Battleground LIVE: The Great Reset Is Collapsing w/ Bryan Dean Wright

Tonight on Battleground LIVE

In the arena tonight: Bryan Dean Wright, host of the Wright Report Daily podcast and former CIA Operations Officer

Tonight on Battleground LIVE:

• Is PA still a swing state?

• Western troops on the ground in Ukraine

• Leftists are getting crushed all over the world

• The Great Reset is about to collapse

• Global Intel update!

Follow Sean on Instagram - @officialseanparnell

Follow Sean on Twitter - @SeanParnellUSA

Get your Battleground apparel at www.officialseanparnell.com

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:03):
Warning you're about to enter the arena and join the
Battle to.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
Save America with your host Sean Parnell.

Speaker 1 (00:14):
Good evening, America, Welcome to Battleground Live. This is the
show where we kick ass, we take names, we lockhorns
with the radical left. We never quit, we never surrender.
From sea to Shining Sea and everybody in between. Welcome
Patriots on this glorious, glorious Friday. Now it's Black Friday,

(00:37):
and so thank you all the loyal og members of
the Battle Crew and mcgroin nation. Thank you all for
joining us today. We know it's kind of a holiday,
and we get it. I don't like to take days off,
you know, I really don't. I also recognize the need
for holidays and family and spending time together and all

(00:57):
of that. That's of course, extremely extremely important. So you know,
it's always a balance, right, of course, take Thanksgiving off
because when I make sure that I'm completely present with
the family. Black Friday has always kind of been a holiday.
People go out shopping. They really start their Christmas shopping
for sure, and really today's a day to put up

(01:19):
a bunch of Christmas decorations. I know, believe me. I know.
Commander Melanie, my amazing wife. Boy, she was a rock
star yesterday is funny the girls and I you know,
she really is a rock star. She she's I told
Melanie last night. And this is not me trying to

(01:42):
get some cool points or whatever ingratiate myself to her,
but I told her this last night too, Like, I
am very lucky because I have an amazing wife who
she is an amazing cook, She cares a lot, loves
the family more than anything. She's unbelievably protective. She's willing
to go to bat for anybody in the family, go

(02:03):
to war for anybody in the family. I mean, she's beautiful,
she's smart, she's got great political instinct. And yesterday, you know,
it was our Thanksgiving and she was probably prepping five
or six different courses for the meal. I'm not even exaggerating.
She's got this big turkey and then she's she's got
this world class stuffing, and she loves stuffing, and every year,

(02:25):
stuffing is probably one of her favorite parts of Thanksgiving.
She cooks all these pies. She got this apple pie,
loves apple pie. Got cherry pies as well. She makes
this also world class mac and cheese, and you know, listen,
We've got lots to talk about tonight. We've got Brian
Dean right on deck. It's right night, so I'm not
gonna waste too much of her time with this. But

(02:48):
she makes the most amazing mac and cheese in the world.
And I have this rule of thumb battle crew, I
just do. I am a very meat and potatoes kind
of guy. Anytime I order something, it's just plain with cheese.
The way I instruct the waitress or waiter at restaurants
on the occasions that we go out. Just imagine I'm

(03:09):
a two year old and I'm ordering something just like that,
so very much like that. And I judge all restaurants.
I don't care if it's five star restaurant, but I
judge all restaurants on their quality of their mac and cheese.
And I am telling you just so you know. I
am a mac and cheese connoisseur. I love mac and cheese.

(03:29):
And here I'm just telling you, Commander Melanie makes some
of the best mac and cheese, probably the best mac
and cheese that I've ever had. And I know that
the kids will probably back me up on this as well.
Listen to me, folks, she's just that good and so okay.

(03:50):
So listen, don't forget to smash that like button, that
little green thumb beneath the video, don't forget about official
Seanparnell dot com, don't forget to follow me on locals. Uh, listen,
lot to talk about tonight. We're going to get to
lots of awesome stuff with Brian Dean Wright. But before
we get to Brian, the Associated Press had an article
out the other day, and it was interesting that it

(04:12):
was released the other day because they know that we're
going into Thanksgiving and so many people aren't going to
be paying attention. The Associated Press, by the way, is
not typically a publication that is friendly to conservatives at all.
In fact, they are a liberal rag. They are fake news.
But what makes the Associated Press so dangerous, particularly effective

(04:35):
fake news, is that all of their articles, if they're
published by the national Associated Press, all of their articles
are then taken and placed in local newspapers all across
the country, So they have a real local type feel.
And you've got to read the fine print to see
if it's an Associated Press reporter who's writing it, and
make sure it's not a local reporter. But That's why

(04:57):
the Associated Press, I think could be dangerous fake news
because even though they're a national or global organization, they
give you a sense that everything that they publish is local, right,
and how it gives you And the reason why that's
important is that if you're running an election, their writing
is if they're local, it gives you a sense of
how people feel locally. But that's really not the case.
If it's written by the Associated Press or for the

(05:17):
Associated Press, chances are they have some global interest or
liberal interest behind everything that they write. That's just the truth.
So they had an article out the other day, and
I'm pointing this out to you because a lot of
what we're going to talk about tonight is the Democrat
globalist worldview is on the ropes in a very, very

(05:40):
big way. And the title of this episode is the
Great Reset is Collapsing. And the reason why I titled
the episode that way is because I believe the Great
Reset is collapsing, and that's a great thing for patriots
all around the world, but especially here because in order
for the Great Reset to happen, and of course we

(06:02):
all know what the Great reset is, it's this anti capitalist,
anti American view very globalist view. They demonize free markets,
they embrace socialism and communism, and they advocate from more
control over your life. You'll live in the pod, you'll
eat the bugs, you'll be happy, type stuff, really dystopian
healthscape type stuff. Well listen, it's on the ropes in

(06:25):
a big way. And so this is why this Associated
Press article was very interesting to me because I think
the Democrats and the media know this. They see the
writing on the wall, and now they're questioning what to
do moving forward. And you can always see what the
Democrats are thinking, what their battle plan is, by reading

(06:46):
between the lines and some of these articles. So, of course,
the title in this Associated Press article Democrats in Pennsylvania
lost its nineteen presidential electoral votes, a US Senate seat,
three other statewide races, two congressional seats in what was
once a reassuring advantage, and voter registration. The title of

(07:07):
the article itself is very simply, is Pennsylvania still a
swing state? Now? For those of you all who have
listened to the show for a very long time, you
know what I think about Pennsylvania. It's the ballgame. Okay,
back to Pennsylvania real quick. The Democrats are worried about Pennsylvania.
Why does Pennsylvania matter? Folks, you've been watching the og.

(07:29):
Members of the Battle Crew, many of you all who
have been in the live chat, are been a part
of this show for a very long time. Pennsylvania is
the ballgame for Democrats. The Democrats just got their asses
whipped in Pennsylvania, likes of which they haven't seen in
a very very long time. You know, I told you.
You know, if you've been watching this show, then you

(07:50):
know that I've been involved on the back end of
everything Pennsylvania for the last two years. Now, then you
also know that I ran for Congress in Pennsylvania in
the twenty twenty cycle with President Trump. I also ran
for Senate in twenty twenty two. I know this state,
I knew what needed to happen here, and I knew
that whatever we did moving forward would be outcome determined

(08:12):
to do. And so we went to work raising a
ton of money trying to fight the political fight in Pennsylvania,
just like the Democrats did. In twenty twenty, the Democrats
had over a six hundred and fifty thousand, actually closer
to eight hundred thousand person voter registration advantage in this year,
in this election cycle that their voter registration advantags was

(08:32):
about three hundred and twenty five thousand. So with the
help of other great patriots like Scott Presler, we were
able to cut that number in half by fighting the
fight the way that the Democrats do. What we also
did in an organization that I ran was fight the
mail in ballot game, in the early vote game. For
those who might be new listening or watching the program,

(08:53):
No I don't like mail in ballots. No I wish
we didn't have them. If I were governor of Pennsylvania
for a day, first thing that I would do was
sign election reform and get rid of mail in ballots
and go back only to absentee ballots for very for
very specific reasons as outlined in the Pennsylvania State Constitution.
But that's not the point. If you want to change

(09:13):
election law, you got to actually win. And so we
went all in on this early vote and mail in
ballot program. And listen to this, at the end of
the cycle, we added over two hundred and forty thousand,
four hundred and thirty Republicans to the permanent vote by
mail list. This was the very first election cycle where
Republicans added more voters to that list than the Democrats.

(09:39):
We also produced get this number. This is this is
no bullshit data here, folks. We also produced three hundred
and sixty five thousand first time vote by mail voters.
Those are the first three hundred and sixty five thousand
people that we need to fold into the program for
the next couple of years. The point is this will

(09:59):
benefit at our party, the America First Movement immensely moving forward.
The goal is to take Pennsylvania off the board for
the Democrats. The goal is to turn Pennsylvania into Florida.
If we do that and the map continues to shrink
for the Democrats, it makes it very hard for them

(10:20):
to win the electoral College. Damn near impossible because if
Kamala Harris lost Pennsylvania. We've talked about this many times,
ninety six percent chance that Trump is going back to
the White House. That's not going to change anytime soon.
That's not going to change in subsequent cycles. The only
thing that we need to do on our end is

(10:40):
make sure that our people show up and adding people
to the permanent vote by mail list where you have
their name, you have their address of where a ballot
is being shipped and all you do is pick up
the phone and call them or send a piece of
mail to them. It makes our job a hell of
a lot easier. So if we're talking about a pathway
to Republicans in power as often as possible, then going

(11:04):
all in on Pennsylvania and taking it off the board
for them while their map continues to shrink does just that.
So that's why the Democrats are panicked. And again, so
much of what Brian and I are going to talk
about are going to be the history of the great
Reset why I think it's collapsing or might be at
least on the ropes all over the world. The Democrat
radical leftist globalist agenda here in America is also on

(11:27):
the ropes. It's part of all of this. So I've
got Brian Dean Wright on deck right now. I want
to bring them on. Welcome my friend, Brian Star, host
of The Right Report Daily podcast. If you are not
listening to this every day, you are wrong. You should
do that. You should subscribe to Brian also former CIA
operations officer. Looking dapper as usual, my friend.

Speaker 3 (11:48):
I'm just trying to bring it to the big Showan show,
Come on now your top shelf people with this Sean show.

Speaker 1 (11:55):
See that has a ring to it. Maybe I should
have put my name in the title of my show.
Damn it. See you have the Right Report. Your name
is right there in it.

Speaker 3 (12:05):
Yeah, well it makes me so famous. I can't step possible.
Everybody informs me huge.

Speaker 1 (12:11):
So people in the chat, someone was saying that your
show yesterday you talked about you traced your lineage and
journey here to America. So first of all, you got
to tell me what are you doing over there on
the right Report.

Speaker 3 (12:25):
Well I gotta tell you. So yesterday I had such
the distinct honor and privilege of giving everybody the family
story going back to the sixteen hundreds in this country.
It's just such an amazing story. My family came across
the Oregon Trail in the eighteen hundreds, and we have
all the old diaries and the old letters and huge photos. Yeah,
it's so it's so amazing. You know, next year, I'm
going to weave in more of the quotes they went

(12:47):
back and forth from the family in Indiana and then
the family in Oregon, which is where they were at
at the time. So my fourth grade grandfather was in
Iowa or in Indiana any rate. It's just such an
amazing story. When we think about giving thanks, you know,
we have so many reasons to get things for me.
I remember the ancestors yesterday. That's such an important thing,
and that was a fun thing to do with the audience,

(13:07):
is just let them know that in my family, we've
got a lot to celebrate. We all do, because we
all have stories and grandparents and great grandparents upon which
we had this amazing foundation of a country that we're
trying to keep together a more perfect union. And it's
tough to do, and sometimes we have some people who
actually hate the country. So it's nice to just give
ourselves a big old, warm, fuzzy hug and be like
we are standing on the shoulders of giants who built

(13:30):
this nation.

Speaker 1 (13:30):
I really appreciate you saying that because I say it often,
and you know, and talk about me joining the military
as some after nine to eleven, twenty something, early twenties,
thinking to myself, man, I just you know, want to
get in the fight, take the fight to the enemy,
younger version of myself. That's all I could think about.
I just wanted to go after the people who attacked us.
That's it. But now, being you know, a little bit older,

(13:53):
probably some better perspective on life. I look back and
think at all of the men and women who served
our country and thought, holy smoke, had I known this
going in, I probably would have. I don't know. I
not taken any of that for granted, and I wish
I would have. You know, when I talked to cadets
at military academies, that's what I tell them. Understand that
you're going in and really standing on the shoulders of

(14:15):
giants here. And so wait, your family was on the
Oregon Trail. My early experience with that is the video
game and elementary So yeah, yes, but you.

Speaker 3 (14:25):
Know about sixty five thousand people died on that Oregon
Trail through all those years of people trying to come out,
well they found My family was not one of them.
But yeah, my third great grandfather was born on the
Oregon Trail in the Dibractic territory, no doctors, no nurses,
back of a wagon with his mom and his father, Albert,
and his two older sisters at the time. Yeah, it's
incredible they actually held back through the winter because then

(14:48):
they sent the brother first and two of his buddies
on horseback to try to get to Oregon first because
there were a lot of claim jumpers. So they went forward.
They left the wagon train behind, so they waited until
they that spring they're broke, and then they headed out
west and they got to organ and time to get
the claim. It's it's an amazing story. It's yeah, it's incredible.

Speaker 1 (15:08):
Well, you know, I not to go too far down
this path, but do you ever think about just if
things happened differently, how every like just sounds I'm real
back to the future shit. But Melanie was reading this
book about the Mayflower coming over about one of the
passengers on the Mayflower getting swept overboard, but he clung
to this chain. People rescued him. The guy survived, had

(15:30):
a huge family. Three presidents come from this guy's family.
But all that guy has to do is not hold
on to the chain and drown and none of that happens.
Like you exist, you know, I mean you talk about
standing on the shoulders of giants. How close I mean
did you come to like just not existing? Yeah, it's

(15:52):
just insane.

Speaker 3 (15:52):
It's just my third great grandfather, grandmother or Julie Ann
not giving Bert to Silas who was her boy, or
if she had died and birth on the Oregon Trail
in Nebraska territory, I wouldn't be here. But if you
go back two generations prior to that, my fifth grade
grandfather was born to a woman who we don't quite
know who the father was. Through GNA or DNA analysis,
we know that the last name was probably a Parker.

(16:14):
In seventeen hundreds, if a woman was giving birth to
a child out of wedlock, not a good deal. But
we don't know the conception because there could have been
a lot of very terrible things that have happened to her.
But the point is a man in southern New Hampshire
took her in, and my fifth great grandfather didn't have to,
he had four sons of his own took her in

(16:36):
and my fifth grade grandfather and raised the man or
the young boy as his own son and gave him
a life or he wouldn't have otherwise had it. So
I come from very humble beginnings. I also come from
the very beginning of this country. But you think about it, like,
we have so many incredible stories in this country who've
been for all kinds of places, for rich and poor

(16:56):
and otherwise. But I think what unites a lot of
us today in today's America is that you can still
be successful if you work hard. And that's what my
fifth grade grandfather I think showed future generations is he
became a farmer and then a blacksmith. When his boys
reached the age of eighteen, he give them an axe.
He shook their hands and said good luck, and he did.

(17:17):
And what we have in the family diaries, he taught
or he treated his sons like a neighbor. From that
point on. They were still his sons, of course, but
he put them out, them out on the nest and
said it's time for you to go on your own.
And so two of his boys went across the Oregon
Trail to find their destiny. And I'm here with you
now because of that.

Speaker 1 (17:35):
It's amazing and it's part of the reason why people
should be listening to your podcast. It really is amazing,
and people have come to really enjoy it. They're always
talking about it in the chat on the show, and
so yeah, I'm glad you're really I mean, I guess
it makes sense that like you were in the CIA,
because there's some overlap between being like an operations intelligence officer,

(17:57):
spy type guy, but also being a good researcher. I
think you've got to be both. I'm more of like
a door kicker, knuckle dragger, I'm more of I don't
think I could ever. I don't think I have the
attention to detail to do anything like that.

Speaker 3 (18:10):
We see where we're teams. This is what we all
bring our own stuff to the table. Friend, we need
the door knockers. We need that. We need guys like you.
Don't you worry about that right now? Look, you leave
the fast cars and the pretty girls to me, but
I'll have you going bang down the door. How about that?
Does that work?

Speaker 1 (18:24):
That sounds fine? That sounds fine. Okay, So let's shift
gears to Ukraine and potential nuclear war. Now it's a
real good transition right right there.

Speaker 2 (18:36):
Heavy things giving everybody, we're all gonna die. Now, it's
time for everybody gets to be super stressed. Let's talk
about potential. We talked about what we're thankful for. Now
let's just talk about how it could all get wiped
out in just a second. So, so, in all seriousness,
I do think that this Ukraine situation is not getting
enough media. You you honestly would think it would be

(18:57):
getting more given how close we are to really bad
things happening. You and I texted earlier in the week
that Britain and France are sending their advisors there. We
definitely already have CIA people on the ground there. I
would even bet that we've got Special Operations forces on
the ground. They're actual, maybe non conventional, but US military
types on the battlefield there.

Speaker 3 (19:17):
Is it's confirmed? Yeah?

Speaker 1 (19:19):
Is it? Is it really confirmed? I mean, I like
we have uniformed American military personnel there. I mean, it's
just the war keeps marching to me in the wrong direction.
And I found this SoundBite which just is an interview
I think on the BBC with Zelenski talking about what
the end of the conflict could look like, and that

(19:42):
just for the people who are listening and watching, that
Zolensky might be willing to seed Russian held territory to Putin,
but in exchange for them being granted access to Nado,
which has always been a red line for Putin. So
it's like, on one hand, here you have Zelenski saying, yeah,

(20:03):
we'll give We'll see some of this terrain, but you know,
we got to get access to NATO. Like, listen to
him talking about this, and I want to get your reaction.

Speaker 4 (20:12):
Well, one alternative perhaps again this is reported from the
United States, and it's fairly simple, really, is that Ukraine
joins NATO, but Russia takes control and keeps the land
that it has to date, would that be a possibility.

Speaker 5 (20:36):
No one has offered us to be in NATO with
just one part or another part of Ukraine.

Speaker 1 (20:43):
That's for once fucked.

Speaker 5 (20:45):
The fact is that it is a solution to stop
the hot stage of the war, because we can just
give the native membership to the part of Ukraine that
is under our control. Fact more, yes, it could be possible.

Speaker 3 (20:59):
But no one offered, Trevor Aby.

Speaker 5 (21:02):
But the invitation must be given to Ukraine within its
internationally recognized border. You can't give invitation to just one
part of a country. Why because thus you would recognize
that Ukraine is only that territory of Ukraine and the
other one is Russia.

Speaker 3 (21:20):
It's god uridich no minimo bra.

Speaker 5 (21:22):
So legally, by law, we have no right to recognize
the occupied territory as territory of Russia. And here we
must not make any mistake to study Vini. But if
we want to stop the hot stage of the war,
we should take under natal umbrella the territory of Ukraine

(21:43):
that we have under our control. That's what we need
to do fast, and then Ukraine can get back the
other part of its territory diplomatically.

Speaker 1 (21:54):
So he's not saying he's he's because it's being I mean,
I've listened to this several times. It's being reported as, yeah, look,
we'll let Putin keep whatever he has. Now, just give
us access to NATO. I don't think Putin's ever going
to be okay with that. But let's say, for example,
that that happens. He's never given that, She's never given

(22:18):
that territory. Up, it's not gonna happen. And I'm not
saying or advocating, hey, well let's back down to Putin, right,
because I that guy's a terrible, evil dictator. But this
stuff all seems like a pipe dream to me. Brian,
Am I right? Am I wrong? Tell me what you're thinking.

Speaker 3 (22:36):
Look, Zelenski's doing what he should do as a president
of his own country, which is trying to defend its
interest in only its interests. So he's doing what he
is supposed to do what his people elected him to do.
That does not mean that we our president and our
Congress and guys like Vindemann and others in our Congress
or in our political system, that we should do what

(22:57):
Ukraine wants. So we have to back and ask ourselves
what's the what are our interests here? Because you are correct,
for folks unaware, we have a multiple CIA basis six
to ten of them depending on who you ask, inside
of Ukraine right now. We have special operations forces inside
of Ukraine right now. And Yessu're quite right to say
the United Kingdom and France are both concerned in putting

(23:19):
their own ground troops in Ukraine in addition to their
own contractors. So this war is absolutely escalating in the
wrong direction obviously, so we should be asking, well, so
why do we care what Zelenski wants or not? And
ultimately I think our play here is we want Europe
to be stable so we can have good trade relationships
with that continent and do we have peace. That's fundamentally

(23:40):
what we want. So when we have a conversation with Putin, whatever,
the deal is fine, but let's make sure that it
is a lasting and a durable piece that's the goal.
That's the end goal. So that's why you might hear
some people talk about it. In fact, I think some
Trump's people saying, let's create like a de militarized zone
through a good chunk of NATO. Did that DMZ becomes

(24:00):
patrolled by European powers and the rest of the rump
of Ukraine does not become NATO. It just becomes this
sort of buffer state with the DMC absolutely the buffer
as it were, between Russia and the rest of Europe.
And that creates your piece. Now, that's a very unhappy
outcome for a lot of people in Ukraine right now.
Of course they're going to lose a chunk of their
territory plus the DMZ, but they've also lost hundreds of

(24:23):
thousands of their men. They're young men in a country
with the demographic crisis that was already running out of men.
And yes, what you heard this week from the Biden
White House to multiple media outlets is that they're encouraging
the government of Ukraine to lower their age requirement for
the men that they're going to throw to this meat
grinder from twenty five to eighteen. And the reason that

(24:44):
Zelensky and the government in Kiev have not done that
to date. Is because they want those men to have
babies and reverse the demographic crisis and decline. But if
you're going to throw the rest of your young men
into this meat grinder, you're not going to have any
men left to populate the nation. And yet that's exactly
what the West is now telling them. By the way,
the Germans are also telling kievan Zelensky the same thing.
So you get the entirety of the West telling Ukraine

(25:07):
throw your young men, all of them, all of them
into this fight. That's interesting. Why what do we want
Ukraine to bleed out in this war of attrition which
we know the Ukrainians are not going to win. They
have less than twenty five percent of the total population,
and a war of attrition, if you are the twenty
five percent, your enemy is the seventy five percent. You

(25:28):
lose absent some crazy weapon which ain't gonna have because
the Risidins have ANUK. So this war of attrition was
lost from day one. The Pentagon, the CIA, the White House,
they all knew this from day one, which really starts
to get into some dark conversation around why the West,
why the United States would allow a war of attrition
knowing that it was going to slaughter the Ukrainian people,

(25:49):
most of their young men.

Speaker 1 (25:51):
Yeah, why why? And now you see Putin threatening Ukraine
and Zelensky with hitting some of their commanding control centers
with high personic missiles too. The West knows this, and yeah,
it really does beg the question why continue to throw
Ukrainian men to the meat grinder and essentially wipe out

(26:14):
their population? As you said, sometimes in a war of attrition,
you get you out all the time. In a war
of attritionan you get exactly that attrition in Ukraine is
not in a position to withstand that Russia just has
more people, full stop. So what the hell? Why escalate?

(26:34):
You know why?

Speaker 3 (26:36):
What you're asking is what we should all be asking
two hundred billion plus dollars into this war. What's the
strategy here? What's the endgame? What's the goal? Well we
actually got some of that at the very beginning of
this conflict in March and then again in April. Joe
Biden and then the Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin respectively
in March and April said that the goal here is
a regime change. You may remember Biden delivered a speech

(26:58):
in Poland in markets.

Speaker 1 (27:00):
We've got to talk more. That's a great regime change,
because that's what it's. People forget about that, Brian.

Speaker 3 (27:06):
Well, that's only half of it. So regime change is
the first part. That's the ultimate goal. Is Biden laid
out the other half of it, which is what Secretary
Austin said in April of twenty twenty two, is if
it's not regime change, it is grinding the Russian military
and the Russian state into such a weakened rump that
it can be controlled regime.

Speaker 1 (27:24):
Change in Russia. You're talking about they want Putin out
of there.

Speaker 3 (27:27):
Well, it's either Putin remains that the preference would be
that Putin is gone. Joe Biden made that clear that
speech in Poland the next month when Lloyd Austin said
the goal is to degrade Putin's forces so that he
can quote never do this again sort of and go
so some paraphrasing, but it's dark close to the exact quote.
So if we can't remove Putin in other words, this
is the strategy. Biden can't and his team can't remove Putin,

(27:48):
We're going to degrade his military to the point that
he can't create any sort of military havoc ever. Again, Okay,
let's just say that that is a strategy. Can we
be honest about that, and can we talk about it?
And if that's the strategy, then that would make some
degree of sense that the Pentagon and Western leaders in
Saint Brussels or Paris in France would be willing to
sacrifice every single last Ukrainian man for that mission. Okay,

(28:13):
let's be honest about that. And now let's ask the
Ukrainian people. Are you Happyrea? Are you okay with us
using you and your men as our puppets as our
proxy fighters? Are you okay with that? Are we okay
with sending five eight hundred thousand and one million Ukrainian
men to their deaths? I mean, that's the conversation we
need to have, and then we need to ask ourselves

(28:34):
a question. Well, wait a minute, So Boutin's not a
good guy. Obviously, he represents his own interests and he's
a meglomaniac, got it. But that doesn't mean that we
have to engage an endless war. There are other options,
diplomatic options like the DMZ and putting the French in
the Russian or the French, of the British troops in
the DMZ, etc. So are there other ways to deal
with Moscow other than a war where the vast majority

(28:56):
of men are slaughtered? And this isn't some hyperbole, by
the way. You know, in other wars, for instance, the
Three Nation War down in South America back in the
eighteen hundreds, ninety percent of Paraguayan men died in that war.
So you can have a situation where something like that happens,
where you're talking about ninety ninety five percent of all
the men of Ukraine gone. God, all right, if you

(29:17):
were a mom or a dad in Ukraine, that's kind
of bad. You would want the world to talk about that. Second,
if you look at the men right now that are
serving versus the men in Ukraine who aren't serving, there's
a very important difference. Who's the canon fodder in Ukraine
right now? Well, the men you can forward about ten
thousand dollars to get out of Ukraine to go into Poland, Germany, Romania,

(29:39):
those are the rich men. So the men in Ukraine
who are not fighting, they're the rich men. The poor men,
whether it be in Kiev or mostly in the rural
areas of Ukraine that cannot afford ten thousand dollars, so
they get snatched by the Ukrainian police, thrown into a unit.
And those are the guys who are the cannon fought.
It's the poor and the rural, as we have seen
countless times in our own country's history as well as

(30:02):
all around the world, that who suffers. So this gets
back then to the strategy we want to use Ukraine
as our puppet to try to degrade Putin. Okay, we're
starting to get into this very State Department Harvard Ivory
Tower conversation about getting down our maps and our pens
and redrawing the lines of Europe. That sounds all lovely
like we've read in some sort of history book, but

(30:23):
we're talking about lives, young men. You and I have
talked about this, not just on your podcast but otherwise.
You and I have gone through this walk in this
country's journey of the global War on Terror. We know
what it's like to have friends who die. We know
what it's like to have friends who lose arms and legs.
We know what it's like to have them come back
in their mind scrambled. That happens set on our porches

(30:44):
and talk about suicide. So we know what this cost
looks like in a very real, in a very personal way.
We're not sitting at State Department headquarters or UB at
Harvard having a conversation about remap on the world. So
that's what I think in this new administration when I pray,
is that that somebody represents those voices irrespective of this
big power play between Brussels and DC and Moscow and

(31:06):
all that kind of stuff, that we remember a little
bit of our humanity as we think about trying to
find ways to engage in peace. That doesn't mean that
we absolutely take war off the table. There is such
a thing as righteous war, that's correct, But in this case,
it's really important that we recognize in a war attrition,
Ukraine's not going to win unless we send in troops.
And are we willing to do that? No, we're not.

(31:26):
So why would you send another generation eighteen to twenty
five year old men in Ukraine to their deaths because
we want to puppeteer these guys who we can take out,
putin or minimize or weaken his regime. Sorry, there are
other ways to do that, And how dare our leaders
in the West use these young men, these poor rural
men in Ukraine to do their bidding as cannon fodder.
It's absolutely evil.

Speaker 1 (31:48):
That's what I couldn't agree with you more. I really,
there really is something that's deeply unsettling about, Yeah, We'll
just get the Ukrainians to do our fighting for us.
And listen, I've heard Republicans and Democrats heard Lindsay Graham
say this, the Ukrainians are killing Russians for us, And
I'm just like thinking to myself, I don't find that honorable.

(32:11):
You know that they're going to get killed. Why are
we advocating for it? Why are we It's just something
about that just seems very dishonorable. And I think for
President Trump and you talk about, you know, this next
administration thinking a certain way. When he was asked by

(32:33):
Caitlin Collins on CNN like are you what do you
want to you want putin to win this war, He's like,
I want people to stop dying. I thought that was
the right answer.

Speaker 3 (32:41):
Yes, you know, yes, Look, one of the things that
makes me a little bit concerned, and you and I
talked about this, is that the new point person that
mister Trump has chosen to try to resolve this issue
in Ukraine is a man who historically has made this
argument that we will win this war and we will
be with Ukraine for as long as it takes, and
we will degrade Putin and the Russian military. Well, who's

(33:03):
the wee friend General Kellogg? I believe is his name.
With all due respect to his tremendous service, he's a
good man, no doubt. But again, these same three four
star generals are also the ones who got us into
a rock in Afghanistan in Ukraine obviously, and we have lost.
So there should be some very tough questions asked of
men like him. Despite the fact that they're very honorable,
that does not mean that they can't be wrong. And

(33:24):
so he has advocated a position that I think is
very very troubling to me, and I sure hope that
he brings a very different perspective than what the mister Kellogg.
General Kellogg has said for years now, which is we're
going to use these young Ukraine men for our sort
of puppet fight against Putin. I think that that is
absolutely the wrong way to go, and the State Department
under Makro Rubio has a much much better chance of

(33:47):
resolving this issue. This needs to be solved with the diplomats,
not with the barrel of a gun, not this one,
not this fight.

Speaker 1 (33:54):
I couldn't agree more. Can you stay right there? Can
I take a quick break and come back talk about
the Great Reset and the history of that and why
I why you know? I you definitely at least I
don't want to speak for you, but I think it's
kind of on the ropes and they're afraid. Do you
do you kind of agree?

Speaker 3 (34:09):
Yes, sir?

Speaker 1 (34:09):
All right, so stay right there. We'll be back with
Brian Dean Wright. Back with Brian Dean Wright. Welcome back,
my friend, host of the Right Report. Former CIA operations
officer Brian the British Prime Minister came out today and
said something that was kind of crazy and and what
I mean by crazy is not in keeping with their

(34:31):
ideological worldview. In fact, what he said today was the
opposite of what people like him have been saying for
a very long time. And anytime these globalists come out
and say something that shocks me a little bit, that
sounds like something Trump could have said to me, I
immediately am suspicious and think that there's an agenda behind it.

(34:52):
And so I want, I want to listen to this
sound by it of the British Prime Minister and then
get your thoughts on all of this.

Speaker 6 (35:00):
What the British people are owed is an explanation, because
a failure on this scale isn't just bad luck. It
isn't a global trend or taking your eye off the ball. No,
this is a different order of failure. This happened by design,

(35:21):
not accident. Policies were reformed deliberately to liberalize immigration. Brexit
was used for that purpose, to turn Britain into a
one nation experiment in open borders global Britain.

Speaker 1 (35:40):
Remember that slogan.

Speaker 6 (35:42):
That is what they meant, a policy with no support
of which they then pretended wasn't happening.

Speaker 1 (35:51):
I mean, it sounds a lot like President Trump. But
this guy does not believe the same things that President
Trump believes. And it's interesting that he says this now
knowing that President Trump's going to be back in office
in a couple of months.

Speaker 3 (36:04):
Well, let's start with this. So we know that this
gentleman is a lifelong socialist, and I mean lifelong Marxist.
When he was eighteen through about twenty five, he was
an editor for a Marxist magazine a couple of years ago.
He was interviewed and he was asked if he was
still a socialist, and he said yes. So let's start
with this. So when we hear socialists talk about how

(36:24):
open borders are bad, you're absolutely right to say, well,
that's shocking, that's very surprising, that's not what they believe,
because they don't. Marxists believe in open borders. So just
make sure that we're all tracking on this. Marxists make
the argument that human labor people should be able to
go across borders at will because capital business owners do
it all the time, So in order to make that

(36:46):
more equitable, we should have open borders. That is the
Marxist foundational position. So this man has been a Marxist
entire life, and not just kind of like he thought
about it in college. Right, He wasn't just experimenting. This
guy was straight up Marxist. So for him to now
say that one of the foundational beliefs of a Marxist,

(37:07):
he no longer believes that, And he's in fact blaming
open borders on the conservatives, who have long advocated for
not having open borders, for actually having a strong Britain.
In fact, in the UK, the previous prime minister, the
Conservative Prime minister, was trying to ship these illegals that
come across the channel to Rwanda. That was his plan
because he was boxed in by European rules, by British rules,

(37:30):
and so he was thinking about, you know, dumping these
people off in Rwanda. So he's changing. So that's really
important for us to think about a b This is
the same guy who sent some of his staffers to
help Kamala Harris win this last election. They failed. So
wait a minute. Kamala Harris was not talking about open
borders for the last four years. He did for the

(37:50):
last for the last couple of months. So what is
then that's changed. What does that suggest is happening? Well,
we definitely should take this moment of surprise to pause.
You were absolutely correct to say that there's something very
very alarming going on here when a Marxist says, hey,
open borders are bad. So this is when it's important
to take a step back, and I do try to
do this on my podcast. I know you and I

(38:11):
have talked about this on your podcast as well. If
you look at what's been happening over the past five years,
and you compare that to say, thirty forty years ago,
it's a very very different kind of Europe. So here's
what I mean. Thirty four years ago, as the Cold
War was coming to a conclusion, and then it came
to a conclusion, we had a lot of people start
to on the left start to percolate back up into

(38:31):
power throughout the European continent. These were Marxist socialists, avowed
obvious ones, so they weren't hiding it anymore. So that
then translated to all kinds of things, so like much
more social spending, much less dramatic, or much less spending
on defense, much more you know, in many cases of
open borders. And part of that was due to what
the World Economic Forum guys like who had that up,

(38:51):
lau Schwab and others. They argue that look, post Cold War,
in post Second World War, capitalism just didn't really work out.
There's too much inequity in the world, and so we
need to sort of reimagine. They would say capitalism, and
they call it stakeholder capitalism. All right, well, what does
that really mean. What it means is socialism and Marxism.

(39:12):
But like the socialists here in the United States who
have openly said, look, anytime socialism has been tried around
the world, it's failed. Status regimes have ruled in our name,
So we can't so we can't say.

Speaker 1 (39:23):
How the hell do you know all of this? This
is insane.

Speaker 3 (39:27):
So I wrote about this years ago when I was
still a Democrat, because I was trying to warn my
party at the time, we are letting this this radicalized
leftist route, which is evil. One hundred and sixty eight
plus million people I've died because of this ideology. Jack
Kennedy and others knocked this stuff out of our party.
It's coming back. We got to do something about it.
And at the time I'm like Pelosi, knock it off.

(39:48):
You know, blue dogs, where are you? Well we all
see where that went. The point is this, socialists in
this country know that the regimes around the world have
tried socialism have failed, whether it be social or Marxism,
whatever in between. So over the past thirty years, socialists
and these reformed capitalists have said, look, we're going to
ditch the old ways that we've done things. We need

(40:10):
to reimagine the ways that we do it. We can't
call it socialism. So we got to call it stakehold
older capitalism. And a part of that, though, is still
going to hold tight to certain socialists from Marxist tenants,
one of them being open borders. And that's what you've
seen throughout Europe now for thirty plus years. Sweden was
one of the first, but we've seen it in places
like Germany on Goola Merkel, while not necessarily a socialist,

(40:31):
certainly embraced this reforming of capitalism. That's why she opened
up her borders to one plus million Syrian and other
North African and Middle Eastern migrants. Words are now trying
to destroy that country. But we see this all over
the place, from the UK to Ireland, to Spain, Portugal, Italy,
on and on this goes. So that has been the

(40:52):
experiment changing Europe to make it less what it was
in the Cold War and more like the Claud Schwab
version of this reformed capitalism which is just Marxism. Well
as it trains out a great reset, the Great Reset,
yes they called it the Great Reset. They want to
reset capitalism and create and creates a sort of this
reformed capitalism, the stakeholder capitalism. Interesting, so this is not

(41:13):
a conspiracy. The World Economic Forum has talked a lot
about it. Klaus Schwab has talked a lot about it,
and that's his fundamental belief is the capitalism has just
destroyed too many lives, it has made too many people poor,
it has destroyed the environment, and it has caused global
warming or global climate change. And so that is the
foundational argument by a Marxist, although I think we could
probably make the argument they don't really believe in all

(41:35):
that stuff. They probably don't really believe in climate change.
They just use it as a pretext to create this
Marxist regime. But anyway, that's a whole different story. The
bottom line is this my man. So this change then
has been taken off in Europe, hasn't it. I mean,
Europe forty thirty years ago does not look like the
Europe today. And that happens to make a lot of
Europeans very angry, very angry. It's what we've seen over

(41:59):
the past five years is from Sweden, Finland, Denmark, the Netherlands, France, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Austria, Spain, Portugal,
the UK, Ireland, all of these nations and more have
started to swing to the right much more conservative. And
of course the reaction by the media in Europe and
the United States is, oh, there, those are not says,

(42:19):
those are the radical rights all.

Speaker 1 (42:22):
That was exactly what they say. It doesn't right. By
the way, by the way, any conservative now is far right.
You're not. I mean, like you're far right, I'm far right.
We're all far right.

Speaker 3 (42:32):
Well, never mind that I say the same things that
I did twenty years ago as a democratic but anyway,
and Barack Obama did and Hillary Clinton but anyway, true. Yeah,
look at the DNC platforms. You and I went through
this in the summertime. It's like it's maga if you
want to call it then. But here's the point. The
people of Europe are angry, just like the people in
this country. We are angry about open borders and we're

(42:54):
saying no. And what's happening is across the European continent
and in this country the left is being pushed out
because their experiment around open borders is unacceptable. This Marxist
belief that human labor should be able to cross across
borders irrespective of vetting, in order to equal out with
the capital and the business owners. That argument expressed through

(43:14):
open borders has made a lot of people very angry,
and the voters are tossing out the left and they
know this, and they know this the Marxist in the left,
which is the Labor Party in the UK Kero Starmer,
who you highlighted, he knows this. They all know that
if they stick with this great reset, they will be
thrown out for a generation or longer. So what they
have to do is recalibrate for the short term to

(43:36):
try to keep their power. Because mister Starmer is one
of the few who actually is retaining control. A lot
of others are getting tossed out, just like we saw
in the United States. So that's what's happening right now
in Europe sort of big picture post Cold War, Second
World War. They're trying to get rid of traditional capitalism
as we have known it. They're trying to replace it
with stakeholder capitalism, which is really socialism rebranded that involves

(43:59):
open borders. That has failed, That has pissed off a
whole bunch of people, to the point where a couple
of weeks ago you and I talked about the fact
that the Berlin police chief said that the gays and
the Jews can't go into Certa neighborhoods in Berlin because
the Arabs will slaughter them. Well, okay, that's what happens
when you don't have border controls and jacks, and you
don't vet people at your embassies and your consulates. You
just let in everybody, riff raff and lovely people combined.

(44:22):
So that's the moment that we're all living through. It's
really an incredible moment in US and Western history, European history.
We are ejecting across the board people on the left,
and they're very scared, and they want to keep power
and they want to retain this ability to continue to
move forward with their socialists and Marxist experiment. So they
have to recalibrate for now. And that's what mister Starmer's doing.

Speaker 1 (44:43):
And do you think that's why do you think that
might be their catalysts or the reason why they're escalating
things in Ukraine? You and I are talked briefly about this.
To escalate a conflict in Ukraine, hope that Russia strikes back,
maybe there's collateral damage in a NATO country to trigger
our Article five intervention of what the Brits and France

(45:04):
and certainly the United States and escalated war because there
are in times of crisis, you know, people of those
nations tend to cling to the leaders of those countries
in a time of conflict. Like you think that might
be a play. I mean this, this is we're just
wargaming here, right, we don't know that this is true.
But like, why I keep coming back, why escalate? It's

(45:25):
it's to me, it's it's lose lose for for everybody.

Speaker 3 (45:29):
Well, let's start with this. Look, it's not a conspiracy
to understand that when leaders fear that they are going
to be pushed out of power, they reach for the
crisis button and they push it again and again. So
they will create a crisis to create a distraction. So
let's just start with that. That is well established in history.
So a B. We now know that the left unquestionably
is losing throughout the European continent and in this country,

(45:52):
So that also is well established that that's not a conspiracy.
So now we're trying to put together the puzzle pieces
to understand and why would I got like Starmer suddenly
pivot to the right on this issue where the voters
are saying we're with your legal experiment A B. Might
it be that this escalation of Ukraine is part of that,
the distraction, sure, but you know, beyond that, what I

(46:14):
think is very very clear too, is you have the
White White House Brussels. European leaders say that we will
be with Ukraine for as long as it takes. They
put hundreds of billions of dollars, their reputations, their governments
on the line to defend Ukraine. Why because they want,
as we talked about earlier, to degrade Putin's of forces
or actually toss them out of office. But now it

(46:35):
is they who who are getting thrown out of office.
It is they who are the weak ones. And so
of course you could see people in power want to
cling to power for all kinds of reasons, ideology being
one of them. Also just the lust for power as well,
and then of course pride and ego, let's not toss
that out. A lot of people get very prideful and
very very egocentric when they realize that their legacies are
going to be in tatters because they have justified this

(46:58):
war and lost. In addition to Iraq and Afghanistan and
now Ukraine, how many guys at the Pentagon in the
CIA are looking at their legacies over the past thirty
years and realizing they have left this country nothing but debt,
blood and disaster. That is America's foreign policy over the
past thirty years.

Speaker 1 (47:14):
I couldn't agree more. It really is true. And Brian,
this is why I'm okay with a different approach. I mean,
I'm serious. This is why I'm okay with a yeah, yes,
haxept for one, it's why I'm okay with President Trump
thinking differently about foreign policy. I mean thinking differently as

(47:36):
part of what brought us the Abraham Accords. I think
that that can be built upon in this next administration.
And to your point about people being you know, these
leftists being scared that they're not in power, and people
in the CIA and maybe in trench bureaucats wondering about
their legacy. And did you see this of Michael Hayden. Now,
this guy, by the way, is a Dukane University graduate.

(47:57):
I believe I went to Dukane from my undergrad and
my master so we share the same alma mater. Unfortunately,
but here's this dude saying Jack Smith plans to release
the report before Donald Trumps worn in and here's General
Michael Hayden. Please please, please, please please the guys, a
former retired four star general, former director of the NSA,

(48:18):
former director of the CIA. What the hell is wrong?
I mean to me, this guy's is like an utter
disgrace to the uniform. And he's trying to undermine the
President Trump's second term before he even gets in office.
That's very clear to me.

Speaker 3 (48:32):
This is the same man, by the way, who about
six years ago, seven years ago, compared what we were
doing on the southern border to Dacau and Auschwitz and
the concentration car.

Speaker 1 (48:41):
What a freaking moron.

Speaker 3 (48:42):
So he's put that on the record than actually trying
to defend a border is the equivalent of Auschwitz. So
that tells you the kind of caliber of the mania is.
Every once in a while, I try to have a
shred of a little bit of compassion for that man,
only because he had a massive stroke, and so part
of me wonders, did his brain just get you know,
did he really? I mean, maybe that's true, true, No,
he did. He suffered a massive stroke. So part of

(49:03):
me wonders, like, is there something not right with this noodle?
I don't know, I maybe That's why I bit my
tongue oftentimes with that man, but not always, because some
of the stuff is so outrageous and so offensive, and
ultimately it helps to make the argument that the deep
state is real and it's really bad. It is control
of everything. Because you've got this guy, a former uh,

(49:24):
you know, senior leader of the Pentagon obviously the NSA
and the CIA saying some really horrible things, which is
that the American people actually shouldn't get a vote in
their in their you know, governments, and we should release
reports to damage you know, a press on elect So, yeah,
you're right, it is an awful, awful guy.

Speaker 1 (49:42):
These are the guys that I mean again, these aren't
boots on the ground operators. These are the former director
of the NSA and CIA also signed the Hunter Biden laptops. Uh,
it was a signatory on the Hunter Biden laptop as
this Russian disinformation letter. I mean, Brian, I hope that
the president, newly elected President Trump, goes in there and

(50:04):
just cleans house. And I honestly, my friend, I think
the American people want that as well. I really believe
that the American people want you know, the entrenched bureaucrat,
the size, the scope, the power of the federal government,
the administrative state. I think they just want it just
completely routed. That's how I feel. I mean, I think
that's part of the reason why people voted for President

(50:26):
Trump is that they're sick and tired of business as
usual in Washington, all those I mean, there's a reason
why Washington, DC is the nation probably the world richest
zip code. You know, there's so much consolidated power there,
and I think the American people are over people like Hayden.

Speaker 3 (50:44):
Yeah, well, I would argue that. I think at this
point most of us know that, Look, we don't have
the solutions to everything. We just know that right now
things aren't normal. This isn't right. We might not be
able to tell you exactly what it should be, but
we just remember decades ago when things were better, and
we know that this moment is not right. When we
are locking up our goods behind pieces of plastic at

(51:05):
stores instead of lacking of criminals, there's something wrong about that.
When there are millions of people who are coming through
our southern border unvetted and then go on to murder
and rape and burglarize people and homes, and the rest
of it. That's not normal, right. So you know the
COVID pandemic, where we knew that this respiratory virus mostly
targeted the obese, that it was a respiratory virus that

(51:25):
was about the same fatality rate as the flu, but
yet shut down and destroyed our education system, our economy
causing profound inflation. That's not right. These public health officiers
like Fauci, they were wrong. Why is there Why is
there nothing in terms of consequences for people like him?
So the American people, I think, are just angry about
a lot of things. We might not have as the solutions.

(51:46):
Maybe don't. We don't have the PhDs with a fancy expertise,
but we just know that this moment isn't right, and
we're right, we're correct, And that anger and that outrage,
I think is really tapping into this new Trump coalition,
which really the end of the day, is transcending race
and sex and sexual orientation, all the rest of it.
It's about workers, it's about working class, it's about middle

(52:08):
class and poor people saying we're done with your wars,
We're done with your crappy inflation and your your terrible leadership.
We note that this isn't normal.

Speaker 1 (52:16):
We want a different American man, well said, I couldn't
agree with you. More. Tell everybody where they can find you,
my friend, Well.

Speaker 3 (52:24):
Look at this smug. That's where you can find me.

Speaker 1 (52:26):
Wait, what does that mug say?

Speaker 3 (52:27):
Well, it's a different version, says right country, not right Report.

Speaker 1 (52:32):
That's what I thought. Yeah, you're you're really you're rolling
with the merch man.

Speaker 3 (52:38):
Yeah, you know, trying to keep up with the Jones is. Yeah,
so everybody can find me money through Friday on the
right Reports. I have it at five am each day.
If you want the transcripts to when I talk about
a resource or source everything, you just go on to
right Report dot substack dot com. Six bucks a month,
seventy bucks a year. You can down those those daily transcripts,
get all the source and I use send it on

(52:59):
to family and friends for your edification and your good
arguments and help you shape what you believe.

Speaker 1 (53:04):
Awesome, my friend, any any plan's gonna go get some
good shopping deals done today on Black Friday.

Speaker 3 (53:10):
No, No, I would rather if you if you give
me a choice, And he said, Brian, you could go
out shopping today and save a bunch of money. Or
you could take broken glass and shove it into your urethra.
I would take I would take the bloody urethra over
shopping today. You don't want to go shopping.

Speaker 1 (53:33):
So now that's a compelling visual. That's a yes.

Speaker 3 (53:37):
So I am not going to go shopping. I'm going
to work because that's what I do.

Speaker 1 (53:40):
So you're an online shopper, you're an it's gonna do
some online Christmas shopping.

Speaker 3 (53:45):
You know what I'm gonna tell you. Set there right now.
You don't see this shirt right here that I'm worrying. Yes,
this shirt is twenty years old. I don't shop. Look
at this. Look at this twenty years old. That's all
I need.

Speaker 1 (53:55):
That's all you need, amen, Low maintenance, low maintenance. All right, Well,
I really appreciate you giving us some of your time today.
I know Black Friday is busy time for everybody, but
you're gonna be hard at work, knows to the grindstone
like you always are. But thanks my friend. Next week,
maybe let's do it all right, see you next week.
Brian All right, that's Brian Dean, right, one of the

(54:16):
smartest guys in the business. Make sure that you're following him.
Subscribe He's got a substack to subscribe to that if
you can subscribe to the Right Report Daily podcast. I mean,
the guy he really is, He really is. You want
to know what the hell is going on in the world,
you should definitely be supporting that guy. So here at

(54:37):
Fort Parnell were doing two thanksgivings. We did one on
Thursday and with the immediate family, and then we're doing
one with the entire family tomorrow. So you know, Commander
Melanie doesn't get much of a break, but it's gonna
be an awesome time and we're very, very excited for it.
And we're really gearing up for the holidays around here,
and I know you all are as well. Well, so

(55:00):
is the White House and so are the Bidens. So
just here's Joe Biden talking about the White House Christmas
tree this year. Just listen and I'll give you my take.

Speaker 7 (55:10):
This beautiful Fraser fur was grown at the Cartner's Christmas
Tree Farm, where the Cartner family has been growing trees
for more than sixty years, and their farm is nestled
in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina, a region
that was recently devastated by Hurricane Helene. The Cartner family

(55:32):
lost thousands of trees in the storm, but this one
remains standing and they named it Tremendous for the extraordinary
hope that it represents. It's an honor to be here
today with Congresswoman Virginia Fox as well as members.

Speaker 1 (55:53):
Okay, so no bullshit here, folks. The Biden administration, I
don't know what the hell the this isn't saying, but listen,
the Biden administration thought it would be a good idea
to take one of the last standing remaining trees from
this area of North Carolina and cut it down and
use it for their Christmas tree. So if you the message,

(56:18):
if you remain strong standing after a tragedy, the Bidens
will make sure that you don't, that you don't succeed.
So it's probably I guess it's fitting that the Bidens
take this beautiful, resilient thing and chop it down, use
it for their own benefit, and toss the remainder away
in the trash when they're all done. It's not exactly

(56:40):
how they've treated America. I mean, it's kind of unbelievable.
Right Anyways, folks, I hope you have a wonderful weekend.
Gfonta as I see you, thank you for Gfonta says
so Joe Biden had it cut down. WTF Yeah, exactly
exactly WT indeed my friend, so yeah, thank you for

(57:03):
the Rumble Rant tip. And also Kovert, thank you for
becoming a monthly subscriber on my locals. Very very very
very grateful for that. Also, folks, listen, have a great weekend.
Make sure you smash out like button on the way out.
I know it's a busy time of year for everybody,

(57:23):
but thank you all for being with me tonight for
right night. Have a great weekend. We're already starting to
plan the shows for next week, but thank you all, folks.
God bless you all, and God bless this amazing country
that we call home. Take care, good night, and I
will see you all on Monday.