I Investigated Tyler Oliveira: Exposing All the Lies…

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
On Christmas Eve, a YouTuber by the name of Vince
Vintage released a forty nine minute long video titled exposing
Tyler olivera YouTube's Biggest Liar, where he calls me a liar,
implies that I am a racist, and ultimately tries to
destroy my career. In this video, I'll be debunking Vince's
outright lies and false claims in order of the most absurd, baseless,

(00:22):
nonsensical claims to the more creative speculation that he presents
to an audience that already hates me. To do this,
I'll even present some behind the scenes footage that will
completely dismantle his baseless lies and irresponsible speculation. And I'm
also going to acknowledge a few mistakes I've made over
the last two years, some of which Vince actually does
point out. Thank you, Vince. But before I disprove all

(00:45):
the lies Vince uses in his attempt to destroy my name,
my reputation, and my channel, I want to set the stage.
Vince is a YouTuber who creates video essays besides a
single photo of him getting married Congratulations. By the way,
Vince's intent higher Twitter account is dedicated to myself and
my channel over the last couple months, NonStop my balls

(01:07):
in his mouth like an obsessive ex girlfriend. Vince is
also thirty three years old. Well, I might not typically
bring that up in this context, given how Vince talks
about this guy who tried to ruin his life for
seemingly no reason, I thought it was rather ironic.

Speaker 2 (01:22):
A thirty seven year old piece of shit, low life
loser who has nothing better to fucking do, just wants
it down and doesn't have to prove anything about it.

Speaker 1 (01:32):
And Vince's poorly constructed hit piece against me and my
Name is the longest video ever uploaded on his channel.
The second longest video is one about Jeffrey Epstein. Yup.
It seems like this is a bit personal, but it
doesn't matter if his criticism is valid and I am,
in fact just a liar than I agree Vince call
me out. But unfortunately for Vince, it's simply not the case.

(01:56):
For simplicity, I'll be using Vince's own tweet of points
he asked me to address as a roadmap for this video.
Let's get into it. Why did Tyler hide the fact
that he shopped at a KKK memorabilia store that sells
bleep and pass it off as an antique store. In
this video, I walked into the store, bought some automatic
assault rocks, this license plate, and a copy of the

(02:18):
city ordnance. Because the entire premise of the video was
the city where everyone must legally own a gun. Every
head of household residing in the city limits of the
city of Kennesalls is required to maintain a firearm together
with ammunition, therefore in the city penal code. That was
kind of the whole point of the video. This is
a Civil War antique store that sells all sorts of
artifacts and memorabilia from the Civil War time period. This

(02:40):
is one of the silliest points ever, but Vince provides
it in his attempt to paint me as a racist.

Speaker 2 (02:46):
I'm not even gonna call you a racist to Hitler
Tyler Hitler Air.

Speaker 1 (02:49):
Vince knows there are many objects for sale in the
store just by looking at the footage in my video,
but he creates a chapter titled KKK in his video,
implying I went in there to go on some sort
of racist shopping spree when I bought literal rocks.

Speaker 2 (03:04):
I mean, hell, he bought so much stuff from this
place that he needed a bag to take out everything
he bought. I mean, it's just a grand old time
at the KKK store, right.

Speaker 1 (03:12):
I maybe spent ten minutes in the store, talked to
this lady, got an interview for the video, bought some
rocks for the bit, and left. This point sort of
outlines how desperate Vince is to paint me as a
racist at whatever the costs.

Speaker 2 (03:24):
I'm not even gonna call you a racist to Hitler. Tyler, hitlerver,
now do you think supporting a store like this might
come off as maybe a little bit racist.

Speaker 1 (03:32):
It's literally an antique store with a Civil War theming
in the deep South of Georgia. I bought rocks, a
piece of paper, and a plate with guns on it.
It's almost like saying, if you pay admission to go
to a Civil War museum, you're somehow supporting slavery. It
doesn't even make sense. And Bence knows this, but he
prays on an audience that already hates me to create
this narrative that I'm a racist. Why did he hide

(03:53):
the fact that he gave the most racist man in
America a welcome gift he bought from the KKK Memorabilia
store that's ell said plea. First of all, I didn't
hide anything. I even posted a photo of him and
I on Instagram with the caption titled I gifted him
automatic assault rocks from Kennesau. For context, I saw the
original video where the most racist man in a video

(04:15):
meets another YouTuber Pooty, and Pooty asks him this me
or does white rock right here? Be honest, don't lie
to me the rock it serves a purpose. Secondly, the
video where we met the most racist man in America
was posted one week after the video we made in Kenisad, Georgia.
Here's all the proof that my trip to Kennesau, Georgia

(04:35):
and then the Zinc Arkansas was in one trip. I
still had the rocks from Kennesa, Georgia. They're in my bag.
I thought of it on the fly. It all worked
out once again. But no, this wasn't some premeditated genius meetup.
The guy doesn't even have a phone. You can't set
meetings with this guy. He was out there. I knew
I still had the rocks in the car. He knew

(04:55):
about the Pooty bit. With the rocks. I knew I
could make him laugh if I gave him the rocks.
I did Boom, we have a video a lot. I
did see the Pooty video and I brought a gift.
I had no intention to meet you, and we saw
it like that's the guy from that one video. He's
gonna blow your mind. You ready to this? Okay? So
I know you liked the rock more than Pooty Rocks.
That's kind of funny, right, Oh yeah, But Vince is

(05:18):
so caught up in me being a racist that he
wants to connect me giving this guy rocks, which is
a callback to this video by Pooty that it's somehow
KKK related. They're just rocks. They're fucking rocks. Why did
Tyler use a PS five as bait to get someone
to break into his car? One, that's a TV, not
a PS five two To see if someone would break

(05:39):
in and take it, We ran a little Mark rober
esque sting operation with the TV and controller in the car.
Fun fact, because I hate thiefs, we emptied the boxes
and put towels in them. But to be fair to Vince,
his real point is that car break ins and auto
theft is so rare in the city of Oakland that
we had to perform a little sting operation to show
that cars do get broken into.

Speaker 2 (05:59):
Because frankly, when Tyler goes to these places, it's not
as bad as he always wants it to be. So
by Tyler's showing all these news clips, it could seem
way worse than what it really is.

Speaker 1 (06:09):
What's hilarious about this, though, is that Vince has hyper
analyzed all of my videos. He's watched the entire Oakland video,
yet he fails to include this scene where we walk
up to a woman who is taping cardboard to her
car window that just got broken into. You know anyone
else who's had their car broken into like this?

Speaker 3 (06:27):
Oh?

Speaker 1 (06:27):
Yeah, yeah, everybody. Everybody isn't This isn't my first time?
Yeah do this? So? How many times has it happened
to you?

Speaker 2 (06:33):
I can't even count on two hands.

Speaker 4 (06:34):
I've had my car stolen to her three times, broken into?

Speaker 1 (06:39):
Oh more than ten times.

Speaker 5 (06:41):
Yes.

Speaker 1 (06:41):
The next person we talked to in the video says this,
just talk to Auntie outside about her car window broken in.
That's normal, man, normal, Yeah, that's normal, everyday currents.

Speaker 2 (06:51):
Real number one, bro, don't league your stuff in the car.

Speaker 1 (06:53):
And what's even funnier is that the crime statistic state
that in twenty twenty three, Oakland reached the highest number
of car thefts in more than a death, with a
forty four percent increase since twenty twenty two. But this
is part of Vince's argument that he begins to construct
that we need to create evidence or falsified b roll
to legitimize the crime that doesn't exist in these cities

(07:13):
according to him. And Vince even gets ahead of himself
with his victory lap as he begins to heart comments
on his YouTube video about me basically co signing more speculation.
This comment, with five thousand likes that he hearted and therefore
surfaced to the top of his comment section reads the
reason the gas station attendant said that on the loudspeaker
was because they saw him leave his car there with

(07:35):
the PS five on the dash. This speaker is actually
programmed to say this on loop because guess what, so
many people break into cars at this given gas station.

Speaker 3 (07:45):
Owner of vin property is not responsible for any theft
or vandalism.

Speaker 6 (07:51):
Thank you for visiting hagen Berger's show.

Speaker 1 (07:54):
We be sure on top of your valuable part.

Speaker 3 (07:57):
Pecure owner of property pornly.

Speaker 1 (08:04):
But I did talk to the actual gas station attendant,
and he said this, they went and break into our car. Hey,
I gotta give a five star review to Hagenberger. No
break ins at eleven pm? Okay, I got it tomorrow morning. Shit.
Why did Tyler hide the fact he brought on known

(08:25):
fraudster Darren Stalcup as his Oakland homeless expert In my
Oakland video, I introduced Darren as a Bay Area native
and investigative journalist.

Speaker 2 (08:33):
In this Oakland video, Tyler brings along this prestigious reporter.
Now this guy isn't a journalist. He's actually a used
car salesman who pulled a seven thousand dollars go fundme
scam a couple months earlier.

Speaker 1 (08:45):
So Vince basically clowns Darren for getting a nine to
five as a car salesman, referring to this Facebook post
by Darren. So, Darren told me that he's been doing
citizen journalism since twenty fifteen. After his cousin, Scotty, was
murdered by fentanyl dealers in the Bay Arealy, Darren's tried
to move on and get a more traditional nine to five,
and he proudly and excitedly got a job as a

(09:05):
car salesman. Vince refers to this Facebook post in an
attempt to discredit Darren and the work he's done since
twenty fifteen in the Bay Area as a citizen journalist.
My Oakland video with Darren went live August fourteenth, and
then over a month later, Darren got a job as
a car salesman. He was excited to get a new
job and a reliable paycheck. Seems pretty understandable and commendable, right.

(09:27):
I asked Darren himself why he moved on and got
a job, and he said, mentally, I'm not the same.
I think about all the faces, the stories, the losses.
Maybe I've got PTSD, or maybe it's just the anxiety
that never lets me sleep. My mind races with what
IFFs and should have. I'm human, just like everyone else,
Yet I feel this crushing weight, this responsibility that I
can't shake off. I just want a moment of peace,

(09:48):
a chance to breathe without the world collapsing around me.
And the dumbest part of Vince's point here is that
Darren got the job afterwards. Basically, Vince is trying to
attack Darren's credibility because he got a job, and in
turn attacking my mind credibility and in turn attacking the
validity of our Oakland video. Secondly, Vince attacks Darren for
running a GoFundMe where he asks his Twitter followers for

(10:09):
money to move out of the tenderloind.

Speaker 2 (10:11):
He'll pulled the seven thousand dollars go fundme scam a
couple months earlier.

Speaker 5 (10:15):
I talk a lot about right wing grifters in my videos,
but this week Fox hosted one that was so lazy.
I'm honestly kind of impressed. This guy, Darren Mark Stalkup,
is trying to raise ten thousand dollars to move from
the Tenderloin neighborhood of San Francisco to another neighborhood in
San Francisco.

Speaker 1 (10:31):
Darren told them what he wanted the money for, use
the money for that purpose, and received the money from
consensual adults. What is the problem. Vince basically throws Darren
under the bus to attack the credibility of everything we've done. Next,
misplaced b roll and b roll mistakes in my videos.
When we're talking about let's say crime, we may show
an example of this crime happening in the given city. Now,

(10:52):
Vince just spent the last four months going through roughly
two years worth of my videos. Analyzing almost fifteen hours
worth of my contents, Fines as a handful of examples
where a given b roll shot takes place in a
different city. For example, here's this shot in our Oakland
video about a machine gun manhunt that turned out to
be from West Oakland, Pittsburgh. Now, Vince's right, this is

(11:14):
a mistake and we messed up. This shot was from
the wrong Oakland. Vince uses this example and a few
others to create this argument that I evil Tyler am
hand placing specific shots to create a false narrative about
the cities we discuss and cover in our videos.

Speaker 2 (11:30):
Once again, Tyler is literally making shit up to push
a narrative.

Speaker 1 (11:35):
But here's the problem. I don't place the buroll for
my videos. I have two editors for my main channel,
and one editor's job is dedicated to finding burell for
the videos. Whether it's me or my editing team, Ultimately,
it's my channel with my name, and it's my responsibility.
I agree with Vince, these are lazy, dumb mistakes that
never should have made it to the final cut. But
the problem is if you take out the few incorrect

(11:56):
shots we placed in some of these videos. For instance,
let's take oak and replace it with this shot and
actual machine guns, or this shot or this shot or
this shot, the same purpose is achieved at visualizing the
gun crimes in question. Another example is this shot of
a shootout in Chicago that made it in our video
about Memphis.

Speaker 2 (12:17):
So Tyler deliberately knew what he was doing.

Speaker 1 (12:20):
Okay, let's take out that shot and replace it with
any of these shots. Does the gun crime go away?
Does the gun wounds of these people that we interviewed
in the Memphis video go away?

Speaker 6 (12:31):
I got shot Mayama?

Speaker 1 (12:33):
Oh, I got shot multiple dan out here? You guys
are shopped? How old are you? You ever been blipped?

Speaker 4 (12:44):
Yeah?

Speaker 1 (12:45):
Actually, holy sh when did that happen? Let me, this
is unexpected. I didn't expect that somebody. If you only
get shot, you knew it. Yeah, I see you. My
two three weeks be out here like wet pop out.
People crazy out here right now. But what's more deceptive
is that we know Vince has combed through all of
my videos. He doesn't show any of the people I

(13:05):
talked to in my videos that tell us about the
gun crime. And just to show how easy it is
to make a mistake. Vince himself improperly cites this clip.

Speaker 2 (13:14):
This clip isn't from Chicago, It's from Houston, Texas, four
years ago. Tyler makes up shit to fit his narrative.

Speaker 1 (13:22):
Heart's the comment where his viewer points his mistake out,
and at the end of the comment it still reads
so Tyler still lied about it. Or this example of
Vince pointing out this flag.

Speaker 2 (13:31):
Oh my god, and there's an ISIS flag. Clearly that
isn't just a peaceful protest that they have ISIS flags
in Sweden.

Speaker 1 (13:38):
And his viewers correct him, stating it is the Shahada.
If this is the logic, then Vince and I both
lied about this nothing burger shot that could easily be
replaced with one hundred other examples of burel that serve
the same purpose. And in this case, the fact that
I can literally replace all of the shots you've pointed
out with one hundred other examples that prove the exact
same thing begs the question why would we even put

(13:59):
these shots in when they're on purpose leave them in
and not hide them or cut them out a year later.
It doesn't make sense because we didn't, just like you
didn't maliciously say this be roll shot was from Houston
when it was actually from Dallas. Vince is ultimately zooming
in on granular detail to argue that I am a deceptive,
manipulative liar when he himself does the exact same thing

(14:22):
in his video attacking me.

Speaker 2 (14:23):
It's more of a hypocrisy of his morals. And I
found this quote from an openly gay member of Congress
that sums up Craig's situation nicely. It's a violation of
principles to vote one way and act another.

Speaker 1 (14:35):
Why did he pretend to be asylum seeker to get
processed by border patrol to see where we would end up?
The behind the scenes logistics of how the government would
process someone claiming asylum and what that process looked like
seems kind of interesting as an American tax paying citizen
to know how this process works. What's funny about this, though,
is Vince feigns some moral outrage that I'm in the
van for twenty seconds.

Speaker 2 (14:56):
What the fuck are you thinking, Tyler? Literally, you took
up the spot of someone that was an actual person
fleeing their lives as a fucking meme. What the actual
fuck are you thinking? You know, the border patrol system
is backed up for years, and you're just adding on
to that for no reason at all.

Speaker 1 (15:16):
And that I've taken up someone's spot to enter America
when once again I'm literally in the car for twenty seconds,
the border patrol guys laughing off. No harm, no foul.
Let's go about this guy. See he's a YouTuber. No
through the camera, I got deny it to access. It's
not like I pushed some pregnant woman out of the
way to take the last spot in the van. There's
no one else left waiting to get in the van.
Even if I did take a seat, I wouldn't have

(15:38):
been taking someone else's seat. You know this, Vince, because
you watched my video and you see me in the
back of the line. Why did Tyler pretend to be
alone in fear for his life in Jamaica, but in reality,
his tour guide was right next to him the entire time.
This is one of Vince's big gotcha moments where he
thinks he proves that I'm willing to lie about the
tiniest of stuff, so why wouldn't I then embellish or

(15:59):
lie about even bigger, more important issues. But the problem
is he's wrong, and here's the evidence to prove it.
For context, he's referring to when I'm in Trench Town,
one of Jamaica's most dangerous neighborhoods. At a certain point,
my guide and I are separated, and this random dude
tells me to come to the farm. Good farm flam
right over that, yeahs which my cameraman, myself and this

(16:21):
guy go to the farm. It all ends well, we
had a great time. I even used my voiceover to
immediately compliment this guy for giving me a little tour
and showing me unexpected hospitality. Well, my guide was nowhere
in sight. I first thought I was setting myself up
to get robbed, but it turns out this guy was
giving me a full tour of the community with unexpected hospitality.
Vince zooms in on this voiceover, trying to paint this

(16:41):
moment as if I was lying and that my guide
was with me the entire time, visiting the garden right now,
a little baby, young mango, is this where you make
the juice?

Speaker 2 (16:49):
So I'm thinking, oh my god, Tyler's gonna get murdered.
Tyler's in the murder capital of the world without his guide.
Oh my God, he's gonna die, He's gonna get robbed.
Seems pretty bad. But let's watch this interaction from a
different angle.

Speaker 1 (17:02):
This is where you make the juice. Thank you, thank you,
de try.

Speaker 2 (17:07):
Oh okay, that's Tyler's cameraman. That's clearly the same thing
going on. Where's this camera angle from. Oh it's almost
like his guide was right there and took this footage.
But Tyler had to sell it off, is that his
guide was nowhere to be seen, and that Tyler was going.

Speaker 1 (17:23):
To get murdered. But in reality, my guide was not there.
And here's twenty eight minutes of behind the scenes footage
that show him and I separated. And here's the exact

(17:57):
moment where him and I reconnect.

Speaker 4 (18:00):
Tyler and I'm blap getting some footage. Anting As for me,
it's a little bit early in the morning.

Speaker 1 (18:06):
I'm the youngry And here's my guide's POV in that
same two hour long vlog that Vince points to in
his video stating that we were together the entire time. Yeah,
look where am I? We aren't together? And then look

(18:27):
at that. There's the exact moment from my guide's POV
where we reconnected.

Speaker 2 (18:31):
Tyler's guide posted a two hour long vlog of their
entire day, and the guide was there the entire time.
Tyler wasn't walking on his own about to get murdered.
That was all just made up.

Speaker 1 (18:43):
But Vince knows that no one is going to fact
check this, and he tries to use it to build
his case that I'm a liar. Vince's continual self glaze
of his attention to detail only further pronounces his malice
and the way he cuts this video together and proves
that he either lied or b he didn't have all
the evidence and he speculated, and this is.

Speaker 2 (19:01):
Just something where it's so small, But why do you
have to lie about this?

Speaker 1 (19:05):
His entire point is that I'm trying to paint the
sense of danger that doesn't actually exist, which is funny
because he conveniently cuts out and omits all of this
testimony from people that live in the community.

Speaker 4 (19:15):
Well, we're seeing a lot of people dying by guns.
That are the more violence we are seeing right, no
change tones, full of crime and violins going. It's been
a long long time, no till my chin come on,
get involved by Chris. There's no shot and can craman violin?

(19:35):
Sometimes we just need that for stuff.

Speaker 3 (19:37):
Just the crime and.

Speaker 1 (19:38):
Violince will shoot each other.

Speaker 4 (19:40):
The thing is just different. No, and it wasn't like
this before. As I can't see, it's like it's a cemetery.

Speaker 1 (19:46):
Vince also cuts out any of the good vibes or
positive moments we met this entire self sufficient community. We're
in the ghetto, but everyone's super nice. Boom boom boom
bo Trench down with my boy. Because his goal is

(20:07):
that when I reach out to someone from a different city,
they google my name, find his video, and they find
out I'm just some big, bad liar trying to paint
their community as negative. Look at this comment and tell
me anything he's done as far as in good faith.
Why did Tyler fabricate the story of the Jamaica bank
truck robbery. Vince is referring to this Berrillium truck. I
pointed out for one second in my Jamaica video, sy

(20:30):
brilliant trucks. That's the equivalent of one of the trucks
in the US that carries the cash. The brilliant trucks
are these big, black armored trucks that are often used
in Jamaica to transport cash. My guide Jamaica. Walk By
was the one who actually told me about these trucks
because there was a large problem with people shooting at
these trucks and robbing the cash from inside of them.
If you google Jamaica Barrillium truck, you can find countless

(20:52):
articles of these trucks getting robbed from the local Jamaican news.
And here's a clip of even my guide jokingly saying
he's afraid about being around these trucks because of the
reputation of them getting robbed and so what you're talking about,
there's bullholes on that thing. I still I am predictant,
still terrified. I will they want to take it very sad.
This is probably a two second mention in my video.

(21:12):
But Vince's goal is to establish that once again I'm
lying about dumb random stuff, to create this false narrative
of there being crime in Jamaica. It's a known problem,
and I'd eventually to guess he in fact knew this
after doing his research. You'll notice he prides himself and
his attention to detail, yet this somehow slipped him, the
very fact that these cars are known for getting shot

(21:32):
and robbed at. Ultimately, this is part of Vince's growing
arguments that I'm inventing tiny lies to create a false
narrative of there being crime in places where it isn't.
That's how bad it.

Speaker 2 (21:42):
People are robbing the cars, They're robbing the bank cars.
That's how bad it is here. Why do you have
to lie about that? Why do you have to make
up this insane narrative? Oh my god, there was a
robbery in place, and I was about this that didn't happen, Tyler.

Speaker 1 (21:54):
For someone who spent four months hyperanalyzing everything I've ever done,
you'd think they'd all so google Jamaica brilliant truck robberies
to at least look into the point I'm presenting of
these trucks being robbed. But no, he calls me a liar,
says the bullet holes I mentioned on the car is
actually due to a paint job. None of this exists.
I've just made it all up. But as we know,
Vince's bad faith, poorly constructed argument has one goal, which

(22:18):
is to discredit me, attack my channel, and prevent me
from working with people in the future. Why did he
fabricate the story of a Christian seafood restaurant selling sex
for fifteen dollars and being a brothel. Let me explain. One.
I asked my guide how much the prostitutes in the
area we were in charge for sex. He gave me
a number that roughly converted to fifteen US dollars. How
much for one night out there? I'm not so sure.

(22:39):
He so it depends on which one you'll go to.
I should think maybe like fifteen minutes or your two
gun a night, or maybe two gun per three whole
wise at twenty thirty bucks. Yeah. Two. We were driving
through this area called the Back Road, basically a little
red light district where many prostitutes are working the streets
and where they take their clients back to the use

(23:00):
little love hotels, walk room. That's the real life of it.
You can't get more real on this. That's exactly what's there.
The mortels are there, the rooms are there, the prostitutes
are there, Young Bill middle Glass, everybody's there. I asked
my guide if it was a hotel. He said, yes,
it's where people go down size.

Speaker 2 (23:20):
Yeah, you've probably kind of quady gain and I just
sketch out with the clean.

Speaker 1 (23:24):
This is a hotel. Yeah, the pirate ship. Hi, this
is where some of the ladies get taken too to
go have sex in and hop out for one. This
is one of the hotels where the ladies get brought
to to have sex with the customers. The john's for
this falling pirate ship and seafood restaurant. I guess that's
just a front or seat food restaurant by day, prostitute

(23:46):
brothel hotel at night.

Speaker 2 (23:48):
So Tyler just walking around sees this restaurant and sees
that the lights are on and assumes that, oh my god,
that's a that's where all the people are getting fucked
in there. Man, it's just fucking grimy. It's a brothel.
It's the dirtiest place you've ever seen. Yeah, that's where
it's happening at Tyler. This is a Christian catering restaurant
that does weddings. Why the fuck would you just make

(24:09):
up a lie about this?

Speaker 1 (24:10):
But I do want to establish a clear difference between
me just inventing a lie and throwing this restaurant under
the bus with no context versus me misunderstanding a quick
little back and forth between my guide and then expanding
upon something I didn't fully understand even watching. It's embarrassing
because I clearly don't even know what I'm talking about.
It was not my intent to throw this restaurant under
the bus, and I legitimately thought it was a brothel.

(24:32):
On the bright side, my viewers only left five star
reviews and said Tyler Olivera sent me here, I apologize.
I fucked up, and it's been deleted from the video.
Why did he hide the fact that his nine to
eleven truther expert he brought on believes Israel blew up
the World Trade Center. I never hid that. I never
even knew that before Vince's video, and we mainly discussed
how he thinks nine to eleven was a false flag

(24:54):
and how he believes it was a controlled demolition. But
I'm sure there's plenty of other stuff he believes as well.
It would be equally controversial in Vince's eyes. How did
you come to the conclusion that nine to eleven was
a false flag?

Speaker 7 (25:05):
For the first ten years, I did not think anything
other than the official narrative. Then after being shown a video,
a close up video of building number seven coming down,
and that got me going because it's obvious to me
that building seven was a controlled demolition.

Speaker 1 (25:26):
With that being said, I want to use Vince's point
here to address a more important point in theme he
presents throughout his entire video, which is that if I
platform or give a voice to someone in my video,
I am endorsing it, co signing it, or treating it
as a matter of fact.

Speaker 2 (25:40):
Now, this whole video is based around Tyler just asking
questions or the Haitians eating the cats with no evidence
to back it up. Now, this is a common tactic
used by conspiracy theorist. So Tyler, let me ask you
a question. I heard your mom was sucking some dong
from fifty bucks at the bar, and I had a
good friend of mine tell me that they saw in
the car sucking some don.

Speaker 1 (25:59):
Vince, come on, man, bringing up yo mama jokes at
thirty three, Vince, keep my mom out of this and
I'll keep your wife out of it.

Speaker 2 (26:07):
Okay, I can tell you an insane conspiracy theory based
on no evidence, present it as a question, and it
almost gives it some validity.

Speaker 1 (26:15):
And this is simply not true. In his video, he
mostly spends time looking at my video where I went
to Springfield, Ohio when Twitter was in uproar, trying to
figure out if the Haitians in Springfield were actually eating cats.
Point being Vince only shows interviews in his video that
make it appear as if I'm co signing racist ideas,
wild beliefs, et cetera, et cetera. Aliens built the pyramids?

(26:38):
Do you think it's possible? George Bush at nine to eleven,
wait for me reading Oh who are you afraid of?
At nine? Videos which message and in general or specific
types of imagine come from different places. If he was black,
would you guys date Bozza? Point being Vince will selectively
only show you one side of the groups of people

(26:59):
I interview, not show you the others. How did you
get here?

Speaker 4 (27:05):
To charlottropap give me jet more tump, I'm equally sam fix.

Speaker 1 (27:14):
All right now that all the immigrants have gotten here,
Guess what when you're getting new stop lights.

Speaker 3 (27:19):
Say hello, they'll smile to you. How many times I
still sleep with my doors open? I've never had to
worry about it. It's more to Americans, And I'll bring
back the park again. You go over there on Saturday
and Sunday, you see the Haitian families, mom, dad, kids,
us in the park exactly for what.

Speaker 1 (27:37):
It's nobody's eating dogs and cats here. The Haitians aren't
bothering us.

Speaker 3 (27:40):
There's not more thousands here, maybe a thousand, Maybe that's
really all.

Speaker 1 (27:45):
They're good people, sure, they're all working. They're going up
to a school up here to learn English. Ironically, we
may have found the most accepting, loving town in America.
And if so, ask you, how can I both co
sign this answer and this answer In the same video
I heard there were room rumors of Haitians eating the
neighbors cats and a Canadian goose. Is that true or
completely false? No?

Speaker 6 (28:07):
No, okay, We've lost a whole bunch of cats. There
was a van load of van pulled over the hat
over one hundred cats in it with the Hazans.

Speaker 1 (28:21):
They said they was eating them. True or no? No,
no okay? Why is everyone coming here? Or is it
possible in these videos that I'm actually trying to get
answers from both sides of a given question and try
to see what they both believe in. I chose to
respond to Vince's video for a few reasons. One how

(28:43):
factually incorrect it is, Two how unoriginal the claims are,
Three how emotionally driven these commentators become in their ambition
to destroy me. And I've chosen to respond to this
because I've witnessed in real time talking head streamers who
take videos like Vince's No their while they eat cereal,
agree with everything, and move on to the next video,

(29:03):
cementing false claims as fact, especially when they perceive the
creator at hand to exist within a certain half of
the political spectrum. None of these streamers are going to
fact check anything, and Vince will not retract any of
his claims. Listen, I want to welcome good faith criticism
and for you guys to use the comment section to
let me know when we do make mistakes. I'm not
trying to shy away from the fact that we have

(29:25):
made mistakes and we will probably continue to make a
few mistakes going forward. And it's unfortunate that Vince and
other people like Vince waste their opportunity to give us
actual constructive feedback and turn their personal frustration into a
fifty minute hit piece designed to stop us from working
with people in the future because they don't actually care
about giving me constructive feedback, they don't like what we show,

(29:48):
and they don't want me on YouTube. Whether it's these
types of people calling me Hitler, or calling me racist,
or assuming malice to any and every tiny mistake we make.
At the end of the day, these people are simply
uncomfortable with the harsh but unfortunate realities that we do show.
I've only been doing this journalistic documentarian work for the
last two years. All I ask is you give us

(30:09):
some time to adapt and grow into the responsibility that
it's become. Anyways, Happy New Year's everyone, Thanks for listening.
Go hug your mom. Peace,