Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Welcome to Veronica Live. And I'm here with my wingman,
John Salek, and We've got one of our Veronica Live
family members back and he just his wife just had
a baby, so now he's a family of four. This
is so exciting. We're so happy to welcome back new dad,
Drew Alan, the millennial Minister of Truth. Congrats Drew, thank you,
(00:24):
thank you.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
It's great to be a dad a second time.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
So I have.
Speaker 2 (00:27):
Solidified my role in the family as outnumbered, I.
Speaker 3 (00:31):
Guess is how we'd say it.
Speaker 2 (00:33):
Great girls to me, I've got a really up the
testosterone here.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
Is anybody getting any sleep in the household, that's the
first question.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
Well this is going to outrage a lot of women
and mothers out there, but yeah, I'm getting plenty of
sleep because my wife breastfeeds exclusively and she's not pumping,
and so I actually am have been sleeping in our
guest bedroom, which is also the nursery when the baby's older.
So yeah, I'm sleeping and working at night and my
(01:04):
wife is taking the slings and arrows. But you know,
I'm available. It's not like I'm some terrible husband. It's
like I've got a job. You deal with a baby,
you know, but no, my wife's didn't. Really, she's amazing.
She's gotten like no sleep in a month, and she
could never tell you almost couldn't tell you.
Speaker 1 (01:19):
No, No, you're married to a supermodel. You did quite well, Drew,
and she is breathtaking, thank you. But we have so
much to talk about. I was just watching Caroline Carolyn Lovett,
the new Press Secretary's first press conference, and oh my gosh, wow, wow, wow,
(01:39):
so impressed, Drew. So literally twenty seven. She was on
fire and she's like, oh Trump answered that the other
day next so I couldn't believe it. She wasn't even
looking at notes, knew everything.
Speaker 4 (01:51):
No binder, yeah, no binder.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
Wow. Oh just that. And that's what I wanted to
talk to you two about today. It's the true the
Trump Trump two point zero uh week? What is this day?
In week two? Starting week two? And I've never been
happier as a human. So how how do you see it?
Speaker 3 (02:10):
Drew? Well?
Speaker 2 (02:13):
I think this might want might be one of, if
not the most successful first weeks of any American president
in our history. To be quite honest, you know, he's
not the first president setting all the uh you know,
norms for the future for the country on his back
(02:33):
per se. But it's very it's very similar what he's doing,
and it's impressive. I mean, like, we don't have enough
time on your show today to even go through the
accomplishments of his first week, and now we're in the
second week and we certainly don't have time to do
all that. But you know, he's fulfilling his promises. I mean,
he released the JA six hostages, uh and and part
of them, you know, many some of them were out
(02:55):
of prison already obviously, but you know, he pardoned them. Deportations.
He deported seven thousand illegals last week, which I think
is the new record. You know, the list is just endless.
Even before he came in, obviously, you had him really
the instrumental negotiating that hostage deal with Hamas and Israel.
You've got the Columbia situation, which we can talk about
(03:15):
later if you want, which is just as founding. But
here's what I'll say to tie him and Caroline Leavitt together.
You know, we just it's like, this is what it's
like to have a real president. And when you watch
Caroline Levitt and that press conference, that's what it's like
to have a real press secretary. You know, we knew
how bad it was the last four years, but because
(03:38):
it was the norm at the time, we didn't have
anything else to compare it to. You know, the the
the real emotional and visceral feeling you have now is
just astonishing to compare this to what we had. And
you know, Karine John Fierre, Biden's press secretary, she was
(03:58):
the Joe Biden of press secretaries. We've just upgraded this country.
It's like, I mean, you know, you know what we're doing.
We're simply acting like we're the greatest country in the world.
That's it, you know, I mean, it's amazing that that
that people weren't doing this in the past.
Speaker 4 (04:15):
And did you see his his Davos speech that he gave,
i mean talk about exploding heads and switch.
Speaker 2 (04:25):
Well, it's just, you know, there's something happening that is
palpable but also hard to pin down at the same
time because it's psychological. What Trump has done since he's
come into office has just uplifted the morale of this
nation in a way that I've never experienced before.
Speaker 3 (04:43):
I mean, I've never.
Speaker 2 (04:44):
Felt you know, I'm not I'm not talking about Michelle
Obama here when she said this is the first time
I've ever been proud of my country, you know, when her.
Speaker 3 (04:51):
Husband was elected.
Speaker 2 (04:53):
But I have never felt this way. I mean, this
is how I I Yeah, I feel I felt this
way about this. You know, I've written about it extensively.
You know that I love America like the people listening
and you both do. But I've never felt this way
in my life about America, where where what I know
to be true about this country is validated by the
(05:16):
president in the White House and the administration right, and
there's an alignment happening that.
Speaker 3 (05:22):
Is just spectacular.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
It's such an amazing time to be an American, and
the Democrats have no defense against it.
Speaker 1 (05:32):
Well, I think it's we've got an alpha man back
in the White House. It has literally been ten days
of glory, ten days of glory, and I'm so happy,
I'm so proud. But I was reflecting because my friend
was like, ronic could turn on the press conference and
we were texting, and I just was reminded that we
literally went through four years of shit with these people
(05:54):
we don't even know who was running the country, and
what a change in ten days through serious. I mean,
it's just it's like the heavens have opened and they
sent Saint Trump that I've been calling him for the
last year.
Speaker 3 (06:09):
You know.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
It's just glorious. And I think one of the things
that I've been most excited about has and we will
have to talk about the Selena Gomez rant, but that
Tom Holman is like preaching and doing you know what
he said he was going to do, and we are
cleaning up these cities. I think yesterday a thousand criminals
(06:30):
were kicked to the curb taken back to their country.
And I'm so excited because I feel like that's part
of getting America back, is getting rid of all of
these these criminals that have raped and killed and done
awful things to Americans.
Speaker 3 (06:46):
Yeah, it is.
Speaker 2 (06:47):
I mean, look, Donald Trump is the alpha male. He
is the de facto leader of this country. But it's
a team effort. I mean, in many ways, as we
learned with his last administration, you're only as good as
the personnel that's around you, because they.
Speaker 3 (07:00):
Can drag you down and sabotage you.
Speaker 2 (07:04):
And whether it's uh Marco Rubio or uh, you know,
the Secretary of State, or whether it's the newly Uh uh,
you know our new Secretary of Defense Pete Hegsaf who
was appointed, or Tom Homan, or the Vice President JD
Vance when he goes on. You know, these these news
(07:26):
outlets and spars, all of these people are not apologizing.
They're not they're not accepting the premises of the left anymore.
They're unapologetically maga and that is making a huge difference.
You did not have that kind of scenario play out
in the twenty sixteen the first administration.
Speaker 4 (07:45):
Do you think the press, the press sat seems to
still be unaware I talk of the mainstream press. They
just seem to still be unaware of reality.
Speaker 2 (07:55):
Uh.
Speaker 4 (07:55):
You know the news conference, they had one idiot from
from a major out and asked about all these deportations,
and Caroline pointed out, it's like these people are criminals,
they're murderers, they're rapist. Why are you defending them? Do
they not see the flaw in their in their arguments?
Speaker 2 (08:17):
Well, yeah, they expect that to work. See, this is
a new American, the new mentality that's been built because
of the lefts just is just like overreach for so long,
and these pity arguments don't work.
Speaker 3 (08:29):
Anymore like, oh.
Speaker 2 (08:30):
Feel bad for nobody feels bad for them. They don't
belong here, they don't have a right to be here.
And you're right, I mean the people that are being
deported right now immediately, I mean they are criminals. So
I mean they're double criminals because it's a crime to
invade this country illegally. That's the violation of federal law.
And then on top of that, you got people committing
crimes in the United States to begin with.
Speaker 3 (08:50):
And there is no pity.
Speaker 2 (08:52):
We are taking back this country and we no longer
accept this idea that it's our obligation to accept the
criminals from around the world. We are not the world's
trash cans.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
I agree. Well, So there's the viral video that Selena Gomez,
who's worth millions and is engaged to her little producer
boyfriend who's worth millions, came out yesterday crying. She was crying.
She said, all my people are getting attacked, the children.
I don't understand. I'm so sorry. I wish I could
(09:23):
do something, but I can't. I don't know what to do.
I'll try everything, I promise, So anyway, I'm sorry. That
was my Selena moment. But then Tom Holman was asked
about and he goes, where's the tears for the sex
traffic children? What is wrong with this? These celebrities? And
of course she had to delete it, you know, so stupid.
(09:43):
I mean, I'm so happy to round these people. They
had where in Denver, the thress, the Aguas, whoever the
hell those guys are. They arrested a bunch of them
at a nightclub. So now, you know, let's get them
out of here. But why do these entitled celebrities think
they can tell us what to do? You know, give
me a break.
Speaker 2 (10:04):
Well, let's let's think about something else to you just
said there? Where were they arrested?
Speaker 3 (10:08):
A nightclub?
Speaker 2 (10:09):
All these poor illegals, they just can't survive in their
home country and they're partying in a nightclub in Aurora,
Colorado or wherever it was, Denver?
Speaker 3 (10:16):
You know?
Speaker 2 (10:17):
Yeah, yeah, I feel bad for me. I don't I
don't got don't have the bad I can't go to nightclubs,
you know what I mean. I got two kids and
and and responsibilities. Uh, plus I don't like nightclubs. But anyway, yeah,
I mean, Selina Gomez, I mean, what a joke, all
these liberal elite. You know, there's there's still you know,
it's like, let's see if this might get too complex.
(10:39):
But you know, I I've been thinking about a few things.
One is, you know, be not States of America and
I have time this and I promise it's it's I'm
doing the turnump weave here. But you know, not sea
to America.
Speaker 3 (10:50):
You know, when we were.
Speaker 2 (10:50):
Created, you know, just like Jesus Christ's arrival, you know,
split the world into a d you know, uh, you
know after his death and before Christ BC, you know,
the Night States divided the world between the new worlds
and the old And what you see is all these
other countries have fallen behind while America, of course has
stored to new heights. We're the most powerful country in
the history of the world in a very relatively short time.
(11:13):
We achieved it faster than the Roman Empire did, certainly
even and these other countries have been left behind because
they are still stuck in the past, right they're socialist countries.
They refuse to accept the the the new blueprint, superior
blueprint of you know, equality, you know, the constitution, natural
(11:35):
rights to come for our creator as.
Speaker 3 (11:36):
In the government.
Speaker 2 (11:37):
And so we have excelled while they have fallen behind. Well,
these Hollywood elite also are incapable, just like the media
of accepting and embracing this new world that we live in,
which is this unapologetic America, which is embracing common sense again.
Speaker 3 (11:52):
And so Selena Gomez is living in her little bubble.
Speaker 2 (11:55):
She's got, you know, a multimillion dollar home there in
Los Angeles. She would never let any of these criminal
illegals into her home, of course, or her neighborhood because
it's gated, or she's around other celebrities and so on
and so forth. And so they continue to operate under
the old rules where you know, it was popular to
film yourself crying about illegals because it's just a talking
(12:16):
point from the left, and they feel obligated to do
it because they're going to get praised. Well, I mean,
if she had done that years ago, I guarantee you
she wouldn't have taken down the video. I mean, that
was a victory in the culture war, the ideological war.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
Well, she didn't take the meet, which let me add
I was googled her. Now her death worth is one billion.
And then her lovely producer music producer boyfriend Benny Blanco
is fifty million. So I just love when when all
of these people, you know, push their little agendas and
they've they've got their little servants and bank accounts and
(12:51):
don't have to worry. So I thought that was interesting. Well,
your ex feed was cracking me up as I was
prepping for you to come on the show. And the
one thing you tweeted, which I can't fully you tweeted
when will Hollywood remake Black Panther with white actors? I
(13:11):
can't fullyeve you wrote that, Drew. I'm like, oh my gosh,
So tell me about that tweet. You are so bold.
I mean, that's the thing. I felt like the last
four years being a white male has been a bad
thing when really we need to look at that's that's
the Trump New two point zero. It's about merit and
(13:31):
not your dumb and your dumb skin color. It doesn't
matter because we all bleed red. So so tell me
what made you write that strong tweet.
Speaker 2 (13:42):
Well, you know, it's so funny. For one, you know,
my identity is not tied up in the least in
my skin color. I never wake up in the morning
and look in the mirror and say, my god.
Speaker 3 (13:51):
Look at this white man. I'm a white man in America.
You know, I'm a white man.
Speaker 2 (13:55):
It doesn't doesn't doesn't enter. But of course, you know,
I'm not a Democrat and I'm not a vic them
you know, trans or whatever it is. But yeah, no,
I mean it's ridiculous. I mean, you know, it's it's
it's been open season on white people. I mean, right,
I mean, uh, you know, I don't wake up feeling
oppressed because I'm just you know, these people are a joke.
But yeah, I mean, white people are under attack. White
men certainly have been under attack in this country for
(14:16):
a long time. And you know, we're supposed to supposed
to feel guilty for something that Democrats did, you know,
before any of us were born, uh, several generations ago.
And so you know, they remake you know, Little Mermaid,
which is an iconic character. She's got you know, red hair,
and they put a black actress in there. Okay, whatever,
why are you doing that? You know the same thing
(14:37):
with snow White. You know, they they I mean her
name is snow White, but they put a Latina in there.
Speaker 3 (14:44):
And these people go out.
Speaker 2 (14:45):
And they and they and they and they're you know,
they're trying to sell a Disney film to people, and
that they just attack like America the whole time. And
this most recent one is the most hilarious of all
because you have somebody who's actually playing Captain America. I
don't know why they're making her a new version of
it anyway. I mean, you had the white guy whatever
(15:05):
his name was, and it wasn't that long ago, but
now they're going to redo it and put a black
guy in there.
Speaker 3 (15:10):
Whatever.
Speaker 2 (15:11):
But this guy goes on a press tour and he says,
you know, America sucks. You're playing Captain America and you're
pitching the movie as this movie sucks.
Speaker 1 (15:17):
Can you believe that?
Speaker 3 (15:18):
You know?
Speaker 1 (15:18):
I can't. I saw that on your back speed. What
is wrong with him? I mean, that's the thing. People
like that don't push unification. And again, I raised my
children the Barney world where every color didn't matter, and
that's how it is in the military. We're melting pot.
So go ahead, John, I.
Speaker 4 (15:38):
Say, Drew, you know, obviously California has been burning out
there and hopefully you're you're not near any of that.
But what do you make of the Trump and the
press conference?
Speaker 3 (15:48):
Trump hat out there?
Speaker 4 (15:48):
With the mayor Karen Bass and uh, you know, I
thought his comment about maybe water would would be a
good thing. You know, water works on putting out fires
really well. But stupidity on her part was astonishing. And
do people in California see that?
Speaker 2 (16:11):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (16:11):
I think they do.
Speaker 2 (16:14):
I mean, you can't watch that press conference. Uh, even
if you are a Marxist and think that Karen Bath
came out in the mayor of La came out looking good.
Uh she was dominated. Yeah, I mean, I you know,
Californias are just so so brain dead, you know, so
many of of of us, not me, but you know,
(16:36):
it's it's a religion to these people. So it's very
hard for people to acknowledge that your whole world view,
your entire life has been wrong. And so that that's
what people are struggling to deal with, you know, and
they will easily just blame anything they can think up
rather than the actual problem or the culprits themselves, which
in this case is Democrats that run the government out here.
(16:57):
But the press conference was just it was another just
tour to four uh, you know, performance like the DeVos thing,
like all these things. Trump walks in a room with enemies,
and he doesn't change or alter you know what he's
gonna say. He just speaks the truth and he basically
bludgeons them with it. And you know, it's it's it's taking,
(17:20):
it's it's taking its toll. And when you every time
you see Trump do that, By the way, some future
Trump is being created in this country. And that's what
the nation fears, because people are watching this president and
they're gonna start acting like him. Right, He's going to
become a role model. His I love, the way he
conducts himself is going to be the way that we
conduct ourselves. So it's it has this massive rippling effect
(17:41):
throughout the country.
Speaker 3 (17:43):
So did you see going to be a Democrat anymore?
Speaker 1 (17:45):
No? No, they're so lost. But did you see when
Newsom ran to the airplane to greet him and then
and then he then he looked like a slob. He
didn't even dress up for the president. But boy did
he kiss the ring. And talking about kissing the ring,
so did all the billionaires that were on the little
inauguration dias to to which I had to ask you
(18:07):
this to include Laura Sanchez who had to showcase her
thousand dollars La pearl lebron drew. So does everybody's kissing
the ring?
Speaker 2 (18:18):
Yeah, everyone's kissing the ring. You know, I trust Trump.
I have to go a little bit of a negative
direction with a billionaire crowd. You know, these people obviously
are kissing the ring because Donald Trump is destroying the
old way and many of these billionaires, you know, to
(18:41):
be honest, a sort of fascism has come into existence
in American Fascism simply is the alignment of private enterprise
and the government.
Speaker 3 (18:50):
Right.
Speaker 2 (18:50):
So you know, in fascist Italy, for example, you were
permitted to unlike unlike community communism. Right, private enterprise is banned. Right,
private ownership is banned altogether. In the government takes it over.
Under fascism, it's allowed nominally to exist. So you can
have a private business superficially as long as it does
with the Democrat Party or the you know, the government says.
Speaker 3 (19:10):
It must do.
Speaker 2 (19:11):
So. Dei for example, was pushed and was like a
string to these Democrats like Target. Right, Remember when Target
went out and made a stupid decision to like push
the transagenda and abortion stuff.
Speaker 1 (19:22):
That's when I gave it up. That is when I
gave it up with the bathrooms. And I remember I
got the letter saying your credit card, you haven't used
it in more than a year. So I gave it up.
I gave it up. I've been going back slowly though, Drew,
I have missed it. But now that they're anti DEI,
it's so great, it's so great.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
Well exactly, but why do they do DEI? It's it's
because they you know, the Left was implementing basically credit
score system, so even though it hit their bottom line,
it was it was helping them with a credit line
and so on and so forth. And this new communist
kind of America that they were creating. Now Donald Trump
is going to destroy that. These billionaires that bought it
and went for it and pushed that agenda now are
(20:06):
are salivating to to become a part of this new
Trump economy. And so I don't I don't love it.
Speaker 3 (20:12):
And I don't like.
Speaker 2 (20:13):
Seeing all these billionaire I mean, as long as these
billionaires are staying on their knees kissing the ring, that's okay.
But you know, these people are not our friends. We
to remember that. Just they're doing what's in their self interest,
right and so and so I don't like the access
that they get. I mean, it's I live in reality,
so I understand it. But these billionaires have access that
(20:33):
you and I will never have because of the amount
of money they have. Uh, and that's gonna happen in
any administration. So you know, I'm not I don't I'm
not critical of Trump about that. He hasn't made any mistakes.
But you know, like even with Elon Musk, you know,
he's a big advocate of these h one b vises,
you know, bringing in foreign labor to work for these companies,
and they're lying to you about the reason they do it.
(20:55):
I mean, there's plenty of Americans who can do the jobs. Uh,
but you know it's importing cheap labor legally, and so
you know, that's what we have to be careful of
because you know, this movement and what's happening in America,
billionaires didn't do it. I mean, you know, On Musk,
you know, we can be grateful for in.
Speaker 3 (21:11):
Some ways, but he's he's not maga these people.
Speaker 2 (21:14):
These people are trying to come into this movement that
we've been a part of, many of us for our
entire lives.
Speaker 3 (21:19):
Under different names.
Speaker 2 (21:21):
It was the Reagan Revolution and now it's you know, maga,
but they didn't build it. And so I resent people
like Zuckerberg who are frauds, who want to come in
and try and hijack this movement and suddenly, you know
claim no, no, he's a total, total fraud.
Speaker 3 (21:38):
He's a piece of crap.
Speaker 1 (21:39):
Yeah, as he posted his little outfit in the tux
a picture with he and his wife.
Speaker 4 (21:45):
And what I find ironic, particularly about Musk, is much
of his success is due to the government and government
programs and grants and and tax benefits and everything else.
I mean, you know, Space Action. You know, they've done
a lot of innovative stuff, but you know, the government
pays for all of their stuff. Okay, that's their big customer,
the Tesla. It would not have been a success if
(22:08):
they didn't get seventy five hundred dollars a car tax credit.
And they actually make all their money from carbon offsets.
You know that people buy carbon credits that they solved
other company companies because the they're electric vehicles.
Speaker 3 (22:22):
You know, he's a creature of government. Point, So that's right.
Speaker 2 (22:26):
These people's yeah, yeah, yeah, go ahead.
Speaker 1 (22:28):
Your pronica, Well no, no, go ahead, Drew, finish your thought.
Speaker 2 (22:31):
Well, I was just going to say, you have to
look at where these people's money comes from. And Elon
Musk case, what benefits his company and his bottom line
is actually not beneficial to the American people.
Speaker 3 (22:42):
So this is the problem.
Speaker 2 (22:43):
You know, there's a misalignment here where Yeah, Elon Musk,
I mean SpaceX is government contracts, right, I mean, I
mean he understandably wants to cozy up to the Trump
administration because you know, his future depends upon much of
this government money. And of course H one, BVSS as
well the Tesla and all that sort of stuff, these
government subsidies. So so yeah, I mean I'm not a
(23:06):
stupid person. I'm aware of that, and I'm watching these
people very carefully.
Speaker 3 (23:09):
Don't f with me.
Speaker 1 (23:11):
I love you true. Oh my gosh. H Well, the
other thing I wanted to ask you about, because I
was literally so disgusted, was with those nomination hearings and
what we had to put up with and then HEGs
it's like glided in uh because of vance, you know,
I mean, we still have these freaking rhinos we need
to get rid of. So, you know, was it an
(23:34):
awful experience for you? I mean that the senator from
Hawaii Horoma whatever her name is, she's actually Senator horrendous
and and she needs to go. And then McConnell, you know,
he's a disaster. And then we always have Collins and Murkowski.
Why can't we ask these damn people that are awful?
Speaker 2 (23:55):
Yeah, it is awful. You know, there's a couple of problems.
I mean, in Alaska's case with Kowski, it's because they
have a uh, maybe one of you can help me,
what have helped.
Speaker 4 (24:06):
Me with its jungle Yeah, it's a jungle primary is
what the nickname of it is. But it's a it's
basically a multiple vote system.
Speaker 2 (24:17):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, and there's another name that I just
can't think of right now because I have dad brain.
But exactly so in a lasta you have an issue
with the way their election system is set up. It
makes it difficult.
Speaker 3 (24:29):
You know, in Maine with Collins.
Speaker 2 (24:32):
You know, it's not a particularly red state.
Speaker 3 (24:34):
So you know, these.
Speaker 2 (24:35):
States where you have some kind of Republican in there. Uh,
in some cases, you know, they can't win elections in
their states unless they run as you know, rhinos effectively.
So you know, it's it's it's a little bit complicated,
but you know, it's it's it's frustrating. You know, they
really want to sabotage and prevent RFK Junior from being
(24:56):
appointed and also Tulci Gabbard and and they really are
gunning for those two because you're not allowed to leave
the Democrat Party and become and become successful like as
something else. Right, So that's a big thing, you know.
But uh yeah, yeah, it's it's it's fun. I'll tell
you a funny story though it's not really to anything. Uh,
you know, I did pr for Tulsi, uh and I
(25:17):
have I don't know, there's a Christmas card and to
turn her husband sitting on my kitchen counter still and
my daughter the other day was like looking at the
picture and she points to her husband, who Hanna looks
like me. He's got a beard and kind of longer hair.
And my wife's like, dadda dad, Dad's like that is
not dad, Dad?
Speaker 3 (25:34):
That is uh.
Speaker 1 (25:37):
Yeah, so funny. Okay.
Speaker 4 (25:40):
The other okay, choice John, it's ranked choice voting is
the is the technical term of what Alaska has.
Speaker 3 (25:51):
Oh I got to get rid of that.
Speaker 1 (25:53):
Well, we've got to get rid of McConnell. I just
can't take it. Anymore.
Speaker 4 (25:57):
So he's gone anywhere that one.
Speaker 3 (26:00):
So people let somebody read.
Speaker 1 (26:03):
Yeah, yeah, what I wanted to ask you about what
has been So back to RFK. Trump has said he's
gonna release the JFK, RFK and the m l K,
all the all the files on it, and the Kennedy
family doesn't want that release. RFK is really thankful, but
like Jack Schlossenberg, the grandson that always has his shirt
(26:26):
off on X doesn't want that out there. And I
think is it because it's going to showcase that Americans
killed both of those people. I mean, I think that's
the bottom line is that, I mean the government colluded
in all of this.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
Well, they oppose it simply for the same reason they
opposed their own kid, RFK Junior and hate him and
publicly attack him, which is just like horrendous. I can't
imagine do that to a family member. But they only
do it because they are Democrat loyalists.
Speaker 3 (26:56):
You know.
Speaker 2 (26:56):
Their relevancy depends upon their alignment with a Democrat party,
you know, and and they like being invited to the
clubs and you know, the parties and things like that,
and that will disappear their whole life. And what's important
to them, which is not actually important in real life.
I mean, if you're a normal human being that's actually
has like a soul. But that's stuff's important to the
(27:18):
to the Kennedy clan, and so that's why that's.
Speaker 3 (27:21):
Why they opposed it.
Speaker 2 (27:22):
I mean, it's I mean, it's really is shocking that
you get into I mean, you're talking about the most
significant member of your family dynasty and getting to the
truth of how he died, right and you come out
as his ken and say, no, we don't want that
out there. We don't want the people to know what
happened to him. So see, this is why it's a
religion to the left, even when it involves their family members,
(27:44):
they will come out against their family members to protect
the party.
Speaker 1 (27:49):
You know, it's interesting.
Speaker 4 (27:50):
I heard an interview with Mike Pompeo, the Republican obviously
former Secretary of State, and I think it was a
CIA also, uh and and his his comment was, they
don't need to be releasing this, And he says it
has nothing to do with the assassinations, you know, the
actual act of the assassination. It has to do with
(28:10):
the CIA and other stuff the government doesn't want to see.
The light of day because of the way the government
was acting. It really had nothing to do with with
the assassination directly, but apparently the CIA was playing some
kind of foreign games or something that that are part
of these files.
Speaker 2 (28:29):
Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, they they I mean, you know,
they don't want us, They don't want to confirm and
add fuel to the fire that's already built in America,
which is anti government sentiment.
Speaker 3 (28:39):
So you know, I mean, this.
Speaker 2 (28:40):
Is this is this is when you look at Jay
six and obviously the government's involvement on that day. We
know that they were involved. We know that they they
set that up. It's not that they were the ones
that were, you know, becoming unruly themselves per se, although
they had people in there, but they wanted to create
an event that could be used and manipulated and presented
as an insert, you know, of course, just to cement
(29:05):
well to prevent any kind of lawful debate about what
happened in that election.
Speaker 3 (29:11):
And this is the same thing.
Speaker 2 (29:12):
So this is another one of those instances in our
history that proves that our government they're not the good guys.
And of course the Democrat demand, the Democrats demand absolute obedience, right,
they don't. They don't permit any anyone to go off
the plantation. And so this would, you know, just be
another concrete example that the Democrat because look that that
(29:35):
that I mean, who who was it that was running
the government who was involved in the assassination of JFK.
It was the Democrat Party Lyndon Baines Johnson, right, I mean,
this is the it was his administration. So it's another
black guy on the Democrat Party at a time when
they cannot really withstand any more humiliation.
Speaker 1 (29:56):
Well the other okay, the other ex tweet I have
to ask you about you wrote birthright citizenship is as
constitutional as row versus weight all. My gosh, Drew, tell
us tell the people what you've mean here.
Speaker 2 (30:16):
Yeah, it wasn't our entire nation's history that we permitted
people to come over here give birth and we granted
them citizenship. You know, I have to get all my
I'll do some of this on my podcast when I'm
sitting down and can get all the specific information correct
for people. But the point is the way we have
permitted birthright citizenship in this country for decades and decades.
(30:38):
Of course, anchor babies, it's not constitutional. In fact, it's
a bastardization of the text, just like people people try
and manipulate, right, the Second.
Speaker 3 (30:48):
Amendment, Right, Oh, only.
Speaker 2 (30:50):
Militias were intended to have WEA But that's not true.
You have to understand what the terms meant at the
time and take the preparatory at both clauses together to
understand the meaning. And so Democrats, of course will use
that to say, oh, no, you know, the founding files
never intended And so in the same way they'll say that,
(31:10):
you know that particular amendment, Yeah, that was intended to
grant citizenship to people who just come over here and
give birth. And it's not true, and it wasn't always
that way. But this is one of those means by
which the Democrats have tried to solidify power for themselves, right, right,
by by bringing in an underclass, permanent underclass that will
(31:31):
vote for them in perpetuity. So this is a very
important discussion to have, and so by comparing it to,
of course the Roe v. Wade, my point is simply
that that's another wrong decision that was made by the
Supreme Court. There is no constitutional right to Rovy Wade,
and there is no constitutional protection for someone from you know,
China to come over here on a flight nine months
(31:52):
pregnant when they're not supposed to be flying anyway, give
birth here, and suddenly that family becomes American citizens. Obviously,
that is a threat to our our own civilization and
it should be prevented.
Speaker 3 (32:04):
No country would, no same country operates that way.
Speaker 1 (32:08):
Okay.
Speaker 4 (32:08):
I think the best argument I heard about that was basically,
you know, the parents are here, they're not under the
jurisdiction of the United States or not United States citizens,
so some other country has jurisdictional authority over those people,
and that that means you're not a US citizen, so
you're your child even though they're born here, that the
(32:29):
US lacks jurisdictional control over over the family. I thought
it was pretty argument.
Speaker 2 (32:34):
Yeah, yeah, and that's that's the key part that they
want to ignore. Uh, in that clause is jurisdiction. So exactly,
it's another country that has jurisdiction over the people that
come here, and so you know, the extension of of
of naturalization is only extended to people who are under
our jurisdiction. So you know, you could have an argument
about you know what that would be. You know, if
(32:55):
if you have like a green card in the United
States of America. Right, you're a legal resident and you're
on way to becoming an American citizen. Okay, then does
the does the United States have jurisdiction over that person?
Speaker 3 (33:05):
Maybe maybe you.
Speaker 2 (33:06):
Know that would be an exception.
Speaker 3 (33:09):
But but uh, but I.
Speaker 2 (33:10):
Think you know, simply it's understandable to say that you
need to be an American citizen or at least close
to it. You know, you're loyally has to be here, not.
Speaker 3 (33:19):
To another country.
Speaker 2 (33:19):
That's the point, you know, it's no, I mean no,
no American in the past would would have would have
would have created an amendment that would would give away
our sovereignty to another nation in such a way.
Speaker 1 (33:30):
No, No, okay, there you posted also, I don't even
I don't even want to remember what the HHS secretary
of the tranny that was looked awful and and you
wrote this was the only thing keeping our enemies in check.
And you you put a picture about how our enemies
are all going to start wars with us now and
blah blah blah, and and and she he was the
(33:52):
only thing keeping our enemies in check. So so when
I read a Drew post at like two in the
morning when I can't sleep and I bust out laughing,
you know, thanks Drew as I wake up my husband.
Speaker 2 (34:05):
You know.
Speaker 1 (34:05):
So that's one of these are this is one of
the bust out laughing, like I Am not going to
miss this transgender crap. And that was the other I'm
so excited about was all of the trans now can't
be in the military, see yah, And I think supposedly
I saw a number was like eight thousand, you know,
these people, which I cannot even believe the numbers that high.
(34:26):
I hope that numbers not accurate, are there? They have
to leave the military now, retire or get out, and
we are taking our military back. And as a retired
Air Force officer, I am excited. I don't I didn't
want to see men in skirts and then like this
is so embarrassing in charge of HHS and was this
fat pig in a skirt?
Speaker 3 (34:47):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (34:48):
Hey, Can I ask you a delicate question since you
serve the military, which I support by the way before Yeah,
so okay, you serve in the military honorably.
Speaker 3 (35:00):
You gain your.
Speaker 1 (35:01):
Wearing a skirt, wearing a skirt many times as a political.
Speaker 2 (35:09):
And your your and your and your and your husband too,
you know, and maybe you can kill those high heels.
Speaker 4 (35:14):
You know.
Speaker 3 (35:14):
It's like one of those James Bond movies.
Speaker 2 (35:15):
You know. But but but you know, like, okay, what
what is your take? You know, Pete Heggsatt has come
out and and said which a lot of people agree with.
You know that you know, he doesn't believe that women's
role should be like on the front lines, right, And you.
Speaker 3 (35:32):
Feel about, well, I've talked about this.
Speaker 2 (35:35):
At we'd break the internet with some heated debate. But
that's that's how I feel.
Speaker 1 (35:40):
Because this is where I draw the line. There's one
hundred and three female fighter pilots. I want. I want
to ensure they are in cockpits, and you know I don't.
And here's my other thing. I want women to be
an army ranger. There's standards, and you can't lower the
standards for for women. Like if you're a fighter pilot
(36:01):
and you're a woman in a cockpit, no standards you
know have been lowered for you. You've got to be
the best. But but you know, I do understand, you know,
because like every time an aircraft carrier goes out to
to on a trip out, what do we call it John.
When they go out in the they go on employment.
(36:23):
Every time they come back, ten percent of the women
are pregnant. So men want to have sex, and you
know that's the thing. So there's a line and you
have to fit do the standards. I mean, I have
to say. One time I took press to Saudi. It
was a big deal. Saudis had not let American American
(36:44):
press in for two years. I asked my wing commander,
could I try? He laughed, He's like, that's not going
to happen. And guess what, I knew how to write
the package, and the Saudis let me bring press. So
I brought a bunch of men over and back then
they lived in a tent city and it was really
hard for me because I wasn't allowed as a woman
(37:06):
to go into a tent with men I was doing
business with. I still got the work done, but it
was hard, you know, but so I understand sometimes yes,
so that was painful, but I got the mission done.
But I to be out in the field in a
(37:26):
fox hole, it's very hard. I mean, we do have
women that deploy our you know, Air Force Red Horse.
They're building stuff and you've got to you know, thet's
set up a women's shower, But I don't know. There
are some lines to draw if you I.
Speaker 4 (37:40):
Just don't think from a societal standpoint, women should you know,
I promise serving in the military, but not in combat roles.
I just think that's not that's just not the right thing.
Speaker 1 (37:50):
Yeah, on the front line in a fox hole. I
don't wanted to do that.
Speaker 4 (37:58):
Well, the conditions are so it is, and it's a
social yeah.
Speaker 3 (38:01):
You're.
Speaker 1 (38:03):
There's no shower sometimes, and unfortunately women with our biology,
I think it makes it hard. We need a shower
and these are men not showering for a month, you know,
and so so I don't know, it's it's but don't
take away my fighter pilot cockpits. I will. I will
go to war with you on that one.
Speaker 3 (38:21):
Drew.
Speaker 1 (38:22):
Well, no, no, that's.
Speaker 2 (38:24):
That's that's so interesting, and I'm glad to hear that. Yeah,
I mean I don't want women on the front lines
for biological reasons obviously, you know, uh, putting tampons in
the middle of a fox you know, a fight, it's
probably not great. And also there's something else, you know,
as somebody who's married, you know, I mean I mean,
if if if it came down to it, and you know,
we were under attack, you know, I'd obviously hand my my
(38:45):
wife a gun and she would she would help to
in the family, and I'd be.
Speaker 3 (38:47):
Glad to do it.
Speaker 2 (38:48):
But you know, imagine like storming the beaches of Normandy
in World War Two. I mean, we have it ingrained
in us to protect women. So what does that do
to your combat mentality when you're storming a beach, when
you've got women all around you. I mean, you know,
you're not going to be legal anymore.
Speaker 3 (39:01):
You're gonna be You're gonna.
Speaker 2 (39:02):
Be more worried about, you know, saving the person next
to you than you are in engaging the enemy. And
obviously you want to protect the people that are in
that are around you, that are men too, But you know,
there's kind of an acknowledgment amongst men that hey man,
we're going to this thing and one of us might
not come out, and it's not the same and you've
got women in combat with you. I just I think
it's I think it's something brutal about a society that
(39:22):
would send its women to die. I don't think we
should do well.
Speaker 1 (39:25):
But that's the thing if there's standards, you know, because
my father went to Virginia Military Institute and I really
wanted to go there because my grandfather had gone there too,
And I entered college and they finally two years later
allowed women to do it, and at that point I
was doing RTC, so I was I was like, no,
But the first woman that was allowed to go to
(39:47):
the citadel was not up to the standard. She got
all this freaking press through and guess what, she couldn't
run two feet and got booted out. And and so
it made like, if I'm going to be a woman
breaking breaking, you know, the sound barrier, I better be
able to hold, be able to do the standards like
(40:08):
the guys. And and that's the thing. If you're talking out
in the field and rangers and the biology that women have,
you know, it's it's it's I think it's going to
be a problem. It's going to be a problem.
Speaker 3 (40:19):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (40:20):
Also look at the brutality aspect of it. You know,
war is a brutal thing, you know, to take a
gun and point it at somebody and kill them. The mental,
the mental process, you know, we live in a society,
a civil society where we say that's the wrong thing
to do. Killing people is not not what we do.
And you have to take somebody and transform them into
(40:43):
into a machine basically that will pull that trigger and
can't remember what's the purpose of war of Veronica to
kill people and breakings.
Speaker 1 (40:51):
But here's the other thing is the enemy doesn't follow
the Geneva Convention. We saw that with what Hamas did
all you know, raping women, killing children. So that's the thing.
You might have these rules, we're not gonna rape women,
but guess what, these people don't give a flying rats
ass and they're gonna rape women, you know. So that's
(41:14):
the thing is, like you said, Drew, is our society
able to handle this because today's warfare is unlike any
other warfare. We've got cameras, cell phones, We've got video
of this stuff, so the Americans would see it, and
I don't think I don't think they're ready for it.
But we have men that are willing to do it.
Give me a fighter jet, I'll strap one on, I'll
(41:36):
drop some bombs and shoot airplanes out of the air.
Any day I'll be Pukan though. That's the only problem.
Speaker 2 (41:42):
Yeah, yeah, I mean, you know, if we were you know,
Amazonian princesses in our society was almost all women. You know,
then maybe they'd be a need.
Speaker 3 (41:52):
But we don't have that.
Speaker 2 (41:53):
But I think to y'all's point, at the end of
the day, like all this discussion boils down to one question.
You know, is the entry of the entry of any person,
male or female to the military. You just have to
ask yourself phone question. Is it going to further the
mission or not? Is it going to help you succeed
or is it going to hold you back? And if
it holds you back in any way, no matter how small,
then you can't do it.
Speaker 1 (42:14):
So true, so true? Well what are we missing, gentlemen?
We've been talking and talking and talking. Yeah, the Jay
sixers are out. I still can't believe some of those
judges pulled shiza and didn't let these people out. That's
what I want. I want to clean it all up. Oh,
let's talk about Columbia real quick. When the woman which
I block these people's names because I can't stand them,
(42:37):
but she's on the view and she's a CNN correspondent
and not next she wrote, well, I guess you're not
going to get any flowers for Valentine's Day. And I responded,
I rather have safety over frickin flowers for Valentine's Day. True,
I mean these.
Speaker 3 (42:52):
People are idiot. That was Anna Navarro.
Speaker 2 (42:56):
Yes, yes, yeah, she's as bad as they come. But
I mean, I mean, there are so many takes on this,
but one is, you know, they talk about coffee and
flowers and you know, some kind of oil, and I think, like,
is that the only country where we can get coffee
and flowers? Like, I don't know, I got flowers in
my backyard. You know, I need coffee from Ecuador, you know,
I mean, Colombia is not the only producer of coffee.
(43:18):
I mean, these people stupid, but it was just glorious.
I mean, to see what a real president can accomplish.
I mean in two hours, it was under two hours.
I mean, the Colombian president says, you know, okay, I
am not accepting these I'm not repatriating these Colombians which
I sent to your country to invade. And you know,
(43:41):
two hours later, you know, Trump says, okay, well, I'm
gonna tear if you're twenty five percent, I'm gonna take
away your visas. I'm gonna make your lives miserable in hell,
I'm gonna do all these you know, implement all these
sanctions and so on and so forth. And then he
comes back and says, actually, you know what, I changed
my mind. I've been thinking about this, and I'm actually
gonna give you my presidential plane. You can actually use
my plane.
Speaker 3 (43:59):
To the poor.
Speaker 1 (44:00):
How about I've never seen a big tu.
Speaker 4 (44:05):
I just thought it was funny that too, that that
he not only told him that he was putting a
twenty five percent terrify. It's just after a week, by
the way, that goes to fifty.
Speaker 2 (44:14):
Oh, just just you know, and and it's and it's
it's so it's like, you know, I mean, we're just
we're acting like we should. I mean, we are the
most powerful nation in history finally, right, and it's hard
to behave like it. And we're not we're not bullies,
but we are going to bully you if you're going
to you know, uh try and you know, uh peacock
(44:40):
around us, because we're gonna show you who's in charge.
And we're not a bullying nation. We're not a mean
nation or cruel nation. But we are a nation that
looks out for our country and our country and that's
the role.
Speaker 3 (44:51):
Of every government.
Speaker 2 (44:52):
And if you're gonna engage the behavior that's a threat
to us or or or hurts our sovereignty or anything else,
you're gonna pay the price. And and you're going to see, uh,
how small and insignificant you are.
Speaker 4 (45:04):
So Trump, you know, it's interesting and Drew that that
you know, we we use our power, or Trump uses
in a very specific and smart way, you know, and
it's not it's not to bludgeon and bully, but you know,
it's like NATO. Good example here as reading that that
Norway is is suddenly upping their defense budget and they're
(45:24):
going to cut a big check to you know, part
of that's going to Green for defense. Now why why
did that suddenly happen?
Speaker 3 (45:30):
Because Green?
Speaker 1 (45:33):
Because he said, and they had to up it to
five percent of their GDP versus to two percent or
whatever it was.
Speaker 3 (45:40):
So they don't even spend that, they spend one percent.
Speaker 4 (45:44):
They spend one percent. Right, So what he's saying is
either either you live up to your agreements or or
there's going to be consequences.
Speaker 3 (45:52):
And that's the way life is, right, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (45:55):
Yeah, yeah, it's it's it's about I mean, the adults
are truly back in Chorge. There's a cat ability and
these agreements aren't to be there, you know, not to
be treaded on or violated. And you know, I mean
I'm excited because I'm so tired of US subsidizing the
rest of the world, even the illegal immigration stuff. I mean, effectively,
what we're doing is we are you know, and actually,
(46:17):
let me pitch this in a positive way when we
talked about illegal immigration. By accepting these illegals, we're actually
doing harm to the country, uh, to the to the
other country as well, because they are not having to
be accountability. Right, they have problems in their country related
to gang violence or crime or poverty. And what what
(46:38):
these other countries are saying is we're not going to
deal with that problem or change our ways. We're just
gonna send these people to the US and they can
take care of these citizens instead of us. And and
that's the wrong thing to do as well. I mean,
my my mentality has always been looked. You know, this
nation is so wonderful because the founding fathers, right, uh,
they went to war with Great Britain to give us
this independence. They sacrificed these other countries, you know, I
(47:00):
mean I'm not advocating violence exclusively, obviously, but you know
these other countries and countrymen need to take take hold
of their countries and implement reforms to improve their own
societies instead of sitting there languishing in you know, this
this darkness and doing nothing about it.
Speaker 1 (47:17):
So true, So what do you think of, gentlemen? Trump
has said that he might do away with the income tax,
and I'm like, oh, yeah, I'm sure I'm doing the
little Trump dance for John who could see me on camera?
Why is he teasing us with this? Will that make
things cost more? My eggs are at seven dollars now
(47:39):
in Florida at the at the grocery outlet, Drew, I
need to have a chicken in my backyard, but I'm
not allowed to in my hoa and I'm the VP
of it, so so tell me what do I do?
Speaker 2 (47:53):
Oh my gosh, Yeah, that's that's a. That's a that's
a tough spot. You know, you can't even get your
own chickens to Yes, I think that it's amazing that
we're thinking differently again. You know, we're not accepting the
status quo any longer. And I don't think that's I
think It's a radical idea in terms of what we've
accepted as mainstream for so long.
Speaker 3 (48:17):
But it's not improbable.
Speaker 2 (48:18):
I mean, you know, but of course, all those all
those proposals demand that the government shrink and stop spending money,
and then we reign in spending first.
Speaker 3 (48:28):
But no, I mean there's all kinds of ways.
Speaker 2 (48:30):
You know, you can you can revise the tax system.
And you know, any tax is going to increase the cost, right,
I mean the taxes on corporations already in America. I
mean that you know that gets passed on to the consumer.
The same thing's true with tariffs. But you know, would
you rather I mean, how do you want to collect
the taxes? I mean, some taxes are going to be paid,
(48:50):
but if the tariffs can offset you know, what income
taxes are in terms of the laborious nature of those
taxes on the income earner, why not. But you know,
I'm not I'm not a fool. Tariffs are taxes, and
and they do get passed on to consumers. But I mean,
(49:12):
I love the idea. I mean, he's he's kind of
looking at this and he's he's saying, hey, I mean,
maybe maybe he changed the way we do things around here.
I mean, you know, we've got fair tax proposals and
flat tax proposals that have been around for a long
time as well. I think those are worth looking at,
you know. I'm I got to be honest. I mean,
I'm not as familiar with the tariff history. He likes
(49:32):
to talk about tariffs and tariffs and tariffs. You know,
I'm not an expert on tariffs or how we used
to use them, to be honest. So that's something that
I'm interested in delving into. And next time we talk,
I'll have a have a you know, more enlightened response.
Speaker 1 (49:47):
No, I've read of articles on it and it was great,
but that was a long time ago.
Speaker 4 (49:52):
That was a hundred years, right, It was one hundred
years ago before the income tax was implemented. The government
was funded by tariff and that was the income was
from teriffs. And when you think about it in the
bigger picture, you have like fair tax is a consumption
based tax. And I used to be an advocate, but
I've always considered it too radical because people look at
(50:14):
the number and they say, oh my god, it's twenty
five percent. Because the rates about twenty five percent, right,
and everybody looks, oh my god, twenty five percent sales
tax on everything, and it's like, well, you only pay
that if you if you buy stuff, and then there's
a you know, they get into the rebate component. I
thought that's where they were getting messed up with fair tax.
It was too complex, it wasn't simple enough to explain.
(50:35):
And tariffs are actually a consumption tax. You only pay
teriffs on stuff that you bring into the country and sell.
That's that's consumption.
Speaker 1 (50:43):
Yeah, and I'll have money for consumption. They're basically you know,
it's going to be great.
Speaker 3 (50:49):
So if you're.
Speaker 4 (50:50):
Saving money, if you're saving right, if you're saving money,
you're not paying the taxes on it, as opposed to
income tax. If you if you take your money and
you save it, you still pay tax on it it.
So you know, if you're in favor of consumption based taxes,
tariffs are actually a good, good way to go.
Speaker 3 (51:06):
M Yeah.
Speaker 2 (51:09):
I mean, if if you if you got if you're
if you're rich and you can afford a Ferrari, well
you're you're gonna pay more taxes than somebody who buys.
Speaker 3 (51:16):
You know, a buick or something. You know exactly it is,
it is.
Speaker 2 (51:20):
I mean, which which is akin to the to the
fair tax. Right, it's a similar kind of principle. But
you know those tariffs MI understanding John, is you know
the tear that the the the person who ends up
paying that tax is the is the company set up
in the US. Right. So if you're gonna import you know,
something from Japan, Uh, you're gonna pay the tariff on that, right.
Speaker 4 (51:38):
Yeah, yeah, you will as a company. And and it's
sort of you can sort of look at as a
value added tax in that in that aspect of it,
you know, where the manufacturers paying, where the middle manner paying,
adding adding their tax value into the into the cost stream.
Speaker 2 (51:55):
But hey, there's another effect to that too though, because
there is a free market at play, and you know,
whatever the tarrafists said at it's based on what the
consumer is willing to spend and what the you know,
the importer, you know, you or me, if we have
a company importing these scoring goods, what we sell them as,
so that price is gonna fluctuate. It It could come
down from what it is what we buy initially right
(52:15):
from the from the forlid country, you know. To set
that emotion. So I mean my whole floss in all
this is we can change things and people adapt. So
this idea that we won't survive if we change the
status quo is untrue. You know, we will adapt and
we will figure it out and things will change just
as they've changed in the past.
Speaker 1 (52:32):
So true. So, Drew, what have we missed today? It's
always fun catching up with you. You're a new dad. I
guess you're getting sleep, so that's great. Yeah, I'm so happy.
Speaker 2 (52:49):
Yeah, yeah, I am too. I'm interested to see what
happens between Russian and Ukraine, right, you know, that's big.
Trump's obviously working hard to end that. And yeah, I mean,
he's just he's just doing a lot of things right now.
I mean, he pieced sign I think three hundred executive orders,
He's undone pretty much everything I could do with a
pen from the past administration.
Speaker 3 (53:12):
And uh, it's just it's just he's a machine.
Speaker 2 (53:15):
I mean, I just You've got You've got like, you know,
Michael Jordan and his prime and the guy's in his
you know, seventies, late seventies. I'm just I mean, I genuinely,
I I am really just astonished with Trump. He does
represent the best of America. I mean, I just I
look at him work, and I think most people look
(53:35):
and they just say, I wouldn't want to do that.
You know, I wouldn't want to do that. I mean,
just how does he even do it?
Speaker 3 (53:41):
You know?
Speaker 2 (53:42):
I think he I think he had he had the
Secretary of State Rubio coming to meet him at mar
A Lago, you know, for a meeting, because he couldn't
wait to get back to I mean.
Speaker 3 (53:51):
This guy's just like a machine. He is a he's
genius and he deserves respect.
Speaker 1 (53:59):
He does well.
Speaker 4 (53:59):
I'm so thikful, And it's it's the out of the
box stuff that that gets me drew. You know. It's
like it's like every time you think you've got to solved,
Trump comes up with something different. You know. It's like
the Ukraine thing I was reading today. Apparently he wants
he's Saudi Arabia to start pumping a lot of oil
to lower the price the world price of oil because
he is going to drive the Russian economy into the
(54:22):
ground where they can't sell oil or gas. And that's
how he's going to make Putin give in, because he's
got the Russian economy. And I'm like, what a brilliant
thing energy and the Saudi's pumping it and you drop
the price per barrel of oil down to nothing, and
the Russians are with you know, on top of all
of the restrictions, they already have no income for the country.
(54:43):
You know, they basically are going to go broke if
they don't, if they don't give up.
Speaker 2 (54:47):
Well, and of course, you know, the Biden administration could
have done that too, if they were actually interested in
enforcing Russia to end the war, because that's exactly how
they've been propped up energy to Europe, you know, pumping
that over there. So yeah, I mean, I just the
guy's mind. I mean, you look at this, and this
is somebody who wasn't in politics, right, I mean, he
was involved with politics and to the extent that he
(55:08):
understood what was necessary to run his businesses and get
approvals and so on and so forth. But he has
a comprehensive understanding of national security. And you know that
he's the one calling the shots.
Speaker 3 (55:18):
It's not by the administration or any other administration.
Speaker 2 (55:20):
Where you know, he's just I mean, you just you
understand that he is intimately involved in all these negotiations,
and he has an understanding of all of it, and
I mean, it is very hard to be an expert
in all these other issues. I mean, it's one thing
to be brilliant as it relates to business, but that
doesn't necessarily correlate to national security. And it's just the
guy just sees solutions and he doesn't.
Speaker 1 (55:44):
See I was going to say he was a hoot
at Davos because he said how the Chinese Prime minister
called him. It wasn't the other way around, like you're
on a date. No, he called me. And then I
loved how he talked about the Saudi Arabian Crown Press
said that he's going to do a six hundred was
it a six hundred million deal and in America, and
(56:08):
he's like, I'm gonna up it. He needs to do
it one trillion, you know, And I bet he's gonna
be one trillion, but I can't count that high. But
I just thought he was a hoot. So it's it's
been fabulous having him back. And Drew, we always love
having you on. You're part of the Veronica Eve family,
and thanks for joining us today because we just covered everything.
(56:30):
America's back.
Speaker 2 (56:31):
Baby, baby, I'm here.
Speaker 3 (56:38):
Can you hear? Me.
Speaker 1 (56:39):
Okay, great, I said, America's back.
Speaker 3 (56:42):
Baby, American's baby. Yeah, yeah, I off to my car.
I'm gonna take my daughter from school, and I put
you back on a Bluetooth so it's not my car.
Speaker 5 (56:50):
But yeah, you know, I just I'm so grateful to
take him on here anytime. And you guys are great,
and you you you know, teach me many things as
well when I'm on here with you, so you know
this is uh, you know, an American town hall.
Speaker 1 (57:06):
All right, well, thanks for joining, Veronica Ive. We'll have
you back