All Episodes

August 25, 2025 • 32 mins
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
But we begin with this. It's time to say goodbye. Obama.
Is the someone else up now we can talk to
no now Gow. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (00:10):
The former president just can't seem to get out of
the political limelight, concerting himself in every aspect of the
Democratic Party everything in politics. In New York, for example,
President Obama boosting Zoe ramam Domini's hope of becoming mayor,
congratulating him, offering him advice, insight guys is socialists port
online communists said on terrorizing the city.

Speaker 1 (00:33):
That call happened soon after the primary. It was a
call that I was honored to receive.

Speaker 2 (00:39):
In California, the former president lending his unwavering support to
Governor Gavin Newsom and his retaliatory redissearching plan to combat
gerrymandering in Texas by fundraising from millions of dollars on
an elite institutional place like NARRAGANZT. He's talking about raising
money for the National Democratic Redistricting Committee this week. All
the pressure was on his shoulders for some reason, And

(01:02):
as we continue to find out more about the Oballa
presidency itself, it appears more clearly than ever the forty
fourth president of the United States was hell bent on
bringing chaos to the incoming president, President Donald J.

Speaker 1 (01:14):
Trump.

Speaker 3 (01:16):
Over one hundred documents that we released on Friday really
detail and provide evidence of how this treasonous conspiracy was
directed by President Obama just weeks before he was due
to leave office, after President Trump had already gotten elected.
So creating this piece of manufactured intelligence that claims that

(01:40):
Russia had helped Donald Trump get elected contradicted every other
assessment that had been made previously in the months leading
up to the election that said exactly the opposite.

Speaker 1 (01:51):
You know, it hurt Trump, but it also hurt our country.

Speaker 2 (01:53):
And the wake of President Trump's executive order outlawed to banking,
it came to light that major bank executives, under pressure
by the Obama and Biden administrations to deny services to
individuals and businesses for political reasons.

Speaker 4 (02:08):
We had nowhere to go capital one strip three hundred
bank accounts for me three hundred In the middle of
the night, they sent us a letter. After doing business
for twenty something years, all your bank accounts for golf
courses and condominium buildings and hotels that are all gone
in the middle of the night. I mean, how do
you pay taxes, How do you pay your employees? This
happened across the board. It happened with JP Morgan Chase,
it happened with Bank of America, it happened with First Republic.

(02:31):
And this wasn't just happening to the Trumps people with
a lot of zeros on the eddit. This was happening
to conservatives all over the country.

Speaker 1 (02:37):
That had happened directly to his dad too.

Speaker 2 (02:39):
Historically, we have never seen anything like this before. I mean,
let's look back in recent history. Gerald Ford lost a
tough race to Jimmy Carter. He happily retired from public life.
He was golfing, he was skiing, joined boards numerous corporations.
Jimmy Carter, Bill Tuses counted ballots in Africa. Ronald Reagan
quietly went to work in Los Angeles. In his office,

(03:00):
he's riding horses, riding, speaking, spending time with his family.
Bill Clinton rode off into the sunset, far away from
the White House, initially spending quality time relaxing on Epstein Island,
hoping we would forget his scandals, focusing on his memoir
in his library. Sure he helped his wife, that's a
different story.

Speaker 1 (03:19):
We know how that ended.

Speaker 2 (03:20):
George so b Bush is spending time with his family
back in Texas in Maine and devotes a lot of
time to painting and charity work. President Biden can't actually
do anything, go anywhere, say he doesn't count. Look, it's
not unusual to have a former president player role in
future elections.

Speaker 1 (03:37):
Go back to the Jacksonian era.

Speaker 2 (03:39):
Andrew Jackson put some of his protegees like Martin Van
Buren and President Pulkin to office. He was a power
broker from Washington in Washington, but he did it from Tennessee.
But Obama oddly stayed in DC and he had no proteges.
Where is the success story that came in his wake?
He backed some real winners, I mean losers. Mala Harris

(04:00):
get elected. Let me check the Ledger. Did Hillary Clinton
get in Nope? Sure Biden got elected, but they're not
even on speaking terms.

Speaker 1 (04:09):
Loyalty was tested, loyalty was broken.

Speaker 2 (04:12):
So not only did Obama's legacy not produce powerful figures
in his way, you can actually argue that he ignited, poked, prodded,
and mocked the most powerful Republican figure of our generation,
Donald J. Trump, into running and then he took care
of the winning.

Speaker 1 (04:27):
Oh I a little hurt that he's not here tonight.
We had so much fun the last time.

Speaker 4 (04:34):
Is this dinner too tacky for the Donald?

Speaker 1 (04:38):
What could he possibly be doing instead? Is it home
eating a Trump's steak? Tweeting out insults to Angela Merkel?

Speaker 5 (04:49):
Is it Donald elects the foreign policy experience to be president.

Speaker 6 (04:53):
But in fairness, he has spent.

Speaker 1 (04:55):
Years meeting with leaders from around the world.

Speaker 5 (04:59):
Miss Sweden, Miss Argentina, Miss Azerbaijan.

Speaker 1 (05:05):
Who's laughing now?

Speaker 2 (05:07):
When John McCain lost to President Obama, he bowed out.
He graciously wished Obama the best.

Speaker 1 (05:11):
He moved on. But after all his.

Speaker 2 (05:14):
Time in Washington, President Obama has not seemed to have
learned a thing.

Speaker 1 (05:17):
So can I make a suggestion?

Speaker 2 (05:19):
Can you move over and let the Democrats figure this
out themselves? They need to start anew Maybe focus on
your marriage.

Speaker 4 (05:26):
Would you be attracted to a guy who's not financially
sound when you meet him?

Speaker 7 (05:34):
I'm married? One?

Speaker 1 (05:36):
Wow?

Speaker 2 (05:37):
And whatever happened to his deal with Netflix? Any new
movies coming out? Celebrity golf tournament to play in? Or
maybe put some focus on your presidential center in Chicago?

Speaker 1 (05:46):
Residents are not happy.

Speaker 2 (05:47):
They're calling it a monstrosity, fearing that they're going to
be displaced by the eight hundred and thirty million.

Speaker 1 (05:53):
Dollar project not yet complete.

Speaker 2 (05:55):
President Obama won twice for himself and has been a
loser for his party.

Speaker 1 (05:59):
Ever, it's time to say Former White.

Speaker 2 (06:02):
House Press secretary of Foxer's contributed Ari Fleischer. Ari, I
just couldn't help but think the President Obama just won't
go away.

Speaker 8 (06:11):
Yeah, and you know, when you're littany, you're a wonderful
litany about the obamasms out there. You left off from
one where he called the filibuster Jim Crow and urged
the Democrats in the Senate to get.

Speaker 6 (06:20):
Rid of the filibuster.

Speaker 8 (06:21):
Yep, Look, Barack Obama couldn't deliver in twenty sixteen when
he was a sitting president on behalf of his anointed
Hillary Clinton. That's when he had the maximum power and
he couldn't get it done. So Barack Obama is like
a lot of presidents frankly.

Speaker 1 (06:37):
Spent forces.

Speaker 8 (06:38):
Politically, it is rare anymore to have a former president
who's got the ability to shape the next election. Obama
keeps trying, but former presidents just don't have that kind
of cloud or role anymore.

Speaker 6 (06:48):
Brian.

Speaker 2 (06:49):
I know, listen, he's extremely talented. It gives a great speech,
unbelievable charisma. We could appreciate all that, but when it
comes to cotails, there is none. So I want to
talk about this presidency. So the president and I the
States had his party pass a monstrous bill. It's almost
his whole domestic agenda. And he passes it in July,
right in July fourth. But since that time, and I'm
going to put up the poll numbers, it does not

(07:10):
great high in terms of public opinion.

Speaker 1 (07:13):
I mean, see an end poll down twenty two.

Speaker 2 (07:15):
In terms of popularity CBS it's minus twenty two.

Speaker 1 (07:18):
Then you got.

Speaker 2 (07:18):
Nineteen Pew we Research, Pew Research Poll fourteen, and then
the Wall Street Journal ten. I don't think they've done
a good job for Republicans saying what's in the bill?
Or do you think it's a bad bill to sell?

Speaker 8 (07:32):
No, here's what they have to do. Instead of calling
this now the big beautiful bill, they have to smell
the sell the small pretty pieces. That's how you drive
this home. If you're you're a senior citizen, you're not
going to have any taxes on your Social Security and
your income anymore. If you're a waiter, a waitress when
you work for doing massages, shoe toenails, fingernails, Yep, no

(07:56):
tax on tips. These are the huge chunks segments of
that bill that resonate instantly as soon as somebody learns
I'm covered.

Speaker 1 (08:04):
By that bill.

Speaker 6 (08:05):
I didn't know that. They named it.

Speaker 8 (08:08):
The one big beautiful bill in aggregate. They he'll pass
it through the House, but now they need to break
it into chunks.

Speaker 2 (08:15):
True, they also have money for rural hospitals. Hit people
like Larry Summers, Treasury Secretary, says they've got to destroy
all rural hospitals. But I think right now the message
through Rehogan party was don't hold town halls.

Speaker 1 (08:27):
It'll be bad. Opstick at optics as.

Speaker 2 (08:30):
Some people don't understand the bill or Democrats come in.
So is that the right thing to do? Back off
to prevent something going bad?

Speaker 8 (08:39):
Well, town halls are risky business nowadays. Unless you're marquee
in politics as you've taken on. You don't mind all
the booing and the shouting and the yelling of your
town hall. You'll meet with anybody. You'll bring out the Democrats.
Town halls are now attended by professional Democratic protesters. They're
not genuine town halls, and they're certainly even in red districts,
not a measure of the red voters in those district.

(09:00):
They are a measure of how the liberal activist groups
can turn people out at a Republican town hall. So
it's a phony measure. I don't look at the town
halls to the way you get your message out. You
get your message out, Brian, like anything else in the
modern era, through communications, through advertisement, through social media, through
meetings with the selected groups. Making an example out of

(09:20):
the waitress. You know, every congressional district should have the
tax cut waitress. Make somebody famous in your district who
is no longer paying taxes on tips and talk. Let
her talk about how her life has improved. These are
the kinds of chunks that I was talking about in
ways I would try to get that message out.

Speaker 2 (09:38):
Now, the last time a sitting president had a really
good midterm, you work for him.

Speaker 1 (09:42):
George W.

Speaker 6 (09:43):
Bush.

Speaker 2 (09:43):
We're at war, coming off with nine to eleven attacks
and going on the offensive in Afghanistan. Now President Trump
desperately knows he's got to keep the House or else
going to spend this whole time fending off investigations and
impeachments seven months in, right before Labor Day. Do you
think the Republicans are at right now in bucking tradition

(10:04):
and holding both chambers.

Speaker 8 (10:07):
Well, I think they're going to hold the set. I
think that's a given. The House is definitely fifty to fifty.
And if I'm Donald Trump, here's the language I'd used, Brian,
I would say that you need to show up in
twenty twenty six and make your down payment on my legacy,
my name and keeping the White House in twenty twenty eight.

Speaker 1 (10:24):
If you don't show.

Speaker 8 (10:25):
Up to make your down payment in twenty twenty six,
you can't show up in twenty twenty eight because it
could be too late.

Speaker 6 (10:30):
I mean, that's what it is.

Speaker 8 (10:31):
He's got to get the base turned out in twenty
twenty six, and the base loves Trump more than they
love Republicans, so it's a little bit of a tough
sell to get people to come out in the huge
numbers there's been in recent elections, a drop off of
almost fifty million Americans from the presidential year to the
non presidential year. Twenty twenty six, cycles the time to

(10:52):
make your down payment, and you have to show up
to make that down payment at the polls.

Speaker 2 (10:57):
All right, all ri if I ssho your great advice.
Thanks so much, it's going to be interesting. Look forward
to talking to you along the way. Thank you, Ari.

Speaker 8 (11:03):
Thanks Brian, alex I'd like you to say a couple
of words to your a young powerful man.

Speaker 9 (11:10):
I think in the past two weeks we've probably had
more progress in ending this war than we have in
the past three and a half years.

Speaker 1 (11:19):
And I think the fact that.

Speaker 9 (11:20):
We're around this table today is very much symbolic in
the sense that it's team Europe and team United States
helping Ukraine.

Speaker 1 (11:30):
There it is Finland's President Alexander.

Speaker 2 (11:32):
Stubb had a seed at the table for those high
stake talks at the White House last week. We're just
stunning to see it's a help brokeer peace was the goal,
of course between Russia and Ukraine.

Speaker 1 (11:42):
Could they do it?

Speaker 2 (11:43):
After forty one plus months since that meeting, more airstrikes
from Russia, little progress towards peace, and Vladimir Putin apparently
making brand new demands. Joining me now with his inside perspective.
Is Finland President Alexander Stubb, who many people thought really
understood Vladimir Putin. He certainly gets along with President Trump.
Mister President, thanks so much for coming coming by giving

(12:05):
your perspective on what's happened. There was a lot of
coverage about how the West and how the US covered
the coming together of the world leaders, Zolenski and the
Lobo Office with the President. But how do you think
Vladimir Putin interpreted it?

Speaker 1 (12:21):
Well? I think he probably looked at it a little
bit in all.

Speaker 9 (12:25):
Because his main nim is basically to split the West,
to show that Russia is the superpower. So the fact
that he saw six European leaders, NATO and the European
Union around the same table discussing with the President of
the United States was a big deal in Moscow. And
we see a lot of that coming out of the

(12:47):
media as well in Russia.

Speaker 2 (12:48):
And that not through Putin but through his surrogates, his
foreign minister, a spokespersons.

Speaker 1 (12:53):
And maybe we have tougher demands.

Speaker 2 (12:55):
Perhaps I know it's your area and you know this personally,
but now Vladimir Putin seem to have changed the rules
a little bit. He says no NATO membership we knew
about that surrender. All of the Donbas, including areas he
hasn't won over yet, no Western troops on Ukraine soil.
The security guarantees don't seem to be in his line,
in his vocabulary anymore.

Speaker 9 (13:16):
Mister President, what do you make of that? Well, it's
typical Russian negotiating tactics. You say one thing in the
beginning and then you start retracting. It happens all the time,
and I think because we were so focused on the
security guarantees, Russia is pushing back on that. But I
think for an American audience, it's very important to understand

(13:39):
the issue of land here because if you take what
Putin is asking from Ukraine, so it's pretty much a nogo.

Speaker 1 (13:48):
He knows it, but he keeps on demanding it. And
remember on the don Boss, he's been trying to get
the area.

Speaker 9 (13:55):
He has seventy five percent of it, but it's taken
twelve years, and fifty percent of that came straight in
the beginning, so it's really advancing just a tiny bit
at a time.

Speaker 2 (14:06):
So that seems to be a no go for any practically,
for all practical purposes. But then you add on top
of that he doesn't want international forces on the ground.
When you guys were talking to the point where what
troops would be used where, and should the US be
deployed with fighter jets perhaps ready to go in Romania.
But now when you get together and talk about where

(14:26):
you go from here, what do you say.

Speaker 1 (14:30):
Well, I mean, we are doing it.

Speaker 9 (14:32):
So one of the key outcomes for mondays what I
would call successful meeting with President Trump, was that we
started to work on the details of future security guarantees.

Speaker 1 (14:43):
And the starting point is very simple.

Speaker 9 (14:45):
The number one provider of security for Ukraine is Ukraine itself.

Speaker 1 (14:49):
It has one.

Speaker 9 (14:50):
Of the most modern and largest armies in the world.
Number two Europe will support that, and then number three
the US coordinates so provides some kind of assistance.

Speaker 1 (15:01):
Aid and backstop. So we're looking at the details right now.

Speaker 9 (15:04):
And remember it's not going to be Russia who tells
Europe or the United States what they can or cannot.

Speaker 1 (15:11):
Do with security guarantees.

Speaker 2 (15:13):
So what I'm wondering is, in the meantime, as lavrav
the Foreign minister, comes up with different things that have
to happen before a trilateral meeting, do we just let
Russia continue to have drone attack after drone attack on
Ukraine or should they pay a price for this delay
of game?

Speaker 1 (15:31):
Well, I think this is a little bit of a pendulum.

Speaker 9 (15:34):
So we saw what happened when President Trump put secondary
tariffs on India for purchasing Russia and oil. The first
thing Putin did was basically to call Trump to say listen,
I want to meet, and that meeting took place in
Alaska and President Trump got Putin around the negotiating table.
And now, of course, if Russia does not do what

(15:57):
it agreed to do with President Trump on Monday, first
to have a bilateral between and Zelenski and then to
have a trilateral between Putin, Zelenski and Trump, I am
sure that Trump will react in one way or another.
I always remind the President that the only thing that
President Putin understands is power, and the only person that

(16:19):
he listens to is Trump, and the only person that
he's afraid of is Trump. So I am sure that
the President is thinking hardh strategically on what to do next.

Speaker 2 (16:30):
No one has to tell you about Russia and what
they've done in the past and the Soviet Union because
it struck your family. They take land, they keep it,
they hold it. That's what happened in World War two,
and you can identify with that, right.

Speaker 1 (16:43):
Yeah, definitely.

Speaker 9 (16:44):
I mean I think that the basis of statehood has
three pillars. One is independence, two is sovereignty, and three is.

Speaker 1 (16:52):
Territorial integrity your land.

Speaker 9 (16:54):
And what happened to Finland after the Winter War, the
War of Continuation in a piece with Stalin in nineteen
forty four, was that we maintained our independence unlike our
Baltic friends who became part of the Soviet Union, but
we lost our sovereignty to decide to decide which organizations
and with whom to be, and then we lost ten

(17:14):
percent of our land. And my take is that it's
very important that Ukraine not only maintains its independence, but
also especially its sovereignty and then finally also gets.

Speaker 1 (17:25):
To keep its land. But we're far from that moment yet.
And they only understand strength.

Speaker 2 (17:30):
They do acquiescences weakness, and you know that better than anybody,
and I think the President picks that up too.

Speaker 1 (17:36):
NATO is not a threat to anybody.

Speaker 2 (17:38):
It's a defensive organization and only Russia feels that way.
And maybe they really know they're not a threat mister President,
thanks so much. We continue to talk to you along
the way, I hope as we try to get closer
and closer to ending this war.

Speaker 1 (17:52):
Thank you my pleasures. Thank you very much, Brian.

Speaker 2 (17:55):
Meanwhile, next, it turns out there was a method to
the madness a President Biden's wide open board center. Lindsey
Graham here to talk about it and how to combat
extreme isn't extremist in doctrination in our elementary schools, Noah
Tishby explains, but hes.

Speaker 1 (18:10):
Bey on tour.

Speaker 2 (18:11):
Fox Nation will be streaming in Richmond, Virginia September twenty seventh,
and then November first in Potsdown Pencil. Well, it turns
out there was a method to the madness of the
President biden open border policy, packing swing states with illegals
to rig elections and tilt the census for Democrats. In
twenty twenty three, for example, look at these numbers. The
legal immigrants in the US reached an all time high

(18:33):
of fourteen million, thanks to record growth of just two
years of President Biden's presidency, bringing a total of three
point five million. It's nuts welcoming more than a million
illegals into the nation's electoral swing States and that is cunning.

Speaker 1 (18:49):
But Trump shut that all down.

Speaker 2 (18:50):
The House Committee of Homeland Security, revealing that, for example,
on July twentieth, yet one hundred and sixteen illegals seized
the southern border. Turned around, by the way, the lowest
thing day in history. Is there a way though, to
stop illegals who are doing it the wrong way? And
we got that down well, rewarding people doing it the
right way, for example, being responsible on Greek green cards,

(19:13):
H one b of visas, helping out the farmers, the
meat packers, as well as hospitality workers. Let's ask a
man who thinks about this stuff all the time. South
Carolina Senator Lindsay Graham, Senator. I know we normally talk
foreign policy, but when it comes to domestic policy, did
you know there was a method to the madness? Did
you think it was just incompetence.

Speaker 10 (19:36):
Oh, no, you can't be that incompetent. I don't think
anybody can be that incompetent. They had an open border
policy for a reason. The reasons you gave makes some
sense to me. But here's what happened politically during the
four years of Biden. People fled the Democratic Party and
joined the Republican Party, I think mainly because of this.

Speaker 6 (19:58):
You know, border policy is national security.

Speaker 10 (20:00):
If you can't have sovereignty over your country and control
your borders.

Speaker 6 (20:03):
You're really not safe.

Speaker 10 (20:05):
So all these people have been let in, I think
probably for a purpose to affect out comes down the road.

Speaker 6 (20:11):
But we're going to change it.

Speaker 10 (20:12):
We're going to deport people, and I'm hoping the census
will not include illegal immigrants because that's not fair to
the country at large. But how they handled immigration is
one of the main reasons Trump won and the Republican
parties in control of everything Center.

Speaker 2 (20:28):
We've talked about reforming the immigration system forever, but the
border's never been sealed, so it was a non star.
Now that it is, can we reward people doing it
the right way? These green card holders waiting for ten
years for an opportunity for the H one B visa
is doing it the right way for the people just
waiting online. Is there a sentiment for that?

Speaker 1 (20:50):
Yeah? I think.

Speaker 10 (20:50):
You know, President Trump has shut down the border, we
still haven't deported people here by the millions. So we've
got to help ice round up people and get them out,
particularly the criminals and the gangs. But they'll come a
time for legal immigration reform. My goal is to make
sure no American worker ever loses a job to a
foreign worker. But when a company cannot find American workers,

(21:14):
let's bring in people from the outside on a win win.
They have to learn our language, you have to bay
our laws. If they broke the law, they have to
pay a fine. I'm hoping we'd get around to that,
but we still have a lot to do on the
illegal immigration side before we get there.

Speaker 1 (21:30):
Right.

Speaker 2 (21:31):
I asked the President about this because farmers who voted
for him say, hey, I'm going to lose all my
work for seventy percent of my workforce.

Speaker 1 (21:38):
So here's what he said about that. I am working
in a plan that I think is going to make
everybody very happy. We have to take care of our farmers.

Speaker 9 (21:45):
We love our farmers, but we also have to take
care of people that want total security and safety in
our country.

Speaker 1 (21:50):
We're going to take care of us.

Speaker 2 (21:51):
Do you think within three months you'll have an answer
to the hospitality workers, meat packers, and farmers, because I
think they make up so within three months, yep.

Speaker 11 (22:00):
I think people are going to be happy.

Speaker 1 (22:02):
So maybe he's going to do something.

Speaker 2 (22:03):
But we know there's a part of the Republican base
they just want zero everybody out, and I just don't
think that's practice. Go background, the President got another big
win this week. They tried to destroy his company, carve
it up and sell it off when he was still
trying to become president, and they charged them five hundred
million dollars in fines even though there was not a
bank complaining. It was all about Letitia James, your thoughts

(22:26):
about this victory and the message and the message to
those who want to do law fair.

Speaker 10 (22:34):
Well, Number one, you can if Trump's a defendant in
New York, He'll be found guilty of anything and they'll
take everything he has because it's such a biased jurisdiction.
So the New York Quarter of Appeals I think righted
or wrong. These pinative damages were ridiculous. The entire charge
was ridiculous. They manufactured a law just to get Trump.

(22:55):
And you know, if you're looking for lawfair, start looking
in New York. That's a good example of it. But
I'm glad we've got a good outcome there. That was
a ridiculous case and the Trump family's going through hell
and Guy's just hanging in there.

Speaker 6 (23:07):
You're doing a great job of the country.

Speaker 1 (23:09):
So let's talk about Ukraine.

Speaker 2 (23:10):
You, like Madia, Trump and others, was horrified that the
Ukrainian did the Russians, realizing they were a dyeing society,
thought they would kidnap Ukraine's next generation and it's between
twenty and thirty thousand, just horrific situations. They went to
boarding schools and orphanes and homes and.

Speaker 1 (23:26):
Took the kids.

Speaker 2 (23:28):
What do you say we could do to change this
to get them back?

Speaker 10 (23:35):
Make Russia state sponsor of terrorism under US law, like
Iran and like Kibab. That are just a handful of
countries that have that distinction. So if they don't return
these children to their families in Ukraine, I have a
bill that would make Russia state sponsor of terrorism. I

(23:55):
want to compliment the first Lady for bringing attention to
the children, not just in Ukraine but Russia.

Speaker 6 (24:01):
But she's been a great voice on this. She lived
in the former Soviet Union. She knows what Putin's up to.

Speaker 10 (24:07):
So, mister President, if you're looking for leverage to go
after Putin, the Congress is ready to help you. We
have a bill to make Russia state sponsor of terrorism,
which should make their economy radioactive if.

Speaker 6 (24:20):
They don't return the children.

Speaker 10 (24:21):
I have a bill with eighty five co sponsors to
allow you to put tariffs on countries that by Russian
ol and guests.

Speaker 6 (24:28):
We're here to help you if you if you need us,
all right.

Speaker 1 (24:30):
Real quick.

Speaker 2 (24:31):
Lastly, on the President and their sudden change of heart.

Speaker 1 (24:35):
With the Russia.

Speaker 2 (24:35):
Excuse me, Russia now says no wish el international troops
for Ukraine security.

Speaker 10 (24:41):
Your real quick reaction, Yeah, you don't let the country
invaded another country twice. Set the terms of conditions to
prevent the third invasion. Do what you have to to
secure the Ukraine, get security, your agreements, and if Putin
doesn't play ball, CRUSH's economy, tariff's on those of buy all.

Speaker 6 (25:00):
Make sure he returns these kids. Crush him and.

Speaker 2 (25:03):
You've got Democrats and Republicans who feel the same way.
Republican support for Ukraine's up nine points in President Trump
took over Central windso Graham, always.

Speaker 1 (25:12):
Great to see it, Thanks so much.

Speaker 2 (25:14):
Next on this show, extremists have been taking over college campuses.
But what you may not know is they are also
infiltrating elementary schools.

Speaker 1 (25:22):
Now let tishy here next on that. Don't move. You're
watching One Nation.

Speaker 2 (25:26):
Glad you are, Los Angeles.

Speaker 11 (25:33):
Ukraine is stepping up attacks against Russian energy facilities, keeps
using drones to strike refineries and pumping stations, part of
an effort to hurt Russia's war machine, and their efforts
appear to be working. Gasoline prices are soaring across the country.
Russia is also accusing Ukraine of launching attacks on a
nuclear power plant. Officials say it sparked a fire that

(25:54):
was quickly put out. Meantime, world leaders are showing support
for Ukraine as the country cel rates it's thirty fourth
independence day from the Soviet Union. President Trump and Chinese
president Shi jen Ping were among those delivering messages of support.
The holiday, though, was celebrated against a backdrop of fading
hopes for a ceasefire. This after Russia ruled out any

(26:16):
immediate meeting between their president and Ukraine's president.

Speaker 3 (26:21):
I'm Marianne Rafferty.

Speaker 11 (26:22):
Now back to One Nation.

Speaker 2 (26:33):
All right, we've seen extremist ideology take root on college campuses.
You talked a lot about that here, but it's not
starting there. It's actually starting earlier than that. It's creeping
in to elementary schools, targeting kids as young as five
years old. With students heading back to class, and some
of your kids are back.

Speaker 1 (26:48):
At school already.

Speaker 2 (26:49):
The question is are they learning or they being indoctrinated
while they think they're learning. Joining us now with a
warning to parents. Israel's former special envoy for combating rorism
deal Umanization is Noah Tishby Noah, a lot of people
are stunned to find out that the indoctrination starts in
grammar school.

Speaker 1 (27:08):
What have you found.

Speaker 5 (27:11):
Well, what we found out is that celebrating terrorism and
hating in America doesn't start in college after October seventh.

Speaker 7 (27:18):
On October eighth, there were people all over.

Speaker 5 (27:21):
College campuses in America celebrating terrorism, hating on America, calling
for the end of colonialism in the Middle East.

Speaker 7 (27:28):
And a lot of people were shocked by this.

Speaker 5 (27:30):
What we found out that this is not starting out
of nowhere in college campus. What has been going on
is a severe indoctrination that is k through twelve all
through education system. We saw a lot of things that
are extremely concerning. They're talking about oppressor and oppress, putting
everything through these paradigms, putting these the Jews into the
oppressor category, completely ignoring thousands of years of oppression against

(27:54):
the Jewish people, completely ignoring history. They're talking about hating America.
They're talking about America being a colonial estate that also
needs to be dismantled. So hating America, hating on the West,
and hating on the Jewish people is happening all over
K through twelve education.

Speaker 7 (28:12):
Like I can give you a personal example.

Speaker 5 (28:14):
My friend, her daughter was in first grade in Los
Angeles and charter school in Los Angeles, and their teacher
was talking about how Israel is committing a genocide. Forget
the fact that that is categorically untrue. This is in
doctrination and has no place in elementary school. And we
need as parents to be extraordinarily aware about this and

(28:38):
ask the questions and look through our teachers' education system
and actually ask questions of our kids and make sure
this doesn't happen. This is not education, This is in doctrination,
and it has to stop.

Speaker 1 (28:51):
Noah, who's teaching the teachers are?

Speaker 2 (28:53):
Where are the teachers getting this from?

Speaker 7 (28:57):
I would actually point out to the teachers' union. We
found out that the LAUSD Teachers.

Speaker 5 (29:02):
Union were voting against the science of reading and for
boycotting Israel bds. They're voting to ban the ADL to
change Holocaust education. The teachers' unions are very very actively
working towards activism rather than education. They cannot do this.

(29:23):
They need to teach our kids to learn. They need
to educate our children and not teach them activism. And
they were I read this article at the Free Press
when they were talking about teacher unions saying how can
we turn our children into activists without getting caught? So
they're very well aware that they are doing the wrong thing.

Speaker 7 (29:42):
Has to stop.

Speaker 1 (29:43):
Yeah, it has to stop.

Speaker 2 (29:43):
It not just anti Israel, anti American, which is really
scary too.

Speaker 1 (29:47):
I mean, while you know the story, I.

Speaker 2 (29:48):
Think I want you to I know, I want you
to comment on. And that is the former CEO and
family owned CBS in Paramount Forever, Sharry Redstone.

Speaker 1 (29:56):
Famously she settled with President.

Speaker 2 (29:57):
At and she says it's because she thought through discovery
things could get worse. For example, she complained about her
own show that she was right. You know, she owns
the place sixty minutes, she said in one sixty minute
segment featuring former State Department officials who quit their jobs
to protest American sport for Israel's war in Gaza. The
segment touched on the Hamas attack on Israel, but focused

(30:20):
on alleged Israeli atrocities enabled by weapons supplied by the
United States. And she thought, well, where's the balance? So
she has thought again, said maybe mister Trump's criticism of
the News division and his lawsuit could be helpful. We
needed more balance. Unbelievable or is it unbelievable? Should we

(30:41):
have expected this?

Speaker 5 (30:45):
It is very believable, And honestly, Cherry Redstone is a
brave woman, and she's correct in her assertion.

Speaker 7 (30:51):
She is pointing out to an anti.

Speaker 5 (30:54):
Israel media bias that is all through our media right now.
I will point out to so specifically the New York Times.
There was a story a few weeks ago about the
starvation in Gaza, which is a complete fake news. There
is a terrible condition in Gaza that is caused by
Ramas and by the lack of cooperation with the UN

(31:14):
to actually distribute the aid that is being given to
Gaza by Israel. They showed a photo of muhammadl Muwatak,
a child that has a cerebral palsy and existing condition.
He is malnourished and looking horrible. They put his photo
on the cover of The New York Times without telling
that he has a pre existing condition. A week later,

(31:37):
images of Eviota da Vid and Romboslavski hostages that are
held by Hamas and are intentionally starved, come out to light,
and The New York Times does nothing about this. There
is a severe media bias against Israel that is causing antisemitism.
They're taking the Hamas Ministry of Health health terrorist organization.
They're taking their word as truth. There's no journalistic integrity.

(32:00):
They're not verifying sources, and this is shown everywhere. I
think she's absolutely correct. More So, CBS used to be
a revered brand and not anymore. Brand that was trusted
and needs to be trusted again. And I think the
sale to Stiddance is a great thing that would actually
allow CBS to turn back into this news outlet that

(32:21):
we all look up to. I think it's a fantastic
thing that happened.

Speaker 2 (32:25):
Absolutely and if people want to see some change, maybe
the change of ownership will do it. No, thanks so much,
I appreciate it. Next on this show, the Newsduol is
back and it's better than ever.

Speaker 1 (32:35):
Why because comedian
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Dateline NBC

Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com

Stuff You Should Know

Stuff You Should Know

If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

Gregg Rosenthal and a rotating crew of elite NFL Media co-hosts, including Patrick Claybon, Colleen Wolfe, Steve Wyche, Nick Shook and Jourdan Rodrigue of The Athletic get you caught up daily on all the NFL news and analysis you need to be smarter and funnier than your friends.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.