January 31, 2025 • 35 mins
Hour 4 of A&G features...
- C.O.W. Clips of the Week & Kamala, please run again in 2028!
- Iran funding Hezbollah & the chaotic hostage release
- Rand Paul at RFK Jr's confirmation hearing
- Final Thoughts!
Stupid Should Hurt: https://www.armstrongandgetty.com/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Show, Katty Armstrong and
Jetty and he Armstrong and Jetty. I'm doing stream of
(00:23):
consciousness here, so I'm looking up at TV and they
got something up there about Martin Luther King Junior. So
February is Black History Month, and you're gonna be hearing
a lot about MLK, and you probably hear something about
it on the show. Because I'm reading the latest King
biography came out last year, won the Pulitzer Prize, and
it's basically updated with a whole bunch of FBI records
that have been released since the previous big Martin Luther
(00:47):
King Junior biography. It just has a lot of things
that nobody knew until recently. Yeah, but one of the
things I get from reading really good history is how
it's so less perfect than the movie version or the
one paragraph version or whatever. There's a podcast called gray History.
(01:11):
I think that's what it's called Gray History. Have you
heard that? It's a history? But anyway, his whole premises
nothing is as clear cut as it's portrayed. Ever, just
it isn't Nothing is everything's gray. I mean, I'm not
on the side of that. Guy was on Tucker Carlson
saying Winston Church was a villain and we caused World
(01:33):
War Two. But it's not as perfect as the version
we generally get of everything. I mean, everything is way
more complicated in the way it played out, whether it's
Martin Luther King Junior's life or World War two, or
you'll pick a topic, but it gets dumbed down. You
(01:53):
have to pick good thing or bad thing. At some
point people pick good thing or bad thing, and then
it's got to be all good or all bad.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
Right, And often the people who are quote unquote wrong
made a pretty good case, but they were wrong, or
so it would seem yeah.
Speaker 1 (02:07):
Or they were ninety percent wrong but right about this
or whatever, or the other way around. Really good guy
did mostly good things and this. But I don't know
why we're treated like we can't handle gray history. Well,
they don't even give us gray history in the moment.
We can't even live it in real time, so I
supposed to be able to live it through the lens
(02:28):
of history would be way too complicated.
Speaker 2 (02:30):
Well yeah, yeah, if you want to get people to
do something, get them to obey you. It's always over simplification.
That's just it's always going to be oversimplified. You know,
how do I describe this exactly without giving too much away.
I'm involved with a project and I was looking for
an example of something and I found it stated absolutely
(02:50):
brilliantly by a loathsome human being, and I thought, no,
there's just too much, too much baggage then, even though
it's a perfect description. And you know, if Jin Ping
is a brutal communist overlord, an oppressor of souls and
a thief of the output of his people, blah blah blah,
(03:13):
if he came up with an absolute perfect description of something,
I get why people would hesitate to use it.
Speaker 1 (03:20):
But I just I don't know. I don't know. Everything's
so oversimplified. Anyway. I'm sorry. That was kind of a
straight thought. We try not to do that around here.
I hope you enjoy it.
Speaker 2 (03:33):
I was just looking at the coverage of Kamala Harris's
probably twenty twenty eight presidential bid. I want that more
than a kid wants Christmas. In fact, I have decided.
Speaker 1 (03:42):
Well, when Gavin's up before that, isn't she gonna run
for governor? Of California.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
Maybe maybe, But I have decided that I am going
to instead of spending my money on life saving high
blood pressure medication this year, I'm going to donate it
all to the Kamala Harris for President campaign to do
anything I can to make her run for president, because.
Speaker 1 (04:03):
That would be one of the most hilarious things I've
ever read. She couldn't get the nomination, which was the
whole knock the first time around. She couldn't get to
the primaries right, but the second time around and man, yeah,
the first time around she couldn't get tough the primary.
Second time around, they had to skip it because she
would have never been able to win. And she if
she runs in twenty eight, she can't beat out the
other Josh Shapiro will eat her lunch. Of course, her boss,
(04:27):
the senile guy.
Speaker 2 (04:28):
He was humiliated a couple of times in presidential race
and ended up being the potus through the weird twists
of history.
Speaker 1 (04:35):
Yeah, all kinds of twists, Trump, COVID and everything else.
Speaker 2 (04:39):
It is time for us to do what we have
been doing in that time as every day go for.
Speaker 1 (04:45):
It, ladies.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
Good stuff coming up later. The slightly more eloquent Rand
Paul with a set of ideas he unleashed during one
of the confirmation hearings yesterday that we just absolutely loved
and we want to make sure you hear. But first
let's take a fond look back of the week. There
was It's cow clips of the week.
Speaker 3 (05:07):
Who I Didn't do it all? Which?
Speaker 4 (05:14):
Three tough hearings Loom, Tulsi Gabbard, Cash Pattel and RFK Junior.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
You may hear lies and smears in this here accusing
me of being Trump's puppet, Putin's puppet, Assad's puppet, a
Guru's puppet, Mody's puppet.
Speaker 5 (05:31):
There can never be a tolerance for violence against law enforcement.
I do not agree for the commutation of any sentence
of any individual who committed violence against law enforcement.
Speaker 4 (05:43):
A healthy person has a thousand dreams, A sick person
has only one.
Speaker 1 (05:49):
Here, one of all these onesies what frog with snaps?
Wait's one piece of clothing that satisfies the needs of
the entire baby. I am supportive of vaccines here to
get the DRM banks off these streets, exactly giving the
authority to go into churches and going to school, the
(06:10):
empowered law enforcement to enforce the law.
Speaker 3 (06:14):
I'm so sorry.
Speaker 4 (06:15):
I appish I could do something that I.
Speaker 3 (06:19):
Don't know what to do.
Speaker 4 (06:22):
We got quarterman Americans death and fan off pro across
at all border.
Speaker 3 (06:25):
Where's the tears from? Now?
Speaker 1 (06:27):
That that is their job, the federal jobs, not to
longtime Mexico City resident Hugo Sanchez is fed up with
illegal immigrants.
Speaker 3 (06:38):
Same thing.
Speaker 1 (06:39):
We don't know these people where they come from, if
they have a criminal record. Let you know about set
Figer saw firebarm then it was just gone.
Speaker 4 (06:52):
We did not know what led to this crash, but
we have some very strong opinions.
Speaker 6 (06:58):
No air traffic control should have said do you have
the aircraft at five o'clock, so they were looking at
the rear.
Speaker 1 (07:05):
How you can come to the conclusion right now the
diversity has something to do with this crash because they
have common sense.
Speaker 6 (07:12):
One of the dumbest phrases in military history is our
diversity is our strength. Our diversity is not our strength.
Our unity and our shared purpose is our strength.
Speaker 3 (07:24):
A woman to men men, two women from.
Speaker 1 (07:31):
I left the bathroom. Trans people go through this thought
process any time there in a bathroom and.
Speaker 3 (07:40):
A very nice to meet.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
I'd like to know what about sex change up racious?
Speaker 7 (07:45):
I see I see.
Speaker 3 (07:49):
The place in.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
Oh We got some texts on the should the day
after we can say super Bowl? Can't we? Sure, as
long as it's not in the midst of a commercial message.
A majority of Americans think the day after the super
(08:15):
Bowl should be a national holiday. I don't know how
you'd get that going.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Yeah, I was explained to us why they can't play
the game on Saturday because it would cost a bunch
of revenue for the host city and blah blah blah.
Speaker 1 (08:26):
Can we look into that or something? Yeah, so that's
the best answers have the game on Saturday. So that's
because you get two nights of hotel rooms you need
to only get one or.
Speaker 2 (08:37):
Something like that, because they have super Bowl Village and
all sorts of attractions and parties and it's a huge
deal and they want everybody to do all that on
Saturday and then go to the game Sunday and fly home.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
Well, for my own enjoyment and everybody else feels the
same way. I'd rather it was on Saturday, I suppose.
But if I'm running drinking man these days, it doesn't
make any difference to me. At this point in my life.
Although it's usually a long day and you got to
go to work the next day, even without drinking, just
takes me away from preparing for the show. What was
I gonna say? Oh, but if I'm running the whole
(09:13):
operation seems to be working pretty well. I mean, I
don't know if I would mess with it. Seems to
be working pretty well. It's the most expensive ad every
single year. It's the most watched show by a lot
every single year. I'm not sure we need to mess
with this formula.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
That's absolutely true. I would be extremely cautious about messing
with it. I agree, But why don't we just make
it a show holiday?
Speaker 1 (09:33):
We have that power? Well, I think because I liked
the day after the Super Bowl tuning into my favorite shows,
hearing what my favorite hosts had to say about commercials,
halftime show, game whatever. Well, I'm tired of putting my
needs behind those of the listening audience. I mean, if
a pop stars nipple ends up on television, I want
(09:56):
to hear it's what my favorite radio host think of that. Yes, yes, hey, Katie,
have you ever heard that story? Has a long time ago?
You're probably a child when that happened when Justin Timberlake
baired Janet Jackson's boob during halftime of the Super Bowl.
Speaker 2 (10:14):
Yeah, I was more a method of getting nourishment in
your life at that point than anything sexual seeing it.
Speaker 1 (10:20):
I remember that story. I didn't totally understand what was
going on at the time, though. How old would you
have been? Do you remember, little kid? Because that was
a long time. What year was that she's I don't know,
it's google that somebody google that.
Speaker 7 (10:32):
I look that up.
Speaker 1 (10:34):
But I the nipple heard around the world heterola specifically.
I don't think I said why this happened at the time.
I can now it's been enough years.
Speaker 3 (10:43):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (10:44):
Dude in my neighborhood got arrested and thrown in jail
for a DUI that morning on a Sunday morning. Oh yeah,
how the hell are you getting thrown in jail on
a Sunday morning. I mean it's like ten o'clock in
the morning. Your hardcore, you are hardcore? Anyway, he gets
thrown in jail, and he's got like a six year
(11:08):
old girl daughter, and I forget who asks if the
wife had to work or something. Anyway, somebody asked, God,
can you watch her because I mean, he's in jail
and I got to work or something. I'm sure this
is before I had kids. So what year was it, kiddie,
It was two thousand and four. Actually it was later
on than I thought. But so I got this six
(11:29):
year old girl at my house. I'd never had a
child in my house. Is before I had kids, so
I'm new to the whole having a kid around thing.
We watched the super Bowl. I don't know why I
thought that was a good idea with the six year
old girl. She probably would have loved who doing lots
of other things while her dad's in jail. Should have
gone for a bike ride or something. I should have
been better, But coloring books are cool, jack, You know,
lots of things would be better than let's watch the
(11:50):
super Bowl anyway, AnyWho ends up having pornography during the
halftime show with the six year old horse in my touch,
I've done a all times. You'd have thought I could
put her in front of the TV and be fine,
But no, there's boobage right there.
Speaker 3 (12:05):
Good lord, porn.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
Her dad's in jail, you're showing her porn. This neighbors
are showing her porn.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
Cow This is not a good it's probably gonna end
up writing a book and you're gonna figure prominently in it.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
Where is she now? So that's twenty years ago and
she's like, so she yes, she's pushing thirty. What are
all things turned out? Hope? So, hope everything's good. What
if she remembers staying at that weird neighbor guy's house
who showed me porn? No, she's for sure only fans.
He's all because of me. She's on the pole. It's
your fault. Okay. Mandon Rand Paul have a great rant
(12:39):
about vaccines and science and stuff yesterday, and the Bernie
Hearing will play you some of that and other stuff
on the way. Two quick things. One horrible. I just
saw a like compilation picture of all the people that
were on that plane that crashed. Oh man, you look
at that and you realize this is not a this
(13:00):
is not an academic discussion. All this stuff right, you know,
young old mom's, dad's kids. Just freaking horrible. Anyway, I
didn't see Mark Alprin's video cast this morning. He has
Megan McCain on as a regular guest, and it's the
best his non partisan attempt to cover the news is
(13:20):
the best thing going if you have a chance to
get it, I think. But anyway, Megan McCain said today,
and this struck with me because the people that I
know personally that are most MAHA are all women. And
Megan McCain said on Halprin's podcast today, there are a
lot of women in my life who were not Republicans
(13:40):
five years ago that because of RFK came to Trump
and if they screw RFK and Tulsa and they don't
get confirmed, it is a flesh wound for the Trump
administration and the Republican Party. There are there are a
lot of women that are really concerned about the health
of kids and have the belief that RFK Junior is
(14:01):
we'll do something about it or finally somebody's paying attention
or something. Mmm. I think I think she's probably right
about that.
Speaker 2 (14:10):
Yeah, and I think that attitude factors in heavily to
what we're going to play next segment. Ran Paul at
one of the hearings yesterday. Absolutely fabulous screed. Did you
have something else you're going to jump into or no?
I don't have to know, No, I just I wanted
to throw out a couple of stories just very briefly.
This is very serious. But two headlines. One Iran is
(14:30):
funding Hesbla Vias suitcases stuffed with cash, Israel warns, absolutely unquestionable.
And the second one Hamas turns hostage releases into a
humiliating spectacle for Israel.
Speaker 1 (14:44):
This hasn't got enough attention. I saw the one last
Saturday where they just did a It was like a
It was like a show with music and signs and
lights and dancing touchdown, dancing about how we won, and
humiliating these poor girls that had been raped and all
their friends.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Shot in front of them and terrifying them. The release
of the hostages was crowds of angry, jeering men screeching
at them within inches of their faces, and as the
women said, they didn't know if they were going to
be released or die. There are only guards where Hamas
members who'd stage the whole thing.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
Wow. Wow, Israel's really bending over backwards to accept this,
And I think I think it's because the big attack
on Iran is coming, and the normalization between Saudi Arabia
and Israel's coming, which is enough of a game changer.
I guess to look the other way over this horror
(15:39):
of a deal.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
Anyway, my overarching point being that the insistence by certain
soft heads, including the Biden administration, that Israel has to
declare cees fire like on October eighth and come to
terms peace terms with Hamas and Hezbolah.
Speaker 1 (15:56):
What planet do you live on? Anyway?
Speaker 2 (16:01):
A moment of peace and hostage exchanges and all is
not going to last very long. A lot of Israel
is not pleased with how Hamas has exploited the opportunity. Anyway,
I'm sure that'll be developing this year, along with the
two things you mentioned, which are major stories.
Speaker 1 (16:20):
What else do we have time for? That's so serious?
It's stupid and serious.
Speaker 2 (16:25):
A woman has pled guilty in the UK's first ever
cyber farting case, hit with penalties after sending videos of
her self breaking wind to her boyfriend's X only in
the UK.
Speaker 1 (16:39):
It's really a troll, said the prophet. So it's her
boyfriend's ex girlfriend. Why are you still upset about that?
Is that right?
Speaker 3 (16:49):
Yes?
Speaker 7 (16:50):
I think?
Speaker 2 (16:50):
Or is it her boyfriend's current Maybe that's misworded, but anyway,
it factors into the UK's utterly disgraceful limitations on free speech.
Speaker 1 (16:59):
Now, if you give offense. You can be prosecuted. Went
to speech hard fart in the primary. What do you
just because it's the other end of her elementary canal?
What are you saying with that speech? I don't like
you Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 4 (17:18):
I vaccinated all my kids. I believe vaccines are one
of the modern miracles. Beyond all Pale The Speckled Monster
is a great book about the introduction of the smallpox
vaccine in seventeen twenty into our country.
Speaker 7 (17:30):
All miracles, but I'm not a one size fits all.
It's not all or nothing.
Speaker 4 (17:34):
I chose to wait on my hepatitis B vaccine and
we did it when they went to schools.
Speaker 7 (17:38):
That made me an awful person? Does that make me
an anti vaxxer?
Speaker 4 (17:41):
Because I questioned the government dictative whether I do it,
And I'm not speaking for anybody else.
Speaker 7 (17:46):
I'm only speaking for myself.
Speaker 4 (17:47):
But for goodnessakes, let's have an honest debate about these things.
Speaker 1 (17:51):
Senator Ran Paula Kentucky, who's an ophthalmologist, he's actual medical
professional weighing in at the RFK Junie you're hearing yesterday,
and you.
Speaker 2 (18:03):
Heard the main point of his screed there at the end,
and you'll hear it more. The idea that can we
stop insisting we must all be of lockstep on some
of these difficult questions. We have to have an atmosphere
of honest debate, and he's absolutely right.
Speaker 1 (18:21):
Anything else to add or shall we plunge on? Let's
hit it if you ask me my opinion.
Speaker 4 (18:25):
There were reporters run uping down the hall and they say,
you still anti vaccine. No, I'm pro vaccine, but on
the COVID vaccine and on the COVID illness there was
a thousandfold or more difference between the elderly and children.
If you don't acknowledge that you're committing malpractice, you're showing
your ignorance if you say a six month old must
be mandated to get it.
Speaker 7 (18:46):
The science is not there.
Speaker 4 (18:48):
So all this blather about the science says this, and
the science says.
Speaker 1 (18:51):
That, no, it doesn't.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
The science actually shows it. No healthy child in America
died from COVID.
Speaker 7 (18:57):
Look it up. No healthy child died from COVID.
Speaker 1 (19:00):
An amazing stat given the fact that we had yellow
caution tape around playground structures and little kids wearing masks.
Good lord, we haven't even talked about that part of it.
So this was a school being closed and the parks
being closed on this sort of stuff. Poor little kids
(19:20):
running around with masks on, can't see you know, the
other kids' faces or whatever for no reason.
Speaker 2 (19:27):
Right, even when that became clear because of Trump derangement syndrome,
absolutely unforgivable.
Speaker 1 (19:33):
Rand Paul rolls on.
Speaker 4 (19:34):
So if you ask me my advice as a physician,
if you were sixty five or older, or overweight and
some other conditions, I would have said, hell, yes, I'd
take the COVID vaccine. The risks of the disease were
real and much greater than the vaccine. But if you
ask me, should my healthy six month old get it? See,
these are the nuances you're unwilling to talk about because
there's such a belief in submission. Submit to the government
(19:57):
to what you're told. There is no discussion. There ought
to be a debate. You're not going to let him
have the debate because you're just going to criticize.
Speaker 7 (20:03):
And say it is this and admit to it, or
we're not going to appoint you.
Speaker 4 (20:06):
But it's more complicated than that, and this is why
people distrust government, because you're unwilling to have these conversations.
Speaker 7 (20:12):
And I go home, ask your Democrat.
Speaker 4 (20:15):
Young mothers, your Republican young mothers if they're vaccinating their
kid for appetities being They're like, well, do I have
to do it on day one? Is this precious little baby?
Is there science to say you shouldn't do it?
Speaker 7 (20:25):
Probably not, But it's my kid.
Speaker 2 (20:27):
You know.
Speaker 7 (20:28):
It's like, there isn't clear cut science saying not to.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
I need to start saying nuances instead of a.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
Nuance, please don't, please don't do that. He pointed out
earlier in his screen. I guess it was edited out
that hepatitis B is generally spread through drug use, needle drugs,
and sexual You're making an assumption that my six month
old is not a smack addict having unprotected sex with randos.
The idea that a one day old kid needs that vaccine,
then it's you know, if I'm wrong about this, I
(20:58):
will manfully announce it and apologize. But I suspect very
very strongly that the idea is we will get much
higher compliance if we have the he BE vaccine part
of the battery of things that you give the kid
in the hospital while the kid is there and you know,
if we let people wait until it's actually necessary, we'll
(21:19):
get lower compliance and more people will get sick and
hurt and die and the rest of it. Again, maybe
it's sort of kind of well meaning, but I think
we're all sick of that sort of paternalism and dishonesty
to get us to comply.
Speaker 1 (21:33):
Rolling along.
Speaker 4 (21:34):
But on autism, there's no good science of anything to
show what causes autism.
Speaker 7 (21:39):
We don't know. It's a profound disease.
Speaker 4 (21:41):
I know many moms here and dads who have kids
with autis, know them personally, I've met their kids. But
the thing is is they saw their kids developing completely normal,
maybe speaking one hundred words go to no words at
about fifteen months of age. Now, there isn't proof. There
isn't proof that the vaccines caused it. That's true, doesn't
proved that it calls it.
Speaker 7 (22:01):
But we don't know what causes it yet.
Speaker 4 (22:02):
So should we be at least open minded we take
seventy two vaccines.
Speaker 7 (22:06):
Could it be?
Speaker 4 (22:07):
I don't know, But we shouldn't just close the door
and say we're no longer. Because we believe so much
in submission, We're not gonna have an open mind to
study these things, and so it's sort of this crazy notion.
Speaker 2 (22:19):
I have found no compelling evidence that indeed autism is
caused by inoculations vaccines, on the other hand, is ran
Paul makes clear again that's yet another example of if
we even have an honest debate and look at this
and have some more studies and all in an open way,
(22:41):
we will have lower compliance rates.
Speaker 1 (22:44):
It's all about compliance, and again with a few exceptions.
Speaker 2 (22:49):
Maybe I think complying with a lot of the vaccine
policies is a really, really good idea. But the days
of being able to just shout to the sheeple they
have to do and they'll all line up and do it,
even though you're presenting it dishonestly. I just there's so
much information out there they can't get away with it anymore.
Speaker 1 (23:07):
Are there seventy two that your kid has to get
to go to school?
Speaker 2 (23:10):
Now, I've seen that repeatedly. I don't know that that's true.
If it's half that many, that's a lot total doses. Perhaps, yeah,
and I'm including boosters. You know, I'm so cynical about government.
It's just particularly pre COVID, we paid so little attention
to this. Why would I believe that somebody somewhere doesn't think, hey,
you know what, you get this on the mandated list,
(23:32):
that's worth five billion dollars. How do we get that
through whatever committee to get you know, add one more
when there's already seventy one or thirty six or whatever
shots adding one more that nobody's paying any attention to.
You just take your kid to the doctor and they
tell you you need this group of injections to go
to first grade, and everybody just says, okay. There's so
(23:52):
much money involved, I find it hard to believe that
there's zero malfeasan's going on.
Speaker 1 (23:59):
Yeah, there's the.
Speaker 2 (24:00):
Very very little profit in vaccines, but times a billion,
maybe it becomes significant.
Speaker 1 (24:05):
The you know, the aspect of it that I think
is likely.
Speaker 2 (24:10):
Well, I don't have any proof this is happening, but
the government and its mandates, particularly in the wake of COVID,
I think deserve whatever is the opposite of the benefit
of the doubt. If somebody came to me and showed
me the secret memo that said, look, if we get
ninety eight percent compliance with this vaccine, we will prevent
(24:31):
ten thousand deaths a year, it's going to result in
about a thousand kids getting being autistic, but as a
net gain, it's it's a good So we're just going
to be quiet about the autism stuff. And I don't
actually believe that's happening. But if you do, because of
(24:54):
what you've observed from the government, I can't call you crazy.
Speaker 1 (24:59):
Right, there's no possible way they know what the long
term effect of the combination of some of these vaccines
are because they haven't been round long enough. Right.
Speaker 4 (25:09):
More of the Randyman schizophrenia. I would put in the
same notion. You have a kid who's completely normal to
eighteen or nineteen and their brain goes heywire.
Speaker 7 (25:19):
How does that happen?
Speaker 4 (25:20):
It's the most bizarre disease. Shouldn't we be open Could
it be our food? It might be vaccines, It might
be our food.
Speaker 7 (25:27):
But autism is more common.
Speaker 4 (25:29):
I don't know about the schizophrenia statistics, but autisms more common.
Speaker 7 (25:32):
Should we want to be open minded? Instead?
Speaker 4 (25:34):
We're so close minded and we're so consensus driven that
the science says.
Speaker 7 (25:39):
This, Well, science doesn't say anything. Science is a dispute,
and ten years from now we could all be wrong.
Speaker 1 (25:46):
Roll on, Curly, roll on.
Speaker 4 (25:47):
Twenty years ago they did this enormous study and they
said everybody over fifty should take an aspirin.
Speaker 7 (25:52):
I thought, well, that's a pretty good idea. It makes sense.
Speaker 4 (25:54):
But you know what, twenty years later they measured it
and they found if you had no heart disease and
you were taking your chance of dying from a brain
bleed or from a stomach bleed.
Speaker 7 (26:03):
We're greater than the risk of heart disease. You have
heart disease.
Speaker 4 (26:06):
They still say take an aspirin if you don't have
changed your mind twenty years later. But would you have
all said I was crazy and I should no longer
be in public discourse if I had said twenty years ago,
I don't feel like taking an asper I ride my
bike all the time.
Speaker 7 (26:18):
I'm afraid I might hit my head.
Speaker 4 (26:20):
But that's what country's about, what this sentence about.
Speaker 1 (26:23):
That's a good example. Yeah, yeah, it is one final clip.
Speaker 4 (26:27):
So just ask you to look at the larger picture
and give the guy break who says I just want
to follow the science where it leads without presupposition. I think,
really what we have up here is presupposition. You've already
concluded it's absolute that autism isn't caused by We don't
know what causes autism, so.
Speaker 2 (26:44):
We should be more humble in what we say. Sorry,
I didn't get to a questions. That doesn't make me
say therefore, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Speaker 1 (26:57):
But you can't.
Speaker 2 (27:00):
And I that we are openly having some of these
conversations thanks to our FK.
Speaker 1 (27:05):
Junior and his advocacy.
Speaker 2 (27:09):
He's got some really troubling conflicts of interest, and he's
half a con man if you ask me.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
But still Da Da Dat knows how to turn lemons
into lemonade. You find a dead bear, what do you do?
You just leave it there? You bury it? No, you
come up with a hilarious.
Speaker 2 (27:25):
Prank, not to mention the underrated, bringing a whales head
home chain, sawing it off the whale and then strapping
it to the roof of your car as its juice
is dripped down the window.
Speaker 7 (27:36):
Barbaric.
Speaker 1 (27:37):
Okay, we got on a topic earlier we need to
fix when we come back. As we finished strong with
the is flatulent speech? I vote no. I don't think
it has First Amendment protections.
Speaker 2 (27:51):
It is unmistakably speech in this instance, and I believe
that Thomas Jefferson would agree with me, certainly Ben Franklin,
who was a big fan of flatulence.
Speaker 1 (28:01):
All right, we'll get to that coming up next. I
downloaded the new operating system for the iPhone with the
AI in it. Another cool thing it does. I just
noticed if you get a long text, it gives you
a little sentence, like a summary of it, instead of
like you gotta click it. It just says, mom wants
(28:21):
to know what time you're going to be there. If
it's like a long paragraph about something, yeah, or something
very handy, very cool, Oh wow, okay, yeah, I'll have
to check that out.
Speaker 2 (28:30):
So speaking of technology, I can't help but be slightly
amused by the fact that I have two ideas of
things to talk about side by side. One is a
really thought provoking riff on the parable of the Good
Samaritan from the New Testament. I know what it means
and doesn't mean, and how it's been distorted by modern politics.
Speaker 1 (28:49):
I would love to talk about that. We should do
a One More Thing podcast on that.
Speaker 2 (28:53):
The other story is about a woman pleading guilty in
the UK's first ever cyber farting case, and that's the
one where going to go with anyway, and honestly, the
serious part of this what cyber flatulence?
Speaker 1 (29:11):
Huh?
Speaker 2 (29:12):
Well, twenty five year old Rhiann and Evans caused distress
or anxiety. It's quote from the case to her boyfriend's
X said the prosecutor, Diane Williams.
Speaker 1 (29:24):
Quote.
Speaker 2 (29:24):
She proceeds to pass gas by placing the camera on
her bottom and passing the gas.
Speaker 1 (29:30):
You can't see them. You can't see gas passing. I
understand the placing the camera, then, Miss Evans. I think
you see more of the microphone than they can see it.
Get to the doctor, Get to a bathroom.
Speaker 2 (29:42):
Miss Evans passing wind her face smiling, Get the camera.
Speaker 1 (29:45):
Oh you think this is funny? Do yes? Yes, actually
I do. I think it's hilarious.
Speaker 2 (29:50):
The victim, Deborah blankety blank said the I'm gonna use
the term here forgive me, folks. The victim, Deborah's such
and such said the booty belches made her feel unsafe
in her own home.
Speaker 1 (30:05):
I do like booty belches, as you know, I'm not
a fan of the F word. Booty belches is a
good one. She went on Katie's about to die quote.
It was purely malicious. She was smirking throughout She found
it hilarious, but the victim didn't. So as part of
her punishment, Miss Evans must attend fifteen rehabilitation sessions sixty
(30:27):
days of alcohol abstinence monitor I see a reality show.
You got to follow her to those rehabilitation sessions and
turn that into a TV show. What the hell is that?
We're trying to rehabilitate you from going after your boyfriend's
ex girlfriends by flatulating into your phone to that history.
I'm sorry, miss Evans. Good to see you again?
Speaker 2 (30:49):
Will you or won't you fart at your boyfriend's ex
via the phone today?
Speaker 1 (30:54):
I won't. Okay, good to see you. We'll see you
next week.
Speaker 2 (30:58):
Plus she's got to endure sixty days of alcohol abstinence
monitoring and a two year restraining order following the cheeky
squeaking stunt. She's no longer allowed to harass the victim
in any way.
Speaker 1 (31:09):
Well, she's got to do something about drinking. So alcohol
was involved. Yes, you gotta let go of your you
started dating something. You can't be angry at their ex
boyfriend or girlfriend, all right.
Speaker 2 (31:23):
Yeah, because they're no longer even together, right, but they
were I think they were at the time.
Speaker 1 (31:29):
Though. Okay, well, and I mean, farting.
Speaker 2 (31:36):
At somebody is not exactly an effective way to say
you should have stayed with me, You see what I mean?
Speaker 1 (31:44):
Yes, the message is not you made a wrong choice
in breaking up with me because I am a catch.
You know, your.
Speaker 2 (31:50):
Aggressive flatulence, says reminded me of how special you are.
Speaker 1 (31:54):
I'm leaving my new girlfriend and coming back to you.
I want to make a life with you now that
you've displayed this behavior. It's funny.
Speaker 2 (32:06):
All the words that came out of your mouth couldn't
convince me, but this, this has.
Speaker 1 (32:12):
He really went to the cops with this. If some
psycho b who's now dating your ex boyfriend sending you it,
just block it and move on with your life, right,
don't you?
Speaker 4 (32:23):
This seems excessive and like she's looking to be a
news story, which I am in no way upset.
Speaker 1 (32:28):
That this is a story. It sounds Jack like you
approve of the booty belches.
Speaker 3 (32:35):
Ignore though I'm strong, I'm strong, You're ready.
Speaker 1 (32:47):
And here's your host for final thoughts, Joe Getty.
Speaker 2 (32:54):
Let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew
wrap things up for the day. There is technical director
Michael Angelo Michael final thought.
Speaker 1 (33:00):
Going back to that new system you downloaded, Jack, will
the AI do swear words? Because they Apple used to
not do swear words. I haven't tried that yet on
the AI texting. I just downloaded the new system last night.
There's a lot of cool stuff in there, and I mean,
I'm not getting paid for this. I just like it
can confirm it does swear Okay.
Speaker 2 (33:19):
Well that's ducking cool. Katie Green are esteemed Newswoman. As
a final thought, Katie, Well, because.
Speaker 4 (33:25):
I'm a child, my favorite part of the new Apple
AI is being able to make my own emojis.
Speaker 1 (33:30):
Oh yeah, that is a hilarious blast. I have to
ask my kids about that.
Speaker 7 (33:35):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (33:36):
Love it.
Speaker 1 (33:37):
Oh yeah, I gotta get on that myself.
Speaker 2 (33:38):
Jack.
Speaker 1 (33:39):
A final thought, we didn't hit this new story today
unless something changes the next twenty four hours. Trump is
slapping the giant tariffs on Canada and Mexico starting tomorrow.
So I'm gonna go to the store and get my
maple syrup and pinatas or holy hockey pucks and retos
(34:01):
or whatever I need to buy to there, right, save
you some money.
Speaker 2 (34:05):
My final thought, I'm going to give to BD who
wrote us a note about the original life and that
asteroid and everything said. He says, to my mind, the
real miracle of it all is how the whole universe
began with an unfathomable amount of energy condensing into one
or two elements, which then, under gravity became stars, which
made all the other elements. These elements eventually self assembled
into the basic amino acids that composed DNA. After all
(34:26):
of that, skipping from one planet to another seems like
a walk in the park. Yeah, yeah, it is incredible
that it happened, and nobody knows why. Armstrong and Getty
wrapping up another grueling four hour workday. So many people
who thinks so little time go to armstrong in getty
dot com. There's something you see over the weekend we
ought to be talking about, sending along mail bag at
Armstrong in getty dot com.
Speaker 1 (34:43):
Pick yourself up's mangy swag. We'll see them Monday. God
bless America. Armstrong and Getty and I said, boy, they
looked like two people that like each other. I am
all beautiful, fag cha can show listen. It's okay, give
me a joke.
Speaker 3 (35:03):
Are you support of all these ones?
Speaker 6 (35:05):
He say, such a nerve bro one final message about
sex age up a Racou, I see I see you,
not
Speaker 1 (35:15):
By a Great Friday You Mother, Armstrong and geddy,
Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Show, Katty Armstrong and
Jetty and he Armstrong and Jetty. I'm doing stream of
(00:23):
consciousness here, so I'm looking up at TV and they
got something up there about Martin Luther King Junior. So
February is Black History Month, and you're gonna be hearing
a lot about MLK, and you probably hear something about
it on the show. Because I'm reading the latest King
biography came out last year, won the Pulitzer Prize, and
it's basically updated with a whole bunch of FBI records
that have been released since the previous big Martin Luther
(00:47):
King Junior biography. It just has a lot of things
that nobody knew until recently. Yeah, but one of the
things I get from reading really good history is how
it's so less perfect than the movie version or the
one paragraph version or whatever. There's a podcast called gray History.
(01:11):
I think that's what it's called Gray History. Have you
heard that? It's a history? But anyway, his whole premises
nothing is as clear cut as it's portrayed. Ever, just
it isn't Nothing is everything's gray. I mean, I'm not
on the side of that. Guy was on Tucker Carlson
saying Winston Church was a villain and we caused World
(01:33):
War Two. But it's not as perfect as the version
we generally get of everything. I mean, everything is way
more complicated in the way it played out, whether it's
Martin Luther King Junior's life or World War two, or
you'll pick a topic, but it gets dumbed down. You
(01:53):
have to pick good thing or bad thing. At some
point people pick good thing or bad thing, and then
it's got to be all good or all bad.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
Right, And often the people who are quote unquote wrong
made a pretty good case, but they were wrong, or
so it would seem yeah.
Speaker 1 (02:07):
Or they were ninety percent wrong but right about this
or whatever, or the other way around. Really good guy
did mostly good things and this. But I don't know
why we're treated like we can't handle gray history. Well,
they don't even give us gray history in the moment.
We can't even live it in real time, so I
supposed to be able to live it through the lens
(02:28):
of history would be way too complicated.
Speaker 2 (02:30):
Well yeah, yeah, if you want to get people to
do something, get them to obey you. It's always over simplification.
That's just it's always going to be oversimplified. You know,
how do I describe this exactly without giving too much away.
I'm involved with a project and I was looking for
an example of something and I found it stated absolutely
(02:50):
brilliantly by a loathsome human being, and I thought, no,
there's just too much, too much baggage then, even though
it's a perfect description. And you know, if Jin Ping
is a brutal communist overlord, an oppressor of souls and
a thief of the output of his people, blah blah blah,
(03:13):
if he came up with an absolute perfect description of something,
I get why people would hesitate to use it.
Speaker 1 (03:20):
But I just I don't know. I don't know. Everything's
so oversimplified. Anyway. I'm sorry. That was kind of a
straight thought. We try not to do that around here.
I hope you enjoy it.
Speaker 2 (03:33):
I was just looking at the coverage of Kamala Harris's
probably twenty twenty eight presidential bid. I want that more
than a kid wants Christmas. In fact, I have decided.
Speaker 1 (03:42):
Well, when Gavin's up before that, isn't she gonna run
for governor? Of California.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
Maybe maybe, But I have decided that I am going
to instead of spending my money on life saving high
blood pressure medication this year, I'm going to donate it
all to the Kamala Harris for President campaign to do
anything I can to make her run for president, because.
Speaker 1 (04:03):
That would be one of the most hilarious things I've
ever read. She couldn't get the nomination, which was the
whole knock the first time around. She couldn't get to
the primaries right, but the second time around and man, yeah,
the first time around she couldn't get tough the primary.
Second time around, they had to skip it because she
would have never been able to win. And she if
she runs in twenty eight, she can't beat out the
other Josh Shapiro will eat her lunch. Of course, her boss,
(04:27):
the senile guy.
Speaker 2 (04:28):
He was humiliated a couple of times in presidential race
and ended up being the potus through the weird twists
of history.
Speaker 1 (04:35):
Yeah, all kinds of twists, Trump, COVID and everything else.
Speaker 2 (04:39):
It is time for us to do what we have
been doing in that time as every day go for.
Speaker 1 (04:45):
It, ladies.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
Good stuff coming up later. The slightly more eloquent Rand
Paul with a set of ideas he unleashed during one
of the confirmation hearings yesterday that we just absolutely loved
and we want to make sure you hear. But first
let's take a fond look back of the week. There
was It's cow clips of the week.
Speaker 3 (05:07):
Who I Didn't do it all? Which?
Speaker 4 (05:14):
Three tough hearings Loom, Tulsi Gabbard, Cash Pattel and RFK Junior.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
You may hear lies and smears in this here accusing
me of being Trump's puppet, Putin's puppet, Assad's puppet, a
Guru's puppet, Mody's puppet.
Speaker 5 (05:31):
There can never be a tolerance for violence against law enforcement.
I do not agree for the commutation of any sentence
of any individual who committed violence against law enforcement.
Speaker 4 (05:43):
A healthy person has a thousand dreams, A sick person
has only one.
Speaker 1 (05:49):
Here, one of all these onesies what frog with snaps?
Wait's one piece of clothing that satisfies the needs of
the entire baby. I am supportive of vaccines here to
get the DRM banks off these streets, exactly giving the
authority to go into churches and going to school, the
(06:10):
empowered law enforcement to enforce the law.
Speaker 3 (06:14):
I'm so sorry.
Speaker 4 (06:15):
I appish I could do something that I.
Speaker 3 (06:19):
Don't know what to do.
Speaker 4 (06:22):
We got quarterman Americans death and fan off pro across
at all border.
Speaker 3 (06:25):
Where's the tears from? Now?
Speaker 1 (06:27):
That that is their job, the federal jobs, not to
longtime Mexico City resident Hugo Sanchez is fed up with
illegal immigrants.
Speaker 3 (06:38):
Same thing.
Speaker 1 (06:39):
We don't know these people where they come from, if
they have a criminal record. Let you know about set
Figer saw firebarm then it was just gone.
Speaker 4 (06:52):
We did not know what led to this crash, but
we have some very strong opinions.
Speaker 6 (06:58):
No air traffic control should have said do you have
the aircraft at five o'clock, so they were looking at
the rear.
Speaker 1 (07:05):
How you can come to the conclusion right now the
diversity has something to do with this crash because they
have common sense.
Speaker 6 (07:12):
One of the dumbest phrases in military history is our
diversity is our strength. Our diversity is not our strength.
Our unity and our shared purpose is our strength.
Speaker 3 (07:24):
A woman to men men, two women from.
Speaker 1 (07:31):
I left the bathroom. Trans people go through this thought
process any time there in a bathroom and.
Speaker 3 (07:40):
A very nice to meet.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
I'd like to know what about sex change up racious?
Speaker 7 (07:45):
I see I see.
Speaker 3 (07:49):
The place in.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
Oh We got some texts on the should the day
after we can say super Bowl? Can't we? Sure, as
long as it's not in the midst of a commercial message.
A majority of Americans think the day after the super
(08:15):
Bowl should be a national holiday. I don't know how
you'd get that going.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Yeah, I was explained to us why they can't play
the game on Saturday because it would cost a bunch
of revenue for the host city and blah blah blah.
Speaker 1 (08:26):
Can we look into that or something? Yeah, so that's
the best answers have the game on Saturday. So that's
because you get two nights of hotel rooms you need
to only get one or.
Speaker 2 (08:37):
Something like that, because they have super Bowl Village and
all sorts of attractions and parties and it's a huge
deal and they want everybody to do all that on
Saturday and then go to the game Sunday and fly home.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
Well, for my own enjoyment and everybody else feels the
same way. I'd rather it was on Saturday, I suppose.
But if I'm running drinking man these days, it doesn't
make any difference to me. At this point in my life.
Although it's usually a long day and you got to
go to work the next day, even without drinking, just
takes me away from preparing for the show. What was
I gonna say? Oh, but if I'm running the whole
(09:13):
operation seems to be working pretty well. I mean, I
don't know if I would mess with it. Seems to
be working pretty well. It's the most expensive ad every
single year. It's the most watched show by a lot
every single year. I'm not sure we need to mess
with this formula.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
That's absolutely true. I would be extremely cautious about messing
with it. I agree, But why don't we just make
it a show holiday?
Speaker 1 (09:33):
We have that power? Well, I think because I liked
the day after the Super Bowl tuning into my favorite shows,
hearing what my favorite hosts had to say about commercials,
halftime show, game whatever. Well, I'm tired of putting my
needs behind those of the listening audience. I mean, if
a pop stars nipple ends up on television, I want
(09:56):
to hear it's what my favorite radio host think of that. Yes, yes, hey, Katie,
have you ever heard that story? Has a long time ago?
You're probably a child when that happened when Justin Timberlake
baired Janet Jackson's boob during halftime of the Super Bowl.
Speaker 2 (10:14):
Yeah, I was more a method of getting nourishment in
your life at that point than anything sexual seeing it.
Speaker 1 (10:20):
I remember that story. I didn't totally understand what was
going on at the time, though. How old would you
have been? Do you remember, little kid? Because that was
a long time. What year was that she's I don't know,
it's google that somebody google that.
Speaker 7 (10:32):
I look that up.
Speaker 1 (10:34):
But I the nipple heard around the world heterola specifically.
I don't think I said why this happened at the time.
I can now it's been enough years.
Speaker 3 (10:43):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (10:44):
Dude in my neighborhood got arrested and thrown in jail
for a DUI that morning on a Sunday morning. Oh yeah,
how the hell are you getting thrown in jail on
a Sunday morning. I mean it's like ten o'clock in
the morning. Your hardcore, you are hardcore? Anyway, he gets
thrown in jail, and he's got like a six year
(11:08):
old girl daughter, and I forget who asks if the
wife had to work or something. Anyway, somebody asked, God,
can you watch her because I mean, he's in jail
and I got to work or something. I'm sure this
is before I had kids. So what year was it, kiddie,
It was two thousand and four. Actually it was later
on than I thought. But so I got this six
(11:29):
year old girl at my house. I'd never had a
child in my house. Is before I had kids, so
I'm new to the whole having a kid around thing.
We watched the super Bowl. I don't know why I
thought that was a good idea with the six year
old girl. She probably would have loved who doing lots
of other things while her dad's in jail. Should have
gone for a bike ride or something. I should have
been better, But coloring books are cool, jack, You know,
lots of things would be better than let's watch the
(11:50):
super Bowl anyway, AnyWho ends up having pornography during the
halftime show with the six year old horse in my touch,
I've done a all times. You'd have thought I could
put her in front of the TV and be fine,
But no, there's boobage right there.
Speaker 3 (12:05):
Good lord, porn.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
Her dad's in jail, you're showing her porn. This neighbors
are showing her porn.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
Cow This is not a good it's probably gonna end
up writing a book and you're gonna figure prominently in it.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
Where is she now? So that's twenty years ago and
she's like, so she yes, she's pushing thirty. What are
all things turned out? Hope? So, hope everything's good. What
if she remembers staying at that weird neighbor guy's house
who showed me porn? No, she's for sure only fans.
He's all because of me. She's on the pole. It's
your fault. Okay. Mandon Rand Paul have a great rant
(12:39):
about vaccines and science and stuff yesterday, and the Bernie
Hearing will play you some of that and other stuff
on the way. Two quick things. One horrible. I just
saw a like compilation picture of all the people that
were on that plane that crashed. Oh man, you look
at that and you realize this is not a this
(13:00):
is not an academic discussion. All this stuff right, you know,
young old mom's, dad's kids. Just freaking horrible. Anyway, I
didn't see Mark Alprin's video cast this morning. He has
Megan McCain on as a regular guest, and it's the
best his non partisan attempt to cover the news is
(13:20):
the best thing going if you have a chance to
get it, I think. But anyway, Megan McCain said today,
and this struck with me because the people that I
know personally that are most MAHA are all women. And
Megan McCain said on Halprin's podcast today, there are a
lot of women in my life who were not Republicans
(13:40):
five years ago that because of RFK came to Trump
and if they screw RFK and Tulsa and they don't
get confirmed, it is a flesh wound for the Trump
administration and the Republican Party. There are there are a
lot of women that are really concerned about the health
of kids and have the belief that RFK Junior is
(14:01):
we'll do something about it or finally somebody's paying attention
or something. Mmm. I think I think she's probably right
about that.
Speaker 2 (14:10):
Yeah, and I think that attitude factors in heavily to
what we're going to play next segment. Ran Paul at
one of the hearings yesterday. Absolutely fabulous screed. Did you
have something else you're going to jump into or no?
I don't have to know, No, I just I wanted
to throw out a couple of stories just very briefly.
This is very serious. But two headlines. One Iran is
(14:30):
funding Hesbla Vias suitcases stuffed with cash, Israel warns, absolutely unquestionable.
And the second one Hamas turns hostage releases into a
humiliating spectacle for Israel.
Speaker 1 (14:44):
This hasn't got enough attention. I saw the one last
Saturday where they just did a It was like a
It was like a show with music and signs and
lights and dancing touchdown, dancing about how we won, and
humiliating these poor girls that had been raped and all
their friends.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Shot in front of them and terrifying them. The release
of the hostages was crowds of angry, jeering men screeching
at them within inches of their faces, and as the
women said, they didn't know if they were going to
be released or die. There are only guards where Hamas
members who'd stage the whole thing.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
Wow. Wow, Israel's really bending over backwards to accept this,
And I think I think it's because the big attack
on Iran is coming, and the normalization between Saudi Arabia
and Israel's coming, which is enough of a game changer.
I guess to look the other way over this horror
(15:39):
of a deal.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
Anyway, my overarching point being that the insistence by certain
soft heads, including the Biden administration, that Israel has to
declare cees fire like on October eighth and come to
terms peace terms with Hamas and Hezbolah.
Speaker 1 (15:56):
What planet do you live on? Anyway?
Speaker 2 (16:01):
A moment of peace and hostage exchanges and all is
not going to last very long. A lot of Israel
is not pleased with how Hamas has exploited the opportunity. Anyway,
I'm sure that'll be developing this year, along with the
two things you mentioned, which are major stories.
Speaker 1 (16:20):
What else do we have time for? That's so serious?
It's stupid and serious.
Speaker 2 (16:25):
A woman has pled guilty in the UK's first ever
cyber farting case, hit with penalties after sending videos of
her self breaking wind to her boyfriend's X only in
the UK.
Speaker 1 (16:39):
It's really a troll, said the prophet. So it's her
boyfriend's ex girlfriend. Why are you still upset about that?
Is that right?
Speaker 3 (16:49):
Yes?
Speaker 7 (16:50):
I think?
Speaker 2 (16:50):
Or is it her boyfriend's current Maybe that's misworded, but anyway,
it factors into the UK's utterly disgraceful limitations on free speech.
Speaker 1 (16:59):
Now, if you give offense. You can be prosecuted. Went
to speech hard fart in the primary. What do you
just because it's the other end of her elementary canal?
What are you saying with that speech? I don't like
you Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 4 (17:18):
I vaccinated all my kids. I believe vaccines are one
of the modern miracles. Beyond all Pale The Speckled Monster
is a great book about the introduction of the smallpox
vaccine in seventeen twenty into our country.
Speaker 7 (17:30):
All miracles, but I'm not a one size fits all.
It's not all or nothing.
Speaker 4 (17:34):
I chose to wait on my hepatitis B vaccine and
we did it when they went to schools.
Speaker 7 (17:38):
That made me an awful person? Does that make me
an anti vaxxer?
Speaker 4 (17:41):
Because I questioned the government dictative whether I do it,
And I'm not speaking for anybody else.
Speaker 7 (17:46):
I'm only speaking for myself.
Speaker 4 (17:47):
But for goodnessakes, let's have an honest debate about these things.
Speaker 1 (17:51):
Senator Ran Paula Kentucky, who's an ophthalmologist, he's actual medical
professional weighing in at the RFK Junie you're hearing yesterday,
and you.
Speaker 2 (18:03):
Heard the main point of his screed there at the end,
and you'll hear it more. The idea that can we
stop insisting we must all be of lockstep on some
of these difficult questions. We have to have an atmosphere
of honest debate, and he's absolutely right.
Speaker 1 (18:21):
Anything else to add or shall we plunge on? Let's
hit it if you ask me my opinion.
Speaker 4 (18:25):
There were reporters run uping down the hall and they say,
you still anti vaccine. No, I'm pro vaccine, but on
the COVID vaccine and on the COVID illness there was
a thousandfold or more difference between the elderly and children.
If you don't acknowledge that you're committing malpractice, you're showing
your ignorance if you say a six month old must
be mandated to get it.
Speaker 7 (18:46):
The science is not there.
Speaker 4 (18:48):
So all this blather about the science says this, and
the science says.
Speaker 1 (18:51):
That, no, it doesn't.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
The science actually shows it. No healthy child in America
died from COVID.
Speaker 7 (18:57):
Look it up. No healthy child died from COVID.
Speaker 1 (19:00):
An amazing stat given the fact that we had yellow
caution tape around playground structures and little kids wearing masks.
Good lord, we haven't even talked about that part of it.
So this was a school being closed and the parks
being closed on this sort of stuff. Poor little kids
(19:20):
running around with masks on, can't see you know, the
other kids' faces or whatever for no reason.
Speaker 2 (19:27):
Right, even when that became clear because of Trump derangement syndrome,
absolutely unforgivable.
Speaker 1 (19:33):
Rand Paul rolls on.
Speaker 4 (19:34):
So if you ask me my advice as a physician,
if you were sixty five or older, or overweight and
some other conditions, I would have said, hell, yes, I'd
take the COVID vaccine. The risks of the disease were
real and much greater than the vaccine. But if you
ask me, should my healthy six month old get it? See,
these are the nuances you're unwilling to talk about because
there's such a belief in submission. Submit to the government
(19:57):
to what you're told. There is no discussion. There ought
to be a debate. You're not going to let him
have the debate because you're just going to criticize.
Speaker 7 (20:03):
And say it is this and admit to it, or
we're not going to appoint you.
Speaker 4 (20:06):
But it's more complicated than that, and this is why
people distrust government, because you're unwilling to have these conversations.
Speaker 7 (20:12):
And I go home, ask your Democrat.
Speaker 4 (20:15):
Young mothers, your Republican young mothers if they're vaccinating their
kid for appetities being They're like, well, do I have
to do it on day one? Is this precious little baby?
Is there science to say you shouldn't do it?
Speaker 7 (20:25):
Probably not, But it's my kid.
Speaker 2 (20:27):
You know.
Speaker 7 (20:28):
It's like, there isn't clear cut science saying not to.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
I need to start saying nuances instead of a.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
Nuance, please don't, please don't do that. He pointed out
earlier in his screen. I guess it was edited out
that hepatitis B is generally spread through drug use, needle drugs,
and sexual You're making an assumption that my six month
old is not a smack addict having unprotected sex with randos.
The idea that a one day old kid needs that vaccine,
then it's you know, if I'm wrong about this, I
(20:58):
will manfully announce it and apologize. But I suspect very
very strongly that the idea is we will get much
higher compliance if we have the he BE vaccine part
of the battery of things that you give the kid
in the hospital while the kid is there and you know,
if we let people wait until it's actually necessary, we'll
(21:19):
get lower compliance and more people will get sick and
hurt and die and the rest of it. Again, maybe
it's sort of kind of well meaning, but I think
we're all sick of that sort of paternalism and dishonesty
to get us to comply.
Speaker 1 (21:33):
Rolling along.
Speaker 4 (21:34):
But on autism, there's no good science of anything to
show what causes autism.
Speaker 7 (21:39):
We don't know. It's a profound disease.
Speaker 4 (21:41):
I know many moms here and dads who have kids
with autis, know them personally, I've met their kids. But
the thing is is they saw their kids developing completely normal,
maybe speaking one hundred words go to no words at
about fifteen months of age. Now, there isn't proof. There
isn't proof that the vaccines caused it. That's true, doesn't
proved that it calls it.
Speaker 7 (22:01):
But we don't know what causes it yet.
Speaker 4 (22:02):
So should we be at least open minded we take
seventy two vaccines.
Speaker 7 (22:06):
Could it be?
Speaker 4 (22:07):
I don't know, But we shouldn't just close the door
and say we're no longer. Because we believe so much
in submission, We're not gonna have an open mind to
study these things, and so it's sort of this crazy notion.
Speaker 2 (22:19):
I have found no compelling evidence that indeed autism is
caused by inoculations vaccines, on the other hand, is ran
Paul makes clear again that's yet another example of if
we even have an honest debate and look at this
and have some more studies and all in an open way,
(22:41):
we will have lower compliance rates.
Speaker 1 (22:44):
It's all about compliance, and again with a few exceptions.
Speaker 2 (22:49):
Maybe I think complying with a lot of the vaccine
policies is a really, really good idea. But the days
of being able to just shout to the sheeple they
have to do and they'll all line up and do it,
even though you're presenting it dishonestly. I just there's so
much information out there they can't get away with it anymore.
Speaker 1 (23:07):
Are there seventy two that your kid has to get
to go to school?
Speaker 2 (23:10):
Now, I've seen that repeatedly. I don't know that that's true.
If it's half that many, that's a lot total doses. Perhaps, yeah,
and I'm including boosters. You know, I'm so cynical about government.
It's just particularly pre COVID, we paid so little attention
to this. Why would I believe that somebody somewhere doesn't think, hey,
you know what, you get this on the mandated list,
(23:32):
that's worth five billion dollars. How do we get that
through whatever committee to get you know, add one more
when there's already seventy one or thirty six or whatever
shots adding one more that nobody's paying any attention to.
You just take your kid to the doctor and they
tell you you need this group of injections to go
to first grade, and everybody just says, okay. There's so
(23:52):
much money involved, I find it hard to believe that
there's zero malfeasan's going on.
Speaker 1 (23:59):
Yeah, there's the.
Speaker 2 (24:00):
Very very little profit in vaccines, but times a billion,
maybe it becomes significant.
Speaker 1 (24:05):
The you know, the aspect of it that I think
is likely.
Speaker 2 (24:10):
Well, I don't have any proof this is happening, but
the government and its mandates, particularly in the wake of COVID,
I think deserve whatever is the opposite of the benefit
of the doubt. If somebody came to me and showed
me the secret memo that said, look, if we get
ninety eight percent compliance with this vaccine, we will prevent
(24:31):
ten thousand deaths a year, it's going to result in
about a thousand kids getting being autistic, but as a
net gain, it's it's a good So we're just going
to be quiet about the autism stuff. And I don't
actually believe that's happening. But if you do, because of
(24:54):
what you've observed from the government, I can't call you crazy.
Speaker 1 (24:59):
Right, there's no possible way they know what the long
term effect of the combination of some of these vaccines
are because they haven't been round long enough. Right.
Speaker 4 (25:09):
More of the Randyman schizophrenia. I would put in the
same notion. You have a kid who's completely normal to
eighteen or nineteen and their brain goes heywire.
Speaker 7 (25:19):
How does that happen?
Speaker 4 (25:20):
It's the most bizarre disease. Shouldn't we be open Could
it be our food? It might be vaccines, It might
be our food.
Speaker 7 (25:27):
But autism is more common.
Speaker 4 (25:29):
I don't know about the schizophrenia statistics, but autisms more common.
Speaker 7 (25:32):
Should we want to be open minded? Instead?
Speaker 4 (25:34):
We're so close minded and we're so consensus driven that
the science says.
Speaker 7 (25:39):
This, Well, science doesn't say anything. Science is a dispute,
and ten years from now we could all be wrong.
Speaker 1 (25:46):
Roll on, Curly, roll on.
Speaker 4 (25:47):
Twenty years ago they did this enormous study and they
said everybody over fifty should take an aspirin.
Speaker 7 (25:52):
I thought, well, that's a pretty good idea. It makes sense.
Speaker 4 (25:54):
But you know what, twenty years later they measured it
and they found if you had no heart disease and
you were taking your chance of dying from a brain
bleed or from a stomach bleed.
Speaker 7 (26:03):
We're greater than the risk of heart disease. You have
heart disease.
Speaker 4 (26:06):
They still say take an aspirin if you don't have
changed your mind twenty years later. But would you have
all said I was crazy and I should no longer
be in public discourse if I had said twenty years ago,
I don't feel like taking an asper I ride my
bike all the time.
Speaker 7 (26:18):
I'm afraid I might hit my head.
Speaker 4 (26:20):
But that's what country's about, what this sentence about.
Speaker 1 (26:23):
That's a good example. Yeah, yeah, it is one final clip.
Speaker 4 (26:27):
So just ask you to look at the larger picture
and give the guy break who says I just want
to follow the science where it leads without presupposition. I think,
really what we have up here is presupposition. You've already
concluded it's absolute that autism isn't caused by We don't
know what causes autism, so.
Speaker 2 (26:44):
We should be more humble in what we say. Sorry,
I didn't get to a questions. That doesn't make me
say therefore, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Speaker 1 (26:57):
But you can't.
Speaker 2 (27:00):
And I that we are openly having some of these
conversations thanks to our FK.
Speaker 1 (27:05):
Junior and his advocacy.
Speaker 2 (27:09):
He's got some really troubling conflicts of interest, and he's
half a con man if you ask me.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
But still Da Da Dat knows how to turn lemons
into lemonade. You find a dead bear, what do you do?
You just leave it there? You bury it? No, you
come up with a hilarious.
Speaker 2 (27:25):
Prank, not to mention the underrated, bringing a whales head
home chain, sawing it off the whale and then strapping
it to the roof of your car as its juice
is dripped down the window.
Speaker 7 (27:36):
Barbaric.
Speaker 1 (27:37):
Okay, we got on a topic earlier we need to
fix when we come back. As we finished strong with
the is flatulent speech? I vote no. I don't think
it has First Amendment protections.
Speaker 2 (27:51):
It is unmistakably speech in this instance, and I believe
that Thomas Jefferson would agree with me, certainly Ben Franklin,
who was a big fan of flatulence.
Speaker 1 (28:01):
All right, we'll get to that coming up next. I
downloaded the new operating system for the iPhone with the
AI in it. Another cool thing it does. I just
noticed if you get a long text, it gives you
a little sentence, like a summary of it, instead of
like you gotta click it. It just says, mom wants
(28:21):
to know what time you're going to be there. If
it's like a long paragraph about something, yeah, or something
very handy, very cool, Oh wow, okay, yeah, I'll have
to check that out.
Speaker 2 (28:30):
So speaking of technology, I can't help but be slightly
amused by the fact that I have two ideas of
things to talk about side by side. One is a
really thought provoking riff on the parable of the Good
Samaritan from the New Testament. I know what it means
and doesn't mean, and how it's been distorted by modern politics.
Speaker 1 (28:49):
I would love to talk about that. We should do
a One More Thing podcast on that.
Speaker 2 (28:53):
The other story is about a woman pleading guilty in
the UK's first ever cyber farting case, and that's the
one where going to go with anyway, and honestly, the
serious part of this what cyber flatulence?
Speaker 1 (29:11):
Huh?
Speaker 2 (29:12):
Well, twenty five year old Rhiann and Evans caused distress
or anxiety. It's quote from the case to her boyfriend's
X said the prosecutor, Diane Williams.
Speaker 1 (29:24):
Quote.
Speaker 2 (29:24):
She proceeds to pass gas by placing the camera on
her bottom and passing the gas.
Speaker 1 (29:30):
You can't see them. You can't see gas passing. I
understand the placing the camera, then, Miss Evans. I think
you see more of the microphone than they can see it.
Get to the doctor, Get to a bathroom.
Speaker 2 (29:42):
Miss Evans passing wind her face smiling, Get the camera.
Speaker 1 (29:45):
Oh you think this is funny? Do yes? Yes, actually
I do. I think it's hilarious.
Speaker 2 (29:50):
The victim, Deborah blankety blank said the I'm gonna use
the term here forgive me, folks. The victim, Deborah's such
and such said the booty belches made her feel unsafe
in her own home.
Speaker 1 (30:05):
I do like booty belches, as you know, I'm not
a fan of the F word. Booty belches is a
good one. She went on Katie's about to die quote.
It was purely malicious. She was smirking throughout She found
it hilarious, but the victim didn't. So as part of
her punishment, Miss Evans must attend fifteen rehabilitation sessions sixty
(30:27):
days of alcohol abstinence monitor I see a reality show.
You got to follow her to those rehabilitation sessions and
turn that into a TV show. What the hell is that?
We're trying to rehabilitate you from going after your boyfriend's
ex girlfriends by flatulating into your phone to that history.
I'm sorry, miss Evans. Good to see you again?
Speaker 2 (30:49):
Will you or won't you fart at your boyfriend's ex
via the phone today?
Speaker 1 (30:54):
I won't. Okay, good to see you. We'll see you
next week.
Speaker 2 (30:58):
Plus she's got to endure sixty days of alcohol abstinence
monitoring and a two year restraining order following the cheeky
squeaking stunt. She's no longer allowed to harass the victim
in any way.
Speaker 1 (31:09):
Well, she's got to do something about drinking. So alcohol
was involved. Yes, you gotta let go of your you
started dating something. You can't be angry at their ex
boyfriend or girlfriend, all right.
Speaker 2 (31:23):
Yeah, because they're no longer even together, right, but they
were I think they were at the time.
Speaker 1 (31:29):
Though. Okay, well, and I mean, farting.
Speaker 2 (31:36):
At somebody is not exactly an effective way to say
you should have stayed with me, You see what I mean?
Speaker 1 (31:44):
Yes, the message is not you made a wrong choice
in breaking up with me because I am a catch.
You know, your.
Speaker 2 (31:50):
Aggressive flatulence, says reminded me of how special you are.
Speaker 1 (31:54):
I'm leaving my new girlfriend and coming back to you.
I want to make a life with you now that
you've displayed this behavior. It's funny.
Speaker 2 (32:06):
All the words that came out of your mouth couldn't
convince me, but this, this has.
Speaker 1 (32:12):
He really went to the cops with this. If some
psycho b who's now dating your ex boyfriend sending you it,
just block it and move on with your life, right,
don't you?
Speaker 4 (32:23):
This seems excessive and like she's looking to be a
news story, which I am in no way upset.
Speaker 1 (32:28):
That this is a story. It sounds Jack like you
approve of the booty belches.
Speaker 3 (32:35):
Ignore though I'm strong, I'm strong, You're ready.
Speaker 1 (32:47):
And here's your host for final thoughts, Joe Getty.
Speaker 2 (32:54):
Let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew
wrap things up for the day. There is technical director
Michael Angelo Michael final thought.
Speaker 1 (33:00):
Going back to that new system you downloaded, Jack, will
the AI do swear words? Because they Apple used to
not do swear words. I haven't tried that yet on
the AI texting. I just downloaded the new system last night.
There's a lot of cool stuff in there, and I mean,
I'm not getting paid for this. I just like it
can confirm it does swear Okay.
Speaker 2 (33:19):
Well that's ducking cool. Katie Green are esteemed Newswoman. As
a final thought, Katie, Well, because.
Speaker 4 (33:25):
I'm a child, my favorite part of the new Apple
AI is being able to make my own emojis.
Speaker 1 (33:30):
Oh yeah, that is a hilarious blast. I have to
ask my kids about that.
Speaker 7 (33:35):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (33:36):
Love it.
Speaker 1 (33:37):
Oh yeah, I gotta get on that myself.
Speaker 2 (33:38):
Jack.
Speaker 1 (33:39):
A final thought, we didn't hit this new story today
unless something changes the next twenty four hours. Trump is
slapping the giant tariffs on Canada and Mexico starting tomorrow.
So I'm gonna go to the store and get my
maple syrup and pinatas or holy hockey pucks and retos
(34:01):
or whatever I need to buy to there, right, save
you some money.
Speaker 2 (34:05):
My final thought, I'm going to give to BD who
wrote us a note about the original life and that
asteroid and everything said. He says, to my mind, the
real miracle of it all is how the whole universe
began with an unfathomable amount of energy condensing into one
or two elements, which then, under gravity became stars, which
made all the other elements. These elements eventually self assembled
into the basic amino acids that composed DNA. After all
(34:26):
of that, skipping from one planet to another seems like
a walk in the park. Yeah, yeah, it is incredible
that it happened, and nobody knows why. Armstrong and Getty
wrapping up another grueling four hour workday. So many people
who thinks so little time go to armstrong in getty
dot com. There's something you see over the weekend we
ought to be talking about, sending along mail bag at
Armstrong in getty dot com.
Speaker 1 (34:43):
Pick yourself up's mangy swag. We'll see them Monday. God
bless America. Armstrong and Getty and I said, boy, they
looked like two people that like each other. I am
all beautiful, fag cha can show listen. It's okay, give
me a joke.
Speaker 3 (35:03):
Are you support of all these ones?
Speaker 6 (35:05):
He say, such a nerve bro one final message about
sex age up a Racou, I see I see you,
not
Speaker 1 (35:15):
By a Great Friday You Mother, Armstrong and geddy,
Hosts And Creators
Joe Getty
Jack Armstrong
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!