America Talks

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:27):
In a world of uniparty politics. Americans are not seeing
the fascism is not bearing to the left or the right,
but a corporate endeavor to control policy for self enrichment
and aggrandizement to non existent issues, to socially condition the
masses for global influence and control.

Speaker 2 (00:45):
This is today's new ward order.

Speaker 1 (00:47):
We the people are not happy with it.

Speaker 2 (00:50):
This is America Talks.

Speaker 1 (01:01):
Hello, everybody, Welcome to America Talks. Here again on another
fine Monday evening. I got AJ with me here. We're
not going to have any guest this week. We we're
gonna have some guests, and they couldn't quite make it
do discheduling conflicts. So I might have listed them, but
forgot to take them out. At any rate, We're still
going to talk about political violence in the United States

(01:24):
of America. What is it? Why is it? What's going on?

Speaker 3 (01:26):
AJ?

Speaker 1 (01:27):
What do you think?

Speaker 4 (01:29):
Well, to bowl it down, political violence basically is the
response for me on the one side or the other
that essentially, people are trying to use violence in order
to see that their ends are met. If they can't
want it to behind in a fair fight, they mainly
go towards the default method, which is they forced you
to do it through violence, and that's it's unfortunate that

(01:50):
in twenty twenty five we're still having to have this
discussion after all these years.

Speaker 1 (01:56):
Well it is, it seems like it's ramping up. So
political has always been a thing, has it, And I mean,
we can go back to the beginning of time with
the Sons of Liberty and not too is political violence
when they were standing up it's against the king and
they they used to hang the liberty flag up on
the liberty tree. They'd stake it there and they rally
themselves up and really chat it up good and get

(02:17):
get ticked off and go through the king's tea into
the bay, or burn a governor's mansion down. That was
a good one. He had to flee to a fort
because he had nowhere to stay. So it's kind of
in our heritage when you think about it. But I
don't know did they actually kill people back in the day,
did they did they string people up as far as
you are colonist or were they more just kind of

(02:42):
acting out violently destroying things? And man, were they like
the original liberals?

Speaker 4 (02:49):
It pains made of say. But unfortunately, since in the
beginning of the Republic. Unfortunately, death, murder.

Speaker 3 (02:58):
Doles as well.

Speaker 4 (02:59):
Go ahead going out duels because that is a foreign
political violence as well. That goes dating all the way
back to before the start of the Republic, and even
during the Constitutional Convention there were duels. So think about
it in that perspective for a second. Our forefathers standing
across from each other trading shots because we can't agree

(03:19):
on an amendment or an article or a clause in
the Constitution.

Speaker 1 (03:25):
I don't remember anything about the Constitutional Convention. Uh we're
talking about from the uh when we had the Our
first order of business was the uh oh geez what
was it called the Constitution or Continental Congress, and it failed.
So that was our first attempt at self governance. But

(03:45):
it failed, and a lot of that had to do
with U States rights and the fact that states were
trying to tear for each other, and people believe more
in their states and didn't believe in the unity of
the United States. They believed in their states as a
nation over that. So now they had this flaw going
on and they said, well, okay, men, we're gonna have
to get together and we're gonna have to have a
convention and determine how we're going to centralize government to

(04:07):
prevent all this from happening. And this is how we've
got our federal government. And but I don't recall them
having duels, but they man, they had. They had arguments
and discussions and little clicks over here and little clicks
over there, having their whispers in the corners and stuff,
and coming back to the table and trying to hash
it out. And of course this is the way you
get the stinking compromise where slavery was supposed to be

(04:29):
abolished and they couldn't do it. Too many people on
plantations or slaves, and they didn't want to relinquish that,
And of course, some of them being economically driven, so
you know, they're thinking about their own survival. They give
a crap about these people's freedom that they were holding hostage.
So and the interest of moving forward, they made the
compromise for eighteen o eight and and yeah, it was

(04:53):
pretty pretty hairy stuff. But I don't remember anything about
duels that they did. They actually like slay each other
or just like kind of punch each other out.

Speaker 4 (05:03):
It got serious enough that at times there were firearms brought.

Speaker 3 (05:07):
In to the mix.

Speaker 4 (05:08):
The old flint lock pistols, and of course they have
their paces mapped out and they present and I'd say
arguably one of the more famous duels is probably the
one between Aaron Burn Alexander Hamilton in eighteen oh four, which,
as we know from the result of that, Alexander Hamilton
was killed by Aaron Burr.

Speaker 1 (05:27):
Yes, okay, so this is passing the constitutional convention that
was like this.

Speaker 4 (05:33):
Particular one is, yeah, this one, it's past it. But again,
the duels those were still around, those lasted for quite
some time.

Speaker 3 (05:44):
To give you a perspective.

Speaker 4 (05:45):
In Kentucky, the current constitution, which we discussed in a
few episodes back, Kentucky State Constitution still has an oath
that politicians in Kentucky still have to adhere to to
this day, which says that you cannot have fought in
a duel, accepted a challenging a duel, second in a
duel under any circumstances, even if you did it out.

Speaker 1 (06:07):
Of state, really no longer be one. Come on, what's
the point of being a man if you can't move
somebody down with some firepower.

Speaker 4 (06:21):
But again, you know, we pointed this as it was
jokes by of course, of course, political violence. You know,
this is the first time that we've seen it, unfortunately,
the Charlie Kirk assassination.

Speaker 3 (06:34):
But we had just a week and a half ago
to have to face.

Speaker 4 (06:40):
You know, you think about the assassination of Abraham Lincoln,
James A. Garfield of course, William McKinley, Martin Luther King Jr.
Of course, both of the Kennedy brothers, both John and Robert,
all of them were victims in some way, shape or
form of political violence because there were those who did

(07:03):
not agree with their politics, policies, actions, whatever you have
you and all that resulting in the murder of people
who could have benefited this country in a better way
in some way, shape or form.

Speaker 1 (07:14):
Oh yeah, Lincoln, Uh, who was a Lincoln. I'm forgetting
I'm missing somebody in between and McKinley Garfield, Garfield, Yes,
you're right, Garfield. So yeah, that's uh, it's kind of
been a long history in the United States of political violence.
But you also got violence that happened during moments of

(07:36):
civil liberties. Martin Luther King was assassinated. We had writing
in the streets, Jim Crow Laws. You know, ku Kluck's
plan was invented for the interest of preserving white culture.
Back at the early or what mid eighteen hundreds, there
were just at the well, about eighteen sixty four, eighteen
sixty five, I guess.

Speaker 4 (07:58):
Right at the cusp of when the so War had
just ended, and this is when we started to get
the early years of it. Right after the fourteenth and
fifteenth amendments came out, was when Jim Crow started. And
that's again that's a sting on our history because we
could have had the power to stop at that time,
but in the process of trying to make sure it stopped,

(08:21):
we dropped the ball. When reconstruction ended during the Hayes presidency, Yeah, you.

Speaker 1 (08:27):
Can only I mean we occupied. There was a great
deal of occupation in the south of the reconstruction. I
think it was like ten years or so. It was
a long time that, yeah, South was being occupied, and
that was to prevent another uprising. They were adamant about, hey,
we're not doing that civil war thing twice, so they'll
get into big ideas. And if you think about it, it
aligns a lot with the King of England prior to

(08:48):
the Revolutionary War, you know, putting soldiers here to monitor
the colonists because they're getting too routy and out of hand.
And in fact, that's how the Civil War, i'll be
the Revolutionary War got kicked off, as you know Paul
River's ride, as we know the basics of history there
and the Red Coats came, the King's men came, and
they came to disarm, they came to hang or well,

(09:08):
I don't know why hanging, but to arrest. I believe that.
I know it was Samuel Adams, and I believe John
Hancock if I'm not mistaken.

Speaker 4 (09:19):
And I do have to be fair about one thing
while we're discussing that, you know, a whole lot of
people think that it's just the left that's doing the
doing the political violence. I got a news flash. It's
been seeing on the right to And the best example
I have of that was in twenty twenty. I actually
had the chance to attend a rally during COVID, and
of course you can pretty much guess that we were

(09:40):
protesting against Andy Basher.

Speaker 3 (09:42):
Well.

Speaker 4 (09:43):
During one of these particular rallies, somebody decided to try
and hang Effigy up Sheer from one of the trees
behind the Capitol, and that lasted just long enough for
somebody to shoot a picture before, thankfully, and we had
email as a guest on here about three weeks ago.

Speaker 3 (09:58):
Tony Waitey cut it down.

Speaker 4 (10:01):
But the individual who did that, from what I understand,
he ended up getting fired later from his job because
this company found out about it.

Speaker 1 (10:08):
Yeah, that wouldn't really I don't think that we can
stew is violence.

Speaker 4 (10:11):
But that's uh, it's a threat of violence essentially if
you look at me.

Speaker 1 (10:17):
Yeah, it's also symbolism. So it's kind of like a
borderline thing where like, yes, you kind of like you're
sending a message. Well at the same time, Uh, it's
a way of expression too. It's like saying, you know,
as far as I'm concerned, you can hang by a rope.
But yeah, it's kind of crossing You're right, it's kind
of a teetering on that that line or crossing that threat.

Speaker 4 (10:35):
I mean, it's it's just like what we're saying right
now on Facebook with everybody who's either laughing or condone
and Charlie Kirk's assassination right now and full disclosure, I'm
just gonna say that right now, anybody who's getting fired
because of that, well, your ball says more than enough
right to fire you for that.

Speaker 3 (10:52):
That's consequence, is what that.

Speaker 1 (10:53):
I think that as much as I disagree with them
for what they're doing, I do think they have a
right to free a speech just like everybody else representing
themselves that way, they have a right to do so.
Oh if their boss decides to fire him over that,
he also has one. There's consequences for freedom of speech.
It's not always now, it's always means you can do

(11:14):
what you want to do, you got to think ahead
before you do it.

Speaker 4 (11:18):
And again this boils down into it when it comes
to you know, here's the thing.

Speaker 3 (11:22):
Yeah, we have free speech in this country.

Speaker 4 (11:24):
You can pretty much say just about anything you want
within the political realm.

Speaker 3 (11:28):
But you got to remember the other.

Speaker 4 (11:29):
Side has just as much right to free speech as well.
And if they want to call you on your bs,
they got more than Yeah.

Speaker 1 (11:35):
Yeah, we'll counter protesting thing like that. That's the actual thing.
Yeah mm hmm.

Speaker 4 (11:41):
But as we can see, we've got those in this
country right now that think that they're the only their
opinion is the only one that matters, and they're going
to do everything they can to ensure that the other
side can't get their message out and that's a shame,
it really is.

Speaker 1 (11:57):
Yeah. Well, well when you're talking about what happened to
Charlie Kirk, my god, Yeah, that goes beyond words, you know,
for being a shame of that's you know, ad hominem
attacks or when you attack somebody's character or make fun
of them because you have no argument left. When you
resort to what happened to Charlie Kirk, that goes beyond
an ad halmondham attack. That's uh to silence that guy

(12:19):
for his speech because you've seen him as a threat
and you wanted to send a message of terrorism is
what it is. It is terroristic activities. And the thing
about it is, and I'm happy to say it, it backfired.
It backfired big time. Not only did it back I
mean it's like it sent the message out across the board,
even to people on the left go wait a minute,

(12:42):
come on, man, I didn't even like the guy, but
that was stupid. And now you've got people that are
going to vigils, you got people in prayer again, you
talk about bringing God back into this country. It's like,
I don't want to say it's a blessing because it
cost him his life, but well, it's kind of like abstract, right.

(13:03):
I want to say it's a blessing. It's like amazing.
Let's say that it's amazing because so many people now
have found themselves again, they found their ideologies again, and
they said, hey, you know what, we're lining back up.
And not only are we lining back up, we're getting together.
They got off social media money, our meeting place is
put on social media, but we're here in person and
we're face to face again. We're connected.

Speaker 4 (13:25):
Yes, And you know, I have to point out what
one of the pastors that Charlie's memorial service said yesterday.
He said, what happened to Charlie was not a murder
as much as it was a sacrifice. Essentially, Charlie is
sacrificing himself so that we could come together again and

(13:45):
see this country essentially move forward as one. And is
it unfortunate that Charlie had to lose his life because
of that?

Speaker 3 (13:55):
Yes? But and I actually had the chance during the visual.

Speaker 4 (13:59):
That iiated on Saturday to read the same scripture that
Being Carson read yesterday. And that scripture is true because
Charlie's sacrifice has created more fruit out of it, because
now we're seeing people come to Christ. We're seeing more
people that are seeing the left for what they really are, and.

Speaker 3 (14:18):
The ice going on the cake on top of that.

Speaker 4 (14:20):
Voter registration right now in the States is blowing up
right now for the GOP, not just new registrations, party
changes as well. In fact, they had the chance to
hear from my buddy ASA within the last couple of days.
He said, the chances of New Jersey being a swing
state by twenty twenty eight are pretty good right now.

Speaker 1 (14:38):
Nice. Yeah, but we still got a ways to go
for that election, so hopefully people can hold two to it.
But since they changed and they're starting to swing over,
chances that they've already committed that's pretty good. That's a
good sign as far as the politics go, or for
conservative values anyway, if that's what they're coming over for. Yeah,
So with you're justc isn't sacrifice so much? Is like

(15:04):
divine interactions, like almost like God said, Hey, you know what, Charlie,
you've earned your place, but you're up here with me now. Yeah,
so it's going to do better for the world that
you come and be with me. And that's basically what
you're saying, Like he saw it, and I thought that,
and I never said it yet, and I haven't heard
anybody else say it. But if you're into biblical prophecy,

(15:26):
like if you ever read Tim Lahay and Jerry B.
Jenkins Left Behind series and stuff, they talked about the martyr,
remember the murder of the innocent life that was took
him before the world. That's what that took me to
when I saw when I saw Charlie Kirk's passing, I
thought to myself, if we were truly in biblical prophecy,
and there truly is a martyr, do we just witness that?

Speaker 4 (15:50):
And in reality, I think that's exactly what we wound
up saying, because here's the thing. Charlie's looking down on
this right now, and despite the shock that we all
have that came from his death, we can only mourn
so much because Charlie's resting with the Father right now.

Speaker 3 (16:08):
And I have no doubt in my mind.

Speaker 4 (16:11):
That Charlie would say right now, I would do it
all over again just the way I did it, because
I earned my place with the Father and I ended
up bringing more people.

Speaker 3 (16:25):
To the side that needs help the most.

Speaker 1 (16:28):
Yeah, So I think I think looking at this as
an unfolded Erica Kirk and her reaction to it and
how she held herself. I mean, she really was very
dignified through the whole ordeal, and as much as it
pained her and as much as a hurt her, I

(16:50):
got the impression they had some preemptive thought inness like,
you know, you really put yourself out there in the spotlight.
You're really on a world stage, or at least a
national stage, and there's a lot of people out there
are too tight and this is a possible boy. I
kind of think they actually sat down and had these
discussions gauging her reaction to it, Like it wasn't a
surprise to her as upsetting as it wasn't as much

(17:11):
as a herder, It didn't come as a surprise that
it happened.

Speaker 4 (17:17):
And it comes down to something that I've actually had
to discuss with my family from time to time what
really brought And it wasn't just Charlie's death that brought
me into this perspective as well. A few years back
in Kentucky, actually we actually had a state rep whose
house was broken into and it was a plan to
tech by the one who did it shot him. I

(17:37):
believe he shot his wife too, but the first one
that got shot was his daughter, who was sleeping in
her own bed. And it opened my eyes and I
pretty much talk to friends and family letter. I said,
if you're involved in politics enough and if you're allowed
enough voice, this is unfortunately the reality that we face.

(17:58):
Does it pay to be involved, yes, But so those
who were going to do it, you have to be
courageous enough to accept the risk that goes with it.

Speaker 1 (18:06):
Absolutely.

Speaker 3 (18:07):
Oh.

Speaker 1 (18:07):
But you know the thing about is the world we're
living in today. Uh. Just here over the weekend, I
guess when was it Saturday or Saturday? Maybe? Yeah, it
must have been Saturday. There was a wedding happening at
a country club here in uh city, right across the
bridge from me and some kid. I guess he got

(18:27):
fired from there and his words were free he said. Uh,
from my understanding, Court, I have witnesses reports he went
into this place while the wedding was happening, said the
children are safe, free Palestine, and started to download onto people.
He managed to wound two people and kill the kill
the father of the bride. So my point in this

(18:53):
is none of us in this world today when you
look at the numbers, it's not terribly high when you
look at the population. I mean, when you talk about
three hundred and thirty five million people and there's been
three hundred and what fifty seven last time I checked
mass shootings in the country this year so far, and

(19:13):
maybe I'm not sure. No, it might be a little
bit more than that now, but I'm not sure what
the fatality rate was, but it was just under it.
And but the injury rate was like eleven hundred or
someone you put it. When you do that kind of
math and you look at the population compared to how
it's not like we should be living in fear. But
the point is because of people's political beliefs pre Palestine

(19:34):
has become a thing. I don't know what kind of
monkey thinking this is that I want you people to
come and defend us in Palestine, so I'm gonna start
killing you people. Excuse me, but that's not motivating for
us to go over there and fight for you. That
doesn't motivating. In fact, it's just the opposite. We're more
motivated to pick up arms and start chasing you were
yours down.

Speaker 4 (19:55):
Well, I'm gonna, you know what, I really got to
throw this down weren't needs to be thrown right now.
A whole lot of what we're seeing with the mass shootings,
the political violence, with the division that's been going on
in this country for quite some time now. I put
that blame a lot of it, probably about eighty five
percent of it on the mainstream media, because that is

(20:16):
America's problem, that's our propaganda machine, unfortunately, and unfortunately the
majority of them are catering to the left.

Speaker 3 (20:23):
And what we.

Speaker 4 (20:24):
Always see on TV usually from that, it's the mass shootings,
it's them concerned about, you know, what's going on with
one celebrity or another. It's looking at the political beliefs
in this country and looking at the political division. And
it's sad that we've let the mainstream media use tragedy
to dictate what happens in this country right now. I

(20:45):
think hostally, we need to see more media stations getting
sued right now, because yeah, they're free to report whatever
they want to, but there are certain lines that don't
need to be crossed.

Speaker 1 (21:00):
Yeah that's uh, that's I can't. I can't go with
you on then, And that's because we have a right
to free speech and freedom of the press part of that.
So it's difficult, but which you're that is a facet
You're not wrong, You're that is a facet of it.
Uh The other facet is including that because of that
is that you're getting copycat offenses. So this kid on

(21:20):
this kid last Saturday was more of a copycat offense
that he was really had hard for Palestine. I think
he just shot that out there because maybe that's part
of his passion, but more was going on than just
Palestine for him. I think. Uh So copycat offense is
because it's in the media all the time. But now
you got to look at the other facet, the third
part of that. It's like a triangle here, and that's

(21:43):
when we got political actors like Joe Biden announced that
Donald Trump is getting to two out of hand and
we're having a hard time control on him and somebody
needs to put a bullseye on him. Well, what that
was a suggestion? That was that alluding to political violence.
One Nancy Pelosi's out there is called them peaceful protesters

(22:05):
and encouraging people to go on and while violence is
happening in the street, she was encouraging it in that
sideways way, like she's not directly announcing it, but she's
making subtle suggestions that, yeah, keep it going, keep up
the fight, or maximum Water's doing that. She's yelling, keep
up the fight, keep fighting, keep fighting. This is encouraging
political violence, while yeah, you're you're copping out because the

(22:27):
words you chose are directly saying we'll go out there
and kill people or go out there harm people, even
though you're alluding to it while you're saying it. They're
choosing the words carefully, but they're leading people the wrong paths.

Speaker 4 (22:41):
And this is that perspective where I'll saying, when it
comes to let's just go ahead and point out Congress
for example, whenever they do something like that, they needed
to start being censured, which they did try to for
I understand, they did try to center ilhan Omar for
her racent comments about Charlie Kirk, and unfortunately that resolution
failed because for Republicans decide to side with the Democrats

(23:05):
on that one. And that's unfortunate because she's making statements
about the man after he's dead. For one thing, and
two she's gone. She's condone on what Tyler Robinson did,
and that's unfortunate.

Speaker 3 (23:17):
It really is.

Speaker 1 (23:19):
She's Somalian. Uh, by nationality. And she said before as
long as she's in Congress, Somalian's will be protected. She's
not here for the United States. She's not here to
represent the people of Minnesota. Oh, she represents her constituents
may be predominantly Somalian, I don't know. But she was
talking about Somalia, the country. She was talking about the

(23:40):
interests of Somalia, which is not uh, it would be conduct.
I'm becoming of a of a congress person. Well, it's
it's conflict of interest.

Speaker 4 (23:52):
But and you know what, while we're on that subject,
to anybody who's probably listening right now, for Minnesota, I'm
just gonna say it right now, vote her out. Please,
just do us all a favor and just vote out
Johann Omar please.

Speaker 1 (24:05):
So yeah, she's uh, she's she's a real piece of work.
Her impress And who was the other one? There? One one?
She's the Palestinian who flies the Palestinian flag outside of
her office now her state flag and US flag the
Palestinian flag.

Speaker 4 (24:28):
And had the nerve after she won the first time
in twenty eighteen to call the President of the United
States and am effort.

Speaker 1 (24:35):
Oh nice, that's a nice representation of her position. So yeah,
So these people have been pushing political violence a lot.
I don't think you'd usually hear it from the politically
right when it comes to politicians. Uh so, but we've
seen in twenty twenty Ram Paul was about assaulted in
the streets. Oh gosh, Holly, his wife nearly had was.

Speaker 4 (25:00):
Ram Paul was assaulted in his own Oh.

Speaker 1 (25:02):
That's right, he was assaulted. I knew there was two
times I skipped it, so you're right. He was. He
was assaulted at his own home by some another and
a mob almost assaulted him in the street. And he
made that statement. He goes, well, I come out of
the building and I don't remember where he was what
they were doing. It was a diner in restaurant, but

(25:23):
I think it was a meeting place for Republicans and
they come out. He says, I come out of the
building and I could see my car and it was
just right there, and I thought I could just walk
over to it. But the mob interesting, and if it
wasn't for the law enforcement officers. Quite frankly, I don't
think i'd be here today. They were intent on him,
they saw him, they identified him. They were coming right

(25:43):
at him. And if you've ever met Ran Paul, I
swear that is the most skinny, shortest guy. I'm not
making fun of him, but he's he has to the
has no chance against somebody six feet tall on two
hundred and fifty pounds. None. If there was a mob
of him, he's done.

Speaker 4 (26:00):
I haven't had the chance to meet Rand, and he
is my own senator, but I do know friends of
mine who have had the chance to meet Rand. And
let me tell you to say something. I'm standing next
to him. You get an idea of how big Rand is.

Speaker 1 (26:12):
And he's not that he's tiny, but you know, and
like I said, I'm not making fun of him because
he's a true gentleman. He's a true statesman, and he's
very articulate and highly intelligent. The man really really wears
some big shoes. He really feels some big shoes and
gets the job done. I appreciate it. In fact, he
was my twenty sixteen pick.

Speaker 3 (26:35):
He was, I will say this much.

Speaker 4 (26:38):
If I knew he had a better chance, bibly, he
would have been my pick too. By the time Kentucky's caucus,
which we did a caucus that year, because oddly enough,
Rand was not only running for Senate at the time,
he was also running for president. And of course in Kentucky,
you can't run on two different primaries in Kentucky and
still seek office, so he can only seek one during

(26:59):
the caucus, one during the primary in May. So we
ended up having the call kiss in Kentucky that year.
Trump did win the caucus, and what I voted for
through the time was Ted Cruz, which Ted of course
came in second, which always I've always thought of Ted
Cruise as the slightly more polished version of Trump in

(27:20):
a lot of ways. But I mean, of course Trump
would end up coming out on top. Rain would end
up getting his Senate sleep back later that year. Would
I picked ran again if he was to run for president?
I would Is he gonna run for it? Well, only
he knows that, Yeah.

Speaker 1 (27:35):
Only he knows that. Yes, Monkey Murray, thank you for
joining us. No other country would tolerate to kind of
disrespect our president gets here. You're right, But that's the
beautiful thing about freedom of speech. You do have it,
and how you decide to use it. DESI on you
what type of character, And the question is when you
go to use freedom of speech. You have to figure

(27:55):
out how do you want to be defined as your character?
You know what I'm saying, So uh, holding h what
looks like the capitated head of our US president with
blood dripping out of it, probably is not going to
define you as a person of great character.

Speaker 4 (28:12):
Yeah, everybody wonders my Kathy Griffin took so much hell
for that. Well, for obvious reasons. You don't try to
get away with postm on social media something like that.

Speaker 1 (28:25):
That was going, Hey, you know what, freedom of speech
and stuff. You can call it art if you want to,
and I'm sure a lot of people appreciated it, but yeah,
that was tacky. I saw it his tacky. I didn't
see his art artistic by any means. Oh. I got
the expressive just like everybody else. I got the expression
in it. And we still see it, people dragging what
looks like a corpse of Trump in the streets and

(28:48):
with a new surrounded his neck or something like their
feet tied or whatever. And we're still seeing, you know,
these sorts of depictions, and what are you gonna do?

Speaker 4 (28:58):
And and you know, back to what I was saying
about the mainstream any earlier and about soon.

Speaker 3 (29:04):
Him more or more often than not.

Speaker 4 (29:06):
We need to be suing them for the stories that
we know that are coming out that are fake and like,
for example, the Nick Salmon story. I know that you're
probably familiar with what happened with Nick Salmon, right, not.

Speaker 1 (29:15):
Sure, go ahead and fill the sal in on it
for those that don't know.

Speaker 4 (29:18):
He was the one that was wearing the Maga hat
I believe. He was in DC, I believe, and somebody
walked up to him and essentially they tried to turn
whatever he was doing into a hate crime. Basically, someone
who was a Native American I believe, walked up to
him and just was basically trying to be in his
face and supposedly Nick cracked a smile and they saw

(29:38):
that as hate. Well, it turns out there's a different
perspective on it and that wasn't what happened at all. Well,
Nick ended up suing cing inn and ended up getting
a settlement out of it.

Speaker 1 (29:48):
Oh well, at least he got something. Yeah, hopefully he
was plenty.

Speaker 3 (29:56):
Yeah, let's have to double check that story.

Speaker 4 (29:58):
Maybe we probably bring that up and our uh in
our next podcast for a little bit. But you know,
as far as the mainstream media in this country goes
right now. It's a shame that whenever I turn on
the news, I have to worry about saying, you know,
they're gonna be trash talking our president. They're gonna be
trash talking what good Americans are trying to do to

(30:21):
preserve life in this country.

Speaker 3 (30:24):
Or let's just go ahead and call it out.

Speaker 4 (30:27):
Anytime there's a mass shooting on there, they always have
to latch onto a tragedy and milk up for everything
it's worth. Even with Charlie kirk assassination, we saw politicians
calling for gun control.

Speaker 1 (30:37):
Yeah, that's getting old. That's been ruled on by the
Supreme Court so many times. Let's see monkey says. I
wonder if his agenda was to sue from the beginning,
I think she's talking about the would you say his
name is Sam Well?

Speaker 3 (30:57):
I doubt he was.

Speaker 4 (31:00):
His intentions were to say from the beginning. Of course,
nobody really knew anything until the story came out. But
obviously when it did come out, the next thing he
knows he's dealing with all this backlash. Well, obviously that's
gonna put somebody in the mood to save someone who's
making them look bad.

Speaker 1 (31:14):
Hey, you know. I The thing about it is is
lawsuits are a thing that people violate rights to commit crimes,
you know what I mean, like civil suits and stuff
like that wouldn't necessarily be a crime, maybe, but it
could be a crime and then followed up with a
civil suit. But the point is is you don't change
things if you're not willing to step up and do
something if that's within your power, that does kind of

(31:36):
influence change, right, So I can't judge a guy for
doing it. If they did him wrong, they did him wrong.
I think I don't think she's saying he was being
you know. I think she was wondering if he was
just setting it up, you know, But I don't think so.
That's kind of like that, remember Rodney King, that might
be considering political violence. I don't know. I'm not sure

(32:02):
on that way, but that to me, that was the
question of questions when that happened to him, was did
he set it up for a lawsuit, because it certainly
looked like it.

Speaker 4 (32:12):
Well, all I can really say about the Rodney King
thing is that that was I think that was police
brutality more than it was political violence, and it is
unfortunate that the Rodney King incident ended up having repercussions
that we would see in the OJ Simpson trial later,
because I still think that that's probably one of the

(32:33):
reasons that factored into OJ being found not guilty.

Speaker 1 (32:36):
Yes, well, yeah, the police in LA did prove themselves
to be brutal. They were definitely brutal on Rodney King.
They get the crap out of that man. They put
him in a wheelchair for a while. I believe, Yeah,
he took a beating. I don't know where he is today.
Probably I think he's passed by now.

Speaker 4 (32:53):
But actually, yeah, Rodney King passed not too long ago.
I think from an overdose of some sort. I could
be wrong.

Speaker 1 (33:00):
Oh jeez, he spent all that all suit money on drugs?
Is that what you're telling me? See the government get
your drugs because scam going So no, I mean, I'm
not going back on what I said about it. Did
it definitely look like police brutality? I took it that
way too, m hm.

Speaker 4 (33:21):
And while we're still broaching that subject right now on
you know, school shootings and things of that nature. You know,
I'm not a big time conspiracy theorist or anything like that,
but you know, sometimes I do wonder at times with
thie school shootings. Now, obviously I believe that the victims
in these cases are real, don't get me wrong on

(33:42):
that one. But I do have a feeling from time
to time that these things are playing beforehand, because it's
basically gaven government and excuse to try to take our
rights away.

Speaker 3 (33:51):
And that's a problem.

Speaker 1 (33:52):
So you see what the Charlie Krook saying. This kid
managed to get get out of there and not be seen.
He seemed to have went down a building, and people there's
a lot of conspiracy theories going to some people claiming, well,
who was helping him because he didn't come down with
a weapon, and YadA YadA, ya don't. I don't know
what they're seeing. I don't know if what there's even
is even factual. But I see these things people are

(34:13):
saying sometimes. And I stayed away from social media a
lot because I didn't want to get wrapped up in
all this stuff. What happened happening, and I know what happened,
but I didn't want to get wrapped up in the
supposed conspiracy theories or this or that and and the nonsense.
But every once in a while you see things like that. However,
there is an investigative journalist goes by the name of All.

(34:34):
It was a very very Radixavum And my friend Billy
Painter does Monday shows with her, so they're probably on
now or getting ready to go live. And she done
a lot of investigative work on that case with the
kidnapping of Gretchen and Whitmer and the governor of Michigan,

(34:57):
and she tells a pretty good story about they set down.
I mean, you can't be an investigative agency and give
the criminals a credit card to go buy weapons you
know they're doing these things, or take them out there
where her governor her house is at night and take
pictures of them out there by her house somewhere. You
not right on top of it, the houses in the distance,

(35:17):
but you can tell it's her house. And so some
things that transpired in the course of this was very
suspicious that this was just a setup to make I
don't know why. I don't remember why the details or
the motivation of it was. Maybe it was to the
governor's advantage because I think it was an election year
and it was like a sympathy thing. I don't recall exactly,

(35:38):
but they had some sort of reason why to set
it up. But there actually was a family parents that
wanted to sue the f BEHIND. They were claiming the
FBI groomed their son fifteen years old. He had some
mental issues and stuff, and they targeted him to groom
him to for a mass shooting. As you're describing it,
and I'm not making that up.

Speaker 3 (35:57):
That was.

Speaker 1 (35:58):
You can go look it up in the news and stuff.
Go do some Google searches on it. You should find
something about it. Probably not the easiest thing to find,
but that was their claim. No, I'm not saying it's true.
I'm not saying none of this is true. I'm saying
use your own discretion.

Speaker 4 (36:13):
But of course that perspective falls in there. Let's talk about,
you know, one other thing that it's funny enough we
mentioned the FBI and the FBI getting sued in the past,
because here's a good example of that.

Speaker 3 (36:26):
Ruby Ridge, oh God, Randy Weaver yeh rbby.

Speaker 4 (36:29):
Ridge, Yep, what happened with his wife getting killed all
because of the raid that was from a un stand
spearheaded by about the FBI and the ATF.

Speaker 1 (36:39):
No, what started that is I think there were federal marshalls,
and so Randy Weaver took a shotgun that he was
given by the Federal Marshal's office because he did odd jobs.
And they're like, well, cool, if you do all jobs,
could you get this reduced of the barrel length produced
for us? He says, yeah, absolutely. Now he took it down.
He didn't do it himself. He took it down to

(37:00):
some pawn shop or some of this guy deals and
guns and stuff and does things like this, and he
had a reduced and length for him and they claimed
he gave him a barrel that was too short. It
was the illegal gun. So now they handed him back
an illegal gun. So he ended up in court over
this and he pretty much said, you know, I'm getting railroaded.
I'm done. I'm not dealing with the same. While he
was supposed to go back to court, instead of going

(37:21):
to court, he decided to retreat to his house in
Ruby Ridge, Idaho, up in the mountains. Now, he was
a piral technician from the military, and this is why
they wanted him because he had military experience. So from
my understanding, they were trying to recruit him back into
the military. And we've seen this done before, where people
with special skills get recruited back. He wanted nothing to
do with it, so he went back to Ruby Ridge

(37:42):
and decided not to go to court, which put him
in contempt. Now, the supposedly the feder Marshall's office were
stalking him in Ruby Ridge. In the mountain. He was
out hunting with his fourteen year old son and his
neighbor next door. The nearest neighbor and his dogs started
to kick because they separated while they were hunting, and
the kid was with the dog. The dog was barking
at something. Well, one of these agents stepped out and

(38:05):
shot the dog and killed the dog. With the kid,
Red turned fire and defense and turned around the ramp. Well,
the agent killed the kid. This is what tripped the
whole Ruby Ridge thing off. And so now it was
no longer people trying to stalk him in the woods.
And I think the reason why they weren't coming to
his house and trying to because their fate. He booby
trapped the woods, so they were trying to figure out

(38:27):
if he made booby traps or not. So now this
was led up to a helicopter circling the sky and
a bunch of cops out there surrounding the property and
the helicopter. Somebody in the helicopter took a shot because
he went out to the barn to see his son's body.
When he what he did, they tried to fire upon him,
so he retreated back to him and his neighbor. The
neighbor got shot in the gut. And when they went

(38:48):
through the door, the wife had opened up the door
while holding their one year old baby, I think it
was one, and when she closed the door, bullet went
to the door and hit her in the head, killed her.
So that's in a nutshell.

Speaker 4 (39:01):
And of course, and of course what happened with Ruby Ridge,
Randy Weaver of course ended up souting the government ended
up getting a settlement out of it. And you know,
Raby Ridge just isn't Ray Ridge is just one example.
Of course, we've all heard the story about what happened
with the Branich Damidians and Waco too, And if you
go down to Waco today, you will hear from them
that they sympathize with the Damidians because of how the

(39:22):
government handled that.

Speaker 1 (39:23):
They were horrible those Bill Clinton's raw janet reno. They
were horrible about it. And the thing about it is
you got to you gotta put this into perspective. Now,
all Waco, Texas, they were taunting the FBI supposedly, let's
let's just say allege of leaders. Supposedly because we don't know,
but the FBI supposedly has these letters where they were
mailing in letters like we're armed or to the hilt,

(39:46):
and we have provisions to the Hilton. There's nothing you
can do to us. So they were kind of taunting
the FBI for whatever reason, I don't know why. And
so when they went to serve a warrant that you well,
you know the story. That's when the officer was shot
and killed and here comes the raid. But how they
handled it was just incredibly incompetent, no reason handled the

(40:06):
way they handled it that all whatsoever.

Speaker 4 (40:09):
I mean, even the sheriff and Waco at the time said,
if they had just give me the warrant and let
me go and talk to David Koresh, which he saw
David Koresh on a regular basis. He said, if you
just let me go ahead and take the Wharton scene,
we can have this handled with no problem flat. But
of course the FBI in a well FBI and at
F and then other agencies that were involved, and it

(40:31):
means to go ahead and flex their muscle. Wanted to
make an example out of them, which is what this
bowled down.

Speaker 1 (40:35):
Yeah, then you had the Feman case happened shortly after that,
but that one unfolded for what it was, I was
totally unchild city. These guys were poor guys, were following
this guy supposed the leader, and it turned out he
wasn't wrapped too tight. Jeez, some things are. But then,
you know, if you want to get into something where
government was at fault, go to Aim and Bundy on

(40:56):
the Bundy standoff, and uh, if you get into who
oh jeez, Finnicum. Uh the boy he was the one,
the only person that was killed. And man, did that
look like a terrible setup. I mean it looked like
they crawled him right into that spot, drove them right
to that spot, and uh caused him to die, you know,

(41:19):
but basically it looked like murder.

Speaker 3 (41:23):
M hmm.

Speaker 1 (41:23):
Yeah. Common sense monkey yup is definitely a thing we're
lacking today since of rationality and common sense, little critical
thinking goes a long way.

Speaker 4 (41:34):
Sense of rationality common sense, uh quite a bit of
ungobly list.

Speaker 3 (41:39):
Let's go ahead and point that out.

Speaker 4 (41:41):
And you know, pastor in church I regularly attend yesterday
even pointed it out. He said, not talking about the left,
not talking about the right. But you know, it's a
shame what happened to Charlie Kirk. And and it's just perspective
when you're crossing the border over into murder, you've got
a problem, and you know murder's never going to be

(42:02):
the way to solve a problem.

Speaker 3 (42:03):
Ever.

Speaker 1 (42:05):
No, it's definitely not a way to drive people to
your sight of the fence either, I mean into your camp.
It's people don't tend to want to flock towards. Uh,
come on, let's fay see you can't be too rational.
That's what you want to do. You want to go
kill people. Something's not clicking right upstairs, and you need
to go seek some hope first.

Speaker 4 (42:26):
M And you know, I got to say I am
proud of Erica Kirk for what she did yesterday by
coming up on that stage and forgiving Tyler Robinson for
killing her husband. I mean, think about that for a second.
The widow of a man who was assassinated for his
beliefs and his wife is stepping up on that stage

(42:50):
and forgiving the man who took his life. I mean
to a whole lot of us that you know don't
live in a Christian way, you know, it's hard for
us to fathom, and even those who do live in
a Christian way, hard for them to fathom the idea
of forgiving somebody like that. But you can tell that
the Kirk family is definitely deep rited in faith when
they're willing to do something like that. And the Bible

(43:11):
says that if you forgive those who have sinned against you,
your father and him will forgive your sins. But if
you don't, your father in Heaven won't forgive your sins.

Speaker 1 (43:21):
So that's the trap. And I sometimes I gotta tell you, man,
I feel pretty strong about my family, and somebody does
something like that, we'd have a hard time public learning
or not feeling forgiveness. I feel a little hardened, you
know what I'm saying. But yeah, I appreciate her strength
and disciplines in her Christian beliefs, and that's what that is.
She really truly has shown she's a Christian. The same thing,

(43:42):
if you remember with I can almost think of this
kid's name who uh in the tenth theory stabbed and
killed the other kid. Oh god, I can't. His name
escapes me.

Speaker 3 (43:53):
Oh, I know what you're talking about now. I'm forgetting
what the name was.

Speaker 1 (43:58):
It's an easy name to remember both of them, but
I cannot recall any of them. But yeah, it's probably
about what six months ago or so, and uh, that's
a track and stuff. Anyway, the father of the kid
that died stepped up and showing forgiveness. And the interesting
thing was he expressed forgiveness and I believe he was
going to reach out to the father of the perpetrator

(44:19):
of the crime, alleged crime, and uh, the his he
didn't want anything to do with him. He didn't want
his forgiveness. He wanted nothing to do with him. It's like, oh,
oh wow, that just said volumes mm hmm.

Speaker 4 (44:35):
And you know, to those who are Charastians listening right now,
you know the situation with Tyler Robinson. You know we've
been saying for the last week and a half. Now,
you know, pray for the Kark family and the struggles
they're dealing with. Pray for the Robinson family as well,
because now they've got a member of their family potentially
on the way to.

Speaker 3 (44:55):
Having to be an example for the death fans.

Speaker 1 (44:58):
Like terminated as a result.

Speaker 4 (44:59):
Yeah, and you know, here's the reality of the situation.
If he comes to Christ before that happens, God will
embrace him and Charlie would embrace him, just as that
they were a son or a brother. I mean, from
the Christian perspective, We've got to see.

Speaker 3 (45:17):
It that way.

Speaker 4 (45:18):
And you know, it's a hard thing to do. I
know that, but you know real, Look, his.

Speaker 1 (45:24):
Parents hurt too. Now they heard too. I can imagine
if I was a father, I can imagine the grief
I'd be feeling. You know how much that must play
in his head every day? Why Why did my son
do that? Why did he Why could I not prevent that?
And now I'm not putting anything on his father, saying
he should have to. Someone's grown and he made his decisions.

(45:44):
But I'm saying it just hard on him. It's really
really and his heart is painful.

Speaker 3 (45:50):
Uh.

Speaker 4 (45:51):
Let's go ahead and mentioned something that I mentioned last week.
Then if we're going to talk about that perspective the
left land and ideology right now that public education, in
particular the universities is pushing because from what we've been told,
Tyler Robinson was one of us before he went into college,
and then when he came out, obviously he must not
have been well rooted in his teachings or what his

(46:14):
family had taught him over the years, because when he
came out, he was a left land and extremist. And
that's where a lot of these kids are coming from
right now. It's public education, indoctrination, and then the icing
on the cake if they have mental issues that you know,
haven't been found yet. When that factor's in, we might

(46:37):
as well be setting up a ticking time bomb.

Speaker 1 (46:40):
Yeah. You know, one of the things we're lacking since
we're on this sort of subject matter is we've allowed
the left to drive the narrative and drive parents away
from their children. When it comes to discipline and structure,
children actually seek this. And when you don't discipline your
children and you don't offer this structure for them at home,

(47:02):
they feel neglected. They truly do. They feel neglected. They
feel like you're letting them, they're not doing what you
should be doing. You can't be their friends, You've got
to be their parents. But when the government is wedging
itself between the parent and the child and telling the
parent they're not allowed anymore. And this is where parents
got to understand parntal rights. You have a right to

(47:22):
raise your child. You have a right to look out
for the welfare of your child. You have a right
to look out for the education of your child, the
health of your child. It's all your responsibility. That's your
right to do so. It's not the government's right to
take that from you. But you've got to stand up
against them. And this is Supreme Court rulings. This is
Supreme Court. Recognize this and in fact, if you don't

(47:42):
value it, what they've been looking at is because the
state of our country and the nature in which it is,
and today with the broken homes and the children running rampant,
they've actually looked at reviewing it and saying printal rights
is now becoming a non existent thing. So it's very
important now more than ever to be involved with the
raising of your child. They'll be afraid to spank your

(48:04):
child and discipline your child, don't draw blood, don't leave
nasty bruises, proper disciplined.

Speaker 4 (48:11):
Yes, And you know I got I gotta point it out.
I don't have children on my own. But I got
anc nephew that are pretty much in a whole lot
of ways like my own. And yes, every now and
then I've had to take part in the discipline. Here's
the thing. If the kid does not like If a
kid doesn't like the punishment, you're doing your job. If
they do like the punishment, well guess what, you're not
doing your job. You're setting them up for failure.

Speaker 1 (48:32):
Yeah. Yeah, when I was a kid, you got grounded,
You got grounded men. Oh no, no, no, go on
play your TV and bring it out here. You're grounded
to your room. You're not getting the enjoyment of television.
You have to think, you get to look inward for
a while. You don't need to be being distracted and stuff,
corounding kid with all his video games and his cell
phone and connection with his friends on social media. Oh no,

(48:53):
there's no there's no discipline, and that he's just going
to entertain himself. That time is going to pass.

Speaker 4 (48:57):
Quickly, and punishment is never meant meant to be enjoyed
by either side. You know, if you're a parent, you
hate having to punish your child. You don't get pleasure
out of it at all, at least a good one shouldn't.
But you know, on the same token, if a kid's
not getting that proper structure. Again I'm repeating myself on

(49:18):
this one, we're setting them up with failure. And if
they turn out to be violent later because they didn't
get the proper discipline, well, who's the blame of that scenario?

Speaker 1 (49:27):
Now?

Speaker 4 (49:27):
I know. With the Robinson family, I think Tyler pretty
much did have you know, structured to some extent, because
I mean, his dad was a deputy shriff. They were
maga all out, yeah what I understand.

Speaker 1 (49:38):
Yeah, but.

Speaker 4 (49:41):
Something apparently just went wrong when he went to college
and the indoctrination started.

Speaker 3 (49:47):
And as somebody who is a product of.

Speaker 4 (49:51):
That system as far as my education goes, I'm glad
that I had the structure, that I had deep rooted Christian,
deep rude conservative value before I went in because had
I not had that, I would have probably been somewhat sailor.

Speaker 3 (50:05):
And Tyler Robinson probably not that violent, but still.

Speaker 1 (50:08):
No, Yeah, every kid's got that potential if they aren't
raised properly and disciplined properly. And think he was funny
because you said that about not and pleasant for either sight,
I start smiling because I remember my father. I didn't
think he was bothered at all by I didn't see
him laugh at me, make fun of me, or but
when he did it, he looked like he wasn't phased
at all. But that's parenting, right. He's not gonna show

(50:30):
a weakness. He's not gonna say, man, I really don't
want to do this to your son. He's gonna be
oh no, no, we're gonna see this through now. And
he was the man that told me when I went
to school. He says, the principal should never ever use
the board of education on you. God help him if
he does, unless he calls me first. And let me
tell you now, boy, you get if he gets permission
he use a boarder of education on you, you get

(50:52):
it twice as bad when your ask gets home. Don't
forget it. He meant it too.

Speaker 3 (50:58):
Uh huh. And you know.

Speaker 4 (51:02):
It's a shame that we've come down to the point
where corporate punishment is proud upon. Well, here's the reality
of the situation. Go look at just about every single
lawbook in the country right now, and it don't matter
what state it is. Corporal punishment is free to use
whenever it's necessary. In fact, if you have a cop

(51:22):
pull up after a kid says that they got spanked
for whatever reason, CoP's probably even gonna laugh or pretty
much say, hey, you called us because your parents punished hit.

Speaker 3 (51:32):
Well, guess what you do it again. We're gonna do
the same thing.

Speaker 1 (51:35):
Yeah, I saw that video. They led that kid back
to his mom. He's like, my mom thanked me. You know,
I got right thing. Oh really, you look like you're
pretty healthy to me. Come and walk with me and
take them back to the mother and give the kid
a butcher one for actually calling the cops on his mother.
How dare you do that to your mother? It was great.
I don't know if it was a put on or
if it was a real video, but it was. It

(51:57):
was a great illustration.

Speaker 4 (52:00):
How common it's becoming our soiety right now. I guarantee
it's based on a real event, Adam.

Speaker 1 (52:04):
Missus, Yeah, yeah, sure enough. So, yeah, let's see what
else we got here. I thought I had something else
on my mind, but we're kind of coming to a
closing to the top of the r I know we
started a little late, but I got to get on
a phone with somebody here soon.

Speaker 4 (52:20):
So right, well, I'm gonna go ahead and just mention
this real quick. I guess we had planned tonight where TJ.
Roberts and Josh Callaway. Josh Callaway has had to deal
ever since he's ran for office. His church has become
a subject of criticism because he comes from an independent
funement Ol Baptist background, and there's a whole lot who

(52:42):
have you know, wished hell on that church, who have
criticized that church for their belief system. There are even
some including who's going to be his primary opponent next year,
which we discussed in last week's showed Julie Cantwell, who
believes that, you know, a man of faith shouldn't bring
those beliefs onto the house floor and boat on them. Uh,
that's his first Amendment right to be that way if

(53:03):
he wants to, So, I mean, really, you're really gonna
try to say that.

Speaker 3 (53:09):
About a man.

Speaker 4 (53:09):
And then on top of that with TJ. TJ has
had to fight the Baser administration on things over the
years he's he's probably had to face he's had to
face death threats as well. I remember him putting that
on a post not too long ago. And you know,
it's a shame that we're seeing it on both sides,
but I can see for factual evidence the lapse is

(53:32):
more prominent about sending up threats than the right is.

Speaker 1 (53:34):
So one of the things I'd like to like to
mention when you said that nothing against TJ by not
by any means.

Speaker 2 (53:41):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (53:43):
A representative is there to represent his constituents in their interest.
That's what they're there for. So you would hope that
if they're there, constituents that they're representing are equally Christian
based or in Christian faith. So if you are, if
you are in fluenced by your faith, that you're your

(54:03):
constituents in their interest, right right. You'd hate to think
that to me. I think if I was a representative
and people didn't show that same faith, I might not
want to be the representative. That's what I'm driving at here.

Speaker 4 (54:17):
Right well, And you know I got to point out this.
So Julie is running up against and this next week
with Josh. Josh is running the course for his UH
state rep state one more time next year. From what
I understand, I don't know if he's going to be
running for anything else afterwards. He may stay in that
job until he wants to give it up. I'm not sure,
but he faced Julie can't well last year in the
primary as well. Julia, of course is far lipt. She

(54:41):
is an out of closet Rhino. Most Rhino would like
to try to hide their misdeeds. Now Julie, she puts
them out for everybody to see. I mean to put
it this way, She's basically the only fans version of Rhino.

Speaker 1 (54:57):
No, it's funny we use that term only fan. Only fans,
by the way, is actually it's actually a true social
media site. It's not always X rated material. But as
soon somebody says only fans the first thing you think
of his X rated material, they gotta bum up with that.
But they did it to themselves because they loved it.

Speaker 4 (55:17):
So yeah, and I bring that up for a reason
because you know, Jillie's running on basically a leftland platform overall.
Josh is of course running on his conservative background, his
Christian background. The primary, it ended one way. Josh Callaway
got seventy nine percent of the boat in that primary.

Speaker 3 (55:37):
Jilly only got twenty one percent.

Speaker 4 (55:39):
So obviously you can see who the constituent's actually wanting.

Speaker 3 (55:42):
That.

Speaker 1 (55:43):
Yeah, it sounds to me like she's just barking up
the wrong tree, trying it to come to the constituents
that he can't represent with his faith, because it sounds
to me like his constituents are in agreement with him
and his faith.

Speaker 4 (55:54):
And she's trying to run for the state next year
against the same man.

Speaker 1 (55:58):
No jeez, So she just shot her definitely, with all
this crap and.

Speaker 4 (56:05):
The definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and
over again, thinking you're going to get a different result.

Speaker 3 (56:11):
It don't work.

Speaker 1 (56:12):
Yeah, yeah, So I think it's time, brother, I think
I got to jump off here. I got to get
this phone call done real quick.

Speaker 4 (56:22):
So all right, so let's go ahead and do the
quick Annouceles real quick. I know that we're not going
to have a show next week, but I know the
week after on October sixth, we plan on having a
show then, and it is going to be for the
most part of a two a based show where we're
going to be discussing, you know, issues that we're having
with the Second Amendment of this country. We've got politicians
that want to take our rights away and they're bringing

(56:43):
their constituents along with them, and we're trying to fight
that back, so that'll be a good show.

Speaker 1 (56:48):
That's yeah, that's the show we need to have right there. Cool,
awesome man, Thank you for being on with me tonight
and or vice versa. You know, it's good good to
have this show. And it was just two of us
this time, and we got a lot of good discussion done,
I think, and so hopefully folks got something out of
it tonight. I know I enjoyed it, so I'll go while.

(57:10):
I'll send it out just like I do every week,
just the way truckers would. Uh. Thank everybody for joining in.
Remember I always keep the grease side down, shines se
up in between the lines, save travels wherever you may
be going. And if you can't be good we can,
well then be good at it and weak gone