June 25, 2024 • 36 mins
CNN's Kasie Hunt said that Rand Paul getting attacked by his neighbor was one of her favorite stories. Squad member Jamaal Bowman heading for primary loss in New York? Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass wants to ban masks at protests. C&B take calls. AOC, Bowman freak out at Bronx rally.
Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome back in Clay Travis buck Sexton Show. Appreciate all
of you hanging out with us. Two days away from
the big debate June twenty seven in Atlanta, no crowd.
We are talking about that. We are also discussing Supreme
Court opinions due to come down the pike. But I
(00:21):
did want to play this cut buck for you. Of
this Casey, I'm told that it's pronounced Casey, not Cassie
Kasi E.
Speaker 2 (00:33):
Hunt.
Speaker 1 (00:33):
I did not know that she was hosting the morning show.
They did have Don Lemon, Caitln Collins, and Poppy Harlow.
I think I'm correcting that that was the Chris licked. Hey,
this is the morning show that's going to bring CNN
back to relevancy and al they fired Don Lemon. I
don't even know where Poppy Harlowe is. They gave Caitlyn
Collins a prime time shoe and now they have this
(00:57):
Casey Hunt in. But it would be one thing if
she was just some unbelievable moral police and she just
is always regulating what people can say. But this is
her on MSNBC saying that Ran Paul being attacked by
his neighbor, which was a very very serious attack, and
(01:20):
Ran Paul took it took it months to recover from this,
and he was one hundred percent in.
Speaker 3 (01:24):
Details today on the incident that left Senator Ran Paul
with six broken ribs. This might be one of my
favorite stories, although of course we don't one of the
clearly Senator Paul is still struggling. Paul's neighbor, Renee Bouchet,
is accused of beating the senator, and GQ reports that
lawn care issues may well have been at the heart
of the dispute. A neighbor told the magazine that Bouchet
(01:46):
pays about one hundred and fifty dollars a month for
professional landscaping, while Paul maintains his yard himself.
Speaker 2 (01:52):
I guess that's the libertarian in him.
Speaker 3 (01:54):
The neighbor also said that part of what fathered Bouchet was.
Speaker 4 (01:56):
The difference in glass length between his lawn at that
of Senator paulse and that Paul strayed grass clippings on
his yard while mowing his own grass.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
Okay, so one of her favorite stories Ran Paul getting
attacked viciously by a neighbor and having six ribs broken.
We know Ran Paul his wife, Kelly also awesome. We've
had them on the show quite a lot.
Speaker 2 (02:26):
For her to be some moral authority on what is
allowed to be said.
Speaker 1 (02:31):
When Caroline Levitt is accurately pointing out the clear bias
of Jake Tapper who compared Trump to Hitler, which whatever
you want to say about Trump is one of the
most out I think one reason they're having trouble in
twenty twenty four, frankly, is once you say guys Hitler,
it's kind of.
Speaker 2 (02:50):
Hard to be like.
Speaker 1 (02:51):
And he's even worse than Hitler. Right, it's just not
resonating in twenty twenty four. But this is the kind
of things that they say on MSNBC that just get
glossed over. But I think it's important for you to
understand she's also a left wing radical and she's trying
to pretend to be straight.
Speaker 5 (03:09):
Ram Paul when he was attacked, the guy was almost
sixty years old. He's sixty one now, so this was
I don't know, four or five years ago, so maybe
he's fifty five or something fifty. You know, he's an
older guy. Is the point. He wasn't attacked over lawn shavings.
He was attacked because he's ran Paul obviously. Notice GQ
magazine reporting these people, It's always tough to know. I'll
(03:32):
say the question, are they malicious or are they just
so stupid? You never really know because they are both
very dumb. And I mean that about the Democrat aligned
legacy media widely, like almost across the board, there are
very few people who are prominent in Democrat political commentary
(03:52):
who are actually really smart. There are a few, there
are a handful, but there are very very few. Most
of them are imbeciles. And the fact that she would
think that it was in any way funny, I mean,
Rampaul was almost beaten to death by this guy. I mean,
when you're talking about breaking six ribs, there could have
easily been a I believe he actually had a punctured lung,
(04:13):
but that can kill somebody, and it took him months
to recover because the beating was so severe. You know,
would she have found it funny if any Democrat, I'll
tell you this, I would not find it amusing. If
any Democrat in the United States an elected office was
attacked by a maniac for his politics and almost kicked
in the ribs to death right there on their front
lawn with their family nearby. I wouldn't find that amusing
(04:35):
at all, but these democrats are unfortunately children, and they
are malicious. So and I'm talking about the ones that
are on TV and paid money to talk to you
about politics. They know nothing. They are glorified PR guys
and PR girls. They just talk about what the messaging is.
(04:55):
They don't actually know a damn thing, and they're moderating
presidential debates and they're supposed to present to you all
this is the truth or whatever. The whole thing. The
whole thing is a fraud. And that's why more and
more people are turning to just people who tell them
what they think about things, and people bemoan the rise
of opinion media. Clay all Media's opinion media. There is
(05:18):
nothing else. There's opinion media and people who are lying
to you about having opinions.
Speaker 2 (05:23):
That's all there is.
Speaker 1 (05:25):
And I think social media has kind of blown that
up because it's impossible for you to not see the bias,
whatever way it goes. When people are sharing things as
frequently as they are on social media, it becomes way
more apparent, and it also enables many of you out
there to be aggressive. I always say consume all of
(05:46):
your media aggressively and presume that you are not being
told the whole story in any respect. And as soon
as you become aware that someone has told you something
that is untrue, even if it makes you happier, you
should trust that person less. And that's one of the
(06:07):
things that's kind of disappointing to me, is, you know,
the fifty one intelligence agents, they get rewarded with all
the lies they told Rachel Maddow, The New York Times,
Washington Post. They all lied to you in spades during COVID,
and that audience continues to lap it up even buck.
As we talked about when the Supreme Court ruled nine
(06:28):
to zero that Colorado couldn't take Trump off the ballot,
a lot of people at MSNBC were agast a gog
in disbelief over the fact that that actually occurred. If
you are regularly stunned by the outcome of a media
event because someone has told you that there's no way
that it's actually going to happen, you should start to
(06:49):
question your media ecosystem that allowed you to believe that
a nine to oh Supreme Court opinion was, for instance,
going to take Trump off the ballot and keep him there.
And I think there's going to be a lot of
people staggered already, they're kind of recognizing it just based
off the question by what happens with this presidential immunity
case when it comes down. I can already tell you
the Democrat talking points are going to be that Trump's
(07:11):
appointees protected Trump because they want him to get re elected,
when in reality, I guarantee you they're trying to draft
a presidential immunity standard which will stand the test of
time in two hundred years from now, when all of
us are gone, will still make sense from a judicial
process to apply to whatever the presidents are in the
(07:32):
decades to come and the generations to come, who are
either Democrats, Republicans, or maybe a party we don't even
know of yet that's going to rise up to replace
one of the Democrats in the Republican parties. But I
think that's just a kind of a testament to who
these people are. I think it's important to go back.
One of our favorite stories is somebody being assaulted because
of his political beliefs.
Speaker 2 (07:51):
Oh, that's interesting.
Speaker 5 (07:53):
Yeah, you would think also that being so both morally
grotesque and intellectually flimsy would cause introspection amongst some of
these so called journalists, But they're really uh, the the
mean dumb kids table from high school that thinks that
everybody wants to sit with them. It's actually not the case.
Most of these entities are losing audience very rapidly, losing relevance,
(08:17):
losing power, and with that they'll also be losing the
money the you know, especially when talking about TV political journalists,
they're generally overpaid. H they are overwhelmingly replaceable, and they
are tend to be people who are both very arrogant
and very insecure at the same time. And that's pretty
(08:37):
much what you get with all these Democrats who are
going to be anchoring presidential debates, and you know, this
is just what you can expect. None of this is
is new, and so it brings me to what does
Trump do about all of this? You know, it's uh,
it's it's not gonna you know, Trump is a great showman,
he's a great you know, he's the greatest political show
(08:58):
on earth, no question, and and he's you know, very
good on his feet and everything else. But this is
not an easy debate for him to do well. In
under the circumstances, I think, yeah, you know, I think
he'll be fine. But will he really be able to
hammer it home in a way that you see the
the numbers trending in his favor. I don't know. I mean,
(09:20):
imagine for a second. To me, Clay, this is no
different than if if there was a Biden Trump debate.
I actually think we would be I think we could
be more fair uh than Donna Bash, Dana Bash and
uh and Taper could be one hundred percent. We could
be fair, but they are as partisan as we are.
As what I'm here to tell you, it is no different.
You might as well have Rachel Maddow and Keith Oberman
(09:43):
UH doing this debate, although no one even members of
Keith Oberman is so I guess Rachel Maddow and some
other MSNBC person.
Speaker 1 (09:49):
I actually think the fairest debate would be Trump gets
to pick the interrogator or interrogator of Biden, and Biden
gets to pick his media person to ask Trump.
Speaker 2 (10:02):
That interrogator or is that a different word interrogation?
Speaker 1 (10:07):
Well, I'm thinking of interrogatories are in the legal process.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
I know that interrogator is the word. So you might
as well. Let me do that. But who would you
pick if you could pick, I would pick pick Joe Rogan.
Speaker 5 (10:24):
I already said that, just because I think that that
would be the widest one moderator.
Speaker 1 (10:29):
Yeah, I don't think that's a bad idea. But if
I were Trump and I'm taking us off the table
because I think both of us would do a good
job quizzing Biden, I'd probably pick Megan Kelly. I think
Megan Kelly would absolutely obliterate Joe Biden with questions. I
bet they would pick a question Trump. I mean at
that level of political you know, gamesmanship and and uh
(10:53):
stakes and everything else. The truth is everyone you need
somebody who is in a position where they can't be
influenced by the corporate powers that be very much, because
they've got enough money that they don't care.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
That's correct.
Speaker 5 (11:09):
Anybody who is desperate for that next contract at CNN
or any cable news network by the way, not going
to be able to break with the orthodoxy of both
the executives who demand a certain kind of performance from them.
And so you know, this is why I actually think
you you're Megan Kelly. It's true of Joe Rogan too.
(11:30):
By the way you'r Megan Kelly point, your Joe Rogan point.
They could go to that debate, do exactly what they
want to do, pose the questions exactly as they want to,
and they're never worried about whether they can pay the
mortgage and you know, feed the kids. And that makes
it I just being honest with everyone. That makes a difference.
It does make a difference. You've brought up with CNN.
Why did Casey Hunt react the way she did because
(11:51):
she goes, oh my god, Jake Tappers the most important
anchor at the network. Now I must protect him or
else the executives will come after me. That's that's very STRAIGHTFORWM.
She needs the next contract. To your point, the only
people who can be truly honest in media. I really
believe this. At some point you have to be able
to not need the next contract or not need that,
(12:13):
or not need to be in media. I mean, if
you're willing to just walk away and do a normal job.
That's another thing too. If you're going to be a
normal person and you don't need to have some big platform,
then I think you're willing to take the kind of
risks you would need to be able to do in
a presidential debate. But for a lot of people, they've
never had a normal job. You and I've had normal jobs,
and they've just gotten their taste of importance in the
(12:35):
last you know, five years, ten years whatever in the
media or longer than that. But they're not going to
want to rock the boat with the corporate powers that be.
I mean, certainly at CNN that's the case.
Speaker 1 (12:46):
Yeah, And I think you can point to Don Lemon
buck as a good example of this. Don Lemon's on
the air for what fifteen years on CNN. As soon
as he's off CNN, Basically he has no audience anymore.
Nobody's following him. Tucker's got a great audience, it seems
very loyal and wants to follow and consume his content.
How can you be on television for fifteen years and
the minute you get kicked off nobody cares about you
(13:08):
at all. Megan Kelly's built a great career for herself.
Bill O'Reilly stall has a huge book of business as
well as online writing. These CNN, I think anchors and MSNBACS,
MSNBC anchors other than Rachel Maddow, I think recognize how
expendable they are the platform matters, not them, And that's
a way to make you feel very insecure.
Speaker 5 (13:31):
Yeah, like I said, though, I mean I'm not saying
that everyone you have to be rich in order to
be honest, but you have to be willing to say
what you think, even if it's going to upset the
people who or or disagree with the people who are
writing your checks. Because at the end of the day,
you're either willing to walk away or you're not right.
You know, whether that's through money or just the force
(13:52):
of character that you have, and you do not have
that with you know these Look what people always ask,
why is to me liberal? Why are college campus so liberal?
Because all the incentives are that way for ninety five
percent of the slots, the jobs, the companies, the universities, though,
whatever it may be. And if you show me the incentive,
(14:14):
I'll show you the results. So the incentives of this debate.
I'll tell you this. If the CNN anchors come out
of this and there's no bump for Biden, that will
be viewed as a failure by their side. So they
want to be able to say they're neutral. But then
the polls will show that somehow Biden gained from this.
That's going to be the whole game.
Speaker 2 (14:31):
Why. I don't know. I don't like I didn't like this.
I don't know why.
Speaker 5 (14:37):
You know that the Trump concession this early, that's another
part of this too. Why give them a chance to
turn things around? They are floundering, Biden is splashing around
in the pool, has no idea where he is or
where he's going.
Speaker 2 (14:51):
You know what I'm saying.
Speaker 5 (14:53):
It's such an It gives such an opening for them,
and Trump is just running away with it right now.
Speaker 1 (14:58):
That's why I think this is not about Trump. I
think this is Biden having to prove the Democrats that
he can be the guy. I think this is a
pass or failed test for him.
Speaker 2 (15:07):
We'll see.
Speaker 5 (15:08):
You know, there's finally a credit card available from a
company that sees the world the way you and I do.
The first of its kind. It's called Coin, and they're
a new and better credit card backed by Visa. Coin
is pronounced like the word coin, but spelled with a
G c O I g N. The website's that simple too,
c O I g N dot com Coin is America's
first credit card built bien for conservatives.
Speaker 2 (15:29):
Look. I went on to the site myself.
Speaker 5 (15:31):
I went to coin c O g I N dot
com and I filled out the stuff there and I've
got my card arriving in about a week, so I'm
gonna be using coin. By the way, they have really
cool designs too that go right along with the patriotic,
all American ethos of this company. So why work with
a credit card company? That's what you're doing when you're
using a credit card, you're basically partnering with that company.
(15:54):
Why partner with a credit card company that's going to be,
you know, funding left wing craziness out there, when you
could be funding great conservative, patriotic causes in this country.
Because that's what happens when you use coin. They give
a portion of proceeds to conservative charities, and last year
they donated more to conservative charities in the top ten
credit card companies combined. Sign up for America's Conservative credit
(16:18):
card at coin coign dot com and make sure you
select please Clayan Buck in the how do you hear
about a section on the website so they know you
heard about it from this show. Coin dot com terms apply.
Go to coin dot com slash disclosures for full.
Speaker 2 (16:33):
Details, news you can count on and some laughs too.
Clay Travis and Buck Sexton.
Speaker 6 (16:41):
Find them on the free iHeartRadio app or wherever you
get your podcasts.
Speaker 5 (16:46):
Welcome back into Clay and Buck. We mentioned it is
primary day in New York and I was actually just
up there over the weekend visiting family and friends. I
do still love New York. It's very beautiful on a
summer on a summer's eve. But the Democrat politics are
still very bad there. They're still in charge. Unfortunately, though
(17:07):
you go to Long Island and all of a sudden
things get a little more sane. Anyway, there's some big
races even within the Democrat side of things. Clay, we
can talk more about this. But Representative Jamal Bowman he
of pulling the fire alarm infamy against George Latimer. This
is the race that everyone's paying attention to because Bowman
(17:30):
is the progressive member of the squad, if you will, leftist.
Latimer is still a Democrat, but less crazy, and it
looks like Bowman may lose in this primary. We'll follow
up with more on this one, we hope so. And
we got some great video AOC Bowman losing their minds.
We'll have some fun with that in the.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
Meantime to Mypillo Extravaganza sale. Great time to try the
products we talk about all year long. Many of those
best selling items on sale for just twenty five bucks.
They're able to slash by cutting out the retail middleman.
You get the savings as a result. Save on the
Giza Dream sheets or the mypillows made with Giza cotton.
(18:09):
Even the best selling My slippers now just twenty five
bucks a pair. My wife absolutely loves them. Your family
will love them as well at this price. Unfortunately, my
wife has bought them in every color. They also have
summer slides. Part of the twenty five dollars Extravaganza sale,
go online MyPillow dot com. Use our names Clay and
(18:29):
Buck as the promo code. MyPillow dot com Radio Listener
special Square twenty five dollars deals, free shipping on orders
over seventy five dollars. Use the promo code Clay and
Buck to access the sale. MyPillow dot Com code Clay
and Buck.
Speaker 2 (18:47):
Welcome back in.
Speaker 1 (18:48):
Clay, Travis Buck Sexton Show. Appreciate all of you hanging
out with us as we are rolling through the Tuesday
edition of the program, two days away from the debate.
But I do think it's important to point out how
quick this whole mask world is unraveling.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
Was it last week? Buck?
Speaker 1 (19:04):
I think we played Hochel and Eric Adams, mayor of
New York City and the governor of New York State saying, Hey,
you know, crime on the subway has gotten so bad,
we're going to ban masks on subways because it's important
that you'd be able to see people's face. Because some
of us have been saying this for a long time.
Masked people this is not a revolutionary concept, like to
(19:29):
commit crimes. If you robbed the train back in the day,
first thing you did was cover your face with a mask.
Speaker 7 (19:35):
Right.
Speaker 2 (19:35):
This is something we've kind of known for a long
time now.
Speaker 1 (19:38):
The protest, this LA situation for those of you out
on the West coast, the anti Jewish protest attacks that
are now taking place everywhere New York, LA, you name
a big city in America and Jewish people are being attacked,
protested against, attacked with the vileuage unfortunately also sometimes physically. Now,
(20:04):
Karen Bass, who is the mayor of Los Angeles, has
just come out and said something that we've been saying
for some time on this show. No one in a
protest should be able to wear a mask. They want
to ban them.
Speaker 2 (20:18):
Listen.
Speaker 8 (20:19):
We also will be contacting and having a conversation with
our city attorney, Heidi Felstein Soto, to talk about several
things that we need to examine, for example, permits for protests,
the idea of people wearing masks at protests, and establishing
clear lines, a demarcation between what is legal and what
(20:41):
is not.
Speaker 5 (20:43):
Here you go, buck, Yeah, I've been saying this all along,
that the laws that banned face covering in public were
valid and were public safety concern I was saying that
in early pandemic twenty twenty days. I was like, this
is there's a reason that we don't do this as
a society. It disconnects us from each other, to not
(21:03):
see each other's faces. It creates a disturbing, disturbing sort
of social pathologies, lack of accountability, lack of identification. Obviously
for law enforcement and a whole range of purposes. It
makes nefarious behavior easier. But when that nefarious behavior turned
into the Democrat elect Biden campaign known as BLM, which
(21:27):
was effectively both a moral blackmail against the country and
an actual physical threat of blackmail with We're going to
riot and destroy things if Trump wins again, trying to
tell people to take the masks off for safety reasons
and also because it did nothing with regard to COVID
(21:47):
didn't they didn't want to hear it. That wasn't gonna
work at the time. But now certainly it's the case
that there was never any benefit from masking. In fact,
as I like to point out, the whole thing was down.
It was dumb, it was uncomfortable, it was pointless, and
it made us all less safe, and it allowed criminals
to do more crimes. So masking should be viewed with
(22:08):
utter contempt. And I will tell you that as I
was flying back from New York to Florida yesterday, there
were people wearing masks in the airport. And I'm not
saying that, you know, I'm not sympathetic to their clear
neurological or you know the fact that their anxiety disorder filled.
(22:32):
But it should be illegal. Masks should actually be banned.
You shouldn't be allowed to wear a mask. If I
have to wear a stupid seatbelt on the plane for safety,
you shouldn't be.
Speaker 2 (22:41):
Allowed to wear a mask. Because I need to know
who you are. I need to know who you are.
Speaker 5 (22:44):
I have a right in a public space to know
who is next to me, to know who's near my belongings,
to know who's getting on the plane I'm on. So
I am as anti mask as one can be.
Speaker 1 (22:58):
Let's take a couple of calls here, and I second
all of that, And it's amazing to see how.
Speaker 5 (23:03):
It's I mean, I've contented for it. I'll just just
be out like I'm not like live and live. No,
they didn't live and let live. And it's bad and
it's bad for society. Contemp, take your mask off.
Speaker 1 (23:12):
It's dumb and the worst of all is And I
still see this occasionally when I'm traveling, young kids wearing masks.
Can you imagine being raised by someone who is that
neurotic and frankly fear obsessed that they're still masking their
two and three year old kids. It's it's indefensible. You
(23:33):
asked a question a while back, and we took some calls.
If you voted for Biden in twenty twenty, maybe you
voted for Trump in twenty sixteen. You're listening to us
right now. How many people are there out there you.
Speaker 5 (23:46):
Know, I do get people who message me occasionally and
they're like, look, I'm a Democrat, but you guys are
very well reasoned and very handsome. So I have to
listen to you anyway, And I just those Democrats are welcome.
Those Democrats, thank you for listening.
Speaker 1 (24:02):
Greg in Virginia says he voted for Biden in twenty
twenty but is now voting for Trump. Greg, how did
you vote in twenty sixteen as well, and what's led
you to make the switch and how did you find
this program.
Speaker 2 (24:17):
I'm just kind of curious in your story.
Speaker 7 (24:20):
Well, I'm embarrassed to say I did vote for Clinton
and Biden because okay, yeah I didn't. I didn't think
Trump would be a good person. I was raised Democrat.
I'm in the Union, you know, we were raised poor.
I thought you had to be rich to be a Republican,
(24:41):
you know, but when COVID came around, I thought, you know,
it was utter nonsense. And I third your guys' opinion
on masking. You know, it really bothers me when they
pulled down that they're wearing the masks the whole time.
They pull it down to eat some snacks or drink
some water and then put it back go.
Speaker 2 (25:01):
So how did you find this?
Speaker 7 (25:03):
I started listening to Rush Limball.
Speaker 2 (25:06):
Okay, so you were listening to Rush.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
But you voted for Hillary, and you voted for and
you voted for Biden.
Speaker 7 (25:14):
Yeah, and I still listen to NPR on Saturdays.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
Oh you four bastard.
Speaker 1 (25:19):
Now, now, now what has been the decision that has
made you change your mind?
Speaker 2 (25:24):
And say?
Speaker 1 (25:24):
Okay, I was a Hillary person, I was a Biden person.
Now I'm going Trump in twenty four in Virginia, which
is a state that now looks like it's going to
be competitive. So your story is one that other Virginians
might share. Why change? What happened?
Speaker 7 (25:40):
The economy stucks? I mean that's the major component while
I'm voting. But also, I mean the left has just
been lying the whole time. Yes, you know, like I
still listened to him, and you know, even through COVID
and every day, I totally disagreed with what how everything
(26:00):
was getting played out, and you know, and how they
attacked Trump through his whole presidency. See I didn't agree.
Speaker 9 (26:08):
With that either.
Speaker 2 (26:09):
Does it bother you that they're using these trials, by
the way, uh, Steve call, or does it bother you
that the trials are clearly being used as a political weapon, honestly,
Or does that not factor in?
Speaker 7 (26:19):
Yes, yes, it does factor it in. Yes, they're still
attacking him, and uh, I think it's the only reason
that they don't want him to be president. You know,
he was trying to drain the swamp his first presidency
and I don't know if they're trying to save their
own butts or.
Speaker 2 (26:37):
Let me let me ask you before we get we
got to get to a few others.
Speaker 9 (26:40):
I'm rooting for Trump right now.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
I was going to say, are you voting Trump this
time around?
Speaker 7 (26:45):
Absolutely?
Speaker 2 (26:46):
There we go, There we go, another satisfied customer. That's
what I like to hear. Good stuff.
Speaker 1 (26:52):
All right, who's next up in line? You've got you've
got the con sir. Yes, and thank you by the
way for the call. And if you're in that case,
if you've changed your vote, I always love hearing those
stories like what has made you change your mind?
Speaker 2 (27:05):
How did you find the show?
Speaker 7 (27:06):
Is? What?
Speaker 1 (27:07):
If you're a swing voter, so to speak, what has
made you move from one party to the other. As
we approach twenty twenty four, John and daytona beach you
got a question that actually I see a lot on
social media.
Speaker 2 (27:20):
What's your question for us? John?
Speaker 9 (27:22):
Yeah, Well, you know, as we're all afraid the Democrats
cheats at every turn, at every possibility, kind of they can.
And so here's the thing. I always feel like, if
Trump could just, you know, calmly ask Joe Biden some
simple questions like, Joe, you know, tell us the name
of the Secretary of State, tell us the name of
(27:43):
the who's in charge of the Department Defense. And I
bet he couldn't do it. So my question is is
it possible that he could have an ear piece? Do
they check ahead of time to make sure that there's
not some kind of you know, implant or something he's got?
Speaker 5 (28:01):
Right, we get a lot, we get a lot of questions,
and this fair question, thank you for calling him. We
get a lot of questions, you know, how can you
how can you be sure that? And and then they
fill in the blank with that they're not going to
give him drugs. I think they are going to give
him drugs. So you know, how can you be sure
that they're not going to give him the questions Maybe
they will, maybe they won't. I think that it doesn't
really matter all that much. And then on the ear
(28:21):
piece question, which he just raised, Biden is, in my view,
his cognition is such that for him to even have
someone in his ear trying to talk to him while
he's it would be too obvious. I actually think that
it wouldn't help him the way that people think it would,
because you know, you'd be able to you'd see him,
(28:41):
he'd have to wait for the person to finish talking,
and then he had to put it in his own
words or try to repeat it. I don't think he
could put it in his own words or repeat it,
and certainly not without touching his ear and making it
very obvious that he was being fed answers. I keep
trying to remind everybody, Joe Biden, the one thing this
guy has done is shoveled bs his entire life. I
(29:05):
promise you he's got one more shoveling session in him. Okay,
I promise you he's not done shoveling yet. So don't
mark my words on this, and you're gonna be calling
in on Friday like Buck was right here.
Speaker 2 (29:17):
I don't know they're shoveling. I'm telling you.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
I would say too for people to take you a
little bit behind the curtain on how television is done.
When you sit with an ear piece in it is
not a There are lots of people that can't have
a producer talk to them during a moment when you're speaking,
because it is very disconcerting to be talking for most
people and then have someone else talking to you in
(29:43):
your ear trying to tell you something to say. Given
Biden's mental and physical cognition, I don't think an ear piece.
I'm with you, Buck, I don't think an earpiece would help.
Speaker 2 (29:54):
Him at all.
Speaker 5 (29:55):
I mean it reminded of being able to speak. Did
you ever have this? When I was in college, there
were some exams that we would have where they would
actually say, you know, it's open book. But the whole
point was it doesn't if you're going to try to
find the information. Remember this is before smartphones, and you know,
i'm old claysl this is before Google was a thing,
(30:15):
really right, So it wasn't you know, open smartphone. That'd
be a little different. But I mean, if you've got
a five hundred page textbook and you're going to be
trying to find the answers for the essays, it's a
little bit like that here like it is not he
doesn't have the speed too, and and and and it's
really more about whether he's able. I think to just
stick with You're going to see him pivot from the question.
(30:37):
You're going to see him pivot from whatever and just
say what he's been trained to say. It's almost instinct
for Biden, like I said, to just keep shoveling the nonsense.
So that that's what I think you're almost certain to see. Well,
you want to take some more calls on this phone.
Speaker 1 (30:53):
I was just gonna say the other caller we got waiting,
who's been waiting a while, I just want to tell him,
because you kind of addressed it. I think you're with
me here. He wants to know, Hey, what about getting
the questions in advance? I don't know that in this
particular situation. I think you and I and if we
picked five random listeners could come up with every question
(31:14):
they're going to ask in this debate time.
Speaker 5 (31:16):
In fact, in the it's not trivial pursuit. Right in
the context of a presidential debate, a question that isn't
an expected question is probably one that everyone groans and says,
why are you asking that? You know and the person
will just ignore and go talk about the economy or something. Right,
So you know it's going to be the economy of
the border election and you know, accepting elections January sixth,
(31:39):
because it's Democrats running this thing, twenty twenty election, accepting
because it's Democrats running this thing. Something about abortion. So
you know, you go down the list, there's nothing. There's
not going to be some They're not going to say
who is this, who's the leader of Turkey? Like it
is a quiz bowl, you know where. That would be
a huge advantage if you knew the quiz bowl questions
in advance to the caller. We had a second ago. Yes,
(32:02):
Biden probably can't name sometimes his secretary. It would be
amazing television, like think of you could do a great
SNL sketch that was like quiz Bowl with Trump and Biden.
Speaker 2 (32:12):
Biden would just be like and Trump would be like
that guy. I love him.
Speaker 5 (32:16):
He's probably the greatest Renaissance painter of all Renaissance painters.
Speaker 2 (32:21):
To be fair.
Speaker 1 (32:22):
There would be a lot of Miss South Carolina moments,
I think from both candidates, which is one of the
greatest of all time clips For those of you who
remember the the Iraq. Maybe we could grab maps like
such as the Iraq and South Africa. Yeah, everyone remember
really pretty girl, Miss South Carolina. Not the greatest response ever,
but yes, quiz Bowl would actually maybe tell us more
(32:46):
because I think you would get so many crazy answers.
I think Biden would have a lot of off. The
residence would be like Celebrity Jeopardy back in the day
with Sean with the fake Sean Connery guy. That was
one of the better snl Remember therapist the rapist. No,
it's there, the pen is Mightier. That's not how we
read it. Yeah, there was a lot of good stuff there. Look,
(33:06):
I want to tell you about Bear Creek Arsenal. They've
got great firearms. Was long ago that they were considered
the best kept secret in the firearms industry. But now
because we're spreading the word here and so many of
you are telling your friends about what quality Bear Creek
Arsenal is manufacturing firearms with, that word is getting out
and I'm so happy to see it, and we're so
(33:28):
grateful to all of you for checking out what Bear
Creek Arsenal has to offer. Pistols and rifles, uppers, lowers,
you name, it. They've got so much great gear when
it comes to firearms, when it comes to what you
need to enjoy your Second Amendment rights. I owned three
Bear Creek Arsenal products. Myself got two rifles and a pistol. Honestly,
(33:49):
the only thing that's holding me back right now is
my gun safe is filling up, so I got to
get another safe and then I can get more Bear
Creek Arsenal. When you see the prices, you see the quality,
and also you remember this is a company that's totally
aligned with you. They do this because they want to
be making firearms, and they stand with shows like this
one that share your values. There's some big multinational conglomerates
(34:12):
out there that make guns, but they don't really stand
for the values that we all share.
Speaker 7 (34:16):
Here.
Speaker 5 (34:17):
Bear Creek Arsenal does best prices, great firearms. Go to
Bear Creekarsenal dot com slash buck, use my name buck
as your promo code get ten percent off your first order.
Exclusions apply. That website is Bearcreekarsenal dot com slash buck
and use promo code buck for ten percent off your
(34:38):
first order.
Speaker 6 (34:39):
Twenty four clay and Bucks Weekly campaign Cliff Notes episodes
dropped Sundays at noon Eastern on the free iHeartRadio app
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 5 (34:49):
Welcome back in Team Clay and Buck. We'll bring you
up the speed on the primary going on in New York.
Interesting because of the intra Democrat party fighting that is
going on there, as is the case in primaries obviously,
but what the possible outcome, particularly of the Jamal Bowman
contest there. He is a congressman for a part of
(35:12):
New York that's some of Westchester and a lot of
the Bronx, I think is what the district is. And
he had a AOC at the route. So the rally
aoced was for Jamal Bowman. Right, I've seen this clip
of AOC and and she's she's jumping up on stage
and I mean, we should put that up at.
Speaker 2 (35:34):
Clayanbuck dot com. But we will.
Speaker 5 (35:37):
We'll take all some more of your calls in the
next hour on what you think about the upcoming debate
as well, will give you the latest on that one.
But play the contest in New York. Here's why it
could be a harbinger of big things to come for
the Democrat Party. If Jamal Bowman is beaten. It could
(35:58):
be that the reason he's beaten is in part because
of where he stands with associations with the Squad.
Speaker 2 (36:06):
And the whole Israel issue.
Speaker 5 (36:09):
And if that causes Jamal Bowman to lose in a
primary in New York, what does that say about where
the sentiment is in Pennsylvania and in Michigan for the
fall election on that issue? You know what I mean?
Is there going to be a cost? So I think
we break that down for everybody and look into what
(36:29):
the tea leads are telling us about.
Speaker 1 (36:31):
The New York primary and how does the Squad respond
if one or more of their members gets knocked out
in the primary season. That Democrat civil war is super intriguing.
It's coming out tonight.
Welcome back in Clay Travis buck Sexton Show. Appreciate all
of you hanging out with us. Two days away from
the big debate June twenty seven in Atlanta, no crowd.
We are talking about that. We are also discussing Supreme
Court opinions due to come down the pike. But I
(00:21):
did want to play this cut buck for you. Of
this Casey, I'm told that it's pronounced Casey, not Cassie
Kasi E.
Speaker 2 (00:33):
Hunt.
Speaker 1 (00:33):
I did not know that she was hosting the morning show.
They did have Don Lemon, Caitln Collins, and Poppy Harlow.
I think I'm correcting that that was the Chris licked. Hey,
this is the morning show that's going to bring CNN
back to relevancy and al they fired Don Lemon. I
don't even know where Poppy Harlowe is. They gave Caitlyn
Collins a prime time shoe and now they have this
(00:57):
Casey Hunt in. But it would be one thing if
she was just some unbelievable moral police and she just
is always regulating what people can say. But this is
her on MSNBC saying that Ran Paul being attacked by
his neighbor, which was a very very serious attack, and
(01:20):
Ran Paul took it took it months to recover from this,
and he was one hundred percent in.
Speaker 3 (01:24):
Details today on the incident that left Senator Ran Paul
with six broken ribs. This might be one of my
favorite stories, although of course we don't one of the
clearly Senator Paul is still struggling. Paul's neighbor, Renee Bouchet,
is accused of beating the senator, and GQ reports that
lawn care issues may well have been at the heart
of the dispute. A neighbor told the magazine that Bouchet
(01:46):
pays about one hundred and fifty dollars a month for
professional landscaping, while Paul maintains his yard himself.
Speaker 2 (01:52):
I guess that's the libertarian in him.
Speaker 3 (01:54):
The neighbor also said that part of what fathered Bouchet was.
Speaker 4 (01:56):
The difference in glass length between his lawn at that
of Senator paulse and that Paul strayed grass clippings on
his yard while mowing his own grass.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
Okay, so one of her favorite stories Ran Paul getting
attacked viciously by a neighbor and having six ribs broken.
We know Ran Paul his wife, Kelly also awesome. We've
had them on the show quite a lot.
Speaker 2 (02:26):
For her to be some moral authority on what is
allowed to be said.
Speaker 1 (02:31):
When Caroline Levitt is accurately pointing out the clear bias
of Jake Tapper who compared Trump to Hitler, which whatever
you want to say about Trump is one of the
most out I think one reason they're having trouble in
twenty twenty four, frankly, is once you say guys Hitler,
it's kind of.
Speaker 2 (02:50):
Hard to be like.
Speaker 1 (02:51):
And he's even worse than Hitler. Right, it's just not
resonating in twenty twenty four. But this is the kind
of things that they say on MSNBC that just get
glossed over. But I think it's important for you to
understand she's also a left wing radical and she's trying
to pretend to be straight.
Speaker 5 (03:09):
Ram Paul when he was attacked, the guy was almost
sixty years old. He's sixty one now, so this was
I don't know, four or five years ago, so maybe
he's fifty five or something fifty. You know, he's an
older guy. Is the point. He wasn't attacked over lawn shavings.
He was attacked because he's ran Paul obviously. Notice GQ
magazine reporting these people, It's always tough to know. I'll
(03:32):
say the question, are they malicious or are they just
so stupid? You never really know because they are both
very dumb. And I mean that about the Democrat aligned
legacy media widely, like almost across the board, there are
very few people who are prominent in Democrat political commentary
(03:52):
who are actually really smart. There are a few, there
are a handful, but there are very very few. Most
of them are imbeciles. And the fact that she would
think that it was in any way funny, I mean,
Rampaul was almost beaten to death by this guy. I mean,
when you're talking about breaking six ribs, there could have
easily been a I believe he actually had a punctured lung,
(04:13):
but that can kill somebody, and it took him months
to recover because the beating was so severe. You know,
would she have found it funny if any Democrat, I'll
tell you this, I would not find it amusing. If
any Democrat in the United States an elected office was
attacked by a maniac for his politics and almost kicked
in the ribs to death right there on their front
lawn with their family nearby. I wouldn't find that amusing
(04:35):
at all, but these democrats are unfortunately children, and they
are malicious. So and I'm talking about the ones that
are on TV and paid money to talk to you
about politics. They know nothing. They are glorified PR guys
and PR girls. They just talk about what the messaging is.
(04:55):
They don't actually know a damn thing, and they're moderating
presidential debates and they're supposed to present to you all
this is the truth or whatever. The whole thing. The
whole thing is a fraud. And that's why more and
more people are turning to just people who tell them
what they think about things, and people bemoan the rise
of opinion media. Clay all Media's opinion media. There is
(05:18):
nothing else. There's opinion media and people who are lying
to you about having opinions.
Speaker 2 (05:23):
That's all there is.
Speaker 1 (05:25):
And I think social media has kind of blown that
up because it's impossible for you to not see the bias,
whatever way it goes. When people are sharing things as
frequently as they are on social media, it becomes way
more apparent, and it also enables many of you out
there to be aggressive. I always say consume all of
(05:46):
your media aggressively and presume that you are not being
told the whole story in any respect. And as soon
as you become aware that someone has told you something
that is untrue, even if it makes you happier, you
should trust that person less. And that's one of the
(06:07):
things that's kind of disappointing to me, is, you know,
the fifty one intelligence agents, they get rewarded with all
the lies they told Rachel Maddow, The New York Times,
Washington Post. They all lied to you in spades during COVID,
and that audience continues to lap it up even buck.
As we talked about when the Supreme Court ruled nine
(06:28):
to zero that Colorado couldn't take Trump off the ballot,
a lot of people at MSNBC were agast a gog
in disbelief over the fact that that actually occurred. If
you are regularly stunned by the outcome of a media
event because someone has told you that there's no way
that it's actually going to happen, you should start to
(06:49):
question your media ecosystem that allowed you to believe that
a nine to oh Supreme Court opinion was, for instance,
going to take Trump off the ballot and keep him there.
And I think there's going to be a lot of
people staggered already, they're kind of recognizing it just based
off the question by what happens with this presidential immunity
case when it comes down. I can already tell you
the Democrat talking points are going to be that Trump's
(07:11):
appointees protected Trump because they want him to get re elected,
when in reality, I guarantee you they're trying to draft
a presidential immunity standard which will stand the test of
time in two hundred years from now, when all of
us are gone, will still make sense from a judicial
process to apply to whatever the presidents are in the
(07:32):
decades to come and the generations to come, who are
either Democrats, Republicans, or maybe a party we don't even
know of yet that's going to rise up to replace
one of the Democrats in the Republican parties. But I
think that's just a kind of a testament to who
these people are. I think it's important to go back.
One of our favorite stories is somebody being assaulted because
of his political beliefs.
Speaker 2 (07:51):
Oh, that's interesting.
Speaker 5 (07:53):
Yeah, you would think also that being so both morally
grotesque and intellectually flimsy would cause introspection amongst some of
these so called journalists, But they're really uh, the the
mean dumb kids table from high school that thinks that
everybody wants to sit with them. It's actually not the case.
Most of these entities are losing audience very rapidly, losing relevance,
(08:17):
losing power, and with that they'll also be losing the
money the you know, especially when talking about TV political journalists,
they're generally overpaid. H they are overwhelmingly replaceable, and they
are tend to be people who are both very arrogant
and very insecure at the same time. And that's pretty
(08:37):
much what you get with all these Democrats who are
going to be anchoring presidential debates, and you know, this
is just what you can expect. None of this is
is new, and so it brings me to what does
Trump do about all of this? You know, it's uh,
it's it's not gonna you know, Trump is a great showman,
he's a great you know, he's the greatest political show
(08:58):
on earth, no question, and and he's you know, very
good on his feet and everything else. But this is
not an easy debate for him to do well. In
under the circumstances, I think, yeah, you know, I think
he'll be fine. But will he really be able to
hammer it home in a way that you see the
the numbers trending in his favor. I don't know. I mean,
(09:20):
imagine for a second. To me, Clay, this is no
different than if if there was a Biden Trump debate.
I actually think we would be I think we could
be more fair uh than Donna Bash, Dana Bash and
uh and Taper could be one hundred percent. We could
be fair, but they are as partisan as we are.
As what I'm here to tell you, it is no different.
You might as well have Rachel Maddow and Keith Oberman
(09:43):
UH doing this debate, although no one even members of
Keith Oberman is so I guess Rachel Maddow and some
other MSNBC person.
Speaker 1 (09:49):
I actually think the fairest debate would be Trump gets
to pick the interrogator or interrogator of Biden, and Biden
gets to pick his media person to ask Trump.
Speaker 2 (10:02):
That interrogator or is that a different word interrogation?
Speaker 1 (10:07):
Well, I'm thinking of interrogatories are in the legal process.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
I know that interrogator is the word. So you might
as well. Let me do that. But who would you
pick if you could pick, I would pick pick Joe Rogan.
Speaker 5 (10:24):
I already said that, just because I think that that
would be the widest one moderator.
Speaker 1 (10:29):
Yeah, I don't think that's a bad idea. But if
I were Trump and I'm taking us off the table
because I think both of us would do a good
job quizzing Biden, I'd probably pick Megan Kelly. I think
Megan Kelly would absolutely obliterate Joe Biden with questions. I
bet they would pick a question Trump. I mean at
that level of political you know, gamesmanship and and uh
(10:53):
stakes and everything else. The truth is everyone you need
somebody who is in a position where they can't be
influenced by the corporate powers that be very much, because
they've got enough money that they don't care.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
That's correct.
Speaker 5 (11:09):
Anybody who is desperate for that next contract at CNN
or any cable news network by the way, not going
to be able to break with the orthodoxy of both
the executives who demand a certain kind of performance from them.
And so you know, this is why I actually think
you you're Megan Kelly. It's true of Joe Rogan too.
(11:30):
By the way you'r Megan Kelly point, your Joe Rogan point.
They could go to that debate, do exactly what they
want to do, pose the questions exactly as they want to,
and they're never worried about whether they can pay the
mortgage and you know, feed the kids. And that makes
it I just being honest with everyone. That makes a difference.
It does make a difference. You've brought up with CNN.
Why did Casey Hunt react the way she did because
(11:51):
she goes, oh my god, Jake Tappers the most important
anchor at the network. Now I must protect him or
else the executives will come after me. That's that's very STRAIGHTFORWM.
She needs the next contract. To your point, the only
people who can be truly honest in media. I really
believe this. At some point you have to be able
to not need the next contract or not need that,
(12:13):
or not need to be in media. I mean, if
you're willing to just walk away and do a normal job.
That's another thing too. If you're going to be a
normal person and you don't need to have some big platform,
then I think you're willing to take the kind of
risks you would need to be able to do in
a presidential debate. But for a lot of people, they've
never had a normal job. You and I've had normal jobs,
and they've just gotten their taste of importance in the
(12:35):
last you know, five years, ten years whatever in the
media or longer than that. But they're not going to
want to rock the boat with the corporate powers that be.
I mean, certainly at CNN that's the case.
Speaker 1 (12:46):
Yeah, And I think you can point to Don Lemon
buck as a good example of this. Don Lemon's on
the air for what fifteen years on CNN. As soon
as he's off CNN, Basically he has no audience anymore.
Nobody's following him. Tucker's got a great audience, it seems
very loyal and wants to follow and consume his content.
How can you be on television for fifteen years and
the minute you get kicked off nobody cares about you
(13:08):
at all. Megan Kelly's built a great career for herself.
Bill O'Reilly stall has a huge book of business as
well as online writing. These CNN, I think anchors and MSNBACS,
MSNBC anchors other than Rachel Maddow, I think recognize how
expendable they are the platform matters, not them, And that's
a way to make you feel very insecure.
Speaker 5 (13:31):
Yeah, like I said, though, I mean I'm not saying
that everyone you have to be rich in order to
be honest, but you have to be willing to say
what you think, even if it's going to upset the
people who or or disagree with the people who are
writing your checks. Because at the end of the day,
you're either willing to walk away or you're not right.
You know, whether that's through money or just the force
(13:52):
of character that you have, and you do not have
that with you know these Look what people always ask,
why is to me liberal? Why are college campus so liberal?
Because all the incentives are that way for ninety five
percent of the slots, the jobs, the companies, the universities, though,
whatever it may be. And if you show me the incentive,
(14:14):
I'll show you the results. So the incentives of this debate.
I'll tell you this. If the CNN anchors come out
of this and there's no bump for Biden, that will
be viewed as a failure by their side. So they
want to be able to say they're neutral. But then
the polls will show that somehow Biden gained from this.
That's going to be the whole game.
Speaker 2 (14:31):
Why. I don't know. I don't like I didn't like this.
I don't know why.
Speaker 5 (14:37):
You know that the Trump concession this early, that's another
part of this too. Why give them a chance to
turn things around? They are floundering, Biden is splashing around
in the pool, has no idea where he is or
where he's going.
Speaker 2 (14:51):
You know what I'm saying.
Speaker 5 (14:53):
It's such an It gives such an opening for them,
and Trump is just running away with it right now.
Speaker 1 (14:58):
That's why I think this is not about Trump. I
think this is Biden having to prove the Democrats that
he can be the guy. I think this is a
pass or failed test for him.
Speaker 2 (15:07):
We'll see.
Speaker 5 (15:08):
You know, there's finally a credit card available from a
company that sees the world the way you and I do.
The first of its kind. It's called Coin, and they're
a new and better credit card backed by Visa. Coin
is pronounced like the word coin, but spelled with a
G c O I g N. The website's that simple too,
c O I g N dot com Coin is America's
first credit card built bien for conservatives.
Speaker 2 (15:29):
Look. I went on to the site myself.
Speaker 5 (15:31):
I went to coin c O g I N dot
com and I filled out the stuff there and I've
got my card arriving in about a week, so I'm
gonna be using coin. By the way, they have really
cool designs too that go right along with the patriotic,
all American ethos of this company. So why work with
a credit card company? That's what you're doing when you're
using a credit card, you're basically partnering with that company.
(15:54):
Why partner with a credit card company that's going to be,
you know, funding left wing craziness out there, when you
could be funding great conservative, patriotic causes in this country.
Because that's what happens when you use coin. They give
a portion of proceeds to conservative charities, and last year
they donated more to conservative charities in the top ten
credit card companies combined. Sign up for America's Conservative credit
(16:18):
card at coin coign dot com and make sure you
select please Clayan Buck in the how do you hear
about a section on the website so they know you
heard about it from this show. Coin dot com terms apply.
Go to coin dot com slash disclosures for full.
Speaker 2 (16:33):
Details, news you can count on and some laughs too.
Clay Travis and Buck Sexton.
Speaker 6 (16:41):
Find them on the free iHeartRadio app or wherever you
get your podcasts.
Speaker 5 (16:46):
Welcome back into Clay and Buck. We mentioned it is
primary day in New York and I was actually just
up there over the weekend visiting family and friends. I
do still love New York. It's very beautiful on a
summer on a summer's eve. But the Democrat politics are
still very bad there. They're still in charge. Unfortunately, though
(17:07):
you go to Long Island and all of a sudden
things get a little more sane. Anyway, there's some big
races even within the Democrat side of things. Clay, we
can talk more about this. But Representative Jamal Bowman he
of pulling the fire alarm infamy against George Latimer. This
is the race that everyone's paying attention to because Bowman
(17:30):
is the progressive member of the squad, if you will, leftist.
Latimer is still a Democrat, but less crazy, and it
looks like Bowman may lose in this primary. We'll follow
up with more on this one, we hope so. And
we got some great video AOC Bowman losing their minds.
We'll have some fun with that in the.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
Meantime to Mypillo Extravaganza sale. Great time to try the
products we talk about all year long. Many of those
best selling items on sale for just twenty five bucks.
They're able to slash by cutting out the retail middleman.
You get the savings as a result. Save on the
Giza Dream sheets or the mypillows made with Giza cotton.
(18:09):
Even the best selling My slippers now just twenty five
bucks a pair. My wife absolutely loves them. Your family
will love them as well at this price. Unfortunately, my
wife has bought them in every color. They also have
summer slides. Part of the twenty five dollars Extravaganza sale,
go online MyPillow dot com. Use our names Clay and
(18:29):
Buck as the promo code. MyPillow dot com Radio Listener
special Square twenty five dollars deals, free shipping on orders
over seventy five dollars. Use the promo code Clay and
Buck to access the sale. MyPillow dot Com code Clay
and Buck.
Speaker 2 (18:47):
Welcome back in.
Speaker 1 (18:48):
Clay, Travis Buck Sexton Show. Appreciate all of you hanging
out with us as we are rolling through the Tuesday
edition of the program, two days away from the debate.
But I do think it's important to point out how
quick this whole mask world is unraveling.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
Was it last week? Buck?
Speaker 1 (19:04):
I think we played Hochel and Eric Adams, mayor of
New York City and the governor of New York State saying, Hey,
you know, crime on the subway has gotten so bad,
we're going to ban masks on subways because it's important
that you'd be able to see people's face. Because some
of us have been saying this for a long time.
Masked people this is not a revolutionary concept, like to
(19:29):
commit crimes. If you robbed the train back in the day,
first thing you did was cover your face with a mask.
Speaker 7 (19:35):
Right.
Speaker 2 (19:35):
This is something we've kind of known for a long
time now.
Speaker 1 (19:38):
The protest, this LA situation for those of you out
on the West coast, the anti Jewish protest attacks that
are now taking place everywhere New York, LA, you name
a big city in America and Jewish people are being attacked,
protested against, attacked with the vileuage unfortunately also sometimes physically. Now,
(20:04):
Karen Bass, who is the mayor of Los Angeles, has
just come out and said something that we've been saying
for some time on this show. No one in a
protest should be able to wear a mask. They want
to ban them.
Speaker 2 (20:18):
Listen.
Speaker 8 (20:19):
We also will be contacting and having a conversation with
our city attorney, Heidi Felstein Soto, to talk about several
things that we need to examine, for example, permits for protests,
the idea of people wearing masks at protests, and establishing
clear lines, a demarcation between what is legal and what
(20:41):
is not.
Speaker 5 (20:43):
Here you go, buck, Yeah, I've been saying this all along,
that the laws that banned face covering in public were
valid and were public safety concern I was saying that
in early pandemic twenty twenty days. I was like, this
is there's a reason that we don't do this as
a society. It disconnects us from each other, to not
(21:03):
see each other's faces. It creates a disturbing, disturbing sort
of social pathologies, lack of accountability, lack of identification. Obviously
for law enforcement and a whole range of purposes. It
makes nefarious behavior easier. But when that nefarious behavior turned
into the Democrat elect Biden campaign known as BLM, which
(21:27):
was effectively both a moral blackmail against the country and
an actual physical threat of blackmail with We're going to
riot and destroy things if Trump wins again, trying to
tell people to take the masks off for safety reasons
and also because it did nothing with regard to COVID
(21:47):
didn't they didn't want to hear it. That wasn't gonna
work at the time. But now certainly it's the case
that there was never any benefit from masking. In fact,
as I like to point out, the whole thing was down.
It was dumb, it was uncomfortable, it was pointless, and
it made us all less safe, and it allowed criminals
to do more crimes. So masking should be viewed with
(22:08):
utter contempt. And I will tell you that as I
was flying back from New York to Florida yesterday, there
were people wearing masks in the airport. And I'm not
saying that, you know, I'm not sympathetic to their clear
neurological or you know the fact that their anxiety disorder filled.
(22:32):
But it should be illegal. Masks should actually be banned.
You shouldn't be allowed to wear a mask. If I
have to wear a stupid seatbelt on the plane for safety,
you shouldn't be.
Speaker 2 (22:41):
Allowed to wear a mask. Because I need to know
who you are. I need to know who you are.
Speaker 5 (22:44):
I have a right in a public space to know
who is next to me, to know who's near my belongings,
to know who's getting on the plane I'm on. So
I am as anti mask as one can be.
Speaker 1 (22:58):
Let's take a couple of calls here, and I second
all of that, And it's amazing to see how.
Speaker 5 (23:03):
It's I mean, I've contented for it. I'll just just
be out like I'm not like live and live. No,
they didn't live and let live. And it's bad and
it's bad for society. Contemp, take your mask off.
Speaker 1 (23:12):
It's dumb and the worst of all is And I
still see this occasionally when I'm traveling, young kids wearing masks.
Can you imagine being raised by someone who is that
neurotic and frankly fear obsessed that they're still masking their
two and three year old kids. It's it's indefensible. You
(23:33):
asked a question a while back, and we took some calls.
If you voted for Biden in twenty twenty, maybe you
voted for Trump in twenty sixteen. You're listening to us
right now. How many people are there out there you.
Speaker 5 (23:46):
Know, I do get people who message me occasionally and
they're like, look, I'm a Democrat, but you guys are
very well reasoned and very handsome. So I have to
listen to you anyway, And I just those Democrats are welcome.
Those Democrats, thank you for listening.
Speaker 1 (24:02):
Greg in Virginia says he voted for Biden in twenty
twenty but is now voting for Trump. Greg, how did
you vote in twenty sixteen as well, and what's led
you to make the switch and how did you find
this program.
Speaker 2 (24:17):
I'm just kind of curious in your story.
Speaker 7 (24:20):
Well, I'm embarrassed to say I did vote for Clinton
and Biden because okay, yeah I didn't. I didn't think
Trump would be a good person. I was raised Democrat.
I'm in the Union, you know, we were raised poor.
I thought you had to be rich to be a Republican,
(24:41):
you know, but when COVID came around, I thought, you know,
it was utter nonsense. And I third your guys' opinion
on masking. You know, it really bothers me when they
pulled down that they're wearing the masks the whole time.
They pull it down to eat some snacks or drink
some water and then put it back go.
Speaker 2 (25:01):
So how did you find this?
Speaker 7 (25:03):
I started listening to Rush Limball.
Speaker 2 (25:06):
Okay, so you were listening to Rush.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
But you voted for Hillary, and you voted for and
you voted for Biden.
Speaker 7 (25:14):
Yeah, and I still listen to NPR on Saturdays.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
Oh you four bastard.
Speaker 1 (25:19):
Now, now, now what has been the decision that has
made you change your mind?
Speaker 2 (25:24):
And say?
Speaker 1 (25:24):
Okay, I was a Hillary person, I was a Biden person.
Now I'm going Trump in twenty four in Virginia, which
is a state that now looks like it's going to
be competitive. So your story is one that other Virginians
might share. Why change? What happened?
Speaker 7 (25:40):
The economy stucks? I mean that's the major component while
I'm voting. But also, I mean the left has just
been lying the whole time. Yes, you know, like I
still listened to him, and you know, even through COVID
and every day, I totally disagreed with what how everything
(26:00):
was getting played out, and you know, and how they
attacked Trump through his whole presidency. See I didn't agree.
Speaker 9 (26:08):
With that either.
Speaker 2 (26:09):
Does it bother you that they're using these trials, by
the way, uh, Steve call, or does it bother you
that the trials are clearly being used as a political weapon, honestly,
Or does that not factor in?
Speaker 7 (26:19):
Yes, yes, it does factor it in. Yes, they're still
attacking him, and uh, I think it's the only reason
that they don't want him to be president. You know,
he was trying to drain the swamp his first presidency
and I don't know if they're trying to save their
own butts or.
Speaker 2 (26:37):
Let me let me ask you before we get we
got to get to a few others.
Speaker 9 (26:40):
I'm rooting for Trump right now.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
I was going to say, are you voting Trump this
time around?
Speaker 7 (26:45):
Absolutely?
Speaker 2 (26:46):
There we go, There we go, another satisfied customer. That's
what I like to hear. Good stuff.
Speaker 1 (26:52):
All right, who's next up in line? You've got you've
got the con sir. Yes, and thank you by the
way for the call. And if you're in that case,
if you've changed your vote, I always love hearing those
stories like what has made you change your mind?
Speaker 2 (27:05):
How did you find the show?
Speaker 7 (27:06):
Is? What?
Speaker 1 (27:07):
If you're a swing voter, so to speak, what has
made you move from one party to the other. As
we approach twenty twenty four, John and daytona beach you
got a question that actually I see a lot on
social media.
Speaker 2 (27:20):
What's your question for us? John?
Speaker 9 (27:22):
Yeah, Well, you know, as we're all afraid the Democrats
cheats at every turn, at every possibility, kind of they can.
And so here's the thing. I always feel like, if
Trump could just, you know, calmly ask Joe Biden some
simple questions like, Joe, you know, tell us the name
of the Secretary of State, tell us the name of
(27:43):
the who's in charge of the Department Defense. And I
bet he couldn't do it. So my question is is
it possible that he could have an ear piece? Do
they check ahead of time to make sure that there's
not some kind of you know, implant or something he's got?
Speaker 5 (28:01):
Right, we get a lot, we get a lot of questions,
and this fair question, thank you for calling him. We
get a lot of questions, you know, how can you
how can you be sure that? And and then they
fill in the blank with that they're not going to
give him drugs. I think they are going to give
him drugs. So you know, how can you be sure
that they're not going to give him the questions Maybe
they will, maybe they won't. I think that it doesn't
really matter all that much. And then on the ear
(28:21):
piece question, which he just raised, Biden is, in my view,
his cognition is such that for him to even have
someone in his ear trying to talk to him while
he's it would be too obvious. I actually think that
it wouldn't help him the way that people think it would,
because you know, you'd be able to you'd see him,
(28:41):
he'd have to wait for the person to finish talking,
and then he had to put it in his own
words or try to repeat it. I don't think he
could put it in his own words or repeat it,
and certainly not without touching his ear and making it
very obvious that he was being fed answers. I keep
trying to remind everybody, Joe Biden, the one thing this
guy has done is shoveled bs his entire life. I
(29:05):
promise you he's got one more shoveling session in him. Okay,
I promise you he's not done shoveling yet. So don't
mark my words on this, and you're gonna be calling
in on Friday like Buck was right here.
Speaker 2 (29:17):
I don't know they're shoveling. I'm telling you.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
I would say too for people to take you a
little bit behind the curtain on how television is done.
When you sit with an ear piece in it is
not a There are lots of people that can't have
a producer talk to them during a moment when you're speaking,
because it is very disconcerting to be talking for most
people and then have someone else talking to you in
(29:43):
your ear trying to tell you something to say. Given
Biden's mental and physical cognition, I don't think an ear piece.
I'm with you, Buck, I don't think an earpiece would help.
Speaker 2 (29:54):
Him at all.
Speaker 5 (29:55):
I mean it reminded of being able to speak. Did
you ever have this? When I was in college, there
were some exams that we would have where they would
actually say, you know, it's open book. But the whole
point was it doesn't if you're going to try to
find the information. Remember this is before smartphones, and you know,
i'm old claysl this is before Google was a thing,
(30:15):
really right, So it wasn't you know, open smartphone. That'd
be a little different. But I mean, if you've got
a five hundred page textbook and you're going to be
trying to find the answers for the essays, it's a
little bit like that here like it is not he
doesn't have the speed too, and and and and it's
really more about whether he's able. I think to just
stick with You're going to see him pivot from the question.
(30:37):
You're going to see him pivot from whatever and just
say what he's been trained to say. It's almost instinct
for Biden, like I said, to just keep shoveling the nonsense.
So that that's what I think you're almost certain to see. Well,
you want to take some more calls on this phone.
Speaker 1 (30:53):
I was just gonna say the other caller we got waiting,
who's been waiting a while, I just want to tell him,
because you kind of addressed it. I think you're with
me here. He wants to know, Hey, what about getting
the questions in advance? I don't know that in this
particular situation. I think you and I and if we
picked five random listeners could come up with every question
(31:14):
they're going to ask in this debate time.
Speaker 5 (31:16):
In fact, in the it's not trivial pursuit. Right in
the context of a presidential debate, a question that isn't
an expected question is probably one that everyone groans and says,
why are you asking that? You know and the person
will just ignore and go talk about the economy or something. Right,
So you know it's going to be the economy of
the border election and you know, accepting elections January sixth,
(31:39):
because it's Democrats running this thing, twenty twenty election, accepting
because it's Democrats running this thing. Something about abortion. So
you know, you go down the list, there's nothing. There's
not going to be some They're not going to say
who is this, who's the leader of Turkey? Like it
is a quiz bowl, you know where. That would be
a huge advantage if you knew the quiz bowl questions
in advance to the caller. We had a second ago. Yes,
(32:02):
Biden probably can't name sometimes his secretary. It would be
amazing television, like think of you could do a great
SNL sketch that was like quiz Bowl with Trump and Biden.
Speaker 2 (32:12):
Biden would just be like and Trump would be like
that guy. I love him.
Speaker 5 (32:16):
He's probably the greatest Renaissance painter of all Renaissance painters.
Speaker 2 (32:21):
To be fair.
Speaker 1 (32:22):
There would be a lot of Miss South Carolina moments,
I think from both candidates, which is one of the
greatest of all time clips For those of you who
remember the the Iraq. Maybe we could grab maps like
such as the Iraq and South Africa. Yeah, everyone remember
really pretty girl, Miss South Carolina. Not the greatest response ever,
but yes, quiz Bowl would actually maybe tell us more
(32:46):
because I think you would get so many crazy answers.
I think Biden would have a lot of off. The
residence would be like Celebrity Jeopardy back in the day
with Sean with the fake Sean Connery guy. That was
one of the better snl Remember therapist the rapist. No,
it's there, the pen is Mightier. That's not how we
read it. Yeah, there was a lot of good stuff there. Look,
(33:06):
I want to tell you about Bear Creek Arsenal. They've
got great firearms. Was long ago that they were considered
the best kept secret in the firearms industry. But now
because we're spreading the word here and so many of
you are telling your friends about what quality Bear Creek
Arsenal is manufacturing firearms with, that word is getting out
and I'm so happy to see it, and we're so
(33:28):
grateful to all of you for checking out what Bear
Creek Arsenal has to offer. Pistols and rifles, uppers, lowers,
you name, it. They've got so much great gear when
it comes to firearms, when it comes to what you
need to enjoy your Second Amendment rights. I owned three
Bear Creek Arsenal products. Myself got two rifles and a pistol. Honestly,
(33:49):
the only thing that's holding me back right now is
my gun safe is filling up, so I got to
get another safe and then I can get more Bear
Creek Arsenal. When you see the prices, you see the quality,
and also you remember this is a company that's totally
aligned with you. They do this because they want to
be making firearms, and they stand with shows like this
one that share your values. There's some big multinational conglomerates
(34:12):
out there that make guns, but they don't really stand
for the values that we all share.
Speaker 7 (34:16):
Here.
Speaker 5 (34:17):
Bear Creek Arsenal does best prices, great firearms. Go to
Bear Creekarsenal dot com slash buck, use my name buck
as your promo code get ten percent off your first order.
Exclusions apply. That website is Bearcreekarsenal dot com slash buck
and use promo code buck for ten percent off your
(34:38):
first order.
Speaker 6 (34:39):
Twenty four clay and Bucks Weekly campaign Cliff Notes episodes
dropped Sundays at noon Eastern on the free iHeartRadio app
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 5 (34:49):
Welcome back in Team Clay and Buck. We'll bring you
up the speed on the primary going on in New York.
Interesting because of the intra Democrat party fighting that is
going on there, as is the case in primaries obviously,
but what the possible outcome, particularly of the Jamal Bowman
contest there. He is a congressman for a part of
(35:12):
New York that's some of Westchester and a lot of
the Bronx, I think is what the district is. And
he had a AOC at the route. So the rally
aoced was for Jamal Bowman. Right, I've seen this clip
of AOC and and she's she's jumping up on stage
and I mean, we should put that up at.
Speaker 2 (35:34):
Clayanbuck dot com. But we will.
Speaker 5 (35:37):
We'll take all some more of your calls in the
next hour on what you think about the upcoming debate
as well, will give you the latest on that one.
But play the contest in New York. Here's why it
could be a harbinger of big things to come for
the Democrat Party. If Jamal Bowman is beaten. It could
(35:58):
be that the reason he's beaten is in part because
of where he stands with associations with the Squad.
Speaker 2 (36:06):
And the whole Israel issue.
Speaker 5 (36:09):
And if that causes Jamal Bowman to lose in a
primary in New York, what does that say about where
the sentiment is in Pennsylvania and in Michigan for the
fall election on that issue? You know what I mean?
Is there going to be a cost? So I think
we break that down for everybody and look into what
(36:29):
the tea leads are telling us about.
Speaker 1 (36:31):
The New York primary and how does the Squad respond
if one or more of their members gets knocked out
in the primary season. That Democrat civil war is super intriguing.
It's coming out tonight.
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show News
Hosts And Creators
Clay Travis
Buck Sexton
Show Links
WebsiteNewsletterPopular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.