The Common Sense Conservatives

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:02):
Welcome to the Common Sense Conservatives, a political discussion group
about current events and other government related matters, every Wednesday
evening from seven to eight pm right here on WSMN
fifteen ninety AM, WSMN ninety five point three FM, and
streaming live on WUSMN dot Live. Making sense of the
inverted reality we are subject to you every day.

Speaker 2 (00:24):
The Common Sense Conservatives are here to help.

Speaker 1 (00:26):
Bring you back to reality. Now your host Chris Wyatt,
Todd McKinley, and John Globin.

Speaker 3 (00:34):
All right, hey, everybody, welcome back to the Common Sense Conservatives.
I'm Tommy Kinley, Northeast Tennessee, joined by my co host,
Colonel Chris Wyatt. Somewhere in the Great Beyond there it
looks like where are you tonight.

Speaker 4 (00:44):
There, Colonel in England still for the Women's Rugby World Cup.
Got some big games coming up this weekend that women
USA women can qualify for the quarterfinals, but they're going
to need some help. They've got to win big and
get a bonus point victory over Samoe, which is poss spoil,
not challenging. But the real issue is England has to
destroy Australia, which is also possible. But the point different

(01:06):
has got to be a big point swing because I'll
wind up tied and then it comes down to who
scored the most points in the tournament. And Australia whacked
the the samoaside seventy three to Nils. That's a lot
of points to make up anyway, that's the situation, So yeah,
I'm here for that. We've got a couple games weekend,
then Spain plays on Sunday, and then it's the quarter

(01:27):
finals the following week and there we go.

Speaker 3 (01:29):
John, how are things there in New Hampshire and holding
down the studio as ever?

Speaker 2 (01:32):
John Grovener in NASHAUA.

Speaker 5 (01:35):
Doing well up here in Nashville, New Hampshire, they're todd
Before you ask Johnson New brother to Chris new former
governor of the state of New Hampshire, is contemplating a
run for US Senate on this next upcoming election. He
feels pretty confident about getting into this race and winning it.

Speaker 3 (01:54):
Well, what are your thoughts on John? Is there any
any thoughts on him?

Speaker 2 (01:58):
Or how is he like?

Speaker 4 (01:59):
There to say?

Speaker 3 (02:00):
I imagine the sinus are They're well known for sure,
but how are they liked after the most recent governor there?

Speaker 5 (02:07):
Well, I'm not exactly certain how well he's liked with
the general public here in New Hampshire. You know, he
had he had been a representative in first district here
in New Hampshire. Further okay, well in ninety seven to
two thousand and three, I think, and he then he
went to a one term Senate seat, and so he's
thinking about returning. He says, somebody's got to run for
New Hampshire. Somebody's got to stand up for New Hampshire.

(02:29):
He is a critic of Donald Trump, and that has
been brought up to him and he just come in
he said, you know, that's I'm running for New Hampshire
and as far as Donald Trump comes, will cross that
bridge when we get to it. So we'll see how
things go. We'll see, you know. Chris has been kind
of We've seen him kind of ride the middle a
little bit a lot, and sometimes you even wonder if
he was a conservative at times, although he always stood

(02:50):
by our gun right. Some much appreciation for that. And
hopefully if Johnston runs, we'll hear a lot of good
things from him and hopefully he stands like Chris for
freedoms or in New Hampshire as opposed to throwing us
under the bus with the liberal left right.

Speaker 2 (03:05):
Absolutely yeah. And here's the thing.

Speaker 3 (03:06):
You know, people talk about, oh he's criticizing Trump or whatever.
You know, you're the president of the United States. You
should be able to stand a little bit of scrutiny,
if you will, a little bit of criticism, even the
bad stuff that's out there, even if it's if not warranted.
You should be able to withstand that. I mean, me,
sitting on the local school board, I get it. Not
not necessarily every day, but you know, once or twice

(03:27):
a week I get, you know, shots from different people, uh,
people that support him in the past, even people who
don't support me for sure, So you can take a
little bit of criticism, I think.

Speaker 5 (03:36):
So. Look, Donald Trump loves criticism, right, I mean he
always vice for criticisms. Give it to me, because I'll
just spin it back to you and throw it back
in your lap. I don't care one way or another
he's going to use it dre him or against you
or whatever. You know, it's like us, they're comingstance conservatives.
I beg for the criticism. I say, you send your
hate mail, will take it. Doing something right. We haven't
got any hate mail yet, or at least George hasn't

(03:56):
passed any any alarm.

Speaker 2 (03:58):
He's burning it. Maybe I don't know.

Speaker 3 (04:01):
Yeah, So, colonel, what is your assessment on the whole
Russia situation. I see that they're budding up even more
with North Korea and China and India, you know, some
of the US tariffs and our strategies backfiring a little bit.

Speaker 4 (04:14):
It looks like maybe, I think so this has been
the case all along, the media acting like this is
something new, in a new development. The only new development
here is the behavior of the Chinese. Communists are trying
to take credit for defeating imperial Japan the Second World War.
Nothing can be further from the truth. Nothing can be
further from the truth. They played virtually no role. The

(04:35):
role was played by US forces, the Soviets where Johnny
come lately just so they could seize Manchuria, and they
come in late to the contest after Japan was essentially defeated,
and the Kumantang under Chang Kai Shek and the American
Volunteer Forces American Voluntary Forces Group over they played major roles.
The Communists were busy killing other Chinese, and they did

(04:55):
play role defeending Japanese, but they were not the proximate
cause for the Japanese empire ending. That was two nuclear weapons,
one over Nagasaki won over here, Hiroshima and US forces,
you know, island hopping across the Pacific. That's what's spelled
the doom for the Japanese Empire, which was over extended.
But the Communists want to take credit for it, and
the media are stupid, lazy and don't know history, and

(05:17):
so they're pretending like this. This grouping of Shijingping president
for life, Kim Chung aun dictator for life, and Vladimir Putin,
a fascist dictator who just doesn't seem to want to
go away, is something new. Before before the Putin never
launched his conflict against Ukraine. He went to Beijing and
got an agreement from the Chinese communists to buy his

(05:39):
timber and his iron ore and his oil and all
these raw materials and pay him in hard currency, so
that you know, when sanctions came, they would survive. And
that's one reason why Russians have survived since they invaded
three years ago. So that's not new. And of course
the Chinese have always been the saviors of the North Koreans.
They're the ones who crossed the Yaoluo River after MacArthur

(06:00):
violated directions from President Truman. So this is not something new,
it's not something special, it's not something amazing. It's not
it's it's nothing to do with it with the tariffs.
It has everything to do with just a the axis
of evil. It is, to quote George Bush, it's an
access of evil, and it's always been an access of evil.
And so the press have the memory of a of
a two year old. They can't remember anything past what

(06:21):
they had for lunch. And that's the problem. Historians know
what happened to the Second World War, and it's sure
as heck is that the Chinese Communist winning it. They
didn't even they needed if heat a Chang Kai shehak
who was weakened by thirty years of war until nineteen
forty nine, four years after the World War ended. So
they can bite me, right.

Speaker 3 (06:39):
Was that the weakened by the Sino Japanese War? Is
that the one you're referring to?

Speaker 4 (06:44):
Yeah, so Chang Kai shehak, Well, just that, but there's
also civil war before the Communist arose, and basically China
was at war with itself for good three decades before,
from about nineteen twelve onwards until until nineteen forty five.
And then there's two sites fought each other after the
Japanese withdrew from China at the end of the war,
So it took four more years before the Communists could

(07:05):
defeat Chang Kaishak and Klement Tank who were mortally wounded
by fighting for you know, for China all those years.
And so the Communists want to take credit, but they're
just a bunch of what's the word looking for interlopers.
And remember that they were thirty to forty million Chinese
in their so called cultural revolution, which is really more
like genocide, right Clinton.

Speaker 3 (07:27):
Absolutely, I think Truman would have something to say about
how much China played and the two atomic bombs that
he dropped on Japan for sure.

Speaker 4 (07:35):
Yeah. No, the Chinese want to take credit for it
and pretend that no one else was involved. And the Russians,
of course, you know, they aren't the Soviets, but they're
the heirs of the Soviet Empire, and so they're going
to claim that they were also involved. I think I'm
hanging up here a little bit, you guys, get me
a little gap there. I think I can fix that.

Speaker 2 (07:48):
Hang up, no you no, you're you're you're coming and
find them on my end over here.

Speaker 5 (07:55):
He may have proved up well as soon as I
say that, Yeah, yeah, he was having troubles on his end.
Yeah we were get them, won't fine, But that's all right.

Speaker 3 (08:05):
Yeah here we popped back in here in just a second.
So for those who don't know who are just joining us,
the Colonel Chris White still out of the country, undisclosed
location in England right now, actually covering the Rugby Women's
World Cup.

Speaker 2 (08:16):
And there's a colonel. He's back in there. Colonel.

Speaker 3 (08:18):
We were hearing you fine, And as soon as I
said that, you logged off for a second.

Speaker 2 (08:22):
I was like, well, I guess I was wrong.

Speaker 4 (08:24):
Twish still here. I don't know how I got bumped off.

Speaker 6 (08:27):
But.

Speaker 5 (08:29):
Uh oh yeah we're getting some uh now we're getting them.

Speaker 3 (08:33):
Yeah now we're getting yeah. Yeah, now we're getting the
freezing and all that good stuff.

Speaker 4 (08:39):
Hey did you see this?

Speaker 3 (08:40):
John? Today, the former CNN host Don Lemone basically raided
Marjorie Taylor Green's office and demanding a meeting, along with
several other people pretending to be to be peaceful, peaceful actors,
if you will, trying to force their way in, harassing
a number of their staffers, trying to demand a meeting,
and of course whenever the office manager came out and
basically said, listen, we have a formal process of going

(09:03):
about this to actually request a meeting, and basically said, well,
you're not even a resident of her district, you know,
how dare you bust in here and start videoing us
and demanding a meeting and pretending as if you're being
peaceful about it.

Speaker 2 (09:15):
So that's that's Donaldman. Did you see that today?

Speaker 5 (09:18):
No? I did not see that. That's pretty interesting. So
this is like a trend for the below. You remember
that time when Russia and China was having a meeting
in Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton when busted into the
meeting demanded to be a part of it, and I
think they got ousted.

Speaker 2 (09:32):
Yeah, as they should.

Speaker 5 (09:33):
Right, this is a liberal left thing, I guess. I
don't know. We just demand to be parts of things
we don't belong. I don't know, right, right, Well.

Speaker 3 (09:40):
I've had people do that on the left as well.
As you go out and run for public office, like
demand you know your time, demand you listen to them
demand you know, you listen to whatever their comments or
complaints are. And it's like, first off, I'm not in
the office yet, you know, you need to go complain
to the person who's actually holding the office. And they
just love to blister you though up and down once
I down the other.

Speaker 5 (10:01):
Yeah, you know, most most times you go to d C.
If you if you call ahead and make an appointment there,
usually they're very glad to give you an appointment. Now,
if I call Rand Paul's office from here and tell
them I want appointments down as an individual, they'll tell
me to go find your senator. You know you can't.
We can't. We can't be dealing with you. We represent Kentucky.

Speaker 2 (10:19):
That's all.

Speaker 5 (10:20):
I'm fine. But if you're a group of people, an
organization and things like that, most times they'll accommodate you.
They'll they'll fit you in somewhere. And they may not.
They may disregard what you have to say, but they
usually will give you the time.

Speaker 2 (10:31):
Yeah, they give you the cursory three to four minutes ahead.

Speaker 4 (10:37):
But this isn't a visit. This is theater. It's political theater.
Don Lemonhead and his band of mary little lunatics went
there to intentionally cause chaos. None of them should be
allowed in the building. Don Lemon is not a journalist,
he's a political activist. He has no business in the
in the Braver and building whatsoever, So he should never

(10:57):
be allowed there. I've been of the Raver Building. I'm
actually it's probably been in there as well. It's it's
where they house all these folks, and you know, it's
really not a place you should let people like Don
Lemon in there. The guy is just a fraud. He's
always been a fraud. He's a whiny, cryingy, cry little baby.
And look this is just pure theater. They just went
there at the stage and make it look like they're
doing something. The Democrats have no policy, no platform, no

(11:20):
plans from America. This is all they have is disruption
and counting on corrupt judges to violate the Constitution and
pretend that laws override the Constitution. The Constitution is supreme,
and we are going to see several court cases that
Trump administration has lost this week to corrupt judges and
circuit courts. They're going to be overturned by the Supreme Court.

Speaker 5 (11:41):
Just give me, I like the way you word. I
don't know if you caught that, Todd, but it's the
building in which they house please say, because.

Speaker 2 (11:51):
An asylum or something.

Speaker 4 (11:55):
Well, if you've ever if you've ever walked in that hall,
you'll see a lot of Popping's self important clown on
who are just used car salesman in shyster ambulance chasing
lawyers that think they're better than the rest of us,
and they're not. Some of them are rootite, some of
them very intelligent, and some of them very patriotic, but
most of them are just scumbags sitting in Congress, sucking
down a paycheck for decades on it. Speaking to which

(12:17):
the penguin is going to retire, Yeah.

Speaker 3 (12:24):
He doesn't look like he's right out of Central casting
for that role, right.

Speaker 4 (12:29):
Oh he is. He should be in the next Batman movie.

Speaker 2 (12:33):
I mean, think about it.

Speaker 3 (12:35):
You put character and him right beside one another, It's like,
how do you.

Speaker 2 (12:40):
Tell the difference?

Speaker 4 (12:41):
Right? I think I think that Jerry Nadler makes a
better penguin than it.

Speaker 2 (12:48):
Love it.

Speaker 4 (12:51):
Top top top top top top. Right.

Speaker 3 (12:54):
What's funny is whenever he's they catch him on the
street many many times in Manhattan and they'll go up
too many, you know, interview him or or talk to him,
and they'll ask him questions and now use his own
words against him.

Speaker 2 (13:04):
They're like, did you hear that Trump said this and this? Yeah,
I don't really like that. I don't appreciate that.

Speaker 3 (13:08):
It's like, actually, congressman, that's your words, by the way,
and they laugh at him and run away.

Speaker 5 (13:13):
That's funny, you know, the ultimate setup.

Speaker 3 (13:16):
Yeah, well you're actually the one who said that. Well,
wait a minute, I'll have to look at that. I
don't have to go back and review that. Maybe you're
using out of context. I don't think so.

Speaker 2 (13:24):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (13:24):
Anyway, the Epstein victims, we're going to bring that up
real quick, and I'm not going to try to harp
on it. But Epstein victims press press lawmakers to support
BUILD to release hidden files. UH say, Americans will be appalled,
and you know, I imagine, yes, they will be appalled.

Speaker 1 (13:36):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (13:37):
But my contention is with with the whole thing people
ran on their there being files and you know, all
this all this stuff, and all of a sudden, what
we get is a I hate to use this word,
big nothing burger, Right, That's what we pretty much got.

Speaker 4 (13:49):
Out of it.

Speaker 3 (13:49):
I mean, you got a few few things here and there,
but what was promised of being in being there isn't there.

Speaker 5 (13:56):
Apparently, it's from my understanding, they released thirty three thoughts,
thirty three hundred pages of toilet paper more or less.
I mean, it's useless, and the whole purpose was just
to try to pacify the people. You know, it's like,
we're not stupid people. It's we're not stupid. Don't treat
it's like we're dumb. We already know all this stuff,
then don't don't release it, like you're doing us a favor.

Speaker 3 (14:17):
Right, And they had the big event, you know, several
months ago back at the White House, people came out
with you know, here's the you know, list one or
whatever it was, document number one release and where.

Speaker 2 (14:26):
Did it go? You know, nothing after that? And I
get it.

Speaker 4 (14:29):
You can't.

Speaker 2 (14:30):
I get it.

Speaker 3 (14:30):
You can't release people's names who maybe or may not
have done something they have to say on trial. I
get that, but you know, there should be able to
wait to redact certain things and release a lot more
information if there's stuff there.

Speaker 2 (14:41):
I don't know. Last I want to talk about it,
but I don't know.

Speaker 5 (14:45):
Did you hear it, Okay, follow you got to follow
that up with with this breaking news man about five
six hours ago, about nine women that were victims of
Jeffrey Epstein said they had enough and they know who
was there, and they remember who was there, and they're
thinking about called constructing their own non effe initial list
of people that have been there because they want they
want justice, you know, And this is what we talked

(15:05):
about the past, is it's necessary to seek justice in
matters like these. This was all. This was a terrible
crime against people. It's a crime against society when you
think about it. But these people were directly involved in
this was a terrible crime against them. They deserve it.
They deserve to have the justice right.

Speaker 2 (15:19):
Oh, I agree.

Speaker 4 (15:20):
I agree. Where have they've been throughout the past five years?
Why are they speaking up now? Well? What's I mean?
They had four years under Biden not being prosecuted. Why now,
I mean.

Speaker 5 (15:32):
I'm not I don't know. They may have been working
with members of Congress that have been pushing it off.
I had no idea, Chris. I would like to get
hold of some of them and invite them to tell explain.

Speaker 4 (15:39):
That to us, get it. It's a horrific experience for
those involved. But this seems very politically self serving at
the moment. And again, you know, I lost some viewers
because their feelings weren't because I got sick of people
droning on about the Epstein files with no evidence whatsoever.
People coming into my chat making silly arguments, and I

(16:00):
talked about the Epstein files, and I'm like, why are
you people so obsessed with this? You know, if that's
your obsession, go elsewhere. I mean, we've reported on the case,
We've given the current situation, and there's nothing to see here,
nothing to talk about. Yeah, but the Trump's covering up.
Trump's not cover up anything. Trump. Trump even asked the
courts to release the documents. Of course, grand jury testimonies
not gonna be released. And now Congress is interjecting itself

(16:22):
in a place where it shouldn't be, and they're releasing
files and thirty three thousand pages additional pages on top
of the stuff that the Trump administration released a few
months ago, when all the extreme right wing people said, oh,
we're giddy or yi, and then they found nothing, so
they're feeling they started attacking Trump. I mean, it's not
Trump's fault that there was nothing in the mature released
because Trump didn't generate this stuff. The justice system did.

(16:43):
But anyway, the whole thing is salacious and I find
it quite annoying that it's still going on. And I'm
glad they released it because I'm tired of hearing people
moan about it and once again they'll find nothing. So
if people have got something they can offer evidence of
people who've committed some sort of crime, then let's get
with it. It's been five years. Epstein's been dead forever,
like it's going to hurt his feelings or he's hiding
in the island in the cribbe.

Speaker 5 (17:02):
And he's been dead forever. But it's been a little while.
Now there is people like Thomas Massey who's calling for
the release. There are other files they have not been released,
and Thomas Massey and a few other members are calling
for the release of these other files, but they need
they need the majority of vote to get them, and
they haven't got it yet. So maybe down the road

(17:23):
we'll see something come up. And that's actually, you know,
something substantial.

Speaker 4 (17:29):
I mean, what other files grand jury files, grand jury
testimony cannot be released. Federal judges that repeatedly. Three of
them said no, and so they can try to shop
this thing around. The house has released thirty three thousand
records on top of the Trump and these are from
the Justice Department presumably. So what files are aft there?
The Justice Department files? Are they? I don't know, are
they somebody's notebooks?

Speaker 5 (17:50):
I know they took a load of information out of
that mansion, you know, when they raided his house, they
took stuff. They had CDs at the hind quarters. They
I forgot how many hours of CEDA they had. It
was a phenomenal amount they had. Of course, if it's
got you know, pornographic material on it, you can't release
that to the public, no, but you can make a
statement at least you know, hey, we found some you know,

(18:12):
notable people.

Speaker 3 (18:14):
Yeah, yeah, you know, ten thousand hours of whatever kind
of porn or whatever you know that was made there
on premise.

Speaker 4 (18:21):
Well, I mean, guys, guys, guys, that's all very important.
It's all sellations. It's criminal activity the justice needs prosecuted.
But it's someone interested in national security and politics. I'm
much more concerned about the buttloads of documents and material
they seize from John Bolton's residence. A man who betrayed
this country, a man who compromised top secret class on
information a la Hillary Clinton. That's something I'm much worse.

(18:44):
And there's no discussion of that in the press, nothing whatsoever,
because once again, the Epstein files have come up to
cloud over paper over the real news that's breaking out
right now, which is John Bolton, And that's not even
being talked about by the media, but they're talking about it.

Speaker 3 (18:57):
Well, let me ask you about John Bolton. They didn't
arrest and they raided and took out a lot of documents.
And somebody said the other day I was watching something.

Speaker 2 (19:04):
On Fox Days.

Speaker 3 (19:05):
It was a sound bite basically saying, oh, it was
the information that we were after. We weren't after him
specifically the documents. And I'm like, yeah, but if he
had the documents, he's the one who committed the crime.
He should be going away with the documents and handcuffs right.

Speaker 4 (19:20):
Well, you would think, I mean, when we take the
time to hunt down and prosecute former Navy service members
who've left after their enlistment because they took a photograph
of their buddies inside a submarine, not revealing any classified
equipment or classified information, but sending them to jail for
compromising classified information for twelve months is convicted felon destroying
the man's life. But we let Hillary Clinton walk in

(19:42):
because she stole top secret Sense compartment information, compromising billions
of dollars worth of collection capability, and putting the station
a risk over and over again. That has the arrogance
to say, did you wipe the computerise?

Speaker 3 (19:53):
Yeah, with the yeah, yeah, come on, and she knew
exactly what she was doing whenever she did that, yeah,
oh yeah.

Speaker 4 (19:59):
Of course they're all like this because she knows she
was untouchable. But no one ever go after her. They'll
never go after her. They'll never go after Biden for
his crimes. They're not going to go after Peter Struck,
Lisa Page, James Comy, any of these clowns who betrayed
their oath to the Constitution, to the nation, who perverted
the means of justice, who committed perjury in front of

(20:21):
the FISA court to get warrants against Carter Page and
against General Flynn on the flimsy evidence of a cooked up,
bogus fake dossier, and then relied on Five Eyes partners
to spy on American personnel in violenced the Constitution using
our five Eyes partners to spy on Americans, which is illegal.
By the way, I can tell you that I know

(20:42):
because I worked in that community. Nothing's happening to any
of these people involved this. There's nothing happening to anybody
in the BIBE regime who who used Twitter and used
Facebook and Instagram and YouTube to silence the speech of
Americans and violations the First Amendment. These are issues people
should be talking about. These are criminals that must be
hunted down and put in orange jumpsuits and spend the

(21:03):
rest of the natural life in prison or face of
death penalty, because these people are a threat to democracy.
Not Donald Trump, not the MAGA movement, not conservatives.

Speaker 2 (21:12):
But I agree with you real quick.

Speaker 3 (21:14):
Somebody in one of the chants said, five eyes question mark,
I know what it means.

Speaker 2 (21:17):
Can you explain it real quick? Five eyes?

Speaker 4 (21:20):
Sure? Five eyes is euphemism for the five Anglo Saxon
countries that share information in the signals intelligence world. So
signals intercept information and share it. No, no, yeah, we
can look it up on the internet. Yeah, but it's
but it's the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and
New Zealand, so those countries, so you'll find that that

(21:42):
we can have Americans working inside those top secret facilities
in the United Kingdom, in Australia, in New Zealand, in
Canada and vice versa. And so friends, I worked in
our security agency and we had laison officers from all
those countries, and I dealt with them all the time,
and I visited some of those countries on occasion to
visit their facilities and to facilitate things we're working on. So, yeah,

(22:03):
it's called the five Eyes because they're yeah, spine five eyes.
And we had we had famously, famously, the British had
someone from Cheltenham, which the headquarters of GCHQ, which is
the Government Communications Headquarters which does what NSA does except
for Britain, and some one of these leftist hate winkers
disclosed top secret information collected through signals intelligence, compromising about

(22:25):
a fourteen billion dollar acquisition program US had developed and
making it almost useless because they hated George Bush during
the Iraq campaign. So five eyes is what we're talking
about there.

Speaker 3 (22:35):
So anyway, right right, real quick, We're going to stick
a national Scooter pete hexss. He is your stark wanting
to drug traffic is following US military strike on Venezuelan vessel,
which I looked at that. I'm like, it looked like
to be nothing more than a glorified bass boat that
the Navy took out. You know, maybe I saw a
bad video or something.

Speaker 4 (22:57):
Well, you know it's in justing you said that, because
I got the impression it was like some big ship
or something like that cargo ship and eleven people are killed.
I'm like, what about the rest of them? Then I
saw the pictures and that it looked like somebody had
something put on a lake to go bass fishing, and
I'm like, well, it's.

Speaker 3 (23:12):
Like, how is that thing going to make it to
the United States. I'm like, they're probably gonna sink first.
I would just watch it sink and then pick the
people up and say, yeah, it didn't work out for
you to return them to shore.

Speaker 2 (23:22):
You didn't have to kill them.

Speaker 5 (23:23):
I mean, takes more money than them and be done
with it, right.

Speaker 4 (23:28):
I suspected off the coast of Venezuela there are a
lot of heavily and narct tyres in intoxicated sea life
right sea life right now.

Speaker 2 (23:36):
Because they're having a good time to fish.

Speaker 4 (23:41):
Fishers swim inside.

Speaker 2 (23:43):
Now, what are your thoughts?

Speaker 3 (23:44):
And I saw some some stuff on social media other
day basically criticizing Trump and Pete he's at the d
D for for using, you know, US forces in this
type of manner.

Speaker 2 (23:54):
What what are your thoughts on that as a defense expert.

Speaker 4 (23:59):
Well, it comes down the question of how you classify
the threat. And of course euphem is in the War
on drugs has been used since the nineteen eighties. We
have wars that are undeclared. Korea was a right, Korea
was a was a war that was undeclared. We never
declared war in Korea, but it was a war nonetheless.
And I don't know that we ever declared war on

(24:19):
Vietnam North Vietnam, but we did fight a war there.
So you can't argue that the war on drugs is
a war. It's just against not formal nation states as such,
with a few exceptions, So in that situation that makes
a legitimate I'm a little surprised that that they blew
the thing up. You normally we try to intercept them,

(24:40):
and I'm not sure why we didn't just try to
intercept unless they're trying to see the message. And I
think they sent a very clear message. This week, we
had a major narco traffic from Mexico convicted and sentenced
to life in prison in the United States and for
that offered testimony is allocution. And he said, you know, hey,
for years, I've just paid off the military, the police,
the judges in Mexico. We get away with wherever want Mexico,

(25:00):
basically saying that Mexico is a narco terroristate. That's basically
what he said. So this is huge development, both the
life sentence for that narco trafficker from Mexico and this
boat being blown out of the water off Venezuela. Of
course they're losing their mind because Trump sent all these
boats down there. But there's a bigger message here. It's
not just to the narco traffickers, it's also to Venezuela,
which was the intent. Maduro's paranoid. He thinks that the

(25:24):
trumpdministration is going to try to do regime change. But
Trump has never done regime change. He's just defeated his
enemies on the battle flight and moved on.

Speaker 2 (25:31):
Absolutely.

Speaker 3 (25:32):
Yeah, but I guess the idea is you know, go
off their coast the international waters. You know, don't let
them move anything anywhere unless you allow it.

Speaker 4 (25:38):
Basically, yeah, well he said, you know, let's be a warning,
and they put it in all caps and a social
media said, you know, you guys, don't mess around with America.

Speaker 3 (25:49):
This ain't gonna work, right, absolutely, folks. You're listening to
Commassist Conservators right here on w seven fifteen ninety eight
to ninety five point three FM, and we're live every
Wednesday night from seven to nineties. And you can also
catch us out on the internet at w sm N
dot Live. That's WSN dot Live. Joined the coast Colonel
Chris White, who's over there in England. I guess he's
going to stick around for the first hour. And John
Grovner has ever holding down the.

Speaker 2 (26:10):
Studio, getting a little dark there. I like the lights
behind you there, John.

Speaker 5 (26:16):
Yeah, I can brighten it up a little bit if
I want to. I got the oh, the Christmas lights.

Speaker 4 (26:22):
It's fine. It's it's starting to look a little bit
like Christmas. That's what I was thinking, right.

Speaker 2 (26:28):
Absolutely.

Speaker 3 (26:28):
Well, this secretary statement, going back to the Venezuela strike,
basically said we're not going to sit back anymore, or
sit back and take it anymore, essentially alluding to the
fact that you know, there's probably more strikes in the
offing if you will moving forward. And I think it
is like you said, Colonel, it's sending a message to
the president there and saying, listen, your time is up.

(26:49):
You probably should move on because you know you got
nothing at this point.

Speaker 2 (26:52):
We're not going to mess around with you anymore.

Speaker 4 (26:56):
Well, it's funny should mention that because I watch an
episode of The Bang Theory recently and there's a line
in there in which Sheldon then someone else says, you know,
because you know they I think until Will Wheatney said
you probably should just go, and then later Amy you
probably should just go to raj So I'm just saying
to Maduro, you probably should.

Speaker 2 (27:15):
Just at this point, Yeah, your position is untenable. You
should move.

Speaker 4 (27:22):
Exactly. Yeah. I mean look that, you know, the history
of Latin America is one of sadness. I mean, we've
had countries that are the fourth largest economy of the
world in the nineteen thirties Argentina, and now it's been
a basket piece for fifty sixty years. After fascists took
over the country in the nineteen thirties. Venezuela is one
of the biggest oil producers and one of the wealthiest
nations in Latin America. And now it's a place where

(27:44):
people eat rats out of garbage cans. And eight million
Venezuelans have fled, many of them to the United States.
And I wish they'd go home to Venezuela. But as
long as a self serving, autocratic fascist dictator like Maduro
runs the country, then they're not going to go.

Speaker 2 (28:00):
You know, think about this.

Speaker 3 (28:00):
In our own country, we have people and I had
a call from somebody today, uh, you know who was
relaying a message to me.

Speaker 2 (28:08):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (28:09):
They wanted to do this anonymously, and they're they're they're afraid.
Well they're not afraid of me, but they're afraid if
if I talk to somebody about the issue, I may
use their name and then all of a sudden, they'll
be reprising against And I'm like, you know, you think
about that.

Speaker 2 (28:21):
People are afraid in.

Speaker 3 (28:22):
This country, the United States, And I'm thinking to myself, well,
you probably have the wrong people in office. You's probably
une like them if you will the next next go around.

Speaker 2 (28:31):
If you're too afraid.

Speaker 3 (28:32):
This wasn't somebody that I represent, It was somebody from
a different district asking some questions because they're afraid to
actually go to their person that represents them. And I'm like,
probably the wrong person to have an office. Probably should
kick them out of office next go around, and we
have an election coming up just in a you know,
just this next year, less.

Speaker 2 (28:47):
Than a year away.

Speaker 4 (28:51):
As you can, you can use the phrase.

Speaker 2 (28:53):
You probably can just go yeah.

Speaker 3 (28:56):
I'm probably use you should probably just go yeah, but
afraid of bringing up to their their representative. And I'm like,
this is kind of like dick dictators in like Venezuela
and other places. You know, this is like, you know,
if you had an issue, you wouldn't bring it up
to Potin because they probably put you to death, you
know what i mean, Like or disappear you with some
sort of mysterious cancer that you know you didn't know
you have, you know, that kills you within ten days.

Speaker 4 (29:20):
Yeah, that's uh, what are you gonna say? What are
you gonna say?

Speaker 3 (29:25):
And and and that's just one of those things like
this is how this country goes in those that direction
if we don't vote out bad people and just continue
to go along, sit on our hands, don't don't speak up?
You know, uh, you know, this is how people that
have ill intent gain power.

Speaker 5 (29:42):
I think Americans become weak there what you talk about
about people feeling reprise on all this other stuff. You know,
don't mention my name because of my black clash. Stop
being so weak? Gross fine man?

Speaker 2 (29:53):
Right?

Speaker 5 (29:53):
I mean, what happened to men in this country? It's
time for men to be men again.

Speaker 2 (29:56):
And it's funny is similar situations.

Speaker 4 (30:00):
You know.

Speaker 3 (30:00):
I see people that post on social media talking about
the Second Amendment in case your government becomes tyrannical. I've
even had some of those people call me and ask
me questions and it's like, why didn't you reach out
to your person? Well, they're too afraid. It's like, so
you talk a big game about the Second Amendment, but
you're too afraid that you're your local representative is a tyrant.
You know, I thought you were a big two a guy.
I know, I saying, don't kill the guy, But you

(30:21):
know where did the tough guy go?

Speaker 2 (30:22):
You know what I mean?

Speaker 5 (30:23):
I see a lot of people with a lot of
big talk until it's time to do something, and all
of a suddenly they cow we're back looking around waiting
for somebody else to do it. It's like, come on, man,
you put it all out there, let's go. You know
the one.

Speaker 3 (30:34):
They're the ones that say you'll find out, you'll find out.

Speaker 2 (30:37):
It's like you never find out because they never do anything.
You'll find out. No another one.

Speaker 4 (30:42):
You know, John, do you know what caused that? Right? John?
Do you know what causes that? Right? You said, where
are the real Manette? Those who those who live off
the municipal water supply are ingesting far too much estrogen
from all the birth control pills are being flushed into
our water system, and then the water being treated, the
estrogen is on its way back into the bodies of.

Speaker 5 (31:04):
Just kind of throwing that out.

Speaker 4 (31:06):
Actually I'm being facetious, but actually there's truth to it.
They've seen deformed fish maw. You know, they've got the
wrong sort of behavior because of the estrogen chemicals that
have made into the water system because of birth control pills.
Yeh comes out in the urine. Oh, I was being
facetious about the dudes.

Speaker 5 (31:26):
But what you're talking about, though, there's some some truth
behind plasticization. So we're drinking out of plastic bottles for
decades now, and it's getting into our systems and stuff,
and it's supposed to be lowering the testosterone levels and men.

Speaker 4 (31:40):
Right, I don't know about that, man. I take you.
I take eighty grams of testosterone every three hours.

Speaker 5 (31:47):
Right, you don't want to know what Chris is lifting weights.

Speaker 4 (31:50):
I got a little bit of I got a little
bit of roid rage going on.

Speaker 2 (31:55):
Pounds each arm.

Speaker 4 (31:56):
Right, that's right, speak the look, you know, doing the
right thing. Look, uh, Todd, I've done it. We've stepped
up and run for office. And I spent a buttload
of my life savings to run for office last year
in a fruitless effort against a corrupt political party, which
I didn't was corrupt until it was already in the
middle of the campaign.

Speaker 2 (32:14):
That's that's how it works.

Speaker 3 (32:15):
And it's always the the the most upstanding, you know,
goodie Republican that that behind the scenes, you know, is
one of the most dangerous and vile people that that
are that that are out there.

Speaker 2 (32:26):
And I see it in Tennessee on.

Speaker 3 (32:27):
A regular basis, on a regular basis.

Speaker 2 (32:31):
But these are people that get the applause whenever they
go to places. You know, it's like, oh, somebody's so great.

Speaker 3 (32:37):
No so and so is actually horrible and would probably
eat your children if given the opportunity, or or if
they thought it would be a few more votes for them.

Speaker 4 (32:45):
You know.

Speaker 5 (32:45):
That's the thing about we've talked about this on the
show before is uh uh I almost got the word here,
social sociology and psych h.

Speaker 2 (33:00):
Psychopathy, psychopathy.

Speaker 5 (33:02):
Thank you throw me the big ones. Yeah, people on
level psychopy have an advantage, right, and a lot of
times that's what they seek is positions of authority, doctors, lawyer, lawyers, cops,
political office. It doesn't mean everybody that's a copper doctor
or lawyer and political office is on the level of psychopathy.
But it's hard to diagnose people in psychopathy too, so
they give them, you know, evaluations and stuff that they

(33:24):
give them give get them into positions, say law enforcement,
but you may not know what you're looking at when
you're doing so, because they're that good, you know, they
hide it that well. They probably don't even know, you know,
it's but they have advantages because they don't have the
same emotional intelligence other people have, you know, they don't
they don't function that way.

Speaker 3 (33:44):
Right, Go ahead, colonel, I gotta tell you everything.

Speaker 4 (33:50):
All I need to know I learned from kindergarten copy.

Speaker 5 (33:58):
I never watched that. But that's straight to the point.

Speaker 4 (34:02):
It's not done to them all.

Speaker 5 (34:05):
It's not did you set here?

Speaker 4 (34:08):
That's funny.

Speaker 5 (34:09):
He's talking to you, Chris. He says, let's explain why
fishing this year was a bust. The fish was temperamental.

Speaker 2 (34:14):
Yeah, that's funny.

Speaker 4 (34:18):
So what did he say the fish had?

Speaker 5 (34:20):
Yeah?

Speaker 4 (34:24):
Yeah, we joke around, but folks, there's been real studies
on that. There's been real studies on that about about
fish and certain bodies of water like in like the
estuaries and and and riverine and the chestpea based stuff
like that, having you know, high levels of estri and
compounds as a consequence. I mean, I was joking about
the men, but it's a true story that you know,
this stuff doesn't get broken down necessarily and it winds

(34:47):
up in urine and it works its way out. So
pretty scary stuff there. We have altered our world in
ways that are more frightened than the climate. Zellets want
to talk about. They want to talk about us change
the weather, and we've actually changed your local environments with landfills,
and with our sewage systems and with our dense populations
and things like that. It's just anyway. But I don't
want to scare people here. The more you know, the

(35:07):
more you're If you.

Speaker 2 (35:09):
Don't know about it, you don't know to be scared.
So you know, I guess ignorance is blessed, right.

Speaker 5 (35:13):
I've actually heard people say I wished I could go
back to being ignorant. I wish I didn't know what
I know now.

Speaker 3 (35:19):
Once you see, you can't unsee, as the saying goes,
for sure.

Speaker 4 (35:22):
Yeah, so repmemblican, And yeah, I think in fact, in fact,
sorry Todd, there's a little breakup there. I didn't realize
I was talking of you there. In fact, I think
that if if all the data on the Epstein case
was actually something was released and we knew it was
all out there, some people regret finding out what they
found out.

Speaker 2 (35:43):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (35:43):
Probably, so I think you're right. Uh, this story, this
story right here sparked a thought.

Speaker 2 (35:49):
Here.

Speaker 3 (35:49):
Republicans in Washington are actually looking to close loopholes across
the nation that gives driving privileges to illegals. And last
week I was in Tampa for the American Legion National Convention,
and as I was trying to leave, pulled up my
driver's license, as I've done dozens of times, handed it
to the guy and he said, oh, you know that
this doesn't work for travel, and I'm like why not.

(36:12):
He's like, oh, it's it's not one of the what
do they call the special idea?

Speaker 2 (36:16):
And I'm like, really, I said, I said, I thought
it was.

Speaker 3 (36:19):
And I looked at it. He said, look right that
it says not for real ID purposes. I'm like, do
you realize I told him, I said, you realize how
many times I've traveled on this? I said, I traveled
here to Tampa on this ID. And he's like, yeah,
you're not supposed to be. I'm like, that's your guys system.
You guys allowed.

Speaker 2 (36:33):
And of course I had other ideas to be able
to travel on Uh.

Speaker 4 (36:36):
Well, of course you had a military retired ID card,
which is real ID. That's all you need.

Speaker 3 (36:40):
And I've had that one turned down a couple of
times before. In fact, I had it turned on the
way to Tampa. I had that I D turned down.
I had to use my driver's license and it worked
no problem. And I'm like, man, I've used this non
real ID probably for at least a dozen flights now,
unbeknownst to me, and I'm like, holy cow, it's not
a real idea. I didn't even notice it's in nine
print right there, not for real ID purposes. So I'm

(37:02):
going to go maybe this week or next week and
get a real ID.

Speaker 4 (37:07):
Well. I know it's because Pennsylvania gives it the options.
One of the last states to come around and actually
produce real ID. You can get a real ID for
one hundred dollars or a driver's license for twenty five dollars.
Give them the fact that w US passport and military
ID card. That was a pretty easy decision to make. Yeah, yeah,
I'll go twenty five.

Speaker 3 (37:25):
I'll go upgrade because and I probably should carry my
passport with me even on domestic trips. I'm probably going
to start doing that. But I will go get the
real ID here in Tennessee. I think it's only like
twenty some bucks though, no big deal.

Speaker 4 (37:37):
That's one hundred and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania they they
fleeceh it pretty good. They're making excuses. I'm sure one
day they'll probably stop issuing, but there's no reason to
issue real ID because I have two biometric IDs, so anyway,
but yeah, there's just another way to take money out
of people's pocket, another way to track our movements so
they can use it against us.

Speaker 3 (37:55):
Yep, right, oh oh absolutely, But it was just kind
of funny that, you know, here's TSA. You know something,
we spend billions of dollars on security and all this stuff,
and we have to have the real idea to get
it get through security. And I've been doing it, you know,
probably for the past couple two three years on number
of flights, like I said, a dozen flights, probably less
than a dozen, but at least ten flights I've used
it on over the past couple of years. And you know,

(38:17):
probably shouldn't have been doing that, but TSA allowed it
to go through no problem.

Speaker 2 (38:20):
I think.

Speaker 5 (38:21):
I think it's like a kick in the teeth. That's
real ID nonsense, because you know, the only passed that
long in two thousand and five. They couldn't implement it
until twenty years later. Now that it doesn't matter let
a bunch of illegals into the country anyway, I mean,
what's the point.

Speaker 4 (38:35):
Right, Yeah, it's a hundred percent of that, you know,
it's kind of like when you're in active duty, you're
automatically enrolled in TSA PRE so you don't have to
enroll or pay for that. Because you're serving the military,
you're a trusted agent. And I was told by the
military that that's the case for your retirement because you
have a permanent dd ID number now not just a

(38:56):
security number, and that that works after I retired for
the first if retired, every time I flew, I got
a body cab research because I wasn't TSA pre I'm like,
what are you talking about. It's mighty well, sir, that's
you're not in TSA PREX. So I finally had to
go and pay to get into TSA pre and and
I finally found out why, And the department says they can't.
They can't vouch for you. You can't vouch for me. You

(39:18):
give me a damn retirement check every month. I'm still
a colonel. I'm subject to recall. If I commit a crime,
at your decision, you can activate me and bring back
an act ude to prosecute me for that crime. You know,
if I commit a civil crime on a military installation
of federal property, they can order me back to active
duty and utadd to prosecute us. What do you can't
vouch for me? What a croc? That is? So I

(39:38):
got to pay this stupid thing which runs out after
five years. The fact, I think next year is when
it runs out, and go do this TSA pre thing,
which is like rect obleed.

Speaker 2 (39:45):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (39:46):
So anyway, just I kind of digressed, but I thought
that was kind of important.

Speaker 3 (39:50):
I did the pre check whenever it came out of
several years ago, and I've reupted recently, and I do
it because I used to do a lot of international travel,
like not not quite as much as you, colonel, but
on a regular basis. And I just love being able
to just slide right through, you know, and get in
and get out. And now I have to wait in
these long queues. I just don't like that.

Speaker 4 (40:10):
Well, the thing for me is it's invariably, it seems like,
whether it's Atlanta or somewhere else, every time I arrive,
the TSC pre line is not close, you know. I
mean I've been Atlanta like four times and I go
to get the TSA pre and it's closed. I mean,
well we shut down at seven pm or whatever time.
Like then why am I paying for this? You know?
And if I go to Harrisburg, you know, you know,

(40:32):
if I go to the TSA pre there's like no
one in front of me. If I go to the
other line, there's like two people.

Speaker 3 (40:36):
So yeah, yeah, what about with that regional airport here, Yeah,
it's you know, the lines to the left is like.

Speaker 2 (40:41):
Three or four people. The one on the rights usually nobody.

Speaker 3 (40:44):
So I like, I like having it so I don't
have to because I'm usually you know, get to the
plane with just a few minutes to spare on occasion,
and I love to be able just to fly through security.
That that helps out locally.

Speaker 4 (40:56):
Two advantages to it. You don't have to take your
shoes off, but that's been rescinded now, you know, the
shoe bomber's been such a so long ago, So no
one has to take their shoes off, and you don't have
to pull your laptop out of the So that's it.

Speaker 5 (41:06):
That was to prevent people from getting athletes foot.

Speaker 4 (41:10):
Now they had Richard, Well, it's because it's because they
have advanced enough sensors can detect that when you walk
through the full body skin, and they had them for years,
but they were still forcing people to take their shoes
off because they're a bunch of perverts.

Speaker 5 (41:23):
Yeah, I remember doing that. I'm like the first time
I went to the airport and I had to take
my shoes off, I'm like, I gotta stop flying. There's
gotta be a better way to travel.

Speaker 2 (41:30):
Yeah, well there's no no quicker.

Speaker 5 (41:33):
They haven't. They haven't done that whole big scotty thing yet.

Speaker 4 (41:37):
So I get your own plane, and that's a better
way because you come in a different terminally. I'll go
through to that nonsense.

Speaker 5 (41:43):
When I need to do. What I need to do
is become a billionaire so I can do private flights
and I don't have to worry about any of it.

Speaker 4 (41:49):
John Trifault is not a billionaire. He's got his own jet.

Speaker 5 (41:51):
Yeah, but I like a billionaire aspect better.

Speaker 3 (41:54):
Yeah, didn't Quanta give him an airplane. Quantas gave him
an airplane to fly with with their logo on it
and him an out outfit, made him.

Speaker 2 (42:01):
An official pilot of Quantus.

Speaker 3 (42:03):
It should have been decades ago, probably now, at least
a decade ago more.

Speaker 4 (42:07):
Really, I mean, that's that's pretty crazy. Quantus has never
had a fatal crash. You think they wouldn't want to
take that risk with a Hollywood.

Speaker 5 (42:12):
A, right.

Speaker 2 (42:14):
But because they were negotiating with and they called him up.

Speaker 3 (42:16):
They're like, hey, you know what you know he's talking
about loves the aircraft, loves he loves their you know,
I guess he collects pilot stuff or whatever.

Speaker 2 (42:23):
And he's like that.

Speaker 3 (42:23):
The CEO is like, hey, John, we we'd love for
you to you know, would love for you to fly
one of our planes.

Speaker 2 (42:28):
He's like how much? Basically, you know, John was thinking
how much did they get? How am I gonna have to.

Speaker 3 (42:32):
Pay basically to put their logo on my plane, which
I'd love to have it on my plane. They're like, no, John,
you don't understand you're going to advertise for us. We
want to pay you. We want to give you a plane.
So they gave him an actual plane.

Speaker 4 (42:44):
Well, I mean, look, all I can think is if
I'd be on the plane in the cockpit with with
the John Travolta, It'd be like Vinnie Barbarino. I'd say, hey, John,
could you lower the landing gear? And he'd be like
what me?

Speaker 2 (42:57):
Yeah, great show?

Speaker 4 (42:58):
By the way, you know, so I how I would
play the world horses chet mister Cutta, mister Cutcha.

Speaker 2 (43:04):
Yeah, in the sweat Hog.

Speaker 4 (43:06):
That was a great show. Yet, so you've been keeping
up with.

Speaker 2 (43:08):
The the election in New York, the mayoral election.

Speaker 4 (43:14):
Yes, I understand that this. Apparently it's been leaked to
that some folks in the Trump administration are considering offering
Eric Adams a post in the Trump administration if he
would just withdraw from the race. I'm not sure the
logic behind that, because if he's in the race, that's
another ten percent of the Democratic vote that gets carved off,
which gives Curtis Lee what a better chance to win
in my view. But I'm not really sure what they're
going after there unless they think that if that, I mean,

(43:37):
I think it's an effort by the trumpminstration make sure
the Democrat actually wins so that Cloma becomes the mayor.
That's pretty frightening. I'd rather take my chance and get
Curtis Sliwa. But they're all worried. Look, I mean, imagine this.
We are becoming like the United Kingdom. Our cities which
have a minority alien population are being taken over by
people who hate Christians, who hate white people, who hate

(43:59):
the West yep we have Minneapolis going with a Muslim
mayor that they're gonna elect from Somalia. We'll have New
York with a Muslim mayor. People that hate not Muslims
don't hate the West, but these people that are Muslims
do hate the West. It's like the mayor of right,
you know, city con It's no different. And in England,
all the major cities English are minorities. In Leicester, in Manchester,

(44:23):
in Birmingham and London. The English minorities in their strategy.

Speaker 5 (44:27):
I mean, listen, these fundamentals I just call them fundamental
Muslim Islamist or Muslims or whatever, gihadists, but that's their
strategies to try to heal over it from the inside
for your offices and start changing your governments into their favor.
I mean, we've heard elmano elan Omar say herself that
she was there to serve Somalia. She's not in there

(44:48):
for the United States. She's not in there for Minnesota.
She's in there. She said that Somali's interest will be
of her concerns as long as she's in office. This
is what's happening in the United States, this is what
happened in Foreign kin, we are under takeover. People just
refuse to identify that. This is why I've been outspoken
against it. You know, I've said it pretty loudly at
times kind of rudely, but I've said it. You know,

(45:11):
these guys aren't nice people. We're dealing. We're playing with
fire here because we're being too nice to them. You know,
there's nothing wrong with people being peaceful Muslims and doing
their thing, and you don't have nothing to say bad
about them. But these jihadists are. They're a problem for us,
and they're going to continue be a problem for us,
and they're setting up communities in the United States in
various places.

Speaker 2 (45:32):
Yeah, absolutely, in a big way. Go ahead, Caryl.

Speaker 4 (45:36):
Yeah, let's talk about Ilian Omar. Ilean Omar, who claimed
that she hasn't made money while she's in Congress, is
an outright liar. She's scoffed to claim she became rich
while serving the House, but her financial disclosed report she's
now worth thirty million dollars. When she filed her financial
disclosed report in twenty twenty four, she's at her assets

(45:58):
were less than two hundred thousand dollars, her income and
her net worth is increased by three thousand and five
percent in one year. She has partnerships in a winery
and a venture capital firm, partly by her third husband,
Tim Minette. I wonder if they're all three at the
same time, you know, but three husbands. Yeah, so's she's
a native of Somalia who dis is America and spew's

(46:19):
racial hatred and anti Christian venom and anti Semitic venom
while sitting in Congress. And she's worth thirty million dollars,
soaring from two hundred thousand last year. This is an
investigation begging to be done, a begging to be done. Yeah,
so this is you know, she's a prominent member of
the far left House Squad, and she's been calling for
higher tax on wealthy people. Well she's one of those

(46:41):
extremely wealthy people. Yeah, and she's she's these people are
such frauds. Thirty million dollars. Thirty million dollars just one year.
What's going on here? Yeah?

Speaker 2 (46:52):
Thirty million.

Speaker 3 (46:52):
I think about this, if you had, you know, barring
winning the lottery, power ball, whatever, if you come up
with thirty million dollars in a year, the IR going
to come and say, what's going on here? Colonel Chris White,
why do you have thirty million dollars basically overnight?

Speaker 2 (47:05):
How did that happen?

Speaker 3 (47:06):
They're probably going to freeze your assets, maybe even take
them that money, and you're gonna have to go through
a long court battle to prove that you got it
not ill not ill gotten gains here, that you got
it legally through justified means.

Speaker 4 (47:18):
Yeah, this anti Christian, anti white, betrayer of America and
who he is her first loyalty to Somalia, as she
stated over and over again while getting sucker in this country.
You know this is this is just wrong and so
many levels wrong, and you know it looked. I mean
I don't regret somebody becoming instantly wealthy, but a member
of Congress going from two hundred thousand dollars in net

(47:39):
value last year to thirty million this year, I mean
that that that that warrants scrutiny. I mean every year
that I was in the Army, that I was involved
with contracts, which is most of the last twenty years
of my career, I had to file a financial disclosure
statement telling them every savings account, every Burger's account, every
stock I own, every every mutual fund I own every property.
I own everything, very intrusive, none of they're in business.

(48:02):
But I had to do it to stay above board.
And we have a member of Congress that went from
two hundred thousand dollars in net Worth a year ago
to thirty million dollars. Where's the uproar? People got their
navel gazing about the Epstein case for a man who's
dead and there's no justice going to, no clear justice
for those who are as victims, other going after his estate.
Yet they're focused on that instead of this nonsense. This

(48:24):
is a serious threat to our democracy. Is either influenced
peddling or something else going on here?

Speaker 2 (48:29):
Yeah, yeah, absolutely.

Speaker 3 (48:31):
And I've had people in the past, you know, officers
tell us and say, listen, don't even accept a ride
from a contractor, even if it's if it's hot out
and you're just coming back to the chow hal, don't
accept a ride from them because somebody could use that
against you. And you know, that's where I learned. You know,
don't accept anything, not even like a trick at handout
that has some logo on or something that's worth maybe
maybe a dollar, you know what I mean. Don't don't

(48:51):
accept anything at all.

Speaker 4 (48:53):
Well, when I worked to the Nationalist Curate Andency, we
would go to these events, these conferences, and there'd be lunch,
and that the vendors would provide lunch, Yeah, and we
were expected to pay something for it, even though it
was free, so that we stayed above board. So we'd
have to put money into the kidie to pay for
the lunch. And then sometimes I don't even had the
lunch because it was the same It's always the same thing,
these wraps, these things didn't care for so I would

(49:15):
even have it, and then I was still expected to pay something,
just so that we couldn't be accused of, you know,
taking bribes in the form of crappy sandwiches. That's help
ull board. We had to be. But you know, members
of Congress call from two hundred thousand dollars to thirty
million one year, and nobody's batting an eye. They're worried
about Epstein. I think I'm more worried about the on Omar.

Speaker 2 (49:33):
Yeah, And that's what I was saying.

Speaker 3 (49:35):
When I was at the White House communications, we had
on Anacostia naval ANX and now joint Base. We had
Building three ninety nine, and of course we had another
annex over next to HMX where we had an office
and of course training facilities. And they're like, don't even
take a ride from a contractor from point A to
point B.

Speaker 2 (49:49):
Just walk over there or drive yourself. But don't accept
it from the contractor because somebody will probably use it
against you, maybe you know, maybe.

Speaker 4 (49:58):
D percent. I wait, a hundred percent of that, And
that's exactly right. Look, I mean the thing drives me
nuts because when I was a young troop in Germany
the nineteen eighties, you know, we were in units that
that the S four controlled the budget so much that
we never had money to fix our camouflage netting. We
couldn't buy screws and bolts and nuts to repair our
generators and our equipment. And so after every field exercise

(50:21):
I would go down to the wash rack after everybody
left the other day, and you know they wash all
they washed the dust and dirt, and then down in
the in the you know the half moon shaped trench,
the concrete where it flowed down. I go through that
and sift through the sand and dirt and pull out
nuts and bolts and put them together and washers and
then put them all in my toolbox so I can
repair our equipment. I mean, that's that's how. And then

(50:42):
I would go to the PX and buy Kansas spray
paint because we couldn't buy paint because there was no money.
Now every year in August mid August, they'd be like, hey,
order everything you need because we have leftover money. Yeah,
because you wouldn't let it use during the year when
it was supposed to be used. And we privates making
one hundred dollars every two weeks or running around buying
cans of paint to paint our vehicles that don't rust.
I mean, and so you know that's that's that's how

(51:05):
serious a lot of us take our responsibility to our nation.
And you've got these scumbags making twenty eight million, eight
hundred thousand dollars in that value one year and then
claiming that the rich aren't paying their fair share. I
think the rich must include people like ileon Omark. I
wish I had twenty eight million dollars in that value.
I sure don't.

Speaker 3 (51:22):
Yeah, I mean, you got to think most members of
Congress and every most every Americans you know book qualifies
as being ultra wealthy. I mean, regardless of what you
just define ultra wealthy as you know, somebody who's a
multi millionaire is essentially most every member of Congress.

Speaker 4 (51:37):
Yeah, Todd, but I think you're oversteady it because all
we've got two pays onder well, two pays onder well. Yeah,
of course that's Bernie Sanders.

Speaker 3 (51:46):
Yeah, yeah, right right right for l But yeah, he
has three houses, the honeymoon in Moscow, amongst other things.

Speaker 4 (51:53):
Right, Yeah, who goes to the Soviet Union for their
honey for their honeymoon. That's someone who really has their
worldview upside down, and people still vote for him in Vermont.
They're a bunch of wackadoles.

Speaker 2 (52:06):
Yep.

Speaker 3 (52:06):
So the people who are from Vermont who are hearing
us so were driving through, stop voting for that guy.
Come on, now, get with the program, stop doing it?

Speaker 2 (52:14):
Or what was to say, I think you should leave?

Speaker 4 (52:17):
Or what was it?

Speaker 2 (52:18):
Yeah?

Speaker 4 (52:18):
Maybe you probably you probably should just go.

Speaker 3 (52:22):
You probably should just get Yeah, yeah, he should probably
just go at this point.

Speaker 4 (52:26):
I mean, come on now, Oh he could joined Jerry Nadler.
They can go hang out at the Statue of Liberty
and learn what America is all about.

Speaker 3 (52:33):
Yeah, I learned what it's truly all about right and
sent us some nonsense Manhattan slash DC A cell a corridor, you.

Speaker 2 (52:39):
Know, elite.

Speaker 4 (52:42):
Yep, that's it. By the way, what's going on with
Joe Biden's documents case? He stole all that classified information,
stuck it in his corvette, buried in his garage, kept
it in a think tank in DC that Chinese spies
frequented any charges on that case, Nah, nothing happens, Z zero.

Speaker 3 (52:57):
Nothing's going to happen. And it's funny is that building?
And of course hit his foundation didn't exist whenever he
left off as as vice president. China funded the commist
Chinese Party funded that building and helped him set up
to his think tank. That somehow these documents magically made
it made its way.

Speaker 2 (53:13):
From Delaware to d C. Yeah.

Speaker 4 (53:16):
Can. I don't think they ever went from Delaware. I
think went directly from the setate right on over, right
on over to the Chinese think tech. I think. Look,
I mean, you know the history of Joe Biden. He
is rather inept when it comes to protect class animation hive.
I was thinking about Biden earlier today, and I was thinking,
you know, because people were trying to run this fairy
tale about Trump had died, Trump is an ill health,

(53:38):
Trump is not well, And of course that's all been
put the rest because it was all just nonsense, left
loser mind because Trump didn't go on in front of
the camera for three whole days. But I'm thinking we're
we overly harsh with Joe Biden. And I thought about it.
He's an old man falling up the stairs. He can't
get his thoughts together. And I thought about it. I said,
you know what, he's been an idiot buffoon for forty years.
We're not being harsh. That's just Joe Biden. That's you're
just telling the truth. Yeah, So I don't think that's right.

Speaker 3 (54:00):
Finding it all well, colonel, we're probably gonna lose in
the next hour. Any final thoughts for you, and of
course anything that we could look forward to, maybe on
ESPN or.

Speaker 2 (54:07):
Something that would Rugby World Cup, well.

Speaker 4 (54:10):
I don't know if you're paying attention, but I think
the big news was this past weekend the best two
games of the tournament, and I was at both of them.
Miracley in the United States versus Australia wound up being
a thirty one thirty one draw, which sounds less than satisfying,
but was a heck of a game. Followed on Sunday
by the South Africa the spring Box, playing Italy, a
team they'd never beaten. They almost beat last year, but
never beaten. They beat Italy and secured a quarter final,

(54:33):
the first time they ever go to the quarter finals.
He never won more than one game to World Cup
and had won a World Cup games since twenty ten,
in fifteen years, so this is huge news. And those
two games were massive. So we'll see if this weekend
as exciting as last week, but I think it's gonna
be hard to top those two games. And it's good because
most of the early games were blowouts. I mean teams
were like England beat USA sixty ninety seven. Yeah, it

(54:54):
was just destroyed. And that's how it was in every game.
And then suddenly the two best games of the tournament
took place one day after. They're in the same town
and it was fascinating. So I'm looking forward to it.
I'll be in York again this weekend to watch USA
versus Samoa on Saturday, and then Spain plays on Sunday
and then it's off to the quarterfinals the follow week.
So that's what I'll be watching ESPN dust cover, but

(55:15):
you got to go looking for it.

Speaker 2 (55:16):
So yeah, yeah.

Speaker 4 (55:17):
In the meantime, I'm wondering if we're gonna blow some
more boats out of the water in the Caribbean, and
I keep my eyes focused on it.

Speaker 3 (55:23):
Well, I'm gonna stay out out of my local lake
and in my bass boat.

Speaker 2 (55:26):
I'll keep it docked for the next couple of weeks.

Speaker 4 (55:28):
We'll see all right, guys. All right, I'll drop off now.
You guys take over for the next hour. Thanks a lot, cheers.

Speaker 2 (55:34):
All right, thanks, colonel. We'll talk to you soon. Brother.

Speaker 3 (55:36):
All right, folks, Colonel Chris White is gonna drop off
and we'll see him again next week and or hear
from you if you listen to on the radio. We
should have what about another minute here, we have the
music playing us off for the hour. We'll be back
at the top of the hour as soon.

Speaker 2 (55:48):
As we get that music.

Speaker 4 (55:48):
And there it is.

Speaker 7 (55:49):
Ladies and gentlemen, come back after these messages.

Speaker 6 (56:11):
WSMN fifteen ninety WSMN ninety five point three FM, Nashua.
Listen watch in Street at WSMN dot Live.

Speaker 3 (56:23):
All right, folks, that's a that's a great commercial. It
gives us, lets us know that the commercial breaks is
about to be over, having that that great commercial right there.

Speaker 2 (56:32):
I love the voice. I think we always comment on that,
don't we, John.

Speaker 5 (56:35):
Yeah, yeah, you guys usually Uh, I always caught the
Wilbur Brimley sounding voice. But yeah, it is kind of
an interesting commercial. It's funny to me because I like
the I guess I gravitate towards more of the hype,
the high motion commercials or songs, music and things like
That's when they hear commercial like they go, wow, it

(56:56):
sounds kind of solemn or you know, just like so
slow and it's appropriate for the commercial. But right, people
gravit that. I mean, you guys just right took great
to it, Like wow, that is a good commercial.

Speaker 3 (57:07):
Right yeah, really good commercial done right, And you can
understand what they're saying. They're not They're not like, you know,
use car.

Speaker 2 (57:13):
Here's car, you know, get the car, you know, you know, Oh.

Speaker 5 (57:16):
Yeah, it's not obnoxial by any means. Yeah. I don't
like the obnoxious ones either. I just like that. Like
when I listen to music, I like some toe tapping,
you know, high end music.

Speaker 2 (57:24):
Oh yeah, I don't live up there.

Speaker 3 (57:26):
But you know if I did live and I would
definitely go see them because I mean that's a respect
respectful commercial.

Speaker 2 (57:32):
It's like, hey, this is what we do. Here's the point.
Do DOT move on? Love it?

Speaker 5 (57:38):
Yeah, straight to the point, very well laid out, articulated,
and we're continuing the commercial. This is the extension of
the commercial.

Speaker 3 (57:48):
Right well, I mean, they paid, they have their their
their their product advertised, and you know we're we're on
we we know.

Speaker 5 (57:55):
That's that's actually the power. That's actually the power of
marketing DOT. I mean, how many times you've been standing
there at the toothpaste hole or I'm going, oh, which toothpaste?
Do I get? All of a sudden you hear the
jingle commity in your head. You know, you wonder where
the white yellow wit when you bush your teeth with
pepsi in or whatever, And you know he's like, oh wow,
wait a minute, that advertising really works. That's all I

(58:15):
can think of, is that jingle yeah?

Speaker 3 (58:17):
Or or the baking soda toothpaste and it's I was
in a toothpaste style. This has been years ago, and
somebody goes, uh, looks and goes, oh, baking soda. Is
there anything baking soda can't do. It's like they're taking over.
It's everywhere.

Speaker 2 (58:30):
Baking soda is in everything.

Speaker 4 (58:32):
You know.

Speaker 5 (58:33):
Yeah, yeah, I wanted to try the charcoal toothpaste, but
I never tried.

Speaker 2 (58:37):
I have, I have. It works pretty good. Uh yeah,
it gets all that, all that the little gunk and
build up off your teeth.

Speaker 5 (58:43):
For sure, that's the one to go to, right absolutely.

Speaker 3 (58:47):
Hey, folks who're just joined us, this is the Comma
Sist Concertos. We're live every Wednesday night. We make sense
of the inverted reality we are subject to every day.
The Commassist conservers are here to help bring you back
to reality. And of course Colonel Chris White, our co host,
is is in England. He was on the first hour.
If you're just joining us, and of course myself, I'm
joining us from northeast Tennessee usually unless I'm traveling. Of course,
John John Gardner holds down the studio there in Nashaulla

(59:08):
right here on WSMN fifty ninety AM and ninety five
point three FM. Of course, you can listen to us
online at WSMN dot Live. If you're setting in your
driveway at home and you're like, man, how do I
find these guys fifteen ninety AM, ninety five point three
FM or WSMN dot live bringing up on your phone.
I'm sure your family would love to hear what we
have to say. I mean, we solve all sorts of problems,
at least we'd like to pretend we do right.

Speaker 5 (59:29):
Well, not exactly full of ourselves. We don't know everything,
but I think we covered some pretty good stuff.

Speaker 2 (59:35):
Sometimes absolutely a free throwing discussion.

Speaker 3 (59:37):
We occasionally have guests on here if you've not joined
our show before, we have callers on a regular we'd
just like.

Speaker 2 (59:43):
To discuss whatever's on our mind. Whoever leads the show.

Speaker 3 (59:45):
What we try to do for people who haven't maybe
joined the show is each week we try to rotate
the hosting duties, and of course whoever the host is
kind of leads the conversation and drives it. Can talk
about essentially whatever they want to or just turn it
over to somebody else to discuss whatever issues that.

Speaker 2 (01:00:00):
They want to discuss. I think it works very very
well that way, and it keeps us, you know, mindful
and respectful.

Speaker 5 (01:00:05):
I think, yeah, it's a panel discussion, I mean, and
you're welcome to join us on our social media site.
You know, if you want to get on Facebook or
YouTube and just look truckers in a bit of broadcasting
network or on Facebook, you just look for comments sense
conservatives and we have a Facebook page for that too,
And yeah, man, we'd love to get people in here
making comments and stuff.

Speaker 3 (01:00:26):
Oh absolutely, We're on all sorts of platforms. And you
know what's funny is I've reached out to a number
of elected officials, different office holders at state, state level,
federal officials and to bte them on the program, and
a lot of times they'll turn me over to their
communications person and be like, well, well, what's your audience
at REACH or whatever. I'm like, well, shoot, we're on
ter Restaurant Radio in Nashville, which that doesn't help most

(01:00:47):
people in the country, but I'm like, we stream it,
it's released as a podcast. But we've got a pretty
pretty good audience across the nation. We got a lot
of truckers who listen to us. And of course we
have an international audience too, not just in South Africa,
which we appreciate those guys down there, but we also
have folks in Europe. A number of truckers in Europe
actually listen to our show, which is kind of great
Italy especially. I get notes occasionally from those folks telling

(01:01:09):
us to keep up the great work. You know, they
love freedom and liberty. They'd love to be a truck
driver here in the US and all that. And then
you know, we appreciate the support that we get wherever
we get it.

Speaker 5 (01:01:17):
For sure, it would hate it if they made the
decision be a truck driver here in the US. Yeah,
thirty five years of that nonsense. I can tell you
that the regulations that absolutely don't make sense.

Speaker 3 (01:01:28):
Right, and parking regulations and of course big government with
the eled mandates and all this nonsense. You know, you
can't park anywhere for crying out loud, and you know
now you end up parking on ramps and that's unsafe
for a trucker for sure. If somebody speeds off a
ramp or tries to speed onto a highway whatever, that's
dangerous for you, especially if you have to get out
and you know, check your load. Uh, you know, whatever
the case may be, it's very dangerous for some trucker.

(01:01:50):
You shouldn't be putting them in harm's way that way.
We need to find a better solution to this problem.

Speaker 5 (01:01:55):
Well, it used to be truck drivers would find some
sort of parking Walmart facilities and stuff. But towns and
municibilities will find them if there's overnight truck night truck parking,
or even our V parking. You know when you crack
open the paper and you see Walmart and Ormond Beach, Florida. Oh,
it's eleven thousand dollars worth of fines because the truck

(01:02:17):
and RV parking is like, well, no, wonder why they're
booting them. I don't wonder why they're trying to get
them out of their parking lots. That's a lot of
money to lose. I mean, normally I would probably knock
a big billionaire company, you know, a multi billion dollar company.
But I can't knock somebody when it's when it's the
the governing body itself that's causing this issue. With all

(01:02:38):
of our issues with truck parking and RV parking, nowhere
to be that. You know, you think they would show
some leniency somewhere to help alleviate the problems. But see
it shows you government really doesn't care todd right, and
you have a.

Speaker 2 (01:02:49):
Private company, a publicly traded company.

Speaker 3 (01:02:51):
Rather I should say, like Walmart or any big box
or whatever the case may be.

Speaker 2 (01:02:55):
Even if you don't own a.

Speaker 3 (01:02:57):
Big boxer, you have a big enough parking lot you
want to offer truck parking. That's your perfect that's your right.
That's how that's like conducting to plomacy if you will.
You're conducting the palmacyy with truckers who were what potential
customers for sure?

Speaker 2 (01:03:08):
Why would you want to.

Speaker 3 (01:03:08):
Send them out, you know, and try to try to
find something or park on an on ramp, off ramp,
whatever the case may be.

Speaker 2 (01:03:14):
It's unsafe for them.

Speaker 3 (01:03:14):
It's unsafe for drivers just everyday drivers commuting to and
from work or wherever the case may be. Uh, you know,
taking the kids home from a ball game or a
hot dog whatever. You put their lives in jeopardy now
because you had this big, huge truck that's now on
the side of the road, and now all of a sudden,
you don't know what it's going to do, if it
pulls out, or if you don't you don't see it.
It's maybe part too close to the edge. You end

(01:03:35):
up grazing it, you hurt yourself, kill somebody, whatever the
case may be.

Speaker 5 (01:03:39):
It's very dangerous They've had cases where people who were
registered nurses that work long shifts and stuff, and they
were driving home from work and that truck was parked
on the shoulder of a rest area going into a
rest erey and they saw the tail lights and they
fell in behind the taillights, thinking that that was a lane,
and well it wasn't. It was a stop. Big truck
we anybody eighty thousand pounds and terminated somebody's life needlessly.

(01:04:01):
And it wasn't because the truck ever wanted to be there.
It's because you can't find any trucking. We had that
bus case, a whole bus full of people was involved
in an accident in the rest area, not because the
truck was parked alongside the road, but he was parked
in a bad spot in the rest area. Right, Yeah,
nowhere to go. So he started starting ventting a parking place.
I see it all the time, truck stops. You would
think the fire chief would be in there telling people

(01:04:22):
they move. You got to move. You're blocking up lanes here.
If there's a fire or emergency, we can't get in
and and man, they're stacked in their point. People have
to go out. The few islands they're sitting there going
the wrong way out the fuel islands, try to get
out of the truck stop because it's so packed in there,
you know.

Speaker 3 (01:04:36):
Oh, absolutely yeah, it's certainly certainly dangerous for sure.

Speaker 5 (01:04:40):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (01:04:40):
And the people that.

Speaker 3 (01:04:41):
Bring you know, all the goods and things that we
love to have, you know, your your smart devices. Uh,
you know your computers that we're using to communicate right here.
You know, whatever the case may be, it's probably came
on a truck. Maybe maybe a train, but.

Speaker 2 (01:04:53):
A truck got it from the train to to the
to the store, for sure.

Speaker 4 (01:04:57):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (01:04:58):
You know, regardless of the size of the truck, it
got there on a truck.

Speaker 2 (01:05:01):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (01:05:01):
And we should be treating these folks a heck of
a lot better and be more appreciative of what they do,
the long hours that they put in. They put their
lives on the line out there on the road for
crandit line and if you if you've been out of
the road lightning, you see how some of these people
drive John and the cutting trucks off as if there's
sports cars for cind out line and then and then flipping.

Speaker 5 (01:05:16):
Off the bat on both ends of the the uh,
the spectrum. Okay, So first things first, they'd like to
tell us that truck drivers moved seventy one percent of
America's freight. I'm going to knock that down and say no,
truck drivers are responsible for one hundred percent of the
freight that's moving the United States of America. And I'm
gonna explain why. How many times have you see a
flatbed truck with the wheels or the axles of train
cars going down the road. Those axles didn't get delivered,

(01:05:39):
so it go right. If it wasn't for that truck
that got the axles to the train cars, that freight
wouldn't be moved on the train. You know, they can
deliver a fuel by pipeline to train stations and airports,
but at the end of the day, it took trucks
to get the pipe there to do it. When they
need to make repairs, it takes trucks there to get
pipe there to do it. You know, you don't just
doesn't happen by osmosis. So if truck at involved one

(01:06:00):
way or another, the other twenty nine percent of the
freight's not going to get moved. So trust one hundred
percent responsible for freight. Movie. The other issue we've got
going on right now, Todd is if federal Motor Carey
Safety administration has been slack. Congress gave them the ability
to regulate training within the trucking industry. They've done some
things about you need, you know, a certified trainer, YadA, YadA.

(01:06:21):
But these guys are getting out of some of these
schools within two weeks. They're not really getting adequate training
and be putting on the road. And then then you've
got countries or countries. Yeah, it seems like a country
states like California that are just issue in our driver's lations.
People don't re speak right now. Yeah, who are illegal,
which is a federal offenseates a federal law. So lax

(01:06:43):
government all the way around is disasperating the problem. And
all this does is saturate the market to try to
keep labor rates down so they don't have to pay
pay a fairway to truck drivers. Then they wrote these
other guys in who want to be onnder operator truck
drivers who really don't understand the industry, but they tell them, hey,
you know what, we're going to leash you a truck.
They make so much money off from leasing trucks and
these poor SAPs that don't know any better, thinking they're

(01:07:04):
gonna make more money being truck drivers who end up
in a contract where they're running their butts off down
the road, not making ends me end up bankrupt because
they're in the stink and lease program where who's making
the money the trucking company that lost them the truck.
As soon as they're out of that truck, they're gonna
lease it back to somebody else the same lease. They're
not gonna like no depreciation of value because he paid
so much. I know, it's one hundred percent. You know

(01:07:26):
we're getting Oh, we'll lease it to this guy and
make even more money. It's a scam all the way around.
The trucking industry is a mess. Truck drivers are grossly abused,
and enough is enough. You know, this is America's roadways.
We need real trained people on America's roadways. We need
people can read, write, and speak to the English language.
And I'm not trying to knock people that don't, because
I've met a lot of people in the p jobby
community that really really nice people.

Speaker 2 (01:07:48):
This is a safety concern.

Speaker 3 (01:07:49):
It's not a matter of you you can't speak English,
you better learn English.

Speaker 2 (01:07:52):
Now it's a matter of safety. That's where you're approaching
it from. I get that.

Speaker 5 (01:07:56):
Yeah, so well, yeah, safety and matter of you know,
these small depending carriers need to be able to make
a living. And because the way things are set up. Yeah,
we believe in a free market, right, but you can't
have a free market where so abusive. You got a
guy running in the red all the time. You know,
how was that going? We do affect safety if he
can't afford his maintenance bills.

Speaker 4 (01:08:14):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:08:14):
I was down in Middle Tennessee, which is, you know,
Nashville is about about four hours from where I'm at
right now. And I have a truck step I normally
stop at. There's a it's in Crossfell. I stop at
the pilot going down. On the other side, there's the BUCkies,
which is you know, a big commercial nonsense. It's too
too too much to try to get in and just
use the restaurant and grab a coffee. So but but

(01:08:35):
I was stopped in there when I was getting a
coffee or whatever, and there's a there's this truck driver
and I was like, uh, who you work for it?
He goes, oh, I'll work I worked for swift, you know,
just got hired on. I said, give me ten minutes
to get down the road.

Speaker 5 (01:08:46):
I was like, you get ahead start.

Speaker 2 (01:08:47):
Yeah, I like, and I was.

Speaker 3 (01:08:49):
Joking with I abandoned the coffee, like I was gonna
walk out the door and say he left. He's like, no, no, no,
He's like, I've been driving for like twenty years. I
was like, okay, good, good to know they the Swift
drivers do take Yeah, but he knew what I was
going for. I was like, I was like, let me
get out and get out of here. You give me
a timad start.

Speaker 5 (01:09:08):
What was that? What was that site? Scott Creed he
created some sort of sight on years ago. He's a
driver truck in a car in the wreck. It was
like mega mega mistakes is what he called it. You'll
be referenced to MAGA carriers and yeah, he used a
big Swift truck in an accident for his cover photo
and stuff and that sight boom, man, everybody grab it
to that gravitating to that site.

Speaker 2 (01:09:30):
How's he doing? I saw something on face? But he
lost some weight, right M.

Speaker 5 (01:09:35):
I don't know, Scotty Reid, are you talking about you know?

Speaker 2 (01:09:37):
My different person? Some times Scott read Sorry, Scott.

Speaker 5 (01:09:39):
Reid's doing quite well. He's uh, he's a salesman now.
He's working for Hydrogen Group. Hydrogen is awesome, man. Hydrogen
is like some of the best energy in the world.
That's the most abundant energy we have on the face
of the Earth. The difficult thing about it is just
separating it from the from the oxygen molecules water here right, yea,
but yeah, it's one of the to fuel efficient bra

(01:10:01):
fuels to burn. It's so basically this company, he has
a hydrid which you call a hydrogen generator that you
come out on a truck. They sell them for a
reason to be priced for what they do, and they've
had trucks they've doubled a fuel mileage. So using these
things for say seventy five hundred dollars a unit, and
you're gonna double your fuel mode, you're gonna save a
lot money. I think he's gonna pay for itself. By

(01:10:22):
the end of the year. You're get more than paid
for that thing. Okay, So uh, pretty interesting technology. And
that's what Scott's got himself involved in two and so
it's sells itself. So he should do quite well.

Speaker 2 (01:10:36):
Yeah, good good man.

Speaker 3 (01:10:37):
Who I mean by the way, had he not put
all this stuff together and put things in motions several
years ago, we wouldn't have this show, you know.

Speaker 5 (01:10:45):
Uh, yes, Scott, he was very well involved here. He
got touched with Tony Justice. You know, Tony's from your
neck of the woods. Yeah, he's a very famous musician
in the trucking industries.

Speaker 2 (01:10:57):
Oh absolutely, yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:10:58):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:10:58):
And it's funny as drive by an old sign that
had had his name on there. Tony Just's music sold here,
you know, and at the truck stops no longer, no
longer there, but the sign was up for years.

Speaker 5 (01:11:08):
Wait a minute, that's the Davy Crockett truck stops.

Speaker 3 (01:11:12):
I think Davy Crockett one of those down that way.

Speaker 5 (01:11:16):
That ways still there.

Speaker 2 (01:11:18):
I think it's still there.

Speaker 3 (01:11:19):
But there's a couple of truck stops near nearby that
I think they think. They're refurbishing some of them and redoing.

Speaker 5 (01:11:24):
Mom and Pops and stuff. Yeah, don't anywhere.

Speaker 2 (01:11:27):
Yeah, yeah, Mom and Pops for sure. Yeah. Tony Just
is good, good man. At least you get him on
the show at some point.

Speaker 1 (01:11:34):
Uh.

Speaker 5 (01:11:34):
Well, I can reach out to him if you like. Yeah,
I'd love to have changed his number and may be
able to get hold of them. I mean we're not
tight or anything, but yeah, he's kind of an interesting character.
He might come on. I don't know.

Speaker 2 (01:11:45):
I love to love to hear what he's up to nowadays,
you know what I mean.

Speaker 3 (01:11:48):
Because it's funny as you think about you know, these
these big you know, song song singer, songwriters, whatever, but
then you go to a truck show and you gravitate
to where he's at.

Speaker 2 (01:11:58):
That's where all the action is.

Speaker 4 (01:12:00):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:12:01):
Yeah, he pulls in the crowd. I think he left
trucking now. He's just gotten so big that music's kind
of just taking over his life.

Speaker 4 (01:12:08):
So that means good on it.

Speaker 5 (01:12:10):
Good on his son's involved in the music. Dude does
a lot of gospel.

Speaker 2 (01:12:14):
Good deal. I mean he's got the pipes for sure.

Speaker 5 (01:12:16):
Absolutely.

Speaker 2 (01:12:18):
Yeah. So so what do you think about the National
Guard being used in DC? I think we talked about
it last.

Speaker 3 (01:12:23):
Last week, uh, but looking to maybe they're going to
send the troops to Chicago, and they even talked about
maybe some LA and a couple other places. What are
your thoughts on sending National Guard to help quell some
of the crime and violence in some of these major cities.

Speaker 2 (01:12:37):
That Democrats have ran into the ground.

Speaker 5 (01:12:39):
So we did cover last week. I brought up brought
up title to Section two fifty three, which clearly states
the President has the right to use the armed forces,
militia or both, or by any means necessary to take
us at such actions when states themselves will not do
the required duties. So he's got the legal authority to
do what he's doing. So as far as what do

(01:13:00):
I think about what he's doing, it's one of those
things you find concerning, right because you like, you look
at that, you go commonly, you know, especially if I
look at things in this conspiratorial sort of way, You're like, Wow,
we're creating a police state. Is that what we're doing here?
And the answer to that is actually no, we're not
really creating a police state. What we're doing is we're
trying to clean up the United States, and that that's

(01:13:21):
what Trump is doing. He's trying to use the National
Guard alongside of civilian police in order for the civilian
So it's a support effort, it's not a takeover, and
civilian police will still be in charge as far as
I know. The National Guards there to assist them, so
it's not creating a police state. So you know, I

(01:13:41):
feel all right about that, and I'm ecstatic to think
that we're doing something. Drugs have been the ruin of
the United States of America. Let's just be honest about
It's been our downfall since early late mid nineteen sixties.
We've engaged in a lot of drug activity, illegal drug activity.
It's always been around. We had guys in the twenties
that did cocaine and stuff, a lot of our Hollywood

(01:14:03):
types and things like that. People with money can afford
drug habits, you know, because they know how to handle it.
They got the money to handle it. So you know,
you do a little coke for a while, do a
little this war. And I'm not promoting drug use. I
despise drug use. But at least they had to common
sense enough to stop doing it, go to place, you know,
a rehab facility, and clean up, and then come back

(01:14:24):
and start their life over again. You know, so they
create a cycle. They can handle it. But when you
got the average Joe blowdown here thinks, oh, you know,
all my freedoms and I'm going to do drugs too,
and I'm going to live like a Hollywood type, they
can't handle it.

Speaker 2 (01:14:37):
Man.

Speaker 5 (01:14:37):
They never get a clean out period. They don't have rehabilitation.
Now we have rehabilitation, but it's society's paying for it,
killing us. You know, it's killing us our You know,
we can't afford the taxes for pay for drug rehab.
We need to get rid of it. So somebody like
Donald Trump comes along this, Yes, this is what we
voted for. Donald Trump comes along, he builds a wall. Wall. No,

(01:14:58):
I don't want a wall. I think it's cause we
have to have a wall, but we need some sort
of deterrent to stop these things from happen, from the
drug mule and the human traffic in the nonsense that
we've been tolerated for so long. We talk about our
second mindmum rights, but we keep the border open, allowing
them to traffic illegal arms into the country. Maybe they're not,
maybe they are. Maybe they're getting somewhere else and bringing
them in, or maybe they're getting within the country. I
don't know, but the point is, if we want to

(01:15:21):
protect our rights, we got to do something to solidify that.
So we got a wall. This will funnel them in
through immigrations and stuff like that, where they're supposed to
legally check in at border patrol and customs agents, sure,
and make their declarations why they're here or if they're
seeking immigration or asylum or what they're doing. That's where
they're supposed to be doing it, not fifteen hundred miles

(01:15:41):
into the country. They're supposed to be doing it there.
But no, we need to stop the drug trades. We
need to stop what's going on. And the way to
do that start cleaning up our streets, you know, get
the violence out of our streets, Start making arrest on
these people. Make these arrest stick. And so I think
Trump's doing all right with the National Guard. He's got
my approval, not that he needs it, but he's got

(01:16:03):
it right.

Speaker 3 (01:16:04):
Yeah, absolutely, Yeah, these these cities and especially Washington needs
to be cleaned up for sure. Chicago, there's people suffering
for so long. And what what I what I'm heartened
to see is you know that there's people in those communities,
African American community, especially UH and of course other minority
communities in Chicago that that have been put out for
so long that they're finally speaking up and they're now
willing to come over and start voting Republican or at

(01:16:25):
least threatened to vote Republican.

Speaker 2 (01:16:27):
Don't know if that's going to happen.

Speaker 3 (01:16:28):
But I would love to see something like that happen.
But at the same time, it's not about just putting
a Republican in there. It's not putting that right person
in the in the job or in the position that
can that can accomplish task and actually see a mission accomplished,
not not not just to be in there just to
play partisan politics.

Speaker 5 (01:16:44):
Right, I think. I don't know if I dare say it,
but I do if we all want Republican, we'd be
in trouble, right if everybody one party and we were
over dominating part. We need some sort of opposition so
when we do find tyranny on one side, we have
an opposing side to take care of it. Sometimes, you know,
Republicans are no better than Democrats when it comes out
they're just say they're just as susceptible.

Speaker 3 (01:17:05):
Well, they're human beings for sure, exactly, Yeah, absolutely, And
of course, you know, I think one of the big
problems with say the Republican Party is we've we've allowed
I don't say allowed, but what we've voted for and
allowed big money to control our elections.

Speaker 2 (01:17:19):
And you know, We've elected a lot.

Speaker 3 (01:17:21):
Of people who've sold us down the river, you know,
because they want that money. They want to pack back,
and they want you know, political action committees and so forth.
They want that back and all the all the money
that goes goes with it. You know, they're they're okay
to sell the everyday voter.

Speaker 2 (01:17:33):
Down the river.

Speaker 5 (01:17:34):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (01:17:34):
But you know, it's that a lot.

Speaker 3 (01:17:36):
Of Republican voters haven't paid attention to that, and they've
allowed the party leadership uh to control stuff like this,
and and the big money has basically destroyed the everyday
people that the Republicans pretend that they're they're for. And
I'm not saying every Republican, don't get me wrong, but
there's many Republicans who have sold out to special interests
or or big money to interest not the everyday people

(01:17:57):
who put them in office. And that that's true across
the border for sure.

Speaker 5 (01:18:00):
It's my understanding that members of Congress favor and eighty
percent of their legislation their favoring large big corporations, these
billionaire types, and twenty percent towards the population within itself.
When they favor these large big corporations, sometimes it's in
disfavor of the general population of their own constitutents. So

(01:18:22):
they're being swayed by money. If you got to have
a billion dollars run for office, know who you're going
to go to because you and I aren't supporting these guys.
We can we can pitch in five ten dollars here
and there, right, we can afford it, right, well, you
know the common person. But you know when these guys
are pitching in huge money and they're doing fundraisers and
things like that for them, that make the difference. Who

(01:18:43):
are they going to favor, right right?

Speaker 3 (01:18:46):
Or the people who paid their tab if you will.
And here's the thing. What I go to a lot
of you know, saying political events, Republican events, and in
your especially campaign events, and you hear people talk about,
you know, well we pay your salbary. You know this
this this It's like, first off, you didn't show up
that during the election. You probably had several other candidates
that were on the ballot that you didn't look at,

(01:19:08):
that you didn't bother to help, that you didn't bother
to send money to in any anyway. Uh, And then
you you allowed the big money that's for a special
special money interest if you will, the big money from
outside of your district, from outside of you know, you're
you're not only just congressiats sometimes outside of your own
state to come in and decide who's gonna who's gonna
win the election?

Speaker 2 (01:19:27):
And you you did nothing.

Speaker 3 (01:19:29):
You didn't you didn't stand up and donate, you know,
ten to fifteen bucks of this person over here to
give them at least a fighting chance, you know, uh,
And instead you have to wait to go uh, you know,
rouse or yell at the person who's in office because
they're not doing what you want them to do. But
guess what, the person who was right there in line
with with with your ideology, you you ignored. You didn't
donate to their campaign, You didn't knock on any doors

(01:19:50):
from them, you didn't make any phone calls, didn't do
any work on social media. But you allowed the big
money to buy buy the election. And now they're in office,
and now you want them to listen to you. It's
not gonna work that way that they don't have to
listen to you. They got an office in spite of you,
and that's why people need to be involved in the primaries.

Speaker 5 (01:20:06):
But you know, you also think God taking the consideration,
Todd is the echo chamber, right, right. You get these
businesses that dominate the time in the office. You know,
they're the ones that get the appointments, they're the ones
that get the big discussions and the feel good talk.
But they also have the money to create the data
and the studies and the things behind them. So when
we talk about pharmaceutical companies, big farming get in their way,

(01:20:28):
it's kind of like, yeah, but they bring in and say, yeah,
they're their own studies, but they're bringing in data, they're
bringing information, and there's no conflict. So we're not going
in there saying, well, I heard you, he's got the study,
but let me explain to you why it's wrong. We
don't have that sort of function, right, So they're believing
the studies they got, they believe the data they're getting.
They're getting sucked in. Their time is being consumed with it.

(01:20:48):
So when we go in there, it's just you know,
three of us go in there represent the trucking industry.
We just followed the ATA in there, and then not
to mention the AT, but Warner Enterprises and sheid our
National Carriers and Swift that you mentioned earlier, so they
had their packs too, and their lobbies too. How many
lobbies are but it's insane amount of lobbies in DC.
So with three of us going there and we sellrate, well,

(01:21:09):
we'd like to discuss these matters with you, and you
know we're pointing to them. We're just three people representing
a small group of people. You know, Well, how many
you get asked this question? How much your membership base? Well,
we represent twenty five people. What doesn't sound as good
as ATA is thirty seven thousand, you know, so we
get drowned out.

Speaker 3 (01:21:28):
Right, Yeah, absolutely, you know, And that's the way it goes.
What's what's your membership?

Speaker 6 (01:21:32):
You know?

Speaker 2 (01:21:33):
And that's what I tell people.

Speaker 3 (01:21:34):
I'm like, there's a saying that that they're they're the
saying they're strengthened numbers. It rings true whenever you go lobby,
and I liked it official, especially a legislative body like
Congress or your state, state, state house, state Senate, whatever
the case may be. Even your local county commission or
parish whatever. If you live in Louisiana, Uh, you know
your county commission. You know, strengthen numbers. How many people

(01:21:54):
do you represent? Now you go represent, I'll bring up
the American Legion. You know, you go into Congress and
you talk to a member of Congress, how many people
do you represent? Well, they know how many people you represent.
You're a national slash quasi international organization with millions of
millions of members. And at the same time, you think
about what we call the Legion family, that that's millions
of more people that they that they have to listen to.

(01:22:16):
So they're gonna take you seriously as American Legion. But
if you're some upstart, you know, local little veterans group,
you know, with twenty members, you know, fifteen members, whatever,
good luck getting a meeting.

Speaker 2 (01:22:26):
And if you do get in the.

Speaker 3 (01:22:27):
Door, it's going to be a quick two to three
minute paint off on somebody you know down the line,
the junior staffer.

Speaker 5 (01:22:32):
That's about it, the guy who's fresh out of training
from downstairs. Yeah, because they're like you repeat them, I'm
so glad you came in here today. You know, so
seriously nervous and doesn't know how to really deal with you.

Speaker 4 (01:22:44):
Yeah, you know, you.

Speaker 2 (01:22:45):
Don't know what it's like downstairs. I don't want to
go back downstairs. I'm want to be up here where
they house all you people.

Speaker 5 (01:22:49):
Well, no, they got I don't know if you if
you've seen or not. But when you walk in the
tunnels down below, they've got training areas where they new
staffers in and they teach them how to deal with
the public and how to public and they give them
like keywords that they can resort to and fall back.

Speaker 2 (01:23:05):
Of course. Yeah, yeah, de escalate.

Speaker 3 (01:23:07):
You know, if you send somebody's upset or about to
start yelling, you have words to de escalate or or
you can shift tack if you want to offer them something,
you know, offer them a beverage or a coffee or something.
If you know they're going to be in your office
for a period of time, you need them to calm down.

Speaker 2 (01:23:21):
Yeah, there's things you can do.

Speaker 4 (01:23:22):
For sure.

Speaker 5 (01:23:23):
I've been off. I've been off for beverages before you
telling me I'm I'm I'm.

Speaker 2 (01:23:28):
No no, no no.

Speaker 3 (01:23:29):
But but you know, if they know you're going to
be let's say you have a meeting or whatever, and
they know you're going to be being there for a
little bit, but you're you're heated, they want to calm
you down before you get get in the meeting with
the principal, whether it's the congressman, congresswoman or the chief
of staff, whoever you're going to meet with. They've tried
to calm you down if you will, to be like, hey,
can I get you a beverage from Oh.

Speaker 5 (01:23:47):
They try to set the mood right to com you.
They do they do when you walk into a office,
or they're low key, kind of talk, real soft and
yeah off the hospital. They are really nice. I mean
I've been to quite a few offices and spoke with them.
You know, it's not too often that guys like myself
have gotten meetings. I mean, I've met Ted Cruise, and
I've talked to quite a few different people. But a

(01:24:08):
lot of times you get Mike Boss was awesome, man,
I like talking with him. But uh, a lot of
times you just get the staffers and but some of
them are really nice and they're awesome to talk with.
Like I I've been to Christian News office. I mean nice,
it's a christ I guess I guess I have that brain.
Chris pappis because he's a Democrat and I'm standing outside
of his office and one of the people in with gochan,

(01:24:30):
isn't that your state? And I look, I go, oh,
that's Chris Pappis like, well, let's go in and just
see if we can get a meeting. It's like, okay,
let's do it. But sure. The lady the charge of
transportation was really nice to sit. She was very excited
and welcome me.

Speaker 2 (01:24:45):
So that's good at all. Bad experience, right, oh absolutely, yeah.
But it's funny you walk walk down the you know,
you walk.

Speaker 3 (01:24:53):
Down those those hallways at the House office buildings and
Senate Office building, you can pick out which ones are
going to be receptive to you for the most part.
You know, you go you go lobby as as an
organization if you will, and they're like, okay, you go
to this person, you go to this person, and everybody
kind of has their assignments. Everybody has the talking points
of you know, the agenda that that the national organization
is pushing.

Speaker 4 (01:25:11):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (01:25:12):
But you know who's going to be more receptive and
who's not going to be generally before you even go in.

Speaker 5 (01:25:16):
Yeah, you know, you see the one with the Palestinian
flag out front.

Speaker 3 (01:25:20):
Not gonna be, not gonna be reflect she's being censured again, right,
She's a piece of crap. Well, even even Democrats Democrats. Yeah,
Democrats are now trying to call her out. They're like,

(01:25:40):
she's no longer representing her constituents. She's representing uh you
know this, Yeah, an ideology. You know, she's pushing some
agenda at this point. So don't be surprised if the
Democrat machine does doesn't try to get her out of
office this next go round.

Speaker 5 (01:25:54):
Well, she's up for censorship. I think Buddy Carter out
of Georgia brought that up and uh so, well, I
was talking to the wife of Bomb, like, you know,
I don't know why they just don't expel her, I
mean at this point in time, But what is it is?
It is a three quarters vote though to expel.

Speaker 2 (01:26:13):
Yeah, I couldn't tell you off the top of my head.

Speaker 5 (01:26:14):
I don't remember either.

Speaker 2 (01:26:16):
I'd have to do a Google search on them.

Speaker 5 (01:26:17):
But it's whether large. It's a large body. It's not
like just a majority, it's a large.

Speaker 2 (01:26:23):
Yeah, it's a high threshold, you know, maybe three fists.
I don't know.

Speaker 3 (01:26:27):
I don't want to say, but yeah, it's a high
threshold because you know, you could be kicking somebody out
just for arbitrary means, or oh they're just a different party.
So let's just kick them out or don't don't allow
them to be seated as a member of Congress, which
Congress can do. That is, by the way, that is
a power that they have, what to expel, well, not
only to expel, but to not seat somebody if if
there's a question of their their election or whatever. Yeah,

(01:26:49):
Congress can choose not to seat somebody. I don't know
that it's ever happened. It may it may have happened
maybe one time in our history. But that is a
power that they have, believe it or not.

Speaker 5 (01:26:58):
Uh, yeah, they Well, often when you get centered to
you lose your you lose your committee assignments.

Speaker 3 (01:27:04):
As you should, as you should, you know, I mean,
you can you can vote on a floor, but you
can't vote in any committees. That's pretty much it, you know,
and you're pretty much I mean, and I say, you're
a useless congress person at that point. But you're pretty
much useless because you can't get anything through committees.

Speaker 2 (01:27:19):
And that's where a lot of the nug work is done.

Speaker 3 (01:27:20):
Not not because once it goes to the House floor,
it's a yes or no basically at that point, you.

Speaker 2 (01:27:25):
Know, it's all the work's done.

Speaker 3 (01:27:27):
All the stuff's been tacked onto it, all the riders,
all the different you know thing, all the different the
little money that they hide on there if you will
to try to get a little extra money.

Speaker 2 (01:27:36):
I can't remember the right name of that when Jesus
off the top of my head.

Speaker 3 (01:27:39):
But anyway, all that stuff's already been done. So you're
just voting yes or no at this point.

Speaker 5 (01:27:43):
Yeah, yeah, if you can't, yeah, I think it's two thirds.

Speaker 3 (01:27:49):
Yeah, an John, don't trust the AI now, come.

Speaker 5 (01:27:54):
On, No, I've been playing a lot on AI lately.
It's funny because I made that statement about it's just
in genuine with and you know it should be using AI.
And here I am chatting away all day long, driving
a truck talking to you. But it's been useful for
looking up news or things like that, but a lot
of times it's like pulling teeth because you've got to
keep digging into it to get the actual news article
out of it.

Speaker 3 (01:28:13):
But right, well, apparently you know how you have technology
that they can deny, like say an adversary access to
say a compound or something like that. Like the White House,
as an example, has all sorts of sensors cameras and
all sorts of things. Now they're incorporating some new AI
functions and trying to create some sort of security, additional

(01:28:34):
security level, if you will, and they they're testing it
with the US Marines, and the Marines were able to
defeat it and get right up on their target because
they went in and started doing cartwheels and all sorts
of weird stuff that the sensors weren't weren't trained to detect.
So they're like, oh, this weird movement doesn't count for anything,
So it just ignored it as if nothing was happening,
and they got right up on their target by doing

(01:28:55):
cartwheels and stupids, jumping jacks, all kinds of weird movements.
Normally they yeah, normally wouldn't actually be doing to sneak
up on a target.

Speaker 2 (01:29:01):
It's kind of funny.

Speaker 5 (01:29:02):
They gained the system.

Speaker 2 (01:29:03):
Yeah, absolutely, so I isn't certainly not flawle.

Speaker 5 (01:29:07):
So those for interested in knowing how many members or
what percentage it is to expel a member of Congress.

Speaker 2 (01:29:12):
It's two thirds, do know why?

Speaker 4 (01:29:15):
I said? Three?

Speaker 5 (01:29:16):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (01:29:17):
Two thirds? Yeah, that makes sense.

Speaker 5 (01:29:18):
Yeah, you racist, You're going back to the U to
the three fist compromise.

Speaker 2 (01:29:23):
Now, yeah, well, I.

Speaker 3 (01:29:24):
Mean that's I couldn't remember the exact number. Yeah, two
thirds makes more sense for sure.

Speaker 5 (01:29:29):
Right, I'm playing with you on the racist thing. I
know that you're not, but yeah, well compromise.

Speaker 2 (01:29:35):
White male Republican from the South. You know what can
I say?

Speaker 5 (01:29:38):
Well, if you as a Democrat, you've been a whole
lot of trouble for that, right, But being Republican you're safe, right.

Speaker 3 (01:29:43):
Yeah, well not not according to the left though, white
male Republican of the South, automatic races.

Speaker 5 (01:29:50):
Oh I forgot. Republicans are fascist now right?

Speaker 3 (01:29:53):
Yeah, we're racist, fascist, We're xenophil, homophobe, We're all the
things that are negative, right, whatever, you whatever, you're going
to make up tomorrow.

Speaker 2 (01:29:59):
That's what are apparently, according to the left.

Speaker 5 (01:30:01):
Did you want a station identification? I might have one
here I can play for you, or you can just
give it yourself.

Speaker 2 (01:30:07):
No, go ahead, play that. Let's see what we got.

Speaker 5 (01:30:09):
See how it sounds.

Speaker 8 (01:30:11):
Broadcasting live from downtown Nashua, New Hampshire. You're tuned in
to WSMN fifteen ninety AM and WSMN ninety five point
three FM.

Speaker 4 (01:30:21):
Catch us aline at.

Speaker 8 (01:30:23):
WSMN dot live or TIBN dot us and don't forget
to follow us on Facebook, YouTube or x at TIBN
the Truckers Independent Broadcasting Network.

Speaker 2 (01:30:35):
Oh yeah, who was that? Was that AI voice?

Speaker 5 (01:30:38):
That was an AI voice?

Speaker 2 (01:30:39):
Okay, yeah, but it had a little bit of like
an accent. But then I was like, okay, that's AI.

Speaker 3 (01:30:45):
You get like for for a second, I'm like accent
now AI because it went flat on me.

Speaker 5 (01:30:50):
Yeah, I needed I need to reach week and it
was a little low on the volume. But it's now
playing earlier this week or last week, and I was like,
you know what, hey, I and somebody they identification of
this AI and so uh yeah, I just kind of
did that stuff.

Speaker 2 (01:31:06):
That's not bad. There's some some of the AI voices
are pretty good.

Speaker 3 (01:31:09):
Well, I'll listen to some some you know history I
I want to say podcast, but history videos on YouTube
that are AI generated if you will, or or they
voices AI. You know, it's reading from some texts, and
some of those are done fairly well. You know, the
ones that are very robotic I can't listen to. But
the ones that have just like the genuine type of
voice if you were like an English voice, something like

(01:31:30):
that that really soft, like, yeah, that's.

Speaker 5 (01:31:34):
What they're working on now. They've really worked to improve
the AI voices because it irritated the crap. I ain't
gonna lie, man, get on TikTok or something. You're flipping
through it and it's his AI voiceovers and it just
got so irritating after a while. It's so sick and
tired of it. And that's that. I'm a big TikTok fan.
I don't spend a lot of time on TikTok. It's
very seldom, but uh right, I keep thinking maybe I

(01:31:54):
should go back there and start posting. I'm posted there
in like it's November of last year or something, you know,
for Trump, and I don't like it, so I just
don't do there much.

Speaker 3 (01:32:03):
Well, you're you're the other reason he got elected, right,
that one TikTok post helped help you?

Speaker 6 (01:32:07):
Yeah?

Speaker 5 (01:32:08):
My thirty views, right, yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:32:11):
Hey that's thirty votes, baby, you know what I'm saying.

Speaker 5 (01:32:14):
Votes, that's right, Yeah, you got it.

Speaker 2 (01:32:16):
It adds up for sure.

Speaker 3 (01:32:17):
But uh, you know, like you like you, like you
just said you posted on social media for quote Trump
right during his campaign. That's what we need people to
do for local candidates if you will, your local school board,
your county commission, and so on state rep races. You know,
you don't have to attack the opponent, but post post
things on that that could help help somebody, because you

(01:32:37):
think about you know, you're one post that gets one
hundred eyeballs or a thousand eyeballs. You know, how much
is that worth in actually advertising dollars?

Speaker 5 (01:32:45):
You know, you got a good point there. You know,
mini hands make light work. You know, the more people
get involved, the easier the job. Uh. I think the
biggest issue for people's understanding politics to get involved in politics,
but also feeling a sense entertainment with it. You know,
there's so much contention and stuff in politics. A lot
of people get turned off and they're like, I just

(01:33:06):
don't want nothing to do with it anymore. Or some
people that do get involved, they're just like, voter straight ticket.
Just voter straight ticket. That's all you do. You vote
a straight ticket.

Speaker 4 (01:33:14):
You know.

Speaker 5 (01:33:14):
It's like, so they don't they don't want to get involved.
They just want to you know, they just check all
the Democrats or all the Republicans and they're done.

Speaker 2 (01:33:21):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:33:22):
Or the folks that just show up every four years,
in a presidential race, thinking that they're, you know, doing it,
doing their their level best to help the country. And
I get it that that helps, for sure, but it's
it's the in between times. It's like, what about the
local races, your state races, you know, even the federal races,
House and Senate races. You know, what about that? You know,
you voted for somebody for that's going to be there

(01:33:43):
for four years? Well, guess what after that first midterm,
they're they're lame duck and until they get elected or
re elected, and then once they're re elected for a
four year term, they're essentially a lame duck all over
again at that point.

Speaker 5 (01:33:54):
So basically, the last eight nine years or so, a
lot of people have seen I don't know if they've
seen a shift in our country or they just become
awakened to what goes on in our country. And but
we see our federal government expanding continuously and it's getting
it's getting overly aggressive, it's getting abusive. It's taken more
and more, like Obamacare took a lot away from state

(01:34:16):
rights and things like that. States had their own insurance commissions,
they had things set up with insurance companies When Obamacare
Care came in, it overshadowed all that and it really
disrupted a lot of that. And this continuously keeps happening,
and it's a disruption for us. So and Obamacare really
didn't fix anything, No, I can tell it really didn't

(01:34:37):
fix anything. In fact, it may have cost the insurance
overall insurance to go up. At the same time, it
may have driven down the quality of service with insurance
or Medicare medical care. In fact, doctor's biggest complaints are
I used to have so much limited time due to
overregulations that I hardly had any time to spend with
my patients too. Now I have none. I have to

(01:35:00):
I'm off to a nurse or something to talk to
him because I don't have time. I got payport to do,
I got patient you know, things to do. They just
don't have time to really spend that time. And that's
a patient concern nowadays, and that's the doctor's concern nowadays.
But the regulations just don't care. And so that's a
lot what we got out of Obamacare. But the point
is it's overshadowed the states, and so the general thought

(01:35:21):
is becoming. The general consensus is that we need to
take our states back. That's the first thing we need
to do if we want to if we value our freedoms,
that we want to keep our freedoms or return back
to our freedoms, we have to go at a state level.
We have to go at a local level and our
state level. So we're basically using a bottom up approach
trying to regain or recapture our American freedoms because we're
seeing them losing. We're seeing an erosion of our freedoms.

(01:35:43):
And this is nothing new. I mean, if you go
back to the driver's license way way back in the day,
somebody actually wrote a book about that, about the erosions
our freedoms see when you when they first started coming
out of the driver's license, it was being challenged and
a Supreme Court justice actually rule. He says, well, you
have a right to travel, therefore you have the right
to use a modern day conveyance to do So what

(01:36:05):
he meant was, you don't need a driver's license to
drive a car because you have a right to travel. Well,
later on, and I don't know where this comes from.
I don't recall any of the US constitutions saying the
United States government or any other form of government is
responsible for you in my safety. But some Supreme Court
justice later on overruled so well, driving is unsafe, therefore

(01:36:25):
you don't have a right to drive, and basically overturned
that ruling and may determine that driving is just a privilege.
If a right was a right, then how does it
ever cease to be a right? That's what I want
to know, just because a judge arbitrarily ruled it's right,
or where in the constitutions is the same thing about
sovereign immunity anywhere? But a core Supreme Court justice somewhere

(01:36:50):
in what the early to mid eighteen hundreds, I think
early eighteen hundreds was it Marshall, I don't remember, but
made a ruling that according to British British common law,
you know, basically, he arbitrariities interject the idea or the
doctrine of sovereign immunity for the government and state governments,
right the federal and states. So it's kind of like
it was never within the boundaries of a US constitution.

(01:37:12):
There's no statute about it. It just became sort of
a judicial doctorate that was adopted and all of a suddenly,
now you lack the ability to sue the federal government.
You lack the ability to sue a state. Now, since
then there have been statutes about how you can sue
the state or sue the government and things like that.
It has to do with a lot of ball. Yeah,
the state has to approve that you can sue the state.

(01:37:33):
The federal government has to prove improve you can see
them or if it's negligent. So if you're driving down
the room and get rear nded by say, DoD vehicle
or something and it caused you severe injuries, then you
have a right to sue them. And it's of a matter.

Speaker 3 (01:37:47):
Because but generally you're you're going to get a payout anyway,
probably better that than to say your your your neighbor down.

Speaker 2 (01:37:54):
The street hit you. You know you're going to get
a good payout. But what a lot of times people
see is dollar signs.

Speaker 3 (01:37:59):
It's like, oh, you said DoD Department of Defense as
an example, Oh, they just plowed in to me. They
got billions upon billions of dollars I can see for
for more than than what this accident is actually worth.
And that's that's a problem right there too. The frivolous lawsuits.
That's another problem.

Speaker 5 (01:38:13):
Well, it is that that's the nuclear lawsuits and frivolous
lawsuits have become a genuine problem and the problem in
the US. But my point is that you know these
things that have been interjected into our judicial system or
into our legal system, where they're just eroding your rights
away to the point that they've decided that, well, you
only have a right to keep in bare arms providing

(01:38:35):
what you say, you can keep the bare arms on.
And even though they have Supreme Court rulings that have
trumped over statutes, and with these rulings, they also affect
the states and their statutes. But then they turn around
and say, well, the states might have a different law. Well,
how can they? How can they if the Supreme Court
already ruled, how can the state have their own law?

(01:38:56):
Because according to my understanding, the Supreme Court ruled that
the fourth applied to all states, right, the Bill of
Rates applied to all states. So any time the Supreme
Court makes a ruling, but it becomes more complicated, then
you get these these doctrines have implied law. Well, because
we can loosely connect this with this and maybe possibly that,
and some case laws from way back when then it's

(01:39:17):
implied somehow, right, and you wonder we pull this stuff
up out of our hind quarters and what's going on.

Speaker 3 (01:39:23):
Well, you wonder why legal fees cost so much because
you got lawyers that are looking at, you know, case
law from thirty forty years ago, doing a lot of
deep dive research. Whenever it should just be common sense
in most situations, but there's always that, like you said,
a law a judge from years ago made a special
ruling a certain way, and that's what you're going to
go hang your hat on.

Speaker 2 (01:39:43):
And sometimes it.

Speaker 6 (01:39:44):
May be.

Speaker 3 (01:39:45):
Maybe the make or break of your case right there,
you know what I'm saying, or your lawsuit, whatever the
case may be.

Speaker 2 (01:39:51):
No pun intended, right.

Speaker 5 (01:39:53):
Yeah, it's kind of like you know, people on the
left are listening. You know, they've dealt with the abortion issue, right,
you know, out for abortion. I'm totally against abortion. I
hate I hate the idea that people would do that
the babies. But at the same time, they told them
they had a right, and now they told them they
don't have it. Which which is it? You know, right,
this is not right for the American people to have
to live in this husion and disorder.

Speaker 3 (01:40:15):
But if you if you read or you know, remember,
the most recent case didn't say that abortion is a writer,
isn't it right. It's said that the court, the Supreme
Court didn't have the right to hear that particular case
because it was a state matter, and they take it
back to the state.

Speaker 2 (01:40:32):
And so that's that's how they kind.

Speaker 3 (01:40:33):
Of got over and they say, oh, we repealed roe
Vers's way. No, they just basically said, hey, we didn't
have the right to hear in the first place, so
it's no one void essentially, right.

Speaker 5 (01:40:41):
Yeah. Correct, they said that, they said you had no
constitutional right to an abortion. Therefore it reverts back to
the states, and it's within the state's boundaries whether.

Speaker 2 (01:40:49):
You may members under the tenth Amendment.

Speaker 5 (01:40:51):
Correct, yeah, correct, So yeah, you're right, You're right, I
stand corrected on it didn't take away your right, but
it don't.

Speaker 3 (01:40:57):
You mentioned Marshall a minute ago, you talking about Supreme
Chief Justice John Marshall.

Speaker 2 (01:41:02):
Right, I think he was like one.

Speaker 5 (01:41:03):
Of the first twenties.

Speaker 3 (01:41:05):
Yeah, yeah, very very So you didn't like John Marshall
or did you like him?

Speaker 5 (01:41:10):
I don't know, you know, I didn't study him necessarily,
but the things I hear from him. There's some things
I question, like where'd you come up with this? But
some things he was very astute, you know he was
talking about he was right on point. So a lot of.

Speaker 3 (01:41:23):
Stuff that he had to rule on he had to
go to basically English common law and pull from that
because we didn't have anything in this country.

Speaker 5 (01:41:28):
Really yeah, but that's not to me, that's wow. I mean, really,
we just Britain. We're going to go revert to their laws.
They're in a whole different country.

Speaker 2 (01:41:38):
How does that apply?

Speaker 3 (01:41:39):
I think you had to set some sort of precedent, right,
I don't know.

Speaker 5 (01:41:43):
Well, he was the one that also said that we
have to that Supreme Court justice obligation to interpret the
US Constitution or something like that, but there's nothing really
saying that. Right. Yeah, I agree with them because because yeah,
he was said the precedents on that was argued because
we did we establish the Supreme Court for that reason.

(01:42:05):
It wasn't just because thinking about it, states, but.

Speaker 3 (01:42:07):
Had they not claimed that power or authority, it wasn't
going to be legislated to them. The legislative branch wasn't
going to give them that power. So if they're like
a coequal branch of government, you know, on one third
right at the government. Uh, they had to have some
sort of power, and that's what they did, basically constitutional
review if you will, you know, which what was he like.

Speaker 5 (01:42:29):
What was the intention of our forefathers? Wasn't that sort
of their intention is when there's disputes within the law, right,
So when there's disputes within the US Constitution, who would
you go to? So I think I think it's I
think it was a stute on that. I think he
was right what he said.

Speaker 3 (01:42:41):
So right, because you think about this state sues this state?
Who here's that case? How does that get resolved?

Speaker 2 (01:42:48):
You know, do do they go to war? So to
keep from states from going to war with one another?

Speaker 3 (01:42:52):
Because you think about it. In those days, they were
sovereign states. They viewed themselves as their own country, if
you will, not as an actual nation like we we
view you view ourselves now.

Speaker 5 (01:43:01):
Right, Well, they're very very well segregated. Yes, during the
Continental Congress, Yeah, because.

Speaker 3 (01:43:05):
You had different different you know, monetary systems and policies,
you had different money money policy, you know, so you
go across the state line. Yeah, Virginia, Virginia's charging the tariff,
and how do you pay that with Tennessee money or
North Carolina money or whatever. And Tennessee was in a
state way back when. Uh, but you know, how how
do you pay for that?

Speaker 4 (01:43:21):
You know?

Speaker 5 (01:43:23):
In short, it was chaos. It was it was detrimental
to certain states. They were they were they were suffering
from it. So yeah, that's why we ended up with
the federal government because they were trying to avoid centralized government, right.

Speaker 3 (01:43:34):
You know, war created the country and then the debts
solidified it, right because the federal government basically took on
all the state's debts essentially more or less.

Speaker 5 (01:43:43):
But yeah, they they well, it was just the chaos
that was created out of it. And like you said,
you were basically getting into warfare with each other. And
they were really biased. I guess you might, you know,
turn the love terms here. They were biased against one another.
It's like it's funny because had a friend pointed that out.
He said, you know, back in the old days, even
though some wars like you know, I'm from the Great
State of Virginia. You know, it's like Roberty Lee didn't

(01:44:03):
want to really fight for the South. He really was
more pro abolitionist, but he was a Virginian, so he
was loyal to Virginia. So he stayed with Virginia. So
he fought for the South. It's not that he was
pro slavery. He didn't, as far as I know, he's
despised it. But he was a Virginian first, right.

Speaker 3 (01:44:21):
Well, he was offered command of the Union Army and
turned it down because he knew Virginia was going to secede,
you know.

Speaker 5 (01:44:28):
Yeah, So, yeah, people had loyalty to the state right
up until I don't know what when wind really did
that change out, because it was really that strong throughout
the nineteenth century, it was strong.

Speaker 3 (01:44:40):
Right Well, I think probably you know, the first Global
War that we were part of, the Spanish American Wars,
whenever I think Americans kind of came together as you know,
we're truly American at this point, you know what I mean.

Speaker 5 (01:44:51):
Yeah, I can see that.

Speaker 3 (01:44:52):
Yeah, right, I think that's probably what brought us together, like, hey,
we need to stick together. Or these European powers that
he still has, you know, the the glory of you know,
colonialism on their mind. We've got to be careful here,
and of course we maybe want to be colonial ourselves
become a world power. And that's what happened when we
beat the Spanish, right, fairly, soundly and quickly we beat
the Spanish.

Speaker 5 (01:45:13):
Yeah, yeah, I think we did all. Yeah, I see
you a point, because there was a lot of contentionent
post Civil War. I mean, we were under reconstruction and
we had occupation of northern troops in the South to
make sure the South didn't flare back up and right,
so there was a lot of contention and probably that's
what it took to start bringing people back together, getting
seeing each other as Americans once again.

Speaker 3 (01:45:32):
Right, absolutely, And of course, uh you know, by doing that,
by coming together, that led to various civil rights movements
and legislation, uh you know, and also voting rights acts
and things of that nature that allowed women to write
to vote, uh you know, African Americans gave them, you know,
full citizenship, right to vote everything. Uh you know that
that kind of started pulling us together, if you will,

(01:45:53):
kind of coalescing around a central idea of what it
means to be an American, and of course our constitution
is sent to that.

Speaker 5 (01:46:00):
I think, yeah, yeah, well, we'll always be a nation,
you know, we'll always fight among each other. I mean
all nations do.

Speaker 2 (01:46:08):
Yeah, I don't have a problem with you.

Speaker 3 (01:46:10):
You and I disagree on something and we go back
and forth or whatever, but so settle it at the
ballot box or to agree to disagree and walk away.
We don't have to go to arms or kill one
another for crying out loud to disagree. It's it's a
fairly populist country that that we can get along and
live a fruitful life without agreeing with everybody one hundred percent.

Speaker 5 (01:46:27):
I can handle disagreement as long as you understand at
the end that I'm right. Yeah, right, And that's the here,
that's the problem, right, that's it.

Speaker 3 (01:46:35):
Everybody, everybody, the people that everybody wants to disagree with me,
they're the problem.

Speaker 5 (01:46:39):
Yeah, yeah, that's it. But as long as everybody understands
I'm right, that's all that counts.

Speaker 2 (01:46:44):
I love it, John, Yeah, so close it.

Speaker 3 (01:46:46):
In the last part of the second hour here of
the show with the common Sense Conservatives right here ws
in fifteen ninety and ninety five point three FM. If
the music plays us soft before I get to hit
that again, we'll be back next week seven to nineties.

Speaker 2 (01:46:58):
So we've still got a few minutes left for the
regular viewers and listeners.

Speaker 3 (01:47:01):
Colonel Chris White is in England right now covering the
Women's World Cup Rugby World Cup. We'll be back probably
in a couple of weeks stateside, so we'll get more
than just the first hour out of him.

Speaker 2 (01:47:12):
It is fairly late over there.

Speaker 3 (01:47:13):
We're glad that he does join us at least give
us an hour of his time before he gets some
rest for the next day. But anyway, for those who
do watch from South Africa who are sticking with us, yeah,
Colonel Chris White will be back next week seven to nine,
or at least that first hour next week anyway, figure
I'll throw that in there.

Speaker 5 (01:47:31):
Gentleal, Yeah, I think we might. We may have him
on the seventeenth, and maybe he's late as the twenty fourth,
I'm not sure.

Speaker 2 (01:47:38):
But right, good stuff, good stuff, you luck you remember.

Speaker 5 (01:47:42):
I can't remember as itinerary, but somewhere around there, he said,
was somewhere around mid aw September.

Speaker 3 (01:47:48):
Right, absolutely, which man, I don't know if I could
sit and cover.

Speaker 2 (01:47:52):
I mean, you must have.

Speaker 3 (01:47:53):
You must love it, you know, very much to be
able to go and cover it, you know what I mean.
I'm like who's paying you to cover this? You know,
I know he's coming out of his own and doing
it for his own viewers and his own listeners, which
which I mean, hey.

Speaker 2 (01:48:03):
You gotta you gotta love it to be able to
go do it on your own dime like that.

Speaker 5 (01:48:07):
I think it's a passion. Chris has a passion for
what he does. It's obvious right when he even like
when he gets on here the way he would gets
very energetic. Oh, absolutely, he really is. He kind of
gets very energetic. You can tell he's got a great
deal of passion for what we do.

Speaker 3 (01:48:21):
Absolutely yeah, and loves the show, loves what you know,
what he's talking about.

Speaker 2 (01:48:25):
And I like letting him go.

Speaker 3 (01:48:27):
I like, hey, go ahead, Philip Fiel some time, you
know what I mean, give us some in depth coverage
on whatever you know.

Speaker 5 (01:48:33):
Are you like me? Because usually I don't. I don't
strike up a conversation. I have friends. You don't care
about my friends. I don't call them very much. Now
call me, because if I'm calling him, I have to
have something on my mind to talk to him about.
There's nothing that's urging me to call him. So I
just don't call him. And I have don't call me
and go. You know that phone rings both ways? Right?
What do I always have to call you?

Speaker 4 (01:48:55):
Let me tell you.

Speaker 3 (01:48:56):
I get it so many times. Like people are like, well,
you didn't call me over the weekend. I'm like, guess
what that you can call me just the same. You know, Well,
you said you'd call over the weekend. Yeah, I know,
I said i'd call, but Sunday rolls around, I didn't
get around to it. You could also call me, I
mean for crying out loud.

Speaker 5 (01:49:11):
You don't have to getoint.

Speaker 2 (01:49:12):
Oh maybe you got me.

Speaker 3 (01:49:13):
I'm talking about middle age, and some of them are
seventy seventy year old people.

Speaker 2 (01:49:17):
Some of them get been out of shape. It's like,
you can call me just the same, you know.

Speaker 5 (01:49:20):
Listen, I'm actually taking blame, though, I gotta admit I'm
pretty bad. I'll think about them corregularly. Sometimes I'll send
somebody a notice of me and man, how you doing
you talk to them? Bor or something. I'll just send
them a next message. But I don't have anything, you know,
just just strike up a conversation. Yeah, when it's doing
shows like this, usually somebody else strikes up the conversation.
I just feed off of me.

Speaker 2 (01:49:38):
You know right, Oh I love that, you know.

Speaker 3 (01:49:40):
I don't do chit chat a little small talking little
that's your weather, how you feeling, You're you're alive, good
for you, hopefully you're you're prosperous. I don't need to
need to sit there and chit chat with you every
night about how you're feeling, how's your goal, how's your whatever.
You know what I'm to do it, don't need to
do it.

Speaker 5 (01:49:58):
It was like people have face. Well, I got home
from work tonight, made dinner, read some of my book,
and uh, played with the cat, and then I took
a bathroom and I'm going to bed, you know.

Speaker 2 (01:50:08):
I was like, yeah, these people have to do these
live updates.

Speaker 4 (01:50:11):
You know.

Speaker 3 (01:50:11):
It's like, oh, you know, like everybody that gets into
their car somehow has to do some sort of live
nonsense or take a photo, you know, or hawk some
product you know you think about. Watch YouTube. Listen to
those YouTube commercials. A lot of them are AI nonsense,
but some of them are just ridiculous. People in their
in their living rooms or their kitchen doing a commercial
about some product.

Speaker 2 (01:50:30):
It's like, who the heck are you? And and and
YouTube's not centering this YouTube's not central the garbage you're pushing,
but but the sensor somebody who's talking to conservative politics.

Speaker 5 (01:50:40):
You know, I know exactly what you mean. I see
these people in there. It's yeah, I just uh, I
don't know. I don't want to put on any years.
We just plainly do what we do and that's it.
I go home by night and I'm done.

Speaker 3 (01:50:52):
There you go, Well, we should have like a few
seconds left here, Johnny, any final thoughts for the listeners
out there.

Speaker 5 (01:50:58):
Well, we did miss one article, you know, for poor
folks in France, they allowed immigration and legal immigrant in
France had decided it was a good idea to grab
a couple of knives and go around knife and people.
I guess he had some sort of rebar and a
couple of knives and he was trying to knife people.
And hey, then we go talk.

Speaker 2 (01:51:13):
There we go. We'll talk to you next week. Seven
ninety is right in episode of fifteen ninety ninety five
point three f M. Until they take care Goblers