All Episodes

June 14, 2024 54 mins

Tonight on Battleground LIVE:

In the arena tonight: Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA Operations Officer and Host of the Wright Report podcast

  • I’m down

  • Biden at the G7…two very different media reactions

  • Dems react to Trump’s visit to Capitol Hill

  • Saudi Arabia moves away from the petro-dollar

  • Russian war ships off the coast of Cuba

  • Putin proposes ceasefire in Ukraine

 

Follow Sean on Instagram - @officialseanparnell

Follow Sean on Twitter - @SeanParnellUSA

Get your Battleground apparel at www.officialseanparnell.com

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
Morning, Europe about to enter the arena and join the
battle to save America with your host Sean Carnell. Good evening, America.
Welcome to the battle crew, from sea to Shining Sea
and everybody in between. Welcome patriots. It is Friday, and

(00:27):
this week has gone by so so fast, folks. Listen.
I h I definitely, I definitely triggered some garbage liberals.
Last night there was this report, you know, Trump was
on Capitol Hill. And by the way, if you want
to gauge the success of that trip of Donald trumpet
Capitol Hill, just listen to how these conspiracy theorist, whack

(00:49):
job mouth breathing Dems reacted to it. They trotted out
this Milwaukee hoax. They said that he was praising Hannibal Lecter.
None of that was true. All of it was lies.
So that means that Donald Trump's appearance on Kapitol Hill
was wildly successful. But while he was there, by the way,
the purpose of the trip, having talked to people around

(01:09):
him on the campaign, was really to build bridges, extend
all of branches to Republicans who hasn't gotten along with
in the past. And that's really important because the Democrats
are an existential threat to this country. And the enemy
of my enemy is my friend. No, I don't like Rhino,

(01:30):
never Trump Republicans, they're the worst. But I think even
those people are waking up to the existential threat that
is the Democrat Party, and they are willing and Trump
is willing to align with them to defeat them in November.
And that's important. But while Trump was at this meeting,
I don't mean to go off on a tangent. There
he floated the concept of eliminating the income tax and

(01:53):
replacing it with tariffs, which, by the way, I immediately
chimed in, you know one, because I thought it was
a genius move. If you've been watching this show for
a long time, you know long time meaning the past
several months, have been doing it less than a year,
then you know that I absolutely loathe taxes. What I
loathe even more than taxes is the propaganda line it's

(02:18):
a pay It's our patriotic duty to pay taxes. It's
the opposite of patriotism to give your hard earned money
to the government. You work your ass off for that money,
and to just give it to the government so they
could study sperm whale sex and the Arctic Ocean is
not patriotic at all. So of course I weighed in

(02:41):
because I hate taxes. It's the right thing to do.
By the way, the income tax is not anything that
the founders ever intended. Let people keep more of their
own money. I also said that this would create a
huge economic boom. People would immediately have twenty to thirty
seven percent pay raise. They'd go out and they'd spend
that money. Each person that got that pay raise creates

(03:03):
a little micro economy around them. They pay taxes, other
taxes with that money, They go to go out to eat,
go to restaurants, they shop, all in their local economies.
It's a boost to everybody a million times over. That
growth by dropping the income tax alone might even exceed
the growth of our national debt, which is at historic

(03:25):
levels of thirty five trillion dollars. But here's why I
really like it. It also forces Biden and the garbage Democrats,
because I realized that it's a complicated tax matter. It's
not as simple as I'm making it. But from a
political standpoint, it forces Biden in these garbage liberals to
say that they're pro income tax, and boyd did they

(03:47):
come out swinging all in the comments of my tweet,
just saying this is a good idea, just one shit
lib after the next saying, oh, this is stupid, You're stupid,
just ready willing able liberals just wanted to give their
money to the federal government, totally unwilling of even considering

(04:08):
that there might be another way to do things. Just
TDS has completely ruined like twenty percent of the country
to where they just are our federal government zombies here
take my money to just wander around like Biden, just
giving their money to the federal government and trusting everything
the federal government does and says. And that's sad, but

(04:31):
I also love triggering the liberals, so to that extent,
To that extent, it was a win. Also, the Scotis
overturned the ban on bump stocks. And here's what this
case is all about and why it's important and what
I need you to realize. And I'm saying this, of
course before I get into the show Round show rundown. Listen,
We've got Brian Dean Wright on deck, former CIA operations officer,

(04:53):
disaffected Democrat, now America First guy, one of the smartest
guys that I know on politics and foreign policy and
everything else. He's coming up in about ten to fifteen
minutes to stand by for him. But let me tell
you about this bump stock thing. Despite what the media
is saying, this case has absolutely nothing to do with

(05:14):
the Second Amendment, because you'll see, oh my god, there
were a country that values guns over the lives of children,
and the Las Vegas shooter he used the bump stock,
and it has nothing to do with the Second Amendment.
If you don't know what a bump stock is, it's
a little plastic piece of equipment that goes on the
butt stock of your rifle semi automatic rifle to make

(05:36):
it fire more rapidly. I don't know a single serious
shooter that uses a bump stock. It's wildly inaccurate. So
essentially all it is is like a range toy that
wastes a crap ton of ammunition. But here's the essence
of this case, boiled down right to its core, and

(05:58):
this is the takeaway, and this is why I think
you should be encouraged going into the weekend. So the
ATF took Congress's ban on machine guns ATF alcohol, tobacco, firearms.
They took Congress's ban on machine guns and decided that
bump stocks are machine guns and just banned them unilaterally,

(06:18):
essentially creating a law out of whole cloth, all around
circumventing Congress essentially. So this case was not in any
way decided on Second Amendment grounds. What's important here for
you all to know is that the Supreme Court of
the United States smacked down the ATF and basically told them,

(06:42):
in very simple terms, Congress makes laws. You do not
you ATF, unelected bureaucrats. You just enforced the laws that
Congress makes, You don't invent them out of whole cloth.
So the Supreme Court says the ATF therefore exceeded its

(07:03):
statutory authority by issuing a rule that classifies bump stocks
as machine guns. So just want to recap. Has nothing
to do with Second Amendment. Has everything to do with
an out of control government stealing and taking your rights,
unelected bureaucrats doing that. So the Supreme Court stood up
to them smack them down. That is a loss for

(07:27):
the deep State anyway you cut it. And you should
be celebrating that post this weekend to a loss for
the deep state, because that's something to be happy about.
So today Brian Dean Wright on Deck. I'm doubling down
on my deep State theory about yesterday that most of
you all didn't like. Don't tune out the show just yet.

(07:47):
I want to. I'm gonna break it down for you
in ways and maybe you maybe you'll be with me
by the end of it. Maybe you won't, in which
case it's fine either way. But the Dems react to
Capitol Hill. We've got the Biden knit the G seven
Russian warships off the coast of Cuba, Putin proposing a
ceasefire in Ukraine. That and so much more coming down

(08:08):
the pike here on Battleground Live. Okay, So bear with
me here. I'm doubling down on something and it was very,
very unpopular yesterday. Like if I went back and I
read the live chat, I know how you all feel
about it. But I'm gonna take one more crack at
it and just just go with me here. Okay. So
is the deep State backtracking a little bit? Are they

(08:29):
shifting fire? I've been obsessed with thinking about this because
part of my job as an infantry officer a ground
combat leader in combat was to analyze the enemy, most
likely enemy response, most deadly enemy response. It was my

(08:50):
job to plan for every contingency. And I've talked to
Commander Melanie about this, and it's kind of changed who
I am even today. I'm constantly thinking through contingencies or
something about military life and being a combat leader. That
just sort of changes you, rewires you, even down to
the DNA level, it seems. But plan for every contingency,

(09:13):
and so for me in an asymmetric threat environment like Afghanistan,
that meant thinking outside the box. And that leads me
to this point. The deep state, the blob unelected bureaucrats
like the ATF. Call them whatever you want. I refer
to them as the deep state because it's exactly what

(09:34):
they are. But the deep state is only effective when
they operate from the shadows with plausible deniability. Now listen, yes,
of course we see what's going on clear as day,
but the vast majority of Americans, folks who aren't paying

(09:58):
attention to politics, probably have never even heard of the
deep state. And as long as those people are asleep,
the deep state can function effectively. The deep state thrives
on being able to throw their hands up and just
simply say it wasn't me. I had nothing to do

(10:20):
with it. That's just a conspiracy theory, you crazy whack
job conservative. So if people actually see what they're doing
in the open firsthand, it's over. It's kind of like
a spy working behind enemy lines and in units that
aren't friendly. The moment that he's exposed for what he is,

(10:42):
it's over, it's done with. He's dead. So the deep State,
the blob, these unint these these these these unelected bureaucrats,
they kind of operate like this as well, but once
everything is out in the open, their machinations aren't effective
any longer. And if people wake up and people saw
this firsthand, the vast majority of people truly learned what

(11:04):
the deep state, unelected bureaucrats, what they're truly capable of,
I don't think that they would tolerate it. So I
think the deep state themselves is walking a very dangerous
line here, And I think more people are awake than
ever before. And if they haven't fully opened their eyes yet,

(11:26):
well they're about to, or at least they're suspicious, right,
because I think people have seen what's happened to Trump
ever since he came down the Golden escalator, like really
only deranged tds, you know, left this lunatics sycophants think

(11:47):
that it's normal and the system is working as it should.
And I think many Deep Staters are traditional neo con Republicans,
like the best way I can describe it are like
Haley Republicans and Nikki Haley Republicans, which I am not
one of those people. You know how I feel about

(12:09):
this am I am a non interventionalist Republican. But coming
from that world, I can tell you that most conservatives
in that space feel that way. It doesn't make them
bad people at all. It's just kind of like all

(12:29):
they really know. It's just kind of how people are,
and so I don't fault them for that. So my
buddy Tony Schaeffer told me that he believes the deep state,
and many never Trump Republicans within the deep State believed
in twenty twenty that Biden would be the lesser of
two evils. I told you this yesterday. They believe that
he was just old lunchbucket moderate Joe. And this kind

(12:53):
of makes sense because many of these Republicans are Republicans
from a different time. They fundamentally don't understand the moment
that we're in they don't understand the threat of the
Democrat Party and what they're capable of. So I can
see a lot of these never Trump, deep state Republicans,
Neo Kon Republicans, Hailey Republicans again, call him whatever you want.

(13:14):
I can see a lot of them saying, Hell, it's
just Joe Biden. He's a moderate. He's been a moderate
all his life. He's done bipartisan work all his life.
I think that this was a grave miscalculation. And in fact,
Tony Schaeffer told me that these folks realize in many
ways they're mistake now. In other words, they see that

(13:36):
Biden is a threat to the United States, both domestically
and abroad. And so this is why Bill Barr, the
man who was at the center of killing any investigation
into the twenty twenty election, Bill Barr endorsed Trump unprovoked.
Trump didn't ask for his endorsement, he just did it.

Speaker 2 (13:56):
Listen to this ryle has begun here in New York City.
It's quite a spectacle, quite an event. I know that
you think that the prosecution seems far fetched. Maybe the
best way I could maybe that's the kindest way that
I can say that your thoughts as to how this
is going now that it's underway, and what you think
about it.

Speaker 3 (14:13):
Well, I've said from the beginning this case is an abomination.
You know, it's obviously political seven years after he pays
hush money to try to come up with this case.
It's also, as you say, it's not only far fetched,
they're trying to predicate it on a federal crime which
wasn't prosecuted, and they're wrong about it. This was not
a campaign contribution. They're just wrong on the law. But

(14:37):
to me, this shows that the real threat to liberty,
the real threat to our system, or the excesses of
the progressive left. They're perverting the system of justice, and
you know that's where the danger lies, the corruption and
subversion of our institutions by the left. I heard you
call this hush money case outrageous, and I also know

(15:01):
you've been asked many times you've had your disagreements with
the former president.

Speaker 1 (15:05):
He's the presumptive nominee. We assume he will be the nominee.
Will you support him in twenty twenty four?

Speaker 3 (15:10):
Well, i've said, well, along, you know, given two bad choices,
I think it's my duty to pick the person I
think would do the least harm to the country. And
in my mind, that's.

Speaker 1 (15:19):
So there you go. A couple of things I want
to highlight for you here. Keep in mind that Bill
Barr was the chief law enforcement officer for the country
under Donald Trump. Keep in mind that Tony Shaeffer. Bill
Barr called Tony Shaeffer and told him, in no uncertain terms,
no more investigating in twenty twenty. It's done. It's over with.
The FBI is going to do one hundred percent of

(15:40):
the investigations. We don't want the US marshals involved. And
so Bill Barr is a perfect example of a sort
of traditional Nikki Haley Republican, Neo Cohn Republican that doesn't
like Trump. But he said right there in that interview,
corruption and subversion of our institutions For people like this,

(16:03):
the institutions, the FBI, the CIA, the United States military,
they just want a sense of homeostasis. And they believed
that Biden would give them that, and they ultimately in
twenty twenty, believed that Trump was the threat. And then
Bill Barr also in that same interview, and this is
a perfect microcosm of how he thinks, and I think

(16:24):
how other traditional neo conservative Republicans think traditional Republicans said
two bad choices. I think it's my duty to pick
the person who would be the least harm to this nation.
So think about this with me here. And I know
that you weren't a fan of my theory yesterday, but I'm,
like I said, I'm doubling down on it today. For

(16:46):
the most part, many of these misguided Republican deep staters,
they have families that live here in America. They don't
want America to collapse. If Bill Barr is saying on
national television that he's supporting Trump that he believes Biden

(17:07):
is a threat to the institution, that's like a signal
to the rest of the Republican deep staters saying that
Biden is the bigger threat. So here's what I think now.
I don't know if you hate this or like this
and didn't agree with me yesterday, but this is what
I'm building to. I think many of the people in
the deep state believe that Trump is going to win.

(17:30):
I think that they believe that while Trump is a threat,
I don't agree with that, that's wrong and incorrect. I
think they believe that Biden is far, far worse. I
just I think that they realize that now. I think
that they remember what it was like under four years
of President Trump and it's nothing like it is now.
And what I think the deep state is doing their
next move because obviously it's always to protect that sense

(17:53):
of homeostasis, right, protect the institutions that they work for.
That's what we talked about, big blooded bureaucracy. Their number
one goal is not the truth, is not looking out
for the people. It's to protect themselves first last in
all ways. So they're gonna do everything that they can
to work behind the scenes to put guardrails on the
next Trump presidency. So what does that look like? Ten

(18:15):
years of support and for Ukraine make it damn near
impossible for Trump to fire our government employees, bog them
down with fake investigations, just like they did the first
four years. There are a million ways they can stifle
another Trump presidency. And I think that they may say, hey,
rather than exposing ourselves more by escalating tactics and as

(18:37):
a consequence, completely destroy our capabilities on our nation in
the process, let's take our chances with Trump, en roll
the dice and keep in mind like this also kind
of makes sense because anytime these idiots meddle in anything,
they make it worse. Look at what they've done from
a foreign policy standpoint, neo conservative foreign policy over the
last twenty years, it's hard to see it as anything

(18:58):
else but a failure. Look at Afghanistan, look at the
Middle East and regime change wars just hasn't been good
for the country, So why should we believe that they'd
be anything better? Domestically They're a disaster. So that's my theory.
I take it or leave it. I'm gonna go back
and read the live chat when this is over. But
I've got Brian Dean right on deck. Okay, So without

(19:20):
further ado, let me bring my friend on, Brian Dean Wright.
Brian Dean Wright, Welcome to the show. Former CIA operations
officer and host of the Acclaimed Right Report, Welcome back
to Battleground.

Speaker 4 (19:32):
Hello sir, speaking of date fate here, we are glad
to be here.

Speaker 1 (19:36):
I was just gonna say, as someone who worked for
the CIA, is what I'm saying just a total whackedob
conspiracy theory or am I like?

Speaker 5 (19:45):
I think that there are different elements or parts of it. Look,
you've got the guys like James Comey or former CIA
director Mike Morell. Those guys are never going to give
up because they now got a stick. They make a
lot of money on TV, in podcast, they are speakers.
They get hundreds of thousands of dollars every year, continuing
the charade that they had perpetrated for years. You then

(20:07):
have other guys, I would say, probably not in the
public sphere as much, who are probably the workaday guys,
even some who've retired, some of those fifty one spies
who lied.

Speaker 4 (20:15):
Some of those guys are quietly.

Speaker 5 (20:18):
What would probably fall into the bucket you're talking about,
which is to say, look, I don't like Trump, but
I also don't like over eight million people coming over
the southern border completely unvetted.

Speaker 4 (20:27):
In earlier this week.

Speaker 5 (20:28):
We have eight of them who are ISIS members or
affiliated with ISIS. That's bad because I fought for twenty
thirty plus years of my life.

Speaker 4 (20:34):
To try to stop that stuff.

Speaker 5 (20:36):
And obviously Biden is listening to the left of his party,
which is Marxist, which believes in open borders because reasons.
So yeah, they're probably sitting back and saying, let's probably
go a different direction. Because the Democrat party that I
thought of, Jack Kennedy, that's gone. The Democrat Party of
even you know, the mid two thousands of early you know,
verse one point zero, Barack Obama when he was talking

(20:57):
about how he would hear Spanish at his garage going
to carfix and I mean, I'm angry that Democrat Party's gone.

Speaker 1 (21:03):
It's gone.

Speaker 4 (21:03):
And I say this as a.

Speaker 5 (21:04):
Guy who was a Democrat for twenty years and I
now look at my party that's you know, former now
no longer part of it.

Speaker 4 (21:09):
I'm like, who are those guys? I don't know? So
I think that.

Speaker 5 (21:12):
You're right to say that there are some that still
do love this country that are looking around saying, okay,
all right, well I didn't like Trump because you know,
he's crazy and he says crazy things. Okay, but you know,
we've got a national security crisis right now in the
White House, not just a border. Look around the world
that's on fire. And oh, by the way, there's a
laptop that says this guy might be taking some secret
cash from the Chinese, amongst others.

Speaker 4 (21:33):
All Right, I might not say publicly, but we got
to do.

Speaker 5 (21:35):
Something different here. So I think you could be right
with those workaday guys.

Speaker 1 (21:39):
I mean, look, I know that, h know, when you
talk about the deep state, I get it. The deep state.
The phrase itself even sounds conspiratorial, but it's real. Just
having buddies in the White House that worked around Trump
every day, these people didn't believe that it existed going in,
you know, and then they get there and they're like,
oh my god, this calcify bureaucracy. And really that's all

(22:02):
it is, unelected bureaucrats stifling or killing the president's agenda
through the big bloated bureaucracy. Like President Trump would issue
an order in the Oval Office, it would sit in
a Manila folder on some dudes that's for like months,
and it would never get implemented. And Trump's staff used
to talk to me and they used to say to me, like,
this is crazy the amount of work that I have

(22:24):
to do just to implement what is a simple order
from a duly elected the United States President. So that
it's real. And these people, in some cases, Brian, they're
political as well. And when the soul of the country
and power is on the line, I gotta believe, especially
when you look at guys like James Comy, right, and

(22:46):
who is Obama, cr Brennan. It was Brennan that he's
like a known communist, right, he's a CIA guy, right,
These these people are unbelievably political.

Speaker 4 (22:56):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (22:57):
Again, there's another bucket of them that these are people
who just they do hate the country and they have
weaseled their way into positions of power and they're happy
to just be Niiliss and watch it burn down. There
are some of those guys too. So the degree to
which people are disagreeing with you or get outraged by
they're probably thinking about the things that we've talked about before,

(23:18):
which is when you know, Schumer said back in twenty
seventeen that I see the intelligence community has six ways
from Sunday to get back at you. If you're a politician, Okay,
well that probably tells you it's not a conspiracy theory.
It's real. The top democrat in the country has admitted this.
That's all the proof we need.

Speaker 4 (23:35):
Yeah, it does.

Speaker 5 (23:37):
I think any reasonable person would say, yeah, we have
a problem in this country, and I don't want to
trust that any of them might come around. I don't
like any of them, including Brian Wright. He seems kind
of shady too, And I get that by the way.
People will say that to me, and I'm like, that's fair.
It's incumbent upon me to prove to you that I'm
not one of those guys. And maybe you will never

(23:57):
believe that that's that that's the case, and that's because
that is now the legacy that I have to live
with because of what my former colleagues have done to
this country. So I get to, you know, get the
shmear on me. And that's just how the way life,
life goes. Booho, what are you gonna do?

Speaker 1 (24:14):
Booo? What are you gonna do? So look at what's happening.
You're gonna talk about corruption, you know, and institutions that
are harming this country. The Department of Justice today coming
out and saying we're not going to prosecute Merrick Garland
after being held in contempt by Congress for not responding
to a congressional subpoena. Meanwhile, as they're declining to charge

(24:37):
Merrick Garland, you've got Steve Bannon and Peter Navarrow, by
the way, not chumps off the street. Steve Bannon was
was Trump's White House Chief of Staff. Peter Navarro's chief
economic advisor, left and right hand to the President sitting
in a Steve Bannon about to be in prison, Peter
Navarro in prison for the exact same damn thing. And
it all goes back to these audio tapes at the

(24:59):
Department and of Justice from the Special Prosecutor Robert Hurr
refusing to release to Congress Brian, what's your take on
all of that insanity?

Speaker 4 (25:09):
Well, let's talk about the hypocrisy. Second.

Speaker 5 (25:11):
The first piece is the national security piece, which is
there are audio tapes of Joe Biden, our commander in chief,
who appeared to be so befuddled, so confused, so diseased
in his mind that a special counsel said, you know,
I'm not going to prosecute this guy because a jury
is going to see that he's senile and bonkers and
they're never going to They're never going to find him guilty.

Speaker 4 (25:32):
So that's what we know to be true. So that
is on those audio tapes.

Speaker 5 (25:36):
So what the Department of Justice is saying, his Department
of Justice, Biden's Department of Justice is saying, Hey, we're
just going to give you the transcripts we promised. They're
completely the same thing as the audio tapes, nothing more
to see.

Speaker 4 (25:47):
You should be fine with that. Okay, well, two things.

Speaker 5 (25:50):
One, do we trust Biden's Department of Justice to give
us clean transcripts? A you know, do we have any
reason to all do doubt that those Department of Justice
officials or others want to try to protect the president.

Speaker 4 (26:02):
I think so that's reasonable.

Speaker 5 (26:03):
Second, from a national security perspective, we need to hear
the audio. It's not just the words. We need to
understand the state and the condition of our commander in chief.

Speaker 4 (26:12):
If this were a moment.

Speaker 5 (26:13):
Of say forty to fifty eighty years ago, when we're
facing off against to the Soviets and it's in the
middle of the Cuban missile crisis, and we got to
make sure that we protect Kennedy because he's going through
some maniacal spell. Okay, we might want to bury the
story for a week or two, because you know, we
could all get new.

Speaker 4 (26:28):
I got it. I might disagree, but I get it.
Like it's a little bit more reasonable, isn't it. But
that's not the case here.

Speaker 5 (26:34):
It's very clearly the case of a Department of Justice
and a media protecting a man who is ancient.

Speaker 4 (26:40):
His mind is shot.

Speaker 5 (26:41):
We can all see it, and it's like that old
story that you tell the children about the king has no clothes.

Speaker 4 (26:47):
We all know that he has no clothes, all of us.

Speaker 5 (26:50):
And yet there are people in power who are trying
to protect him, pretending that he's got lovely robes on.
That's a big deal from a national security perspective. Put
aside your partisanship or your belief or where you like
that guy, they're not. We got a very dangerous world
out there, a lot of crazy people, they got nukes.
We need a guy in the White House or a
gal who has their mind and their wits about them.
That's what this is all about, and that's why we
need those audio tapes. The transcripts ain't enough. Of course,

(27:14):
Then the hypocrisy piece, the second part of that, Yeah,
go figure. You know Biden's people are protecting him. It's outrageous,
it's wrong, it's unlawful, and he's yet one more example
of law fair and that's what has to be cleaned up.
The Department of Justice is rotten to the core. That
has to be cleaned up or you are not going
to have a republic. It ain't gonna happen.

Speaker 1 (27:32):
So what is so I know the Republicans, I mean
because a lot of people will say, well, look, you've
got the transcripts, why do you need the audio tapes?
And you know you have Democrats saying this is just partisan.
Look what the president's going through now with his son.
He's a recovering addict. The media talks about Hunter Biden
like he's a fifteen year old. Meanwhile, like he's like

(27:53):
a fifty year old corrupt you know, been working for
his dad for a decade now, maybe more so, help
us understand why the audio tapes are important.

Speaker 5 (28:06):
Because it's not just what mister Biden says, it's also
how he says it. I mean, think about this from
a national security perspective. If you are, let's say it
told a singand officer and you're listening to a phone
call as one of those guys an analyst at say
NSA listening to a foreign leader. When they would write
up their reports and talk about what they heard. They
don't talk about just the words. They talk about the

(28:29):
state and the condition of the person speaking them, the tone.
Does their voice sound weak? Does it sound strong? Is
he fumbling and bumbling? During the Soviet era, we would
absolutely be listening to not just the words, but the
tone of the foreign leaders in Moscow. It is no
different here. An Intel officer with their salt would want
to hear the audio and not just listen to or

(28:50):
not just read the transcript. So there is a national
security reason. Irrational if you ask any sensible guy or
gal in the Intel community, who would have the chance
to listen to putin not just the words, but his
secret behind the scenes conversations, not just the transcripts, you
damn skippy. They would want to listen to those tapes.
And there's a reason for it. It's not just politics.

(29:11):
There is a very real clear national security angle here.
It looks some Republicans might want to use it for politics,
of course they would, But for the rest of us
who really care about the country and not just the politics,
we want to hear the Dagon tapes.

Speaker 4 (29:23):
There's a real good reason for it, and we need
to hear them.

Speaker 1 (29:26):
And what's crazy about it is like this, this interview happened,
what like with Robert Hurr a year ago, maybe maybe more,
I don't know, probably about a year ago. And Biden's
clearly so much worse now, like you see him at
the G seven. If it wasn't for the Italian Prime
minister walking with him and guiding him. There might have

(29:47):
had there might have had a silver alert issued or
something like that, he seemed. And I say this as
somebody who just I just love the country. Do I
like Biden?

Speaker 2 (29:56):
No?

Speaker 1 (29:56):
Do I make fun of him all the time? Yes,
of course I'm a Lockstow and Beryl Trump guy. But
like you see, you don't want to see your president,
Democrat or Republican on the world stage just being embarrassed
like that, Brian, And like it's like you talk about
the Emperor has no clothes. We all see it for ourselves.
And so these audio tapes, like from a national security standpoint,

(30:20):
I do think it's important that that stuff is released.
And it's all the more important because when you look
at what's happening in the world in these you know,
Russian warships off the coast of Cuba, clearly, clearly things
are escalating all around the world. Kind of would like
to know that our commander in chief actually knows what

(30:41):
the hell day it is, right.

Speaker 5 (30:43):
So let's emphasize and underline the point. It's not just
you or I or folks listening and watching right now
who see that Biden is very clearly a devented man
who is losing has lost his min long ago. Our
allies and adversaries alike see this as well. They know
that we've got somebody in the White House who, on
his best days are being propped up by some kind
of medication.

Speaker 4 (31:03):
Worst days, the man is loopy.

Speaker 5 (31:05):
And thus it's not him that's really leading the country
all the time, there are others. Who are those others?
What's the chain of command? How quickly can they make
a decision? It starts to inject a lot of uncertainty,
and that is a very very bad thing when you're
talking about the United States with nuclear weapons, who arguably
is not, if not the it is one of the
two superpowers in the world or three. Yeah, so a

(31:27):
lot of people are watching what is happening with this
White House, and there's a degree of weakness. Look at
the southern borders, there's one example. But look at mister
Biden himself. That's why this matters. That's why it's not
just embarrassing. That's not That is certainly one part of it,
but it suggests profound weakness. If you want to go
very tribal on this, if you're going to attack an
opposing tribe, you're going to do it when their chief

(31:48):
looks like, you know, he had a little bit too
much firewater, obviously, So that's.

Speaker 1 (31:53):
Why this matters exactly. So let's like shift gears to
Ukraine and that region of the world. Speaking of the
world on fire, you know, Putin came out today and
you know, laid down a ceasefire proposal with Ukraine. Said
Ukrainian troops should be completely withdrawn from Dantes and lu
Ganz and People's republics, Kiirson and Zapparzy regions. And he

(32:16):
also said Ukraine should promise to give up plans to
join NATO. So if those terms are met, Putin says
that ceasefire order will be declared immediately. It doesn't seem
like Biden and the Democrats, which strangely have become in
my lifetime, you know, a hawkish pro war party, which

(32:39):
I honestly never thought I would see, you know, but
they don't seem like they're much interested in a ceasefire
in Ukraine at all. What do you think about all this?

Speaker 4 (32:49):
It's absolutely correct.

Speaker 5 (32:50):
So look, you know, just last week and again this week,
we have seen a number of things that would suggest
there is absolutely no interest for peace in western capitals,
the United States, Brussels and beyond on. And that's because
they argue, at least publicly, that Putin is going to
march on the rest of Europe. Right, So that is
what they have said over and over and over again,
and that could be true. But show the evidence for that.

(33:11):
What's the justification. What is the intelligence. What is the
high quality or high confidence, multi sourced intelligence that tells
you that that is going to be true. Because if
it's there, then you can make a very compelling argument
that no peace deal with Ukraine is dumb because he's
just going to take it and restock the men and
the war material out and then he's going to continue
to march into Poland and Hungary and then eventually into Paris. Okay,

(33:34):
if you believe that to be true and you have
the intel, show it, make the case to the world.
They haven't and they won't. That doesn't mean that Putin
won't do that. But if you're going to continue to
lock your country into war, if you're going to sign
this country up for ten years of weapons and military
cooperation with Ukraine, which is what Biden has done this week,
for years to come right, you me, you might want

(33:57):
to just make the point a little bit more clearly
with high quality intel. Well, and the fact that they
haven't done that tells me that it's not there. So
why are we going to be interested in a piece
deal if we really believe that this is true, they're
going to march across Europe unless unless that's not what
it's really all about. And Senator Graham this we made
the comment or last Sunday made the comment that really

(34:18):
the war is all about the dirt, right, the minerals
on the ground, ten to twelve trillion dollars, That's why
we should care about Ukraine. That's why we should go
send our folks over there, men and women in uniform
for all the minerals. Oh okay, well, now it starts
to become a little bit more interesting.

Speaker 1 (34:33):
That really frustrated me, and I thought, I've been thinking
about that particularly particular phrase. We covered it on the
show a little bit, but I've been thinking about that
for most of the week, because you know, this war
in Ukraine is just like every other war that I've
experienced in my life, where in Iraq it was, oh,
we've got to go in weapons of mass destruction in
Afghanistan nine to eleven. That's where Bin Laden is and
I understood. I understood that got to go get Bin Lauden.

(34:55):
Why are we staying for so long after? It was
because of nation building and making sure that the Afghanis
could could govern and secure their own people. But we
surrendered in Afghanistan, We withdrew from Iraq. We created a
void in Iraq, a vacuum in Iraq. Isis came to
fruition there, rampaged across the Middle East, left a trail

(35:18):
of bodies in their wake. And it just seems like
two things, Brian, where you have people say, well, listen,
this is about PreTect protecting democracy. It's about protecting freedom.
If you value freedom, put that Ukrainian flag in your bio,
come hell or high water. We're not letting the Russians
take Ukrainian freedom because that's what we believe. Like that's

(35:40):
what the rallying cry around Ukraine was for years. And
now it's like Lindsay Graham on television like, well, we
can't let them take the minerals, and I'm like, so,
it wasn't about freedom and democracy and aspirational bullshit like that.
It was just like you just wanted minerals, right, and
then the whole Putin rampaging across Europe absolutely should be

(36:02):
sourced with intelligence and if it's there, presented to the
world make the case. I mean, you think we'd learn
our lessons after Iraq and weapons of mass destruction debacle.
But the whole like what I call the Neocon paradox,
where Republicans who are making the case that Putin is
going to rampage across Europe simultaneously say in the same
breath that we have to support Ukraine because Russia's on

(36:23):
the ropes. Well, if Russia's on the ropes and there's
a you know, people are about to take out Putin
and there are armies about to collapse, how then is
he going to have the capability to rampage across Europe.
None of this makes sense to me, and I think
ultimately that's why the American people buy Larns don't support
sending taxpayer dollars to Ukraine in perpetuity.

Speaker 5 (36:46):
What do you think, Well, it's a very divided thing,
isn't it a polling show Republicans and independence do not
support continued don't this war in Ukraine?

Speaker 4 (36:55):
S anymore cash Democrats do. But studying back, you mentioned something,
and let's.

Speaker 5 (36:59):
Start with this talk about a rock and Afghanistan, we
could probably toss in Libya and Syria. The folks at
the Pentagon and the National Security Council who put together
that war strategy and how to execute it, the generals
and so forth, the senior brass they failed, and they
are still in power. A lot of those men are
still at the Pentagon and the NSSE, and they are

(37:19):
the ones executing the war strategy in Ukraine.

Speaker 4 (37:22):
That doesn't seem very smart.

Speaker 5 (37:24):
The guys who ruined us and all these other places
are now in this new war trying to figure out
how to win this one.

Speaker 4 (37:29):
I don't think so. We don't have the best.

Speaker 5 (37:31):
And brightest anymore run out of our military anyway.

Speaker 4 (37:34):
But that aside.

Speaker 5 (37:35):
The second piece that you're talking about that's so very
important is let's just assume that Putin is going to
march beyond Ukraine. Let's assume for a second that they've
got this grand design and the righteousness of our cause
of defending Ukraine is on our side. Let's just assume
that that's fine. But you got to fight the war.
Do you have the men on the ground to do it.

(37:57):
Do you have the war materiel already created? Do your
fact victories? Can they they produce this stuff? There is
the reality of actually fighting the war versus wanting to
fight it. Two very different things. And what we were
seeing in Ukraine. As Loosny, who was one of Zelensky's
most senior generals, was through the fall.

Speaker 4 (38:14):
He was replaced.

Speaker 5 (38:15):
He has been saying for a long time, we don't
have the men to fight this. They are snatching men
off the street, throwing them in vans, trying to get
them to basic training. Earlier this week, the Washington Post
said that these guys, when they get to basic, they
don't even know how to fire a gun. They're not
even asked to fire the gun. When they get deployed.
They don't know how to fire a gun. They can't
disassemble it, they can't clean their gun. We're talking about
cannon fodder. So that matters. That really matters when you

(38:38):
start talking about sending stuff to Ukraine. There are not
enough folks on the ground to fight this war. Even
if you believe that the cause is just so, that
means that we've got to get the boots from somewhere,
and guess where those are going to come from. We're
hearing it from France and the Baltic nations in Poland
and O. They're talking about we've got to get NATO
troops on the ground. That's you and I, my friend,

(38:59):
a friend still in uniform.

Speaker 4 (39:01):
That's who is going to have to fight this war.

Speaker 5 (39:03):
Ukraine is running out of men, and that is going
to be the continued problem for this war. Even if
you believe that Ukraine is that the fight is justin
Zelenski's fight is just we don't have the war material
and we don't have the men unless we want to
send our men there.

Speaker 1 (39:18):
I've said it over and over that the longer the
stalemate in Ukraine, the longer we continue to support them
with no real end in sight, no diplomatic strategy. The
longer that stalemate drags on, the more likely it is
for American sons and daughters to be boots on the
ground there keeping the peace facing down a Russian horde.
And that is not something that I want. I know,
it's not something that you want. The American people sure

(39:38):
as hell don't want that. And you look at all
these people with the Ukrainian flags and their bios, like,
do you support Ukraine so much that you're willing to
send your son or daughter to die for the cause.
If the answer to that question is no, you should
probably take the damn flag out of your bio because
that's where this thing is headed.

Speaker 5 (39:54):
Well, and let's pause there for a second, because one
of the things you talked about in terms of the
deep state, where we talk about Lindsey Graham, you combine
those two things together, and actually there's a theme here
for a lot of those folks, including some of the
folks of the CIA that I used to work with,
and I think a lot of folks at the Pentagon,
in the State Department n SC, they view the world
kind of like that that board game risk, right where

(40:14):
you have your men and you have your dies and
you throw them and you want to conquer different territories
because you think it's a game. It's something that you
sit down at you know, Foggy Bottom with the State
Department guys, and you know up at Harvard and we
dalind we said, we talk about the world.

Speaker 4 (40:29):
You know. That is how they look at this.

Speaker 5 (40:31):
And they sit around with their cocktails and they think
about how we're going to reorder the world. And it
is an academic exercise. It's not a board game. It's
not an exercise. These are real men and women who
go abroad and they die, and a lot of people
are wreck not just men and women in uniform, but civilians.
And I'll tell you, for me, and I think probably
for you, you have a lot of friends who didn't
come home from these conflicts, and if they did come home,

(40:54):
they were missing limbs, or their minds were so shot
that they struggle with alcoholists or anxiety issues or depression,
or they put a bullet in their damn head.

Speaker 1 (41:05):
Yep.

Speaker 5 (41:05):
So that's the real consequence to the Lindsay Grahams and
the neocons and others who want to get involved in
the war who think it's a board game, or they're
setting up in the Harvard School of Governance and they're like, well,
dal and we must take Ukraine. These people are not
the ones who have to deal with their best friends
who come to sit back in their porch and want
to put a bullet into frigginhead.

Speaker 4 (41:25):
I've had that happen. I don't know if you have.

Speaker 5 (41:26):
I would imagine you probably had those conversations with friends
that's when this becomes very, very real. And this is
not just about a bio you know, flag in your bio,
or you know, we need the minerals. But when you
have friends who die, it becomes a lot more real.

Speaker 1 (41:40):
It's such a great point and I have many many times.
I mean, I've lost more friends of these stupid wars
than I over thirty of my friends, you know, as
a ground pounding frontline infantry guy for sixteen months, and
battalion went back to RC East Paktika Province, Afghanistan twice
in nine months. It was just I mean, yeah, it's horrible.

(42:00):
And when you see the you know, the hell of
war on the on the battlefield and the fallout at home,
it kind of gives you a different perspective, Brian, And
that's ultimately like my perspectives on these on this fight.
You people like to say, oh, you're a Trump guy,
you're an America first guy, you're an isolationist, like, okay,
label me in any way that you want. But my

(42:22):
perspectives have been shaped by my experiences conducting diplomacy at
the tip of the spear with Afghan warlords. I know
how they think, and I've seen the fallout from politicians
in Washington on both sides of the aisle that do
exactly what you said. They look at the world as
if it's like a game of risk. Send American troops here,

(42:44):
pull them out of here, not even like fully understanding
or comprehending what it means. And it drives me crazy.
It drives me crazy. And then you look at, you know,
the consequences of the world with people who really don't
have they're just politicians. They don't really have any experience
fighting wars or in the really like like you did

(43:06):
in the intelligence community as an operations office. So there's
politicians that had briefings, you know, and you know, you
look at now you've got Russian warships, you know, ninety
miles off the coast of what's going on with that,
like if you see, like obviously Putin doesn't feel very
afraid of Biden in the White House or any of

(43:27):
the lackeys behind the curtain running the show.

Speaker 4 (43:29):
Right.

Speaker 5 (43:30):
So I think that there's two things with this Russia
in Cuba stuff, you know. First, to be fair, we
have seen this kind of activity for many, many years.
In fact, we're going to see it much more throughout
this summer and into the fall, Moscow is sending its
long range bombers the first time I think about five
or six years.

Speaker 4 (43:47):
These kinds of exercises are actually pretty common common.

Speaker 5 (43:50):
That is to say that the Russian's going in the
Atlantic or the Caribbean. So we're gonna see a lot
more of that, and we have for years. So in
that sense, it's not that big of a deal. The
United States does this a lot, by the way, and
the Taiwan straight in the South China Sea and the
Pacific nearest China or the Koreas, so.

Speaker 4 (44:05):
In that sense it's not a huge deal.

Speaker 5 (44:07):
The question is, you know what signal is Putin trying
to send and does that really matter? So what he's
clearly trying to say is, look, y'all have beat me
up in Ukraine. You're using your proxy forces, but we
still pack a punch. Just want to remind you, just
just in case anybody's forgotten, And that's what Putin is
doing here with this latest series of ships and the

(44:29):
long range bombers to come throughout this summer into the
foll He's just reminding everybody that he can still get
into this fight. Just be real careful so that's what
this is really about.

Speaker 1 (44:38):
So let me ask you a question, Brian. I had
some audience questions from the last time you were on
the show, and so we're gonna shift years abruptly from
foreign policy to questions about you personally. And the question
that I got most often was how the hell do
you keep your teeth so white? And if if you're

(44:59):
clearly you gotta have some sort of sponsorship with a
teeth whitener on your on your plan right like, because
whatever you're doing is working. Man.

Speaker 4 (45:08):
Thank you? Well, I I'm flattered, uh for for the compliment. Yeah.

Speaker 5 (45:14):
Look, you know I'm pushing fifties, so I'm gonna take
whatever compliment I can get. I don't have your hair.
This is every time I see you, let me. I
just like, like, I want his hair. How do I
get that?

Speaker 1 (45:24):
My kids say that I have fancy hair.

Speaker 4 (45:26):
You know what I mean, it's very fancy.

Speaker 1 (45:29):
Thank you?

Speaker 4 (45:29):
Yes, you know? Uh so what teeth? What? I just
I brush?

Speaker 1 (45:34):
I don't know, that's just brush, that's it.

Speaker 5 (45:40):
Maybe I not, Yes, like I don't I go to
the Dennis twice a year.

Speaker 4 (45:45):
Uh, I don't know.

Speaker 1 (45:51):
Yeah, You're like, I'm sorry. I took you totally off
guard by that. I got a lot of questions about it.
People want to know what you're doing.

Speaker 4 (45:59):
Well, all I can say is, brush you know.

Speaker 1 (46:04):
Okay, So what are you talking about on the Right
Report lately? I tell you the time you were on
the show, you told me about a country that I
didn't even know existed. So talk to me about what
you got going on on the Right Report. If you're
not subscribed, folks that are listening and watching, you've got
to subscribe. Wherever you listen to podcasts The Right Report
with Brian Dean Wright. It's like your own personal presidential

(46:25):
Daily Brief. And if you want, like you know smart
I don't even know the smart Intel and what's happening
in the world, like you should subscribe to that. But
tell us what you talked about this week, my friend.

Speaker 5 (46:38):
The whole goal is to take people around it, not
just the country, but around the world and say, look,
why do these crazy places matter to us? And try
to tie your pocketbooks or your family to the country's
fate to what's going on in these strange places. This week,
one of the things that I talked about was the
fact that our Secretary of State said to Hamas, look,
you've just rejected the latest peace deal that was I

(46:58):
believe on Wednesday, And he said to Hamas, look, the
time for haggling is over. At some point, the haggling
has to stop. And what I talked about was compare
that to what we see with President She and his
belief that he must continue this fight. It's about it's
about destiny, it's about creating a world under his order.
And in many ways, President She and the head of Hamas,

(47:20):
who's a man named Guya Seinoar, they are both chasing
destiny for their nations and their tribes. And if we
have a National Security Council and staff and our chief
diplomat saying, hey, the time to haggle is over.

Speaker 4 (47:32):
We got to find a deal.

Speaker 5 (47:33):
No, No, those men are chasing history. They're trying to
reorder the world. For Seinoar's part, he's trying to, you know,
kick the Jews out and take over the lands from
the river to the sea.

Speaker 4 (47:43):
Those are his Arabs. That's what he argues. You're not
going to haggle with that.

Speaker 5 (47:46):
So for our chief diplomat to say, let's let let's
just work something out and stop haggling, it's crazy. Why
do we care about that? Well, we have lots of
men and women in uniform in places like a Rock
and Syria, the Red Sea, the Mediterranean. That's important. Also,
ladies and gentlemen, you all who are listening to you
have invested over three hundred million dollars and a lovely peer.

Speaker 4 (48:06):
Off the Gossa script. The damn thing keeps falling apart.
Oop see, I don't know if you saw just today.

Speaker 5 (48:12):
They're actually going to pull that back into Israel over
the weekend because the waves are going to be a
little bit too high.

Speaker 1 (48:18):
Incredible.

Speaker 5 (48:19):
We invested over three hundred million dollars and a peer
that can't by design, cannot take over a foot or
a foot and a half of waves when we know
that the waves off the God's Strip can go as
high as five or plus feet.

Speaker 4 (48:30):
Well, who made that choice? Who decided to.

Speaker 5 (48:32):
Build a peer that's going to fall apart with anyway?
It's crazy. The White House screwed up on that one. Depentagon,
by the way, I don't know people know this. Dependagon
warned the White House that this idea of a peer
was stupid, shouldn't do it anyway. But here we are
So I talk about that this week about.

Speaker 1 (48:47):
She why did the White House do it? Because they
needed a photo op, They needed a photo hoop.

Speaker 5 (48:54):
No, in all seriousness, I believe Biden knows that he
has to win Michigan. He has to win place just
like Arizona, Pennsylvania, others that have twenty thirty eighty thousand
Muslim Americans. Based on what we know from polling, about
sixty percent of American Muslims believe that Hamas is in
the right. About sixty percent of the American Muslim population
in this country believes that Hamas's right to attack Israel

(49:17):
on October seventh. That's sobering in and of itself. But
the point is that that is part of Joe Biden's coalition.
So he has to satiate their anger and help them
to basically go to the bout box and if they
have to pinch the nose and vote for him. So
he's got to put out this peer. He's got to
show that he is eightying the Palestenian people.

Speaker 4 (49:36):
That's a pretty big deal. So that's why that peers.

Speaker 5 (49:38):
Even though he knew and the Pentagon briefed him that
they think was going to fall apart.

Speaker 4 (49:42):
That's why he did it. It's just politics, ugly ugly politics.

Speaker 1 (49:46):
Well, so where can people find you? Brian?

Speaker 5 (49:49):
The right report like my last name Wright on all
podcasts platforms. We go live about five am Eastern every day,
miney through Friday.

Speaker 1 (49:57):
Five am. Yes, sir, mess around, you don't mess around.
You got a great dental hygiene and you're up. I
love it, man, I love it so Brian, thank you
for giving me so much of your time. We gotta
get listen. We've got to get you back, and we
gotta do We've gotta figure out this map stuff. I've
been telling people about your map stuff for a long time.

(50:18):
We got to set up some sort of chalkboard or
something like that. Get you up there in a little
tweed jacket with elbow pads and a little pointer.

Speaker 4 (50:27):
And even whiter teeth.

Speaker 1 (50:28):
It's gonna be teeth.

Speaker 4 (50:30):
My teeth are gonna outshine the map. People get lost.
It's gonna be great. Are we gonna do it at night?
My teeth. Give me the flashlight, it's gonna be.

Speaker 1 (50:38):
Use a black Yeah. We can do whatever. The sky's
the limit is the point, Brian. But anyways, brother, thank
you for your time. Man, and I will I'll see
you soon, man. Thanks Brian Will All right, that was
Brian Dean, right, my good buddy, one of the smartest
guys in the business. You should definitely subscribe to the
Right Report because it really is your own personal presidential

(50:58):
daily brief. He's very, very smart. Check them out, okay, folks,
So listen, going into the weekend, it's Father's Day. I
want to tell all the fathers out there and grandfathers
you know, thank you. It is not an easy job
being a dad or father in America. If you're doing

(51:20):
it right, you know, your kids come first all the time.
If you're doing it right, you're thinking about how your
decisions impact your kids and what's best for them all
the time. And you know, the reason why I say
it's not easy to be a dad in America is
because you're constantly and there's all these crazy, harmful stereotypes

(51:42):
about dads and sitcoms. Obviously, this is something that's deeply
personal to me, having fought in the family court for years,
fighting just to be in the lives of my kids.
And I am and I love it. We've got a
great family. All that hell is behind me. But my
point is is that it's tough being a dad, and
you've got all these stereotypes of the stupid father and
every sitcom known to mand. Just know that you are appreciated.

(52:07):
Strong fathers are necessary in every single family. And if
you are a strong father and a strong dad and
you care and love your family and you're there for
them and you think about them every day, this is
your weekend. And I want to say Happy Father's Day
to all of you. You're so so important. You're critical
to the traditional American nuclear family. You know, protect provide

(52:32):
is the two core tenants of your job, something that
I take very very seriously. Protect and provide. If these
things are important to you and your kids are important
to your family's important to you, This country is important
to you. Happy Father's Day to you all, and so listen, folks,
going into the weekend, I want to go into the
weekend strong. Thank you all for being here on Friday, Man,

(52:53):
Brian Dean Wright is awesome. Next week, We've got an
amazing show. So many cool, exciting things coming down the pike.
By the way, like I'm hosting Jesse Kelly's nationally syndicated
radio show again on a couple more dates here in
the summer, I'm hosting Wendy Bell I think in the
last week of July, first week of August for an

(53:13):
entire week. That's gonna be awesome. So the show is growing,
and it's growing because of you all. So thank you
to the Battle crew. Thank you to mcgroin nation who
also joins this show and is responsible for helping this
show grow. On your way out, make sure you smash
that like button, that little green thumb beneath the video.

(53:36):
We don't always hit it, but I always like to
try to hit two hundred likes by the end of
a show. That's sort of the benchmark to get on
the leaderboard at Rumble. I think likes are weighted pretty heavily.
To get on the leaderboard at Rumble, you got to
have between six hundred seven hundred likes. I think you know,
on some of our good days, we're between three p
fifty and five hundred. So smash that like button. It

(53:58):
helps the show immensely. Tell your family and your friends
to subscribe to Battleground Live. We need them in the
trenches fighting to save this country and that's what this
show is all about, saving America. So as always folks,
keep the faith, take action in your community. God bless
you all, have a great weekend, and God bless this amazing,

(54:19):
exceptional country that we call home. Take care, good night,
and I will see you on Monday. Battle cru

The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show News

Advertise With Us

Follow Us On

Hosts And Creators

Clay Travis

Clay Travis

Buck Sexton

Buck Sexton

Show Links

WebsiteNewsletter

Popular Podcasts

24/7 News: The Latest

24/7 News: The Latest

The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.

Crime Junkie

Crime Junkie

Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.