Spectrums of Disorder: A Tylenol Saga (10/2/25)

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hello, anybody home today, I want you to open your mind.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
I've almost come to the conclusion that the story is
subdamning that the massive Apple people can't deal with it.
We are in process of developing a whole series of
techniques to bid people actually to love their certitude.

Speaker 3 (00:23):
We face a hostile ideology, global in scope, atheistic in character,
ruthless in purpose, and insiduous in methode.

Speaker 2 (00:32):
So we are opposed around the world by a monolithic
and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covet means for
expanding its sphere.

Speaker 1 (00:40):
Of influence to change the minds and the attitudes and
the beliefs of the people to bring about one world
socialist totalitarian government.

Speaker 3 (00:49):
The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists.

Speaker 4 (00:53):
It is patterned itself after every dictator who's ever planted
the ripping imprint of a boot on the pages of history,
just the beginning of time.

Speaker 2 (01:00):
If you can get people to consent to the state
of affairs in which they are living, then you have
a much more easily controllable society than you would if
you were relying poorly on clubs and firing squads and
concentration camps, tools that the conquest do not necessarily come
with barns and extorsions, and followed there are weapons that

(01:21):
recimply fight prejudices.

Speaker 1 (01:23):
As you connect the dots between different people, organizations, religions, history,
suddenly the picture starts to form. The Kingdom of God
is within men, not one man nor a group of men.
Someone born in the United States is not more special
than someone born in Mexico.

Speaker 2 (01:40):
Someone who is white is not more special than someone
who is black.

Speaker 1 (01:44):
They're just vehicles for the consciousness to experience.

Speaker 4 (01:48):
They do not want your children to be educated. They
do not want you to think too much.

Speaker 1 (01:56):
It was learned that the aliens have men and were
then manipulating matters of people. Your secret society is witchcraft, magic,
the occult, and religion.

Speaker 2 (02:03):
They're reaching to our children in music, television, books, right
young children's instence.

Speaker 5 (02:08):
How can I just still a litet of stand with
an efficiency?

Speaker 1 (02:11):
So if you have the opportunity to stand next to
one of these machines, it feels like an altar to
an alien god. Genetic powers most awesome forced the planet's
ever seen, but you wielded like a kid that's found
his dad's a gun.

Speaker 2 (02:23):
You are the airport who has an ounce, but applying
this there is now in the prevention of the army.

Speaker 4 (02:27):
Too many others know what's happening out there, and no one,
no government agency has jurisdiction over the truth. Any state,
any entity, any ideology that fails to recognize the worth,
the dignity the rights of man, that state is absoluting
a case to be found under m from man guid
in the Twilight, Sir, a man.

Speaker 1 (02:46):
Time, some of you got acquainted with the real hard proof.
It's the haw that says I will not acquiesce.

Speaker 2 (02:55):
Freedom is the free major to you right, freedom from
the disasters from on the state.

Speaker 1 (03:00):
If you don't connect the dots, just a mass of
what's all this about? You are listening to The Secret
Teachings Radio. I'm your host, Ryan Gable. If you'd like
to contact the show tonight, you can email rd Gable
at yahoo dot com. Reach out to the show on

(03:22):
social media. The easiest way is by visiting the website
at www dot tst radio dot info. On the website
you'll also find my books and you will find our
full show archive all the past episodes. If you missed anything.
It is available now in the archive to download and listen.

(03:44):
The show airs Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday. And
if you don't listen consistently to the show, but you
do enjoy the show. If you haven't realized this yet,
each episode is sort of tailor made to a specific subject,
but a lot of episodes link and connect together, so
sometimes you need to listen to more than one show
and the entirety of a show because we break things

(04:07):
down to the molecular level and then we put them
back together again, at least on the majority of shows.
Tonight's show is one of those shows. Tonight is a
show We're going to break things down to the base level,
and we are going to try to put it back
together and to see if it has any grip, any teeth,

(04:28):
to see if it has any weight. We might even
carry this over into another episode of The Secret Teachings.
Sometimes I listen to old shows and I think when
I listen to them, hearing myself it's a weird thing anyway,
But when I'm listening to the show, I'll think I
understand why people only listen to radio shows for ten

(04:52):
to fifteen minutes on average, Because if you don't have
a lot of time, and you're looking just for bullet points.
Most radio shows and podcasts, even if they're giving you
bullet points, are not condensing them down to two three minutes.
So it's much more convenient. It's easier to just go

(05:13):
to a TikTok, or to go to an Instagram, or
to go to a Facebook an x and just read
the very curated, limited content as opposed to listening to
a breakdown on a given subject. And I've also noticed
that the more professional, at least this is my experience,

(05:34):
the more professional you try to be, the more difficult
it is to expand your outreach because if you're sitting
down with time to listen to a show, it's probably
not something you really want to invest a lot of
thought into. And it's something that I experience myself when
I don't have something on in the background, I don't

(05:56):
have work to do, and I'm just kind of sitting
in silence and I think I want to listen to something.
The first thing I think is I don't really want
to listen to something that makes me have to continue
to work and give me ideas for new shows and
maybe something to put in a book. And so I
want to listen to something that's kind of background noise,
So I get it. I understand. I'm only explaining this

(06:21):
because this is something that I go through. It's something
I know that many of you go through. There's now,
with the accessibility of media, so many different options to
choose from. It's hard to really pick and stay focused
or loyal to one thing or another. Another reason I
try to give you a variety on this show. Tonight's

(06:41):
episode begins with a wacky story. It begins with a
social media post of what is an artificial intelligent video
and AI video promoting med beds that the President of
the United State eights shared and when I saw this,

(07:05):
I thought this alone could be a full two hour
show because the medbed conspiracy, as we've discussed on this
show before. I think we talked about it on the
Kramer Versus Kramer episode about that con artist. I think
he was selling med beds. But we've also I have

(07:28):
and friends of mine have also dealt with medbed people
at conferences before. My good friend ryder Lee was sitting
with me at a conference a couple of years ago
and this guy came up to us. We both knew
who he was. I think writer knew who he was.
I knew who he was. He's a very annoying guy,
and he came up to us and was telling us
all about these med beds that you can get. And

(07:49):
I've known who this guy was for close to ten
years now, and he's been saying every time I've seen him,
the medbeds are coming next year, next year. And it's
been you know that, I've known the guy ten successive
years of their coming next year, and then we never
get med beds. I'm thinking that they just watched Alien

(08:10):
and they get the idea of the medbed from that,
or they watched Elysium and they get the idea of
the med bed from that. It's only for the elite,
it's only for the wealthy. It cures cancer, it cures
all kinds of elements, that can birth an alien baby
if you really need it to in any emergency. But
we never actually get med beds. And so because these
people are so infatuated with the medbed, if the President

(08:33):
shares a video which has now been deleted, and it
appears to imply that medbeds are real, then the people
that are infatuated with the idea are going to hold
it up as proof, and the fact that it was
deleted is additional proof that it's real and they don't

(08:55):
want you to see it. The video, which has been deleted,
was intended to resemble a Fox News segment on the
show hosted by the president's daughter in law, Laura Trump.
It featured an AI version of Trump promising access to
new medical technology. Of course it wasn't real. It was fake,

(09:16):
but it was promoting the idea of med beds. Every
American will get a medbed card, and with it, you'll
have access, not just access, guaranteed access to our new
hospitals led by the top doctors in the nation, equipped
with the most advanced technology in the world. That's at

(09:38):
least what the fake Trump said in the AI video.
Now there's another angle to this that could be addressed
in its own separate show, and that is that people
actually believed an AI version of Trump was real and
it wasn't. That's problem enough, But the fact that people
believed that this was some kind of real video, and

(10:01):
that the video itself was confirmation that the medbed was
real and that we're all going to get cards medbed
cards and they're going to give us access to these
new hospitals. Where are they building these new hospitals? Where

(10:22):
are they putting up these new medical facilities? Because any
hospital I've been to is just a standard hospital. There's
a few that are really high end, but most of
them are just standard hospitals. One of the hospitals I
went to in Tucson wasn't just a standard hospital. It
was a pretty gross hospital. The floors were pretty dirty.

(10:44):
Definitely didn't want any kind of surgeries being performed there.
The one I had my ablation at, about fifteen minutes
from that hospital was pretty clean. It was a very
very decent hospital. Nice hospital. Where are they building these
new hospitals? Like do these people think of the amount
of logistics and infrastructure that has to be assessed and

(11:09):
built to replace all old hospitals with new hospitals with
med beds. And if there are med beds that can
do all these wonderful things, why do you need a
hospital in the first place. You would just installed in
your home, wouldn't you. Or am I missing something here?
And of course, if you're a fan of the medbed conspiracy,
I am missing something because there's like fifteen different twenty

(11:33):
thirty forty different angles on it, and no matter how
you address it, you're always wrong if you don't necessarily
believe in the med bed as if it's Christ, and
if you don't believe in Christ, then you don't get
eternal life. Wouldn't you just like install it at home.
There'd be like a little Ikia guide that comes with it,

(11:56):
with a little cartoon drawing that shows you how to
put it together. It's easy, but it can be frustrating.
You might need to really push something in there or
really hit it with a hammer, but it'll it's it's
an easy install. Why would you build new hospitals, these
giant hospitals for med beds when people could just have
them installed in their homes. And who pays for all

(12:17):
of this? A lot of these q Andon wackos believe,
And look, I could be more inclusive and just not
say wacko, But like, if you believe in the q
Andon narrative, at this point, you are a wacko. You
are crazy because the whole thing has for years been
proven to be a fraud. It was proven to be
a fraud the first time there was a q post.

(12:38):
It's all intelligence, all AI and all people on the internet.
Making crap up. It's garbage, it's nonsense. But wouldn't you
install this in your home? Why would you need to
build these big hospitals? And who pays for all of this?
Because these right wing q ANDON people are like anti communist,

(13:00):
anti socialist, But somehow there's a bunch of money where
everybody gets a medbed. Isn't that kind of like socialist
or something. It just doesn't make any sense, at least
to me, doesn't make any sense. Some of this actually

(13:22):
comes from the UFO community, not really that surprising because
people believe that we reverse engineered alien technology and we
develop the med beds from this alien tech. Of course,
if that's the case, maybe we can make them bigger.
But most of these alien entities that people have contact

(13:42):
with that are highly technically advanced, particularly the Grays, are
really short and they're kind of maybe biological but probably mechanical,
and they probably don't need med beds to start with.
So maybe these are the med beds of the reptilians.
But if they're the reptilians, they're like twice our height,
and if they're the tall Grays, they're still much taller

(14:03):
than us. So I guess we've shrunk down the medbed
or have expanded the medbed. And what was used on
the biology of some ten foot tall insect some fifteen
foot tall, white Nordic looking creature with blonde hair that
all these old UFO hags want to have sex with.

(14:25):
Then this is a completely different biology. I mean, I
guess that's the idea of reverse engineering, right, But we
reverse engineered gray or reptilian or insectoid medical pods for
human use, and we're all just going to get one.

(14:47):
It doesn't make any sense at all. It's totally nonsensical.
It's totally ridiculous, and it falls into and under all
these different categories. Right it's under the category of new
age holistic UFOs. They all have this kind of blended
together incestral relationship already, but now they're also part of

(15:08):
make America healthy again. And one of the things that
fake Trump said in this video was these facilities are safe, modern,
and designed to restore every citizen to full health and strength.
This is the beginning of a new era in American healthcare. Yes,
the beginning of a new era in healthcare where you,

(15:30):
as an American who is most likely overweight, suffering from
chronic inflammation, diabetes, cancer, heart disease, respiratory problems, probably a
fatty liver to intocrine system problems. You probably have an
issue with your thyroid, You probably have an issue with
your glands. You probably have an issue with pretty much
the entire body and brain. But if you hop into

(15:53):
a MEDBD, it'll slim you down as a man, to
the appropriate weight of your height. Did you know that?
That's what the MEDBD does. And if you're two three
hundred pounds overweight, don't fret. You get in the med
bed and once they squeeze you and jam you into
it with those like shoehorns, they close it and then

(16:15):
it just shrinks you down to your normal size. So
women that are a little bit overweight, it's like ozimpic,
but it's a more technological advance form of ozimpic. You
get in the medpod, the med bed, and then you
all look like Playboy models. Now that's what the gray
aliens are trying to tell us. And if you're a man,
it basically turns into fabio. You just get in the

(16:35):
med bed, hundreds of pounds of weight just fall off
of you, and then you hop out. You've got six
pack abs. You're much taller now too. Every man's six
foot three four now, and you're cured of all your diseases.
And then you can go on smoking and drinking and
taking drugs and not sleeping and not drinking water, and

(16:57):
not getting fiber and eating only one particular form of
food and ignoring all others because of some diet trend
on the internet, and of course taking diet pills and
all this other stuff that people take, and then you
can get back in the medbed when those conditions create
the same effects that you needed the med bed four
in the first place. It's just this idea that's so similar.

(17:20):
I can't help but think it's so similar to the
financial medbed fraud. Remember the financial med bed fraud. It's
not an actual med bed. I'm just saying it's a
similar thing to the medbed. It's a financial med bed fraud.
And that was called the reset. Remember the financial reset.

(17:41):
People thought the financial reset is coming. All the horrible, evil,
lying scumbag bankers who have complete control of the world
economically have just decided, because the white hats had a
meeting with them, that they're going to give up all
of their wealth and debt and control and resources and

(18:03):
assets for you lonely workers and peasants, and they're going
to reset the whole system and you get a payment
of like a million dollars and then that transformed into
bitcoin and digital currency, which then transformed into CBDC, and

(18:27):
then they said no, they're different, and then actually they're
the same thing, and then they call it stable coin.
And now from Vietnam to the UK and everywhere in between,
they're telling people that if you don't have the Digital ID,
you won't be able to have a job, you won't
be able to have a bank account. Vietnam just stripped
about eighty something million bank accounts people that weren't registered

(18:49):
to the Digital ID. So it was a scam. Q
and I was a scam. The Great Reset was a
financial scam. It turned out to actually be a reset.
It was just called the Great Research and that was
the World Economic Form version. Because they primed you and
prepped you with this dis and misinformation, they manipulated you, well,

(19:11):
it's a reset. You got to agree and believe in
the reset, and then the reset turned out to be
you got scammed again. And the Medbed is another scam.
It's an absurd scam and it plays on people's desire,
like with those zimbig for a magic remedy. I don't
have to take care of myself or I don't have

(19:33):
to acknowledge that I'm just getting old. And when you
get old, your body breaks down some faster than others.
A large part of it has to do with how
you live your life. But hey, I'm seventy something years old,
I'm getting old. You don't have to succumb to your ailments,
but you can try to work on them to maybe
be a little bit less tight and you know, restrictive.

(19:57):
And a lot of older people start trying yoga and
it opens up the muscles, it opens up, you know,
their hips and their shoulders. Like that's an option. Or
you could just sit behind a computer and give scum
bags like Kramer and David Wilcock money in hopes that
one day you'll have a flying car and a medbed
that will reverse age you in the process, like you're
going to go to the moon and get and do

(20:19):
a twenty and back like Corey Good. It's nonsense, and
these people pray they are predators. They prey on people
that are in their homes. Most of these people are alone,
their husbands or wives have died. A lot of them
are older women. They don't have anything. Maybe they're on
drugs and they're just looking for an alternative solution. So
some scum bag named Colonel Kramer, which is a totally

(20:42):
made up designation, gets online start selling med beds. Some
guy with a parrot on his shoulder and a giant
dog that he doesn't know how to control at a conference,
goes around trying to sell people med beds, convince them
of the med beds. People like David Wilcock tell you
you're gonna have flying cars and med beds. Total nonsense.

(21:07):
The Financial reset was a scam, The medbed is a scam,
and it's all part of the same scam. It's the
QAnon New Age UFO conspiracy cult, which is largely brought
to you by the alphabet agencies and corporations. Where are
all these new hospitals at? Where are all these med

(21:31):
beds at? There ain't no med beds. There might be
containers where they grow humans. They're called artificial wombs. There
might be suicide pods those kind of look like the
artists rendering of med beds. They got synthetic wombs they

(21:56):
got suicide pods. Still ain't seen a medbed unless that's
what the suicide pod is, which would make sense too,
because the financial reset was if I just give all
my money away to this, to crypto or something, I'll
get money back. It's a scam. If I just hold
out a little bit longer, they're gonna give me all

(22:17):
this money. Why why? And if I get in this
pod it's a med bed, it'll take all my pain away. Yeah,
because it cuts your wrists and you bleed out and
die because it fills the pod with toxic gas that's poisonous,
and then you die because it cuts off the oxygen

(22:38):
and then you can't breathe and then you die. But
guess what, no more pain because you died. Do you
see a connection between the med beds and the suicide pods.
I do. As a matter of fact, I don't just
see a connection between them. I think they're pretty much
the same thing. Because the only pod that has been
introduced to society in the last ten to fifteen years

(23:01):
we've been hearing about this medbed nonsense is the suicide pod,
which once it fully functions and operates the way it's
supposed to, and you can have more direct access to them.
They have them up in Canada to their parts of
the world. Then guess what will happen. You will have
one in your home or you'll just go to a
facility and you can kill yourself with it. You might

(23:22):
have one in your home too, because family members might
want to come over and much more convenient to kill themselves.
If you're rich enough, you could buy a suicide pod,
have it delivered to your house, and then you choose
to die the way that you want to die in
your own home, and that's it. You don't have to
go to a facility. None of these facilities even have

(23:42):
to be built. They just install suicide pods in them
and then you sign up and you go kill yourself.
I really think that the suicide pods are the medbds.
You don't have any more pain because you die. It's
like Logan's Run. You reach a certain age, you're dead,
you start floating and you blow up. Okay, there is

(24:03):
nobody coming to save you. There's no med beds, there's
no Donald Trump on a white horse with Jesus hanging
out with him in the Oval Office, giving him executive orders.
Jesus doesn't do that. Stephen Miller does that. The psychopath, sociopath,
foreign agent gives the president executive orders, not Jesus. Suicide

(24:28):
Pod is the med bed, I think, and Your Great
Reset is the Great Reset, Your Financial reset is the
World Economic Forum reset. It's almost getting to the point
where I just want to sit back with snacks and
watch the con because if the cons are getting really interesting,
it's it's like, oh, we're right about that, right about that,
right about that, right about that, right about that, right
about that, right about that. And guess what. I didn't

(24:49):
make this whole time, any of it up. Guess what,
I also didn't make any money because I'm not selling
you false hope. No more pain. Pain is the name
of the game. But no more pain, no more game,
because guess what, You're dead. That's the med bet. We
spend a few minutes on that here at the beginning

(25:09):
of the show to talk about the absurdity of it,
and I think this recalls an episode we did called
death by Yolo on the twenty second of September, where
I talked about how the three biggest lobbies, three of

(25:30):
the biggest, but they're the three biggest top five. I
think technically three biggest lobbies in DC are meat, dairy,
and sugar. And they might not be classified as meat, dairy,
and sugar, maybe the sugar industry is, but that's essentially
what they are. Meet, dairy, and sugar the top lobbying

(25:50):
groups in Washington. If you miss that show, you should
definitely go back and listen to it, because those top
lobbying groups are getting exactly what they want from the
MAHA movement. And I should clarify these are the three

(26:10):
of the biggest industry groups. There are much more powerful
lobbying groups like the Chamber of Commerce and National Association
of Realtors, but in terms of health and nutrition food
things like this industry, sugar, meat, dairy are the biggest,
some of the biggest. And so when I hear the

(26:31):
MAHA movement say that we're going to fry McDonald's fries
in beef tallow and ignore the pesticides, the modification, the chemicals,
and all the other stuff, or when the White House says, hey,
we're going to put sugar in coca cola, as if
that solves a problem, and we're going to according to Kennedy,
need to drink more whole milk. Just see I see meat,

(26:54):
I see sugar, and I see the dairy industry. I
don't see making America healthy again. And when you don't
have a lot of coke, and you don't have a
lot of milk, and you don't have a lot of
excessive meat consumption, you get healthier societies. Big conservative commentator
Michael Savage acknowledges this too. Societies that don't eat any

(27:16):
of this stuff, or don't eat a lot of this stuff,
they live substantially longer than people who do. It's a
giant contributing factor. So making America healthy doesn't start with beef,
tallow whole milk, and sugar and Coca cola. It starts
with not consuming any of this fast food. It starts
with not consuming large quantities of dairy, large quantities of meat,
and large quantities of sugar laced soda or artificially sweetened

(27:40):
sugar soda. That's where it starts. The MAHA movement has
done virtually nothing to support people's health. In fact, it
tends to do the opposite. In fact, Kennedy was even
saying that we should all wear wearable devices to monitor
our health. You know, like a fitbit type device, wearable technologies,

(28:03):
wearable devices, and where have I heard of these wearables before?
I don't know the ideology behind transgenderism, which moves into transhumanism,
where we merge with machines and it becomes indistinguishable what
is human and what is not? You know, those things
that crazy people like David Ike have been talking about

(28:26):
for forty years or however long he's done it, crazy
things that we talked about on this show fifteen sixteen
years ago, And it turns out we were right. There's
a whole bunch of these. I'll give you a couple
of examples. One of them is Sweden putting microchips into
citizens to enter businesses or to pay for snacks and

(28:48):
vending machines. Another one is micro needle Patch is developed
by the Billimoni Gates Foundation. Another one is the smart pill.
And in the last seven days, we've seen you see
videos on social media. At least I have some viral
videos where people are saying, oh my god, did you
hear what the Swedes are doing? They're putting microchips in
people's hands. Yeah, we knew that back in twenty seventeen,

(29:15):
twenty eighteen Yep, we've known that for years. Oh but
what about the micro needle patches, about the Billina the
Gates Foundation or the Bill Gates Foundation. Well, when it
was the Bill Mila the Gates Foundation. Yeah, they had
those four or five six years ago. They were talking
about them during COVID. You'd put all the vaccine information
for a child on this micro needle patch and the

(29:35):
baby won't cry because you just it's a little patch.
You don't even fill the needles. We know about that.
And now I've just heard a World Economic Forum conversation
with Pfizer CEO Albert Borlaw talking about smart pills. And
I thought I wrote about the smart pill in a

(29:57):
book I wrote about ten years ago. Remember Regina Dugan.
Regina Dugan, I believe she was also the head of
advanced Technology at Vodaola Google executive Regina Dugan who said that,

(30:17):
and I think she also worked at Facebook as like
a she was helping them work on their algorithms to
basically determine what people are going to do before they
do it, like mind control, predictive programming type of thing.
But she said this about these pills. This pill has
a small chip inside of it with a switch. It
also has what amounts to an inside out potato battery.

(30:38):
When you swallow it, the acids in your stomach serve
as the electrolyte, and that powers it up, and the
switch goes on and off and creates an eighteen bit
ECG wide signal in your body, and essentially your entire
body becomes your authentication token. That's the smart pill. I
wrote about that in my book over a decade ago.
Others have written about the same thing. Now it's all

(30:58):
over the internet Concerned Citizen on X which I just
can't stand that account. They're just it always pops up.
I blocked it, it unblocks, and then it just shows
me stuff that I knew fifteen years ago, as if
it's new. Oh my god, they're gonna have smart pills
for us to take, Like, where have you been? This
stuff has been around for decades. You're just now figuring

(31:20):
this out. This was really old news. And it serves
a couple of purposes. One, when you listen to Albert
Borla talk about this, I'll play the clip for you.
It scares people. And from the last time we heard
about these smart pills over a decade ago, Motorola, Google

(31:41):
were developing them. It scared people then and then it
disappeared and we never had smart pills. And now it's back,
and oh it's the first time. It's not the first time,
but this scares people again. It frightens people again. It
terrifies people. Oh my god, smart pill. Then you also
have to question maybe they've already put these into your
b This was one of the conspiracies with COVID vaccines, right,

(32:02):
tracking devices, electronic tracking devices in the vaccines. They don't
need to do that. They can just you can swallow
a pill. They could put it in pills you take normally.
They could put it in tile and all you don't know.
Here's Albert Borla.

Speaker 3 (32:15):
FDA approved the first electronic pill. If I can call
it like that, it is basically biological.

Speaker 1 (32:22):
It's track it's a tracking device.

Speaker 3 (32:24):
Tablet and once you take the tablet and dissolves into
your stomach, sends a signal. But you took the tablet.
So imagine the applications of that compliance the insurance combines
to know that the medicines that patients should take they
do take them. It is fascinating what happens in this field.

Speaker 1 (32:45):
It is yes, so you take it. Your stomach powers,
it sends a signal. They want to use these for patients.
Initially the argument was patients that are elderly. Maybe you're
at home, you feil, you can't get up, you don't
have that life alert system. Push the button, and now
the doctor knows that you haven't taken your pill because

(33:06):
the pill hasn't been swallowed, the acid hasn't activated it, it
hasn't sent a signal to your phone or to the
local cell phone tower, which then sends it to or
the satellite which sends it to the doctor's office, and
then it notifies them Ethel hasn't taken her pill at
one pm. Maybe we should call nine one one. And
that's how they bill it, as if that's the purpose

(33:27):
of it, as if the purpose isn't to do exactly
what Albert Borlage just said, and that is to get compliance.
Because if you're instructed to take these equilibrium pills and
you don't take one, you miss one, or you cleverly
disguise it in your mouth like the pick a episode
of SpongeBob, still no pickles, and you disguise it, they'll

(33:50):
know you didn't swallow it. So then they're going to
hold you down and force you to swallow it. They'll
know that you didn't take it. And by the time
this stuff is acknowledged and admitted fifteen years plus later,
twenty something years, it's already been introduced. But this is
for each individual pill. It'll connect to your cell phone, etc. Etc.

(34:15):
That was crazy and now just mainstream, more economic form
videos they just put on the Internet. It's all there,
and yet we've known about it for a long time.
They call these also authentication pills, because if you can't
remember your password, who has time to remember personal information?

(34:37):
You take one of these pills, and instead of having
a thumbprint or a facial scan or a pesky password,
it authenticates from within side of your body, that's right,
So you don't have to remember your password anymore. You

(35:02):
don't have to remember those pesky little digits. Now you
just have to remember where you put your pills. And
then you take one of those pills and it unlocks
your phone or your other device. Motorola also has electronic tattoos,

(35:23):
similar technology i'd imagine to the micro needle patch of
Bill Gates. It just concerns me when I or others
have discussed this for far, clearing the hurdle of over
a decade, some for twenty thirty years, me fifteen or

(35:45):
so years. And then when it actually happens or the
idea is introduced again, it's by people that are like bots,
or people that are paying for followings, or its people
that are pretty much influencers that then get to direct

(36:07):
the conversation around what is happening. In other words, it's fake.
This brings me to thailandal. I was out of town
when this story broke about thailandal, and so I posted

(36:29):
on my Facebook page to save it. I posted a
WFLA news Channel eight story about the I suppose you
could call it linking of thailandal to autism. The news story,
National News story said Trump administration suggests thailandal during pregnancy

(36:53):
causes autism. Now, just in case we don't know the
definition of suggests, let's go to the dictionary suggest The
words suggest, which comes from Latin means to put forward
a consideration. You ever got out to eat with somebody

(37:16):
or a few people, and everybody says I want Italian,
I want this, I want that, And there's someone else
who hasn't given their opinion, and you say, well, what
do you want? They say, well, I suggest we go
to that buffet because they have a little bit of everything.
That's a suggestion. It doesn't automatically transport you to the buffet.
It doesn't mean that everybody else is wrong. It just
means that somebody gave their opinion and that's it. An

(37:39):
opinion is not a fact. An opinion can be a fact,
but an opinion is not a fact. An opinion is
not scientific. Opinion is not anything except what you think
and what you would prefer. It's a consideration for something.
It's no different than hey, mom, can I get this toy?

(37:59):
All think about it, which usually means no, but she'll
think about it, she'll consider it. You can give your
mom suggestions for Christmas gifts, or your dad's suggestions, or
your grandma or grandpa suggestions, or your aunt or your
uncle's suggestions for what you want for your birthday or
for Christmas. It doesn't mean they're going to get it
for you. You can want a new two thousand dollars MacBook.

(38:24):
That doesn't mean they're going to get you one. You
can suggest it to Santa. It doesn't mean Santa's going
to bring it this is really elementary suggests. This is
the national headline. And this is what gets me is
that the people that hate the Trump administration were like,
that's total nonsense. I'm going to take a whole bottle
of talanol right now. Good. Darwin was right about you.

(38:50):
And then if you're like me, you post on social media.
For me, it was just to save the story. I said.
Quote may contribute is an another way to say look
the other way. And the absolute hatred that I receive
from that actually shocked me. I was told I have

(39:12):
Trump derangement syndrome, which is the opposite of, but equal to,
I don't trust Trump. So I'm gonna take a bunch
of tilanol right now. Good, I'll buy you a bottle.
I'll buy you two bottles, take them all. I don't care.
But see that is actually that's Trump enragement syndrome. Trump

(39:35):
derangement syndrome is not saying hey, when they tell you
it may link to something and I don't believe that
and you get upset, that's derangement. See. I don't even
buy the definitions of these insults that people leverage, that
people use. It's either take the whole bottle or believe

(39:58):
that the president's word is what makes the sun rise
and the rainfall and the moon sparkle at night. It's
like some North Korean dictatorship brainwashing nonsense. The president's statement
is a fact, even though it's not really the president's statement.
It's like a statement of multiple people working together trying

(40:20):
to cover in part for the pharmaceutical companies that they
have standing behind them watching over what they do. And
we don't leave any room for the middle ground. We
don't leave any room for people in the middle to
ask questions. We don't leave any room for opinions. Even

(40:43):
though theirs is an opinion, we suggest that it's linked
to something. And so that's why I think even the
terms TDS, I call it tees, I don't even think
that that's correct, because you know what derangement is. Derangement

(41:05):
is acting in a irrational and out of control way,
acting irregularly. It's irrational behavior. So when I say, for example,
claiming that something may cause something else to happen is

(41:26):
not a fact, it's an opinion and saying that it
may cause something else in the midst of an already
heated debate over what probably contributes largely to autism, and
vaccines are definitely not the cause of autism. They're a
potential contributing factor, which maybe taialanol is, but that would
make it a contributing factor, not a cause the cause.

(41:48):
But to say that is labeled Trump derangement syndrome, no,
I think you've got the terminology wrong here. Derangement acting irrational.
Short is I'm gonna take a bottle of tylenol because
Trump said it might cause autism. That is derangement, But
it's also more like enragement because everything the guy says,

(42:10):
you get really, really angry. That's enragement. That's just being angry.
That's why I call liberals tes. They have Trump enragement syndrome.
Whatever the guy says. As a matter, if he says,
breathe oxygen, they get enraged. Don't tell me how to
breathe oxygen. I'll put a bag over my head and

(42:31):
suffocate myself just to prove you wrong. Orange man. That's arrangement.
It's also derangement, but it's first and foremost enragement that
leads to the derangement. TDS is what happens when you say, yeah,
I think that that's not accurate and people's first response

(42:52):
is to say you've got tds. No, no, you have
because you think that my opinion, which is objective, which
is like, maybe it does, but I don't think that's
the cause. And also saying something might be the cause

(43:12):
of something or might be linked is not proof that
something is. There's a different The terminology matters here, and
the immediate reaction is you've got twods. This is not
an adequate or a rational, or a civilized or an
intelligent argument to anything. I'm glad that I had an

(43:39):
old friend named Aaron Lamb DJ Wired from the old
days of radio. He responded back to this gentleman and said,
why don't you take two of these tile and on
and release the Epstein files. True, well not, we don't
need the Epstein files anymore because guess what we have,
the Amelia Earhart files. That's what we really wanted. That's

(44:02):
just like pond stars, right, I'm really trying to get
the Epstein files for this. Well, the best I can
do is Milliar Earhart. And so when I said no,
it's it's a maybe link to something, it's just may contribute.
Is even the word contribute means to participate, like means

(44:24):
to add two. It doesn't mean causes. And I'm so glad.
I'm so, so so glad that this person I guess
to prove me wrong, sent me a Harvard University School
of Public Health article. I'm so glad because this article
is really important for tonight's show. This was them trying

(44:45):
to prove me wrong. And the article says this, using
a seat of metaphine during pregnancy may increase children's autism
and ADHD risk. Now, first of all, it's just an
article on the Harvard website. It's not an actual medical study.

(45:10):
Second of all, you notice the words there right, may
increase a child's risk, may increase a risk. So if
you think about it, try to break these words down.
Not increases a risk, It may, it might it could

(45:34):
perhaps possibly increase, not cause, not lessen, but increase a
child's autism and ADHD risk. And what is a risk, Well,
it's the potential a situation that, well, you have the

(45:57):
potentiality of something happening to you that's dangerous. So saying
that a state of metaphin may increase possibly might increase,
even if it's a fraction of a percent, which is
essentially statistically irrelevant in a child's autism and ADHD risk,

(46:21):
which is the potentiality in a situation for you to
be exposed to something. So it's like the most vague
thing that you could possibly write. And I'm so glad
this person sent me a Harvard report on how I'm
wrong when the article they sent me reinforces my point
two fold. May increase a risk, not increases a risk.

(46:47):
May increase a risk. You hear that all the time.
That's the Legalese language. And all the drug commercials taking
lett whatever the drug is, may increase your risk of
developing X, Y and Z. Some will say does increase
your risk. They didn't forget the may. It's because in

(47:10):
those cases it does verifiably increase your risk of whatever
the side effects are where the direct effects. Rather to
say may increase means that it might. Mom, can I
get this toy? I'll think about it. Maybe every kid
knows that means fifty to fifty shot, but in reality,
as an adult, you know that means more than likely no,

(47:33):
but there's an off chance that maybe for Christmas you'll
get it. It's really that simple. And then if you
combine that with risk, well, a risk is a situation
involving exposure to danger. So the risk is there's a possibility,

(47:55):
but there's also a possibility it won't happen. And that's
just the risk of what we call autism in ADHD.
So what the hell is autism and what the hell
is ADHD? ADHD is a tension deficit hyperactivity disorder. But
what does that mean? Well, for years we've classified ADHD

(48:20):
as a condition of childhood. What does that mean? It
means if you like to run, if you like shiny things,
if you like to climb things that kids like to do.
These are signs that your kid may have ADHD or ADD.
But ADD is not as severe as ADHD. Does your

(48:43):
three year old have a hard time concentrating? Do they
like to play with toys and climb on things and
spill drinks? Do they sometimes feel sleepy at approximately one
o'clock in the afternoon when they maybe miss their nap
at twelve? Then your kid might have AD It's just
like the cat flew from the Simpsons. Do you feel

(49:06):
mild thirst sleepy in the evening? Are you hungry sometimes
during the day? Then you might have cat flu? So
what is ADD? ADD? Attention deficit disorder, You have a
deficit in attention. Isn't that just in and of itself

(49:31):
totally subjective Because some parents choose to abort children that
have Down syndrome or that might have some handicap, they
have no ability to deal with it, or they think
it's wrong. Others prefer those babies to be born, and

(49:52):
they maybe they get frustrated, but they live with a
child who has Down syndrome or some child who has
a handicap, and they keep it together better than parents
who just can't stop their kids from running around and
smashing things. So it's really a matter of the situation,
the environment, the attitude of the parents, the philosophy of

(50:15):
the parents. A lot of things contribute to whether or
not the parents themselves have the ability to have their
attention focused on something. Most parents have ADD too, because
they don't put their phones down to watch their kids.
We now call ADD an outdated term. So for years

(50:38):
it existed and now it just doesn't exist anymore. Think
about that, for years you went to the doctor and
they said your kid as ADD back in the eighties.
With the DSM in the nineties start to become outdated

(51:02):
and they replaced ADD with ADHD because people were kind
of numb to the ADD things, so we gotta sell
more drugs. It's ADHD. You go to the doctor. My
kids running around? What do I do? Do they have ADD? No, ma'am,
they don't have ADD I'm so glad, but they could
have ADHD? Oh my god, what's that? Well, ma'am, it's

(51:23):
a more severe case of ADD. Has your kid displayed
any any anger at wanting to take a nap? Yes,
every day, Billy, he hates taking naps. Do they also
try to get sweets? Like they always want more dessert?
He always wants more cookies? Oh my god, what does
that mean? Well? One more question? Does your child often

(51:45):
throw temper tantrums? Every day? Doctor? He has ADHD? And
the mom's crying, Oh my god, what am I gonna do? Go?
I call the husband, Honey, Honey, I'm so sorry. Billy
has ADHD. What are we gonna do?

Speaker 4 (51:57):
Well?

Speaker 1 (51:57):
What does the doctor say?

Speaker 5 (51:58):
Honey?

Speaker 1 (51:58):
Doctor said, we have to put in on a regimen
of drugs and he needs to have maybe surgery. And
they don't do surge for ADHD. But it gets that
absurd and that's how they brainwash and control and traumatize
and manipulate and basically torture parents over a couple of letters.

(52:22):
And so now we get ADHD. Well, what the hell's
ADHD Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. They're not just attention deficit,
they're hyperactive. And I'm like that meme on a bench,
the skeleton that's just waiting, that's me. I'm waiting for
somebody with big boy gloves on. I've actually been waiting

(52:47):
for RFK Junior to say it that we know what
causes actual excessive hyperactivity. We know it's anything that interferes
neurologically with a child. It's also the environment. It's also
the parenting. It's also perhaps the religion. There's a lot

(53:08):
of things that contribute to it. You know what one
of the biggest things that contributes to this is it's
not a byproduct of nature. It's called food coloring. But
we wouldn't want to criticize our new age parenting of
my kid won't calm down. I give them eminems, and

(53:32):
the emin ms will keep them calm for about ten
seconds while they eat them. And they might be quiet
for a moment thinking they're going to get more eminems
or skittles. And then they just they go again, and
the parents like, I don't understand it. He'll stop for
five seconds and then he goes again. And then you
have to break it down. One, they're a child. Two,

(53:57):
you're giving them food coloring, which is not linked to
food calling, doesn't maybe increase the risk. Food collerings are
shown to directly cause neurological deficiencies neurological damage that contribute

(54:17):
again doesn't necessarily cause entirely, but contributes directly with none
of these may risk words, contributes directly to what the
kinds of behaviors that we want to put kids on
drugs for. You could just stop feeding them food coloring.
It might not be the answer in every case, but
it's certainly an answer in some cases. It causes neurological damage.

(54:42):
And that's just the food coloring. That's just the food coloring.
And we know this from countless medical journals, scientific reports,
I mean just for years we've known this, but it

(55:02):
never gets discussed, never gets discussed. The harms of synthetic
dies in children, both with and without comorbidities, are extremely,
extremely well documented. It's well known in the medical literature.
In fact, you can pull up articles from the NIH.
I pulled up one here. For children with comorbidities such

(55:25):
as autism, spectrum disorder, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, exposure
to synthetic dies can worsen existing symptoms and complicate management
of the condition. Yeah, they can also contribute to the
definition of what those things are quote autism and hyperactivity disorder. Furthermore,
even children without comorbidities, synthetic dies compose a health risk

(55:48):
by affecting their cognitive, behavioral, metabolic, and nutritional development. Yeah,
so that means we should probably stop giving kids synthetic dies.
If you don't like that article from the Journal of
Environmental I believe that's Journal Environmental Research for Public Health.
You don't like it, Okay, we can pull up others.

(56:12):
We can pull up articles from Here's another one. This
is Science Direct. I believe biochemical Get rid of this advertisement.
Biochemical processes mediating neurotoxicity induced by synthetic food dies. Synthetic
food dies modulate neurotransmitter synthesis and uptake. All right, you

(56:34):
read the article. Yeah, they're durable, cost effective, but what
do they actually do neurotoxic effects of the six most
commonly used synthetic dyes f D and C yellow five,
FDN C red three, blue number one, FDN C red

(56:54):
forty yellow, f D and C number six, and then
blue number two. The evidence here's a key word, suggests
that these dyes can significantly impact brain function and overall
neurological health. So, based on that definition in this particular
article from Science Direct, wouldn't that mean that food colorings

(57:16):
are equally as responsible as TILANL. So where is the
Kennedy and Trump administration on pointing out that food colorings
are equally and by the way, far more well documented
in causing neurological developmental issues. From the Union for Concerned

(57:42):
Scientists to medical journals to everything in the middle, It's
very well known. Some are direct, some are suggests. But
even if it's suggests that these dyes significantly impact the
function overall neurological health of a child, guess what that
would put it into the same classification category as the
Trump administration is put Tail and all may contribute suggests

(58:03):
they believe great well, so is the same for food colorings.
So why isn't that addressed? Why isn't that mentioned? Probably
because outside of Kennedy, most of These people eat this
stuff on a daily basis and don't think anything of it.
They probably take a lot more strong drugs than talent
all to get rid of headaches and pain, but they

(58:25):
eat this stuff on a daily basis. You've seen the president,
multiple presidents eating this stuff. Everybody just thinks it's like
just a normal way of life. Nobody questions it. Nobody
questions skittles or m and ms. Ironically, I think the
healthiest skittle that was ever released was that Equality pack
where every skittle was gray. That was actually probably a
healthier skittle, which ironically was like the transgender LGBTQ skittle.

(58:48):
You already had the rainbow. You got rid of the
rainbow for the LGBTQ pack. It was weird, But that
gray skittle, that was probably a healthy skittle. Not healthy,
but it was a healthier skittle because you have the
food colorings. Okay, but the point is, we know, oh this,
we know this very well that food collarings contribute directly
to neurological developmental issuing kits. You know what also contributes

(59:09):
to that wearing a mask, pumping them full of chemicals
and metals at a young age. Vaccines definitely contribute to it.
What is the evidence that it's tailenol. We've seen studies
in jam A Pediatrics going back to twenty twenty a
cohort study of the Boston Birth cohort that analyzed cord
blood biomarkers and found higher levels of acet of metaphine

(59:30):
metabolites linked to increased ASD risk, which was up to
three point six two times for highest exposure in the group,
suggesting a dose response relationship with no causation. A set
of metaphin used during pregnancy and child a children's risk
of autism, ADHD and intellectrial disability. This is from JAMA
also in twenty twenty four, and another one from JAM

(59:52):
in twenty twenty four. A set of metaphin used during
pregnancy in children's risk of autism, ADHD and intellectual disability
involved a large Swedish cohort group of over two point
four million children. This was a huge one which showed
an increased risk of ASD, but sibling control analysis eliminated
the association attributed it to a familiar confounders like share,

(01:00:15):
genetic or environmental conditions. That was last year. The Swedish one,
which was a massive, massive study showed that there's no link.
At the worst, it's a small increased risk, and at
the best, there's no link at all. Here's one from
this year, Environmental Health Evaluation of the evidence on acetamtaphin

(01:00:38):
use and neurodevelopmental disorders using the Navigation Guide methodology. The
systematic review of forty six studies found consistent positive association
between prenatal aceta metaphin and ASD, with stronger links and
higher quality studies and evidence of exposure response patterns. Though
it calls for more research on mechanisms like oxidative stress
or neuroinflammation. It's always another contributing factor. Here's another one.

(01:01:04):
This one is a systematic review of the link between
autism spectrum disorder and acetometaphin, a review of sixteen studies
showing associations with ASD and other outcomes like ADHD, urging caution,
and aceta metaphin use during pregnancy, pending further evidence. Here's
another one also this in the last one from PMC

(01:01:25):
this year twenty twenty five. For this particular one, The
last one was twenty twenty two. Acetamtaphin's role in autism
in ADHD, A mitochondrial perspective proposes a theoretical mechanism involving
mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress for acetamtaphin metabolites supported by
epidemiological study data linking prenatal exposure to higher asd ADHD

(01:01:46):
diagnosises but emphasizes multi factoral adeology, which is the same
case in many of these studies. In other words, there's
some links and there's some n links. And considering what
we know about food coloring, food coloring should be the

(01:02:07):
big issue that the White House and the MAHA movement
are dealing with right now. I mean, Plus, everybody knows
that thaileanol can damage the stomach, right, everybody knows that
thailanol can damage your other vital organs, right, And why

(01:02:28):
does it damage the stomach, liver, and kidneys Because it's
poison and your body's trying to get rid of the poison,
especially in your kidneys, especially in your liver. Seated of
medicine's even a leading cause of acute liver failure in
the US. That indicates that it's guess what poison, And

(01:02:51):
like other things, it should be used in very restrictive moderation,
like if you have a really nasty headache. It's a
good chance that if you start taking aceta metaphine, or
you start taking et cetern or whatever these new pills
are that they have, etc. Was when I was a kid.

(01:03:12):
I don't know if they still have et cetera, and
I assume they do. If you take that every day
all the time, it's probably going to make you a
lot sicker than the migraines are. And then you have
to ask, well, what's causing these migraines? You know, I
haven't had a migraine as an adult, but I had
them all the time as a kid. What's the difference

(01:03:34):
between when I was a kid and as an adult.
There was a period of transition, probably between eighteen and
twenty one, where I was changing my lifestyle. But the
difference was as a kid, all I ate was bread
and sugar and candy and processed food and soda. And
when I stopped eating all that, no more migraines. So

(01:03:58):
it probably contributed some thing to it, right, I suggest
I believe that it may have had some contributing factor
to the risk of me having migraines because of all
the terrible stuff I was eating. My brain, my body,
was breaking down and was poisoned. Now I don't get migraines.
In fact, I don't get headaches at all. I have
spinal issues from a car wreck where I get neck pain,

(01:04:19):
but I don't have any headaches at all. And I
didn't figure that out because I was smart. I figured
it out just as a byproduct of changing my lifestyle.
And it's like, oh, look, no more headaches. So it's like,
we create the problems and then we take drugs to
fix the problems. Then the drugs make the problems worse,
or maybe they mask the problem by turning off pain pathways,
and then they just get dumped out through the processing

(01:04:42):
centers of the body and then it causes liver and
kidney damage and stomach problems. Then we're like, oh no,
what are we gonna do. The Tilenol's a medicine. Well,
it's like in the worst case scenario, if you really
need it, take it. Hey, look, I have a set
of metaphin in my house right now. I've probably taken
three full a set of metaphan this year when I
had horrible, severe pain and I was out in public

(01:05:07):
and I had to take a train back home, and
I just couldn't. I was going to throw up. I
took the cinemataphine I usually take half a one, and
it really helped me to get home. And even taking
three this year, I've just said to myself, that's still
too many. One per quarter is still too many for me.
The last time I had really back pain about a

(01:05:28):
week and a half ago, I was on the train
coming home and I just sat up the best that
I could and leaned forward, and it must have taken
this pressure off of something. I put my head on
my hands on the train on the bench and I
just sat there and I tried to relax, and within
about twenty thirty minutes the pain went away. So it's
clearly something that I'm creating, I'm causing, even though I

(01:05:51):
admittedly still take talent on occasion. But I'm also an
adult too, like you, and this issue over talent on
autism is specifically about infants. It's about babies, it's about
pregnant women. And that brings me to the history of talanow.
Where does talanol come from, Where does the seat of
metaphine come from? How long has it been around? And

(01:06:13):
how long has autism been around? Have we conversed about that. Yeah,
I know that there's some crazy liberal websites or crazy
liberal commentators, like there's no way autism is caused by
talanaw because talannaw was introduced and like the nineteen fifties
or something like that, sixties, seventies and eighties it became popular.

(01:06:35):
And autism goes back to the early nineteen hundreds. Yeah,
I've seen all that. I know. I know it was
introduced in nineteen fifty five by McNeil Laboratories. I know
autism goes back way before that. So let's try to
figure out what exactly is autism. Autism was described in

(01:06:58):
the nineteen forties, but autism, it goes back long before
the nineteen forties. Autism is several decades older than taylanol.
This is important to know and important to understand, maybe
for reasons that you might not think. Hang on a second,

(01:07:20):
we're going to get to it. If you think about
what causes autism from a historical point of view, before
you really had the types of vaccine rollouts that you
have today, the vaccine agendas that you have today, what

(01:07:43):
was causing it back then? And I think to understand
what might have been causing it back in the early
nineteen hundreds of the early twentieth century with Eugene A. Bluler
I think is his name, first use the term autism.
You know, the definition of autism by this Swiss psychiatrist

(01:08:04):
back in nineteen eleven was much different than what we
defined it as in the forties, and much different than
what we defined it as today, in the same way
that we define whooping cough differently today than we did
in twenty eleven, and differently in twenty eleven than we
did in nineteen fifteen, sixteen, seventeen forty. It was nineteen fourteen,

(01:08:29):
So the definitions of these things change. But what exactly
could have caused autism back then when you didn't have
the vaccines, Well, you had far filthier conditions. You had slums,
You had pollution and poison in the air and in
the water and in the food in ways that we
can't fathom or imagine today, especially in places like New York,

(01:08:49):
places like London. So what was causing it back then?
Probably the pollution, probably the the filth. But I want
you to think of something else. What are the symptoms
of polio? And there's a couple of different types of
polio rare. There's non paralytic polio, and there's paralytic polio.

(01:09:11):
Then there's also post polio syndrome. They classify polio as
an infectious disease, But what exactly are the symptoms of polio? Fever,
sore throat, fatigue, headache, nausea and vomiting, muscle aches, muscle stiffness,

(01:09:31):
also meningitis like symptoms, sensitive delight next stiffness. That's what
polio is now by that definition, my car wreck when
I was a kid that I was in has given
me polio because I have sensitivity delight, I really do.

(01:09:53):
I don't like bright light. I work in the dark
most of the time. I read in the dark most
of the time with a very dim light. I have
constant now stiffness. I always have back pain and it
gets severe enough I feel like I'm gonna throw up.
Still have that problem today? Do I have polio? Or
was I in a really bad car wreck? And if

(01:10:16):
I go to the doctor today, They're probably not going
to diagnose me with the polio. But if I went
to the doctor with those conditions, maybe I got into
a horse and buggy accident one hundred years ago and
I went to the doctor, they'd say, you've got polio,
and maybe they give me some really poisonous drugs that
would actually make me go paralytic polio. I don't get

(01:10:38):
headaches anymore, really just neck pain. But I'm fatigued a lot.
But I know why that is. It's because I don't
sleep enough. I get a sore throat a lot. In fact,
i've gotten a sore throat the last couple of weeks.
Why because it's the fall now and it's a little
bit colder outside, and I sleep with the window open,
and I wake up there's been fires around here, and
I wake up I can't breathe through my nose because
it's stuffed up, and I'm breathing through my mouth. My

(01:10:58):
mouth's all itchy, and my throat's all sore. And it's
not polio. It's just I slept with the windows open,
and I don't get fevers, but you get a fever,
that's the detoxification process. So the symptoms of polio are
just natural symptoms that the body expresses as ways in
which it's dealing with some sort of irritant or some

(01:11:19):
sort of condition that is caused by the environment or
some kind of poison, But what else causes polio? And
this has been a heated debate for a very long time.
Chemical usage like DDT. For example, polio started to rise

(01:11:44):
in the nineteen forties and fifties, and guess what that
coincided with in Europe and the United States. Widespread DDT
use and people were being diagnosed with polio back then,
and many people, including myself, believe that maybe they didn't

(01:12:05):
have polio, or maybe polio is a classification for a
set of symptoms that were actually caused by DDT among
other chemicals. They used to spray this on kids lunches,
They used to spray this on playgrounds, they used to
display this, spray this at public pools, at the beach neighborhoods.
I look the DDT man's here. It's kind of like
ice cream. These are neurotoxins DDT and organo phosphates, neurotoxins

(01:12:30):
that can disrupt nerve function. Sound like maybe autism, sound
like maybe polio. There's also environmental toxins, you know, like lead,
arsenic mercury that used to be a medical cure quote

(01:12:51):
unquote one hundred years ago. By the way, I just
went to the dentist. You probably won't believe this. I
went to the dentist. I haven't been to the dentist
for a very long time. Try to keep good care
of my teeth. I have a chip tooth from basketball
when I was much younger. I went to the dentist
for the first time in decades. I've been there a
few times now. My wife has got some of her teeth.

(01:13:12):
We both got a cleaning, and then she got some
of her teeth fixed up that she had issues with too.
And we're in there at the dentist and I had
I think I had three total cavities. One was super small,
it wasn't really even an issue, but they filled it
with something. And I had asked my wife because I
know she has a filling one of her teeth, and

(01:13:33):
it looked like mercury at first, and I had asked
her and she said, no, no, it's silver, which you know,
if you have enough silver that can hurt you too.
But having a little bit of silver in your mouth
snuffing like having mercury. And so I asked the dentist
and I had to translate it because I don't speak
Japanese enough to be able to have that conversation, so
I put it on my phone. I said, after he

(01:13:54):
filled my tooth, I know it wasn't mercury. It was
some kind of plastic cap substance, probably toxic too, but
isn't as bad as mercury. I said, do the Japanese
still use mercury? And he said oh. He was a
very quiet dentist. But when I said that, he's said,
oh oh, And he explains it to me on his phone.

(01:14:15):
He types it out and he tells me, no, that's absurd.
Of course, we don't use mercury, not anymore. Hey, why
just curious what he would say. And he said, well,
because we found out a long time ago that mercury
was extremely poisonous, and so we don't put that into

(01:14:35):
people's mouths. And I thought, oh, that's interesting, because I
don't know about you or your dentist that you go to,
or maybe you're in dental work. But I remember the
last time that I knew that somebody went to an
ex girlfriend and I went to the dentist four or
five years ago. As during COVID, they still had the
option of mercury. This was an Arizona They still had

(01:14:57):
the option to put mercury in your mouth. Also, when
I went to the dentist that when I had the
cleaning a couple of weeks ago. This is before I
asked them about mercury. I said, well, I told my
wife first, was like, can you translate and tell them
no floride? And she's like, what's flora? I don't know
what floride is. Oh, it's a translation language issue. So

(01:15:18):
I typed it out and she said, I don't think
I know what that is. Still, I said, well, can
you at least ask you know, here's the translation you asked?
She asked, you know what they said? They kind of
like looked at you, like what I said, We don't
use fluoride. And in the cases they do use any
kind of florid, it it's for specific cases for kids.

(01:15:40):
It's not widespread. It's not in the water supply. And
the dentist said, you're not a child, so we're not
going to put floride on your teeth. Plus, we don't
even really do that anyway, And I thought, hold on
a second, they don't use fluoride and they don't put
mercury in people's mouths. How many centuries are we behind?
In the United States, Like, seriously, we are a century

(01:16:04):
behind other civilized industrial nations. We still put mercury in
people's mouths. We still pump fluoride, unregulated fluoride into the
water supply. By unregulated, I mean the dosage into the
water supply. Some people might have one glass of water.
Some people might have thirty glasses of water. It's completely

(01:16:25):
unregulated drugging of the population. It's nonsense. It's crazy. And
I'm just so used to asking these questions and the
dentists like, we don't use fluoride mercury in your mouth,
that's extremely poisonous. Who would do that? And I said, Usa, Oh, yeah,
the Americans do that because they're insane, because our entire
system is corrupted to the core. You think that maybe

(01:16:50):
the mercury in the mouth, You think that maybe the
DDT pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, all the stuff that we spray
on children's clothing and their beds, the fire retardants. Do
you think that maybe the perfume that mom wears, or
the cologne that Dad wears, or the poisonous food like

(01:17:13):
substances that are given to kids at school or by
their grandma. Because it's just a fun snack that I
wanted my grandkid to have, or that are given to
kids as a payment for behaving, which actually increases the
neurological dysfunction and makes them even more quote hyperactive and
makes them even more quote autistic. Do you think that

(01:17:34):
maybe that stuff has something to do with it and
not just a tile and all that in the off
chance you might have took it, might have caused by
might have caused some maybe suggestible possible thing that might
have increased their risk by a fraction of a percent
that in a laboratory setting, in the worst case scenario,
isn't even statistically significant. Do you think that maybe those

(01:17:54):
things contributed to had something to do with might not
be the only cause, but are contributing of different things
that contribute to the cause. And that's really the thing.
It's like, it doesn't Ryan said, I heard on this
radio show he thinks cologne is the cause of autism. No,
I'm not single minded, like the Maha movement and like

(01:18:15):
the president is any of these people. I'm thinking in
more complex terms here, cologne doesn't cause autism. But do
you think that maybe the cologne, maybe the perfume, maybe
the herbicides and secticides, pesticides DDT that we sprayed on
kids' lunches and videoed it like it's a science experiment.
The food like substances and all. Though societies much cleaner

(01:18:39):
than it was back in the time of London one
hundred years ago, or New York in the shantytowns, we
still spray chemically. We have more synthetic chemicals now than
ever before. We might not be living in total filth,
but now it's almost like we live in even too
steral of an environment. Do you think that maybe these things,
maybe the television, maybe the TikTok, maybe the social media,

(01:19:00):
maybe the phones, maybe the tamplets, maybe the computers. Do
you think that all of this might contribute a little
bit to it? He said, cell phones cause autism. No,
all of it combined together. You can't bake a cake
with an egg, right. You can't bake cookies with just
peanut butter. You need flour, you need sugar. If you're

(01:19:20):
a non vegan baker, you need butter, you need you
need milk or something. Whatever you're baking, you need eggs.
If you're a vegan, you might use flax seed instead
of egg. Which is a very good substitute. You might
use soy milk instead of dairy. You have to have
all the ingredients. You don't. It's not like, well, describe

(01:19:41):
the ingredients to a cake, egg what else?

Speaker 4 (01:19:44):
No?

Speaker 1 (01:19:44):
Just the egg. The egg I think makes it. Okay,
But what about the sugar, the icing, the flour, the salt,
the baking powder, what about the milk, what about all
thet doesn't it need other stuff?

Speaker 2 (01:19:53):
No?

Speaker 1 (01:19:53):
Just the egg. Well, that's just an egg. Let's just
scramble egg as the sunny side of it. That's a
that's not a cake. That's just an egg. That's how
we're describing autism. It's just the tile and ol. What
about the food colorings? Nope, So you don't think it
could be anything else. No, we think it's tilano. Okay. Oh,
you're gonna finally go address the fast food issue. Okay,

(01:20:15):
what are you gonna do about that? Well, let's fright
in beef tallow so people can still eat it. You
just want to fright in beef tallow to benefit the
meat industry, which is one of the biggest lobbies in
Washington for food. Oh okay, and you want us to
drink more whole milk and you want us to drink
more soda with sugar in. It sounds like the industries

(01:20:37):
are getting what they want and the American people are
once again getting screwed. And it sounds like this has
become such a cult that if you question it, you're
labeled not American. It sounds like they're giving preferential treatment
to mRNA manufacturers. But they cut a lot of program

(01:21:00):
ms half of a billion dollars. Yeah, but they also
let other programs go forward. They cut twenty two of them.
But they also let others that were already in the
works go forward, which included the big companies, And they
just cut out the little companies, i e. Competition to
the big companies. How is this not How's this not
on like the front page of every alternative source of information?

(01:21:21):
How is this not on the front page of every
non mainstream media source of information? How is this not
at the headline of every major alternative radio show podcast?
Do you think that maybe there are other contributing factors
to autism? Even the vaccine thing? Vaccines don't cause autism,
that's absurd. Do they contribute to it? Yeah? Does tile

(01:21:46):
and all contribute to it? Maybe, but as a far
smaller percentage. Just think about it like this. If you
had a chart, a pie chart, and the pie chart
showed you or the graph. Maybe it's a graph. I
like to think of in things in pie charts. It's
easier for me to visualize. But if you have a
pie trae of a graph and it shows you ten
things that contribute to autism, okay, like the ten ingredients

(01:22:10):
that make up a cake, some of them are more
important than others. If you forget the pinch of salt,
it's probably gonna be okay. But if you forget the sugar,
unless it's a rice cake. I think rice naturally tastes
better anyway than regular flour. But if you forget the
sugar on a regular cake, it's probably not gonna taste
very good. Well, I was watching a cooking show one
time and someone mistook salt for sugar and they and

(01:22:32):
it was gross. Some things are more important than others.
But if you just have an egg, and egg doesn't
make the cake. An egg contributes to the making of
the cake, makes it more fluffy, makes it makes the
icing more fluffing that you can whip it up with
some milk. But you have this list of things. You know,
your sugar, your egg, your milk, your flour, your salt,
your baking materials. You put all that together, okay, and
then there's like a percentage of the pie chart where

(01:22:55):
one's a little bit more important than another one. Like
if you don't have flour, you can mix everything else together,
you're not gonna get a cake. It's pretty important to
have flour, and you can subjectively argue which is more important,
but you still need all the ingredients to make the cake.
Is the point, right, So if you have this list,
and let's say the most important thing, just for sake
of the example, the most important thing is a good flower,

(01:23:16):
because some flowers won't work. Some flowers won't work. If
you're gonna use like garbonzo bean flour, you ain't making
a cake. So you need a certain kind of flour.
That's at the top of the list when you think
of making a cake, flowers, Like that's the main thing, flour,
and then maybe at the very bottom is a pinch
of salt. If you forget it, no big deal. And

(01:23:37):
that's exactly how I see the tilan All debate. I
see up here at the very top the flower is vaccines,
it's chemical usage, it's food colorings at the very maybe
the bottom third, it's maybe some til and alls, maybe
some other drugs. Maybe that contributes to it. Maybe it's

(01:23:57):
the pinch of salt. But the big issue is probably vaccines.
It's probably for ADHD and add and what we call autism.
It probably has a lot to do with food colorings too,
and chemicals, and that's the big issue. But our government
is focusing on the salt, and it's confusing to those

(01:24:17):
of us who can see the whole chart, and we're like, yeah,
but if you forget the salt, it's not that big
of a deal for this cake. But if you forget
the flower, it's not a cake. And if you say
it might be something else, then you get called what
I got called, you get called Trump derangement syndrome. Really,
is that all you have is that all these people

(01:24:39):
have is calling people names. You've got TDS. Actually you
have TDS. You are deranged to think that asking objective
questions about reality and pointing out that there are other
things that contribute to the thing that you're talking about,
that's derangement. To get upset about that, that's irrational. It's
also enragement because you get angry. This is really the

(01:25:03):
core of our problems. It is a societal, civil, cultural issue.
I think that something else might also contribute, even if
tilanol contributes, but something else might contribute more to autism.
You just got Trump derangement syndrome because these people are
so intellectually void, and they're so brainwashed by the cult,

(01:25:25):
and they're so ready for war with the Democrats that
anybody who questions the most absurd and ridiculous statement is
considered the enemy. Even if I think, yeah, if the
Democrats want to take a bunch of tilanol because they're protesting, fine,

(01:25:46):
I'll buy them a bottle. I don't care scrowm. So
you hear me say that, Oh, he must be on
our side. Yeah. But also this whole tilan all causes
autism thing that's also absurd. Oh you must be taking
the tile and all that. These people are out of
their minds. The whole country is crazy, and all of

(01:26:08):
this stuff contributes to it, plays a part in it,
plays a role in it. I read an article this
is from the Wall Street journalist said RFK Junior's team
wanted to tut an autism therapy. Instead, they went after tailanol.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Junior's team had described by
the beginning of September, or had decided rather by the

(01:26:30):
beginning of September, to tell Americans that acina metafine, the
active ingredient in talanow, was a possible cause of autism,
but officials were divided over how much emphasis to put
on the painkiller, and were planning to discuss it as
one of many possible causes. People familiar with the matter said, now,
see that's rfk Junior. That's logical, that's rational, that's objective,

(01:26:52):
that makes sense. That is the truth. Whatever the truth is,
that's the truth. It's possibly an other cause, but there's
a lot of other causes too. Doctors that Kennedy had
selected to lead key agencies under him suggested the big
stories should be I don't know how to pronounce this.

(01:27:12):
It's a generic drug lukovron lukovin in which they saw
promises for alleviating autism symptoms. But at a meeting with
Talanhow's maker, Kennedy was convinced that a seat of metaphine
was the cause, which, even if it was the cause,

(01:27:33):
you would think that they would also still put emphasis
on the alleviation of the quote symptoms. So it's kind
of a strange story. We think that there might be
a lot of problems, there might be a lot of
things that are causing this. They met with tail and

(01:27:53):
All and their maker, and then they decided, actually, it's
just a set of metaphine causing it. What happened into
that meeting? What happened to RFK Junior who says, it's
Wi Fi, it's cell phone signals, it's chemicals, it's poison.
It's your food, it's your drinks, it's your fast food,
your process food like substances. This is not food, it's junk,

(01:28:14):
it's garbage. What happened to that Kennedy who said it's
a whole array of things. He sets down with the
Tailenol company for a few minutes. He's like, Yep, it's
a ceta metaphine, that's what's causing it. Yeah, but aceta
metaphan has only been around since what nineteen fifty five,
growing in sixty seventies and eighties. I mean it dates

(01:28:37):
back to the eighteen nineties, but in terms of its
widespread use and availability as a painkiller, it goes back
to the nineteen fifties, and you couldn't get it over
the counter until what nineteen sixty was introduced by mcnil
laboratories in fifty five. Johnson and Johnson bought them very
soon after that, I think nineteen fifty nine, and then

(01:29:00):
by nineteen sixty you could get over the counter, and
it took off in the seventies, in the eighties, nineteen eighties.
It's been around in the eighteen nineties. Yeah, but it's
also wasn't widely available. So even if you tried to say, okay,
it's been around since the eighteen nineties and we have
the classification of autism in nineteen eleven, you got to
think of a couple of considerations here. One, eighteen nineties

(01:29:22):
doesn't mean it came out the first day of eighteen nineties.
The eighteen ninety nineties, it became started to become used,
and it was really restricted use, like, it wasn't widely available.
So if autism developed, I mean over how long less
than twenty years, and it was first diagnosed, you would
need more than twenty years to notice that there were

(01:29:44):
these subtle symptoms in people that were classifiable as a
condition and you can't blame that autism on aceta metaphin
because a cate of metaphin wasn't widely available for another
fifty years, in the same way that you can't. I'm
going to test my memory here. Sometime nineteen fourteen nineteen eighteen,

(01:30:07):
they introduced the first whooping cough vaccine. Whooping cough actually
went up after that in the thirties and the forties.
Then they redid the vaccine and merge it with a
secondary vaccine, and around that time, whooping cough which was
caused by other conditions, you know, environmental conditions, conditions health
the mother, the health of perhaps even the family, but

(01:30:28):
things that contributed to what we call whooping cough, largely
hygiene and cleanliness in hospital settings, and all kinds of
other things. So they merge it with another vaccine, and
then they reintroduced it when the numbers started to actually
go down, even though it had been out for thirty

(01:30:48):
something years before that. I mean, that's fraud. And then
when numbers went down again in two thousand and eight, nine,
ten eleven, they changed the definition of whooping cough so
they could sell more vaccines. That's verifiable. Check it out
if you don't believe me. So he's changing dates, changing definitions.
You could certainly draw a link between acta metaphine. I'm

(01:31:09):
not even I'm not. The thing is I'm not sitting
here saying it's not people think, oh, I'm a democrat.
I mean he's a democrat saying it's not what you know,
you're not a scientist. No, what I'm saying is weird
for RFK Junior to spend his life being like, it's
the Wi Fi, it's the cell phones, it's the towers
and the satellites, it's the poison food, and it's it's

(01:31:29):
the McDonald's, and it's the Coca cola. And then for
him just to sit down with tiland All for twenty
minutes and he's like, yeah, it's a scene of metaphin.
That's called compromise. You want to get to the bottom
of mister Kennedy, you need to say it's a set
of metaphin, because guess what that does. One half the
country is so out of their minds that they will

(01:31:52):
take more tailand all because they're told not to. So
that's marketing strategy for tilan All first of all. Second
of all, by doing this, they take all the pressure
off of the vaccine companies, which you know, damn well,
regardless if vaccines are a major cause of autism or not,

(01:32:17):
have faced tremendous pressure, heat, and even lawsuits or people
trying it. You can't really assue them, but lawsuits over
things like this, They've faced a lot of scrutiny, and
all they need is the Maha golden boy of the
liberal conservative. He can kind of blend and blur the
line between the divide and the country, telling his followers,

(01:32:38):
you know what, calm down, it's really tile and all.
It's not a big deal. We'll fix it. And you know,
Pfizer and Maderna are cutting checks to somebody. I mean,
this is like, this is like Dick Cheney turning to
his friend and shooting him in the face. I mean,

(01:32:59):
this is like who did nine to eleven? Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia. Oh so we have to go to warwi Iraq. No,
we're gonna bomb in Afghanistan. You're like, what wasn't a family?
There's a family. Got bit about that? A bunch of
Saudi Arabians. So what you're saying is we have to
bomb Afghanistan. You have bomb Iraq. So it's like vaccines, vaccines, vaccines, vaccines, vaccines.

(01:33:28):
We need the final report. Mister Kennedy, it's a scene
of medicine. This is the same Kennedy who is behind
the universal COVID and flu vaccines, and the same Kennedy
behind cutting off funding to essentially competition to those vaccines.
The same Kennedy behind big meat now and big dairy

(01:33:48):
now and the Trump in the station we had big
sugar now and mRNA vaccines, universal ones. He couldn't do
something positive if he wanted to, which I think that
he does. There's way too much blackmail, compromise, buyouts, threats,

(01:34:09):
and god knows what else. And that's the deal. You
want to start a conversation on maybe cutting back some
vaccines from the childhood program, Okay, we'll back you on that.
You can cut one or two of them, or recommend
that maybe maybe kids have a few less. But when

(01:34:31):
you issue your report on autism, you're not going to
make any direct connection to vaccines. So do you want
kids to stop receiving them and dial on that hill
because we will stop you, or do you want to
take the win of not having as many vaccines right now.
But putting it into this vaccines cause autism, that's the

(01:34:52):
kind of meetings that are had. I can guarantee you
that I would put money on that. But we also
have to ask another question, what exactly is autism anyway,
just like we asked what is add what is ADHD?

(01:35:12):
What is autism? Because you know, there's some new age
people that think autism is like the next step in
human evolution. What is autism? I went to a number
of different websites to try to find what autism is,
like an official definition of autism. Went to the American

(01:35:32):
Psychiatric Association. I went to Advanced Autism dot com, which
is like an autism services website. They describe how autism
was coined in nineteen eleven by Eugene Bleuler. Leo Kanner
published a paper defining infantile autism. In nineteen forty three,
Hans Asperger describes as syndrome as burgers that share similarities

(01:35:58):
with Canon's autism, later known as Asperger syndrome. In nineteen eighty,
the DSM three establish a standardized diagnostic criteria for autism.
In nineten ninety four, DSM four categorized autism as a
spectrum disorder, but what exactly is it? Autism spectrum disorder
encompasses a range of symptoms and severity levels, making it

(01:36:19):
a spectrum disorder. This means that individuals with autism may
experience a variety of developmental issues, with some requiring significant support,
while others may lead more independent lives. As awareness and
recognition of autism have increased, more resources and support systems
have become available for families and individuals affected by autism. Now,

(01:36:39):
I want to tell you something that's a personal story
that you might think is irrelevant, but I think it's
the most relevant story that I could most relevant thing
I could possibly share with you in the remainder of
tonight's show. And yes, it relates to my time spent
over here in Japan. Let me put it this way.

(01:37:00):
People know that Japan is famously a very I don't
want to say pacifist, but people here prefer to have
peace rather than have arguments and discussions. And I used
to think that's not that attractive because I'm a straightforward,
straight shooter. I like to be direct and honest. But

(01:37:20):
then I experienced it for myself and I was like, oh,
it's not really, it's not like your girlfriend or your
wife or your husband or your boyfriend drops the issue
and then they hold a grudge. It's like you drop it,
and you actually drop it, and then nobody thinks about
it again. And that in and of itself, if you
just isolate that idea. And I'm not saying that's universal,

(01:37:42):
I'm just saying, like, generally speaking, that might not be healthy,
but when you are focused on the beauty of life
or you're focused on having peace, it kind of balances
out the perceived negativity in the same way that I
perceive being straight honest with people as being positive, but
over here that would be considered very negative. It's a

(01:38:03):
cultural thing, is basically what I'm saying. When my wife
came to the US, we went to a museum in Tucson.
We went to the Air and Space Museum and there
was a we went to see they have some of
these like buildings they built in the middle of the

(01:38:23):
air field. I think they had a B twenty nine,
And there was someone taking a picture and I kind
of sawed at the last second, so I ducked down,
kind of did like a head bob thing.

Speaker 5 (01:38:34):
I was like, oh, sorry, sorry, sorry, sorry, And.

Speaker 1 (01:38:36):
My wife started laughing. I said, what she said that
was extremely Japanese. I said, what the apologizing thing? She said, no, no,
just like the ducking and like the bobbing of the head.
And I knew what it was. She explained that I
knew what she mentos. I get that people do that
all the time over here. Everything's just like a slight
head balancing.

Speaker 5 (01:38:53):
Oh I'm sorry, I'm sorry, sorry, sorry, And.

Speaker 1 (01:38:55):
I like that. I like the idea of that. Every
time someone pulls out almost cuts me off my bike,
they always bow, they wave.

Speaker 5 (01:39:03):
I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry.

Speaker 1 (01:39:04):
It's not a lot nicer than you know, having the
middle finger thrown at you and people curse at you
out the window. So I'm thinking of all that and
how in the United States my whole life. I when
I was in Boise, Idaho, I did a lot of
walking and a lot of reading. People walk and look

(01:39:26):
at their phones. I walk and read. It's just I
can do it. I guess I didn't realize how weird
that is for some people. But I walk and read
and I people used to mock me, make fun of me.
It's like you're on your cell phone walking and reading.
I don't. I don't understand what the issue, what's the
difference here? It was weird, like it happened a lot.
People saw it happen. It was weird people, But people
made fun of me for reading. Everywhere I've lived in
my life, it's weird, like you said, on a bench

(01:39:48):
at a park. I had somebody come come up to
me one time in Florida when I lived there. They're like,
why you read? I was like, is this idiocracy? Is
this illegal? I was like, because I want to learn something.
You know, you got the internet, right, yeah, but I
want to read a book. I've had that happen to
me more times than you can imagine. And then over here,

(01:40:10):
like everybody on a train has either of they either
have their phone or the or the reading a book.
And I'm telling you this because I felt like I
fit in more over here. I've explained that before. I
feel like I fit in here. I do a lot
of that apologizing and kind of that natural like I'm
sorry bowing thing. It's like a natural thing that I've
always done, and its I fit in over here. If
I did that in the US, it's like this kid

(01:40:31):
got autism or something, which is kind of my point
because as much as I am very direct with you
on radio, if you met me in person, I'm a
pretty quiet person. I mean, i'll say something to somebody,
I'll confront people at conferences, I'll do it. But for
the most part, I'm a pretty calm person. I'm a
pretty reserved person. I'm not a competitive person, not really.

(01:40:54):
I'm not a very aggressive person except in very limited circumstances.
I'm pretty laid back. I'm I'm very like, let's have peace,
and but if you mess with me, I'm gonna mess
you up. So that attitude is always seen as like weakness,

(01:41:19):
you know, in my life has always been seen as weakness.
Over Here, it's not seen as weakness, it's seen a strength.
It's seen as like peaceful. And then traditionally, over here,
you know that there's a system of honor. So if
someone does do something like there's ways to handle it,
which different kind of system in the US, but that's

(01:41:40):
kind of the wild West system. But that's that's how
it used to be. So I'm just thinking, like, if
you because when I was a kid, I was never
formally diagnosed with autism, but I got family members and
people I know they're like, you definitely have autism, and
it was always based on something like you've got a
really good that's autistic. Really having a good memory is autistic.

(01:42:04):
I don't think having a good memory it means I
have autism. I think it means you don't have a
good memory yourself. I think that you're just like, oh,
he has a normal memory, so he's autistic. I'm thinking
of all this because I imagine that if you took
the definition of autism based on the way that American

(01:42:24):
society functions, and you compared it to like the not
the medical definition of autism in Japan, but if you
compared it to the behavior of people out in public,
you would think that everybody here has autism. This is
something that I was thinking about planning for tonight's show,

(01:42:50):
because when I look around, I see people that are
just heading a book, very kind of almost you know, twitchy,
the way they interact unless you're on the right shower
trained people like kind of twitchy with like sit down.
They don't want to disturb you. They even have announcements
like be careful, put your backpack on the front, don't
disturb people, don't make people's lives inconvenience. It's just constant reminders,
which I love. It's amazing. So I looked up the

(01:43:13):
statistics about this in the US. The numbers are explosive.
In twenty twenty one and thirty six had autism. Why
is that though improved screening, awareness, diagnostics, But how much
of that is also just classifying people as quote autistic

(01:43:35):
for patients for money for new experimental therapies. It's just
like add which ADD existed, then it didn't exist, Then
they just changed the name to sell more drugs and therapies.
It's the same thing with ASD. So I looked I
was like, okay, what about in Japan. Well, according to
the Japanese Society of Psychiatry Neurology, in Japan, the rate

(01:43:55):
of autism is one out of one hundred and Sixtyechnically,
this report says Japan has a slightly higher percentage of
autism compared to the global average, but again that probably
contributes Japan's the fourth largest economy in the world. Is
probably it's probably because of the modern medical analysis of

(01:44:16):
this stuff, which has been increased drastically in the US
the last twenty years. In Japan too, they're just a
little bit behind in terms of implementing it. But again,
what I mean, what is autism? How do people behave
that have autism and you look up like, okay, what
is the definition of autism? How do people behave difficulty

(01:44:41):
appreciating their own or other's emotions or having emotional issues,
aversion to making eye contact, lack of proficiency at nonverbal
gestures almost like a scripted speech, interpreting abstract ideas literally,

(01:45:04):
difficulty making friends and keeping them. First off, having difficulty
making friends and keeping them is not a mental or
neurological problem. You just have different interests and people don't
have those interests. You don't have friends. I don't really
have a lot of friends. It's not because I'm autistic.
I just don't really have a lot of people that

(01:45:24):
I consider to be anywhere near an intellectual level. That
makes the conversation interesting. It's not autism. It's just I'm
not interested in Kim Kardashian. I'm not interested in the NFL.
I'm not interested in most of the I don't even
even people I know. Sometimes I'm like, I don't have
no idea what you're talking about. Never heard of that before?
So that doesn't mean you have autism. But if you

(01:45:45):
look at these things like not having eye contact and
having bizarre by whatever definition, nonverbal gestures and scripted speech,
I mean that is like the Japanese, that's exactly how
they act. My wife acts that way when you're in public.
It's just like as not. It's not like it's a

(01:46:08):
I don't mean like it's a police state. I just
mean it's people just act constantly aware of their surroundings,
and if they're inconveniencing other people, and there's a lot
of bowing and a lack of eye contact. And if
you came to Japan with an idea of what autism is,

(01:46:29):
you would look around and be like, everybody here is autistic?
Now are they No? But if you looked at it
through the same lens that people diagnose me as a
kid with autism, he likes to read books, he avoids
eye contact, he has trouble with the way that he
speaks to people, he has trouble with nonverbal gestures. He

(01:46:49):
sits weird, he acts weird, he stands wed, he eats
food weird. You'd find the same thing over here in
the Land of the Rising Sun. You'd be like, dude,
everybody here has autism. So is it that the entire
Japanese island chain has autism or as autism? Maybe even

(01:47:10):
though people have it and have problems. Maybe autism, like
add or ADHD, is a fabricated disorder like polio, and
the symptoms of what we call add ADHD, polio or
autism are actually created by a combination of contributing factors

(01:47:34):
that have nothing to do within the case of polio,
a virus, have nothing to do in the case of
add or ADHD, with some kind of like imbalance in
the brain, which they removed add from the list that
doesn't exist anymore. Else ADHD some kind of like chemical imbalance,
or they're just abnormal. No, they're just kids and food

(01:47:56):
coloring contributes to that. Or in the case of autism,
oh it's tailanal maybe in like one of a million cases,
there's other things that contribute to it. So don't get
me wrong. We have a lot of listeners who have
autistic children. What I'm saying is, and this is the problem.
It's like saying that viruses don't cause disease. Oh, you
don't believe viruses exist. No viruses exist, I don't know

(01:48:20):
what they are. What I'm saying is and neither do scientists.
Because they say they're alive, they say they're dead. We
still argue about that. It's not a matter of if
the virus is real. It's a matter of does it
cause the disease. Yeah, there's something there, it's an artifact,
it's something. It's a matter of does it cause the disease.
Same thing with autism. Yeah, you've got some conditions here.

(01:48:40):
You call that, the doctors call that autism. But if
you strip away the name autism and you look at
what the kid is doing, what the kid is experiencing,
what the kid is dealing with, do you think that
maybe that could be caused by something else. So I
know what caused my condition. It wasn't being up in

(01:49:01):
a society that encourages you to bow. What caused my
condition to be really reserved and not have eye contact was,
in my assessment, pretty severe psychological trauma as a kid,
pretty severe psychological and verbal trauma which resulted in me
not really having a lot of friends and certainly not dating,

(01:49:23):
and not really being sure that I was alive or
had any value whatsoever. And that'll definitely make you put
your head down and definitely make you think like I'm
not worth anything, I'm less than you, and just have
that natural instinct to not stand up straight, which is
part of my back problem too. I don't stand up
straight still to this day, not just from a car reck.

(01:49:44):
It's from the upbringing. Now that looks the same as
what's happening over here where people bow. It's not for me.
It's really just I like that bowing thing. But it's
also because I've always walked my whole life with my
head down and just really reserved and not feeling like
really worth anything. That's the childhood issue. But those kinds

(01:50:05):
of behaviors are classified as autism. So is it like
a neurological disorder or is it the result of trauma
and abuse that causes it. No, that doesn't mean if
you have an autistic child you abuse them. I'm saying
there could be other factors. If you strip away the
veneer of polio, of autism, of ADHD, is it really

(01:50:28):
caused by a virus in the case of polio, Is
it really caused by some neurological defect? In the case
of ADHD, Is it really caused by some kind of painkiller.
In the case of autism, there might be contributing There
are contributing factors to all of these things, But if

(01:50:49):
you strip away the veneers, like with cancer, what actually
causes it? What actually causes the quote autism because the
definition of autism also falls into the category of how
Japanese society works. It also falls into the category of
how kids act when they're abused verbally, physically, psychologically. It

(01:51:11):
also falls into the category of a subset of the
population who generally speaking, just are less outgoing, would rather
read a book than play a sports. A subset of
the population who just behave a little bit differently. Maybe
they like comic books, they act a little bit differently
than everybody else. Do you think that maybe there could

(01:51:35):
be something else contributing to it, that it's not tail
and all or a neurological defect. Could be the food
coloring in the case of ADHD, or in the case
of polio, maybe it's the DDT they spread everywhere. Don't

(01:51:56):
really have polio today, but they're also not looking for polio.
And that's another part of this, is like when there's
an emphasis on we need more diagnostic of autism suddenly
everything else disappears. We need more diagnostics of Star's cove too.
Selling the flu disappears. Anytime there's a new disorder or
a reinvented disorder, it's always based on what the doctors
are told to look for. I don't like things to

(01:52:19):
change in my life. That's also a sign of autism,
being focused on niche subjects to the exclusion of others.
Listen to the way that one's turned around. Maybe others
don't want to hang out with you because you have
an interest in something that's very niche and you just

(01:52:41):
really don't know anybody else who has that same interest.
Maybe you're not excluding others, maybe they're excluding you, and
we call that autism. I used to go to the
playground every day after school, almost every day and play basketball.
Virtually nobody ever wanted to play with me. Was I going?
Wasn't an niche subject, per se? I guess at my

(01:53:01):
school it was somewhat niche. Weren't a lot of basketball players.
Was that me excluding others? Or was that others excluding me?
Or was it just nobody really wanted to play basketball?
They all wanted to play hacky sack, or they all
wanted to play flag football. Another definition is like not
liking loud noises. Come to Japan again, you'll think everybody's

(01:53:24):
autistic because you just do not hear loud noises here,
even when you're in Tokyo. It's nothing compared to what
it is I think in every other country. Tokyo is
like silent compared to any American city. You rarely hear
a car horn, You rarely have ever hear anybody yelling.
The only people I've ever he heard made any noise
near the apartment I live at are Indians that live

(01:53:45):
in the apartment complex next door. There's a bunch of
Indians that just don't know how to play music within
a reasonable volume and don't know how to talk on
the phone without screaming. Otherwise, you just like don't hear anything.
Be quiet on a train, So like, by this definition,
Japanese trains or autistic trains, be quiet, don't have loud noises.
Oh my god, it's autistic. No, it's just respectful. And

(01:54:08):
again this is a cultural thing, so like I guess
a culture can be autistic. This is also a thing
where kids are abused and so they develop or maybe
they're abused indirectly by movies and TV and social media,
like with TikTok causing girls to become Inarexic and that
creates these conditions. It's very true for young girls in

(01:54:29):
that regard, or you know, liking to arrange things. Boy,
oh boy. If you think arranging things is autistic, come
on over to the Land of the Rising Sun. They
organize the boxes that they use to organize, the boxes
that they used to organize other things. My wife has
like a degree in organization. Every time we go to

(01:54:51):
the store or almost every time we're buying a new
boxes Morgan, she loves organ I thought I loved organizing
in America, I was called autistic and OCD for wanting
to organize. Over here, I'm a slob because I don't
organize as much as they organize. It's crazy. I like
Marie Condo, that organization women too. Used to watch her
and that show is I love watching her organized things.

(01:55:12):
That's like my reality TV. It's just like crazy. So
in the United States, I want to organize, and that's OCD.
I'm told by every girl I ever dated and by family.
But I come to Japan and I don't organize enough.
I'm considered like not that organized, even though I'm pretty organized.

(01:55:35):
My wife thinks it's pretty organized, but she's like, it's
not as organized as it could be. I love this
so much, Please organize it better. I needed to organize better.
But see, all these things were things that I was
called autistic for. I like organization. I don't stare at
people in the eyes because I think sometimes it's disrespectful.
That's just a cultural thing, because some cultures say if

(01:55:57):
you don't stare into the eyes, it's disrespectful. It's cultural.
So autism can be cultural. I bet you've never heard
anybody say that before. Autism can be a cultural thing.
Scripted speech, boy, oh boy, come over to Japan. Accidentally
bump into somebody, You're gonna hear scripted speech. So sin,
sum my sin, come in to say go to say

(01:56:17):
dog what aka? Sorry? Sorry? Sorry, I'm so sorry.

Speaker 4 (01:56:20):
Are you okay?

Speaker 1 (01:56:22):
That's scripted speech. It's not a bad thing, but scripted speech,
that would you consider that autistic? And again, in my case,
experiencing what I considered to be psychological verbal kind of
abuse of trauma as a kid. Those kinds of things,
to me, those kinds of things created the conditions where
I don't have eye contact, I look down. I have

(01:56:43):
trouble with verbal gestures, with nonverbal gestures. Rather, I have
issues with being able to really truly understand why people
get so incredibly emotional about stuff, because I'm a very
rational person, try to be and I'm try to take
these things. And but my OCD, which turned out to

(01:57:05):
not be a me issue, it turned out to not
be autism. I was just living in the wrong country.
It doesn't mean if you have kids that are autistic
that they're not autistic. What it means is maybe there's
a different definition of autism that we haven't considered yet.
Maybe a lot of it is cultural, maybe a lot
of it is extremely subjective. And just like they've changed

(01:57:27):
the definition of ADD to ADHD and ADD suddenly disappeared,
maybe the same thing will happen with autism. And maybe
we're just putting a heavy emphasis on natural childhood developments
in some cases and in the cases that are really extreme.
Maybe that's a subset of the population that always behaves
like that, and we're just now realizing it because we're

(01:57:47):
focused on those kinds of behaviors. So what I'm trying
to say is I don't have Trump derangement syndrome. I
just don't think tailan all is the answer to this problem.
But I am pretty sure that the same administration, which
just now after the tailanow announcement, has announced a deal

(01:58:08):
with Pfizer to lower drug prices. Everybody gets so excited,
but like herschel Walker asked, why are you on the insulin?
To begin with? Why are you on these drugs? To
begin with? These lower drug costs will include the Trump
our X website. They include that executive order where the
President says, let's make these drugs at home, Let's make

(01:58:29):
them cheaper. Do you ever think that maybe drugs are
really expensive because there's so many people that want them,
and maybe they're not as expensive in some other industrial,
clean countries because people don't take as many of them.
That maybe the solution to the problem of we're really

(01:58:49):
sick and we're also the most medicated is not more medication.
But it's circular logic. We're sick because we don't have
enough meds. No, we take the most meds. We don't
need more. And if you think a seit of medicine's bed,
take a look at some of the stuff Peiser sells.
Take a look at some of the stuff that's subsidized
by the federal government for Pfizer, and just look at Kennedy.

(01:59:13):
He went from being opposed to Pfiser to apparently becoming
one of their biggest supporters. We don't like them, We
don't trust them. They profit off of disease and death too. Yeah,
this Peiser company is actually a pretty good company. We
kind of like them. Wow. Tstradio dot info, Ardigable at

(01:59:36):
yahoo dot com. Thank you so much for supporting the show,
listening to us. You can buy me a coffee. You
can get a copy of one of my books. You
can subscribe to the advertisement free archive. All of that
on the website plus social media links. Stay safe, stay informed,
stay healthy, and I will talk to you on the
next broadcast.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Cardiac Cowboys

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Spectrums of Disorder: A Tylenol Saga (10/2/25)

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Cardiac Cowboys

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Spectrums of Disorder: A Tylenol Saga (10/2/25)

Stuff You Should Know