extremists as they called them. Remember this,
and when they released their list of domestic violent extremists,
it included people that were just asking basic questions. You
might remember this. You heard it on all the conservative
talk shows. You heard it on Info Wars, you heard

(01:17:57):
it on every platform where someone was trying to be
hip and against the deep state of the New World Order,
and everybody talked about this. Some people read it on air.
I read it on air. I have a copy of it.
It said this, and during DVE motivations, that's domestic violent

(01:18:17):
extremism pertaining to biases against minority populations and perceived government overreach.
Perceived government overreach, perceived, perceived, perceived will almost certainly continue
to drive DVE radicalization and mobilization to violence. Now, just
from that line alone, you can see from the Patriot Act,

(01:18:40):
going back twenty years to this DVE report from the
Bided administration, you can see how we went from activities
that threaten human life and influence government policy and effect
government conduct. These are like direct actions. Protest does fall

(01:19:01):
under that. We've gone from that too. Now, if you
are perceiving that there's government overreach, whether there is or not,
that's an act of domestic violent extremism. So you can
see how these things expand to include everybody. So, yeah,
it matters when you kill an American citizen. I don't

(01:19:23):
care if he has an RPG in a picture here
or there, or I don't care if he has an
Islamic flag behind him or something. Whatever nonsense they try to.
You don't even know who this guy is, Like, oh,
he was a Muslim, just kill him right in twenty eleven, Yeah,
they'll expand that to include you too. You just heard
net Yahoo talking about how they'll use drones to silence

(01:19:44):
their opponents. It's the same policy. This report from the
White House goes on newer socio political developments, such as
narratives of fraud in the recent general election, the emboldening
impact of the violent breach of the US capital, conditions
related to the COVID nineteen pandemic, and conspiracy theories promoting

(01:20:07):
violence will almost certainly spur some dvs to try to
engage in violence this year. Of course, none of that
really happened, but they set the precedent, and they drew
the line in the sand, and that line is pretty solid.

(01:20:27):
If we think that we don't like what you're saying,
even if we misunderstand you, you're a domestic violent extremist.
That's the bottom line, that's it. And it would be
like a you know, a Banana republic that movie Bananas
with Woody Allen. It would be a situation like that
where a government takes over that's accused of stealing the election,

(01:20:49):
and the first thing they do is basically outlaw questioning
of the election being stolen. I mean that is that's
all the proof that you need. I don't need voting machines,
I don't need stuffing envelopes or ballot boxes. I need
to know that the government that just took over, that
was accused of reading an election, just essentially made it
illegal to question whether or not they read the election.
I mean, that's all the evidence you need right there.

(01:21:11):
But then they also list people that agree with the concept,
not the actions, but the concept and the ideology. But
behind the capital breach, which was not a breach, it
was allowed to happen. And if you questioned masks, social distancing,
if you question vaccines, that's all evidence of domestic bond extremism.

(01:21:32):
Remember when every conservative Christian talking head, good boy, American
man and woman, father and husband, mother and wife, across
the United States, we're talking about that, and they just
wanted Trump to get back in office. We could stop

(01:21:53):
these evil democrats. Allow me to update you on the
new presidential directive as published September twenty fifth, two thousand
and twenty five. This is directly from President Trump, a
presidential memoranda countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence. Let's

(01:22:22):
see what this document says. What is classified by the
Trump administration as domestic terrorism. We know what it was
under Bush. It was the Dixie Chicks saying we don't
want to go to war. We know what it was
under Obama it was we'll just murder you, even if

(01:22:45):
you're a citizen and there's no due process of law
and all Americans are enemy combatants. We know what it
was under Biden. If you question the government, or if
we just if we think that what you're saying or
doing is motivated by COVID conspiracies, or if we think

(01:23:09):
that you think that we stole the election, then you're
a domestic violent extremist. We've gone from that to now.
Listen to this list, a slightly tweaked list, but a
similar list, nonetheless, which is getting more and more brazen,
more and more authoritarian, more and more tyrannical. And I

(01:23:29):
won't stop with the Trump administration, it'll move on to
the next administration. This is from the White House website.
I'm wondering. I've been wondering since I read this, trying
to find a show to put it into. I was wondering,
where are all the same people that were like down
with the Democrats, Obama's third term, Biden's evil, he's a pedophile.

(01:23:54):
They're going to label everybody terrorists, just like you know,
just like Bush did this new like mega pro America movement.
They were all over this, and I was behind them.
I was like, yeah, that's true. And then Trump did
it and everybody just kind of shut their mouths and
didn't say anything. I actually was curious. I was like,

(01:24:14):
did Alex Jones talk about this? Did any of the
commentators that loved Trump talk about this? Of course not,
or if they did, there's no everyday coverage of it.
When Biden released I should say, the autopen. When the
White House released this Domestic Violent Extremism Report, this Domestic

(01:24:35):
Terrorism port in June twenty twenty one, this was in
the alternative media every day for weeks and weeks and
weeks and weeks and weeks, highlighting all them the ways
in which you could become a domestic violin extremist. But
if Trump does it, well, he's got a good reason
for it. Let me read you some of what this
document says. There are common, recurrent motivations and indications uniting

(01:25:01):
this pattern of violence and terroristic activities under the umbrella
of self described anti fascism. This is the order that
supposedly lists antif as a domestic terrorist group, but it
actually doesn't because it's an executive order, and Antifa has
not actually been classified as a domestic terrorist group, which
I told you they wouldn't be because the people that

(01:25:21):
run the Trump administration are the people that are behind Antifa.
If you have trouble figured it out, email me or
read my new book and you'll learn all about it
and I can explain it to you if you want
to email me. These movements portray foundational American principles support
for law enforcement and border control as fascist to justify
and encourage acts of violent revolution. This anti fascist why

(01:25:47):
has become the organizing rallying cry used by domestic terrorists
to wage a violent assault against democratic institutions, constitutional rights,
and fundamental American liberties. You could just cut out the
democratic institutions. He should just be constitutional rights and American liberties,
but or rather human liberties, but okay. Common threads animating

(01:26:09):
this violent conduct include anti Americanism, anti capitalism, and anti Christianity,
support for the overthrow of the US government, extremism on migration,
race and gender, and hostility towards those who hold traditional
American views on family, religion, and morality. And then they

(01:26:30):
go on kind of funny enough to say, as described
in the Order of September twenty second, twenty twenty five,
designated in TIEF as a domestic terrorist organization. Remember this
is an executive order, this isn't an actual classification. The
groups and entities that perpetuate this extremism have created a
movement that embraces and elevates violence to achieve political outcomes,
including justifying additional assassinations. They go into reference to Charlie

(01:26:53):
Kirk assassination. But this is wrong because this anti fascist
group is not a movement that was just created. It's
been around since the twenties or before that. It's a
paramilitary wing of the Communist Party in the United States.
They would go with the Jewish mafia and they would

(01:27:13):
beat up people, break bones of people who were anti
World War two. They didn't want the US to go
into the war. People they didn't want to go into
the war were called Nazis, which is weird, Like wouldn't
you want to go if you were a Nazi into
the war to fight for the Nazis? But you don't
want to go to war. They painted it as if

(01:27:36):
you're a pacifist, you don't want to stop the Nazis
killing Jews. But the problem is this was in like
like what the couple of months or years before the
war even began, like when there's talks that there might
be a war, and Antifa was oning this ten years
before that when they were protesting and rioting, that there
was any indication that the National Socials was going to

(01:27:56):
round up criminals because they were mostly criminals. And it
was a Jewish communist paramilitary wing, or i should say
a Jewish paramilitary wing of the Communist Party in German
in Berlin, particularly in Berlin, was also in the United States.
It's not new, but let's address what some of these
things are. One of them stands out to me immediately

(01:28:20):
support for the overthrow of the US government. Well, of course,
of course that might be an indicator for terrorism. But see,
here's the thing. What did that Biden order say in
twenty twenty one, the emboldening impact of the violent breach
of the US capital? What did the Democrats call that?
They called it Pearl Harbor, They called it Hiroshima, they

(01:28:42):
called it Nagasaki, They called it worse than World War Two,
they called it the murder of babies. They called it
all kinds of things. Some of those are real, some
of those made up. They did actually call it Pearl Harbor,
and someone called it Hiroshima, but they called that an
attempt to overthrow the government. So the Democrat definition was

(01:29:04):
January sixth. The Republican definition is support for the overthrow
of the US government. I get it, But the context
of that with Biden's order or plan, and the lack
of context for the definition of what that means. And
let me explain what I mean by that. The first

(01:29:28):
animation of this violence that Trump administration explains is anti Americanism.
It's anti americanism. Now that means whatever you want it
to mean, anti americanism. You have your idea of what

(01:29:48):
America is, but what is anti americanism? It changes from
one administration to the next administration to the next administration,
and if it changes from one administration to the next administration,
it's fluid, and it becomes a tool. It becomes a

(01:30:09):
weapon to target political opponents of the administration. The Democrats
do it, and the Republicans are doing it too. They
did it when Bush was in office. They're doing it
with Trump. Trump isn't changing things. He's following the same playbook.
And I wanted to play something for you again. You've
probably heard it many times on this show. Maybe you

(01:30:32):
didn't hear it, because this particular episode where I played
all these clips was what god Us removed from aftermath media.
This is Pete Hexith. Anyone that wants to take the stage.

Speaker 4 (01:30:46):
And talk about dual loyalty is dead wrong. What this
organization represents, what Western civilization represents today is under an
under standing, then Zionism and Americanism are the front lines
of Western civilization and freedom in our world today.

Speaker 1 (01:31:11):
That is the Defense secretary, the one that just gathered
all these generals and gave this speech to the generals
about no more wokeism and we need a strong military.
And we'll get to that in just a moment. Pete Hegseith,
who is very much behind this administration's definition of what

(01:31:32):
terrorism is. He considers it to be Islam. He just
equated Zionism and Americanism, and the Trump administration just said
that one of the indicators that you could be a
terrorist is if that you express views that are anti Americanism,
not anti American anti Americanism. Anti Americanism would mean that

(01:31:55):
if you don't support Israel, you're a terrorist. This is
the White House and the Department of Defense saying if
you don't support Americanism, which is inherently defined by these
people as Israelism, then you are a terrorist. You are
an anti fascist, which is bizarre because the anti fascists

(01:32:17):
are run by Israel. Anti capitalism, now think about this
very carefully. I'm not anti capitalism. I mean this shows
I sell books. It's capitalism. But there's a problem with
this term too because there's no definition of it provided

(01:32:40):
what is anti capitalism. Anti capitalism might mean that you
decide to not pay at tax anti capitalism on something
you sell. That is anti capitalism might be defined as
anti corporatism. So I don't want to support Paizer or Maderna.

(01:33:09):
That would make me an anti capitalist, and that would
make me a traitor to the United States, which is
ironic also because that would be the literal definition of
Mussolini's fascism. And don't think I'm saying that Republicans are
fascists and the Democrats aren't, because they're both fascists. The
Democrats are the ones with some Republicans that they conspired

(01:33:29):
with big businesses to keep them open during the pandemic,
and small businesses had to be shut down. That's the
definition of fascism. So you notice that there's something bizarre here.
Anti Americanism includes not supporting the wars of Israel. That
means that if you protest against a foreign country, that's
also an act of terrorism. If you don't support the

(01:33:51):
big corporations that basically run the government, which is fascism,
but it goes both ways, then you're anti capitalist. And
what is anti Christian? Well, if you ask the Hegxith
Christians with crusader tattoos, it's an undying, unrelenting, unyielding loyalty
to a foreign country. Not all Christians, of course, but

(01:34:16):
if you ask these Pentagon Christians who want a crusade,
then if you don't support the crusade. If you don't
support the eradication of Islam as a religion, then you're
also anti Christian, which is also ironic because the people
that run this administration have listed Easter as an anti
Semitic story. They've also, according to the ADL, considered and

(01:34:38):
classified Christianity as a hateful extremist group. So that would mean,
by the Trump administration's own definition, that they have to
list the ADL as a terrorist organization, and we know
that won't happen. Also, extremism on migration, race and gender.

(01:34:58):
What does that mean? Extremists some on migration, race and gender.
I don't know what does that mean. If you have
an opinion that you want there to be open borders,
or if you think that there should be like racial
animosity in society, and if you push for gender confusion
in schools, does it mean that or does it mean

(01:35:22):
you're not allowed to have an opinion on those things?
Because even having an opinion out of a super I
don't know if conservatives it's not the right word, but
a very super and rigid definition of those things. If
you don't have the right opinion, then your opinion is
considered an act of terrorism. And the other thing is
hostility towards those who are traditional American views on family, religion,

(01:35:44):
and morality. This is ironic because if you were to
define those terms, you would find that the people that
are paying the Trump administration, that gave him the money,
that basically run the administration, are the people that are
attacking traditional American views on family, religion, and morality. These
are the people pushing no families. They did it to
the black community. They destroyed the black community with drugs.

(01:36:06):
They destroyed the black community with cultural degradation like they
did to the Germans in the nineteen twenties. And what
as an American view on religion, we have a first Amendment.
You can practice Islam, you can practice Christianity, you can
practice Judaism, you can practice Hinduism, you can practice Buddhism.
You can practice whatever you want. As long as you

(01:36:28):
believe in a supernatural deity, then that's a religion. By definition.
The Church of Satan is not a church of set
temple has set. That's not a religion. According to the
founders of this country. Extremism, hostility towards American religion. Well,

(01:36:48):
Christianity is not the only religion, which makes this also
again ironic, because you've got members of Congress and people
running to become members of Congress that want to eradicate
Islam from the United States. This is a Christian country.
You can't have Islam here. Why can you have Judaism? Then,
why can you have Hinduism? You can't have Islam. It's
a religion. Will they preach hate? Read the Koran? You

(01:37:10):
can't commit suicide in Islam. And besides getting into that
whole argument again, this order is essentially a violation of
the First Amendment on that basis alone, and hostility towards
traditional morality. What is traditional morality? Because if you ask
most members of Congress, or if you ask members of

(01:37:33):
the executive branch or the judicial branch, I mean, let's
go back to a simpler time. Let's go back to
the nineties. Man. The nineties were a simpler time, right,
We were more moral. Not too long after that, we
were questioning why Janet Jackson's breast popped out at the
Super Bowl. We had a congressional investigation why was there
almost a nipple on TV? That's a simpler time, right,

(01:37:57):
except for the whole part where the president was getting
blown under the desk. What exactly is traditional morality and
being hostile toward traditional morality? I mean, you want to
go back to Ronald Reagan. Yeah, Ronald Reagan was a
great guy, except that whole I ran Contra, and that
whole war on drugs, and that whole undermining and undercutting

(01:38:20):
the black communities in America. Except for all that, Ronald
Reagan was a great guy. They got his picture up.
I've been to the Republican National Convention. They still have
that guy's picture up at the National It's like it's
almost as if Ronald Reagan was running for president. I
went to one in Tampa. I went to an R
and C. You go to the R and C and
they just and it was in the hockey arena where

(01:38:42):
I go see lightning games all the time in Tampa,
and you know, I'm used to seeing all the of
all the old pictures of lightning players, and it was
just Ronald Reagan. I walked around the whole arena Ronald Reagan,
Ronald Reagan. Ron was like, is Ronald Reagan alive? Is
this an RNC for him? Or like, what the hell
is this?

Speaker 4 (01:38:59):
Yeah?

Speaker 1 (01:38:59):
I remember when the the Reagan administration. They wanted to
counter Soviet influence in Central America by supporting the contrast
who really didn't really they didn't really want to work,
They really didn't really want to fight. So we gave
them guns, remember that. We gave them a bunch of guns.
And then they hauled drugs into America for the cartels,

(01:39:22):
all those nighttime flights into Arkansas and who was the
governor there? And then we distributed the cocaine in black
neighborhoods thanks to George Bush Senior. Now new taxes. What's
that scanner at the airport. I've never seen something like that. Yeah,
because you'd never been in the real world. You've lived

(01:39:44):
in a bubble your whole life with servants that take
care of you. God, didn't even know what a scanner
is at a grocery store. Yeah. Reagan was a great president,
the guy that was behind I ran conscious averting Congress,
selling arms and drugs and then waging a war on drugs. Yeah. Great.
And then the one president who has figured it out,

(01:40:05):
Richard Nixon, they paint him as the criminal. But Ronald
Reagan they still put his picture up. And I think
these Republicans when they go to these conventions. I think
they have to say some kind of prayer to Reagan
and cut their hands and do like a blood packed
or drip blood into the bowl and light light a
candle for reg I don't It's some weird cult ritual though,
And that's just how it goes. That's just how it is,

(01:40:27):
I suppose, And George Bush Senior carried it on into
the next administration. So what exactly is morality? You look
at this definition of all these things, and what does
it actually tell you. It tells you nothing except that

(01:40:50):
the Trump Countering Domestic Terrorism Order is the same as
the Biden Countering Domestic Terrorist Plan. More so than in order,
it was an actual plan. It's very similar to what
Obama did, very similar to what Bush did. See a

(01:41:11):
pattern here, Republican, Democrat, first Trump, Republican then Democrat, then
Trump again Republican. Because Americans have amnesia every four years,
and they've all labeled free speech and free protest. Now

(01:41:32):
your expression of a religion is also labeled as extremism.
You know, some people actually believe that Muslims just inherently
hate Christianity, which is the total opposite of reality by
this definition. But the Trump administration, they would consider Islam
to be a threat to the United States and they
could try to outlaw Islam, although it's protection of the
First Amendment. This is crazy stuff. And I just watch

(01:41:54):
I go to all the sources, all the big talking heads,
and I'm like, let's see if they're saying it, type
it in. Nope, nobody's talking about it. What about them, Nope,
they're not talking about it. They're not talking about it.
Maybe someone mentioned it. But if this was Biden, this
would be front page of every alternative website, this would
be the front page of every single radio show podcast

(01:42:16):
that is a little bit leaning to the right. But
since it's Trump, well he's got a good reason for
doing it.

Speaker 4 (01:42:22):
Right.

Speaker 1 (01:42:25):
Look, I'm all for making sure the military is strong.
I'm all four from making sure the military officials that
are running the military are not big slobs. I don't
like Hexith, but I think it's funny that he said
it's unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals. It is
unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals. It's completely unacceptable.

(01:42:49):
And yes, the military should be for the best of
the best, and it should exclude certain people that are
not the best of the best. But see there's another
problem here. How exactly that our founding father's view these
types of these types of things. How did our founding

(01:43:11):
father's view standing armies, Some were for, somewhere against. Washington
believed that there was some necessity to it. But the
primary thing that our founding fathers believed was that the
most important thing that you could have to protect the

(01:43:36):
people was an armed citizenry. The people have to be armed.
That only works. However, if you live in a society
where people are moral, people are educated, people are healthy

(01:43:56):
of mind and body, people understand, and the civic order,
people are responsible, you cannot have a George Washington, Thomas Jefferson,
James Madison, Samuel Adams, Alexander Hamilton government. If the people

(01:44:16):
are big, fat, ignorant slobs who don't know anything about anything,
or skinny slobs who don't know anything about anything, you
can't have an armed population. That's dangerous. It is if

(01:44:38):
the people are ignorant, if the people are uneducated, if
the people are uncivil, can't have that. George Washington said
that a free people ought not only to be armed,
but disciplined. Good luck finding that in America. I've always wondered,
what would it be like in Japan if the Japanese,

(01:45:00):
who are probably the most disciplined outside of the Germans
in the world, well they brainwashed Chinese and North Koreans.
But that's a completely separate situation. This is not a
communist country in Japan. It's a pretty free society for
the most part. If you gave Japanese guns, and like,
if you have a society that's based on honesty, you
lose a wallet, people return it. I've lost things, my

(01:45:22):
wife's lost things just in a few months. People return it.
They don't steal it. Something falls to the ground, people
put it up on a put nobody's ear pods, phones,
nobody steals things here for the most maybe they're still
an umbrella. That's about it. What would it be like
if a society like this had guns. This kind of
society is exactly what Jefferson and Washington were talking about,

(01:45:43):
an honest society, an educated society, a healthy society, a
disciplined society. That's actually a really sad thing to think about.
It means that Japan is more of what our founding
fathers wanted our country to be. Our country actually is
that's the only way you can have an armed citizenry,

(01:46:04):
which is meant to be the actual standing army against
aggression that enters into your country and tries to take
your stuff, tries to kill your family, tries to take
your land. That's what an armed citizenry is for. And
a standing army is only needed in very, very very
specific circumstances. Jefferson hated the idea in times of peace

(01:46:31):
a standing army, he believed was dangerous, and he's right
about that. And that brings me to the conclusion of
tonight's show, and of course, pulling in what we discussed
with Hiroshima Nagasaki tonight. Those bombs were dropped because they
were experiments, because we had them, so we might as

(01:46:54):
well use them. Oh, it's going to deter the Soviets. Well,
here's a night. Why don't you drop one of those
bombs somewhere in Europe or somewhere in Russia where there's
no civilians and just drop one and show them what
you did, or send them a video of what you

(01:47:16):
filmed out in New Mexico, although that's all fake at
Lookout Mountain, but send them a picture or something. Hey,
this is what we'll do to Moscow if you don't
back off, Or we could have just let General Patten
arm the Germans and go in and kill all the communists.
That would have been the best thing to do. Why
wouldn't we drop a bomb on the Japanese to intimidate

(01:47:37):
the Russians. Russia is close to Japan. Couldn't you drop
it in the ocean. They could have done that in
Japan too. Just drop it in the ocean, drop it
off the coast, and show people the proof of what
you have. You have to drop it on a civilian city,
indiscriminately murdering people to intimidate the Russians over there. Just

(01:48:00):
drop it on them. They're the ones that deserved it.
The Russians were way worse than anything the Nazis or
the Imperial Japanese did. Joseph Mangela was nothing compared to
what those rush do You know what the r these
people did in Russia. And I shouldn't say the Russian
because it's not Russian people, it's the Soviets. You know
what these people did. Go and read some of the
reports of what these people would do to prisoners. You

(01:48:23):
would want to go to Auschwitz you'd want to go
to Takaal after you read about some of the stuff
that happened in the gulogs. There's actually stories about that
people that were in gulags and escaped and they fled
to Germany, some of them to be putting camps elsewhere
because they were illegally there and they loved They were
like resorts compared to the gulags. We get fed a meal,

(01:48:45):
actually get fed three meals. We have medicine. Actually, you
have full dental care. They had full dental code Auschwitz.
You should have dropped it on Russia. If you're gonna
drop it, why not drop it over there and show
them what you Anyway, you got new toys, you want
to play with them, and therein lies the problem. This

(01:49:10):
is the issue that I have. Number One, it's the
same definition of domestic terrorism throughout the last two decades
from Bush to Trump, and there's a slight variation in
who gets labeled with it. But it's really just about

(01:49:32):
criticizing the government, that's really what it is. And if
you have a standing army, great. I don't think we
should put soldiers in the high heels and lipstick and
have pregnant flight suits. Like the Bided administration had. But also,
I don't think that we should build an army, just

(01:49:54):
build it, because if you build it, just build it,
they will come and you will have war. And that's
not a good I And since when has having a
standing strong military ever deterred war? It doesn't. This idea
of having a strong military and nuclear weapons will deter warfare, Well,

(01:50:15):
it hasn't stopped warfare yet. That's like saying vaccines eradicated disease. Well,
it hasn't yet, So we need to do something else.
Maybe the hygiene would fix it. Maybe the cleanliness would
fix it. Maybe the better food would fix it. Maybe
having better diplomatic relations with countries would fix it. Maybe
not threatening Russia, threatening Russia, threatening Russia, threatening Russia, threatening

(01:50:37):
Russia for decades, maybe that would fix it. If you
just stop threatening people, if you just stop overthrowing regimes,
if you just stop meddling in South America and the
Middle East, and maybe if you just stop in Southeast Asia,
you stop doing that, maybe the world would be a
little bit more peaceful. Stop funding terrorism, that might help

(01:50:59):
stop meddling. Basically, you wouldn't even need a standing army.
Probably who's going to compete with the United States. Who's
going to invade this country and take us on Nobody nobody,
and nobody's launching nuclear weapons. Nobody's going to It's mad,
it's nonsense. Technology has evolved, warfare has evolved. But if

(01:51:24):
you have a standing military, you're going to use it.
If you have nuclear weapons, say it with me, you're
going to use it. And the bomb tests were not enough,
so they had to drop them on Hiroshima, Nagasaki and

(01:51:46):
then sending soldiers and doctors to figure out what happened
to these genetically defective Japanese people who were just subhuman
life that didn't deserve to live. According to FDR, Truman
probably thought the same thing. I've really loved that portrayal
of Truman in the Oppenheimer movie who waves the handkerchief

(01:52:09):
at Oppenheimer. Don't worry, the blood will be on my hands.

Speaker 4 (01:52:13):
Boy.

Speaker 1 (01:52:14):
I like that blood on my hands. Yeah, Truman was
a psychopath, so is FDR. And you have to be
to get to that level of power. Use them, And
Truman's been accused of that by I think leading historians.
Just use it to use it. You're going to we's
got to use it. We've got to show people we
have it. So let's blow up a couple of civilians,

(01:52:34):
blow up some cities. It's over there in Japan. They're
they're inferior to us anyway, even though they're intellectually superior
in health, genetically superior in a lot of ways too.
But that's neither here nor there. Americans used to be
superior in those ways. We kind of gave all that
up to so we all kind of look like Churchill
in FDR now. But if you have nuclear weapons, you're
going to use them. If you have a standing army,

(01:52:56):
you're going to use it. If you have definitions of
terrorism and include people that say things that you don't
agree with, you're going to use it. And what does
that entail? That includes putting people in jail, censoring them,
starting wars, using experimental weapons. I'm wanting to think about

(01:53:17):
it long and hard. What's the idea anyway during the
Cold War about nuclear weapons? You either use them or
you lose them. The same thing with ai, same thing
with chemical weapons. It's the same thing with standing armies.
It's the same thing with labels of domestic terrorism. If
you have an army, you're going to use it. If

(01:53:41):
you have experimental weapons, you're going to use them. And
if you have this label of domestic terrorism, as vague
as it is, you're going to use it to jail people.
You're going to use it to strip away people's fundamental rights.
You're going to use it to destroy the very thing

(01:54:03):
that you're supposed to be protecting with those weapons in
that military. And this is why Rome is so fascinating,
because this is essentially what happened to Rome. This is
how it fell, except it lasted a hell of a
lot longer than the US did. And you know, we
say for years, well it's coming, nothing's coming. We're already here.
We're in the state of civil war. And we basically

(01:54:25):
have Roman emperors success of Roman emperors that have total
control of the legislature, that don't even care to address
it most of the time, and don't even really care
what the courts say.

Speaker 3 (01:54:39):
Ei.

Speaker 1 (01:54:39):
There were times in Rome they would stick up the
Roman Constitution just as like a symbol of like you
put up a championship banner, like, yeah, we won back
in nineteen seventy three, haven't won since then. It's put
that up in the Roman Senate. We used to have
this constitution. Look at this, they tell the people, Look,
we follow it. The emperor was in control. They didn't
really call them an emperor. They called me in imparatists

(01:55:00):
I believe was the Latin. But they were really in control.
Or in Egypt, the pharaohs were controlled by the priests.
And that's basically what's happening. To have a priest class
that's controlling the presidency. And that's why you cut the
right ear of this slave of the high priest, which
is the high priest of Maga in the Satanic circles.
So the mega priest leader has a servant with their

(01:55:21):
right earcut, and that is the servant who carries out
their agenda. Yes, this is a Satanic administration, just like
the ones previous to it. No, it's hard to hear
for some people. But go read the Countering Domestic Terrorism
and Organized Political Violence Memorandum. You might think, oh, they
designated Antifa terrorist group. No they didn't. Antifa is run

(01:55:42):
by the people that run the Trump administration and the
Biden administration and the Obama administration and the Bush administration
and the Clinton administration and the other Bush administration and
so on and so forth. They're behind the drugs, they're
behind the gangs and the legal immigration, and there behind
all the things these people want to stop. And it's
like it's so complex, but it's also really simple to understand.

(01:56:07):
It's really simple to understand. Just I mean, it's like
a kid. Tell a kid that you bought them a
package of cookies and just sit at there on the
table and tell them not to get into the cookies.
You could bring it home and hide it until dinner's over,
or you could see, like, hey, little Johnny, I've got cookies.
I'm gonna put them right here, don't touch them. What

(01:56:27):
do you think little Johnny's gonna do. He's gonna eat
the cookies, and he's gonna do it deceptively, so you
don't know he's eating the cookies. You're gonna find out,
but after that point, it's he already ate them. And
that's what this is. Standing armies, experimental weapons, labels of
domestic terrorism, just like Biden, just like Obama, just like Bush.
And we're putting it on the table and saying, here's

(01:56:49):
a standing military, here are experimental weapons, here's labels of
domestic terrorism. To stop people from questioning your country, and
this foreign country that has a lot of control in
your country, don't touch them. What's the first thing these
psychopaths are gonna do. They're gonna lie, they're gonna cheat,
they're gonna steal, they're gonna get the cookies.

Speaker 2 (01:57:06):
And then they're gonna drop the cookies. They're gonna get
the cookies, they're gonna employ the cookies. They're gonna get
the cookies. They're gonna jail the people they don't like
the cookies. And just like Hiroshima was an experiment, and
Nagasaki was an experiment, and in many ways Dresden was too.
All this is an experiment. And how much tyranny you
will take? At what point do you say, Uncle Sam,

(01:57:28):
I tap out, I can't do this anymore.

Speaker 1 (01:57:30):
You never will. If you're convinced that it's for your
own good, you never will. If you're convinced it's to
stop those other guys, right, we gotta stop those democrats.
You never will if you're convinced that it's for your
own good stopping the other side. And now we're hearing
as the military's prep the weapons are ready to go,

(01:57:53):
the orders are in place to round up citizens who disagree.
Now we're hearing a out Ben Lodden's son looking to
blow up hospitals dressed like nurses and doctors. As I
said last night, who blows up hospitals? Who dresses up
like something? They're not to carry it to acts of terrorism?
It ain't the Muslims. And we're on the precipice of

(01:58:16):
war with China, we're told, and Russia and whatever they're
going to do in the United States, whatever act of terrorism,
that's going to be justification to start that war with Iran,
just like Alex Carpon Palenteer predicted that domestic terrorism order
from the White House. By the way, that memorandum, you

(01:58:38):
think that maybe has anything to do with the Pallenteer
database that the White House is building, the one that
they use to drone bomb people in Gaza or journalists.
Just something to think about, kind of like the President's
proposal to use American cities as training grounds for the
armed forces. So much for the comment, Tatis act right,

(01:59:02):
But it's all because we're winning so hard. Tstradio dot
info is the website, alreadigable at yahoo dot com. Is
the email. Thank you so much for tuning in tonight
to the secret teachings. Please email me if you have
any questions. Alreadigable at yahoo dot com, reach out to

(01:59:23):
us on social media. If you don't like the advertisements
during the show, subscribe to the ad free archive on
the website if you've already done that. Thank you so
much for supporting this independent Monday through Friday broadcast. I
will talk to you on the next broadcast the next show.
Don't forget to buy me a coffee to support the

(01:59:44):
show as well, or grab one of my books on
the website like ocult Arcana tstradio dot info.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Cardiac Cowboys

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Black Rain & Standing Armies (10/1/25)

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Cardiac Cowboys

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Black Rain & Standing Armies (10/1/25)

Stuff You Should Know