September 4, 2025 • 36 mins
Hour one of the Thursday September 4, 2025 edition of The Armstrong & Getty Show features...
- Anticipation of RFK's testimony...
- Florida's new vaccine policy...
- Jeffery Epstein victims speak-out...
- Mailbag!
Stupid Should Hurt: https://www.armstrongandgetty.com/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe, Katty Armstrong and
Petty and he.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
Armsronged live from Studio C say signor hey, dimmily lit
room deeper than the bowels of the Armstrong in Getty.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
Excuse me, I have a cold communications compound. We are
today under the tutelage of our general manager, Robert F.
Kennedy Junior. That's a pretty good RFK Junior impersonation, or
try it. Why is he our general manager today? He'll
be testifying in front of Congress today Jack about the
(00:58):
upheavals he's called at EHHS and the CDC and the NBA. Anyway,
it should be jazzy. It's going to be beyond jazzy.
Speaker 3 (01:08):
It'll be fantastic, performative goodness from everybody all around.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
It'll just be fantastic. I just hope there's lots of anger,
because we need more anger. I want a lot of
yes or no answer the question two things are too complicated,
answer yes or no on a lot of that, ah classic,
But then I want a lot of from RFK Junior
dancing around the answer. So implying in or just stating
(01:35):
outright that he will be responsible for the deaths of children.
That would be good too. That would be a highlight
which you know conceivably could be true.
Speaker 3 (01:44):
So if you looked into the headline that happened while
we were getting off the air yesterday, that's around the
RFK Junior story, Florida announcing they will become the first
state to not mandate vaccinations for kids going to school.
Speaker 1 (01:56):
I did. I read that. I was troubled by it.
A couple of different aspect of it. Were you convinced
that it's a good idea for Florida or not to
do what they did? No, I don't think it is
a good idea. It's not completely outside the realm of understanding.
I get it. I think it's an unwise decision. But
(02:17):
so much of the credibility of those who would advocate
for a reasonable slate of required vaccinations they blew. They
blew their own credibility through COVID and other actions. So right,
that's what I get it. We're in a bad spot,
we are.
Speaker 3 (02:34):
That's what the mainstream media is leaving out of this story.
I don't agree with a lot of RFK junior's views
on things, But the CDC completely destroyed any reason for
me to listen to them during COVID. I mean, why
would I take their point of view on anything ever
(02:54):
at this point in my life right anything. And I'm
not an expert on this by any means, but it
absolutely could be argued that the slate of required vaccinations,
it'slloned beyond reasonableness. Yeah, it is so many. That would
be the way to approach it. Used to be whatever
it was, eight vaccinations, now your kid gets like forty?
Speaker 1 (03:18):
Are all of those necessary?
Speaker 3 (03:19):
That would be a good discussion to have, as opposed
to go from all the ones we have no out
of none.
Speaker 1 (03:26):
Yeah. I'm going to write a book on parenting someday, Jack,
and you'd be ill advised to read it and an
idiot to follow its advice. But one of the pieces
of advice I'd have is you take your kid out
to the woodshed when they're about eight years old. Obviously
half wood. We all have a woodshed in this scenario. Well,
if you don't get one, that's in chapter one. You
need a wood Chapter one, get a woodshed, right anyway,
(03:49):
So you take your kid out to the woodshed. You
haven't put their arm they're right handed in this scenario,
haven't put their right arm on the chopping block. And
you take the axe and you say, I'm gonna chop
off this is your arm. God said to Abraham, kill
me a son. I mean, where where are we going? Here?
On Highway sixty one? Clearly? But uh so uh And
(04:10):
then as as your child looks to you in fear
and horror, you say, if you throw away your credibility,
your reputation, you have done as much damage to yourself
as if I had actually chopped off your arm. Now,
(04:31):
obviously you're gonna need years of counseling from this little incident.
This is quiet, a little scenario, but you and it
popped fully intact into my head. Isn't that where the
point being? The children, people, institutions. They have become so
cavalier about chucking their credibility based on whatever emotional whim
(04:58):
or fervor of the moment. There there you know it's
I want to bring it up. Later came across a
couple of pieces of journalism about where can I get
the COVID booster with these confusing new guidelines, and what
about my child? And people are like adamant that that
that's a mistake, and where could I what can we
(05:20):
find a doctor will go to? Nobody ever, says, nobody
ever even asks is there credible data that suggests a
healthy child needs it? No? No, no there's not. Because
this cult has has has has risen up around you know,
(05:41):
COVID and the shots and all that, and so people
and government institutions made recommendations for cult reasons, not for
scientific reasons. So yeah, their credibility is just trashed.
Speaker 4 (05:50):
You know.
Speaker 1 (05:51):
It's the biggest lie in that. So there's a lot
of them to choose from. The biggest lie out of
the whole COVID thing was and they knew they were
lying when they sat at least after a little while.
Maybe not at the very beginning, but very soon they
knew they were lying when they said, if you get vaccinated,
you can't spread the disease. You are you won't get
(06:11):
the disease, right, both of.
Speaker 3 (06:13):
Them, right, And so that was the biggest lie of all,
and that led to I mean, it didn't make any
difference if Aaron Rodgers got vaccinated or not.
Speaker 1 (06:24):
He could still get the disease. If he got it
and spread it, so what the hell difference did it make? Well?
And how about thousands of United States military personnel tossed
out of the military, healthy young studs who are like,
I don't know. I've heard the vaccine isn't safe, and
I'm a healthy young stud It's not gonna make any
difference to me whether I get the freaking disease. It's
(06:46):
got to rip its way through the barracks no matter
what we do, and we'll all be fine. And they
were all fine.
Speaker 3 (06:56):
So you know, Grillin, the guy who runs the department
that's got the biggest budget in the entire world, RFK
Junior today about all that stuff is fine, But I'd
sure like to hear some CDC people have to explain.
Why did you keep claiming that you couldn't get COVID
(07:16):
if you got vaccinated when you knew that wasn't true.
Speaker 1 (07:19):
You knew you were lying.
Speaker 3 (07:20):
I know why, because you thought you could convince more
people to get vaccinated. But you lied to us, and
you lied to us, oh about.
Speaker 1 (07:27):
And the six feet apart was completely freaking made up.
So why would I believe anything you ever say again
in my life?
Speaker 3 (07:34):
I personally won't. I'm guessing most of you who listen
won't either ever believe anything the CDC ever sides again
in my.
Speaker 1 (07:40):
Life, I'd believe it as much as if somebody said
it to me in the line of target. Right. That's perfect, honey,
some guy told me I needed a COVID booster right
up there with the CDC. By the way, I'm working
out Chapter four of my parenting book is how to
teach your kids to clean their rooms involves setting fire
to your own home. But I encourage you to pre
(08:02):
order your copy today. You know what, very biblical with
your opening chapter.
Speaker 3 (08:07):
Let's start the show officially because it's going to require
some conversation. Also, I'm Jack Armstrong, He's Joe Getty on
how did this get to be already Thursday, September the fourth,
the year twenty twenty five, or Armstrong in getting we
approve of this program so much to cover. Let's leap
it to action now officially according to f CC rules RAGS,
the show starts at mark.
Speaker 5 (08:28):
In the past, people rarely lived longer than seventy years,
but today they say that at seventy you're still a child.
Human organs can be continuously transplanted the longer you live
the younger you become and can even achieve immortality.
Speaker 3 (08:47):
Oh okay, so a hot mic moment. Obviously, in what
language do they speak to each other? President She and
President Putin don't know because I don't think Putin speaks
Chinese and I doubt she speaks Russian anyway, Right, it
could be they both have crack translators by their sides. Yes,
(09:07):
translator is the correct term. I heard when people say interpreter,
that is incorrect because you're not supposed to be interpreting things.
You're supposed to just be transmitting exactly what they said.
But in a hot mic moment, she and Putin were
discussing immortality and getting new organs.
Speaker 1 (09:25):
Put In, Yeah, they're both in their early seventies. And
as you heard there they one of them suggested to
the other, oh, yeah, you can just get you know,
your organs swapped out every couple of years whatever, and
probably live forever. WHOA, Oh troubling, because they have access
to those organs and they'll get them from dissidence.
Speaker 3 (09:48):
Neither one of them had to say, well where would
I get the organs? Neither one of them needed to
have that have that conversation. Oh snatch a healthy young
dude off the street and take his organs as his
fault for me on the street.
Speaker 1 (10:03):
That is interesting. Yeah, what are Wow?
Speaker 3 (10:06):
Wow, it's why would they be any different than kings
of the Middle Ages.
Speaker 1 (10:12):
They wouldn't be. That's what they are, right, Yeah, yeah,
how serious a conversation do you think that was? Why
would you have it? Then you two can't get on
the phone or have a private conversation anyway. You're just
the first time you ever get together face to face
in public. You're strolling around and you get into the
whole snatching organs from healthy people's conversations. They were going
(10:34):
from point A to point being then shooting the ball,
I mean, the chatting. I'll tell you what, this agent
is no fun. I'm kind of stiff after sitting there
for a while. She yeah, well you know, I hear.
Soon you can get to Oregon.
Speaker 3 (10:48):
I'll tell you what you need. You need the spine
of a dissident. That's what I did. Wow, wow, crazy boy.
The lighter side of dictatorship. And then the thing we
got to talk about coming up in a little bit.
I can't believe. I was watching ABC News last night.
They ed They led with Epstein and and it.
Speaker 1 (11:11):
Was a shocking coverage. The whole thing has turned even
more shocking to me the way it's being portrayed.
Speaker 3 (11:17):
I just it blows. The whole thing blows my mind.
And I would like to pretend it's it's gonna say, unimportant.
It still might be unimportant, but Congress is wrestling.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
With it today.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
Yeah, having just come back into session, you'll hear what
some of the survivors said yesterday in the press conference,
what Trump said, how they responded to him, and all
that sort of stuff. And as usual, I think Trump
could have put the thing to bed with like one
more sentence, but he's really good at leading out the
one sentence, which he might do on purpose because he
likes to, you know, inflame things. But he I think
(11:56):
he could have put this to bed with one sentence,
but he did not. So we'll get to that a
little bit later. To a bunch of other stuff. Our
text line is this four one, five, two nine five KFTC.
What we're about to itch you with a bunch of different.
Speaker 1 (12:13):
Headlines that just came across. The most interesting one maybe
going on and it's not like kind of your normal
news headline, but it is Paramount is in talks to
buy Barry Weiss's Free Press, which we love, for two
hundred million dollars and give her a senior editorial role
(12:34):
at CBS News. I think this is damn interesting because
I think maybe possibly what I was hoping would happen
is about to happen, and that some news major news
organization New York Times, Washington Post, one of your major networks,
realizes people are not digging the partisan news thing at all.
(13:00):
A lot of people are hating it. There is a
huge opening out there for a news outlet that people believe,
whether they agree with it or not, they believe it
like used to happen.
Speaker 3 (13:10):
And that might be what CBS is up to. Because
there were some quotes that came out while we were
on vacation that register woman, when she was selling CBS
to a paramount, was horrified at some of the CBS
coverage that she had seen in the last year and
how biased it was on her own network she ran.
Speaker 1 (13:29):
She just she hated it. She couldn't believe that they
were that biased. Yeah, and it's possible possible that just
as a business decision, Paramount's going to decide that the
Barry Weiss's of the world. Who's her politics aren't mine,
but she's really into being honest. H huh there guests
spend two hundred million dollars. Good for her, by the way,
(13:50):
leaving New York Times, starting her own thing and building
it up and then selling it for two hundred million dollars. Wow. Yeah,
I just hope they retain editorial independence, that CBS doesn't
ruin it. Although you know who knows who knows? Nothing
lasts forever. Uh yeah, And it's funny you should bring
that up before we hit a handful of headlines in
that I have three or four different sources that have
(14:13):
your list of today's top stories, and they're all different.
They're all very different. In fact, there's remarkably little overlap.
You got the DeSantis well, the Florida story. They are
working to eliminate all childhood vaccine mandates for schools in Florida.
(14:33):
The Florida Surgeon General, Joseph Flatipo, where's his direct quote?
He said, this smacks of slavery totalitarianism. He's a blackfelon
went all. You know, it sounded very defund the police
seat to me, I don't think vaccination's smack of slavery. No,
(14:54):
and and what you do, how can the government tell
you what to put in your body? Well, in very
very arrow circumstances, like reasonable vaccinations, it makes sense for
reasons we'll talk about in a little while. Anyway, Let's
see we can talk about that. They're a slew of
judges rulings on like whether President Trump can quash that
(15:18):
two point two billion dollars in research grants to Harvard.
The judge said, no, no, you can't. It's the first
Amendment thing. We'll see that. One's going to bounce back
and forth. Another judge said, you can't like super quickly
deport people on the basis of the whatever the hell
Act of nineteen seventy one. Ever, ye I know, I don't.
Speaker 3 (15:37):
Even read the first sentence of these stories anymore about
judge ruled exactly that one will bounce back and forth
as well, leading up to the really interesting one, and
that is the tariff's case, which the Appeals Court, by
was it seven to four, said no, you can't rely
on the AIPA Act to and act all these tariffs.
(15:59):
It's institutional because Congress has the power to tax and
the Act you're relying on does not say that you
can blah blah blah. But the Trump administration said to
the Supreme Court, hey, can y'all jump on this as
quickly as possible. So they really want an expedited process,
which I think is a really good thing.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
I was thinking as I read a handful of cases,
you know, we've got to have I don't know, maybe
a second Supreme Court, or I don't know, turn the
Supreme Court less. It's kind of a white tablecloth waiter
in a tuxedo steakhouse. At this point, we need to
change it into more of a Chick fil A where
if a big case comes along, you can get an appointment,
(16:38):
like for tomorrow at two. Yeah, I would agree.
Speaker 3 (16:40):
Well, it seems to be like the emergency room. As
I found out, you go in with a heart thing,
they move you ahead of everybody else. And that's why
the Supreme Court should be or vomiting.
Speaker 1 (16:49):
I've found that in the past, if you start vomiting,
they come to if really, if any fluids are coming
out of you, you get to the front of the line.
So you got a sprained ankle, But if you can
make yourself up, chuck, trust me, they'll see quicker.
Speaker 3 (17:02):
This might be the headline for a lot of y'all.
Nobody won the power ball last night, so it raises
to one point seven billion dollars, the third largest pot
in history.
Speaker 1 (17:11):
And they'll drag in what on Friday or whenever they
draw yes, and Michael I demand, I demand the plucky
youngster talking about grandpa playing the power ball when we
talk about this, crying out loud, what do we have
to tip you? This Epstein thing? It's okay, you got
to hear this, Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 4 (17:33):
So this is a Democrat hoax that never ends.
Speaker 1 (17:37):
You know.
Speaker 4 (17:37):
It reminds me a little of the Kennedy situation. We
gave them everything over and over again, more and more
and more, and nobody's ever satisfied. From what I understand,
I could check, but from what I understand, thousands of
pages of documents have been given. But it's really a
Democrat hoax because they tried to get people to talk
(17:58):
about something that's totally relevant to the success that we've
had as a nation since I've been president.
Speaker 1 (18:04):
I voted for Trump and for him to say what
he's saying is beyond me because I put my hope
in him, and he's supposed to protect us.
Speaker 3 (18:18):
So there was a big gathering yesterdays while we were
on the air, a whole bunch of the victims of
Jeff Very Epstein, the sex trafficking monster, and g Dog Maxwell,
A whole bunch of women that when they were children
basically found themselves in the web of that craziness. And
(18:40):
we're raped and or abused in all kinds of different ways.
And that's why Epstein and Maxwell we're going to go
to prison. This whole Epstein's story has been like a
master class in talking past each other from the beginning.
And I don't understand why we can't. It's like being
in quicksand and I don't understand why we can't pull
(19:02):
ourselves out of this mess. Why can't There are a
number of reasons the media wants to put Trump and
Republicans in an uncomfortable position. Since they hammered the Epstein
thing for years, acting like it was a big deal
and that there were secrets to be had, they say
(19:23):
they want to put them in an uncomfortable position of
having to deal with that. And then you got a
whole bunch of Republicans who were scared of their base
who believed what the Republicans told them in the first
place about the Epstein thing being such a big deal,
So they don't want to come out and say, but
could everybody just raise their head up and say, look,
it was overstated by a lot to get you to
(19:44):
vote for us, acting like there was some sort of
child pedophile ring thing going on. It's not true, and
can we all just move on with our lives. There's
nothing in the Epstein files. Can we just all move on?
Speaker 1 (19:56):
Yeah? I would love that too. I was noodling this
through yesterday because I was really I really want to
be able to recognize this sort of beast when it
comes down the pike and understand, Okay, this is another
one of these. We live in an attention economy, a
term you've probably heard. There are zillions and zillions of
dollars being made in getting you to look, read, listen,
(20:18):
watch whatever for a few minutes. Sometimes it's a few
seconds at a time. TikTok has mastered the art of
just tiny microdoses of distraction, entertainment, amusement, something to keep
you riveted well in print if you click on it,
even if you only read one sentence. The clicks add up,
and they can sell that to advertisers, right exactly. So
(20:40):
you get something anything that has heat to it, that
gets attention, that gets interest, and it can be everything
from a cop bapp and a guy on the head
to the Epstein deal to you know, there are a
dozen examples that have happened recently. If they can eight heat,
(21:01):
there's money to be made. And then the Epstein thing.
What makes it unique, I think is that you have
Democrats with some really good reason to keep that heat
stoked up, and you have Republicans who you mentioned their reasons.
They spent a long time telling their constituents that they
are evil, dark secrets and by god, we're the do
(21:24):
gooders who will go in and expose them. And then
you just have sex and ugliness and crime and suicide
and mystery and conspiracy. This is an unbelievable heat generator. Well,
and all sorts of different people are profiting from you.
Speaker 3 (21:37):
I skipped over explaining those two clips, So they're talking
about different things. So those poor crying women who were
freaking used as sex slaves when their children, of course
they're very upset recounting it. Trump doesn't think you weren't
raped by Epstein and his friends.
Speaker 1 (21:57):
He's not calling that a hoax. But the responding is
if he is right that that Trump is denying that
this happened to you. No, he's not.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
Nobody's denying this happened to you. It's horrible. The people
were found out, at least the main people that were
running it and arrested, and we're going to go to jail.
And one of them died either hung himself, readied, but
he's dead, and the other one's in prison. What Trump
is calling a hoax is the idea that there's some
secret file that's going to damage him that is a hoax.
(22:30):
But why can't and then the media knows.
Speaker 1 (22:32):
That ABC News, CBS News, everybody who covered this, I
saw it on NBC this morning, I heard it on NPR.
Everybody who's covering this knows that that's what Trump is
talking about when he says it's a hoax. He's not
calling the fact that these women who were on the
Capitol steps yesterday were raped when they were young a hoax, right,
(22:52):
But then they know that, but they're pretending, and then
they've sticked the microphone in there and these poor women
who they're crying hunting the worst thing that ever happened
in their lives, stick a microphone in their face and say,
the president just said this is a hoax. Oh my god,
he did. No, it's not a hoax. Oh jeez, oh
play one of the one of the gals there was
on the steps of the Capitol or whatever. They were
making the media rounds, which is fine if you want
(23:14):
to be hurt, that's what you do. But one of
the gals was saying, and we know there are other
victimizers and we are willing confidentially to name them at
some point in the future. And we got to find
that clip because I want to get it exactly right.
But it's like, wait, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. You're doing
(23:36):
a tease now, yes, so hinting that maybe absolutely a tease.
She stood up there and she said, well, we're compiling
our own list of the famous people we saw and
we will be releasing that. Stay tuned, And yeah, I
agree with I felt like, okay, what is it brought
to you by Pizza Hutt and Verizon Wireless? I mean,
why is there a teasier? Well, and again, there there
(23:58):
are so many different layers of immorality here. If I'm
just getting buzzed, I'm getting wasted at a Jeffrey Epstein
party and there's hotties about that's that's just that's at
being at a party. And you can't equivocate between that
and knowingly sexually grooming and abusing underage girl. It's such
(24:20):
a mess. Now, as I've said fifty times, there are
like eleven different versions of this story. Which one are
we talking about. They have every right to come out
and name everybody they ever saw a party, of course,
who could stop them. But but why did you tease
it like that?
Speaker 3 (24:35):
Why didn't you just stand right there say I saw
Bill Gates, I saw Bill Clinton a one time. I
gave a massage to you know, whoever named the name.
Nobody can stop you from saying that. So why did
you tease it like that? That's weird. And I'm not
saying they're up to something. I'm not trying to claim
that at all. Again, the main thing that happened yesterday
was they pretended everybody in all of media pretended that
(24:59):
Donald Trump was calling their stories lies.
Speaker 1 (25:03):
And that's not at all what he was saying. So
why are we playing this game? It's driving me crazy
now just tiresome. Mark Halprin says this, and I think
this is true. Should I play the clip first or
let's play the clip first? There is this portion of it.
President Trump has not ruled out pardoning Maxwell by show
of hands? Is there anybody who would support Gaylan Maxwell
(25:25):
getting out of prison?
Speaker 3 (25:27):
Only if I'm there when she gets out and we
could show up collectively. Yeah, they're all horrified, of course,
with the idea of her getting out of prison. Why
Trump holds out the possibility that she might be pardoned?
I have no idea, but Mark Alprin writes this today.
Until the twin mysteries of why Maxwell was moved to
a cushier prison, I wonder, and why okay, okay go on?
(25:51):
And the why the White House is trying so hard
to keep the documents for being revealed or solved, We
have no idea. What's going on? Why are they fighting
so hard to It's not like Trump cares about well,
grand jury testimony is supposed to be private, so you
don't find you know, he doesn't care.
Speaker 1 (26:05):
About that sort of thing, right, So it's I want
to know more from Mark by what he means, because
it's not up to the executive branch. Whether a lot
of that stuff gets released, it's entirely a judicial question.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
But he's leaning on the House and members and the
Speaker of the House to not pass any legislation to
release it, you know, And he's got the.
Speaker 1 (26:29):
Power to lean on people.
Speaker 3 (26:30):
Why why isn't Because I'm surprised Trump, of all people,
he doesn't care about norms and that sort of stuff.
I'm surprised he just said, just release it all. Let's
get this over with and and okay to and then
the first one, why did they move her to the
club fed? Your answer is.
Speaker 1 (26:47):
Well, they were desperate to be seen doing something. And
she said, I'm not talking to you. Why would I
unless I get something. They said, we'll move you to
it because she prison if you sit down and spill
your guts. And she said, okay, and do you believe what?
She's a freaking mystery. But to get the information they
got out of her, that's all she had. Well, and
(27:09):
or they had leverage to get deeper into it. You
don't think it looks like.
Speaker 3 (27:16):
You come out and give the interview and say I
never saw Donald Trump do anything, and we'll move you
to a nicer prison. That it was that obviously that's
what a lot of people are speculating.
Speaker 1 (27:26):
Oh, sure, it's unfalsifiable, as they say, I have no
way to prove that that's not true, so I'm just
not interested in it. But then what I wouldn't do it?
I would not if I'm prisent, I wouldn't move her
to the cushier prison when it's gonna look exactly like
I've got something to hide, and I just found a
way to keep her mouth shut. I know it was.
(27:47):
What's the opposite of a master work of bad pr Yeah,
oh my god. So a quick word from our Oh,
I'm going to jump the gun into a little pre
mail bag mail bag just to illustrate to you. Well,
I'll illustrate when I illustrate. There's no illustrating to be
done here except to illustrate how important it is to
(28:10):
have an estate plan, whether it's a trust or a will,
and that varies from person to person. But our friends
at trust and will dot com will help you understand
which is best for you and you can get the
security and peace of mind by making the state plan
now super affordably.
Speaker 3 (28:28):
Yeah, create and manage online a customer state plan starting
at one hundred and ninety nine dollars, and it's encrypted
like bank level encryption. It's set up for your state
to follow your laws and regulations and all that sort
of stuff, and it's something you can do yourself. Have
all your important documents in one place, live customer support
through chat, phone or email.
Speaker 1 (28:50):
Does it sound a little intimidating to you, like a
big task? As Jack said, they have live customer support
all the time, step by step process to guide you
from start to finish, and each will or trust again
customized to your state and your needs, secure your assets,
protect your loved ones with Trust and Will, and you
get twenty percent off the already very reasonable estate planned
(29:11):
documents by visiting Trust and Will dot com slash armstrong.
That's Trust and Will dot com slash Armstrong. NFL starts tonight.
I want to talk about that more later. Okay, I
do too. There's a couple of emails, this one from
a guy who's email of a lot who says for
(29:35):
two low t men like yourselves too. I like the beginning.
Oh no, it's it's it's just in the truck driver
who is a young well, I you know what, I
won't care to like yourselves, blah, to bloviate on your
conviction to fight for the West in America. I hope
(29:55):
you do better than forty five seconds of your coverage.
He's convinced that Epstein is a tool of the Jews,
the evil Jew conspiracy to run the world, and the
evil Jew is trying to tear down America, and all
the evidence is there. Blah blah blah. Okay, enjoy that
sighail my friend. And then uh wow, you got James
(30:16):
who says, your obvious hatred of the Epstein story is
well documented. It's not hatred, it's exhaustion. But you seem
to be in denial because you know very well that
the vast majority of the Trump crowd are drenched in it.
I'm not one of them, but I see the comments everywhere. Sure,
the Democrats smell blood and are taking advantage of it,
but it's the Republicans, right wing pundits in their magabase
that give this story life. Trump himself is trying to
(30:37):
make it a phony Democrat made up thing, which is insane.
Speaker 3 (30:40):
And won't work. The q MAGA people want names a list.
Why didn't the Biden people release it?
Speaker 1 (30:46):
All?
Speaker 3 (30:46):
To me, that's the lynch pin, the Rosetta stone of
why this story isn't anything. The Biden administration had years
to release all this stuff, and they had it what
they were protecting Trump and other Republicans.
Speaker 1 (31:00):
The other reason I'm so exhausted by this is, Okay,
I will I will answer that question from the MAGA crowd, Well,
because the Democrats are in on it. Look Bill Clinton,
the list blah blah blah, child molesters, blah blah blah.
Then from the Democrat crowd, oh, we are protecting the
judicial process. And more effects have emerged now that have
made it clear that Trump himself was blah blah blah
(31:20):
blah blah. It's just it's it's like a series of
dogs chasing their own tails.
Speaker 3 (31:25):
The thing that Trump said yesterday that was the most true.
He said, this is going to be like the jfk assassination.
There's no amount of information that's going to make this
go away. Correct, And he's right, absolutely correct.
Speaker 1 (31:36):
Mail Bag. Next, Dallas is going to get crushed by
Philadelphia tonight on Game one of the NFL season. But
we'll talk more about the NFL season later, And why
is Philly so good? And they've been so good, so long. Well,
(31:57):
it's an accounting maneuver. Really we will explain. Yeah, yeah,
so our freedom loving quote of the day. I am
going with a series from British authors in honor of
my visit to the UK recently, And of course here
is Orwell's famous famous quote, people sleep peaceably in their
beds at night only because rough men stand ready to
(32:18):
do violence on their behalf. Except that he never said that.
Oh really, like half of the quotes online, don't half
the quotes on the internet are false? Abraham Lincoln? Who
did say that? Because that's a good quote. Well, what
Orwell said was those who abjure, which is a fancy
word that means solemnly renounce. Those who abjure violence can
(32:42):
do so only because others are committing violence on their behalf. Yeah,
which is a good, solid, concise statement.
Speaker 3 (32:50):
Yeah, that's a good takedown of pacifists.
Speaker 1 (32:54):
The line has also been attributed variously to Winston Churchill
and Rudyard Kipling for some reason, but the original quote
was the one I just read to you. Interestingly enough,
the first appearance of that line is in nineteen ninety three,
and call him in the Washington Times, in which Richard
Greneer paraphrased Orwell, and he said, as Orwell pointed out,
(33:16):
people sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because
rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
But he was clearly paraphrasing it. But it over time.
Now every damn quote website on the Internet will list
that as something Orwell said verbatim.
Speaker 3 (33:29):
It's basically the ending of whatever that movie was. Jack
Nicholson and Tom Cruise, right, you need me on that wall. Yeah,
you can't handle the truth. A few good men, Yeah.
Speaker 1 (33:39):
Mailbag and they're right by the way, both Jack Nicholson
and Orwell and Richard Grenier drops note mail bag at
armstrong and getty dot com. You could offer such constructive
assoughts as this from Chuck like your show, not trying
to be mean or hurtful. But I can't identify which
one of he was Armstrong and which is getting to
(34:02):
clarify which one is the guy who sounds like he
has not past puberty yet. Please answer, that'd be Jack
and out of concern as he checked with his doctor. Thanks.
Then he mentions he listens every day on his way
to work. First, a good day at work, Chuck for
some reason, I ended up on one of our chat
room thingies yesterday, like got fed on my phone on
my feed. Oh my god, mate, Oh really wow? Why
(34:28):
do you listen if you hate it so much?
Speaker 3 (34:32):
Although there was somebody compared you to a combination of
Mark Twain and George Orwell and something.
Speaker 1 (34:37):
Now or William Shakespeare's Last Week. Oh did I you
know what? I ought to post this online? I say,
I guess I posted the original. But when when one
day you said, after one of my rants, I sounded
like a biblical prophet, and Katie said, no, more like
Gandalf from the Lord of the Rings, and she made
(34:57):
that ai thing. I got my poster. Now, I've got
a poster mounted on cardboard of me as a Gandolphian
Biblical profit with the caption is. And then Joe Getty
spake unto them.
Speaker 3 (35:12):
So you have you have a giant poster of yourself
looking like Moses.
Speaker 1 (35:17):
That's not weird at all. I find it hilarious. Let's
see this from John Joe, excuse me. And then he died.
I'm healthy now, but I've got that thing where you know,
for weeks after you get healthy, you're still coughing that
(35:40):
respiratory thing. Anyway, Joe, now that you've experienced life in London,
can you explain how average British citizens found out the
truth about the decay resulting from the rampant immigration. Is
their legacy media fair and doing their jobs unlike American
legacy media? Well no, mostly, No, it's a lot like
American media. They have left right and center and media
(36:01):
and you know, kind of mainstream hacks and the rest
of it. No, the way they found out about it
is because they're living their lives. They see it around them.
Their girls are getting raped, they're looking at sharia law
creeping across London for instance. Yeah, nobody had to tell them.
Speaker 3 (36:19):
They see it, and then they see people being jailed
for saying anything about it, right, even making jokes.
Speaker 1 (36:26):
Hello. More on that topic to come. Also, a couple
of great emails on the whole blowing up the Narco boat.
Speaker 3 (36:33):
Oh wow, that's a good topic. If you missed a segment,
get the podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand.
Speaker 1 (36:37):
A lot more on the way Armstrong and Getty
Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe, Katty Armstrong and
Petty and he.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
Armsronged live from Studio C say signor hey, dimmily lit
room deeper than the bowels of the Armstrong in Getty.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
Excuse me, I have a cold communications compound. We are
today under the tutelage of our general manager, Robert F.
Kennedy Junior. That's a pretty good RFK Junior impersonation, or
try it. Why is he our general manager today? He'll
be testifying in front of Congress today Jack about the
(00:58):
upheavals he's called at EHHS and the CDC and the NBA. Anyway,
it should be jazzy. It's going to be beyond jazzy.
Speaker 3 (01:08):
It'll be fantastic, performative goodness from everybody all around.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
It'll just be fantastic. I just hope there's lots of anger,
because we need more anger. I want a lot of
yes or no answer the question two things are too complicated,
answer yes or no on a lot of that, ah classic,
But then I want a lot of from RFK Junior
dancing around the answer. So implying in or just stating
(01:35):
outright that he will be responsible for the deaths of children.
That would be good too. That would be a highlight
which you know conceivably could be true.
Speaker 3 (01:44):
So if you looked into the headline that happened while
we were getting off the air yesterday, that's around the
RFK Junior story, Florida announcing they will become the first
state to not mandate vaccinations for kids going to school.
Speaker 1 (01:56):
I did. I read that. I was troubled by it.
A couple of different aspect of it. Were you convinced
that it's a good idea for Florida or not to
do what they did? No, I don't think it is
a good idea. It's not completely outside the realm of understanding.
I get it. I think it's an unwise decision. But
(02:17):
so much of the credibility of those who would advocate
for a reasonable slate of required vaccinations they blew. They
blew their own credibility through COVID and other actions. So right,
that's what I get it. We're in a bad spot,
we are.
Speaker 3 (02:34):
That's what the mainstream media is leaving out of this story.
I don't agree with a lot of RFK junior's views
on things, But the CDC completely destroyed any reason for
me to listen to them during COVID. I mean, why
would I take their point of view on anything ever
(02:54):
at this point in my life right anything. And I'm
not an expert on this by any means, but it
absolutely could be argued that the slate of required vaccinations,
it'slloned beyond reasonableness. Yeah, it is so many. That would
be the way to approach it. Used to be whatever
it was, eight vaccinations, now your kid gets like forty?
Speaker 1 (03:18):
Are all of those necessary?
Speaker 3 (03:19):
That would be a good discussion to have, as opposed
to go from all the ones we have no out
of none.
Speaker 1 (03:26):
Yeah. I'm going to write a book on parenting someday, Jack,
and you'd be ill advised to read it and an
idiot to follow its advice. But one of the pieces
of advice I'd have is you take your kid out
to the woodshed when they're about eight years old. Obviously
half wood. We all have a woodshed in this scenario. Well,
if you don't get one, that's in chapter one. You
need a wood Chapter one, get a woodshed, right anyway,
(03:49):
So you take your kid out to the woodshed. You
haven't put their arm they're right handed in this scenario,
haven't put their right arm on the chopping block. And
you take the axe and you say, I'm gonna chop
off this is your arm. God said to Abraham, kill
me a son. I mean, where where are we going? Here?
On Highway sixty one? Clearly? But uh so uh And
(04:10):
then as as your child looks to you in fear
and horror, you say, if you throw away your credibility,
your reputation, you have done as much damage to yourself
as if I had actually chopped off your arm. Now,
(04:31):
obviously you're gonna need years of counseling from this little incident.
This is quiet, a little scenario, but you and it
popped fully intact into my head. Isn't that where the
point being? The children, people, institutions. They have become so
cavalier about chucking their credibility based on whatever emotional whim
(04:58):
or fervor of the moment. There there you know it's
I want to bring it up. Later came across a
couple of pieces of journalism about where can I get
the COVID booster with these confusing new guidelines, and what
about my child? And people are like adamant that that
that's a mistake, and where could I what can we
(05:20):
find a doctor will go to? Nobody ever, says, nobody
ever even asks is there credible data that suggests a
healthy child needs it? No? No, no there's not. Because
this cult has has has has risen up around you know,
(05:41):
COVID and the shots and all that, and so people
and government institutions made recommendations for cult reasons, not for
scientific reasons. So yeah, their credibility is just trashed.
Speaker 4 (05:50):
You know.
Speaker 1 (05:51):
It's the biggest lie in that. So there's a lot
of them to choose from. The biggest lie out of
the whole COVID thing was and they knew they were
lying when they sat at least after a little while.
Maybe not at the very beginning, but very soon they
knew they were lying when they said, if you get vaccinated,
you can't spread the disease. You are you won't get
(06:11):
the disease, right, both of.
Speaker 3 (06:13):
Them, right, And so that was the biggest lie of all,
and that led to I mean, it didn't make any
difference if Aaron Rodgers got vaccinated or not.
Speaker 1 (06:24):
He could still get the disease. If he got it
and spread it, so what the hell difference did it make? Well?
And how about thousands of United States military personnel tossed
out of the military, healthy young studs who are like,
I don't know. I've heard the vaccine isn't safe, and
I'm a healthy young stud It's not gonna make any
difference to me whether I get the freaking disease. It's
(06:46):
got to rip its way through the barracks no matter
what we do, and we'll all be fine. And they
were all fine.
Speaker 3 (06:56):
So you know, Grillin, the guy who runs the department
that's got the biggest budget in the entire world, RFK
Junior today about all that stuff is fine, But I'd
sure like to hear some CDC people have to explain.
Why did you keep claiming that you couldn't get COVID
(07:16):
if you got vaccinated when you knew that wasn't true.
Speaker 1 (07:19):
You knew you were lying.
Speaker 3 (07:20):
I know why, because you thought you could convince more
people to get vaccinated. But you lied to us, and
you lied to us, oh about.
Speaker 1 (07:27):
And the six feet apart was completely freaking made up.
So why would I believe anything you ever say again
in my life?
Speaker 3 (07:34):
I personally won't. I'm guessing most of you who listen
won't either ever believe anything the CDC ever sides again
in my.
Speaker 1 (07:40):
Life, I'd believe it as much as if somebody said
it to me in the line of target. Right. That's perfect, honey,
some guy told me I needed a COVID booster right
up there with the CDC. By the way, I'm working
out Chapter four of my parenting book is how to
teach your kids to clean their rooms involves setting fire
to your own home. But I encourage you to pre
(08:02):
order your copy today. You know what, very biblical with
your opening chapter.
Speaker 3 (08:07):
Let's start the show officially because it's going to require
some conversation. Also, I'm Jack Armstrong, He's Joe Getty on
how did this get to be already Thursday, September the fourth,
the year twenty twenty five, or Armstrong in getting we
approve of this program so much to cover. Let's leap
it to action now officially according to f CC rules RAGS,
the show starts at mark.
Speaker 5 (08:28):
In the past, people rarely lived longer than seventy years,
but today they say that at seventy you're still a child.
Human organs can be continuously transplanted the longer you live
the younger you become and can even achieve immortality.
Speaker 3 (08:47):
Oh okay, so a hot mic moment. Obviously, in what
language do they speak to each other? President She and
President Putin don't know because I don't think Putin speaks
Chinese and I doubt she speaks Russian anyway, Right, it
could be they both have crack translators by their sides. Yes,
(09:07):
translator is the correct term. I heard when people say interpreter,
that is incorrect because you're not supposed to be interpreting things.
You're supposed to just be transmitting exactly what they said.
But in a hot mic moment, she and Putin were
discussing immortality and getting new organs.
Speaker 1 (09:25):
Put In, Yeah, they're both in their early seventies. And
as you heard there they one of them suggested to
the other, oh, yeah, you can just get you know,
your organs swapped out every couple of years whatever, and
probably live forever. WHOA, Oh troubling, because they have access
to those organs and they'll get them from dissidence.
Speaker 3 (09:48):
Neither one of them had to say, well where would
I get the organs? Neither one of them needed to
have that have that conversation. Oh snatch a healthy young
dude off the street and take his organs as his
fault for me on the street.
Speaker 1 (10:03):
That is interesting. Yeah, what are Wow?
Speaker 3 (10:06):
Wow, it's why would they be any different than kings
of the Middle Ages.
Speaker 1 (10:12):
They wouldn't be. That's what they are, right, Yeah, yeah,
how serious a conversation do you think that was? Why
would you have it? Then you two can't get on
the phone or have a private conversation anyway. You're just
the first time you ever get together face to face
in public. You're strolling around and you get into the
whole snatching organs from healthy people's conversations. They were going
(10:34):
from point A to point being then shooting the ball,
I mean, the chatting. I'll tell you what, this agent
is no fun. I'm kind of stiff after sitting there
for a while. She yeah, well you know, I hear.
Soon you can get to Oregon.
Speaker 3 (10:48):
I'll tell you what you need. You need the spine
of a dissident. That's what I did. Wow, wow, crazy boy.
The lighter side of dictatorship. And then the thing we
got to talk about coming up in a little bit.
I can't believe. I was watching ABC News last night.
They ed They led with Epstein and and it.
Speaker 1 (11:11):
Was a shocking coverage. The whole thing has turned even
more shocking to me the way it's being portrayed.
Speaker 3 (11:17):
I just it blows. The whole thing blows my mind.
And I would like to pretend it's it's gonna say, unimportant.
It still might be unimportant, but Congress is wrestling.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
With it today.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
Yeah, having just come back into session, you'll hear what
some of the survivors said yesterday in the press conference,
what Trump said, how they responded to him, and all
that sort of stuff. And as usual, I think Trump
could have put the thing to bed with like one
more sentence, but he's really good at leading out the
one sentence, which he might do on purpose because he
likes to, you know, inflame things. But he I think
(11:56):
he could have put this to bed with one sentence,
but he did not. So we'll get to that a
little bit later. To a bunch of other stuff. Our
text line is this four one, five, two nine five KFTC.
What we're about to itch you with a bunch of different.
Speaker 1 (12:13):
Headlines that just came across. The most interesting one maybe
going on and it's not like kind of your normal
news headline, but it is Paramount is in talks to
buy Barry Weiss's Free Press, which we love, for two
hundred million dollars and give her a senior editorial role
(12:34):
at CBS News. I think this is damn interesting because
I think maybe possibly what I was hoping would happen
is about to happen, and that some news major news
organization New York Times, Washington Post, one of your major networks,
realizes people are not digging the partisan news thing at all.
(13:00):
A lot of people are hating it. There is a
huge opening out there for a news outlet that people believe,
whether they agree with it or not, they believe it
like used to happen.
Speaker 3 (13:10):
And that might be what CBS is up to. Because
there were some quotes that came out while we were
on vacation that register woman, when she was selling CBS
to a paramount, was horrified at some of the CBS
coverage that she had seen in the last year and
how biased it was on her own network she ran.
Speaker 1 (13:29):
She just she hated it. She couldn't believe that they
were that biased. Yeah, and it's possible possible that just
as a business decision, Paramount's going to decide that the
Barry Weiss's of the world. Who's her politics aren't mine,
but she's really into being honest. H huh there guests
spend two hundred million dollars. Good for her, by the way,
(13:50):
leaving New York Times, starting her own thing and building
it up and then selling it for two hundred million dollars. Wow. Yeah,
I just hope they retain editorial independence, that CBS doesn't
ruin it. Although you know who knows who knows? Nothing
lasts forever. Uh yeah, And it's funny you should bring
that up before we hit a handful of headlines in
that I have three or four different sources that have
(14:13):
your list of today's top stories, and they're all different.
They're all very different. In fact, there's remarkably little overlap.
You got the DeSantis well, the Florida story. They are
working to eliminate all childhood vaccine mandates for schools in Florida.
(14:33):
The Florida Surgeon General, Joseph Flatipo, where's his direct quote?
He said, this smacks of slavery totalitarianism. He's a blackfelon
went all. You know, it sounded very defund the police
seat to me, I don't think vaccination's smack of slavery. No,
(14:54):
and and what you do, how can the government tell
you what to put in your body? Well, in very
very arrow circumstances, like reasonable vaccinations, it makes sense for
reasons we'll talk about in a little while. Anyway, Let's
see we can talk about that. They're a slew of
judges rulings on like whether President Trump can quash that
(15:18):
two point two billion dollars in research grants to Harvard.
The judge said, no, no, you can't. It's the first
Amendment thing. We'll see that. One's going to bounce back
and forth. Another judge said, you can't like super quickly
deport people on the basis of the whatever the hell
Act of nineteen seventy one. Ever, ye I know, I don't.
Speaker 3 (15:37):
Even read the first sentence of these stories anymore about
judge ruled exactly that one will bounce back and forth
as well, leading up to the really interesting one, and
that is the tariff's case, which the Appeals Court, by
was it seven to four, said no, you can't rely
on the AIPA Act to and act all these tariffs.
(15:59):
It's institutional because Congress has the power to tax and
the Act you're relying on does not say that you
can blah blah blah. But the Trump administration said to
the Supreme Court, hey, can y'all jump on this as
quickly as possible. So they really want an expedited process,
which I think is a really good thing.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
I was thinking as I read a handful of cases,
you know, we've got to have I don't know, maybe
a second Supreme Court, or I don't know, turn the
Supreme Court less. It's kind of a white tablecloth waiter
in a tuxedo steakhouse. At this point, we need to
change it into more of a Chick fil A where
if a big case comes along, you can get an appointment,
(16:38):
like for tomorrow at two. Yeah, I would agree.
Speaker 3 (16:40):
Well, it seems to be like the emergency room. As
I found out, you go in with a heart thing,
they move you ahead of everybody else. And that's why
the Supreme Court should be or vomiting.
Speaker 1 (16:49):
I've found that in the past, if you start vomiting,
they come to if really, if any fluids are coming
out of you, you get to the front of the line.
So you got a sprained ankle, But if you can
make yourself up, chuck, trust me, they'll see quicker.
Speaker 3 (17:02):
This might be the headline for a lot of y'all.
Nobody won the power ball last night, so it raises
to one point seven billion dollars, the third largest pot
in history.
Speaker 1 (17:11):
And they'll drag in what on Friday or whenever they
draw yes, and Michael I demand, I demand the plucky
youngster talking about grandpa playing the power ball when we
talk about this, crying out loud, what do we have
to tip you? This Epstein thing? It's okay, you got
to hear this, Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 4 (17:33):
So this is a Democrat hoax that never ends.
Speaker 1 (17:37):
You know.
Speaker 4 (17:37):
It reminds me a little of the Kennedy situation. We
gave them everything over and over again, more and more
and more, and nobody's ever satisfied. From what I understand,
I could check, but from what I understand, thousands of
pages of documents have been given. But it's really a
Democrat hoax because they tried to get people to talk
(17:58):
about something that's totally relevant to the success that we've
had as a nation since I've been president.
Speaker 1 (18:04):
I voted for Trump and for him to say what
he's saying is beyond me because I put my hope
in him, and he's supposed to protect us.
Speaker 3 (18:18):
So there was a big gathering yesterdays while we were
on the air, a whole bunch of the victims of
Jeff Very Epstein, the sex trafficking monster, and g Dog Maxwell,
A whole bunch of women that when they were children
basically found themselves in the web of that craziness. And
(18:40):
we're raped and or abused in all kinds of different ways.
And that's why Epstein and Maxwell we're going to go
to prison. This whole Epstein's story has been like a
master class in talking past each other from the beginning.
And I don't understand why we can't. It's like being
in quicksand and I don't understand why we can't pull
(19:02):
ourselves out of this mess. Why can't There are a
number of reasons the media wants to put Trump and
Republicans in an uncomfortable position. Since they hammered the Epstein
thing for years, acting like it was a big deal
and that there were secrets to be had, they say
(19:23):
they want to put them in an uncomfortable position of
having to deal with that. And then you got a
whole bunch of Republicans who were scared of their base
who believed what the Republicans told them in the first
place about the Epstein thing being such a big deal,
So they don't want to come out and say, but
could everybody just raise their head up and say, look,
it was overstated by a lot to get you to
(19:44):
vote for us, acting like there was some sort of
child pedophile ring thing going on. It's not true, and
can we all just move on with our lives. There's
nothing in the Epstein files. Can we just all move on?
Speaker 1 (19:56):
Yeah? I would love that too. I was noodling this
through yesterday because I was really I really want to
be able to recognize this sort of beast when it
comes down the pike and understand, Okay, this is another
one of these. We live in an attention economy, a
term you've probably heard. There are zillions and zillions of
dollars being made in getting you to look, read, listen,
(20:18):
watch whatever for a few minutes. Sometimes it's a few
seconds at a time. TikTok has mastered the art of
just tiny microdoses of distraction, entertainment, amusement, something to keep
you riveted well in print if you click on it,
even if you only read one sentence. The clicks add up,
and they can sell that to advertisers, right exactly. So
(20:40):
you get something anything that has heat to it, that
gets attention, that gets interest, and it can be everything
from a cop bapp and a guy on the head
to the Epstein deal to you know, there are a
dozen examples that have happened recently. If they can eight heat,
(21:01):
there's money to be made. And then the Epstein thing.
What makes it unique, I think is that you have
Democrats with some really good reason to keep that heat
stoked up, and you have Republicans who you mentioned their reasons.
They spent a long time telling their constituents that they
are evil, dark secrets and by god, we're the do
(21:24):
gooders who will go in and expose them. And then
you just have sex and ugliness and crime and suicide
and mystery and conspiracy. This is an unbelievable heat generator. Well,
and all sorts of different people are profiting from you.
Speaker 3 (21:37):
I skipped over explaining those two clips, So they're talking
about different things. So those poor crying women who were
freaking used as sex slaves when their children, of course
they're very upset recounting it. Trump doesn't think you weren't
raped by Epstein and his friends.
Speaker 1 (21:57):
He's not calling that a hoax. But the responding is
if he is right that that Trump is denying that
this happened to you. No, he's not.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
Nobody's denying this happened to you. It's horrible. The people
were found out, at least the main people that were
running it and arrested, and we're going to go to jail.
And one of them died either hung himself, readied, but
he's dead, and the other one's in prison. What Trump
is calling a hoax is the idea that there's some
secret file that's going to damage him that is a hoax.
(22:30):
But why can't and then the media knows.
Speaker 1 (22:32):
That ABC News, CBS News, everybody who covered this, I
saw it on NBC this morning, I heard it on NPR.
Everybody who's covering this knows that that's what Trump is
talking about when he says it's a hoax. He's not
calling the fact that these women who were on the
Capitol steps yesterday were raped when they were young a hoax, right,
(22:52):
But then they know that, but they're pretending, and then
they've sticked the microphone in there and these poor women
who they're crying hunting the worst thing that ever happened
in their lives, stick a microphone in their face and say,
the president just said this is a hoax. Oh my god,
he did. No, it's not a hoax. Oh jeez, oh
play one of the one of the gals there was
on the steps of the Capitol or whatever. They were
making the media rounds, which is fine if you want
(23:14):
to be hurt, that's what you do. But one of
the gals was saying, and we know there are other
victimizers and we are willing confidentially to name them at
some point in the future. And we got to find
that clip because I want to get it exactly right.
But it's like, wait, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. You're doing
(23:36):
a tease now, yes, so hinting that maybe absolutely a tease.
She stood up there and she said, well, we're compiling
our own list of the famous people we saw and
we will be releasing that. Stay tuned, And yeah, I
agree with I felt like, okay, what is it brought
to you by Pizza Hutt and Verizon Wireless? I mean,
why is there a teasier? Well, and again, there there
(23:58):
are so many different layers of immorality here. If I'm
just getting buzzed, I'm getting wasted at a Jeffrey Epstein
party and there's hotties about that's that's just that's at
being at a party. And you can't equivocate between that
and knowingly sexually grooming and abusing underage girl. It's such
(24:20):
a mess. Now, as I've said fifty times, there are
like eleven different versions of this story. Which one are
we talking about. They have every right to come out
and name everybody they ever saw a party, of course,
who could stop them. But but why did you tease
it like that?
Speaker 3 (24:35):
Why didn't you just stand right there say I saw
Bill Gates, I saw Bill Clinton a one time. I
gave a massage to you know, whoever named the name.
Nobody can stop you from saying that. So why did
you tease it like that? That's weird. And I'm not
saying they're up to something. I'm not trying to claim
that at all. Again, the main thing that happened yesterday
was they pretended everybody in all of media pretended that
(24:59):
Donald Trump was calling their stories lies.
Speaker 1 (25:03):
And that's not at all what he was saying. So
why are we playing this game? It's driving me crazy
now just tiresome. Mark Halprin says this, and I think
this is true. Should I play the clip first or
let's play the clip first? There is this portion of it.
President Trump has not ruled out pardoning Maxwell by show
of hands? Is there anybody who would support Gaylan Maxwell
(25:25):
getting out of prison?
Speaker 3 (25:27):
Only if I'm there when she gets out and we
could show up collectively. Yeah, they're all horrified, of course,
with the idea of her getting out of prison. Why
Trump holds out the possibility that she might be pardoned?
I have no idea, but Mark Alprin writes this today.
Until the twin mysteries of why Maxwell was moved to
a cushier prison, I wonder, and why okay, okay go on?
(25:51):
And the why the White House is trying so hard
to keep the documents for being revealed or solved, We
have no idea. What's going on? Why are they fighting
so hard to It's not like Trump cares about well,
grand jury testimony is supposed to be private, so you
don't find you know, he doesn't care.
Speaker 1 (26:05):
About that sort of thing, right, So it's I want
to know more from Mark by what he means, because
it's not up to the executive branch. Whether a lot
of that stuff gets released, it's entirely a judicial question.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
But he's leaning on the House and members and the
Speaker of the House to not pass any legislation to
release it, you know, And he's got the.
Speaker 1 (26:29):
Power to lean on people.
Speaker 3 (26:30):
Why why isn't Because I'm surprised Trump, of all people,
he doesn't care about norms and that sort of stuff.
I'm surprised he just said, just release it all. Let's
get this over with and and okay to and then
the first one, why did they move her to the
club fed? Your answer is.
Speaker 1 (26:47):
Well, they were desperate to be seen doing something. And
she said, I'm not talking to you. Why would I
unless I get something. They said, we'll move you to
it because she prison if you sit down and spill
your guts. And she said, okay, and do you believe what?
She's a freaking mystery. But to get the information they
got out of her, that's all she had. Well, and
(27:09):
or they had leverage to get deeper into it. You
don't think it looks like.
Speaker 3 (27:16):
You come out and give the interview and say I
never saw Donald Trump do anything, and we'll move you
to a nicer prison. That it was that obviously that's
what a lot of people are speculating.
Speaker 1 (27:26):
Oh, sure, it's unfalsifiable, as they say, I have no
way to prove that that's not true, so I'm just
not interested in it. But then what I wouldn't do it?
I would not if I'm prisent, I wouldn't move her
to the cushier prison when it's gonna look exactly like
I've got something to hide, and I just found a
way to keep her mouth shut. I know it was.
(27:47):
What's the opposite of a master work of bad pr Yeah,
oh my god. So a quick word from our Oh,
I'm going to jump the gun into a little pre
mail bag mail bag just to illustrate to you. Well,
I'll illustrate when I illustrate. There's no illustrating to be
done here except to illustrate how important it is to
(28:10):
have an estate plan, whether it's a trust or a will,
and that varies from person to person. But our friends
at trust and will dot com will help you understand
which is best for you and you can get the
security and peace of mind by making the state plan
now super affordably.
Speaker 3 (28:28):
Yeah, create and manage online a customer state plan starting
at one hundred and ninety nine dollars, and it's encrypted
like bank level encryption. It's set up for your state
to follow your laws and regulations and all that sort
of stuff, and it's something you can do yourself. Have
all your important documents in one place, live customer support
through chat, phone or email.
Speaker 1 (28:50):
Does it sound a little intimidating to you, like a
big task? As Jack said, they have live customer support
all the time, step by step process to guide you
from start to finish, and each will or trust again
customized to your state and your needs, secure your assets,
protect your loved ones with Trust and Will, and you
get twenty percent off the already very reasonable estate planned
(29:11):
documents by visiting Trust and Will dot com slash armstrong.
That's Trust and Will dot com slash Armstrong. NFL starts tonight.
I want to talk about that more later. Okay, I
do too. There's a couple of emails, this one from
a guy who's email of a lot who says for
(29:35):
two low t men like yourselves too. I like the beginning.
Oh no, it's it's it's just in the truck driver
who is a young well, I you know what, I
won't care to like yourselves, blah, to bloviate on your
conviction to fight for the West in America. I hope
(29:55):
you do better than forty five seconds of your coverage.
He's convinced that Epstein is a tool of the Jews,
the evil Jew conspiracy to run the world, and the
evil Jew is trying to tear down America, and all
the evidence is there. Blah blah blah. Okay, enjoy that
sighail my friend. And then uh wow, you got James
(30:16):
who says, your obvious hatred of the Epstein story is
well documented. It's not hatred, it's exhaustion. But you seem
to be in denial because you know very well that
the vast majority of the Trump crowd are drenched in it.
I'm not one of them, but I see the comments everywhere. Sure,
the Democrats smell blood and are taking advantage of it,
but it's the Republicans, right wing pundits in their magabase
that give this story life. Trump himself is trying to
(30:37):
make it a phony Democrat made up thing, which is insane.
Speaker 3 (30:40):
And won't work. The q MAGA people want names a list.
Why didn't the Biden people release it?
Speaker 1 (30:46):
All?
Speaker 3 (30:46):
To me, that's the lynch pin, the Rosetta stone of
why this story isn't anything. The Biden administration had years
to release all this stuff, and they had it what
they were protecting Trump and other Republicans.
Speaker 1 (31:00):
The other reason I'm so exhausted by this is, Okay,
I will I will answer that question from the MAGA crowd, Well,
because the Democrats are in on it. Look Bill Clinton,
the list blah blah blah, child molesters, blah blah blah.
Then from the Democrat crowd, oh, we are protecting the
judicial process. And more effects have emerged now that have
made it clear that Trump himself was blah blah blah
(31:20):
blah blah. It's just it's it's like a series of
dogs chasing their own tails.
Speaker 3 (31:25):
The thing that Trump said yesterday that was the most true.
He said, this is going to be like the jfk assassination.
There's no amount of information that's going to make this
go away. Correct, And he's right, absolutely correct.
Speaker 1 (31:36):
Mail Bag. Next, Dallas is going to get crushed by
Philadelphia tonight on Game one of the NFL season. But
we'll talk more about the NFL season later, And why
is Philly so good? And they've been so good, so long. Well,
(31:57):
it's an accounting maneuver. Really we will explain. Yeah, yeah,
so our freedom loving quote of the day. I am
going with a series from British authors in honor of
my visit to the UK recently, And of course here
is Orwell's famous famous quote, people sleep peaceably in their
beds at night only because rough men stand ready to
(32:18):
do violence on their behalf. Except that he never said that.
Oh really, like half of the quotes online, don't half
the quotes on the internet are false? Abraham Lincoln? Who
did say that? Because that's a good quote. Well, what
Orwell said was those who abjure, which is a fancy
word that means solemnly renounce. Those who abjure violence can
(32:42):
do so only because others are committing violence on their behalf. Yeah,
which is a good, solid, concise statement.
Speaker 3 (32:50):
Yeah, that's a good takedown of pacifists.
Speaker 1 (32:54):
The line has also been attributed variously to Winston Churchill
and Rudyard Kipling for some reason, but the original quote
was the one I just read to you. Interestingly enough,
the first appearance of that line is in nineteen ninety three,
and call him in the Washington Times, in which Richard
Greneer paraphrased Orwell, and he said, as Orwell pointed out,
(33:16):
people sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because
rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
But he was clearly paraphrasing it. But it over time.
Now every damn quote website on the Internet will list
that as something Orwell said verbatim.
Speaker 3 (33:29):
It's basically the ending of whatever that movie was. Jack
Nicholson and Tom Cruise, right, you need me on that wall. Yeah,
you can't handle the truth. A few good men, Yeah.
Speaker 1 (33:39):
Mailbag and they're right by the way, both Jack Nicholson
and Orwell and Richard Grenier drops note mail bag at
armstrong and getty dot com. You could offer such constructive
assoughts as this from Chuck like your show, not trying
to be mean or hurtful. But I can't identify which
one of he was Armstrong and which is getting to
(34:02):
clarify which one is the guy who sounds like he
has not past puberty yet. Please answer, that'd be Jack
and out of concern as he checked with his doctor. Thanks.
Then he mentions he listens every day on his way
to work. First, a good day at work, Chuck for
some reason, I ended up on one of our chat
room thingies yesterday, like got fed on my phone on
my feed. Oh my god, mate, Oh really wow? Why
(34:28):
do you listen if you hate it so much?
Speaker 3 (34:32):
Although there was somebody compared you to a combination of
Mark Twain and George Orwell and something.
Speaker 1 (34:37):
Now or William Shakespeare's Last Week. Oh did I you
know what? I ought to post this online? I say,
I guess I posted the original. But when when one
day you said, after one of my rants, I sounded
like a biblical prophet, and Katie said, no, more like
Gandalf from the Lord of the Rings, and she made
(34:57):
that ai thing. I got my poster. Now, I've got
a poster mounted on cardboard of me as a Gandolphian
Biblical profit with the caption is. And then Joe Getty
spake unto them.
Speaker 3 (35:12):
So you have you have a giant poster of yourself
looking like Moses.
Speaker 1 (35:17):
That's not weird at all. I find it hilarious. Let's
see this from John Joe, excuse me. And then he died.
I'm healthy now, but I've got that thing where you know,
for weeks after you get healthy, you're still coughing that
(35:40):
respiratory thing. Anyway, Joe, now that you've experienced life in London,
can you explain how average British citizens found out the
truth about the decay resulting from the rampant immigration. Is
their legacy media fair and doing their jobs unlike American
legacy media? Well no, mostly, No, it's a lot like
American media. They have left right and center and media
(36:01):
and you know, kind of mainstream hacks and the rest
of it. No, the way they found out about it
is because they're living their lives. They see it around them.
Their girls are getting raped, they're looking at sharia law
creeping across London for instance. Yeah, nobody had to tell them.
Speaker 3 (36:19):
They see it, and then they see people being jailed
for saying anything about it, right, even making jokes.
Speaker 1 (36:26):
Hello. More on that topic to come. Also, a couple
of great emails on the whole blowing up the Narco boat.
Speaker 3 (36:33):
Oh wow, that's a good topic. If you missed a segment,
get the podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand.
Speaker 1 (36:37):
A lot more on the way Armstrong and Getty
Hosts And Creators
Joe Getty
Jack Armstrong
Popular Podcasts
NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal
Gregg Rosenthal and a rotating crew of elite NFL Media co-hosts, including Patrick Claybon, Colleen Wolfe, Steve Wyche, Nick Shook and Jourdan Rodrigue of The Athletic get you caught up daily on all the NFL news and analysis you need to be smarter and funnier than your friends.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com