Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
At some point you just kind of go, Okay, the
NFL is fixing it for the Chiefs.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
I'm just gonna say. I'm just gonna say it on
the radio.
Speaker 1 (00:06):
They're fixing it for Chiefs and Taylor Swift and I'm
getting sick of it.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Name one call that went the Ravens way zero. Yeah, yeah, Yeah.
Speaker 1 (00:15):
We'll go into how many times the Kansas City Chiefs
ripped off the Ravens and the Refs helped them do it.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
We'll talk about that later in the show.
Speaker 3 (00:22):
We've got Nick coffee at ten thirty.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Yes, right, yes.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
So listen.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
Here we go.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
With hat in hand, I want to offer a heartfelt
apology to Judge an Dela Hanty. Judge and Delahanty. I've
already apologized her via Fallen. We'll get into that last night.
But yesterday I made a social media post and I
was accusing her of letting a convicted fella out with
(00:50):
the head of gun on one thousand dollars bill on
June the nineteenth. The guy that we're talking about is
the same one the carjacked someone's mother, someone's sister, someone Walmart. Okay,
so I wanted to find out, well, what Judge let
(01:11):
this guy out when he was convicted Fellen and gets
caught with the gun. It was not Judge and Delahanty.
It was another judge and we'll get to her later.
But I wanted to apologize for getting it wrong, and
also I want to talk more on that because it
brought light to something that's very disturbing on how I
got it wrong, and we'll get that in a second.
(01:33):
But also I want to I want to speak to
the character of Ann Delahanty because when I called to apologize,
not only did Judge Delahanny accept my apology, but she
did it with such extreme dignity and grace and class.
It was unbelievable. And I can honestly say the way
(01:55):
she accepted my apology would not have been the way I.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Would accepted it.
Speaker 3 (01:58):
Really, So I say all that to say this, thank
you so much Judge and Della Hanty for being so
gracious taking the time. Because when I realized the mistake
was made, I picked up the phone. I caught her
and not only does she accept my phone.
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Call, but right so, what you found out yesterday you
were on the phone with me yesterday, was there was
two or three things that I was very interesting and
kind of answers questions of where we are with this city.
So you tell me one of the two big things
that you found out as you went through this. You
were just trying to find out a judge's name, right,
So here's how I got it wrong. Okay, it's difficult
(02:41):
for here's how it goes, and here's how I went
for me yesterday.
Speaker 3 (02:43):
When you just try to do it the regular guy way.
I called the courthouse, told the one I needed. I
could barely understand the person that answered. They transferred me.
Told the story again. They said, oh no, that's this department.
Transferred me again. Got in touch with the next apartment.
They said, no, no, no, it's this department, transferred me again. Okay,
(03:07):
so now it rings and rings and rings. I've got
on a speakerphone and it rangd for five minutes because
I said, I'm gonna sit here. If I have to
sit her afternoon, I'm waiting till they pick up the
damn phone. Yeah. Actually it helped. And then the phone
gets disconnected. Oh boy, So now I'm not saying this,
don't take this out of context. I'm not saying I'm
a big deal or anything like that. Then I went
(03:29):
to people that are high up in the court system. Yes, okay,
because you have those contacts. And the only reason I
do this because I've been in media for thirty years.
I'm a nobody. But I'm just saying this is what
I did. So I reached out to two different people
that are high up in the court system, and they said,
no problem, we'll get that information for you. All right.
(03:49):
Both of them returned the information as and but it
was not her wrong judge, wrong judge. Okay, So before
I posted it, I contact them both again. I said,
can y'all double check this because I don't want to
post the wrong information. Actually, no, An Dela Hanty, you
have for a while. Yeah, yeah, So they reported back, No,
(04:13):
it definitely is. And then the other one definitely is.
So I posted and I contacted Anne Dellahanny. I said,
just letting you know I posted this. If you will
come on the show tomorrow, you're more than welcome. She
starts saying, take that down. It's not me. I promise
you it's not me. So that I contact them again, guys,
can y'all both confirm again? They confirm absolutely. Now these
are again people high up in the.
Speaker 1 (04:33):
Course right, and have access, sit in front of a screen,
have access. They're on a computer and they're like, I'm
looking at it now.
Speaker 3 (04:39):
It's like and it's up for the third time. There's
no question that's who it is. I returned to her.
She starts saying, no, that's not sending me screenshots. At
that point, after the post was up for maybe five
to ten minutes, I set it to private. Yeah, okay,
I said, here's what I'm going to do. I'm going
to set this to private, and then when I get
(04:59):
a firm answer with you know, visual proof showing me
the documents, I'll take it down and put the correct
judge up. So that's when I started calling around, and
it took me four hours to get in touch. Finally
a third person that is really high up contacted me.
(05:19):
Spent probably about thirty five minutes on the phone, and
I said, well, explain to me how this happened. He said, well,
first I went to this judge, then that judge. He
starts explaining. Ninety seconds into the conversation, I stopped him.
I said, I feel like I'm listening to a gaze
on who's on first free card MONI, yeah, who's got
the queen, you know, and he goes, well, you're you're
(05:40):
not wrong. So at that point, my wife is home
because it's that late in the afternoon, okay, and she's
sitting there listening to me, and I look at her
and she looks at me, shrugged her shoulders, like I
have no idea. Okay. So we're gonna to get more
(06:00):
in the weeds in this at the bottom of the hour,
because in my opinion, the absolute, hands down best journalists
out there is Natalia Martinez, Okay. And the reason why
is because she does this all the time. I reached
out to her, I said, how frustrating is is it
this bad on you? And she says it's worse. So
she's gonna tell exactly how hard it is just to
(06:20):
get a simple answer. And by the way, once again,
the answer I was looking for is, hey, a convicted
felon that was picked up with a gun got released.
Who was the judge that released him? That's all I wanted, right.
Speaker 1 (06:32):
Okay, And I'll give you a little tease, right, Dave,
I'm gonna tease you, okays. Teas one of the comments
from one of these individuals said, every felon has a gun.
We can't put them all in jail. Well, I'll let
you know the answer to that after after the.
Speaker 3 (06:51):
Actually about three people relate that to me yesterday. Yeah,
same statement, including Natalia Martinez.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (06:57):
Yeah, So so don't try it, no, no, yeah, it's a
I think what In the end, you'll learn that they
are just trying to expedite these through and they don't
really care. And they are there's a lot of these,
a lot of these fellas with a gun that are
just released on their own recogniance.
Speaker 3 (07:13):
Okay, can I can I say something to that too? So,
come to find out, as we dug deeper and I
started to get answers, I said, well, why was the
bell set at one thousand dollars? And the answer was
the judge that actually left the convicted felling out on
one thousand dollars. Her name was Josephine Buckner. Okay, And
(07:34):
I said, well, why did the judge let the felling
out with a gun charge on a thousand dollar bell?
And the answer I got from this person was, well,
she raised it to a thousand. I said, well, I said,
what what I said? Hang on?
Speaker 2 (07:50):
So she was the hanging judge?
Speaker 3 (07:51):
Said, I said, what do you mean? They raised she
raised it, and he said, originally it was set up
for ro R And then that judge says it's not
stiff enough. We need to raise this raised it to
one thousand dollars.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
Yeah, all right, so we'll get into it. Man.
Speaker 1 (08:08):
The system of is broken and it's overwhelmed for sure.
Not the system, I think is wrong. The people down
there are trying to do their best, I think is
what we were trying to figure out here. Okay, all right,
So last night's game the NFL started.
Speaker 2 (08:24):
There is a new rule.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
If you didn't know the NFL, you know how the
offensive tackle has his left leg.
Speaker 3 (08:31):
Let's stop. Yes, can we go back to the very beginning? Yeah,
I didn't watch, but I heard that the national anthem
just got crucified.
Speaker 1 (08:41):
No, no, no, the B two bomber went over with
the fireworks at the same time.
Speaker 2 (08:46):
Okay, no, I didn't. I did. Who sang the national anthems?
Speaker 1 (08:50):
She actually, she actually sang it normally. She sang it
like a normal song, a B two bomber.
Speaker 3 (08:56):
I saw complaints all over social media, saying, just sing
it like it's supposed to be saying.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
She's saying it like she normally, like it was the
most normal national anthem I've heard.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
I think social media just needs to shut the f up.
That was it? Oh click, can you know, I'll pull
it up unless you listen to it.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
And by the way, because Jackie and I stand up,
we were watching it outside. We stood them and put
our hands over our heart. We're listening to the song
and at the end we're like and we at the
end when the fireworks are going off, and then you
see this.
Speaker 2 (09:28):
The B two bomber is gigantic.
Speaker 3 (09:30):
Yea.
Speaker 2 (09:30):
So when it goes over the stadium, it's you hear this.
Speaker 1 (09:35):
And she says Home of the Brave, and the B
two goes right over at that same time, and Jackie
and I looked at each other and go, football's back.
Speaker 3 (09:43):
What people don't know is that B two bomber was
chasing some Martians.
Speaker 2 (09:47):
I think.
Speaker 1 (09:48):
I think, if there's some people you just cannot please.
So whatever they're talking about, I have no idea.
Speaker 3 (09:54):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (09:55):
So right before the half, Ravens are on the fifteen
yard line. There's a couple seconds left in the half.
If they score this touchdown there, they go into the
into the half with the lead. So Lamar catches Kansas
City's defense and they're not ready. So he's lifting his
leg and step come on, come on, so they snap it.
(10:15):
He catches the ball. Here comes the ref. Time out,
time out, time out. Well, here's what happened. The defensive
coordinator is running down the field and screaming and doing
the timeout in the face of the ref. The ref
calls a timeout. When they do that, everyone else are
on the on the on, the show goes. He can't
do that. The only person that had called timeout is
(10:36):
the head coach. He's like, everyone in the stadium knows that,
and then he and then the little defense coordinator got
a little smile on his face like sorry.
Speaker 2 (10:44):
Sorry, not sorry. So it's like, I'm sorry that matters.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
I mean that the ref knows the only person that
can call a timeout is the head coach. Like, if
anybody knows, it's the ref that you killed another scoring opportunity.
Speaker 2 (10:59):
And no one else looks like Andy Reid. It's ridiculous
except Craig's daddler maybe, and I think he's dead and
he's one of my favorites. And little kid for that
was awesome.
Speaker 3 (11:15):
He looks more like Andy Reid than Andy Reid does.
Speaker 1 (11:18):
I'm sorry it's so awesome. And look again, I we
were just so glad. And let me tell you, we've
been watching a bunch of college games. It's so the
talent in the NFL is, it's so the speed of
the game and everything else is so ridiculous in the NFL.
Speaker 2 (11:32):
Even with all of that, they dial up two of
the best teams in the league. Yes, and it comes
down to possibly a last second touchdown and a two
point conversion on the last play to win the game.
No game, he was out by half an inch.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
Game over his feet here his feet come down the
last play of the game, and they scored it a touchdown.
They went back and reviewed it and his toe is
just touching a little bit of the right time left.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
There's no time the game. So and it was like
the NFL and they were going to go for two
to win or lose the game on the final play.
Speaker 1 (12:02):
They have makey they have changed the rules to make sure.
We saw the stat last year when we were talking
about draft kings and all that, We're like, look, three
out of four games in the NFL come down to
one possession games, three out of four. So they have
set the pieces on the board. Rules wise, to make
sure even if you're down twenty one, you ain't out.
(12:23):
So it's it's back. I'm excited tonight. Your Packers play
in Brazil and Packers Eagles.
Speaker 2 (12:30):
Both teams were told don't leave the hotel. Are you serious?
Because it is not safe in sal Polo, Brazil.
Speaker 3 (12:36):
And by the way, the state Why.
Speaker 2 (12:37):
Did the NFL send two of the best franchises to Brazil.
Speaker 3 (12:40):
The stadium that are gonna be playing the end holds
sixty Brazilian people.
Speaker 2 (12:47):
It's a lot, man, it's an intimate setting. That's a lot.
Thank you.
Speaker 1 (12:52):
Okay, So that's my rant on the NFL. I still
had a great time. Lamar played great. You know, I
missed a couple throws there down the stretch, but you know,
you know, it is what it is. He was trying
to put the team on his back again. He's not figured.
Speaker 2 (13:03):
If not for Lamar's legs, Kansas City rolls him. Oh absolutely,
there's no question.
Speaker 3 (13:08):
All right. What's Travis Kelsey's mom's name?
Speaker 2 (13:10):
Oh, I don't know.
Speaker 3 (13:11):
Donna.
Speaker 2 (13:12):
She was with She was with UH and they made
a big deal. Did you notice how Taylor didn't sit
with Brittany because Brittany I was talking about yeah, and
Taylor doesn't want to say I'm a Trump person side.
Speaker 3 (13:21):
I saw the headline this morning. There was a headline
on another side that said, uh, Taylor Swift didn't sit
next to Brittany Mahomes.
Speaker 1 (13:30):
No, she sat next to Kelsey's ye soon to be
mother in law.
Speaker 3 (13:35):
Yeah, Brittany Mahomes though she didn't. Are they engaged Brittany?
Speaker 2 (13:39):
But they're gonna be Oh.
Speaker 3 (13:41):
I heard that she's gonna cheat on him? No with Madonna? No,
come on, sorry, I should have learned my lest he's
an angel from having I should have learned my left
astery yesterday with it Judge and Dellahlly let me fact check.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
That she should cheat on him? Though, get a better
album out will she's happy and the album is boring?
Speaker 3 (14:00):
That right here in the Swift to cheat on no
with Madonna? Yeah? That wow.
Speaker 1 (14:05):
I will say this this. We dismissed the stupidity of
social media. But yesterday I was talking to some of
the promotions and the girls were like, well, that they
have a contract.
Speaker 2 (14:16):
I saw the contract online.
Speaker 1 (14:18):
That the contract that they are having a relationship and
here's the breakup date. In September twenty eighth, and I
was just like, sweetie, you know that's fake, right. She
was like, no, it's a it's a contract, says they're
going to break up on September.
Speaker 3 (14:30):
Well, see, that's that's when I when I when I
finally found out the truth about Judge and Dellahanny. I'm
also made apology post. I requested please please share this
because it's important. People see on social media and they go, oh, yeah,
it must be true.
Speaker 2 (14:46):
It must be true.
Speaker 3 (14:47):
Yeah, that's right here. You know what it's in print,
it's in pratt.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
The good stuff gets must be true.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
They're cheating, so I don't know how many times, how
many times did they miss their tackle moving way before
the ball snapped. It's so stupid, it's like so obvious.
And then warrens Sharp just put on the online. He
was like, you're telling me so they called a time
out when you don't have one, but there's no penalty
(15:16):
for getting the time out, Like there wasn't a penalty,
Like you can't do that. All right, I'm taking deep
taking deep breath key treatments.
Speaker 3 (15:23):
Yeah you do.
Speaker 2 (15:25):
And season just started listen to this song. Yeah, I see it.
I have another Natalian song too.
Speaker 3 (15:34):
Talian Martinez here there. Hell, hey, listen before we get
into this, uh Dave's got a very special.
Speaker 2 (15:42):
Show for you.
Speaker 3 (15:42):
Ye, please don't. Let's time for a lot of time.
Natalian Martinez joins the show. Here's what's going on yesterday?
I just wanted to get this information. Who was the
judge that led a convicted fella out uh with the
possession of a gun for a thousand dollars bill on
(16:03):
June nineteenth, later held an innocent woman a gunpoint in
a Walmart drive through and LMPD had to shoot. You
would think it'd be easy, but it was a four
hour journey, and by the way, it got wrong. I
got the wrong information from two very high up sources,
verified four times each. Natalia, how difficult isn't that difficult
(16:23):
for you? Every time that you just try to get
a simple answer out of a haul of justice? Is
it hours of work just for you as well?
Speaker 4 (16:32):
It's incredibly difficult. It is ridiculously difficult. And sometimes I'll
have someone call me and tell me about a guy
with an extremely violent history that was walked on a
convicted felon with a gun charge after you know he
had committed some other crime, and they'll say, hey, this
(16:55):
guy just you know, got ro rd when and he
was on probation for example, for all the other crimes
that he has committed. And I sometimes not be able
to run that story that day, and it'll take me
up until the next day to find out a very
simple thing, like you said, what judge made that decision?
Speaker 3 (17:17):
And here's what's I'm sorry to interrupt, but here's what's
really disturbing about yesterday and Italia. I had to go
through two people. They're really really high up in the
court system, and they had this. As a matter of fact,
it was so quick that it got the answer back.
I was like, can you double check because they have
access to this system.
Speaker 2 (17:36):
But two information was wrong.
Speaker 3 (17:37):
The information was wrong, right, verified four times from two
different sources that are extremely yours are going.
Speaker 1 (17:44):
I'm looking at it on the screen right now to
tell you that that's got to be concerned.
Speaker 3 (17:47):
Yes, does that concern you?
Speaker 5 (17:50):
Yes? Absolutely.
Speaker 4 (17:52):
You talk about transparency when the you know, sometimes the
people inside, you know, the prosecutor's office will have to
double check themselves when I'll call and ask about whatever
decision because the information can be wrong. I know exactly
what they were looking at and it was probably a
(18:14):
courtinet document.
Speaker 3 (18:16):
It was.
Speaker 4 (18:18):
It'll lift there, it's like itemized and it'll list the
name of the judge on there. But you can't even
rely on those records, even though it is an official
like part of the record of the courthouse. It's because
sometimes it's just wrong.
Speaker 2 (18:36):
And if well.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
As a reporter, e're ue, look Dwight, if he was
doing this for TV or a newspaper article, he has
his two sources, two separate sources confirm this story. He
goes with it, it's wrong, and then everyone's gonna come
down and go, dude, the guy made the guy got
it wrong, and then his reputation takes a huge hit
and maybe gets fired.
Speaker 5 (18:57):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (18:57):
No, it's terrible, and you you can't be one hundred
percent sure. You know, There's been times where I'm like, Okay,
this person is the person who would know like they
you know, I can go.
Speaker 5 (19:10):
With this information.
Speaker 4 (19:12):
But yet I have been burned trying to get that
information before to the point where I just go to
the courthouse, like physically get up and go there and
pull the record myself and take a look at the
paperwork to make sure that that is what judge made
that call but I will tell you even then, it's
(19:37):
very difficult because sometimes the forms don't have the judge's
name on them, and it's a scribble of a signature.
There's no stamp with the judge's name. So here is potentially,
you know, a decision that could negatively affect a lot
of people's lives and there's no liability. There's the name
(19:57):
of the judge isn't even on the freaking form. So
I've snapped pictures and if I still have them on
my phone, I'll post them so that you guys can
see what I'm talking about. It is a scribble that
some of these judges, right, and so like a yeah,
So you're looking at it, and I'm having to go back,
(20:17):
you know, to to different attorneys and different other judges
and I'm like, this is your signature?
Speaker 5 (20:22):
Is this your signatures? This your signature? Because I can't
even tell.
Speaker 4 (20:27):
And this is somebody who does this all the time,
and it's that hard imagine for the regular person in
the public who has one thousand percent the right to
know exactly what the people of the community is voting
for are doing.
Speaker 5 (20:42):
And it's that hard.
Speaker 3 (20:44):
Oh that is Let me speak, Let me speak to
that for a second. And by the way, we're talking
with an Italian Martinez from Wave yesterday in the quest
we're just finding out who let Randall Allen out on
a thousand dollars bill on June nineteenth, and he winds
up committing a crime. I'm holding a woman at gunpoint
in a Walmart and the judge actually raised who was Yeah,
(21:05):
And by the way, that's what it was the most
disturbing part. It was set ro R because the person
that finally cleared this up for me, I said, why
was this set of one thousand dollars? The answer I
got was, well, Judge Buckner raised that. I said, well,
what raised it? Yeah? He was going to be released
on an ro R. That wasn't stiff enough. But to
speak with what you just said, I tried it just
(21:27):
for the experience so I could talk about it. I
just tried it the regular Joe way yesterday. I didn't
cast you in any of my favors yesterday. First I
tried just the average Joe route, called the courthouse, told
him what I wanted. I could barely understand the person
that answered the phone. They transferred me to another department.
Then that department says, no, no, no, that's this department
transferred me to a third department. That department says, no,
(21:49):
it's another department they transferred me. It rings seriously, I
timed it five minutes. I told my wife, I'm gonna
sit here afternoon. Let the ring. If it happens, I'm
not letting him off. The hook gets disconnected within five
minutes and I start having to pull in favors. It's
absolutely ridiculous, and I think the honestly think the Hall
of Justice has this shell game going on just to
(22:11):
protect each other. Because this is serious information. I should
be able, anybody should be able to say, oh, this
guy that has a violent history gets out on bail.
What judge let him out on bail? That should be
especially important to people that.
Speaker 4 (22:26):
Vote exactly because they are voted in, and that presents
all kinds of problems because one, you know, you don't
have the platform to make an informed vote, which is
highly Unamerican and incredibly problematic.
Speaker 5 (22:42):
I don't care who you would end up voting for.
Speaker 4 (22:46):
And secondly, there's no accountability. So a judge can be
the best judge and do all the things that.
Speaker 5 (22:55):
They are supposed to be doing.
Speaker 4 (22:58):
Great or they could also be the judge that doesn't
show up for thirty days out of the first ninety
days that she was elected in and nobody even knows,
and nobody can confirm it, and nobody can even see
what choices she made on which cases because the records
are so messed up.
Speaker 5 (23:14):
So yeah, the judicial.
Speaker 4 (23:17):
System in Jefferson County needs a lot of accountability. They
need a lot of revamping. They need new systems that
can track this information easily, and just let's start where
people have access to this information and can make their
own decisions, all right.
Speaker 3 (23:36):
The Italian Yeah, cast one real quickly, ye, Natalia. Look,
I had to put you on the spot, but you
put other people on the spot. I made some calls
yesterday other legislators, including my wife. If this comes up
in committee, would you be willing to testify along with
me and another media source on how difficult it is
just to get a straight answer at a whol injustice.
Speaker 4 (23:59):
Testify a strong word because you know my station owns
my life.
Speaker 3 (24:03):
Okay, that's true. Okay, Well the word sestify is a
wrong word.
Speaker 1 (24:06):
Yeah, Okay, listen, I tell you you do this more
than we do. We do a different type of show.
Speaker 2 (24:12):
But this is it.
Speaker 1 (24:13):
I want to know if there's is there anything that
information that makes this makes sense? Anytime I can't figure
things out of why is this system like this? There
has to be an answer, right, is corrections overrun and
they can't handle any more people. So corrections is looking
at judges going to stop, don't send me these people.
If they haven't fell in with a gun, you can't
send them this way. Is the police and the prosecutors
(24:36):
seem to be getting on the same side. But now
because we were throwing the judges under the bus, now
the judges are going, hey, man, it ain't me, dude,
it's the system. So where in lies what information that
you have figured out that makes any of this make sense?
Speaker 4 (24:52):
Oh gosh, I mean it is such a huge problem.
Speaker 5 (24:55):
Where do you start. You have to start somewhere, right.
Speaker 4 (24:58):
It is true in the time of the pandemic, particularly,
there was a lot of pressure, or when Louisville jail
was severely overcrowded, there was a lot of pressure to
not put people in jail if they didn't have to
be so. But that is no longer the case. I
mean with Jerry Collins over at LMGC. Things have changed
a little bit, and you know that that issue severe
(25:22):
overcrowding has been somewhat alleviated. Now judges will tell you
we can't throw everybody in jail for a convicted felon
with a gun charge because it is so prevalent. Yes,
that is true, but pick something. Let's take the convicted
gun with a fellon charge out of the picture. Let's
say rape, Let's say robbery. Let's say another assault. Right,
(25:46):
let's pick another charge. Start somewhere. Yes, there is an
issue where it's so prevalent in our community. But if
there is no accountability and there are no parameters for
certain things, wouldn't Why wouldn't you? What's the risk if
you're a bad guy, you're going to be breaking the laws.
What is the risk if nothing is going to happen.
(26:08):
It's like we're advertising that Jefferson County is the place
where you can come commit a crime because nothing will
happen to you.
Speaker 5 (26:13):
And you know what, You're probably right.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
They're probably right. And look, I want to ask you
another question real quick, because there were many things that
came to light yesterday that were so alarming to me
on my quest to just get a simple answer, alcoholic justice.
Which judge released this convicted felam with a gun on
June nineteenth? Simple cutting? Do doc? Question brought to light
a lot of things, and I had many conversations with
(26:38):
other entities yesterday, and a common thing that I heard
a couple of times was, every convicted felaon has a gun.
I pick up the phone to call you to ask you, hey,
is it this miserable on you as well? And you
told me, well, yeah, Dwight, every convicted felaon has a gun.
That's alarming. It really is. Listen, Natalia Martinez, nobody understand. Well,
(27:00):
I'm sure the average joe that has tried to look
up information on who lets out which violent criminal knows,
but most people don't know the trouble you go through.
God bless you, I say, and thank you so much.
Speaker 2 (27:12):
Okay, keep finding a good fight, lady.
Speaker 5 (27:14):
Have a question for you guys. Who was singing name?
Speaker 3 (27:18):
What's that?
Speaker 2 (27:18):
Who is singing your name?
Speaker 4 (27:21):
Dave?
Speaker 2 (27:21):
Who was singing your name? That's a It's a guy
on YouTube that has all these songs.
Speaker 3 (27:25):
About his name is Sergeant Matt Sanders. I am not sure.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
Sanderettes, you know he could sing like that.
Speaker 3 (27:33):
By the way, Chief Humphrey and Matt Sanders joins the
show at the top of the hour. Couldn't make it
for cops Rock. We're gonna do it on Friday. Baby
now telling Martinez, thank you for all you do for
so many my friend.
Speaker 5 (27:45):
You guys, thank you.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
Oh man, it's it's not good David, please please stop,
please stop.
Speaker 2 (27:52):
Hey, who do we have Unlimited Landscapes.
Speaker 1 (27:55):
If wanted a pool in your backyard, they'll take care
of you. They're in Middletown, been around for thirty years.
I've known the guys, the owner of that business since
he was fifteen years old. Unlimited Landscapes dot Com is
a great place just to go and see what they do.
They do it all so if you want to swim
up bar, they could do that. You customize your pool
in your backyard, you drink a cup of coffee, you
look it out the back window and going wish there
(28:16):
was a pool there. Well, they could make it happen
at Unlimited Landscapes. With Unlimited landscapes dot com.
Speaker 2 (28:21):
And when you have a pool party, you get lots
of pasta to cater it, lots of you get the
family sized andrees literally for Lasagnias would feed forty people. Yep,
I kid you not.
Speaker 1 (28:31):
We were snacking on the chips, the sour dough chips
last night with the almond dip. Watching the game last
night with the Chiefs and Ravens on the back deck.
It was so much fun. Lots of pasta makes everything better.
Go to thirty seven seventeen Lexington Road in the heart
of Saint Matthew's back. After this right now, we're gonna
lie to the Chief and how much we like Matt Sanders,
and we'll be back on news radio eight forty whis
At some point you just kind of go, Okay, the
NFL is fixing it for the Chiefs.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
I'm just gonna say. I'm just gonna say it on
the radio.
Speaker 1 (00:06):
They're fixing it for Chiefs and Taylor Swift and I'm
getting sick of it.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Name one call that went the Ravens way zero. Yeah, yeah, Yeah.
Speaker 1 (00:15):
We'll go into how many times the Kansas City Chiefs
ripped off the Ravens and the Refs helped them do it.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
We'll talk about that later in the show.
Speaker 3 (00:22):
We've got Nick coffee at ten thirty.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Yes, right, yes.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
So listen.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
Here we go.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
With hat in hand, I want to offer a heartfelt
apology to Judge an Dela Hanty. Judge and Delahanty. I've
already apologized her via Fallen. We'll get into that last night.
But yesterday I made a social media post and I
was accusing her of letting a convicted fella out with
(00:50):
the head of gun on one thousand dollars bill on
June the nineteenth. The guy that we're talking about is
the same one the carjacked someone's mother, someone's sister, someone Walmart. Okay,
so I wanted to find out, well, what Judge let
(01:11):
this guy out when he was convicted Fellen and gets
caught with the gun. It was not Judge and Delahanty.
It was another judge and we'll get to her later.
But I wanted to apologize for getting it wrong, and
also I want to talk more on that because it
brought light to something that's very disturbing on how I
got it wrong, and we'll get that in a second.
(01:33):
But also I want to I want to speak to
the character of Ann Delahanty because when I called to apologize,
not only did Judge Delahanny accept my apology, but she
did it with such extreme dignity and grace and class.
It was unbelievable. And I can honestly say the way
(01:55):
she accepted my apology would not have been the way I.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Would accepted it.
Speaker 3 (01:58):
Really, So I say all that to say this, thank
you so much Judge and Della Hanty for being so
gracious taking the time. Because when I realized the mistake
was made, I picked up the phone. I caught her
and not only does she accept my phone.
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Call, but right so, what you found out yesterday you
were on the phone with me yesterday, was there was
two or three things that I was very interesting and
kind of answers questions of where we are with this city.
So you tell me one of the two big things
that you found out as you went through this. You
were just trying to find out a judge's name, right,
So here's how I got it wrong. Okay, it's difficult
(02:41):
for here's how it goes, and here's how I went
for me yesterday.
Speaker 3 (02:43):
When you just try to do it the regular guy way.
I called the courthouse, told the one I needed. I
could barely understand the person that answered. They transferred me.
Told the story again. They said, oh no, that's this department.
Transferred me again. Got in touch with the next apartment.
They said, no, no, no, it's this department, transferred me again. Okay,
(03:07):
so now it rings and rings and rings. I've got
on a speakerphone and it rangd for five minutes because
I said, I'm gonna sit here. If I have to
sit her afternoon, I'm waiting till they pick up the
damn phone. Yeah. Actually it helped. And then the phone
gets disconnected. Oh boy, So now I'm not saying this,
don't take this out of context. I'm not saying I'm
a big deal or anything like that. Then I went
(03:29):
to people that are high up in the court system. Yes, okay,
because you have those contacts. And the only reason I
do this because I've been in media for thirty years.
I'm a nobody. But I'm just saying this is what
I did. So I reached out to two different people
that are high up in the court system, and they said,
no problem, we'll get that information for you. All right.
(03:49):
Both of them returned the information as and but it
was not her wrong judge, wrong judge. Okay, So before
I posted it, I contact them both again. I said,
can y'all double check this because I don't want to
post the wrong information. Actually, no, An Dela Hanty, you
have for a while. Yeah, yeah, So they reported back, No,
(04:13):
it definitely is. And then the other one definitely is.
So I posted and I contacted Anne Dellahanny. I said,
just letting you know I posted this. If you will
come on the show tomorrow, you're more than welcome. She
starts saying, take that down. It's not me. I promise
you it's not me. So that I contact them again, guys,
can y'all both confirm again? They confirm absolutely. Now these
are again people high up in the.
Speaker 1 (04:33):
Course right, and have access, sit in front of a screen,
have access. They're on a computer and they're like, I'm
looking at it now.
Speaker 3 (04:39):
It's like and it's up for the third time. There's
no question that's who it is. I returned to her.
She starts saying, no, that's not sending me screenshots. At
that point, after the post was up for maybe five
to ten minutes, I set it to private. Yeah, okay,
I said, here's what I'm going to do. I'm going
to set this to private, and then when I get
(04:59):
a firm answer with you know, visual proof showing me
the documents, I'll take it down and put the correct
judge up. So that's when I started calling around, and
it took me four hours to get in touch. Finally
a third person that is really high up contacted me.
(05:19):
Spent probably about thirty five minutes on the phone, and
I said, well, explain to me how this happened. He said, well,
first I went to this judge, then that judge. He
starts explaining. Ninety seconds into the conversation, I stopped him.
I said, I feel like I'm listening to a gaze
on who's on first free card MONI, yeah, who's got
the queen, you know, and he goes, well, you're you're
(05:40):
not wrong. So at that point, my wife is home
because it's that late in the afternoon, okay, and she's
sitting there listening to me, and I look at her
and she looks at me, shrugged her shoulders, like I
have no idea. Okay. So we're gonna to get more
(06:00):
in the weeds in this at the bottom of the hour,
because in my opinion, the absolute, hands down best journalists
out there is Natalia Martinez, Okay. And the reason why
is because she does this all the time. I reached
out to her, I said, how frustrating is is it
this bad on you? And she says it's worse. So
she's gonna tell exactly how hard it is just to
(06:20):
get a simple answer. And by the way, once again,
the answer I was looking for is, hey, a convicted
felon that was picked up with a gun got released.
Who was the judge that released him? That's all I wanted, right.
Speaker 1 (06:32):
Okay, And I'll give you a little tease, right, Dave,
I'm gonna tease you, okays. Teas one of the comments
from one of these individuals said, every felon has a gun.
We can't put them all in jail. Well, I'll let
you know the answer to that after after the.
Speaker 3 (06:51):
Actually about three people relate that to me yesterday. Yeah,
same statement, including Natalia Martinez.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (06:57):
Yeah, So so don't try it, no, no, yeah, it's a
I think what In the end, you'll learn that they
are just trying to expedite these through and they don't
really care. And they are there's a lot of these,
a lot of these fellas with a gun that are
just released on their own recogniance.
Speaker 3 (07:13):
Okay, can I can I say something to that too? So,
come to find out, as we dug deeper and I
started to get answers, I said, well, why was the
bell set at one thousand dollars? And the answer was
the judge that actually left the convicted felling out on
one thousand dollars. Her name was Josephine Buckner. Okay, And
(07:34):
I said, well, why did the judge let the felling
out with a gun charge on a thousand dollar bell?
And the answer I got from this person was, well,
she raised it to a thousand. I said, well, I said,
what what I said? Hang on?
Speaker 2 (07:50):
So she was the hanging judge?
Speaker 3 (07:51):
Said, I said, what do you mean? They raised she
raised it, and he said, originally it was set up
for ro R And then that judge says it's not
stiff enough. We need to raise this raised it to
one thousand dollars.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
Yeah, all right, so we'll get into it. Man.
Speaker 1 (08:08):
The system of is broken and it's overwhelmed for sure.
Not the system, I think is wrong. The people down
there are trying to do their best, I think is
what we were trying to figure out here. Okay, all right,
So last night's game the NFL started.
Speaker 2 (08:24):
There is a new rule.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
If you didn't know the NFL, you know how the
offensive tackle has his left leg.
Speaker 3 (08:31):
Let's stop. Yes, can we go back to the very beginning? Yeah,
I didn't watch, but I heard that the national anthem
just got crucified.
Speaker 1 (08:41):
No, no, no, the B two bomber went over with
the fireworks at the same time.
Speaker 2 (08:46):
Okay, no, I didn't. I did. Who sang the national anthems?
Speaker 1 (08:50):
She actually, she actually sang it normally. She sang it
like a normal song, a B two bomber.
Speaker 3 (08:56):
I saw complaints all over social media, saying, just sing
it like it's supposed to be saying.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
She's saying it like she normally, like it was the
most normal national anthem I've heard.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
I think social media just needs to shut the f up.
That was it? Oh click, can you know, I'll pull
it up unless you listen to it.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
And by the way, because Jackie and I stand up,
we were watching it outside. We stood them and put
our hands over our heart. We're listening to the song
and at the end we're like and we at the
end when the fireworks are going off, and then you
see this.
Speaker 2 (09:28):
The B two bomber is gigantic.
Speaker 3 (09:30):
Yea.
Speaker 2 (09:30):
So when it goes over the stadium, it's you hear this.
Speaker 1 (09:35):
And she says Home of the Brave, and the B
two goes right over at that same time, and Jackie
and I looked at each other and go, football's back.
Speaker 3 (09:43):
What people don't know is that B two bomber was
chasing some Martians.
Speaker 2 (09:47):
I think.
Speaker 1 (09:48):
I think, if there's some people you just cannot please.
So whatever they're talking about, I have no idea.
Speaker 3 (09:54):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (09:55):
So right before the half, Ravens are on the fifteen
yard line. There's a couple seconds left in the half.
If they score this touchdown there, they go into the
into the half with the lead. So Lamar catches Kansas
City's defense and they're not ready. So he's lifting his
leg and step come on, come on, so they snap it.
(10:15):
He catches the ball. Here comes the ref. Time out,
time out, time out. Well, here's what happened. The defensive
coordinator is running down the field and screaming and doing
the timeout in the face of the ref. The ref
calls a timeout. When they do that, everyone else are
on the on the on, the show goes. He can't
do that. The only person that had called timeout is
(10:36):
the head coach. He's like, everyone in the stadium knows that,
and then he and then the little defense coordinator got
a little smile on his face like sorry.
Speaker 2 (10:44):
Sorry, not sorry. So it's like, I'm sorry that matters.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
I mean that the ref knows the only person that
can call a timeout is the head coach. Like, if
anybody knows, it's the ref that you killed another scoring opportunity.
Speaker 2 (10:59):
And no one else looks like Andy Reid. It's ridiculous
except Craig's daddler maybe, and I think he's dead and
he's one of my favorites. And little kid for that
was awesome.
Speaker 3 (11:15):
He looks more like Andy Reid than Andy Reid does.
Speaker 1 (11:18):
I'm sorry it's so awesome. And look again, I we
were just so glad. And let me tell you, we've
been watching a bunch of college games. It's so the
talent in the NFL is, it's so the speed of
the game and everything else is so ridiculous in the NFL.
Speaker 2 (11:32):
Even with all of that, they dial up two of
the best teams in the league. Yes, and it comes
down to possibly a last second touchdown and a two
point conversion on the last play to win the game.
No game, he was out by half an inch.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
Game over his feet here his feet come down the
last play of the game, and they scored it a touchdown.
They went back and reviewed it and his toe is
just touching a little bit of the right time left.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
There's no time the game. So and it was like
the NFL and they were going to go for two
to win or lose the game on the final play.
Speaker 1 (12:02):
They have makey they have changed the rules to make sure.
We saw the stat last year when we were talking
about draft kings and all that, We're like, look, three
out of four games in the NFL come down to
one possession games, three out of four. So they have
set the pieces on the board. Rules wise, to make
sure even if you're down twenty one, you ain't out.
(12:23):
So it's it's back. I'm excited tonight. Your Packers play
in Brazil and Packers Eagles.
Speaker 2 (12:30):
Both teams were told don't leave the hotel. Are you serious?
Because it is not safe in sal Polo, Brazil.
Speaker 3 (12:36):
And by the way, the state Why.
Speaker 2 (12:37):
Did the NFL send two of the best franchises to Brazil.
Speaker 3 (12:40):
The stadium that are gonna be playing the end holds
sixty Brazilian people.
Speaker 2 (12:47):
It's a lot, man, it's an intimate setting. That's a lot.
Thank you.
Speaker 1 (12:52):
Okay, So that's my rant on the NFL. I still
had a great time. Lamar played great. You know, I
missed a couple throws there down the stretch, but you know,
you know, it is what it is. He was trying
to put the team on his back again. He's not figured.
Speaker 2 (13:03):
If not for Lamar's legs, Kansas City rolls him. Oh absolutely,
there's no question.
Speaker 3 (13:08):
All right. What's Travis Kelsey's mom's name?
Speaker 2 (13:10):
Oh, I don't know.
Speaker 3 (13:11):
Donna.
Speaker 2 (13:12):
She was with She was with UH and they made
a big deal. Did you notice how Taylor didn't sit
with Brittany because Brittany I was talking about yeah, and
Taylor doesn't want to say I'm a Trump person side.
Speaker 3 (13:21):
I saw the headline this morning. There was a headline
on another side that said, uh, Taylor Swift didn't sit
next to Brittany Mahomes.
Speaker 1 (13:30):
No, she sat next to Kelsey's ye soon to be
mother in law.
Speaker 3 (13:35):
Yeah, Brittany Mahomes though she didn't. Are they engaged Brittany?
Speaker 2 (13:39):
But they're gonna be Oh.
Speaker 3 (13:41):
I heard that she's gonna cheat on him? No with Madonna? No,
come on, sorry, I should have learned my lest he's
an angel from having I should have learned my left
astery yesterday with it Judge and Dellahlly let me fact check.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
That she should cheat on him? Though, get a better
album out will she's happy and the album is boring?
Speaker 3 (14:00):
That right here in the Swift to cheat on no
with Madonna? Yeah? That wow.
Speaker 1 (14:05):
I will say this this. We dismissed the stupidity of
social media. But yesterday I was talking to some of
the promotions and the girls were like, well, that they
have a contract.
Speaker 2 (14:16):
I saw the contract online.
Speaker 1 (14:18):
That the contract that they are having a relationship and
here's the breakup date. In September twenty eighth, and I
was just like, sweetie, you know that's fake, right. She
was like, no, it's a it's a contract, says they're
going to break up on September.
Speaker 3 (14:30):
Well, see, that's that's when I when I when I
finally found out the truth about Judge and Dellahanny. I'm
also made apology post. I requested please please share this
because it's important. People see on social media and they go, oh, yeah,
it must be true.
Speaker 2 (14:46):
It must be true.
Speaker 3 (14:47):
Yeah, that's right here. You know what it's in print,
it's in pratt.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
The good stuff gets must be true.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
They're cheating, so I don't know how many times, how
many times did they miss their tackle moving way before
the ball snapped. It's so stupid, it's like so obvious.
And then warrens Sharp just put on the online. He
was like, you're telling me so they called a time
out when you don't have one, but there's no penalty
(15:16):
for getting the time out, Like there wasn't a penalty,
Like you can't do that. All right, I'm taking deep
taking deep breath key treatments.
Speaker 3 (15:23):
Yeah you do.
Speaker 2 (15:25):
And season just started listen to this song. Yeah, I see it.
I have another Natalian song too.
Speaker 3 (15:34):
Talian Martinez here there. Hell, hey, listen before we get
into this, uh Dave's got a very special.
Speaker 2 (15:42):
Show for you.
Speaker 3 (15:42):
Ye, please don't. Let's time for a lot of time.
Natalian Martinez joins the show. Here's what's going on yesterday?
I just wanted to get this information. Who was the
judge that led a convicted fella out uh with the
possession of a gun for a thousand dollars bill on
(16:03):
June nineteenth, later held an innocent woman a gunpoint in
a Walmart drive through and LMPD had to shoot. You
would think it'd be easy, but it was a four
hour journey, and by the way, it got wrong. I
got the wrong information from two very high up sources,
verified four times each. Natalia, how difficult isn't that difficult
(16:23):
for you? Every time that you just try to get
a simple answer out of a haul of justice? Is
it hours of work just for you as well?
Speaker 4 (16:32):
It's incredibly difficult. It is ridiculously difficult. And sometimes I'll
have someone call me and tell me about a guy
with an extremely violent history that was walked on a
convicted felon with a gun charge after you know he
had committed some other crime, and they'll say, hey, this
(16:55):
guy just you know, got ro rd when and he
was on probation for example, for all the other crimes
that he has committed. And I sometimes not be able
to run that story that day, and it'll take me
up until the next day to find out a very
simple thing, like you said, what judge made that decision?
Speaker 3 (17:17):
And here's what's I'm sorry to interrupt, but here's what's
really disturbing about yesterday and Italia. I had to go
through two people. They're really really high up in the
court system, and they had this. As a matter of fact,
it was so quick that it got the answer back.
I was like, can you double check because they have
access to this system.
Speaker 2 (17:36):
But two information was wrong.
Speaker 3 (17:37):
The information was wrong, right, verified four times from two
different sources that are extremely yours are going.
Speaker 1 (17:44):
I'm looking at it on the screen right now to
tell you that that's got to be concerned.
Speaker 3 (17:47):
Yes, does that concern you?
Speaker 5 (17:50):
Yes? Absolutely.
Speaker 4 (17:52):
You talk about transparency when the you know, sometimes the
people inside, you know, the prosecutor's office will have to
double check themselves when I'll call and ask about whatever
decision because the information can be wrong. I know exactly
what they were looking at and it was probably a
(18:14):
courtinet document.
Speaker 3 (18:16):
It was.
Speaker 4 (18:18):
It'll lift there, it's like itemized and it'll list the
name of the judge on there. But you can't even
rely on those records, even though it is an official
like part of the record of the courthouse. It's because
sometimes it's just wrong.
Speaker 2 (18:36):
And if well.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
As a reporter, e're ue, look Dwight, if he was
doing this for TV or a newspaper article, he has
his two sources, two separate sources confirm this story. He
goes with it, it's wrong, and then everyone's gonna come
down and go, dude, the guy made the guy got
it wrong, and then his reputation takes a huge hit
and maybe gets fired.
Speaker 5 (18:57):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (18:57):
No, it's terrible, and you you can't be one hundred
percent sure. You know, There's been times where I'm like, Okay,
this person is the person who would know like they
you know, I can go.
Speaker 5 (19:10):
With this information.
Speaker 4 (19:12):
But yet I have been burned trying to get that
information before to the point where I just go to
the courthouse, like physically get up and go there and
pull the record myself and take a look at the
paperwork to make sure that that is what judge made
that call but I will tell you even then, it's
(19:37):
very difficult because sometimes the forms don't have the judge's
name on them, and it's a scribble of a signature.
There's no stamp with the judge's name. So here is potentially,
you know, a decision that could negatively affect a lot
of people's lives and there's no liability. There's the name
(19:57):
of the judge isn't even on the freaking form. So
I've snapped pictures and if I still have them on
my phone, I'll post them so that you guys can
see what I'm talking about. It is a scribble that
some of these judges, right, and so like a yeah,
So you're looking at it, and I'm having to go back,
(20:17):
you know, to to different attorneys and different other judges
and I'm like, this is your signature?
Speaker 5 (20:22):
Is this your signatures? This your signature? Because I can't
even tell.
Speaker 4 (20:27):
And this is somebody who does this all the time,
and it's that hard imagine for the regular person in
the public who has one thousand percent the right to
know exactly what the people of the community is voting
for are doing.
Speaker 5 (20:42):
And it's that hard.
Speaker 3 (20:44):
Oh that is Let me speak, Let me speak to
that for a second. And by the way, we're talking
with an Italian Martinez from Wave yesterday in the quest
we're just finding out who let Randall Allen out on
a thousand dollars bill on June nineteenth, and he winds
up committing a crime. I'm holding a woman at gunpoint
in a Walmart and the judge actually raised who was Yeah,
(21:05):
And by the way, that's what it was the most
disturbing part. It was set ro R because the person
that finally cleared this up for me, I said, why
was this set of one thousand dollars? The answer I
got was, well, Judge Buckner raised that. I said, well,
what raised it? Yeah? He was going to be released
on an ro R. That wasn't stiff enough. But to
speak with what you just said, I tried it just
(21:27):
for the experience so I could talk about it. I
just tried it the regular Joe way yesterday. I didn't
cast you in any of my favors yesterday. First I
tried just the average Joe route, called the courthouse, told
him what I wanted. I could barely understand the person
that answered the phone. They transferred me to another department.
Then that department says, no, no, no, that's this department
transferred me to a third department. That department says, no,
(21:49):
it's another department they transferred me. It rings seriously, I
timed it five minutes. I told my wife, I'm gonna
sit here afternoon. Let the ring. If it happens, I'm
not letting him off. The hook gets disconnected within five
minutes and I start having to pull in favors. It's
absolutely ridiculous, and I think the honestly think the Hall
of Justice has this shell game going on just to
(22:11):
protect each other. Because this is serious information. I should
be able, anybody should be able to say, oh, this
guy that has a violent history gets out on bail.
What judge let him out on bail? That should be
especially important to people that.
Speaker 4 (22:26):
Vote exactly because they are voted in, and that presents
all kinds of problems because one, you know, you don't
have the platform to make an informed vote, which is
highly Unamerican and incredibly problematic.
Speaker 5 (22:42):
I don't care who you would end up voting for.
Speaker 4 (22:46):
And secondly, there's no accountability. So a judge can be
the best judge and do all the things that.
Speaker 5 (22:55):
They are supposed to be doing.
Speaker 4 (22:58):
Great or they could also be the judge that doesn't
show up for thirty days out of the first ninety
days that she was elected in and nobody even knows,
and nobody can confirm it, and nobody can even see
what choices she made on which cases because the records
are so messed up.
Speaker 5 (23:14):
So yeah, the judicial.
Speaker 4 (23:17):
System in Jefferson County needs a lot of accountability. They
need a lot of revamping. They need new systems that
can track this information easily, and just let's start where
people have access to this information and can make their
own decisions, all right.
Speaker 3 (23:36):
The Italian Yeah, cast one real quickly, ye, Natalia. Look,
I had to put you on the spot, but you
put other people on the spot. I made some calls
yesterday other legislators, including my wife. If this comes up
in committee, would you be willing to testify along with
me and another media source on how difficult it is
just to get a straight answer at a whol injustice.
Speaker 4 (23:59):
Testify a strong word because you know my station owns
my life.
Speaker 3 (24:03):
Okay, that's true. Okay, Well the word sestify is a
wrong word.
Speaker 1 (24:06):
Yeah, Okay, listen, I tell you you do this more
than we do. We do a different type of show.
Speaker 2 (24:12):
But this is it.
Speaker 1 (24:13):
I want to know if there's is there anything that
information that makes this makes sense? Anytime I can't figure
things out of why is this system like this? There
has to be an answer, right, is corrections overrun and
they can't handle any more people. So corrections is looking
at judges going to stop, don't send me these people.
If they haven't fell in with a gun, you can't
send them this way. Is the police and the prosecutors
(24:36):
seem to be getting on the same side. But now
because we were throwing the judges under the bus, now
the judges are going, hey, man, it ain't me, dude,
it's the system. So where in lies what information that
you have figured out that makes any of this make sense?
Speaker 4 (24:52):
Oh gosh, I mean it is such a huge problem.
Speaker 5 (24:55):
Where do you start. You have to start somewhere, right.
Speaker 4 (24:58):
It is true in the time of the pandemic, particularly,
there was a lot of pressure, or when Louisville jail
was severely overcrowded, there was a lot of pressure to
not put people in jail if they didn't have to
be so. But that is no longer the case. I
mean with Jerry Collins over at LMGC. Things have changed
a little bit, and you know that that issue severe
(25:22):
overcrowding has been somewhat alleviated. Now judges will tell you
we can't throw everybody in jail for a convicted felon
with a gun charge because it is so prevalent. Yes,
that is true, but pick something. Let's take the convicted
gun with a fellon charge out of the picture. Let's
say rape, Let's say robbery. Let's say another assault. Right,
(25:46):
let's pick another charge. Start somewhere. Yes, there is an
issue where it's so prevalent in our community. But if
there is no accountability and there are no parameters for
certain things, wouldn't Why wouldn't you? What's the risk if
you're a bad guy, you're going to be breaking the laws.
What is the risk if nothing is going to happen.
(26:08):
It's like we're advertising that Jefferson County is the place
where you can come commit a crime because nothing will
happen to you.
Speaker 5 (26:13):
And you know what, You're probably right.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
They're probably right. And look, I want to ask you
another question real quick, because there were many things that
came to light yesterday that were so alarming to me
on my quest to just get a simple answer, alcoholic justice.
Which judge released this convicted felam with a gun on
June nineteenth? Simple cutting? Do doc? Question brought to light
a lot of things, and I had many conversations with
(26:38):
other entities yesterday, and a common thing that I heard
a couple of times was, every convicted felaon has a gun.
I pick up the phone to call you to ask you, hey,
is it this miserable on you as well? And you
told me, well, yeah, Dwight, every convicted felaon has a gun.
That's alarming. It really is. Listen, Natalia Martinez, nobody understand. Well,
(27:00):
I'm sure the average joe that has tried to look
up information on who lets out which violent criminal knows,
but most people don't know the trouble you go through.
God bless you, I say, and thank you so much.
Speaker 2 (27:12):
Okay, keep finding a good fight, lady.
Speaker 5 (27:14):
Have a question for you guys. Who was singing name?
Speaker 3 (27:18):
What's that?
Speaker 2 (27:18):
Who is singing your name?
Speaker 4 (27:21):
Dave?
Speaker 2 (27:21):
Who was singing your name? That's a It's a guy
on YouTube that has all these songs.
Speaker 3 (27:25):
About his name is Sergeant Matt Sanders. I am not sure.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
Sanderettes, you know he could sing like that.
Speaker 3 (27:33):
By the way, Chief Humphrey and Matt Sanders joins the
show at the top of the hour. Couldn't make it
for cops Rock. We're gonna do it on Friday. Baby
now telling Martinez, thank you for all you do for
so many my friend.
Speaker 5 (27:45):
You guys, thank you.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
Oh man, it's it's not good David, please please stop,
please stop.
Speaker 2 (27:52):
Hey, who do we have Unlimited Landscapes.
Speaker 1 (27:55):
If wanted a pool in your backyard, they'll take care
of you. They're in Middletown, been around for thirty years.
I've known the guys, the owner of that business since
he was fifteen years old. Unlimited Landscapes dot Com is
a great place just to go and see what they do.
They do it all so if you want to swim
up bar, they could do that. You customize your pool
in your backyard, you drink a cup of coffee, you
look it out the back window and going wish there
(28:16):
was a pool there. Well, they could make it happen
at Unlimited Landscapes. With Unlimited landscapes dot com.
Speaker 2 (28:21):
And when you have a pool party, you get lots
of pasta to cater it, lots of you get the
family sized andrees literally for Lasagnias would feed forty people. Yep,
I kid you not.
Speaker 1 (28:31):
We were snacking on the chips, the sour dough chips
last night with the almond dip. Watching the game last
night with the Chiefs and Ravens on the back deck.
It was so much fun. Lots of pasta makes everything better.
Go to thirty seven seventeen Lexington Road in the heart
of Saint Matthew's back. After this right now, we're gonna
lie to the Chief and how much we like Matt Sanders,
and we'll be back on news radio eight forty whis
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!