Mysteries of Egypt (9/26/25)

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Hello, anybody home today, I want you to open your mind.

Speaker 2 (00:09):
I've almost done on the conclusion that the story is
subdamning that the massive Apple people can't deal with it.
We are in process of developing a whole series of
techniques two bid people actually to love their certitude.

Speaker 3 (00:24):
We face a hostile ideology, global in scope, atheistic in character.

Speaker 2 (00:29):
Ruthless in purpose, and insiduous in methode. Or we are
opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy
that relies primarily on covet means for expanding its sphere of.

Speaker 1 (00:40):
Influence to change the minds and the attitudes and the
beliefs of the people to bring about one world socialist
totalitarian government. The potential for the disastrous rise of misfaced
power exists. It is patterned itself after every dictator who's
ever planted the ripping imprint of a boot on the
pages of history beginning of time.

Speaker 2 (01:01):
If you can get people to consent to the state
of affairs in which they are living, then you have
a much more easily controllable society than you would if
you were relying poorly on clubs and firing squads and
concentration camps. Tools of conquest do not necessarily come with
barns and extorsions and follows. There are weapons that simply

(01:22):
fight outs prejudices.

Speaker 3 (01:24):
As you connect the dots between different people, organizations, religions, history,
suddenly the picture starts to form.

Speaker 1 (01:32):
The Kingdom of God is within men, not one man nor.

Speaker 3 (01:35):
A group of men. Someone born in the United States
is not more special than someone born in Mexico.

Speaker 2 (01:41):
Someone who is white is not more special than someone
who is black.

Speaker 3 (01:44):
They're just vehicles for the consciousness to experience. They do
not want your children to be educated. They do not
want you to think too much. It was learned that
the aliens had men and were then manipulating matters of
people through secret societies, witchcraft, magic, the occult, and religion.

Speaker 2 (02:04):
You're reaching to our children in music, television, books.

Speaker 3 (02:07):
Right, no children's existence.

Speaker 2 (02:09):
How can I just still advise that a staff as
an efficiency.

Speaker 1 (02:12):
So if you have the opportunity to stand next to
one of these machines, it feels like an altar to
an alien god.

Speaker 3 (02:18):
Genetic powers the most awesome force the planet's ever seen,
but you wielded like a kid that's found his dad's gun.

Speaker 2 (02:23):
You're on the airport who has been ounced, but applying
this there is now in the provestion of the army.

Speaker 1 (02:27):
Soo many others know what's happening out there, and no one,
no government agency has jurisdiction over the truth. Any state,
any entity, any ideology that fails to recognize the worth,
the dignity the rights of man, that state is absolute
a case to be found under m from man guid
in the Twilight Center.

Speaker 3 (02:46):
About time some of you got acquainted with the real
hard truth. It's the haw that says I will not acquiesce.

Speaker 2 (02:55):
Freedom is the privilege to be right, freedom from the disasters.

Speaker 3 (03:00):
If you don't connect the dots, it's just a mass
of what's all this about? You are listening to the
Secret Teachings Radio. I'm your host, Ryan Gable tst Radio
dot info is the website. Rdigable at yahoo dot com

(03:20):
is the email. If you are tuning into the Secret
Teachings tonight, some of you may be for the first time.
I encourage you to listen to the entirety of the episode,
the entire broadcast, And if you don't have the time
to do that right now, I'll tell you what a
lot of people won't tell you, and that is to

(03:41):
stop listening and wait until you have the time to
listen to the full show. It will be worth it.
And make sure you have a pen or a piece
of paper to take notes as well. Tstradio dot info
also has my books, including A cult Arcana, which is
kind of the flagship book, and it is a massive
inside yclopedic. I would say it's a dictionary. It's an encyclopedia,

(04:06):
it's grimoars, it's everything you need or want to know
about the occult it's in that book. Sometimes I go
back and look at it and think, how the hell
did I write this thing? In fact, I just kind
of rewrote the entire thing and re released the I
guess you could say a main second edition of the

(04:26):
book about a year ago roughly so. It is available
on the website digital copies as well as physical copies
sent to you within hopefully two weeks. And I would
like to encourage you to get a copy of that
book tonight because it will definitely help you with tonight's

(04:47):
main topic, and that is Egyptian mysteries. I'm not an
expert in Egypt, but there is a lot of Egypt
in the book. And we're going to discuss this tonight
on the show. Also quickly, if you have bought me
a coffee, slash, bought me a t slash, bought me

(05:08):
a book, it's all the same thing. I just don't
like coffee. Thank you for doing that. That is really
helpful and it really supports the show. And I'm always grateful,
especially when there's a new platform that we use when
people go out of their way to support us. And
we've had Gary sign up and Dean Walker sign up

(05:30):
and land and sign up, or at least I think
that's the name because they put someone as the name
and I see their email, Land and thank you for
signing up to buy me a coffee. That supports the
show like you wouldn't believe. So tonight's episode takes us
first not to Egypt, but to my personal life, which

(05:54):
is where most inspiration for the shows come from. And
as we were discussing the pre show on YouTube, this
is a video show tonight on Fridays, and only because
of listeners like you subscribing to the show, buying books,
buying me a coffee, etc. That I can do the
video show. So I'm talking to two audiences. I'm talking
to the main audience on audio, and that I'm talking

(06:16):
to some of you are still part of the main audience,
but you're on YouTube tonight. That's why we did the
pre show for the free show on Fridays. Anyway, though,
I try to start out with a story that justifies
the subject, because I think it's important to have a

(06:36):
narrative and a baseline. And so I am, as most
of you know, I am not a big fan of technology.
I'm using it right now, but I'm maybe the better
way to say this, I'm not a big fan of
technology that is forced upon me. I don't like receiving

(06:59):
bank cards where they don't ask my permission to change
my card to a microchip that won't work when I
go to use it, and then they tell me, you know,
we'll swipe it, and you swipe it and the system says, no,
you got to use it as a chip. And then
if you do that two, three, four times and then
say some ritual prayer, maybe they let you swipe it.
And I remember my bank actually sent me this new

(07:21):
card five six years ago and it says thank you
for signing up for this new card with this microchip,
and I said, I didn't sign up for this. A
contacted the bank. Oh, you were opted into it. It's like,
so I was forcibly opted into this. I wasn't allowed
to make the choice. That's the kind of technology I

(07:42):
don't like. I don't like being forced to do something.
Most of you know because I've showed it to you
before when I've done interviews or pictures online or something.
But I used to have a huge book collection, and
I got it down to a workable three suitcases to
move over here to Japan. And it's a big say,

(08:04):
it's a pretty decent library still. And in that library,
I have some of my favorite books that I would,
under no circumstances ever give up. I've always thought, laying
in bed at night, you know, if there was a
disaster and I knew I was never coming back to
where I was living, what books would I grab. I've
always thought the Secret Teachings of All Ages, that's a given.

(08:24):
I would also grab the Four Masks of God book
by Joseph Campbell. There's four of them. One of them
is pretty big, it's like extra large, large, medium, and small.
I'd grab those, and I might grab Oh, I don't know.
There's so many other great books, but if I had
a small little bag to stick books and that those
would be the starting point. So I would never give

(08:45):
those up under any condition, any condition. And recently I
decided for travel purposes to acquire a digital e reader
to and that was a good decision, but also a
bad decision because it's supposed to be simple. It's not.

(09:10):
It's very difficult, and I just thought it was so
ironic when I'm reading, you know, the promos for it,
which are different than if they're trying to sell you something.
It's different than if you read the instruction manual and
everything's like, oh, it's so easy, so easy, so easy,
so easy. And I'm thinking I have literally spent more
than fifteen I've counted them, more than fifteen hours sitting

(09:32):
behind this computer trying to get I've had two e readers.
I tried the Kindle and I tried the Cobo, and
I can't get either one of them to really fully work.
And you would tell that to tech people. They don't
know what you're talking about. What are you talking about?
This is a great device. Jeff Bezos told me this
always works, so it must be you, And hey, maybe

(09:55):
it is. I'm admittedly not a tech guy. But as
I was playing with that device, you know, a friend
of mine who also has one, he says, it's just
terrible that you really can't own your books. He said,
you know, Amazon can just delete stuff off of it,
and I said, yeah, I know that. I've been talking
about that for years. Sony does it. Microsoft does it

(10:16):
with games. Of course Amazon does it. There have been
issues with copies of nineteen eighty four. I think that
was even the New York Times article. They did a
story on it about how nineteen eighty four ironically was
pulled from stores. But you can't really own anything. That's

(10:37):
the point. That's the problem. You can't own anything. It's
supposed to be happy about that. I'm not happy about that.
But it's the way that things can be changed. I mean,
if you have a book like nineteen eighty four and
it gets removed, Let's say, do you really know if
that book that gets removed gets removed? Do they notify you? No,

(11:02):
they just remove it. This gets deleted. But furthermore, how
many things that you have digitally can be pulled and replaced,
Where maybe a paragraph or a sentence is removed, a
really important piece of critical information, and I've been thinking
about that recently because of this digital e reader and

(11:25):
because I've I've always hated these services. And there's a
there's a book that I think I'm going to ditch now.
But there's a book that I have a physical copy
of it. It's a language book for learning Japanese. It's
it's a great book. It's a it's published well, it's
everything's it's a really good book. It's a perfect book
for learning Japanese Japanese, and I wanted to put on

(11:48):
the digital device. Do you know that you can't download
this book? Do you know that you can't really own
the book? You have to pay for a subs description
on the internet to access the book, which is about
one of the dumbest things I've ever heard ever. You

(12:11):
have to pay for a one month or a six
month subscription to a file because it's convenient to have
that on a device as opposed to carrying around this
giant book, which I also have a physical copy of.
It's just annoying, but it's also a very important, little

(12:31):
critical detail to indicate to show us that our civilization
is on a path to great things, but also to
ruin and when we stick everything we have onto a
hard drive, everything we have into a cloud system, my

(12:52):
computer still pops up. Join the cloud, Join the cloud.
I don't want to join the cloud. Screw the cloud.
I don't want to put my personal you know, effects
and blood samples on the cloud. You just want to
choke these people, at least I do. And I really,
I promise him, not a violent person, but I want
to choke these people. The cloud is so great. No

(13:14):
it's not. But they told But but Tim Cook said
it was great, and he's gay, so it has to
be a great thing to put your stuff on the cloud.
Same thing with Microsoft. You can't even own Microsoft Word now.
You have to pay for subscriptions for that. So the
point is, if things can just be removed now today

(13:35):
from your device, and then fast forwarding into the future,
what exactly is going to be found of our civilization
as we transition and parley into the Egyptian mysteries? What
will be left of our civilization folks? Anything? I mean,

(13:57):
eventually you probably wouldn't find books, You probably wouldn't find
anything like that because everything would be digital and with
time and you don't have a battery, you can't access it,
no matter no matter how advanced it was at the time.
I mean even today, if I don't charge the device,

(14:19):
I can't access it. And I just I know that
fourteen to fifteen minutes into the show, some people might
kind of doze off or think this is boring, But
this is important to understand if you want to understand Egypt,
or if you want to understand any other ancient civilization.

(14:41):
This is really really important because really the only thing
that might be left over are things that we constructed
that would withstand the test of time. Things that are
made out of stone, things that are made out of rock,
things that are going to last through ataclysmik E. Vince

(15:01):
and last through time the Great Equalizer and lasts through
rain and floods and fires and all sorts of other things.
Little readers are not going to survive that. Little pieces
of technology we love so much are not going to
survive that. I see a listener in the chat who said,

(15:23):
I believe this is Chris and the chat, the USA
is doomed. Well, yeah, but look, it's not just the USA,
it's the whole world. And you want to see technology,
you come to Asia. Asia makes what we have in
the United States look primitive, especially if you go to
one of these Japanese stores a yodavashi camera or a
big camera. Holy hell, I mean these places are like

(15:49):
it's really something that I can only use the analogy
of like it was an alien planet, because you know,
you go into a store in the US and there's
like three ops and all of them, you know, you
have no customer service, And I mean here, it's not
like that. Here, there's like an entire store built into

(16:09):
a store, into a store on top of a store,
and it has like a thousand options for everything you want.
It's it's really fascinating. So over here in Japan it's
in terms of doom, it's way worse over here. I
mean it's great, but it's also way worse in terms
of what the future holds, because none of that stuff
is going to hold up to the test of time.

(16:29):
It just won't. And so if that can be just
in real time, if something can just be deleted, what
does that tell us about the past, and if in
time a lot of things will go missing? That we
have all this great literature and history books And I
downloaded some of the Joseph Candell books last I own

(16:53):
a lot of them already the physical but I had
to download the digital copies because once you buy something,
you got to buy it again. That's the model. I
do the same thing with a cultarkane of my book,
And so I bought these books. And I'm thinking, these
are all of these Joseph Campbell books or most of them,
are really important for every human on planet Earth. It

(17:16):
doesn't matter if you live on an island in the
middle of the ocean, or if you live in the
center of Europe, where you live in the Antarctic area.
It doesn't matter where you live, like these books are
instrumental for understanding who we are as people, cultures, religions, myths, folklore, etc.
And if you just if we just lost Joseph Campbell
just gone, there was no Joseph Campbell, I don't know

(17:39):
if a lot of people would understand, and including myself
in the past, I wouldn't have understood how instrumental Joseph
Campbell's work was to understanding human civilization. A better example
would be Star Wars. Like you understand that Star Wars
literally was only Star Wars because of Joseph Campbell. I

(18:05):
believe George Lucas was a student of Joseph Campbell. So
this is and by student, I mean a follower learned
from him. Yes, I've seen in the chat Carl Young
as well, just those two guys. If Carl Jung disappeared,
If Joseph Campbell disappeared, and we could say this about

(18:26):
a lot of people, we would lose just in their work.
We would lose, It's beyond comprehension, the understanding. We would
lose for the world, for our cultures, for the body,
the brain, society. There's a lot of working parts in

(18:49):
human civilization. And so that's why you look at something
a civilization like Egypt. And I honestly feel, this is
my honest feeling. I've come to think that Egypt is
kind of a stale subject I have. And why do
I think that, I don't fully know. I think it's

(19:11):
because that's what I grew up with, and I have
had very little contact growing up with anything else. Like
I was unaware that there were pyramids anywhere else in
the world when I was a kid. Right, it's just
like a thousand shows on the History Channel about Hitler
and a thousand shows on the Discovery Channel about Egypt,

(19:34):
And yeah, it's really important, But it would be way
more important if we were to have a million shows
on the Discovery Channel about how Egypt is not the
only place on planet Earth where you have basically the
same religious practices mummification, rituals, after life, magic, etc. It's

(19:58):
not the only place. It's one of many plays. And
that's where you know a Graham Hancock comes in with
Fingerprints of the Gods in the nineties and people find
him to be crazy. It's like, have you read the book.
It's not crazy. It's basically a scientific journalistic investigation into
what Joseph Campbell did, which was comparing different religions and

(20:21):
folklore and myths and showing how they're all very very similar.
I mean, that was what I was interested in when
I first started radio. Never read Joseph Campbell, and people
would ask me you must be a Campbell fan or
a young fan. I was like, I've never I don't
even know who Carl Jung was when I was eighteen
years old. That's how poor my schooling was. I would

(20:42):
have school in West Virginia, so you could forgive me
the ignorance. I mean, it's West Virginia eight I don't
know if they knew who Carl Young is at anywhere
in that state. I'm from there. I can make the joke.
If you're from West Virginia, it's a joke, but you
probably didn't catch it because the education system is so
bad in West Virginia. But nobody talks about any of
these people. Joseph Campbell should be taught in high school.

(21:05):
But I mean, wouldn't that help us to understand each
other a little bit better? You want to have like equality,
equity teaching Joseph Campbell would be a great way to
do that, would be a really great way to do that.
But of course school is modeled after the you know
that episode of King of the Hill where the I
think it's the state they send this like equity expert

(21:27):
to Bobby's school and everybody's getting along fine, everybody's happy,
and then this guy comes in and he starts he's like,
you're gonna wear the you know, this symbol and this
symbol and you know your people attack their people and
let's just all talk about it now. And it turned
these kids into activists. Such a great episode. I love
King of the Hill, such a great episode. That's basically

(21:49):
what it is. If you were to teach. Joseph Campbell,
on the other hand, should be a high school class.
It really should. It should be incorporated into the curriculum.
Although some people think he's crazy. It's like, I don't know,
it's crazy about just recording myths, Like that's somehow crazy.
But if that was taught, you would create and would
foster a much more quote inclusive, equitable environment because it

(22:11):
doesn't matter where you're from. You'd be like able to
to recognize before you become an adult that your culture
is pretty much the same as every other culture. You
just call things by different names, and there's different ways
to say them and write them, and it's it's all
the same. It's all the same thing. And that might

(22:32):
be oversimplifying it, but it's pretty much all the same thing.
But that's it's not taught in schools. Now. Young maybe
a little bit, but most people don't know that. Young
was also very much into the paranormal. And of course,
if you learn anything about Young in any educational institution,
I don't teach you that, it'll teach you that this
guy who's like the father of uh, you know, psychology

(22:56):
and understanding the mind was also writing things like I'm
seeing spirits and ghosts, and they're knocking at my door,
and there's apparitions and the people that are working with
me or seeing them too. That just conveniently gets left
out of the college education, doesn't it when you do
learn about Young, because that would discredit and they're powerful.
People have been able to use the Youngian model for

(23:19):
bad things, you know, just like the Brenees propaganda book
written in the nineteen twenties. They used it for really
nasty things. So anyway, the point is stuff can be deleted.
In the long run, how do we access the information
if we don't have a battery and also are modern civilization.

(23:43):
If we were just to delete one of these people,
like a Young or a Campbell, we would lose so
much understanding and we would lose so much of our
pop culture too, especially I would say Young, how much
Young is influenced pop culture? Sure, it's it's also weird.

(24:04):
I don't want to divert to a different topic. This
might sound like a different topic, but it's just another example.
You know, if you think about how much influence pop
culture wise, Japan has had on the world. It's not
just the cars, it's not just the A lot of
people know the video games like the Green Code, and

(24:24):
the Matrix is partly Japanese script. The way that they
dress the martial arts, that's all Japan That's just the Matrix.
That's just one example. You know, Ninja, Samurai, Godzilla. So
much pop culture and if you just I've thought about that,

(24:48):
if you just like removed the Japanese pop culture from America, Like,
what would America pop American pop culture even be, what
would any pop culture even be if you just removed
like the Japanese pop culture, which is like everything. It's
crazy how much it has influenced our culture. And so

(25:12):
this isn't like an existential exercise. Okay. What I'm saying
is society, culture, civilizations is made up of is built
from very very complex sub units, and within those are

(25:34):
additional sub units. And when you put it all together,
you get civilization. If you start picking pieces and removing them,
if you think about it that way, you can see
how fragile the whole system really is, and how losing
a book like or losing a series like The Masks
of God, for example, would devastate literature. It would devastate mythology,

(25:57):
it would devastate Hollywood. I mean, you know, like most
movies are based off of the Youngian and the Campbell
you know, baseline, the narratives like the young and archetypes
and the Campbell mythology. If you just remove that, you
would lose like fifty or maybe more percent of all entertainment,

(26:19):
or at least decent entertainment, good entertainment, which can be
proven by the fact that Disney has a band in
that model today And that's why their movies suck, because
they don't follow the Youngian archetypes, they don't follow the
Campbell mythology. They just do things that are politically correct.
And you see how Disney fails at that. A lot
of companies do. So if you relate that to history,

(26:47):
and I talked about this maybe last night on the
show too, maybe I mentioned it on our Nightmare at
the Museum show. But if you just stripped just this
is the way I think about it. If you just
think about the idea that if you were to look

(27:10):
at what you have in your kitchen right now, like
as a cooking utensil, and some by some chance a
fork survives the apocalypse and archaeologists are looking at that
fork in the future I think I mentioned this because
there was just a full dining set with like a

(27:31):
cup and bowl and all that found somewhere in Turkey
is one of the first ever one of the very
few first full dining sets that were ever found. It's
several thousand years old. But if you just had archaeologists
looking at the fork, I mean, how much can you
really ascertain about the people that use that fork? Very little?

(27:53):
In fact, if you found that fork in Asia, you
might have no idea that people would use chopsticks. If
you found chopsticks, you might you know here, and then
you found a fork in the West, you might think, well,
these people were primitive, they use pieces of wood to
pick up their food, when really the chopstick is far
more sophisticated than a piece of metal that you stab

(28:15):
things with. You have to really have coordination to use chopsticks,
or at least to use them well, so technical chopsticks
are a little bit more advanced, but you wouldn't be
able to tell that if you just had like these
wooden sticks. Then you get like a stainless steel fork, Like, yeah,
there's more industrial advancement behind the fork, but the technical

(28:35):
and the historical and the psychological and the motor skills
and the and all of that needed to use chopsticks
is way more advanced than just picking up a fork
and stabbing food. But how would you have any idea?
How would you have any idea what we were doing
in twenty twenty five if that, if all you had
was a fork from the kitchen, you wouldn't Your Xbox

(28:59):
is in their PlayStation is not there, your computer's not there,
all the fans technology is all gone. It's all gone.
So I think about those things and then I apply
them to in this case, Egypt. But this is what
I do for every show, just to give you an idea,
is I try to think of something that gives us
like a better perspective on what the topic is going

(29:21):
to be. So let me put it this way. Most
of you know that this week earlier this week, I
was out of town, so I had some pre recorded shows.
I missed some big topics because of that. But I
think that some of them were decent shows. At least
the ones I thought were really good. Nobody responded to them,
and the ones I were like, oh, this just sounds
not that great. It almost sounds like I phone it in,

(29:43):
which I didn't, but it sounds like I phone it
in and then people are like, oh my god, it's great,
it's a great show. It's weird how that works. So
I went to Hiroshima with my wife and we went
to an Egyptian exhibit and I've never s I've seen
anything physically from Egypt, never seen it. I've never seen

(30:09):
never been to the Brooklyn Museum, which is where this
particular set was from. So I was very excited, and
we got a ticket and what wasn't that expensive? It
was like a ten dollars or something, kind of surprising.
It was so cheap, so we go maybe maybe it's
like thirteen dollars. It was pretty cheap. So we go
to this museum and I have not really because I

(30:34):
felt that it was stale, going back to what I
said about being stale, because I've just first thing I
was introduced to right about it so much, it kind
of gets It's not a particular love for me. I mean,
I love it, but it's not like an obsession for me,
bea so it kind of gets put in the background.
It kind of becomes stale because I'm learning about all
these other things, which was what took the conversation to
Campbell a little bit ago, so bringing the conversation back around,

(30:57):
I still wanted to see it, and I guess I
was not up to date on my official Egyptian history,
whatever the narrative is now. And so I was reading
there at the museum. Well, my wife was reading the
Japanese and translating it some of it for me, and
I had my phone to translate some of it. Some

(31:19):
of it was in English. But the one thing I
thought was interesting is that I remember a time, in fact,
I remember where I was. I was in the radio
studio at WPRK in winter Park, Florida, when I read
an article fifteen sixteen years ago that said, archaeologists now

(31:41):
believe that it's possible that maybe the people that built
the pyramids were not slaves. Do you remember that? Do
you remember before that that's all you ever heard about
the pyramid builders. They were slaves, they were beaten by
an evil pharaoh, and they had Jews doing hard labor. That's,

(32:06):
in regard to the Pyramids of Egypt, not accurate because
it at least the Great Pyramid and the two subsequent
pyramids on the Plateau, those were not built by slaves.
Those were built by people that were And I remember
this article paid in oils and spices, which you know,
to us is something we throw out when it goes bad,

(32:27):
and we forgot we had it. But you know, in
those days, it was a very precious commodity, and people
that were paid in oils and spices were basically being
paid in gold and silver. In fact, at one point,
Egypt didn't even have gold. They didn't have a system
of currency like we imagine it. And it was brought
to Egypt maybe by those same people that told us
they were enslaved and forced to build the pyramids. But

(32:49):
that's a whole different subject entirely. So the Egyptians we
were told, I mean my whole life. When I was
in fifth grade, we had Egyptian Days. You know, this
was like part of our history class. And when we
had that Egyptian Day, I remember dressing up in some

(33:11):
kind of Egyptian costume and I had no context or
knowledge about any of it, you know, but that's what
we did. We did that in school, and I just remember,
I remember I remember hearing that in school too, because
I was I was always a fan of history. I
remember my history classes a lot of the stuff that
we learned. I've always just been fascinated with history, and
they taught us that in school slaves built the pyramids

(33:32):
kind of glossed over, but like, yes, slaves built the pyramids.
And actually remember one time, a lot of people, a
lot of you think Ryan's smart. Ryan's really intelligent. You
wouldn't say that if you if you were in school
with me. When I was fifth grade, we had a
three class rotation and we had a history class on Egypt.
And I remember I was not paying attention. It's horrible,

(33:57):
horrible kid not paying attention, and the teacher said, okay,
so Ryan, you want to come up. It wasn't even
me goofing off with other kids. I was just like
not paying. I was like, this is boring. I was
falling asleep. He just like, you want to come up
and answer the question. So I was forced to cope
and answer the question. I remember she said, what makes
the Nile River so you know, important? And I just

(34:19):
went I literally, I'll never forget this. It's like a
core memory. I said, it goes up this way and
she's like, that's right, it flows in that direction. I
guess you were paying attention, and I was like, yeah, yeah,
that's that's right, That's that's what I meant. Just never

(34:40):
forget that. But that was like one of the Egyptian classes.
I think it was the same one we had to
dress up like an Egyptian and Mistostokos in the chat said,
did you walk like an Egyptian? No, I didn't. I walked.
I think that was actually the day we were I
was in a car wreck before school, so I walked
like I had severe back problems, which I still suffer
from today, and it would have been nice to get

(35:01):
some kind of medical assistance. But you know, the person
that hit us was a Christian and we can't sue Christians,
so I have to suffer with every day back in
neck pain thanks to Christ. Thank you Jesus. I appreciate that.
Could pray to Christ, but Christ apparently wants me to
suffer with neck and back pain because we can't sue
his children. Personal issue. We move on from it. But

(35:21):
that was my I think it was the day that
I wore that Egyptian costume. No walking like an Egyptian,
but I did walk like I had a severe trauma
from the car wreck. That's what I walked like anyway.
So if if something like a Carl Young or something
like a Campbell was lost, put that into context with

(35:45):
I mean forever it was slaves built the pyramids. Slaves
build the pyramids, slave build the pyirments. Slave and then oh, actually,
they probably were not slaves. They probably were skilled workers.
They probably were paid in oil and spicy is. These
people were probably not slaves. And I remember, I have

(36:06):
no idea what episode it was, if even there's a
recording of it, which there probably is somewhere buried in
my hard drive, but I remember I remember very vividly
reading that on air and being told that I was wrong.
It's like, well, it's not really me saying that, This
is like archaeologists saying it. But okay, I guess I'm

(36:26):
wrong because I read an article of what someone else said.
My first introduction to the idiocy of I'm right, you're wrong.
This is my belief, and you're wrong because I don't
believe what you believe. That I remember so vividly, and
then I go into this museum in Hiroshima this week
and it says what the article said fifteen years ago,

(36:52):
the people that built the pyramids were skilled workers. They
were paid in like oil and spice, and I thought,
son of a bitch. One that makes me feel a
little bit old, I guess because I remember a time
when it was slaves that built the pyramids. I also

(37:15):
remember the time, and this is the second thing that
pisses me off. I remember the time when I was
told I was crazy for suggesting that slaves didn't build
the pyramids, and that wasn't my opinion or something. It
was just like an archaeological investigation that was reporting on that.
And then fifteen years later, fast forward, I go in
to a museum in Hiroshima, and oh, skilled workers built

(37:40):
the pyramids. Hmm. Now, I don't want to discuss this
because it's irrelevant to the show. Well, I mean, it's relevant,
but it's irrelevant because I'm going, you know how I am,
I will, I'll jump off into the deep end. But
they've told us that the tribe of Israel built the pyramids,
and they were whipped and beaten and t poorly and

(38:01):
slave they were slaves. That whole narrative falls apart. That
whole like Prince of Egypt, bullshit falls apart. And since
it falls apart, it means that they also lied about
that this too, which is which is a monumental lie,
because this is the whole issue with the pyramids at Giza.

(38:22):
They're incredibly complex. The Egyptians didn't even know how they
were built, despite the fact that this museum I went to,
this exhibit I went to in a museum was up
to date by telling us, hey, it's skilled workers and
oils and spices. And I'm like, well, I remember when
it was slaves. And then we get, you know, into

(38:43):
the exhibit a little bit more and they tell us,
you know, in the in the exhibit, they're still in
that old archaic mindset. Well, you know, this Great Pyramid
of Giza, we don't really necessarily call it the Great
Pyramid of Geza. We call it the Great Pyramid of
kuf Wo. I looked over. I had the translator, but
I looked at my wife and I said, they say

(39:05):
Cufu built the pyramid. But see, the thing is they
don't actually have any evidence of that. Really evidence they
have is the main And I even questioned myself. I
was like, did I did I tell my wife that correctly?
Was I Was I wrong in remembering that? And I
wasn't because I looked it up, and it turns out
the main evidence they have that Cufu built the pyramid
was graffiti that someone had scribbled across one of the

(39:29):
chambers inside and which was found in eighteen thirty seven.
Just graffiti. So I guess if I just go tag
the White house, Ryan was here, this is my building.
I own the White House now. I mean that is
literally the foundation of the we know who built the
pyramid narrative. Yeah, so one of the workers, uh, basically

(39:54):
tagged the inside of the building. Really, that's that's your evidence. Well,
if that's what it takes to that's what it takes
to take possession of a property. I mean, it's going
to change the whole real estate market. You could just
scribble something, you know, this is my house now and
you're in, and that's actually the basis of the whole

(40:16):
Cufu built it. And I look more into that and
they say that Cufu's name was written in hieroglyphics as
part of the graffiti. There's also I guess you could
call them artifacts excavations around the Giza plateau, and there's
like tools and seals and pottery from Kufu's to fourth

(40:39):
datus to Cufu's time, which again is like you using
the house analogy. You go into the house and you
buy this house, and you, you know, you hoard stuff
for years. You've got stuff in the basement, you've got

(40:59):
stuff behind walls, and then you know, you die and
they clear out the house. You didn't build the house,
you just took possession of the house, you know, but
you loved a bunch of stuff there. And then in
the future, someone goes to the house and finds, you
know something, a newspaper and oh, we know that this
this old lady Ethel who was a hoarder, she must

(41:20):
have built the house because she left a newspaper behind.
I mean, I get it. I understand that that's that's illogical.
I mean it, it is illogical, but it's like a
logical assumption for mainline archaeologists who are trained to not
question narratives. And you got to do it by the facts,

(41:40):
which is kind of ironic because I you did it
by the facts, you really wouldn't have a narrative at all,
because you'd say, logically, rationally, objectively, finding a newspaper that
somebody left behind in the attict is not proof that
they built the house. That's just utterly absurd. I believe

(42:01):
there's also the main argument. So there's graffiti and there's
some artifacts which don't say that. It's just like people
were working there at the time. But it also is
argued by archaeologist. Again I look this up after the museum,

(42:21):
it's argued by archaea. This is this is the best one,
maybe better than the graffiti. It's argued that who built
the pyramid because we have some scribbling on a wall,
but also because there's no contradictory evidence. Great, so there's
no we probably evidence you wouldn't find because you you've

(42:44):
already set the date, so even if you did found it,
find it, you would say you didn't find it and
it would be lost, which is a lot of times
what happens. These things that are older just get dismissed,
like the Kensington ruinstone for example. But the thing is
like because there's no it's like, here's my theory, and
because no evidence has disputed my theory, my theory is right.

(43:05):
And these aren't even really theories. This is like hard
it's considered hard fact, like slaves built the pyramids, and
then when it was overwhelming evidence that had mounted to
prove that wrong. It's taken fifteen years to change the narrative.
And I don't know at what point in the last
fifteen years. It could have been six years ago, eleven

(43:28):
years ago, but at some point in the last fifteen
years we've gone from if I put on a test
that slaves did not build the Pyramids, I would flunk
the test. But then a few years later, if I
put slaves that build the pyramids, they'd say, you're correct,
you get a gold star, you get a smiley face sticker.

(43:50):
Same thing with peltdown Man forty years of fraud, although
in this case we're not talking about fraud necessarily. We're
just talking about there's some graffiti there and nobody has
come up with any other evidence, so this must be
who built it, which is just bad. But you know

(44:10):
that was from eighteen thirty seven to that's the orthodoxy
that built modern archaeology. So you can understand, like why
these people hold onto this stuff. What's the saying. Archaeology
or historical narratives or history changes with every successive death
of an archaeologist or something like that, or historian too.

(44:34):
So a listener in the chat says the land in
the time of the Pyramids was lush and green, not
a desert, so says Academia. Does that change anything? Is
that is that an official narrative now? Because I remember
when people suggested that that it was actually lushing green
at one point, you know, people were saying, no, that
can't be true. It's a desert. It's like, well, we're

(44:55):
not talking about last year. We're talking not even a
thousand years ago. We're talking a law long time ago,
a really long time ago, when it was lush and green.
And this is the Robert shockwork. It was eleven thousand.
It was like younger, driest period before that, even lush
and green. So I don't know, is that is that
like a mainline narrative now too. It's weird to watch

(45:20):
these narratives change over and over and over again. It's
really strange, especially if you've, like me, you've invested your
life in this. Believe our listener and another listener in
the chat room said they also denied the Hanging gardens
never existed. Yeah, now they're what are they one of
those seven Wonders of the world or something I think

(45:41):
didn't exist? And the Geeza plateau is also a weird
place too in that regard, because while we acknowledge those exist,
we pretty much outside of a random Discovery Channel show
or like a random book that you find, there's almost
no acknowledgment overall for the same structures being found all

(46:05):
over the world. I mean, that's becoming a little less
true now because especially because of light are and they're
just like turn the light aar on. Oh we found
a city in Ecuador, a whole civilization. All right, turn
it on over here. Look, we found ten different megacities
with highways connecting each other. Oh my goodness, So I

(46:27):
guess were there were civilizations in the Amazon that were very,
very sophisticated, not just the ayahuasca, but also which is
the chemistry and the pharmacology, but also the terra preta,
which is like the never ending soil that just regenerates,
even after all these years. It just regenerates, and you
can put some of it on soil that's not very fertile,

(46:50):
and it will fertilize the soil. I think one of
the arguments for that was it was a compost heap
just right outside the little hut that they lived in,
which there was nobody there and then they found the
Terra preade. It's like, oh, they must have lived in
huts and they just threw stuff out the front door
of the hut because they were stupid, and that created

(47:10):
the Terra preda. Of course, nobody explains how a civilization
that large in the Amazon could have, you know, developed
anyway without the terror prey to begin with, because that's
the stuff that let them grow food. I mean, that was,
or I think still is as of a couple of
years ago. That's still the argument of how that Terra

(47:34):
Preada is there. It's like they threw stuff out the
front door of their shack. Well, how did they even
build the shack in the first place? How was there
enough food to sustain the people living there without the soil,
the black soil in the first place. It's just so stupid.
It's really stupid, and you don't have to be an
archaeologist or even that intelligent to know that it's stupid. Again, though,

(47:54):
you have to realize that, I think objectively, you have
to realize that some people only work off of like
what they can see, which is fine, you should work
off what you can see. The problem with that is
thinking that you have to have like an absolute answer,
which you don't. That's the problem. It's like, we're told

(48:19):
this is an absolute thing, slaves built the pyramids, and
then fifteen years later I go into a museum and
exhibit in Hiroshima and they tell me, oh, yeah, they didn't.
They didn't build the pyramids. It was actually people that
were paid in fine spices and oils. You're like, now,
wait a second. I passed a test in high school

(48:41):
because I said that slaves built the pyramids. So I
got that answer wrong on the test. If I would
have left it blank because we didn't know, I would have.
I would have. I did stuff like that in school too.
I'd write like Jesus because they'd tell us to a
Christian school, Jesus is the answer, so I put Jesus in.
I was a real asshole in school. Jesus is the answer,

(49:02):
seventeen times two hundred and forty five. Jesus who built
the pyramids? Blank? You don't know I got the question
and the answer correct. I was a sarcastic asshole back
then too. I just wasn't refined at the time anyway. Yes,

(49:22):
in the chat, I see someone asked about Troy as well. Yes,
Troy was also a myth until that was found. So anyway,
specifically on the subject of Egypt, I'm going to pause,
remind people what they're listening to, and then we will
go back into the show. We're almost at the halfway point.
This is the Secret Teachings. For those of you listening

(49:43):
on a YouTube, Facebook, and x this is a live
video show on Fridays, almost always at the same time.
I think it's time zones have got me all mixed up,
but I believe it's five pm Mountain Standard time, and
this show is only video on Fridays for you because

(50:06):
you support us by buying books on the website tstradio
dot info, subscribing to the show, and then also just
listening to the free show archive with all those annoying ads.
I know they're so annoying, but they keep the show up.
They keep us running independently. And for those of you
who are listening audio only, that's the mass majority of

(50:29):
the audience. Then you are listening to the main show.
You can't see anything, obviously, but you can go watch
the video when you get a moment to do so.
It's free if you're in the free video stream and

(50:51):
chant tonight. Please go download the show after the fact.
Please go download the show after the fact. It really
helps us out. I know most of you do. I'm
just reminding you and thanking you for doing that. Thank you,
thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you. And lastly,
buy me a coffee. Cash app and PayPal are options.
I really don't like PayPal, but cash app and buy

(51:13):
me a coffee are great ways to support the show.
And if you want to do that, you can click
the links below in the video. It's below on YouTube.
If it's the audio show you're listening to, it's below
under the show description on whatever platform you are listening to. Also,
Chris in the chat says, I tried to confirm this.

(51:38):
I don't. I mean, I'm not they sent Chris, you
sent this to me on Facebook right that we are
top ten in history podcasts on Spreaker. I did not
know that. That's really cool. Top ten in history, which
is weird. I see those lists come out all the time,
Top fifty paranormal conspiracy shows. I never make that list

(52:01):
because they don't know what my show is. Because I
got removed from talkstream Live, so I don't rank there
anymore or at all. And there's like weird, horrible conspiracy shows.
You know, people like is the mic on? Okay, so
tonight we're going to talk about the Ananaki and like
so there's like Aliens and it shoots the top because

(52:23):
there's just so little there's so little quality that if
anybody has a working microphone, it shoots the top one
hundred on those platforms, you know, outside the top like
maybe fifty, which are good shows. I never get ranked
on there. I'm like, why, I feel like my shows,
like the Ultimate Conspiracy Show, Why is my show not

(52:43):
ranked there? And then I learned because we got removed
from the ranking system, and that has to do with
another radio host too named Jimmy Church. I think he
contributed to that. But yes, we're on Spreaker independently top
ten for history podcast, which is amazing. I guess that's

(53:04):
because I learned the reason for this is because the
show is set to history on Spreaker and there's not
a conspiracy option, so I guess it throws us to
the history section. Tim Curley said, Christina Gomez number one
podcast of all time. YEP, if you're thinking about committing suicide,

(53:26):
that would be the one to listen. To, Well, that's
pretty harsh. Heather Wade would be the one to listen
to if you're thinking about committing suicide. Don't really convince
you to leap to jump Christina Gomez? Will you? Definitely
you need to buy plaster if you listen to that
show plaster? Why would you buy plaster? Because you're gonna

(53:48):
punch a hole for the wall. If you listen to
Christina Gomez, you're like, this girl banged Jimmy Church and
now she's an expert on UFOs. That's how it works.
I just have sex with Jimmy Church and then I
get a show. It's crazy how the system works. Anyway, Oops,

(54:13):
did I say the behind the scenes thing? Oops? See,
that's why people don't want to associate with me. Ryan
can't keep a secret. Well, it's not a secret. It's
actually pretty well known. It's just like he's a scumbag.
And if you bang people in the industry, Like if
you're Richard Dolan's wife, you have sex with Richard Dolan
and then you get a speaking engagement on remote viewing,

(54:34):
it's great. See, that's why you don't get people on
your show. Ryan, you talked about Richard Dolan. Well, I
don't dislike Richard Dolan. I think Richard Dolan's actually a
really nice guy's a cool guy, smart guy. He's also
blown me off like half a dozen times. But that
is what happens. You know, you have sex with David Wilcock,
as Elizabeth did, and then she gets a speaking engagement,

(54:54):
and then you have sex with Richard Dolan and you
get a speaking engagement on something that you know nothing about.
And then and if you do that with you mean church,
you get a top five podcast. It's just like so
it's just as bad as Hollywood. Then it's basically what
you're saying. Okay, anyway, let's transition to the Egyptian mysteries,

(55:15):
or transition back to the Egyptian mystery. So, as I said,
I went to this museum and I want to show you.
This is video. And for those of you and audio,
remember you you can watch the video for free. But
even if you're not listening on YouTube right now, you're

(55:36):
on the audio version. Listen, Please listen to the full
audio show and then check out the video a little
bit later, because if you just cut and run now,
we lose the ad revenue. This image here, it's in
Japanese most of it here see it's obviously hard to see,
but there's also some English at the bottom that gives

(55:57):
you an idea of what it is. This item here
number nine in the museum, and these are I was
allowed to take these pictures for the record. They let
you take pictures of these things. The scribes, palette and
read pins. I had never seen those before, but these
are what a scribe would use to write. And the
reason I'm showing you this picture and I'm going to

(56:19):
show you some other pictures is because I've never seen
this stuff before, and seeing it up close made me
reappreciate Egypt because when you see this stuff up close,
and maybe maybe the picture some of the pictures might
do it justice, see it up close and you think,

(56:43):
like I did, maybe you think this is what I thought.
These people really were very sophisticated, very advanced, and not
only very sophisticated and very advanced, like really really really
sophisticated and really advanced. It took what had become for
me a stale topic because I just talked about it

(57:04):
endlessly over the years, to like a renewed interest. And
as I'm looking at this stuff, I'm thinking if I
went back to the first time I learned about Egypt
or is fascinated by some of this stuff. Seeing this
in person in comparison to when I first heard about
this stuff, it's like a ten full increase in interest

(57:28):
because when you look at it in person, you're thinking,
these people were more advanced intellectually than we are today,
like by leaps and bounds. They were very, very sophisticated.
And remember we're talking about thousands and thousands and thousands

(57:52):
and thousands of years ago. We're talking about a time
period where people were supposed to just be dumb, and
they were supposed to be, you know, very primitive. But
obviously they weren't. Going back three thousand, oh, it would
about five thousand years three thousand BC, and then you

(58:15):
go back to some Aaria, it's what four thousand. But
if you go back before that, you have the same
fingerprints of civilization all over the world. You know, like
some of the oldest pottery in the world is Joman pottery.
It's also some of the more I don't think it's
Joe Mama. I think the oldest pottery is before that
era the oldest, but Joe Man is part of its

(58:36):
one of some of the most fisticated pottery in the
world too, and fingerprints of civilization are all over the world.
But anyway, I went to this museum, I looked at
this stuff in person, and it's way, way, way, way
more cool. There's way more advanced than I think I
could have gotten, or I think that any of you
would get if you just watched it on TV, which

(58:57):
is what most it was. What but where most of
us get our information on stuff like this right, which
takes me back to my arguments about digital devices and
music and games and books and things like that where
you really can't own it. When you hold a book
in your hand, you process the information differently. When you

(59:18):
own something and physically deal with the media, you have
a different reaction to it. It's like DVDs. You don't
just scroll through Netflix endlessly and then you're done with
your meal. Before you even pick a show. You have
to go through this DVD folder right, open it up,
go turn the page, turn the page, turn the page,

(59:40):
and then you find a DVD put it in and
there's no like, hey, let's stop this if we don't
like it and find another DVD. It's like you pick
a DVD you watch the movie and that's what you get,
or a VHS tape, that's what you get, and when
you're done, you got to rewind it. You're much more involved.
It's not so mindless. And so seeing all this off
on TV when I was a kid, and seeing all

(01:00:02):
this even tho as an adult, you still seepy gypty gypty,
Egyptian every stuff everywhere. I'm telling you in person seeing it,
it's a completely different experience, which is what we get
with books and movies and stuff like that. Music seeing
it's almost like when I when I first when I

(01:00:29):
first listened to Joe Rogan, I never listened to Joe Rogan,
but I listened to Joe Rogan's stand up one time,
like a year ago, and he said, you know before
it's a funny joke, he said, before the pandemic, he said,
I would you know, I would think, you know, pharmaceutical
products are the best thing in the world. Injections were
the best thing in the world. He's like, after the pandemic,

(01:00:51):
I don't think we went to the moon. And that's
kind of the feeling that I get with a lot
of things nowadays. I get that feeling of, you know,
before I went and actually saw the these artifacts, I
would think Egypt was really advanced, And then when I
actually saw them, now I'm thinking, I don't know if
they built the pyramids, but it definitely wasn't aliens. It

(01:01:12):
was humans that were more advanced and more evolved in
more ways than one than we are today. And we've
devolved from that state of high civilization, which is exactly
what happened in Egypt. They began at an advanced stage
and then declined. That's still something that nobody has explained.

(01:01:35):
How do you begin at the technological apex and then decline?
At least that's how the story is told. I suppose
if we lost all the records prior to twenty twenty five,
you'd say that our contemporary civilization began with Ai and

(01:01:57):
then devolved from that if you don't have any records.
But then there's also like there also are records, they
just ignore them, like the King's List. Well, that can't
the King's List can't be true. You know what the
King's List is, right, that's where they push the dates
back thirty thousand BC or something like that, and forty

(01:02:17):
thousand BC. That's just a metaphor. It's like, well, that's
funny you say metaphor, because most of the Egyptian belief
system is based on metaphors and symbols. But this is
an actual list of people that supposedly existed, and it's
like a record that you have, and you're denying it
because it doesn't fit into the physical archaeological model, which

(01:02:38):
is really really, really sleazy and cheap, and it's also
basically a lie. It's a lie. It's disgusting how all
of this works, you know, And a lot of these
archaeologists too. There's some great archaeologists, and there's people like
that Dibbil guys, it's his name, Dibbel. He debated Graham

(01:03:00):
Hancock on Joe Rogan. That's actually the first Joe Rogan
episode I ever listened to. It was recent, and I
watched that. I wanted to watch it, and I just listened,
but I listened, and I went back and watched some
of the clips of it. That guy is so arrogant
and so patronizing, and so he what was his argument?
My father was an archaeologist. It's like, hey, that's not

(01:03:23):
a that's not an argument. I wish Graham would have
grilled him on that, like, that's not an argument. Your
emotional appeal to your father is not an argument, okay
about anything. It's a fallacy, it's a diversion, it's misdirection.
It's disgusting. Well my father came up with this. I

(01:03:45):
don't fuck your father. I don't who, I don't. I
don't care. That's that's not the point. I don't care
about you. I don't care about me. I don't care
about anything. I want the truth. I want one to
what is more accurate, what is more true? I don't
care about what your father did. I never understood that.
You know, Like, if my son grows up and we
find out that there really were no conspiracies. It was

(01:04:08):
all fake, it's all made up. The conspiracy was to
create fake conspiracies and it was all quote provable, I
would hope my son says, yeah, my dad was cool,
but he also believed a lot of stuff that wasn't
true and disseminated on the Internet and on trustal radio.
If I'm still alive, I'd be like, Okay, it's true.

(01:04:30):
I don't why we're so emotional about things like my
dad did this? Who fuck your dad? Who cares? What's
the truth. I want the truth. I don't care what
your great great grandfather did. Maybe they were important, maybe
they contributed. They probably did. His dad probably contributed greatly
to archaeology. But that's not an argument for evidence, right,

(01:04:55):
that's not an argument for evidence. Tim Curley says you
you should listen to the Douglas Murray Dave Smith debate. Yeah,
that is the that's the second. Was it the second,
Joe Rogan? I think that the Graham Hancock one was older,
So I think it's that this is the second one
I listened to. Was the Douglas Murray Dave Smith debates.
That was wild stuff. You've never been there? What an

(01:05:17):
what a condescending a hole? Anyway, Yeah, Eric Schrock, you've
never been there, hasn't he? Then that guy also use
that argument himself, like about places he's never been and
said that arguments like that. Oh, I saw a clip
of him saying, arguments like that are just really really,

(01:05:37):
you know, intellectually inferior. And then he uses the same argument.
It's so silly. I don't even know why we just
wait around for people to confirm, you know, certain stuff.
When you look at this stuff from this is from
the Egyptian Museum. So you've got a couple of things
happening here. You either have people that look at this

(01:05:58):
and say, well, well, yeah, we know that skilled workers
built the pyramids now, but we really needed a fifteen
years of confirmation and and whatnot to confirm it. It's like,
I get that, that's okay, great, you need confirmation, but
you didn't have confort clearly because you're now admitting that
skilled workers built them. You never had confirmation of the

(01:06:20):
slave theory. So maybe you should have doubled check that
before you sold that to the people, and before you
pumped that into the minds of kids who wrote that
on tests and if they didn't know what they flunked
and that could have destroyed people's lives. It's pretty serious.
We needed the evidence. Well, then you shouldn't have published

(01:06:42):
fake information about slaves then, because slaves didn't build the
Pyramids of Giza. They may have built other pyramids, but
they didn't build the Pyramids of Giza. So on one side,
you have those people like the kind of the I
don't know, I don't want to say orthodox, but you
have the orthodox type archaeologists and others, and they say,

(01:07:05):
we needed the evidence of the sialed workers. Again, why
didn't you need the evidence of the slaves? And then
you get the other side, and this is my favorite side,
I'll admit it. My favorite side is why would you
show these pictures on your show? Ryan? Clearly this stuff
was made. It's fake. Okay, maybe it is fake, maybe

(01:07:28):
some of it is fake. Usually that's the weird thing
you see these conspiracies nowadays, where people will say, you
know that dinosaur bones are fake, They're not real, they're made,
man makes them. It's like, yeah, I went to a
museum in Boise, Idaho that had a t Rex display

(01:07:51):
and it said on the display, as part of the exhibit,
this is most of these are not real bones. Some
of them are, most of them are not. So like,
if it was a conspiracy to make you think it
was all real bones, why would they also tell you
most of this is not real bones? Are you illiterate?
Did you just skip over the little plaque that said, hey,
half of this is fake? So why would they tell

(01:08:12):
you that if there's some grand conspiracy. This is the
thing that doesn't make any sense to me. Usually, if
you go to I love museums, I go to museums
and I see things like this is a replica. Okay,
it's a replica. Like I went to the Dolli Museum.
Some stuff was real, a lot of it was a replica,
which to me is kind of stupid to go see replica,

(01:08:33):
but I went to it. Don't like Dolly personally, don't
really think it's definitely talent, but I think it's a
weird kind of talent. And I don't. I'm not really
intrigued by it, so I don't really care. But I
went to it and most of it was a real replica,
and I'm like, I could just see this on the internet.
I don't need to come spend That was an expensive

(01:08:53):
museum too, because all the hippie yuppy liberal types like
to go it's a Dolly museum. I have to go
see the Dolly museum. And then you go and it's
like thirty five dollars to see replicas. I don't. I
don't want to see replicas. I want to see the
real thing, you know. But they don't. You know, they're
very little in there. They don't really show you the
real thing. But why would they tell you it's fake

(01:09:14):
if there's a conspiracy to convince you that it's real.
You just did read the fine print. I have no doubt,
no doubt some things are replicas. I'm pretty sure that
in this museum there were a few things that were replicas,
but most of it was not a replica. That's the
other side of this coin. It's all fake. What's that

(01:09:36):
stupid AI video that's going around the internet. Did you
know that the Pyramids of Giza were actually built in
like nineteen eighty seven with modern construction equipment. Really, they
were built in nineteen eighty seven. I think that was
one of the years. It might have been earlier, I
don't know, but it was definitely when cranes were around,
which is also kind of weird because that conspiracy of

(01:10:00):
like the whole plateau of Giza was only built recently,
like like a few years before I was born. Is
also based on like the mainline archaeology narrative, the archaeological
narrative that they had to have used like cranes or
modern technology to do it, So there's like a blending

(01:10:20):
together of mainline orthodoxy. So like they used a levy
pull pull system, like a like an archaic crane, and
like the conspiracy world where nothing's real. Like they've gone
so far off the edge, they've come back around to
the side. Like when you go so far the right,
you end up on the left. So far to the

(01:10:41):
left end up on the right. That's what these two
sides have done. They've gone so far in their respective
cults that they've come back around. They've met each other
in the middle. Of course. The other question is if
it was built in nineteen eighty seven, is one of
them that I saw recently. I'm pretty shure were that

(01:11:01):
in nineteen eighty seven? Just just thought, I'm pretty sure that,
and I have to I should double check this to
make sure I get the date right. Yeah, Sony released
the first camcorder in nineteen eighty three, so we're talking

(01:11:22):
several years before the Pyramids were built, they tell us.
And yet the video of it looks like film, so
I guess maybe people were still using film. But see,
here's the other thing when you have this is I
should play the video, but I don't. I don't really
want to play that garbage on my show. I went

(01:11:43):
to film school and I shot in film. And if
you've got film that's old, and maybe it's not the
best shape and there's like artifacts on it. Yeah, you're
you're gonna get that kind of classical you know film.
Look as the slides are going, you kind of get
like holes that open up or close and like smudges

(01:12:06):
here and things like that. Stuff like that you normally
don't get like a consistent Well. In other words, what
they did was they made up a fake video using
AI and then they put a filter on, like a
film filter. That's what it is. It's garbage, just like
Ashton Forbes and his fake videos of the Malaysian Airline

(01:12:27):
flight fake fake fake fake fake. By the way, we
have a he's got a beef with us too. By
the way, he wanted the spark notes on our three
hour Malaysian Airline flight show and I said, there are
no spark notes, it's a presentation. And he said, well

(01:12:48):
with about the video, it's fake, you're a fraud. Well,
prove to me that it's real. Proved to me that
it's fake. Well, you sold very expensive free energy devices,
so I'm pretty the videos fake, Very sure it's fake.
We also saw these videos too with Egypt. Remember the
story that came out earlier this year about what was

(01:13:12):
discovered in Egypt under the pyramids. In March of this year,
beneath the Kaffre Pyramid, one of the three main pyramids,
there was a discovery of these giant things, right, these
giant I guess you could say. People said they were springs,
people said that they were tunnels. People said a lot

(01:13:36):
of stupid stuff. And maybe I should show you a
picture of that. Yeah. This here's an artist rendering of
what it looks like. I'll bring this up on the
screen for you. This is one of the artists renderings
of what was under the Great Pyramid complex. This is

(01:13:57):
Kawfry and one of the other pyramids, and it's it.
I don't know, I don't know what it looks like. Actually,
it looks like maybe some kind of like pipes or something, coils,
something like that. I don't know. That's under the pyramid.
And remember when this happened, Remember people were saying, that's

(01:14:21):
where the reptilian grays are. Really, that's that's jumping to conclusions.
Don't you think that's where the reptilian grays are? What
does that even mean? They live in they live in coils.
It's so stupid. And then you got people saying it's
not real. Well, how do you know it's not real? Whatever,
I don't know what it is. But how do you
know it's not real because they didn't have, you know,
direct authorization from the Egyptian government to do the scans.

(01:14:43):
It's like, I think they did it by satellite, so
they didn't have to get direct permission to do it.
So it's not real because they didn't have permission to
do it. Like, none of the arguments for any of
this stuff means any makes any sense at all. And
I'm pretty sure that they claimed that they found or

(01:15:06):
some people believe that they had found what was it,
like the Hall of Records or something like that, which
how many times has that been quote unquote discovered. Let
me see if I can pull up the article about
this Egyptian discovery March Pyramids. So here's here's some archaeological websites.

(01:15:32):
A vast underground city. It's not really an underground city,
as you can see by the artists rendering. They'll show
you the artist rendering in the same articles that they
call they call it a giant city. It's not a
giant city. It's pipes or coils or something like that,
a vasts. I don't think it's really a city. I mean,
I guess maybe they're using a different definition of city.

(01:15:55):
They used synthetic aperture radar technology. And I believe the
I'm looking at the article right now here. I could
pull this now. I don't. It's not waste time pulling
this up. But I believe they also said that they
found here's a three D model. That's what you're looking

(01:16:16):
at now. And oh, this is another great one. Here's
the three D model. It looks like something from tomb Raider.
You play tumb Raider, you play tum Rader in like
the PlayStation one. That's what it looks like. Okay, there's
their model. And I believe they also said I'm pulling

(01:16:38):
this up right now. I mean, I'm not for the record,
I'm not disputing what they found is probably something there.
What I'm disputing is every argument that describes what it
is without actually knowing what it is. And then I

(01:16:58):
think the most busy thing that disproves that this is
anything substantial, at least to me, is the argument that
they found the halls of a mente, which is, you know,
like a hall of records. It includes the hall of records.
And I thought, well, that's really interesting because the thing is,

(01:17:19):
you can't find the Hall of Records or you can't
find a Mente because it's not a physical place. And
I think I did three different shows where I was
a guest and I explained this, and I said, they
claim they found the Halls of Amente. You can't find

(01:17:41):
the halls of a Mene. They're not a physical place.
It is a mythological land that might be tied to
near death experiences, that might be connected to underground chambers,
but it's not the actual land of Amente. But they
say that they found it. But the Hall of Amente

(01:18:04):
is the underworld, it's the hidden land, it's the spirit
world where we don't really know what goes on, so
you can't find it. And in fact, the Egyptian records
of what we can read, what we can, what we
can we can scroll through, there's no mention of it
being like an underground chamber beneath the pyramids. It just

(01:18:27):
it doesn't make any sense. So that was that was
the clue that I got that these people, these scientists,
might not they might be technically skilled, but they definitely
don't know the mythology of Egypt because it was never
described as a physical place that you can go in
this world. There's a connection perhaps to a to a
cave or to a temple, and you go into the

(01:18:50):
you know, the physical access point. But it's not a
physical place. It's a it's a spiritual place. It's a
soul or a spirit realm, all right. That I think,
to me disproves that that they found anything there. But

(01:19:12):
you know that's just me, And then I'm covering it up,
probably because you know, I don't want you to know
about the reptilian bases. Look at those reptilian bases there, folks.
We had listeners in the chat before the show, the
pre show, we got some inside information. Dinosaurs built the pyramids,
and then according to my insider, aliens built the dinosaurs.

(01:19:39):
So wrap your head around that one. Aliens built dinosaurs
and dinosaurs built the pyramids. It's like a fred flintstone
thing in the quarry. You know. He throws a couple
of capstones on some pyramids, slides down off the back
of the of the dinosaur, the big long neck, and
then hops into his car powered by his feet, and

(01:20:00):
goes and gets the giant racker ribs. That's what it is.
It makes makes a lot of sense, doesn't it. Actually, maybe, hey,
dinosaurs building the pyramids makes more sense than it was
built with log rollers and some rope. Sure, that makes
makes a lot of sense. I can imagine dinosaurs moving

(01:20:23):
blocks into space. I can't imagine people using ropes to
move blocks that are the size of I mean, you
see some of those blocks. They are massive, But that
ain't nothing compared to what the Chinese were trying to do.
You'd look at I did the show earlier this week
or last week, it was last week, look at this
stuff that Chinese did. Oh my god, how did they

(01:20:44):
end their smaller people? How did they move those blocks?
This isn't some of this stuff that Stella in the
one quarry. It's not a MOI had. It's like the
size of a small mountain, and they cut it and
prepared to move it. Reportedly, there's another one. I think
it's in Montana or Wyoming. I think it's Wyoming. There's

(01:21:07):
also that wall up there that just conveniently gets left
out of you know, American history, Just a giant megalithic
wall somewhere up in the Montana Dakota's areas. Who cares though? Right?
All right, let's go back to the museum. So I
was in this museum and I'm looking at these artifacts,
and I actually thought that this was This was a

(01:21:30):
brilliant observation by my wife. She just said, hey, that
kind of looks like, you know, Buddha, and not the
statue itself, but it kind of looks like the head
of Buddha. And I thought, you're right, it does. I
actually didn't even think of that. She's right, it did
look like Buddha. And if you I'll zoom in here

(01:21:53):
so you can see this better, because I was standing
here for like five minutes looking at this particular statue.
It's a statue of Nikara and his family. And I'm
looking at this and I'm looking at the sun on
the right or well it's your left, but his right.
And you'll notice the hand gesture that this kid is

(01:22:17):
doing well, they say kid. But he's also as tall
as his see, a little bit taller than his dad,
a little bit less, almost the size of his dad.
I mean, maybe he's like a teenager if his dad
stood up. I don't know. I don't know what age.
But the point is I was looking at this and
I'm thinking, okay, so the Egyptians used to depict children
in this way, you know, innocence. Maybe archaeologists say sucking

(01:22:42):
the finger. That's why they used to do this. And
I thought, really, is that really the best description of
what that hand gesture means. You gotta do better than
that for me. So I'm sitting there trying to figure
out the statue. I think, this looks really familiar. What's
the name of that god? And then I realized, oh,

(01:23:04):
that's that's a very very famous god, Hypocrates. And for
those of you who don't know Hypocrates, I will show
Hippocrates to you. Apocrates does the same hand gesture. Now,
the reason that this was interesting me in the museum,
I'm sitting there looking at this, I'm thinking, Okay, the

(01:23:25):
plaque says that this is a hand gesture that has
something to do with innocence in childhood, which in a
sense it does, but that's not really the point. The
point is Hypocrates is doing this not because he's an
innocent child, but because of what Hypocrates represents. Hrpocrates is

(01:23:49):
a god of silence. I have this in my book
called Arcana. By the way, if you've not read it yet,
you can get a copy of it at TST radio
dot info and there's links below in the show description
to the website that is. Hyppocrates is the Greek name
the Greek god of silence, who is equated to the

(01:24:12):
Egyptian Horus. Oftentimes, Herpocrates is depicted with the symbols of
the alpha and the omega behind the lips, behind the
finger which is placed in front of the lips to
imply silence and secrets are the mysteries, the mysteries from

(01:24:36):
the voice, the word vibration, the mysteries from the sexual
copulation of the connection between the mouth and the tongue,
the vaginal and the phallic organs. Every act of speaking

(01:24:56):
is a sexual act. Is also wisdom the mysteries SSH.
Don't reveal the mysteries, the mysteries of life, the mysteries
of nature. This is also misinterpreted in Masonry to mean
that if you don't be quiet, will kill you, which
some societies do do that. I think the Masons have

(01:25:20):
been misrepresented because the SH could mean a lot of things.
That could mean one, we don't know the secrets either.
It could also mean don't tell the secrets SH. We
don't have to get into an entire presentation on matt
But the point is I saw this at the museum
and I thought, that's the same thing. Even the headdress

(01:25:45):
is a common headdress. Of the headdress is the same
as well, and there's no note of that in the museum.
There's no note of like the hand gesture of Hippocrates.
And I thought, okay, So they now admitted at the
introduction to the museum, slaves did not build the beer mids.

(01:26:05):
We'll give it to them fifteen years later. And which
is funny, like a eighteen year old, nineteen year old
kid me said that before museums said that not because
I was smart, but because I just read other archaeologists
found and then was told that's not true until fifteen

(01:26:26):
years later and apparently it is true. So then there's
no notice. The only thing is on this little plaque here.
It just talks about you could translate this if you want.
It talks about the silence, because this is in Japanese,
talk about that the silence in regard to children, like
children are quiet, maybe they're to be respectful, or children

(01:26:50):
are sucking on their finger. I mean, that's the weird thing.
The plaque actually says. I can read some of this,
but it would be easier to just translate it because
I'll be stumbling stumbling through the translation. But if I
translate this and read it to you, this is really
important because this is all the museum says of the statue.

(01:27:11):
It says, in the center stands Nikara, the scribe supervisor,
flanked by his wife Nika Neb Nika Neb and their
son Ankh Mara. Nikar's legs are long, making him appear
much taller than the two men beside him, which is
a bad translation because one is his wife his son

(01:27:32):
on the left, which would be from your vantage point.
So the one I have highlighted here, the silence finger
holds his fingers to his mouth, emphasizing his youth. The
sculptor likely intentionally made the heads of the three men,
or the two men and the wife of different heights
and made them all the same height. That's the translation

(01:27:53):
through the photograph. I think when I translated it there
it said a slightly different translation. It's basically the same thing,
but it did say that the symbol of the finger
to the mouth represents childhood, at least that's what archaeologists believe.
But how can you be an archaeologist. Seriously, how can
you be an archaeoloists, a professional archaeologist and not catch

(01:28:16):
the similarity between Hypocrates and this guy's son as they
tell us it's the sun, Like, maybe I'm blind, but
what you see on your screen right now that is
the same as this. It's the same. So what let
me guess one is suggesting childhood, the other is part

(01:28:41):
of the secret teachings of Egypt? How do you miss that?
And I actually think it's missed. I think most time
it's missed. I don't think these archaeologists, most of them
probably would reject the work of a Joseph Campbell. But
how can the archaeologists. Maybe they've already admitted too much
for the time. They've already admitted slaves didn't build the pyramids,

(01:29:03):
and I'm the next part of the exhibit in and
they just can't come to grips with the fact that
this hand gesture is part of the mysteries of Egypt. Again,
I'm not disputing that it could mean childhood, but what
I'm disputing is that it is unrelated to this. Because
everybody in Egypt is connected to a god, a goddess,

(01:29:25):
Every symbol is connected to a more a higher or
a lower, more sophisticated, complex concept. They didn't just carve
stuff to carve stuff. And so back to what my
wife had noticed, she said, the headdress. There, you see
the headdress. It kind of looks like Buddha. And she

(01:29:47):
just said it in passing, it kind of looks like Buddha.
While I was looking at this hand gesture, and I thought,
I said, I said, you're right, it does look like
the Buddha headdress. And indeed it does very similar, is
it not that's the same headdress. Now, mind you, this

(01:30:11):
is like the first statue in the museum. So I'm
already I'm like a minute in and I'm already finding this,
and my wife actually found this one. I'm thinking, now,
hold on a second. This is Harpocrates and the Buddha headdress.
I had never I had never noticed that before. So
I give her credit for noticing that. And I'm looking

(01:30:33):
at that and I'm thinking, that is the same thing.
There's no note of that, there's no note of that.
It's just like, this is some guy and his kids,
and he's a scribe and this is his wife, and
that's it. So no note about the Hypocrates or the
Buddhist or the Buddha symbol. No note about that, the

(01:30:55):
significance of what that would mean. It's just it's just
so weird that you can these people are you know,
these museums, like how much millions and millions of dollars
are invested in stuff like this and the archaeological you know, narratives,
and you don't have to be an archaeologist to just

(01:31:19):
look at the similarities. The it's identical. Look at the
similarities between these two things. It's same thing, same thing,
same thing. As I'm saying that. If you're listening audio,
we're talking about the finger and the headdress. Now for

(01:31:42):
the record, Buddha and I don't know if I'm pronouncing
the sanskript correctly. The USh nisha or the in more
of an English translation. The USh nisha is one of
the thirty two marks of Buddha, appearing as a protuberance
or dome like bump on the top of the Buddha

(01:32:04):
statues kind of looks like for those of you who
can't see it, it looks kind of beaded, like a
bunch of beads or something, and it's it's really weird
when if you look up the Ushnisha. It's usually described
as like a distinct headdress. The thing is, it's not

(01:32:27):
that distinct because there's several statues of the Egyptians wearing
the same thing, and the Buddha didn't come from Egypt,
So what is that supposed to mean? And the thing is,
I don't know, but clearly there's a connection between these things.

(01:32:49):
Clearly there's a connection between this and this. What is it?
I can't say for sure. It's not really the point
of the show for me to say, but that's that's fascinating.

(01:33:10):
This is the the Ushni Shah of the Buddha. And
you can say, well, that's just an Egyptian headress, just
an Egyptian crown. Yeah, but it's identical minus the flaming torch,
which is consciousness spirit. It's identical. And considering the significance
of the sh and the context of the ssh there's

(01:33:35):
more than one meaning here. And you know, I understand
some museums so they can't they can't show like every detail,
but you would think that that's an important feature. I
think it's an important feature. All right, Moving on to
the next one. Just some other interesting statues and things

(01:33:58):
I took pictures of and why I have two pictures
of that, pictures of that. This is something that I had.
What if I can can I rotate this? Yeah, I've
heard about this, I've just never seen one before. This
is the I believe they ever heard as like a
funerary game board. I'd never seen one of these before,

(01:34:21):
but I've heard, I've seen pictures. I've just never seen
one in person. I've never seen any of these artifacts
in person. But here's a game board. And okay, this
is a really important statue. In fact, I'm going to
pull from the very end of this presentation this image

(01:34:42):
here because there's a similarity. What if I can can
I copy that and paste that new? So I have
to kind of do this. Okay, hold on one second.
I'm gonna pull this image up so you can see
it next to this other image. It's going to take
a minute. Well, maybe I can just do this if
I can just take a screenshot of this, delete this one,

(01:35:05):
and then add it back in. Yeah, it's a little
bit easier. We'll add it back in here. Okay, so
this is oops, I added it. Oh my goodness, I
added it too far, too far away from the other image.
I apologize one moment again. Let me find the image. Okay,

(01:35:28):
here it is, we'll put that in there. Okay. You
notice in this particular statue that the individual is flanked
on both sides by what appeared to be crocodiles. Right,
you'll see the same thing in this picture crocodiles. Same

(01:35:51):
thing now on their head. I took a picture up close. Here.
I took another picture up top, so you can kind
of see there's a scarab on the head. Now, this
is something I want to show you because I think
there's another There's a guy that does a He wrote
a book too, and he does like short esoteric videos,

(01:36:15):
really good stuff. This guy's brilliant and he has made
a lot of videos talking about the significance of Egyptian
gods and symbols and how they relate to the human body.
So let's look at the human skull. We're going to
go through this image and then go through There's a

(01:36:37):
bunch of images, but there's only a few that I
really want to focus on. If you look at the
human skull and you compare it to a scarerib, which
is what's on top of this statue's head, there is
a similarity and I'm trying to find an example here. Yes,

(01:37:01):
here it is so human skull and a scarab very similar,
is it not, In the same way that you've probably
seen the eye of Horace and the human brain. There
is a similarity between the eye of Horace and the

(01:37:23):
human brain, and I will show that to you as well.
And this goes on and on for God's goddesses and
symbols of the Egyptian civilization. So these things are connected.

(01:37:47):
There's a whole bunch of them. But these are just
two examples here. Now I want to show you something else. This.
There's different names for this. I'm going to try to
find a few different examples here. But let's see. I'm
going to pull this up from I believe it's ancient
sumer as well. So maybe let's see how we can

(01:38:12):
do this. Okay, there's one image. I'm doing this all
in real time. Okay, let's see Shinto shrine. You can
type this in with me too. I've been Shinto shrine
guardian dogs and you'll know it automatically when you see it.

(01:38:32):
You've probably seen these on Chinese architecture before, but these
are very popular on Japanese shrines as well. You get
these guardian dogs. When we were in Hiroshima, we went
to Itatskushima Shrine and there's two very large ones outside
the main entrance. Maybe I can find that one. And

(01:38:57):
here are some examples for you to look at. Wilelife
try to find this last image. But here is the
Oh I found it better. It's Kashima Shrine. That's fantastic,
so I don't have to use that alime photo. Okay.
So here is Citadel of Sargon. So you got these

(01:39:18):
guardian half human half animals, and they also have that
kind of beaded headdress as well. And then here is
it's Kashima Shrine Miyajima at the guardian dogs. And here
is an Anari shrine, fox shrine to foxes that are guardians. Okay,

(01:39:42):
so you notice that these are This is a similar thing, right.
This is the Middle East and this is Japan. You
really can't get much further away and more distinct than that.
And here you have the same images, right, Okay, it's
the same thing where we talk about something called the
beast slayer or the lion slayer, which is something you

(01:40:04):
find throughout cultures around the world, and that is what
this image is where you find the depiction of two
crocodiles in Egypt. Now, this last image that you see
on your screen here, this is something that I had,
we had missed in the museum, and I look back
to make sure I didn't miss anything, and I had,
so I went back and looked at it. And I'm

(01:40:24):
glad that I did, because this image is very very similar,
if not identical, to the same image I'm trying to
find it here. It's called the Monster Tamer. This is Iraqi, okay,
And why I hold that up on the screen, I
want you to look on the other side of the
screen where you can see these images, right, these two images.

(01:40:50):
There's with the scab on the head, okay, that's the skull.
And here is the the two crocodiles, just like in
that other statue. Here's the two crocodiles again. And then
on your screen you can see this is the Tamer,

(01:41:11):
the monster Tamer. And there's endless examples of this, but
apparently you can't even pull that up on the on
the internet. So that's the Monster Tamer. And you'll notice
that that's identical in nature to this image from Egypt.
And there's no mention that it's identical. It's the same

(01:41:32):
exact thing, except in this case it's appears to be
some kind of human like bull. There's also one with
lions too, and in the case of Egypt, it's crocodiles.
It's the monsters that are conquered in the in the
in the area that we're talking about that we're dealing with.
It's also it's not just civilization, it's also just you know,

(01:41:55):
the animal self. So this is really important, Okay. A
listener in the chat says, the crocodile is symbolic for
subduing your sexual nature if the second chakra according in
this if the second chakra according to ancient Hindu philosophy.
I don't know that about India. I assume that you're right.
That sounds very specific to just be a guess, but

(01:42:17):
that is what it would represent. That would make sense
because the crocodile, if that's what it represents an Indian philosophy,
would also make a lot of sense. Considering that we've
got a headdress, a Buddha headdress identical to this Egyptian headdress.
I mean, boot is not that old. Buddha is way
more recent. But the idea for where this headdress comes

(01:42:40):
from is we don't know. I mean, Egypt is four
thousand years BC India, and the philosophies there are double
that or maybe triple that before they were even written down.
And yet the imagery and that canography came thousands of years,
five thousand years after four thousand, five hundred years after Egypt.

(01:43:01):
But still the idea is there, and this is a
universal thing. I mean really, at that point doesn't even
matter who really did it first, because we can see
the connections between all of this, and it's the same
thing happening here with these two crocodiles and the guardians,
the guardians, the guardians. Oh here's another image. I know
that I can pull this one up. The Lilith, Queen

(01:43:23):
of Knight. There's the Queen of Knight, Lilith with her
guardian owls. This isn't just like a random statue, right,
It's not a random statue. Something to think about. Last
few things here. I just thought this was interesting here
as an Egyptian scithhe And also I should note that

(01:43:49):
Cyris is the I said. The Greek name. The Egyptian
name is Ashrar or Ashar, not Bashar command or whatever.
Nonsense is but sr and isis as we say in English,
is really asset asset in Egyptian. Here are some other images.

(01:44:16):
One thing that was very prevalent was the blue water
lily symbolism, which again is also universal. Talked about this,
before you've got your peyote, you've got your blue water lily,
and your poppy, and your ergot, and your which is

(01:44:38):
fungus from wheat hallucinogen, how it's prepared. And then you
have your ayahuasca, which is like the big one, and
then you have DMT, which is where I mean, that's
in the Brew. But you have like you know, DMT
that you can get and people smoke it or I
don't know what they do with it, they smoke it.
And someone told me you can actually get blue water lily,

(01:45:00):
and I thought, really, you can get blue water lily.
Of course, the people that, you know, the person that
told me that, the people that were doing that were
people that were you know, they were the hippie yuppie types,
and they were like crushing blue water lily and like
turn it into some kind of paste and then snorting
it or something. And I was like, you probably shouldn't
do that. But it's spiritual. Man. Yeah, I don't think

(01:45:24):
that you should just be playing with it. They had
a special process of preparation for It's like ayahuasca. Probably
shouldn't play with that, but you can get blue water lily.
Apparently it's available, and that is what you see here.
This was very prevalent, and it's weird because the prevalency
of it was just it was everywhere, but there wasn't

(01:45:46):
there was maybe it was any Japanese. Maybe I couldn't
read it, but there was like no mention anywhere of
stuff they did read about. How like every third object
was blue water lily, blue waterly, Like that should have
been a separate exhibit. Why were they so obsessed with
blue water lily. I mean that's where they got all
their ideas from, is the blue water lily. I can

(01:46:07):
tell you that came from the blue water lily. Okay,
here's some This is my wife's favorite part. The cosmetic
cosmetic items of the Egyptians. Here's an Egyptian mirror, which
is also a ritual item. Same thing in Japan, the kagami.

(01:46:29):
And this this is a very famous image. This is
interesting because in Egypt, you know how there's like this
modern argument last twenty five thirty years about stem cells,
and there's companies that will take like the blood and
the umbilical cord and you can save that and then
eventually you'll have you know, if you have an issue

(01:46:49):
with a health problem later in life, they can take
this sample the stem cells and the umbilical cord and
they can use that to heal. It actually helps people. Well,
the Egyptians apparently knew the same thing or something similar
to it. They actually took breast milk. Good on the
archaeologists for admitting this one, acknowledging this one. Rather, they

(01:47:11):
took breast milk, they put it in a vessel a container,
and the foam that formed on top. They would take
that and use it as a medicinal substance that would
help people and help the child. So I mean that
is extremely advanced medicine, extremely advanced science for four thousand BC.

(01:47:36):
Like we just started having that discussion in the nineties.
This is incredibly complex. Here's a better image of it.
And they actually had the original. I guess you'd say
the original. Here's that head dress again, by the way,
they actually had the original. This was I think my
actually here hold on Before I get to that, here's

(01:47:57):
the guardians again, the sphinx guardians, and of course the
crook and flail, the sheep and bull, bull and sheep.
That's what the osiris X means. And what's under the
X is the space that's marked by the X, which
is the soul, which is the gold. That's why X
marks the spot over the heart, which is the seat

(01:48:19):
of the sun. But and there you can see it
a little bit better. And those are cosmological ages. Here's
your flying solar disc the sun that raw, the raw
sunboat moves to the sky, crashes, is recovered. That's your
first UFO story. And here are some other items. There's

(01:48:44):
the falcon that's horace. Here is an osiris with the
onk in the middle of the head, streaming upward, just
like the Buddha I showed you earlier. And here is
this is the famous one. Here is isis suckling Horus.

(01:49:05):
Look at that's the classic isis suckles horse. I was
most excited to see that. You know, that's the one
where people are like the devil put that there because
Jesus came before, and you're like, no, no, no, Jesus
didn't come before. Well the devil put it there. Then, No,

(01:49:27):
it's just a universal symbol. In fact, I just saw
the same image. They still use this image today. I
saw this in Hiroshima, as a matter of fact, at
the Peace Park if I could find that real quick too. Yeah,
at the Peace Park they had this image, not suckling.

(01:49:51):
But here's the woman if you can see that, Okay,
the woman walking on the moon and then she has
the child in her arms. This is like the black Ma.
This is Isis and Horus, this is Mary. It's the same. Well,
that's a modern one. They just copied it. Well, yeah,
but from the modern time to four thousand years ago,
it's the same universal symbol. And Jesus did reportedly go

(01:50:16):
to Egypt. Is that is true? Cheryl says, Yeshua loves Egypt. Yep. Well,
the Jews accused Jesus of coming back with tattoos from
Egypt where he wrote down all the magical formulas. All right,
fast forwarding. The second most fascinating thing to me was

(01:50:37):
to actually see these hieroglyphics up close, and to see
and to be able to I mean, I can read
a few of them. This is a jed pillar, the
spine or the phallus, and it goes along with the aunk,
which is the These are the ovary if you zoom in,
the ovaries are here. This is the womb, and this
is the birth canal, and it also represents the humans,

(01:50:59):
the arm, the legs crucified, and the human head. Otherwise
we just have like a Tao cross, which you've probably
seen that before, Tao cross, the mark of yalve. And
then here's the yed pillar, which would be you know Jedi,
the Jedi. This would also be the spine and so on.

(01:51:22):
Some more hieroglyphics, Horus. Here these symbols are together. That's
male and female man. That's like the yin yang basically
more blue water lily. It's a whole bunch of that,
and some more incredible pictures. There's an Anubis. I don't
think they I think it's just a jackal, but they

(01:51:45):
did have an Anubis statue in there. Another osyrus and
isis and that's just like a model boat. I actually
did forgot, but I remembered when I saw this that
some of the mummy wrappings actually they had hieroglyphics written
all over them. Good handwriting too. Here's an actual like

(01:52:06):
jet artifact, and here's an up cluse of it. This
is ep pep, the one that eats the sun like
that ritual that NASA did two years ago. This is
the you can see here on the plaque peessish nef

(01:52:27):
or peschiaf Kef. I always thought it was pession Kef.
Think it's pessish Kef. This is what they would rip
open the body with to do the ritual of mummification.
But I believe they also cracked the skull with it,
which is interesting because they did the same thing in
the Americas too, to release the soul. Here's some of

(01:52:48):
these coffins, it's pretty cool. And then this particular image.
This is really interesting because this particular image, here's the
symbol for the duot and I had never seen that before.
This is the whole funerary process where they've got the
vessels here and that's where they would put the different

(01:53:12):
organs of the body. And then here's the doot the
five pointed star, and that's their underworld. That's you know,
that's what the that's what these scientists claim they found.
They found the Halls of Mine. They found the other
world with some pipes or something below the Great Pyramid Complex.

(01:53:33):
It's like, Eh, I think it's a story, and I
think it's a symbol, and I think it's a metaphor,
and I think it's complex, and I think that we
I genuinely think, I don't. I don't know if we
have the capacity to understand this. I don't. I don't
think we have the capacity to understand what these people

(01:53:54):
were doing. And it's only thanks to people like a
Joseph Campbell and you know Hancock, Robert bouval a shock,
which you know he's I don't think he's out as
out on the limits some of the other people are.
But there's a lot of people we have to think,
and there's a lot of people that have made it

(01:54:15):
more difficult to figure out what's going on. But we
don't know. We don't have the answers. But what we
do know is that there's a lot of universality in
this and I just showed you the universality with some
of those things just from this museum is a lot
more I guess you could say, real than than not real.

(01:54:35):
And we will conclude the show on this. You definitely
want to go see this if you have not seen it,
it's all over the news today, NBC News, NBC News.
Ancient skull from China may shake up timeline of human evolution.

(01:54:56):
You think researchers, you sophisticated scanning and digital reconstruction techniques
to determine the original shape of the skull, which is
between nine one hundred and forty thousand and one point
one million years old. And remember when that skull was
found the Peking Man. And now that can't be right,

(01:55:22):
that can't be true because Africa, Africa. A new analysis
now indicates that the skull belongs to an early branch
of a sister lineage to our species, in a finding
that may shake up the innocy of how human evolution
unfolded over the past million years or so. This skull
is called a yung Jang two. I lived at forty

(01:55:45):
years old, which is pretty interesting because we were told,
you know, people only lived to like twenty thirty, which
I think that's probably not that accurate because a lot
of people lived a lot longer than that during those
time frames. This is a whole other subject I guess
we could talk about. But the point is, here's a skull,
it's Chinese, and that's I don't really care where it's from.

(01:56:08):
It's like if it's from India, Grave, it's from Africa Grade.
I don't know why people make this an identity, the
Chinese making an identity, the the Africans making identity, the
Indians made Who gives a shit. Just tell me what
the oldest thing is we have and we'll go from there.
And let's not make it orthodox. Let's keep an open
mind because five years ago you'd have said this is crazy,
and now it's mainstream science. Just like slaves built the Pyramids. Actually,

(01:56:33):
fifteen years later, turns out slaves didn't build the pyramids.
It turns out skilled workers built the pyramids. Masons built
the pyramids. People that got paid in oil and spices.
So you might want to you might want to just
stop making things orthodox. It would be one of the
best ways to deal with this. That would be the
best way. Okay, tst Radio dot info, rdigable at yahoo

(01:56:54):
dot com. Thank you so much for joining us in
the chat. You can see it scrolling there on the screen.
We did a pre show tonight and this is our
main show, but you can listen to them both on
our YouTube and that is free. It's only free because
listeners like you buy books like a called Arcana, you
subscribe to the ad free archive, and you support us

(01:57:15):
with things like cash app PayPal, but mostly buy me
a coffee in the subscription service. That's the main ones.
We don't do any kind of money bombs, or we
don't do super sticker chats or whatever they're called. They're
called super chats. We don't do that on YouTube. I
think that helps to not get our account taken down

(01:57:37):
as well on top of everything else. But we don't
do any of that, and so your support and almost
even the honor system in some ways is the way
that we do things here. Thank you so much for
tuning in tonight. Hope you enjoy the show, and I
hope that you will join us next week for another
round of shows. Thank you so much for supporting us

(01:57:57):
in whatever way that you do. Please share the show link.
I see Joe Rup just popped in the chat. Howdy Joe,
you missed the whole show. Go back and rewind it.
I think you'd actually really enjoy this one, at least
the last hour and a half. Definitely write up your alley.
And if I didn't call you out in the chat tonight,

(01:58:18):
it's because I tried to do a presentation and we
did a pre show tonight, so you got to get
here earlier. Hit the reminder button on YouTube to remind
you when the show is on air. For anybody who
is listening audio only, go get that video. If you're
listening video, go get that audio. Stay safe, stay inform,

(01:58:39):
stay healthy. As always, I'll leave the chat going here
for a moment and I will talk to you on
the next broadcast one more time, so you don't forget
Secret teachings Monday through Friday audio audio audio only, and
mostly this is just a free nice thing we do

(01:59:01):
for listeners Friday nights. Otherwise it's audio only. The video
is the free thing. Have a great weekend. I'll talk
to you on the next broadcast.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Cardiac Cowboys

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Mysteries of Egypt (9/26/25)

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Cardiac Cowboys

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Mysteries of Egypt (9/26/25)

Stuff You Should Know