Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
This is twenty four, a weekly highlight reel from the Clay,
Travis and Buck Sexton Show featuring all things election coverage.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Let's get started. Here are Clay and Buck.
Speaker 3 (00:14):
President Trump himself is joining us. Mister President, I appreciate
you being with us.
Speaker 4 (00:20):
Well, thank you very much.
Speaker 3 (00:22):
So let's start with how you think it went. I'm
sure you saw at least some of the Biden press
conference yesterday in the evening. What's your takeaway? Because the
New York Times and a lot of others seem like
they thought it could be the end, but doesn't really
seem like the end.
Speaker 4 (00:43):
Well, it's not the end for him, because when you
control the delegates, it's never the end. I mean, there's
nothing anybody can do. So as long as he wants
to continue doing this, he's going to be able to
do that. It's very hard to do anything else. But
I thought the worst part of the press conference was
the a moment during the day when he introduced Zelenski
(01:05):
and he introduced him as Vladimir Putin. That was not good.
That was unpardonable. You can't do that. You know, there
are things you can do and things you can't do.
That was a bad one. So he introduced him as Putin,
and then I guess somebody started screaming at him, and
he corrected as much as you can. You know that
(01:28):
doesn't get corrected very easily. So he went in there
with the yips. I think he went into the press
conference with the yips because, frankly, if he were Winston Churchill,
who was not bad at press conferences, by the way,
if he were Winston Churchill, his press conference was going
to work out too well because of what happened previous.
Speaker 1 (01:48):
Talking to President Trump here, I appreciate you starting off
the show here with us.
Speaker 2 (01:53):
When you look at the way.
Speaker 1 (01:55):
That Biden performed against you and you knocked him out
on June twenty seven. I mean you're a boxing fan,
you're a UFC fan. I mean he was done, and
I know you've challenged him to other debates, But does
a part of you feel like you were basically Mike Tyson.
Speaker 2 (02:11):
And he was you know, Spinks and you knocked him out.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
Why does he deserve a chance to get back in
the ring with you, Because usually when you get knocked out,
you don't get antermediate rematch.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
If it goes to the judge, goes to the scorecard.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
Maybe you get the rematch, you know, the story does
a party you feel like, Yeah, I've dismissed this guy.
Speaker 2 (02:29):
I knocked him out. We don't even need a debate again.
Speaker 4 (02:33):
Well, remember he offered to do the debate. But they
took everything that they wanted. They had seats, right, they
had the anchors that they wanted, They had every single
element of the debate that they wanted. They even wanted
his sitting down. That was the only thing. I said, Look,
let's stand up for a little while. That would look terrible.
So although debates have been done sitting down and probably successfully,
(02:54):
but I thought standing up with a better look. The
one thing he wanted was the lecter and the one
on the left, and so he got that, and I
got something that I wanted, which was to go last.
But it was a very interesting evening when I when
I walked in, I noticed he was quite pale and
(03:15):
didn't really look at him very much until he started gaffing.
And he was he was doing some He was saying
some bad things, meaning like words didn't belong in the
right place, words were going into the wrong place, lots
of words, but they were not being properly placed. And
that was the only time I really looked over at him.
(03:35):
But I thought it was you know, look, I've been
given credit for a great debate. I don't know what
happened to him. He didn't do too well, and that
was the beginning of a long period of time. You know,
he's had numerous chances to make up for it. They've
given him many chances to make up for it, and
you know I wouldn't. It was certainly not like the debate.
(03:57):
I don't think he's had any moment. You could tell
me better and I would know, but I would say
that they haven't been stellar these makeups. Last night was
not a stellar performance. Again, the gaff he made earlier
on was bad, but last night was not stellar. He
called me as vice president, and he didn't do it sarcastically.
(04:18):
By the way, if he did it sarcastically, it would
have been great. But it wasn't done sarcastically. So he
called me, and he made quite a few other mistakes.
But it wasn't like a total disaster. Now, the debate
was a disaster for him, there's no question about it.
Speaker 2 (04:35):
President Trump.
Speaker 4 (04:35):
I assume he looked forward to a second debate was
supposed to be doing a second debate in September. Oh,
do the television networks look forward to that one.
Speaker 1 (04:46):
But so you're willing to give him a rematch, because
I actually think that's kind of you, given the fact
that you knocked him out. I mean again, like Mike
Tyson didn't immediately say okay, get in the ring against Sphinx.
I kind of feel like he was flat on the
you know, on the canvas, looking up at you.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
But that seems kind Maybe you can knock him out again.
Speaker 4 (05:05):
Well, I think we owe it maybe to the public
to do it. You know, I think you have an
obligation to sort of do it. You're the Republican nominee
and you're the Democrat nominee, and I think maybe to
an extent, we owe it to the public to do it,
if that makes sense.
Speaker 2 (05:20):
Yeah, But.
Speaker 4 (05:24):
I actually I actually was suggesting yesterday maybe you'll have
a first of this that we go in together, because
I am cognitively great, perfect and I've had tests. I
do routine, you know, whenever I do. I just did
a physical, by the way, and I came out perfectly.
(05:44):
We'll announce those numbers soon or whatever. I have to announce.
But but I suggest that we go in together and
do a cognitive test. We'll do cognitive tests. We'll do
it together like a team.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
Would you do it on tellims you Live, like a
cognitive cognitive test on television with him?
Speaker 4 (06:05):
I would do whatever they want. I'd do the test.
I'd do mental acuity tests with him. I would do whatever,
whatever it would be appropriate. But they have actually tests,
they have scanning tests, lots of different tests. And I
actually feel that anybody running from not age wise. I
mean I've spoken to I deal with people that are
(06:28):
much older than Biden. They are one hundred percent. You know,
Biden is unusual in a way, But I've spoken to
people much older than him and they're one hundred percent.
Speaker 2 (06:38):
Is he the matchup you want? President Trump? This is
this is important.
Speaker 3 (06:42):
Is he the matchup you want in terms of who
is going to be on the ballot for the Democrats
at the top of this fall, Because there's reporting that
your team is very pleased that it looks like he's
going to stay in. It's not going to be Kamala
and there's not going to be some third option switch
at the convention.
Speaker 4 (07:01):
Well, there was reporting in a rag called The Atlantic,
I think they call it, and it's not a particularly
good reporter, not a particularly good magazine, And there was
some reporting there that I really wanted him. I assumed
it was going to be him. Who would assume differently?
You know, he had the nomination, right, So what am
(07:22):
I going to It's going to be somebody else. I
think that in many ways she may be easier than him,
and perhaps I'm wrong, but I've been pretty good at
this stuff over the years. I think in many ways
she may be easier than Biden. But we don't think
too much in terms of anyone else until he gets out.
(07:43):
If he gets out, I don't know that he's going
to get out. He's you know, he's proud. I don't
know if he should be proud because he's destroyed our country. Frankly,
it's been the worst president in the history of our country.
He's allowed close to twenty million people in many from
prisons and mental institutions, and many terrorists in our country.
(08:04):
Right now, there's going to be an attack one hundred percent,
and he's allowed that to happen. We have the strongest
border now, we have the weakest border probably ever in
any country. There's never been a country, there's never been
a border like this, But you know, and many other things.
I have to go through them. But I always assumed
I was going to be running against him. If it were,
(08:27):
I think it can only be her, because I think
you'd have a very big problem in the Democrat Party.
Who was somebody other than her?
Speaker 1 (08:35):
Do you think Barack Obama is behind trying to push
out Joe Biden at all? Do you follow kind of
this palace intrigue. It's really kind of wild. In the
two weeks since you knocked them out in the debate,
I mean, they have just spun completely out of control.
And I've been reading that Barack Obama, George Clooney comes
out and says, hey, you got to drop out. Can
you believe how much of a dumpster fire they are
(08:56):
right now?
Speaker 4 (08:59):
Well, I thought you were Soloney was very disloyal, because
whether you like Biden or not, you know, he's been
nice to Cloney. I thought it was very disloyal, backstabber.
Third rate movie actor. He was a television actor who
never made really a good movie, and so he's sort
(09:19):
of third rate. He goes as a movie actor at
Clark Gable he's not. And you know, but I thought
it was a I thought it was a great actor
of disloyalty. And Obama hates Biden and Biden hates Obama.
We know that because that's been for a long time.
You remember, you guys, remember your perfect age for us.
But Hillary Obama wanted Hillary, not Biden. And Biden never
(09:46):
forgot that they hate each other. You remember when I
said that Bush and Marco had a lot of problems
together and they said, no, no, no, we get along,
we get along. I said, no, you don't get along.
You don't get along. And two debates in, and by
the way, Marko is doing very well, I will tell you,
but two debates in they started really going at it.
I said, I told you. And if you remember the
(10:09):
famous debates, we had those great debates, the Republican debates,
actually among the greatest ever. But I said, I told
you when they started going at it, well, these two
hate each other. There's no question about that. And why
wouldn't Why wouldn't Biden hate because you know, he really
passed a more in a more prime time period. But
(10:31):
I don't want to again, I don't want to stress
age because so many people I know so many people
who are far older than Biden who were so so amazing.
I speak with Rupert Murdoch a lot. I think Ruper's
ninety four and ninety five, that's right, so he's substantially older.
He's like thirteen years older than Biden. He's one hundred
(10:54):
percent sharp.
Speaker 3 (10:56):
He's just attack, just checking out with everybody. We are
talking to former President Trump here, and we think future
President Trump again, my friends, things are certainly looking good.
And to that end, President Trump wanted to get your
take on are you already a point where you're willing
to say or that you feel strongly that a majority
(11:18):
of the American people have rejected the lawfair all these
different uses and abuses of the law by these crazy
prosecutors against you, because it feels like the Democrats are
in a panic that that hasn't worked. And if anything
has actually brought some people to your.
Speaker 4 (11:36):
Side, I think it has brought people to my side.
I'm shocked at it because it's so dirty and so vicious,
and it's used in other third world countries. We're sort
of a third world country too, by the way, because
of our voting and our voting procedures and all you know,
I had dinner last night at mar A Lago with
(11:59):
the head of Hungary, Victor Orban and very strong guy.
He was. I mean, we had an amazing dinner and
we talked about the voting, and I said, what's the difference. Well,
our procedures are much more secure than yours. He just
said that, just out of the blue. He said, our
(12:20):
procedures are much more strict than yours. They don't do
mail in voting, they don't do the kind of things
that we do. But they have real voting, you know,
in other words, you go and you get checked and
you have identification, and we have voting. And so Victor
will say, Victor is a strong guy, a great leader
(12:40):
of that country. You know, it's a country that's doing
very well. They don't have crime, they don't have, you know,
much crime, very little. And he just said, well, you know,
our voting is so different than yours. Ours is much
more secure. And I wasn't looking for that answer. That's
just an essy and I had a smile to my
(13:01):
and he's right. Many countries, any legitimate country that has
legitimate voting, it has to be more secure than us.
When you have mail in voting and all the crazy
things that we have. There's no security there, very little.
We're like a third world country in so many ways.
And when Biden did the weaponization of the Justice Department,
(13:22):
NDAs and attorney generals and as you know, he sent
people to those agencies to work there to get me.
And when he did that, I think the people really
rejected it, and I think probably it has made me
more popular.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
Yeah, we're talking to President Trump. Vice president there, You've
done a good job I think of creating a lot
of different drama associated with who the vice president is
going to be. Can you tell us have you made
up your mind on your pick yet? And second part
of that, have you decided on how the vice president
(13:59):
is going to be announced?
Speaker 4 (14:03):
I'd love to do it during the convention. You know,
the Republican Convention is a big deal. In the old days,
they used to do it that way. Now technology makes
it more difficult. I say, no, it's supposed to make
it easier. It makes it actually more difficult, if you
can believe it. But I'd love to do it during
the convention, which would be you know, or just slightly
before the convention, like Monday. Love to do it on
(14:25):
Tuesday or Wednesday actually, But for a lot of complex
reasons that you people understand you pretty much don't do that.
And I have some really really good candidates, and you know,
maybe leaning one way and that changes sometimes, you know,
all of a sudden you see something that you like
(14:46):
or you don't like, and you lean a little bit differently.
But we have some very good We have a very
good bench. We have a very good bench.
Speaker 1 (14:53):
How would you announce it? Do you call up everybody?
Speaker 2 (14:56):
Like?
Speaker 1 (14:56):
How many finalists would you say you have right now?
Is it like a job offered? Do you call them up?
Do you bring them in in person? Have you thought
about how you would convey that offer?
Speaker 4 (15:07):
It's like a highly sophisticated version of The Apprentice? Yeah, okay,
if you think about it. And they're great people, They're
really good. I got to know them very well. I'd
say four people, you know, four or five people, but
I got to know them very well. Some dropped out
over the course of they didn't drive, you know, I had.
(15:29):
There were reasons why they wouldn't have done as well.
Speaker 3 (15:34):
So it's still open, though, sir, you're telling us that
it's not necessarily a done deal.
Speaker 2 (15:38):
In your mind. Is that right? You're still thinking it over?
Speaker 4 (15:40):
I have no I'm going into great detail, but more ultimately,
it's more of an instinct. You know, you develop an instinct,
but I like to know all the facts before the
instinct kicks in. The people are fantastic, Like I watched
Tim Scott on television yesterday. He was fierce and great.
(16:02):
He was great. I watched Marco over the weekend on television.
He was incredible. JD has been great. You have a
man named Bergham who's a fantastic governor in North Dakota.
And you know, it's a state that's very very prosperous,
very successful, and he's done a good job there. You have,
(16:24):
you have some terrific people.
Speaker 3 (16:27):
We just want to give you a chance of President
Trump to close us out here to tell everybody all
across the country who's listing millions of people who who
are feeling optimistic but also don't want to get ahead
of themselves, how how should they be feeling as we're
going into the absolute peak of this election cycle. Given
(16:47):
your numbers and where you are.
Speaker 4 (16:51):
Well, I think it's the most important election in the
history of our country. We have an open border that's
a disastro, it's a sieve, it's a it's an open wound,
and people are coming into our country that shouldn't be here,
and we cannot let this happen, and we're going to
have to move them out. We'll have to deport them.
We'll be doing a large deportation. We'll have no choice.
(17:13):
They're prisoners, their mental institution, people from mental institutions, and
you can look all over the world where they've done this.
They're moving them into our country. They're doing it purposely.
The governments of those countries, many countries, not just South America,
and their crime rates are way down. Venezuela, their crime
rate is down by seventy two percent. Wouldn't we be
(17:34):
nice if we had a crime rate that went our
crime rates? Our crime rates are going up because we're
taking all these prisoners and all these people from other countries.
But you take a look at El Salvador, take a
look at these countries. Their crime rates are way down
because they're deporting their criminals, their drug dealers, and they're
emptying out their jails into our country. How stupid can
(17:56):
we be? But I'd say, with everything, and it's so
that's mendus problem that we have that we shouldn't have had.
You know, we wouldn't have had that problem. We wouldn't
have had the war in Ukraine. Think about it. You
wouldn't have had Russia attack in Ukraine. There's no way
he would have done it. Had a good relationship with
both of them, you would have It wouldn't have happened.
(18:17):
You wouldn't have had China looking very violently at Taiwan.
I don't see what's going to happen there, but could happen.
They certainly, they certainly are threatening right now. But you
wouldn't have that, and you wouldn't have inflation. You wouldn't
have had the attack on Israel. That would have never happened.
Aren had no money, they were broke with sanctions, they
(18:39):
were literally broke. There was no terror. I had no
terror during my administration. We had no terror attacks. And
now it's like terrible what's happening, and all over the world,
the whole world is exploding. And Victor Orbin actually said,
the only thing you can do is get Trump backed.
He kept everything. I kept things in order. You wouldn't
have had all these every one of these events, including inflation.
(19:03):
You wouldn't have had that was caused by stupid energy
policies of this administration. It was caused by energy, the
cost of energy. So we're going to make our country
great again. We're going to have a big, a really
big week and I think it's going to be very inspiring.
I hope so. And we have to get back to business.
We have to get back to running the country the
(19:23):
way it should be. We have to stop the crime
our cities are. In Chicago, last week, one hundred and
seventeen people were shot and seventeen died. That's a war zone.
That's worse than most war zones. You don't have that happening.
That's not happening in Afghanistan. That's not happening in other
(19:46):
places that you think of being a violent country. Chicago,
think of it. One hundred and seventeen people were shot
over the weekend. Now it was a big weekend. Like
what we're adding an extra seventeen died.
Speaker 1 (20:03):
Last question for you, mister President, I love the golf challenge.
Buck has never watched a golf match on television. He
said he would watch you play against Biden. Do you
I love the twenty stroke challenge? He challenged you first,
what do you think Biden would actually shoot if he
had to count every hole? And do you think he
(20:27):
would even be able to finish eighteen holes or do
you think they would have to stop it and take
him off because he's not healthy enough to even finish
eighteen holes.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
How do you think the round would.
Speaker 4 (20:37):
Go so without Bragg? And I'm a very good golfer.
You know. I've won club championships, many, many, many club championships,
and I win them all the time. I still win them.
I play just as good now as I did twenty
years ago. That's a good sign. That's a good physical
and cognitive test, because golf is mental also, right. But
(20:58):
I've won many club shipsampionships, and he cannot win a
club championship. Nor can he break a hundred. There's no
way he breaks a hundred. I've seen his swing. I've
never seen him play, but I've seen his swing, and
I've spoken to people that are near to him, and
he's a terrible golfer. But he's all talked. You have
to understand he is. When pilots go to the White House,
(21:21):
they say, he says, oh, I used to fly planes.
When truckers go to the White House. He said, oh,
I drove a truck everything that anybody goes there. Well,
he made the challenge to the wrong guy in golf.
I mean, I've offered him. I give him twenty struck
tennis side, I said, and I'll give him million dollars
to his charity. But they turned me down. They said no. Now,
(21:43):
if he was a six handicap, which he's not, he
says six point two because he wants to be nice
and accurate. I don't believe he could break one hundred
and fifty. I've watched his swing. I don't believe. And
I break seventy a lot, but I shoot in the
low seventies and mid seventies. And that's that's what you
have to do. You know, when you play, when you
win club championships, you're playing against scratch golfers, and I
(22:06):
often beat them. I mean this year I won three
and I don't get to play very much relative to
a lot of these guys. They live on the golf course,
you know. So you know, he makes a challenge. He's
all talk and no action, a nasty guy. And remember
he weaponized government against me, and that's a very bad precedent.
(22:27):
To say, very very bad, very dangerous.
Speaker 3 (22:30):
Well, mister President, we are so thankful both for the
time that you've given us today and also that you
are in this fight and that you're going to take
it to the very end here in this election, and
so many people here are thinking about you, supporting you,
and praying for you as you do. So thank you
so much again for coming on Clan buck Well, Thank.
Speaker 4 (22:48):
You, and you have a great show, and I appreciate
it and it's an honor to be honored. And I'll
see you guys soon. Thank you very much.
Speaker 2 (22:54):
Thank you, sir. You're listening to twenty four a year
of impact with Clay and buck the.
Speaker 3 (23:04):
Save Act, the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act. Man, they
love their acronyms up on Capitol Hill. Not as much
as we did in the CIA, a lot more acronyms there,
but they still like them up on Capitol Hill. And
here here's the deal. They're trying to get this through
in Congress. And guess what, the Democrats don't want to
(23:25):
play ball of this at all. That's not a surprise.
I think we would all expect that. Speaker of the House,
Mike Johnson spoke to this issue, and I mean.
Speaker 2 (23:34):
He's straight upset.
Speaker 3 (23:34):
It's because Democrats want illegals to be able to vote.
Speaker 2 (23:39):
Play it.
Speaker 5 (23:40):
Many of the Democrats want all of these illegals to
participate in our federal elections. They want them to vote.
There's no other conclusion that you can draw. When the
White House announced they would veto the bill, they effectively
handed our elections over to all of these illegal aliens
that have come here. And the number is far greater
than what is being reported. Whatever number is being reported
is grossly underreported. I've been saying for some time. I
(24:02):
think it's probably close to sixteen million. That may be
an underestimate, and it's a serious problem. And we cannot
allow a federal election to be jeopardized by people who
can run into the local welfare office, sign up for
taxpayer benefits, and check a box it says I'm a
citizen and I want to vote.
Speaker 3 (24:19):
You know, seems pretty straightforward, doesn't it. Clay Democrats completely
and adamantly opposed to this. We should ask why.
Speaker 1 (24:28):
It also is evidence of what Joe Biden did is
a generational move, and this is important for everybody to understand.
He opened the floodgates at the southern border allowed ten
million or more. You just heard Mike Johnson there say
it might be higher than sixteen million. Whatever the math is,
(24:50):
it is a number that is eight figures or more, right,
ten million or more. That's more than over thirty I
believe of our state populations in illegals that have entered
just since Joe Biden became President of the United States.
And if Trump wins, and I certainly hope he does
(25:12):
in November and he comes in and we've had Stephen
Miller on this program a lot talking about the exact program.
When it comes to deportation, they are going to immediately
sue him into the high heavens to try to stop
all these illegals from being taken out of the country.
You have to ask yourself why, because their long range
(25:33):
plan is that these illegals come into our country, get married,
have children, have citizens that are children, and then it
becomes incredibly difficult to deport them because then you're tearing
apart families.
Speaker 2 (25:50):
You are an awe. They'll call him hitler.
Speaker 1 (25:52):
The ability to actually deport ten million people is I
think Democrats are wagering virtually impossible, and so they've created
the problem, and when the problem is tried to uh,
when there's an attempt to address the problem, they'll immediately
throw up all roadblocks and try to use it to
(26:13):
their political advantage. And it's so instructive that they won't
even vote. This is a very basic thing, right, Hey,
who should vote in American elections? American citizens? That should
be something that ninety nine percent of all Americans agree on.
Speaker 3 (26:30):
Otherwise, Democrats allow it, you know, allow mail in ballots
from Shanghai and Mumbai and Dugil Dwarf and you know whatever,
like anyone all over the world gets to say in
our election. Right, it's absurd, it's completely crazy. But you know,
to your point, they they recognize that there is political
benefit in this. I'd also say one of the air
that they usually will play this game of there's no
(26:51):
voter fraud, and then we say, well, actually, there are
people have gone to prison for voter frauds, so I'm
pretty sure there is voter fraud. And then they go, Okay,
there's voter fraud, but there's not that much. And then
you can talk to election people who have real expertise
and elections and they will tell you that one there's
it's very hard to actually find this kind of fraud,
(27:11):
and two, there's no political will, especially at the federal
level under a Democrat, to look for this kind of
a fraud. So, and think of all the illegality that
currently exists around the whole issue of illegal aliens, legal immigrants.
They're in the country illegally, they're signing documents and paperwork
and doing things that are also illegal, and they're completely
(27:34):
safe from prosecution for all of that. But we're to
believe that if they were to vote in an election,
that the Biden administration is going to really track them
down and deal with that.
Speaker 2 (27:44):
It's completely absurd.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
The number one complaint I bet you get and I
know I get, is you guys don't talk enough about
how they're going to rig the twenty twenty four election.
Speaker 2 (27:59):
I know you those emails. I get those emails all
the time.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
Let me say this, this is one that I think
Trump has actually addressed pretty well in twenty twenty four.
But to the extent we don't talk about it enough.
I want to reemphasize it here. Trump's not gonna win.
I don't believe a super close race. I think if
it is a super close race. I think that Democrats
(28:24):
are going to find a way to work the angles
to their advantage. They were stunned when he won a
super close race in twenty sixteen. I don't think they
ever thought it was possible. They got caught flat footed.
They got fifty percent of the vote in for John
Fetterman and the Senate race in Pennsylvania before voters were
(28:45):
even aware he couldn't speak. We know in many ways
Biden can't speak right now. If he's the nominae, people
are still going to show up. This is where Trump
is right. This win has to be too big to rig.
And the way it is too big to rig is
if all of you listening right now get out and
are active, and we expand the battleground beyond the seven
(29:09):
states that everybody's talking about right now. We need to
put Virginia in play. We need to put New Hampshire
in play. We need to put Maine in play, Minnesota,
New Mexico, maybe New Jersey. We need to create a
larger battlefield so that it's like if you have remember
the cartoons back in the day, Buck when the dam
(29:30):
would start to break and you had the cartoon character
who was trying to put his finger over the different
holes that are exploding in the wall, and eventually the
exploding wall has so many holes that the water can't
be stopped. This is one that I think Trump is
actually messaged well. But it's my response to all of
you saying, oh, they're gonna rig it.
Speaker 2 (29:49):
Got to make it too big to rig.
Speaker 1 (29:51):
Got to make it the dam that has too many
spouting water holes to allow them to put it all
back into their control. Let me also say this, you
got to be very careful if you're out there listening,
be very careful that you don't buy into nihilism, this
idea that nothing matters. I know you've heard this. Sometimes
(30:13):
there is a lot of and I understand it, but
there is a lot of negativity out there, this idea
of oh, they're going to rig it. I don't know
why you even talk about this. I don't know's You
can't allow yourself to be overcome by cynicism. You have
to believe, even when sometimes it means that you get
(30:35):
kicked in the teeth when you wake up or you
watch the election results come in. You have to be
willing to get up over and over again. And that
is what I would say, right now, if it's going
to be Trump v. Biden or Trump vy Harris or
whatever it's going to be, we're already starting to get
I'll get them every day an email. You don't talk
enough about how they're going to steal the election.
Speaker 2 (30:57):
Too big to rig.
Speaker 1 (30:57):
I think Trump's messaging it well, got to put a
situation out there where there are so many different places
where the win can happen that it's like a damn
that's starting to break.
Speaker 2 (31:08):
They can't manage to control it.
Speaker 3 (31:10):
And I'd say this, I promise, if we knew where
they plan to cheat, we will talk about it. But yeah,
we're not on those emails.
Speaker 2 (31:17):
Believe it or not.
Speaker 3 (31:18):
The Democrats are not like, hey, let's get let's get
right wing talk show hosts Clay and Buck in the
loop on where we plan to try to steal the
election from Trump. We are not privy to that. But
certainly in things like illegals voting and anywhere where we
see weakness as we are right now, we talk about it.
But yeah, I know they don't. They don't include us
in the in the I just.
Speaker 2 (31:39):
Think you know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1 (31:41):
There is a certain degree when you lose a few games.
It's like a sports team that doesn't have any confidence
they can actually win. Something goes a little bit awry
and they're like, oh, here we go again. And it
takes a new culture to break through the culture of
losing to learn how to win. It's a huge part.
I think the Republican Party hasn't learned how to win
(32:02):
because I think a lot of people, even back in
sixteen when Trump won, it was like, oh my, it's
like you just suddenly found a pot of gold at
the end of the rainbow. You weren't expecting it and
it suddenly happened. And then everything since has been other
than like Glenn Youngkin for instance, in twenty one, mostly
disappointing over the last six to eight years.
Speaker 3 (32:23):
Yeah, well, I try to remind everybody things went very
well from twenty sixteen until twenty twenty basically politically for
all of us, and the country was actually in really
good shape and things were going. So I often get
the question, I'm sure you do to Clay, especially at
live events, you know, speaking, We're gonna be in Milwaukee
at the RNC, so stuff like this will come up,
(32:44):
and the Q and A. The most common question, how
do we win our country back? And I try to
tell people the fight's never over, So there's no it's
not ever one, as in, we're done, we're good. The
bad guys, the communists, you know, the Chinese Communist Party, whatever,
it's never gone, so there's no okay, hey, we have one.
I like to think of it as how do we
put ourselves in position to move our country in the
(33:08):
right direction and have prosperous and peaceful and and dare
I say joyous two year, four year, six year increments
whatever it may be, like, how do we win the
next four years for America in the best possible way,
Because that's doable.
Speaker 2 (33:22):
We can do that.
Speaker 3 (33:23):
And we have had stretches before where things have been
moving in the right direction and people have been growing
in wealth, growing in freedom, growing in prosperity. So it's
never over, right, the fight's never done. And I think
that's important to remember too, because otherwise you do start
to get into nihilism, like what when do we win
our country back? You win it, and then you have
to keep defending it, and you have to stay in
the winter spot, right, You have to keep the pressure on.
(33:46):
You have to be vigilant. There's no you know then
and then the Republic lived happily ever after. That's not
a thing. It's never going to be a thing. So
we keep fighting, we keep pushing, and we stay in
the fight day in and day out,