Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Listen now to President Trump last yesterday forgive me in
North Carolina saying we cannot take four more years of
Kamala Harris. Listen now to Trump saying, on November fifth,
our message to her and the entire Biden Harris regime,
(00:20):
You're fired.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
Rold cut four, Mike, We're not going.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
To let this incompetent, socialist lunatic keep breaking our economy
for four more years.
Speaker 2 (00:31):
It'll destroy our country.
Speaker 3 (00:35):
On election day, we're going to tell her that we've
had enough, that we can't take anymore. Kamala, you're doing
a horrible job. You're a terrible attorney general, you are
a terrible district attorney.
Speaker 2 (00:49):
You're the worst vice president in history. Kamala, you're fired.
Get out of here. Go get that baby.
Speaker 1 (00:57):
Yeah, yeah, Now that's what I'm talking about again.
Speaker 2 (01:01):
It was a master speech. There's an other way to
put it.
Speaker 1 (01:05):
And then, just very quickly, here is how Trump is
now framing the election. Now he stays on this, he
can't lose. If you like what's happening in California, then
you vote for Kamala and Tim Waltz. If you like
what I did for four years, then you vote for me.
So really, do you want Cammie California and you know,
(01:29):
with all the mess that California has become, or do
you want the American dream?
Speaker 2 (01:34):
It's really that simple. Roll cut five, Mike.
Speaker 3 (01:40):
Everything Kamala Harris touches turns bad.
Speaker 2 (01:44):
It all turns bad.
Speaker 3 (01:45):
San Francisco was a great city, now it's unlivable. California
was a great state, now it's unlivable. She breaks everything,
just like she broke the border, broke our economy. But
soon we are going to fix every single problem Kamalah
and Joe Biden have created, and we are going.
Speaker 2 (02:03):
To save our country. We are going to save America.
We're going to save America.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
Look, I'm telling you, I've seen a lot of Trump rallies.
I've seen him deliver a lot of speeches, but I've
never seen him as disciplined, as focused, as on message
as he was yesterday. And he's all he's got to
do now is keep repeating that speech in battleground after
(02:30):
battleground after battleground state. And I am telling you he
is going to soar in the polls. And if they
can just make sure that they don't steal the election,
have enough poll watchers have enough lawyers. Everybody's got to
do their part. Then Trump will be victorious on election night.
(02:52):
Now let me just quickly throw this log on the fire.
The Trump team is now very worried about reports come
out of New York City that Judge won. Mrshawn you
know him, that corrupt hack Democrat hack judge is going
to be sentencing Trump over the Alvin braggcase, the so
(03:14):
called hush money case. Andrew Andy McCarthy, who's an opinion
guy at a contributor and a columnist at National Review.
He's also on Fox News. One of their legal analysts,
Andy McCarthy, yesterday came out and said he is convinced
that Mrshawn will put Trump behind bars. Apparently, now Trump's
(03:38):
people are getting winned that Mershawn is also promising to
put Trump either under house arrest or put him behind bars,
put him in jail two months.
Speaker 2 (03:50):
Before the election.
Speaker 1 (03:52):
They feel that this is their last play, that Kamala
cannot win on her own, and the only way to
stop Trump is to jail Trump. So let me throw
this log on the fire. If one Merchan jails Trump
or imprisons Trump, will that hurt him or help him?
(04:14):
I'll be perfectly on like again, brutally honest with you,
like I'm in the confessional. I think if they try
to imprison Trump two months before the election, it is
going to be such blatant election interference, such naked authoritarianism,
such obvious political persecution, that not only is the backlash
(04:38):
going to be immense, it is going to alienate so
many independent voters that it's gonna propel Trump even higher
ten fifteen points in the polls. I think it's gonna
boomerang against them. They think putting him behind bars is
going to be a pr disaster for true and effectively
(05:02):
take him off the campaign trail, and then they will
paint him not just as a convicted felon, but as
an imprisoned felon. And they believe that this will tank
Trump's numbers and put Kamala over the top. So my
question to you, if they jail Trump or put him
under house arrest, will it hurt Trump or ultimately will
(05:27):
it benefit Trump? David in Ashland, thanks for holding David, and.
Speaker 2 (05:32):
Welcome Jeff Hi.
Speaker 4 (05:36):
Regarding regarding Mishean, I think that what's going to happen
is if they I think that they would probably do
house arrest. I think only because that they wouldn't want
to be like the bad boys and stuff and and
but I think that even under house arrest, let's face it,
(05:57):
Biden and you know, they and he was in the cellar,
you know. I think that wherever Trump is at, I
think that Trump is a force to be reckoned with.
I think he's uh, you know, the only the only
issue is I mean I I've traveled to uh, Russia
(06:17):
and to Belarus, and I can tell you the media
in this country has turned into the media in the
communist countries, and they'll put a spin on it to
make Trump really look terrible. That's that's their that's their role.
Speaker 2 (06:34):
David.
Speaker 1 (06:34):
I'm just curious. You've been to Russia, you've been to Belarus.
How would you compare the media there to the media here.
Is it the same? Is it better?
Speaker 2 (06:49):
Six?
Speaker 1 (06:50):
One seven two, six, six, sixty eight sixty eight is
the number? Okay, let's go right back to David in Ashland.
Speaker 5 (06:57):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (06:58):
David is He's visited Russia, he's visited Belarus, formerly communist countries,
but still both of them run by very repressive regimes.
The media is completely in the tank for both Putin
and Lukashenko, who's the strong man that runs Belarus. And
so David was making the point that our media has
(07:19):
become very similar to the media in both Russia and Belarus. David,
if you don't mind me asking, how would you compare
our media to what you saw or what you've seen
in Russia or Belarus.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
Is it the same, is it a little bit better?
Is it worse? What say you?
Speaker 4 (07:40):
Well, I would have to say the media in Belarus
and Russia was it was like a main media source
that was coming out. I would have to say the
United States as reinforced propaganda. Basically, they're weaponized and it's
multiple medias and they all have the same agenda. And
(08:01):
I don't know whether that was under that law that
was enacted by Obama back in twenty and thirteen. But
I can tell you also too that even in voting,
I was there during the election in Bella, russ and
I'll tell you it's like I knew someone that was
at the polls. The people didn't want Lushenko. And what
(08:26):
happened was at the end of the day, a group
of people came in, took the boxes and Lushenko in
that particular area, you know he was a top top dog,
So I mean it's cheating in the voting, just like
I think we have here. And I think the media,
the media in this country needs to be you know,
(08:48):
abolished whatever, and they need to be fact checked for
everything that they do, and if they don't do it,
then they should be pay a major consequence. I think
that we need to not only you know, when if
Trump becomes president, I think that the media needs to
be uh taken apart and they need to start printing
(09:11):
the truth and tell them the truth.
Speaker 1 (09:13):
I so agree. Oh, you have no idea how much
I agree. In fact, David to me, if it wasn't
for the media carrying Kamala Harris, this election would be
over right now.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
I mean it'd be over.
Speaker 1 (09:26):
I mean all you know, all we got to do
is just wait till November fifth, and you know, let's
sen and Trump is is you know, is in and
we can start turning the country around. And in fact,
in that Axios piece where Kamala's advisors are talking about
their strategy, they openly admit that their whole strategy rests
on a completely subservient and compliant media. They go, no, no,
(09:49):
the media will make this a style over substance election.
The media will paint her as a fresh face. The
media will cover up for her. The media will allow
her to hide and stay in the basement. So you know,
they're openly saying, oh, no, no, no, the media. That's
that's our biggest ally. Our whole strategy rests upon the
(10:12):
fact that we know the media is going to cover
up for us and protect us every step of the way.
I mean, it's it's beyond it's disgusting. It's they are
the enemy of the American people, as Trump said, and
that's why they need to be thoroughly exposed and discredited. David,
thank you very much for that call. In fact, I
(10:33):
don't want to get too sidetracked, but I want to
show you how bad and how blatant it's getting. So
as an example, okay, even by CNN standards.
Speaker 2 (10:45):
Okay, this is CNN, it's a new low.
Speaker 1 (10:49):
So, as you know, Musk and Trump had a wide
ranging record shattering the discussion interview on x A come
bind one million viewership, one million views, and the overwhelming
majority people between the ages of eighteen to thirty five.
(11:11):
So not only did he have a massive audience, but
it was a young audience, and of course that petrified
the media. So the elite establishment propaganda media went after
Musk and Trump. Dana Bash CNN was caught red handed
(11:33):
openly lying and misrepresenting what Trump and Musk were discussing,
in particular when it came to nuclear energy and nuclear power.
So in the beginning of the conversation they start talking
about the bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. By the time
(11:55):
Dana Bash is done, she gives the impress into all
of the listeners or the viewers that elon Musk and
Trump are all for bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yeah, blow
these cities up, blow other cities up, drop these noakes.
Speaker 2 (12:16):
The more noakes we drop a little better.
Speaker 1 (12:21):
I understand that that it was okay to blow them
up the first time. And who cares how many people died,
because hey, they love cities being incinerated by nuclear bombs.
Listen now to Dana Bash roll cut fourteen.
Speaker 6 (12:39):
Mike, I want to play one exchange that was kind
of classic. Well, there were a lot of changes that
were exchanges that were classic Donald Trump, but this one
really stuck out to us.
Speaker 5 (12:51):
And night Sucky were bombed but now they're like full
cities again.
Speaker 7 (12:55):
So it sladly not. That's something that.
Speaker 5 (12:57):
You know, it's not as scary as people think. Basically,
it's not as scary.
Speaker 6 (13:03):
That was more Elon Musk than Donald Trump talking about
sort of suggesting that what happened almost eighty years ago,
I think eighty years ago next year, the bombing of
Hiroshiama on Nagasaki. Now it's okay, okay, I'm kind of
trying to blow off the impact of that.
Speaker 1 (13:21):
Yeah, hundreds of thousands of people dead, no problem, it's okay.
Speaker 7 (13:25):
Hey.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
In other words, these are two war mongering lunatics. Okay,
that's what they're trying to convey that these are sociopathic,
heartless lunatics who think dropping nuclear bombs is no big thing.
That's so you're watching CNN. That's why, by the way,
if you just watch CNN, that's why you hate the
(13:47):
guy so much. That's why you want to kill him.
Because if that's what you're all, if that's all you're
being fed by CNN, you're thinking, oh my god, he's
going to get us all killed. This guy loves nuclear war.
Here's what was really said. Here was what was really said. Okay,
this is so I'm gonna just I don't want to
(14:08):
read the whole transcript. I'm going to read to you
just a few lines. This is Elon Musk. So they're
talking about nuclear energy and nuclear power here it is.
Listen now to Elon quote. Yeah, actually there's the bad
side of nuclear which is a nuclear war, very very
(14:28):
bad side. But then he goes on to say, but
there's also I think nuclear electricity generation that is underrated.
And then he goes on to say to Trump, you know,
you're right. People have this fear of nuclear electricity generation.
But it's actually one of the safest forms of electricity generation.
It's just a huge misunderstanding. Now he goes on to say,
(14:51):
I don't want to be It was quite a lengthy exchange,
but he goes on to say that, hey, nuclear power
is cheap. In fact, it's quite safe in terms of
nuclear power plants, that more people die or are injured,
say in mining, coal mining or whatever, than are actually
in nuclear power plants. And then Trump is chiming in saying, no,
(15:16):
I hear you, but it's the branding of it. When
people hear nuclear, they think about Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They
think about Chernobyl. These things are horrible, These things are bad.
And then they said this roll cut fourteen a mike.
Speaker 5 (15:38):
After Pokushima happened in Japan, Like people were asking me
in California, you know, are we worried about like a
nuclear cloud coming from Japan. I'm like, no, that's crazy.
It's actually it's not even dangerous in Pokushima. I actually
flew there and ate locally grown vegetables on TV to
prove it. And I donated a solar water treatment is
(15:59):
it's solo power system for a water treatment plant.
Speaker 3 (16:02):
And yeah, but you happen to fail so well lately
and I'm worried about it.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
No, no, but I'm only getting mine.
Speaker 5 (16:08):
You know. It's it's like, you know, Hiroshima and Knightshuck
were bomb but now that they're like full cities again.
So it's not something that you know, it's not as
scary as people think.
Speaker 2 (16:21):
Basically, you see how they took it all out of context.
Speaker 1 (16:26):
He's talking, yeah, and then you had that you know,
Nu Kashima, I remember that meltdown at the nuclear reactor
and he said, no, look, it wasn't that bad. I
even went to eat the local food. They were able
to clean it up, they were able to recover. So
you've got Elon Musk and Trump and that historic interview
that took place on X Space a couple of nights ago, huge, massive,
(16:50):
massive audience, actually shattered all records, and the media doesn't
know what to do, so they literally can talk and
manufacture a fake story CNN with caught red handed. So
you hear these guys literally saying, oh, nuclear war is
a horrible thing. Both of them. Oh, it's horrible what
happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki horrible. In fact, Trump is saying,
(17:12):
that's one of the reasons why we have to stop
the war between Russia and Ukraine, because we don't want
Russia to go nuclear. We got to prevent the nuclear
war at all costs. And then Elon is saying, no,
I know, it's horrible, and he goes. And the sad
thing is people think that nuclear electricity generation i e.
Nuclear power plants, which by the way, emit no carbon whatsoever,
(17:37):
are environmentally very safe. You know, for the most part.
They have some leaks here and there, but for the
most part, very environmentally sound, extremely cheap, abundant, almost limitless energy.
And he says, if you're serious about climate change, and
if you're serious about the environment, then you would look
at nuclear energy, nuclear power, nuclear electricity generation. And then
(18:02):
he talks about Fukushima, which had a nuclear meltdown and
it live, some toxic waste spilled out, but they cleaned
it up very quickly. And Elon says, you know, by
the way, people don't know this, but there are less
injuries and deaths from people at working at nuclear power
pants plants or toxic spills or whatever than say, in
coal mining or other industries. And he said, you know,
(18:25):
even Fukushima. Hey, look they cleaned it up so quick.
I went down there. I hate the locally grown food,
the vegetables. And Trump is teasing them, Yeah, you don't
look so well, and you know, they're having a little bit.
They're bantering, but the point is, and Trump is saying, no,
I know, I hear what you're saying, Elon, but when
people hear nuclear they start freaking out because of Hiroshima, Nagasaki.
(18:50):
And Elon is saying, I had people running up to me,
are we going to have nuclear clouds over California now
that we had Fukushima was trying to explain the fear
mongering and the hysteriaan the panic porn surrounding nuclear energy. Now,
by the time CNN is done, they were, oh yeah,
(19:12):
they were ecstatic about the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Aha,
that's just classic trumph.
Speaker 2 (19:19):
Wipe them all out.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
Yeah, drop those nukes and let them die. The exact
opposite of everything they were saying and discussing.
Speaker 2 (19:33):
Now.
Speaker 1 (19:34):
The difference this time was we had the tape, we
had the actual interview. So when CNN pushed their bs
and it's pure propaganda lies, people countered and said, no,
we heard the interview.
Speaker 2 (19:50):
No, in fact, it was the very opposite. What are
you talking about? Now?
Speaker 1 (19:56):
Has CNN apologized yet? Has Dana Bash been reprimanded? Nyet?
Speaker 2 (20:05):
Does anybody who watched CNN even know that they were
lied to? Yet?
Speaker 1 (20:12):
That's how they roll, you know, And as someone wants
one of these commentators, I forget who but made a
very good point. Forget liberal bias, you know, forget media bias.
Forget even fake news that's so eight years ago. What
we're watching now this is regime propaganda. That's what the
(20:35):
so called quote unquote media has become. They're nothing more now.
Than a propaganda arm of the Biden Harris regime. Everything
they say is a pack of lies. Jude in New Hampshire,
Thanks for holding Jude, and welcome.
Speaker 7 (20:54):
Jeff.
Speaker 2 (20:54):
How are you good? How are you Jude?
Speaker 7 (20:57):
Would hanging in there kind of target rich environment, shall
we say? With what's going on right now, I've been
on whole the while, and I know your conversation has
bought somewhat, but when you're talking about the inflation in everything,
there's really something that needs to be addressed, and that's
(21:17):
the Federal Reserve Bank. And a lot of people think
that it's an operating unit of the federal government. It's not.
It's actually it's a privately held bank like a lot
of the central banks in the government in nineteen thirteen
essentially turned over the generation of currency to those individuals
(21:39):
at almost banks, and that works against the people with
the inflation models that are coming out. I mean, I
know they're saying, oh, it's you know, under three, but
for a lot of people, they don't count gasoline prices
and food prices in that, so the real inflation is
(21:59):
much And when they say, oh, it's coming down, well,
that's like saying, yeah, you plunge the knife in my
back six six inches and you pull it out an
inch and a half. And now you're saying you're doing
me a favor. Okay, fine, but that has to be
addressed in our tax collections right now are running about
(22:19):
four trillion dollars a year, but we're spending six The
math doesn't work, and it's going to have to be addressed.
It's a mathematical certainty. We're going to run into trouble
with that. Another thing Harris said on I saw a
clip on Twitter. She's going to raise business taxes. Okay,
(22:43):
we're going to make them pay. The problem is businesses
don't pay taxes. They collect taxes. It's a cost of
doing business. So when you tax business, you tax the
little people. You tax the people that go to work
every day. Because those taxes and those costs are added
(23:05):
into the cost of the final product, we have to
be of that burden. So she's that's just saying she
might as well come out and say I'm going to
raise your taxes. She said she's going to go after
state taxes, things like that. That camp is with the
ability of people to transfer wealth to their children. And
(23:27):
one other thing to consider if she does prevail, hopefully not,
but if she wins, expect China within two to four
weeks to make a move in Taiwan after the election,
not after the inauguration. And if you think you have
financial problems, now let that happen, because they the CIA
(23:50):
doesn't want those chip fab plants falling into the hands
of the Chinese government. That is that will be catastrophic.
So I'd just like to yo, you take on some
of those Jude.
Speaker 1 (24:03):
Let me ask you this. Okay, I can, I can
name any product. Let me just because I'm gonna basically
now I'm you know, I'm a Type two diabetic, Jude,
so they got me on a diet, so I really
got to lay off the cheeseburgers.
Speaker 2 (24:15):
You know, I love cheeseburgers.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
I mean it, I love I love Whoppers with cheese,
I love the Wendy's Classic with cheese. I love the
Big Mac extra sauce.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
But let that go.
Speaker 1 (24:26):
So let's say you make cheeseburgers. Okay, you're a little
you know, you're a nice little restaurant. You're a you know,
and you you sell cheeseburgers, fries and shakes. Kamala Harris
now imposes massive crushing taxes on you. You can't afford
to pay these taxes. You it's your profit margin. You're
(24:47):
literally you're working for free. So what are you going
to do?
Speaker 2 (24:50):
Jude?
Speaker 1 (24:51):
You've now got, you know, these taxes. Now she's raising taxes.
What are you possibly going to do? Either you go
under or you work for free. Well, you're not gonna
work for free, and you don't want to go under.
So what would you do, Jude? If you were selling cheeseburgers,
you have the only.
Speaker 7 (25:11):
Way to survive is you have to raise prices.
Speaker 2 (25:13):
Bingo, see bingo, see what I mean?
Speaker 1 (25:15):
You have more common sense, I'm serious, okay than this
woman who's the vice president of the United States and
was a senator from California and now is the presidential nominee.
Speaker 2 (25:25):
It's just common sense.
Speaker 1 (25:27):
So you got to raise the price of cheese, of
your burger, of the meat, of your fries, of your shakes,
of everything. So in the end, who's really gonna pay
your taxes?
Speaker 2 (25:36):
It's not you.
Speaker 1 (25:37):
It's me, maybe more before than now because they got
me on a diet.
Speaker 2 (25:41):
But you know what I'm saying.
Speaker 1 (25:43):
So it's you know, customers, consumers like me and people
in the audience. And that's that's what we're gonna get
under a Kamala Harris regime. Prices are gonna go way
up because taxes are gonna go way up. And busy
businesses always pass on or offload their taxes to their customers,
(26:04):
not because they're nasty, ugly people, because if they don't,
they go under. That's their profit margin. It's gone. So see,
that's what the that's what a businessman like Trump understands.
A communist like Kamala or Tim Waltz not so much, Jude,
(26:25):
Thank you very much for that call now. And furthermore,
the Federal Reserve is one of the most destructive institutions
we've ever created. Ron Paul, not Rand Paul, but Ron
Paul is father absolutely brilliant on this. You know, notice
why can we borrow so much money because the Fed
(26:47):
just keeps printing more of it. What do you think
has caused all this inflation? It's the massive deficits, the
massive debt, and then they just print and print and
print and print. And that's why we've lost the purchasing
power of our dollar. And that's what's slowly impoverishing and
destroying our country. And look, you're right, it's simple mathematics.
(27:10):
You're taking in four trillion in taxes, by the way,
it's the most we've ever taken in, so we don't
have a revenue problem. There's more money coming into the
coffers of the federal government now than in any other
time in the history of the United States. But we're
spending six trillion dollars. That's two trillion dollar deficits every
(27:31):
single year. So let's leave out four trillion and six trillion,
because that's that's such a massive amount of money. People
can't wrap their mind around it. Here, let me ask you, okay,
you and your wife, you guys work like dogs. You
make four hundred thousand dollars a year. You scrape, you know,
you scrape every dollar you can and you run. You
(27:53):
take in four hundred thousand a year, but you're spending
six hundred thousand dollars a year. And your overall debt,
because our national debt is thirty six thirty seven trillion,
so your overall debt on your house or your whatever
your properties is three point six three point seven million dollars.
So you got a crushing debt. You've taken in four hundred,
(28:17):
But you're spending six hundred every year. Every year two
hundred thousand in the red, and then the next year
two hundred thousand in the red, and then the next
year two hundred thousand dollars in the red. Now, in
the short term, how do you get by? Well, I
put it on my credit card, I make the minimum payments.
(28:39):
Then there's interest on the credit cards. Then I go
to the bank. I like borrow money from the bank,
but then there's interest on that. Now, okay, maybe you
can swing it for a year or two, But year
after year after year after year, what do you think
is going to happen to you and your family? It
doesn't take a rocket scientist. You don't have to have
(29:00):
have an economics degree from Havid to figure this thing out.
The whole thing's gonna go capput. You're gonna go broke,
You're gonna go bankrupt. Honey, this is not sustainable. If
we take in four hundred, we can spend four hundred.
Speaker 2 (29:18):
That's it.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
Frankly, I'd like to take in four hundred and spend
three hundred. Why so I have an extra hundred thousand
to start paying off the debt on the house, sweetheart,
because we're never gonna swim our way out of this debt.
But okay, I forget that. You take in four hundred thousand,
spend four hundred thousand. Now that's how I run my home.
(29:45):
I'm sure that's how you run your home. Whatever you
take in fifty thousand, one hundred thousand, whatever the figure is,
I don't care. Eighty thousand, one hundred and fifty thousand,
whatever your combined income is. That's what we take in.
That's what we spend. Oh, well, we can't afford a vacation.
That's too bad this year. We don't go on vacation.
(30:05):
Oh we can't go out to eat, too bad, we
can't go out to eat. Oh I used to buy steaks.
I can't afford steaks. Too bad, we don't eat steak.
Not the federal government, not these crooked, corrupt politicians in Washington,
not Joe Biden, not Kamala. They spend and they spend,
(30:28):
and then they spend some more, And you wan us
to have you run our country. You wouldn't run your
house like this, Why would you allow to run a
country like this? So, and then you have these idiot liberals, Oh,
so dom and gloom. This is all my god, the
(30:50):
sky is falling. Well, it's a mathematical certainty. We're gonna
go bankrupt. Every economist says it. It's not a question
of if, it's a question of when. That's why Trump
is saying, if we don't unleash massive economic growth, in
(31:11):
other words, bring in a lot more money, we can't
just make four hundred thousand. We got to start making
a million and start tightening our belt fiscal responsibility. If
we don't do both things, we're gonna go broke as
a country, we're gonna go under.
Speaker 2 (31:31):
And he says, as a patriot.
Speaker 1 (31:33):
As an American who loves this country, I don't want
that to happen. And according to the idiots in the media,
he's the crazy one, he's the extremist. So the guy
that's saying, we got to get our fiscal house in
order and we got to really grow and boom. The
economy's got a boom, and we've got to unleash energy production,
(31:58):
deregulate the economy, slash taxes, encourage private investment, encourage investment
into our country manufacturing, bring those jobs back the supply chains.
Trump was brilliant on that yesterday. Bring all the supply
chains back, bring the jobs back here? Why because then
(32:19):
more jobs, more taxes. Hello, people spend more money. Hello,
the economy grows.
Speaker 4 (32:28):
Hello.
Speaker 1 (32:31):
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight.
Tom in Ohio, Thanks for holding Tom, and welcome.
Speaker 8 (32:41):
Good morning, Jeff, Hi Tom. You know Trump needs to
continue to hammer on the contrast between what life was
like during his administration and then also, you know, judgeta
post that against Harris. I would be less about by,
and like you said, I wouldn't mention him. I would
(33:03):
just continue to hammer her. And the other thing that
I would also do, Jeff, I'm him, I know is
people listen to your show. I would also go back
and say these are the things that I tried to
implement in my first term.
Speaker 9 (33:16):
I e.
Speaker 8 (33:17):
You know, most of you people that are standing in
this audience work for a private company. Company falls on
hard time, so the company's got to tighten their belt.
They have to maybe rationalize and get.
Speaker 2 (33:27):
Rid of people.
Speaker 8 (33:28):
I try to get, you know, to go to these
cabinet people and have them cut two three, four five
percent of the workforce. You would have thought that it
was stillmar that I was asking for them to blow
the place up. He also needs to say when i'd in,
when I get elected, you need to help me down ballot.
(33:49):
And here's why, because you're gonna have people like Jimmy
Raskin that are going to try to prevent him with
Section three of the fourteenth Amendment to keep him out
because he's an insurrectionist. So the down ballot is also
very very important.
Speaker 1 (34:07):
I'm with you all the way, Tom all the way.
And look, he's going to need all the help he's
going to get from us, all the help that we
can give him. He's going to need help because if
he doesn't have control of Congress, they're not going to
allow him to even be inaugurated. Jamie Raskin, the Democrats
have openly said it. They're going to prevent him on
(34:28):
January sixth, Yes, January sixth, twenty twenty five, they are
going to declare that he's an insurrectionist and they're going
to block him from having the votes the Electoral College
ratifying him and his victory. And so, in other words,
they're going to have the ultimate insurrection to stop Trump.
(34:49):
So he's got to at a minimum, he's got to
retain control of the House at a bare minimum. Frankly,
you should win the House and the Senate so he
can implement his entire agenda. So and Tom, I completely
agree with you. Biden is now irrelevant. Forget Biden. I
wouldn't even mention his name once if I were Trump,
(35:10):
your rival. Your opponent is now Kamala Harris. All of
your fire train, all of your heavy artillery, all of
your guns on her. Attacker, attacker, exposer, exposer, and just
keep comparing and contrasting your four years to their four years.
(35:32):
What you want to do for the country, what she
wants to do for the country. And I think if
he does that, he's invincible. He's unstoppable. And that's what
was so to me impressive about yesterday's speech. It was
almost practically a perfect stump speech. And all he's got
to do now is have the discipline to repeat it
(35:54):
over and over and over and over again. Tom, thank
you very much for that call. John in New Hampshire,
Thanks for holding John, and welcome.
Speaker 9 (36:07):
Good morning, Jeff. You know profound stuff this morning. You know,
that was an incredible point that Tom just made. You know,
I've been listening to you for ten years. I have
called you in the past, but you know, not recently.
In this particular call from Dane who was seventy one,
who lost his home, and that was an amazing point
(36:29):
and it made me call this morning because there's a
very important thing I want to get to. It's really
a question, you know, we need to get down to
the root causes of what's going on behind all of this.
And Tom just mentioned Jamie Raskin. I was going to
mention him also, but he's kind of the third name.
The first two are Obama and Soros. My question is this,
(36:55):
why is it that we can't arrest these two guys?
Why are we not doing anything to get ahold of
them and stop them from what's going on behind the scene.
And another question that goes along with that is why
is it that we were able to get John Gottie.
If you remember how we got him, we ended up
(37:17):
surveilling his little club and we actually caught him talking
about murder.
Listen now to President Trump last yesterday forgive me in
North Carolina saying we cannot take four more years of
Kamala Harris. Listen now to Trump saying, on November fifth,
our message to her and the entire Biden Harris regime,
(00:20):
You're fired.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
Rold cut four, Mike, We're not going.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
To let this incompetent, socialist lunatic keep breaking our economy
for four more years.
Speaker 2 (00:31):
It'll destroy our country.
Speaker 3 (00:35):
On election day, we're going to tell her that we've
had enough, that we can't take anymore. Kamala, you're doing
a horrible job. You're a terrible attorney general, you are
a terrible district attorney.
Speaker 2 (00:49):
You're the worst vice president in history. Kamala, you're fired.
Get out of here. Go get that baby.
Speaker 1 (00:57):
Yeah, yeah, Now that's what I'm talking about again.
Speaker 2 (01:01):
It was a master speech. There's an other way to
put it.
Speaker 1 (01:05):
And then, just very quickly, here is how Trump is
now framing the election. Now he stays on this, he
can't lose. If you like what's happening in California, then
you vote for Kamala and Tim Waltz. If you like
what I did for four years, then you vote for me.
So really, do you want Cammie California and you know,
(01:29):
with all the mess that California has become, or do
you want the American dream?
Speaker 2 (01:34):
It's really that simple. Roll cut five, Mike.
Speaker 3 (01:40):
Everything Kamala Harris touches turns bad.
Speaker 2 (01:44):
It all turns bad.
Speaker 3 (01:45):
San Francisco was a great city, now it's unlivable. California
was a great state, now it's unlivable. She breaks everything,
just like she broke the border, broke our economy. But
soon we are going to fix every single problem Kamalah
and Joe Biden have created, and we are going.
Speaker 2 (02:03):
To save our country. We are going to save America.
We're going to save America.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
Look, I'm telling you, I've seen a lot of Trump rallies.
I've seen him deliver a lot of speeches, but I've
never seen him as disciplined, as focused, as on message
as he was yesterday. And he's all he's got to
do now is keep repeating that speech in battleground after
(02:30):
battleground after battleground state. And I am telling you he
is going to soar in the polls. And if they
can just make sure that they don't steal the election,
have enough poll watchers have enough lawyers. Everybody's got to
do their part. Then Trump will be victorious on election night.
(02:52):
Now let me just quickly throw this log on the fire.
The Trump team is now very worried about reports come
out of New York City that Judge won. Mrshawn you
know him, that corrupt hack Democrat hack judge is going
to be sentencing Trump over the Alvin braggcase, the so
(03:14):
called hush money case. Andrew Andy McCarthy, who's an opinion
guy at a contributor and a columnist at National Review.
He's also on Fox News. One of their legal analysts,
Andy McCarthy, yesterday came out and said he is convinced
that Mrshawn will put Trump behind bars. Apparently, now Trump's
(03:38):
people are getting winned that Mershawn is also promising to
put Trump either under house arrest or put him behind bars,
put him in jail two months.
Speaker 2 (03:50):
Before the election.
Speaker 1 (03:52):
They feel that this is their last play, that Kamala
cannot win on her own, and the only way to
stop Trump is to jail Trump. So let me throw
this log on the fire. If one Merchan jails Trump
or imprisons Trump, will that hurt him or help him?
(04:14):
I'll be perfectly on like again, brutally honest with you,
like I'm in the confessional. I think if they try
to imprison Trump two months before the election, it is
going to be such blatant election interference, such naked authoritarianism,
such obvious political persecution, that not only is the backlash
(04:38):
going to be immense, it is going to alienate so
many independent voters that it's gonna propel Trump even higher
ten fifteen points in the polls. I think it's gonna
boomerang against them. They think putting him behind bars is
going to be a pr disaster for true and effectively
(05:02):
take him off the campaign trail, and then they will
paint him not just as a convicted felon, but as
an imprisoned felon. And they believe that this will tank
Trump's numbers and put Kamala over the top. So my
question to you, if they jail Trump or put him
under house arrest, will it hurt Trump or ultimately will
(05:27):
it benefit Trump? David in Ashland, thanks for holding David, and.
Speaker 2 (05:32):
Welcome Jeff Hi.
Speaker 4 (05:36):
Regarding regarding Mishean, I think that what's going to happen
is if they I think that they would probably do
house arrest. I think only because that they wouldn't want
to be like the bad boys and stuff and and
but I think that even under house arrest, let's face it,
(05:57):
Biden and you know, they and he was in the cellar,
you know. I think that wherever Trump is at, I
think that Trump is a force to be reckoned with.
I think he's uh, you know, the only the only
issue is I mean I I've traveled to uh, Russia
(06:17):
and to Belarus, and I can tell you the media
in this country has turned into the media in the
communist countries, and they'll put a spin on it to
make Trump really look terrible. That's that's their that's their role.
Speaker 2 (06:34):
David.
Speaker 1 (06:34):
I'm just curious. You've been to Russia, you've been to Belarus.
How would you compare the media there to the media here.
Is it the same? Is it better?
Speaker 2 (06:49):
Six?
Speaker 1 (06:50):
One seven two, six, six, sixty eight sixty eight is
the number? Okay, let's go right back to David in Ashland.
Speaker 5 (06:57):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (06:58):
David is He's visited Russia, he's visited Belarus, formerly communist countries,
but still both of them run by very repressive regimes.
The media is completely in the tank for both Putin
and Lukashenko, who's the strong man that runs Belarus. And
so David was making the point that our media has
(07:19):
become very similar to the media in both Russia and Belarus. David,
if you don't mind me asking, how would you compare
our media to what you saw or what you've seen
in Russia or Belarus.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
Is it the same, is it a little bit better?
Is it worse? What say you?
Speaker 4 (07:40):
Well, I would have to say the media in Belarus
and Russia was it was like a main media source
that was coming out. I would have to say the
United States as reinforced propaganda. Basically, they're weaponized and it's
multiple medias and they all have the same agenda. And
(08:01):
I don't know whether that was under that law that
was enacted by Obama back in twenty and thirteen. But
I can tell you also too that even in voting,
I was there during the election in Bella, russ and
I'll tell you it's like I knew someone that was
at the polls. The people didn't want Lushenko. And what
(08:26):
happened was at the end of the day, a group
of people came in, took the boxes and Lushenko in
that particular area, you know he was a top top dog,
So I mean it's cheating in the voting, just like
I think we have here. And I think the media,
the media in this country needs to be you know,
(08:48):
abolished whatever, and they need to be fact checked for
everything that they do, and if they don't do it,
then they should be pay a major consequence. I think
that we need to not only you know, when if
Trump becomes president, I think that the media needs to
be uh taken apart and they need to start printing
(09:11):
the truth and tell them the truth.
Speaker 1 (09:13):
I so agree. Oh, you have no idea how much
I agree. In fact, David to me, if it wasn't
for the media carrying Kamala Harris, this election would be
over right now.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
I mean it'd be over.
Speaker 1 (09:26):
I mean all you know, all we got to do
is just wait till November fifth, and you know, let's
sen and Trump is is you know, is in and
we can start turning the country around. And in fact,
in that Axios piece where Kamala's advisors are talking about
their strategy, they openly admit that their whole strategy rests
on a completely subservient and compliant media. They go, no, no,
(09:49):
the media will make this a style over substance election.
The media will paint her as a fresh face. The
media will cover up for her. The media will allow
her to hide and stay in the basement. So you know,
they're openly saying, oh, no, no, no, the media. That's
that's our biggest ally. Our whole strategy rests upon the
(10:12):
fact that we know the media is going to cover
up for us and protect us every step of the way.
I mean, it's it's beyond it's disgusting. It's they are
the enemy of the American people, as Trump said, and
that's why they need to be thoroughly exposed and discredited. David,
thank you very much for that call. In fact, I
(10:33):
don't want to get too sidetracked, but I want to
show you how bad and how blatant it's getting. So
as an example, okay, even by CNN standards.
Speaker 2 (10:45):
Okay, this is CNN, it's a new low.
Speaker 1 (10:49):
So, as you know, Musk and Trump had a wide
ranging record shattering the discussion interview on x A come
bind one million viewership, one million views, and the overwhelming
majority people between the ages of eighteen to thirty five.
(11:11):
So not only did he have a massive audience, but
it was a young audience, and of course that petrified
the media. So the elite establishment propaganda media went after
Musk and Trump. Dana Bash CNN was caught red handed
(11:33):
openly lying and misrepresenting what Trump and Musk were discussing,
in particular when it came to nuclear energy and nuclear power.
So in the beginning of the conversation they start talking
about the bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. By the time
(11:55):
Dana Bash is done, she gives the impress into all
of the listeners or the viewers that elon Musk and
Trump are all for bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yeah, blow
these cities up, blow other cities up, drop these noakes.
Speaker 2 (12:16):
The more noakes we drop a little better.
Speaker 1 (12:21):
I understand that that it was okay to blow them
up the first time. And who cares how many people died,
because hey, they love cities being incinerated by nuclear bombs.
Listen now to Dana Bash roll cut fourteen.
Speaker 6 (12:39):
Mike, I want to play one exchange that was kind
of classic. Well, there were a lot of changes that
were exchanges that were classic Donald Trump, but this one
really stuck out to us.
Speaker 5 (12:51):
And night Sucky were bombed but now they're like full
cities again.
Speaker 7 (12:55):
So it sladly not. That's something that.
Speaker 5 (12:57):
You know, it's not as scary as people think. Basically,
it's not as scary.
Speaker 6 (13:03):
That was more Elon Musk than Donald Trump talking about
sort of suggesting that what happened almost eighty years ago,
I think eighty years ago next year, the bombing of
Hiroshiama on Nagasaki. Now it's okay, okay, I'm kind of
trying to blow off the impact of that.
Speaker 1 (13:21):
Yeah, hundreds of thousands of people dead, no problem, it's okay.
Speaker 7 (13:25):
Hey.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
In other words, these are two war mongering lunatics. Okay,
that's what they're trying to convey that these are sociopathic,
heartless lunatics who think dropping nuclear bombs is no big thing.
That's so you're watching CNN. That's why, by the way,
if you just watch CNN, that's why you hate the
(13:47):
guy so much. That's why you want to kill him.
Because if that's what you're all, if that's all you're
being fed by CNN, you're thinking, oh my god, he's
going to get us all killed. This guy loves nuclear war.
Here's what was really said. Here was what was really said. Okay,
this is so I'm gonna just I don't want to
(14:08):
read the whole transcript. I'm going to read to you
just a few lines. This is Elon Musk. So they're
talking about nuclear energy and nuclear power here it is.
Listen now to Elon quote. Yeah, actually there's the bad
side of nuclear which is a nuclear war, very very
(14:28):
bad side. But then he goes on to say, but
there's also I think nuclear electricity generation that is underrated.
And then he goes on to say to Trump, you know,
you're right. People have this fear of nuclear electricity generation.
But it's actually one of the safest forms of electricity generation.
It's just a huge misunderstanding. Now he goes on to say,
(14:51):
I don't want to be It was quite a lengthy exchange,
but he goes on to say that, hey, nuclear power
is cheap. In fact, it's quite safe in terms of
nuclear power plants, that more people die or are injured,
say in mining, coal mining or whatever, than are actually
in nuclear power plants. And then Trump is chiming in saying, no,
(15:16):
I hear you, but it's the branding of it. When
people hear nuclear, they think about Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They
think about Chernobyl. These things are horrible, These things are bad.
And then they said this roll cut fourteen a mike.
Speaker 5 (15:38):
After Pokushima happened in Japan, Like people were asking me
in California, you know, are we worried about like a
nuclear cloud coming from Japan. I'm like, no, that's crazy.
It's actually it's not even dangerous in Pokushima. I actually
flew there and ate locally grown vegetables on TV to
prove it. And I donated a solar water treatment is
(15:59):
it's solo power system for a water treatment plant.
Speaker 3 (16:02):
And yeah, but you happen to fail so well lately
and I'm worried about it.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
No, no, but I'm only getting mine.
Speaker 5 (16:08):
You know. It's it's like, you know, Hiroshima and Knightshuck
were bomb but now that they're like full cities again.
So it's not something that you know, it's not as
scary as people think.
Speaker 2 (16:21):
Basically, you see how they took it all out of context.
Speaker 1 (16:26):
He's talking, yeah, and then you had that you know,
Nu Kashima, I remember that meltdown at the nuclear reactor
and he said, no, look, it wasn't that bad. I
even went to eat the local food. They were able
to clean it up, they were able to recover. So
you've got Elon Musk and Trump and that historic interview
that took place on X Space a couple of nights ago, huge, massive,
(16:50):
massive audience, actually shattered all records, and the media doesn't
know what to do, so they literally can talk and
manufacture a fake story CNN with caught red handed. So
you hear these guys literally saying, oh, nuclear war is
a horrible thing. Both of them. Oh, it's horrible what
happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki horrible. In fact, Trump is saying,
(17:12):
that's one of the reasons why we have to stop
the war between Russia and Ukraine, because we don't want
Russia to go nuclear. We got to prevent the nuclear
war at all costs. And then Elon is saying, no,
I know, it's horrible, and he goes. And the sad
thing is people think that nuclear electricity generation i e.
Nuclear power plants, which by the way, emit no carbon whatsoever,
(17:37):
are environmentally very safe. You know, for the most part.
They have some leaks here and there, but for the
most part, very environmentally sound, extremely cheap, abundant, almost limitless energy.
And he says, if you're serious about climate change, and
if you're serious about the environment, then you would look
at nuclear energy, nuclear power, nuclear electricity generation. And then
(18:02):
he talks about Fukushima, which had a nuclear meltdown and
it live, some toxic waste spilled out, but they cleaned
it up very quickly. And Elon says, you know, by
the way, people don't know this, but there are less
injuries and deaths from people at working at nuclear power
pants plants or toxic spills or whatever than say, in
coal mining or other industries. And he said, you know,
(18:25):
even Fukushima. Hey, look they cleaned it up so quick.
I went down there. I hate the locally grown food,
the vegetables. And Trump is teasing them, Yeah, you don't
look so well, and you know, they're having a little bit.
They're bantering, but the point is, and Trump is saying, no,
I know, I hear what you're saying, Elon, but when
people hear nuclear they start freaking out because of Hiroshima, Nagasaki.
(18:50):
And Elon is saying, I had people running up to me,
are we going to have nuclear clouds over California now
that we had Fukushima was trying to explain the fear
mongering and the hysteriaan the panic porn surrounding nuclear energy. Now,
by the time CNN is done, they were, oh yeah,
(19:12):
they were ecstatic about the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Aha,
that's just classic trumph.
Speaker 2 (19:19):
Wipe them all out.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
Yeah, drop those nukes and let them die. The exact
opposite of everything they were saying and discussing.
Speaker 2 (19:33):
Now.
Speaker 1 (19:34):
The difference this time was we had the tape, we
had the actual interview. So when CNN pushed their bs
and it's pure propaganda lies, people countered and said, no,
we heard the interview.
Speaker 2 (19:50):
No, in fact, it was the very opposite. What are
you talking about? Now?
Speaker 1 (19:56):
Has CNN apologized yet? Has Dana Bash been reprimanded? Nyet?
Speaker 2 (20:05):
Does anybody who watched CNN even know that they were
lied to? Yet?
Speaker 1 (20:12):
That's how they roll, you know, And as someone wants
one of these commentators, I forget who but made a
very good point. Forget liberal bias, you know, forget media bias.
Forget even fake news that's so eight years ago. What
we're watching now this is regime propaganda. That's what the
(20:35):
so called quote unquote media has become. They're nothing more now.
Than a propaganda arm of the Biden Harris regime. Everything
they say is a pack of lies. Jude in New Hampshire,
Thanks for holding Jude, and welcome.
Speaker 7 (20:54):
Jeff.
Speaker 2 (20:54):
How are you good? How are you Jude?
Speaker 7 (20:57):
Would hanging in there kind of target rich environment, shall
we say? With what's going on right now, I've been
on whole the while, and I know your conversation has
bought somewhat, but when you're talking about the inflation in everything,
there's really something that needs to be addressed, and that's
(21:17):
the Federal Reserve Bank. And a lot of people think
that it's an operating unit of the federal government. It's not.
It's actually it's a privately held bank like a lot
of the central banks in the government in nineteen thirteen
essentially turned over the generation of currency to those individuals
(21:39):
at almost banks, and that works against the people with
the inflation models that are coming out. I mean, I
know they're saying, oh, it's you know, under three, but
for a lot of people, they don't count gasoline prices
and food prices in that, so the real inflation is
(21:59):
much And when they say, oh, it's coming down, well,
that's like saying, yeah, you plunge the knife in my
back six six inches and you pull it out an
inch and a half. And now you're saying you're doing
me a favor. Okay, fine, but that has to be
addressed in our tax collections right now are running about
(22:19):
four trillion dollars a year, but we're spending six The
math doesn't work, and it's going to have to be addressed.
It's a mathematical certainty. We're going to run into trouble
with that. Another thing Harris said on I saw a
clip on Twitter. She's going to raise business taxes. Okay,
(22:43):
we're going to make them pay. The problem is businesses
don't pay taxes. They collect taxes. It's a cost of
doing business. So when you tax business, you tax the
little people. You tax the people that go to work
every day. Because those taxes and those costs are added
(23:05):
into the cost of the final product, we have to
be of that burden. So she's that's just saying she
might as well come out and say I'm going to
raise your taxes. She said she's going to go after
state taxes, things like that. That camp is with the
ability of people to transfer wealth to their children. And
(23:27):
one other thing to consider if she does prevail, hopefully not,
but if she wins, expect China within two to four
weeks to make a move in Taiwan after the election,
not after the inauguration. And if you think you have
financial problems, now let that happen, because they the CIA
(23:50):
doesn't want those chip fab plants falling into the hands
of the Chinese government. That is that will be catastrophic.
So I'd just like to yo, you take on some
of those Jude.
Speaker 1 (24:03):
Let me ask you this. Okay, I can, I can
name any product. Let me just because I'm gonna basically
now I'm you know, I'm a Type two diabetic, Jude,
so they got me on a diet, so I really
got to lay off the cheeseburgers.
Speaker 2 (24:15):
You know, I love cheeseburgers.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
I mean it, I love I love Whoppers with cheese,
I love the Wendy's Classic with cheese. I love the
Big Mac extra sauce.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
But let that go.
Speaker 1 (24:26):
So let's say you make cheeseburgers. Okay, you're a little
you know, you're a nice little restaurant. You're a you know,
and you you sell cheeseburgers, fries and shakes. Kamala Harris
now imposes massive crushing taxes on you. You can't afford
to pay these taxes. You it's your profit margin. You're
(24:47):
literally you're working for free. So what are you going
to do?
Speaker 2 (24:50):
Jude?
Speaker 1 (24:51):
You've now got, you know, these taxes. Now she's raising taxes.
What are you possibly going to do? Either you go
under or you work for free. Well, you're not gonna
work for free, and you don't want to go under.
So what would you do, Jude? If you were selling cheeseburgers,
you have the only.
Speaker 7 (25:11):
Way to survive is you have to raise prices.
Speaker 2 (25:13):
Bingo, see bingo, see what I mean?
Speaker 1 (25:15):
You have more common sense, I'm serious, okay than this
woman who's the vice president of the United States and
was a senator from California and now is the presidential nominee.
Speaker 2 (25:25):
It's just common sense.
Speaker 1 (25:27):
So you got to raise the price of cheese, of
your burger, of the meat, of your fries, of your shakes,
of everything. So in the end, who's really gonna pay
your taxes?
Speaker 2 (25:36):
It's not you.
Speaker 1 (25:37):
It's me, maybe more before than now because they got
me on a diet.
Speaker 2 (25:41):
But you know what I'm saying.
Speaker 1 (25:43):
So it's you know, customers, consumers like me and people
in the audience. And that's that's what we're gonna get
under a Kamala Harris regime. Prices are gonna go way
up because taxes are gonna go way up. And busy
businesses always pass on or offload their taxes to their customers,
(26:04):
not because they're nasty, ugly people, because if they don't,
they go under. That's their profit margin. It's gone. So see,
that's what the that's what a businessman like Trump understands.
A communist like Kamala or Tim Waltz not so much, Jude,
(26:25):
Thank you very much for that call now. And furthermore,
the Federal Reserve is one of the most destructive institutions
we've ever created. Ron Paul, not Rand Paul, but Ron
Paul is father absolutely brilliant on this. You know, notice
why can we borrow so much money because the Fed
(26:47):
just keeps printing more of it. What do you think
has caused all this inflation? It's the massive deficits, the
massive debt, and then they just print and print and
print and print. And that's why we've lost the purchasing
power of our dollar. And that's what's slowly impoverishing and
destroying our country. And look, you're right, it's simple mathematics.
(27:10):
You're taking in four trillion in taxes, by the way,
it's the most we've ever taken in, so we don't
have a revenue problem. There's more money coming into the
coffers of the federal government now than in any other
time in the history of the United States. But we're
spending six trillion dollars. That's two trillion dollar deficits every
(27:31):
single year. So let's leave out four trillion and six trillion,
because that's that's such a massive amount of money. People
can't wrap their mind around it. Here, let me ask you, okay,
you and your wife, you guys work like dogs. You
make four hundred thousand dollars a year. You scrape, you know,
you scrape every dollar you can and you run. You
(27:53):
take in four hundred thousand a year, but you're spending
six hundred thousand dollars a year. And your overall debt,
because our national debt is thirty six thirty seven trillion,
so your overall debt on your house or your whatever
your properties is three point six three point seven million dollars.
So you got a crushing debt. You've taken in four hundred,
(28:17):
But you're spending six hundred every year. Every year two
hundred thousand in the red, and then the next year
two hundred thousand in the red, and then the next
year two hundred thousand dollars in the red. Now, in
the short term, how do you get by? Well, I
put it on my credit card, I make the minimum payments.
(28:39):
Then there's interest on the credit cards. Then I go
to the bank. I like borrow money from the bank,
but then there's interest on that. Now, okay, maybe you
can swing it for a year or two, But year
after year after year after year, what do you think
is going to happen to you and your family? It
doesn't take a rocket scientist. You don't have to have
(29:00):
have an economics degree from Havid to figure this thing out.
The whole thing's gonna go capput. You're gonna go broke,
You're gonna go bankrupt. Honey, this is not sustainable. If
we take in four hundred, we can spend four hundred.
Speaker 2 (29:18):
That's it.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
Frankly, I'd like to take in four hundred and spend
three hundred. Why so I have an extra hundred thousand
to start paying off the debt on the house, sweetheart,
because we're never gonna swim our way out of this debt.
But okay, I forget that. You take in four hundred thousand,
spend four hundred thousand. Now that's how I run my home.
(29:45):
I'm sure that's how you run your home. Whatever you
take in fifty thousand, one hundred thousand, whatever the figure is,
I don't care. Eighty thousand, one hundred and fifty thousand,
whatever your combined income is. That's what we take in.
That's what we spend. Oh, well, we can't afford a vacation.
That's too bad this year. We don't go on vacation.
(30:05):
Oh we can't go out to eat, too bad, we
can't go out to eat. Oh I used to buy steaks.
I can't afford steaks. Too bad, we don't eat steak.
Not the federal government, not these crooked, corrupt politicians in Washington,
not Joe Biden, not Kamala. They spend and they spend,
(30:28):
and then they spend some more, And you wan us
to have you run our country. You wouldn't run your
house like this, Why would you allow to run a
country like this? So, and then you have these idiot liberals, Oh,
so dom and gloom. This is all my god, the
(30:50):
sky is falling. Well, it's a mathematical certainty. We're gonna
go bankrupt. Every economist says it. It's not a question
of if, it's a question of when. That's why Trump
is saying, if we don't unleash massive economic growth, in
(31:11):
other words, bring in a lot more money, we can't
just make four hundred thousand. We got to start making
a million and start tightening our belt fiscal responsibility. If
we don't do both things, we're gonna go broke as
a country, we're gonna go under.
Speaker 2 (31:31):
And he says, as a patriot.
Speaker 1 (31:33):
As an American who loves this country, I don't want
that to happen. And according to the idiots in the media,
he's the crazy one, he's the extremist. So the guy
that's saying, we got to get our fiscal house in
order and we got to really grow and boom. The
economy's got a boom, and we've got to unleash energy production,
(31:58):
deregulate the economy, slash taxes, encourage private investment, encourage investment
into our country manufacturing, bring those jobs back the supply chains.
Trump was brilliant on that yesterday. Bring all the supply
chains back, bring the jobs back here? Why because then
(32:19):
more jobs, more taxes. Hello, people spend more money. Hello,
the economy grows.
Speaker 4 (32:28):
Hello.
Speaker 1 (32:31):
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight.
Tom in Ohio, Thanks for holding Tom, and welcome.
Speaker 8 (32:41):
Good morning, Jeff, Hi Tom. You know Trump needs to
continue to hammer on the contrast between what life was
like during his administration and then also, you know, judgeta
post that against Harris. I would be less about by,
and like you said, I wouldn't mention him. I would
(33:03):
just continue to hammer her. And the other thing that
I would also do, Jeff, I'm him, I know is
people listen to your show. I would also go back
and say these are the things that I tried to
implement in my first term.
Speaker 9 (33:16):
I e.
Speaker 8 (33:17):
You know, most of you people that are standing in
this audience work for a private company. Company falls on
hard time, so the company's got to tighten their belt.
They have to maybe rationalize and get.
Speaker 2 (33:27):
Rid of people.
Speaker 8 (33:28):
I try to get, you know, to go to these
cabinet people and have them cut two three, four five
percent of the workforce. You would have thought that it
was stillmar that I was asking for them to blow
the place up. He also needs to say when i'd in,
when I get elected, you need to help me down ballot.
(33:49):
And here's why, because you're gonna have people like Jimmy
Raskin that are going to try to prevent him with
Section three of the fourteenth Amendment to keep him out
because he's an insurrectionist. So the down ballot is also
very very important.
Speaker 1 (34:07):
I'm with you all the way, Tom all the way.
And look, he's going to need all the help he's
going to get from us, all the help that we
can give him. He's going to need help because if
he doesn't have control of Congress, they're not going to
allow him to even be inaugurated. Jamie Raskin, the Democrats
have openly said it. They're going to prevent him on
(34:28):
January sixth, Yes, January sixth, twenty twenty five, they are
going to declare that he's an insurrectionist and they're going
to block him from having the votes the Electoral College
ratifying him and his victory. And so, in other words,
they're going to have the ultimate insurrection to stop Trump.
(34:49):
So he's got to at a minimum, he's got to
retain control of the House at a bare minimum. Frankly,
you should win the House and the Senate so he
can implement his entire agenda. So and Tom, I completely
agree with you. Biden is now irrelevant. Forget Biden. I
wouldn't even mention his name once if I were Trump,
(35:10):
your rival. Your opponent is now Kamala Harris. All of
your fire train, all of your heavy artillery, all of
your guns on her. Attacker, attacker, exposer, exposer, and just
keep comparing and contrasting your four years to their four years.
(35:32):
What you want to do for the country, what she
wants to do for the country. And I think if
he does that, he's invincible. He's unstoppable. And that's what
was so to me impressive about yesterday's speech. It was
almost practically a perfect stump speech. And all he's got
to do now is have the discipline to repeat it
(35:54):
over and over and over and over again. Tom, thank
you very much for that call. John in New Hampshire,
Thanks for holding John, and welcome.
Speaker 9 (36:07):
Good morning, Jeff. You know profound stuff this morning. You know,
that was an incredible point that Tom just made. You know,
I've been listening to you for ten years. I have
called you in the past, but you know, not recently.
In this particular call from Dane who was seventy one,
who lost his home, and that was an amazing point
(36:29):
and it made me call this morning because there's a
very important thing I want to get to. It's really
a question, you know, we need to get down to
the root causes of what's going on behind all of this.
And Tom just mentioned Jamie Raskin. I was going to
mention him also, but he's kind of the third name.
The first two are Obama and Soros. My question is this,
(36:55):
why is it that we can't arrest these two guys?
Why are we not doing anything to get ahold of
them and stop them from what's going on behind the scene.
And another question that goes along with that is why
is it that we were able to get John Gottie.
If you remember how we got him, we ended up
(37:17):
surveilling his little club and we actually caught him talking
about murder.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Amy Robach & T.J. Holmes present: Aubrey O’Day, Covering the Diddy Trial
Introducing… Aubrey O’Day Diddy’s former protege, television personality, platinum selling music artist, Danity Kane alum Aubrey O’Day joins veteran journalists Amy Robach and TJ Holmes to provide a unique perspective on the trial that has captivated the attention of the nation. Join them throughout the trial as they discuss, debate, and dissect every detail, every aspect of the proceedings. Aubrey will offer her opinions and expertise, as only she is qualified to do given her first-hand knowledge. From her days on Making the Band, as she emerged as the breakout star, the truth of the situation would be the opposite of the glitz and glamour. Listen throughout every minute of the trial, for this exclusive coverage. Amy Robach and TJ Holmes present Aubrey O’Day, Covering the Diddy Trial, an iHeartRadio podcast.
Good Hang with Amy Poehler
Come hang with Amy Poehler. Each week on her podcast, she'll welcome celebrities and fun people to her studio. They'll share stories about their careers, mutual friends, shared enthusiasms, and most importantly, what's been making them laugh. This podcast is not about trying to make you better or giving advice. Amy just wants to have a good time.