Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:15):
Truth Seekers is a viewers supported show. Wonderful people like you who enjoy this
show send pledges in the form ofsuper Jazz, souperstickers, super thanks,
PayPal or cash out. Instructions forhow to help are in the description.
You can also join our Patreon andfor as little as one dollar a month,
(00:36):
you can get extra content. Patreonsupporters go backstage pass, early access
to all our production videos before theyare distributed publicly, Stephen Cambion's music,
private writings, a monthly show journal, and more. You can also become
a YouTube channel member for five dollarsa month. A YouTube membership includes all
(00:58):
of the Patreon benefits, plus aspecial member's badge, priority reply to video
comments and the live chat, plusa monthly member's only video. We thank
you all kind and generous benefactors forsupporting truth Seekers. Thank you for your
generosity and support. Truth Seekers isa viewer supported show. Now there's a
(01:55):
great way to support these broadcasts andshow your support. Please be sure and
check out our merchandise store. Linksto our two merchandise online stores are in
the links to this video or podcast. The Amazon storefrontships super quickly in the
United States. Great Britain and manymore places. Amazon may not ship to
(02:15):
your country or location. If that'sthe case, hit our second merchandise linking
description and visit our Red Bubble storefront. Imrgindice from our Red Bubble storefront ships
worldwide but may take longer than Amazon. We've got a great deal of super
high quality merchandise for you to choosefrom, including T shirts, phone cases,
(02:37):
sweatshirts, and even billows. Thefeedback from our products have been overwhelming
and great quality products and fast shipping. People all over the world are buying
some merchandise and showing their support ofthe show. Praise the cash, Praise
the cash, Praise the cash.We thank you all kind and generous benefactors
(03:00):
who are buying some merchandise and helpingus to continue this journey. Thanks for
(03:23):
being here, and this is truthSeekers with your hosts Stephen Cambion. Please
rate, Mike and comment on ourvideos and podcasts. If you are listening
to an audio podcast, please writeus five stars to help us ride in
the search bankings. If you're watchingon YouTube, please like, comment,
and subscribe to our channel. Ifyou're listening to an audio podcast, we
(03:46):
love and appreciate you listeners, butyou are missing the live tapings. All
our shows are recorded live with videofeeds. We'd love you to come be
a part of our live broadcasts andtapings. For podcast, Head on over
to you YouTube, click the searchtool a little magnifying glass or truth Seekers
one word in the search bar andhe enter. You'll see a strange and
(04:10):
mysterious guy with sunglasses. That meansyou've found the channel. Go there,
smash the subscribe button and hite thenotification belt to receive up to dating from
on our YouTube channel. We welcomeyou to be a part of our life
taping and our chapel during the livebroadcasts. Seek the Truth, Speak the
truth. This is truth Seekers,truth Seekers Truth. Greetings and salutations,
(05:28):
friends, and welcome back to truthSeekers, where we explore some of the
strangest and most mysterious stories out there. Tonight, I thought we would talk
about one of my favorite videos onthe internet. Somebody asked me recently,
of all the UFO videos and alienvideos and Bigfoot videos, what's your favorite
(05:48):
video on YouTube? And I thoughtabout it for a while and I decided
that it would have to It woulddefinitely have to be the Skinny Bob alien
footage and related releases. Now,for those that don't know, I believe
it began April thirteenth, twenty andeleven. Someone began uploading some very strange
(06:16):
videos to YouTube. They looked asif they were historical footage footage from perhaps
the nineteen forties or maybe even thirties, based on the train that was shown
in the video and some of thevehicles. But is it real? Is
(06:40):
it really what it looks like,which is a video footage of a flying
saucer and then video footage of actualalien creatures. Regardless of whether you believe
it is fake or real, Ihave to say that the person who created
this it's extremely well done. Whetherit's fake or real, it's extremely well
(07:04):
done. If it's real, it'samazing. But if it's fake, the
artistry an attention to detail that wentinto making this thing is impressive, really
impressive. So I thought there's reallyfour clips, but the most famous clip
(07:25):
is the clip with the alien,specifically someone somehow the alien got named Skinny
Bob in this and sort of madethe rounds throughout UFO conspiracy Land, and
everyone was talking about this for quitesome time. Eventually, I think the
story kind of died out because noone could prove it was true. And
(07:46):
conversely, no one could prove thatit was fake. And the originator of
the originator of the actual video,if it was created by, for example,
a puppeteer or a CGI artist ora creature effects designer, has never
come forward to claim credit for hiswork, which is always not really sit
(08:11):
well with me, because it's sucha viral, crazy lot of attention this
thing got. It's hard for meto imagine somebody just sitting in the background
and not stepping forward and saying,yeah, you know that those videos that
got millions of views, I'm theguy who created them. And here's how
(08:31):
generally with a lot of these videos, that's what happens. We get to
see later how it was created,who was involved in the creation of it,
and usually we get some education intowhat went into creating this great hoax,
if it is indeed a hoax.Now, I just wanted to mention
(08:54):
that a few people sent me thisvideo of the alien when it came out
because they knew that I was intopuppets and puppetry, especially making puppets and
puppetry on film, and you know, people like ask me is do you
think it's a puppet? And Ihave done pretty extensive work in puppets on
(09:20):
film. Call it a crazy hobby, I don't know why. For magic
shows, I was using these puppetsfor a long time that were really like
modified ventriloquist puppets. But we didsome different kinds of things than people usually
do with ventriloquism puppets, and Igot an education into how to film puppets,
(09:41):
how to make them look more realistic. I had puppets with moving eyes,
blinkers, all the most advanced,you know, kind of puppets that
can be created. We did.I wanted them to be as realistic as
possible. But from what I knowabout puppets and the art, the state
(10:03):
of the art with puppetry, evenif you get into animatronics and using lots
of servos and electric motors and solenoidsto move things, the level of detail
in this video I've watched it many, many times. The one thing I
will say is that the alien shownin this video is not a puppet,
(10:28):
or if it is a puppet,it has been let's say, computer enhanced
through CGI effects. The blinking inthe video is way too realistic. Blinkers
on puppets don't look that realistic.So I guess without further ado, I
(10:52):
think, without any more delay,we should we should give the give the
video watch, but first I willcheck in with the live chat. Super
v Funct is here, also knownas Vanessa Thor and Hello, Yeah,
(11:15):
Jonahside says hello to Vanessa, Helloto Vanessa Thor. Super v fun Cat
comments skinny Bob looks so similar toCrowley's lamb demon alien thing. Yes,
I had thought that as well,and shout out to KB. KB is
back for another round of mystery withus here at truth Seekers. Good to
(11:39):
see you back here at KB,nice to see you back. And out
of Mind is here. Shout outto out of Mind, who is being
very helpful in her moderate in themoderation. Here to provide the twitch link.
You too can follow us on twitchplanet. Lupa is here. Hey
everybody, kind of very early morningfrom me to you there in the evening.
(12:01):
Love the show. Thank you foryour kindness and and support. Rick
von himlick Spooner is here. Yes, and one second, friends, there's
(12:22):
one thing I wanted to check here. Okay, so we had a mystery
of our own on our hands aboutwho donated on July twenty eighth, the
mystery five dollars donation, because Ididn't want to just read that person's real
(12:43):
name from the PayPal donations, soI kept saying, who did that?
Who did that? And we foundout it was Ryan Morphy Richards donated a
generous donation of five dollars on Julytwenty eighth. I want to think thank
you from the bottom of my heart. Every little bit helps keep the show
flowing and going, and your kindnessand generosity and support of the show is
(13:09):
much appreciated. God bless you RyanMorphy Richards for your kindness and support of
the show. And for those thatdon't know, you can go to my
about page and make a donation.If you like this kind of content,
you want to see the show continueto expand and grow, Your financial support
would be much appreciated. There's alsomy Patreon, which was a little as
(13:33):
a dollar a month. You toocan support our show here and if you
go to the about page. Inif you just go to my channel and
go to the about page, boththose donate links are there. Before I
forget, I will put up Iwill put PayPal up. Just in case
any donations come in, this iscalled the not so super Chat donation.
(13:56):
So what happens if you make adonation. There's a spot where you can
add a note. Just add anote, put your user ID or you
know handle here in the live chatwhat your name is, and then whatever
message you'd like to share with theaudience or for me to read live on
air. And that's how that works. It's are not so super chat donations
(14:22):
until we can do the superchat donation. So yeah, with anymore delay,
let's just watch this crazy video becausethis video, it's just one of my
favorites. It's one of my favorites. One second, friends, here,
let's sure. Oh yeah, andthis one I found. The title says
(14:45):
Skinny Bob Alien footage footage from thenineteen fifties confirmed to be real by Rick
Doty. I'm not sure if RickDoty is a source that I would trust,
given that he was literally a disinformationbut yeah, he's got a lot
to say about a lot of thesealien topics. So let's take a look
at the video. Let's start fromthe beginning here and here we see some
(15:16):
type of and there is no soundon this. I don't believe so some
type of flying saucer UFO and it'sbeing taken I believe, out of a
train. More footage of a UFO. And here we see our first alien,
(15:43):
maybe a mangled alien. Is thisa crash? And here is Skinny
Bob himself h And here we seea bunch of them, and that,
(16:40):
my friends, is there's four ofthe Skinny Bob videos. That, my
friends is the most famous, themost famous one because it shows the actual
alien there were. They were cutup into four separate videos somehow on the
original channels that uploaded them, youknow. And I thought, there's somebody
(17:07):
that did an excellent breakdown of thetimeline, and I was going to present
the timeline, and then you know, I found this, so this will
be And again for that first video, I don't think it's copyrighted, but
we're still saying fair use, fairuse. It's kind of hard to copyright.
I guess eleaked elaked top secret videoof an alien and a flying saucer.
(17:33):
I don't think it's copyrighted, butfair use, fair use. And
on the next clip we're going toplay again, I'm going to cite fair
use. We're educating the public.We're going to be talking about and discussing
the next video clip. And thisis from Objects Unknown, and it's Bills
channel, which I have seen abunch of times before. He's got quite
(17:56):
a subscriber base, does some goodshows. He did an excellent presentation on
this Skinny Bob video and the seriesof videos. I'm specifically interested in educating
you guys and everyone really with thetimeline of the history of this thing.
So again we're going to cite fairuse, and we will make sure I
(18:18):
to share the audio because this guy'sdefinitely talking, okay, And again we're
going to cite fair use for usingthis clip. We're going to be educating
in the public and discussing and critiquingthe clip, using it for educational purposes.
Fair use. I have this sortof cued up to when he begins
(18:38):
to break down of a series ofevents that led to these four videos being
posted for episode news release basically startingon April thirteen, twenty eleven. It
appears to show a video clip packagefrom probably the nineteen forties these sixties.
(19:00):
Apparently what you see is a UFOcoming in over a city and whoever has
got the video camera out appears tobe up in the air. What you
then see is some kind of anactual event crash, landing. I'm not
sure, quite sure. You seealiens, they're clearly aliens. They don't
(19:21):
seem to be any kind of fakealiens right off the bat, so you
want to you know, you getpulled into the story right away. Yeah.
I remember when I first saw this, and I got I got sucked
right in, like, oh mygod, there's a flying saucer. It
looks like something, it looks likea crash or something or landing of some
sort. And then we see thealiens crazy. There appears to be some
(19:45):
kind of a recovery of aliens,maybe even some kind of medical procedure being
done, and then it's sort ofleft just like that. You don't know
what to think. Then on Mayfirst, the big video is released.
Yeah, so at first this videowas sort of a teaser. And it's
funny to me that there's only literallya few minutes, a few minutes of
(20:06):
this footage. But for some reason, whoever uploaded it to YouTube chose to
upload it in you know, twentysecond segments or something like that to really
stretch it out, and I guessget people's anticipation and excitement built. I'm
not sure, but on May firstwe get the second video that dropped to
the same YouTube channel. It isa close up of the Skinny Bob creature.
(20:29):
First of all, what we seewhat appears to be I don't know
what to call it. Basically,it's like an interview with the alien.
He's not really speaking, but he'sdefinitely gesturing to whoever is in the room
with him or her, uh big. I just wanted to mention that I
don't know. I thought when Iwatched this video that he was working some
(20:52):
kind of switches and machinery or something. It looks like he keeps reaching out
and he's looking in something and doingsomething, maybe assembling something, working on
something. I really don't know,And I also wanted to mention from this
angle we could see sort of closeup. There's a few possibilities for what
this is, and the possibilities arereally that it's a puppet. That's the
(21:17):
first possibility. The second possibility isthis is all computer generated images and effects.
The third possibility that I've heard peoplemention is that this could be a
child in prosthetics. But you're basedon this head and everything that would have
to be one hell of hell ofa prosthetic, or maybe a lifelike movable
(21:42):
mask, but we don't see themouth move, so for all we know,
it's some site sort of latex prostheticthat still allows the wearer to blink.
That's a possibility, And of coursethe fourth possibility is that it's an
a who knows the cranial head theeyes that classically have been associated with aliens.
(22:07):
What's really interesting, though, isthat we hear the sound of the
projector playing in the background. No, that's stupid. The original videos which
were posted, they had this guyis saying it's the sound of the video
projector, like a film projector,and no it's not. I took apart
(22:29):
the audio and I could clearly seeloop points, so that means that the
audio was added. It was asound effect of a film projector that was
added on top of the video,which made me sad because then I knew
that this was somehow at least partiallymanipulated. Why would somebody add a film
(22:52):
projector sound effect loop to the videos? It appears that whoever released his video,
and by the way, it wasreleased by Ivan zero one three five,
No one really knows who ivan zero, one, three, five.
Is he only released or she onlyreleased or they only released four videos?
(23:15):
This is the second one in theseries, so may one this appears.
Yeah, so the user that originallyuploaded these on their channel, they only
have those videos. They never followedup with more. Nobody ever found out
who the uploader was, were theirreal identity, So it's it's a great
mystery still today. And the alienclearly looks to be extremely realistic. You
(23:41):
see the eyes of blinking in away that looks like it could well be
real. I mean, if it'sfake, whoever faked it went through the
pain of basically aging footage or makingfootage look like it's really old, has
a lot you know, sounds upfor an old projector in the background,
and then apparently an alien with veryvery natural things occurring the way the skin.
(24:06):
Yeah, one of the things Inoticed is that we see brow movements
up here throughout the video as wellas the blinking. You also, it
really looks pretty natural and realistic.Why would there be brown movement up here
if it was a puppet, youprobably wouldn't include brow movement in a puppet.
(24:26):
CGI Maybe if it was a prostheticthat would be a difficult thing to
you know, you need like airpumps and pressure, you know, maybe
hydraulic. I don't know, tomove around the brows while this alien is
looking around. So if it's fake, it's it's really well well done fake
and kind of moves and appears aroundthe eyes when the blinking is occurring.
(24:52):
Some people on the internet it pointedout it looks very realistic. Other people
pointed out it could be fake.Let me tell you something. If this
is fake, extremely extremely good job. And I compare that to a video
that I'll mention in a minute.But I got to tell you is an
extremely extremely believable scene. Yeah,and I agree with this, gentleman.
It's extremely believable. It's probably thebest, and it's probably the best video
(25:19):
of an alien that I've ever seenthat was not yet proven to be fake.
It's been a series of alien videosthat came out that were later proven
to be hoaxes, and those didnot look this good. None of them
did. This one sort of standsalone. You see the alien from a
profile shot, and then you seethe alien some sort of like a mug
(25:41):
shot or some kind of way themilitary might you know, document the alien
the way it looks full frontal,you know, looking at the aliens straight
up, oh, straight on.So then on May eighth, whoever ivan
zero one three five is he putsout or she puts out or they put
out some kind of a message tothe internet saying hey, look, you
(26:02):
might be critiquing us basically paraphrasing,but you'll never figure this out. Basically
we yeah, the material is,this is the message. The material is
an edited compilation of the documents thatwe have. Your opinion and the conclusion
you draw from this material do notdepend on us. Maybe you are looking
in the wrong direction. You arethe ones who reject You were the ones
(26:25):
who reject this material. And therewe see a three fingered hand, which
I guess is the alien's hand.It looked like three fingered in the video.
You are, you know, incontrol of the material. Is the
implication. There is no TV show, film, any kind of you know,
entertainment product associated with this. Youcould really connect to it and really
put the word yeah. And Ithat was my original thought too when I
(26:48):
first saw this video, I thoughtthat it was pulled from a movie and
then manipulated. And I have andno one has been able to prove that
that is the case. We cannotfind this material anywhere else in either fictional
material UFO documentaries. There was apretty famous another hoaxed video that was reported
(27:11):
to be like army people grabbing aliensfrom a crash site and throwing them on
a gurney that was proven to befrom the Roswell Hollywood movie later, and
that really made the rounds for along time, like see, look that's
the army grabbing those Roswell aliens.And it turned out to be just taking
(27:32):
from a movie and then manipulated wordout there in more ways. You know,
you guys are being more skeptical thanyou need to be. This is
a real disclosure. This is disclosure. So that's the implication of this.
Of the three sequences that we've seenso far April thirteen, May one,
and May eight, and then onMay seventeen, May seventeenth, we get
(27:52):
the shots of the sort of crashI suppose, and the multiple alien shots,
and I have to say that thislooks a lot more blurred, less
clear, and the aliens when theyshow multiple aliens seemed a lot less detailed,
and that of course is suspect aswell. How come. When you're
(28:15):
showing a single alien, there's allthis incredible clarity and detail. When you're
showing the multiple aliens, it's grainy, it's blurred out, and it's hard
to see the details of the alien'sfeatures, et cetera. Eleven, there
appears to be this incredible family vacationvideo that's released. That's ird. Now,
(28:37):
the story is that the military wasinvolved in some kind of treaty negotiations,
some kind of interaction with these alienbeings. But apparently in nineteen sixty
one, and apparently these videos gofrom all these films go from nineteen forty
two to nineteen sixty one, whateverthat means. But this event on this
particular last fourth tape appears to bewhat they're calling a family vacation, and
(29:03):
the family vacation involves apparently a secretvideo that was filmed by military officers who
weren't really allowed to be filming thesealiens. Apparently they had secretly had a
camera brought to the scene against thetreaty, against the treaties mandates, and
basically they filmed these aliens moving around. Now, look again, in this
(29:26):
footage, the alien's features are veryblurry, very obscured, very grainy,
which I find suspect. Again,why when we see the single alien,
is the footage so good and whenwe see these multiple aliens walking around it
gets significantly deteriorated. They call ita family vacation. Maybe that's a bit
of a joke. I don't know, but it's very interesting how it kind
(29:49):
of ends on this event where themilitary apparently broke the rules and they had
to revise the treaty. According toIvan zero one three five, apparently that
there was some sort of a youknow, breaking of the treaty and maybe
that ended the interactions for all weknow. Yeah, so that's an excellent
(30:11):
sort of breakdown of the history ofyou know, when the videos were posted,
and some more events around those videos. I uh was gonna show,
if you'll indulge me for a moment, just to show people. Let me
(30:33):
see one second. The second I'mgonna have to find this really quickly.
Friends, Please bear with me.Okay, you know my old YouTube channel
(30:59):
and pull out a really old videothat I produced quite a long time ago.
But I just wanted to show thisto show some that I have more
than some familiarity with puppets and puppetwork. Okay, one second. You
(31:25):
know a lot of people that arevery skeptical of this video have said it's
a puppet. They're all they're justpuppets, and I disagree. I know
a lot of people that work withpuppets on film too, besides my own
experience with them. And what canI tell you, friends, it's let
me get this cute though it's verydifficult. It's nearly impossible actually for me
(31:53):
to to believe that these are theseare puppets in the video. And you
know, I like to depend onpeople who have actual experience when they make
statements. Somebody saying it's a puppetwhen they don't have any experience with puppet
work, especially creating puppet work onfilm, really shouldn't be you know,
(32:15):
putting your mouth and gear if theydon't have the facts I talked to.
I think most recently I talked towell, I talked to somebody that's well
known for puppets. He worked fora time for Kevin Smith. If you
(32:35):
ever saw the Buddy Christ statue,he created it. He's a friend of
mine. He does special effects.We talked about this video. He mentioned
my own puppet work and he saidyour puppet work's pretty good. Could you
do that? And I said no. And then I said, your puppet
work is better than mine, couldyou do that? And he said no.
So it is what it is.But I wanted to just show I
(32:57):
want to show some of my oldpuppet work, just so that people know
that when I say it's not apuppet, I do know something about I
definitely know something about putting puppets onfilm. This is an old magic video
of mine that was on my TVin Philadelphia a long time ago. There
was something called Mine TV in Philadelphia, sort of public access, and I
(33:20):
was one of the early people doinga show about magic and all matter of
weirdness. Really, so let's takea watch of this. Welcome back to
the lost world of magic in thiswaterhouse, sigular way from the rest of
(33:44):
the world can be and as collectedsome of the greatest secrets of magic,
These secrets of magic he has beendirected in in many many years. The
search, as you know there,it ends sometimes when the magician guys some
(34:05):
of their illusions. And here thesecrets aren't too important to let just die,
not keeping them near, to cheatthem alive, And so here they
wait until the right place and theright time. This is how the magic
of the Nest still is alive.Yeah, So just to display, I
(34:31):
did a lot of stuff with puppetson film and got pretty good at it.
That's just that's an actual, prettyearly example. I have a lot
better puppet work, but I don'tI didn't have videos handy. My point
is that when people say it's apuppet, go talk to people who know
(34:52):
something about puppets. I don't believeit's a puppet. Most people that know
anything about puppets and puppeteering and andespecially putting puppets on film would disagree that
it is a puppet. Okay,So I'm going to cite fair use for
one more just one more piece,friends, one more piece, and that
is we have a comment on thisvideo and it's it's significance, whether it's
(35:16):
real or not, from Nick Pope. Actually, and I thought that he
made some great points about this,about this series of videos. So we're
gonna cite fair use. We're educatingthe public on these series of videos called
(35:38):
the Skinny Bob videos. We willbe discussing what mister Pope has to say
in the following clip. This isfair use. It's the definition of fair
use. So we're gonna site fairuse and use a clip from this video.
Okay, one second, friends,alien life? Does it exist?
(36:06):
And if so, has it evervisited Earth? These are questions humans have
been hoping to answer for years.The latest claim of proof has appeared on
YouTube, claiming to be leaked footageto an extraterrestrial being interrogated over fifty years
ago. We asked Nick Pope,who used to investigate UFOs for the Ministry
of Defense, what he thinks ofthis sensational video. And for those who
(36:30):
don't know, Nick Pope was oncethe person that was sort of in charge
of England's program to study UFOs.Of course, lately I've heard some things
that that may or may not bevery accurate. But Nick Pope is a
picture in the UFO world, andyou know has done lectures and the conference
(36:52):
circuit for a decade. Based onhis experience in the English English equivalent of
the Department of Defense. This isone of the better fakes that I've seen.
Looking at the skills of the filmmaker, I think it's a nice piece
(37:12):
of work. It's well put together. No, I agree with the black
and white imagery is a nice touchbecause it plays into that whole idea that
this might be something that's been inthe government vaults for a while, might
even relate to Roswell, the holyGrail of euphology. Yeah, and it's
interesting. I've mentioned this before thatmany hoaxes sort of tack onto an already
(37:35):
believed event in UFO mythology or lure, and certainly Roswell is one of the
most famous UFO events and stories,and Roswell is generally believed by most people
who believe in aliens and the governmentcover up so interesting that they tack onto
Roswell and sort of try to makethat connection. People, I think have
(37:59):
a number of different motivations for creatingsomething like this, and it's clearly an
exceptional piece of work, and someCGI filmmakers actually use something like this to
showcase their skills. Yeah, thatI would agree with. However, most
CGI artists or filmmakers the time.You know, I am not a CGI
(38:22):
person, but I know enough aboutCGI and Blender and a lot of three
D rendered animation software that to dothis level of a CGI creature would be
probably hundreds of hours. So I'vealways wondered why that person puts so much
work into this if it is fakeand never stood up and came forward to
(38:46):
take the credit for it. Oneof the other reasons why people are hoax
is simply the joy of putting oneover on someone. Never never underestimate the
appeal that has. The interesting thingis this video. I would say that
for many hoaxers, it's kind ofa game like see how smart I am
I can fool these people could be? Who isn't going to change anyone's mind.
(39:08):
Believers will go on believing, Skepticswill go on thinking it's a lot
of nonsense. If anything, afilm like this is going to polarize people's
beliefs. Those who believe in UFOsand extraterrestrials will say, this proves my
point. I was right all along. Skeptics are going to say, it's
such an obvious fake. If that'sall you've got, just proves it's nonsense.
(39:30):
Yeah, and that I agree with. I think that most UFO believers
that I've talked to think this videois real. People who are let's just
say, the true believers, andpeople who are not believers in UFOs and
aliens and the whole government covered itup. Those people generally think that this
(39:50):
is fake. So has this movedthe debate forward at all? No,
And again this does not past thetest of falsifiability, meaning this can neither
be proven to be true nor provento be fake. So to me,
it has very little evidentiary value.But you know, it's definitely had a
(40:15):
cultural impact and significance, especially inthe UFO community. Most people are aware
of this video and most people havean opinion on it, whether it is
real or fake. And I've seendebates rage on like above top Secret and
evaline forums and other places that talkabout this stuff. The debate rages on
(40:36):
is this real or fake? Afilm like this ends up as being not
just interesting from a cultural and sociologicalpoint of view, but I think it's
something that will end up being usedas ammunition in this ongoing dog fight between
(40:59):
the skeptics believe it. Yeah,exactly, So it just becomes it just
becomes fodder for debate on you know, on websites, you know, those
like this just becomes another story forpeople to argue about endlessly on UFO Twitter
(41:19):
or you know, on message forums. I've seen people arguing about this.
It seems like the debate never endson this video. So where are we
at with this? Well, we'reat an impass because I'd like to prove
(41:40):
this is real, but I canI'd like to prove it was fake,
so I can put it in onebin or the other, but I can't.
So this video, this series ofvideos stays in my gray bin.
Maybe it's real, maybe it's fake. Maybe someday the person that created it
(42:01):
would step forward to take credit andwe could all know that it was fake
or that it was real. NowI mentioned there's just a few possibilities here
that it is a puppet. Idon't believe that that it is a child
in prosthetics. I'm not sure.I believe that based on looking at this
(42:24):
alien would have to be one hellof a creature designer, prosthetics maker,
especially to make those brows move whenthe eyes open and close. So I'm
not sure that I believe that.The third explanation is it could be a
CGI created animated creature, but thatwould take hundreds of hours for somebody to
(42:46):
animate this thing, and then they'dhave to give it that aged film black
and white treatment, and that wouldtake a lot of computer rendering time.
ET cetera. So you know,if it's a hoax. Of course,
the last possibility is that it's analien. The other possibility that I thought
about is that it could be apuppet which was then later manipulated through digital
(43:12):
effects and animation effects. You know, you could have had a static puppet
without any movement in the actual videofootage, and then the eye movement and
brow movement could have been added throughdigital effects and computer animation, sort of
taking a puppet and enhancing it.I've done some things like that, kind
of like that puppet piece that yousaw that I played earlier of mine.
(43:37):
Later I learned that I could takethe footage of the puppet and then I
could make him blank digitally, whereI can make his eyebrows raise, or
different effects of a face that theactual puppet didn't have. I could do
in post with some digital effects softwareand animation software. That's another possibility.
(43:57):
And of course it's possible that it'sa real alien. So, friends,
what do you think? Is thisa real alien or is this a hoax?
Is this a fake? I amgoing to turn my completeent level and
way behind here. Sorry, friends, I'm going to turn my total attention
(44:20):
to the live chat. The factthat you can't dismiss it is in itself
pretty cool. The way the dudemoves just reeks of real to me.
Yeah, I've heard people say thatthe thinness and shape of the body is
interesting. The skinny aspect absolutely.Brian cannot tell over there in the twitch
chat, you know. I hopewe get some more twitch users because I
(44:40):
think Brian cannot Tell is over thereby himself sometimes. But thank you for
helping to get our twitch chat going. Brian cannot tell. There was a
long version in an interview with alienand autopsy photos all at the same time.
Rick von Himlich Lunar says, Ithink it was created by someone who
(45:00):
is not invested in a topic andhe created over the course of studying a
degree in three D digital animation.Could be, could be, but somebody
knew at least enough about the Roswellaliens and what they were supposed to look
like to create a pretty convincing fake. If it is fake, I think
it's okay to back burner and notbe sure about things, to be in
(45:22):
a place where both things could betrue. Whoever, I need more to
believe. Yeah, I'm I'm odd. Obviously. I'm I'm more on the
side of this is fake until proofemerges. This is supposedly from the fifties
sixties, right, released in theeighties. No, it was released in
twenty eleven. But yeah, it'ssupposed to be from the forties or fifties,
(45:45):
I believe. But is that softwareas old as the footage? Yeah,
there was CGI software in twenty eleventhat you could do something like this
with the computers will much less powerfuland it would have taken a lot more
rendering time than it would today.But it could have been done in twenty
(46:06):
and eleven or two thousand and twoeven Really, it is possible that it
could have been a rendering for avideo game that was in production but never
made it to completion. It looksvery similar to Silent Hill from the late
nineteen nineties. Yeah, I haveto look that up. Wreck You could
be right. Yeah, amazing,It's still amazing footage. Though. It's
(46:28):
one of my favorite videos to lookat. Of all of the UFO and
alien videos out there, this one, to me is the best and most
convincing. But I'm still not convinced. Still not convinced. Oh, I
(46:51):
did not know this the video wasdiscussed in the community by several reputable people
just prior to its release. Manybelieve it was a red herring, a
try to head off some real onesthat were stolen. Then could be right,
it could be that it. Yeah, you never know. The Russian
(47:13):
providence lends credence. Actually they don'tseek to cover the et thing up.
Well, I don't know about that. You know, Russia has its own
Area fifty one and stories of crashalien craft that were recovered just like we
do. So I don't know thatthey are any honest, more honest with
their citizens than we are. Ithink this way released before twenty eleven.
(47:40):
William Pixley, We just played avideo earlier that said it was released in
twenty eleven. I have notes previousnotes that said it was released in two
thand and eleven. That was thefirst time that it was seen in twenty
eleven. Was it made before then? Probably, if it's supposed to be
from the nineteen forties or even somebodywas creating a hoax, it was probably
(48:01):
made, and it could have beenmade at any time but two thousand and
nine, twenty ten, and thenuploaded on twenty eleven. Yeah, it
came out in twenty eleven, nearas I could tell. Yeah, and
Rick von Himlich spluner yea, heconcurs it came out twenty eleven. I
(48:23):
believe Don Craz's phase is a greatone for discussion, but like Stephen said,
needs to be a no until moreinformation. Yeah, yeah, I
agree that this is it's just suspect, you know, it's just not it's
not it's not proof of anything,because if you know, if somebody could
(48:45):
come forward and say, here's wherethe video was taken. Here, here's
who took the video, here's whoI guess stole it from some classified vault
somewhere. But like most of thesethings, we find that we just don't
get the proof, or if theytry to offer that kind of proof,
(49:05):
you know, it's some anonymous sourceor somebody like that with the you know,
behind a shade, with their voice, you know, disguised, which
isn't a reputable or believable source.You just never know with these things,
you never know. So I mustbe mendel on this because I think it
(49:29):
was earlier, like the mid nineties. You may be some people may be
confusing this video with the alien interviewvideo with Victor which was released in the
nineteen nineties, and I did acomplete and total debunk that and that we
can prove is fake with really goodsources. I start on this stuff in
(49:51):
nineteen ninety four, John Viio,I like. I like that you call
it how it is? Thanks John, Uh. Yeah, welcome to our
live chat, John, Please dosubscribe if you like this kind of content.
If you have not done so already, ream ce. They don't look
(50:12):
like Welcome to the chat. ReamSee. It's good to see you here.
I missed you last few shows.You must have been you know,
you must be a busy guy.They don't look like CGI to me.
If they are, CGI is betterthan a lot of CGI I see in
movies. Yeah, I will agreewith you. If it's CGI, it's
extremely well done CGI creature. Whatdoes Stewart's Birdlob think of this? I
(50:37):
don't know. Don't know, WilliamPixley, Maybe you can email them and
let us all know. It's leda battle Angel level CGI for sure.
If it's CGI is ahead of itstime, Yeah, especially for being released
in twenty and eleven. There's here'swhat I remember about twenty and eleven.
You could do HD videos and youcould do, you know, really high
(51:00):
quality digital renderings, but it tookforever. Like I used to have a
secondary computer that I would copy videoprojects over to, and it would still
go for days. Sometimes, liketo produce an hour and a half HD
video would take a day, liketwenty four hours of that thing chugging away,
and then sometimes the computer would overheatturn off in the middle of the
(51:21):
render. It was like the StoneAge for digital projects. Now we have
much more powerful capable computers. Soyeah, it's impressive that he created this
with the technology of those days.If if somebody indeed did going to convention
and seminars, yes interview on autopsy, then this video is all in a
string. Yeah, similar to those, but different. The problem is the
(51:45):
whole UFO community is polluted. WelcomeJasmine Emeric, who comments the problem is
the whole UFO community is polluted.I often ask myself why I would what
would I consider proof of alien visitation, alien technology and aliens living among us.
Yeah. I want to see thealiens. I want to talk to
(52:05):
them, I want to interview them. And if you have alien technology,
I want, you know, areal and actual scientist to look at it
and say, yeah, this isdefinitely alien technology. The other problem with
the UFO community is that people justmake statements, is if they're factual,
Like we have alien crash retrieval medals. ARTS parts were thoroughly debunked, And
(52:30):
if that's what TTSA is claiming isalien materials that they have, it's just
ridiculous. If they're making money dealsbased on ARTS parts, that should be
a fraud charge because ARTS parts havebeen thoroughly debunked. Even Art Bell told
Linda Moulton Haw that they were fakesand that there was nothing extraordinary about the
(52:52):
metals. But you know, peoplemake these statements as if it's factual.
I guess it's that whole thing,like if you repete a lie enough times,
people will still believe it. Thisword is the word he knows the
Russian et file top to bottom.Yeah, I'd be interested to see what
(53:13):
he thinks about this picks because yeah, he's definitely an expert when it comes
to when it comes to the Russianspace program and UFOs. Sure, he
would definitely be considered the leading expertprobably, So any questions or comments for
me please put in all caps otherwise, friends, it's been a long day.
(53:37):
And we will probably be wrapping thingsup pretty early tonight. I'm sorry
for the late start. We hadsome technical fun issues here and yeah,
I was dealing with I was hackingaway on this computer prototype all day and
I'm running out of steam rapidly.Carol Utley says, I'm afraid Howell tends
(54:02):
to believe a lot. Yeah,you know, some people are just I
don't understand some of these people thatgo out on the Internet and they just
believe anything and bring their viewers anything. I don't know. Jasmine Emerics.
Similarly, Eric Davis talking about thisalleged crash retrieval, just because he said
(54:22):
so doesn't mean it's true. Ineed more proof, Jasmin Emeric, you
may be interested to know that EricDavis. I'm doing research on him and
I'm going to present my finding soonand I think there's going to be a
lot of pissed off, disappointed peoplewhen we hear about some of the things
that have happened in mister Eric.Doctor. Eric Davis's background Basically, he
(54:45):
was panned as a crackpot by theAir Force long time ago for some projects
that he was involved in and somebolsterous claims that he was making maybe twenty
years ago with regard to projects hewas involved in. Seems to me that
he likes to stretch the truth agreat deal, and I, for one
(55:07):
do not trust him any longer asa source. That may change, we'll
see. And you know, again, I'm one of those people like,
great, you got alien crash retrieval. Let's see it. Let's see it.
But we don't see it. Andhow come everybody involved in this New
York Times thing is either directly orindirectly connected to TTSA. It's like York
(55:30):
Somebody at the New York Times islike ttsa's propaganda arm right, and helping
them get investment money and helping themget publicity for what they're doing seems to
me like one big money grab.And again, you know, we talked
about this before, but like peopleciting Eric Davis as proof that Bob Blazar
(55:51):
is telling the truth is a joke, because Eric Davis said that he was
a fraud. You can't do that. But these people are doing it.
It's just they just keep repeating theselies, right, And I love how
the believers are taking text from theoriginal article which was then castrated, and
they made all these retractions, butpeople are still using lines from the retracted
(56:14):
part of the article. They hadto back things up. Harry Reid said,
hey, I never said that.How do you run with the story
in the New York Times quoting asenator and then the senator later comes out
and says, excuse me, Ididn't say any of this shit about off
world vehicles. I didn't say anyof this shit. And then they had
(56:34):
to pull that statement out of thearticle, and people are still quoting Harry
Reid is saying that. When HarryReid himself says, excuse me, I
didn't say that. I didn't saythose lines that they attributed to me and
posted in this New York Times article, I didn't say that. But people
on UFO Twitter are still running around, and I guess the story is going
(56:55):
to be that Harry Reid's lying nowlike he didn't mean to spill the beans.
It's ridiculous. Good point. It'slike TTSA is writing the articles and
New York Times is publishing it.I'm reviewed, Yeah, it appears to
me that how the hell do youget a look Jentsmine Emmerick. You're a
(57:15):
journalist, right, more so thanme? I don't consider myself a journalist,
but even I, before quoting someonewould double check with them and say,
excuse me, I'm going to quoteyou said this is that? Okay?
How the hell on God's green Earthdo you get to the level of
being a New York Times journalist,a columnist for the New York Times and
(57:39):
you didn't check the quotes before youpublished an article to millions of people.
It's amateur hour. Clowns choose bullshitand they have no credibility for doing stuff
like that. Reim se would itbe played if I were to ask you
(58:00):
about the current situation on the anteater front. I have no idea what
you guys are talking about over there, William Pixley, Senator Reid didn't say
what you were indicating. He said, there is a phenomen and we didn't
know what it is. New YorkTimes, come on, picks, he
said, I didn't say what theyoriginally said in the article. That's what
(58:21):
he said. He said, Ididn't say that. Hold on one second,
and yeah, he did make asort of a a statement. And
(58:43):
now I'm not going to be ableto find the retraction. I'm not gonna
be able to fight They definitely madea retraction picks. I'll find it and
send it to you. Off offthe air, I found a lot of
bogus clips and videos come from littleknown foreign films and projects. Yeah,
(59:04):
welcome paranormal Jiggy. You may beright. This could be some little known,
you know, film about aliens fromBosnia or you know, Romania,
or some little European country or Indiaor someplace that nobody has seen. Maybe
it was like taken from a Bmovie, foreign film. We just don't
(59:27):
know. He did step back fromthe definitive assertion we got a ship.
Don't disagree there. Yeah, wellthey basically had him saying that we had
a spaceship, and then they hadto pull back and say, oh,
he didn't say that, because hesaid he didn't say it. Not a
journalist. Just try to look atthings realistically, agree with hu Jasmin Emeric
(59:51):
Brian cannot tell the whole object ofthis is to discredit the UFO community and
further censor than that. It's allset up. Yeah, it may be,
Jasmine Emmer. I want to believeme too. I'm just like Fox
Molder and I even bought the poster. It's over there on my door,
my office door. Every time Iwalk in and out of this office,
I see that I want to believe. They don't make it easy, right,
(01:00:15):
And it seems like it's easier tobelieve when you live in this in
your own believing mind and your confirmationbias, and it's like bedtime stories.
It's comforting, right. Ah.Yeah, those aliens, bro, they
came here and they're going to helpthe human race. Uh you know they're
(01:00:36):
going to help the human race.M see Rick von Himlick Spluner. They
are very distracted right now by theupcoming nominating convention in Nashville, where they
will set their agenda of important functionsto perform in twenty twenty one. Yes,
he took issue with the notion therewas a ship hardware yet because he
(01:00:57):
doesn't know there was hardware. Nobodythere's hardware. We got one guy,
doctor Eric Davis, who was basicallycalled a kook by the US Air Force
twenty years before this, and we'vegot the goods on that. We'll be
sharing it soon. Brad Gray ishere. Good day, Truthers. Good
to see you back, Brad Gray. Always good to see you. Brad
(01:01:20):
Gray says, I have the posteras well, I think we all got
that poster at one time or another. Rick von Heimlick Splooner. Indeed,
there may be unfortunate important functions tobe completed without intrusion very well, could
be William Pixley. They do notmake it easy. This is by design.
You mean they don't make it easyto believe in this stuff. I'm
(01:01:43):
not so sure about that. Butwhat doesn't make it easy is that for
every Let's just do some math here. And this is just off the top
of my head. It's my opinionand speculation. Of one hundred stories about
aliens not Let's say about one hundredstories about alien spacecraft and aliens, right,
(01:02:08):
or one hundred people telling stories aboutalien spacecraft and aliens. How many
out of those hundred stories can youdefinitively prove as a true story with facts
evidence, and I mean overwhelming factsand evidence to the you know, let's
say beyond a reasonable doubt evidence thatit's real. How many out of one
(01:02:30):
hundred cases would you say, becauseI'd say three, two, maybe one
out of one hundred. And theproblem becomes that you have to plow for
one hundred fake stories to get toone that may be real. And even
those they may be real, butyou can't prove they're real. But you
couldn't prove they were fake. Andthat's the rabbit hole that we've been going
(01:02:54):
down, that I've been going downsince I was a kid with this stuff
the UFO commune, and he usuallydiscredits itself. Yeah, we've got you
know, We've got people, youknow, like Wendell Stevens who turns out
to be a convicted child molester.We've got people like Stan Romanek who turns
out to be a kiddie porn fan. Right. We've got people like Sean
(01:03:15):
David Morton who basically stole all ofthese old people's retirement money and spend it
all right, claiming that he wasa psychic. We've got I don't know
this Jan Harnzan he just got poppedfor trying to have sex with what he
thought was an underage girl. Andthe list goes on and on and on
(01:03:39):
for decades. We just want thetruth, and you can't handle the truth.
Yeah, man, it's been along day. I agree with you,
Carol, definitely. And Jasmine Emrickis agreeing with reemsee correct they do,
and don't they want there to bea cloud. Yeah, often thought
(01:04:00):
that whoever, if there is acover up, they want to mondy the
waters. And I don't know.The more I think about all this UFO
stuff, the more that I thinkthat it's really it's really the government putting
some of these stories out there tohide the top secret research they're really doing.
(01:04:25):
If people think it's aliens and getridiculed for it, then you might
not get to the truth of whatthey really have, which is probably exotic
propulsion drones and stealth blimps and alot of things like that. They control
all information getting out for a longtime, both sides. If you have
(01:04:45):
a real story, you're a painted. It's crazy and life is disrupted,
so you don't want to Yeah,a lot of people with real stories probably
don't don't want the don't want theridicule. I grew up on the Lake
Michigan Triangle hotspots seeing stuff myself.There is definitely something to believe in.
Discernment will hopefully lead us to thetruth without being fooled calmed. Yeah,
(01:05:06):
and that is always the danger.Roswell is a perfect example of a uf
POST story with hundreds of testimony.Yeah, but even that, Like I
was once, I read Don Schmid'sbooks and I was like, this is
great. Don Schmidt claims that hecan tell us who retrieved the bodies,
who loaded them in the trucks,who loaded the bodies, and a crate
(01:05:28):
who flew the bodies to write Patterson, And he's got names and dates and
stories. But then you get tosomebody like cal Corp's book, who picks
apart those people and their stories,and you are left again not knowing what
to believe. We are not alonefull stop on that, I will agree
with you. I would say it'scloser to sitting through five hundred pieces of
(01:05:53):
junkin finding one piece of valuable oruseful information. Yeah, that's basically where
I'm at. Is here and sayshello everyone, welcome back, Banya.
It is good to see you here, definitely good to see you here.
And friends, I'm gonna just becauseit can there we go winding down here,
(01:06:20):
So back to the darker scene andlet's see Brad Gray says, if
a UFO lands in public and thereit is that I don't believe. Well,
I saw on myself when I wasa child, and I will always
want to know and always wonder whatthat thing I saw was, and that's
(01:06:44):
you know what started me down therabbit hole. I wanted to know what
it is that I saw. Iwanted to know. I have to know
ream See, I would not believein UFOs, flying saucers, et cetera
if I had not seen one myself. I don't know what it was,
and I don't know if it wasan alien craft, but it was strange
and I never figured it out.Yeah, I had a similar experience for
(01:07:06):
see, and I tell the wholestory. If anybody is interested in my
UFO story, it's called Encounter inthe Forest and it's on my old old
YouTube channel. A truer statement aboutthe UFO field I have never seen Brian
(01:07:26):
cannot tell who says swim through asewer for a teaspoonful of truth? That
is the UFO situation is in theRick von Heimlick Schooner. What multiple video
angles. Yeah, we moved toa three camera setup, but unfortunately tonight
we're only going to be using popthat this camera does not do well with
(01:07:46):
low light, So we have amulti camera setup now, Rick von Heimlick
Schooner. And that is something thatyou guys in the Patreon support and the
people making PayPal. Nations generously gaveme a few bucks, and I bought
a couple of additional webcams so thatwe can do multiple camera angles. Looks
(01:08:09):
much better with multiple camera angles.The filter of what we're given has been
one hundred percent government controlled. Thatparadigm is now pretty blown apart. The
number of credible people testifying to theevidence is overwhelming. Disclosure projects alone,
Come on, William picks Lea.Stephen Greer is not somebody that you can
(01:08:30):
trust. Count Truth once again,fashionably late as always, Yes, but
we are very happy that you decidedto grace us with your wonderful presence here
once again. Welcome to the showCult Truth seventy seven. And you wouldn't
be a woman if you weren't fashionablylate, right. Jasmine Emercks's cool ream.
(01:08:56):
See I've never had an experience Raeimseytalking about his experiences Jasmine Emeric.
It was a weird orange ball andit was moving in a strange way.
It was not a plane or helicopteror a star. That is all I
know about what I saw. Yeah, mine was definitely a metal. It
was a craft made of metal.I didn't just see a light in the
(01:09:17):
sky. I seen this thing rightabove me at the tree top level while
I was in a forest. TheDon Craze phase have to agree with you,
Don Cray's face. Stephen Greer sucksnot to be trusted at all.
Yeah, and boy, I've gotsome stuff on Stephen Greer that relates to
(01:09:39):
these Wilson documents that everybody's getting soexcited about even though they're fake, and
that may shed some light on whythe Wilson documents cannot be trusted. Anybody
ever noticed that we're not allowed toknow who bought the documents from Edgar Mitchell's
estate. Friends, there may bea reason why nobody wants us to know
(01:10:02):
who the original purchaser of those documentswas. Okayim see, I do believe
that people are having experiences. Thankyou for sharing yours. Have you done
a video about it? Don't agreeat Don crazy. The WO stuff is
(01:10:28):
a bit off putting, Okay.I think that Stephen Greer is filled with
WU stuff. William Pixley, theguy thinks he can meditate and call spaceships
to come visit him. That's WO. That's a lot of WO. Lots
of WO. Stephen Greer has lotsof wo William Pixley, Stephen Greer is
(01:10:51):
Rick ron heimlick Splooner says Stephen Greeris a Stage five creeper. Not that
it has anything to do with hiswork, just a casual observation. Reem
Seed does have a video, JasmineEmeric, Yes, it is somewhere on
my channel. I you should posta link in the live chat reams.
I'd like to see. I'd liketo hear that realm see. I like
(01:11:15):
WU stuff. The more woo,the better woo woo. Yeah, close
family friend, Uh no picks.I don't think so, but time will
tell. We'll see. In SaintCroix on a dock, a bright red
(01:11:36):
light came straight down five hundred feetfrom the dock, dropped six blue lighted
balls in the ocean, and shotstraight back up. Five people all of
us ran wow. Jasmine Emeric,I like my upology with a dash of
WU and without conspiracy. Yeah.Yeah, there's all flavors. There's all
(01:11:57):
flavors out there for you, soyou can you can get the WU or
not get the WU. You couldget the conspiracy side of it, the
government cover up the men in black. There's a whole menu of UFO stories
out there for everyone. It's foreveryone. Okay, there we go,
(01:12:23):
so friends, Yeah, I thinkwe're gonna call this one a quick one
because you know, this was nota big topic tonight. This was just
a little one. So for someof the shows, we're not going to
do the full two hours. We'lljust go, you know, until it
feels about right. I don't wantto overstay my welcome. You know,
there's an old saying in show businessalways leave them one thing more. And
(01:12:47):
when you do like a three hourstream or two hour stream every day,
maybe some people can't really get caughtup. And rem Sea posts his UFO
experience video. You can hear allabout rem Sea's UFO experience. I will
watch that as soon as the show'sover and maybe remsee you would be willing
to come on my show and tellthe story and be a guest, because
(01:13:09):
I probably will have lots of questionsfor you, having had a similar experience
myself. William Pixley says, thereis will win this reality, folks.
It's why it's interesting. Kel truth. Well, I'm glad I got to
at least say hi to everyone.Yeah, and that's what replays are for.
(01:13:29):
You can see the short presentation thatI gave tonight. I think it
was about forty minutes tonight. Actuallythat's all on this Skinny Bob video.
William Pixley three hundred and fifty onesubscribers. Things are moving up nice.
Yeah, I'm very pleased. I'mnot looking. I keep telling myself,
I'm not gonna look at the numbers. I'm not gonna worry about the numbers.
(01:13:50):
I'm just gonna keep doing shows,keep doing shows, try to do
quality shows. We've done things toimprove things here. The audio is so
much better now. My sincere gratitudeand thanks to everyone who supported me on
Patreon and everyone who gave a donation, because I just pulled that money out
(01:14:11):
last week, and I've been savingup the Patreon pennies because I knew,
like you know, forty bucks amonth isn't going to cover all this equipment.
So I just didn't take it outfor a few months. And then
last week we took whatever was thereout and we got a couple of odds
and ends. We've got a brandnew microphone that's this great condenser microphone that
(01:14:32):
I found that I did lots ofresearch to try to get the most bang
for the buck out of the microphone. The show sounds very so much better
now, and it's all thanks toyou guys that have been donating and the
Patreon supporters as well. In fact, everything here, all the webcams,
the backdrop, the lights, themicrophone, everything that I'm using, with
(01:14:55):
the exception of the computer, whichwas kind of donated as well, everything
here was provided for me generously byyou supporters, So you have my gratitude.
I definitely have an attitude of gratitude. Every day I sit down here
to do some work to prepare forthe shows, and I smile to myself
(01:15:15):
knowing that somebody out there likes whatI'm doing, and it keeps me working
hard. Don Craize, William Pixley, have you watched the Vero Beach Greer
video? Yeah, because Don Crag'sbays correct me if I'm wrong. But
(01:15:36):
isn't the Vero Beach Greer video wherethey show some fireballs up in the sky
and Greer claimed that he meditated Hemeditated those aliens up and got those alien
spacecraft to communicate, right, Hegot those alien spacecraft to come and visit
him. And then it turned outthat there was Flair military exercises happening at
(01:16:01):
the exact same time the career wasapparently calling aliens down. Bro, So
I called bullshit on Stephen Greer.He's been caught so many times. He
got caught with this ane coma whatever, the fake alien baby alien. It
turned out to be a human fetus, and he still won't let that go,
claiming there's a cover up now andit's really an alien. Come on,
(01:16:24):
man, And he made millions offof that movie and he still keeps
going. He's been caught checking picturesof moths claiming that they were alien entities
that they summoned up. Okay,William Pixley, I get Greer has a
certain creep factor. That said,I do not think he's full crapped.
(01:16:45):
I just don't. Too many seriespeople have to testified. Love to see
the video. Yeah, Rick vonHeimlich splooner. The dildo has come from
the Patrion money. Unfortunately, notthat buying a whole bunch of dildos to
fill a big box turns out tobe a lot more expensive than Patreon and
PayPal donations would allow for So Itook that out of my own pocket.
(01:17:09):
Try to explaining that one to yourwife honey, did you just spend one
hundred and thirty dollars on dildos?Yeah, and I hope I don't have
to explain why I just bought onehundred and thirty dollars worth of dildoz Okay.
(01:17:29):
I think he is exploring the consciousnessside and is always kind of opaque,
even when he gets caught in lies. You know, he said that
he breathed Woolsey, who was aDepartment of Defense person. I think he
was like somebody in the Department ofDefense or a CIA person, and he
claimed he briefed that person. Andthen that person said, I don't know
(01:17:50):
what he's talking about. He claimshe briefs a lot of people. Okay,
you're right, William Pixley. Atakanais not a fiuce. The bone
analysis said it was around four yearsold. I misspoke. It's still human.
(01:18:11):
They did the DNA tests. It'shuman. It's a human. It's
a deformed human, for sure,but it is a human. And actually
I think there are conflicting reports abouthow old that at a common humanoid was.
(01:18:39):
Jeannette Krazinko, Oh my goodness,you're hilarious. Rick von Helox Lunter
from your personal collection. That no, Rick Vannimble exploonter, I do not
have a personal collection of dildo's.I had to acquire the dildos just to
do the David Wilcock Box of Dildo'schallenge. Oh yeah, he was ahead
(01:19:04):
of the CIA Wolvesey change, Yeah, of course, picks. He changed
his story. No, he didn'tchange his story. Listen, go talk
to John Greenwolf from the Black Vault. He was working on a show for
the History Channel and he sent aletter to Wolsey to verify Greer's claim that
he had been briefed about UFO's andalien crash retrievals by Stephen Greer of the
(01:19:26):
Disclosure Project, and Woolsey said,it never happened. I was at a
social event. I might have beensitting near him at this social event.
We didn't talk about any of thisstuff. So you know, he's fast
and loose with the facts. Likehe sits at he's at some social event
and he meets Woolsey and then allof a sudden he's saying he's briefing Woolsey.
(01:19:46):
There's no proof that he briefed Wolsey. If the guy who's he's saying
was brief says, no, itnever happened. You can't say the guy
changed the story. He's covering itup. No, the same thing with
these will some documents. Yeah,Woolsey wrote an official letter with other people
at the dinner they attended denying debriefingcalled their dinner talk polite conversation. They
(01:20:11):
had a dinner conversation, William Pixley. They did not talk about aliens and
flying saucers. But that hasn't stoppedStephen Greer from cashing in saying that he
briefed a CIA director. No hedidn't. Okay, there are others who
attest to see, this is thedebate you get into what others, what
(01:20:33):
others matter? When the man himselfsaid no, this never happened, what
Stephen griers assistant is going to sayit happened. Stephen Grier's wife who was
at that dinner with him, isgoing to say, yeah, my husband
briefed them. No, No,you can't, you can't. This is
the beleeving mind. This is yourconfirmation bias, William Pixley. If you're
(01:20:57):
willing to just deny a factual statementfrom Wolsey who says this never happened,
then I can't help you. Youget it. You're grasping for straws.
You want so desperately to believe thatStephen Greer really did brief the CIA disinformation
agent. That you're willing to comeup with these explanations that are far fetched
at best for why Wolsey would lie, right, And people are doing the
(01:21:23):
same thing with this Admiral Wilson.The Admiral Wilson guy comes down and says
this is fiction, and people arestill arguing, No, he's lying.
Of course he's lying. It's allcover up bullshit. There's no there there.
Yes, Brian cannot tell Saul Grearticconvention years ago. He crame across
(01:21:45):
as a bar and I'm very cultishwith yes men. Yeah, he's the
Pt Barnum of euthology. But heis also the most financially successful guy in
euthology. If you look up someof the stuff with his movies, understand
how this works. He doesn't.He does a fundraiser to make the movie,
gets millions of dollars to make themovie, and then he sells the
(01:22:10):
movie on Netflix. How does thatwork? I don't understand. It doesn't
cost millions of dollars to make amodern documentary at the very best, even
if you paid a good video editor, you paid for stock footage, you
paid people to be in interviews.You're talking ten or twenty thousand dollars to
make a decent, broadcast quality documentarytoday. Where does all that money go
(01:22:31):
that he collects. I don't know. Someday we're gonna look into all that
money. Yeah, picks, we'regonna just agree. We are going to
agree to disagree because it's gonna takeus nowhere. You're gonna you're gonna say
(01:22:55):
this, I'm gonna say that,and we'll go back and forth. I
wonder why the government doesn't have peoplelike Greer will cock up for fraud.
I guess it's just considered entertainment.Yeah, I guess so, And several
of them I think should have been. You know, Stephen Greer's entire inner
(01:23:17):
circle left him a couple of yearsback over Greer and money and proprieties.
Yeah, there's millions of He's gotmillions of dollars in UFO believers sending him
money. And here's another thing aboutStephen Greer that's ridiculous. He claims to
have this CE five protocol, whichis a way of communicating with aliens and
(01:23:38):
flying saucers and getting them to humeditate, and then the aliens and the
flying saucers come and visit you friends. If that was real, it would
be one of the greatest human discoverieson Earth. Or you could make an
iTunes app, right, you canmake it. You can make an iPhone
app and an Android app that peoplehave to buy for twenty dollars to do
(01:24:01):
this. It's ridiculous. It's ridiculousif that was real, why are you
If it's real, why are youtrying to profit from it? Shouldn't everybody
on Earth be able to communicate andcall in those aliens? Or is he
only concerned with his pocket? Yeah? Yeah, they owe a debt to
(01:24:24):
Greer, even if he's dripping wooin a bit creepy. The guy could
be a raging sociopath to stick hishead in this news. We disagree,
yeah, and we will continue todisagree. Where can I see the stuff
you have on Greer? Well,I have never done a show on Greer,
but based on a lot of thingslately, I think that's going to
be coming up. But Greer isone of those people, like the show
(01:24:45):
that we did on bab Blazaar orthe show that we did on on Richard
Dolan, where you know, theguy's got millions of dollars and I can't
go off half cocked without proof ofwhat I will be presenting. So I'm
gonna have to really do a lotof research and cover my you know,
cross my t's and dot my eyeswhen it comes to somebody like him,
(01:25:08):
because I've heard that he throws aroundlawyers a lot, and yeah, we
got to be very careful if wedo a story on him. Career was
great at the National Press Club eventin a late nineties. Something corrupted him
since then. Yeah, it's money, Jasmine Emory, because anyone tried to
(01:25:31):
meditate to call the aliens I have, it didn't work. Yeah, me
too, and it didn't work.It never worked. His films are crowdfunded.
What is wrong with that? WilliamPixley, Here's what's wrong with that.
When you crowdfund and collect millions ofdollars and then you create a documentary
(01:25:53):
with those millions of dollars that perhapscost twenty thousand dollars in total to make.
What happened to the rest of thatmoney? Does he just keep all
that money and he's done this multipletimes. He collected millions to create one
of those, and then he didyou know again, like a twenty thousand
dollars video, okay, and thenhe sold that on Netflix, kept all
(01:26:15):
those millions of dollars, and thenhe did another crowd funding and collected millions
of dollars again or at million atleast both times. All that money's got
to go somewhere, William Pixley,and it went right in his pocket.
It didn't go into the documentary.You don't. How does he collect millions
of dollars to make a documentary thatshould be the greatest documentary every created if
(01:26:35):
he's going to spend all that moneyon the documentary. But he doesn't.
He spends what everybody spends the leastamount you can to make it broadcast quality
and really good quality, you know, transitions and titles and music and stuff
like that. I mean, Icould be wrong, but there's no way.
Maybe maybe, maybe, and thisis a stretch. He spent one
(01:26:57):
hundred thousand dollars on each film,and that's if he's higher very expensive video
editors, producers, productions, assistantcameraman. Maybe maybe he spent one hundred
thousand dollars. What did he dowith the other nine hundred thousand dollars?
Greer wants to be one with thealiens. Yeah, REMI I don't know
(01:27:18):
much about Greer at all. Iwas an early you know before. He's
like a lot of guys. WhenI first found him years many years ago,
I was like, Wow, adoctor, you know, and he
has got facts and evidence. Butthen when you start looking into his so
called facts and evidence, it turnsout to be bullshit most of the time.
(01:27:42):
But yeah, I have tried toinvoke demons, Jasmine. They ignored
me. You never know, theycould be one and the same. Aliens
and demons might be the same thingfor all we know. Greer's biggest shortcoming
on substance is saying that all ET'sare benevolent. Yeah. I believe that
that is a very irresponsible statement.How do you paint with such a broad
brush. How does he know allET's benevolent? It's like saying, all,
(01:28:06):
you know, Americans are benevolent.There's no way there's good in being
in all people. And I believethat that would be reflected in any alien
species. Some alien species may bebeneficial, may be benevolent, but there's
got to be malevolent ones that justgo around destroying things and taking whatever they
want resource wise from other species.I would think, what about the movie
(01:28:30):
Phenomenon? When does that come out? No idea. I like your tenacity
debate is good. Yeah, career'stime, skill, and talent are being
mismanaged. She would be a betterasset back in the er. Yeah,
I believe that, agreed, Rick. Let's see you're correct for arguments purposes,
(01:28:51):
ask him to address your assarch.He likes to do interviews. You
know, listen, I said this. I think you said you know somebody
that could get to him and seeif I can get an interview. He's
not going to do an interview withme. He's not going to do an
interview. And he's especially not goingto do an interview if he knows that
I've got all this proof that he'sbeen faking and fraud and stuff for years
(01:29:14):
now. He's not going to wantto do an interview with me. He
only does softball interviews. Go check. I've never one time the only person
that ever and this is a funnystory. You guys can look this up.
The only time that somebody's been reallypushy with him. It was Carry
Cassidy, and Carry Cassidy was basicallyyelling at him for claiming that all aliens
(01:29:35):
were benevolent and telling him that hewas irresponsible. And it's a funny interview,
but yeah, he only does softballinterviews. He will not come on
a show like mine where we're goingto ask hard hitting questions and actually ask
him, you know important you know, listen, I think that's a valid
(01:29:56):
question, like how much did youreally spend on these documentaries that you collected?
A million? I believe it's likea million dollars each. He crowdfunded
each. He got a million dollarsto create each of the movies, and
you know, then he goes onand profits more by selling the movie to
Netflix. Right. I think howit works is that the people at crowdfunded
get a free copy, but everybodyelse, you know, you got to
(01:30:19):
pay for Netflix or Hulu to getto watch his stuff. I don't know,
And I just wanted to say thatthe latest movie of his, it's
the first sentence the narrator says,I don't recall it off hand is a
lie, but it was something likethe government has admitted that aliens are visiting
us, the government never admitted that, and for him to start the movie
(01:30:41):
on a lie speaks volumes about thecredibility of the rest of the information in
the DVD or the movie. Thefirst sentence opens with a complete and totally
inaccurate, factually inaccurate statement that aliensthe government has admitted that aliens have visited
(01:31:01):
US. No show me where thegovernment admitted that. It's never happened.
How do you open a movie withthat? It's ridiculous. So the reason
I've asked, I've watched all Greerstuff. It's all very convincing, especially
the false flag stuff. A lotof this stuff makes sense to me.
But I'm here to learn and beskeptical. Yes, cult truth, I
believe that. Yeah, he talksabout false flag events because you know what
(01:31:26):
false flag events happen. He basicallythrows in some factually accurate, historical,
you know, historically significant points totry to prove the rest of his points,
which are all bunko. We're gonnado, you know what, I
commit to it right now. I'mgonna commit to it right now. We're
gonna do. We did the dirton Richard Dolan. Let's be fair,
(01:31:46):
We'll do the dirt on Stephen Greer. I got a bunch. I've got
three folders of stuff on Stephen Greer. I was going to do a show
on him on the Midnight Hour andnever got around to it. Yes,
the documentary that costs one million dollarsshould look very impressive. There are over
(01:32:12):
a thousand people with serious credentials thathave stood up to tell their stories and
demand the government comes clean. Youmay be right, you know, I
really thought that that disclosure event thathe held in two thousand and one is
going to take legs. He claimsthat nine to eleven happened right after that
and just took the wind out ofthe sales of that thing. And for
all I know, he's right,but seems like a comedian excuse. He's
(01:32:35):
been taking people's money for years promisinghe's going to bring about disclosure. He's
one of the UFO Messiahs. Youknow, there's a few of them.
There's Grant Cameron talks about this,and it's an excellent point that there are
these UFO Messiahs. There are peoplelike Stephen Greer who think it's their place
in the world that they're going tobring about disclosure. Right, you have
(01:33:00):
people like Tom DeLong from TTSA.He's another one of the UFO messiahs.
He's going to bring about disclosure.There's a lot of UFO messiahs running around
promising they're going to bring disclosure,and they're all collecting money, all of
them, every single one of them, all of them. And you know,
one of them that I used toreally have a lot of respect for
that I've been kind of very learyof lately, right is Stephen Bassett.
(01:33:28):
He's another one of the UFO messiahs. He's going to bring about disclosure.
And you know, I liked alot of what he talked about, and
I got to interviewing ones and whathappened was he gave a great interview and
I was like, this is agreat interview. But then at the end
of the interview he did this bigpitch begging for money so that he could
bring us disclosure. And that killedit for me. It killed it for
(01:33:49):
me. And yeah, look,I guess maybe he does good work.
I don't know exactly what he does, but he goes to Washington and tries
to talk to senators and congress peopleand push the disclosure thing. But and
I guess yeah, he's got topay for his expenses. But it just
turned me off that he did thishuge pitch like, if I could get
(01:34:09):
ten thousand dollars, I could spendI don't know if he was asking for
ten thousand dollars maybe, but hispoint was if he could get you know,
a bunch of thousands of dollars,he could go to Washington again and
really push the issue and really andreally move the dial. And all these
guys promising disclosure are all collecting money, every single one of them, every
(01:34:30):
single one of them. Yeah,I agree with you. I guess Bassett
is trying to be the UFO lobbyistof record. He's got to eat.
Yeah, well, or he couldget a day job and do that part
time if he feels that passionate aboutit. I've never heard that cal truth.
(01:34:54):
I'm gonna have to look this storyup. Career said, the Phoenix
lights happened because he was in Phoenixthat night and it was a CE five
that created that event. Yeah,that's also what magicians do when something happens,
you take the credit right kind oflike there's assholes over there in Australia,
remember that, Like, Wow,if we got a lot of rain
(01:35:15):
that could put the fires out,and we should call up the rain.
And then rains came and some idiotstook credit for, you know, bringing
the rain and putting out the Australianwildfires. It's ridiculous. Yes, Jasmine
Emeric makes an excellent point. Ilove the way their disclosure is behind paywalls.
It's like selling Jesus Christ message.Oh wait, yeah, it's a
(01:35:39):
lot like religion, right. Yeah. And it's funny that you mentioned selling
Jesus Christ message because I was,Jasmine Emeric. I was trying to think
of nice gifts, little gifts thatI could give to people that are making
donations, and I have a friendthat does sort of import export and he
found me a bunch of different stuffand one of them one of those gifts.
(01:36:00):
I think, you know, inthe next week or two, we're
going to start offering some gifts ifyou give a PayPal donation, and one
of those things is going to bethese really nice wooden rosaries. I always
thought it was I always thought it'slike weird that they give you something that's
supposed to be holy, like arosary, and it's made out of plastic,
(01:36:24):
you know, Like I guess doesit still work? Can you still
pray the rosary with it? Yeah? But it seems funny to me that
this is supposed to be a sacredobject and it's made out of plastic.
So anyway, we have these reallyreally nice, really beautiful wooden roses on
the way, and those will beoffered for a gift that I could give
(01:36:45):
back to some of my viewers fortheir kind of generous donations. William Pixley,
The Phoenix lights are an amazing event. Yes they are, Yeah,
nice, jas Memori says, yeah, and I don't We got buch of
other little things just to just sothat I you know, if you give
a donation like I guess for therosaries, like if you give a twenty
(01:37:08):
dollars donation, then that week I'llnail you one of these really nice wooden
rosaries. I've been getting back intosome sort of spiritual practice. I should
also mention that I've been trying CWChanters Commonwealth chanting and I'm going to do
a whole show on his Commonwealth Chantingbecause I think it's interesting and did I
(01:37:33):
find it beneficial? So far?I think it is beneficial. It forces
me. CW. Chanters, CommonwealthChance the spiritual texts every day, and
if left to my own sort ofyou know devices, I won't do that.
I won't spend a few minutes everyday reading spiritual texts. I just
(01:37:54):
won't do it. And this systemthat he had developed sort of forces me
take the time to you know,take the time give some attention to your
spirituality every day and read some spiritualtexts. I think it's incredibly beneficial.
(01:38:15):
William Pixley, that's a good promotion, Steven. Yeah. And I thought
just that we could be all inclusive. We could have prayer beads from other
religions as well, and people couldtell me, you know, if they
want the Jewish prayer beads, ifthey want the Rosary, or they want
you know, there's there's many differentversions of prayer beads and I like all
(01:38:38):
of them. Carol Utley, I'dlike a T shirt truth Seekers. Yeah,
I'm gonna work on that. Thereis a way that in the in
the YouTube channel itself, you couldvery easily, I'm told from a friend
that does it. There's a companythat will sort of drop ship everything for
you and you get a cut ofit, and they get a out of
(01:39:00):
it. I'm gonna set that upand everybody who wants a truth Seeker shirt
can order one soon. I gottamake it a point to get that done,
because yeah, then I could belike Richard Dolan and you two could
buy Stephen Cambian Truth Seekers coffee mug. Whatever we have to do. And
also I just wanted to ask ifanybody is interested in this. I know
(01:39:24):
somebody who produces the best organic,real raw honey that you'll ever have in
your life. It is amazing.They do it by planning wildflowers all around
the around the hive setup that theyhave. And you know, I'm looking
(01:39:45):
for something to sell to help supportthe show. If you guys think that
selling honey would be you know,like it's a little weird. Yeah,
but I think that a lot ofpeople who listen to my show maybe health
conscience and into the organic things likeraw honey. It's just awesome. I've
been having it in my tea andI use it to make my favorite side
(01:40:11):
dish for dinners is honey glaze carrots, and that's super simple to do.
You throw these carrots in a potwith water, you boil them, you
drain it and then it's just ateaspoon of this honey and a couple of
pats of butter. Mix it up. It's delicious, guys Man Emeric.
(01:40:32):
My religious text of weight has beengnostic. Carol Utly, remember mood rings.
Hell yeah, I'm gonna get ussome moove rings. Excellent suggestion,
Carol Utly. Maybe for like aten dollar donation you get, I'll mail
you a mood ring right now.I gotta go look for mood rings.
(01:40:55):
Truth Seekers branded harmonicas we're gonna turninto kiss We're gonna have truth seekers.
Can't gits. If this keeps up, sell your butt off. Just make
sure how you do so. TrashUx, not sure we got one vote
for the honey. My mom loveshoney, but you should sell the CPD
(01:41:16):
oil too. I buy both.You know, we're going to get a
storefront together, because listen, theCOVID thing destroyed my business and it's I'm
not sure if it's sad, butreally this is one of the major This
is one of the things that Ihave right now is the show. You
(01:41:38):
know, and everybody else has allthese commercials and they sell this crap.
But here's what I'm going to say, Manuka honey is good from New Zealand.
Here's what I'm going to say aboutselling products. You got to pay
the bills, right, So ifselling some products or offering free gifts to
(01:41:59):
get different sized donations, I thinkwe're going to do some things like that
too. So some of the thingsare going to be like, if you
give a twenty dollars donation, I'mgoing to mail you one of these really
nice handmade wooden wooden rosaries. Butwe may have commercials and sell things like
the honey or the CBD oil.That's a good suggestion. Maybe the mood
(01:42:19):
ring will be another gift for makinga donation. But here's the thing.
I gotta say this very carefully.On my previous show, I did not
get the right to say no toa commercial. Does that make sense?
So in other words, if thedistributor of the show said, hey,
(01:42:43):
we're going to have you Hockin,We're going to have you Howking coaling cleanse
constantly, I had no, absolutelyno right to say no. I don't
want somebody advertising talking about cleanse yourcolon, get the tea. You know,
I hated that. Every time Iheard it, I cringed. I'm
like Oh my god, people arebuying diuretics a diuretic tea to cleanse the
(01:43:10):
colon from my show. I hatedthat, but I didn't have the right
to say no, right because thedistributor has to get a few bucks for
doing the distribution whatever. I refuseto have any product here that I will
not personally endorse or use myself,and that's a good thing. So at
(01:43:31):
least being independent now I have controlof that and nobody can force me to
sell people shit tea. I don'twant to sell shit tea. I'm sorry.
I don't want to sell tea thatmakes you shit like crazy. I
just don't want to do it.I'm not going to do it. So
we may start selling some products here, but they're not going to be anything
I don't want to sell. Oh, Jonah side with another excellent suggestion,
(01:43:59):
band dad is. But of coursetruth seekers dildos man. Now I gotta
go research how do you accustom printon top of dildos? Because we could
put the truth Seeker's logo right downthe dildo. With Jonah side, that
would be great. Oh my goodness. John Seins are possibly authors of the
(01:44:24):
Dead Sea Scrolls. William Pixley,sir, you're gonna sell cheese. No,
but I'm gonna go talk to thehoney girl. And uh, here's
what I think of the honey isgonna work like this. I think that
I'm gonna take the orders by myPayPal and then forward him to her and
she's just gonna drop ship it toyou because I'm not sure how to store
(01:44:46):
all that honey. And like,you know, like and I got kids.
Man, if my kids get ahold of like a bunch of jars
of honey, it's not gonna gowell. So but we're gonna work that
out. Being down are a decentidea rem ce. I like tea.
I like Herbal tea rem C.I don't like shit tea, the Colon
(01:45:06):
Cleansed tea, and I hated theircommercials because it was always like punch of
Colon, change your life. Youknow. It was such terrible commercials,
and I had to listen to ithundreds of times because you know, editing
like, okay, put the commercialsin and then play oh God to get
(01:45:27):
the tea shit. You know.Yeah, I have no problem with the
CBD oil ones, but uh,I didn't like to get the tea sleepy
Time Tea with honey. Yeah,I like that sleepy Time tea, this
Celestial Seasons sleepy Time tea. Thatstuff's just delicious and it's kind of something
about Herbal tea. It's like comforting, right, Yeah, maybe we'll sell
(01:45:49):
Herbal tea. So now I gotto go look up mood rings and custom
printed dildos. Thanks. Thanks forthe homework. Guys. Well, friends,
we're reaching an hour and forty fiveminutes, and I think that now
would be a good time to wrapthings up. I definitely want to let
me just check PayPal. Make surewe don't have any donations to shout out
(01:46:12):
tonight. You know we don't,no honey, no money tonight. But
it's all good, friends, Wekeep moving forward. I am really appreciative
of everybody that has been supporting theshow, like commenting, subscribing. Please
do, please do know that oneof the best ways that you could support
(01:46:36):
me right now is to try tohelp me get the subscriber count up.
So if you know somebody that likesthe kind of subjects that we cover,
and most of you in the livechat probably have many friends that do,
send them a message, send theman email, say hey, this new
show is on and you would probablylike it. Go subscribe, check it
out. I would sincerely appreciate that, KB. I am vicariously searching for
(01:47:08):
Peppa Pig. KB. I can'tstand Peppa Pig. My four year old
plays that constantly. I hate it. I hate it, and I mean,
you know he does. He leavesit on, right, he leaves
on, He'll leave on Peppa Pigand he walk away from the TV.
And I'm like in the kitchen listeningto Peppa Pigs screaming, and I don't
(01:47:30):
know that he hasn't even been watchingit for a half hour. Carol at
least says sweet dreams. Yes.Friends, So we're gonna wrap things up
here. I want to thank eachand every one of you for joining me
tonight. I almost didn't do theshow tonight because we had some technical issues,
but I'm glad we worked it out. I'm sorry it was a little
(01:47:51):
late tonight. Yeah, friends,until next time, Until next time,
leave that. There will be ashow tomorrow night at ten pm. I
am going to try something crazy thisweek, and I'm going to try to
do a show. I'm gonna tryto do five shows next week that may
(01:48:12):
or may not be possible, wemay be go into the cabin. And
here's the deal. When I'm atthe cabin now, my wife is bringing
guests and there's guests in the trailer, so I can't use that to stream.
My mother in law's in the cabinas well with the children and my
wife, and there's really only tworooms. And I don't know if we'll
be able to do a show.Maybe I could do it outside, but
(01:48:32):
then I got to worry about bears. So yeah, you know, I'm
doing my best to try to tryto do five shows a week. Sometimes
that's not always possible. But untilnext time, folks, my name is
Stephen Cambian. Good night and Godbless say A. Truth Seekers is a
(01:51:41):
Pewer supported show. Wonderful people likeyou who enjoy this show send pledges in
the form of super chat, superstickers, super thanks, PayPal or cash up.
Instructions for how to help are inthe description. You can also join
our Patreon and for as little asone dollar a month you can get extra
(01:52:01):
content. Patreon supporters go backstage passearly access to all our production videos before
they are distributed publicly. Stephen Cambion'smusic priory writings a monthly show journal,
and more. You can also becomea YouTube channel member for five dollars a
month. A YouTube membership includes allof the Patreon benefits, plus a special
(01:52:25):
members badge, priority reply to videocomments and the live chat, plus a
monthly members only video. We thankyou all kind and generous benefactors for supporting
truth Seekers. Thank you for yourgenerosity and support. Truth Zikers is a
(01:53:16):
viewer supported show. Now there's agreat way to support these broadcasts and show
your support. Please be sure andcheck out our merchandise store. Links to
our two merchandise online stores are inthe links to this video or podcast.
The Amazon store frontships super quickly inthe United States, Great Britain and many
(01:53:38):
more places. Amazon may not shipto your country or location. If that's
the case, hit our second merchandiselinking the description and visit our Red Bubble
storefront. Merchandise from our Red Bubblestorefront ships worldwide, but may take longer
than Amazon. We've got a greatdeal of super high quality merchandise for you
(01:53:59):
to choose from, including T shirts, phone cases, sweatshirts, and the
billows. The feedback from our productshave been overwhelming and great quality products and
fast shipping. People all over theworld are buying some merchandise and showing their
support of the show. Praise thecash, Praise the cash, Praise the
(01:54:20):
cash. We thank you all kindand generous benefactors who are buying some merchandise
and helping us to continue this journey. Thanks for being here. This is
(01:54:49):
truth Seekers with your hosts Stephen Cambion. Please rate, Mike and comment on
our videos and podcasts. If youare listening to all your podcast please write
us five styles help us ride inthe search brankings. If you are watching
on YouTube, please like, comment, and subscribe to our channel. If
(01:55:10):
you're listening to an audio podcast,we love and appreciate you listeners, but
you are missing the live tapings.All our shows are recorded live with video
feeds. We'd love you to comebe a part of our live broadcasts and
tapings. For the podcast, headon over to your YouTube click the search
tool a little magnifying glass. Goodtruth Seekers. One word in the search
(01:55:31):
bar, and near enter you'll seea strange and mysterious guy with sunglasses.
That means you've found the channel.Go there, smash the subscribe button and
hit the notification belt to receive upto date info on our YouTube channel.
We welcome you to be a partof our live taping and our chapel during
the live broadcasts. Seek the truth, Speak the truth. This is truth
(01:55:58):
seekers, truth seekers. In thecomput improve computing, Internet computing. In
(01:56:26):
intrining and accounting, working and reacting, puting, regency, incoming, atting,
coting and recuting, resting and actucting, ding and including in intentingting,
dicing, reducing, resulting, completing, insulting, including constricting company, in
(01:56:51):
conjecting, boding, poking up contacts, acting in until incutting, costum compu s