January 2, 2025 • 36 mins
Featured during Hour 1 of the Thursday, Jan 2, 2025 edition of The Armstrong & Getty Replay..
- Sexual Revolution, Only Fans, and sex with 100 guys Part 1
- Sexual Revolution, Only Fans, and sex with 100 guys Part 2
- Sexual Revolution, Wealth Tax, and Jack Manscaping
- New Tom Hanks Movie and Woman rejected by Hooters
Stupid Should Hurt: https://www.armstrongandgetty.com/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:09):
Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George
Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong, Joe.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
Getty Armstrong and Jetty and Gee Armstrong and Gaddy Strong. Welcome.
We are off this week.
Speaker 3 (00:29):
So you're gonna hear some best of replays of the
Armstrong and Getty Shaw.
Speaker 2 (00:33):
You're gonna love him.
Speaker 3 (00:34):
You're gonna be here. I'm gonna be at home, sitting
in my car and listening to the radio while you
do so.
Speaker 4 (00:39):
While you're enjoying yourselves this week, why not hit armstrong
a Getty dot com and pick up an A and
G T shirt or hat for your favorite ang fan,
including the cut the Crap shirt or the hot Dogs
are Dogs.
Speaker 2 (00:51):
It's up to you.
Speaker 3 (00:53):
So I tweeted out this thing over the weekend, this
long thread about the sexual revolution that I found was
really interesting and a lot of the responses were fantastic,
and I thought, well, that sparks a conversation we should
do on the air, and then became aware of the
perfect story to lead us into that.
Speaker 4 (01:11):
Yeah, this young British woman, she's an only Fans performer.
Speaker 2 (01:18):
Lily Phillips.
Speaker 4 (01:18):
She's twenty three years old from an intact home, middle
class English, but she's a porn on OnlyFans performer and
decided to have sex with one hundred men in one
day as some sort of clickbait publicity stunt thing, and
(01:44):
documentary filmmaker decided to make a documentary about the before
and after.
Speaker 3 (01:49):
I'm wondering what people like, People who haven't heard this already,
what their initial reaction to that was. Is there anybody
listening whose initial reaction was anywhere in the realm of
that's hot or were was practically everybody's initial reaction like
physical revulsion. I get physical revulsion from hearing that. Not
(02:13):
only do I not have a ooh that sounds hot,
it kind of makes me sick to my stomach to
think about it.
Speaker 4 (02:18):
Yeah, it's physically disgusting on several different levels, including the
fact that the body is not meant to take that
the female forms specifically. And secondly, I think there's a
soul deep revulsion to any person being exploited in that way,
(02:40):
including by herself. That's that's a damaged, sad soul.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
Well, who are the guys that participated in it and
enjoyed it enough?
Speaker 2 (02:53):
Yeah? Yeah, I don't know the logistics of it.
Speaker 4 (02:57):
Honestly well, and a lot of the documentaries about how
she realized she had to remove her mind and her
soul from her body during this experience, and that was
disturbing and discouraging and saddening and sickening and blah blah blah.
But now you know, the bizarre and truly horrifying PostScript
(03:20):
is she's announced that she's going to have sex with
a thousand guys in a day as her next stunt.
Speaker 3 (03:26):
It's interesting that her immediate reaction at the end of
the day of having sex with the hundred dudes was tearful,
and I've seen the promo physically obviously emotionally physically shaken.
I mean, she was disturbed by what had happened. And
I saw one reviewer say that this documentary is the
(03:48):
best anti porn documentary unintentionally you could possibly make.
Speaker 2 (03:52):
Yeah. I believe that.
Speaker 4 (03:54):
Yeah, there are serious psychological issues going on there.
Speaker 3 (03:58):
It's terrible, right. Does it mean anything more or not
about our culture or anything? Or is it just a
one off, stupid stunt. We can discuss that, but it
leads into this pretty good I came across this and
retweeted it. Like I said, I thought it was interesting
this guy thinker writer person. The sexual revolution was a
disaster sixty years ago. They tried to redefine sexuality to
(04:23):
liberate mankind using finger quotes. Everything they said was a lie.
Yet their lives have ruined millions of lives. Here's the
worst live the sexual revolution that is still plaguing society today.
The sexual Revolution became prominent in the nineteen sixties on
the service I said that. In practice, however, it sought
(04:43):
something sinister, societal destruction. It sounds crazy at first, but
let's meet one of the movements leaders. Do you know
if her name is Kate Millet or Millett or I
don't know, am I L E. T. T. Kate Millet
was a leading figure of this sexual revolution. Time magazine
called her the Karl Marx of the women's movement.
Speaker 2 (05:03):
Like that's a good exnod compliment.
Speaker 3 (05:05):
The thesis of her work was the family is a
den of slavery, with the man as the bourgeoisie and
the woman and children as the proletariat. Here she is
on the cover of Time magazine back in the sixties.
I'm looking at it right here.
Speaker 4 (05:18):
Well, they got the march part right, Yeah, that's part
of Marxism. She was just turned her attention to that
aspect of it.
Speaker 3 (05:23):
Yeah, Millet said casual sex would free women from the
slavery of marriage.
Speaker 2 (05:29):
Well, there you go.
Speaker 3 (05:30):
The fact that she thinks marriage is slavery is all
you need to know about her. In reality, however, Millet
wasn't after liberation like any Marxists. She wanted one thing,
societal destruction. Her sistery Mallory shared a chilling story explaining
Millet's true agenda. Mallory recalled attending a feminist meeting with
Millet in nineteen sixty nine. The meeting began with a
disturbing chant, which she called the Litany of Evil. It
(05:53):
explained the core beliefs of Millet in her group. Here's
the chance, as written in the book The Anti Mary,
which is all about this. Why are we here today?
The chairwoman asked, to make the revolution? They answered, what
kind of revolution? She replied, the cultural revolution? They chanted,
And how do we make the cultural revolution? She demanded,
by destroying the American family. How do we destroy the
(06:14):
family by destroying the American patriarch? How do we destroy
the American patriarch by taking away his power? How do
we do that by by destroying monogamy, They shouted, and
everybody cheered. How do we destroy monogamy by promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution, abortion,
and homosexuality. And here we find the great lie of
(06:35):
the sexual revolution, push promiscuity to destroy the family. But
how does promiscuity destroy the family? And this is where
it got really interesting to me. It breaks the bonds
of marriage, destroys trust, and so's division between the sexes.
Casual sex is dehumanizing other people's bodies become the means
for selfish pleasure. People degrade one another, themselves and their souls.
(06:59):
A society that celebrates promiscuity is a dying society. To
idolize sex is to destroy trust, friendship, and family. In short,
all civilizations live and die by their families. What then,
does healthy sexuality look like. Sexuality reaches peak virtue when
it's expressed in marriage, and it's procreative. Why it orients
(07:20):
your sexuality to love instead of lust. It becomes a
force of charity that builds loving families. Monogamy is about
giving everything to a person you love most. You don't
lose freedom, you flourish and virtue. Procreation meanwhile, teaches you
to love your children more than yourself. Families become the
force of charitable love. They're the bedrock of a healthy society.
The takeaway above all offered grace who fallen victim to
(07:44):
the lies of the sexual revolution. This person wrote beyond that,
reject the lies of casual sex. Lust drives you to ruin,
but love offers an endless exaltation of virtue. One of
the interesting things I thought about all that is he
at no point got into the religion part. That those
who are such proponents of, you know, free sex and
(08:06):
sleeping around everything like that always point to people that
are against that is some sort of religious stick in
the MUDs wackadoo's.
Speaker 2 (08:13):
He didn't have to go there at all.
Speaker 3 (08:15):
Metallists, I mean, there is no denying that the Central
Revolution tracks perfectly with the breakdown of the American family
and endless divorces and blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 2 (08:26):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (08:26):
Yeah, what's interesting to me. And I'm reminded of the
old saying that the greatest trick the devil ever played
was convincing nankind he doesn't doesn't exist. The extent to
which the Marxists of the world pitch various policies, whether
we're talking about what we were just talking about. And
(08:48):
I had professors, at least one who as just kind
of a casual throwaway as part of one of our discussions,
I think it was a philosophy class, explained that the
family is actually an institution of oppression and evil, and
society will only be free when the nuclear family is
torn apart. And I was sitting there, as a Midwestern
kid from a happy, intact family, thinking the hell are
(09:09):
you talking about?
Speaker 2 (09:11):
Whee to do what? Well?
Speaker 4 (09:14):
See, Well, that's my ultimate point though, which I'm working
my way toward, is that whether it's that or the
Alvin Braggs of the world and the Cesobodines, the progressive
prosecutors who are in George Giscones who are pitching that
we need this criminal justice reform to bring social justice
(09:34):
to the streets and.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
We cannot prosecute our way out of the things we see.
Speaker 4 (09:39):
As if anybody thinks you can, again getting back to
the devil convincing us he doesn't exist. What percentage of
the population understands that these people make these moral arguments
for these policies, and the people the real activists don't
mean a word of it.
Speaker 2 (09:58):
Now, they're useful idiots on the color campuses.
Speaker 4 (10:00):
They've bought the moral arguments and they think they're sincere,
and so they pitch them to humanity. But at the
core of it, it's not because they think these policies
will help our society.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
It's that they think it will tear it apart.
Speaker 4 (10:14):
They want to bring on collapse in chaos because in
that chaos, this is a straight out of March.
Speaker 2 (10:20):
It's amazing nobody knows this.
Speaker 4 (10:22):
Out of that chaos they take control and institute communism.
Speaker 3 (10:28):
Well how about this, how much do you think the
sexual revolution plays a part in the breakdown of the
American family as this person just laid out.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
Do you agree with it? Very very large?
Speaker 3 (10:40):
Yeah, very very large, if not like practically all of it.
Speaker 2 (10:44):
Who I don't one in that?
Speaker 3 (10:46):
I mean who I mean, I can understand how if
you're a twenty two year old guy, you might think
that's a win. Maybe a twenty two year old woman
you might think that's a win. But long term, really
did it?
Speaker 2 (10:58):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (10:58):
They are a lot of my favorite things. Agree that
the transitory feeling of freedom and the enjoyment of promiscuity
among women was very, very short lived, and among the
vast majorities of women, they realized, oh, being convinced that
I can have sex just like a promiscuous guy is great.
It was a lie. It just enabled them to be
(11:20):
used by more guys. And you know, I don't judge
you folks. You do whatever you think is right, whatever
you feel, and you choose your own life path and
I wish you well. But there's just no questioning this.
And we're old enough to have seen several of these cycles.
All changes, not progress. There are things that catch hold
(11:44):
and everybody is doing them, everybody's talking about them. It's
a huge trend in a society that turn out to
be terrible, practically disastrous. Just because everybody's doing it doesn't
mean it's a good idea.
Speaker 2 (11:59):
Are from them.
Speaker 3 (12:00):
That's really interesting. Do you think there's any putting the
genie back in the bottle on that sort of thing
outside of like a cataclysmic, you know, great depression, World
War sort of thing.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
Probably not.
Speaker 4 (12:12):
I mean, in spite of these big societal waves we've
been talking about, people still have the capacity to make
their own judgments and craft their own lives. I suspect
that among people who see it that more the way
we see it, it'll be fine. But no, I think
(12:32):
you're right to have a serious change back to a
more traditional view of sexuality and sex and marriage and
that sort of thing.
Speaker 2 (12:40):
Yeah, it would take some huge, huge societal change.
Speaker 3 (12:44):
I just I'm surprised there's not more like just looking
at the results and thinking, Okay, are we better off
here than we were before? And if you think so,
explain to me in what way you have more sexual
partners by the end of your life. How's that a
win necessarily?
Speaker 2 (13:02):
Yeah? Yeah, I don't. I don't know.
Speaker 4 (13:04):
It's tough because people just they're living their lives. They're
they're surrounded by one hundred different inputs and swirling you know,
currents of this, that and the other, and it's tough
for them to really nail down one particular aspect of
life like this and say, okay, that change has had
a bad result.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
It's just all too confusing.
Speaker 3 (13:22):
I think, Well, I don't think what this one is
that confusing. I think it's a fairly straight line from
sexual revolution through the family coming apart, and the explanation
there of the you know, sowing the seeds of distrust
and lying and blah blah blah blah blah, all.
Speaker 2 (13:37):
That sort of stuff that's just horrible, horrible, horrible.
Speaker 4 (13:39):
To add to that, the richest government on Earth declaring
to women all over the country, you don't have to
be married to a man anymore.
Speaker 2 (13:46):
You can be married to the government.
Speaker 3 (13:48):
Awesome anything, awesome making We've got a lot of replies
on Twitter, but most of you aren't on Twitter. What
do you think you could text or email? I mean
we might have some in mail bag tomorrow. You could
text now four one, five, nine five K see.
Speaker 2 (14:00):
The Armstrong and Getty Show. Yeah, more Jack or Shoe
podcasts and our hot Lakes.
Speaker 1 (14:09):
Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty the Armstrong and Getty Show.
Speaker 3 (14:19):
So we've got the audio of that only fans chick
who had sex with one hundred guys in one day.
And if you were listening to the previous segment, we
are not celebrating this sort of thing at all. We're
using an example of the breakdown of I don't know society, well,
I don't even know.
Speaker 2 (14:38):
I don't even think it's morals.
Speaker 3 (14:39):
I think it's practicality, just the practicality of having a
happy life.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
A lot of morals, that's what they are. Sure, yeah, sure, yeah, yeah,
but they're always looked at wrong.
Speaker 3 (14:50):
They're looked at as like a because God said it,
you have to do it.
Speaker 2 (14:53):
What kind of weird do would believe that? No, it's
gonna give you a better life, is the reason.
Speaker 4 (14:59):
Yeah, because it's been tried five million times living a life,
and we've figured out the best ways to do it.
Speaker 3 (15:06):
Anyway, back to our question, we've got audio of this
woman describing what it was like.
Speaker 2 (15:10):
Do we want to hear from them?
Speaker 4 (15:11):
Yeah, yeah, why not? Yeah, I've heard it before. It's
it's interesting. Go ahead, Michael.
Speaker 2 (15:16):
First one, it's not for the week girls.
Speaker 1 (15:19):
If I'm honest, it was hard.
Speaker 2 (15:24):
I don't know if i'd recommend it. Why. I think
if you're a different type of girl. It's very like.
Speaker 1 (15:31):
It's kind of like being in a sense of like
it's just a different.
Speaker 4 (15:39):
Feeling. I don't know how to explain it, Like.
Speaker 2 (15:43):
It's not like just having something.
Speaker 1 (15:45):
Yeah, yeah, just one in, one out, Like it feels intense.
Speaker 2 (15:50):
I'm sure, like more intense than you thought it might
really and she starts crying in that nice yeah, I
get to the next one. Michael. I think that was
kind of the hall pop.
Speaker 4 (16:06):
It is like this is this is irrelevant, stop it.
This has to do more generally with her only fans
career and just constantly providing satisfactory content for subscribers. But
in other clips that I've heard, she talks about she
(16:29):
can't remember the faces of most of the men. Well,
of course, not one hundred in a day, how could you?
Speaker 2 (16:35):
And I quote from the Free Press.
Speaker 4 (16:36):
At first, she pretends she's upset because she feels badly
that some men haven't been satisfied despite traveling a long
way and supporting her. But soon what appears to be
the real truth beyond her grief is revealed.
Speaker 2 (16:46):
Quote.
Speaker 4 (16:47):
I think it was like feeling so robotic. I've got
this routine of how we are going to do this,
and like sometimes you're just disassociated and it's like not normal.
And in other words, she was describing separating her body
from her soul, and as this writer points out, the
way she describes her experience is virtually indistinguishable from the
symptoms of rape trauma, syndrome, mood swings, dissociations, self blame, guilt,
(17:11):
and sometimes hypersexuality.
Speaker 3 (17:13):
And then she'll be dealing with a lot of these
feelings the rest of her life and she's only twenty three.
Speaker 4 (17:19):
Yeah, and this writer, it's very good, gets into various
sex workers of various ages and various parts of the world.
Speaker 2 (17:26):
The whole I have to deaden my soul to get
through it.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
Jack Armstrong and Joe frettys The Armstrong and Getty Show,
The arm Strong and Yetdy Show.
Speaker 3 (18:03):
So we were talking about this only fans fan star
who had sex with one hundred guys in a day
and they made a documentary about it and it's disgusting.
And then we rolled into this Twitter thread that I
came across over the weekend about the sexual revolution and
out was a lie and it destroyed American families and
it made women less happy. And maybe you agree with that,
maybe you don't. Kay, Do you want to weigh in
on any of this before we get to some texts,
(18:25):
This whole story makes me sick.
Speaker 5 (18:27):
I'm sorry, it's just listening to that clip of her
talking about what about the aftermath? She sounded like a
rape victim, and it just this is gonna this is
She's twenty three years old, right, She's got her whole
life and she i just feel very bad for this girl.
Speaker 3 (18:44):
She's pretty financially successful. I think she got two million
dollars for this, and she has like five employees or
something like that, lives in London, my full time employees,
so she's But like, is that two million dollars? I
wasn't trying to justify it, just a just throwing that
in a couple of texts we got about this whole topic,
(19:05):
this one. I'm afraid she's going to kill herself in
the future. I hope not, but that wouldn't shock me.
As she gets older, it's going to become more clear
on just on the idea of the sexual revolution was
a lie and nobody benefited. Got this text I thought
was interesting. Born in San Francisco, I lived this period
(19:27):
right this person, and I think I know who they
are Even then I thought something was off about it.
And now alone without children and a bunch of cats,
and I can say, what a krocabloney.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
Interesting. Yeah. From a dude's.
Speaker 3 (19:44):
Side of this, female absolute and relative happiness has gone
down since the feminism and sexual libertine culture of the sixties.
Women complained, got their way and made themselves less happy.
Guess who they're going to blame for their lack of happiness.
Most divorced men can tell you, haha.
Speaker 4 (20:01):
Right this person, Wow, well, well enjoy that laughing. Last,
I'm just reminded of the unif for the Joe Getty
Unified Theory of civilizations.
Speaker 2 (20:12):
That and there's so many examples of it.
Speaker 4 (20:15):
It's almost tedious that we veer from one guardrail to
the other, never have any idea when we hit the
sweet spot and keep going until we've gone way too
far and created a disaster. Then we veer back toward
the other guardrail. Another example of this, you know, crime
policy back and forth, there are too many people in prison,
(20:35):
were too hard on crime, Well, there's too much crime
in the streets. We didn't need to be harder on crime.
And it just goes back and forth. Sexuality, I think
is similar. They're a handful of other fairly obvious examples.
Speaker 3 (20:47):
But on the left side of politics, I don't feel
like the left appreciates appreciate culture at all and the
role that plays in society.
Speaker 2 (20:57):
That doesn't seem to be a concern. No.
Speaker 4 (21:01):
I think in general, on the left, including you know,
moderate lefty people that we could work with, that'd be fine.
We can talk about policy and come to a happy conclusion.
There is in general much less regard for the importance
of culture.
Speaker 2 (21:15):
I would agree completely, and.
Speaker 4 (21:17):
On your outer left, and I'm not talking about five percent,
I'm talking about like twenty five percent of the left.
They hate the culture and want to destroy it. Back
to my theme, a lot of the neo Marxist stuff,
they pitch it to you as a way to improve society.
They are fully cognizant of the fact that it will
(21:38):
not do anything but destroy society.
Speaker 2 (21:41):
That is their goal.
Speaker 4 (21:42):
They've written books, their names are on the spine. This
is not my fantasy. They will tell you proudly that
this is their goal.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
Does that bother.
Speaker 3 (21:54):
Anybody on the left that the champion of the sexual
revolution was out to destroy the American family because I
thought that would be better. I mean, I know some
of you agree with that, but not most of you,
right anyway.
Speaker 4 (22:13):
Yeah, I just I will always be amazed till my
dying day how few people take the radical left at
their word. They have told you precisely what they're doing,
and and people like me are considered I don't know,
paranoid or whatever. It's not paranoid at all.
Speaker 3 (22:33):
Religious wacko. We need some really good transition music.
Speaker 2 (22:39):
Michael. Do you need maybe even two s at different stores?
Perhaps I do it, stereome go ahead.
Speaker 6 (23:00):
Some help, finding some help, help, boundary for help, take
a look offering some help, and Vivian, you were so
(23:25):
close to that million dollars.
Speaker 3 (23:28):
Oh my god, it's just a regular mom who had
a chance at a million dollars if she could have solved.
I'm looking at the board. There you got the erring part.
Some and help are basically completely solved. Help is solved.
Some is missing wood letter, So it's just what is
something arring some help? When you hear the beginning of it.
(23:48):
I want to hear her guesses.
Speaker 6 (23:50):
Wondering some help, answering some help.
Speaker 2 (23:53):
I'm finding some help.
Speaker 6 (23:55):
You run for some help, boundary for help.
Speaker 2 (24:01):
That's boundary for I don't know. I'm sorry.
Speaker 4 (24:06):
The nice lady didn't win the money, but you know
why she didn't because she's no good at the game.
Speaker 3 (24:11):
Well she said she was nervous, and I've had that before,
where I just I can't I can't like come up
with things that if I weren't nervous I could come
up with easily, because then you know, you know, whatever
kind of situation, but.
Speaker 2 (24:23):
Which is part of the game she's bad at yes, yes, boundary.
Speaker 4 (24:32):
Offering for help again, her her anguish brings me no
joy whatsoever?
Speaker 2 (24:38):
Yeah, No, too bad, she missed out on a million dollars.
Speaker 4 (24:40):
Well, well, it's the way the cookie crumbled, it is
exactly Or is this a sign of the cruel new
Ryan Seacrest era on wheel of fortune and which when
you rule that wheel with an iron at which no
holds her barred?
Speaker 2 (24:56):
Perhaps? What was the brilliant book?
Speaker 4 (24:58):
Oh, we interviewed the author so Hoover Foundation guy, Hoover
Institution guy. But it was about the fact that welfare
programs of all sorts expand inevitably. If you have like
pathetic on the scale of one to one hundred, and
you start a program that's for levels one, two, and three,
what's the next thing that happens level four? Are advocates
for level four say, well, whoa whoa level force? Just
(25:21):
one more level of pathetic? Why aren't they getting any help?
Speaker 3 (25:25):
The book is the High Cost of Good Intentions, and
it has so many great examples, going clear back to
revolutionary war veterans and how it started with people who
fought in the Revolutionary War, then spread to their spouses,
then spread to their kids, and it ended up being
people who were alive during the Revolutionary War. And it
just kept spreading and spreading. And we've done that throughout history.
Speaker 4 (25:46):
A guy who wants picnicked on bunker hill, you know
whatever it was, Yeah, yeah, it inevitably explains.
Speaker 2 (25:52):
So the mirror image of that, and it's this is
so insidious. But once you catch on to.
Speaker 7 (25:56):
It, nobody gives a crap about billion or will shed
a single tier. They are an utterly unsympathetic group when
it comes to especially being taxed. But you've got this
concept of taxing unrealized gains, which has been seen as abhorrent.
But if you can get that concept into play against
(26:18):
the utterly unsympathetic billionaires, soon it's one hundred millionaires and
you're thinking, I still don't give a crap. Wait, and
you won't have to wait long, mister, honey, honey, we
just hit five.
Speaker 2 (26:31):
Hundred thousand dollars in the four oh one k. They
are coming for.
Speaker 4 (26:35):
You, man, they are absolutely coming for you. The income
tax originally was extremely narrow. I can't tell you the
number of government social Security. Again, the mirror image was
originally for like two percent of the population. Can you
realize how this would work?
Speaker 3 (26:50):
So you got stock in Tesla or whatever, Tesla goes
up a lot this year, Okay, well you made you
made money, you owe tax on that. So my Tesla
stock went up fifty and now I owe you whatever.
You'd have to pay twenty grand, even though I haven't
cashed it out yet. And of course the Tesla stock
could go back down after that, and then what do
(27:11):
you do.
Speaker 4 (27:12):
So setting aside the whole introducing something abhorrent mission creep
principle as we were talking about last hour, it would
also be absolutely devastating to the stock market and everybody's
four oh one case, because there would be huge dumping
of stock among the investor class. It would be too
expensive to keep it, and it would happen a year
after year after year to avoid taxes and kenonymous drop
(27:35):
me a text Also, the unrealized gain tax is simply
paying the tax on that stuff early.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
It doesn't make any more money.
Speaker 4 (27:44):
In fact, it makes less because the asset will not
grow as quickly because of the tax being extracted from it.
The capital gains tax will be paid upon death or
transfer like it is now, but it won't be able
to grow as much. What seems like a tax gain
is just paying it early. Typical shell game taxes are now,
(28:06):
some people might argue, but billionaires who have say a
billion dollars worth of stock, they can borrow against that
as income and spend that money and live lavishly and
the rest of it well go with a value added tax.
Then if you buy anything, there's a value added tax,
but you have to eliminate income taxes and one hundred
other dopey you know, duplicit as taxes.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
But anyway, that's enough of that.
Speaker 3 (28:29):
I vote on who's got the most joy. I don't
pay attention to this stuff.
Speaker 2 (28:33):
Amazon announced five days a week. Beiches. Sorry, that's the
greatst way to put it.
Speaker 4 (28:39):
They're telling their corporate staff to be in the office
every weekday.
Speaker 2 (28:43):
There is stroom draw and angst.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
I've got such a dichotomy of opinions on Amazon. I
hate that it's closed down many of my favorite local
stores in my small town because they couldn't keep up
with Amazon. On the other hand, I wanted a little
hair trimmer for my man escaping Katie.
Speaker 2 (29:01):
You know, Abe oil for your puff daddy. You know how, Katie,
I'm always manscaping. I need to.
Speaker 4 (29:08):
I just yeah, it's no kidding, turn off here, It's
just close your eyes and cover your ears.
Speaker 3 (29:12):
This is harassment because I was gonna mention it. I
just knew you really don't want to hear that. You
really really don't even want to think about that. But
I bought a manscaping tool on Amazon and I had
it in three hours at my house. No, they probably
didn't even have what I was looking for, film, a
porn or what.
Speaker 2 (29:29):
Why do you need a party? I didn't need a
three hours. I didn't.
Speaker 3 (29:34):
I'm going to a freakout or whatever you call those likes,
freak session, freaking freak.
Speaker 8 (29:38):
Off, freak off with this story, Jack, But how does
any store stay open when I can order something and
have it at my house in two hours, I know,
or tonight or tomorrow.
Speaker 3 (29:51):
I mean, it's amazing, absolutely amazing. And now I'm being
well groomed and smooth as a dolphin.
Speaker 2 (29:55):
Oh my god, oh God, kill me. Now, this is
the worst sixty seconds right the Armstrong and Getty Show.
Speaker 1 (30:02):
Yeah more Jack, more Joe podcasts and our hot links
and the Armstrong and Getty show, you.
Speaker 2 (30:15):
Could spend the rest of my life here. I didn't
see that.
Speaker 3 (30:21):
Con oh, I think I think it's a little luly
for you to say I'll spend the rest of my
life here.
Speaker 2 (30:28):
You're gonna freak him out. He's gonna run away. How
long is are How long do you known each other?
All right, that's enough.
Speaker 3 (30:34):
Tom Hanks, so young Tom Hanks trying to change his
voice while it's an old the Tom Hanks trying to
sound like a young Tom Hanks because they're doing that
deaging technology that most of us hated in the movie
The Irishman. If we saw it, I just didn't think
it was that great anyway. Tom Hanks and Robin Wright
pairing again. You remember them for Forrest Gump in a
(30:57):
new movie called Here that's getting so much attention because
it is set forty years ago, and it looks like
Tom Hanks when he was in the TV show Bosom Buddies,
at least in the pictures I've seen, and a young
Robin Wright then. And it's a one like the camera
never moves I've read. I don't understand how that could
possibly it be like a play. I don't know yeah,
(31:18):
sounds like anyway, it's getting a lot of attention for
those two gimmicks.
Speaker 2 (31:22):
Whether or not it's good or not, I have no idea.
Speaker 4 (31:25):
Yeah, okay, it its not like a Forrest Gump spin off, right,
the same team, same writer, same director.
Speaker 2 (31:32):
Yeah okay, and then Tom Hanks and Robin Wright.
Speaker 3 (31:35):
But most of the time when movies have gimmicks, we
deagified or this or that, oftentimes that that the gimmick
is the main thing they got going for.
Speaker 2 (31:46):
Yeah, yeah, so we'll see.
Speaker 4 (31:49):
So Supreme Court decision came out yesterday somewhat about abortion.
Speaker 2 (31:57):
It's really it's it's again fairly murky.
Speaker 4 (32:00):
It has to do with Idaho as banned almost all
abortions except to save a woman's life or rape and
incept that sort of thing. And the suit said that
conflicts with a federal law that says you have to
render emergency care to a person to save their life
(32:20):
that supersedes everything, or to stabilize their condition. And it's
just an argument around the particulars of our right stabilize
a woman versus saving her life and what does that mean.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
And it's really a three.
Speaker 4 (32:34):
To three to three decision that said, you know, we're
not going to stay this. You go ahead and treat
these women and if they need an emergency abortion, it's
not against the rules.
Speaker 2 (32:44):
But the lower courts are going to keep looking at this.
Speaker 4 (32:46):
Plus Idaho has changed its stance a little bit, plus
this and that, and it's just it's not definitive at all,
Like so many of these decisions so far.
Speaker 3 (32:56):
Anti abortion activists delta blow by the Supreme Court yesterday.
Speaker 4 (33:06):
I suppose that's true, but it's not much of a blow.
It's not very informative that headline glance. Oh no, no reporting.
Mainstream media reporting on Supreme Court decisions is practically useless
and it might be counterproductive. And we got an email
from somebody who is kind of edging close to the
point I want to make, so I'll make it. There
have been a handful of cases, including important ones like
(33:28):
the censorship case where the Soups come out with their
decision after months of consideration, of wrangling and behind the
scenes and blah blah blah, it's the end of the session.
Speaker 2 (33:37):
Here we are a Jew and blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 9 (33:39):
The ones where you say, you know, we don't think
the people have standing can't you just come Why don't
you figure that out first? Right when you first get
it together, you look at all the cases and say,
all right, let's figure out if everybody's got standing before
we waste any more of our times.
Speaker 2 (33:54):
Come up with a bad fun up front.
Speaker 3 (33:56):
So everybody's waiting for the final definitive government versus social
media company's ruling.
Speaker 2 (34:03):
Now they don't have a stand, Well, why did you
just say that? They're back in October? Yink you want,
you can't make us.
Speaker 3 (34:11):
Here's my least favorite New York Post headline of the
day that's designed to get you to click on it.
I applied for hooters jobs to honor my dad, but
I was rejected despite having I gotta say this slow
so you get it all. There's just two lines, but
there's a lot here. There are only two lines, but
there's a lot in them. There's much to take in
(34:32):
paying attention. I applied for a hooter's job to honor
my dad. We could unpack that right there. What the
hell does that mean? I applied for a hooter's job
to honor my dad. Okay, that's the thing. Is dying
wish was that his daughter would wear the tiny little
orange shorts.
Speaker 2 (34:49):
And the white sox. Yes, Katie, Oh, I was just
is that or a stripper?
Speaker 5 (34:53):
You know?
Speaker 3 (34:55):
Anyway, honor my father. I applied for a hooter's job
to honor my dad. I was re rejected despite having
three boob jobs. Cowny air enough And of course there's
a picture too small to see what's going on that
you would click on the story boob jobs?
Speaker 5 (35:12):
You say, I thought you were going to say, despite
having three boobs, and that was going to be a
whole story in itself.
Speaker 4 (35:18):
Well, you'd think she'd be at least fifty percent more
likely to be higher than the average applicant.
Speaker 2 (35:23):
You got to join the circus.
Speaker 4 (35:27):
I haven't been to a circus that features that sort
of act in many moons.
Speaker 2 (35:33):
You gotta go south through the border for that sort
of thing. Oh boy, I think I'll stay there. I
applied for a hooter's job to honor my dad.
Speaker 7 (35:41):
What.
Speaker 2 (35:42):
I was rejected despite having three boob jobs? What again?
But I did not click on the story, so I
have no more.
Speaker 3 (35:49):
You know.
Speaker 4 (35:49):
I put in an app at Buffalo Wild Wings. But
then I thought, what would my dear depart a dad want?
Speaker 2 (35:57):
He'd want me at.
Speaker 3 (35:57):
Hooters, Right, one more boob job, but I'm going to
fill out the application.
Speaker 1 (36:03):
Armstrong and Getty
Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George
Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong, Joe.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
Getty Armstrong and Jetty and Gee Armstrong and Gaddy Strong. Welcome.
We are off this week.
Speaker 3 (00:29):
So you're gonna hear some best of replays of the
Armstrong and Getty Shaw.
Speaker 2 (00:33):
You're gonna love him.
Speaker 3 (00:34):
You're gonna be here. I'm gonna be at home, sitting
in my car and listening to the radio while you
do so.
Speaker 4 (00:39):
While you're enjoying yourselves this week, why not hit armstrong
a Getty dot com and pick up an A and
G T shirt or hat for your favorite ang fan,
including the cut the Crap shirt or the hot Dogs
are Dogs.
Speaker 2 (00:51):
It's up to you.
Speaker 3 (00:53):
So I tweeted out this thing over the weekend, this
long thread about the sexual revolution that I found was
really interesting and a lot of the responses were fantastic,
and I thought, well, that sparks a conversation we should
do on the air, and then became aware of the
perfect story to lead us into that.
Speaker 4 (01:11):
Yeah, this young British woman, she's an only Fans performer.
Speaker 2 (01:18):
Lily Phillips.
Speaker 4 (01:18):
She's twenty three years old from an intact home, middle
class English, but she's a porn on OnlyFans performer and
decided to have sex with one hundred men in one
day as some sort of clickbait publicity stunt thing, and
(01:44):
documentary filmmaker decided to make a documentary about the before
and after.
Speaker 3 (01:49):
I'm wondering what people like, People who haven't heard this already,
what their initial reaction to that was. Is there anybody
listening whose initial reaction was anywhere in the realm of
that's hot or were was practically everybody's initial reaction like
physical revulsion. I get physical revulsion from hearing that. Not
(02:13):
only do I not have a ooh that sounds hot,
it kind of makes me sick to my stomach to
think about it.
Speaker 4 (02:18):
Yeah, it's physically disgusting on several different levels, including the
fact that the body is not meant to take that
the female forms specifically. And secondly, I think there's a
soul deep revulsion to any person being exploited in that way,
(02:40):
including by herself. That's that's a damaged, sad soul.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
Well, who are the guys that participated in it and
enjoyed it enough?
Speaker 2 (02:53):
Yeah? Yeah, I don't know the logistics of it.
Speaker 4 (02:57):
Honestly well, and a lot of the documentaries about how
she realized she had to remove her mind and her
soul from her body during this experience, and that was
disturbing and discouraging and saddening and sickening and blah blah blah.
But now you know, the bizarre and truly horrifying PostScript
(03:20):
is she's announced that she's going to have sex with
a thousand guys in a day as her next stunt.
Speaker 3 (03:26):
It's interesting that her immediate reaction at the end of
the day of having sex with the hundred dudes was tearful,
and I've seen the promo physically obviously emotionally physically shaken.
I mean, she was disturbed by what had happened. And
I saw one reviewer say that this documentary is the
(03:48):
best anti porn documentary unintentionally you could possibly make.
Speaker 2 (03:52):
Yeah. I believe that.
Speaker 4 (03:54):
Yeah, there are serious psychological issues going on there.
Speaker 3 (03:58):
It's terrible, right. Does it mean anything more or not
about our culture or anything? Or is it just a
one off, stupid stunt. We can discuss that, but it
leads into this pretty good I came across this and
retweeted it. Like I said, I thought it was interesting
this guy thinker writer person. The sexual revolution was a
disaster sixty years ago. They tried to redefine sexuality to
(04:23):
liberate mankind using finger quotes. Everything they said was a lie.
Yet their lives have ruined millions of lives. Here's the
worst live the sexual revolution that is still plaguing society today.
The sexual Revolution became prominent in the nineteen sixties on
the service I said that. In practice, however, it sought
(04:43):
something sinister, societal destruction. It sounds crazy at first, but
let's meet one of the movements leaders. Do you know
if her name is Kate Millet or Millett or I
don't know, am I L E. T. T. Kate Millet
was a leading figure of this sexual revolution. Time magazine
called her the Karl Marx of the women's movement.
Speaker 2 (05:03):
Like that's a good exnod compliment.
Speaker 3 (05:05):
The thesis of her work was the family is a
den of slavery, with the man as the bourgeoisie and
the woman and children as the proletariat. Here she is
on the cover of Time magazine back in the sixties.
I'm looking at it right here.
Speaker 4 (05:18):
Well, they got the march part right, Yeah, that's part
of Marxism. She was just turned her attention to that
aspect of it.
Speaker 3 (05:23):
Yeah, Millet said casual sex would free women from the
slavery of marriage.
Speaker 2 (05:29):
Well, there you go.
Speaker 3 (05:30):
The fact that she thinks marriage is slavery is all
you need to know about her. In reality, however, Millet
wasn't after liberation like any Marxists. She wanted one thing,
societal destruction. Her sistery Mallory shared a chilling story explaining
Millet's true agenda. Mallory recalled attending a feminist meeting with
Millet in nineteen sixty nine. The meeting began with a
disturbing chant, which she called the Litany of Evil. It
(05:53):
explained the core beliefs of Millet in her group. Here's
the chance, as written in the book The Anti Mary,
which is all about this. Why are we here today?
The chairwoman asked, to make the revolution? They answered, what
kind of revolution? She replied, the cultural revolution? They chanted,
And how do we make the cultural revolution? She demanded,
by destroying the American family. How do we destroy the
(06:14):
family by destroying the American patriarch? How do we destroy
the American patriarch by taking away his power? How do
we do that by by destroying monogamy, They shouted, and
everybody cheered. How do we destroy monogamy by promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution, abortion,
and homosexuality. And here we find the great lie of
(06:35):
the sexual revolution, push promiscuity to destroy the family. But
how does promiscuity destroy the family? And this is where
it got really interesting to me. It breaks the bonds
of marriage, destroys trust, and so's division between the sexes.
Casual sex is dehumanizing other people's bodies become the means
for selfish pleasure. People degrade one another, themselves and their souls.
(06:59):
A society that celebrates promiscuity is a dying society. To
idolize sex is to destroy trust, friendship, and family. In short,
all civilizations live and die by their families. What then,
does healthy sexuality look like. Sexuality reaches peak virtue when
it's expressed in marriage, and it's procreative. Why it orients
(07:20):
your sexuality to love instead of lust. It becomes a
force of charity that builds loving families. Monogamy is about
giving everything to a person you love most. You don't
lose freedom, you flourish and virtue. Procreation meanwhile, teaches you
to love your children more than yourself. Families become the
force of charitable love. They're the bedrock of a healthy society.
The takeaway above all offered grace who fallen victim to
(07:44):
the lies of the sexual revolution. This person wrote beyond that,
reject the lies of casual sex. Lust drives you to ruin,
but love offers an endless exaltation of virtue. One of
the interesting things I thought about all that is he
at no point got into the religion part. That those
who are such proponents of, you know, free sex and
(08:06):
sleeping around everything like that always point to people that
are against that is some sort of religious stick in
the MUDs wackadoo's.
Speaker 2 (08:13):
He didn't have to go there at all.
Speaker 3 (08:15):
Metallists, I mean, there is no denying that the Central
Revolution tracks perfectly with the breakdown of the American family
and endless divorces and blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 2 (08:26):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (08:26):
Yeah, what's interesting to me. And I'm reminded of the
old saying that the greatest trick the devil ever played
was convincing nankind he doesn't doesn't exist. The extent to
which the Marxists of the world pitch various policies, whether
we're talking about what we were just talking about. And
(08:48):
I had professors, at least one who as just kind
of a casual throwaway as part of one of our discussions,
I think it was a philosophy class, explained that the
family is actually an institution of oppression and evil, and
society will only be free when the nuclear family is
torn apart. And I was sitting there, as a Midwestern
kid from a happy, intact family, thinking the hell are
(09:09):
you talking about?
Speaker 2 (09:11):
Whee to do what? Well?
Speaker 4 (09:14):
See, Well, that's my ultimate point though, which I'm working
my way toward, is that whether it's that or the
Alvin Braggs of the world and the Cesobodines, the progressive
prosecutors who are in George Giscones who are pitching that
we need this criminal justice reform to bring social justice
(09:34):
to the streets and.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
We cannot prosecute our way out of the things we see.
Speaker 4 (09:39):
As if anybody thinks you can, again getting back to
the devil convincing us he doesn't exist. What percentage of
the population understands that these people make these moral arguments
for these policies, and the people the real activists don't
mean a word of it.
Speaker 2 (09:58):
Now, they're useful idiots on the color campuses.
Speaker 4 (10:00):
They've bought the moral arguments and they think they're sincere,
and so they pitch them to humanity. But at the
core of it, it's not because they think these policies
will help our society.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
It's that they think it will tear it apart.
Speaker 4 (10:14):
They want to bring on collapse in chaos because in
that chaos, this is a straight out of March.
Speaker 2 (10:20):
It's amazing nobody knows this.
Speaker 4 (10:22):
Out of that chaos they take control and institute communism.
Speaker 3 (10:28):
Well how about this, how much do you think the
sexual revolution plays a part in the breakdown of the
American family as this person just laid out.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
Do you agree with it? Very very large?
Speaker 3 (10:40):
Yeah, very very large, if not like practically all of it.
Speaker 2 (10:44):
Who I don't one in that?
Speaker 3 (10:46):
I mean who I mean, I can understand how if
you're a twenty two year old guy, you might think
that's a win. Maybe a twenty two year old woman
you might think that's a win. But long term, really
did it?
Speaker 2 (10:58):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (10:58):
They are a lot of my favorite things. Agree that
the transitory feeling of freedom and the enjoyment of promiscuity
among women was very, very short lived, and among the
vast majorities of women, they realized, oh, being convinced that
I can have sex just like a promiscuous guy is great.
It was a lie. It just enabled them to be
(11:20):
used by more guys. And you know, I don't judge
you folks. You do whatever you think is right, whatever
you feel, and you choose your own life path and
I wish you well. But there's just no questioning this.
And we're old enough to have seen several of these cycles.
All changes, not progress. There are things that catch hold
(11:44):
and everybody is doing them, everybody's talking about them. It's
a huge trend in a society that turn out to
be terrible, practically disastrous. Just because everybody's doing it doesn't
mean it's a good idea.
Speaker 2 (11:59):
Are from them.
Speaker 3 (12:00):
That's really interesting. Do you think there's any putting the
genie back in the bottle on that sort of thing
outside of like a cataclysmic, you know, great depression, World
War sort of thing.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
Probably not.
Speaker 4 (12:12):
I mean, in spite of these big societal waves we've
been talking about, people still have the capacity to make
their own judgments and craft their own lives. I suspect
that among people who see it that more the way
we see it, it'll be fine. But no, I think
(12:32):
you're right to have a serious change back to a
more traditional view of sexuality and sex and marriage and
that sort of thing.
Speaker 2 (12:40):
Yeah, it would take some huge, huge societal change.
Speaker 3 (12:44):
I just I'm surprised there's not more like just looking
at the results and thinking, Okay, are we better off
here than we were before? And if you think so,
explain to me in what way you have more sexual
partners by the end of your life. How's that a
win necessarily?
Speaker 2 (13:02):
Yeah? Yeah, I don't. I don't know.
Speaker 4 (13:04):
It's tough because people just they're living their lives. They're
they're surrounded by one hundred different inputs and swirling you know,
currents of this, that and the other, and it's tough
for them to really nail down one particular aspect of
life like this and say, okay, that change has had
a bad result.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
It's just all too confusing.
Speaker 3 (13:22):
I think, Well, I don't think what this one is
that confusing. I think it's a fairly straight line from
sexual revolution through the family coming apart, and the explanation
there of the you know, sowing the seeds of distrust
and lying and blah blah blah blah blah, all.
Speaker 2 (13:37):
That sort of stuff that's just horrible, horrible, horrible.
Speaker 4 (13:39):
To add to that, the richest government on Earth declaring
to women all over the country, you don't have to
be married to a man anymore.
Speaker 2 (13:46):
You can be married to the government.
Speaker 3 (13:48):
Awesome anything, awesome making We've got a lot of replies
on Twitter, but most of you aren't on Twitter. What
do you think you could text or email? I mean
we might have some in mail bag tomorrow. You could
text now four one, five, nine five K see.
Speaker 2 (14:00):
The Armstrong and Getty Show. Yeah, more Jack or Shoe
podcasts and our hot Lakes.
Speaker 1 (14:09):
Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty the Armstrong and Getty Show.
Speaker 3 (14:19):
So we've got the audio of that only fans chick
who had sex with one hundred guys in one day.
And if you were listening to the previous segment, we
are not celebrating this sort of thing at all. We're
using an example of the breakdown of I don't know society, well,
I don't even know.
Speaker 2 (14:38):
I don't even think it's morals.
Speaker 3 (14:39):
I think it's practicality, just the practicality of having a
happy life.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
A lot of morals, that's what they are. Sure, yeah, sure, yeah, yeah,
but they're always looked at wrong.
Speaker 3 (14:50):
They're looked at as like a because God said it,
you have to do it.
Speaker 2 (14:53):
What kind of weird do would believe that? No, it's
gonna give you a better life, is the reason.
Speaker 4 (14:59):
Yeah, because it's been tried five million times living a life,
and we've figured out the best ways to do it.
Speaker 3 (15:06):
Anyway, back to our question, we've got audio of this
woman describing what it was like.
Speaker 2 (15:10):
Do we want to hear from them?
Speaker 4 (15:11):
Yeah, yeah, why not? Yeah, I've heard it before. It's
it's interesting. Go ahead, Michael.
Speaker 2 (15:16):
First one, it's not for the week girls.
Speaker 1 (15:19):
If I'm honest, it was hard.
Speaker 2 (15:24):
I don't know if i'd recommend it. Why. I think
if you're a different type of girl. It's very like.
Speaker 1 (15:31):
It's kind of like being in a sense of like
it's just a different.
Speaker 4 (15:39):
Feeling. I don't know how to explain it, Like.
Speaker 2 (15:43):
It's not like just having something.
Speaker 1 (15:45):
Yeah, yeah, just one in, one out, Like it feels intense.
Speaker 2 (15:50):
I'm sure, like more intense than you thought it might
really and she starts crying in that nice yeah, I
get to the next one. Michael. I think that was
kind of the hall pop.
Speaker 4 (16:06):
It is like this is this is irrelevant, stop it.
This has to do more generally with her only fans
career and just constantly providing satisfactory content for subscribers. But
in other clips that I've heard, she talks about she
(16:29):
can't remember the faces of most of the men. Well,
of course, not one hundred in a day, how could you?
Speaker 2 (16:35):
And I quote from the Free Press.
Speaker 4 (16:36):
At first, she pretends she's upset because she feels badly
that some men haven't been satisfied despite traveling a long
way and supporting her. But soon what appears to be
the real truth beyond her grief is revealed.
Speaker 2 (16:46):
Quote.
Speaker 4 (16:47):
I think it was like feeling so robotic. I've got
this routine of how we are going to do this,
and like sometimes you're just disassociated and it's like not normal.
And in other words, she was describing separating her body
from her soul, and as this writer points out, the
way she describes her experience is virtually indistinguishable from the
symptoms of rape trauma, syndrome, mood swings, dissociations, self blame, guilt,
(17:11):
and sometimes hypersexuality.
Speaker 3 (17:13):
And then she'll be dealing with a lot of these
feelings the rest of her life and she's only twenty three.
Speaker 4 (17:19):
Yeah, and this writer, it's very good, gets into various
sex workers of various ages and various parts of the world.
Speaker 2 (17:26):
The whole I have to deaden my soul to get
through it.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
Jack Armstrong and Joe frettys The Armstrong and Getty Show,
The arm Strong and Yetdy Show.
Speaker 3 (18:03):
So we were talking about this only fans fan star
who had sex with one hundred guys in a day
and they made a documentary about it and it's disgusting.
And then we rolled into this Twitter thread that I
came across over the weekend about the sexual revolution and
out was a lie and it destroyed American families and
it made women less happy. And maybe you agree with that,
maybe you don't. Kay, Do you want to weigh in
on any of this before we get to some texts,
(18:25):
This whole story makes me sick.
Speaker 5 (18:27):
I'm sorry, it's just listening to that clip of her
talking about what about the aftermath? She sounded like a
rape victim, and it just this is gonna this is
She's twenty three years old, right, She's got her whole
life and she i just feel very bad for this girl.
Speaker 3 (18:44):
She's pretty financially successful. I think she got two million
dollars for this, and she has like five employees or
something like that, lives in London, my full time employees,
so she's But like, is that two million dollars? I
wasn't trying to justify it, just a just throwing that
in a couple of texts we got about this whole topic,
(19:05):
this one. I'm afraid she's going to kill herself in
the future. I hope not, but that wouldn't shock me.
As she gets older, it's going to become more clear
on just on the idea of the sexual revolution was
a lie and nobody benefited. Got this text I thought
was interesting. Born in San Francisco, I lived this period
(19:27):
right this person, and I think I know who they
are Even then I thought something was off about it.
And now alone without children and a bunch of cats,
and I can say, what a krocabloney.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
Interesting. Yeah. From a dude's.
Speaker 3 (19:44):
Side of this, female absolute and relative happiness has gone
down since the feminism and sexual libertine culture of the sixties.
Women complained, got their way and made themselves less happy.
Guess who they're going to blame for their lack of happiness.
Most divorced men can tell you, haha.
Speaker 4 (20:01):
Right this person, Wow, well, well enjoy that laughing. Last,
I'm just reminded of the unif for the Joe Getty
Unified Theory of civilizations.
Speaker 2 (20:12):
That and there's so many examples of it.
Speaker 4 (20:15):
It's almost tedious that we veer from one guardrail to
the other, never have any idea when we hit the
sweet spot and keep going until we've gone way too
far and created a disaster. Then we veer back toward
the other guardrail. Another example of this, you know, crime
policy back and forth, there are too many people in prison,
(20:35):
were too hard on crime, Well, there's too much crime
in the streets. We didn't need to be harder on crime.
And it just goes back and forth. Sexuality, I think
is similar. They're a handful of other fairly obvious examples.
Speaker 3 (20:47):
But on the left side of politics, I don't feel
like the left appreciates appreciate culture at all and the
role that plays in society.
Speaker 2 (20:57):
That doesn't seem to be a concern. No.
Speaker 4 (21:01):
I think in general, on the left, including you know,
moderate lefty people that we could work with, that'd be fine.
We can talk about policy and come to a happy conclusion.
There is in general much less regard for the importance
of culture.
Speaker 2 (21:15):
I would agree completely, and.
Speaker 4 (21:17):
On your outer left, and I'm not talking about five percent,
I'm talking about like twenty five percent of the left.
They hate the culture and want to destroy it. Back
to my theme, a lot of the neo Marxist stuff,
they pitch it to you as a way to improve society.
They are fully cognizant of the fact that it will
(21:38):
not do anything but destroy society.
Speaker 2 (21:41):
That is their goal.
Speaker 4 (21:42):
They've written books, their names are on the spine. This
is not my fantasy. They will tell you proudly that
this is their goal.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
Does that bother.
Speaker 3 (21:54):
Anybody on the left that the champion of the sexual
revolution was out to destroy the American family because I
thought that would be better. I mean, I know some
of you agree with that, but not most of you,
right anyway.
Speaker 4 (22:13):
Yeah, I just I will always be amazed till my
dying day how few people take the radical left at
their word. They have told you precisely what they're doing,
and and people like me are considered I don't know,
paranoid or whatever. It's not paranoid at all.
Speaker 3 (22:33):
Religious wacko. We need some really good transition music.
Speaker 2 (22:39):
Michael. Do you need maybe even two s at different stores?
Perhaps I do it, stereome go ahead.
Speaker 6 (23:00):
Some help, finding some help, help, boundary for help, take
a look offering some help, and Vivian, you were so
(23:25):
close to that million dollars.
Speaker 3 (23:28):
Oh my god, it's just a regular mom who had
a chance at a million dollars if she could have solved.
I'm looking at the board. There you got the erring part.
Some and help are basically completely solved. Help is solved.
Some is missing wood letter, So it's just what is
something arring some help? When you hear the beginning of it.
(23:48):
I want to hear her guesses.
Speaker 6 (23:50):
Wondering some help, answering some help.
Speaker 2 (23:53):
I'm finding some help.
Speaker 6 (23:55):
You run for some help, boundary for help.
Speaker 2 (24:01):
That's boundary for I don't know. I'm sorry.
Speaker 4 (24:06):
The nice lady didn't win the money, but you know
why she didn't because she's no good at the game.
Speaker 3 (24:11):
Well she said she was nervous, and I've had that before,
where I just I can't I can't like come up
with things that if I weren't nervous I could come
up with easily, because then you know, you know, whatever
kind of situation, but.
Speaker 2 (24:23):
Which is part of the game she's bad at yes, yes, boundary.
Speaker 4 (24:32):
Offering for help again, her her anguish brings me no
joy whatsoever?
Speaker 2 (24:38):
Yeah, No, too bad, she missed out on a million dollars.
Speaker 4 (24:40):
Well, well, it's the way the cookie crumbled, it is
exactly Or is this a sign of the cruel new
Ryan Seacrest era on wheel of fortune and which when
you rule that wheel with an iron at which no
holds her barred?
Speaker 2 (24:56):
Perhaps? What was the brilliant book?
Speaker 4 (24:58):
Oh, we interviewed the author so Hoover Foundation guy, Hoover
Institution guy. But it was about the fact that welfare
programs of all sorts expand inevitably. If you have like
pathetic on the scale of one to one hundred, and
you start a program that's for levels one, two, and three,
what's the next thing that happens level four? Are advocates
for level four say, well, whoa whoa level force? Just
(25:21):
one more level of pathetic? Why aren't they getting any help?
Speaker 3 (25:25):
The book is the High Cost of Good Intentions, and
it has so many great examples, going clear back to
revolutionary war veterans and how it started with people who
fought in the Revolutionary War, then spread to their spouses,
then spread to their kids, and it ended up being
people who were alive during the Revolutionary War. And it
just kept spreading and spreading. And we've done that throughout history.
Speaker 4 (25:46):
A guy who wants picnicked on bunker hill, you know
whatever it was, Yeah, yeah, it inevitably explains.
Speaker 2 (25:52):
So the mirror image of that, and it's this is
so insidious. But once you catch on to.
Speaker 7 (25:56):
It, nobody gives a crap about billion or will shed
a single tier. They are an utterly unsympathetic group when
it comes to especially being taxed. But you've got this
concept of taxing unrealized gains, which has been seen as abhorrent.
But if you can get that concept into play against
(26:18):
the utterly unsympathetic billionaires, soon it's one hundred millionaires and
you're thinking, I still don't give a crap. Wait, and
you won't have to wait long, mister, honey, honey, we
just hit five.
Speaker 2 (26:31):
Hundred thousand dollars in the four oh one k. They
are coming for.
Speaker 4 (26:35):
You, man, they are absolutely coming for you. The income
tax originally was extremely narrow. I can't tell you the
number of government social Security. Again, the mirror image was
originally for like two percent of the population. Can you
realize how this would work?
Speaker 3 (26:50):
So you got stock in Tesla or whatever, Tesla goes
up a lot this year, Okay, well you made you
made money, you owe tax on that. So my Tesla
stock went up fifty and now I owe you whatever.
You'd have to pay twenty grand, even though I haven't
cashed it out yet. And of course the Tesla stock
could go back down after that, and then what do
(27:11):
you do.
Speaker 4 (27:12):
So setting aside the whole introducing something abhorrent mission creep
principle as we were talking about last hour, it would
also be absolutely devastating to the stock market and everybody's
four oh one case, because there would be huge dumping
of stock among the investor class. It would be too
expensive to keep it, and it would happen a year
after year after year to avoid taxes and kenonymous drop
(27:35):
me a text Also, the unrealized gain tax is simply
paying the tax on that stuff early.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
It doesn't make any more money.
Speaker 4 (27:44):
In fact, it makes less because the asset will not
grow as quickly because of the tax being extracted from it.
The capital gains tax will be paid upon death or
transfer like it is now, but it won't be able
to grow as much. What seems like a tax gain
is just paying it early. Typical shell game taxes are now,
(28:06):
some people might argue, but billionaires who have say a
billion dollars worth of stock, they can borrow against that
as income and spend that money and live lavishly and
the rest of it well go with a value added tax.
Then if you buy anything, there's a value added tax,
but you have to eliminate income taxes and one hundred
other dopey you know, duplicit as taxes.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
But anyway, that's enough of that.
Speaker 3 (28:29):
I vote on who's got the most joy. I don't
pay attention to this stuff.
Speaker 2 (28:33):
Amazon announced five days a week. Beiches. Sorry, that's the
greatst way to put it.
Speaker 4 (28:39):
They're telling their corporate staff to be in the office
every weekday.
Speaker 2 (28:43):
There is stroom draw and angst.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
I've got such a dichotomy of opinions on Amazon. I
hate that it's closed down many of my favorite local
stores in my small town because they couldn't keep up
with Amazon. On the other hand, I wanted a little
hair trimmer for my man escaping Katie.
Speaker 2 (29:01):
You know, Abe oil for your puff daddy. You know how, Katie,
I'm always manscaping. I need to.
Speaker 4 (29:08):
I just yeah, it's no kidding, turn off here, It's
just close your eyes and cover your ears.
Speaker 3 (29:12):
This is harassment because I was gonna mention it. I
just knew you really don't want to hear that. You
really really don't even want to think about that. But
I bought a manscaping tool on Amazon and I had
it in three hours at my house. No, they probably
didn't even have what I was looking for, film, a
porn or what.
Speaker 2 (29:29):
Why do you need a party? I didn't need a
three hours. I didn't.
Speaker 3 (29:34):
I'm going to a freakout or whatever you call those likes,
freak session, freaking freak.
Speaker 8 (29:38):
Off, freak off with this story, Jack, But how does
any store stay open when I can order something and
have it at my house in two hours, I know,
or tonight or tomorrow.
Speaker 3 (29:51):
I mean, it's amazing, absolutely amazing. And now I'm being
well groomed and smooth as a dolphin.
Speaker 2 (29:55):
Oh my god, oh God, kill me. Now, this is
the worst sixty seconds right the Armstrong and Getty Show.
Speaker 1 (30:02):
Yeah more Jack, more Joe podcasts and our hot links
and the Armstrong and Getty show, you.
Speaker 2 (30:15):
Could spend the rest of my life here. I didn't
see that.
Speaker 3 (30:21):
Con oh, I think I think it's a little luly
for you to say I'll spend the rest of my
life here.
Speaker 2 (30:28):
You're gonna freak him out. He's gonna run away. How
long is are How long do you known each other?
All right, that's enough.
Speaker 3 (30:34):
Tom Hanks, so young Tom Hanks trying to change his
voice while it's an old the Tom Hanks trying to
sound like a young Tom Hanks because they're doing that
deaging technology that most of us hated in the movie
The Irishman. If we saw it, I just didn't think
it was that great anyway. Tom Hanks and Robin Wright
pairing again. You remember them for Forrest Gump in a
(30:57):
new movie called Here that's getting so much attention because
it is set forty years ago, and it looks like
Tom Hanks when he was in the TV show Bosom Buddies,
at least in the pictures I've seen, and a young
Robin Wright then. And it's a one like the camera
never moves I've read. I don't understand how that could
possibly it be like a play. I don't know yeah,
(31:18):
sounds like anyway, it's getting a lot of attention for
those two gimmicks.
Speaker 2 (31:22):
Whether or not it's good or not, I have no idea.
Speaker 4 (31:25):
Yeah, okay, it its not like a Forrest Gump spin off, right,
the same team, same writer, same director.
Speaker 2 (31:32):
Yeah okay, and then Tom Hanks and Robin Wright.
Speaker 3 (31:35):
But most of the time when movies have gimmicks, we
deagified or this or that, oftentimes that that the gimmick
is the main thing they got going for.
Speaker 2 (31:46):
Yeah, yeah, so we'll see.
Speaker 4 (31:49):
So Supreme Court decision came out yesterday somewhat about abortion.
Speaker 2 (31:57):
It's really it's it's again fairly murky.
Speaker 4 (32:00):
It has to do with Idaho as banned almost all
abortions except to save a woman's life or rape and
incept that sort of thing. And the suit said that
conflicts with a federal law that says you have to
render emergency care to a person to save their life
(32:20):
that supersedes everything, or to stabilize their condition. And it's
just an argument around the particulars of our right stabilize
a woman versus saving her life and what does that mean.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
And it's really a three.
Speaker 4 (32:34):
To three to three decision that said, you know, we're
not going to stay this. You go ahead and treat
these women and if they need an emergency abortion, it's
not against the rules.
Speaker 2 (32:44):
But the lower courts are going to keep looking at this.
Speaker 4 (32:46):
Plus Idaho has changed its stance a little bit, plus
this and that, and it's just it's not definitive at all,
Like so many of these decisions so far.
Speaker 3 (32:56):
Anti abortion activists delta blow by the Supreme Court yesterday.
Speaker 4 (33:06):
I suppose that's true, but it's not much of a blow.
It's not very informative that headline glance. Oh no, no reporting.
Mainstream media reporting on Supreme Court decisions is practically useless
and it might be counterproductive. And we got an email
from somebody who is kind of edging close to the
point I want to make, so I'll make it. There
have been a handful of cases, including important ones like
(33:28):
the censorship case where the Soups come out with their
decision after months of consideration, of wrangling and behind the
scenes and blah blah blah, it's the end of the session.
Speaker 2 (33:37):
Here we are a Jew and blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 9 (33:39):
The ones where you say, you know, we don't think
the people have standing can't you just come Why don't
you figure that out first? Right when you first get
it together, you look at all the cases and say,
all right, let's figure out if everybody's got standing before
we waste any more of our times.
Speaker 2 (33:54):
Come up with a bad fun up front.
Speaker 3 (33:56):
So everybody's waiting for the final definitive government versus social
media company's ruling.
Speaker 2 (34:03):
Now they don't have a stand, Well, why did you
just say that? They're back in October? Yink you want,
you can't make us.
Speaker 3 (34:11):
Here's my least favorite New York Post headline of the
day that's designed to get you to click on it.
I applied for hooters jobs to honor my dad, but
I was rejected despite having I gotta say this slow
so you get it all. There's just two lines, but
there's a lot here. There are only two lines, but
there's a lot in them. There's much to take in
(34:32):
paying attention. I applied for a hooter's job to honor
my dad. We could unpack that right there. What the
hell does that mean? I applied for a hooter's job
to honor my dad. Okay, that's the thing. Is dying
wish was that his daughter would wear the tiny little
orange shorts.
Speaker 2 (34:49):
And the white sox. Yes, Katie, Oh, I was just
is that or a stripper?
Speaker 5 (34:53):
You know?
Speaker 3 (34:55):
Anyway, honor my father. I applied for a hooter's job
to honor my dad. I was re rejected despite having
three boob jobs. Cowny air enough And of course there's
a picture too small to see what's going on that
you would click on the story boob jobs?
Speaker 5 (35:12):
You say, I thought you were going to say, despite
having three boobs, and that was going to be a
whole story in itself.
Speaker 4 (35:18):
Well, you'd think she'd be at least fifty percent more
likely to be higher than the average applicant.
Speaker 2 (35:23):
You got to join the circus.
Speaker 4 (35:27):
I haven't been to a circus that features that sort
of act in many moons.
Speaker 2 (35:33):
You gotta go south through the border for that sort
of thing. Oh boy, I think I'll stay there. I
applied for a hooter's job to honor my dad.
Speaker 7 (35:41):
What.
Speaker 2 (35:42):
I was rejected despite having three boob jobs? What again?
But I did not click on the story, so I
have no more.
Speaker 3 (35:49):
You know.
Speaker 4 (35:49):
I put in an app at Buffalo Wild Wings. But
then I thought, what would my dear depart a dad want?
Speaker 2 (35:57):
He'd want me at.
Speaker 3 (35:57):
Hooters, Right, one more boob job, but I'm going to
fill out the application.
Speaker 1 (36:03):
Armstrong and Getty
Hosts And Creators
Joe Getty
Jack Armstrong
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.