Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Hey, everyone, Welcome to joblivestream. Today's open lines, where I
hope to talk to some of youabout your supernatural stories, and of course
I have some news and videos toshare with you as well. That's depends
on which one comes first, whetherone of you logs in to talk to
me, otherwise I will start sharingthose of course. In the description below
(00:21):
this video, you will have thelink for the Telegram group where you can
download the software on your computer oryour telephone and basically join the r FO
hob chat where there will be avoice chat going on right now where you
will be able to listen and alsocontribute and talk to me. If you
don't want to do that and you'rejust you're watching on one of the other
platforms, you can in the commentsbelow you can put three asterisks and put
(00:46):
your question down so that way Iknow it's directed towards me. If there's
a guest or somebody else that wantsto share the story and some of you
have some questions, that asterix methodhelps me then to know that this question
is for the person that's sharing theirstory. So anyway, there's some some
things that there are new that Iwould like to share with you, and
(01:11):
some things are some of the olderUFO videos with some I guess some new
discoveries or maybe somebody finally started payingattention. But I'll get to those here
in a second. So anyway,let me switch over and and get things
going. I just want to checkreal quick, all right, it looks
like I'm live and we're going onlive and everywhere else, don't. I
(01:34):
wanted to basically make sure that Idon't have the same thing happened like it
did last time, where I thoughtI'm streaming and YouTube was lagging behind and
some of you didn't start listening untiljust about ten minutes into it, all
right, So the first thing Iwant to cover is, so basically most
(01:55):
of you know that Tim Burschett,if I remember correctly how to pronounce name,
and Representative Luna and two others havebeen kind of the people that have
been pushing this uful disclosure or updisclosure whichever you know you want to,
whichever term you want to use.And but that's not necessarily say that some
(02:16):
of the other senators are on boardwith what's going on from some of the
other states. Those four that hadthe UAP hearing were kind of in the
forefront. But this one is justan interesting clip from Senator I might drawing
a blankot his name here he goesSenator Holly from Missouri, and he basically
(02:40):
just has an interesting take on thatthat he basically set on use nations.
So I want to play that clipfor you now. Senator Josh Holly says
he can't verify whether the UAP programexists, but as some of the claims,
Grush is making track with what Holly'sheard in briefings. He's saying that
the government knows more about this andthey have previously let on. That doesn't
(03:02):
really surprise me because it looks tome like the government has been tracking these
UAPs for a long time now andhas not been saying much about it.
All Right, that's that, AndI think maybe Grush that the one that
kind of is the main person thattestified for those of you that old doom,
(03:24):
he might have a feeling he couldpotentially come out more basically talk about
more, because everything during the hearingit's always been well, I'll tell you
basically later. And what's it calleda skiff? I believe a secure room
if I'm not mistaken, where hecan share more information and lists and names
(03:44):
of other people involved in all thiscover up and so a lot of that
has what's going on. During thathearing, it was like, you know,
I can't tell tell you now,I can't speak about this here and
so on. So I'm hoping thatin a very near future he would be
able to just can open up moreand just you know, just finally spit
it out. But the on theother news, they have I think it's
(04:06):
been a couple of days, maybemaybe a bit more than a couple of
days, they have finally released anofficial Pentagon site. And so it's a
root m I L so arrow dotMill and they have a little discosure on
topics as an official website of theUnited States government. Here's how you know,
(04:30):
and they say a dot mill websitebelongs to an official US Department of
Defense organization in the United States,and then of course talking about that,
it's the dot mill. It's asecure site with the HTTPS little lock on
top. And so anyway, Ipersonally did not search through the site.
(04:53):
I'm sorry I can't give you thatinfo, but you can actually look it
up yourself, and apparently you cansearch here for some certain things regarding what
they have available for you to see, and if you scroll down there's some
more slides of some previous presentations thatif you watch them online you can you
recognize them, and the basically PowerPointpresentations. And then under specifically cases under
(05:19):
official up videos, they have allthe videos posted. I think it's all
the videos posted that they have usedto analyze and basically use this kind of
to study and figure out, Okay, is this a unidentify aerial phenomena UFO
or is this at something they canidentify? And so of course a lot
(05:41):
of these are also something that arevery very recognizable if you look at them.
We've seen them before, the objectin the Middle East, there's the
what we know as the tic TACand so anyway, so check it out.
But then of course I want toshow you a clue about I want
(06:03):
to see if it is a senatoror is it representative either way, Tim
Burchette Bisky talking about the site,and he makes some pretty good points.
It's about close to five minutes,so I want to plead this for you
now and then we'll take it fromthere. Suspect there's some truth and we
are welcoming in a congressman at theforefront of the UAP hearing. US Representative
(06:27):
Tim Burchett from Tennessee Congressman Burchett,it's so good to see you. Thanks
for being here, Thank you forhaving me to Tasha. Let's start with
the Pentagon launching that new website.It does provide some declassified information on UFOs,
including pictures and video, so thepublic can take a look. Now
you've said about the Pentagon smells dollars. What do you mean by that,
(06:47):
Well, since nineteen forty seven,the Pentagon has denied that UFOs even exist,
and now all of a sudden,they're they're saying they exist. And
it's ironic that it's right after ChuckSchumer has said that he's going to but
something in the NDAA to National DefenseAuthorization Act to in fact to screen photos
(07:08):
that if they have any national defenseor national security implications, that they won't
be able to put them out.So what they've done is put another layer
of government more dollars. You know, the Pentagon loses a billion dollars a
year easily, They've never passed onit. At some points, they've had
sixty percent of their military of theirassets unaccounted for anywhere else, and you'd
(07:30):
be in handcuffs. What do wedo with the Pentagon? We roared them
with more tax dollars every year,So this to me shows nothing. Y'allways,
journalists and me as a confersman,I just want transparency. I want
them to release the files that theyhave, and I know you've called for
that over and over again. Itsounds like, ultimately you don't feel that
this website will be useful or revealanything we haven't seen before, no,
(07:51):
ma'am. As a matter of fact, the stuff that's on it already is
old stuff. You know. Theydenied that the tic tac videos even existed.
That are you can google TikTok videoon YouTube and watch them, and
they denied they even existed. Andthen they were relaked and they said they
were fakes, and then they hadthe audio of the pilots and they turned
(08:13):
out to be some of the bestpilots in the world, and they were
forced to have to come forward withthat saying then, so I don't trust
them as far as I can throwthem. I've said before, I think
the Pentagon is mostly a bunch ofwar pimps. All they're doing is selling
war, and we just roll outthe cash for them, and it's unfortunate.
I want to pick up on whatyou said about transparency a moment ago,
(08:33):
because since these hearings you've been saying, just bring me transparency. So
what do you think the important nextstep is? What concrete step do you
want to see? I would liketo see the files released to the American
public. You know you're talking aboutat Washington, DC that weren't even released
to Kennedy assassination files. Nobody's evenalive in any of those that dealt with
(08:54):
that assassination or that was involved init. Yet with these UFOs it's almost
a weekly occurrence. I talked topilots all the time, where we're blocked
from talking to pilots. They arebasically you know, they'll be reprimanded if
they do come forward. I hadhad an amendment to the FAA, the
Federal Aviation Authorization Reauthorization Act, andto just say if a commercial pilot spots
(09:20):
a UFO or UAP or some kindof aerial phenomena that in the report that
they make to the FAA, thatthey have to issue that report to Congress.
Well, guess what, the intelligencecommunity, not the committee, the
community told Congress they were uneasy withthat. So the gutless bunch in Congress
both parties decided not even to hearthe hear the amendment that I had proposed.
(09:43):
So if they don't exist, theysure spending a hell of a lot
of time and money and effort tostop us from seeing their files. I
suspect there's greed, there's money,there's reverse engineering, there's all kinds of
things that are involved in this,and until we get some transparent we will
never get to the bottom of it. And Congressman, Congressman, you've said
(10:03):
that you are one hundred percent surethe federal government is covering up documents about
UFOs. In your view, whatis the government's motive for a lack of
transparency on UAPs. That's a goodquestion. There's a compartmentalization of this.
You have an incredible in these videosyou're watching, there's no there's no heat
signature. These things are defining anykind of you know, we had to
(10:26):
pilots in our testimonies swear that thesethings were There's nothing on the planet Earth
or any of our enemies or allieshave that could do anything like this.
Yet there's an energy source in therethat doesn't put off a heat signature.
Could you imagine what that would doto the Pentagon. They would be out
of business. For one, wewouldn't need to be fighting these worthless holes
over a barrelable in the Middle East. We could hear homes in the winter,
(10:50):
poor folks could could stay cool inthe summer. We might be able
to power automobiles and other things withthis energy source. Yet it's to me,
there's something else, luth I am. And it's generally in Washington they
say it's about greed, it's aboutpower, and it's about control, and
you combine all those things into this, and I suspect there's some truth in
that. Thank you for watching.Good Yeah, I think it makes some
(11:13):
really good points. But a lotof the points that we all been saying
from from the beginning of this basically, the technology itself is revolutionary. It
would basically just take take all thesedifferent companies that be very much have to
rely on, you know, powercompanies, gas companies, all of them
(11:33):
basically out of business. And soyeah, the way it started, I'm
still you know, I know alot of you out there are very skeptical
about, you know, what's goingon in which direction this whole disclosure that
you know what shape it will take. But I think this is the beginning.
You know, if we have moresenators like that, representatives like that
(11:54):
in Congress, in government in generaltalking in these terms, and people actually
listening for change, you know,they can next time maybe support somebody that
is all for disclosure along with everythingelse that they want, you know,
from them, you know, inoffice, unless the whole system changes,
I don't know how soon, youknow, or or if at all,
(12:16):
and you know, we don't haverepresentatives anymore, or it takes form of
some other shape of form or shapewhat I'm trying to say, form or
never mind, I can't speak Englishtoday. Basically it takes another shape altogether
than what it is right now.But anyway, so I think that was
(12:39):
that's very refreshing to have somebody that'ssitting government official talking in the way that
he's talking, because usually they willstart talking about that once they retired and
out of office, and you know, always makes you wonder, it's like,
why didn't you say that while youwere in office when you had some
influence, when you could have donesomething. So I'm glad at least he's
doing it. Okay. So thenext thing I want to show you is
(13:05):
this one is oh okay. Thisone is an older video, and I'm
describing this real quick for those thatare listening only. It's it's a video
where some say it's a missile,either say it's a down UFO And basically
it comes in in this It doesn'thave a sound, so I guess I
could play it as you're watching it. It comes down, hits the ground,
(13:30):
ricochets, it seems to kind ofspeed back up, doing kind of
a wide and elongated fall back down, and then finally falls into pieces.
And so some say this is basicallya missile that didn't explode an impact and
then eventually disintegrated. Others say thisis not what a missile would would act
(13:54):
like, would behave like, becauseit seems like the whole object itself is
glowing in this very in this veryweird way, almost almost like you would
have a disc shape object in away just glowing and then having whatever difficulties
it's having that eventually cause it tocrash. And if there were any occupants,
(14:18):
I don't know how they could possiblysurvive that. If you ever watched
this video, but yeah, Iknow, said so, I just wanted
to let you know that there istalks about that, you know, there's
there's missile, that this is amissile and so on. But a lot
of things I was trying to findthey couldn't find, or at least they
didn't provide any specific links where thiswas kind of research and said, okay,
(14:39):
well here this is to prove thatthis is what's going on. Instead,
we were just kind of stuck againat the speculation that if it's UFO,
it's incredible that this was captured,and even if it's a missile,
it's a ins acredible nonetheless. Okay, so let's let me go on to
(15:01):
the next video. And so thisone, I think this was a few
days ago, maybe four or fivedays ago, September two, and this
is something that somebody recorded over whatlocation exactly, I don't know. There's
(15:22):
somebody this person is asking if thisare the similar or the same objects that
are captured or were captured at analysisa force base, and it's just a
question. But I'm going to justplayed for you and for you to see
what it exactly is, and I'mgoing to mute the sound here real quick.
(16:00):
So the video is still playing forthose listening. It's basically a bunch
of orbs, about four or fiveof them, occasionally more. They would
kind of come together and then alignin weird ways and then start chasing each
other and really moving and turning inreally interesting ways. Whether or not this
could be could be drones, Idon't know, because I'm not sure how
(16:26):
how long ago this was exactly filmedand whether or not drones were really because
drones weren't really that prevalent back then, and obviously nowadays you can easily,
you know, fool people. Butit looks looks pretty impressive just seeing a
bunch of these orbs chasing each otheraround the sky, and you know,
(16:48):
just adding it to one more rfulvideo to debunk or to just figure out
what in the world is exactly asor was all right, next video,
So this one is actually a videoI've seen often, and I think I've
seen this on coast to coast.They am long time ago. I think
it was two thousand and five,two thousand and six, so it's it's
(17:12):
pushing out there in the years.But anyway, this is I mean when
I first saw it, this isobviously way older from it's from a Apollo
ten mission, and you see thethe module that basically is kind of hovering
or was released I believe from Igets separated and there's camera in in the
(17:37):
rear section filming the separation. Andthen you see this small but very clear
orb that's just kind of flying by. And of course the fewer and your
for enthusiasts, you want that tobe an unidentified flying object. Some might
say, okay, this was somethingthat was released from the modules themselves and
(17:59):
so obviously reflects the sun and hasthat glow to it. But anyway,
I'll play it for you and youcan see it yourself. It comes up
in the very beginning of the video, and I don't think it repeats again,
so pay close attention. I'll tryto follow with the mouse. But
it comes up from right here,right there and goes by, and basically
(18:25):
it's just flies by, and thatway it's been. It's been recorded that
way and hasn't been altered. Andyou would have thought if this was something
that they would want to not showor alter in some way, if they
don't want people to speculate. Buteither somehow they missed it or it was
left there on purpose. Okay,it's repeating now, it's only twenty five
(18:48):
seconds, but it's looping in thein the Twitter stream itself. Okay,
so let's see. Oh, thislast one was actually a couple of days
ago about over. Let me seewhat location is for Stampa, Florida.
And so most of you will knowif you basically have a asteroid entering the
(19:12):
atmosphere, it glows very brightly fora little while and then it breaks off.
It basically just disappears, and wegenerally call them shooting stars, and
it's usually something really associated, youknow, with the romance, but this
is something entirely different that It's justit flies across the sky. It leaves
(19:33):
a huge trail, but it doesn'tdissipate. So anyway, I'll just play
that for you. It has somesound, and here we go. I'm
getting a video. There's this hugething making a re entry right now,
huge fireball up in the sky.That's actually sick. It's just leaving a
(19:56):
trail across the sky. That thing'scoming from like several times the speed of
sound into the atmosphere. It's crossingover the sky. Hold on, I
need to get record this. Lookat that thing. Oh, I gotta
(20:18):
record on it. But yes,it's gorgeous. Look at it, and
only to get like a few secondsto go from one end of the sky
to the other. It's like fadingoff in the distance. Now I can
really even capture it. So thereit is. So and again it could
(20:51):
either be uh and basically maybe asatellite re entering and burning up in or
bit and we don't know about it. It's just taken a very very long
time to burn up and just leavingthis trail behind. But most of the
time I don't know about you,but all I've ever seen that it's it's
there for a short time and itdoesn't lying go around in this way.
(21:15):
But anyway, it's an interesting videoto see. If you have more information,
if you're watching right now, pleaseleave some comments in the comments section
below. But anyway, that's allI have for you today, use wise
and video wise. If some ofyou still want to call in over telegram
to share your stories with me,I'm still here for a little bit.
If you have any questions maybe thatyou can direct towards me, or have
(21:38):
other statements to make, just pleasemake sure you put the three asterisks and
your question down and I'll see whatyou've written. All right, let's see
him. We have labeled labels welcome, good to see you again, Jamie
Hello, Kurt Bredy, Rolder,losing he mister, and Hazel welcome.
(22:08):
Yea, yeah, no, SoI it's been very interesting just with with
basically the way things have been goingtoday. I spent most of the day
cutting up an interview that I didwith with darryl Anchor and the Channels Bashar
and basically created a whole bunch oflittle shorts about five of them, and
(22:32):
I will cut out even more.But I think now more than ever,
it's important to this information that's alwaysbeen here to just keep pushing it to
the forefront because what he was talkingabout, and most videos that I have
on are justice relevant now that thenthey were relevant back then. And it's
(22:52):
about about what channeling means, whatthese different eats off from his perspective and
all these other things. So evenif you're not into that, it's at
least worth hearing about it, learningabout it so that if something like that
comes across your path, you willhave that information. You know. Otherwise
(23:14):
there's nothing wrong with you just treatingit the way you treat every other piece
of entertainment where it's just something memorablethat you watched, you know, and
just leaving it that. But thenof course there's some people that if they
don't like it, they just havesome very negative reactions that just feel like
they have to just let it allout. So anyway, I don't know
why you would waste your time whenyou can just simply Okay, this is
(23:37):
not what I'm about, this isnot what I want to see, and
just move on. But I guessthey just make it a point to leave
some negative comments. But anyway,what basically kind of prompted me to this
is that the same way that Iwas saying quite some time ago, the
way this closure is going right now, eventually we're going to have to face
(24:00):
with these other things, you know, face these other things like eat human
contact, what was the hybrid program? Because there's hundreds, if not thousands
of people that have gone through theprocess that have written their stories, have
told their stories, have basically madetheir stories public to where I don't know
(24:22):
at what point or how long youcan go on basically ignoring that and still
call yourself a researcher, because asa researcher, you're you know, you're
supposed to kind of go down thisroute into everything that you can possibly research
about the subject, because if notjust one, but two and three and
so on, you know, thousandsof people have these constant stories of constantly
(24:47):
being contacted. That right there tellsyou, hey, there is potentially more
here that we need to look into. Instead of just nope, let's block
all that out. We'll only lookat lights in the sky, what time
was recorded, it's their video footage. If not, that's it. There's
nothing else to deal with here.And I think it's a very close minded
way to look at it. Ifespecially you want to say that you're looking
(25:11):
at this scientifically, okay, allright, Well, if some of you
don't have any the questions for me, or don't want me to mention or
maybe talk about some other things there, I don't have anyone else that is
calling in or wanting to talk.So I was hoping maybe some Bigfoot stories
(25:34):
or alien stories or other things,but it seems like it's probably not going
to happen tonight. But anyway,I'm going to keep that up and keep
it going, to make it availablefor those that maybe in the future might
have come across it and want toshare their story and tell about it,
and I'm here for that. Allright. Well, anyway, thanks all
(26:02):
of you. I hope you foundthis a little bit of information to share
with you today useful, and joinme again next week at seven pm.
Hopefully if I'm having open lines thatwe'll actually have some guests calling in.
If not, I have been actuallystill trying to set appointments and get more
guests in, and like I saidlast time, I think I have a
(26:23):
feeling the second all of them startrolling back in, I'll just have one
guest after another each Wednesday, becauseit's just the way things have been happening
with a lot of the scheduling isthat it's just all postponed, and I
just have a feeling the wave isgoing to come in here very soon.
So anyway, well, thanks toall of you. Thanks for tuning in,
(26:45):
and I appreciate you. If youlike this video or any of the
other videos on this channel, pleaselike and share them and spread the word.
Subscribe to the channel, and Ihope to see you next time.
All right, do you take care