The Common Sense Conservatives

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Views and opinions of the following show do not reflect
those of WSMN, its owners and or associates.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
Welcome to the Common Sense Conservatives, a political discussion group
about current events and other government related matters every Wednesday
evening from seven to eight pm, right here on WSMN
fifteen ninety AM, WUSMN ninety five point three FM, and
streaming live on WUSMN dot Live. Making sense of the
inverted reality we are subject to you every day. The

(00:31):
Common Sense Conservatives are here to help bring you back
to reality. Now, your hosts, Chris Wyatt, Todd McKinley, and
John Grovends.

Speaker 3 (00:39):
All right, hey, folks, welcome back to the Common sens Conservatives.
I'm Tod McKinley here in northeast Tennessee, joined by my
co host, Colonel Chris Wyatt there in Central PA. And
John Gardner holding down the studio there in Nashville. John,
how are you at it tonight?

Speaker 4 (00:51):
Uh?

Speaker 1 (00:51):
Doing well? Todd doing well? You know, another fine week
of the Common Sense Conservatives. So glad to be here.
Oh yeah, by the way, look up for people to
turn the turn and right onto East Pearl Street. Though
apparently they don't know it's one way. So I found
that going tonight.

Speaker 3 (01:06):
Did you get hit or no?

Speaker 1 (01:07):
No, they I happened to be in the laying over,
so I was good. But yeah, I'm thinking, I was thinking.
I never thought about it before, but they're not well marked.
Is to be in one way is they just got
one little black and white sign and you know none
of those do not inner signs or anything like that.
And so as I was walking back up to the studio,
I was looking for to go Yeah, right, there's no
doing not inner signs or anything. So I guess I
can see how people get confused if they're not from

(01:27):
around here.

Speaker 3 (01:29):
There you go. Colonel Chris White, he was out last
week at a fundraiser. How did your fundraiser go.

Speaker 4 (01:34):
Colonel, Well went very well, guys. Thanks appreciate you covering
for me while I was gone. It was the highest
grossing night by a figure of two percent in the
entire six years i've very five years i've been a
member of this post. We've never had a night that
made that much money. The bar sales were very good
for the night, but all of them. Mohney was raised

(01:54):
through the Chinese Aux and the Silent Aux in the
fifty to fifties and the door and all of that,
plus the buffet went over very well. We made like
over a thousand dollars off the buffet if I'm not mistaken.
Since people donated almost all the food that was just
money to the post. It really helped out lot. It'd
be nice if we had one weekend a month like that.

Speaker 3 (02:15):
Yeah, yeah, absolutely, every vso across the country would love
to have something like that for sure.

Speaker 4 (02:20):
Well, when I was in Birmingham, Alabama, those guys make
like forty grand a month off of parking fees or
is it a weekend when football's going on. They make
a ton of money because they're right down the street
from University Alabama Birmingham Basketball are, and the football stadium
is just right past that, so people need plays the park,
it's a short distance. They make a ton of money.
I was really envious. I wish we could make that

(02:41):
kind of money.

Speaker 3 (02:42):
Yeah, that's great. Yeah, we have a post out of Knoxville, Tennessee.
So for University of Tennessee games, they go and do
the bartending basically, and they make about fifty grand a year,
you know, off of just on that home football games
and that pays off.

Speaker 4 (02:55):
All, no doubt. The guys in Birmingham have enough money.
They're so flushed with cast that they sponsor paying for
something like you know, five or six veterans sustain a
local you know, half Way House. They pay like thirty
two hundred a month for those guys who live there.
It's amazing. Must be nice to have those kind of resources.
We certainly care kill for it.

Speaker 1 (03:15):
You do you happen to rent out the hall when
it's not use.

Speaker 5 (03:18):
Or we do, but the number events is limited.

Speaker 4 (03:21):
Also, we've had problems with our kitchen and reliability of staff,
and so you know, when you can rent the place out,
just use it, but you get a flat fee for that.
But you really make money as if you do banquets
because we can charge a fixed amount for it. And
that's really good. But with the place has been screwed up,
with the way it's been run for so long, and
you know, we spend so much time right around just
trying to keep the heat on, keep the electricity on, yeah,

(03:42):
and deal with people's misbehavior and stuff like that that
it really we need someone that's good at what they're
doing and spends time on it, and we haven't been
able to find that yet, so hopefully we will.

Speaker 3 (03:52):
Yeah. I find every veteran service like American Legion or
VFW post that has a bar generally has those problems
with people when it costs problems and you know the troublemakers.

Speaker 4 (04:02):
Well they do. And you know, the thing that's so
frustrating about is is that this is an organization to
dedicate to veterans, their survivors, their spouses and all that,
and people want to act like tools. You know, I
mean enough, just stop being a full it's you know,
what happens is that these people they see the VFW
and the Legion as their local cheap bar that they
get to hang out. Yeah, that's that's not what the

(04:22):
Legion of the VFW are. These are veterans service organizations.
They're not there for the canteens. The canteens are just
something to help with camaraderie, but instead of because there's
all kinds of headaches. I had to write an indefinite
dismension for someone yesterday who posted something on Facebook. Our
manager posted a notice asking for experienced bartenders and this
person has been out of shape. And the reason this
person's been out of shape is because they had volunteered

(04:43):
to do our quiz nights, you know, so we'd do
it two nights a week and we bring people in
and we do the quizes, and that person volunteer to
do it. Next thing, I know, without the board's approval,
the idiot manager who we fired, started paying that woman
five hundred dollars a week to do it. Well, that
costs us two thousand dollars a month, and we're in
the whole And when no one authorized that, we didn't
know it. We're like, what's the expense. Oh, that's for

(05:03):
quiz nine, for quiz night. We should be making money.
We're not paying for that anyway. It's just and that person,
after the money was turned off when the announcements made,
went on on our Facebook page, a veterans page on
Facebook and put down don't bother. These people hate their
employees and treat their employees like crap and the the
idea and a bunch of other stuff and their members
and that.

Speaker 2 (05:23):
Ye.

Speaker 4 (05:24):
So you know what, that's person has got an in
definite suspension. And you know what's worse, it's the spouse
of a veteran.

Speaker 3 (05:30):
Yeah, oh yeah, yeah, Well we had to suspend a
post and we'll get to the good technical stuff here
in the second. But we had to suspend a post
so that they were doing illegal gambling and stuff like that.
And you have people that just attacked me because you
know they were doing wrong, but they want to attack
me for shutting them down. You know, it's like, come on,
get over yourselves.

Speaker 5 (05:46):
Yeah, I get this all the time. You know, well,
you know who are you?

Speaker 4 (05:49):
Well, there are rules and no one's ever forced them.
It's not my fault that you got away with this
crap forever. There's one reason why nobody comes in here
anymore because people.

Speaker 3 (05:55):
Like you exactly. It destroys the posts here. In Tennessee,
we had a special election yesterday and Democrats This is
from Fox News. Democrats Surgeon Tennessee throws new uncertainty on
a GP's twenty twenty six house map in district Trump
carried by twenty two points. Republican Matt van Apps won
by nine points yesterday, and it says, I'll give you
the first paragraph here. The results from the hotly contested

(06:18):
special election in Tennessee seventh congressions that are in are
in handing a decisive actor republic to the Republican. But
Both Republicans and Democrats are drawing political ammunition from the outcome.
President Donald Trump proclaimed it was a great night for
the Republican Party after a GP nominee, Matt Vanaps, defeated
Democrat arrival often been in the high stakes race to
succeed former GP represented Mark Green, who resigned from office

(06:42):
in June to take a private sector job. And of course,
you know, yeah, people are saying that, you know, this
is you know, the Republicans are underperforming, Democrats are overperformed.
At I think it's a special election issue where a
lot of Republicans and Conservats don't show up for special elections.
I think it's sad, but it's one of those deals though.

Speaker 4 (06:59):
It's utter nonsense. I mean, they've been trying to play
this game ever since November elections. I mean, listen to
this nonsense. Oh, look at those look at this. Trump
is unpopular. The Democrats surge to big victories in California,
with a proposition in New York City, in New Jersey,
in northern Virginia. I'm so the Democratic strongholds and if

(07:20):
they didn't get fifty five per cent or more, that
would be a story. But they tried to play this
up and make and people fell for it. Oh look
they're close. They might win in New Jersey, they might
win in Virginia. Now look, Virginia's full of Democrats who
are racist. They'll never vote for a black women.

Speaker 3 (07:36):
Yeah, that's true, that is true. They happen to be
Democrats though, right of course.

Speaker 4 (07:41):
That's the Democrats who will never vote for a black woman.
Now look, it's it's just utter nonsense, the whole thing.
They're just they just talking stuff up. There's nothing to it.
And in this case, I mean, it was a runaway election.
He won by nine points. I mean that's not even close,
not even close. So I mean they try to pretend like,
you know, this is a here Trump He won by
twenty two. It doesn't matter what Trump went by. That

(08:02):
was a presidential election when people show up. This was
an off your special election in which nobody turns out
for this thing. And even if they did, congressional candidates
typically with exceptions, do worse than the presidential candidate. The
president has to drag a lot of amo on his
coattails to get in office when he comes in office,
whichever president is. So these people are just frauds, man.

(08:22):
These media outlets are nothing but total frauds, and it's
just it gets really, really obnoxious and old after at
some point.

Speaker 3 (08:29):
Absolutely so, the DODIG finds Seth's use of signal for
the Hoothy trust strike, planning risk harm for the US
mission and pilot source states, and I'm sure the colonel
probably knows a little bit more about the use of
signal during this raid. I just want to get your
thoughts on the fact that that they used it. And
of course, well obviously we know about it because it

(08:50):
was sent to a member of the media.

Speaker 5 (08:51):
I believe right, yes, it was somehow somebody put the
media on there.

Speaker 4 (08:56):
All right.

Speaker 5 (08:56):
My take on it, Hag Seth is completely wrong.

Speaker 4 (08:59):
I mean, if this was a service member, they're beginning
in Article fifteen right now for compromising the mission. I mean,
this could have cost people of their lives. This is
beyond stupid on the part of Pete Haig Seth. And
he has his family on there. What the hell does
his family have the right time? They have no business
knowing about attacks. They're not read on, they don't have
a clearance. I mean, you know, if you've got a
clarence and you're talking to your spouse about your secret stuff.

(09:21):
You shouldn't have a clearance. You should keep your mouth shut.
That's under their damn business. You know. I went to
I deployed the Israel back in nineteen ninety two, and
I didn't tell anybody about this, but I had all
these people come office and I go to the PX
and these spouse and be like, hey, so I hear
my husband's going on that mission with you. What mission? Well?
The one Israel? Like, what are you talking about? I

(09:41):
don't know what you're talking about. People run their mouths,
you know, loose lips sink ships. And hegseeth needs to
be censured for this. He needs to be admonished the
two punts. But Trump's not gonna punish him. This is
beyond the pale irresponsible. Look we get upset about Hillary
Clinton stealing classified information and then look, I want to quibble, Well,
he has the right to declassify. Yes, he does have
the right to classify certain things, but he has no

(10:02):
right to use an unsponsored, unsanctioned, unapproved, insecure and I
don't want to hear that it's encrypted.

Speaker 5 (10:08):
We can break anything. I worked at NSC.

Speaker 4 (10:10):
Don't even try that crap. You know signal is not
an authorized application if it was. When I worked at
NSA during the Gulf War, I had to carry a
darn motorola then had encryption on it and then think
ran my battery down so quickly because it runs all
the time, the encryption constantly running through cipher's. You know,
I had to do that, and I was just doing contracting,
you know. But it was during the time of war,

(10:30):
but they didn't want anything to get out, so you know,
this is this is I'm sorry, Pete hagg Seth is
reprehensible and they're right. And here's the worst part. He
didn't even sit down to be interviewed. That says a
lot to me. Either it's disdained for the inspector general
process or he thinks it is above the law. In
either case, it's not a good look. So Pete haig
Seth is wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong on this and
he deserves to be pillared for it. But we shouldn't

(10:52):
spend too much time on it. We got bigger fish
or fried with the bottom line is he shouldn't get
a free pass on this because it's unacceptable. If one
of my soldiers did this, they'd be getting chaptered out
or the beginning article fifteen right.

Speaker 3 (11:01):
Now right, absolutely so. Apparently, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro unleashed
on former Vice President Kamala Harris Doering an interview published Wednesday,
claiming that the Democrat nominee for president wrote about him
and her book was utter bullstein. As John would put it,
this is according to Fox News. Uh, I love it.
Democrats are calling out their own. Now, I guess since
Kamala has you know, has no future in public politics

(11:24):
at this point, right, yeah, so it's okay to call
her out. Now she's done, we can call her out.

Speaker 1 (11:30):
I don't think she had a future before. Just it
was all a flu That's.

Speaker 3 (11:34):
Something you know, had had had the Democrat you know, president,
had half a brain, you know, it would have been
a different story for her. But obviously his brain was damaged.

Speaker 1 (11:44):
Joe Biden, well, what are they now starting to talk
about it? They're starting to come out a little bit. Well, well, yeah,
he's showing signs. It's like, yeah, he was showing signs
a long time ago.

Speaker 3 (11:52):
Gain you knew about it, You knew about it. But
I love this book that that that Kamala wrote, And
thanks that people are just gonna you know, it's gonna
save her or political career moving forward is going to
rescue he. Now the Democrats are actually calling her out
on I love it. They're they're calling out lies. It's
blatant lies.

Speaker 4 (12:07):
I love it. Well, that's what it is. Definitely lies.
Nothing about that.

Speaker 3 (12:12):
Absolutely. So the California Lutheran University trying to set up
a Attorney Port USA chapter has been denied a secret
ballot vote of two to eleven to one abstention, according
to the Associated Press. So, yeah, apparently not going to
be able to have a Turning Point chapter there because
people are too afraid to vote publicly and and stand
on you know, their their own merit. I guess so

(12:34):
their leg of their vote secret vote to deny that,
you know, a Turning Point USA chapter at a Lutheran university.
I don't kind of quite of understand that.

Speaker 4 (12:43):
Well, it's because their frauds are not really Lutheran universities.

Speaker 3 (12:47):
Yeah, that's kind of just throw me for for of
course it's in California though, Just so well, Georgetown is
also a fraudulent Jesuit school.

Speaker 4 (12:53):
I mean, you know, they they pull that crap in
try to play these games like these, these these people
high behind religion. Look at the Epistle Church. They're happy
to bring people all over the world who don't share
our values in this country, who don't have any interest
in our moras and our values and norms. And we
see what some of them actually do, the behavior they have,
and so they're happy to bring over here because they're
making money and pretend that they're loving and carrying their

(13:15):
people of faith at Piscopal Church. But they're nothing but
a bunch of racists. As soon as Trump suspends the program.
Oh and they're money grubbers because oh, he's only letting
white South Africans go over here. We supported arch business
Desmond Chew two during apartheid. Hey that was thirty years ago.
The people are coming over, most of them rounder the
age of thirty. They're born under the A And see
they had nothing to doing apartheid. So why are you

(13:36):
such a racist? You have a probably being three hundred
thousand Urainians here for three years and dumping them in
our neighborhoods. They're a white lives time I checked. So
look these organizations, you have to take a close look
at them because so many of them are fraudulent. They
all have a purpose, and the purpose isn't their state
of purpose. The purpose of Piscopal Church bring reftees over
here is not because they're loving people who care about

(13:56):
the downtroden. They're money grabbing bastards who want money, and
that's what it's all about. When the money is turned off,
they use the excuse and use their stupidity and their
ignorance to complain about white races because they're just because
they're the racist. Look, I mean, I'm sick of these
bigots in these organizations. I mean, we have all kinds
of an American the American Criminal Liberties Union, the Southern
Poverty Law Center. These are just frauds and organizations that

(14:17):
grift money to attack mainstream America. And you know what,
I'm glad Trump's present now, you know what, Pour it on, buddy,
cut them all off, set them all home, get it
get it done, get it done right.

Speaker 3 (14:29):
Absolutely, So, what what is your thoughts on, you know,
from a military standpoint of the strikes in Venezuela, on
some of these little boats that they have down there,
what are your what's your take on that?

Speaker 4 (14:38):
Number one, the strikes are not in Venezuela. So let's
be clear, they're international waters. No, but I mean, but
that's the press is running with that narrative. So every
single strike has been in international waters, and so it's
a different topic altogether. I'm not a fan of it.
Why aren't we doing boarding operations? But that's what I mean,
rather than blow them up by He's trying to send
a message. But all it's doing is is cloud in

(14:58):
the waters. But you know what, even if he did
legitimate boarding operations, which is under international law law, the
seat is allowed. Even if we were doing that at sea,
they would still come up with something complained and then
we'd have these people in our hands and they'd be martyrs.
So that's probably why they just start taking them out. Uh.
I'm not thrill with it, but I'm a little more
concerned about Trump's announcement yesterday in the Cabinet meeting that

(15:20):
we will now start striking targets on land. Now we're
hitting someone's sovereignty. So I'm concerned about that.

Speaker 3 (15:27):
Well, where where do you think it goes if we
if we do hit the targets, say just on the
beach or shore or somewhere in like a harbor somewhere.

Speaker 4 (15:35):
Uh no, I think we're going to hit drug manufacturing
facilities in Columbia and Venezuela.

Speaker 1 (15:39):
Yeah, he's going after.

Speaker 3 (15:40):
He's going after get going deep, deep into the country,
not just along the borders or you know, just inside
the border.

Speaker 4 (15:46):
Well. And and and what I envisioned seeing is you know,
I mean we've seen this movie before. It was called
Clear and Present Danger with Harrison, So that's what that's
what I envisioned, seeing a Delta or Seal Team six
raid into the jungles of Columbia or Venezuela to take
out and blow up a narco terror site and then
Hels coming any vacuum and then hopefully it's not an
off the books operation like we saw in Clear Pleasure Danger.

Speaker 3 (16:09):
Yeah. Well the President at the end, now, Jack, here's
what you're gonna do. You're gonna put that in your pocket.
You're gonna go on the lecture circuit. Yeah, basically trying
to love it. That's how it goes on behind the
scenes there in Washington. I have you're gonna go, right,
you know, you're gonna go make one hundred thousand dollars
on the lecture circuit and all this. Yeah, mister president,
we're gonna expose just what we're gonna do.

Speaker 4 (16:28):
Sorry.

Speaker 1 (16:29):
Yeah, So it seems to me that under the the
what is it the authorization?

Speaker 4 (16:35):
Was it?

Speaker 1 (16:35):
Authorization for use of military force? Allows Trump to declare
people as terrorists. He's got so many days to submit
that and to Congress, so that's what he's done. It
seems to me he's following protocols while he's doing this. Also, Chris,
those boats that you're talking about weren't under states. They
weren't under what They're stateless when they're not flying their flag. Therefore,

(16:57):
they don't fall under the sovereignty of their state. If
they're not flying their flag, doesn't that give a certain leeway.

Speaker 4 (17:04):
Well, it's true that if they're not flying a flag,
then they put themselves in a position, but it doesn't
change the fact that that they have to meet certain
conditions to be attacking these things. I mean, you can
attack pirates, that's that's self defense. There's no self defense here.
So look, I'm not a lawyer and I'm not gonna
I'm not gonna parse language about it. My only point
here is that I just expressed he asked my thought

(17:26):
on it concern because I'm not arguing that it's not
allowed or illegal, or even that I'm against it, and
I'm not making that argument. I'm just stating that there's
there are concerns here, particularly we start talking about going
on because now we're violent in a country sovereignty.

Speaker 1 (17:40):
He's definitely entered a gray area. It's not you know,
it's unprecedented. So you're right if he goes, I.

Speaker 4 (17:45):
Wouldn't say it's unprecedent. And we've attacked a lot of
countries in the thirties and forties in Latin America. It
became our modus operatic. We invaded countries in these little
banana republics, so I would it's just it's just in
the living memory of people, it's kind of unpresent.

Speaker 1 (17:57):
Yeah, yeah, there you go. That's a better way to
word it.

Speaker 3 (18:02):
Absolutely for sure. So what's going on in your neck
of the woods, that colonel that you want to talk
about tonight, anything in particular.

Speaker 4 (18:08):
Well, I mean that you've kind of hit on the
things I want to hit on tonight. There's there's a
few other but nothing here in Pennsylvania. I mean, there's
nothing really, But you know, do you know that Arizona
is suing Timu, the Chinese company, for stealing their trademarks
and ripoffs and fakes and also making data illegally and
violation of the Consumer Protection Act. So that should be interesting.

(18:30):
Won't see what happens there Beyond that, you know, they're
still making hay about Epstein. They're desperately trying the leftist outlets.
I saw the Guardian and several newspapers released news stories
about the Democrats releasing photographs of Epstein's house. Who cares?
I mean, by the way, it's tacky. I saw the pictures.
It's really Yeah. If you got this kind of money
and you live like this, you've got no class.

Speaker 3 (18:54):
I've seen videos that claim to be from his island,
people just walking on vacant buildings and stuff like that.
I'm like, what's the point of the the videos? You know,
there's nothing there. It's just empty, empty rooms and buildings.
There's no evidence there whatsoever that's gonna convict anybody of anything.
You know, it's empty.

Speaker 4 (19:10):
It's an island. Now, I'm with you, and you know,
the big one news this week, really, guys, is that
is all the immigration and all the temperate protected status
and all those changes.

Speaker 5 (19:21):
So if you want, I'll run through some of the
things that have happened Trump.

Speaker 4 (19:24):
Trump is literally shutting the door, John, shutting the door
on people coming this country. So here we go temporary
protected status. There are one point two million people living
here in temporary protected status. There is a situation where
we let people in the country who aren't refugees or
we don't give them refuge status, and we say, look,
it's two dangerous to go home, So we're going to
protect your TPS. Unlike TDS Trump arrangement syndrome.

Speaker 3 (19:46):
It's close.

Speaker 4 (19:47):
But of that one point two me and six hundred
and six thousand are Venezuelan nationals, half of them. But
this past week, I remember he mentioned he did a
thing famously about Somalia because of all the frog and
he says, I'm going to stop TPS for Somalis in Minnesota. Yeah, well,
there's maybe seven hundred and five Somali's total in the
state of Minnesota that I have TPS, so it's not

(20:08):
going to a major impact. But he has suspend it
for Sudan and a bunch of other countries. Then he
announced there'll be no immigration visa's process for any of
the nineteen countries on the watch list, which includes ten
African countries. In addition to that, Christy and Nome came
out very hard saying we just want to stop all
these dirtbaged and criminals. Literally, that's almost what she said
coming into our country. And on top of that, they

(20:30):
did the unprecedented step of saying the two hundred and
thirty three thousand refugees came over through the refue program
under the Immigration nationality at nineteen eighty during the Biden regime,
every one of their cases is going to be reviewed
for fraud, and that's going to take a long time.
I hope that they focus on a certain number of them,
starting with Afghanistan because that's where a lot of the
frauds started.

Speaker 5 (20:50):
But then you know they lied to a member.

Speaker 4 (20:52):
You know, Alejandro Majorcis and Carne Jean Pierre and Joe
Biden tell us all these people that have been vetted,
they've all gone through I mean they're getting out of
a plane, they're falling off the wheels is, the taxis
down the runway to their death. It has been vetted,
and so they know they lied to us. Now we
find out there were eighty nine thousand Afghans who flooded
this country in a period of three's who had no

(21:13):
vetting whatsoever. And of that I did the numbers the
other day. Let me see, I can find the numbers here.
It's insane. There's all these people with criminal charged against
them and all these things about suspicious about what's going on.
It's absolutely insane what's been going on with these people.
So let me see here. I've got the numbers here.
So of that seventy six thousand number I was talking
about eighty nine thousand, But the seventy six thousand in
this group, eight hundred and sixty eight were flagged for

(21:36):
derogatory information. So in other words, there's a problem with them,
either pedo's rapist murders, or criminals or thieves, or there's
something dodging.

Speaker 5 (21:44):
So that is about nine percent.

Speaker 4 (21:46):
Another five thousand were flaged five thousand and five for
national security reasons, so now we're up to twelve thousand.
Eight hundred and seventy six were flagged for fraud they
committed a fraud that we know about, and nine hundred
fifty six flag for public safety. That's thirteen thousand of
seventy six thousand who weren't vetted. We already know have
problem with imagine what's going to happen with the rest
of them. Oh, but these are good people, they helped us.
I'm sorry, I'm sorry, Homer. That doesn't work. So two

(22:09):
hundred and thirty three thousand refte case all going to
be reviewed, and every one of those people could be
kicked out of the country. Now, the odds are a
lot of them won't be kicked out because vetting was
done proper. If people come from the Congo or elsewhere
beyond maar So. But still, that's unprecedented. He stopped all
asylumn case processing because the system is broke. That's completely
We have two point three million asylumn seekers in American
Given that ninety five to ninety seven percent as soldum

(22:31):
cases are fraudulent, that means over two million aliens in
this country. You have no business being here. Let's get
them out, kick them out, let's speed up these cases.
They're hiring a bunch of attorneys, paying as much as
one hundred and eighty thousand dollars a year for people
with either judge or a lawyer or attorney experience to
be these immigration judges, and frankly, they don't have to
hire attorneys. They hire reasonable people. You don't have to

(22:51):
be a judge or an attorney to be to be
an immigration judge. So they're trying to accelerate that and
it just goes on and on, you know. So basically
they set the cap of seven five hundred refugees for
this year from the world and they've preserved they claim
about seven thousand, that for South African So this is
a stark contrast, not just that. If you look at
you look at the border crossings, the ones we catch,

(23:12):
the number of people being caught at the border that
are Illeglantern is dropped to a trickle And I said,
trickles the lowest it's been in living memory. It hasn't
been this low since Desi and Lucy were on TV.
You know, we'll see I have something to you.

Speaker 3 (23:28):
Yeah, so, I know, we didn't mention that the shooting
of two National Guard, uh you know, soldiers of Andrew
Wolfe and Sarah Beckstrom shot by Ramalla Loachenwall, who's you know,
I guess has been indicted at this point, I mean
a terrorist for crying out loud. We've allowed into our country,
and you just talked about some ways that we can

(23:50):
hopefully mitigate that. You know, we're not going to eliminate
everybody for sure, but mitigate that in a long way
with some of the stuff you just talked about. Whatever
it kept this individual out of the country, or would
have at least investigated him, or what would have done
with this guy.

Speaker 4 (24:04):
In this case, it's it's very hard to make the
claim that it would have made a difference because supposedly
he worked for the CIA for a number of years,
and if he's working with the CI, but I'm hearing
the problem is you're a rumored in nuendo.

Speaker 5 (24:15):
I don't know the facts.

Speaker 4 (24:16):
We're in a rumor that he actually led the CIA
and the military and ambushes. But I mean, if that
had been happening, you think we'd have been smart enough
to pick up on that at some point. But he
did it for years, so so in this case, I
don't know that would have would have would solve the problem.
But the bottom line is this, this is people from
the Stone Age. They have no business here, you know,
you know, electricy, wow, oh my, we meet meet people

(24:37):
aren't forced to be Muslims. We can't have that I
mean stone age people. Now, people are gonna say your
NFO big no, not there's there's proper Afghanis who are
willing to come here. They can be Muslims, they can
practice their faith. They don't try to impose shari hous,
they don't try to change the cultural mores and norms.
They add to our colleidescope. But it's a small number.
Most of those people just flooded in here because there's

(24:58):
total chaos and no control. They We're busy getting thirteen
service members killed in the rush to get people out
of there, rather than provide proper security Kabul because we
had an idiot, demented lunatic who was the president who
didn't even sign his parts. By the way, all that's
bikers too. We'll get to that shortly. Trump has just
abrogated all of the executive orders that were signed by
the autoped Let's see how. But we're got to tell
about that shortly. But look, this Afghan thing is is

(25:20):
it's not just that, but the Afghan thing is out
of control. In this guy's case, I don't know what
it made a difference, but I never would have brought.

Speaker 3 (25:25):
Him over here, right, Yeah, you would have probably had
many red flags right off the battle, and this guy
for sure, Yeah, he's harboring those feelings. Someone would have
come out at some.

Speaker 4 (25:34):
Point, right, I mean, you know, people are good at
hiding things, but not that good and not everybody you know, right, yeah,
because I remember we've had interpreters over the years.

Speaker 3 (25:42):
That let ship stuff. Sorry, a slip out.

Speaker 1 (25:46):
Were you talking about a shirt.

Speaker 3 (25:48):
A shirt slip out? Yeah, the shirt slip out, you know,
and you have to go report that, you know. It's like,
yeah he said this and this and this, you know,
so you know, next thing, you know, they're going pretty quickly.

Speaker 4 (25:58):
Yeah. No, I mean, look, it's I mean, what are
you going to say about this. It's just it's really
really really tragic. What happened here and it was targeted,
is really an act of terrorism. He hunted them, and
you know, a lot of people there was some criticism
people watching the video because someone a passer by had
to hold a phone up as they drove by, and like,
what are these soldiers running away? They weren't running away.

(26:20):
They were moving, communicating and getting to different firing positions
because they were caught in an ambush. You either either
either return fire and drive through the ambush, which is
impossible in a city street, or you pull back and
you adjust, and that's what they were doing. I thought
their fire techniques, from what I could see in that
little video were really good. It's it's but this guy
walked up and shot them on the ground. We don't

(26:41):
know the nature of the of the staff startanists a lot.
I have a bad feeling was shot in the head
because the guy shot and he went down, he came
up and fired another shot, and what do they usually do?
That's what they're going to do. So I don't know
what the nature her injuries are, but I do remember
as she was lying dying, her father was there and
he said, she's not going to make it. We're here
to be with her. This is horrific, you know, this
is exactly what Trump said needed to happen. I was

(27:03):
interviewed this week by someone in South Africa who I
had a decent interview with, but he wanted to push
back on the use of the military in the cities,
and I said, it's perfectly legitimate, legal, you know, passe
comatadus does to apply here. It's a national guard. YadA, YadA, YadA,
and He's like, yeah, but this is this is the America.
We don't expect to see that. I said, well, you
know what, if the Democrats hadn't run this country in
the dumpster, we wouldn't be having this problem. Yes, but

(27:24):
all of the all of the military being deployed in
cities controlled by Democrats. I'm like, have you looked at
our major metch pulinarians. Every single major match pulinearer in
his country, without fail, is run by Democrats, and most
of them are nothing but basket cases. If you look
at Detroit and Chicago and they've been run by Democrats
for decades. I mean, I don't think Republican's run in
Chicago's nineteen thirties. I could be wrong on that, but

(27:44):
it's been a long time, you know. And so these
people have destroyed these places. They're soft on crime, they're
namby pammy nonsense. This is what people killed, and this
is ridiculous. And they run around, oh like during the
Bush Machine, the federal government is giving army cars, the
military hardware to the police, and then they spent a
decade disarming the police. And now we have, you know,
the OK Corral. People just shooting people in the streets

(28:06):
in Philadelphia and Chester in DC in Southeast DC, and
Anacostia in Chicago and the South side Chicago. Hey, look,
I know where this happens. You know why because I've
been there. But the people that don't have never been there,
run their mouths. They've never they never dodged bullets in Anacostia.
I've been down there, wouldn't doune fires. Oh yeah, anyway, Yes,
people should wear signs.

Speaker 3 (28:24):
I mean right over near where the three building three
ninety ninety is white house communication just outside there pop
shots all the time.

Speaker 4 (28:32):
Yeah, yep, yep. Well, you know you worked the same
facility I was at. You were a bowling I used
to run you know, isn't ironic?

Speaker 6 (28:37):
I like this.

Speaker 5 (28:38):
It was just that Chris Chris Rock has said this.

Speaker 6 (28:40):
You know.

Speaker 5 (28:40):
How come it's always you know, the most dangerous town.

Speaker 4 (28:43):
The street in the town is always named MLK Boulevard.
It was right out the gate of bowling up Force Base,
goes up the steep hill and in order to get
a good hard running and then coming back it's relaxing
because I'm going downhill. I would always run up MLK.
And I'm gonna tell you what man said a couple
of times. You know, I took my life and my
own hands doing that a little crazy around there.

Speaker 1 (29:04):
You get a good running when you feel like you're
running for your for your life.

Speaker 3 (29:07):
Well, this is like reminds him being back in Somalia.

Speaker 5 (29:13):
Run exactly, Run Forest Run.

Speaker 3 (29:17):
So I got to ask you now, you're talking about
the Somalis and immigration all this. Have you seen the
videos of them talking about they prefer Sharia law then
US law and the constitution?

Speaker 4 (29:27):
Uh? They did?

Speaker 3 (29:27):
Man on the streaming reviews in Minnesota.

Speaker 5 (29:29):
You know what I prefer deportations.

Speaker 3 (29:31):
How do you tell you that's what they should have
done immediately? All right, let's get this guy out of here.

Speaker 4 (29:35):
Roll him up.

Speaker 3 (29:37):
We're gonna take you back to sharia law. Buddy, we've
got you hooked up over here. Problem.

Speaker 1 (29:41):
There's a place in the world for that, isn't there?

Speaker 3 (29:43):
No, Absolutely, It's called the country you came from.

Speaker 1 (29:46):
Yeah. Sorry, It's like it's like liberals, you know, they
like to leave a liberal state go to a fine
conservative state, but they want to bring their laws with them.
It's what are you doing? You know you had you had,
you had what you wanted there. You should just stayed
there and then they should. But it's too expensive to live.

Speaker 4 (30:01):
What y'all wonder what there's a reason for that? When
you have seven different blends of gasoline mandated by corrupt
officials in Sacramento. This is what happens. I moved from
Iowa in nineteen ninety ninety five, No, ninety seven, I
mean from Iowa in ninety seven. Wait, no, no, I'm sorry.
I was in Iowa nine ninety and two ninety nine

(30:21):
because I came back to the States. I'm sorry. I
moved from Italy in ninety nine to California. I stopped
in Iowa, which is where I used to be stationed
in Iowa state. Iowa has low gas prices because the
don't have all these stupid regulations. I think I paid
like a dollar eighty nine a gallon. I drove across
the country to California. I lived in Monterey. Gasoline was
four dollars and eighty five cents a gather for regular
as opposed to dollar eighty nine. Do you know what?

(30:43):
Because California's stupid emissions in the regulations for all these
different blends, you go to gas station like which one
am I supposed to use like five different blends here.
You know, all I need is regular premium. That's all
I need now. And by the way, today Trump relaxed
the cafe standards. Finally, this idiotic stuffy god just remove
all again. That's why we can't get you know, get
V eights anymore, because the nonsense these manufacturers have to

(31:05):
comply with these ridiculous gasoline stairs. Right. Look, if I
want to spend the money for gasoline.

Speaker 5 (31:10):
To put in my vehicle, that's my choice.

Speaker 4 (31:12):
I don't want to drive a little car made at
a cardboard that you know, gets flattened by a deer
when I hit a deer. It has three cylinders in
it and thirty five horse power, which is what they
want us driving. That's a hun day.

Speaker 1 (31:26):
Remember the Ugo it was the three Was it a
three cylinder car?

Speaker 5 (31:30):
No, But the Trebot was a three stroke engine.

Speaker 4 (31:32):
I remember that.

Speaker 3 (31:34):
You talked about the cafe corporate average fuel economy. But
I'm thinking of cafes, like, you know, going in to
get a coffee. Now you can go and order a
regular coffee now, right, it's a different things.

Speaker 4 (31:46):
Who can afford it?

Speaker 5 (31:47):
My frappuccino is seven dollars in the Starbucks. These people
are smoking cocaine.

Speaker 1 (31:52):
I'm on the I'm on the you know, got my
pot of coffee at home program.

Speaker 3 (31:56):
Yeah, that's what I do. Yeah, I do like my
little kereg not a problem, but I.

Speaker 1 (32:00):
Like it that way. You know, you make it look
you like it. It's not You're not going to some place.
And they're inconsistent in some of this water down coffee,
Like wow, this tastes like cream and sugar warts the coffee.

Speaker 3 (32:09):
I put too splendors in a little bit of mocha
in there, you know, and it's perfect for me, John,
and I have no comment.

Speaker 4 (32:14):
I don't drink coffee. It's an evil substance invented by
Satan to enslaved mankind. And for those of you who
can't handle your morning.

Speaker 1 (32:21):
That is blasphemy.

Speaker 3 (32:22):
That's big mine in the evening in the afternoon.

Speaker 5 (32:26):
Sorry, that is an accurate analysis. You see these people
that freak out and they're really difficult to be around.
We don't have their coffee in the morning. You know
exactly what I'm talking about.

Speaker 1 (32:36):
America runs on duncans, I run on coffee.

Speaker 3 (32:39):
What's happening in your neck of the Budge in New Hampshire.

Speaker 2 (32:41):
There.

Speaker 1 (32:41):
Oh jeez, I haven't really looked at anything going on
too much. I was looking at something in her earlier things,
and it's not a whole lot that I can see
going on. I mean, Meggie good Lander's still running her
mouth and not knowing much. Wish she's talking about it
pretty much summarizes her.

Speaker 3 (32:55):
Right there, pretty standard.

Speaker 1 (32:56):
Right, yeah, she's like, you know, she's a smoother version
of Jeb Asband Crockett. I guess she's seeking attention, but
she's not as toxic or vulgar about it.

Speaker 3 (33:05):
All right there you go, Yeah, toxic.

Speaker 1 (33:10):
That woman's good. That woman's got to go. I hear
jasminc Crockett wants to run for US Senate. Can you imagine?
I don't think she's getting that out of Texas. I
don't think, you know, winning a house seat is one thing,
but for her to get the whole state of Texas
to vote for her, oh my.

Speaker 3 (33:24):
Goodness, No, I don't think so. One hundred and seventy
four thousand dollars is not enough. She has some mortgage
and all these bills. I'm like, most every American has
the same bills and mortgage you have, and they make
a way less than you do. I'm sorry. They make
it work. You can make it work.

Speaker 4 (33:38):
Yeah. No. I actually saw an interview with what used
to be an opposition leader in South Africa today who
was attacked in an op ed in South African. So
the same platform gave him an opportunity to come in
for right a rebuttal and it was comical listening to him.
This guy makes over one hundred and fifty eight thousand
dollars a year, which in South Africa is a king's ransom.
Trust me, you can live comfortably in South Africa thirty

(34:00):
thousand dollars a year, So that's a fortune in South Africa.
He's a member of parliament, he's a Minister of Agriculture.
He's got additional money, you know. Anyway, he has all
the benefits of perks, the office and stuff. And it
was revealed recently that he had failed to pay his
credit card bill to the tune one hundred and forty
nine thousand Rand, which sounds like a lot, but that's
like eighty eight hundred dollars. I mean when I travel,

(34:21):
that's a credit card bill for me unfortunately, but so
he had failed to pay it and basically for Nigda
defaulted on his debt, so he was taking the court
and had a judgment against him. This is the leader
of a political party. By the way, he has zero assets.
He's forty nine years old, has no money in the bank,
no stocks, no bonds, doesn't own a house, doesn't anything
some official going on there. And the guy's answered questions

(34:42):
and he says, well, you know, I think it's nobody's
business those people that you know their finance. I'm like, hey, dude,
you just don't get it. You're you're open to public scrutiny.
How are people supposed to trust you as knowing what
you're doing when you can't even manage your checkbook and
you can't pay your credit card bill and all. By
the way, his own political party suspended his party card
earlier this year, so.

Speaker 3 (35:02):
He was using a corporate card, if you will, for
personal expenses or something.

Speaker 4 (35:07):
Well that's the allegation that there's no evidence presented to
the public as yet. But the guy who suspended it,
who also happened to be a minister that he fired recently,
which wasn't wise, said that he was using it for
personal expenses, as have others saying that he was getting
takeaway food for it to take you know, deliveries and
stuff like that. I don't know if that's true, but
this is the point. The point is that how can
I trust a politician and can't bounce or check? But

(35:28):
this was one of the reason why I can't trust
Alexander Cortes. She can never pay her credit card bill
until she got into Congress, and then she was one
hundred and seventy dollars years done. Enough, we have expenses,
you know what, Hey, you should get you know, instead
of going to that nail salon, she get your nails
done less often, sweetheart.

Speaker 1 (35:46):
She should try being a truck driver in the United
States and over the RUAD, trying to make ends meet,
living on the road.

Speaker 3 (35:51):
Down for dates too, apparently, right, So that's another reason
we don't like her.

Speaker 4 (35:55):
Oh yeah, that's true. We were Republicans all on the day.
Oh my goodness, Lord helped me. Lord helped me.

Speaker 1 (36:01):
How many How many times have you asked Todd how
many times you've been knocking under door?

Speaker 3 (36:05):
I'm sending emails constantly.

Speaker 4 (36:09):
She doesn't answer emails. That's just rude.

Speaker 1 (36:11):
So you're you're a competition, is that it?

Speaker 3 (36:14):
Right?

Speaker 1 (36:15):
So?

Speaker 3 (36:15):
Trump is facing black lives about immigration here, folks. President
Donald Trump is facing mounting criticism after referring to Somali
immigrants as garbage, singling out Representative Eleon Omar of Democrat
from Minnesota, who arrived in the United States in nineteen
nighty five after a family fled Somali's civil war. Trump
made the comments during a cabinet meeting Tuesday while discussing
the situation in Minnesota under Democrat Governor Tim Wallas, who

(36:37):
was former Vice President Kamala Harris's running mate last year.
As we all know, of course, this is according to Newsmax. Yeah,
I think he's probably smart on I'm not saying every
immigrant is garbage, but a lot of them are, especially
the ones I saw on the Man on the Street interviews,
you know, talking about they'd rather prefer Sharia law in
laws that they have in Somalia versus what they have

(36:58):
here in the United States. It's like, get gone, then.

Speaker 4 (37:00):
Well, what was that?

Speaker 1 (37:01):
What was that issue about a Samoalog I just read
this earlier today. I think Somalian had raped a thirteen
year old girl and the excuse they gave was, well,
he hasn't been in the country long enough to really
adapt to our customs and assimilates, Like, wait a minute,
he raped a thirteen year oldgo and you say that's
the excuses because it's common in Somalia coming back out
that that is an excuse.

Speaker 4 (37:22):
That So a German woman was sentenced to three years
in a federal penitentiary in Germany because she protested because
convicted rapist who raped German teenagers and preteens were set
free by the female judge saying, well, they didn't.

Speaker 5 (37:38):
Understand our laws. It's just a matter of way.

Speaker 4 (37:40):
They understand the law. You can't have you can't have
intercourse with a twelve and thirteen year old child. And
she got a three year prison sentence a German citizen
because she protested social media. That's a country that's gone.
France is gone, Germany's gone, is gone, and yeah, they're
all gone. These are these are corrupt places where they
prey upon their own citizens for exercise of free to

(38:01):
speech if they dare say anything about criminal acts by
criminals because they're Muslims, and they call it racist, but
Islam is not a race, it's a religion.

Speaker 5 (38:09):
It can be bigotry, but it can't be racism. And
that's how stupid this is.

Speaker 1 (38:13):
It's like that guy from England who come to the
United States Robertson, Well, the guy who got the chance
to fire a gun. He took a picture and put
it on social media on a home in England. The
police come knock out the door and told him informed,
you need to take in consideration other people's feelings. And
then later on he was arrested for it. And I
think he's spent thirteen months trying to fight it all
because he made a social media social media post of

(38:36):
shooting a gun in the United States.

Speaker 4 (38:39):
Well, there is a guy who was in South Africa
recently who was hunting and he posted a thing on
LinkedIn or something like that, a photograph of him with
a rifle, and he goes back to UK and he
was detained. I don't know the status of that case,
but this is insanity.

Speaker 1 (38:54):
How dare he go to another country and enjoy their
customs and illegally enjoy their customs?

Speaker 3 (38:59):
Right?

Speaker 5 (39:00):
Right, These these these people are out of control.

Speaker 4 (39:02):
They need to be smacked down and quickly.

Speaker 3 (39:05):
Right and people that you know, you're who's listening to this,
I mean, this could easily happen in the US, if
you allow a certain party to gain control.

Speaker 1 (39:12):
It will go that way in certain regards. It has happened.
We've seen our own government work against us and violate
our rate to free speech, working with social media, basically
manipulating or force some social media platforms to shut us down.

Speaker 5 (39:24):
That's one hundred percent correct. That's where I was going next, and.

Speaker 4 (39:26):
You got you beat me to it there, John, I
couldn't help save this. No, it's good. I've blet you.
It's this is we've already we've already lived this, this nonsense,
it's already happened here. It's really frightening how these people
get out of control, and that's what they want to do.
They want to shut people down, and they they crush
free speech. I mean, where are the indictments for the
White House staff, for the National Chic and Health, for

(39:48):
the CDC for for doctor fraud, I mean doctor fauci
and and doctor Blixon and and Joe Biden and Kara
jan Here and all these people colluded, cajoled coerce tech
companies to violate the First Amendment. These are sacricyc natural rights.
These people belong in prison. You don't even need a trial.
We'll give them a trial, but they don't need a trial.
I know they're guilt. They stood up there and lie

(40:08):
to us, and they and they interfered. We have the proof,
the Twitter files exposed it. What if we ever get
the YouTube files or the other files like Facebook. Man,
these people are going to prison and that's where they belong.

Speaker 1 (40:19):
They are passing laws all the time that violate a
constitutional racist Supreme Court still overrule those, and when they
overrule those, they do not remove those laws from the books.
They keep them there, so and essentially they're basically holding
them like a threat for those that are in aren't,
are not in the know, so they think that it's
a law that they can't they can't exercise their own
right whatever it is, like firearms laws that have been overruled,

(40:41):
but they're still there. The laws are still there and
they're still declared as laws even though they're not enforceable.
So essentially they're violating a right to many different ways.

Speaker 4 (40:51):
Well, it's hard to argue with the facts. You got
the facts right there.

Speaker 3 (40:54):
Right, Yeah, yeah, absolutely, It's easier to control people the
more the more things you keep on the book, especially
gear of things. It's like Oh, I could get you
on a technicality on something that's really really minor that
you would never think about. You know, you didn't look
you didn't you look left right but before you cross
the street, but you're supposed to look back to the left. Oh,
that's a little code that we.

Speaker 4 (41:12):
Got you on.

Speaker 3 (41:12):
You know, somebody could get you on that. I mean,
there's so much nonsense. Right well, I mean right now
I've made something up.

Speaker 4 (41:18):
But you know, right now, there are nineteen bills in
the House maybe the House input to the House, that
are aimed at censoring children's access to the Internet in
the name of safety. I'm sorry, isn't that Isn't that
what parents are for? Shouldn't parents have that responsibility? Who
is the state to tell me my child can't become

(41:38):
proficient in technology and become an expert in it so
that they make tons of money when they come of age.
You know, what right do they have? So these kids
are not supposed to touch computers until they're out of
high school. I mean, that's just ridiculous. But Australia has
already done it, and now other ones are trying to
do it. You know, it's it's and we had nineteen bills,
and Congress is trying to suspend liberty and the only

(42:00):
reason I've got for it so far as there is
a fuse speech oute. Wait a second, you can't do this,
this is free speech. But the kids, But the kids,
you know, But but right there, empowering parents.

Speaker 1 (42:10):
When you say that reminds me of Raley James years ago.
She used to say it all the time. They say
it's for the children. It's always for the children. But
they use it as leverage to force us to agree
to things that we normally wouldn't agree to. And in
this regard, they're going to say, well, we have to
protect our children on the internet. They're claiming that they
own our children. They always like to say, you know,
children belong to the state, not to the parent, which

(42:30):
is wrong. Parental rights is an actual thing. They are
your children, They are your custodio. You know, your job
to keep them and raise them for their own greater good.
But they so what you're talking about is digital ID, right,
So they want us all to get digital ID, so
they contract us on the internet. But they're going to
say it's to protect children, to make sure that they

(42:50):
are adults accessing certain sites.

Speaker 5 (42:54):
Well, and then they want to live with the sites
adults can access.

Speaker 4 (42:57):
We already had this deal between credit card companies and
banks trying to limit you know, some of the adult
sites years ago, and a lot of them went out
of business because of that, and now they try to
do it to gambling sites. You know, look, people need
to be adults and take responsibility for their inn actions,
and if their parents, they need to parent, not let
the television, not let the school parents your kids. You
need to be involved in their lives. You need to

(43:17):
have control over them. It's not the role of the
state to do that. Instead of developing a generation that's
moving towards AI and the fourth generation Industrial Revolution, we
are going to keep our kids from accessing these things
because it's harmful.

Speaker 5 (43:30):
Well, not all of it's harmful. A lot of it's
very productive and useful.

Speaker 4 (43:34):
Right, but now they're not going to be experts in
it because some idiot in Congress thinks they know better.

Speaker 3 (43:39):
Yeah, well, of course, because it plays well with what
little base that they need to win an election. You know,
they'll go back to their districts and they'll be like, Okay,
what what what voting block do I need? This time
to win that nomination or win that win that election,
and that's who they'll play to. And that's probably what
this is coming from.

Speaker 4 (43:55):
Yeah, it is. It's this is you know, any anyone
that claims to be a conservative that supports this garbage
is not a conservative. They're certainly not a libertarian. Libertarians
believe in the government not being involved in things, and
true conservatives also think the government should be constrained. But
anytime you start talking about censoring people and taking responsibility
away from parents and sets right, guess what. Guess what

(44:17):
you are? You're illegitimate. I mean, I don't know how
else to say.

Speaker 1 (44:22):
You got you have to get into consideration. These same
people that say, hey, you know what, we need to
protect our children are the same people are saying Donald
Trump is very very bad for t one after these
drug cartels are actually actually trying to protect the drug
cartels who are praying on your children. They're trying to
feed drugs to your children. They're trying to human traffic
your children. They may not be directly your individual child,

(44:44):
but there are children within our country or even outside
of our country into our country. These people aren't good people.
We need to protect our children. Yeah, let's do it
that way. Let's do it that way. Let's follow Donald
Trump's lead and do it like that, because I like
that path better.

Speaker 4 (44:58):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (44:59):
Yeah. And you have a question about the boats coming
out of Venezuela or wherever. What's the range on those boats?
How far can they make it? Where do they go
from once they leave Venezuela?

Speaker 1 (45:09):
Where do they go to with with the low apparently
all the way to the United States with four outboard motors.

Speaker 4 (45:15):
That's why they that's why they got four outward motors. Yeah, yeah,
which makes them go very fast. And you know they've
got to have the fuel. Yeah, Okay, there's obviously some
fuel on board because they blow up very nicely.

Speaker 1 (45:28):
Yeah, they do. I was gonna say they got some
large capacity tanks on those things, I'm sure, especially with
that many motors.

Speaker 3 (45:34):
Right, what's the one on one? What the time is
to get across you know, wherever they drop it off at.

Speaker 4 (45:39):
Well, it's a lot faster than the cruise ships, I'll
tell you that much.

Speaker 1 (45:42):
I can tell I can tell you too. Those social
media posts are correct. I ain't seeing it. I'm not
seeing any fishing poles or fishing lines or a fishing
gear of any type less than big blue barrels inside
those boats are to hold and contain their fish. But
how did they cant right?

Speaker 3 (45:55):
Yeah? Right, yeah, well, how do we know they're not
fishing vessels? It's like, yeah, pretty much, just sure that
there's not a fishing vessel, you know, all that all
those drugs crammed in those barrels. I'm sorry.

Speaker 1 (46:05):
They may have been fishing vessels once they cut off
the top. Yeah, I don't know. I doubt that they
look like they look like they look like speedboats like
they used to go mores.

Speaker 3 (46:17):
Yea, yeah, absolutely. So a judge is ordering January sixth
defendants to be pardoned by Trump to have their money refunded.
Those who paid money in for restitution or whatever. Uh,
they're being ordered to have their money refunded by the government.
So that's interesting. Cording to Fox News, I guess they should,
right if they got pardon.

Speaker 4 (46:38):
You know, if it's yes, if it's a commutation, no, right.

Speaker 3 (46:42):
Yeah, commutation obviously it's just you don't finish off out
a sentence. You still obviously have been convicted of it. Uh,
you know, whenever your pardon, it's like it could kind
of never happen in a lot of ways. Really, it's
not even like an expungement, it's like it never happened.

Speaker 4 (46:56):
Correct, Yeah, you have no conviction the charges if that's
if that's what you do. Yeah, but you know, as
I said, a commutation is different.

Speaker 3 (47:02):
So yeah, absolutely. We got a few minutes here when
I go around Robin there, John, what do you want
to talk about before we get in this hour world?

Speaker 1 (47:11):
Well, let's see, you know, put a hot mic in
front of somebody, asked my question like that and his
mine goes blank. That's me for you.

Speaker 6 (47:17):
You know.

Speaker 1 (47:18):
You know, I became an over the road truck driver
because every time I got to test, my mind went
blank tested high school.

Speaker 4 (47:25):
Are you trying to tell us that the people that
aren't truck drivers aren't that smart? I mean, I don't
think that's true.

Speaker 1 (47:31):
No, there's a lot of a lot of highly intelligent
truck drivers. Truck drivers are wait about DEEI. Truck drivers
come from all sorts of breeds and walks of life
within the United States and sometimes not even in the
United States. Some well educated truck drivers, some of them
used to be physicists and stuff like that. I've seen
guys that pick it up right you know, because they're smart,
they pick it up right away. You think they had

(47:52):
lots and lots of experience, Like, no, man, we've been
driving for three years. And then you get some guys
out there that just looked like they'll never ever be
able to back up a truck.

Speaker 3 (48:01):
Can't you say, can't back a truck up?

Speaker 1 (48:03):
They'll never be able to back up a truck.

Speaker 3 (48:06):
Oh yeah, I've seen some people man struggle at loading dogs.
Man just struggle. And then you get somebody from the
loading dog jumps in there and just backs it in
real quick like, so you go.

Speaker 1 (48:15):
Well, speaking of trucking, pe Haigseth is going after the
trucking schools now because these trucking schools, and this is
part of our problem here in the United States with
the trucking industry. Relatively speaking. For the miles that truck
drivers put in there, they're safe, they are safe drivers.
But one of the major issues we do have within
the trucking industry is that we have these truck driving
schools that have two week programs. You know, they don't

(48:37):
teach them the laws. They don't you know, there is
a little green book we call it. You know the
code of federal regulations and you should know those right.
If you're gonna be in an industry, you're gonna be
professional of that industry, you should know the laws that
you're working under. So they're not teaching them that in
two weeks. They're not teaching them how to back up
in two weeks or lucky thing putting gear and go
forward in two weeks. I've actually had people approach me

(48:58):
and ask me how to how to couple run couple
of truck, tractor and trailer. They should know that before
they even got behind the wheel in the first place.
They should never have been pump on the whill so
they knew how to. And that is a safety issue
within itself. If you ever get a high hook on
a truck and lose a high hook where the kingdom
doesn't lock properly and hit a bump and lose that
trailer fully loaded or something, it's gonna seize up on
the interstate and Soody's going to remend it and die.

(49:19):
It's not safe. So you know, there are a lot
of issues with that. So now I think I might
say pee access And I met Sean Duffy, the US
under Transportation so he yeah, he is going after these
trucking schools now. And he told me, he says, if
you don't get back together, you're going to lose your
license to teach people how to drive, not that they're
teaching them anyway.

Speaker 3 (49:38):
Yeah, I mean, do you're not teach them hook up
a trailer or barely to drive forward? Yeah, you're doing
everybody on the road at disservice.

Speaker 1 (49:45):
You're right, they're doing the students of disservice.

Speaker 4 (49:48):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (49:48):
Yeah, four weeks. I'm sorry, that's that's not two weeks.

Speaker 1 (49:52):
We're talking about two week courses. Stuff about crash courses here,
you know, and they're not cheap. You're talking about eight, nine,
ten thousand dollars for two weeks.

Speaker 3 (50:00):
And then just throwing them out on the road.

Speaker 4 (50:01):
Man.

Speaker 1 (50:02):
Yeah. So it's a lot of ridiculousness going on out there.
It's not just trucking. There's a lot of industries that
there's a lot of ridiculousness going on. And this, this
is something that we have to have some integrity again,
you know what I mean, We have to some dignity
again in our society. We can't just keep throwing people,
you know, throwing caution into the wind as we do.
There are no shortcuts in life.

Speaker 3 (50:24):
Yeah right, aay, colonel, that's exactly right.

Speaker 4 (50:28):
There are no shortcuts there. There's a fixed cost of
doing business, and the fixed cost doing business truck industry
is qualified experienced truckers, not handing out bubble gum vacations.
You know, that's we can't We can't have that. I mean,
you know, a truck and an audibly there are weapons.
You can't have people that don't operate them operating them.
That's just just dumb. Anyway, that's my take on it.

Speaker 3 (50:49):
Yeah, right, Well, and next hour I want to I
want to lock in and ask you know about the
peace process there in Ukraine and get your thoughts on it, colonel,
to see where you think it's going head, Uh, we're
gonna have a piece piece deal anytime soon, or what's
going on there? Get your thoughts on that, uh, and
anything out you guys want to discuss in the next hour.
We've only got a few minutes here. Also, will take

(51:11):
anybody's calls that are out there. Last week before Thanksgiving,
John and I took some calls. Anybody liked to call
in John, if you give out the number there whenever
before we go to break, give us a call. We'd
love to hear from you. We'd love to hear from
our audience, for sure. You know we don't. We don't
have all the answers. We just sit here and pretend
like we do.

Speaker 4 (51:26):
Folks.

Speaker 3 (51:27):
Yeah, call and give us some answers.

Speaker 1 (51:29):
Everybody, well, fake it till we make it. Yeah, ladies
and John if you would like to call in, the
phone number is six zero three eight one six one
five nine, just like the call numbers right fifty ninety
AM on your AM dial. Six zero three eight one
six nine zero.

Speaker 3 (51:47):
There we go, Folks. Just give us a call in
the next hour to tell us what you did over.
Thanksgivin tell us what you're gonna do for for Christmas
coming up? Uh, you know, just give us your thoughts
on anything. Really, to be honest with you, We're we're open.

Speaker 4 (51:58):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (51:58):
Plus it helps fill the out or for.

Speaker 1 (52:00):
Sure it's a panel discussion. We like callers to come
in and give their viewpoints, even opposing viewpoints, and it
is listed in the description on our social media sites.
Tructors that have been broadcasting work on Facebook and YouTube.
You won't find it out next because they don't low
with description. Oh you also find it a common sense
conservatives on Facebook.

Speaker 3 (52:21):
There you go, excellent, there you go, folks. Yeah, you
can find us many different ways. In the course we're
live every Wednesday night, seven to nine Easter, we'd help
bring you back to reality from the inverted world that
we live in. Right, anyway, about two minutes left, Colonel
any final thoughts for the hour.

Speaker 4 (52:38):
Well, I think that a lot of tension's going to
be focused in the very near future on all this
effort by the Trump administration to eliminate the easy path
into the country. I mean, they've already spent eight years
calling him a racist. Give the fact that people from
all the world, not just around our black people, be
inclean white people come to the country, it doesn't really stick.
But they're going to try to push it anyway, and

(52:59):
I think we'll see a lot of that. The other
thing we're gonna see a lot of it's not gonna
go away, is this whole thing about did hag Seth
order the second strike on the speedboat to kill the survivors?
Right because they want to They want to hang him
for a war crime. So that's you know, I don't
know that it's a war crime. It's not a war
but maybe an act crime against humanity, but I don't

(53:19):
even think it's that. And he also he claims he
didn't didn't give the order. So we'll see how's that develops.
But they're not gonna let go that like a dog
with a bone.

Speaker 3 (53:27):
Right, absolutely, yeah, it's like, did they have an opportunity
to surrender? I don't know what was the excalation of
force there on the ground. That's that's interesting.

Speaker 4 (53:36):
Agreed.

Speaker 3 (53:37):
All right, folks, will be right back after the break.

Speaker 6 (54:17):
WSMN fifteen ninety WSMN ninety five point three FM, NASHAUA listen,
watch and stream at WSMN dot Live.

Speaker 3 (54:30):
All right, folks, welcome back to the common Sense Conservatives
right here on WSMN fifteen ninety AM and ninety five
point three FM. I'm Todd McKinley in Northeast Tennessee, joined
by my cur host John Grober in the studio holding
it down, and of course Colonel Chris Wyatt in Central PA.
A lot of chatter over here on the chats there.
I don't know if anybody wants to take any of
those and discuss them, but phone lines are open, ladies,

(54:50):
and gentlemen, if you want to call in. John gave
the number there just before the break, if you want
to hit it again one more time, John. But before
we get to any callers, k I'd like to get
your take on the peace process with Ukraine and Russia
right now, if you have, if you have a thought
on your head.

Speaker 4 (55:07):
Over well, I've said all along that the only way
this ends is either Russia annexes the eastern third of
Ukraine up to the Nipper River, or Ukraine grees to
concede into perpetuity the Crimea, which they've lost to facto
and the Dombass which they've lost in this conflict. Sure
that Putin is not going to give up, and it
doesn't look like we're gonna get peace until Zelenski gets

(55:30):
his arm twisted to do that. Now people are gonna
say that's not fair. Well, you know, all's love and fair,
and all's fair in love and war. That's the bottom
line here. If Zelensky hadn't perturbed Putin, we probably wouldn't
be at this stage. So, I mean, that doesn't justify
what Putin did, but that's just the reality. I mean,
I get a kick out of people run out and
talk about it's not right, he's not right. Well, I'm sorry,

(55:51):
do you know human beings? Have you ever followed history?
Just take a few minutes, crack open to cities on
the Peloponnesian War and read the Malian Dialogue. Most famous
line history, my my view, not the history people are
doing repeat history from uh from uh what's name said?
To Ada? But rather the most famous line history of
me is that the strong will do what they want

(56:13):
and the week will suffer what they must.

Speaker 3 (56:15):
So hey, yeah, sorry, that's true. Yeah you can't. You
can't cry foul, you know, if you're going to be
dictated to it's just the way it's going to be.

Speaker 5 (56:24):
You can cry, but it isn't gonna change the reality.

Speaker 4 (56:26):
It's gonna change.

Speaker 3 (56:27):
Yeah, it's not gonna change the reality. Yeah, you're right.

Speaker 1 (56:29):
I think everybody was a kid once when some other
kid yinked the toy out of your hand and you yelled,
it's not right, it's right, it's not fair. This is
just the same thing on a grander scale.

Speaker 4 (56:37):
You know, it's.

Speaker 1 (56:39):
Right much much, But yeah, life, life's not fair. Life's
really not fair, you know, And you're always going to
get bullied and until you stand up for yourself. And
that's a lot of what we've been a lot of
us have been screaming throughout the past, you know, is
you got to stand up for yourself, always questioned authority,
always question people's intentions, and be willing to stand up
for yourself when necessary. And a lot of people don't

(57:00):
want to do that. They think just chattering on social
media is the answer.

Speaker 4 (57:04):
You know.

Speaker 1 (57:04):
I see a lot of X spaces and things like that.
They talk about the problems of the issues. That's great,
but that's not fighting the war, you know, that's just talk.
That's not even planning or strategizing.

Speaker 3 (57:14):
Right, I'm gonna look up see what the death toll
there is roughly. Uh, shoot, I can't, I can't bring
it up readily, but yeah, just seeing how many people
have been killed there, thousands of deaths, thousands of injuries,
you know, illness.

Speaker 5 (57:28):
In Ukraine, over over a million people have died in
this conflict.

Speaker 3 (57:31):
Yeah, I mean just millions of people and thousands of
people have been wounded, hundreds of thousands wounded and critically wounded.
You know, it's gonna be suffered. The loss of life
are gonna be limb and I cite the rest of
their life for cranitline, and of course all the people
that's been displaced, many hundreds of thousands of people displaced
in this. You know, it's time to wrap it up
at this point because Ukraine, to me, it is only

(57:53):
on the losing side. It's just a matter of how
much are you gonna lose?

Speaker 1 (57:56):
Well, Russia's taking as it's too, haven't. I mean they've
had to brother North Korea because they were losing manpower.

Speaker 3 (58:02):
Sure, sure, but at this point, I don't think Russia
is gonna say, oh right, we're gonna give it all
back to you. I don't think that's gonna happen at
this point. And of course putin I think to say,
face can't give it, give anything back at this point.

Speaker 1 (58:13):
So what do you guys add on this? Do you
really think it's right for Russia to invade invaded Ukraine?
Do you think it's right for them to try to
claim portions of Ukraine?

Speaker 4 (58:22):
No?

Speaker 3 (58:24):
Wrong? Yeah, but how did we get out of it?

Speaker 4 (58:27):
That?

Speaker 3 (58:28):
A million more people dying, you know what I'm saying, well,
and people being able to return to some peaceful life
at this point, you.

Speaker 1 (58:34):
Know, it sounds cold and heartless. But it's not our problem.
It's not ours. But at the same time, we take
it on like it is. You know, Trump said he
was going to bring it into it. I once kind
of flirted with the idea, why don't we put US
troops in Ukraine for rebuilding purposes and as long as
they're there, Russia can't attack because if they attack us,

(58:55):
they got problems. I know that that sounds bad because
now it sounds like I'm suggesting we should put our
own military and harms way. So that's how much that's
the issue.

Speaker 3 (59:04):
With what I'm saying cost our taxpayers to do that.
You know what I'm saying, the cost of what trillions
of dollars for us to do that.

Speaker 1 (59:11):
We've already spent a bunch of money. Uh, so you
got to figure out something better at this point. Yeah,
you got to figure out something better than throwing good
money after bad So there's got to be a better strategy.
I don't know putting our own troops in Ukraine just
as a mechanism so they can't attack Ukraine anymore is
a good idea, because like I said, they may and
you don't want to put your own troops in harms way,

(59:32):
that's that's asking for me.

Speaker 3 (59:34):
But are we gonna we're gonna send them over there
for for for forty years or more? You know what
I mean?

Speaker 1 (59:39):
Oh yeah, I created another forty year war. That'd be good, right,
as if we're not bankrupt enough.

Speaker 3 (59:44):
Well, you know, I think about like post World War two,
where we we're still there since in most of Europe,
a lot of Europe since post World War Two for
good reason in some respects. But are we gonna leave
them there for forty years or fifty years in Ukraine?
You know what I'm saying, to guarantee that Russia doesn't
come back.

Speaker 1 (59:59):
Yeah, that's where.

Speaker 4 (01:00:00):
We're in Japan seven years after the Second World War.
We're in Korea, seven years after the Second World War.
We're in Germany, We're in Italy, We're in the UK.
We are still in a limited number in the Netherlands.
I mean, you know, and we've got troops in Turkey too.
I mean, and we used to have troops in Greece.
But I mean we have troops all over the place, right, Yeah,
So we.

Speaker 1 (01:00:19):
Can't spread ourselves too thin. That's part of how Room fell,
isn't it. They tried to conquer the world. They spread
themselves too thin and they started collapsing from within.

Speaker 3 (01:00:27):
So we're in most of those countries not to be
there to fight the fight any wars. It's a lot
of it for relationship and of course for training purposes.
I believe a lot of those. Right.

Speaker 5 (01:00:36):
Well, it's it's for deterrence.

Speaker 3 (01:00:38):
Too, I mean forwardly deployed too.

Speaker 4 (01:00:41):
The purpose in Europe was to deter the Soviets from evading,
but I mean that ended thirty years ago and we're
still there. I'm not arguing against for as I've concerned.
The Europeans are like you petulant children. They can't behave themselves.
I mean, we have to intervene. Look look at that.
There's been nothing but conflict in Europe since the end
of the Cold War. I mean, look at Bozia with
the coase of I mean, look look look at the

(01:01:01):
nonsense going on in Ukraine.

Speaker 3 (01:01:03):
Just and and you got to think the Europe I
mean has had centuries upon centuries, millennia of fighting over
you know, who gets you control of this part of
the world or this part of this partil Oh, there
should be this family or should be this family. Yeah,
it's it's ridiculous. It's enough of it. Yeah, you know,
we come over to the New World and we want
to make a better a better life for people. And

(01:01:25):
we're certainly not perfect, but we're not fighting over a
little parcels of the world to be being being controlled
by one family or another. It's come on, we don't
do that at least.

Speaker 1 (01:01:35):
So do you think the United Nations and failing and
a lot of this?

Speaker 4 (01:01:38):
Uh, you know.

Speaker 1 (01:01:39):
I mean we've got we've got the Ukraine Russia issue,
but you've got a lot of stuff going on in
Africa too, for in humanities. You've got a lot of
stuff going on throughout the globe for in humanities. As
you is the United Nations just a failing project?

Speaker 4 (01:01:53):
Well, it depends on which you think of the Unit Nations.
I don't have a high opinion our nations.

Speaker 1 (01:01:58):
Don't know.

Speaker 4 (01:01:59):
I don't believe it constructivism and the United Nations is
an example of constructivism or if people like to call
it a multilablism, but I just I don't believe in it.
It doesn't it doesn't work, I mean, you know, so
the G twenty is a perfect example that you guys,
I don't know if you're paying attention to that. But
the G twenty summit just ended in South Africa, and
you know, the presidency was in the hands of South

(01:02:20):
Africa and right here around post the side.

Speaker 5 (01:02:23):
He was going to stump Trump, so he thought it'd
be clever, and he announced.

Speaker 4 (01:02:26):
The consensus because there's always a consensus, agreement and statement
at the end of the conference, and with twenty countries
it's hard to reach consensus, so it's usually not much
to it. But this time South Africa decided to take
the G twenty, which is a body form to advance
the economic interest of its member states, which represents seventy
five percent of gross domestic product, you know, economy on
the planet. It's meant to advance their interest. But he decided, well,

(01:02:49):
we're making a commitment to debt relief, to forgive the
debt of poor countries, and we are going to also
talk about the just industry transition here where these Europeans
and Americans give us money so we can we can
you know, build nuclear power plants and solar panels for
ourselves and you pay for it. Look, they turned this
thing into a ridiculous thing, and so so Trump didn't
go it didn't go, and so they they he thought

(01:03:11):
he was clever and he did consensus statement declaration before
the conference even began. So that's just that's so my
point there is my point that it is parigans. My
point there is with constructivism, it doesn't work. There was
no consensus. You can't have consensus when one person disagrees,
let alone two or more in this case two degree.
Argentina wouldn't sign, us, wasn't there wouldn't sign either. So

(01:03:32):
the whole thing is just ridiculous. I've never liked constructivism.
Of course, if you do graduate studies and you talk
of political systems, international arena, this is one of the
one of the theories you talk about. You've got, of
course realism constructivism, and I don't. I don't believe constructivism.
It's just it's just it's just, you know, un doesn't
work because there's one hundred and ninety plus members. You

(01:03:52):
can't read consensus. Someone's always going to have a complaint.
No one's ever going to completely look at when Russia
and day to Ukraine, thirty eight countries I think abstained
or voted against a sanctioning or you know, calling out
Russia for its illegal invasion that should have been unanimous
except for Russia. So the G seven works much better
because it's seven countries. It's much easier to reach consensus

(01:04:13):
with seven. Twenty is hard.

Speaker 3 (01:04:15):
So right, absolutely, so he thought he's gonna call him out.
What an idiot? You have no leg to stand on,
my friend, you have a tiny fraction of economy. You're
not gonna call out the big bad wolf on the
block here. I'm sorry.

Speaker 5 (01:04:29):
Thought they sort of thought they were.

Speaker 3 (01:04:30):
Yeah, So, what what is your thoughts about after the
G twenty or or do anything constructive come out of
it that you saw?

Speaker 4 (01:04:37):
Well, one thing that definitely came out of it, I'll
tell you this is Trump said South Africa is not
invited to next year's conference. He said, you're not welcome
in Miami, and then the South Africans doubled down. The
South African president went on television and spoke to the
nation on Sunday, and it was just it was sad
to see. I mean, if if you have experience in
diplomac here, even just a person that can walk into

(01:04:58):
a gum, he'd be like embarrassed by what he did.
Off he give says, I want to I want to
thank the nation. Everyone did such a great job coming together.
This is this is you know, probably South Africa. We
showed we're great hosts. I'm sorry, buddy, but that's your job.
That's your minimum requirements to be a good host. I'm
sure people get from place to place and they're safe
and they have a good conference.

Speaker 5 (01:05:16):
That's your minimum requirement. So that happened then, and they said,
and you.

Speaker 4 (01:05:20):
Know, people recognize what a great conference he had with
the Prime Minister of India Nuendri Mode, he said, thank
you for hosting the summit. Uh yeah, that's this called
diplomatic protocol. It wasn't like he praised you with you know,
all kinds of great work. These people. It's just it's embarrassing.
It's so embarrassing. Yeah, but it gets worse because after
he did that, then Trump uninvited him to the meeting

(01:05:43):
next in two weeks in d C. Because that meetings
throughout the year and they're all going to be in
the US. So the only thing they weren't invited to
was the Leader's summit next year in Miami. They could
have come to all the other meetings. But then he
is will we are a full partner and we're a
founding member and we are gonna come to everything. And
I'm thinking, dude, you you need a visa to come
to America. I'm sorry, that's just the reality of life.
And now you're not gonna get a visa because you

(01:06:04):
can't keep your mouth shut. Well, they have a meeting
on the fifteenth and sixteenth December in DC, the Shirpas,
that's the senior people who organize everything for the leaders.
So the Sharper's meeting is on the fifteenth, sixteenth December.
And guess who's not invited. Twenty countries, nineteen invitations went out.
Guess who didn't get one? That's not africot. Oh, it

(01:06:25):
gets better, it gets better, todd. So on top of that,
the US took over the G twenty. So what else
did they get? They get responsibility for maintaining the website.
Guess what they did day one? Every document, every policy,
every plan, every agreement the South Africans worked out during
their year under having the presidency all gone nothing on
the website. It's completely wipe. If you go to the

(01:06:46):
G twenty website, do a search for G twenty good website,
it says sorry, page page not found or something like
that with a picture of Miami twenty twenty six, and
then you go to the G twenty reference for the
US hosting and there's a picture of Trump and dark
clothes going the best is yet to come. So you know,

(01:07:06):
you know, there's a phrase you you you mess with
the bull, you get the horns, and that's what they've done.

Speaker 3 (01:07:10):
Yeah, So we brought up the UN here, NATO, We
brought up to G twenty, the G seven, uh which
these organizations has beneficial, truly beneficial to the United States,
which which could we probably do without or or kind
of shy.

Speaker 4 (01:07:24):
Away from if you will do away with you mean
un agencies?

Speaker 3 (01:07:28):
What what you in NATO or G seven, G seven,
G two.

Speaker 5 (01:07:32):
No, NATO, NATO doesn't need to go away.

Speaker 4 (01:07:34):
It does need massive reform. It needs massive reform. I
would reform it by I would reform it by taking
the Europeans out of the loop.

Speaker 3 (01:07:44):
We're going to reform it. You just do what we
tell you to do.

Speaker 4 (01:07:46):
All this exactly. It would be much better run organization.

Speaker 5 (01:07:49):
Uh No, I mean, but NATO doesn't need to go away.

Speaker 4 (01:07:53):
Okay, but there are other other things that don't really
accomplish a whole lot. But I mean mostly the un
organizations that you know who has been a problem for years,
which is unfortunate. Uh. They were never very responsored to
the public, and now they're they're on their back foot
because of all the COVID scam stuff. Uh. And of
course renaming monkey pox to MPOs I get a kick, Well,

(01:08:14):
I get it, Yeah, it does. It does. I get
a kick out of people who assume things. So they
said we couldn't call it monkey pocks because it's racist
against monkeys. Yeah, and because because those racists who are
liberals who want to change the name, they look at
monkeys and they see black people. I don't look at
monkeys and see black people. I look at monkeys and
see simeons who throw their feces at each other. That's

(01:08:35):
what I see.

Speaker 3 (01:08:36):
There's they're smart enough to be able to throw feces.

Speaker 4 (01:08:38):
That's that's what I look at, right, Yeah, I mean
that's not black people. I mean the fact that they
default think that that's a racist statement tells me that
they are in their hearts racist. That they see monkeys
and they see they see primates and they see black people.
I don't see black people want to see primates I
see primates well, you know, and some members of the
Democratic Party. Let's be honest, right, yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:09:00):
Oh, I won't say it because they'll say, oh, he's
just being racist, but you know, yeah, anyway, like jas
mc crockett always throwing her feces, you know, not because
she's black, but she seems to throw a lot of
feces at people.

Speaker 4 (01:09:11):
Jasamin Crockett, is that that that obnoxious loudmouth chick at
the club when we go to the club and you're like, ah,
it's her again, and nobody wants to hear that.

Speaker 1 (01:09:20):
Some people think just because they're a loudmouth, they're going
to get their way.

Speaker 3 (01:09:24):
Oh yeah, that's the way it is in politics.

Speaker 4 (01:09:26):
Now.

Speaker 3 (01:09:26):
You look at Republicans. Not every Republican, but a lot
of Republicans are taking a playbook for or taking a
page from the Democratic playbook be very loud, obnoxious and
calling people names, you know, and level accusations, and by
the time they figure out it, it's false. Elections are over.
It's sad.

Speaker 1 (01:09:42):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, that has been a strategy for them
for a long time. Lie lie, lie, very good at
their own lies.

Speaker 3 (01:09:50):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:09:50):
Absolutely, remember what's his name there? The let's see the
demonterat senator from Nevada, Harry Harry Reid. Yeah, Harry Reid,
remember him. He lied about uh, Mitch, Mitch Robney, Mitt
Robney by saying Robney he put his dog on his
roof and he killed it because he drove around the
dog strapped to the roof. And people fell for that story.

(01:10:11):
And you know what's really bad about that, Harry Reid?
Did you? Harry and Mitt Robney are both Mormons, right,
and Mormon does to another. So. But but he ran
on and said that, and after the election was over
and he was called on it, he said, people are
but he said, yeah, what's your point?

Speaker 5 (01:10:26):
It worked?

Speaker 4 (01:10:27):
Yeah, that's who they are. That's who the Democrats are.

Speaker 3 (01:10:30):
No, no, no, morals absolutely.

Speaker 4 (01:10:33):
So I want to ask you real quick.

Speaker 3 (01:10:34):
You were on here last week Marjorie Taylor Green resigning
January fifth, I believe it was her resignation date. And
I don't know if you've been able to talk about
it or not, but what are your thoughts about the
resignation and what's what's her future look like, if anything
at all politically?

Speaker 4 (01:10:49):
Well, I think in Georgia she has a big future.
She wants and she wants to run it for the Senate,
she might be able to win it. She wants to
run for governor, she could win that. But as far
as the Magian movement, I think she's cut her own throat.
She already was a person that some of us who
are conservatives tolerated barely because she's a grenade pin pulling,
throwing into the room the chass and walk in and

(01:11:11):
pretending like she's in charge. She's always a busy body,
stuck her nose and everything, and a lot of conserveris
get mad when I say this, But you have to
be objective. That's who the woman is, That's who she's
always been. So I mean, you know, that's not a
statement for against HER's a statement of fact. As far
as as far as her withdrawing from the race, frankly,
after all this verbose, bombastic language in the past six years,

(01:11:32):
I think she's a coward. I mean, and also, I
mean this is ridiculous. The people of her district vote
for her to represent them for two years. Why are
you resigning a year into your term. There's something else
going on here. She's either a coward or she's about
to take some high paying job somewhere and she sees
the handwriting the wall because she's like, well, I can't
change anything. You've been there for six years. Why did
you run the second time and the third time in

(01:11:52):
the fourth time for office? If you can't change anything,
It's just it's ridiculous. I'm not at all impressed by margin,
Teddy Green. If that hurts people's feelings, they don't want
to listen to me, that's your problem, not my problem.
I mean, you like her. I'm not telling people not
to like her, but I'm just telling you asked my view, Todd,
that's my view. I think it's cowardice, political cowards.

Speaker 3 (01:12:10):
I would agree with you, and I don't think she's
gonna be able to do anything outside of unless she's
got you know, running for senate and you know, lined
up because there's two Democrat senators. Other than that, I
think she's pretty much done for.

Speaker 1 (01:12:20):
I honestly, I wouldn't call her. Maybe a misunderstanding you,
but I wouldn't call her. I don't think she's afraid.
I don't think she's a coward necessarily. I don't know
why she's borowing out of your early That to me,
that's political suicide. That's saying, I can't make a commitment.
So if you want to come back and run again,
or even like you said, in another office and Senate
or in government governor's office, you're not you're not suitable

(01:12:41):
to win because you didn't fulfill your agreement with the
people on the term you redeserve. So that that that
within itself is an issue. But she seems to be
pretty brave about things. One of her claims is she's
she's tired of the death threats. I don't know where
the death threats are coming from, but I know she's
been swatted number of times.

Speaker 3 (01:12:59):
A lot of at least three or four times at
her house.

Speaker 1 (01:13:02):
Yeah, yeah, so people have been after her. She's got
a point out, But so did Josh Hawley. And we
didn't hear him cry. You didn't we hear him back down.

Speaker 4 (01:13:09):
And he's a senator. He also was was was was
wrapped up in this fake January sixth stuff they tried
to go after me. Had nothing to do with it
because he simply had the temerity to refuse to vote
for the results in a couple of states because there
was questions about him. He followed the constitution and he
became a target. His pregnant wife was nine months pregnant.
His lunatics were in her front yard demonstrating, beating on

(01:13:31):
her door with law enforcement watching this. That's a felony,
and they watched it, they didn't do anything about it,
and Josh Holly never complained about that. So my problem
with margin Taylor Green is exactly what you said, death threats. Okay,
she's been getting this for six years. Nothing is ratchet up.
Now nobody's paying attention to marjor Taylor Green. So something
else is going on here or she's it's just political cowardice.

(01:13:52):
I mean, you know, I'm sorry. I mean you know
this isn't new. She stands up and tells us she's
a warrior. She's going to fight, fight, fight, and she's
going to be there. She's gonna do this, and she
doesn't even finish her term. Out if she had terminal
cancer or if she had she had some sort of
cancer scare or health risk, Okay, we'll get a free pass.
I mean, no one should jeopardize her health. But but
you stood up to run for office, you ran your mouth,

(01:14:14):
you attack people, You drew a lot of disfavor on
the Republican Party. And conservatives in particular with your actions,
and now you're gonna walk away without finishing your time
in office. I'm sorry, that's just I'm not buying it.
There's something else going on.

Speaker 1 (01:14:27):
You alluded to the fact that she might be taking
a job in the private sector or finding a career
in the private sector somewhere, And she spent some time
on The View. She spent some time kind of buddying
up to some Democrats. Do you think that's actually an
option she might take. She may actually show up on
the View as their opposition to create dialogue.

Speaker 4 (01:14:43):
And I would be shocked if she wound up with View,
but I wouldn't be shocked she woe up on MSNBC.
She wound up on Fox, But I mean, I don't
think Fox wants her, but a definitely MSNBC would take her.

Speaker 3 (01:14:56):
Yeah, probably pay your half a million bucks, you know,
to kind of pop on there ever often to just
blah blah blah blah blah, you know, run her mouth.

Speaker 4 (01:15:02):
She doesn't need money. She's she's a she's a trust
fund baby. She inherited daddy's business. She's worth millions because
of that. So, you know, I don't think that's an
issue of money. But she wants to be relevant, and
to me, she's made herself irrelevant. Finish. She finished her
term and left. I would have had a lot of
respect for But I don't have respect for this nonsense.

Speaker 1 (01:15:20):
This is just that I absolutely agree with that. To me,
you finish that commitment, don't.

Speaker 4 (01:15:25):
Know unless there's a legitimate reason you can't. You know,
your child got hit in a car accident, maybe twenty
four hour care. You need to be there for your child.
You can't be in Congress. You know, I get it,
But but that's none of that's in play here. It's
all very cryptic, and it really looks to me like
somebody whose feelings are hurt because she's no longer in ascendency.
She's no longer the favored child because Trump is angry

(01:15:47):
at her because she's acting like a fool in his view,
and so she's no longer favorite. So she's going to
take her toys and throw them out of the pram
And that's what she's doing, and that's why I have
no respect for it. She's like a perpetulant child. I'm
not being a favorite baby and she throws toys out.

Speaker 1 (01:16:03):
I mean, come on, Trump admitted she had his phone number,
his personal phone number. She caught him relentlessly, which is
kind of an occasion that she was probably holding him,
trying to manipulate or influence him to do things that
she thought he should be doing instead of allowing him
to do his job.

Speaker 4 (01:16:19):
Well. Also, look, i'd mean, look, you know, I mean
I haven't said this before about her, but I mean
a time she acts like, you know, I'm the star
of the show, just a representative. There's four hundred and
thirty four other ones out there. If you're a center,
you could be a little more cocky, like you know,
and demand attention. But this this constant me me, me, me, me, me,
Hey over here, over over here. Look, it's it's very

(01:16:39):
off putting. And you know, if that hurts people's feelings, hey,
sorry about it.

Speaker 3 (01:16:43):
Do you think there may be like somebody has a
lot of dirt on her and she's like, you know what,
I got to step back.

Speaker 4 (01:16:48):
And that's that's supposition. I don't know that she's a
bad person or she's done anything wrong. I don't know
about people were making that supposition, But I just think
that there's something more here going on than we know,
and I think it probably just boils down on what
it said. She didn't get away.

Speaker 1 (01:17:02):
Yeah, I'm leaving you know, was she what she did
want a sentence? She wanted to move up to the Senate,
and uh.

Speaker 3 (01:17:08):
She didn't get she didn't get parties support.

Speaker 1 (01:17:10):
Now, well she was she wanted to the party's not
supporting her, and Trump's not supporting for her. Trump flight
out told her, you don't qualify, You're not gonna win
the senatece And it's kind of true. She's a little
little polarized here. Again, like I said earlier, you sir,
you see the constituency in the House, you got a
smaller people to gain favor. But when you're trying to
gain favor of a whole state, it's kind of you know,

(01:17:30):
you're putting a lot out there, and you're putting your
asking a lot, and something like her, she's not in
that position to ask that she.

Speaker 5 (01:17:36):
Will be a candidate that can't draw more than two
percent of the black vote.

Speaker 3 (01:17:39):
That's a problem, George, right, make time in Georgia.

Speaker 4 (01:17:42):
Yeah, absolutely, I'm just saying that because who she is.
Whether it's fair or true or not, that's just the
reality is.

Speaker 1 (01:17:49):
It's not just the black vote. There's a you know,
probably a lot of monitors that find her too far
right and they're not going to go for it.

Speaker 4 (01:17:54):
But moderate moderate, that's the black vote is a clear
distinct block ape people who can count on a certain
percentage of vote. So you can basically kiss ninety eight
percent of whatever percentage Black folks vote of the total vote,
and that's always putting you at a major disadventure.

Speaker 3 (01:18:10):
Large number of black votes who are vote Republican in Georgia,
for sure, but not enough to make up for that.
It's not enough, but enough that we can make a
difference if you're in a tight race for a nomination
or something.

Speaker 4 (01:18:21):
It's it's looked losing the black vote in Georgia, getting
such a small percentage of is enough for her not
to be a viable candidate for the Senate. And I
mean lived in If she lived in Louisiana or in
South Carolina, it would be a non starter. But in
Georgia it's tough. I mean, you know, the population of
South Carolina is like forty percent black. Last time I
tell me, I have to double check it. But the

(01:18:43):
point is that now she's not she's not electable at
least at the moment, because she's been a bomb thrower
and she just peep you off. And a lot of
people look at her and see her unfairly as a
racist and a bigot. She is, but that's how she's seen,
and I.

Speaker 3 (01:18:56):
See her as a big bomb thrower, really somebody who
has accomplished much. Pulling out your faults for sure.

Speaker 4 (01:19:01):
She said that.

Speaker 1 (01:19:04):
She didn't get support, but I think I think Chris
is hitting the nail on the head pretty much with
the emotional outrage. I think she just got angry, she
felt outrage, and she didn't get support she felt like
she deserved, and this is the result. I think that's
where you hit the nail on the head, Chris.

Speaker 4 (01:19:21):
No. I mean, look, I I I didn't stop being
an officer because Clinton became president, even though I vomited
and thought of it and I was right about his presidency.
I didn't quit being president because because Barack Obama became president. No,
I didn't quit becoming president. I mean I still fulfill
my duty, I honor my oath and I mean my officer. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:19:41):
Yeah, but I said, you said I didn't quit being president.

Speaker 4 (01:19:47):
Wow, Okay, I got some big dreams there. Sorry, yeah,
let it out president my local four H club, That's
what I was talking about. But no, no, I I
didn't quit being an officer. I didn't. I didn't and
walk away. I did my duty. As long as the
orders were lawful, I follow them and I just I
grined and buried it. You know, I wasn't the favorite

(01:20:07):
toy at times. I saw people who are empty vessels
who just looked a certain way, or people liked their
them because they were passive, or they had a gifted
gap and not in my case, not competitors. But I
saw people getting promoted up pays. I'm like, you know, whatever,
I'm not worried about that.

Speaker 5 (01:20:23):
I'm not here for that. I'm here to do the
best job I can.

Speaker 4 (01:20:25):
And and you know, and it seems to me like
her feelings are hurt and this is an emotional response
and I have no respect for that. You know, this
is a lesson I try to tell to people, and
she's not gonna listen to me. She's a multillionaire, she's
a member the House representis. But you know, if you're
pissed off, write an email, say what you want to say,
save the draft, come back the next day. Ooh, it's
a good thing I didn't send that, right, Yeah, yeah, absolutely.

Speaker 3 (01:20:50):
Yeah, I've done that before. Where you want to you
want to say something, I've sent a couple of emails before.
I probably shouldn't have uh to a senior even though
I was right in the in the.

Speaker 4 (01:20:59):
Matter, I probably doesn't matter if your approach was wrong.

Speaker 3 (01:21:02):
Yep, right, Yeah, I should have worded it different. But
I had people that were either at their equal rank
or higher that defended me in the moment, and like
we worked it out, but it was probably I shouldn't
have said it that way.

Speaker 4 (01:21:12):
Yeah, you're right now. I mean I've in fact, I
sit here now and I'm down to just five drafts
in my personal email account. I had forty two a
couple days ago.

Speaker 3 (01:21:23):
Oh maybe, so did you send No.

Speaker 4 (01:21:26):
No, I pretty much deleted all of those, and some
of them go back a couple of years. But my
point is that even on my personal account, a lot
of times, and you know, I hold back because you.

Speaker 5 (01:21:34):
Know that stuff lasts forever.

Speaker 4 (01:21:35):
Once you send it. It's on a server and it
could come back and bought you. And it's the same
thing here. What she's done has made a lot of
people angry. I mean, I don't trust her. I already
I was already in offense about her because of their behavior.
I thought some of the stuff she did was great
and fantastic, and I appreciate it. But but I mean,
you know, I think a lot of people aren't going
to trust her.

Speaker 1 (01:21:54):
She didn'thow a whole lot for restraints. She'd use f
bombs on national television and think nothing of it.

Speaker 4 (01:21:59):
Right.

Speaker 1 (01:22:00):
Oh, so, I'm not sure the relevance of this question,
But holding is asking where McCain's daughter, and I assume
he's asking about Megan McCain where her daughter ended up.
Maybe I'm thinking he thinks he's but he's not from
all She's not from Georgia's so now she from Arizona.

Speaker 4 (01:22:15):
But I don't, I don't, I don't know, I don't
know what.

Speaker 3 (01:22:18):
Yeah, she was on the view for a while, right,
and I don't know. I think she got married, had
kids maybe, and then I don't know. I don't know
what what what what her story is, to be honest
with you, But but she was somebody who got somewhere
because of nepotism, basically because of her name. Her name
is basically you know, she didn't do the job that
she was hired to do. But but the doors were

(01:22:41):
open because of who she was a daughter of for sure.

Speaker 1 (01:22:43):
Well she made contacts and stuff too, right, she worked
at father's campaign and.

Speaker 3 (01:22:47):
Made well, yeah, I'm saying a lot of these people,
like you know, Sarah Huckabee Sanders out of out of Arkansas,
the governor. I'm not saying she's not a good governor
or a good candidate, or wasn't good at a press secretary.
But these doors opened because of the relationship. Because right,
so let's be clear on that.

Speaker 1 (01:23:03):
Sometimes that relationship will get you there.

Speaker 3 (01:23:05):
Oh absolutely. But I find it disgusting the way people
just roll out the red carpet for them. It's like, oh,
so and so son or daughter's going to be here,
we have to, oh, let's vote for them because they're
running for this office. It's like what set them up
to be able to get to that point, you know,
and people just roll over and love it. They just
because people love the love royalty, even though we talk about,

(01:23:26):
well we got away from the king, you know, King
George the Third, but people love royalty. People love you know,
the Hollywood Royalty, political royalty, and they vote for it too.
It's sad, yeah, and grows.

Speaker 1 (01:23:37):
Somebody put in a post earlier that Chris should apply
for a secretary of Defense or or something like that.
I think that's what they were saying because Haig Seth
has gotten a little bit underwater with some of the
things going on. But these guys make political promises right
when they're campaign and they have people that are being
put in there because they're suggested to them. Somebody like Chris,
who's not connected to them, doesn't qualify the job. Not

(01:24:00):
because he's not qualified to do the job. It's just
simply because he doesn't have the contact.

Speaker 3 (01:24:04):
You're not on the inside of the of the click
and at the same time would probably do the job
to the letter versus you know, shine Away when it
comes to politics. You know, I think you'd make a
decision based on the facts, not on a political decision,
is what I'm trying to say. You make it, you know,
a yes or no decision. It's not well, it's gonna
look bad on the president, you know, so I won't

(01:24:25):
make the decision.

Speaker 4 (01:24:26):
You know.

Speaker 3 (01:24:27):
That's the way we would look at it, I think,
and that's the way the colonel I believe if you
were ever prop prompted to join the administration in such
a position, you probably wouldn't last long because you'd probably
be like, I'm sorry, mister President, I'm not gonna make
a decision.

Speaker 5 (01:24:39):
But I'd be fine. I know when it's the right
time to do that.

Speaker 4 (01:24:42):
And I never tell the Emperor he's not wearing clothes
in front of a crowd, and you do that in private. No,
I think I would last. I think i'd be fine.
But yeah, it's definitely I'm not a yes man. That's
for darn shark.

Speaker 3 (01:24:55):
Yeah, you know how to say no, at least tactfully.

Speaker 4 (01:24:57):
Right, Yeah, I think that that's just I mean that
stuff is just being a yes man, is contract counter
in indicative what you're supposed to be doing, and it's
more all cowardice in my book.

Speaker 1 (01:25:08):
So yeah, it's not productive for sure.

Speaker 4 (01:25:11):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:25:12):
I'm reading up on Marjor Taylor Green here real quick,
and her first the sentence of the introduces on our
Wikipedia page, it's, uh, Marjor Taylor Green, MTG is an
American politician, businesswoman, conspiracy theorist. That's the first sent Yeah,
oh wow, that's not that's not a good thing to have.
That in your first sentence of your introduction.

Speaker 4 (01:25:30):
Right, No, that's not it doesn't matter what she says,
they'll they'll I mean, yeah, she actually she embraces it.

Speaker 5 (01:25:38):
You know, I'm good for her.

Speaker 4 (01:25:39):
You know, people are going to call you that, you know,
go ahead and turn it back on them. Yeah, go
ahead call me that.

Speaker 3 (01:25:44):
Yeah, I mean, but she's embraced so many of these
conspiracy theorists since she's going back to when she ran initially,
none of them have actually actually come to fruition, have
been proven true for the most part from what I'm
looking at here.

Speaker 4 (01:25:57):
Yeah, she's definitely says some out and out of there,
so you know, that's another thing to consider. She said
some really wild statements out there.

Speaker 1 (01:26:03):
But anyway, well, was that a reflection upon her constituency.
I mean, she actually listening to her constituency, and they're
kind of leading her into these.

Speaker 4 (01:26:10):
Conspiracy season, leinging people into conspiracy theories.

Speaker 1 (01:26:14):
You think she's the call pert. Huh, Yeah, you know
what they've been saying though, these conspiracy theories only conspiracy
theories until they're proven just to be conspiracies.

Speaker 4 (01:26:24):
Well, I mean it's a fair appointment. Yeah.

Speaker 1 (01:26:27):
Well, some of that voting that went on. We're still
we're still talking about twenty twenty and a lot of
us aren't convinced otherwise. And we know COVID A lot
of those conspiracy theories have turned out to be true.

Speaker 4 (01:26:39):
You know. Well, in our conspiracy theorism, I was using
data to refute the COVID as it was going on,
but unfortunately getting censored, you know. So I mean, I
mean it was only conspiracy theory, and in respect because
people couldn't get to the truth.

Speaker 1 (01:26:52):
It was labeled conspiracy theory by those in charge on
the left.

Speaker 4 (01:26:56):
And oh funny how that works.

Speaker 3 (01:26:57):
Yeah, it was an actual conspiracy that people were just
commenting on. Really, what I take of it. Yeah, it
was an ongoing conspiracy. I mean, I mean, to defraud
people of money to a lot of people to control them. Also,
there was a presidential election year that we had to
control as well, right, or they had to control.

Speaker 1 (01:27:15):
I should say, yeah, they did a good job. You
give them when they do a good job. They do
a good job. They maybe scumbakes for it, but they
did a good job. Whether or not.

Speaker 3 (01:27:24):
You know, votes were planned or something like that, or
elections were rigged on a hole that kept a lot
of people at home for crying out loud, It really did.
It changed the dynamic a lot.

Speaker 1 (01:27:35):
A lot of people are aferd of that as a
test on the people. And I really liked that post
when it came out about how you behaved during the
COVID epidemic. That's who you are. You need to take
note on that. That's exactly who you are.

Speaker 3 (01:27:49):
You know, if you immediately started calling people out on
masking and six feet separation and all this stuff, if
you went out immediately started trying to hal buy a
bunch of gas and toilet paper and all this stuff.
First off, you're not prepared going out and buying a
mad dash to the grocery store or the gas station.
Buying a bunch of gas isn't going to make you
prepared for what's going to come. If there's an apocalyptic
moment for crying out loud, I mean, it just is

(01:28:10):
not gonna happen. But so you're right, the way you
acted is exactly who you are.

Speaker 4 (01:28:15):
Yeah, that's the fact. I mean, And the way that
people acted was reprehensible. I mean, calling people out, screaming
at them, nark and people, and then law enforcement enforcing
illegal actions like shutting down worship services, right because the
government knows better. Why would anybody trust the government after
all the stuff that's gone down in COVID in the

(01:28:36):
past five years. I mean, it's absolutely ridiculous these guys,
I mean, it's I don't know what to tell you, man,
it's just absolutely insane what they've gotten away with here.
They kill people, They kill people with their fake information
and their lies. And they got away what we did.

Speaker 1 (01:28:50):
That's what they told us we did.

Speaker 4 (01:28:53):
They were liars. Some of us understand epidemiology and infectious diseases,
some of us have spent decades researching and involved in that.
And to listen to these idiots try to tell me
that they know what they're talking about. It's just obnoxious
and it's so disconcerted. You know what they'll get theirs.
You know, they're not going to get admitted to heaven
because they're all evil.

Speaker 3 (01:29:12):
Yeah, evil, Yeah, absolutely. And the alternative for the mayoral
race there in New York was the disgraced governor Cuomo,
who got ousted for all the all the sexual assault
and the gropiness of him, and of course the number
of people he got killed during COVID. He was the
only alternative for the mayoral race for credit loud.

Speaker 1 (01:29:30):
Come on, now, Well, he wasn't the only alternative, you.

Speaker 3 (01:29:33):
Know I'm saying, But but he when it came down
to it, I mean, Sleewell wasn't going to get it.
I mean, so he's just sentially the only alternative. I mean,
I disagree, you know what I mean, that's the only alternative.

Speaker 4 (01:29:45):
It's the best they can put up.

Speaker 1 (01:29:46):
Yeah, I'm pretty much handled it. Handed it to a socialist,
right dangerous.

Speaker 3 (01:29:52):
But he had he had a nice meeting. I guess, uh, Mom,
Donning had a nice meeting at the White House what
last week or whatever it was. And President Trump I
didn't he didn't brace him too much in front of
the press.

Speaker 4 (01:30:03):
Well, I think a lot of us were disappointing in
President Trump because we knew that. But I understand he's
being pragmatic. I get it. But the first chance he got,
that scumbag went back and dumped all over Trump.

Speaker 3 (01:30:15):
So of course he did, and he knew it was
gonna happen. I mean, he wasn't gonna do it in
the Oval office standing right beside the guy. But it's
funny those those press conferences where he makes them stand
beside him and he sits down. Yeah, that's a power
move all.

Speaker 4 (01:30:27):
That's definitely a power move.

Speaker 3 (01:30:29):
Yeah, that's a power movement. And he does photo ops
with people in the Oval Office. He doesn't stand in
front of the Oval Office beside people. He sits at
the desk. That's a power movement.

Speaker 1 (01:30:37):
And Trump understands that. That's kind of like when when
you see him do photo ops, he'll make sure he's
in center. He actually remember that one time when he
he put his hand on the guy's chest and squeeze
between everybody to position himself for the photograph rate in
the center.

Speaker 3 (01:30:50):
Yeah, yeah, well, yeah, you're talking about whenever you do
world leader photos, we call it a family photo. And
I've had to help organize those things before, and I
can guarantee you there was probably a mark right in
the middle that for President Trump, and that guy probably
stood on it thinking he's not gonna move me out
of the way.

Speaker 1 (01:31:04):
He did absolutely, Yeah, he will do that. He has
no inhibitions about that at all whatsoever. The other thing
was debates when he was debate, like say Hillary, that
was pointed out he was on her. He hovered her. Yeah,
power movie, Bulldog in her He's like, yeah, yeah, yeah, no,
I'm going to show people I'm a lot stronger than
you are.

Speaker 4 (01:31:24):
It's a lot easier to be able to do this
power moves when you tower over everybody like he and
I do. You know we're both tall, so I mean
these people aren't tall. They have a disadvantage with yeah. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:31:33):
Al Gore tried to do it against George W. Bush,
and George w just stopped and looked at him kind
of did like a little like what do you what
do you want?

Speaker 1 (01:31:39):
You know of nudged him, and.

Speaker 3 (01:31:44):
Al Gore had to go back to the other side
of the stage because he looked like a twit.

Speaker 4 (01:31:47):
I mean, well, he generally looks like a twitt.

Speaker 3 (01:31:49):
I mean, how Darry, how dare you the father of
the Internet.

Speaker 4 (01:31:52):
Come on, I guess I guess I'm just a meanie.

Speaker 3 (01:31:58):
No, no, no, no, there we go. So yeah, Marjorie Taylor,
I want to read up on her and how she
got got her money, for sure, but Eric from.

Speaker 5 (01:32:05):
Her dad, from her dad, I mean business.

Speaker 3 (01:32:08):
Erica Kirka, showing some grace, she rejected argument that gun
vioce was the root problem that led to husband's assassination
the Tourney. Port USA CEO was the final guest speaker
at the New York Times Deal Book Summit, and she
a lot of grace right there and rejected that outright,
which then they were angling for her to kind of
agree with her about gun violence and all this stuff.

(01:32:30):
She rejected it. And I think that showed a lot
of character on her part for sure.

Speaker 4 (01:32:35):
Yeah, so she gets a lot of grief. People come
after her and I'm like, you know.

Speaker 3 (01:32:40):
Yeah, assassinated right on, right in front of everybody. You know,
on TV. You can't but they came out of.

Speaker 4 (01:32:47):
These conspiracy theories that she was behind all stuff.

Speaker 3 (01:32:49):
I mean, it's just right.

Speaker 4 (01:32:50):
People are sick, you know, they really they really need
to get their heads checked to some of these people.

Speaker 3 (01:32:54):
It's it's anyway, scrolling down on social media just in
the days after that, people that I defriended several people,
you know, it's like people, Oh, look at this. He
knew it was coming, so you look at where he looked.
He knew he was going to be shot. Like, oh,
look at this security guy. He puts something in his pocket.
That's a signal. It's like a law enforcement officer came up,
gave him a challenge coin. One of the guys to

(01:33:15):
to Charlie Kirk's left uh and put it in his
Pocket's clear as day. And I said on social media
what it was, and somebody tried to refute that, No,
that's not what it was. That was the signal. I'm like,
putting something in your pocket that's clearly a challenge coin
from law enforcement is not a signal.

Speaker 1 (01:33:30):
From Also, if you if you work in a security detail,
if you are using signals, it doesn't mean you're signalings
right right exactly.

Speaker 3 (01:33:39):
I mean, because you got to think you have radios
and of course sometimes if there's a lot of people,
sometimes radio traffic, if it's just point to point, doesn't
get through. Sometimes you have to use some hand signals,
you know, visual signals. That happens, Trust me, that happens.
And they weren't signaling anybody to shoot for crying out loud.

Speaker 1 (01:33:57):
It's there were some there were some things they were
talking about them tearing down the setting stuff. Right after
it happened. I'm thinking myself, that doesn't sound normal. You
don't you criminate a scene. So I don't know if
they really did that or if that's just something because
anybody you can take video footage and throw things together
to make it look like something.

Speaker 3 (01:34:16):
Well, I think the FBI took control of the crime scene.
I think local law enforcement locked it down immediately. I
don't think nobody was tearing it down right after the fact.

Speaker 1 (01:34:24):
Yeah, you can't trust.

Speaker 3 (01:34:26):
After they turned the scene over, the company that was,
you know, tasked with setting all that up, was tearing
it down, and they were doing cleaning and stuff as
they were putting putting stuff away, as you would probably
do anyway you think about this. You go to somebody's
house where they committed suicide, somebody's got to clean that, right,
I mean so generally that's what they were doing. They
were cleaning up after the fact. And they were trying

(01:34:47):
to lie and say immediately after the assassination they were
cleaning getting rid of evidence. It's like, that's three or
four days later, you're taking this picture.

Speaker 1 (01:34:54):
Come on, that's what I That's what I figured of
it there. Somebody's just piecing it together and trying to
make it look like something that's not. You can't trust
anything you see on social media. You really got a
question it all the time because people have their own agendas,
their own stupid little yeah, whatever co people.

Speaker 3 (01:35:09):
Sometimes people's bona fides are. I was in the army
for three years years ago, you know, in nineteen seventies,
so I know about guns and ballistics. It's like, no,
you don't, No, you don't.

Speaker 1 (01:35:20):
I shot a gun one so I know all about him.

Speaker 4 (01:35:22):
I know all about it.

Speaker 3 (01:35:23):
It wouldn't have done this. So they had to come
from this area over here, or his security guard shot him.
I'm like, come on. It's like saying, uh, the Secret
Service agent the front seat driving Kennedy's limos shot him.
I'm like, come on, people think that.

Speaker 1 (01:35:35):
So was there was there any proof for I think
I think there was, because I think it was where
didn't you have a safety vest on, a bulletproof vest?

Speaker 3 (01:35:42):
I think he had. I think he had a vest on.
And I imagine anybody in a situation like that would
have some sort of vest, whether it was a bulletproof
or stab vest. It could have been a stab best
as he shakes hands keep from from stabbing in it.

Speaker 4 (01:35:54):
You know.

Speaker 1 (01:35:54):
It definitely was a high powered rifle and he so
the theory was that it hit him in the vest,
it didn't him in the neck.

Speaker 3 (01:36:00):
And originally and then come up into his neck and possible.

Speaker 1 (01:36:04):
That made more sense to me when when I heard
that that because according to front of my understanding of
the corner's report, he didn't understand why the bullet didn't
have an exit wound. Well, if it hit him in
the chest first, it deflected a lot of the power
and income a lot of okay, yeah, so.

Speaker 3 (01:36:21):
It didn't have any escape velocity after it hit his
soft tissue.

Speaker 1 (01:36:24):
So yeah, so that made sense to me once once
I saw that, I'm like that, Okay, that brings it
all together.

Speaker 3 (01:36:31):
Yep. Oh yeah, absolutely yep. And of course where he
was shot, there was there was no saving him at
that point. He was dead within seconds probably.

Speaker 1 (01:36:40):
Well, yeah, you get the juggler like that, you're bleeding.
Oh yeah, it's it's a matter of sixty seconds to
one hundred and twenty seconds. You're you're going to lose
too much, right, same thing like for moral ardery and
various other places. Right, absolutely, let's it gets tied off.
I mean, that wasn't happening in that case.

Speaker 3 (01:37:00):
No, No, there was no way, yeah not not no
way for sure. But yeah, again his wife widow, you know,
showing some grace for crying out loud. I mean, just
that's unbelievable. Oh wait, we'll get about ten minutes left here.

Speaker 1 (01:37:15):
Ten minutes you know, you know, Todd, that gives us
enough time to talk about Trump. Want to get rid
of federal income tax?

Speaker 3 (01:37:24):
Oh yeah, bring that up?

Speaker 4 (01:37:25):
Oh and how about our how about our tariff bonus?
Oh yeah, tell me more, to me more exactly.

Speaker 5 (01:37:32):
This is like an episode of Grease Man, tell me more.

Speaker 1 (01:37:35):
Well, I've always I've always been for getting rid of
the federal income taxt. You guys know that. I mean
Chris and I Todd debated that back and forth a
couple of times. So it's kind of curious how Chris
might feel about enough you feel a sense of change
with the with the terriff's kind of proving themselves and
the possibility of get rid of federal come text. But
I'm also curious about do you think it's appropriate running

(01:37:55):
such a national debt that we need to take care
of our responsibilities? First?

Speaker 4 (01:37:59):
Yeah? Okay, So first off, I'm all in favor of
no income tax. The income tax is what's led to
government become a leviathan that's out of control. I mean,
the imposition the sixteenth Amendment is an abomination. It goes
against everything the found is believed in. So I have
no problem with but from a practical standpoint, we can't
do it. We can't do it. If income tax brings
in I think by two point four two point six

(01:38:20):
trillion dollars of the money we spent, maybe it's more
than me it's two point nine now, but nothing comes
close to that. And the tariffs aren't going to come
close to that. I mean, they've they brought in like
three hundred million or billion extra. Ooh, that's great to start,
but they got a long way to go before they
can replace they can replace income tax, So it's not
a practical thing in the near term. Maybe if the
government got in order and down the road many years

(01:38:40):
from now. But no. And as far as the bonus,
free money is nice, but I'd rather see the debt
paid down. I'd see the government balance its budget rather
than give us money. We've already seen this before. They
try to juice it during COVID with these payments, and
all it did was screw things up. So I would
much rather see that that would strengthen the dollar, and

(01:39:00):
strengthen dollar would make us all healthier and wealthier. You know,
that's much better for us rather than give people two
thousand bucks to blow on, you know, a trip to
Vegas or something like that, you know, or paying down
the mortgage. So I don't I don't agree with that,
but getting ready of the come tax, I'm all a
favor of that, Franks. I'm also all in favor of
a flat tax ten percent. Boom problem solved, everybody, billionaires

(01:39:21):
pay ten percent. Yeah, we pay ten percent. Once you
pay ten percent, you know, down a certain thresholds, if
you're below the poverty line, you know, no pay taxes.

Speaker 3 (01:39:30):
Right, I agree with you. And what would that replace
what we're already paying? Or would that would increase? What
would it look like?

Speaker 4 (01:39:37):
Well, flat tax would replace the income tax. There be
none of this garbage. You know, it's called progressive for
a reason, which is.

Speaker 3 (01:39:43):
Yeah, what would that bring in more or the same
amount of money that we're currently bringing in?

Speaker 4 (01:39:48):
Or I haven't done I haven't done the math in
a while, but I so I'd have to look. I
think there's something like it's there's one hundred and eight
seventy eight million or eighty million people in the workforce
who would be able to pay that before you start
executing people based on poverty level. But that's not all
income owners. There's people who have passive income and you
could tax that ten percent. So there's retirees that you

(01:40:09):
take ten percent from, and people who just wealthy and
don't do anything, so they have passive income.

Speaker 5 (01:40:13):
So I don't know the total number, but let's say
it's two hundred million people.

Speaker 4 (01:40:16):
We have to look at that.

Speaker 5 (01:40:17):
You know, I think that so I haven't.

Speaker 4 (01:40:19):
I did the math years ago, but you know, things
have changed a lot since then, of course. But the
problem line is this, the government shouldn't be taking more
than ten percent of your total income, but they already
tax this. Okay, First off, you work for a company.
They take tax from that company for making a profit.
And then if that company pays dividends to the shareholders,
you have to be a shareholder. You pay tax on
the dividends, and then you get your income. You pay

(01:40:43):
tax on that from the revenue of the company generatedor
who's already paid tax on their business. And then they
charge your SOI Security and they put charge your employer
half your Social Security and then you buy things. Now,
fortunately there's no national value aut of tax, so we
just be worse. But there is taxes. There are excise
taxes on your cable, on your telephone bill. My dark
cable bill is three hundred two dollars a month, and

(01:41:04):
only one hundred and eighty nine dollars of that is
for the cable company. The rest is all these ridiculous
fees paying. I'm paying for phones to give to drug
dealers and prostitutes through the federal program. They give free
telephones out to people. Then I'm to prove they need it.
You know. It's so so, there's there's there's a lot
of money that comes in the government, and if you
trim the amount of money have they have to live

(01:41:25):
within the budget, and they have to sacrifice the things
like the National downa for the Humanities and financing Robert
Mayplethorpe to make insulting images of Christ and fending millions
of Christians. We don't need that.

Speaker 3 (01:41:36):
That can go away, right absolutely. You find a lot
of these nice little projects that people love to throw
out there, all the writers that members of Congress throw
on all these bills that are going to get passed.
You know, bring in you know, I guess, bring on
pork from their home districts. And Home States get rid
of stuff like that as well. I'd love to see
the president have a line out and vidio on a

(01:41:56):
lot of these things, especially whenever it comes to the spending.
You know, balance budgets needed for sure.

Speaker 4 (01:42:03):
I'm with you on that one. I have no problem
with that.

Speaker 1 (01:42:06):
That's what we need. We need. We need Congress get
it back to get them, get us a balanced budget.
We need some sort of plan to get us out
of this debt. I mean, we're good. We were pretty
much put a country at risk with debt, and basically
the only thing saving us right down is the fact
that the dollar can't be replaced with anything else on
the globe. If it could, we be underwater. We'd be
in terrible trouble.

Speaker 4 (01:42:27):
You're correct, because because we have not seniority, but seniority
in which because the dollar is the global currency, we
accrue benefits such as everyone prices oil in dollars.

Speaker 5 (01:42:39):
They don't they don't price it in other currencies.

Speaker 4 (01:42:41):
So we get over big time because other countries have
to deal with the swings in and the cost of
oil because of currency fluctuations, and so it gets more
expensive for currency and the price goes up. We only
have to deal with the price going up or down.
That's it, that's it. That's it. For sure, huge advantage
for us because our currency is global currency, and most

(01:43:02):
people don't realize that. But I know that it's a
huge advantage and I'm glad we have it. But you know,
other countries don't get that advantage. They have to deal
with the price wings and the currency fluctuation. So it
was very fortunate. If we didn't have that advantage, we'd
really be screwed. We'd be hit with the double ami
every time the things went against us. Right now, it's
just it's just one thing that comes at it, so
you know, yeah, but people people don't realize that. They
don't think about that stuff.

Speaker 3 (01:43:23):
So yeah, I remember like traveling to the Middle East
and places like that. Whenever you go to like the
little souks or the shops or whatever, and it's like
they ask if you're paying in dollars or whatever, because
the price changes depending on what you're using. Yeah, and
if you use American dollars you usually can get over
pretty well, and you know, you leave with a nice haul.
Of course, they leave with a lot of money, you know,

(01:43:43):
compared to what their local currency usually is.

Speaker 4 (01:43:47):
Yeah. So gosh, John, when do we debate tax income tax?
I've never been it.

Speaker 1 (01:43:52):
Oh god, that was years ago when we first started that,
we were arguing about whether we should have income tax
or not have income tax. I brought up the idea
about the national tax replaced income tax.

Speaker 4 (01:44:01):
No, no, I'm against that, against that.

Speaker 1 (01:44:03):
Yeah, So talking about we were talking about variable different things,
and I think your stance on it was you would
rather because we were because you got two types of taxes, right,
you got direct tax and indirect tax. Or your income
tax is a direct tax. Your indirect tax would be
the corporate taxes. The taxes that corporation's pay get passed
on to consumers. So when you purchase their taxes, so

(01:44:25):
you're getting you're gonna double whem me here. So I've
always had an issue with the idea of income tax.
I think it's an unnecessary burden among the people that's
adjusting the corporate tax. And we'll pay our taxes in consumption.
And the problem with that is you can save money
that way because if you if you if you tie
your belt, you decide, hey, I want to buy a house,
you don't spend so much because you want to buy
a house, you want to put your money towards that.

(01:44:46):
Therefore the government takes the hit, so they want to
keep the direct tax. So we've had that kind of
argument back and forth. And you were for cutting corporate
taxes as opposed to income tax, where I'm more in
favor of cutting income tax or have been.

Speaker 4 (01:45:00):
Yeah, I'm with you.

Speaker 3 (01:45:02):
There we go, folks. Yeah, last couple of minutes here, folks.
You've been listening to the common Sits Conservatives right here
on WSMN fifteen ninety AM and ninety five point three FM.
We make sense of the inverted reality we are subject
to every day. The Commas Hits Conservatis are here to
help bring you back to reality with Kurt, hosts Chris Wyatt,
Todd McKinley, and John Grovener. Folks, we love having you here.
Of course, if you listen to us anywhere WSMN dot

(01:45:24):
Live or anywhere we stream this show, we really appreciate you,
especially our South African audience for sure, with Colonel Chris
Wyatt bringing that on for sure. But anyway, last couple
of minutes here, any final thoughts gentlemen before we close
up the show today.

Speaker 4 (01:45:40):
Well, I'm looking forward to see how this immigration thing goes,
you know, and people's heads exploding. By the way, I
received an update while we're sitting here from a South
AFRICFG and I have an image of them over the
South Atlantic winging their way to Atlanta. There you go, good,
there we go, ob basically taking advantage of the Wi
Fi in flight.

Speaker 3 (01:46:00):
Well, shoot, what I would like to have maybe if
we could, maybe you could arrange somebody to come on
as a guest and discuss maybe their experience with the
process and everything like that.

Speaker 5 (01:46:08):
You know, well, I don't know if that's of interest
to a lot of people, but we can do that.

Speaker 4 (01:46:12):
Sure. I did get Villain onto Billy's program, Billy Painter's program,
because he asked me, you know, they live in the
same town.

Speaker 5 (01:46:23):
They only live like five minutes from each.

Speaker 4 (01:46:25):
Other, yep. So I put them in contact and they've
met and hung out, and he did it on his
program Speed It's John. I got to fill in for
you last night on the Patriot Confederation there and and
it was a very fortuitous night. It was my one
free night and Billy called me and he needed help.
So I said, okay, fine, I'll pitch in uh. But
it was very rewarding because the father of DJ Daniel

(01:46:48):
was was the guest and fantastic talking about that's a
little kid who was given honorary secret service eventshals at
at the at the State of the Nation address or
the State of the Union address at whatever it was.
Trump did the presentation of Congress when the Democrats sat
on their hands for a thirteen year old cancer survivor.
They're just such evil reprobates.

Speaker 1 (01:47:07):
That was a good show.

Speaker 4 (01:47:08):
I was.

Speaker 1 (01:47:08):
I was listening to it as I was plowing snow
on Lowell, Massachusetts, so I really enjoyed listen to the show. Unfortunately, yeah,
unfortunately I got called into work so I couldn't still
Chris Coverage and thank you for that, Chris.

Speaker 3 (01:47:21):
For you folks down on Lowell, mass you had clean
streets cause of John Well.

Speaker 5 (01:47:25):
I was.

Speaker 1 (01:47:26):
I was doing my due diligence there you go, only
because I was getting paid.

Speaker 4 (01:47:29):
Unfortunately, money money. We need somebody to clear arsenal. Can
you make it over this way?

Speaker 1 (01:47:36):
It's a long trip. I don't know.

Speaker 4 (01:47:39):
I can't career.

Speaker 3 (01:47:40):
Guess we'll be back next week right here on WSM
fifty ninety and ninety five point three f M. Until then,
take care of God bless