Battleground LIVE: Fake News All Around Us w/ Bryan Dean Wright

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
Morning, Europe, about it under the arena and join the
battle to save America with your host Sean Parnell. Good evening, America.
Welcome to Battleground Live. I'm your host, Seawan Parnell, combat vet,
New York Times bestselling author, humble servant of America from

(00:26):
Sea to Shining Sea and everybody in between. Welcome American Patriots.
You know, listen, folks, last night we did here in
Fort Parnell a fantasy football draft. Now, I know that
many of you do not watch the NFL, and I

(00:48):
respect that. Now I will not let any commie, thug
loser tell me what I can and should not, can't,
should should or should not watch. Now the family did
a fantasy football draft. Commander Melanie is involved in it.
In it. Brock Star, my producer extraordinaire, is involved in it.

(01:09):
My father is involved in it. So many members of
my family are involved in it. Now. It is very
very very cutthroat and very very very very competitive. Now,
after we do the draft, and of course Brock talks
smack the entire time, I'm trying to study, I'm trying

(01:31):
to do the draft, and he's texting me NonStop making
fun of my picks. Now you get these report cards
after your draft, after the draft is all done and complete,
and the report cards don't really mean anything. They don't.
But for whatever reason, I care a lot about this

(01:53):
report card, the draft report card. It might sound like
the dumbest thing in the world, but let me give
you a quick rundown. So my league is called the
Maga Warriors League, So Maga Warriors. And of course Melanie's
name is Commander Melanie's name, and she was last year's champion,
by the way, didn't want to play this year so
she could quote go out on top. Didn't want to

(02:17):
defender championship. Her name last year and her name this
year is the Insurrectionists. And she's got Buffalo Man as
her team profile screaming, So that should tell you a
lot about the kind of person that Melanie is. But
Brock's name is, of course Wendy Bell Radio Army WBR Army.
And of course my name is the Impeachables. We've got

(02:41):
lots of other good names in the league. But Melanie
again did not want to play. The grade on her
report card A plus A plus. The grade on Brock's
report card B, So Brock Star gets a B. So
he's talking smacked me the whole time, but still managers

(03:01):
is to come away with a B. You know what
my report card was D? And I'll tell you what
a D. I've never gotten a D in anything in
my life. And it says the title says the Impeachables
strikes out in draft projected to swing and miss and
MAGA Warriors League. We know what to hell with that
because we are tracking for a first place finish. Nothing

(03:23):
but cutthroat competition around here and what you will get through.
I assure you that you will get regular updates on
this as we continue to progress through the season. Come
hell or high water, I'm going to prove that report
are wrong. So welcome to show. Make sure you like
and rumble smash that little green thumb beneath the video.
We've got Brian Dean right on deck and we are

(03:46):
very very excited to have him. One of the smartest
guys out there. We've been doing for the last several
weeks what we have been calling a Global Intel segment,
where we kind of go around the world hitting stories
that the media doesn't cover and in particular talking about
how those stories tie into news outlets and what's been

(04:09):
reported in our country and all around the world, and
the reason why these things are being covered. I mean,
Brian is just one of the smartest people in around
to talk about that this stuff. But we're gonna be
tired doing the global intel someone around the world, and basically,
thirty minutes or a little bit more than thirty minutes,
we got him on deck. We're gonna talk about the
Trump town hall because we have to. We're gonna talk

(04:30):
about CNN eviscerating Kamala Harris yet another Russia hoax. This
is so complicated. I'm gonna get into that with Brian
as well. But right off the top, did you see
the video I had yesterday? Well, I meant to play
it yesterday but it got left on the cutting room
floor because the show went long with Savage Rich Barris.

(04:52):
But did you see the video of Big Fanny her
daughter being pulled over on the side of the road
in Georgia And who shows up on the bodycam footage
after her daughter was pulled over? But of course Big
Fanny Willis, but also Nathan Wade. The crazy thing about

(05:12):
this is that Big Fanny testified that her and Wade
were not together anymore. And so now they're showing up
together dressed in civilian club. I mean, come on, something
doesn't feel right. Something does not feel right. So we
will keep our ear to the ground on that. Did
you see also today that Hunter Biden changed his plea

(05:36):
to guilty in the federal tax case as a jury
selection began on Thursday today. The plea changes come as
Biden faces charges related to evading one point four million
dollars in taxes. So here are the key details that
you need to take away from this. Biden's defense attorney
announced that the first son will submit an Alford plea

(05:57):
Alford plea allowing him to avoid a trial by acknowledging
the prosecution has enough evidence for a conviction without admitting guilt.
Biden faces Hunter Biden faces felony tax charges in Los
Angeles federal court, accused of a scheme to avoid paying
one point four million dollars in taxes between twenty and

(06:18):
sixteen and twenty nineteen. His legal team has previously argued
that Biden's action were not willful due to his struggles
with alcohol and drug addiction. Now let me ask you this.
Do you think that any of you would be afforded
that privileg er could feasibly make that argument if you
cheated the government out of one point four million dollars

(06:40):
of taxes. I don't think so. I don't think that
that would fly. But the interesting thing about this plea
to me is the Alfred plea. What's called First of all,
I never even heard of it until today. The Alfred
plea allows him to avoid a lengthy trial by a
acknowledging the prosecution has the evidence it needs for a conviction.

(07:05):
But all of this without admitting guilt. Now do you
remember when Joe Biden said he was not going to
pardon his son? Do you remember that? To me, if
you're Hunter Biden, how do you make an Alfred plea
like this? How do you just say I'm not going
to go to trial? Yep, I got. I acknowledge that
you have enough evidence and I'll take whatever conviction comes down,

(07:27):
but I'm not going to admit any guilt. That to
me translation that you know your dad is going to
come through in the clutch and pardon you before he
leaves office.

Speaker 2 (07:35):
Right.

Speaker 1 (07:35):
We always knew that was going to happen, and I
think it probably will. So again, you heard it here.
You heard me talk about this here first, and I'm
sure that some other conservative influencers are talking about it too,
but we will keep our ear to the ground on
that as well. But Trump's town hall, let's get back
to that here in a second. I thought Trump's approach

(07:56):
I watched the whole thing. You know, it was quintessential Trump.
But I thought his approach here, especially in a swing
state like Pennsylvania, which is where I'm from, was particularly
appealing and persuasive because it's self deprecating in a way.
And I'll play you the sound here in a second,

(08:16):
and then I'll tell you what I'm thinking. But just
listen to this.

Speaker 3 (08:20):
If she won, you're not going to have any fracking
in Pennsylvania. You have five hundred thousand jobs.

Speaker 4 (08:25):
Think of that.

Speaker 3 (08:26):
That's your biggest business. And you get a big majority
of your income from tracking, and you have somebody that's
not going to allow fracking. She's not going to allow it.
You can't take the chance. You have no choice. You've
got to vote for me. You've got to vote from.

Speaker 1 (08:41):
Me, even if you don't like me. You know.

Speaker 3 (08:50):
It's way no. But even if you don't like me,
you can sit there Zach can't stand that guy, but
there's no way I'm going to.

Speaker 1 (08:58):
Vote for her.

Speaker 3 (08:59):
Now, you have to have tracket. You know, you're the
biggest in the country for this. You have two of
the biggest sites in the world. It's a massive business
for Pennsylvania.

Speaker 1 (09:09):
Okay, So let me tell you a couple things. One,
if you ask an independent, and I know lots of independence,
many of whom will just say, I just don't like Trump. No,
I don't think he did a bad job as president,
but I don't like him. And because I don't like him,
I'm not sure that I can vote for him. It
almost always comes down to that, I swear to God,

(09:31):
as superficial as that sounds, it almost always comes down
to that. Many people on the right, I don't I
don't care about Trump's comportment. You know, I don't have
highly idealized perceptions of what I expect in the White House.
What I want is somebody who's going to be an
ass kicker. I want somebody who are enemies are going
to fear. I want somebody with a rudimentary understanding of
how to operate or how to oversee a free market

(09:54):
economy without the government being too involved. But INDEPENDENCE just
feel that is an issue, and I feel like for Trump,
saying something like that is very as simple as it sounds,
is very very very compelling. Like, listen, I understand that
you might not like me, I get it, but you

(10:14):
can't afford not to vote for me, because if you
vote for Kamala, you know the economy's gonna tank. You're
you're voting for price controls, You're voting for an electronic
electronic vehicle mandate by twenty thirty five, you're voting for
a ban on fracking, You're voting for more wars globally.
I mean, I do think that. As superficial as that is,
it is a very very compelling argument. So I've got

(10:35):
Brian Dean Wright on deck right now, and I don't
like to waste a single second with him because he's
super smart. My friend, Brian Dean Wright, welcome to the show.
Thanks for being here dressed all nice dressed.

Speaker 5 (10:48):
To him, Well, thank you, I appreciate it. I didn't
know you could say I was wearing pants. So it's
it's a freak dressed out for.

Speaker 1 (10:52):
You today, like it's a job interviewer or something you're bringing.

Speaker 5 (10:56):
Well, you never know you got a dress for your
next job, So maybe I can be I'm I've always
sad to you.

Speaker 4 (11:01):
I'm like your right hand guy. I'm you know, you're
Ed McMahon. You're the person.

Speaker 1 (11:05):
Hey, you know I we got to do what we
got to do on here, right, Like, that's how it works.
So you are, of course, you're a former CIA operations officer.
You're the host of the Right Report Daily podcast, and
I get messages from people almost every single day saying
that they listen to your show almost every morning and
they learn something new every day that they listen to
your show, which which is kind of great, right. I

(11:27):
knowing you the way that I do, I would feel
like you would geek out over.

Speaker 4 (11:30):
That, for sure.

Speaker 1 (11:32):
I love that's the goal, right, I mean, life is short.

Speaker 5 (11:35):
Let's let's try to help each other, educate each other,
and get through whatever this madness moment is in this
this country.

Speaker 1 (11:42):
Okay, So let's I want to get your sense on
the state of the race right now. I know that
you talk a lot about foreign policy and things like that,
but obviously you look at the polling, it seems like
Kamala has peaked out. My thesis is the more she talks,
the less popular is, which is why they're trying to
hide her. You have this Tim Walls stolen valor stuff

(12:04):
that's not going away. He shows up in Pennsylvania yesterday
with a camo hat on, dressed like he's I don't know,
and like and take.

Speaker 4 (12:12):
A drag outfit by the way, just very clear.

Speaker 1 (12:16):
Yeah, dressed like he's like like a a pristine Carhart
shirt tactical fans. He's got a camo hat.

Speaker 5 (12:23):
It's like being in the second grade and you dress
up as a doctor. That does not make you an
actual doctor. Most most of us like that, but he doesn't.

Speaker 4 (12:29):
He's trying it. God bless him.

Speaker 1 (12:31):
He's so weird. I'm sorry, but it's, you know, the
whole projection thing on behalf of the Democrats. You know,
when he calls JD. Vance weird, right, my first thought was,
first of all, I know Jdvans, He's about as normal
as they come. But my first thought was, well, okay,
if they're calling JD. Vans this guy, if they're calling JD.
Vans weird, then Walls must be really really weird. Like
that's just how I'm wired to think nowadays. And I'm

(12:54):
just watching this guy get off the airplane. He's wearing
a Camo hat with a Special Forces crest in the
middle of what I mean, guy's been busted out on
stolen valor twenty times. Brian. It takes some serious cojones
to show up in a swing state with a Camo
hat that has a Special Forces crest on. It just

(13:14):
seems so weird to me, him waving and kicking around.
What's your take, where do you think, America?

Speaker 5 (13:20):
Well, that guy look at My granddad used to to
call people who are little bit different, they'd be queer
as a three dollars bill. So I think that our
friend mister Wallas might fall into that category. I don't
know what his dealers otherwise, but he is a strange dude.
More importantly, beyond just the presentation. You think he's queer
as a three dollar bill, And.

Speaker 4 (13:37):
I'm not talking about sexual orientation. I'm just saying he's
a little different. That's the point. Back in the day,
That's what that word used to me.

Speaker 1 (13:45):
Anyway, Mike, Yeah, I know. I guess point is that what.

Speaker 5 (13:51):
Is inside of that guy's head, I think is the
weird part, all right, you know, so we now know
that he is saying things back in the day, like
the Communist Party when he would go to China, it
was a lovely system because everybody was the same and
they would all be treated equally. So this is a
guy who was saying this stuff all the way back
in the nineteen nineties, knowing or he should have known
that going back to nineteen hundred until now, about one

(14:12):
hundred and sixty eight million people have been slaughtered through
terrible economic policies or the deity of socialist governments around
the world. So if that's the record and this guy
is like, well, I don't know, it seems pretty good, though,
then now we have a problem in his mind, like
that the hamster isn't working upstairs to turn the wheel
fast enough if he can't figure out that maybe communism

(14:33):
is not the way to go. So I think that
that really is the fundamental issue, in addition to the
fact that the guy cannot tell the truth. He lies
about everything everything. Yeah, no, it's it's like pathological at
this point. So, you know, in terms of some of
the polling data, although kind of low medium confidence on
that right now, what is clear seeing another is a
reporting that you know, men in this country are not

(14:56):
pulling the lever for Kamala Harris, especially white men, especially
the veterans. So, mister Trump pass, those guys locked down
because they've been or they have sacrificed their bodies in
their minds to this country and they've come home and
they know a threat and.

Speaker 4 (15:09):
They know a liar.

Speaker 5 (15:10):
You know, they know these guys like Tim Walls. They've
served with guys like them. You know what I'm talking about?

Speaker 4 (15:15):
You do?

Speaker 5 (15:15):
Yeah, Like, now, this this guy should not be in
your power. He can go back home and he can
do whatever they do in that state. That's fine, but
he does not need to be the vice president.

Speaker 1 (15:26):
So, Brian, what do you make?

Speaker 3 (15:28):
So?

Speaker 1 (15:28):
I think Tim Walls went to China on one of
his many trips to China and commemorated a honeymoon or
something on the anniversary of Tanneman Square the Master.

Speaker 5 (15:38):
He got married on that anniversary day five I think,
five years later or something.

Speaker 1 (15:42):
That is insanely weird and creepy, is it not?

Speaker 5 (15:45):
Well, I'm not a communist, so you know, it does
seem strange to me, but it didn't apparently to him.

Speaker 4 (15:51):
So there you go.

Speaker 1 (15:52):
Well, so you had mentioned something on this show a
couple of weeks ago about how the like of Tim
Walls being approached by someone in the CCP to spy
or be an asset for the CCP was damn near
close to one hundred percent.

Speaker 4 (16:08):
He's been there all my testicles on it. That's correct.

Speaker 2 (16:10):
I stand by that, bet, my friend very Yes, that
is exactly how you framed it a couple of weeks ago,
very very high stakes bet. By the way, yeah, sure,
that's how those extra former spies roll.

Speaker 4 (16:24):
We're all in.

Speaker 1 (16:26):
Well. The crazy thing about it is I've been like
mentioning this on social media, trying to draw attention to it,
and so you've come forward. And then my buddy Tony Schaefer,
who has also worked in a clandestine space for the
Department of Defense, also said, yeah, one hundred percent chance
that he was approached. And we've had people that were
doing vetting for the FBI or now since retired from
the FBI saying yeah, one hundred percent chance. How is

(16:50):
it that the media has not Now, I know he's
trying to ignore these questions, but to me, this is
the most important question, and this segues to what I
ultimately want to talk about, is the fact that our
government seems like they are infested with spies CCP spies, Brian,

(17:12):
And so you know, you look at the problem that
the Democrats have. You have Biden with clear connections to
the communist Chinese.

Speaker 5 (17:19):
You have I mean, I'm in the laptop with terabytes
of data and Congression testimony and also.

Speaker 4 (17:24):
On her I mean, come on, Other than that, it's
a mystery. We don't really know.

Speaker 1 (17:29):
Well, I mean, so Biden, and then you have and
then you have Diane Feinstein being driven around for like
twenty years by a Chinese spy. Then you have Eric
Swalwell and Fang Fang, and then you've got the news
of New York Governor Kathy Hochel and her former chief
of staff being connected to the CCP, and of course
Tim Walls making all these trips over there. I'm telling you, Brian,

(17:53):
this feels I mean, it's very concerning, but it's to
me it's also very very dangerous that our government seems
to be infected, just infested with high level CCP spies.

Speaker 5 (18:06):
So let's get to that first part that you mentioned. Actually,
but before I came on, you were talking about how
mister Trump said and that great moment in the town hall. Look,
you don't have to like me to vote for me.

Speaker 4 (18:16):
In fact, you know, basically I.

Speaker 5 (18:17):
Get it if you don't, but you you got.

Speaker 4 (18:18):
To pull a lever for me.

Speaker 5 (18:19):
And what he's talking about there, whether we call it
Trump derangements syndrome, whether we call it this is massist
area that we saw back in twenty fifteen and twenty
sixteen ever since around Trump Russia allegations or the Charlottesville hoax,
or just pick whatever it is. The point is that
the American media is not interested in asking hard questions
if it might possibly help Republicans, conservatives, or definitely Trump.

(18:44):
So their view is, you know, we don't want to
bring up anything bad or negative about the opposition or
that is just to Trump.

Speaker 4 (18:51):
And so that explains why the media doesn't want to
do it.

Speaker 5 (18:53):
We also know, through good data going all the way
back a number of decades, that the most journalists give
to Democrats when they do give politically. So okay, so
we know that the journalists in this country really aren't journalists.
They throw that cloak on to try to then advance
a political cause or their own ideology. Okay, Now this

(19:13):
other question is, yeah, but We've also got a lot
of people in government, should be the FBI, the Department
of Justice, you know, other guys at the Department of
Homeland Security that should be looking into this, these out
these connections between you know, Americans and foreign powers, especially
the Chinese. Okay, well, we have some evidence that they
are doing that, like this gal up in New York,
Linda Son who worked for ms. Hokol, the governor currently,

(19:37):
the previous governor Cuomo, and others going back a number
of decades.

Speaker 4 (19:41):
So it's not like they're not looking at the issue, but.

Speaker 5 (19:44):
It tends to be rare that they target those Democrats,
and it tends to be much more common that they're
going after Republicans or conservatives. We have that pretty well
documented for a couple of years now, don't we. So
that's I think that the part is there's this inconsistent application.

Speaker 4 (19:59):
Of the law.

Speaker 5 (20:00):
Well that has absolutely proven at this point. And second,
but we're not really doing that. As to say, the
FBI and the Department of Justice, they're not doing what
they need to do to make sure that we wrap
these people out and throw them in jail. And that
would include some thoughtful investigation into a guy like Tim Walls,
who he was a National guardsman going over when he
had physical access to facilities inside of this country and

(20:21):
United States government information, he was traveling over to a
place that he shouldn't have at least based on what
I understand in terms of my own experience, you can't
travel there without very clear guidance or permission to do so.
The Pentagon so far is refusing to answer the question.
Did Tim Walls have a report that he traveled, did
he get permission to go? And then was he debriefed?

Speaker 1 (20:39):
After the fact that they're refusing, they're refusing to answer.

Speaker 5 (20:43):
They have The Congress has asked the Pentagon to address
this issue. That was about two weeks ago. I don't
remember the representative who sent this request. The Pentagon has
so far refused to answer any of these questions. So
the request made of the Pentagon to answer it, I mean,
but the Pentagon, what do you think, Brian? The non
answer to me seems seems like an answer. Well, look,

(21:04):
if we go, let's just say forty years ago, if
we had a concern that somebody was working for the Soviets,
I think most people in the media and most people
on both sides of the aisle. Even if you had
great disagreements between Reagan and Tip O'Neil in the House,
or if you had George Bush and Tom Foley, who's
Speaker of the House Democrat from Washington day at the time,
those men and women would have said, all right, look,

(21:26):
we have our differences, but holy smunks, we're not going
to put a Soviet potential.

Speaker 4 (21:29):
Spy in the White House or near it. So we
need to deal with this.

Speaker 5 (21:34):
That's not modern America. That is not the way that
we function. And so that means that guys like Lloyd
Austin who are are more partisan, that they put their
party or their personal interests over the country. And that's
what the Pentagon is doing right now, that's what the
FBI is doing. There should be an investigation into a
guy like Tim Walls.

Speaker 4 (21:50):
There should have been.

Speaker 5 (21:50):
Twenty thirty years ago, by the way, obviously, but there
hasn't been. And I think that that's the demonstration of
the moment of how far we have fallen as a country.

Speaker 4 (21:59):
We can fix it. It's just gonna take very very different leadership.

Speaker 1 (22:02):
I mean, what's the benefit of the Pentagon not being transparent?
It seems like it flies in the face of their
mission to you know, protect America from enemies. You know,
if Tim Walls is compromised, you don't want the guy
in the Oval Office a heartbeat away from the presidency.
So don't understand why they would cover something like this up.

(22:24):
It seems like critically important information for the American people
to have, especially in an election year.

Speaker 5 (22:30):
Well for and I appreciate your dedication to facts and
logic and reason. Unfortunately, that is not the America in
which we live any longer. So if you're like me,
you're ready to move to Mars, especially with you earlier
texting yeah, I'm gonna go. I sent a note to
Elon let's just start over on Mars.

Speaker 1 (22:46):
It's gonna be like total recall up there. Did you
see that movie? It was not good.

Speaker 4 (22:50):
It was very Look, I don't have a lot of
great option. Shot. I'm willing to take the Mars option.
They don't have oxygen, that's right, I'll give it a
shot right now.

Speaker 1 (22:59):
Thinks that are really scrue up here.

Speaker 5 (23:01):
Look, in all seriousness, you're absolutely right. The Pentagon should
be investigating this, the Department of Justice and the FBI
should be on this. But again, we have a director
of the FBI, Christopher Ray, who called the lawlessness of
crossfy your hurricane into Trump. He called that lawlessness a
series of missteps, his words, series of misteps. You and
I and everybody who's watching it and listening knows that

(23:23):
if you called your wife by the name of your
ex girlfriend, that is a misstep. Okay, lawlessness in this
country is not a misstep. And so that tells me
that the current FBI director is not serious about the job.
He's not serious about the country. He's serious about weaponizing
his job and his role and the FBI. So that
is the moment in which we live, and that's why
we have got to have different leadership in the White House. Frankly,

(23:44):
you know we have a binary choice. It's miss Harris
or mister Trump. I don't think there is much of
a choice.

Speaker 4 (23:50):
From my optic.

Speaker 5 (23:51):
If you understand the magnitude of the problem, you gotta
vote in, as Trump said, like him or not, you
gotta vote the guy in so we can clean this
place up.

Speaker 4 (23:57):
That I think is what it boils down to.

Speaker 1 (24:00):
Yes, I obviously couldn't agree more. What do you make
of this the alleged spy that was connected to Kathy Hokeel,
you mentioned, like when we were talking prior to the
show that you know, million dollar condo or million dollar
condo in Hawaii, million dollar home in New York City.

Speaker 4 (24:19):
You know, twenty point one million bro paid in full cash.

Speaker 1 (24:21):
What are you talking about? Tell me it seems like
it's a lot worse than the media is actually reporting.

Speaker 4 (24:27):
Twenty twenty four Ferrari, Yeah, this gal had some cash.
Here's the deal.

Speaker 5 (24:32):
Folks out there might be surprised to note that a
lot of spies don't get paid a ton of money.
So it's not like, you know, millions of dollars typically
every year. For someone to get that kind of money,
they have to be exceptional. And this is true not
just for the CIA, but other services as well. Absolutely,
I mean, I'm talking about changing world history. Those guys
get a million, two whatever a year, But they are

(24:54):
also not given that directly because that becomes a counter
intelligence concern. Suddenly you start buying Ferrari's four point one
million dollar cash home and you get smoked out. So
that's why the amount of money, the lifestyle that she
was living some doesn't add up. She wasn't just doing
as the indictment is saying, which in this case, was
blocking Taiwanese officials from coming to the United States. I

(25:16):
think she was helping some Chinese officials come to this country,
offering them some help with the visas, writing some letters
of recommendation to the State Department. You know, she was
doing some of this stuff, which of course is bad
and awful, But to get that much money, I don't know.
There's something else going on. It's not in the indictment.
She has done a lot more in New York, doing
a lot more for the Chinese government. We'll see if
that is ever exposed or disclosed. I don't know that

(25:39):
it will because why she was doing a lot of
this stuff on behalf of not just the Chinese, but
ultimately doing stuff inside of the Democrat Party. And that,
my friend, gets back to something you mentioned in brief passing.
But it's so important for people to realize Eric swallwell
like him or not, I don't care. He was attempted
to be recruited by a Chinese spy Fang thing. We

(25:59):
all know that infamous story. But the thing is that
a lot of people forget Feng Fang was not just
going after him. She was going after dozens of other
California and Midwestern politicians, up to and including governors, state legislators, mayors,
county commissioners. This gal was getting around and it wasn't
just her. This was part of an investigative report that
was revealed back in twenty twenty. The FBI and others

(26:21):
have since confirmed that yes, this is in fact what
the Chinese do. They try to control what's called the
Center Washington, d C. By controlling what is around it,
the states, the state legislators, the governor's office. So they
start locally and in these state races they try to
then push those people eventually when they're recruited to our
federal government. But they can also have a lot of

(26:41):
power on our states, like in New York and California.
So what's important is when you talked about a few
minutes ago that it seems like our government is just
full of spies, the answer is yes, but it's not
just DC, it's everywhere. This country is profoundly aggressive in
controlling us. And so when you start asking questions like, well,

(27:02):
he doesn't make any sense, Brian, why wouldn't de Pentagon
chase after Tim Walls?

Speaker 4 (27:05):
That's bonkers.

Speaker 5 (27:06):
Well, there's probably a reason, right, and it's probably something
connected to what I'm just talking about, whether it's just
sheer politics, you know, stupid people. We don't want to
discount that there are done people like Lloyd Austin, bless
his heart, there are others you know who are probably
then compromised too. So we have a multiple reasons that
we can pick and choose from of why stuff doesn't
make sense. But the point is the threat is super

(27:28):
real and you got to have people in the White
House to realize that. And you can put on some
brass knuckles and start punching President she in the face
until he respects us, because right now he's not.

Speaker 4 (27:37):
He doesn't. One of the things that we talked.

Speaker 5 (27:39):
About earlier and that I'd love to talk about is
this whole stopping Chinese cyber threat.

Speaker 1 (27:44):
Yeah. I was just gonna get there. I was just
gonna get there. You talk about vult Typhoon and yeah,
break it down up.

Speaker 4 (27:49):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (27:51):
So so here's the bottom line for folks on where
there is a Chinese cyber group.

Speaker 4 (27:56):
It's called the vult Typhoon.

Speaker 5 (27:58):
Now, Chinese has a lot of these guys and they
kind of keep them off books. They pay them a
lot of money, they give them tools. There's not really
much of a difference between them. But the bottom line
is volt Typhoon is a very effective cyber operator. They
have put their cyber tools on our military basis and places.

Speaker 4 (28:14):
Like Hawaii and Guam.

Speaker 5 (28:15):
They're also doing it inside of the homeland and they're
putting their cyber tools on our water systems, our electrical systems, ports,
natural gas pipelines, all of it. And the reason what
the FBI has already admitted publicly is that what they're
trying to do is have a kind of a zero
day switch when they invade Taiwan. They want to flip
that switch and cause just absolute anarchy inside of this country.

(28:37):
And so they're just waiting for that moment to flip
that switch, shut us all down. We go into mad
max territory, and it prevents us from having a good
president who with an organized a counter strike against the
Chinese in a place like Taiwan.

Speaker 4 (28:48):
So that's what we knew.

Speaker 5 (28:50):
But last week Biden's MSSA and his State Department's cyber
gurus said they were asked.

Speaker 4 (28:57):
Well, what are we doing to stop this strike?

Speaker 5 (29:00):
It kind of seems bad and the NSA lead, our
chief technical spy was was like, you know, we don't know.

Speaker 4 (29:07):
This is hard. I don't know.

Speaker 1 (29:09):
It's hard to s he said, and I quote I
don't he said. The question was when asked how to
how the US plans to deter the group dubbed volt
Typhoon from future attacks, David Frederick, Assistant Deputy Director for
China at the NSA, replied, I don't have a good
answer to that.

Speaker 5 (29:26):
Well, that that seems bad. Now, I'm not the smartest
guy around. Maybe you are, and you can put your
sky head on and kind of figure out what that means.

Speaker 4 (29:34):
But I'm pretty sure it's bad.

Speaker 1 (29:35):
That's bad.

Speaker 5 (29:36):
Yeah, yeah, okay, So that means so first and foremost,
this threat is real and it's very serious. Second, listeners
to your show and to mine, you know, we talk
about this. You should be prepared. This isn't funny, even
if we can like just exasperated by it. You should
be ready. Your your food, your medicines, your water systems,
all of that. Treated like a early nasty hurricane, like

(29:57):
a Katrina or something awful that's going to take months
for this country to turn back online.

Speaker 4 (30:02):
That really is the point. And I underline that right
now and for.

Speaker 5 (30:05):
This show in particular, because one of the things that
we know Sean is that October is a very important
month along with April and that part of the world.
Why because that's when the wanders of the Taiwan Strait
start to calm down. And so that is what a
lot of folks that they have talked about. Look, we're
gonna be looking for those civilian fairies to start going
in to the Fujian Province, which is just across from Taiwan.

(30:25):
If we start to see that build up, that means
an invasion is imminent.

Speaker 4 (30:30):
So October.

Speaker 5 (30:32):
God, I hope I'm wrong, but October could be the
October surprise.

Speaker 4 (30:37):
I don't know if President She is going to choose
this October.

Speaker 5 (30:40):
But again, we have a man in the Oval office
whose brain is some sort of form of oatmeal and
it does not work after about six pm until ten
am the next day. So that seems bad. Again, because
we also can't stop typhoon. Also, it seems bad. So
I'm thinking to myself, Gosh, if I'm there's no perfect

(31:00):
time for this invasion at all, is this October attracted
to me?

Speaker 4 (31:04):
The answer is yes, But you know what I pull
a trigger. If I'm she, I don't know.

Speaker 5 (31:07):
The Timewhenese government, by the way, released their own assessment
that the Chinese don't have the proper invading forces, the
boats and some of the personnel to do a proper invasion,
in no small part because of the topography of Taiwan itself.
It's very mountainous, so they don't believe Taiwan. Taipei does
not believe that they will be invaded anytime soon.

Speaker 4 (31:25):
But well, let's see, there's no perfect time to do it. Boy.

Speaker 5 (31:29):
If I'm she, I'm definitely looking for a weakness in America.
I've got that guy in the White House right now,
we've got clearly a moron who's running the pentagonist Lloyd Austin,
bless his heart. And we've got the NSA and others
saying that they don't know how to stop my volt typhoon.
You put that all together, and it's very attractive. I'm
not saying it's going to happen, But in the world
of intel, we talked about degrees of confidence that something

(31:50):
could happen. And you look at all these indicators, you
look at all the intel, and you start to realize
you know, we're starting to push towards medium or high
degree of confidence that he might just pull the trigger.
And so that's why on my show and I would
emphasize here and you and I have talked about this,
it really is prudent to be prepared because we live
in an incredibly unsettled time.

Speaker 1 (32:10):
All right, all right, stay right there. I want to
ask you about Russia and then we're going to jump
right into the Global Intel update. Can I take a
quick break? All right, be right back back with Brian
Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer and host of The
Right Report Daily podcast. Brian, Welcome back, my friend. Okay,
so can we talk about Russia? So yes, So China

(32:30):
and Russia to me, all of this is tied together.
He'll be just you just broke down why we should
be concerned about who I believe to be our number
one foe geopolitical, foe, military rival in the world, China.
All of this disconcerting news about China has been breaking
slowly but surely over time. We went down the list
of all the Democrat politicians who seem to just be

(32:52):
infested with CCP spies around them. These are just the
ones that we know about. And then all of this
stuff happens with Russia. We get this Americ Garland, the
Biden DOJ come out and roll out Russia Russia Gate
five point zero. On the heels of that, Putin endorses
Kamala Harris because Joe Biden endors Kamala and previously Putin

(33:16):
had endorsed Biden. I mean that in and of itself
should tell you something, right, I mean, I mean Putin
loves Biden and Putin loves Kamala because they're just so
pathetic and weak, and he's able to do anything that
he wants to do with them in the Oval office.
I mean, that's how I take that.

Speaker 5 (33:32):
And then also said that Kamala has an infectious laugh. Yeah, yeah,
infections a little fella.

Speaker 1 (33:39):
I wonder. Yeah, he knows what he's doing. He you know,
he's a very shrewd politician, but also understands the clandestine
game as well. Obviously he's very dangerous. I'm no fan
of Vladimir Putin, but all of this stuff happened, and
then and then you get this indictment, this Doda indictment
that came out yesterday of Tenant Media and Lauren Chen,

(34:02):
who is I guess in charge of Tenant Meetia and
all of these are just allegations and just I want
everyone to know who's listening and watching. I don't trust
anything the DJ says nothing. The timing of this is
suspect to me, right before an election, and associated with
this are conservative influencers. And to me, I'll just tell
you how, it's like, all of this terrible, all this

(34:22):
terrible news for the Democrats comes out about China and
all these Democrats who are connected to the CCP in
some way, including Tim Walls, and all this Russia stuff
comes out basically the very next day. Almost seems to
me like it's almost a huge distraction to lend credence
to one crush independent content creators who you know, like

(34:44):
because to me, this this indictment says that these conservative
content creators were essentially the victims and didn't really know
because Tenant MEETI. I mean, this is complicated, but all
this Russia stuff comes out, and to me, it seems
like it's just a distraction from all the very very
dangerous China stuff that's come out. What do you take?
What's your take on all of this?

Speaker 5 (35:03):
So I think for folks listening The big picture question
that you should wrestle with is is it good when
a foreign power, no matter if they're an ally or otherwise,
or investing in our media a be in specific content
creators or influencers, podcasts, whatever.

Speaker 4 (35:19):
They may be.

Speaker 5 (35:20):
And if, however, you answer that, we should be thinking about, well,
what if these foreign powers want in return?

Speaker 1 (35:27):
Right?

Speaker 5 (35:27):
Is it just you know, cash return investment, Oh, you know,
give me fifteen percent return and that's fine, or is
there something more? These are voices and platforms that are
very important than to shape to shape propaganda efforts. Obviously,
that's what a lot of folks would probably think about
in terms of why the Russians might do that here.

Speaker 4 (35:44):
They're not alone the United States. We do this around
the world.

Speaker 5 (35:47):
We also know that other powers do this inside the
United States, like the government of Cutter in the Middle East.
The Saudist are investing in our media enterprises.

Speaker 1 (35:55):
Is what do you see, right, the British broadcasting I
mean right, I mean right. So now let's get back.

Speaker 5 (36:00):
To BBC and the Brits in a second. But the
point is foreign powers are trying to invest in this
country all the time to shape our media. It's not
just for a ten to fifteen percent or whatever return.

Speaker 4 (36:10):
Okay, so that's bad.

Speaker 5 (36:11):
We should be on our toes for that kind of
stuff because we want to be able to make our
own choices around who our politicians are, what we think
is truth, and we should be able to debate that
without foreign powers trying to push and pull us. That's
been happening, by the way, for centuries millennia. I think
you could probably argue that foreign powers are always trying
to do this with each other. So we can start
with that, like, that's why this does matter, and we

(36:32):
should think about that.

Speaker 4 (36:33):
Now.

Speaker 5 (36:33):
The second piece that you're talking about, which is, okay, well,
what's the most important If we know that everybody's trying
to do this to us and we're trying to do
that to them. As we think about threats and we
think about problems, we've got to rack and stack this stuff.

Speaker 4 (36:46):
You're saying, well.

Speaker 5 (36:47):
Whatever it is, I think China should be number one
across the board, and you are right, China should be
the number one concern.

Speaker 4 (36:53):
So we should be looking.

Speaker 5 (36:53):
At you know, hey, where are the indictments of the
Chinese using influencers in this country on the left, those
indictments Okay, I'm not seeing that's that's curious. That's curious,
isn't it, especially when we know the last six, seven,
eight whatever years, the FBI and the Department of Justice
have been weaponized to target conservatives exactly, just the DOJ

(37:14):
and the.

Speaker 4 (37:14):
FBI, the Department of Homeland Security.

Speaker 5 (37:17):
In fact, one of the things that you and I
talked about is they had that disinformation and misinformation board
that was stacked with folks who said the actual biggest
threat internally in this country were Christians and Trump supporters
amongst others.

Speaker 4 (37:28):
No, no they're not.

Speaker 5 (37:29):
But that again, that is the weaponization that has to
be addressed by a new president. But so let's just
start there. But now we have this other issue. If
we're going to rack and stack threats, let's talk about
the British for a second. Actually, so sure we know
that the BBC or others might try to license some
of their content, you know, and if it's David Attenborough
talking about some pigmy and a goat in Australia.

Speaker 4 (37:50):
Like, well, welcome to this beautiful little pigmy. How does
it breed?

Speaker 5 (37:54):
We don't know, like that, we don't really care, like
we don't care about the BBC content of that. Well,
we cared about actually is the Labor Party, which is
a socialist party working.

Speaker 4 (38:06):
With the Kamala Harris campaign.

Speaker 2 (38:08):
They were invited to the DNC perfect They.

Speaker 5 (38:11):
Were invited to the DNC to give Kamala Harris advice
about how to run her campaign campaign and win in November.
So when I look at threats, I'm most concerned about China.
Like you, I'm also really concerned about socialism because it's
a death cult. And now we have the major nominadee
nominee for the Democrat Party working with the Socialist Party

(38:34):
in the United Kingdom. Labor a democratic socialist let's use
the name correctly, who are trying to basically build a
socialist world. That should be getting a lot more intention right.
So these socialists are trying to influence the future of
our country.

Speaker 4 (38:47):
So what that they're British, I don't care. They're not
really our allies.

Speaker 5 (38:51):
They have weird teeth and I don't like their ideology,
So that to me is the problem.

Speaker 4 (38:56):
That's the issue.

Speaker 5 (38:58):
Yes, Look, whoever these influencers are on the right who
have taken money that maybe their lawyers didn't probably vet
where the cash was coming front. It turns out that
it's coming from the Russians. You know, look, they're gonna
have to answer those questions. Why didn't they properly vet that,
you know, to reach which they want to be like, Hey,
I'm a victim or you know, shame on me for
not doing more? Maybe I should have. Fine, that conversation's relevant,

(39:20):
it's fair to have. But and we should talk about
the Chinese where are those indictments? And we should talk
about the British socialists with the representative death cult working
with Kamala, and that's also relevant.

Speaker 4 (39:31):
I think.

Speaker 5 (39:32):
So that's how I kind of rack and stack this problem.
That's how it encourage people to think about it. Lots
of people do propaganda, We do it, lots of others
do it. Why do we care what's the biggest threat?
And if we're looking at for an influence, shouldn't this
socialist crap? I don't care if it comes from the
UK or not. Should that be part of the conversation?
I think So that's what I spent about thirty three
minutes this morning on the Right Report talking about, which

(39:55):
is the Kamala Harris is absolutely the most radical leftist
candidate we have had in this country for at least
one hundred years. And she's pulling in other crazy radical.

Speaker 4 (40:03):
Leftists as well.

Speaker 5 (40:04):
And by the way, the Washington Post has said this,
a leftist outlet, Washington Post said about three weeks ago
that her economic policies are far to the left, even
of Joe Biden, who has pulled the party far to
the left on economic issues, trying to get the government
involved in every facet of the economy. Not my words,
not my assessment, that is the Washington Post, which supports,

(40:25):
generally speaking, the Democrat pointy. So we have an abundance
of evidence that Kamala Harris and her ilk are going radical,
far to the left, and that I think if we're
looking at foreign influence should be a part of the question.
I don't care if they are British, well, how.

Speaker 1 (40:39):
Is she or why is she connected to them? And
how is that even allowed? How is that?

Speaker 4 (40:44):
I mean, because they're not Russian?

Speaker 1 (40:46):
Well right, well, having run too, I gotta believe that's
a huge deal. You're I mean, you can't do that
stuff if you're running a campaign.

Speaker 5 (40:56):
Well, look, Bill Clinton did it back of the nineties.
So this is not necessarily the first but it is
important as we think about again at the DNC, who
did we have up on the stage. We had Alexandria
Acasia Corts, who represents the socialists in this country. We
also have a guy like Bernie Sanders who continues to
champion of the Democrat cause. So they are attracted to

(41:16):
and glomming on the Democrat Party. There's a brilliant treatise
that the Democrat Socialist of America came out with him.

Speaker 4 (41:22):
In twenty sixteen, twenty fourteen.

Speaker 5 (41:24):
Where they basically said that the way that this country
will become socialists is they have to rebrand socialism with
sort of good vibes and good feeling and they give
away a lot of free stuff like free housing and
free medical care, free jobs for all if you want
them with a federal government. Once they rebrand, because they know,
as they acknowledge in this document back in twenty fourteen,
that socialism is.

Speaker 4 (41:44):
A death goult.

Speaker 5 (41:45):
Well, then that's when they're going to actually start executing
the socialist mission, which is to take over private businesses.
They say those will be called cooperatives, Those will then
be eventually turned over to a government board. Those used
to be called soviets, and that the government board will
discis what businesses produced, and this is key. Labor in
this country will be decided by these boards of who

(42:07):
gets what jobs? So what what training do you want?
That's going to be decided by these boards. Like Alexander
Kusa Cortez, she's going to be heading these things up
and people like her, and they're gonna decide what you
and I get to do. Now, you know, personally, I'm
you know, I'm hoping to be one of those Chippendale dancers.

Speaker 4 (42:23):
Uh, but you know, fingers crossed.

Speaker 1 (42:25):
That you could be, you could be a forerunner on that.

Speaker 4 (42:29):
Let me do.

Speaker 5 (42:30):
I'm in a corner the market. It's going to be great,
and all the Martians gonna come in. They're gonna be like,
we shouldn't like this, but we do anyway. Uh, look,
jokes decided this. This really is serious because this socialism stuff,
it's it's you know that mister Trump and others have
said that, you know, it's Comrade Kamala.

Speaker 4 (42:48):
They're not wrong.

Speaker 1 (42:49):
The evidence is there.

Speaker 5 (42:50):
We just don't have a media that that actually wants
to stand up to that because actually a lot of
them like that too. So that's why it's important for
the rest of us who have our eyes open, irrespective
of our party affiliation, we can point to the data
in the facts and then apply logic and reason for
those of us who still care.

Speaker 4 (43:05):
And say, yep, it's bad, it's a problem. We got
to talk about it.

Speaker 1 (43:09):
All right, Let's shift gears to Israel, beb Netan Yahoo
and the Philadelphia Corridor. What do you ask there?

Speaker 4 (43:15):
Tell us all right, So for folks out aware that
there's a little strip of land between Israel and Egypt.

Speaker 5 (43:20):
It's called the Philadelphi Corridor. And here's why it's important.
For decades, the folks in the Palace Palesadian territory, the
Gaza Strip, they have used this stretch of land to
build tunnels to smuggle in weapons and bombs and drugs,
and they then of course then attack Israel. Well, about
twenty plus years ago, the Egyptians and the Israelis were like,

(43:42):
all right, we got to lock down this Philadelphi Corridor.
It's bad deal. The palestin Indians are reviews in it. Well,
the Egyptians didn't really hold up their end of the bargain.
They allowed those tonnels to be built. Every once in
a while, they would flood one or blow on up,
but not really. And that's why the October seventh attack happened,
because they were able to flood so much of that
stuff into the Philadelphi Corridor. The Israelis under net Yahoo

(44:03):
are like, you know what, we don't want that to
happen anymore, and we would prefer not to die. So
they want to retain control of the Philadelphi Corridor. Now
there's some debate within Israel whether or not they really
need to physically have access to that and hold it,
But the bottom line is the Israelis want it because
they don't want to die. Hamas wants it because they
want to kill the Jews. And that's really to hang

(44:24):
up here. I mean to just boil it down to
its simplest level. And those tunnels, to be very clear,
are they're for death. That's the whole point and the purpose.
So there you go, there's the Philadelphi Corridor. That's why
it is such a big disagreement. The Israelis want to
keep it for the obvious. The they want to keep
it for the obvious, and the rest of the world
is like, wow, crap, how do we figure this one out?

Speaker 4 (44:44):
And there really is.

Speaker 5 (44:45):
In my view, it's not very smart to ask the Israelis, hey,
give this access back to the Egyptians even though they
just failed, or give this access to Hamas because they promised,
you know, they won't do it again.

Speaker 4 (44:58):
Come on.

Speaker 5 (44:59):
That's why, to me is kind of a no brainer.
When when you got a group like Hamas and Existence
who only is there to kill and destroy the Israeli state.

Speaker 1 (45:07):
Well, so what do you do with the Philadelphi Quarter?
I mean, what's the solution?

Speaker 5 (45:13):
Well, if I am Netanyahu, I keep it and I
don't care what Biden says.

Speaker 1 (45:18):
Yeah, yeah, Well, I mean the story is this. This
is in the large the larger context of the conversation,
I think is you know, we had we just had
an American hostage in addition to five other Israeli hostages executed,
and for just for people who are listening and watching,
I mean, the Israelis from all reports that I've read,
could hear the gunshots when they were happening. All this

(45:39):
happened in Rafa, they were breathing down the next of
the of the hostage holders in Hamas. And on the
heels of all this, Biden gets asked, like, is netan
Yahoo doing enough to pursue peace, and Biden says no,
and then bb net Yahoo gives a speech He's like,
I've agreed to paraphrasing, of course, I've agreed to everything
that the US says proposed. It just goes down the list.

(46:02):
The only thing that's changed in the last five days
is that Helmas is executing our people and one of
your citizens. And so yeah, I kind of agree that.
You know, bb net and Yah, who should not listen
to to Joe Biden here. I mean it's like, there
was no way, and I've said this many times in
the show, Brian, there is no way Democrat or Republican.

(46:23):
I mean, who the hell knows with the Democrat Party
of today. But if something like that happened along our
southern border to the citizens of Texas, Louisiana, any one
of these border states where we had twelve hundred American citizens, men, women, children,
the elderly murdered in the most grisly fashioned and filmed
you can bet we would hunt those people to the
end of the earth and wouldn't matter what anybody else

(46:43):
told us, it would just would That's just what we
would do.

Speaker 4 (46:48):
And I how how long did we negotiate with bin Laden.

Speaker 1 (46:51):
Right exactly. I mean, it's a it's a it's a
great point, and like I don't actually, I do understand
the reason why Biden and now tiptoeing around this issue
because it's I mean, it's a political issue for them,
Like they can't win they can't win Michigan without completely
bending the knee to their pro Hamas base.

Speaker 5 (47:12):
So you know, late last October, there was a poll
done by an A plus upholster called Signal that showed
about sixty percent of American muslimsport supportive Kmas's attacks. Those
individuals are also voters, and they tend to vote for Democrats.
So that is the challenge that the Democrats have. They
have opened up their tints to be such a big
tint party that they've let in Islamic radicals who want

(47:33):
to slaughter us. You know, their reaction is, well, let's
placate them. Normal people would be like, no, let's deport
them or jail them. So that I think is the
internal problem that the Democrats actually have right now. By
the way, there's a connection there to Marxism and why
Marxists typically support these lawest cause.

Speaker 4 (47:50):
But that's for another time. The bottom line is for
the israelis the issue.

Speaker 5 (47:54):
The here is to just simplify this for people who
get confused, should Israel exist? Nineteen forty eight it was reconstituted.
If you believe that Israel should exist, then you can
find a way forward in terms of a peace deal.
Might not be great or easy. It's going to be
probably very hard to figure out the final border lines.
But you know, for all these years, you know, sixty
plus years, there has been an effort to try to

(48:15):
find a way forward, but the Arabs and the Persians
have said, nope, Israel shouldn't exist. That's just the fundamental
starting point. That's Samasa's starting point. If however, they were
to change their mind and say, all right, look we're
not happy, we don't think Israel should exist, but we're
willing to accept it and just move on, well, now
you can get to a peace deal. So that is
the fundamental issue. So we can talk about the Philadelphi
cord or, and we should. But the issue here is

(48:38):
you've got a group hum Us or there be Palestinian
Liberation Organization PEL before the islamihr had or Hasiblah or
pick the group. They all believe that the nineteen forty
eight creation of Israel is bad and those are Arab lands,
and so the Jews got to go and Israel's got
to go. So until they changed their mind, it's war.
And so of course these railers are going tobate you know,
what should we do about the Philadelphi cord or But

(48:58):
the bottom line is they acknowledge these guys want us dead,
and until they changed their mind, we got to just
keep killing them or you know, keeping them along the
little boil. And that is a horrific thing because what
that translates to be is there are a lot of
kids in the Gaza Strip who.

Speaker 4 (49:11):
Didn't choose this.

Speaker 5 (49:13):
Their parents and grandparents and great grandparents chose this for them,
and now they're the ones who are suffering with things
like polio. There's currently God bless the folks in Israel
allowing this polio vaccination currently that is underweg in the
Gaza Strip.

Speaker 4 (49:26):
But they're the ones who paid the price. You know,
they're missing school, they're missing limbs. This is the price of.

Speaker 5 (49:32):
Their parents and grandparents and great grandparents. They had chosen
war because they want to annihilate the Jews, in Israel.
So long as that changes, more suffering and you're gonna
get extremists on all sides who don't want this to
be solved until one or the other gets wiped out.

Speaker 1 (49:45):
So there you guys, okay, can you shift gears to
Ukraine and the foreign master calling for regime change in Moscow?
What do you make of this?

Speaker 5 (49:53):
Well, that's bad because we tend to be very bad
at regime change. So yes, last week the Foreign Minister
of Ukraine's we should we it is time to address
the elephant in the room, which is that we got
to have regime change. On paraphrasing, he said, it's we've
got a problem in the mind because the ultimate threat
in this fight is Putin and it's the regime in Moscow,

(50:13):
and that's what we have to remove from power if
we're serious. He said, that is the fundamental issue. So
that was last week. It didn't get a lot of press.
It should because what that means is Zelenskin and his
team are really ultimately gunning for regime change, and are
we prepared for that? Do we have the industrial base
or the military to support that? And even if we
don't want it, are they going to drag us into something.

(50:35):
There's this idea of a tail wagging the dog, where
your junior partner in international affairs, the Ukrainians in this case,
wags us the dog, the big junior partner. That's what's
happening in Ukraine. That's the fear, and that is what
I'm concerned about.

Speaker 1 (50:48):
So okay, take us to Brazil. Sugar cane fires and
Colorado gang violence. We covered on the show what's happening
in Aurora and these you know, these Venezuelan gangs take
over entire apartment complexes, starting at Aurora and now it's
branching out to Denver. I've heard nine to one to
one calls of the same thing happening in Chicago. Sugarcane

(51:09):
fires are associated with all of this.

Speaker 4 (51:11):
Tell us, yep, let's do it.

Speaker 5 (51:14):
In Brazil, there is a prison gang called the PCC.
About two weeks ago, they lit sugar cane fields on fire.
Why they knew it was a very very dry time
and they could get away with it, or they thought
they could, but second it would cause profound problems for
the central government, the federal government. So this prison gang,
while it is in competition with another prison gang called
trend de Ragua, the Venezuelans from just up north, they

(51:35):
all know each other, they all talk. Here's the problem,
PCC is in the United States.

Speaker 4 (51:40):
This prison gang that just used this tactic of burning
up our agricultural fields or down there.

Speaker 5 (51:45):
The Venezuelan gangs know this as well. So now the
question becomes, when you infiltrate this country with gang members
who are willing to use arson against our ag communities,
and they were doing it right now in Brazil, might
they use those same kinds of tactics if they think
that they are under pressure by central authority in this
case the federal authority down in Brazil.

Speaker 4 (52:03):
But it's the cops.

Speaker 5 (52:04):
So Trende Ragua has already said that they are going
to kill cops in Denver when they start chasing after him.
So the tactics are what concerned me. These prison gangs
down in South America, they don't mess around. So this
issue of border states really is everybody, and that includes
even in isolated rural communities, farmers and ranchers, maybe even
loggers up in the Rockies. But it could be in

(52:26):
the eastern part of Colorado. But it's not just in
Colorado front. It is in Texas. We just had the
Dallas Police Department confirmed that Trende Iragua is operating there.
We know they're in Miami, New York, Chicago, They're everywhere.
These prison gangs don't mess around and using this tactic
of burning our fields could be the next thing to
watch for.

Speaker 1 (52:44):
Wow, Okay, what about coffee prices. I'm a commander. Melanie
and I are huge coffee drinkers and we don't like
the idea of coffee prices going up.

Speaker 5 (52:52):
Yeah, well, sorry, they are because two countries produce about
fifty sixty percent of the world's coffee supply, Vietnam and
especially Brazil around forty percent. They're suffering from a massive
rout right now, and so that's why Arabica prices have
gone up so far this year pretty substantially.

Speaker 4 (53:08):
But it's going to likely.

Speaker 5 (53:09):
Get worse because there is a continuing drought and right
now one of the flowers are coming out, and that's
when they really need that water. They got a little
bit of rain over the past number of days, so
it could help a touch. But if you want to
sock up on coffee, you should probably do it because
this apply from those two countries. Are getting really really
squeezed because Vietnam is also having a drought and heat
problem as well.

Speaker 1 (53:30):
See. I mean, this is why you should tune into
the show, and this is why you should listen to
Brian Dean Wright's Right Report Daily podcast. You stay ahead
of the curve with all this stuff. Before you know,
coffee is barren on the shelves and some of these
grocery stores go get it. Because I'm telling you, it's just,
oh my god, that would be terrible. It would because and.

Speaker 5 (53:49):
I am I tell bad news all the time on
the Right Report. I'm known as the Angel of Death
amongst my listeners.

Speaker 4 (53:54):
So I do try to do good news. I look
for it, I promise if you tune in.

Speaker 1 (53:58):
Okay, So I guess a little bit more bad news.
Illegal illegals driving down wages, tell us tell got there.

Speaker 4 (54:05):
Yeah, this is really sobering, folks.

Speaker 5 (54:07):
So look, the Biden Whitehouse and Miss Harris have authorized
about three million work permits for illegal aliens and fake
asylum seekers coming into this country. Three million more workers
means that we have to According to Roydor's News News Service,
who has worked with a variety of economists, we need
two hundred thousand jobs every month created in this country
to just take care of the illegals and the fake

(54:28):
asylum seekers. So what does that mean. If we don't
he the two hundred thousand, which we haven't, we're averaging
about one hundred and seventy four thousand per month every
month for the past couple of years or last year anyway,
that means we're not creating enough jobs. So where are
they going to go? Well, they got idle hands Devil's
Workshop in New York. That's part of the explanation for
why sexually transmitted infections are going up so dramatically in
that city.

Speaker 4 (54:49):
And they are. But it's also.

Speaker 5 (54:51):
True that if we're not hitting two hundred thousand, they
become net debtors to our society and take a lot
of money. But for those who do have these work permits,
they're gravitating towards the gig economy and towards blue collar
work naturally because they don't speak English or not much
of it, and they don't have any advanced skills. So
they're going to the places where they can get the work.
So that's why we are seeing wages now year over

(55:13):
year down about twenty five percent for ag workers about
seventeen percent for manufacturing workers. It's true across the board
in blue collar America. So people who might think, well, gosh,
you know what, how does this really impact me, How
does the border really impact me?

Speaker 4 (55:26):
I'm not seeing them.

Speaker 5 (55:28):
Well, if you have friends and family who are doing
the gig stuff or they are in blue collar work,
it's impact in them. Drivers, for instance, transportation workers, long
hal truckers. You know, they're getting their licenses to drive,
and they're driving down wages because there are so many
of them. So true, So that not only is the
problem now my friend miss Harris gets elected, that border's
opening up. I don't give a crap about her recent pivots.

(55:50):
She's made very clear sus for open borders. This problem
is going to get much much worse for our friends
who are working in our factories and fields and our farms.

Speaker 4 (55:58):
And I'll tell you if this gets back to one
of the things that you said before I came on,
if you don't like Trump fair enough, look at the alternative.
That's what you're gonna get.

Speaker 5 (56:08):
You're gonna get morse pain and more economics offering for
those folks in this country who are already struggling with
over the past three or four years because of the pandemic,
ridiculousness and all the inflation, the housing crisis that's hitting
those folks the most. That's why we're seeing a lot
of them put all of their debt onto credit cards.
By the way, about one point one four trillion in debt,
a record number. And it's not just like they're buying ferraris.

(56:31):
They're using it to buy food and clothes. So it's
a really tough time right now. We have this evolution
of a sort of a two tiered America, and it
is being driven in no small part because of an
open border.

Speaker 1 (56:42):
You know, Brian, the Democrats have really pulled the wool
over the eyes of many of these union leaders and
now I mean the rank and file union folks. I mean,
especially here in Pennsylvania. I mean, I would say eight
out of ten of them are voting for Trump just
because they sense that their jobs are at risk when
a Democrat is in power. But if you look at
what the Democrats are doing in Washington with the pro Act,

(57:05):
and for people who are watching, people who are listening,
and the pro Act basically is being positioned and pitched
as a big time pro union bill, and all these
pro union Democrats are pushing it. But what I mean
does a lot of terrible things that would functionally destroy
the gig economy and contract work for sure. But it
also gives union protection to illegal aliens. And when you

(57:28):
think about that, what's that going to do? You think
that that makes it easier or more difficult for a
blue collar union laborer to find work. It makes it
a hell of a lot more difficult. And so you
have these union leaders talking about the pro Act being
pro union. It's not pro union. It's pro It basically
fills their union leader's coffers, but it destroys and it

(57:49):
certainly it destroys the I don't know, it destroys all
their blue collar workers. You know, it's just devastating to them.

Speaker 5 (57:56):
For decades, and people need to remember this. For decades,
Democrats argue that illegal migration was bad because it impacted
blue collar workers the most.

Speaker 4 (58:05):
Go back decades.

Speaker 5 (58:05):
Caesar Chavez argued for this exact same thing Democrats up
into the two thousands, up until really Barack Obama started.

Speaker 4 (58:11):
To switch things in twenty twelve.

Speaker 5 (58:14):
Democrats argue this, there's a national Academies of Science study
from twenty sixteen that makes it very clear first generation
migrants or net drain on the economy for these reasons.
They come to us without skills and without the ability
to speak English. Democrats knew this, That's why they were
against illegal migration. So now they're trying to do this
switch aru by talking about how actually they are the
old Democrats standing up for the working class. That's not

(58:35):
the party anymore. I was a part of that party
for twenty years and I left it because it was
no longer the party that represented me or people like
my family, working class folks out on our rans and fog.
So yeah, it really is a profound disservice to the
working class in this country to not really fully understand
how they're being impacted by the border and by the

(58:56):
Democrat Party who's flooded this country with cheap labor, because
that is what is happening. Data are overwhelmingly clear, and
that should be a big part of the conversation that
I think mister Trump is trying to have with folks.
But a lot of these union leaders are just dying
the world Democrats because that's just how they think. They
shut off to think and believe instead of really putting
their members first, their mission first, which is forget the party,

(59:16):
focus on the goal, which is trying to protect the
working class. So your right to say, it's a bonker's
movement for this country and for the working class. And
if you aren't at least giving mister Trump a shot
and listening to them thinking about these issues, and you
are a working class person, you are not doing yourselves
or your family. It's a profound disservice, is what you're doing.

Speaker 1 (59:37):
So Brian, tell us where we can find you. Tell
us what you got on deck for the Right Report
Daily podcast, How we could subscribe? You got a substack,
tell us all about it.

Speaker 5 (59:47):
Yeah, so every day usually by three am, but definitely
by five am East Coast time. The podcast is available
twenty five minutes, give or take. I go around America,
around the world. We talk about all the kinds of
things we just did today, you and I from politics
to global affairs and how that stuff impacts this. I
also offer on Rightreport dot substack dot com. I have
a substack where people can actually download the transcripts. Click

(01:00:09):
on a little link, you know, if words underlined, that's
gonna take you to the original source for all the.

Speaker 4 (01:00:13):
Things that I'm spouting off right now.

Speaker 5 (01:00:15):
It's really nice for listeners to be able to be like,
I'm gonna fact check this guy, let me see his sources.
That's what people can get on substack six bucks a
month to get that, to share those kinds of things.
So that's what I do every morning, Monday through Friday.
I tell everybody about America in the world. And it's
a lot of fun and I would be honored if
people join me, but if not, just come and listen here.
I joined this America sweetheart once a week or so.

(01:00:40):
It's always horrible because I see your beautiful damn hair
and it makes me sad.

Speaker 4 (01:00:44):
I let me get the row gain out again.

Speaker 1 (01:00:45):
Her hair looks the same as mine.

Speaker 5 (01:00:48):
No, no, frid This this is all like duct tape
and hairspray and some give me a break. Ronco Ronco
back in the nineties with its spray on hair, you know,
like put like fiberglass that was colored.

Speaker 1 (01:00:59):
That's Awkwa spray. It's fine like Awkwad spray.

Speaker 4 (01:01:02):
I'm not above it. I'm not above it.

Speaker 1 (01:01:06):
Brian Man. I love having you, man, and so does
the audience. We like I said, I get messages from
people all the time about how they listen to your
show learn from it. So if you're watching, you're listening,
please go support Brian Dean Wright in every way possible. Brian,
Thank you, my friend. Hopefully you see you next week,
maybe the week after. All right, see it, Brian, take care.
All right, that's Brian Dean Wright, one of the smartest

(01:01:27):
guys in the business. He really is the best. All right, folks, man,
these hours just flies by. Please do not forget to
like the show. Very very very very happy. I mean
you all have. I mean, the show grows so much,
and it's grown because of you. The more you share,

(01:01:49):
the more you talk about it like it really does help.
And I'm immensely grateful for all of you. Smash that
like button before we get out of here, tell your
family and your friends to continue to subscribe to Battleground Live.
This is your show, a show for we the people
up flag for man, Cindy Gefontes, I see you. Thank
you for the rumble rant tip. As always, folks, so

(01:02:10):
appreciate you got a hell of a Friday show on
deck for tomorrow. Kind of a recap of everything that
happened this week. Lots of very cool and exciting things
on deck for the show as well, and just working
on lots of cool things just to make the show better.
And I know that many of you all don't watch
n A full football, but I'm telling you beware of

(01:02:32):
in the mornings for Brockstar complaining that the league is rigged.
He likes to say that the league is rigged. It's
not rigged, but you will get updates on the fantasy
for the MAGA Warriors Fantasy Football League. As always, folks,
listen to me. God bless you all. Thank you for
sticking with me for the hour. God bless you all.
Keep the faith. The best is yet to come. Take

(01:02:53):
action in your community. Take care, good night, God bless
and I will see you tomorrow. Battle crew, take care, yeah,

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show News

Follow Us On

Hosts And Creators

Clay Travis

Buck Sexton

Show Links

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Battleground LIVE: Fake News All Around Us w/ Bryan Dean Wright