Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
Every Patriot has an obligation to question authority. Those who
are honest are not concerned with your watchful vigilance, and
those with integrity are not concerned with your discernment. Every
American is obligated to voice their concerns and stand up
for their freedoms and liberties.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
One nation on your God, indivisible with liberty and justice
for all.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
Ladies and gentlemen. We are the men in the arena.
We are the Patriot Confederation.
Speaker 3 (00:37):
We will live back down from bye. We're a free Americans.
Speaker 4 (00:59):
All right, Ladies and gentlemen, Welcome to Patriot Confederation for
what is the ninth of September twenty twenty five. I'm
your host, Bad Billy out of Twin Falls, Idaho, joined
as always by John Grog. When you're out of Nashville
in New Hampshire, how's it going up in the great Northeast,
New England.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
I'm doing well, Billy, and all same old, same old.
Here in Northeast. I can mark myself safe from not
being stabbed in the neck. Of course, I don't ride
the train, so I'm pretty good that way.
Speaker 4 (01:25):
My goodness. Yeah, we'll touch on that a little bit.
Joining us this week. I believe out of Tennessee, if
I'm correct, Courtney Turner, I met her when I was
in South Dakota last year. How are you doing.
Speaker 5 (01:38):
I'm doing well, thank you, thanks for having me.
Speaker 4 (01:41):
Yes, yes, so you are in Tennessee then that's right. Yes,
of course I lived a short time in the Memphis area.
I don't know how close you are are there a few.
Speaker 5 (01:53):
Hours yeah, a few hours away, so Nashville.
Speaker 4 (01:57):
Yeah, that was about to say you must be closer
to Nashville, especially since you're still Central Time. Getting confused
with the time zones. That's why we're running a couple
of minutes late today. But well, I'm in Mountain Time,
but I always use Eastern Time because that's the greater
(02:17):
that's where the greater of our population is, so it
seems to be a bit more universal.
Speaker 5 (02:23):
Yeah, fair enough, fair enough, Yes, Yes, it was centric
of me to operate time.
Speaker 4 (02:32):
Yes, yes, indeed, And uh, I just wanted to touch
on that what what John was saying. I'm just I'm
just gonna say this to get this off my chest,
even though I talked a lot about it yesterday with
Reid experiment Dan Wass. But I I've always been pretty
disgusted with the mainstream media and and their refusal to
(02:55):
cover such things that are so important. But the Ukrainian
girl whose name I cannot pronounce, that that actually happened
back on the twenty second of August, and then just
today I'm finding out about Dakara Thompson. I can't remember
where where this incident happened. But we're talking about two
(03:17):
young girls, two bright, beautiful young girls that are getting
their murders, are getting no attention whatsoever. Uh. The Ukrainian
girl that's that's a black on white crime. Nobody seems
to care. And then Dakara Thompson, she's a black girl,
but she was killed by an illegal immigrant. Nobody seems
(03:38):
to care. And I'm sick of this. And then they're saying,
O Trump's starting, you know, he he's gonna start a war,
civil war within within our nation. You know, he's invading
these cities. He invaded Washington, DC, and he's looking to
invade Chicago. Well, as far as I'm concerned, the invasion
(03:59):
is already happened when Biden left the border open. And
I'm sick of this. And and two young girls who
didn't deserve what they got are paying the price, and
I'm tired of.
Speaker 2 (04:13):
This, honestly, Billy. The open border problem has been going
on a way longer than Biden. It's been an issue.
You go back to the nineteen nineties. We've had all
these problems. What was the train murderer there? The guy
was walking the train lines coming out of Mexico into
the US and he was killing people. And it's been
a nonsensical thing for a long time. It's about time
we had somebody like Donald Trump stand up with a
little bit of backbone and set people straight.
Speaker 4 (04:36):
Well, I know it's been going on for quite some time.
It just seems to be highlighted and gotten a lot
worse under the last administration.
Speaker 2 (04:44):
Well, people are also becoming more aware of it talking
because I did talk to people about it in the
nineteen nineties and early two thousands about these issues. You
remember romoson copy on that case. I don't know if
that floats with you. Guys. Two border patrol agents were
chasing down being shot at, tracing down to drug smugglers
and they end up shooting one of them. They got
(05:04):
hauled into jail, and we treated the drug smuggler that
got shot. We treated him like, and this was during
the Bush administration, so it's been a long time issue.
We had cartels and helicopters shooting at border patrol agents
with military grade weapons back in the early two thousands.
Nobody was doing anything about it. When you talk to
people about it, the attitude was, well, that doesn't affect me.
(05:28):
I'm prepared in New England. That doesn't affect me. I
live in the Midwest. But it does affect you one
way or another. We've learned this third in the Trump administration.
It does affect you. Affects every state in the Union
because these people are migrating up within the interior of
the United States and they're causing harmon detriment. They're selling
drugs to our children, you know, they're muling these things
(05:48):
in here. They're setting up jops in the United States
and marketing these two fifth graders. This is a horrible,
horrible thing we've been doing with for decades and it's
time for it to stop.
Speaker 5 (06:00):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
The traffic arms that order the three worst crimes in
the United States of America. Thank God for Donald J. Trump.
Hopefully we can keep that momentum going.
Speaker 4 (06:10):
And also the murder of the Ukrainian girl has been
let out of jail multiple times. I don't know if
it was by the same judge, but I endorse the
petition to start holding judges accountable that let these animals
out and commit these horrible acts. Yes, anyway, enough about that,
(06:35):
let's get to our guest, Courtney. Thank you very much
for joining us. Why don't you before we get started,
to give a little background and tell listeners a bit
about yourself.
Speaker 5 (06:46):
My name is Courtney Turner. I'm the host of the
Corney Turner podcast. I also do a podcast called Dangerous
Dames with doctor Lee Merritt. We took a break for
the summer, but we will be returning in October, so
that'll be starting up pretty soon. And I also write.
I write articles. I'm working on a couple of books
at the moment, and you can find most of my
(07:08):
writing material on substack and that's a Courtney Turner got
substack dot com. But I spell my name like Courtine,
so c O you r t E and a y
T you r n e R and yeah. So I
got into the podcasting space around twenty twenty one, so
I don't know. I think we might have gone through
(07:28):
a little bit of my story last time. But for
those who are not familiar, I was born with a
series of challenges. You could say, so kind of you know, show.
Speaker 4 (07:40):
It does not show.
Speaker 5 (07:42):
Thank you. I appreciate that. But in twenty twenty, when
everything was shut down and people's faces were covered, I
found myself really struggling, very very depressed, and very isolated
because I'm hearing impaired. I wear bilateral hearing aids now,
but I actually learned how to speak by reading lips
because I didn't get hearing aids. So I was almost
(08:03):
six years old and I'm also blind in one eye.
I had heart surgery when I was a year old.
I was born with hypotonic limbs bin and graphic motor impairment.
They pretty much told my mom and the best you
could hope was to find a nice institution for me
to spend my life. Fortunately they were wrong, but I
didn't realize how much I still depend on nonverbal communication
(08:24):
and lip reading for clarity of speech until all the
coping mechanisms I spent my life developing were then stripped
from me by these face coverings. So I found myself
very isolated, depressed, frustrated, and I had you know, I
started voicing a lot of opinions on social media. I
(08:44):
did not realize that you could post an orange on
social media and you will have about a thousand responses
telling you know, what's really an apple. This just seems
to me how it works. I found myself, you know,
a lot of arguments that I didn't really about. Things
I didn't really think were controversial at all, you know,
and I just was naive. I didn't realize this was
the nature of how things worked on the internet. So
(09:06):
people had I started joining a lot of zoom groups
really just so I could have conversations and be able
to talk to people, and so I wasn't in complete,
you know, solitary confinement, which is basically would it felt
like I would go about an hour and a half
to go for a hike with a friend so that
I could see her face and have a conversation, so
that I you know, didn't feel completely you know, I
(09:30):
was really depressed. We'll just leave it at that. But yeah,
so on these zoom calls, someone had said, you know,
they heard about my story and they said, you need
to be on Rogan And I know this sounds now,
it doesn't sound funny anymore. Because I said it so
many times, but I said, what's a Rogan? Why do
I need to be on it? I mean, that's how
little I knew about podcasts. So I, for the record,
(09:51):
I know who Jar Rogan is. Now. I started listening
to podcasts, and a bunch of people had approached me saying,
you should start like a blog, a blog, a podcast,
And I started listening to podcasts mostly because it was
a way to you know, I guess the way people
felt in the old days about having the TV in
their living room. You know, it was a way to
have some background noise communication when I was really isolated,
(10:15):
and it did really help me. But the idea of
starting my own sounded terrifying and sounded like a terrible idea.
But then all of a sudden, I had an epiphany
and I was like, oh, then I might be able
to have like a you know, naked face conversations and
this might save my life. And so I made a
commitment for six months to do some podcasts. And I
(10:35):
really was trying to get people in person. You know,
that wasn't always possible, but I was just craving you know,
that naked face in person communication. And so I made
a commitment for six months that I would record the conversation,
whether they be virtually like this or whether they be
in person. There were some that I was able to
(10:56):
get and I told them that I might not air them,
that it was really just an exercise for me, you know,
an experiment that I was committing to myself. And they
loved it, and it was very gratifying for me, really
help boost my morale. And so in January of twenty
twenty one, I aired my first I think, you know,
(11:16):
I think I did one in December that was just
a solo one really as a test because you have
to you have to send something into Apple and Spotify,
you know, to be approved. And I knew if it
was too political, that might be not a great idea.
So but yeah, so I started, and that's kind of
sent me down all sorts of you know, trails and
(11:38):
research and kind of shifted my paradigm in many ways.
So it's been quite.
Speaker 4 (11:44):
A journey, absolutely absolutely. Of course, when I met you,
you were right there alongside doctor Merritt and I actually
I got to see her again while I was in
Oklahoma at this last July, and her and I had
another conversation. You know, I'd like to credit her for uh,
just twenty minutes talking to her changed my whole outlooks
(12:09):
as far as help and medical goes, because she's that
intelligent she can do that.
Speaker 5 (12:15):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (12:16):
And then, of course, uh, you know, earlier this year,
John and I had uh uh doctor Rayma on doctor
Ryma Libo on and of course great, yeah, yeah, actually,
actually I'll tell you I had to. I called her
for for a professional opinion too. After I saw doctor
(12:38):
earlier this year and he recommended a shingles vaccine. Doctor Rayma,
with her colorful language, told me what to tell him.
And I'm like, cause she she doesn't hold back.
Speaker 5 (12:52):
Yeah, I can imagine what she said. Yeah, yeah, you know.
Speaker 4 (12:59):
Since then, you know, if I'm if I'm getting advice
from doctor Merritt or doctor Ryman, I take it very
very seriously because I believe them to be right thus far,
you know, And I mean, and uh, I'm not going
to ask for proof of what they're saying is correct either.
(13:19):
I don't feel like I need to be honest with you. Yeah, yeah, yeah, Well,
well let's dive into this a little bit further. Real quick.
I do want to say if you're watching this on YouTube.
The live feed may be the only opportunity you get
to see this on YouTube, because we're going to be
(13:40):
bringing up issues that YouTube sometimes doesn't like. And you know,
we can we can get away with it live, but uh,
you know, leaving the archive up you might get a strike.
So we've got to take it down once it's over.
What that's We're going to take our first commercial break in.
We'll be back in about two minutes. All right, ladies
(14:05):
and gentlemen, we are back, joined by Courtney Turner. And
before we go further into Healton Medical, I was prior
to today's show. I was actually watching your interview that
you had with with the uh the Patriot Punk right
(14:26):
there out of Tennessee. Of course, that's pretty much. That
was the dead giveaway of where where you are? Interesting guy.
In fact, while I was at while I was in
Oklahoma this last July, I had one lady stop me
and she she was there from not too far from Memphis,
(14:46):
and she told me a little bit about him. Of course,
the name had slipped my mind until today, and I
got to check out his podcast and I've I was listening. Uh,
you know, I guess Tennessee. Is it in the work
or did they pass the law about the flags.
Speaker 5 (15:04):
Oh, I don't know what ended up happening with that,
to be really honest. Yeah, they were working on that
at the time, but I do not get the date.
Speaker 4 (15:15):
Okay, okay. Well, here in Idaho, we did pass that
same law. Basically for government buildings, you have the American flag,
the state flag, you have military flags or tribal flags.
But other than that, you know, no rainbow mafia flags
or no, no, and you know, keeping a fair no
Christian flags or anything like that. You know, Well, the
(15:37):
mayor of Boise found a loophole and won a case
and is able to fly the rainbow mafia flag in
front of the mayor's office in Boise. Of course, if
you ask me, she's somebody who's who came over to
Idaho to change the landscape because she grew up in
(15:57):
Massachusetts and she's a dedicated socialist.
Speaker 5 (16:02):
Yea, they did pass it. They passed a large restricting
flags and public plays on state property. Yep, we did.
Speaker 4 (16:12):
Oh. Well, you know what, Johnny probably have to ask
Todd a little bit about that or see if he's
followed up on it too.
Speaker 2 (16:19):
Tomorrow Yeah, probably not if you could just fix some
of your gun laws and get some freedoms down there.
Speaker 4 (16:26):
Yeah. Well, last I checked, Tennessee is constitutional carry.
Speaker 2 (16:34):
We had a guy on Common Sense that was talking
about it, and there's a lot of restrictions in Tennessee
maybe a lot of people aren't aware of, but it
could be a little hairy from my understanding.
Speaker 4 (16:42):
The same here in Idaho. Yeah. But one thing I
did do as of last night, I wanted to check
lowest crime states in the Union. And John, guess which
one came up number one.
Speaker 2 (16:56):
You gotta tell me Idaho, New Hampshire. Oh, you gotta
tell me. You look like you're pretty proud the Union.
Speaker 4 (17:07):
Now Idaho is in the top five. Though.
Speaker 2 (17:10):
Yeah, I can imagine.
Speaker 4 (17:13):
Yes. So get back to you, Courtney, and that, of course,
the journey you're you're talking about that you've been on
just sounds quite interesting because I know I talked to
you that one time. We only talked for like eight minutes, though,
and I really didn't know a lot of background on you.
But I what I didn't know is you were born
(17:34):
with these complications. I got to say how impressed I
am how you've overcome them because I would have never
guessed in a million years that this all this happened
to you.
Speaker 5 (17:46):
Thank you. I appreciate that.
Speaker 2 (17:48):
Yes, I'm sit over here totally the blind when you
came in and tell you said something I would have
never known.
Speaker 4 (17:56):
Yes, of course, I think though that the time of
COVID was definitely an awaking, an awakening for us. And
I gotta admit when COVID first hit, I was nervous
as hell, and I wasn't going anywhere without a mask.
And yeah, I was wearing one for a while until
(18:16):
I realized how number one, how uncomfortable they are. And
and then for the research they don't do anything for you.
What's the purpose, you know?
Speaker 3 (18:26):
And then.
Speaker 4 (18:28):
And then when I was I was in in a
town right on the Idaho Oregon border, across into Oregon,
and we're in a restaurant where they wanted us to
keep our masks on it ald times only dipping them
down between bites of our food doesn't seem to make sense.
And that it was that moment I realized they're really
(18:52):
starting to trample on our freedom with this idiocy, total idiocy.
Oh but you're gonna make someone sick. Oh, it's it
prevents somebody from I.
Speaker 5 (19:05):
Didn't wear the mask like from the beginning, and I
was not afraid. From the very beginning. I thought the
whole thing was a hoax. From the very beginning.
Speaker 4 (19:15):
I told the waiter, it's like all abide by year old,
wear my mask while I'm waiting for my food, But
once my food is in comes, I am going to
take it off and I'm going to eat normally. I
want to enjoy the taste of my food and I
cannot do that with a face diaper on.
Speaker 5 (19:34):
Yeah, exactly, do it that way. It had a GPS,
so it knew whether you were sitting or standing.
Speaker 4 (19:43):
Yeah.
Speaker 5 (19:44):
Yeah, it's the only virus in history that had a GPS.
Speaker 4 (19:50):
You know. And then, of course, the whole idea of
the mask, I heard two different things, but both of
them make sense, and both of them are true. Number one,
it's a Satanic ritual Luciferian act to wear a mask
and stand six feet apart. That is true.
Speaker 5 (20:10):
Yeah, it's a sign of enslavement.
Speaker 4 (20:14):
And then I talked to Elvis Sineska over in Australia
and he said that the retina scanning on the surveillance
cameras can't read the eyes if people are not standing
six feet.
Speaker 5 (20:30):
Apart, right, Yeah, it was partly machine learning training.
Speaker 4 (20:35):
Yeah, yes, so it's you know, it's a combination of
both that I think are both Luciferian. Of course the
obvious and then AI is Luciferian from where I stand.
To begin with, cyber satan. Cyber satan, I never heard
that phrase.
Speaker 3 (20:53):
But.
Speaker 5 (20:55):
Nobody said that, But that's what I think it is.
Speaker 4 (20:58):
I like it.
Speaker 2 (20:59):
I like everybody coined their billy, it's been coined. Hmmm,
I'm saying you coined it.
Speaker 5 (21:08):
I don't know if I coined it, but but it's
what I say, it's what I call it, So.
Speaker 2 (21:14):
Let's do it.
Speaker 4 (21:16):
Sure you didn't buy it from from the get going that.
I'm impressed with that because at the beginning I was scared.
I mean, as a lot of people were.
Speaker 5 (21:28):
Sure, I know a lot of people were. There were
a couple of like telltale signs for me. One was
that they kept calling it a virus, but they kept
telling you that, you know, you had to wipe off surfaces,
and that didn't make sense to me because bacteria lives
on surfaces for a period of time depending you know,
but viruses don't now not even according to mainstream narrative
(21:53):
of viruses. I mean, we can have a whole conversation
about viruses, that's you know, but if you were to
subscribe to the mainstream brology narrative, then it doesn't live
on surfaces. So that was very strange to me because
they kept saying you have to wipe everything down, you
have to work glove that you needed, like the plexiglass,
I mean, all of these things that just made no
sense to me, but they were. Yeah, there were just
(22:16):
a lot of like very specific kind of things that
like what was the masking to do? We knew that
that would cause more harm than good. Uh, and we
knew that even back then they had all And that's
what I kept posting on social media, which was very
interesting that I was surprised people were arguing with me.
This is you know, they've studied this historically, that the
(22:38):
all of the deleterious side effects of covering your face.
I mean, I don't want to be super crude, but
you you know that's how you expel your rodey waste.
So you know you wouldn't expel and then you know,
reabsorb it, right, you know, strategy talking about right. I'll
spare you all the details, but you wouldn't do another
(23:00):
cases you would think that's quite gross. So but in
this case, everybody somehow thought that was just perfectly fine.
I'm like, you're literally now inhanaling your bodily weights, like
your tonxins that you've just expelled. So that didn't make
any sense to me. Yeah, there were just so many
things I and I think because of my own personal story,
(23:20):
I kind of felt like, if I'm wrong and this
is the thing that takes me out, then okay, Like
I mean, I just didn't really believe it.
Speaker 2 (23:27):
But yeah, well I think somebody took that to extreme.
Hero comment I see here. But it is true that
you do excrete toxins and stuff are your pores when
you sweat and stuff like that, and breathing that's why
you smell. Like when somebody's heavily intoxicated or something, you
smelled strong on their breath and things like that.
Speaker 4 (23:48):
Yes, yes, of course, why would.
Speaker 5 (23:52):
You think it's good for you to then put that
back inside you exactly? Doesn't make sense.
Speaker 4 (23:59):
Well, I read that one story about that one child
who was constantly wearing a mask, and all of a
sudden he gets a horrible rash all over his face.
What were the very reasons you were talking about.
Speaker 5 (24:11):
There was a lot of that, especially with children, because
children's skin is much more porous than adults, and it's
actually I mean, they really expel waste through their skin.
That's why oftentimes that they're much more susceptible to rashes.
And that's actually a sign of health to you know,
(24:32):
to break out and that's how you're clearing out. But
children are much more able to do that than adults are,
so they were really a lot of them were experienced
a very terrible time. It was also creating cognitive decline
because you know, for me it was very significant because
I couldn't hear, so I learned by reading people's lips
(24:54):
and you know, the nonverbal communication was incredibly important for me.
But for all children it's actually really extremely important. You know,
they may not suffer quite as greatly if they can hear.
But we saw the IQ deterioration. The emotional relatability was
in decline, and all of this was because people's faces
(25:15):
were covered and for children, that's how they read emotions,
it's how they relate. A lot of times they mimic
and that's part of their developmental process, not just socially
but cognitively, so it's it was quite devastating that they
did that. And then of course on top of it,
they locked them down and they were staring at screens
for you know, hours on end and learning horrendous things
(25:38):
on top of it. So it was it was not
a good time.
Speaker 4 (25:42):
Well, you know, when it comes to my daughter, I
mean she's kind of she's really falling to the left
on some things. But when COVID hit, I mean I
told her to keep her little butt home and she's like,
I'm not gonna let a virus stop my life, and
(26:02):
I applaud her for taking that stand. Then of course
she cut COVID and you know she tested positive.
Speaker 5 (26:13):
Why did you test her?
Speaker 4 (26:16):
She tested herself. I didn't have anything to do with it.
Speaker 5 (26:19):
Yeah, I mean they proved like those tests were focused.
I mean, we are right. Carrie Molis, who invented the PCR,
said it's not a diagnostic tool, and all it is
is like they program the cycles. So I mean the
analogy would be you could test your hair for lead.
(26:40):
Everybody is going to have lead in their hair every heating.
But if you those cycles. You magnify it. Now suddenly
you're gonna be like, oh my gosh, there's a lead pandemic. Pandemic.
It's just that everybody has some you know, nanoparticles of lead.
Speaker 4 (26:57):
Well, see, we got to go to our next break
here in just a moment. But I'll tell you no,
she definitely had COVID because I caught something that all
the symptoms were COVID, you know, or whatever they talk about.
Because I lost my sense of smell for about a week.
But then I realized, I said to myself, this is
what I was scared of. I've been sicker than this before.
(27:19):
This isn't so bad, you know. I mean, yeah, I
had I had a bit of a store throat, I
had a headache. Then I lost my sense of smell
for about a week. Then I got it back and
I was fine.
Speaker 5 (27:30):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (27:31):
Yeah, So let's go go ahead and go to our
bottom of the hour break and we will be back
in about three minutes. And again, if you were watching
us on Cube Broadcasting, thank you very much, and be
sure to tune in to Patriots' Prayer Network for other
(27:54):
great programs as well. Again, we are joined by Courtney
Turner and uh a courtney. I was going to tell
you before going to break too as Uh you know
if when I learned that I had COVID on my
own when my daughter tested positive according to them, mind you,
I got a call from the hospital. They were advising
(28:14):
me to come in, which I didn't, I mean, and
then I was reading something about people like me who
who weren't counted cases, I guess, and they were they
were wanting to uh implement charges against people like me
who didn't go in to get tested. I mean, And
(28:37):
I said, I'm not going to be a statistic I mean,
it doesn't matter if I have it or I don't.
I think they're gonna tell me I have it, I mean,
just just so they can. Uh you know, doctors will
get obviously getting a bonus on there if they put
that down on their paperwork. But I did get sick.
There's no denying that. But uh, you know what I've
(29:02):
always I have to remember that. Yeah, as much as
we try to avoid it, there's two things in life
we're not going to avoid, and that's sickness and death.
It's they're both going to happen.
Speaker 5 (29:16):
Well, I don't know they're they're they're trying to cheat
the death part for sure.
Speaker 4 (29:21):
We well we always try to do that or we
try to avoid it somehow.
Speaker 5 (29:26):
But yeah, they're saying, now what is it? Was it
China that's saying that they're going to live to one
hundred and fifty and uh, yeah, I actually just read
something where a bunch of scientists were saying that this
generation will live to be a thousand.
Speaker 4 (29:43):
Oh now.
Speaker 5 (29:46):
Says we'll just upload our consciousness to the clouds to
live forever.
Speaker 2 (29:51):
No talk about introcation of AI and and robotics and
stuff like that. Probably that with what do they call
the uh little micro robots to put in your system
for healing.
Speaker 5 (30:05):
You.
Speaker 4 (30:06):
M hmm, well yeah, no, I think, uh, the only
thing you're going to get towards immortality on this world
is if you have more money than you can spend,
and that that means your great grandkids have more money
they can spend. That's that's immortal. The closest you're gonna
(30:27):
get to immortality, and who's gonna how many people are
that wealthy?
Speaker 2 (30:31):
So play Devil's advocate here for cyber Satan. Uh, they
consider the fact that or the idea that if they
want to develop all this robotics and stuff and AI
technologies is meant to replace human beings. If it's meant
to replace human beings, then they don't need the population
they have, So wouldn't it wouldn't the benefit be to
(30:52):
build robots so the elite rich can survive without.
Speaker 5 (30:55):
Us, so that who can survive elait.
Speaker 2 (30:58):
Rich people who are very very wealthy, so they don't
need to depend on human beings anymore. They'll have robot servants,
they'll have robots taking care of all the all the
things that they need to take care of for their
own needs. So basically, you remember the Georgia guidestones and
the five hundred million and right over at eight eight billion,
and their idea is that we should only have five
hundred million. Well five hundred million might need the robots
(31:21):
to fill in the gaps, right.
Speaker 5 (31:23):
Well, I don't know. I mean there's many camps of
the transhumanist thought and some of them are actual posthumanists.
So there's you know, several handbooks on posthumanism that that
is a school where they believe, you know, it will
be completely replaced by robots and you know, it's a
(31:44):
synthetic biology, so it'll be completely terror formed, but most
of them are transhumans. So they're talking about a merger
you know then, which is a field that exists already.
You know, it's a synthetic biology, which is a you know,
it's like a biotechnology, nanobiotechnology.
Speaker 4 (32:02):
Uh.
Speaker 5 (32:03):
This this notion of taking organic life and merging it
with machines and in that field is growing exponentially. So
I don't know. I mean, I think that really what
they want to create is like a neo feudal society
that's primarily techno feudal. But I think they do still
need the humans. Somebody has to program the AI. I
(32:26):
don't personally believe the AI will ever become sentient. I
know there's a lot invested in convincing people that it's
already become sentient.
Speaker 3 (32:35):
Uh.
Speaker 5 (32:35):
There there's a lot of narrative seating, you know, towards that.
But I don't believe that. But I do think that
they want to convince people that. But either way, I
think that in terms of they have some AI that
can recursively program, but there still needs to be humans
at some point.
Speaker 4 (32:52):
So absolutely, you know, you know, there is I think
back to an old episode of Doctor Who. You know,
I'm not talking about what started the one they started
in two thousand and five. I'm talking about, you know,
the one they had from the sixties to the late eighties.
And there was an episode where there was a race
(33:13):
of people who were who were prey advanced in mathematics
and did not touch technology except to record their program.
And I remember the phrase, only the living brain is
immune to malfunction, that is, unless somebody's trying to brainwash you.
But I always think of that, only the living brain
(33:35):
is immune to malfunction.
Speaker 2 (33:38):
Well, if you think about it, the human brain, human
beings are more phenomenal than robots when you think about it.
Our processed ability to process information and do the things
that we do is way beyond the technologies that we have.
But we don't, you know, how to utilize all that.
We don't we don't understand that. We're so what's the word,
(33:59):
we're such emotional thinkers. We don't really rationalize right.
Speaker 5 (34:05):
Right now, our processing is definitely beyond AI. AI can't
compete with humans currently in certain things that can you know,
there's in like just a generic kind of data processing
and aggregating. Obviously, AI is going to be faster, just
like a calculator is faster than most people can do math.
Not everybody, but the majority of people. Uh my debit
(34:28):
act eat any calculator. We go shopping and before they
could even punch it into a calculator, he would give
the number. So there are people but that he is not.
He was the exception. To most people, a calculator would
be faster, and that's very similar for AI for most people.
You know, for data processing, AI is going to be faster.
AI can scour the Internet and you know, find information
(34:51):
much faster than a researcher could go to a bunch
of different sites or go into a bunch of different libraries.
But in terms of most processes, humans waste surpass AI currently.
I do think AI is advancing quite rapidly, so exponentially,
it's going to increase in its capacity, but it's still
(35:12):
it's still a question of sentience. I don't think that
AI is ever going to achieve that.
Speaker 2 (35:17):
So yeah, well yeah, it's kind of hard for I mean,
they don't have a soul, right, I mean, they don't
have the same functions as far as centient. We're conscious
that way. I mean it's a matter of consciousness. Isn't
being sentient being self aware exactly. If it's a matter
of being self aware, can they become self aware? It
seems like only through programming.
Speaker 5 (35:39):
I don't think they can. I don't think they can
even be programmed to be self aware. I don't think
I think they don't have a soul. I don't. I
don't think they can. I know there's debates on that.
You know, there's debates on simulation theory as well. I
don't believe in that either.
Speaker 2 (35:53):
But oh, here's the issue that we're getting to. Because
we were talking about integation of AI with human beings
and what they're looking for as far as computer chips
go in the future is using DNA from my understanding,
and once they start doing that and starts technology into
your body, can tap into your DNA for memory. Right
now we're talking about a whole different level of becoming sentient.
Speaker 5 (36:14):
Well, no, because this is still this is what I'm
talking about. This is synthetic biology that that's what I
was just talking about. This is merging organic material with machine.
But it's still not. So this is where people do
start to go into justifying that there could be sentient
because there is a theory that cells do have a memory,
(36:35):
but memory is not sentience. It's not the same thing.
So I think even if you can put in nanotechnology
and merge it with this kind of robotic technology with
human organic material, I still don't think you're achieving sentient.
You may be achieving something that looks very similar, and
then they could try and convince people. Now, I will
(36:57):
say that I do think that the ramifications of convincing
an people that machines have achieved sentience will be just
as significant and potentially dangerous as if it were to
actually achieve the sentience, Which is why I think it's
really important for people to maintain a level of critical
thinking and discernment to be able to recognize what is
(37:18):
real and what is.
Speaker 4 (37:19):
Not creating the collective basically.
Speaker 5 (37:23):
Yes, that is the note here.
Speaker 4 (37:26):
Yep, resistance is futile. I'm starting to wonder if some
of these files, these movies and TV shows we were
watching are at all prophetic, Like especially we can go
we could start with Rob Reiner, who really is a meathead.
Speaker 5 (37:46):
Well, I don't think they're prophetic. I mean, the CIA
has a film liaison division. They do a lot of
the military term for it is operational preparation of the environment.
The more colloquial term would be predictive programming. So what
they do, especially in science fiction, although they do it
in other types of genres as well, but especially in
(38:07):
science fiction, they do a lot of this predictive programming.
So they put forth these narratives that seem incredibly far fetched,
really futuristic, like they'll never happen, But it's a way
of conditioning people so that when it does happen, people
are much more desensitized and ready. They're acquiescent to that
type of environment. So that's why they say it's operational
(38:30):
preparation of the environment.
Speaker 2 (38:31):
Not a condition for it. But looking forward to I
mean days years ago, twenty thirty years ago, we had
movies about that, right, like Blade Runner or something where
they were talking about coming home and you're talking to
a computer and having a conversation with computer about the news,
turning in flights, TV, stuff like that, and which to
(38:52):
do this would you like me to do that? Now
we're doing it today also, right, Oh yeah, yeah, So
I think what they're doing is you got a bunch
of geeks talking about this twenty thirty forty years ago.
They're seeing the direction, because technology really isn't new to us.
It's really a lot older than we think it is.
TVs were being developed with in the twenties and the thirties.
(39:15):
Well they just become popular or in the home until
the fifties, but thirty years prior they existed. So I
think they saw a future, talked about the future. Science
fiction writers picked it up. I said, hey, I can
write a good story on this. Well, maybe they do it.
Speaker 5 (39:31):
I don't think it's quite as organic as that. This
is why I bring up that the CIA has a
film thes on division. I mean, I mean, this is
very public. You can go right to the CIA dot com.
You can look this up. They talk about many of
the public facing films television shows that they have worked,
they've consulted on. So this is not this is not cover.
(39:53):
It's just not necessarily widely known. But they do plant narratives.
They're doing consulting oversee what will be the accepted propaganda.
Speaker 2 (40:04):
Essentially, you're you're right, and I'll be back here again.
Twenties and thirties, Hollywood actors didn't smoke. It wasn't til
the cigarette companies went to Hollywood said hey, if actors
to pick up our brand of cigarette, you know, flash
them in the screen and smoke them. We'll give you
money towards your movies. YadA YadA, YadA, and money talks.
Speaker 5 (40:21):
And was very instrumental in that propaganda.
Speaker 4 (40:25):
Yeah, so interject, Yeah, so yeah, we're at the final quarter. Wow,
this has gone by the fastest I've ever seen, not
even getting everything I wanted to bring up. Wow, has
it gone by. So we're gonna go ahead and take
our final break and we'll be back in about just
(40:45):
under two minutes. All right, ladies and gentlemen, we are
back and just getting ready to wrap things up here
with Courtney Turner. Courtney, I meant to ask earlier, Well,
obviously you do the Dangerous Dames podcast with doctor Merritt.
I don't know what the brief period of time we have.
(41:10):
Can you tell us how exactly that got started and
how you got teamed up with her?
Speaker 5 (41:15):
Sure? I mean we we had gone to several conferences together.
We became friends, like very quickly, and she we were
comparing notes on a lot of research stuff back and forth,
and she had said something, you know, like thorowaway. She
was saying, how we're the Dangerous Dames, and I said,
that's such a great name, and so we were we
(41:38):
went to go meet her, my husband and I, and
he was like, we should use this, like, let's do
a show the dangerous names, and yeah, how it happened.
Speaker 4 (41:47):
So and well, of course that's because you're dangerous because
you're talking about things that people don't want or not
I shouldn't say, people but don't want you talking about,
whether it be the vaccines or something else along those lines,
you know, I mean, I mean, they don't want somebody
(42:11):
as intelligent and a free thinker like doctor mer or
like you out there telling the truth basically, so it
fits perfectly. You're only dangerous to them, you're safe. Dust
That's good.
Speaker 5 (42:25):
I'm glad to hear.
Speaker 4 (42:26):
I'm well, I'm I'm more likely to listen to uh
to you before I ever ever listen to them. Yeah, yes, yes,
but yeah, yeah, as you stay to you're currently on
(42:46):
a brief hiatus. But when are you coming back with that?
Speaker 5 (42:49):
With that in October? Yeah?
Speaker 4 (42:51):
So so next month?
Speaker 2 (42:54):
Yeah, yeah, my show.
Speaker 5 (42:58):
So people can still find I have plenty of content.
People can find my articles. I've done some pretty uh
you know, extensive dives recently, I did one on Epstein
pretty recently and a very different angle that most people
are not covering. Most people are not familiar with it
at all, so it's a if you're interested, that that's
(43:20):
something to check out. So that that was one of
my recent ones. And then I did something called the
Phoenix Conspiracy, which is a kind of talking about the
Hegelian dialectic that is pushing us towards the technocracy and
on the left and the right hand paths. So that
that's the Phoenix Conspiracy article. But I've got a bunch
(43:41):
of material on there, so yeah, no shortage of content.
Speaker 4 (43:44):
Okay, this is all on your website.
Speaker 5 (43:46):
Or do you have a substack my substack, yes, Courtney Turner,
So Courtenay Turner dot substack dot com.
Speaker 4 (43:54):
Yes, okay, okay, I'll be sure to tag you in
that one. I pose this on substect. I got to
tell you I like substack just for posting the show
because I can put so much more in the description
and give more details about our guests and put additional
videos within there instead of just posting links, which is
(44:16):
why I decided to start the sub stack, and I
think it works out very well.
Speaker 5 (44:21):
I like it as a platform. I like the audience
on it, you know, I don't. I think they're in
the honey pot sweetening phase. It is largely invested by
Andrews and Harwitz and Teal. But the thing about substack
that it does make it unique is they do let
you keep the emails, so you have some ownership, and
(44:43):
then with the articles, you can make PDFs of them,
so you have some ownership there, which I really like.
I also find it's a you know, because of the medium,
it's more of a platform for articles and writing, so
it tends to be a little bit more of a
literary audience, which.
Speaker 4 (45:02):
I appreciate absolutely absolutely. Yeah. Like, well, if you go
the Patriot Confederation sub stack, you know certain episodes like
I think I mentioned this last week too, like go
back to the interview that John and I had with
(45:23):
Shade Bledsoe, who's the wife of j six or Matt Bledsoe,
and and of course she told she told the story.
But then there's so much more in the description, plus
additional videos of and uh you know the uh one
very short video of him sneak sneaking up on his
(45:44):
kids when they actually let him out of jail.
Speaker 5 (45:47):
MHM.
Speaker 4 (45:48):
Which I hear. Yes, so there's yeah, there's a lot there.
But you know, I encourage anybody to go to Courtney
Turner dot com and just or just punching Courtney Turner
on Rumble to see past episodes and you will be
(46:10):
amazed at especially the Dangerous Dames podcast, which is I
actually had had the pleasure of us watching you guys
do live a couple of times too while I was
South Dakota.
Speaker 5 (46:25):
Yep, right, I remember that. Yeah, that was great. That's
super fun.
Speaker 4 (46:31):
The red Pillow Exposer always super fun. John. We if
we don't get one here in Idaho, we got to
get one in uh, New Hampshire, so I can finally
have an excuse to make it out that way.
Speaker 2 (46:44):
Yeah right, you're backyard right there.
Speaker 5 (46:50):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (46:52):
New Hampshire is not a very big state, so you
don't have far to drive wherever it is.
Speaker 2 (46:57):
Well other than southern New Hampshire. So I'm gonna be
as to wherever it is.
Speaker 4 (47:03):
Even if it's in northern New Hampshire. It's Yeah, it's
not a very big state.
Speaker 2 (47:08):
It can be good three and a half hours or
something to get up there to the top, but yeah,
it's it's doable either way. If they want to put
up there in Pittsburgh, way up there next to Canada,
that's fine. I'll go up there. And I don't think
there's much for hotels, hotels or anything up there, but
you know what, we'll throw a tent in the camp
round or something.
Speaker 4 (47:27):
But we'll be there all right, unless it's unless it's
in the winter time.
Speaker 2 (47:34):
M yeah, well, obseral temperatures up there might be a
little harsh.
Speaker 4 (47:38):
Yes, yes, yes, indeed.
Speaker 5 (47:41):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (47:42):
So Courtney, what is the sub stack again, because I'm
definitely interested in the Phoenix article, which I'm gonna post
all the links on our sub stack once. This is
our chive two. This is all going to be tagged
in there.
Speaker 5 (47:59):
So so it's Courtney Turner and again I spell my
name like Courtine, so it's co O. You are t
E n A Y t U r n e R
dot substack dot com. And I did The most recent
article I did was on AI Toys. So Elon's baby
Mama Grimes is involved in this company, Cheerio, and they
(48:20):
have these little plushy dolls that have AI voices. She
was one of the voices, the voice of Rock of course,
so I had did a short article on that, and
then the Epstein article. It's on game B and Epstein's
ties to transhumanists and tech technocratic funding. It's a pretty
long I think it's like eighteen thousand words, so that
(48:41):
was a pretty extensive dive. And then the one under
that would be probably the Phoenix Conspiracy, which is on
the dialectic that is a marching towards the technocracy and
the various movements that are involved in that.
Speaker 4 (48:55):
So yes, yes, because I don't know AI scores me,
to be honest with you, because it doesn't for me.
Speaker 5 (49:05):
I think it's a great tool. It can be leveraged,
but like any other tool, you need to respect the
tool and we need to be concerned about who's programming
it with what's behind it.
Speaker 3 (49:16):
It.
Speaker 4 (49:16):
Well, just like anything, it can be abused, and it
is being abused, you know, because they do. They're they're
they're talking about certain things like you reach a certain
age and you're gonna, uh, they want to pass laws
to where you're gonna have to have a license to live.
And if you can't get a license to live, what
does that mean? You know? They I wish I was
(49:38):
making this up.
Speaker 2 (49:40):
So they does that go back to what I was
talking about with the cyber Satan, where they're going to
sort of eliminate people five hundred million.
Speaker 5 (49:47):
That's great. Weak. Where do they say that there's a
license to live?
Speaker 4 (49:52):
You know, I'll have to ask Radix about this. She's
the one to work with on Mondays and she does
this thoroughly. Somebody he finds is very very dark like that.
But I yeah, I just I see AI as a
as a threat to our our very well to live,
(50:13):
you know. I mean, I could say to our reason.
Speaker 5 (50:15):
Why itself is, it's about how it's being utilized. I
think it's really important. It's like, you know, guns are
not the problem, right like whose hands is hand? Yeah,
So I think the same thing goes for AI. And
right now what they're doing is very concerning. It's a
what's what's happening in the United States with AI is
(50:38):
just as concerning as what's happening is with the UN
and AI. Trump's latest AI action plan. I'm actually writing
a book, co authoring a book on technocracy at the moment.
But Trump, I've been doing a lot of research into
Trump's AI action plan and he created He's in it.
He talks about the stack that he's going to export
to the rest of the world. So essentially, he's going
(50:59):
to create the technique that they tried to do in
the nineteen thirties with the Technocracy Inc. Right if you're
familiar with Technocracy Inc. It was a response to the
Great Depression. It was an economic proposal. Josh Hattleman, who
is Elon Musk's grandfather, was actually the head of Technocracy Inc.
In nineteen thirty six to nineteen forty one, and then
(51:19):
he left and he started something called the Social Credit Party.
It was literally called the Social Credit Party, and then
he was run out of Canada. But this idea is
being very much resurrected. And they had a vision of
the technique which was the North American Union and what
it did include. It included Canada and Greenland and Mexico.
So the whole North American Union. What is Trump talking about.
(51:41):
He's talking about annexing Canada, he's talking about acquiring Greenland.
So we were literally seeing him fulfilled these plans of
Technocracy Inc. That were mapped out back in the nineteen thirties.
But they didn't have the technology back then to do it.
And what they also didn't have is the three legged stool,
so technocracy. He was focused primarily on the economic policy,
(52:03):
but now we're seeing this is very much being infused
with these religious movements, uh, you know, as well as
the political So we've got the three legs stool to stand.
Speaker 4 (52:12):
So oh my goodness. Yeah, well we are definitely out
of time. Courtney. I want to thank you very much
for joining us and once again Courtney Turner dot com. Uh,
look at the spelling there, of course. Well we may
have somebody who's only listening or could be visually and
(52:33):
uh impaired. How is that spelled.
Speaker 5 (52:35):
It's spelled like court toiney so phonetically, it's courtin a
it's ce O. You are t e n A y
t U r n e R Turner parts easy.
Speaker 4 (52:47):
Yeah, and on tap for next week, we will be
joined by Glenita Zeyderveld. Of course, Uh, my Senator, she's
got some she's got some things happening here in my
next woods. Plus she's going to enlighten me a little
bit about some of the infighting within the Conservatives here
in Idaho that needs to stop.
Speaker 5 (53:11):
Yeah, there's a lot everywhere.
Speaker 4 (53:13):
Yeah, drama, drama, drama, Yes, all right, well Courtney, God
bless you. Thank you so much. You bet absolutely. Ladies
and gentlemen, thank you very much for tuning into Patriot Confederation.
God save the Republic of the United States of America.
Speaker 3 (53:36):
We will live back down from by the fe
Every Patriot has an obligation to question authority. Those who
are honest are not concerned with your watchful vigilance, and
those with integrity are not concerned with your discernment. Every
American is obligated to voice their concerns and stand up
for their freedoms and liberties.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
One nation on your God, indivisible with liberty and justice
for all.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
Ladies and gentlemen. We are the men in the arena.
We are the Patriot Confederation.
Speaker 3 (00:37):
We will live back down from bye. We're a free Americans.
Speaker 4 (00:59):
All right, Ladies and gentlemen, Welcome to Patriot Confederation for
what is the ninth of September twenty twenty five. I'm
your host, Bad Billy out of Twin Falls, Idaho, joined
as always by John Grog. When you're out of Nashville
in New Hampshire, how's it going up in the great Northeast,
New England.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
I'm doing well, Billy, and all same old, same old.
Here in Northeast. I can mark myself safe from not
being stabbed in the neck. Of course, I don't ride
the train, so I'm pretty good that way.
Speaker 4 (01:25):
My goodness. Yeah, we'll touch on that a little bit.
Joining us this week. I believe out of Tennessee, if
I'm correct, Courtney Turner, I met her when I was
in South Dakota last year. How are you doing.
Speaker 5 (01:38):
I'm doing well, thank you, thanks for having me.
Speaker 4 (01:41):
Yes, yes, so you are in Tennessee then that's right. Yes,
of course I lived a short time in the Memphis area.
I don't know how close you are are there a few.
Speaker 5 (01:53):
Hours yeah, a few hours away, so Nashville.
Speaker 4 (01:57):
Yeah, that was about to say you must be closer
to Nashville, especially since you're still Central Time. Getting confused
with the time zones. That's why we're running a couple
of minutes late today. But well, I'm in Mountain Time,
but I always use Eastern Time because that's the greater
(02:17):
that's where the greater of our population is, so it
seems to be a bit more universal.
Speaker 5 (02:23):
Yeah, fair enough, fair enough, Yes, Yes, it was centric
of me to operate time.
Speaker 4 (02:32):
Yes, yes, indeed, And uh, I just wanted to touch
on that what what John was saying. I'm just I'm
just gonna say this to get this off my chest,
even though I talked a lot about it yesterday with
Reid experiment Dan Wass. But I I've always been pretty
disgusted with the mainstream media and and their refusal to
(02:55):
cover such things that are so important. But the Ukrainian
girl whose name I cannot pronounce, that that actually happened
back on the twenty second of August, and then just
today I'm finding out about Dakara Thompson. I can't remember
where where this incident happened. But we're talking about two
(03:17):
young girls, two bright, beautiful young girls that are getting
their murders, are getting no attention whatsoever. Uh. The Ukrainian
girl that's that's a black on white crime. Nobody seems
to care. And then Dakara Thompson, she's a black girl,
but she was killed by an illegal immigrant. Nobody seems
(03:38):
to care. And I'm sick of this. And then they're saying,
O Trump's starting, you know, he he's gonna start a war,
civil war within within our nation. You know, he's invading
these cities. He invaded Washington, DC, and he's looking to
invade Chicago. Well, as far as I'm concerned, the invasion
(03:59):
is already happened when Biden left the border open. And
I'm sick of this. And and two young girls who
didn't deserve what they got are paying the price, and
I'm tired of.
Speaker 2 (04:13):
This, honestly, Billy. The open border problem has been going
on a way longer than Biden. It's been an issue.
You go back to the nineteen nineties. We've had all
these problems. What was the train murderer there? The guy
was walking the train lines coming out of Mexico into
the US and he was killing people. And it's been
a nonsensical thing for a long time. It's about time
we had somebody like Donald Trump stand up with a
little bit of backbone and set people straight.
Speaker 4 (04:36):
Well, I know it's been going on for quite some time.
It just seems to be highlighted and gotten a lot
worse under the last administration.
Speaker 2 (04:44):
Well, people are also becoming more aware of it talking
because I did talk to people about it in the
nineteen nineties and early two thousands about these issues. You
remember romoson copy on that case. I don't know if
that floats with you. Guys. Two border patrol agents were
chasing down being shot at, tracing down to drug smugglers
and they end up shooting one of them. They got
(05:04):
hauled into jail, and we treated the drug smuggler that
got shot. We treated him like, and this was during
the Bush administration, so it's been a long time issue.
We had cartels and helicopters shooting at border patrol agents
with military grade weapons back in the early two thousands.
Nobody was doing anything about it. When you talk to
people about it, the attitude was, well, that doesn't affect me.
(05:28):
I'm prepared in New England. That doesn't affect me. I
live in the Midwest. But it does affect you one
way or another. We've learned this third in the Trump administration.
It does affect you. Affects every state in the Union
because these people are migrating up within the interior of
the United States and they're causing harmon detriment. They're selling
drugs to our children, you know, they're muling these things
(05:48):
in here. They're setting up jops in the United States
and marketing these two fifth graders. This is a horrible,
horrible thing we've been doing with for decades and it's
time for it to stop.
Speaker 5 (06:00):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
The traffic arms that order the three worst crimes in
the United States of America. Thank God for Donald J. Trump.
Hopefully we can keep that momentum going.
Speaker 4 (06:10):
And also the murder of the Ukrainian girl has been
let out of jail multiple times. I don't know if
it was by the same judge, but I endorse the
petition to start holding judges accountable that let these animals
out and commit these horrible acts. Yes, anyway, enough about that,
(06:35):
let's get to our guest, Courtney. Thank you very much
for joining us. Why don't you before we get started,
to give a little background and tell listeners a bit
about yourself.
Speaker 5 (06:46):
My name is Courtney Turner. I'm the host of the
Corney Turner podcast. I also do a podcast called Dangerous
Dames with doctor Lee Merritt. We took a break for
the summer, but we will be returning in October, so
that'll be starting up pretty soon. And I also write.
I write articles. I'm working on a couple of books
at the moment, and you can find most of my
(07:08):
writing material on substack and that's a Courtney Turner got
substack dot com. But I spell my name like Courtine,
so c O you r t E and a y
T you r n e R and yeah. So I
got into the podcasting space around twenty twenty one, so
I don't know. I think we might have gone through
(07:28):
a little bit of my story last time. But for
those who are not familiar, I was born with a
series of challenges. You could say, so kind of you know, show.
Speaker 4 (07:40):
It does not show.
Speaker 5 (07:42):
Thank you. I appreciate that. But in twenty twenty, when
everything was shut down and people's faces were covered, I
found myself really struggling, very very depressed, and very isolated
because I'm hearing impaired. I wear bilateral hearing aids now,
but I actually learned how to speak by reading lips
because I didn't get hearing aids. So I was almost
(08:03):
six years old and I'm also blind in one eye.
I had heart surgery when I was a year old.
I was born with hypotonic limbs bin and graphic motor impairment.
They pretty much told my mom and the best you
could hope was to find a nice institution for me
to spend my life. Fortunately they were wrong, but I
didn't realize how much I still depend on nonverbal communication
(08:24):
and lip reading for clarity of speech until all the
coping mechanisms I spent my life developing were then stripped
from me by these face coverings. So I found myself
very isolated, depressed, frustrated, and I had you know, I
started voicing a lot of opinions on social media. I
(08:44):
did not realize that you could post an orange on
social media and you will have about a thousand responses
telling you know, what's really an apple. This just seems
to me how it works. I found myself, you know,
a lot of arguments that I didn't really about. Things
I didn't really think were controversial at all, you know,
and I just was naive. I didn't realize this was
the nature of how things worked on the internet. So
(09:06):
people had I started joining a lot of zoom groups
really just so I could have conversations and be able
to talk to people, and so I wasn't in complete,
you know, solitary confinement, which is basically would it felt
like I would go about an hour and a half
to go for a hike with a friend so that
I could see her face and have a conversation, so
that I you know, didn't feel completely you know, I
(09:30):
was really depressed. We'll just leave it at that. But yeah,
so on these zoom calls, someone had said, you know,
they heard about my story and they said, you need
to be on Rogan And I know this sounds now,
it doesn't sound funny anymore. Because I said it so
many times, but I said, what's a Rogan? Why do
I need to be on it? I mean, that's how
little I knew about podcasts. So I, for the record,
(09:51):
I know who Jar Rogan is. Now. I started listening
to podcasts, and a bunch of people had approached me saying,
you should start like a blog, a blog, a podcast,
And I started listening to podcasts mostly because it was
a way to you know, I guess the way people
felt in the old days about having the TV in
their living room. You know, it was a way to
have some background noise communication when I was really isolated,
(10:15):
and it did really help me. But the idea of
starting my own sounded terrifying and sounded like a terrible idea.
But then all of a sudden, I had an epiphany
and I was like, oh, then I might be able
to have like a you know, naked face conversations and
this might save my life. And so I made a
commitment for six months to do some podcasts. And I
(10:35):
really was trying to get people in person. You know,
that wasn't always possible, but I was just craving you know,
that naked face in person communication. And so I made
a commitment for six months that I would record the conversation,
whether they be virtually like this or whether they be
in person. There were some that I was able to
(10:56):
get and I told them that I might not air them,
that it was really just an exercise for me, you know,
an experiment that I was committing to myself. And they
loved it, and it was very gratifying for me, really
help boost my morale. And so in January of twenty
twenty one, I aired my first I think, you know,
(11:16):
I think I did one in December that was just
a solo one really as a test because you have
to you have to send something into Apple and Spotify,
you know, to be approved. And I knew if it
was too political, that might be not a great idea.
So but yeah, so I started, and that's kind of
sent me down all sorts of you know, trails and
(11:38):
research and kind of shifted my paradigm in many ways.
So it's been quite.
Speaker 4 (11:44):
A journey, absolutely absolutely. Of course, when I met you,
you were right there alongside doctor Merritt and I actually
I got to see her again while I was in
Oklahoma at this last July, and her and I had
another conversation. You know, I'd like to credit her for uh,
just twenty minutes talking to her changed my whole outlooks
(12:09):
as far as help and medical goes, because she's that
intelligent she can do that.
Speaker 5 (12:15):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (12:16):
And then, of course, uh, you know, earlier this year,
John and I had uh uh doctor Rayma on doctor
Ryma Libo on and of course great, yeah, yeah, actually,
actually I'll tell you I had to. I called her
for for a professional opinion too. After I saw doctor
(12:38):
earlier this year and he recommended a shingles vaccine. Doctor Rayma,
with her colorful language, told me what to tell him.
And I'm like, cause she she doesn't hold back.
Speaker 5 (12:52):
Yeah, I can imagine what she said. Yeah, yeah, you know.
Speaker 4 (12:59):
Since then, you know, if I'm if I'm getting advice
from doctor Merritt or doctor Ryman, I take it very
very seriously because I believe them to be right thus far,
you know, And I mean, and uh, I'm not going
to ask for proof of what they're saying is correct either.
(13:19):
I don't feel like I need to be honest with you. Yeah, yeah, yeah, Well,
well let's dive into this a little bit further. Real quick.
I do want to say if you're watching this on YouTube.
The live feed may be the only opportunity you get
to see this on YouTube, because we're going to be
(13:40):
bringing up issues that YouTube sometimes doesn't like. And you know,
we can we can get away with it live, but uh,
you know, leaving the archive up you might get a strike.
So we've got to take it down once it's over.
What that's We're going to take our first commercial break in.
We'll be back in about two minutes. All right, ladies
(14:05):
and gentlemen, we are back, joined by Courtney Turner. And
before we go further into Healton Medical, I was prior
to today's show. I was actually watching your interview that
you had with with the uh the Patriot Punk right
(14:26):
there out of Tennessee. Of course, that's pretty much. That
was the dead giveaway of where where you are? Interesting guy.
In fact, while I was at while I was in
Oklahoma this last July, I had one lady stop me
and she she was there from not too far from Memphis,
(14:46):
and she told me a little bit about him. Of course,
the name had slipped my mind until today, and I
got to check out his podcast and I've I was listening. Uh,
you know, I guess Tennessee. Is it in the work
or did they pass the law about the flags.
Speaker 5 (15:04):
Oh, I don't know what ended up happening with that,
to be really honest. Yeah, they were working on that
at the time, but I do not get the date.
Speaker 4 (15:15):
Okay, okay. Well, here in Idaho, we did pass that
same law. Basically for government buildings, you have the American flag,
the state flag, you have military flags or tribal flags.
But other than that, you know, no rainbow mafia flags
or no, no, and you know, keeping a fair no
Christian flags or anything like that. You know, Well, the
(15:37):
mayor of Boise found a loophole and won a case
and is able to fly the rainbow mafia flag in
front of the mayor's office in Boise. Of course, if
you ask me, she's somebody who's who came over to
Idaho to change the landscape because she grew up in
(15:57):
Massachusetts and she's a dedicated socialist.
Speaker 5 (16:02):
Yea, they did pass it. They passed a large restricting
flags and public plays on state property. Yep, we did.
Speaker 4 (16:12):
Oh. Well, you know what, Johnny probably have to ask
Todd a little bit about that or see if he's
followed up on it too.
Speaker 2 (16:19):
Tomorrow Yeah, probably not if you could just fix some
of your gun laws and get some freedoms down there.
Speaker 4 (16:26):
Yeah. Well, last I checked, Tennessee is constitutional carry.
Speaker 2 (16:34):
We had a guy on Common Sense that was talking
about it, and there's a lot of restrictions in Tennessee
maybe a lot of people aren't aware of, but it
could be a little hairy from my understanding.
Speaker 4 (16:42):
The same here in Idaho. Yeah. But one thing I
did do as of last night, I wanted to check
lowest crime states in the Union. And John, guess which
one came up number one.
Speaker 2 (16:56):
You gotta tell me Idaho, New Hampshire. Oh, you gotta
tell me. You look like you're pretty proud the Union.
Speaker 4 (17:07):
Now Idaho is in the top five. Though.
Speaker 2 (17:10):
Yeah, I can imagine.
Speaker 4 (17:13):
Yes. So get back to you, Courtney, and that, of course,
the journey you're you're talking about that you've been on
just sounds quite interesting because I know I talked to
you that one time. We only talked for like eight minutes, though,
and I really didn't know a lot of background on you.
But I what I didn't know is you were born
(17:34):
with these complications. I got to say how impressed I
am how you've overcome them because I would have never
guessed in a million years that this all this happened
to you.
Speaker 5 (17:46):
Thank you. I appreciate that.
Speaker 2 (17:48):
Yes, I'm sit over here totally the blind when you
came in and tell you said something I would have
never known.
Speaker 4 (17:56):
Yes, of course, I think though that the time of
COVID was definitely an awaking, an awakening for us. And
I gotta admit when COVID first hit, I was nervous
as hell, and I wasn't going anywhere without a mask.
And yeah, I was wearing one for a while until
(18:16):
I realized how number one, how uncomfortable they are. And
and then for the research they don't do anything for you.
What's the purpose, you know?
Speaker 3 (18:26):
And then.
Speaker 4 (18:28):
And then when I was I was in in a
town right on the Idaho Oregon border, across into Oregon,
and we're in a restaurant where they wanted us to
keep our masks on it ald times only dipping them
down between bites of our food doesn't seem to make sense.
And that it was that moment I realized they're really
(18:52):
starting to trample on our freedom with this idiocy, total idiocy.
Oh but you're gonna make someone sick. Oh, it's it
prevents somebody from I.
Speaker 5 (19:05):
Didn't wear the mask like from the beginning, and I
was not afraid. From the very beginning. I thought the
whole thing was a hoax. From the very beginning.
Speaker 4 (19:15):
I told the waiter, it's like all abide by year old,
wear my mask while I'm waiting for my food, But
once my food is in comes, I am going to
take it off and I'm going to eat normally. I
want to enjoy the taste of my food and I
cannot do that with a face diaper on.
Speaker 5 (19:34):
Yeah, exactly, do it that way. It had a GPS,
so it knew whether you were sitting or standing.
Speaker 4 (19:43):
Yeah.
Speaker 5 (19:44):
Yeah, it's the only virus in history that had a GPS.
Speaker 4 (19:50):
You know. And then, of course, the whole idea of
the mask, I heard two different things, but both of
them make sense, and both of them are true. Number one,
it's a Satanic ritual Luciferian act to wear a mask
and stand six feet apart. That is true.
Speaker 5 (20:10):
Yeah, it's a sign of enslavement.
Speaker 4 (20:14):
And then I talked to Elvis Sineska over in Australia
and he said that the retina scanning on the surveillance
cameras can't read the eyes if people are not standing
six feet.
Speaker 5 (20:30):
Apart, right, Yeah, it was partly machine learning training.
Speaker 4 (20:35):
Yeah, yes, so it's you know, it's a combination of
both that I think are both Luciferian. Of course the
obvious and then AI is Luciferian from where I stand.
To begin with, cyber satan. Cyber satan, I never heard
that phrase.
Speaker 3 (20:53):
But.
Speaker 5 (20:55):
Nobody said that, But that's what I think it is.
Speaker 4 (20:58):
I like it.
Speaker 2 (20:59):
I like everybody coined their billy, it's been coined. Hmmm,
I'm saying you coined it.
Speaker 5 (21:08):
I don't know if I coined it, but but it's
what I say, it's what I call it, So.
Speaker 2 (21:14):
Let's do it.
Speaker 4 (21:16):
Sure you didn't buy it from from the get going that.
I'm impressed with that because at the beginning I was scared.
I mean, as a lot of people were.
Speaker 5 (21:28):
Sure, I know a lot of people were. There were
a couple of like telltale signs for me. One was
that they kept calling it a virus, but they kept
telling you that, you know, you had to wipe off surfaces,
and that didn't make sense to me because bacteria lives
on surfaces for a period of time depending you know,
but viruses don't now not even according to mainstream narrative
(21:53):
of viruses. I mean, we can have a whole conversation
about viruses, that's you know, but if you were to
subscribe to the mainstream brology narrative, then it doesn't live
on surfaces. So that was very strange to me because
they kept saying you have to wipe everything down, you
have to work glove that you needed, like the plexiglass,
I mean, all of these things that just made no
sense to me, but they were. Yeah, there were just
(22:16):
a lot of like very specific kind of things that
like what was the masking to do? We knew that
that would cause more harm than good. Uh, and we
knew that even back then they had all And that's
what I kept posting on social media, which was very
interesting that I was surprised people were arguing with me.
This is you know, they've studied this historically, that the
(22:38):
all of the deleterious side effects of covering your face.
I mean, I don't want to be super crude, but
you you know that's how you expel your rodey waste.
So you know you wouldn't expel and then you know,
reabsorb it, right, you know, strategy talking about right. I'll
spare you all the details, but you wouldn't do another
(23:00):
cases you would think that's quite gross. So but in
this case, everybody somehow thought that was just perfectly fine.
I'm like, you're literally now inhanaling your bodily weights, like
your tonxins that you've just expelled. So that didn't make
any sense to me. Yeah, there were just so many
things I and I think because of my own personal story,
(23:20):
I kind of felt like, if I'm wrong and this
is the thing that takes me out, then okay, Like
I mean, I just didn't really believe it.
Speaker 2 (23:27):
But yeah, well I think somebody took that to extreme.
Hero comment I see here. But it is true that
you do excrete toxins and stuff are your pores when
you sweat and stuff like that, and breathing that's why
you smell. Like when somebody's heavily intoxicated or something, you
smelled strong on their breath and things like that.
Speaker 4 (23:48):
Yes, yes, of course, why would.
Speaker 5 (23:52):
You think it's good for you to then put that
back inside you exactly? Doesn't make sense.
Speaker 4 (23:59):
Well, I read that one story about that one child
who was constantly wearing a mask, and all of a
sudden he gets a horrible rash all over his face.
What were the very reasons you were talking about.
Speaker 5 (24:11):
There was a lot of that, especially with children, because
children's skin is much more porous than adults, and it's
actually I mean, they really expel waste through their skin.
That's why oftentimes that they're much more susceptible to rashes.
And that's actually a sign of health to you know,
(24:32):
to break out and that's how you're clearing out. But
children are much more able to do that than adults are,
so they were really a lot of them were experienced
a very terrible time. It was also creating cognitive decline
because you know, for me it was very significant because
I couldn't hear, so I learned by reading people's lips
(24:54):
and you know, the nonverbal communication was incredibly important for me.
But for all children it's actually really extremely important. You know,
they may not suffer quite as greatly if they can hear.
But we saw the IQ deterioration. The emotional relatability was
in decline, and all of this was because people's faces
(25:15):
were covered and for children, that's how they read emotions,
it's how they relate. A lot of times they mimic
and that's part of their developmental process, not just socially
but cognitively, so it's it was quite devastating that they
did that. And then of course on top of it,
they locked them down and they were staring at screens
for you know, hours on end and learning horrendous things
(25:38):
on top of it. So it was it was not
a good time.
Speaker 4 (25:42):
Well, you know, when it comes to my daughter, I
mean she's kind of she's really falling to the left
on some things. But when COVID hit, I mean I
told her to keep her little butt home and she's like,
I'm not gonna let a virus stop my life, and
(26:02):
I applaud her for taking that stand. Then of course
she cut COVID and you know she tested positive.
Speaker 5 (26:13):
Why did you test her?
Speaker 4 (26:16):
She tested herself. I didn't have anything to do with it.
Speaker 5 (26:19):
Yeah, I mean they proved like those tests were focused.
I mean, we are right. Carrie Molis, who invented the PCR,
said it's not a diagnostic tool, and all it is
is like they program the cycles. So I mean the
analogy would be you could test your hair for lead.
(26:40):
Everybody is going to have lead in their hair every heating.
But if you those cycles. You magnify it. Now suddenly
you're gonna be like, oh my gosh, there's a lead pandemic. Pandemic.
It's just that everybody has some you know, nanoparticles of lead.
Speaker 4 (26:57):
Well, see, we got to go to our next break
here in just a moment. But I'll tell you no,
she definitely had COVID because I caught something that all
the symptoms were COVID, you know, or whatever they talk about.
Because I lost my sense of smell for about a week.
But then I realized, I said to myself, this is
what I was scared of. I've been sicker than this before.
(27:19):
This isn't so bad, you know. I mean, yeah, I
had I had a bit of a store throat, I
had a headache. Then I lost my sense of smell
for about a week. Then I got it back and
I was fine.
Speaker 5 (27:30):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (27:31):
Yeah, So let's go go ahead and go to our
bottom of the hour break and we will be back
in about three minutes. And again, if you were watching
us on Cube Broadcasting, thank you very much, and be
sure to tune in to Patriots' Prayer Network for other
(27:54):
great programs as well. Again, we are joined by Courtney
Turner and uh a courtney. I was going to tell
you before going to break too as Uh you know
if when I learned that I had COVID on my
own when my daughter tested positive according to them, mind you,
I got a call from the hospital. They were advising
(28:14):
me to come in, which I didn't, I mean, and
then I was reading something about people like me who
who weren't counted cases, I guess, and they were they
were wanting to uh implement charges against people like me
who didn't go in to get tested. I mean, And
(28:37):
I said, I'm not going to be a statistic I mean,
it doesn't matter if I have it or I don't.
I think they're gonna tell me I have it, I mean,
just just so they can. Uh you know, doctors will
get obviously getting a bonus on there if they put
that down on their paperwork. But I did get sick.
There's no denying that. But uh, you know what I've
(29:02):
always I have to remember that. Yeah, as much as
we try to avoid it, there's two things in life
we're not going to avoid, and that's sickness and death.
It's they're both going to happen.
Speaker 5 (29:16):
Well, I don't know they're they're they're trying to cheat
the death part for sure.
Speaker 4 (29:21):
We well we always try to do that or we
try to avoid it somehow.
Speaker 5 (29:26):
But yeah, they're saying, now what is it? Was it
China that's saying that they're going to live to one
hundred and fifty and uh, yeah, I actually just read
something where a bunch of scientists were saying that this
generation will live to be a thousand.
Speaker 4 (29:43):
Oh now.
Speaker 5 (29:46):
Says we'll just upload our consciousness to the clouds to
live forever.
Speaker 2 (29:51):
No talk about introcation of AI and and robotics and
stuff like that. Probably that with what do they call
the uh little micro robots to put in your system
for healing.
Speaker 5 (30:05):
You.
Speaker 4 (30:06):
M hmm, well yeah, no, I think, uh, the only
thing you're going to get towards immortality on this world
is if you have more money than you can spend,
and that that means your great grandkids have more money
they can spend. That's that's immortal. The closest you're gonna
(30:27):
get to immortality, and who's gonna how many people are
that wealthy?
Speaker 2 (30:31):
So play Devil's advocate here for cyber Satan. Uh, they
consider the fact that or the idea that if they
want to develop all this robotics and stuff and AI
technologies is meant to replace human beings. If it's meant
to replace human beings, then they don't need the population
they have, So wouldn't it wouldn't the benefit be to
(30:52):
build robots so the elite rich can survive without.
Speaker 5 (30:55):
Us, so that who can survive elait.
Speaker 2 (30:58):
Rich people who are very very wealthy, so they don't
need to depend on human beings anymore. They'll have robot servants,
they'll have robots taking care of all the all the
things that they need to take care of for their
own needs. So basically, you remember the Georgia guidestones and
the five hundred million and right over at eight eight billion,
and their idea is that we should only have five
hundred million. Well five hundred million might need the robots
(31:21):
to fill in the gaps, right.
Speaker 5 (31:23):
Well, I don't know. I mean there's many camps of
the transhumanist thought and some of them are actual posthumanists.
So there's you know, several handbooks on posthumanism that that
is a school where they believe, you know, it will
be completely replaced by robots and you know, it's a
(31:44):
synthetic biology, so it'll be completely terror formed, but most
of them are transhumans. So they're talking about a merger
you know then, which is a field that exists already.
You know, it's a synthetic biology, which is a you know,
it's like a biotechnology, nanobiotechnology.
Speaker 4 (32:02):
Uh.
Speaker 5 (32:03):
This this notion of taking organic life and merging it
with machines and in that field is growing exponentially. So
I don't know. I mean, I think that really what
they want to create is like a neo feudal society
that's primarily techno feudal. But I think they do still
need the humans. Somebody has to program the AI. I
(32:26):
don't personally believe the AI will ever become sentient. I
know there's a lot invested in convincing people that it's
already become sentient.
Speaker 3 (32:35):
Uh.
Speaker 5 (32:35):
There there's a lot of narrative seating, you know, towards that.
But I don't believe that. But I do think that
they want to convince people that. But either way, I
think that in terms of they have some AI that
can recursively program, but there still needs to be humans
at some point.
Speaker 4 (32:52):
So absolutely, you know, you know, there is I think
back to an old episode of Doctor Who. You know,
I'm not talking about what started the one they started
in two thousand and five. I'm talking about, you know,
the one they had from the sixties to the late eighties.
And there was an episode where there was a race
(33:13):
of people who were who were prey advanced in mathematics
and did not touch technology except to record their program.
And I remember the phrase, only the living brain is
immune to malfunction, that is, unless somebody's trying to brainwash you.
But I always think of that, only the living brain
(33:35):
is immune to malfunction.
Speaker 2 (33:38):
Well, if you think about it, the human brain, human
beings are more phenomenal than robots when you think about it.
Our processed ability to process information and do the things
that we do is way beyond the technologies that we have.
But we don't, you know, how to utilize all that.
We don't we don't understand that. We're so what's the word,
(33:59):
we're such emotional thinkers. We don't really rationalize right.
Speaker 5 (34:05):
Right now, our processing is definitely beyond AI. AI can't
compete with humans currently in certain things that can you know,
there's in like just a generic kind of data processing
and aggregating. Obviously, AI is going to be faster, just
like a calculator is faster than most people can do math.
Not everybody, but the majority of people. Uh my debit
(34:28):
act eat any calculator. We go shopping and before they
could even punch it into a calculator, he would give
the number. So there are people but that he is not.
He was the exception. To most people, a calculator would
be faster, and that's very similar for AI for most people.
You know, for data processing, AI is going to be faster.
AI can scour the Internet and you know, find information
(34:51):
much faster than a researcher could go to a bunch
of different sites or go into a bunch of different libraries.
But in terms of most processes, humans waste surpass AI currently.
I do think AI is advancing quite rapidly, so exponentially,
it's going to increase in its capacity, but it's still
(35:12):
it's still a question of sentience. I don't think that
AI is ever going to achieve that.
Speaker 2 (35:17):
So yeah, well yeah, it's kind of hard for I mean,
they don't have a soul, right, I mean, they don't
have the same functions as far as centient. We're conscious
that way. I mean it's a matter of consciousness. Isn't
being sentient being self aware exactly. If it's a matter
of being self aware, can they become self aware? It
seems like only through programming.
Speaker 5 (35:39):
I don't think they can. I don't think they can
even be programmed to be self aware. I don't think
I think they don't have a soul. I don't. I
don't think they can. I know there's debates on that.
You know, there's debates on simulation theory as well. I
don't believe in that either.
Speaker 2 (35:53):
But oh, here's the issue that we're getting to. Because
we were talking about integation of AI with human beings
and what they're looking for as far as computer chips
go in the future is using DNA from my understanding,
and once they start doing that and starts technology into
your body, can tap into your DNA for memory. Right
now we're talking about a whole different level of becoming sentient.
Speaker 5 (36:14):
Well, no, because this is still this is what I'm
talking about. This is synthetic biology that that's what I
was just talking about. This is merging organic material with machine.
But it's still not. So this is where people do
start to go into justifying that there could be sentient
because there is a theory that cells do have a memory,
(36:35):
but memory is not sentience. It's not the same thing.
So I think even if you can put in nanotechnology
and merge it with this kind of robotic technology with
human organic material, I still don't think you're achieving sentient.
You may be achieving something that looks very similar, and
then they could try and convince people. Now, I will
(36:57):
say that I do think that the ramifications of convincing
an people that machines have achieved sentience will be just
as significant and potentially dangerous as if it were to
actually achieve the sentience, Which is why I think it's
really important for people to maintain a level of critical
thinking and discernment to be able to recognize what is
(37:18):
real and what is.
Speaker 4 (37:19):
Not creating the collective basically.
Speaker 5 (37:23):
Yes, that is the note here.
Speaker 4 (37:26):
Yep, resistance is futile. I'm starting to wonder if some
of these files, these movies and TV shows we were
watching are at all prophetic, Like especially we can go
we could start with Rob Reiner, who really is a meathead.
Speaker 5 (37:46):
Well, I don't think they're prophetic. I mean, the CIA
has a film liaison division. They do a lot of
the military term for it is operational preparation of the environment.
The more colloquial term would be predictive programming. So what
they do, especially in science fiction, although they do it
in other types of genres as well, but especially in
(38:07):
science fiction, they do a lot of this predictive programming.
So they put forth these narratives that seem incredibly far fetched,
really futuristic, like they'll never happen, But it's a way
of conditioning people so that when it does happen, people
are much more desensitized and ready. They're acquiescent to that
type of environment. So that's why they say it's operational
(38:30):
preparation of the environment.
Speaker 2 (38:31):
Not a condition for it. But looking forward to I
mean days years ago, twenty thirty years ago, we had
movies about that, right, like Blade Runner or something where
they were talking about coming home and you're talking to
a computer and having a conversation with computer about the news,
turning in flights, TV, stuff like that, and which to
(38:52):
do this would you like me to do that? Now
we're doing it today also, right, Oh yeah, yeah, So
I think what they're doing is you got a bunch
of geeks talking about this twenty thirty forty years ago.
They're seeing the direction, because technology really isn't new to us.
It's really a lot older than we think it is.
TVs were being developed with in the twenties and the thirties.
(39:15):
Well they just become popular or in the home until
the fifties, but thirty years prior they existed. So I
think they saw a future, talked about the future. Science
fiction writers picked it up. I said, hey, I can
write a good story on this. Well, maybe they do it.
Speaker 5 (39:31):
I don't think it's quite as organic as that. This
is why I bring up that the CIA has a
film thes on division. I mean, I mean, this is
very public. You can go right to the CIA dot com.
You can look this up. They talk about many of
the public facing films television shows that they have worked,
they've consulted on. So this is not this is not cover.
(39:53):
It's just not necessarily widely known. But they do plant narratives.
They're doing consulting oversee what will be the accepted propaganda.
Speaker 2 (40:04):
Essentially, you're you're right, and I'll be back here again.
Twenties and thirties, Hollywood actors didn't smoke. It wasn't til
the cigarette companies went to Hollywood said hey, if actors
to pick up our brand of cigarette, you know, flash
them in the screen and smoke them. We'll give you
money towards your movies. YadA YadA, YadA, and money talks.
Speaker 5 (40:21):
And was very instrumental in that propaganda.
Speaker 4 (40:25):
Yeah, so interject, Yeah, so yeah, we're at the final quarter. Wow,
this has gone by the fastest I've ever seen, not
even getting everything I wanted to bring up. Wow, has
it gone by. So we're gonna go ahead and take
our final break and we'll be back in about just
(40:45):
under two minutes. All right, ladies and gentlemen, we are
back and just getting ready to wrap things up here
with Courtney Turner. Courtney, I meant to ask earlier, Well,
obviously you do the Dangerous Dames podcast with doctor Merritt.
I don't know what the brief period of time we have.
(41:10):
Can you tell us how exactly that got started and
how you got teamed up with her?
Speaker 5 (41:15):
Sure? I mean we we had gone to several conferences together.
We became friends, like very quickly, and she we were
comparing notes on a lot of research stuff back and forth,
and she had said something, you know, like thorowaway. She
was saying, how we're the Dangerous Dames, and I said,
that's such a great name, and so we were we
(41:38):
went to go meet her, my husband and I, and
he was like, we should use this, like, let's do
a show the dangerous names, and yeah, how it happened.
Speaker 4 (41:47):
So and well, of course that's because you're dangerous because
you're talking about things that people don't want or not
I shouldn't say, people but don't want you talking about,
whether it be the vaccines or something else along those lines,
you know, I mean, I mean, they don't want somebody
(42:11):
as intelligent and a free thinker like doctor mer or
like you out there telling the truth basically, so it
fits perfectly. You're only dangerous to them, you're safe. Dust
That's good.
Speaker 5 (42:25):
I'm glad to hear.
Speaker 4 (42:26):
I'm well, I'm I'm more likely to listen to uh
to you before I ever ever listen to them. Yeah, yes, yes,
but yeah, yeah, as you stay to you're currently on
(42:46):
a brief hiatus. But when are you coming back with that?
Speaker 5 (42:49):
With that in October? Yeah?
Speaker 4 (42:51):
So so next month?
Speaker 2 (42:54):
Yeah, yeah, my show.
Speaker 5 (42:58):
So people can still find I have plenty of content.
People can find my articles. I've done some pretty uh
you know, extensive dives recently, I did one on Epstein
pretty recently and a very different angle that most people
are not covering. Most people are not familiar with it
at all, so it's a if you're interested, that that's
(43:20):
something to check out. So that that was one of
my recent ones. And then I did something called the
Phoenix Conspiracy, which is a kind of talking about the
Hegelian dialectic that is pushing us towards the technocracy and
on the left and the right hand paths. So that
that's the Phoenix Conspiracy article. But I've got a bunch
(43:41):
of material on there, so yeah, no shortage of content.
Speaker 4 (43:44):
Okay, this is all on your website.
Speaker 5 (43:46):
Or do you have a substack my substack, yes, Courtney Turner,
So Courtenay Turner dot substack dot com.
Speaker 4 (43:54):
Yes, okay, okay, I'll be sure to tag you in
that one. I pose this on substect. I got to
tell you I like substack just for posting the show
because I can put so much more in the description
and give more details about our guests and put additional
videos within there instead of just posting links, which is
(44:16):
why I decided to start the sub stack, and I
think it works out very well.
Speaker 5 (44:21):
I like it as a platform. I like the audience
on it, you know, I don't. I think they're in
the honey pot sweetening phase. It is largely invested by
Andrews and Harwitz and Teal. But the thing about substack
that it does make it unique is they do let
you keep the emails, so you have some ownership, and
(44:43):
then with the articles, you can make PDFs of them,
so you have some ownership there, which I really like.
I also find it's a you know, because of the medium,
it's more of a platform for articles and writing, so
it tends to be a little bit more of a
literary audience, which.
Speaker 4 (45:02):
I appreciate absolutely absolutely. Yeah. Like, well, if you go
the Patriot Confederation sub stack, you know certain episodes like
I think I mentioned this last week too, like go
back to the interview that John and I had with
(45:23):
Shade Bledsoe, who's the wife of j six or Matt Bledsoe,
and and of course she told she told the story.
But then there's so much more in the description, plus
additional videos of and uh you know the uh one
very short video of him sneak sneaking up on his
(45:44):
kids when they actually let him out of jail.
Speaker 5 (45:47):
MHM.
Speaker 4 (45:48):
Which I hear. Yes, so there's yeah, there's a lot there.
But you know, I encourage anybody to go to Courtney
Turner dot com and just or just punching Courtney Turner
on Rumble to see past episodes and you will be
(46:10):
amazed at especially the Dangerous Dames podcast, which is I
actually had had the pleasure of us watching you guys
do live a couple of times too while I was
South Dakota.
Speaker 5 (46:25):
Yep, right, I remember that. Yeah, that was great. That's
super fun.
Speaker 4 (46:31):
The red Pillow Exposer always super fun. John. We if
we don't get one here in Idaho, we got to
get one in uh, New Hampshire, so I can finally
have an excuse to make it out that way.
Speaker 2 (46:44):
Yeah right, you're backyard right there.
Speaker 5 (46:50):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (46:52):
New Hampshire is not a very big state, so you
don't have far to drive wherever it is.
Speaker 2 (46:57):
Well other than southern New Hampshire. So I'm gonna be
as to wherever it is.
Speaker 4 (47:03):
Even if it's in northern New Hampshire. It's Yeah, it's
not a very big state.
Speaker 2 (47:08):
It can be good three and a half hours or
something to get up there to the top, but yeah,
it's it's doable either way. If they want to put
up there in Pittsburgh, way up there next to Canada,
that's fine. I'll go up there. And I don't think
there's much for hotels, hotels or anything up there, but
you know what, we'll throw a tent in the camp
round or something.
Speaker 4 (47:27):
But we'll be there all right, unless it's unless it's
in the winter time.
Speaker 2 (47:34):
M yeah, well, obseral temperatures up there might be a
little harsh.
Speaker 4 (47:38):
Yes, yes, yes, indeed.
Speaker 5 (47:41):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (47:42):
So Courtney, what is the sub stack again, because I'm
definitely interested in the Phoenix article, which I'm gonna post
all the links on our sub stack once. This is
our chive two. This is all going to be tagged
in there.
Speaker 5 (47:59):
So so it's Courtney Turner and again I spell my
name like Courtine, so it's co O. You are t
E n A Y t U r n e R
dot substack dot com. And I did The most recent
article I did was on AI Toys. So Elon's baby
Mama Grimes is involved in this company, Cheerio, and they
(48:20):
have these little plushy dolls that have AI voices. She
was one of the voices, the voice of Rock of course,
so I had did a short article on that, and
then the Epstein article. It's on game B and Epstein's
ties to transhumanists and tech technocratic funding. It's a pretty
long I think it's like eighteen thousand words, so that
(48:41):
was a pretty extensive dive. And then the one under
that would be probably the Phoenix Conspiracy, which is on
the dialectic that is a marching towards the technocracy and
the various movements that are involved in that.
Speaker 4 (48:55):
So yes, yes, because I don't know AI scores me,
to be honest with you, because it doesn't for me.
Speaker 5 (49:05):
I think it's a great tool. It can be leveraged,
but like any other tool, you need to respect the
tool and we need to be concerned about who's programming
it with what's behind it.
Speaker 3 (49:16):
It.
Speaker 4 (49:16):
Well, just like anything, it can be abused, and it
is being abused, you know, because they do. They're they're
they're talking about certain things like you reach a certain
age and you're gonna, uh, they want to pass laws
to where you're gonna have to have a license to live.
And if you can't get a license to live, what
does that mean? You know? They I wish I was
(49:38):
making this up.
Speaker 2 (49:40):
So they does that go back to what I was
talking about with the cyber Satan, where they're going to
sort of eliminate people five hundred million.
Speaker 5 (49:47):
That's great. Weak. Where do they say that there's a
license to live?
Speaker 4 (49:52):
You know, I'll have to ask Radix about this. She's
the one to work with on Mondays and she does
this thoroughly. Somebody he finds is very very dark like that.
But I yeah, I just I see AI as a
as a threat to our our very well to live,
(50:13):
you know. I mean, I could say to our reason.
Speaker 5 (50:15):
Why itself is, it's about how it's being utilized. I
think it's really important. It's like, you know, guns are
not the problem, right like whose hands is hand? Yeah,
So I think the same thing goes for AI. And
right now what they're doing is very concerning. It's a
what's what's happening in the United States with AI is
(50:38):
just as concerning as what's happening is with the UN
and AI. Trump's latest AI action plan. I'm actually writing
a book, co authoring a book on technocracy at the moment.
But Trump, I've been doing a lot of research into
Trump's AI action plan and he created He's in it.
He talks about the stack that he's going to export
to the rest of the world. So essentially, he's going
(50:59):
to create the technique that they tried to do in
the nineteen thirties with the Technocracy Inc. Right if you're
familiar with Technocracy Inc. It was a response to the
Great Depression. It was an economic proposal. Josh Hattleman, who
is Elon Musk's grandfather, was actually the head of Technocracy Inc.
In nineteen thirty six to nineteen forty one, and then
(51:19):
he left and he started something called the Social Credit Party.
It was literally called the Social Credit Party, and then
he was run out of Canada. But this idea is
being very much resurrected. And they had a vision of
the technique which was the North American Union and what
it did include. It included Canada and Greenland and Mexico.
So the whole North American Union. What is Trump talking about.
(51:41):
He's talking about annexing Canada, he's talking about acquiring Greenland.
So we were literally seeing him fulfilled these plans of
Technocracy Inc. That were mapped out back in the nineteen thirties.
But they didn't have the technology back then to do it.
And what they also didn't have is the three legged stool,
so technocracy. He was focused primarily on the economic policy,
(52:03):
but now we're seeing this is very much being infused
with these religious movements, uh, you know, as well as
the political So we've got the three legs stool to stand.
Speaker 4 (52:12):
So oh my goodness. Yeah, well we are definitely out
of time. Courtney. I want to thank you very much
for joining us and once again Courtney Turner dot com. Uh,
look at the spelling there, of course. Well we may
have somebody who's only listening or could be visually and
(52:33):
uh impaired. How is that spelled.
Speaker 5 (52:35):
It's spelled like court toiney so phonetically, it's courtin a
it's ce O. You are t e n A y
t U r n e R Turner parts easy.
Speaker 4 (52:47):
Yeah, and on tap for next week, we will be
joined by Glenita Zeyderveld. Of course, Uh, my Senator, she's
got some she's got some things happening here in my
next woods. Plus she's going to enlighten me a little
bit about some of the infighting within the Conservatives here
in Idaho that needs to stop.
Speaker 5 (53:11):
Yeah, there's a lot everywhere.
Speaker 4 (53:13):
Yeah, drama, drama, drama, Yes, all right, well Courtney, God
bless you. Thank you so much. You bet absolutely. Ladies
and gentlemen, thank you very much for tuning into Patriot Confederation.
God save the Republic of the United States of America.
Speaker 3 (53:36):
We will live back down from by the fe
Popular Podcasts
CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist
It’s 1996 in rural North Carolina, and an oddball crew makes history when they pull off America’s third largest cash heist. But it’s all downhill from there. Join host Johnny Knoxville as he unspools a wild and woolly tale about a group of regular ‘ol folks who risked it all for a chance at a better life. CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist answers the question: what would you do with 17.3 million dollars? The answer includes diamond rings, mansions, velvet Elvis paintings, plus a run for the border, murder-for-hire-plots, and FBI busts.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.