Snake Eyes 910 is the New 911 (9/29/25)

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hello, anybody home today, I want you to open your mind.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
I've almost done on.

Speaker 3 (00:09):
The conclusion that the story is subdamning that the mass
of Apple people can't deal with it. We are in
process of developing a who series of techniques. Two bid
people actually to love their cerviitude.

Speaker 4 (00:23):
We face a hostile ideology, global in scope, atheistic in character,
ruthless in.

Speaker 3 (00:29):
Purpose, and insiduous in method. Or we are opposed around
the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies
primarily on covet means for expanding its sphere of.

Speaker 1 (00:40):
Influence to change the minds and the attitudes and the
beliefs of the people to bring about one world socialist
totalitarian government.

Speaker 3 (00:49):
The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists.

Speaker 1 (00:53):
It is patterned itself after every dictator who has ever
planted the ripping imprint of a boot on the pages
of history. This is the beginning of time.

Speaker 3 (01:00):
If you can get people to consent to the state
of affairs in which they are living, then you have
a much more easily controllable society than you would if
you were relying poorly on clubs and firing squads and
concentration camps, tools that conquest that necessarily come with bats
and extortions and fold there are weapons that re simply

(01:21):
fights prejudices.

Speaker 4 (01:23):
As you connect the dots between different people, organizations.

Speaker 5 (01:27):
Religions, history, suddenly the picture starts to form.

Speaker 1 (01:32):
The Kingdom of God is within men, not one man
nor a group of men.

Speaker 3 (01:35):
Someone born in the United States is not more special
than someone born in Mexico. Someone who is white is
not more special than someone who is black.

Speaker 4 (01:44):
They're just vehicles for the consciousness to experience. They do
not want your children to be educated.

Speaker 1 (01:52):
They do not want you to think too much.

Speaker 4 (01:56):
It was learned that the aliens had men and within
manipulating masters of people through secret societies, witchcraft, magic, the occult,
and religion.

Speaker 1 (02:03):
They're reach into our children in music, television.

Speaker 4 (02:06):
Books, right now, children's sists.

Speaker 1 (02:08):
How can I just still lies?

Speaker 5 (02:10):
Set a stand with an efficiency.

Speaker 4 (02:11):
So if you have the opportunity to stand next to
one of these machines, it feels like an altar to
an alien god. Genetic powers the most awesome forced the
planet's ever seen. But you wielded like a kid that's
found his dad's gun.

Speaker 3 (02:23):
You're on the airport who has an ounce but applying
this there is now in the production of the army.

Speaker 1 (02:27):
Too many others know what's happening out there, and no one,
no government agency has jurisdiction over the truth. Any state,
any entity, any ideology that fails to recognize the worth,
the dignity the rights of man, that state is absolute,
a case to be found under m from mankind in
the Twilight Side.

Speaker 4 (02:46):
About time some of you got acquainted with the real
hard truth. It's the haw that says I will not acquiesce.

Speaker 3 (02:55):
Freedom is the privilege to be right, freedom from the disasters,
and ho the state.

Speaker 4 (03:00):
If you don't connect the dots, just a mass of
what's all this about? You are listening to the Secret
Teachings Radio. I'm your host, Ryan Gable. Tstradio dot info
is our website. If you missed any of our previous episodes,
including Friday's Specialty Show, you can visit the website and

(03:23):
listen to all of the shows for free. You can
also get access by subscribing to the full show archive
with no advertisements. Plus you get access to additional content
on the website. Tstradio dot info. That is where you
support us directly. All the links. It's also where you
can find our social media links to follow us and

(03:47):
see show updates. We don't have a lot of them
because we've been banned from pretty much everything. In fact,
the ones we have up we've been banned from those two,
but we've been allowed back on them. That's all on
the website. It's the easiest place to go to find
everything TST radio. Otherwise, a lot of you find the
show and listen to the show through Spreaker. And I
would like to thank you, and I suppose congratulate you

(04:11):
and myself, I guess I'm not sure how to really
respond to it. But we are ranked in the top
ten on spreaker for history shows, which is also a
little weird because I don't really think that this show
is considered a history show, although it's not weird considering
that's the only option that I thought was relevant to
the show. There is no paranormal option. There is no

(04:34):
conspiracy option. I don't know if i'd put the show
unto a conspiracy option anyway. I don't know what the
word conspiracy means anymore. It's like when you say a word,
any word, over and over and over again, and eventually
it just loses its meaning. It's kind of like that
with conspiracy. It's like that with anti semi too. These

(04:57):
words lose their meaning. They don't really have any value
or strength anymore. It's no meaning behind them. And even
if you know the definition of the actual word, it
doesn't matter because people know the the word in a
different context. Conspiracies used to be something that I was

(05:17):
really fascinated with, and conspiracies to me were the moon landing,
the Kennedy assassination. Those are classic conspiracies. If you write
a book on conspiracies, that's front page, back page stuff like,
that's the back of the book. That's the front of
the book. There's a collage with a lunar module and

(05:38):
the Zupruder film and Bigfoot. I mean, that's what I
used to think of when I thought of conspiracies. Now
I don't know what the word means. Everything is a conspiracy.
Same thing with syop. Everything's a syop too. Everything's a
false flag conspiracy, syops and false flags. Now are you like,

(06:01):
I'll use a cooking analogy. They're kind of used like
truffle oil. Some people don't like truffle oil. But if
you use truffle oil on a dish, even if it
tastes the same as every other dish with truffle oil,
it's almost like a drug. You can't stop eating it.
It's really good. And that's basically what conspiracies and sobs

(06:25):
and false flags are. It's kind of like adding truffle
oil to a dish. I've always said that truffle oil
is kind of like cheating at cooking. I used to
go to this Ethiopian restaurant, fantastic restaurant. Guy was from Ethiopia.
He brought Ethiopian cooking to Rochester, New York. I used
to go there. That was the one really good thing
about living in Rochester. They had this amazing I guess

(06:48):
it was technically a guy shopped at the store I
worked at too, so it was technically I guess organic
produce on top of that. But it was a really
good restaurant. Although he put truffle oil in everything, and
I always used to think this guy's cheating. This food
would be so good, and it is still good, but
he puts trouble in everything, And that's just kind of
how I see alternative news nowadays. Conspiracies, syops and false

(07:13):
flags they sprinkle a little bit of it into every story.
Nothing happens naturally, which that itself, if you've noticed it,
should be a suspicious thing. I've noticed it. It's very
suspicious that nothing happens naturally. And what I mean by

(07:35):
that is not to imply that everything's controlled. What I
mean by that is to state very objectively and very
firmly that most things are not controlled. Some things are,
but most things just happen. And when those things happen

(08:00):
called coincidences. When we find weird patterns or maybe symbols
or something that seems out of place, So most things happen.
Some things are scripted, planned, organized, you name it, and

(08:24):
those might be considered conspiracies. As for the mass majority
of things that happen, when we find something weird within
the natural order of things, that's called a coincidence. Sometimes
we could refer to it as framing. But to encapsulate

(08:46):
this idea, most things just happen. We can find coincidences
and we can frame them in a certain way, so
we can pull out conspiracy, syops and false flags, but
most of the time things just happen. However, there are
some scripted, there are some organized, there are some staged

(09:08):
events that take place, or at least the way that
certain natural events are reported on to frame them in
a certain way, to create a certain narrative. You know,
that would be placed, I think under the category of
PsiOps specifically, but it also probably would be placed into
the category of conspiracy. These things get blended together. So

(09:32):
there's a couple of different ways to address any world event,
anything that you hear or probably most importantly, things you
don't hear. But these are the ways in which we
can sort of address and figure out what is happening
in the world. You know, I'm very humbled by the
fact that so many people message me from around the

(09:55):
world and ask me what my opinion is on this,
or that I've had half a dozen or so people
very seriously ask me via email or social media. I
don't trust anybody else's viewpoint on this. What do you
think about the Kirk assassination. What do you think about

(10:17):
Charlie Kirk's funeral? What do you think about his wife?
I'm really dying to know what you have to say
about this on your show. Are you going to do one? Please?
Do one. It's humbling. I'm grateful that you trust me
so much, but don't put too much trust in me
because I don't have the answers. Maybe that's why you

(10:39):
trust me anyway. I don't know, but I don't have
the answers to this. There are so many different angles,
figuratively and literally of the assassination alone that it's hard
to keep up. I was out of town for four
days last week, all new shows, but out of town
for four days, kind of out of the loop. Had

(11:03):
my phone, of course, but tried not to check it
a lot. Went to some museums, went to the Hiroshima
Peace Park, went to the Victims More Immemorial and all
that stuff. I've done it twice now and it's it's
a humbling and sad and also strangely peaceful experience. So
I was sort of out of the loop on what

(11:24):
was happening. And when I came back into the world
of what was happening, I was confronted with drones killed
Charlie Kirk. I was confronted with the CIA killed him
with little guns. I was confronted with somebody used a
watch to shoot him, like a wristwatch, that there was
a gun in the microphone, that the camera had a

(11:45):
gun on it that Charlie Kirk shot himself. I mean,
I've heard everything, and I don't think that any of
those theories are the byproduct of some conspiracy to flood
the public space with ideas and with conflicting stories. I

(12:08):
think it's just a byproduct of people having access to
the Internet and to the videos, and if there is
a conspiracy within that, it's the video being shared on
all these platforms and not being taken down. Remember when
Ben Laden was quote unquote killed. I say quote unquote

(12:32):
because of the dialysis thing and because of the reports
that he had died years before that. But remember when
Bin Laden was killed and they said they can't show
us his body because Islamic practice dictates he has to
be dumped into the ocean, which is strange for people
that don't really live near water. But remember when the
government told us that all the big newspapers, all the

(12:55):
big government agencies can't show you his body. Just trust
us when we tell you that he died and we
dumped him in the ocean. But they can show as
Charlie Kirk over and over and over and over again.
And you have to ask yourself who owns the platforms?
Who owns the media that wants you to see this,
because if they didn't want you to see it would
be pulled immediately. It's too graphic, it's to this, it's
to that. So there's a conspiracy. It's letting the video

(13:19):
stay up. And I'm all for transparency, but it's letting
the video stay up and then allowing the natural environment
that is social media to go to work and people
go to work and there's wristwatch guns, and there's drone guns,
and there's microphone guns, and there's guns on the cameras,

(13:42):
and then Kirk shot himself. And I just imagine, you know,
what would what would social media look like if we
go back to the nineteen sixties and we look at
the Kennedy assassination from all these cull phone cameras and

(14:02):
all of these cameras that are set up on the
street to video the president driving through town. If we
go back to nineteen sixty three, I bet you we
wouldn't just have the sort of Bill Cooper the driver
shot him story. We wouldn't just have the Grassy Knoll.

(14:25):
We would have the same types of theories about Charlie Kirk.
But for John F. Kennedy. His wife shot him, he
shot himself, drone shot him. Some person with a pocket
watch on the side of the road near the motorcade

(14:47):
shot him with the pocket watch. You already see that
in the Kennedy assassination. When you have a mystery, there's
the guy on the grassy Knoll, there's the book depository,
there's the guy in the sewer drain, which of course
was popularized I think in a fictional way by the
X Files. One of my favorite episodes. Kind of a
lost episode in the mix of general X Files episodes,

(15:09):
but I love that backstory of the smoking Man. It's
a great episode. I think somebody shotting from the sewage drain,
somebody shotting from the vehicle. These are all different stories,
and we don't really have much video to go on
compared to what happened to Kirk. So you can see
that even in the sixties, because it's a mystery, and

(15:31):
because it's the president, and because it was public, all
of these different theories populate. All of these theories grow,
and over time, we dismiss the Warren Commission, we dismiss
some people dismiss the Grassy knull, some people accept it.

(15:51):
But at least all of that's based on with the
exception of the Warren Commission, at least the other alternative
theories are based on something that's kind of like real.
I mean, you can really make an argument for the
grassy all. You can. I'm not saying I believe that,
I'm just saying you can make an argument for it.
You can make a pretty good argument for the multiple
shooter theory, which I think is based on audio evidence alone,

(16:16):
definitely true, which that was also part of the Kirk
shooting too. There was a second gun shot. There was
it was heard on the audio. I guess what I'm
getting at here is that if you had the same
social media that we have today back in the sixties,
you get all the same wild conspiracies about Kennedy's death.
And it's not because the CIA is pushing it's not

(16:38):
because there's some big conspiracy. It's just because this is
what we do. We speculate, and Charlie Kirk was a
big figure, internationally recognized. He was just over here in
Tokyo a couple of weeks before his death. He's internationally recognized.
People love the guy, some people hating, but people love

(17:00):
the guy, and he gets shot publicly, and we have
videos from all over the place, and it's like an amplified,
steroid driven Kennedy story. So we've heard all of these
different stories. We've heard and we've seen all the different angles,

(17:20):
but we still don't have an answer. And largely this
is based on the availability of the video that otherwise
could be pulled down, kind of like with the Zuppruder film.
Some people argue that was edited. Maybe it was, and

(17:42):
even the idea that we just don't know. We might
not ever know who killed Kennedy, who shot Kirk? How
many licks does it take to get to the center
of a TUTSI pop? The world probably will never know
because the people that actually do these things, like the

(18:04):
Smoking Man, just go back to their home, pat their
kids on the head, and say hello to their wife
and that's it. Feel no remorse, no guilt. Maybe they do.
I don't know. I don't walk in their shoes. But
even that, as like an analogy, it's probably a lot

(18:24):
closer to the truth. I don't believe the official story.
I don't believe that Tyler Robinson was the shooter, end
of story. But I also don't believe that Charlie Kirk
was killed with a microphone gun or a wristwatch gun

(18:45):
or a camera gun, or that he shot himself from
his ring, although there are a bunch of terrorists west
of Jordan who make pagers explode, so there's I suppose
the possibility there. But I don't believe anything that I'm told,
anything that I see, anything that I hear without properly

(19:06):
looking at it. So when I'm out of town last
week and I start coming across all of these conspiracies
about his wife, I already had my opinions about his wife,
but then I hear these conspiracies about his wife, and
I quietly saved all of this on my phone in

(19:26):
screenshots and just emailed the screenshots to myself. So I
had a little file from when I got back from
the trip, and people had been emailing me, texting me
asking me what I thought, what my opinion was, and
I said, well, i've seen it all. I don't really
know if I can confirm any of it. I need
to look at it. And that's what I've done for

(19:48):
tonight's shows. I've looked at it all, and I've tried
to find pieces that are true, that are accurate in
pieces that are inaccurate and not true. Becau. But it's
so easy to create a conspiracy. It's so easy to
run a sigh op on yourself. We do it all

(20:09):
the time. We don't recognize it. As the show was
beginning tonight, I have no reason really to tell you
this except to kind of hopefully prove how easy it is.
As the show was beginning tonight, our three and a
half minute introduction was playing, and I was sitting here thinking,

(20:31):
it's really easy for some people to make up conspiracies.
And it's not because they're consciously doined. It's because they
don't know any better and don't have any context for
the situation, the case, the story, whatever. And I was
thinking Charlie kirk and this movie Snake Eyes, which we

(20:51):
will talk about tonight on the show, and for some
reason it popped into my head Kirkland, probably because Charles
Kirkland was in the movie Snake Eyes. That was the
character who was shot in the neck assassinated during a
boxing match. I believe it was. We'll talk about that

(21:13):
in a moment. But I thought Costco because Costco is
a store that my wife and I frequent and she
likes buying the Kirkland products because they're a little cheaper.
So I thought Kirkland Costco. This is pretty easy to

(21:34):
make up a conspiracy. Where was Charlie Kirk shot Utah
Valley University? Type that in where's that rm, Utah, Okay?
And is there a Costco in the area. I looked
it up, and there is a Costco in the area
just a few minutes actually from where Kirk was shot.
You could actually walk there in probably fifteen twenty minutes.

(21:58):
You could walk and drive with probably take you less
than five minutes. It doesn't mean anything, folks. I'm just
saying there's a Costco near where he was shot, and
Costco serves Kirkland products to their customers. It doesn't mean anything,
but I could create a conspiracy out of it because

(22:19):
I could look at the addresses and the numbers and
the other businesses in the area. I could look at
the cost Co address, I could look at the Utah
Valley University address. Play with the numbers if you will.
This is not me suggesting that Gamatria that ritual, that

(22:47):
which I think is an overused, misunderstood word. Ritual just
means a prescribed order of doing things. So everything is
really a ritual. Everything we do is a ritual. But
the more magical elements of ritual, you know, like new
moons and solar eclipses and the autonnel equinox, all happening

(23:10):
within the twenty four hour period of Charlie Kirk's funeral.
We'll talk about that tonight as well. That's more of
the magical ritualistic motif that I'm talking about. But you
can play with all of these numbers and all of
this stuff. It doesn't mean that gamatri doesn't mean that coincidences,
it doesn't mean that actual magical ritual aren't part of it.

(23:34):
It just means that most of the time it's like
conspiracy paradolia. That's another way to look at it. Conspiracy
paradolia or psciot paradolia. You see it everywhere, you know,
is the Deep State in the room? Now? Is the

(23:54):
Illuminati in the room? Now? Can you see the Illuminati
in the room now? The psychiatrist asks, they're patient, Now,
can you see Donald Trump in the room with us? Now?
Is he here? Now? Is the Orange Man here now?
People that are seen and hearing things that they're not
sure if it's real, it's not real they're schizophrenic. There's

(24:15):
a lot of that in conspiracy Land. People are sigh
oping themselves into thinking that because there's a Costco down
the road from the place where Charlie Kirk was shot,
that it must have something to do with his death,
because Costco has a brand called Kirkland, and Kirkland is

(24:35):
the name of the guy in the movie who's shot.
That sort of mirrors what happens to Charlie Kirk in
real life. That movie Snake Eyes, of course, is what
I'm referring to. I made up the Costco thing. It's silly,
It's really silly. It's stupid silly. But you could do
it with anything, with any shooting. Look at the Enunciation shooting,

(25:00):
at the church shooting in Minneapolis with Robin Westman, and
what was in between that shooting and a shooting the
day before that which got very little attention just down
the road. What's in the middle of those two shootings.
I did a show on it, the George Floyd memorial.
Remember what happened after the George Floyd death, which involved

(25:21):
fentanyl and a heart problem according to the autopsy, we
had the demanding of defunding the police. We also had
I can't breathe as a protest slogan, and then we
had mask mandates to muzzle people and prevent them from

(25:42):
breathing properly. Is that a coincidence? Is that a syop?
Is that a conspiracy? Is that a glitch in the matrix?
What is that? And the George Floyd Memorial in the
middle of these two shootings which occur when we have
an administration that's the total opposite of defunding the police.

(26:04):
Now they want the police to be militarized and sending
them into cities across the country as the ultimate goal,
not just Washington, Baltimore, in Chicago, but to send these
militarized police into every city in the United States. We
go from one extreme to the other. We go from
a death and masking and can't breathe, I can't breathe

(26:27):
and having the police defunded to let's give the police,
let's give law enforcement. Let's just give the National Guard
in the military everything and set them loose in American
cities because we have to stop the crime. And that
happens after another shooting. So you get these two sides,

(26:48):
these two extremes that exploit something to push their agenda
to push their narrative, or it occurs on the heels
of something like this antural event which can be exploited
for political purposes, which is more often than not, what
is happening. Things happen and there's no exploitation. Things also happen,

(27:13):
and there's a lot of exploitation. And then sometimes things
don't happen unless they're scripted, staged, and organized, and that
would be what we call a conspiracy. In fact, you
could say most of the time what happens naturally is exploited.
Almost everything that happens is exploited. Sometimes things don't happen,

(27:36):
don't happen to be exploited, and sometimes things happen and
are not exploited. But that's kind of rare because you
never want to let a good crisis go to waste, right.
I think we need a definition of what predictive programming is,
and I think we need a definition of what predictive
programming is in context with a conspiracy, because a conspiracy

(27:59):
and predictive ping or two separate things, but they're treated
as if they're the same thing. I mean, if there's
a conspiracy by some sinister force to kill Charlie Kirk
and hijack his movement. That's different than predictive programming. And

(28:21):
if you're really looking for that shadowy caball behind Kirk's
death or anything that happens in the world, you're prone
if you look enough to find evidence of what you're
looking for, and ninety nine percent of the things that
you're looking at, you're ignoring, and you're only finding details

(28:42):
that you want to believe that fit the narrative. As
a horrible bias that conspiracy world suffers from. It's very strange.
This movie Snake Eyes. A politician named Charles Kirkland assassinated
by getting shot in the neck at a high profile event,

(29:05):
and the assassination occurs at this heavyweight boxing match, which
is perhaps we could say, a metaphor for the dueling
Charlie kirk and the mostly wacko liberal students that don't
know anything about anything fighting with each other and boxing
back and forth. Though once in a while someone would

(29:25):
get a good punch in and knock Charlie down a
peg and say you're wrong, Charlie, and they would be right,
and he wouldn't know how to handle it. Very rare,
but it's a boxing match, and the boxer who takes
a fall during the film is named Lincoln Tyler, and
we have a Tyler Robinson in the Charlie kirk assassination. However,

(29:51):
September tenth is from everything that I can tell, not
the date of the fight in the film, the date
of the fight in the film, the place in the
time where he has actually killed this politician, Charles Kirkland
is September nineteenth, not September tenth. Screenshots from the movie,

(30:15):
so you don't have to go watch the whole thing.
Show the arena where the fight is, American flags flying
and they show Tyler versus Ruiz September nineteenth, ten PM.
I'll give you this though, if you look at it
without really processing it, your brain does the processing for you.

(30:37):
And the font that is used on this sign says
September tenth. If you look a little closer, it actually
says September nineteenth. And you can kind of confirm that
by looking close and seeing that the zeros in the
ten PM don't have a line through them because there's zeros,
and the apparent zero of the tenth actually turns out

(30:59):
to be an nine because the top is curved back
into the that's what a nine is, right, So it's
clearly a nine, but it looks like a ten, and
so if you're just glancing at it, you might see
September tenth. It's forgivable, it's understandable. It doesn't mean that
there's not a character named Charlie Kirkland. It doesn't mean
that they weren't assassinated by being shot in the neck
at a whole high profile boxing match. It doesn't mean

(31:22):
that's not true. But what it means is not everything
in the movie, not everything in real life, is the same.
And it's strange because if you could get someone who
buys this theory and thinks the movie predicted what happened,
then you show them it's actually September nineteenth, because they

(31:47):
believe it. The predictive programming element that is, they'll just
throw out that part, like, well, okay, it was September tenth,
but still what about all this other stuff? This proves
the predictive programming. And that's what we do when we
have a belief in something. We just believe, and even
when something's proven wrong, we sort of ditch that part

(32:07):
and we say, well, okay, that's fake, that's wrong, that's not,
but the rest of this is still real. Eventually you
pick it apart until there's nothing. That's usually what happens.
I can't say that about this movie Snake Eyes, because
I think it's really weird. Charles Kirkland shot in the
neck a politician, nonetheless at a high profile event, at

(32:31):
a big boxing match, essentially what Charlie kirk did with
these students on campus. It's very strange. Reportedly, the film
was actually shot at a place that refers to Donald Trump.
That place is called the Trump taj Mahal in Atlantic City.

(32:55):
It was used as an arena for the boxing scene,
and that makes this all the more bizarre, all the
more strange. So virtually everything about this conspiracy, it's not
a conspiracy, but we have to speak the language. Virtually
everything about this conspiracy is true. Yes, Charles Kirkland was assassinated.

(33:21):
Yes there was a boxing match, There was a Lincoln Tyler,
there was a Trump taj Mahal, And yes Tyler is
a guard, a junior lodge officer in Freemasonry who guards
the door with a sword. Actually walked into a Masonic

(33:45):
lodge in Boise, Idaho one time and came face to
face with a tyler. They don't actually kill you, it's symbolic.
They actually let me into the ritual room to see
what was happening. But a tyler is supposed to guard
the door from the profane on the outside. And so
that is strange considering that Tyler Robinson, which by the way,

(34:11):
you have to remember Tyler Robinson, and then what was
the last high profile shooting right before that? That was
Robin Westman or Westwoman. So Robin, we have the Robin
When you look at the Free Masonic, if you will,

(34:33):
element of this, What is Tyler Robinson actually doing. What
is his image being used for. It's being used to
guard the people that probably set this whole thing up.
He might have pulled the trigger. I don't know. He
probably was involved. But there's more to the story than

(34:55):
just this kid. And just like a tyler guards a
Masonic lodge, Tyler Robinson has been used to guard those
that are very likely behind the killing of Charlie Kirk. However, however, however, however,

(35:16):
there are things in the movie, like the September date,
which are not true. The Free Masonic element, even the
Tyler is I don't think you could say that's even
a coincidence. It's not a coincidence. It's not a conspiracy,
it's not a psyop. It's just a character named Tyler.

(35:38):
Has nothing to do with masonry, it has nothing to
do with Masonic rituals, just a name. I mean, I've
got several Tylers that listen to this show. Does that
mean they're Masons or something. That's a stupid assessment. It's
really weird how these conspiracies come together. They're really like snowballs.

(36:02):
One person posts it and then it's snowballs and snowballs
and snowballs snows and then eventually it has all this
dirt and these sticks in this, this rubble in it.
It's like gross, dirty snow. Nobody likes dirty snow. I
hated that about living in snowy areas. Dirty snow. Oh
so gross. And that's what these conspiracy theories, I don't

(36:25):
know what they are. That's what that's what this is.
They're all dirty snowballs, really dirty snowballs. So it's it's
it's it's true that there's Trump, there's Tyler, there's Kirkland.
Even the fact that it's in September, I'll give you that.
That's very weird, very strange. But there's also a Kirkland

(36:51):
costcoat down the road from the shooting. Does that mean
that costco was involved with the death of Charlie Kirk
I don't think so. And it reminded me of a
movie called White Noise. Remember this movie White Noise that
came out in twenty twenty two about a train carrying
toxic chemicals derailing in a small Ohio town. And remember

(37:12):
how that movie came to life when on February third
of twenty twenty three, a train carrying toxic chemicals derailed
in the same town, East Palestine, Ohio, which was used
for filming the movie Train Crash. But remember, just like

(37:34):
with September in the Snake Eyes movie, remember people said,
I'll never forget this. I'll never forget any of these
conspiracies because they're so outlandish they stick with you. I
remember people said that the whole movie was filmed in
this tiny town, and everybody in the town worked on
the movie and then they were the victim of the

(37:54):
real thing happening in real life. And that's not true.
What is true is that some of the people that
live in the town were involved, but not everybody and
the whole movie wasn't filmed in this town, and then
the real thing happened. There's a difference between these extremes

(38:16):
of that's not interesting or everybody was involved. There's a
middle ground, and that middle ground, I think is the
place that we should all strive to get to, to
rise to. It's the only way we can objectively investigate
any story. We need to be able to step back

(38:40):
from the conspiracies. We need to be able to acknowledge
that some things are really weird, but that doesn't make
this some kind of conspiracy sy out false flag. We
talked about the movie Weapons and the strange miracle connections

(39:01):
and the visual connections that movie had to the Minneapolis
church shooting, slash school shooting with Robin Westman, the two
seventeen on the clock, the seventeen kids running out of
their homes vanishing in the middle of the night, the

(39:22):
strange connection between the two seventeen, the deaths, and the injuries.
Two seventeen is nineteen, the number of days between the
release of Weapons and this shooting in Minneapolis. The bizarre,

(39:42):
strange motif of a quote transgender shooter with red hair
not really boy or girl or maybe both. And a
character in the movie weapon with red hair but also

(40:04):
with light blonde, wispy hair or gray hair, and also
almost bald in other scenes, almost like a creature that
transforms between these different personalities and these different appearances, which
is very transgender esque, is it not? That was the

(40:25):
ant in the movie. All of that is bizarre. It's
strange to me that I know this is like a
really personal thing, But it's strange to me that, as
someone who has done this for fifteen sixteen years, that
anybody asks me, why don't you believe in predictive programming

(40:49):
or conspiracies? It's like, where have you been? I was
talking about that stuff before you ever got onto a
podcast platform. Just because I don't believe everything means that
I'm a shill or I'm working for the government or
covering something up. It's very strange. I was talking about

(41:16):
Aaron Alexis back when that shooting happened almost fifteen years ago,
and the nature of what he wrote on his gun,
this is my elf weapon. Remember that he said he
was being followed and people were beaming signals and sounds
into his head. And if you fast forward today and

(41:37):
if you fast forward to today. What you'll find is
this is a reoccurring motif, and it appears to have
become more common to find this at like the core
of these shootings, Robin Westman wrote on his guns and
or her guns and holsters and bowler. So it's you

(42:02):
learn the same thing about Luigi Mangione, the Ice sniper
a few days ago reportedly wrote stuff on bullets. But
I'd caution you to just believe those stories. I caution
you to ask the question, consider the possibility that those

(42:23):
writings are left as evidence artificially, that they're written on
the bullet casings after the fact, that that's a possibility,
not a for sure thing, but a possibility. In other cases,
we don't have writing on the bullets, we don't have
writing on the guns. We have writing on the walls

(42:44):
of a bathroom in the case of the almost shooting
in Colorado with Diego Medina. Yes, all of that is bizarre.
All of that is strange. All that is fascinating. I
get it, I understand, and I'm one of those people
why it's so fascinating. I'm simply cautioning a slow and

(43:08):
steady approach. This is another problem with we want it
now we want the instagratification. We want the answers right now,
We want the answers yesterday. And if you're really searching
for answers or searching for the truth, you're not going
to find it in thirty second TikTok videos. You're not
going to find it, no matter how meticulous the sources,

(43:32):
You're not going to find it in anyone setting, anyone
show or documentary. There's always something left out of the equation.
You can't reduce everything to spark notes. So this movie
Snake Eyes appears to be predictive programming. But let me
ask you this, how many of you firmly believe that

(43:54):
the Simpsons or that Family Guy, or even SpongeBob. You
might not know about the SpongeBob case, but you know
about the Simpsons and Family Guy. How many of you
believe that those shows actually truly predict the future. How
many of you think that those shows, in apparently predicting

(44:19):
the future are coincidences. I take things on a case
by case basis. When I see Trump and the Simpsons,
I think, well, Donald Trump has been a public figure
for a very long time. He's a cultural icon. People
everywhere knows who he is before everybody loved him. Now

(44:42):
it's like or dislike. And he had aspirations at one
point in the past to run for president, and people
had ask him about that in old interviews. So as
a Simpsons writer, where you're satirizing events that have occurred

(45:04):
and you're thinking what might happen next, it's not a
stretch of the imagination to think that The Simpsons would
take something that kind of sounds ridiculous, like President Donald Trump.
That sounds ridiculous, especially when that episode aired. Reportedly, a

(45:28):
lot of those images, by the way of The Simpsons,
are also fake, which is a whole other part of this.
So you have to think that if you're satirizing something,
if you're looking at world events, if you're looking at
things that are happening, and then you're trying to turn
it into some fictional story, and I mean, that's what

(45:49):
writers do. You write from your own experience, you write
what if? That's what science fiction is. It's not really
hard to imagine that the Simpsons could predict the future
when they're just playing with things that are already on
the cusp of happening. And you know how many things
that are in the Simpsons that are never looked at

(46:11):
as being predictions of the future because they weren't and
nothing ever happened on a certain day at a certain time,
so they just kind of get ignored. But you find
one thing that looks like something else, and suddenly that's proof.
The Simpsons writers are all time travelers. I mean, look
at the Family Guy, Kevin Spacey. Stewie runs through the

(46:33):
mall naked. It's an old episode. Help me, help me,
help me, I've escaped from Kevin Spacey's basement. Viewers probably
thought that's weird, this show's really quirky. No, it's because
Seth MacFarland and the guys at Family Guy, they knew
what Kevin Spacey was up to. The women knew what

(46:55):
Kevin Spacey was up to. That's why they put it
in the show. Something Farlane isn't a time traveler. And
I can give you a personal example of this in radio.
I can make a prediction right now that I know
will come true. January first of twenty twenty six will

(47:17):
be a normal day. You will not have ascended to
some spiritual dimension like David Wilcock, the lying con artist
fraud has told people again he'll disappear, he'll reappear, people
will forget, and he'll start selling some new scam in

(47:38):
twenty twenty six. It's a guarantee. I'm not predicting the
future because I have some supernatural knowledge. I can say
that because that's the pattern of lying and disappearing, and
that's the pattern of fraud and behavior that this man
has demonstrated. So yet, it might be weird the Simpsons

(48:01):
seem to predict the future, or a family guy, but
if you analyze it objectively, it's not really that weird.
Even if it's kind of weird, it's not really that weird.
There's an explanation for it. But I caution you to
also remember that if there's an explanation for something, you know,
when people say I'm sure there's a scientific explanation, well yeah,

(48:23):
that's kind of what paranormal investigation is all about. Science
has rejected the idea. So paranormal investigators go and investigate
paranormal abnormal things phenomenon because regular scientists won't. And a
real paranormal investigator is going to do what a scientist
would do. They're not going to go into ghost shows

(48:44):
and knock on things. Are you here? Anybody here, can
you come out and talk to us. Real paranormal investigators
are serious, they're very scientific, they have equipment, and they
investigate things other people won't investigate. Still use the scientific
method that still use the process of discernment and trying
to be objective about the evidence that you get. But

(49:07):
that's not fun, right, It needs to be theatrical, So
they make it theatrical, and it makes a joke out
of paranormal investigation in the same way that scientists that
take money and are paid off by industries make quote
science seem like a generalized because science is a lot

(49:28):
of different things. That makes just science in general seem
sleazy and scummy. But it's not when people make it
seem like that. It's like fraudulent parental investigators do. So
it's not hard to imagine that the Simpsons and Family
I could do that if you know inside information about

(49:53):
very famous people, or you want to satirize the possibility
of what might happen in the future with you know
this this very public figure. Same thing with SpongeBob. There's
an old episode of SpongeBob where Patrick and SpongeBob gets
stuck and Sandy, who's a squirrel that lives underwater gets

(50:14):
stuck in her little oxygen dome for the winter. The
door freeze is shut. And then you watch this episode
in a modern context like I have, and you think,
oh my god, they wrote into this episode a shot
at Dan Schneider at Nickelodeon. There's probably more of that

(50:38):
in SpongeBob. Patrick and SpongeBob spent the winter playing these
Western characters, and one of them was named Dirty Dan,
apparently a nickname for Dan Schneider who was doing bad
stuff to kids at Nickelodeon. Dirty Dan. The Nickelodeon crews

(50:59):
that worked on SpongeBob reportedly hated Dan Schneider, which is
just another reason to love SpongeBob. Hated Dan Schneider. Is
that predicting the future? SpongeBob predicted the Nickelodeon documentary, or
maybe the Nickelodeon documentary was about what the people at
SpongeBob knew all those years ago, and that's why they
put it into the show. You can think of that

(51:20):
almost like as reverse causality or retro causality. It's not,
it's just there's an explanation. But when someone says there's
an explanation for the science doesn't mean that that explanation
suddenly takes the mystery away from things. I mean, in effect,
it does, because the mystery is, let's solve this, and
once you have an answer, it's not really a mystery anymore.
But it's still interesting. I mean, I find that to

(51:44):
actually be as interesting of how The Simpsons, how Family Got,
how SpongeBob could seem to predict these things because they
know what's going on behind the scenes. Now, movies like
White Noise, I don't know how about Independence Day. Independence
Day could be said to be a predictive programming film
as well. Released July third, nineteen ninety six, it seemed

(52:06):
to predict the appearance of a city sized UFO, which
did manifest as the Phoenix Lights in March of nineteen
ninety seven. Famous actors, pilots, people driving their cars down
the road. Everybody saw it. City size ufo. Essentially. It

(52:29):
also moved over multiple states too. It wasn't just Arizona,
it was all over the Southwest American Southwest. Predictive programming
or just coincidence, or perhaps its manifestation that could be

(52:50):
whatever the explanation is scientifically for that maybe it's manifestation.
Maybe it's that we watched Independence Day and then the
next collective UFO sighting was something from Independence Day. You know,
you watch a movie and you have a dream about it.
Most people that are rational don't watch a movie and

(53:11):
then have a dream about the movie and think that
angels are speaking to them or that they're getting some
inside information or something like that. It usually just means
that you watched a movie and you absorb things in
your unconscious mind, and then the dream state allowed those
things to come out to play, and that's why you

(53:33):
imagine that stuff. Manifestation is another explanation for this, and
I find that to be fascinating. I don't find the
explanation to this stuff to be to be boring. And
so that brings me at the halfway point of tonight's show. Roughly,

(53:53):
that brings me to the Charlie Kirk story again, because
just like in the movie Snake Eyes, which more so
deals with Charlie Kirk's assassination, this next story isn't so
much about predictive programming per se, or in the same way,

(54:16):
it's more about the potentiality for programming that's not so predictive.
Programming in the sense of Erica Kirk. Now, I don't
know this woman. I will however, tell you my impression

(54:37):
of her, and I will however, tell you that I
have a bias in my impression of her being objective
and honest. And then I'll tell you why I feel
that there's maybe something accurate about the again conspiracy SAAP,

(54:59):
whatever it is is that has blossomed from her taking
the reins of the Kirk Empire, and we'll go through
and look at the various theories of who this woman
is or who she actually is. We'll do that here

(55:19):
in just a moment. I want to remind you that
you're listening to the Secret Teachings Radio because of you.
We're in the top ten in history shows, which is
what the show is tagged. I believe that was the
only option that was relevant on Spreaker as a history show.
We are in the top ten on Spreaker for history.

(55:39):
They don't pay us anything additional for that. They don't
make money or get an award or something. But that's
kind of cool to say, because we're not ranked anywhere else,
because we've been kicked off of places and people don't
like us that much. But we're ranked on Spreaker. I
also know that based on the surveys of all the
shows on Ground zero plus before what it was Aftermath,

(56:02):
before that collapsed, we were right next to Ground zero,
So it's humbling. I thank you for that. I appreciate that,
and I think a lot of that probably has to
do with people going and listening to the free Archive,
because they base it on the Sprieker Archive specifically. So
if you're doing that, you helped us into the top

(56:23):
ten on Spreaker overall for history shows. That is really
something to be grateful for, and I am grateful for that.
Thank you so much. It's kind of cool to say. Again,
I don't really get anything for it, but it's cool
to say that it's all thanks to you. It's also
thanks to you that we can do those Friday shows.
People subscribe to the ad Free Show, you buy books

(56:47):
like Occult Arcana, Liberty Shrugged. My new book coming out
sooner than later, sometime hopefully by the end of November,
hopefully before Thanksgiving, the US Thanksgiving that is, maybe Honikah
would be a good time to release it. And also

(57:08):
I want to thank all of you who have bought
me a coffee slash book. Buy Me a Coffee is
under the show description on all of the audio streams.
You can buy me a coffee. You can cash app PayPal.
I don't really like straight up donations. It kind of
kind of feels weird. And if you're a new listener

(57:29):
to the show, I encourage you not to donate because
you don't know me yet. But you can buy a book,
you can subscribe, you can just listen to the free archive.
It play in the background, mute it for all I care,
just let it play, and that helps the show too.
Tstradio dot info thank you so much for supporting us

(57:49):
and keeping us on the air Monday through Friday. Independent
and for those of you on ground zero A plus
listening to this, thank you for staying up extra late
listening to the secret teachings in the late night or
perhaps early morning hours of wherever you may be that's
on ground zero plus. Our website again is TST radio

(58:11):
dot info. That's TST radio dot info. Thank you for
your support. Now to Erica Kirk. Just like the snake
Eyes predictive programming theory, in the case of Erica Kirk,

(58:31):
we have a series of very strange bullet points, very
strange interesting facts that like the predictive programming where some
of it's apparently true and other things are not true.

(58:51):
And I might do a larger analysis of that movie,
but tonight is not the time or place for that.
In this hour, we're going to look at Erica Kirk,
and we're going to look at her background, which is
something that you could have found out before Charlie Kirk
was shot. She wasn't really in the spotlight. But if

(59:14):
you really wanted to know more about Charlie Kirk, I
like this guy, I want to see who his wife is,
who's he married to? And then you did some digging,
you'd probably feel a little bit weird about the woman
he was married to. Now there's different theories on how
he actually met her. But this is one of those

(59:35):
things like if you use a dating app and people
use that tired line of willing to tell my parents
that we met at a museum, willing to tell my
parents we met at a park, people aren't always honest

(59:57):
about how they met. And plus, you know, if you
met someone over and over again and then you started
dating them, like when did you actually meet my wife?
And I were just discussing this too. We met for
the first time, like in person in Hiroshima Station, but
we known each other for a while before that, so
when we actually met in person, it was it was

(01:00:19):
like we we already knew each other because we did.
So we were debating like when was technically the first date?
I don't know. And then our actual marriage ceremony, which
we prepared for a while, is this year it's a
shintos ceremony in Tokyo we have planned for later this year.
Is that going to be the anniversary or is it
like when we actually got married the anniversity. I don't know.

(01:00:41):
You might think that's a silly, unnecessary detail to include
in the show, but I think it's important because there
were these theories about Erica Kirk having been introduced to
Charlie by Donald Trump. There are theories about the two
of them meeting at a Turning Point US event, which
would make sense if she's in that same group, and

(01:01:06):
then others say no, he messaged her on like Instagram
or something, and then maybe then then they met at
the turning Point event. Hey, why don't you come out
to the event? I like you, I don't I don't know.
I don't know what people do, but I don't know
how people meet, and I don't know if it matters,
but it kind of matters a little bit, maybe because

(01:01:27):
of the implications of the other stuff that Erica Kirk
is involved in. And what I mean by that is,
if Donald Trump did introduce Erica Kirk to Charlie Kirk,
it's not really weird because here's just a woman who
is very traditional and very conservative, and she's a beauty

(01:01:48):
queen and Trump wants to, I guess, hook his boy
up with this this girl. So hey, Charlie, why don't
you meet this woman? Could be as simple as that,
or it could be something more in the same way

(01:02:10):
that Milania Trump was introduced to President Trump in a
way that's very similar but could be suspicious based on
the background of Malania Trump. You know, when you're dealing
with models, you're dealing with people that are and I

(01:02:31):
don't mean the actual models themselves necessarily, I'm talking about
the industry. You're dealing with people that are usually pretty suspicious.
I mean, it's like Sopranos mafia running the strip club
kind of a thing. There really aren't a lot of
good people in the modeling business. There really aren't a
lot of good people that deal in lingerie. There really

(01:02:52):
aren't a lot of good people in the porn business,
if you know what I mean. So if you have
shady characters, really shady characters, and these shady characters are
essentially giving away or introducing top models to powerful, important people,

(01:03:18):
it gets a little bit suspicious. Now, on the other hand,
if you're a Donald Trump, if you're a Charlie Kirk,
and you're in those communities around those kinds of people,

(01:03:38):
it's not really that weird. It's just those are the
people that you hang out with. If you work at
a Walmart and you don't have much of a social life,
you might meet your wife or your husband, or your
boyfriend or girlfriend at Walmart, you might meet them. If
you work at a McDonald's. It's not really weird if
you meet somebody in the ecosystem that you live in.

(01:04:00):
But it is weird when you have shady characters basically
dealing women to powerful figures. That's when things get a
little bit shady. That's when things can, i should say,
get a little bit shady. Because we know that Milania
was essentially set up with Trump thanks to Pelo Zempoli,

(01:04:27):
who if you look at this guy he just type
in his name, I mean, the guy looks like he's
in the mafia. This guy could be a character on
the Sopranos. And if you look at this guy and
some of his photographs, I mean, this guy looks shady

(01:04:50):
and sleazy, and I wouldn't trust this guy to tell
me what time it is. And there's a couple of
images of him with these models around him them and
these women look more lifeless than a doll. In fact,
I was in Hiroshima last week and I was looking
at we were looking at souvenirs and things like that,

(01:05:10):
and we came across some of these old wooden Japanese dolls,
which I've always wanted one of these little wooden Japanese dolls.
They're called koqushi. And my wife said, she's like, I
know you like these dolls, and I'll buy one for you.
And so we're clear, so nobody starts rumors. We're not
talking about sex dolls, folks. From my little wooden dolls

(01:05:31):
used to be toys for children. They're really popular for
people to get a part of Japan and take it
home with them and then they have like real ones
that are for decoration, and I wanted to get something
like this my wife I was going to buy it.
I didn't end up getting one. My wife's gonna buy
me one. So we look at these Koqueshi dolls and
they all have personalities. But if you look at these
women that are photographed with Palo Zimpoli, I mean, they

(01:05:54):
do not look like they have brains, let alone a soul.
They just look totally soulless. There's nothing going on behind
the eyes. I mean, I can't say for sure because
it's all a case by case basis, but a lot
of these women look like they've been very very you know,

(01:06:15):
they've given permission to get into the industry, but they've
been molested violently. That's the impression that I get. I
was thinking when I saw those pictures, like these little
Coqueshi dolls have more personality than some of these models
do that have been photographed with Palo z Ambali, the
guy who basically set Malani up reportedly with Donald Trump. Now, also,

(01:06:38):
if you're Donald Trump and you're in the beauty pageant
scene and you're connected to all of these people, it's
not really a weird thing to be set up with
some supermodel. It's not really weird, but there is that
EH Mafia, most sads, CIA, a British intelligence Jeffrey Epstein

(01:07:03):
connection that maybe it's surface level stuff, maybe it's introductory
level stuff, but it starts to feel like eyes wide shut.
And when you find out that maybe Charlie Kirk was
introduced to Erica by President Trump again, it could be

(01:07:24):
just hey, hot girl, conservative guy, you need a strong,
hot woman behind you. Look at this girl, you should
go on a date. I guess that's what guys don't.
I never lived like that, but I guess that's what
guys do. They Powerful people set each other up, and
that's just normal. It's not anything really weird about that.

(01:07:47):
It's powerful people looking each other up with connections. And
I know that this is all true because I in
the radio world. I mean, there's a lot of that.
There's a lot of powerful people that hook each other
up with things, connect people with things, a lot of
sleazy things that go down. And just so we're clear,
we're talking about at like a UFO conference, we're not

(01:08:09):
talking about high finance. We're not talking about big banks,
we're not talking about big corporations and the foundations of
like the economy and the government. We're talking about UFOs
and crystal bowls and that kind of stuff happens. So
I know that at a rate hundreds of times worse
than anything that would happen to the UFO conference. This

(01:08:29):
kind of stuff happens in the real world. And there's
this whole series of mafia is involved too, right, it's
not just one mafia, and there's lots of different words
for mafia. Anyway, it's that idea, though, that gets you uncomfortable.
You're like, okay, so wait a minute. The golden Conservative

(01:08:49):
boy might have been introduced to his model wife, his
Miss Arizona wife, by the president who was involved in
those pageants. It's not really weird, but it could start
to get weird if you incorporate, if you learn, and

(01:09:12):
incorporate other elements into it. Because behind Erica Kirk was
a history of things that feel and sound a little
bit maybe a little bit strange. Do you remember I'm

(01:09:35):
sure that you do. I would guess that all of
you remember this. Do you remember the photograph? Some people
have really rejected this and tried to disprove it, but
there's at least a handful of photographs of just Laying
Maxwell doing something there's no like official record of her

(01:09:59):
work at Disney, but doing something that involves Disney and
children going back to the nineteen eighties, and of course
that has resulted in a lot of suspicion Giselaying Maxwell
dealing with kids and dealing with Disney events back in

(01:10:21):
the nineteen eighties. That makes people feel a little bit uncomfortable.
Makes me feel a little bit uncomfortable to think about
that too. If you remember that, and if you don't,
you just learned it. It seems familiar because when we
learn that Erica Kirk was involved in helping orphans, you

(01:10:46):
save the children, you see that familiarity again, that weird
pattern again. And nobody ever would question someone who wants
to help kids, right unless they're in a white van
with a lollipop. You really wouldn't question that someone wants
to help kids, want to help children. Great Erica Kirk

(01:11:08):
was involved in what is called Romanian Angels, an orphan
ministry in Romania. This orphan ministry, which has been by
every official source protected and there's no official evidence, court records, lawsuits,

(01:11:31):
anything that prove this, but locals in Romania have accused
the Romainian Angels of trafficking children under the guise of
mission work. This is exactly here's that pattern again, the
same exact thing that the Clinton Foundation has been accused of,

(01:11:54):
particularly and famously in Haiti. When you have people like
just laying Maxwell, but you have people like that in
the nineteen eighties, we learn after knowing who they are
from what has come out, we go back and look
at their past and we're like, ooh, that's real suspicious
her involvement unofficially officially whatever it was with Disney, when

(01:12:17):
you hear that maybe Gislaine Maxwell through Disney was helping
to kidnap or traffic girls or children or whatever. And
then when you find out that the Clinton Foundation has
been accused of the same thing in places like Haiti,
and then you find out that Erica Kirk worked with

(01:12:37):
a group that has been accused of doing the same
exact thing. I mean, is there a conspiracy from Romania
to Haiti for locals to get together and say, you know,
we really don't like these missionary groups of these foundations
coming in here and helping kids. We want to make
up a story about how they're hurting the kids. What
can we say about the groups these organizations. I don't

(01:13:02):
think the locals are conspiring to make up these stories.
And the fact that locals do accuse these groups of
doing these things, and the fact that kids do go missing,
and the fact that court's law enforcement in the media
staunchly oppose even the notion of it, while neglecting to

(01:13:26):
include important details of some of these stories, indicates that
there is a vast network, of vast web of very
very very powerful, sick people, evil people that do probably
do something to the effect of what these groups have
been accused of. Now I'm going to use the word reportedly,

(01:13:48):
just like how Charlie Kirk met Erica reportedly he messaged
her on Instagram. I think it would make more sense
he was introduced to her by somebody. I'm not even
saying she's a bad person. I really don't know. What
I'm saying is this is the story reportedly, this is
what's being said. Some of this is very verifiable, like
her pageant work, and she did work with orphans and

(01:14:10):
all that. I mean, it would equally make as much sense,
which is part of the reason that they use kids
for cover it would make a lot of sense. If
you are a conservative Christian traditionalist, you want to help
the orphan kids. It's a great thing to do. You're
helping innocent, poor children. That's a very Christian thing to do.

(01:14:33):
But it's also perfect cover if your intention is to
hurt kids, like people that get into healthcare or childcare
with the intention of hurting vulnerable people or abusing vulnerable people.
Could be the elderly, could be children. It goes up
and down the spectrum. People get into elderly care so

(01:14:53):
they can abuse and take advantage of the elderly. I
don't know the percentage, but I'm sure it's about a percent,
maybe two percent. People get into nursing for that reason.
People get into medicine in general for that reason. People
get into daycare for that reason. I mean, what better

(01:15:13):
way to get access to your victims than to get
into the fields that give you direct access to your victims. Hence,
you know, the church, the synagogue, et cetera. So reportedly
she ran the Romanian Angels. Others have said she worked

(01:15:35):
closely with them, she didn't run it. I think that
she ran it, and that was part of, you know,
her part of her resume that she's involved in this
helping kids. It's like when you think of you think
of modeling, and you think of those questions they ask,

(01:15:57):
you know, the miss a mayor Erica, Miss Universe, What
do you think about kids? I think kids should be fed?
What do you think about children? I think children are small,
and I think that we should make sure that we
don't step on them. And children are the future, you know,

(01:16:20):
stuff like that. It fits. Maybe I'm missing something. I
never understood the point of a beauty pageant. I don't
really understand that. It's like a bunch of egotistic women
and a bunch of pervert men that just like mutually
benefit from exploiting each other. Is what is the point

(01:16:40):
of a pageant? I don't really understand that. In fact,
I'm suspicious of anybody involved in pageantry. I don't really
get it. I think it's all pretty suspicious. But that's
just me. Now, let me say this before we go on.
I already had a perception of Erica Kirk that is biased.
And it's not biased in the sense of like I

(01:17:02):
don't like the woman and I hope that she's suffering.
I don't mean that. I just mean when I looked
at her reaction to Charlie's death and I everybody reacts differently.
You know, there are people that are Buddhists that they
don't flinch at death. I'm kind of one of those people.
Not a Buddhist, but I don't really flinch at death.

(01:17:25):
I flinch at watching medical shows where people get cut open,
but I don't flinch at death. The notion of death
doesn't scare me. It doesn't frighten me. Used to it
doesn't frighten me. It doesn't scare me, though, so some
people just don't they're not bothered by it. I mean,
would I be devastated if something happened to somebody close
to me, Yeah, but I don't think I would have

(01:17:49):
the same kind of reaction that a lot of more
emotional people would have. I have emotions, but I have
them largely, not exclusively. I have them largely under control.
They do come out on the show sometimes, but I
have them largely under control. You have to be able
to control your emotions. This is what the Secret Teachings
are all about, by the way, So some people respond

(01:18:11):
to it differently. Maybe she in public wants to do
a little laughing. Maybe she wants to treat it lightly,
and then behind the scenes she's crying her eyes out
and thinking about committing suicide. I don't know, we don't know.
Everybody reacts to things differently. You have to objectively consider
that what is her background. She's Christian, Maybe she takes

(01:18:32):
you know, I guess you could say delight in the
belief that Charlie's with God now and he's not in
danger anymore, and I can smile about that. You know
that's possible. It's a fifty to fifty split for me,
because I think it's equally disgusting that people will take

(01:18:55):
everything that happens and turn it into a conspiracy and
be like Erica Kirk gave a speech about Charlie and
she smiled one time. She's evil, she killed him. It's like,
shut up. That's just as disgusting as if she were
this monster people are making her out to be. Maybe

(01:19:16):
she is. I really don't know. I'm just reporting, but
in good faith, I have to say I also have
a bias against her, not for who she is as
a person, but just because I have a biased against
I'll want to say it out loud right now. I
have a biased against traditional. I'm pretty sure she's a

(01:19:37):
fake blonde traditional fake blonde Christian women. The reason that
I have a bias against fake blonde Christian traditional women
is because I don't believe it. I don't believe it.
I don't believe that you were goody two shoes. I
don't believe that you're really that traditional. I don't believe

(01:19:59):
that you even I really know how to define what
traditional means. I don't really believe that you're that good
of a person. Now, this comes from personal childhood trust issues.
This comes from a Christian upbringing, but it also comes
from my before I ever saw The X Files, my

(01:20:19):
general feeling of I don't really trust anybody. Ever, you
have to really earn my trust. I don't even really
trust myself on anything that I do. I don't trust
that my show's good. I don't trust that my books
are good. I don't trust that I'm making a good decision.
When I purchase a singular Apple at the store, I

(01:20:39):
could have gotten a better Apple. Part of that's also
because I'm frugal, and I want to make sure I
get the best and the most for my money, or
the best quality at the best price for my money.
But a lot of it's because I just I questioned myself.
I'll walk around a grocery store two three times, put
stuff back, pick it back up. It's not compulsion, it's
just do I need that? Am I? Could I get
something more if I two things I need instead of

(01:21:01):
this one thing I really don't need because should I
put this back? That's who I am. I question myself,
not to the point of insanity, but just to the
point of I need to keep myself in check. It
keeps the brain sharp. So I have a bias against
fake blonde Christian women that talk about how I just
love God so much. I don't really believe you, or

(01:21:23):
I believe you do, but a lot of those people
are in a cult, and so I don't really trust
that idea. Now, look at if you're a fake blonde
listening to this show being like I'm appalled at what
Ryan's saying. It's not an assault or an insult or

(01:21:43):
an attack on you. I'm just telling you objectively speaking.
I have a little bit of bias of being able
to trust people like that, and that includes traditional brunette
Christian women, it includes Christian men. I don't know if
I really trust a lot of Christian men. I forget

(01:22:05):
the name of this kid. There's a kid who's like
a I guess he's like a new Charlie Kirk. I
didn't even know who the kid was. He guess he's
like a best selling author. I don't remember who this
kid is. I have no idea. I'm not going to
waste time thinking of who it is. But he's he's
got almost like a Southern accent, got kind of that,
a little bit of a Southern accent, flying around on
private jets giving talks. Best selling author, super young kid.

(01:22:33):
I think I saw him from Charlie Robinson posted something
about this kid and I saw it and I thought,
this kid is a wasp. He's a total wasp, and
he also just makes me really uncomfortable. Oh here it is. Yeah,
who is this kid? Was this kid's name Brillain Holly Hollyhind. Yeah.

(01:22:59):
So I see people like that, and there's two reasons
I don't trust them. I don't believe anybody who claims
and presents themselves as like a Christian, a very good
Christian person. I don't really believe that that's who they are.
And that's a trust issue for me. But Also, I
don't trust people who don't embrace I don't know, being real,

(01:23:24):
because nobody sits like this and dresses like this. Like
when you're at home alone by yourself, do you sit
and dress and smile like that. I don't think so.
So it's you're always putting on an act. Me I'm
not putting on an act. Still don't trust myself though,
people like this I don't trust because I just don't.

(01:23:45):
There's something about these wasps. And you look at Brilin
Hollydend and you look at Erica Kirk. You know, Erica
Kirk was wealthy before she was with Charlie. So it's
not like she's a gold digger or something. She was
very wealthy reportedly before she got with Charlie. Before she
got married to Charlie, she already had money. So people

(01:24:09):
that have like a lot of money and they're flying
on private jets and there, and they're really really connected
within their you know, their respective industry. That's not a conspiracy.
It's just that when I see stuff like that, I
think usually you don't get to that position unless there's

(01:24:31):
some form of compromise or something that somebody else wants.
I mean, seriously, do you have Do you know how
far I could be in the radio world if I
would have just done what everybody told me to do
at the beginning, if I would have just shut up
and do what I'm told, Like, how much money I

(01:24:54):
would probably have how many millions of dollars I might
have in this deal, that deal advertisements. I don't want
to imagine it because it kind of makes me a
little bit upset. But I also can sleep at night.
That's that's the trade off, and I just know that's
in radio. I mean, you're look, if you're shaking hands
with Donald Trump, and you're winning beauty pageants and you're

(01:25:14):
already super wealthy, and you come from a family who's
connected to the defense industry, yeah, I'm going to question
who you are and who's exploiting and using you potentially,
and what your motivations are. You could still be a
great person, but I'm going to question it a little bit,

(01:25:35):
a little bit, because I don't know if I can
trust you when you have all of these connections. It
is true her father was in the defense tech industry
in Arizona, But then again, I mean, I have numerous
listeners on this show who either themselves or their parents

(01:25:56):
worked at a military base, or a not a military base,
but like a secretive military base, or a secretive national
lab like the Idaho National Laboratory, or people that worked
at Raytheon, or people that worked close with the people
that worked at Aary fifty one. Whether I believe them

(01:26:18):
or not, I don't. It doesn't really matter. I don't
think people are making stories up. I'm just saying, just
because your parents work somewhere doesn't mean that you're suspicious.
That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is when
your father's in the defense industry and I don't think
there's any verified claims of this, but has some connection
potentially to the Iron Dome, and when you know your

(01:26:45):
grandfather also reportedly has similar connections to the higher echelons
of society, and when they're already super wealthy and super connected, yes, naturally,
the children of this family and the children of other families,
they get together and form other families. And that's how

(01:27:07):
That's how it is in Japan, that's how it is
in China's how it is in the US, how it
is all over the world. But I'm allowed to question
it when I find things to be suspicious, and when
you start linking things up, it might just be a
natural byproduct of the contact that that industries and that
governments and that wealthy people have. I mean, a lot

(01:27:32):
of people might think from this radio show. You might
think that I'm something that I'm not. A lot of
people think that if you're on radio, you must be
super wealthy, you must have a giant house, you must
have a lot of cars. I don't know how many
people actually think that about radio, but you know, the
TV stars, movie stars, stuff like that, that's what you think.

(01:27:52):
Some people think that about radio. I don't make that
much money and it's all from what I've built. And
also I don't live that glamorous Hollywood life. But I'm
only using this as example because some people think that
I do, and it's hilarious. It's funny because I don't.
I really don't. It's funny. So you have to consider

(01:28:17):
all of that in this assessment of Erica Kirk. There's
a lot of potentially strange things, but there's a lot
of things that also just kind of make sense. Her
father was connected to the defense industry and she was

(01:28:41):
very wealthy, but that doesn't mean anything. A lot of
people work for the defense industry. A lot of people
are wealthy. If you're using that as a justification to
paint some conspiracy or to paint this woman in a
certain way, I think that's wrong. On the other hand,
there are a lot of questions, so we're going to
proceed through some of the rest of this. Let's look

(01:29:04):
at Erica Kirk in a little bit more detail. Yes,
she was Miss Arizona. I believe it was in twenty twelve,
and yes Miss USA was owned by Donald Trump's Miss
Universe organization at the time. That's true. Her career was
in entertainment as a model, an actress, and a casting

(01:29:27):
director before she shifted to philanthropy and ministry. Some people
just get out of that business and go into something else.
Some people give up the fast pace life of Wall
Street and they become average everyday folks who decide to

(01:29:51):
live in a camper. It's normal. But it's also pretty
normal for people that are involved in high finance so
or in modeling, or in entertainment, or in law or
something to shift into something else as part of a
role that they're playing. Take the DC Dreno, for example,

(01:30:12):
when I first saw the DC dreno. I saw it
pop up all over X. I thought, this guy is
a plant, this guy's a fraud, this guy is working
for somebody. I'm tired of seeing this guy. Do you
know who the DC dreno was. Rogan o' handley wasn't
just some random person who popped up and was like,
I've got some good ideas for the conservatives, and people said,

(01:30:34):
let me listen to what you have to say. No,
Rogan o'hanley was a Jewish entertainment lawyer in California and
then decided I'm going to become a conservative Christian influencer
and I'm going to be Irish because he's got Irish background.

(01:30:56):
He was a Jewish lawyer before this. Then he became
an Irish commentator for conservatives. That's an example of what
I'm talking about here with Erica Kirk. Sometimes people just say,
you know what, I can't deal with this Wall Street
thing anymore. I'm going to go live in a van.
And some people decide, or it's part of their job

(01:31:16):
to take on a different role, to switch from an
entertainment lawyer to a conservative influencer, a Jewish lawyer to
a Christian influencer. That thing happens just as much as
the other thing where people just get tired of one
job and go into another one. So maybe Erica got

(01:31:38):
sick and tired of her entertainment career and decided I'm
going to get into philanthropy and helping people, and I'm
going to get into ministry, or that's a way to
infiltrate the kind of Christian conservative base, or it could
be something else. The story of Erica Kirk was really

(01:31:59):
not a story anybody cared about or talked about until
Charlie was shot. It's understandable she wasn't the one out
there doing the speeches. She wasn't the one out there
doing the debates. He was. And it's kind of like
after Art Bell died, you know, people were exploiting his death.

(01:32:19):
His wife said please stop exploiting his death, and people
didn't really care much about what she had to say.
But people that are like famous and popular, like, if
I died, just let it be, Just let it be.
Maybe I'll be assassinated if I die. Just let it be.

(01:32:42):
You don't need to ask people close to me to
get information about Just let it be. Not suicidal don't
plan to die anytime soon. If I do, maybe it's suspicious,
But you get what I'm saying. It's why do we
care what Erica Kirk has to say? Why do I
really care? Just because she was Charlie Kirk's wife. I mean,

(01:33:05):
she's involved in Turning Point USA, but she wasn't the
public face of it. Like, why do I care what
this woman has to say? That was my first thought
when I saw her. I don't really care what this
woman has to say. If it's all kosher and it's
all halal, it's all blessed and there's nothing weird, then

(01:33:26):
you know you felt sorry, and then you move on.
And if you're inna grieve this much over one person,
you got some you've got some serious issues. When you
got hospitals and schools being bombed overseas in Ukraine and Gozen,
you just don't really care about that. But this one
guy dying, this is what matters. I mean, at some
point it get it gets ridiculous. And I saw the memorial,

(01:33:49):
I saw this thing they hosted for him in Arizona,
and I thought, this is weird, and this is where
the second dose of I don't know if I trust
this whole story, let alone her. It just seems weird.
They introduced these people at the memorial like it was
a w W E event, And maybe that's not weird.

(01:34:12):
I know how conservatives are. Conservatives are always trying to
appeal to the youth. So they put rock bands in church.
They have loud speakers where they blast the music. It's
like heavy metal Jesus band, Like I love Jesus, you know,

(01:34:33):
Jesus is my favorite. I've been to those churches. They're
they're weird. It's as weird as my my my singing sad.
It's just that weird. That's exactly what it sounds like
in one of those weird rock band churches. Some of
them are a little more tame, you know, they got
the normal Christian singers. Jeezus, they got the band in
the background. You know, it's weird. That's how that's how

(01:34:58):
Christians try to reach out to people that because they're
kind of like disconnected from reality a little bit, like
this wasp kit I just mentioned, And they also try
to do things that are just kind of weird. You know.
They're just like, we got to appeal to people. What
can we do with this? What can we do with
this event, Well, let's have sparklers and fireworks. That'll get

(01:35:20):
people's attention. These people are just like really disconnected. So
the conservatives try to appeal to people through like rock
bands at churches, and the liberals try to appeal to
people with like debauchery and gay sex. It's it's really
weird how that both sides are really disconnected. But you know,

(01:35:40):
if I died and I wandered the same thing about Charlie, like,
would Charlie have wanted there to be a giant public
Roman colosseum style funeral where they or memorial where they
introduce people with like sparklers and fireworks. It's like they're
introducing the players at the super Bowl. The supermodel from Arizona,

(01:36:07):
you know her as the wife of Charlie Kirk. It's
Erica Kirk, and then the sparklers. That's you gotta admit,
that's weird for a memorial. It's really weird for like
a funeral. Normally people that wear black and they're sad.
And that's again one of the first things that made

(01:36:29):
me think this is strange. As a matter of fact,
when I saw the line of people outside the memorial
the funeral. I think it was technically a memorial. I
kept I kept thinking funeral. But outside of this memorial,
I noticed and I was watching this kind of dumbfounded.
There were people cheering or something. When they held this

(01:36:53):
event on September twenty first, it was like a sports event.
It was like a super Bowl. His funeral slash memorial
was accompanied by lines of people that had prepared to
go inside of the coliseum and pay their respects, and

(01:37:15):
there were people outside in lawn shares. I watched the video,
it was like, this is so great. People people came
to watch Charlie Kirk and they respect him and he's
a great freedom loving American who got shot and killed
by a crazy liberal. And there's people outside in chairs
like doing a roller coaster, both hands in the air. Yeah,

(01:37:36):
we're here at the Charlie Kirk funerals, Like, what the
fuck is this? And then you go inside and they
had Steve Bannon on a headset doing commentary, and I
was thinking, what the fuck is that? It got Steve
Bannon doing like Don Cherry commentary on a fucking funeral.
It was weird. You have to admit that's a little weird.

(01:37:58):
Then they introduced people and they got sparkler fireworks going off.
What the fuck is that? And you say these things
and people just assume that you think it's all a
conspiracy or that you're being disrespectful, and I think, you know,
every culture is different, but like typically in the United States,
in the West, we don't usually have lines of people

(01:38:22):
cheering to get into a funeral. We usually don't have
sports commentary, and we usually don't have fireworks going off
when they bring out the wife. I saw that one
WWE meme where they've got the woman. She's doing like
it's a backward pose as she's coming out of the tunnel,
and they got the sparklers and stuff going off, and

(01:38:45):
there's a couple of different memes they say something like
how I celebrate my husband's death or how I mourn
my husband's death. It's weird, isn't it a little bit weird?
I mean, that is maybe evident enough that something's off.
But then again, that's also how conservatives try to appeal
to people. But then again, you don't really need to

(01:39:07):
appeal to people because people already like Charlie Kirk and
they were going to show up anyway, and it's really
weird because I've been to Turning Point USA events. I
went to one in Arizona, I went to one in Glendale.
I went to one in Phoenix, and Ron De Santas
was there, and I mean, all the big names were there.
Charlie was there. I think, I just I don't think that.

(01:39:29):
I don't think I saw him speak. I didn't see
the whole thing. But I stood outside and I go
and everybody's outside and just standing there and waiting to
get in line. And that was my one Turning Point
USA event. And then I try to put that into
context with people cheering outside of the funeral, at least
in some of the videos I saw. I don't mean

(01:39:50):
like constant cheering, but people in chairs where the camera
comes down they're like, yeah, we're at the Charli Kirk funeral.
It's like, this is weird because I went to a
Turning Point USA event and people were not that excited
to go to the event to see living people. Very strange.
Maybe that's how we decide as a society to deal
with the loss of someone like a Charlie Kirk. It's

(01:40:11):
just too much to deal with, so we need to
treat it like a sports event. Maybe that's the only
way we can cope with it, the only way that
we can really process it, and the only way that
we can really deal with it. And if that is
the case, I get it, I understand it. I just
still think that it's weird that they have fireworks or sparklers,

(01:40:38):
and I think that it's weird that people are outside
waiting like it's a sporting event. You know, if you
really cared about freedom that much, why can't you get
this many people together to do something in Phoenix where
they have a skid row and people get burned alive
in dumpsters. Why can't these people go out and clean
up the streets while they're waiting, get a tick, and

(01:41:00):
then go clean the streets, do something to actually fix
your community, rather than going to the funeral of a
guy who actually was doing something to fix your community.
And it's a little bit weird. You know that they've
got Steve Bannon playing Marv Albert doing commentary. I mean
that had to be one of the weirdest things the
whole And then I was like, the fireworks, so that's

(01:41:21):
actually that's actually that's weird, And then the people sharing
that's really weird. Two people are. It's very strange. It's
very magically ritualistic. And then you learn like I did,
and I heard the rumors and they're half true, half
not true again because people just assume things, so you
have to look at it yourself. His funeral took place

(01:41:43):
on September twenty first. There were two hundred thousand people
that reportedly attended. I heard eighty, then I heard one hundred,
then I heard two hundred. I have no idea how
many people shut up, I really don't. I don't trust
any numbers. I don't trust any reports. Everything's different. It's
just the The Internet is half a hot live, half dead.
Half the people are bots. It's run by AI and

(01:42:06):
chat bots, and you don't know what to believe. Okay,
but a lot of people attended. People were outside, people
were inside, and the date was September twenty first. Now,
for those of you who are interested in the changing
of the yearly guard, for those of you who are

(01:42:34):
interested in the occult, you might find it interesting that
the Charlie Kirk funeral slash memorial took place on September
twenty first, which was a Sunday, And you might find
it interesting that September twenty first is the autumnal equinox,

(01:42:57):
and that's on a day of the sun. You might
find that a little bit interesting, And if that's all
that it was, then it's not even really a coincidence.
It's just just is now. Some of them also might say, well,
hold on a second, the northern hemisphere autumn equinox is

(01:43:20):
September twenty second September twenty third. Well, in the Witch's calendar,
it's actually the twentieth through the twenty third, so like
twenty twenty one, twenty two into the twenty third. It's
like three days. That's what all the equinoxes and solstices are,
their three day festivals, and they cover the period of
the start, the actual equinox or solstice moment, and then

(01:43:41):
the post as it transitions into the next stage of
the year. So his funeral memorial took place on the
autumn equinox on the Witch's calendar, and there was a
new moon on September twenty second, early in the morning,

(01:44:05):
so in other words, spring equinox begins, the new moon begins,
and although it wasn't visible from Arizona, you could see
it in New Zealand And, Antarctica and some Pacific islands.
There was a partial solar eclipse on September twenty first. Now,
in terms of the time difference New Zealand, Antarctica, Pacific Islands, Arizona,

(01:44:33):
I don't know the exact time difference in terms of
the time zones, but September twenty first was a partial
solar eclipse. Just like the people outside, like, yeah about
Charlie Kirk funeral, I can't wait for this. It's gonna
be awesome. And the commentary inside, you know, Marv albert
Ak Steve mannon giving commentary. I mean, it would have

(01:44:55):
been interesting if they'd have had like a Don Cherry
suit and it would have changed, you know, design as
they come back from commercial break, do it Tostito's commercial,
Pepsi commercial comeback, We're heard, the Charlie Kirk funeral. It
is about to go down, getting ready for kickoff. It's weird.
And the Sparklers when it introduced Erica Kirk, it's weird,

(01:45:19):
and just like all those things are weird. It's weird
that it took place on the Spring equinox, it took
place at the beginning of a new moon, and it
took place kind of during a solar or partial solar
eclipse and on a sun day. That's cosmologically ritualistic. That's

(01:45:44):
very weird. We also just learned, and it's understandable why
someone might want to do this, but we just learned.
Some of you might have seen this in other reports,
but I think most people just learned that Erica Kirk saved.

(01:46:07):
I guess, like a pendant that Kirk had with a
drop of his blood on it, and she's holding onto that.
Charlie Kirk's wife revealed she wears his blood stained pendent. Reportedly,
the paramedics ripped it off of him attempting to stop
the bleeding. Some of the blood remained on the crevice

(01:46:31):
of the cross, and so she keeps this bloody cross
pendent on her because it has the blood of her husband.
I get it. I suppose keep blocks of hair. People
want women on the internet to send them dirty socks
and dirty underwear and jars a p or I guess,

(01:46:52):
I get it. I mean this is a different situation
than that, right. This is your husband that just got
shot and there's blood on his pendent and you pray
to God that he's in heaven and it's you want
to hold onto that. It's also kind of part of
that apotheosis again. But yes, she has this blood stained pendent.

(01:47:13):
By the way, she was a literal actress. For anybody
accusing her of being an actress, she was an actual actress.
She was actually in the Emerson Drive music video She's
My kind of Crazy, and in the video you can
see the numbers nine to ten September tenth. That's very strange,

(01:47:39):
is it not. So we are dealing with something here
that is perhaps a mix of all the things I
mentioned at the beginning of the show. Something natural that's exploited,
things that happen that are coincidences. We frame these narratives,
we run syops on ourself. Something are staged and organized.

(01:48:02):
We have conspiracy paradolia, some things perhaps we manifest, and
I think all of that is relevant to this story.
But I also think that there's more to the story.
Romanian Angels was a project under Erica Kirk's five one
c three nonprofit Everyday Heroes Like You. It focused on

(01:48:25):
supporting Romanian orphanages, including donations to or holiday gifts and
donations to certain facilities in Romania where children needed help,
specifically Christmas time and other times of the year. She
even collaborated with the US military on logistics of doing

(01:48:47):
this type of thing, and reportedly they praised her in
part of their partnership with the US military, which remember
she her father's defense industry. Now there are unverified and
debunked fact checks, they tell us because there's no Romainian

(01:49:08):
court records, no investigation officially, none of that linking Romaining
Angels and Erica Kirk to the rumors of human trafficking
child trafficking just like, yeah, there's nothing happening with the
Clinton Foundation in Haiti, nothing happened with Maxwell at Disney
with kids, and maybe there's not. However, there are potentially

(01:49:34):
some connections that just can't really be overlooked. One of
them includes Colonel Otto Busher, who is implicated and unrelated.
This has nothing to do with Romainian Angels, but unrelated
two thousand, roughly early two thousands US military trafficking in Romania.

(01:49:57):
And then here's Erica Kirk. She just a kind lady,
and she has a foundation, a group that is helping
orphanages in Romania, and she's doing it with the assistance
of the US military. Which has a history of trafficking
kids in Romania. That just gets a little bit too

(01:50:17):
maybe close to the truth. It's a little bit odd,
don't you think doesn't mean that she did anything. It
just is a little bit strange because when you're talking
about the modeling world and you're talking about let's help kids,
these foundations and these groups that we set up, usually
that's not what they're used for. They're not helping kids.
They're helping themselves to the kids. They're helping themselves to organs.

(01:50:42):
And you know who's been implicated in this directly, it's
in their own newspapers Israel. Reports are that Israel was
involved in trafficking those kids out of Romania, not necessarily
in connection to Erica Kirk, but back in two thousand
and one, Romania was investigating Israeli adoption agencies linked to

(01:51:10):
organ trafficking, organ harvesting, and child trafficking in Romania. And
magically this is around the exact same time in the
early two thousands when Colonel Otto Busher was also implicated
in this US military trafficking in Romania. So it would

(01:51:30):
appear as if the US and Israel, and I'm sure
plenty of other countries too, were involved in trafficking children
using orphanages in Romania. And Erica Kirk is brought into
this because of her group, because of the angels. She's

(01:51:54):
trying to save those angels, save those kids. Saybody wants
to save the kids. Save the kids, Save the kids,
save the kids. Because those Romaining Angels. She's linked to
all of this. And look, the locals have blamed the
Romaining Angels. Locals have blamed them, just like the Clinton Foundation.
Locals blamed these Romainian angels. She openly worked with the military,

(01:52:22):
and the history of the military of the United States
and Israel in Romania was the connections between them and
the trafficking of children and adults for organ harvesting and
other things. And the fact that she was working with
the US military is a little bit, a little bit strange,

(01:52:46):
a little bit uncomfortable. And then you know her connections
to the modeling world and Trump and entertainment and being
in music videos. And I understand why people think, oh,
she's like a honeypot trap, or if not a honeypot trap,
she's she's something other than what she appears to be.

(01:53:07):
Would it surprise me?

Speaker 5 (01:53:08):
No?

Speaker 4 (01:53:10):
Should it surprise, you know, but all of this was
also essentially public record before Charlie was shot. Nobody figured
it out. I guess you could say, well, nobody cared
until there was a reason to care. But then the
question is, Charlie was a really smart guy. He didn't
figure any of this out, Like, wasn't this exactly what
he was opposed to? You know? Except for that whole

(01:53:31):
I trust my sources. Let's let the Epstein thing go.
Wonder how much Erica Kirk had to do with convincing
him to say that but he didn't know any of this.
This is Erica Kirk talking about what is next for
Turning Point USA. The last thing I'll play you, the
last thing I'll say on the show. Let's listen to
what she had to say.

Speaker 5 (01:53:51):
First, we have unused material from speeches that he's had
that no one has heard yet. We have Sunday specials
lined up to the brim because my husband was so
intentional about making sure that there was enough content always.

Speaker 2 (01:54:07):
Anians, he made sure we recorded everything every He would
not do a speech unless we could get the video
and the.

Speaker 5 (01:54:13):
So we have speeches that no one's heard of. We
have interviews that no one's heard of. We have stuff
from Korea and Japan that no one's heard of podcast.
So I mean, in the words of my husband, buckle up,
because there is a lot of content to be had
and we have so many amazing things down the pipeline

(01:54:34):
that we are working on currently that.

Speaker 4 (01:54:35):
Will unveil and do time.

Speaker 5 (01:54:38):
I am so excited.

Speaker 2 (01:54:40):
And so by the way, those are things Charlie himself
that he wanted.

Speaker 4 (01:54:43):
He wanted.

Speaker 2 (01:54:44):
We were working on some big things, you know, right
up until the end. And you know, we've talked about
that a lot. Like a lot of the guiding vision
that we're using right now to kind of study the
ship and figure out where we're going is the things
Charlie himself where we were going.

Speaker 5 (01:55:00):
One hundred percent. And similar with Turning Point USA, Charlie
had a plan moving past twenty thirty that he's shared
with the team and has implemented. So we're not going anywhere.
We have the blueprints, we have the blueprints, we have
our marching orders, and we are just remaining humble and

(01:55:21):
grateful to God and we're remaining just steward.

Speaker 4 (01:55:26):
So wouldn't it be convenient if Charlie Kirk was assassinated
by a foreign government that needs the support of the
youth now more than ever because it's waning rapidly and
they need that support now because if they don't get
that support now, the timetable is up times up. They're

(01:55:51):
not going to get the regime changes in their wars.
They're not going to get the full support of the
United States and future generations went forward in the conservative
community because people are just done and sick of this
foreign country. Wouldn't it be something if Erica Kirk was involved.

(01:56:16):
By involved, I mean the world of pageantry, the world
of defense contractors, the world of Donald Trump, the world
of high finance and high power, and that she was
introduced to Charlie Kirk in the same way Malaney was
introduced to Trump. She was a payment, She was just
a connection. She was someone to watch him. Wouldn't it

(01:56:40):
be something if the blueprint that they have for twenty
thirty onward is exactly what we've seen happening with Turning
Point USA already, And that is a bunch of conservative
people that otherwise would never have gotten off their behinds
getting up and going and signing up for Turning Point USA.
And wouldn't it be something to that blueprint included parleying

(01:57:03):
their service to country and God into service for this
foreign country right in time for this foreign country to
be saved from the devastation of losing virtually all support
from the entire world and mostly the United States, and

(01:57:25):
continuing on their agenda. And it just so happened to
be this foreign country and people that represented in the
United States are heavily implicated in Charlie Kirk's death. Wouldn't
that be something if maybe they were lying about Charlie
Kirk's quote plan someone dies, you can say anything about them.
Everybody who knows them well, I knew him. I got

(01:57:45):
a text mess from I got this, I got an
email from him. What if the plan was fake? What
if the plan is to get all these young people
to support what maybe they otherwise wouldn't support. And Charlie
Kirk had a great platform that and that ladies and
gentlemen would be one hell of a conspiracy if it

(01:58:06):
were true. And it appears that quite a bit of
it is true. And it appears that Erica Kirk, at
least maybe unknowingly, but probably knowingly but perhaps potentially I
don't really know for sure, but might have had some
connection to this international network of organ harvesters, child traffickers,
and of course this would also connect her to those

(01:58:27):
disgusting unhuman Tait brothers too, which conservatives have some weird
like gay relationship with. And so if you can take
anything away from tonight's show outside of the conspiracy, psyops,
false flags and predictive programming, it's that nine ten is

(01:58:47):
the new nine to eleven. Nine to eleven we know
a foreign country was directly involved in that, we know
the lies about who was involved led to endless ongoing
war and it appears the same thing as happening today
after nine to ten, terrifying crackdown on free speech, free press, etc.

(01:59:09):
And now globally as if the solar lunar equinox ritual
was the basis for this digital IDs being fully implemented
from Australia to Vietnam where they're deleting your bank account
if you don't have one, to the UK where you
can't have a job if you don't have one. The

(01:59:31):
people that claim to be Christian and the people that
claim to love God and be the people of God
might just be the very devil himself incarnate TST. Radio.
Do nfolreadigable at yahoo dot com. Please buy me a coffee,
Please grab a book, Please subscribe. Thank you for listening
to the show, making us in the top ten, putting
us in the top ten of Spreaker for history shows.

(01:59:54):
I'll speak with you on the next broadcast.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Cardiac Cowboys

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Snake Eyes 910 is the New 911 (9/29/25)

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Cardiac Cowboys

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Snake Eyes 910 is the New 911 (9/29/25)

Stuff You Should Know