August 9, 2024 • 36 mins
Buck read Kamala's autobiography so you don't have to. Democrat strategy is to hide Harris for as long as possible. Harris word salad montage. Kamala agrees to one debate. Trump talks about how Democrats took presidency away from Biden. If Trump stays focused, he'll destroy Kamala. Walz joke about JD Vance couch lie shows how low Democrats are willing to go. Truncated campaign favors Harris.
Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome in everybody Monday. I'm sorry Friday. I knew that
was gonna happen Friday edition of the Klaid, Travis and
Buck Sexton Show. As you can tell, having a little
bit of a a little bit of a cold today.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
This is Bob Clay is out.
Speaker 1 (00:14):
He is out on vacation, having a lovely time celebrating
his twentieth anniversary. He's out next week too. I assume
by Monday my voice will be normal, So apologies. Today
I have hydrated. I have had as much Crocket coffee
as I safely can without spiraling off into orbit. So
we are going to get into all of it today,
(00:34):
and I'm gonna remember what day it is. I just
was reading something right as we started, so it could
happen to the best of us. Also on a little
bit of cold med So if I say anything crazy,
if all of a sudden I devolve into a Kamala
Harris style word salad, I will blame it on the
day quill. So we've got a lot going on here.
Vice President Harris and the campaign strategy that they're trying
(00:59):
to explain to people as something other than hide the candidate,
but it is hide the candidate.
Speaker 2 (01:05):
That will be something that we dive into.
Speaker 1 (01:08):
We've got Ryan Gradusky joining us in the second hour,
talk about the battleground states, the polling, the latest on
the numbers. Should folks be concerned, I say no. I
say we should be focused, we should be energized, we
should be ready for the fight ahead.
Speaker 2 (01:28):
But scared.
Speaker 3 (01:30):
No.
Speaker 1 (01:31):
I think Trump's got this. I believe it in my bones,
I feel it in my toes. I think Trump has
got this thing. So it doesn't mean that we can
take our foot off the pedal. It just means that
we should have a quiet confidence and a steely determination
about this upcoming election. You've also got prosecutors asking for
(01:51):
a three week delay in Donald Trump's twenty twenty election
obstruction case.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
We'll talk to Julie Kelly about that.
Speaker 1 (01:58):
And the body camera footage as well that has come
out from the attempted assassination of Donald Trump or the
shooting of Donald Trump, which is also what happened. We'll
talk to Julie Kelly about that. In the third hour.
I wanted to get us started here with the Kamala
Harris phenomenon. In this moment, I was reading this morning
(02:20):
the Kamala Harris autobiography. And if you're wondering, it is
as boring, however boring you think the Kamala Harris autobiography
may be. The Truths We Hold, the Truths we hold,
however boring you think it is, it is more boring
than that. But this is what I do for you.
(02:40):
This is the dedication to this job that I have.
Even with a nasty sniffle, I wake up early in
the morning, drink my Crockett coffee and read The Truths
We Hold. It's not even a good title, which for
a memoir, you know you think that would be part one.
Speaker 2 (02:56):
Not even a good title. Definitely not a good book.
Speaker 1 (03:00):
And it's interesting because without the political skills to sell
the messaging in the book, it all is bound to
fall flat, meaning there's not enough to go with. There's
not enough struggle, there's not enough interesting story in Kamala's background.
I mean really, one of the more interesting parts of
(03:21):
her life before she became a senator and a state
Attorney general, I guess would have been her social life.
Speaker 2 (03:28):
Just saying so, there's.
Speaker 1 (03:30):
Not a lot to work with here, and that's why
the whole strategy has come down to, don't let the
American people see who this candidate really is, because they're
just hoping in the same way that the plan was
to hide Biden's dementia from the American people long enough
that it's too late.
Speaker 2 (03:50):
Oh sorry, we fooled you.
Speaker 1 (03:52):
You voted just enough to put him into office for
four more years and then have Kamala take over. The
plan now is to have some of the undecided, some
of the persuadable voters think maybe Kamala is actually pretty cool.
Maybe she's young, she's hip, she sees the future. She's
running a campaign. They're using the word that they use
for Obama.
Speaker 2 (04:12):
So much hope. Oh it's a campaign of hope and joy.
Speaker 1 (04:19):
Well, I am hoping that people aren't swindled by this nonsense,
and I hope that the American people get to see
who Kamala Harris really is. This is one of the
biggest exercises in gaslighting I can think of in modern
American history. Just as a point of quick review, and
(04:40):
you can do a fast Internet search and see these articles.
It has been known by Democrats for all of the
Biden presidency that Kamala was a failure, hadn't established her
own brand, was unimpressive and was really just a huge disappointment.
Speaker 2 (04:59):
To the demoocrats who put her in this role.
Speaker 1 (05:03):
But look, when you make decisions based on these superficial
characteristics of gender and race, this kind of thing can happen.
It was never about Kamala Harris is brilliant, has a vision,
makes great decisions, has a record to be proud of.
It was Oh, she's a Democrat and she is a
black woman. She is an Indian woman as well, you
(05:25):
know South Asian background, and so that's what we need, right,
That's what we need in this role to complete the picture.
It's about the cover of the book, not what's inside
the book. And as I said, the true as we
hold the book.
Speaker 2 (05:38):
Is not good. It is not good.
Speaker 1 (05:41):
But they thought they could push this forward and they're
trying to do it right now without anybody being I
guess we're all the wiser, but we're just supposed to
take this this huge switch from Kamala as a drag
on the Biden ticket to Kamala is the leader we
need in this moment, the same this, same people. It's
not that I disagree with these individuals who are saying
(06:03):
this stuff now, it's that they were saying something entirely
different again anti truth, not just untrue, anti truth. Kamala
has gone from so bad she makes Biden look bad,
and that was a year ago, that was six months ago,
that was maybe even three weeks ago, so bad she
(06:25):
makes Biden look bad to oh my gosh, isn't she amazing?
Speaker 2 (06:29):
Isn't she doing?
Speaker 1 (06:30):
And I have to credit some of the acting jobs
that I've seen, of course on Morning Joe. Wow, I'm
going deep into the communist headquarters, aren't I? I mean,
thank god, I'm drinking my Crocket in the morning to
keep me feeling the freedom, because otherwise I'm reading Kamala's
autobiography of watching Morning Joe. I mean really, I'm getting
a PhD in commy. But I'm sitting there and I'm
(06:50):
looking at how they are trying to create. They're trying
to generate an entirely false enthusiasm about her. The enthusiasm
is for the Democrat machine being in charge. The enthusiasm
that they're trying to draw upon is for Donald Trump
to not be president. But they have to dress that
up as something else. They have to create this belief
(07:13):
that Kamala is fantastic. The problem with that, other than
the most obvious thing of all, which is that she
is even for a Democrat, she is a weak politician,
and she's also a far left politician. I mean, you
cannot run away from things like I would ban fracking.
You cannot run away from raising money for people who
(07:34):
are burning down neighborhoods in Minneapolis because they're unhappy about
something that.
Speaker 2 (07:38):
Had nothing to do with them.
Speaker 1 (07:39):
Another thing that never really gets said about this the
death of George Floyd. The people, whether they were in
Minneapolis or anywhere else, they had nothing to do with them.
It was a criminal case. They found the police officer guilty.
I disagree with the verdict, but that is the justice
system that we have. It actually had nothing to do
with them burning down things, looting things because they're upset
about something that happened to somebody else.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
Think about that logic for a second. So am I
allowed to burn down something?
Speaker 1 (08:04):
Because I think it's really unjust that there are Democrats,
including kamo's vice president Walls, who want twelve year olds
to make irreversible and incredibly damaging gender changes to themselves.
Like if I went and burned something down over that,
I'd be an arsonist, I'd go to prison.
Speaker 2 (08:21):
Oh, but it's about social justice, so it's okay.
Speaker 1 (08:24):
No Kamalla push that stuff because that is Unfortunately, the
mob mentality is central to the Democrat party. It's why
they are collectivists ideologically. I mean, this is very deep
seated psychological stuff for Democrats. It comes from both that
very noxious combination of extreme arrogance and extreme insecurity that
(08:49):
committed leftists have. They think they should be in charge
of everyone else on everything, but they also feel deeply
insufficient themselves, know at some level that they are unimpressive,
they are weak will, they are scared.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
They're scared all the time.
Speaker 1 (09:06):
In fact, a lot of the worst things that happen
in the world come from fearfulness. We think of it
as as just viciousness, but viciousness is the secondary characteristic
after people being fearful. I'm not good enough, I'm not
smart enough, I'll never make it. I'm scared, so I'm
going to do terrible things.
Speaker 2 (09:23):
Anyway.
Speaker 1 (09:23):
I didn't think I'd get too deep into the democrats
psychology today, but here we are. I'm getting into Kamala
Harris's psychology, which is why, Oh, I have Kamala's way too.
I have the authorized biography. Oh yes, I'm reading that
one as well. I'm not on vacation. I'm just at
an undisclosed freedom Bunker location, and I had to get
some reading done, or had to have some reading for
(09:45):
by the pool. And sure enough, Kamala's way and the
truth we hold. I'm not learning very much either. It's
all pretty known. Kamala's resume is quite flimsy. I mean, yes,
she was a prosecutor. Think about that. You're prosecutor in
San Francisco. A lot of prosecutors, a lot of attorneys
in cities across the country. Did she clean up San Francisco?
Did she make it impressive as a city or did
(10:07):
she make it worse? Did San Francisco get better or worse?
While she had the power to do something about it?
It got worse? Did the state of California get better
or worse? While she had the power to do something
about it got a lot worse? And did the United
States of America get better or worse while she was
vice president and given things like the border as borders
(10:27):
are under her control. We see a pattern here, right,
and now she's going to be president. Talk about failing upwards.
It's remarkable. But the New York Times trying to explain
to everybody that this is nothing to see, no problem
at all. Vice President Harris, this is from the New
York Times. I'm reading to you. This was on her
front page today again. I guess reading New York Times
(10:50):
in the morning. This is what I do. I do
this so you don't have to. Vice President Kamala Harris
has granted an interview, has not granted an interview or
held a news conference since President. I'd an endorse her
for president. Critics say she has been too cautious with
the press. Her supporters think it's the right strategy. Right now.
Look at the way they're setting this up. That's a quote, Okay,
(11:12):
that is New York Times first paragraph. Really the sub
subheading of their main story on Kamala today on the website.
And they're making it seem like this is brilliant strategy.
It's a deception, right, It is a deception. If I
told you, hey, hey, I want you to come buy
(11:33):
a house, and I say the house is amazing, it's
a beautiful house. You're gonna love this house future generations.
I don't know why I'm turning into Trump future generations of
your family. Beautiful house, the most beautiful yard you've ever seen, big,
beautiful yard, swimming pool, greatest swimming pool on our I'm
telling you all about this house, and you're getting excited.
(11:53):
You're like, oh, wow, that sounds amazing. And I tell
you the price. You say, oh, that's the price. That's
that's a great deal. Let me see the house. And
I go no, no, no, no, no, not not yet, not yet.
I say, well, hold on a second. You might be
thinking to yourself that that seems to be a bit
of a red flag, right, No, come on, let me
see for myself.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
I really I just want to walk through it one time. No,
I can't.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
I can't let you see this house yet. Maybe maybe
at some point in the future. But I want you
to make up your mind now as to whether you're
whether you will buy it. You know, we can sign
the contract later, but I want you to tell me now.
I want you to give me verbal agreement you're gonna
buy this house without seeing it. That is the game
the Democrats are playing with the Kamala Harris candidacy. They
(12:38):
want people to be all in without knowing what they're
all in for. They want people to be excited about
something without understanding what they're getting excited about. And this
comes after the gas lighting, So it was gaslighting. Kamala
used to be horrible. Now the exact same people who
are Democrats who are saying she was terrible are saying
(12:58):
she's amazing. And while they've now transitioned into the she's
amazing phase, they're saying, Oh, we're not going to show
it to you because it's brilliant strategy. And then they
say Republicans are bouncing on this, Well, yeah, if you're
trying to hide the product in this case a politician
(13:19):
from the people who are the consumers in this case,
the voters that would seem to be the basis of concern,
wouldn't it. This is why, And I'll break down some
more of the numbers, and we talked yesterday about white
working class voters in swing states, and we'll speak to
Ryan gar.
Speaker 2 (13:36):
Dusky about that later as well.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
But this is why I still have a quiet confidence
in the Trump ticket, because they can only hide for
so long, and when the hiding stops, it's going to
be Kamala Harris out there for all the American people
to see and hear from and she at some point
she has agreed to at least one debate. At some
(14:00):
point she's going to have to stand on a stage
and explain why she has said and done some of
the most radical left wing things imaginable.
Speaker 2 (14:09):
So we will get into all of that.
Speaker 1 (14:12):
My friends coming up here. Also, it's a Friday. I
would love to take your calls. You'd help me with
my voice too. So it's doing pretty well so far,
but by hour three, whoo, my vocal cords are going
to look like uncooked hamburger meat. Sorry that was gross,
but you know what I mean. Indulge me for a
minute here as I share with you another project that
I'm taking on this Monday. I'm debuting a new e newsletter.
(14:33):
This one's all about the intersection of world events and
finances and how you're affected. This is the kind of
stuff I've always paid attention to. You know, my dad
made a living watching the markets and reporting on them.
My brother has done the same for a big hedge
fund in the past, and this is stuff that we
talk about at the dinner table, along with geopolitics and
everything else. We want to know what's going on with
our money, with our finances. In this newsletter, you'll get
(14:55):
my analysis on what's happening in the world and how
it affects you.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
Including Theottom line.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
Now I'm bringing in deep expertise on this as well,
collaborating with Brad Thomas, who's a writer and market analyst
who's been looking at stocks for a long time and
has an incredible track record. Brad's a really bright guy
and he's built his whole name on knowing where the
markets are going. So together we'll be publishing this weekly
newsletter so you can make key moves to position yourself
(15:22):
to take advantage of what's coming. Sign up to receive it.
It's free. It's a free newsletter. Go online to this
new website, the Urgent Message dot Com. It's easy to
sign up, easy to receive, and I think you're really
going to enjoy the insights and it could give you
some great stock tips and stock ideas for the future.
You'll see what I mean the Urgent Message dot Com.
(15:42):
That's the Urgent Message dot Com.
Speaker 2 (15:46):
You ain't imagining it. The world has gone insane. Reclaim
your sanity with Clay and Fun.
Speaker 4 (15:53):
Find them on the free iHeartRadio app or wherever you
get your.
Speaker 2 (15:57):
Podcasts, welcome back into and Buck.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
So Kamala Harris saying she's going to do an interview
and saying she is open to more debates as well.
Speaker 2 (16:08):
This has cut ten. Listen to this is yesterday.
Speaker 5 (16:11):
I'm glad that he's finally agreed to a debate.
Speaker 2 (16:13):
I'm September tenth.
Speaker 1 (16:14):
I'm looking forward to it.
Speaker 6 (16:15):
And put me tells out are you open to more debates?
Speaker 7 (16:19):
I am happy to have that conversation about an additional
debate where after September tenth.
Speaker 1 (16:26):
So she's happy to have a debate September tenth. She's
happy that that's what's going to be going on, but
she won't tell us when she's going to be in
a position to accept the other the other debates, right,
I just want to remind you, well how it's going
to go in this debate. Here's a Kamala word salad
(16:47):
montage play nine.
Speaker 2 (16:49):
Well. I think culture is.
Speaker 8 (16:53):
It is a reflection of our moment in our time
right because it is.
Speaker 7 (16:58):
We who stand together, ever collective, who have the power
and the ability to see what can be un murdered
by what has been the nature of democracy. There is
a duality to it has two sides to it. On
the one hand, there's incredible strength right that when a
democracy is intact what it does for its people in
(17:21):
terms of the strength it gives its people and protects
in terms of individual freedoms and rights, right and liberties.
Speaker 5 (17:28):
We all watched.
Speaker 8 (17:30):
The television coverage of just yesterday. That's on top of
everything else that we know and don't know yet based
on what we've just been able to see. And because
we've seen it or not doesn't mean it hasn't happened.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
Yeah, that's the woman who says she is looking forward
to the debate. You can make of that what you will,
you know. Finally, we have a credit card company that
are supporting conservative causes. It's called Coin spelled with a
G back by Visa. It's the first of its kind.
Coin was created to be a credit card you can
rely on, one that reinforces conservative values and embraces the
(18:08):
American spirit. They got that done by donating proportion of
every purchase you make to conservative causes and charities. I'm
excited about their most recent decision to support a cause
by the name of Rescue twenty two. You probably can
tell how much I love dogs because to man I
just heard Ginger a minute ago. But in Rescue twenty
two they take dogs, train them and pair them with
veterans to be service dogs for disabled veterans. It's an
(18:30):
amazing charity. And this is the kind of stuff that
coin does. A credit card aligned with your values. Plus
with coin you'll earn one percent cash back rewards. This
is what Carrie uses now when she goes to costco
and runs up quite a bill. Sometimes coin coign dot com,
that's coin coi gn dot com. Make sure you select
(18:50):
Clay and Buck and the how do you hear about
a section terms apply? Go to coin dot com slash
disclosures for full details.
Speaker 2 (18:57):
Welcome back into Clay and Buck.
Speaker 1 (18:59):
And it's definitely live radio. We have Ginger vocalizing her
displeasure with the Democrat ticket. Before I know Ginger, we'll
have to know that she objects to Kamala Harris's incredibly
radical agenda and record on energy policy, for example, and
also her support of the anarchic BLM riots and then
(19:23):
on walls. Ginger is very upset with his loose talk
about his military record to inflate it, and also the
fact that the guy is a lunatic lib This is
what she has told me, so I wanted to translate
that for you, because sometimes the barking isn't as clear
to everybody else. We have a lot here on the
(19:43):
Kamala Harris debate and discussion going on.
Speaker 2 (19:48):
One is I do think that.
Speaker 1 (19:52):
I think that they recognize now that Walls was a mistake.
Speaker 2 (19:56):
But as I have said, we.
Speaker 1 (19:58):
Shouldn't reflexively assume that whatever Kamala Harris does is some
brilliant thing, or rather the Democrats around her have some plan.
Speaker 2 (20:07):
They're playing four D chess whatever.
Speaker 1 (20:10):
I think it was Kamala's call, and I think she
made a bad one. The whole point of the vice
president pick for Kamala Harris was to present a guy.
I think it was only guys who were under consideration
to balance the ticket in terms of gender, a guy
who would appear normal to people, you know, guys in
(20:32):
the Midwest.
Speaker 2 (20:32):
I'm want to say normal.
Speaker 1 (20:33):
I mean like the guy next door, like somebody that
could be, you know, coaching your kids basketball team, and
that he could you could have your kids look up
to at some level and think is a good guy
and all this stuff. But when you see what Walls
has stood for, and I really appreciate that. When we
put this out to Minnesota callers yesterday, we aired a
bunch of calls, but we could have taken far more,
(20:57):
and it.
Speaker 2 (20:57):
Would have just been people who.
Speaker 1 (21:01):
Are telling us how terrible Walls actually is right, letting
us know what he stood for as a matter of
decision making and policy. And once again the Democrats are
lying about who the people are that they're putting forward.
The Democrats have decided that the only way they can
(21:23):
win come election time is to present people as something
other than what they really represent and what they really believe.
So they're trying to fool you, right, They're trying to
fool the electorate, and I know it's not going to
work on you per se. But there are people who
are very casual observers of the news and politics. You know,
(21:45):
when people say low information voter, that's one way to go,
but I feel like there's always that there's different ways
people can take that. To be low information about politics
is not to be low information about everything. I actually
can understand how an individual would want to live a nice,
happy life and not get too deep into the weeds
(22:07):
of politics. I disagree with that approach to life in America.
But I can understand how, and I don't have a
you know, it doesn't get me, doesn't ruffle my feathers
or anything. Right, And people are free to pursue their
own happiness in their own way. But there are people
out there who will listen to what the media is
saying Abou Kamala Harris who aren't Democrats or died in
(22:30):
the world democrats, and they'll believe it. And that's what's troubling, right.
There's a reason they're lying so much in such concerted fashion.
It's because it will work at some level. And so
then we have to do the counter narrative. You know,
one thing I thought was really interesting. We're looking at
the Trump counter narrative here, and he did the press
conference yesterday. We carried a bunch of it. I did
(22:53):
get the emails that say, why do you have to
go to commercial or to a herdbreak? Just keep playing it?
And I have to explain, No, we don't really have
a choice. It's like a you know, like a TV
show that give you an hour and that's it. You know,
we can't just blow through all of our breaks. And
we we aired as much of it as we could
live and I listened to the rest of it after
the fact. But the Trump response was interesting on a rate,
(23:19):
on a number of things, but on this in particular,
just the fact that we're supposed to think what's happened
here with the Biden Harris ticket is in any way acceptable,
is in any way normal or standard operating procedure. I
mean here he is pointing out that they they essentially
against Joe Biden's wishes, twisted his arm into not running anymore.
(23:43):
And he's the sitting president, he is the Democrat Party leader.
You would think this is cut one play it.
Speaker 6 (23:49):
The presidency was taken away from Joe Biden. And I'm
no Biden fan, but I'll tell you what from a
constitutional standpoint, from any standpoint you look at, they took
the presidency away, and people were saying he lost after
the debate, he couldn't win. Well, I don't know that
that's true necessarily, but whether he could win or he
couldn't win, he had the right to run and they
took it away. They said they're going to use the
(24:09):
twenty fifth Amendment. They're going to hit you hard. Either
we could do it the nice I heard. I know
exactly because I know a lot of people on the
other side, believe it or not.
Speaker 3 (24:18):
And they said we'll do it the nice way, we'll
do it the hard way. And he said, all right,
So that mean they've really taken What they've done is
pretty incredible.
Speaker 1 (24:29):
What they've done is incredible, not in a good way,
in a hard to believe way, and it's like, we're
not allowed to process this or take this into consideration
at all. The same voice, is the same party machinery,
The same DNC that a month ago was all in
for Joe Biden is now telling you to be all
(24:52):
in for Kamala Harris. And they just picked Kamala Harris
after they got caught with their hand in the cookie jar,
with Biden trying to lie to everybody. Now, that's the
part of this that frustrates me. What the polls should
show is anybody who is an independent or a swing
voter should view what happened with Joe Biden as disgraceful
(25:15):
and understand how dishonest the Democrats are in this whole process.
They were hiding a commander in chief's dementia so they
could hold onto power. That is what they were doing.
That is a statement of fact. That everyone agrees on.
The Democrats have had to admit this right now. They
say their only way around this is we weren't hiding it,
(25:36):
we didn't know. Okay. So the Democrats are telling everyone collectively,
the Democrat machine, that they have an IQ in the forties, okay,
that they are incapable of seeing the most basic and
obvious reality. And that's their excuse.
Speaker 2 (25:52):
So you can either believe the Democrats are liars or
they are so.
Speaker 1 (25:55):
Stupid as to be incapable of being in charge of
their own affair. I guess, take your pick. We all
know they're liars. I wish I could tell you the
Democrats were that done, but they're not. They're liars. They
would rather be engaged in deceit than anything else. Actually,
I mean, I think they enjoy it at some level too,
(26:16):
because it's a mark of power, and it's a mark
of lack of consequences. If you can get away with
lying and lying and lying and still stay in power,
well doesn't that just prove how in charge you really are? Reality, facts,
the observation of the electorate don't really matter very much.
Speaker 2 (26:32):
Now we have.
Speaker 1 (26:36):
Some opportunities here for the public to see the truth
about Kamala Harris. And it is going to require, however,
Donald Trump to stay on task and be focused. I
don't think mockery of Harris by the president will work.
I think that we can do that. I think the
rest of the Trump supporters out there are free to
(27:00):
discuss Harris's record and personality and all the rest of it.
But Trump needs to be on his a game. I
hope that he learned. Learned isn't the right word, really.
I hope that he replicates the experience that he had
from that first debate with Joe Biden, in which all
he has to do is just show people the truth.
(27:23):
Just Trump, be Trump, show them. Yeah, of course, be engaging.
He makes some jokes here and there, but let her
expose herself.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
At some level.
Speaker 1 (27:33):
The debate will happen. She has agreed to it. Now
it's a question of do enough people see the truth
in time. The truncated schedule, the shortened election schedule, is
definitely a advantage for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
That's a shame because hiding for a right.
Speaker 1 (28:00):
If I told you that you had to go hide
in a house, and you only had to do it
for thirty seconds, you're in much better shape than if
I told you have to hide for five hours.
Speaker 2 (28:08):
Right. You know that's the situation with Kamala Harris. Right now.
Speaker 1 (28:12):
They may have stumbled into an even easier in the
basement strategy, which is why The New York Times on
its front page is writing about that and saying, Oh,
isn't this so smart that they want people to think
of it not as.
Speaker 2 (28:27):
Dishonest but as brilliant.
Speaker 1 (28:30):
Right, we don't want people to figure out who this
really is, so we're not going to show you.
Speaker 2 (28:35):
Aren't we so clever?
Speaker 1 (28:37):
It's pretty terrifying when you think about what they're also
implying with all that they know they're doing this, and
they simply do not care. But this is why it
is so imperative for Donald Trump to win. While he
must stay focused, and I truly believe he will do so.
I am not people. I got a text my friend
(28:57):
this morning. Are you nervous about Kamala Harris?
Speaker 2 (28:59):
No? Do I recognize at some level that she could
win this election? Yes, of course.
Speaker 1 (29:06):
But do I have a strong and unshakable belief that
Donald Trump is a man of destiny at this point
and that he will overcome all these crazy obstacles, the
four criminal indictments, the press lying about him constantly, the
impeachments and the hoaxes and the Russia collusion and all. Yeah,
I think he's going to overcome all that, and I
think he's going to become president again. That is what
(29:28):
I believe. And you're free to call in and tell
me I'm wrong or right, whatever you like. Eight hundred
two two eight two. Switching my focus for a second
to another part of the world. People in Israel are
still bracing for what comes next, and as hard as
they try to lead normal lives every day, there's a
part of them that knows to be prepared for what
comes next. They've been on high alert for some time now,
(29:50):
some days more intense than others. We talk to people
in Israel every week, including our friend at the International
Fellowship of Christians and Jews. They're helping Israelis across the
country the event they're forced to spend days or weeks
in bomb shelters. While these shelters keep Israeli safe, they
need to be equipped with essentials for survival, including food
and water. The Fellowship has launched a project to immediately
(30:11):
equip bomb shelters with emergency food boxes for Israelis who
have to remain there in case of an attack. Ten
thousand of these food boxes have been delivered and they're
preparing to deliver thousands more. We spoke with the president
of IFCJ on the show yesterday, Yiel Xstein. You can
hear the conversation over at Clayandbuck dot com. If you
can support the federation's efforts, now is the time donate
(30:32):
forty five dollars to help provide an emergency food box
that includes items like food, water, baby formula, and other
critical essentials for vulnerable Israelis trapped in bomb shelters. The
website is SUPPORTIFCJ dot org. That's support IFCJ dot org.
Speaker 4 (30:49):
Stay on top of election use with twenty four from
Clay and Buck, a weekly podcast you can find on
the free iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 2 (31:00):
Welcome back into Clay and Buck. What are we at now?
Speaker 1 (31:04):
Almost three weeks We're twenty days since Kamala Harris became
the de facto Democrat nominee. Not a single press question,
not one. And this is Soviet style campaigning, right. You
have the apparatus of government. I remember Biden still in
charge theoretically the apparatus of the state media, which is
(31:27):
what we largely have now in spirit, if not in technicality,
and they're hoping to pull this whole thing off.
Speaker 2 (31:37):
Bill in Ohio, you want to weigh in? What's up? Bill? Oh?
Bill drop? Jessica in Texas? What have you got for its?
Speaker 1 (31:46):
Jessica, Jane and salg do any of our callers wish.
Speaker 2 (31:56):
To talk today on the Clay and Buck Show. Jane
in South Carolina? What have you got for us? Hey?
There we go.
Speaker 5 (32:02):
Okay, Yeah, I can't even start where I know about Kamala,
But anyway, I do know this that I've been around
for some time, and it's just a given that people
are as sick as their secret and the media is
pushing her to be so cavalier and cute. But one
(32:24):
of these days it's going to open up, God hope
and the American people will see what she is.
Speaker 1 (32:31):
Well, this is all thanks, thank you, Jane. This is
all a a time game, right, a timing game. They're
just trying to let people know. I'm sorry, to make
sure people don't know until it's too late, right, And
I know that with early voting you're talking about people
(32:53):
casting votes before they know certainly what's going to happen
if there's a later debate. I think early voting is
in early September in some places, and I got to
check and see what's the guys. Let me know, what
is the earliest early voting that can be done in
this presidential election? Is it's how many days out?
Speaker 2 (33:10):
Is it.
Speaker 1 (33:12):
The Oh they're trying to hide this from everybody, and
the media is all in on it. So we have
both limited resources to get the truth out, meaning people
all the investigative reporters. And remember when Sarah Palin was
the VP for McCain and that was announced in the
summer back in two thousand and eight, and all of
(33:32):
a sudden, there were reporters all over Wasilla, Alaska, and
you know talk you know who did Sarah Palin got
a problem with And they're just diving into everything. And
you could say, well, you know that's the game. Yeah,
but they're all looking at that. They weren't doing that
to to Biden, right, they weren't doing that to the
(33:52):
Obama ticket. So this is this is a one sided game.
So we have both the problem of the resources to
find the information and also the problem of dissemination of information.
Speaker 5 (34:06):
Now.
Speaker 1 (34:06):
I think Elon Musk with X has helped this tremendously
because X is a it's kind of an exchange, an
international exchange for information now right where even if you're
not an ex user, a lot of conversation, news stories,
breaking news, news tips are happening there. And it isn't
(34:29):
the political monoculture that it used to be, or really
just the totalitarian system that it used to be. I mean,
it was effectively a digital totalitarianism where all of a sudden,
when it was important. I know they weren't doing it
every day on everything, but on COVID, on the elections,
on election cheating, on a whole range of things, they
would shut down free speech. They no longer would you
(34:51):
have free speech right. So I think that's important and
I think that you know, you can see also the
way they mobilized narrative against Jade events. I mean they've
they've taken fabricated they took a fabricated meme with really
a like a like a stupid childish joke meme of
(35:15):
JdE events. And not only did they did the media
run lots of stories on this walls made a joke
about it, you know, I mean, this is the most
gutter politics imaginable, but that's what they've done to go
after JD events. So and I know that we all
expected that this was going to be what happened, but
(35:36):
we didn't expect it would be within a ninety day
a period.
Speaker 2 (35:40):
We didn't expect it to be.
Speaker 1 (35:43):
A such a short timeline because I think it does
make their deception easier, and that if there's a point
of concern that I could express to you right now
about where this election is going, nothing has surprised me really,
other than the fact that they were willing to shove
(36:04):
Biden out the door, which they did against his will.
Speaker 2 (36:07):
And as Trump pointed out, that's crazy.
Speaker 1 (36:09):
But now that the timeline issue is something that you
can't really blame Republicans for not having this all set
up in advance. This has never been done before. I mean,
they change candidates in the middle of the race. As
Trump has said, it's like changing fighters in the middle
of a fight.
Speaker 2 (36:25):
What is this?
Speaker 1 (36:27):
And Democrats are just hoping that they can game the
system to their advantage, just like they did during COVID
in twenty twenty.
Speaker 2 (36:34):
With all the new COVID voting regulations, So yeah, I know.
Speaker 1 (36:39):
They're just constantly cheating in different ways, but we still
have to win.
Speaker 2 (36:43):
I think Trump will. More coming up
Welcome in everybody Monday. I'm sorry Friday. I knew that
was gonna happen Friday edition of the Klaid, Travis and
Buck Sexton Show. As you can tell, having a little
bit of a a little bit of a cold today.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
This is Bob Clay is out.
Speaker 1 (00:14):
He is out on vacation, having a lovely time celebrating
his twentieth anniversary. He's out next week too. I assume
by Monday my voice will be normal, So apologies. Today
I have hydrated. I have had as much Crocket coffee
as I safely can without spiraling off into orbit. So
we are going to get into all of it today,
(00:34):
and I'm gonna remember what day it is. I just
was reading something right as we started, so it could
happen to the best of us. Also on a little
bit of cold med So if I say anything crazy,
if all of a sudden I devolve into a Kamala
Harris style word salad, I will blame it on the
day quill. So we've got a lot going on here.
Vice President Harris and the campaign strategy that they're trying
(00:59):
to explain to people as something other than hide the candidate,
but it is hide the candidate.
Speaker 2 (01:05):
That will be something that we dive into.
Speaker 1 (01:08):
We've got Ryan Gradusky joining us in the second hour,
talk about the battleground states, the polling, the latest on
the numbers. Should folks be concerned, I say no. I
say we should be focused, we should be energized, we
should be ready for the fight ahead.
Speaker 2 (01:28):
But scared.
Speaker 3 (01:30):
No.
Speaker 1 (01:31):
I think Trump's got this. I believe it in my bones,
I feel it in my toes. I think Trump has
got this thing. So it doesn't mean that we can
take our foot off the pedal. It just means that
we should have a quiet confidence and a steely determination
about this upcoming election. You've also got prosecutors asking for
(01:51):
a three week delay in Donald Trump's twenty twenty election
obstruction case.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
We'll talk to Julie Kelly about that.
Speaker 1 (01:58):
And the body camera footage as well that has come
out from the attempted assassination of Donald Trump or the
shooting of Donald Trump, which is also what happened. We'll
talk to Julie Kelly about that. In the third hour.
I wanted to get us started here with the Kamala
Harris phenomenon. In this moment, I was reading this morning
(02:20):
the Kamala Harris autobiography. And if you're wondering, it is
as boring, however boring you think the Kamala Harris autobiography
may be. The Truths We Hold, the Truths we hold,
however boring you think it is, it is more boring
than that. But this is what I do for you.
(02:40):
This is the dedication to this job that I have.
Even with a nasty sniffle, I wake up early in
the morning, drink my Crockett coffee and read The Truths
We Hold. It's not even a good title, which for
a memoir, you know you think that would be part one.
Speaker 2 (02:56):
Not even a good title. Definitely not a good book.
Speaker 1 (03:00):
And it's interesting because without the political skills to sell
the messaging in the book, it all is bound to
fall flat, meaning there's not enough to go with. There's
not enough struggle, there's not enough interesting story in Kamala's background.
I mean really, one of the more interesting parts of
(03:21):
her life before she became a senator and a state
Attorney general, I guess would have been her social life.
Speaker 2 (03:28):
Just saying so, there's.
Speaker 1 (03:30):
Not a lot to work with here, and that's why
the whole strategy has come down to, don't let the
American people see who this candidate really is, because they're
just hoping in the same way that the plan was
to hide Biden's dementia from the American people long enough
that it's too late.
Speaker 2 (03:50):
Oh sorry, we fooled you.
Speaker 1 (03:52):
You voted just enough to put him into office for
four more years and then have Kamala take over. The
plan now is to have some of the undecided, some
of the persuadable voters think maybe Kamala is actually pretty cool.
Maybe she's young, she's hip, she sees the future. She's
running a campaign. They're using the word that they use
for Obama.
Speaker 2 (04:12):
So much hope. Oh it's a campaign of hope and joy.
Speaker 1 (04:19):
Well, I am hoping that people aren't swindled by this nonsense,
and I hope that the American people get to see
who Kamala Harris really is. This is one of the
biggest exercises in gaslighting I can think of in modern
American history. Just as a point of quick review, and
(04:40):
you can do a fast Internet search and see these articles.
It has been known by Democrats for all of the
Biden presidency that Kamala was a failure, hadn't established her
own brand, was unimpressive and was really just a huge disappointment.
Speaker 2 (04:59):
To the demoocrats who put her in this role.
Speaker 1 (05:03):
But look, when you make decisions based on these superficial
characteristics of gender and race, this kind of thing can happen.
It was never about Kamala Harris is brilliant, has a vision,
makes great decisions, has a record to be proud of.
It was Oh, she's a Democrat and she is a
black woman. She is an Indian woman as well, you
(05:25):
know South Asian background, and so that's what we need, right,
That's what we need in this role to complete the picture.
It's about the cover of the book, not what's inside
the book. And as I said, the true as we
hold the book.
Speaker 2 (05:38):
Is not good. It is not good.
Speaker 1 (05:41):
But they thought they could push this forward and they're
trying to do it right now without anybody being I
guess we're all the wiser, but we're just supposed to
take this this huge switch from Kamala as a drag
on the Biden ticket to Kamala is the leader we
need in this moment, the same this, same people. It's
not that I disagree with these individuals who are saying
(06:03):
this stuff now, it's that they were saying something entirely
different again anti truth, not just untrue, anti truth. Kamala
has gone from so bad she makes Biden look bad,
and that was a year ago, that was six months ago,
that was maybe even three weeks ago, so bad she
(06:25):
makes Biden look bad to oh my gosh, isn't she amazing?
Speaker 2 (06:29):
Isn't she doing?
Speaker 1 (06:30):
And I have to credit some of the acting jobs
that I've seen, of course on Morning Joe. Wow, I'm
going deep into the communist headquarters, aren't I? I mean,
thank god, I'm drinking my Crocket in the morning to
keep me feeling the freedom, because otherwise I'm reading Kamala's
autobiography of watching Morning Joe. I mean really, I'm getting
a PhD in commy. But I'm sitting there and I'm
(06:50):
looking at how they are trying to create. They're trying
to generate an entirely false enthusiasm about her. The enthusiasm
is for the Democrat machine being in charge. The enthusiasm
that they're trying to draw upon is for Donald Trump
to not be president. But they have to dress that
up as something else. They have to create this belief
(07:13):
that Kamala is fantastic. The problem with that, other than
the most obvious thing of all, which is that she
is even for a Democrat, she is a weak politician,
and she's also a far left politician. I mean, you
cannot run away from things like I would ban fracking.
You cannot run away from raising money for people who
(07:34):
are burning down neighborhoods in Minneapolis because they're unhappy about
something that.
Speaker 2 (07:38):
Had nothing to do with them.
Speaker 1 (07:39):
Another thing that never really gets said about this the
death of George Floyd. The people, whether they were in
Minneapolis or anywhere else, they had nothing to do with them.
It was a criminal case. They found the police officer guilty.
I disagree with the verdict, but that is the justice
system that we have. It actually had nothing to do
with them burning down things, looting things because they're upset
about something that happened to somebody else.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
Think about that logic for a second. So am I
allowed to burn down something?
Speaker 1 (08:04):
Because I think it's really unjust that there are Democrats,
including kamo's vice president Walls, who want twelve year olds
to make irreversible and incredibly damaging gender changes to themselves.
Like if I went and burned something down over that,
I'd be an arsonist, I'd go to prison.
Speaker 2 (08:21):
Oh, but it's about social justice, so it's okay.
Speaker 1 (08:24):
No Kamalla push that stuff because that is Unfortunately, the
mob mentality is central to the Democrat party. It's why
they are collectivists ideologically. I mean, this is very deep
seated psychological stuff for Democrats. It comes from both that
very noxious combination of extreme arrogance and extreme insecurity that
(08:49):
committed leftists have. They think they should be in charge
of everyone else on everything, but they also feel deeply
insufficient themselves, know at some level that they are unimpressive,
they are weak will, they are scared.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
They're scared all the time.
Speaker 1 (09:06):
In fact, a lot of the worst things that happen
in the world come from fearfulness. We think of it
as as just viciousness, but viciousness is the secondary characteristic
after people being fearful. I'm not good enough, I'm not
smart enough, I'll never make it. I'm scared, so I'm
going to do terrible things.
Speaker 2 (09:23):
Anyway.
Speaker 1 (09:23):
I didn't think I'd get too deep into the democrats
psychology today, but here we are. I'm getting into Kamala
Harris's psychology, which is why, Oh, I have Kamala's way too.
I have the authorized biography. Oh yes, I'm reading that
one as well. I'm not on vacation. I'm just at
an undisclosed freedom Bunker location, and I had to get
some reading done, or had to have some reading for
(09:45):
by the pool. And sure enough, Kamala's way and the
truth we hold. I'm not learning very much either. It's
all pretty known. Kamala's resume is quite flimsy. I mean, yes,
she was a prosecutor. Think about that. You're prosecutor in
San Francisco. A lot of prosecutors, a lot of attorneys
in cities across the country. Did she clean up San Francisco?
Did she make it impressive as a city or did
(10:07):
she make it worse? Did San Francisco get better or worse?
While she had the power to do something about it?
It got worse? Did the state of California get better
or worse? While she had the power to do something
about it got a lot worse? And did the United
States of America get better or worse while she was
vice president and given things like the border as borders
(10:27):
are under her control. We see a pattern here, right,
and now she's going to be president. Talk about failing upwards.
It's remarkable. But the New York Times trying to explain
to everybody that this is nothing to see, no problem
at all. Vice President Harris, this is from the New
York Times. I'm reading to you. This was on her
front page today again. I guess reading New York Times
(10:50):
in the morning. This is what I do. I do
this so you don't have to. Vice President Kamala Harris
has granted an interview, has not granted an interview or
held a news conference since President. I'd an endorse her
for president. Critics say she has been too cautious with
the press. Her supporters think it's the right strategy. Right now.
Look at the way they're setting this up. That's a quote, Okay,
(11:12):
that is New York Times first paragraph. Really the sub
subheading of their main story on Kamala today on the website.
And they're making it seem like this is brilliant strategy.
It's a deception, right, It is a deception. If I
told you, hey, hey, I want you to come buy
(11:33):
a house, and I say the house is amazing, it's
a beautiful house. You're gonna love this house future generations.
I don't know why I'm turning into Trump future generations of
your family. Beautiful house, the most beautiful yard you've ever seen, big,
beautiful yard, swimming pool, greatest swimming pool on our I'm
telling you all about this house, and you're getting excited.
(11:53):
You're like, oh, wow, that sounds amazing. And I tell
you the price. You say, oh, that's the price. That's
that's a great deal. Let me see the house. And
I go no, no, no, no, no, not not yet, not yet.
I say, well, hold on a second. You might be
thinking to yourself that that seems to be a bit
of a red flag, right, No, come on, let me
see for myself.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
I really I just want to walk through it one time. No,
I can't.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
I can't let you see this house yet. Maybe maybe
at some point in the future. But I want you
to make up your mind now as to whether you're
whether you will buy it. You know, we can sign
the contract later, but I want you to tell me now.
I want you to give me verbal agreement you're gonna
buy this house without seeing it. That is the game
the Democrats are playing with the Kamala Harris candidacy. They
(12:38):
want people to be all in without knowing what they're
all in for. They want people to be excited about
something without understanding what they're getting excited about. And this
comes after the gas lighting, So it was gaslighting. Kamala
used to be horrible. Now the exact same people who
are Democrats who are saying she was terrible are saying
(12:58):
she's amazing. And while they've now transitioned into the she's
amazing phase, they're saying, Oh, we're not going to show
it to you because it's brilliant strategy. And then they
say Republicans are bouncing on this, Well, yeah, if you're
trying to hide the product in this case a politician
(13:19):
from the people who are the consumers in this case,
the voters that would seem to be the basis of concern,
wouldn't it. This is why, And I'll break down some
more of the numbers, and we talked yesterday about white
working class voters in swing states, and we'll speak to
Ryan gar.
Speaker 2 (13:36):
Dusky about that later as well.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
But this is why I still have a quiet confidence
in the Trump ticket, because they can only hide for
so long, and when the hiding stops, it's going to
be Kamala Harris out there for all the American people
to see and hear from and she at some point
she has agreed to at least one debate. At some
(14:00):
point she's going to have to stand on a stage
and explain why she has said and done some of
the most radical left wing things imaginable.
Speaker 2 (14:09):
So we will get into all of that.
Speaker 1 (14:12):
My friends coming up here. Also, it's a Friday. I
would love to take your calls. You'd help me with
my voice too. So it's doing pretty well so far,
but by hour three, whoo, my vocal cords are going
to look like uncooked hamburger meat. Sorry that was gross,
but you know what I mean. Indulge me for a
minute here as I share with you another project that
I'm taking on this Monday. I'm debuting a new e newsletter.
(14:33):
This one's all about the intersection of world events and
finances and how you're affected. This is the kind of
stuff I've always paid attention to. You know, my dad
made a living watching the markets and reporting on them.
My brother has done the same for a big hedge
fund in the past, and this is stuff that we
talk about at the dinner table, along with geopolitics and
everything else. We want to know what's going on with
our money, with our finances. In this newsletter, you'll get
(14:55):
my analysis on what's happening in the world and how
it affects you.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
Including Theottom line.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
Now I'm bringing in deep expertise on this as well,
collaborating with Brad Thomas, who's a writer and market analyst
who's been looking at stocks for a long time and
has an incredible track record. Brad's a really bright guy
and he's built his whole name on knowing where the
markets are going. So together we'll be publishing this weekly
newsletter so you can make key moves to position yourself
(15:22):
to take advantage of what's coming. Sign up to receive it.
It's free. It's a free newsletter. Go online to this
new website, the Urgent Message dot Com. It's easy to
sign up, easy to receive, and I think you're really
going to enjoy the insights and it could give you
some great stock tips and stock ideas for the future.
You'll see what I mean the Urgent Message dot Com.
(15:42):
That's the Urgent Message dot Com.
Speaker 2 (15:46):
You ain't imagining it. The world has gone insane. Reclaim
your sanity with Clay and Fun.
Speaker 4 (15:53):
Find them on the free iHeartRadio app or wherever you
get your.
Speaker 2 (15:57):
Podcasts, welcome back into and Buck.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
So Kamala Harris saying she's going to do an interview
and saying she is open to more debates as well.
Speaker 2 (16:08):
This has cut ten. Listen to this is yesterday.
Speaker 5 (16:11):
I'm glad that he's finally agreed to a debate.
Speaker 2 (16:13):
I'm September tenth.
Speaker 1 (16:14):
I'm looking forward to it.
Speaker 6 (16:15):
And put me tells out are you open to more debates?
Speaker 7 (16:19):
I am happy to have that conversation about an additional
debate where after September tenth.
Speaker 1 (16:26):
So she's happy to have a debate September tenth. She's
happy that that's what's going to be going on, but
she won't tell us when she's going to be in
a position to accept the other the other debates, right,
I just want to remind you, well how it's going
to go in this debate. Here's a Kamala word salad
(16:47):
montage play nine.
Speaker 2 (16:49):
Well. I think culture is.
Speaker 8 (16:53):
It is a reflection of our moment in our time
right because it is.
Speaker 7 (16:58):
We who stand together, ever collective, who have the power
and the ability to see what can be un murdered
by what has been the nature of democracy. There is
a duality to it has two sides to it. On
the one hand, there's incredible strength right that when a
democracy is intact what it does for its people in
(17:21):
terms of the strength it gives its people and protects
in terms of individual freedoms and rights, right and liberties.
Speaker 5 (17:28):
We all watched.
Speaker 8 (17:30):
The television coverage of just yesterday. That's on top of
everything else that we know and don't know yet based
on what we've just been able to see. And because
we've seen it or not doesn't mean it hasn't happened.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
Yeah, that's the woman who says she is looking forward
to the debate. You can make of that what you will,
you know. Finally, we have a credit card company that
are supporting conservative causes. It's called Coin spelled with a
G back by Visa. It's the first of its kind.
Coin was created to be a credit card you can
rely on, one that reinforces conservative values and embraces the
(18:08):
American spirit. They got that done by donating proportion of
every purchase you make to conservative causes and charities. I'm
excited about their most recent decision to support a cause
by the name of Rescue twenty two. You probably can
tell how much I love dogs because to man I
just heard Ginger a minute ago. But in Rescue twenty
two they take dogs, train them and pair them with
veterans to be service dogs for disabled veterans. It's an
(18:30):
amazing charity. And this is the kind of stuff that
coin does. A credit card aligned with your values. Plus
with coin you'll earn one percent cash back rewards. This
is what Carrie uses now when she goes to costco
and runs up quite a bill. Sometimes coin coign dot com,
that's coin coi gn dot com. Make sure you select
(18:50):
Clay and Buck and the how do you hear about
a section terms apply? Go to coin dot com slash
disclosures for full details.
Speaker 2 (18:57):
Welcome back into Clay and Buck.
Speaker 1 (18:59):
And it's definitely live radio. We have Ginger vocalizing her
displeasure with the Democrat ticket. Before I know Ginger, we'll
have to know that she objects to Kamala Harris's incredibly
radical agenda and record on energy policy, for example, and
also her support of the anarchic BLM riots and then
(19:23):
on walls. Ginger is very upset with his loose talk
about his military record to inflate it, and also the
fact that the guy is a lunatic lib This is
what she has told me, so I wanted to translate
that for you, because sometimes the barking isn't as clear
to everybody else. We have a lot here on the
(19:43):
Kamala Harris debate and discussion going on.
Speaker 2 (19:48):
One is I do think that.
Speaker 1 (19:52):
I think that they recognize now that Walls was a mistake.
Speaker 2 (19:56):
But as I have said, we.
Speaker 1 (19:58):
Shouldn't reflexively assume that whatever Kamala Harris does is some
brilliant thing, or rather the Democrats around her have some plan.
Speaker 2 (20:07):
They're playing four D chess whatever.
Speaker 1 (20:10):
I think it was Kamala's call, and I think she
made a bad one. The whole point of the vice
president pick for Kamala Harris was to present a guy.
I think it was only guys who were under consideration
to balance the ticket in terms of gender, a guy
who would appear normal to people, you know, guys in
(20:32):
the Midwest.
Speaker 2 (20:32):
I'm want to say normal.
Speaker 1 (20:33):
I mean like the guy next door, like somebody that
could be, you know, coaching your kids basketball team, and
that he could you could have your kids look up
to at some level and think is a good guy
and all this stuff. But when you see what Walls
has stood for, and I really appreciate that. When we
put this out to Minnesota callers yesterday, we aired a
bunch of calls, but we could have taken far more,
(20:57):
and it.
Speaker 2 (20:57):
Would have just been people who.
Speaker 1 (21:01):
Are telling us how terrible Walls actually is right, letting
us know what he stood for as a matter of
decision making and policy. And once again the Democrats are
lying about who the people are that they're putting forward.
The Democrats have decided that the only way they can
(21:23):
win come election time is to present people as something
other than what they really represent and what they really believe.
So they're trying to fool you, right, They're trying to
fool the electorate, and I know it's not going to
work on you per se. But there are people who
are very casual observers of the news and politics. You know,
(21:45):
when people say low information voter, that's one way to go,
but I feel like there's always that there's different ways
people can take that. To be low information about politics
is not to be low information about everything. I actually
can understand how an individual would want to live a nice,
happy life and not get too deep into the weeds
(22:07):
of politics. I disagree with that approach to life in America.
But I can understand how, and I don't have a
you know, it doesn't get me, doesn't ruffle my feathers
or anything. Right, And people are free to pursue their
own happiness in their own way. But there are people
out there who will listen to what the media is
saying Abou Kamala Harris who aren't Democrats or died in
(22:30):
the world democrats, and they'll believe it. And that's what's troubling, right.
There's a reason they're lying so much in such concerted fashion.
It's because it will work at some level. And so
then we have to do the counter narrative. You know,
one thing I thought was really interesting. We're looking at
the Trump counter narrative here, and he did the press
conference yesterday. We carried a bunch of it. I did
(22:53):
get the emails that say, why do you have to
go to commercial or to a herdbreak? Just keep playing it?
And I have to explain, No, we don't really have
a choice. It's like a you know, like a TV
show that give you an hour and that's it. You know,
we can't just blow through all of our breaks. And
we we aired as much of it as we could
live and I listened to the rest of it after
the fact. But the Trump response was interesting on a rate,
(23:19):
on a number of things, but on this in particular,
just the fact that we're supposed to think what's happened
here with the Biden Harris ticket is in any way acceptable,
is in any way normal or standard operating procedure. I
mean here he is pointing out that they they essentially
against Joe Biden's wishes, twisted his arm into not running anymore.
(23:43):
And he's the sitting president, he is the Democrat Party leader.
You would think this is cut one play it.
Speaker 6 (23:49):
The presidency was taken away from Joe Biden. And I'm
no Biden fan, but I'll tell you what from a
constitutional standpoint, from any standpoint you look at, they took
the presidency away, and people were saying he lost after
the debate, he couldn't win. Well, I don't know that
that's true necessarily, but whether he could win or he
couldn't win, he had the right to run and they
took it away. They said they're going to use the
(24:09):
twenty fifth Amendment. They're going to hit you hard. Either
we could do it the nice I heard. I know
exactly because I know a lot of people on the
other side, believe it or not.
Speaker 3 (24:18):
And they said we'll do it the nice way, we'll
do it the hard way. And he said, all right,
So that mean they've really taken What they've done is
pretty incredible.
Speaker 1 (24:29):
What they've done is incredible, not in a good way,
in a hard to believe way, and it's like, we're
not allowed to process this or take this into consideration
at all. The same voice, is the same party machinery,
The same DNC that a month ago was all in
for Joe Biden is now telling you to be all
(24:52):
in for Kamala Harris. And they just picked Kamala Harris
after they got caught with their hand in the cookie jar,
with Biden trying to lie to everybody. Now, that's the
part of this that frustrates me. What the polls should
show is anybody who is an independent or a swing
voter should view what happened with Joe Biden as disgraceful
(25:15):
and understand how dishonest the Democrats are in this whole process.
They were hiding a commander in chief's dementia so they
could hold onto power. That is what they were doing.
That is a statement of fact. That everyone agrees on.
The Democrats have had to admit this right now. They
say their only way around this is we weren't hiding it,
(25:36):
we didn't know. Okay. So the Democrats are telling everyone collectively,
the Democrat machine, that they have an IQ in the forties, okay,
that they are incapable of seeing the most basic and
obvious reality. And that's their excuse.
Speaker 2 (25:52):
So you can either believe the Democrats are liars or
they are so.
Speaker 1 (25:55):
Stupid as to be incapable of being in charge of
their own affair. I guess, take your pick. We all
know they're liars. I wish I could tell you the
Democrats were that done, but they're not. They're liars. They
would rather be engaged in deceit than anything else. Actually,
I mean, I think they enjoy it at some level too,
(26:16):
because it's a mark of power, and it's a mark
of lack of consequences. If you can get away with
lying and lying and lying and still stay in power,
well doesn't that just prove how in charge you really are? Reality, facts,
the observation of the electorate don't really matter very much.
Speaker 2 (26:32):
Now we have.
Speaker 1 (26:36):
Some opportunities here for the public to see the truth
about Kamala Harris. And it is going to require, however,
Donald Trump to stay on task and be focused. I
don't think mockery of Harris by the president will work.
I think that we can do that. I think the
rest of the Trump supporters out there are free to
(27:00):
discuss Harris's record and personality and all the rest of it.
But Trump needs to be on his a game. I
hope that he learned. Learned isn't the right word, really.
I hope that he replicates the experience that he had
from that first debate with Joe Biden, in which all
he has to do is just show people the truth.
(27:23):
Just Trump, be Trump, show them. Yeah, of course, be engaging.
He makes some jokes here and there, but let her
expose herself.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
At some level.
Speaker 1 (27:33):
The debate will happen. She has agreed to it. Now
it's a question of do enough people see the truth
in time. The truncated schedule, the shortened election schedule, is
definitely a advantage for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
That's a shame because hiding for a right.
Speaker 1 (28:00):
If I told you that you had to go hide
in a house, and you only had to do it
for thirty seconds, you're in much better shape than if
I told you have to hide for five hours.
Speaker 2 (28:08):
Right. You know that's the situation with Kamala Harris. Right now.
Speaker 1 (28:12):
They may have stumbled into an even easier in the
basement strategy, which is why The New York Times on
its front page is writing about that and saying, Oh,
isn't this so smart that they want people to think
of it not as.
Speaker 2 (28:27):
Dishonest but as brilliant.
Speaker 1 (28:30):
Right, we don't want people to figure out who this
really is, so we're not going to show you.
Speaker 2 (28:35):
Aren't we so clever?
Speaker 1 (28:37):
It's pretty terrifying when you think about what they're also
implying with all that they know they're doing this, and
they simply do not care. But this is why it
is so imperative for Donald Trump to win. While he
must stay focused, and I truly believe he will do so.
I am not people. I got a text my friend
(28:57):
this morning. Are you nervous about Kamala Harris?
Speaker 2 (28:59):
No? Do I recognize at some level that she could
win this election? Yes, of course.
Speaker 1 (29:06):
But do I have a strong and unshakable belief that
Donald Trump is a man of destiny at this point
and that he will overcome all these crazy obstacles, the
four criminal indictments, the press lying about him constantly, the
impeachments and the hoaxes and the Russia collusion and all. Yeah,
I think he's going to overcome all that, and I
think he's going to become president again. That is what
(29:28):
I believe. And you're free to call in and tell
me I'm wrong or right, whatever you like. Eight hundred
two two eight two. Switching my focus for a second
to another part of the world. People in Israel are
still bracing for what comes next, and as hard as
they try to lead normal lives every day, there's a
part of them that knows to be prepared for what
comes next. They've been on high alert for some time now,
(29:50):
some days more intense than others. We talk to people
in Israel every week, including our friend at the International
Fellowship of Christians and Jews. They're helping Israelis across the
country the event they're forced to spend days or weeks
in bomb shelters. While these shelters keep Israeli safe, they
need to be equipped with essentials for survival, including food
and water. The Fellowship has launched a project to immediately
(30:11):
equip bomb shelters with emergency food boxes for Israelis who
have to remain there in case of an attack. Ten
thousand of these food boxes have been delivered and they're
preparing to deliver thousands more. We spoke with the president
of IFCJ on the show yesterday, Yiel Xstein. You can
hear the conversation over at Clayandbuck dot com. If you
can support the federation's efforts, now is the time donate
(30:32):
forty five dollars to help provide an emergency food box
that includes items like food, water, baby formula, and other
critical essentials for vulnerable Israelis trapped in bomb shelters. The
website is SUPPORTIFCJ dot org. That's support IFCJ dot org.
Speaker 4 (30:49):
Stay on top of election use with twenty four from
Clay and Buck, a weekly podcast you can find on
the free iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 2 (31:00):
Welcome back into Clay and Buck. What are we at now?
Speaker 1 (31:04):
Almost three weeks We're twenty days since Kamala Harris became
the de facto Democrat nominee. Not a single press question,
not one. And this is Soviet style campaigning, right. You
have the apparatus of government. I remember Biden still in
charge theoretically the apparatus of the state media, which is
(31:27):
what we largely have now in spirit, if not in technicality,
and they're hoping to pull this whole thing off.
Speaker 2 (31:37):
Bill in Ohio, you want to weigh in? What's up? Bill? Oh?
Bill drop? Jessica in Texas? What have you got for its?
Speaker 1 (31:46):
Jessica, Jane and salg do any of our callers wish.
Speaker 2 (31:56):
To talk today on the Clay and Buck Show. Jane
in South Carolina? What have you got for us? Hey?
There we go.
Speaker 5 (32:02):
Okay, Yeah, I can't even start where I know about Kamala,
But anyway, I do know this that I've been around
for some time, and it's just a given that people
are as sick as their secret and the media is
pushing her to be so cavalier and cute. But one
(32:24):
of these days it's going to open up, God hope
and the American people will see what she is.
Speaker 1 (32:31):
Well, this is all thanks, thank you, Jane. This is
all a a time game, right, a timing game. They're
just trying to let people know. I'm sorry, to make
sure people don't know until it's too late, right, And
I know that with early voting you're talking about people
(32:53):
casting votes before they know certainly what's going to happen
if there's a later debate. I think early voting is
in early September in some places, and I got to
check and see what's the guys. Let me know, what
is the earliest early voting that can be done in
this presidential election? Is it's how many days out?
Speaker 2 (33:10):
Is it.
Speaker 1 (33:12):
The Oh they're trying to hide this from everybody, and
the media is all in on it. So we have
both limited resources to get the truth out, meaning people
all the investigative reporters. And remember when Sarah Palin was
the VP for McCain and that was announced in the
summer back in two thousand and eight, and all of
(33:32):
a sudden, there were reporters all over Wasilla, Alaska, and
you know talk you know who did Sarah Palin got
a problem with And they're just diving into everything. And
you could say, well, you know that's the game. Yeah,
but they're all looking at that. They weren't doing that
to to Biden, right, they weren't doing that to the
(33:52):
Obama ticket. So this is this is a one sided game.
So we have both the problem of the resources to
find the information and also the problem of dissemination of information.
Speaker 5 (34:06):
Now.
Speaker 1 (34:06):
I think Elon Musk with X has helped this tremendously
because X is a it's kind of an exchange, an
international exchange for information now right where even if you're
not an ex user, a lot of conversation, news stories,
breaking news, news tips are happening there. And it isn't
(34:29):
the political monoculture that it used to be, or really
just the totalitarian system that it used to be. I mean,
it was effectively a digital totalitarianism where all of a sudden,
when it was important. I know they weren't doing it
every day on everything, but on COVID, on the elections,
on election cheating, on a whole range of things, they
would shut down free speech. They no longer would you
(34:51):
have free speech right. So I think that's important and
I think that you know, you can see also the
way they mobilized narrative against Jade events. I mean they've
they've taken fabricated they took a fabricated meme with really
a like a like a stupid childish joke meme of
(35:15):
JdE events. And not only did they did the media
run lots of stories on this walls made a joke
about it, you know, I mean, this is the most
gutter politics imaginable, but that's what they've done to go
after JD events. So and I know that we all
expected that this was going to be what happened, but
(35:36):
we didn't expect it would be within a ninety day
a period.
Speaker 2 (35:40):
We didn't expect it to be.
Speaker 1 (35:43):
A such a short timeline because I think it does
make their deception easier, and that if there's a point
of concern that I could express to you right now
about where this election is going, nothing has surprised me really,
other than the fact that they were willing to shove
(36:04):
Biden out the door, which they did against his will.
Speaker 2 (36:07):
And as Trump pointed out, that's crazy.
Speaker 1 (36:09):
But now that the timeline issue is something that you
can't really blame Republicans for not having this all set
up in advance. This has never been done before. I mean,
they change candidates in the middle of the race. As
Trump has said, it's like changing fighters in the middle
of a fight.
Speaker 2 (36:25):
What is this?
Speaker 1 (36:27):
And Democrats are just hoping that they can game the
system to their advantage, just like they did during COVID
in twenty twenty.
Speaker 2 (36:34):
With all the new COVID voting regulations, So yeah, I know.
Speaker 1 (36:39):
They're just constantly cheating in different ways, but we still
have to win.
Speaker 2 (36:43):
I think Trump will. More coming up
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show News
Hosts And Creators
Clay Travis
Buck Sexton
Show Links
WebsiteNewsletterPopular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.