June 24, 2024 • 29 mins
US Congressman Ronny Jackson discusses the cognitive issues of Joe Biden and the alleged cover-up by the media and the Democratic Party. Jackson suggests that Biden has a degenerative cognitive condition that is getting worse over time. He also mentions the possibility of medication being used to help Biden perform better during public appearances. Jackson expresses concern about the impact of Biden's cognitive decline on national security and the country's standing in the world. He calls for an investigation into the media's role in covering up Biden's condition and suggests that the administration is being controlled by unknown individuals.The Tudor Dixon Podcast is part of the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Podcast Network. For more visit TudorDixonPodcast.com
Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to the Tutor Dixon Podcast. I am excited today
because we have US Congressman Ronnie Jackson with us. He
represents the Texas thirteenth thirteenth District and he served three
and three presidential administrations, starting with George W. Bush in
the White House Medical Unit and later served as a
physician for both Presidents Obama and Trump. And of course
(00:23):
we want him here to talk about cheap fakes.
Speaker 2 (00:27):
Congressman welcome, Hey, Tutor, thank you for having me. I
appreciate it.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
I'm so glad you're here because it's like perfect timing.
We've been trying to do this for a couple of
weeks now, and I feel like this was a god
thing because now all of a sudden, we have all
of these news stations coming out and saying, oh, when
Biden wanders off and when Biden just start stands staring
with like looking at nothing, this is cheap fakes that
(00:54):
they're faking this video.
Speaker 3 (00:55):
From a medical perspective, what do you see.
Speaker 2 (00:59):
Well, it's a desperate temp for them to spend this
and cover up the obvious. And from a medical standpoint,
I see what I've been seeing since he was candidate.
Joe Biden, and he's much worse now that this guy
has cognitive issues that are interfering and now completely preventing
him from doing the job that he's supposed to be doing.
But you know, you really don't have to be a
medical expert anymore. I mean, it's gone way to beyond that.
You certainly don't have to be, you know, physician to
(01:21):
the president. You don't have to be a physician at all.
We've all seen relatives that have had similar situations to this.
I don't know what the issue is. I'm not his doctor.
I don't know if he's got multi infer dementia of
asking dementia some sort, if he's got Alzheimer's or Parkinson's
or what it is. What I do know is he's
got some type of degenerative progressive dementia or you know,
cognitive issue that's related to his age. And it's the
(01:44):
one thing they all have in common. No matter what
the cause is, they all get worse with time. They
don't get any better, they just continue to degenerate and
get worse. They give medical you can give medications, it
can help some those medications eventually stop working. So you know,
that's I think what we've been over the last three
and a half years of his presidency. I think they've
been doing their best to try to cover this up,
(02:05):
and you know, now it's to the point where they
just can't cover it up anymore. It's so obvious as
to what's going on, and there's a coordinated cover up
now between the White House and the mainstream liberal media,
other Democrats that are out there, Joe Biden, the president's physician,
Kevin O'Connor, they're all covering this up right now. They're
trying their best to hide this. But the problem they
have is that he can't come out into public at all.
(02:27):
I mean, we've seen this. It happens that the June
tenth thing. It happened overseas. You know, every time they
put him in front of the cameras, something weird happens,
like he freezes up like this, or he just slurs
his speech in this incoherent babble that comes out of
his mouth. I mean, it's crazy. So I think that
it's a big problem for our country right now.
Speaker 1 (02:46):
There was just from a medical perspective, there was a
moment that I have to bring up to you. We
talked about it on the podcast a few days ago.
But he was in the White House. He's in the
Oval office, and they're all shouting the question at him
like they always do, you know, and he's sitting there
and he like a.
Speaker 3 (03:04):
Child, he'd win blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 1 (03:07):
Blah and then laughs hysterically, which was a very strange
thing for an adult to do. What kind of I mean,
when have you when do you see something like that?
Is that a dementia thing?
Speaker 2 (03:17):
Yeah, absolutely, it's a compensation thing. That's also the reason
that he strikes out and gets angry sometimes because they
have this sense of vulnerability. They don't know what's going
on right, They're confused, they're not sure, and so a
lot of times that manifests itself as angry outbursts. But
sometimes it'll manifest itself as something like that. He's just
trying to, you know, to do something to deflect because
(03:38):
he's very confused about what's happening. That's another reason why,
you know, when the debate comes up in a few days,
they stacked the deck as much as they possibly can
to help out Joe Biden. They came up with all
these rules related to the debate, no audience, and you know,
you know, the MIC's being turned off whenever someone's not
actually answering a question. All these things that are to
his advantage. And you know, President Trump said, I don't
(03:59):
care what you do. Give him, give him every advantage
you want. We're gonna you know, I'll be there and
we will debate. But one of the reasons is because
you know, he doesn't have any reserve right now, and
he gets overstimulated. So they don't want an audience there.
They don't want they want it to be as as
sterile as it possibly be because when he's overstimulated, he
doesn't know how to react. And so we had it
(04:20):
guess probably what's going on.
Speaker 1 (04:21):
We had a grandmother with dementia, and there were over time,
there were tells that she kind of knew that she
was in a bad situation, and she would say, I
might have already told you this, which she had just
told you five minutes before, and was having a lot
of short term memory issues. And I think that's something
that people don't know exactly how to place it. But
(04:42):
I feel like that's what you're telling us is happening
with Joe Biden, is that he's overcompensating. So the anger
is compensating because he knows something's off, and so he
tries to make this big display to overshadow what's off
with his mind right now, right it's.
Speaker 2 (04:58):
A big insecurity and you can imagine, you know, if
there were if this were happening to you and you
were confused about what was going on, where you were at,
what you were doing, what the subject was, you know,
what you were supposed to say, where you were supposed
to go, which is what we see repeatedly is you know,
he wonders off and he doesn't know what's going on.
You can see you would be looking for something to
grasp onto and sometimes you know this, uh, these angry
(05:21):
outbursts I think are a result of that. That's really
common with people who have cognitive uh, cognitive decline is
is to have these angry outbursts and it's a defense
mechanism and I think it's going to get worse, and
you know, I think we'll probably see some of that
during the debate as well. And you can see Tutor,
you know, when you know, I don't know what they
what they kind of cocktail, you know, pharmaceutical cocktail. They
(05:42):
had him on during the stead of the union, but
he was on something right. Uh, We've never seen him
like that. I mean, he came in and I don't
know that it did Didny any real you know, favors,
because instead of just being you know, sleepy and confused looking,
he just was angry, just loud, screaming, angry old man,
but he was he was awake and alert. You know.
I think they're going to do that again, but I
(06:02):
don't think it's going to be I don't think it's
going to help him answer questions and make any sense.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
I remember talking to you in twenty nineteen, and in
twenty nineteen we were saying, man, he's off, he's and
if you compared video of him in twenty nineteen from
when he was vice president, it was a shocking difference.
And now you would look at video from twenty nineteen
and go, man, he was so much better than he
is now. So I think your point is well taken
(06:28):
that this doesn't get better. And even I mean everybody
who's had somebody in their life who suffers from dementia,
it's a devastating situation to watch because it doesn't get better.
I think we all know that it doesn't improve over time.
That's from a medical standpoint, but I want to ask
you something from a congressional standpoint, because for me, it's
(06:48):
very disturbing to see the mainstream media listen to what
Karine Jean Pierre said. And I say that because I
believe that the campaign and the administration meet with the
media regularly, because I look at this now as state run.
There is no better indication of it than what has
happened this week. The videos unedited. These are not they're saying, oh,
(07:13):
they're too zoomed in. These were videos. And I have
to stress this, especially over when they were at the
G seven and they're all looking at the parachuters and
they're all together.
Speaker 3 (07:23):
These are staged events. Nobody's wondering what to do. These
are all world leaders.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
Who have staff who have been clearly they've been clearly
briefed on what needs to happen next. And you've traveled
with presidents before, so I want you to explain. They
know they're supposed to stay in that circle, they know
there's a camera there, they know they're being watched, and
he wandered off the mainstream media. To me, this is
the scariest part. They were given the directive to go
(07:52):
out there and say he didn't wander off, this video
was edited.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
What does that mean for a free press?
Speaker 2 (07:59):
Well, I mean I think we lost the press a
long long time ago. And remember too, even though they're
saying that these are like, what do they call them,
cheap fakes, they don't want to call them deep fakes
because there's an actual definition for that. They might be
liable for, you know, for accusing these people of editing
videos that they haven't edited. But remember that it was
the White House press pool that was overseas that was
(08:20):
taking those videos. It wasn't some right wing you know
video you know, right wing news organization that was making
these videos and then editing them to make him look
bad or cropping them or whatever. This was the White
House press pool that travels with the president that was
doing these videos. So, you know, I think that you're right.
I think that for a long time, the mainstream media
(08:41):
and the liberal media have worked for the Democrats. They're
essentially their communications branch. They do everything they can to
to prop them up in home. You know, Honestly, at
this particular point, I hope that they get away with
it for a little bit longer. I don't want him
to get so bad that they yanked him from being
the the nominee. As worried as I am about our
country between now in January, when President and Trump takes over.
(09:03):
Right now, President Trump is positioned to just destroy him
in the next election and and come back into the
White House, and I want that to happen more than anything.
I want President Trump to be our president again. And
I think the best chance he has of that happening
is to have Joe Biden as his as his run
as his uh, as you know, his opponent. And so
I don't I hope they don't try to, but I
fear they're going to. I think they're you know, they're
(09:25):
going to at some point, they're going to let the press. Uh,
they're going to turn the press loose the Democrats, not
the White House, and they're going to let the press
turn on the Biden administration in an effort to figure out,
you know, how to get somebody else in to take
his place. Because I think they're they're coming to the
realization as well that they made a huge mistake here
making Joe Biden their nominee, and they're kind of in
a in a real difficult spot right now. None of
(09:47):
them really want him to just you know, uh, they
don't want to. They don't they realize that if he
you know, obviously becomes president and he has another four
years to serve, I mean a lot of people wonder
can he even make it to January? But I can
guarantee you he's not going to be president for four
more years. Like you said, we've seen that rapid degeneration.
And then now they're confronted with, well, if that's the case,
then you know, Kamala Harris will be president and they
(10:09):
don't like her either, They have no use for her.
So I think they want to find a way to
clear the deck and to get too new you know,
presidential and the vice presidential candidate on. And I think
at some point the press will actually help them do that.
But once again, that's the press being used as a
tool of the liberal left, and that's been the case
for a long time. So I think that it's one
(10:30):
of the many problems we have in this country. We
have a press that is biased, a press that is
politically motivated, and then we have an administration that uses
every aspect of their government as a weaponized tool against
their adversaries. And what you end up with is you
end up with the Soviet Union, you end up with
communist China. You know, this is where this is where
(10:50):
we're headed right now, and we're getting there rapidly. So
people in this country should be horribly concerned about what
they see on a day to day basis. I don't
care if you're right, if you're left, if you're independent, Democrat, Republic,
and what you're seeing right now should scare you to death,
and you should get out and vote. You should get neighbors.
The only way we're going to win this because there
will be fraud. There will be cheating again in the
key areas that matter, in the five or six big
(11:10):
cities that you know that they can get away with
this and swing elections. It's going to be going on.
We have to get so many people out to vote.
You've heard the term before, too big to rig. That's
what has to happen this time. It has to be
so overwhelming that they can't even take it away with
you know, with cheating and fraud.
Speaker 3 (11:26):
Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
the Tutor Dixon Podcast.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
I think that when we look at what's happening though
with the media.
Speaker 3 (11:37):
That helps them, That helps them.
Speaker 1 (11:39):
To push out people who wouldn't have voted too on
their side. And that's the problem because we have never
in this I don't think we have ever in this
country seen oppressed so obedient to a political party. And
it is terrifying to me, and I wonder how you
prevent this. And you made a good point there that
they're saying cheap fakes instead of deep fakes because they
(12:00):
don't want to be sued. Now, I will say there
was a point when Karine Jean Pierre said deep fakes,
and she had said cheap fikes first, deep fake second.
Speaker 3 (12:09):
However, I don't really think that they.
Speaker 1 (12:12):
Should be able to get away with this because they
are accusing, and in some.
Speaker 3 (12:16):
Cases they've accused by name.
Speaker 1 (12:17):
I mean, they've put up clips from Fox, they've put
up clips from Newsmax, and they've clearly said these were
edited to make you believe something is happening that is
not happening, which is a complete out.
Speaker 3 (12:28):
And out lie.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
So at some point is there a recourse because I know,
when you're a political person running for office and you
know this too, there's very little recourse when someone lies
about you because you're a you're a public figure, and
people can lie about you, and you have no defamation claim,
you can do nothing about it. So is there a
recourse or should there be a recourse for some of
these news organizations that are being the public is being
(12:52):
told they are lying when truly is the other news
organization lying about them? And in some cases the administration.
Speaker 2 (12:58):
Well, I don't know legally what can be do. I
hope something can be done, and I hope that people
that have the ability to sue some of these organizations
will do it. But from a congressional standpoint, I think
that we should we should be looking at the big
picture here. I think this is a coordinated cover up,
like I said before, and I think we should be
looking at it from that aspect. Who is covering up
the you know, what's really going on here with other
(13:19):
because this is this is not a joke right now.
You know, this is a huge issue for our country.
I mean, he's destroyed our economy. We have unbridled inflation,
we have massive numbers of terrorists and criminal gang members
crossing our southern border. We have crime in the streets,
we have probably tear cells set up almost certainly for
the next nine to eleven that are here now because
of the open border. You look at what's going on overseas.
(13:41):
You know, we've got Russian warships in Cuba right off
of our coast of Florida, I mean, just miles away
from the Florida coast. We have you know, the Russian
president meeting with North Korea. We have Iran and China
and North Korea and Russia conspiring against us right now.
This is a serious situation. Bad things are happening right
now around the world. Our adversaries are taking advantage of
(14:02):
the weakness that's displayed by our supposed commander in chief
and head of state. Right now. Our allies don't trust us,
they don't believe in us anymore. They think that our
president's an absolute joke. So something needs to be done
about this. So we need to look at this from
a congressional standpoint as a national security issue and a
cover up of something that's going to get us in
(14:23):
trouble from a national security standpoint, and start looking at everybody,
looking at what's going on in the White House, at
the press secretary, you know, at the physician, at the
press at everybody that's complicit, and everybody that's helping cover
this update all need to be called out. We need
to know what's going on. So I hope that we
can do that.
Speaker 1 (14:39):
No, you make a great point, because I think an
investigation of the media and the connection of the media
with the administration is absolutely necessary, especially when we're looking
at a cover up of potentially a president who is
in no shape to be serving. And we know that
if you are not in the medical health to be serving,
you have to step away.
Speaker 3 (14:57):
Is that not true?
Speaker 2 (14:58):
That's absolutely true. I mean that's what the twenty fifth
Amendments for. And you know, there's several ways to do it.
There's a way that they can voluntarily do it where
the president can step down, and there's a way where
they can involuntarily do it with where a where the
vice president and a majority of the president's cabinet declares
that he's not fit to serve anymore and then they
reach out to the Speaker of the House into the
Senate and they remove him from from office. That that
(15:21):
can be done, I mean, it's it's in the you know,
it's in the twenty fifth Amendments. Fell that pretty easily,
and so I don't know, you know, if they get
to the point where they do something like that. I mean,
the problem with that host scenario is that all the
people that you rely on to get the ball rolling,
they all rely on him being president for their power,
their authority, their influence, for the positions that they have.
(15:42):
Once he's gone, they're gone essentially, right.
Speaker 1 (15:44):
Yeah, that's just your deep state. That's like, no, we're
not getting rid of the boss. We got to keep
them here. That's two employs us. I mean, it is
kind of a crazy system. But you I mean, I
think again, I'll say, we've never seen a situation where
the people I understand the deep state and all of
those people and the vice president not wanting to say, hey, yeah,
he can't do this anymore. But I don't understand the
(16:06):
media coming in and covering this up. While we are
in a situation where what you just said, we see
North Korea and Russia creating an alliance. Russia and China
have already said they want to see a new era
and condemned the United States. When you see the connection
of all four Russia, China, Iran, North Korea all together,
(16:27):
this is the most danger I think the world has
ever been in and there is no doubt that it
connects directly back to the weakness coming from the White House,
which is connected directly to his medical condition. And we're
supposed to act like it's not going on.
Speaker 2 (16:42):
Yeah, I know, titter, and it's even worse than that,
because what you have right now is with these four countries,
you know, this new access of evil more or less,
with Russia, China, you know, North Korea and Iran coming
together and conspiring, we're very likely in the very near
future to be in a situation we're we're fighting multiple wars,
war on your wars on more than one front. Right,
(17:03):
we could be involved in a war between you know
that's breaking out between Israel, Hezbillah and Iran, while simultaneously
getting drawn into what's going on in Ukraine and then
potentially something happening in Taiwan with China. Right, So we're
potentially in a situation we could be fighting a war
on multiple fronts simultaneously. What's happened over the last three
and a half years in the Biden administration is they
(17:25):
have destroyed our military from the inside out. They have
focused on nothing but this woke ridiculous agenda, and they
have not focused on training or equipping our troops to
fight a war, right, and so we are weaker now
militarily than we have ever been that I can remember
in my you know, in my lifetime that I can
remember since I've been tracking these things and combining that
(17:47):
with the with the horrible situation we're potentially in overseas
because of Biden's weakness, and it's a recipe for disaster. Well.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
And I think the thing we never talk about is
that the Joe Biden of years ago, that Joe Biden,
even as vice president, would not have been playing up
these ads to the for the military that are filled
with transgender people.
Speaker 3 (18:07):
This was not his thing. He was certainly not for
weak military.
Speaker 1 (18:11):
He was certainly not for giving away all this money,
all of these radical movements, giving away all the money
for student loans. This has never been Joe Biden's brand. However,
suddenly Joe Biden seems to have lost his mind a bit,
and all of these people are moving in and creating
a new brand. It's incredibly dangerous. And I say that
(18:32):
because it's not Joe Biden running the country.
Speaker 2 (18:36):
That's right. I mean, he's not pulling the strings. We
all know that, And like you said, I think that
you know, they read him in to just the minimum
amount of stuff they need to know. I mean, I'm
sure that most of the stuff that we talk about
on a day to day basis that we're concerned about.
I'm sure he doesn't even He's not even privy to
a lot of it, right because they're just giving him
just enough to stand up in front of the teleprompter
for a few minutes and pray to God that he
(18:56):
can read it, which he generally cannot do, and then
shovel him off of steafe as quick as possible and
not let anybody ask me a question. So I don't
think he knows what's going on to a large extent.
I don't think they're reading him into the issues completely.
And I think there are other people behind the scenes,
and I'd like to know that be part of the
investigation of what's going on here. Who's actually running this
country right now? I used to think it was Susan
(19:18):
Rice and Ron playing and people like that. They're gone now.
I don't know who's pulling the strings right now. But
he is not in charge, and he is not making
these decisions.
Speaker 1 (19:26):
Let me ask you, because you did go on these
trips with a couple of different presidents, and so you
understand the rigor of the day and how challenging it
is to get through these long trips overseas like the
G seven, when you see all these people coming out.
Now we've had some of the reporters from overseas who
have said people on the ground were saying, this is
the worst it's ever been. He gets lost mid sentence,
(19:46):
He's in and out of conversation, He's not able to concentrate.
There are times when they felt he was falling asleep.
You at one point see Zelenski run around the table
and kind of shake him awake. And again they're saying, oh, no,
this is not happening. This is happening from the standpoint
of having been on these trips. The last night he
was there, which was not the last night of the
G seven, he left early. That was also a telling sign.
(20:10):
But he left early. But the last night he was there,
he didn't attend the dinner, and that seemed kind of
surprising to people. From your perspective. Have you ever seen
a president that just bows out on things like that?
Speaker 2 (20:20):
I have never seen anything like that. I was with
President Bush, Obama, and Trump. I was at the White
House for fourteen years. Those troops are brutal sometimes. You know,
you get on the plane, you fly for thirteen sixteen hours.
You know, you leave it's early in the morning. Here,
you land, it's early in the morning. There, you have
to get off the plane and you have fourteen hour
day ahead of you. It's absolutely brutal. And President Bush,
(20:42):
President Obama, and President Trump had no problem with that.
They all did it. They basically started working as soon
as they hit the ground, and they worked until the
minute that they came back. What you're seeing right now
in the press once again covering for the president, was
making a big deal and saying, look, he's going overseas
and he's got this big, long overseas trip. Well, they
used to do this to Reagan too, when Reagan started
(21:03):
having problems. They stretched the trips out so when you
get over there, there longer, so you don't you know, basically,
they give him time to recuperate and recover. And you
mentioned that he left early and they didn't go to
the dinner, But he forgot to mention that when he
got there, he got there like nine o'clock in the morning,
and they called the lid on it right away, and
he had an entire day where he was just mia.
He was just basically I guess he went back to bed.
I don't know what they did, but they're packing this
(21:25):
stuff in and they're spreading this schedule out, so he
has hardly any commitments while he's there. He's skipping a
bunch of the stuff that he's expected to be at.
This is all part of the plan to get him
to survive these overseas trips because they are brutal. And
this one was a trip to Europe, so it wasn't
like he was going to Southeast Asia. He was just
on the plane for probably six, you know, eight hours,
got there and still couldn't function.
Speaker 1 (21:46):
And we're not talking about a commercial jet. I mean
he's on a plane where he can relax and yeah, yeah,
So this is what you know, the way we travel
is not the way the president is traveling. So when
people are like, well he's on a plane that whole time, No, no, no,
I mean it's like a traveling house. See, he has
time to rest. So really quick, before I let you go,
you mentioned medication, and I think all of us who
(22:08):
have watched someone with dementia were like, was there a
time when we could have given them adderall and seen
them or is this something that you see occasionally with
dementia patients or what is happening because the mainstream media
has now picked up on the fact that Republicans are
saying he must have some medication that is helping him
get through this, because we've seen the moments where he
gets really tired, where he can't he fumbles the words,
(22:31):
he can't see the teleprompter, things seem very off, and
I will say the State of the Union, he definitely
got through the speech, and so I think a lot
of us were going, well, how is it that he
can be so bad one day and he can be
very clear the next regardless of being angry. It just
doesn't seem to add up for those of us who
have experienced this with our loved ones.
Speaker 2 (22:53):
Well, this is not just a science. So there's a
real art to this. As you know, like you know,
he has good days and he has bad days, and
typically what happens is time goes on, there fewer good
days and more bad days. When this, you know, whatever's
going on progresses and he gets worse and worse, and
that's what we're seeing here, but still are good. There
are good days and there are bad days. There are
good times of the day and bad times of the day,
(23:13):
and it's up to his team and his physition everything,
and I'm sure they struggle with this to figure out
when's the best time to roll him out for something.
And then you can give medications that can cover this
stuff up. Like I said, they can help. There's certain
medications that are designed for cognitive issues like Alzheimer's and
Parkings and things like that that increase your nerve conduction
and increase you know, your ability that your cognitive ability.
(23:35):
They don't typically work for long periods of time, and
as time goes on, they become less and less effective.
That's just kind of generally how they work. And and
then then there's medications that are just pure stimulants like
amfetamine type drugs like adderall and things like that, and
then drugs like pro vigil who aren't not infetamine based
but are also stemults. So I'm sure they have a
cocktail of medications that they've been probably experimenting with for
(23:57):
a while to get it just right so that they
can get him just where they want debate, and then
they struggle to find, like, let's try to figure this
out so that it's the right time of day, if possible,
to be rolling out in front of the cameras. I mean,
they're failing miserably, right despite that, we still all see
what's going on. But yeah, I imagine that there is
a there's a real effort to try to factor all
this stuff in and come up with something where he
(24:19):
can just stand in front of the teleprompter for a
few minutes without embarrassing himself.
Speaker 1 (24:24):
Stay tuned for more of my interview with Congressman and
Ronnie Jackson. But first, I want to take a moment
to tell you more about my partners at IFCJ. Since
the terror attacks on October seventh, anti Semitism has been
on the rise, and you know, it's not just in Israel,
but it's here at home in the US and around
the world. And that's why I've partnered with the International
Fellowship of Christians and Jews. And today I'm coming to you,
(24:47):
my audience, to ask that you stand with us and
IFCJ to raise your voice, just as Oscar Schindler and
Corey ten Boom did. This pledge is asking Christians to
stand with their Jewish brothers and sisters to never be silent,
to show the Jewish people they are not alone. They
have God and Christians on their side. For the month
(25:08):
of June, we are asking Christians to sign this pledge,
which will be delivered to the President of Israel, to
show that Christians in America are not only standing in solidarity,
but they're speaking up to let's take a stand today
with the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews to let
the Jewish people know they're not alone. For you to
sign the pledge, just like I did, go to support
(25:30):
IFCJ dot org. That's support IFCJ dot org to take
a stand today. More with Congressman Ronnie Jackson after this,
what's your prediction for the debate?
Speaker 2 (25:43):
Well, I don't know. I think he's probably going to
show up in similar fashion that he did for the
for the Study of the Union. I imagine that he
will be, you know, wide eyed and yelling a bunch
and just you know, the typical what we've seen when
he is awake, angry old man. I don't think he'll
make much sense. I think that he does, He really
has very little that he can hang his hat on.
(26:04):
I mean, what's he gonna all he's gonna be able
to do is try to attack President Trump. He's not
going to be able to talk at all about his
accomplishments over the last three and a half years. Because
that's why he's approval rating in his rock bottom right now,
is because he's failed miserably on every front. Whether it's
foreign policy, domestic policy, it does not matter. He's a
total global failure. And so I think that his only
(26:26):
he's just going to be yelling at President Trump a
lot and accusing him of all kinds of stuff. And
I think he'll make all kinds of inaccurate statements, stuff
that are complete lies. We've seen that over and over.
You know, the press prides themselves on, you know, fact
checking people or whatever. They don't fact check anything this
man says. Every time he gets up, he tells some
outrageous story. You know, maybe it's his you know, uncle
being eaten by cannibals, or you know, the fact that
(26:46):
he used to be a truck jobber, or you know, I.
Speaker 1 (26:48):
Mean, you know, he's all likes so bizarre.
Speaker 2 (26:51):
Yeah, it's crazy, and they don't you know, they don't
ever talk about this stuff. If that were President Trump,
I mean, they'd be losing their minds, right. So I'm
sure he's gonna he's gonna he's gonna push all kinds
of you know, you know, untrue facts out there, you know,
and and he's going to get away with a lot
of it because the moderators have been hand picked, you know,
to to facilitate him.
Speaker 3 (27:11):
It is so crazy. I mean, you bring that up.
Speaker 1 (27:13):
That is really bizarre, the whole I mean, he tells
the driving the truck, he tells the uncle's story, the
Amtrak story. I mean for years he ran for president
before and had to step down because of plagiarism. The
guy is a pathological liar. And the media actually it
never happens. I mean, that's one thing that's been consistent.
This is not a dementia thing. That's the one thing
(27:35):
we can rely on with Joe Biden. He's going to
lie to you. He's going to tell you stories they're
totally untrue. I mean, really, when you get the entire
country of Papua New Guinea mad at you because you
make up a story like this is our president, it
seems bizarre.
Speaker 3 (27:50):
This is where we are.
Speaker 2 (27:52):
I keep waiting for him to get up and you know,
in the line from Steve Martin and the jerk, to
get up and say I was born a poor black child, right.
Speaker 1 (27:59):
I mean right, yes, Oh yeah, I forgot about corn
pop and it's for your legs.
Speaker 3 (28:07):
Oh my gosh.
Speaker 1 (28:07):
It's so bizarre. It's so bizarre, and it's our president.
Nobody's saying anything about it. I think that's the thing
that is great. That's why I'm like, why we have
to investigate the media, because why.
Speaker 3 (28:20):
Would they not at least say the truth? Like this
stuff is nuts?
Speaker 2 (28:24):
Yeah, idiots, it's insane. It's hard to watch.
Speaker 3 (28:27):
It, is well.
Speaker 1 (28:28):
We appreciate the fact that you do watch it and
you work hard every day for us in Washington. And
thank you so much for taking your sweet life in
Texas and going out there and fighting for us in Washington, DC.
Speaker 3 (28:41):
Congressman Ronnie Jackson, thank you so much.
Speaker 2 (28:44):
Thanks Tudor. I appreciate what you do too.
Speaker 1 (28:45):
Thanks for having me, Thank you, and thank you all
for listening to the Tutor Dixon podcasts. For this episode
and others, go to Tutor dixonpodcast dot com or head
over to the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you
get your podcasts and join us next time, have a
blessed ding
Welcome to the Tutor Dixon Podcast. I am excited today
because we have US Congressman Ronnie Jackson with us. He
represents the Texas thirteenth thirteenth District and he served three
and three presidential administrations, starting with George W. Bush in
the White House Medical Unit and later served as a
physician for both Presidents Obama and Trump. And of course
(00:23):
we want him here to talk about cheap fakes.
Speaker 2 (00:27):
Congressman welcome, Hey, Tutor, thank you for having me. I
appreciate it.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
I'm so glad you're here because it's like perfect timing.
We've been trying to do this for a couple of
weeks now, and I feel like this was a god
thing because now all of a sudden, we have all
of these news stations coming out and saying, oh, when
Biden wanders off and when Biden just start stands staring
with like looking at nothing, this is cheap fakes that
(00:54):
they're faking this video.
Speaker 3 (00:55):
From a medical perspective, what do you see.
Speaker 2 (00:59):
Well, it's a desperate temp for them to spend this
and cover up the obvious. And from a medical standpoint,
I see what I've been seeing since he was candidate.
Joe Biden, and he's much worse now that this guy
has cognitive issues that are interfering and now completely preventing
him from doing the job that he's supposed to be doing.
But you know, you really don't have to be a
medical expert anymore. I mean, it's gone way to beyond that.
You certainly don't have to be, you know, physician to
(01:21):
the president. You don't have to be a physician at all.
We've all seen relatives that have had similar situations to this.
I don't know what the issue is. I'm not his doctor.
I don't know if he's got multi infer dementia of
asking dementia some sort, if he's got Alzheimer's or Parkinson's
or what it is. What I do know is he's
got some type of degenerative progressive dementia or you know,
cognitive issue that's related to his age. And it's the
(01:44):
one thing they all have in common. No matter what
the cause is, they all get worse with time. They
don't get any better, they just continue to degenerate and
get worse. They give medical you can give medications, it
can help some those medications eventually stop working. So you know,
that's I think what we've been over the last three
and a half years of his presidency. I think they've
been doing their best to try to cover this up,
(02:05):
and you know, now it's to the point where they
just can't cover it up anymore. It's so obvious as
to what's going on, and there's a coordinated cover up
now between the White House and the mainstream liberal media,
other Democrats that are out there, Joe Biden, the president's physician,
Kevin O'Connor, they're all covering this up right now. They're
trying their best to hide this. But the problem they
have is that he can't come out into public at all.
(02:27):
I mean, we've seen this. It happens that the June
tenth thing. It happened overseas. You know, every time they
put him in front of the cameras, something weird happens,
like he freezes up like this, or he just slurs
his speech in this incoherent babble that comes out of
his mouth. I mean, it's crazy. So I think that
it's a big problem for our country right now.
Speaker 1 (02:46):
There was just from a medical perspective, there was a
moment that I have to bring up to you. We
talked about it on the podcast a few days ago.
But he was in the White House. He's in the
Oval office, and they're all shouting the question at him
like they always do, you know, and he's sitting there
and he like a.
Speaker 3 (03:04):
Child, he'd win blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 1 (03:07):
Blah and then laughs hysterically, which was a very strange
thing for an adult to do. What kind of I mean,
when have you when do you see something like that?
Is that a dementia thing?
Speaker 2 (03:17):
Yeah, absolutely, it's a compensation thing. That's also the reason
that he strikes out and gets angry sometimes because they
have this sense of vulnerability. They don't know what's going
on right, They're confused, they're not sure, and so a
lot of times that manifests itself as angry outbursts. But
sometimes it'll manifest itself as something like that. He's just
trying to, you know, to do something to deflect because
(03:38):
he's very confused about what's happening. That's another reason why,
you know, when the debate comes up in a few days,
they stacked the deck as much as they possibly can
to help out Joe Biden. They came up with all
these rules related to the debate, no audience, and you know,
you know, the MIC's being turned off whenever someone's not
actually answering a question. All these things that are to
his advantage. And you know, President Trump said, I don't
(03:59):
care what you do. Give him, give him every advantage
you want. We're gonna you know, I'll be there and
we will debate. But one of the reasons is because
you know, he doesn't have any reserve right now, and
he gets overstimulated. So they don't want an audience there.
They don't want they want it to be as as
sterile as it possibly be because when he's overstimulated, he
doesn't know how to react. And so we had it
(04:20):
guess probably what's going on.
Speaker 1 (04:21):
We had a grandmother with dementia, and there were over time,
there were tells that she kind of knew that she
was in a bad situation, and she would say, I
might have already told you this, which she had just
told you five minutes before, and was having a lot
of short term memory issues. And I think that's something
that people don't know exactly how to place it. But
(04:42):
I feel like that's what you're telling us is happening
with Joe Biden, is that he's overcompensating. So the anger
is compensating because he knows something's off, and so he
tries to make this big display to overshadow what's off
with his mind right now, right it's.
Speaker 2 (04:58):
A big insecurity and you can imagine, you know, if
there were if this were happening to you and you
were confused about what was going on, where you were at,
what you were doing, what the subject was, you know,
what you were supposed to say, where you were supposed
to go, which is what we see repeatedly is you know,
he wonders off and he doesn't know what's going on.
You can see you would be looking for something to
grasp onto and sometimes you know this, uh, these angry
(05:21):
outbursts I think are a result of that. That's really
common with people who have cognitive uh, cognitive decline is
is to have these angry outbursts and it's a defense
mechanism and I think it's going to get worse, and
you know, I think we'll probably see some of that
during the debate as well. And you can see Tutor,
you know, when you know, I don't know what they
what they kind of cocktail, you know, pharmaceutical cocktail. They
(05:42):
had him on during the stead of the union, but
he was on something right. Uh, We've never seen him
like that. I mean, he came in and I don't
know that it did Didny any real you know, favors,
because instead of just being you know, sleepy and confused looking,
he just was angry, just loud, screaming, angry old man,
but he was he was awake and alert. You know.
I think they're going to do that again, but I
(06:02):
don't think it's going to be I don't think it's
going to help him answer questions and make any sense.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
I remember talking to you in twenty nineteen, and in
twenty nineteen we were saying, man, he's off, he's and
if you compared video of him in twenty nineteen from
when he was vice president, it was a shocking difference.
And now you would look at video from twenty nineteen
and go, man, he was so much better than he
is now. So I think your point is well taken
(06:28):
that this doesn't get better. And even I mean everybody
who's had somebody in their life who suffers from dementia,
it's a devastating situation to watch because it doesn't get better.
I think we all know that it doesn't improve over time.
That's from a medical standpoint, but I want to ask
you something from a congressional standpoint, because for me, it's
(06:48):
very disturbing to see the mainstream media listen to what
Karine Jean Pierre said. And I say that because I
believe that the campaign and the administration meet with the
media regularly, because I look at this now as state run.
There is no better indication of it than what has
happened this week. The videos unedited. These are not they're saying, oh,
(07:13):
they're too zoomed in. These were videos. And I have
to stress this, especially over when they were at the
G seven and they're all looking at the parachuters and
they're all together.
Speaker 3 (07:23):
These are staged events. Nobody's wondering what to do. These
are all world leaders.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
Who have staff who have been clearly they've been clearly
briefed on what needs to happen next. And you've traveled
with presidents before, so I want you to explain. They
know they're supposed to stay in that circle, they know
there's a camera there, they know they're being watched, and
he wandered off the mainstream media. To me, this is
the scariest part. They were given the directive to go
(07:52):
out there and say he didn't wander off, this video
was edited.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
What does that mean for a free press?
Speaker 2 (07:59):
Well, I mean I think we lost the press a
long long time ago. And remember too, even though they're
saying that these are like, what do they call them,
cheap fakes, they don't want to call them deep fakes
because there's an actual definition for that. They might be
liable for, you know, for accusing these people of editing
videos that they haven't edited. But remember that it was
the White House press pool that was overseas that was
(08:20):
taking those videos. It wasn't some right wing you know
video you know, right wing news organization that was making
these videos and then editing them to make him look
bad or cropping them or whatever. This was the White
House press pool that travels with the president that was
doing these videos. So, you know, I think that you're right.
I think that for a long time, the mainstream media
(08:41):
and the liberal media have worked for the Democrats. They're
essentially their communications branch. They do everything they can to
to prop them up in home. You know, Honestly, at
this particular point, I hope that they get away with
it for a little bit longer. I don't want him
to get so bad that they yanked him from being
the the nominee. As worried as I am about our
country between now in January, when President and Trump takes over.
(09:03):
Right now, President Trump is positioned to just destroy him
in the next election and and come back into the
White House, and I want that to happen more than anything.
I want President Trump to be our president again. And
I think the best chance he has of that happening
is to have Joe Biden as his as his run
as his uh, as you know, his opponent. And so
I don't I hope they don't try to, but I
fear they're going to. I think they're you know, they're
(09:25):
going to at some point, they're going to let the press. Uh,
they're going to turn the press loose the Democrats, not
the White House, and they're going to let the press
turn on the Biden administration in an effort to figure out,
you know, how to get somebody else in to take
his place. Because I think they're they're coming to the
realization as well that they made a huge mistake here
making Joe Biden their nominee, and they're kind of in
a in a real difficult spot right now. None of
(09:47):
them really want him to just you know, uh, they
don't want to. They don't they realize that if he
you know, obviously becomes president and he has another four
years to serve, I mean a lot of people wonder
can he even make it to January? But I can
guarantee you he's not going to be president for four
more years. Like you said, we've seen that rapid degeneration.
And then now they're confronted with, well, if that's the case,
then you know, Kamala Harris will be president and they
(10:09):
don't like her either, They have no use for her.
So I think they want to find a way to
clear the deck and to get too new you know,
presidential and the vice presidential candidate on. And I think
at some point the press will actually help them do that.
But once again, that's the press being used as a
tool of the liberal left, and that's been the case
for a long time. So I think that it's one
(10:30):
of the many problems we have in this country. We
have a press that is biased, a press that is
politically motivated, and then we have an administration that uses
every aspect of their government as a weaponized tool against
their adversaries. And what you end up with is you
end up with the Soviet Union, you end up with
communist China. You know, this is where this is where
(10:50):
we're headed right now, and we're getting there rapidly. So
people in this country should be horribly concerned about what
they see on a day to day basis. I don't
care if you're right, if you're left, if you're independent, Democrat, Republic,
and what you're seeing right now should scare you to death,
and you should get out and vote. You should get neighbors.
The only way we're going to win this because there
will be fraud. There will be cheating again in the
key areas that matter, in the five or six big
(11:10):
cities that you know that they can get away with
this and swing elections. It's going to be going on.
We have to get so many people out to vote.
You've heard the term before, too big to rig. That's
what has to happen this time. It has to be
so overwhelming that they can't even take it away with
you know, with cheating and fraud.
Speaker 3 (11:26):
Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
the Tutor Dixon Podcast.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
I think that when we look at what's happening though
with the media.
Speaker 3 (11:37):
That helps them, That helps them.
Speaker 1 (11:39):
To push out people who wouldn't have voted too on
their side. And that's the problem because we have never
in this I don't think we have ever in this
country seen oppressed so obedient to a political party. And
it is terrifying to me, and I wonder how you
prevent this. And you made a good point there that
they're saying cheap fakes instead of deep fakes because they
(12:00):
don't want to be sued. Now, I will say there
was a point when Karine Jean Pierre said deep fakes,
and she had said cheap fikes first, deep fake second.
Speaker 3 (12:09):
However, I don't really think that they.
Speaker 1 (12:12):
Should be able to get away with this because they
are accusing, and in some.
Speaker 3 (12:16):
Cases they've accused by name.
Speaker 1 (12:17):
I mean, they've put up clips from Fox, they've put
up clips from Newsmax, and they've clearly said these were
edited to make you believe something is happening that is
not happening, which is a complete out.
Speaker 3 (12:28):
And out lie.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
So at some point is there a recourse because I know,
when you're a political person running for office and you
know this too, there's very little recourse when someone lies
about you because you're a you're a public figure, and
people can lie about you, and you have no defamation claim,
you can do nothing about it. So is there a
recourse or should there be a recourse for some of
these news organizations that are being the public is being
(12:52):
told they are lying when truly is the other news
organization lying about them? And in some cases the administration.
Speaker 2 (12:58):
Well, I don't know legally what can be do. I
hope something can be done, and I hope that people
that have the ability to sue some of these organizations
will do it. But from a congressional standpoint, I think
that we should we should be looking at the big
picture here. I think this is a coordinated cover up,
like I said before, and I think we should be
looking at it from that aspect. Who is covering up
the you know, what's really going on here with other
(13:19):
because this is this is not a joke right now.
You know, this is a huge issue for our country.
I mean, he's destroyed our economy. We have unbridled inflation,
we have massive numbers of terrorists and criminal gang members
crossing our southern border. We have crime in the streets,
we have probably tear cells set up almost certainly for
the next nine to eleven that are here now because
of the open border. You look at what's going on overseas.
(13:41):
You know, we've got Russian warships in Cuba right off
of our coast of Florida, I mean, just miles away
from the Florida coast. We have you know, the Russian
president meeting with North Korea. We have Iran and China
and North Korea and Russia conspiring against us right now.
This is a serious situation. Bad things are happening right
now around the world. Our adversaries are taking advantage of
(14:02):
the weakness that's displayed by our supposed commander in chief
and head of state. Right now. Our allies don't trust us,
they don't believe in us anymore. They think that our
president's an absolute joke. So something needs to be done
about this. So we need to look at this from
a congressional standpoint as a national security issue and a
cover up of something that's going to get us in
(14:23):
trouble from a national security standpoint, and start looking at everybody,
looking at what's going on in the White House, at
the press secretary, you know, at the physician, at the
press at everybody that's complicit, and everybody that's helping cover
this update all need to be called out. We need
to know what's going on. So I hope that we
can do that.
Speaker 1 (14:39):
No, you make a great point, because I think an
investigation of the media and the connection of the media
with the administration is absolutely necessary, especially when we're looking
at a cover up of potentially a president who is
in no shape to be serving. And we know that
if you are not in the medical health to be serving,
you have to step away.
Speaker 3 (14:57):
Is that not true?
Speaker 2 (14:58):
That's absolutely true. I mean that's what the twenty fifth
Amendments for. And you know, there's several ways to do it.
There's a way that they can voluntarily do it where
the president can step down, and there's a way where
they can involuntarily do it with where a where the
vice president and a majority of the president's cabinet declares
that he's not fit to serve anymore and then they
reach out to the Speaker of the House into the
Senate and they remove him from from office. That that
(15:21):
can be done, I mean, it's it's in the you know,
it's in the twenty fifth Amendments. Fell that pretty easily,
and so I don't know, you know, if they get
to the point where they do something like that. I mean,
the problem with that host scenario is that all the
people that you rely on to get the ball rolling,
they all rely on him being president for their power,
their authority, their influence, for the positions that they have.
(15:42):
Once he's gone, they're gone essentially, right.
Speaker 1 (15:44):
Yeah, that's just your deep state. That's like, no, we're
not getting rid of the boss. We got to keep
them here. That's two employs us. I mean, it is
kind of a crazy system. But you I mean, I
think again, I'll say, we've never seen a situation where
the people I understand the deep state and all of
those people and the vice president not wanting to say, hey, yeah,
he can't do this anymore. But I don't understand the
(16:06):
media coming in and covering this up. While we are
in a situation where what you just said, we see
North Korea and Russia creating an alliance. Russia and China
have already said they want to see a new era
and condemned the United States. When you see the connection
of all four Russia, China, Iran, North Korea all together,
(16:27):
this is the most danger I think the world has
ever been in and there is no doubt that it
connects directly back to the weakness coming from the White House,
which is connected directly to his medical condition. And we're
supposed to act like it's not going on.
Speaker 2 (16:42):
Yeah, I know, titter, and it's even worse than that,
because what you have right now is with these four countries,
you know, this new access of evil more or less,
with Russia, China, you know, North Korea and Iran coming
together and conspiring, we're very likely in the very near
future to be in a situation we're we're fighting multiple wars,
war on your wars on more than one front. Right,
(17:03):
we could be involved in a war between you know
that's breaking out between Israel, Hezbillah and Iran, while simultaneously
getting drawn into what's going on in Ukraine and then
potentially something happening in Taiwan with China. Right, So we're
potentially in a situation we could be fighting a war
on multiple fronts simultaneously. What's happened over the last three
and a half years in the Biden administration is they
(17:25):
have destroyed our military from the inside out. They have
focused on nothing but this woke ridiculous agenda, and they
have not focused on training or equipping our troops to
fight a war, right, and so we are weaker now
militarily than we have ever been that I can remember
in my you know, in my lifetime that I can
remember since I've been tracking these things and combining that
(17:47):
with the with the horrible situation we're potentially in overseas
because of Biden's weakness, and it's a recipe for disaster. Well.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
And I think the thing we never talk about is
that the Joe Biden of years ago, that Joe Biden,
even as vice president, would not have been playing up
these ads to the for the military that are filled
with transgender people.
Speaker 3 (18:07):
This was not his thing. He was certainly not for
weak military.
Speaker 1 (18:11):
He was certainly not for giving away all this money,
all of these radical movements, giving away all the money
for student loans. This has never been Joe Biden's brand. However,
suddenly Joe Biden seems to have lost his mind a bit,
and all of these people are moving in and creating
a new brand. It's incredibly dangerous. And I say that
(18:32):
because it's not Joe Biden running the country.
Speaker 2 (18:36):
That's right. I mean, he's not pulling the strings. We
all know that, And like you said, I think that
you know, they read him in to just the minimum
amount of stuff they need to know. I mean, I'm
sure that most of the stuff that we talk about
on a day to day basis that we're concerned about.
I'm sure he doesn't even He's not even privy to
a lot of it, right because they're just giving him
just enough to stand up in front of the teleprompter
for a few minutes and pray to God that he
(18:56):
can read it, which he generally cannot do, and then
shovel him off of steafe as quick as possible and
not let anybody ask me a question. So I don't
think he knows what's going on to a large extent.
I don't think they're reading him into the issues completely.
And I think there are other people behind the scenes,
and I'd like to know that be part of the
investigation of what's going on here. Who's actually running this
country right now? I used to think it was Susan
(19:18):
Rice and Ron playing and people like that. They're gone now.
I don't know who's pulling the strings right now. But
he is not in charge, and he is not making
these decisions.
Speaker 1 (19:26):
Let me ask you, because you did go on these
trips with a couple of different presidents, and so you
understand the rigor of the day and how challenging it
is to get through these long trips overseas like the
G seven, when you see all these people coming out.
Now we've had some of the reporters from overseas who
have said people on the ground were saying, this is
the worst it's ever been. He gets lost mid sentence,
(19:46):
He's in and out of conversation, He's not able to concentrate.
There are times when they felt he was falling asleep.
You at one point see Zelenski run around the table
and kind of shake him awake. And again they're saying, oh, no,
this is not happening. This is happening from the standpoint
of having been on these trips. The last night he
was there, which was not the last night of the
G seven, he left early. That was also a telling sign.
(20:10):
But he left early. But the last night he was there,
he didn't attend the dinner, and that seemed kind of
surprising to people. From your perspective. Have you ever seen
a president that just bows out on things like that?
Speaker 2 (20:20):
I have never seen anything like that. I was with
President Bush, Obama, and Trump. I was at the White
House for fourteen years. Those troops are brutal sometimes. You know,
you get on the plane, you fly for thirteen sixteen hours.
You know, you leave it's early in the morning. Here,
you land, it's early in the morning. There, you have
to get off the plane and you have fourteen hour
day ahead of you. It's absolutely brutal. And President Bush,
(20:42):
President Obama, and President Trump had no problem with that.
They all did it. They basically started working as soon
as they hit the ground, and they worked until the
minute that they came back. What you're seeing right now
in the press once again covering for the president, was
making a big deal and saying, look, he's going overseas
and he's got this big, long overseas trip. Well, they
used to do this to Reagan too, when Reagan started
(21:03):
having problems. They stretched the trips out so when you
get over there, there longer, so you don't you know, basically,
they give him time to recuperate and recover. And you
mentioned that he left early and they didn't go to
the dinner, But he forgot to mention that when he
got there, he got there like nine o'clock in the morning,
and they called the lid on it right away, and
he had an entire day where he was just mia.
He was just basically I guess he went back to bed.
I don't know what they did, but they're packing this
(21:25):
stuff in and they're spreading this schedule out, so he
has hardly any commitments while he's there. He's skipping a
bunch of the stuff that he's expected to be at.
This is all part of the plan to get him
to survive these overseas trips because they are brutal. And
this one was a trip to Europe, so it wasn't
like he was going to Southeast Asia. He was just
on the plane for probably six, you know, eight hours,
got there and still couldn't function.
Speaker 1 (21:46):
And we're not talking about a commercial jet. I mean
he's on a plane where he can relax and yeah, yeah,
So this is what you know, the way we travel
is not the way the president is traveling. So when
people are like, well he's on a plane that whole time, No, no, no,
I mean it's like a traveling house. See, he has
time to rest. So really quick, before I let you go,
you mentioned medication, and I think all of us who
(22:08):
have watched someone with dementia were like, was there a
time when we could have given them adderall and seen
them or is this something that you see occasionally with
dementia patients or what is happening because the mainstream media
has now picked up on the fact that Republicans are
saying he must have some medication that is helping him
get through this, because we've seen the moments where he
gets really tired, where he can't he fumbles the words,
(22:31):
he can't see the teleprompter, things seem very off, and
I will say the State of the Union, he definitely
got through the speech, and so I think a lot
of us were going, well, how is it that he
can be so bad one day and he can be
very clear the next regardless of being angry. It just
doesn't seem to add up for those of us who
have experienced this with our loved ones.
Speaker 2 (22:53):
Well, this is not just a science. So there's a
real art to this. As you know, like you know,
he has good days and he has bad days, and
typically what happens is time goes on, there fewer good
days and more bad days. When this, you know, whatever's
going on progresses and he gets worse and worse, and
that's what we're seeing here, but still are good. There
are good days and there are bad days. There are
good times of the day and bad times of the day,
(23:13):
and it's up to his team and his physition everything,
and I'm sure they struggle with this to figure out
when's the best time to roll him out for something.
And then you can give medications that can cover this
stuff up. Like I said, they can help. There's certain
medications that are designed for cognitive issues like Alzheimer's and
Parkings and things like that that increase your nerve conduction
and increase you know, your ability that your cognitive ability.
(23:35):
They don't typically work for long periods of time, and
as time goes on, they become less and less effective.
That's just kind of generally how they work. And and
then then there's medications that are just pure stimulants like
amfetamine type drugs like adderall and things like that, and
then drugs like pro vigil who aren't not infetamine based
but are also stemults. So I'm sure they have a
cocktail of medications that they've been probably experimenting with for
(23:57):
a while to get it just right so that they
can get him just where they want debate, and then
they struggle to find, like, let's try to figure this
out so that it's the right time of day, if possible,
to be rolling out in front of the cameras. I mean,
they're failing miserably, right despite that, we still all see
what's going on. But yeah, I imagine that there is
a there's a real effort to try to factor all
this stuff in and come up with something where he
(24:19):
can just stand in front of the teleprompter for a
few minutes without embarrassing himself.
Speaker 1 (24:24):
Stay tuned for more of my interview with Congressman and
Ronnie Jackson. But first, I want to take a moment
to tell you more about my partners at IFCJ. Since
the terror attacks on October seventh, anti Semitism has been
on the rise, and you know, it's not just in Israel,
but it's here at home in the US and around
the world. And that's why I've partnered with the International
Fellowship of Christians and Jews. And today I'm coming to you,
(24:47):
my audience, to ask that you stand with us and
IFCJ to raise your voice, just as Oscar Schindler and
Corey ten Boom did. This pledge is asking Christians to
stand with their Jewish brothers and sisters to never be silent,
to show the Jewish people they are not alone. They
have God and Christians on their side. For the month
(25:08):
of June, we are asking Christians to sign this pledge,
which will be delivered to the President of Israel, to
show that Christians in America are not only standing in solidarity,
but they're speaking up to let's take a stand today
with the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews to let
the Jewish people know they're not alone. For you to
sign the pledge, just like I did, go to support
(25:30):
IFCJ dot org. That's support IFCJ dot org to take
a stand today. More with Congressman Ronnie Jackson after this,
what's your prediction for the debate?
Speaker 2 (25:43):
Well, I don't know. I think he's probably going to
show up in similar fashion that he did for the
for the Study of the Union. I imagine that he
will be, you know, wide eyed and yelling a bunch
and just you know, the typical what we've seen when
he is awake, angry old man. I don't think he'll
make much sense. I think that he does, He really
has very little that he can hang his hat on.
(26:04):
I mean, what's he gonna all he's gonna be able
to do is try to attack President Trump. He's not
going to be able to talk at all about his
accomplishments over the last three and a half years. Because
that's why he's approval rating in his rock bottom right now,
is because he's failed miserably on every front. Whether it's
foreign policy, domestic policy, it does not matter. He's a
total global failure. And so I think that his only
(26:26):
he's just going to be yelling at President Trump a
lot and accusing him of all kinds of stuff. And
I think he'll make all kinds of inaccurate statements, stuff
that are complete lies. We've seen that over and over.
You know, the press prides themselves on, you know, fact
checking people or whatever. They don't fact check anything this
man says. Every time he gets up, he tells some
outrageous story. You know, maybe it's his you know, uncle
being eaten by cannibals, or you know, the fact that
(26:46):
he used to be a truck jobber, or you know, I.
Speaker 1 (26:48):
Mean, you know, he's all likes so bizarre.
Speaker 2 (26:51):
Yeah, it's crazy, and they don't you know, they don't
ever talk about this stuff. If that were President Trump,
I mean, they'd be losing their minds, right. So I'm
sure he's gonna he's gonna he's gonna push all kinds
of you know, you know, untrue facts out there, you know,
and and he's going to get away with a lot
of it because the moderators have been hand picked, you know,
to to facilitate him.
Speaker 3 (27:11):
It is so crazy. I mean, you bring that up.
Speaker 1 (27:13):
That is really bizarre, the whole I mean, he tells
the driving the truck, he tells the uncle's story, the
Amtrak story. I mean for years he ran for president
before and had to step down because of plagiarism. The
guy is a pathological liar. And the media actually it
never happens. I mean, that's one thing that's been consistent.
This is not a dementia thing. That's the one thing
(27:35):
we can rely on with Joe Biden. He's going to
lie to you. He's going to tell you stories they're
totally untrue. I mean, really, when you get the entire
country of Papua New Guinea mad at you because you
make up a story like this is our president, it
seems bizarre.
Speaker 3 (27:50):
This is where we are.
Speaker 2 (27:52):
I keep waiting for him to get up and you know,
in the line from Steve Martin and the jerk, to
get up and say I was born a poor black child, right.
Speaker 1 (27:59):
I mean right, yes, Oh yeah, I forgot about corn
pop and it's for your legs.
Speaker 3 (28:07):
Oh my gosh.
Speaker 1 (28:07):
It's so bizarre. It's so bizarre, and it's our president.
Nobody's saying anything about it. I think that's the thing
that is great. That's why I'm like, why we have
to investigate the media, because why.
Speaker 3 (28:20):
Would they not at least say the truth? Like this
stuff is nuts?
Speaker 2 (28:24):
Yeah, idiots, it's insane. It's hard to watch.
Speaker 3 (28:27):
It, is well.
Speaker 1 (28:28):
We appreciate the fact that you do watch it and
you work hard every day for us in Washington. And
thank you so much for taking your sweet life in
Texas and going out there and fighting for us in Washington, DC.
Speaker 3 (28:41):
Congressman Ronnie Jackson, thank you so much.
Speaker 2 (28:44):
Thanks Tudor. I appreciate what you do too.
Speaker 1 (28:45):
Thanks for having me, Thank you, and thank you all
for listening to the Tutor Dixon podcasts. For this episode
and others, go to Tutor dixonpodcast dot com or head
over to the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you
get your podcasts and join us next time, have a
blessed ding
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show News
Hosts And Creators
Clay Travis
Buck Sexton
Show Links
WebsiteNewsletterPopular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.