37. The Nazi Pope?

Pope Pius the Twelfth remains silent while the Holocaust unfolds before his eyes. The pontiff who should have spoken truth to power chooses institutional preservation over moral courage, creating one of the most controversial legacies in papal history.

Unlock an ad-free podcast experience with Caloroga Shark Media! Get all our shows on any player you love, hassle free! For Apple users, hit the banner on your Apple podcasts app. For Spotify or other players, visit caloroga.com/plus. No plug-ins needed!

Subscribe now for exclusive shows like 'Palace Intrigue,' and get bonus content from Deep Crown (our exclusive Palace Insider!) Or get 'Daily Comedy News,' and '5 Good News Stories’ with no commercials! Plans start at $4.99 per month, or save 20% with a yearly plan at $49.99. Join today and help support the show!

We now have Merch!  FREE SHIPPING! Check out all the products like T-shirts, mugs, bags, jackets and more with logos and slogans from your favorite shows! Did we mention there’s free shipping? Get 10% off with code NewMerch10 Go to Caloroga.com

Get more info from Caloroga Shark Media and if you have any comments, suggestions, or just want to get in touch our email is [e-mail]

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:03):
Caaleroga Shark Media. March second, nineteen thirty nine, white smoke
rose from the Sistine Chapel as the cardinals announced their
choice for the new Pope. Eugenio Pacelli, who took the
name Pius the twelfth, was a brilliant diplomat who had

(00:25):
spent years negotiating with European governments. He spoke fluent German,
understood European politics better than perhaps any man alive, and
seemed perfectly suited to guide the Catholic Church through the
growing crisis in Europe. Within six months, the world would
be at war. Within three years, Nazi Germany would be

(00:46):
systematically murdering millions of Jews across occupied Europe, and the Pope,
who had been elected to provide moral leadership in humanity's
darkest hour, would remain largely silent while the Holocaust unfolded
before his eyes. Pious the Twelfth's wartime conduct would become
one of the most controversial legacies in papal history. His

(01:07):
defenders argue that he saved hundreds of thousands of Jewish
lives through quiet diplomacy and behind the scenes intervention. His
critics claim that his silence in the face of genocide
made him complicit in the greatest crime of the twentieth century.
This is White Smoke, Episode thirty seven, the Nazi Pope.

(01:30):
The question haunts Catholic consciousness to this day. When faced
with ultimate evil, did the Vicar of Christ speak truth
to power? Or did he choose institutional preservation over moral courage.
Today we examine the most controversial papacy of the modern era,
when silence became as significant as speech and papal neutrality

(01:51):
faced its ultimate test. Eugenio Pacelli's path to the papacy
had been shaped by decades of diplomatic service that taught
him to value prudence, discretion, and institutional survival above all
other considerations. As papal nuncio to Germany from nineteen seventeen
to nineteen twenty nine, he had witnessed the collapse of

(02:13):
the Kaiser's regime, the chaos of the Weimar Republic, and
the rise of extremist movements that threatened traditional European civilization.
Pacelli's diplomatic experience had convinced him that the Catholic Church's
survival depended on maintaining neutrality in political conflicts while negotiating
practical arrangements with whatever governments happened to be in power.

(02:37):
This approach had served the Church well during the upheavals
following World War I, when papal diplomacy had protected Catholic
interests across a continent torn by revolution and civil war.
The reichs Concordat of nineteen thirty three represented both the
triumph and the tragedy of Pacelli's diplomatic philosophy. As Vatican

(02:58):
Secretary of State, he had negotiated this treaty with adult
Hitler's government, securing legal protection for Catholic schools, organizations, and
clergy in exchange for the Church's withdrawal from German political activity.
The Concordat seemed to provide the institutional security that Paceelli
considered essential for Catholic survival in Nazi Germany. Catholic schools

(03:21):
would continue operating, priests would be protected from persecution, and
the Church would maintain its organizational structure even under totalitarian rule.
From a narrow institutional perspective, the agreement appeared to be
a diplomatic master stroke. Yet the Concordat also legitimized Hitler's
regime in the eyes of many German Catholics who had

(03:42):
been uncertain about supporting the Nazis. The Vatican's willingness to
negotiate with Hitler suggested papal acceptance of Nazi rule, encouraging
Catholic cooperation with a government that was already showing signs
of its criminal intentions. More critically, the kunchord UT's requirement
that Catholic clergy avoid political activity effectively silenced the Church's

(04:05):
voice at the moment when moral witness was most desperately needed.
The institution that should have provided leadership against Nazi ideology
had voluntarily muzzled itself in exchange for legal protection. Pacelli's
election as Pope Pious the Twelfth in March nineteen thirty
nine coincided with the final collapse of European peace. Within

(04:27):
months of his coronation, Nazi Germany invaded Poland, triggering the
World War that would test every principle of Catholic moral teaching.
Pius's response to the outbreak of war revealed his fundamental
commitment to papal neutrality, regardless of the moral implications involved.
His first encyclical Sumi Pontificatus, condemned the invasion of Poland.

(04:49):
In general, terms, while carefully avoiding any specific criticism of
Nazi aggression or ideology. This pattern of moral equivocation would
carry Cried Pious's entire wartime papacy. When confronted with specific atrocities,
he would issue general condemnations of violence without identifying perpetrators

(05:10):
or victims. When pressed to speak more directly, he would
cite papal neutrality and the need to protect Catholics in
Nazi occupied territories. The systematic persecution of European Jews presented
Pious with the ultimate test of papal moral authority. Beginning
in nineteen forty one, Nazi Germany implemented the Final Solution,

(05:31):
a coordinated program to murder every Jew in Europe. This
was not merely another episode of historical anti Semitism, but
an unprecedented attempt at genocide that required immediate and unambiguous
moral condemnation. Reports of mass murder reached the Vatican through
multiple channels. Throughout nineteen forty two and nineteen forty three,

(05:54):
Catholic clergy and Poland reported mass executions in the ghettos.
Diplomats provided detailed accounts of deportations to death camps. Jewish
leaders pleaded directly with the Pope for public condemnation that
might slow the killing. Pius's response was consistent silence. When
pressed by Allied governments to speak out against Nazi atrocities,

(06:17):
he cited the need for papal neutrality and expressed concern
that public condemnation might provoke even worse persecution. When Jewish
leaders begged for papal intervention, he provided vague assurances of concern,
while avoiding any public statement that might identify the Church
with Allied war aims. The most devastating example of papal

(06:39):
silence came during the deportation of Rome's Jews in October
nineteen forty three. Under the Pope's very windows, Naziss troops
rounded up over a thousand Roman Jews for deportation to Auschwitz.
The operation lasted from early morning until afternoon, conducted in
full view of Vatican City. Pious knew exactly what was happening.

(07:02):
Vatican officials watched the round up from their windows. The
Pope could have walked onto his balcony and condemned the
operation before the international press. A single papal statement might
have saved hundreds of lives and demonstrated Catholic solidarity with
persecuted innocence. Instead, Pious remained silent. The deportation proceeded without

(07:25):
papal protest. Over eight hundred Roman Jews died in Auschwitz,
while the Vicar of Christ said nothing about their fate.
Pius's defenders argued that his silence was actually a form
of effective action, pointing to the many Jews who found

(07:48):
refuge in Catholic institutions throughout Nazi occupied Europe. Convents, monasteries
and churches did indeed shelter thousands of Jewish refugees, often
at considerable risk to the Catholic personnel involved. Yet this
rescue activity, however admirable, cannot excuse papal silence about the
systematic murder of millions. Individual acts of courage by ordinary Catholics, priests,

(08:13):
and nuns should be celebrated, but they do not absolve
the Pope of his moral responsibility to speak truth about
ultimate evil. The argument that public condemnation would have provoked
worse persecution fails to convince when measured against the actual
scale of Nazi crimes. It is difficult to imagine how
the Holocaust could have been worse than it was, and

(08:35):
papal silence certainly did nothing to mitigate its horror. More importantly,
this argument assumes that institutional preservation was more important than
moral witness, a calculation that contradicts the most fundamental principles
of Christian teaching. The Pope who remained silent to protect
Catholic institutions for God, that the Church's ultimate mission is

(08:58):
prophetic witness rather than institutional survival. Pius's Christmas Address of
nineteen forty two represented his closest approach to direct condemnation
of Nazi atrocities. Speaking of the hundreds of thousands who,
without any fault on their part, sometimes only because of
their nationality or race, have been doomed to death or

(09:19):
to a slow decline, he seemed to acknowledge the Holocaust
while avoiding any specific identification of victims or perpetrators. Yet
even this veiled reference was so abstract and diplomatic that
it failed to provide the moral clarity that the situation demanded.
The pope, who spoke of hundreds of thousands when millions

(09:40):
were being murdered, who mentioned nationality or race when Jews
were being specifically targeted, demonstrated the bankruptcy of diplomatic language
when confronted with ultimate evil. The post war period would
see systematic efforts to rehabilitate Pius's wartime record through emphasis
on his private rescue activities and diplomatic interventions. The legend

(10:03):
of the Pope who Saved the Jews emerged gradually based
on anecdotal evidence and selective documentation that ignored the larger
pattern of papal silence. Yet the historical record is clear,
when faced with the greatest moral crisis of the twentieth century,
the pope chose institutional caution over prophetic witness. The man

(10:25):
who claimed to speak for God remained silent while God's
chosen people were systematically murdered by a regime that he
had legitimized through diplomatic recognition. Pious the Twelfth's legacy forces
Catholics to confront uncomfortable questions about the relationship between institutional
authority and moral responsibility. Can papal claims to spiritual leadership

(10:48):
be reconciled with such complete moral failure when confronted with
ultimate evil? The Pope who remained silent during the Holocaust
demonstrated that even the highest religious authority could and fail
catastrophically when institutional considerations override moral obligations. His example serves
as a permanent reminder that religious leadership means nothing without

(11:11):
the courage to speak truth, regardless of political consequences. The
controversy surrounding Pious the Twelfth's wartime conduct has prevented his canonization,
despite pressure from conservative Catholics who admire his doctrinal orthodoxy
and administrative efficiency, The church that quickly canonized popes of

(11:31):
far lesser achievement has been unable to declare saintly a
pope whose silence during genocide overshadows any other accomplishments. Yet
perhaps this ongoing controversy serves a valuable purpose, forcing each
generation of Catholics to examine the relationship between religious authority
and moral courage. The pope who remained silent when millions

(11:53):
died reminds us that institutional position means nothing without the
willingness to risk everything for fundamental human dignity. The question
of whether Pious the twelfth was Hitler's pope may be
too simple for the complex realities of wartime diplomacy and
institutional survival. But the more important question is whether he

(12:14):
was Christ's pope, whether he fulfilled the prophetic mission that
defines authentic religious leadership. By that standard, the judgment of
history seems clear. When faced with ultimate evil, the Vicar
of Christ chose silence over truth, caution over courage, institutional
preservation over moral witness. The pope, who should have been

(12:35):
the voice of God, became complicit through his silence in
the greatest crime of the modern era. The tragedy of
Pious the Twelfth lies not in his personal malice, which
seems to have been absent, but in his failure to
understand that religious authority without moral courage becomes complicity with evil.
The diplomat, who thought he was protecting the church through

(12:57):
prudent silence, actually damaged it its credibility in ways that
persist to this day. His legacy serves as a permanent
warning that religious institutions, however ancient and revered, remain vulnerable
to moral failure when their leaders place institutional survival above
prophetic witness. The silence of Pious the Twelfth echoes still,

(13:20):
reminding us that neutrality in the face of evil is
itself a form of evil. White smoke is a production
of calaroga shark media portions of which were made with
the help of a narration, but still written and produced
by real podcasters Mark Francis and John McDermott.