12-05-25 SHOW

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
So depending on where you are, it's not too bad
at the moment, but that doesn't hold for anyone necessarily,
you know, for everyone, I should say, yea necessarily is
you're you know, triad north up some problems the further
you get east, and of course the further you get south,

(00:22):
less problems. Is still wet roadways, you should be cautious
on the bridges and stuff. Miss Jade, I don't know
if you're busy there. How was your commute this morning?
I forgot to ask you there was it? I mean
other than probably you know, a little little moisture on
the road. You're coming from the south, so I'm assuming
it wasn't a it's not snowing down in Fayetteville or anything, right, No, it's.

Speaker 2 (00:44):
Not snowing, but it is a lot of rain, and
it was just.

Speaker 1 (00:49):
Yeah, yeah, just okay, all right, Well, so you know,
I just checked the I think the temperature in the
car was forty one this morning coming to the student
and that's just you know, in Raleigh there, so uh yeah,
raced Age. It will be along as he does to
inform us of all of that throughout the show, and

(01:10):
then we'll talk to him obviously in the next hour. Also,
we haven't had a chance to chat with our buddy
Pete for a minute because of course we had Thanksgiving
holiday and the whole week off. Well I did anyway,
and uh so we'll chat with Pete. And they got
a new scandal of bruin down there. I'm I don't

(01:33):
I want to say I'm jealous, because I'm glad it's
not necessarily it might be happening, but at least we
don't know about it yet. Like every moment down in Charlotte,
it's some new crazy thing, some new crazy thing, like
I don't know, perhaps there's this lawsuit, so they have

(01:56):
this weird lawsuit thing going on. I'll get in. I'll
let Pete get into most of it. Here's the low lights.
I was gonna say highlights. So the low lights are
the city manager approved some settlement and the settlements with
the police chief's husband, and the settlement is one dollar
below the threshold for which they would have to have

(02:17):
the city council provide oversight on this. Apparently the city
manager can unilatterly settle any lawsuits they want for under
one hundred thousand dollars, but as soon as it hits
one hundred thousand dollars. Then the city council in Charlotte,
which themselves is full of corrupt individuals, in my opinion,

(02:38):
would have to do oversight, and I don't know, maybe
one or two of them would be like, this is
not a good look. But instead they settled for ninety
nine nine ninety nine dollars. I don't know if ninety
nine cents was attached, and that's just I guess that's
just business as usual. So I am curious about that.

(03:00):
We'll talk about Senator Slenderman and a few other things.
Oh are they still all? They're still doing some Charlotte's
Web protests down there. I'm just looking at pizza a
little rundown list here. Oh good, it'll be a be
a busy, productive conference. Maybe I should sue Pete for
just under one hundred thousand. No, i'd have to see

(03:20):
the city as well. I don't know. We'll threaten lawsuits
that'll be coming up here a little later. In addition
to we got Narco boats, we got CNN getting into
the gambling business, because why not. I need to be
in the gambling business, and satanic child sex abuse rings.

(03:47):
At the risk of sounding like Alex Jones satanic child
sex abuse rings? What are we doing? You know, yesterday
we had the kitten crushing child porn thing, then we
had the cult, the Roadblock's cult. There's so much evil

(04:08):
in this world, and it's like they don't just pick
one lane of evil. Everybody's got to be like these
hodgepodge hybrid little like fusion restaurants of you know, potential
wood chipper victims. I'm not saying we need to go

(04:30):
back to burning people at the stake, but holy crap, man,
like the how this is allowed to fester and grow?
And look, technology makes some of this easier, but at
the end of the day, this is this is in
person work. Oh by the way, the child the satanic

(04:52):
child sex abuse ring, according to police, is run by
a woke journalist, because why not. Absolutely so. Yeah, so
let's see he was right about that. The the hey,
hold on, let's see what I got in the system.

(05:14):
That's some fun this morning? Do do do? I'm gonna sneeze,
holding wow, I don't know what's causing that this morning.
I apologize just having a sneeze. And maybe I'm allergic
to satanic child sex abuse cults. I hope, So I

(05:35):
would carry that as a badge of honor, man, absolute
badge of honor. All right, where's the frog thing? Oh?
We have so much here it is here, it is.
He was right about this too, he was right. Hold on,
let me turn my button borro on, there we go.

Speaker 3 (05:54):
I don't like them button chemicals in the water because
they turned the freaking frog caag.

Speaker 1 (05:58):
Oh that's the song. And so what was actually happening
is they were the chemicals were were corrupting the chromosomal
makeup of the frogs, and so it was turning them more.
It was screwing with them. So he wasn't one hundred
percent there. Child the satanic child sex abuse cults are

(06:20):
a you know, we're top.

Speaker 4 (06:22):
Like a.

Speaker 1 (06:24):
Main story on his show. All I wonder if the
Builderberg thing's correct. I'm going to assume it is. Now.
Oh in the hybrid human animal chimeras, Yeah, yep, that's
the thing. Oh yeah, wait, this one's probably true.

Speaker 3 (06:45):
I mean I alway told people around herm they think
she's even possessed. Okay, I'm just gonna go ahead and
say it. Okay, they said they're scared. That's why when
I see her when kids are Buyer. Actually get scared
myself for the child. I mean, he's that big rubber
face and that I mean, this woman is dangerous. Ladies
and gentlemen, I'm telling you he is a demon. But yeah,

(07:08):
he is completely out of his mind. He wanders around
for the Joe Biden naked in the White House in
the middle of the night, doesn't know who he is.

Speaker 1 (07:18):
I gotta admit, though, if I'm the President and I'm
one around naked in the White House because one other
there's no other opportunity, you're going to be able to
do that more than once. I guess if you got
in on a tour and you were quick enough about it,
you could grab the brass ring there. But it's not
going to end well for you. If you're the president,
what are you gonna do? But no, the Builderberg thing

(07:41):
was it was Builderberg or one of the or one
of the other Oak whatever, one of the secret Society gatherings,
and Jones claimed that if you want to be president,
you show up to this thing, and when you do,
they take you a room, they film you while they

(08:02):
assault you. If he catch what I'm putting there, so
that they have blackmail material on you. So, I guess
if he nailed the satanic child sex abuse called I'm gonna,
I'm gonna, I'm gonna assume that happened to uh Joe.
I think you have to go to it. So and
Biden had gone to it. I don't know if Trump
ever went to one of those AnyWho. That's how we're

(08:25):
starting the morning. Good morning, Happy Friday, six fifteen. Hang on,
and I know it's early, it's only six thirty five,
and there's a lot of day to go. But I'm
pretty sure that nobody's gonna be able to I shouldn't
challenge Congress. I am reasonably sure that nobody's going to
be able to muster something dumber than this. But I

(08:47):
will give them a small sliver of a percentage of
a maybe, because sometimes they over excel. So Senator Jack Reid,
Senator Jack Read's being interviewed yesterday about the and of
course you probably heard some of the performative responses from

(09:08):
very solemn and serious Democrat senators and House members who
went into that closed door meeting with the admiral who
gave the gave the order to throw another shrimp on
the barbie, so to speak, and they're like, it's the
I have to tell you, it's the most horrible thing

(09:31):
I've ever seen in my adult career. It's the worst
thing I've ever seen in my life. And by the way,
you need to understand that the people saying that were
around and watch video of Barack Obama missile a tween, okay,
hell fire missile. They knew this guy's kid, this Ali

(09:52):
Loachi dude from San Diego, who is a US citizen,
by the way, and his kid, sure, so he knew
he was in there in Amman, Jordan, in this building
and they hit and they hit the building multiple times.
But they knew this dude was in there, and they
knew his kid was in there, and he knew they

(10:12):
were American citizens, and he did it extra judiciously. We
talked about it here on the show. The difference, of course,
was they were American citizens and he did it anyway.
And there's weddings, there's all sorts of that stuff. Now
you can agree or disagree with it, and I'm sorry.
I look, if you have a wedding going on and
it's a wedding for a big high ranking terrorists and
all the other high ranking terrorists are there. I don't

(10:36):
necessarily have a problem with them. I'd rather if you
got them all in one spot. You remember like the
big circle that they did with the Yameny pirates or
they the name escapes me, but remember when they were
all gathered outside for like the like the thing you
do on a corporate retreat, and they were just like, oh, perfect,

(10:56):
boosh right, I'm fine with that because those are military goals,
just as eliminating those terrorists were. It hits a little
different when it's American citizens, though, because as an American citizen,
even if they try you in absentia, at least there
is a process there. You had an advocate those things.

(11:17):
Obama didn't wait for that stuff, and these very same
idiots who are out there making those statements were here
for it, and we're fine with it. So look, it's performative.
Make your judgment call based on the information and the
information appears to be, and we'll convey it to you.
Let's see here, the information appears to be that, yes,

(11:39):
while there were two survivors after the initial blast, they
were attempting to gain access to communications equipment on the boat.
The boat in and of itself was not destroyed. So
the drugs are still there, and they were attempting to
grab DRUP for whatever reason. I know, I'm a little
unclear on why they were trying to grab them. Maybe
just the part where they thought that they might be

(11:59):
able to get rescued with some of that. But ultimately
it then creates a scenario where members of our US
military have to go over where these guys are in
the water or on this boat, the disabled boat, or
the part of it that remained, and they don't know
if they have a weapon, they don't know any of

(12:22):
this stuff, and so they are now imperiled more for
the purpose of rescuing Narco terrorists. And I'm sorry, I'm
going to err on the side of our members of
the military. Is somebody send me an email the other
day who's a veteran, And they're absolutely right. People are
conflating and the media is willing to play along with it.

(12:43):
Two different things. They're conflating the standard for law enforcement
or for individuals for the purpose of self defense in
the United States with how we do war and we
do things different police officers going to shoot to stop
the threat, they're going to attempt to create a scenario

(13:04):
and if that means killing the person sometimes it does.
Or if they shoot somebody who has a weapon who's
pointed at him, and that person goes down on the
ground and that weapon goes sideways and is not accessible
to them anymore, and police feel that they can see
their hands and all of that, please generally have an
obligation to go over and attempt the arrest. It's it's
why they handcuff people that they've already shot too. There's

(13:25):
all these safety protocols in war. You gotta keep hitting
it till it explodes. It's a total it's a totally
different thing. In fact, I want to read it verbatim
because he said it better than I'm going to say it. Uh,
hang on, hang on my emails on crack this morn.

(13:46):
My email thinks it's Saturday already. I think, oo, do
do do do do do do? Where was this this
had to be on Monday? Ummm yeah, okay, I'll find it.

(14:09):
But you get the gist of what I'm putting out there, right.
And so when you're in your mind and you keep
being told that this is some sort of police action
versus a military action, you're going to conflate the two
because that's just not how the military tends to roll.
So keep that in mind, I guess, is what I

(14:32):
would say. I don't know why I can't find the
damn thing, but whatever, you get the point. So that's
not the dumbest thing. That's just that's the standard emotional manipula.
It's the heart. It's the hardest thing I ever had
to watch. No, it's not. And by the way, you
said that about January sixth, you very same piece of garbage,
and then you also signed on to it's the worst

(14:53):
thing since nine since No, it wasn't even nine to
eleven was something else. It's just also dumb, also performative,
and shame on Fox News. I keep hearing them run
it without any counterpoint to it. I don't know what
the hell is going on over the Yeah, I'll criticize
our own news service when they're doing something like that.

Speaker 5 (15:12):
Feed.

Speaker 1 (15:12):
They're just feeding this guy's audio every half hour. It's embarrassing. Now,
the dumbest thing came from Senator Jack Reid is then
doing an interview with CNN and says this.

Speaker 2 (15:23):
But you know, one of the factors that drives.

Speaker 6 (15:28):
Views in the United States and is demand and most
knacko traffickers are not in those boats. They pay people
to do that, and usually people who are not significantly
involved with knacko trading.

Speaker 2 (15:44):
It's the way they make money.

Speaker 1 (15:47):
Yeah, so they're not invoked. So one more time, because
he did say what you thought.

Speaker 2 (15:56):
He said, you know, one of the factors that drives.

Speaker 6 (16:01):
Views in the United States and is demand, and most
narco traffickers are not in those boats. They pay people
to do that, and usually people who are not significantly
involved with naco trading. It's the way they make money.

Speaker 1 (16:20):
So the people who are trafficking the narcotics are not
narco traffickers. Make that make sense, Well, they don't always.
It's a side hustle. They got to make money. Another

(16:41):
guy said, well, you have to understand they're economically challenged. Sure,
I absolutely Venezuela, although most I mentioned that is self inflicted.
Colombia and other countries down there have a you know,
from a financial standpoint, it's night and day versus the US.
That being said, we have plenty of people who are
economically challenged here in the United States, so we still
have an expectation that they're not going to go out

(17:03):
and traffic drugs. You want to make an argument about
legalizing drug that's a different argument. But we have an
expectation when laws are on the books that regardless of
whether you're poor or rich, you may find it more
understandable that somebody who is struggling financially may you know,
cross over that threshold. And I'm sympathetic to that, but

(17:25):
there's still an expectation that they don't. And that's part
of this larger thing where we just decided we don't
want to hold anyone responsible. It's kind of the same
argument with the the immigration stuff right where they're like, oh,
the you know, mom got deported and the kids are
still here because the kids are from here, and now
they're living with dad because dad was actually from here,

(17:46):
and it's a or grandma or whatever it is, and
you've just you've you've taken this family apart. Well, some
American citizen goes out and does something against jail time.
Guess what. They're separated from their family. They go to jail,
they go to prison. Unless you're like Chicago, then that'll

(18:06):
never happen. But you get the gist of it. But no,
if you traffic narcotics, if you're literally in the act
of trafficking narcotics. It's the actual meaning of the word
you are moving this. In this case, it was on
the East Pacific side. So I'm gonna guess they were

(18:28):
coming out of Columbia and we're probably going to little
the peninsula there that connects Panama and Costa Rica, which
is kind of rule because they have big problems because
you have that daring gap you got to go around.
They have big problems with drugs and being trafficked through
both those countries to the Caribbean side and making their

(18:48):
way to Europe. But on the west coast side, on
the Pacific side, you get that and it goes into
ports in northern Mexico and is trafficked up into the
US in many instances. Don't anyone tell you differently. There's
maps of this stuff. There are maps of this stuff.

(19:11):
Oh okay, here I found the email. Yeah, that's what
this is, all right. It says, all right, guys, this
is from somebody who has extensive military background and even
from a law enforcement standpoint, so I thought, I thought
this was a very good person to comment. It says,
I think the problem is people are looking at a
military operation through the lens of a law enforcement operation.

(19:34):
In law enforcement you shoot to stop the threat, which
they did with the first strike, But in the military
you shoot to destroy and win the war. And I
think that that is a very accurate recitation of that.
And I don't look, it doesn't matter if you're in
the narco trafficking business just on the weekends to make
ends meet, you're still narco trafficking. That's still the reality.

(19:58):
And look, are is it underlings getting killed rather than
the bosses l F Yes, yes, it is. Frankly, I
would I would prefer it be all around. And in fact,
if you want to uh, if you want to concentrate
on the upper echelon there, then you probably impede people
from uh, you know, choosing to participate in narco trafficking

(20:20):
at the most basic level. But they're still narco traffickers.
It doesn't change anything just because you're like, oh no,
they just they just do it for money. Why do
you think the other guys do it? What do you
think the boss is in it for? What? A Nobel
peace prize? You think the guy living in the giant
hacienda somewhere is doing it out of the goodness of

(20:41):
his heart. Hell no, he's doing it to make money.
The motivation remains the same. Somebody just gets more of it. Yeah,
a guy who runs iHeartRadio, Bob Pittman, our CEO. I
don't know all his motivations, but some of it's probably
monetary as well as status and things like that. Guess what,

(21:03):
that's also kind of my motivation. That's because that's how
it works. Your boss at works probably doing it to
make a living as well, probably make a little better
living than you. But you're all in it for the
same reasons. So it's the words. The absurdity of this
word salad from Senator Reid Jack read it wouldn't be

(21:26):
Harry Reid, He's dead. But is is meaningless. I'm a
radio broadcaster. How do I know I'm broadcasting on the radio? Jade?
You you have when you're not doing radio? You're a bartender, right, yes,
I am. Do you tend bar while bartending? Do you

(21:51):
do you make drinks and tend bar as a bartender? Yeah?
All right, look at that, Jade's a bartender. Wait do
you do it for money?

Speaker 2 (22:02):
Of course I do it for Oh wow.

Speaker 1 (22:04):
Wow, listen to all listen to that as free. Yeah,
but the type of place that I work at.

Speaker 3 (22:09):
It's it's not like you know, like you know those
regular dive bars and stuff.

Speaker 1 (22:13):
I got you, Yeah, but at the end of the day,
there is an incentive there. Jade's a bartender, Jade's a
radio broadcaster right now. I'm a radio broadcaster right now
because we're doing the things that are inherent in the name.
And if you're driving a boat full of fifty five
gallon drums full of fentanyl and anything else under the
sun so that you can transport said drugs from point

(22:35):
A two point B for the purpose of getting them
to the markets in which you sell them, you are
trafficking narcotics, full stop, period, exclamation points emojis, if you will,
done and done six forty nine hang on, trying to
make He's pointing out that these are not the masterminds
of the operation. I understand that, but they're still doing

(22:56):
that for money, participating in whatever the act is. Let
me let me turn this around on you, sir. Do
you think from a military because it seemingly your argument
is that one is military and the others really not,
but we're pretending that it is. Do you think members
of the military are members of the military. I know

(23:16):
it sounds like a weird question, but I want you
to understand what I'm asking you because if you're a
member of the US military, you get paid well unless
they shut it down, but you don't make a gazillion dollars.
But if you have to go participate in a military operation,
you're expected to participate in the manner in which you

(23:40):
are being compensated, even if it's not that much compensation.
And so, you know, you're a you're a you know,
you're a lance corporal and you're taking orders from a
you know, a major or whatever it may be, or
an admiral. In this case, you're expected to go ahead

(24:02):
and do your duty, even though admiral's making a lot
more money than you are. That's just how it works.
So now that these are designated terrorist organizations, it is
what it is. Everybody's playing their part. And I'll tell
you what, Well again, I'd be more. I'd more enjoy

(24:27):
the old like Desert Storm ninety one videos where we
could watch, like a missile go down some weird beard's
chimney and blow it to smitherings. And they were doing that.
So the you know, the heads of these narco terrorist organizations.
The fact is it may cause people who are pondering
that decision to go ahead and pilot a modified cigarette

(24:49):
boat where they've ripped out the interior holl so they
could fit as many fifty five gallon drums of you know,
narcotics in there to go, ah, maybe I'll do something else,
maybe I'll do something else. So you know, it all

(25:10):
works in that direction. But pretending that you.

Speaker 2 (25:15):
Know, one of the factors that drives.

Speaker 6 (25:19):
Views in the United States and is demand, and most
naco traffickers are not in those boats. They pay people
to do that, and usually people who are not significantly
involved with naco trading.

Speaker 2 (25:35):
It's the way they make money.

Speaker 1 (25:37):
Yeah, yeah, so again, it's how everyone involved in narco
trading and trafficking makes money by trafficking and selling narcotics
or producing it. They met work in a lab. You're
all part of the apparat Thai. So and shame on
CNN for going Uh oh, it makes perfect sense. No,
it doesn't stop it. It's Friday morning, so you know

(26:00):
that going for you. Unfortunately, depending on where you are
in the sound of my voice, it could be a
slickery kind of morning. If we'll go, we'll go with
that word. I like that word, so you know, just
kind of know what you're dealing with temperature wise, and
what exactly the moisture. I think everyone got some sort

(26:23):
of moisture, be it rain, sleet, freezing rain, and as
you head north from the sound of my voice, snow
in some instances. So just give it an extra minute,
everything will be okay. Got a busy weekend of huddling
indoors trying not to freeze, so with your family, hopefully
enjoying yourself. Oh so, yesterday on the show, hold On,

(26:45):
let me address this. I don't think this guy's mad
by any means. But yesterday on the show, we chatted
at eight oh five, as we normally do with our
NERD correspondent Stephen Kent and Steve and I were talking
about a movie that was on Netflix. It's called Train
Dreams and If and it's really good. I thought it

(27:06):
was really good. Stephen thought it was really good because
you know, a lot of the a lot of streaming
movies has been very disappointing over the last few months.
There's been some bangers, don't get me wrong, this year,
but I don't know, I haven't been very impressed. I
was very impressed with this movie. But the movie is
basically said in the early nineteen hundreds, and it is
I think a very, very, very accurate observation of what

(27:30):
it was like to be part of those crews clearing
and settling the West. As somebody who has I would
argue that I have a pretty extensive knowledge of this
because my family didn't, and I'm a history nerd, and
I grew up just taking it as much information as possible.
And that's why, and that's why whenever we have these

(27:52):
conversations about any of the Native American stuff out there,
what was going on with the US cavalry post Civil War,
and what that looked like, I don't hold anything back.
It was a very very It was not for the timid, Okay,
it was as family members as somebody who had family
members literally killed by Native American tribes in the eighteen

(28:14):
hundreds in that part of the country, it was tough
work and the men and women. But from a you know,
the clearing of the woods, the lumber industry, the trapping industry,
the railroad industry, both both US citizens as well as
people who were brought in from China and various other countries.

(28:38):
It wasn't rainbows and unicorns. Well, it just wasn't. And
I'm not going to tell you everything that happen and
that happens in the movie, but I don't think at
any point we implied that it was a happy movie.
So but so he said me an email said, hey,
thanks for the sad movie recommendation. Must have been some
dust in the air. I was go, okay, so I'm

(28:59):
gonna assume that you liked it. But yeah, yeah, because
life was tough, life was unflinching. It was lawless in
a lot of the in a lot of instances, or
lawless in a more moderated sense. But definitely there was

(29:21):
frontier justice, as they say, and that was the story,
not just for the West and within this timeframe, but
that was the story of America from the from the
from the moment, from the moment, you know, what the
hell happened? The Lost Colony probably wasn't happy.

Speaker 7 (29:44):
I know that.

Speaker 1 (29:44):
I know there's some theorized that they just kind of
blended in with Native American tribes. I don't know about
all that. I think some bad stuff probably happened, and
there's lots of other examples and that was just part
and parcel of what was going on in the world
at that time, as you have this mad scramble for

(30:04):
these new lands for amongst these European countries. Sure you
had the post crossing, you know, bearing straight Native American
tribes that flourished throughout the Americas, and that was part
and parcel of the conflicts. So if we're gonna watch
that movie, I will let you know it's it's not
a happy movie, but it's a really well done movie,

(30:29):
really well done. And so I don't know, maybe if
you're looking for something to watch this weekend, he could
watch that, or he could watch highlights of George Pickens
refusing to try to catch the ball for the Cowboys
last night. I've never seen anyone give less of a crap.
And Randy Moss used to play for my team and

(30:50):
he'd go, not that he wasn't an amazing player, but
he would have games where he's just like Randy Moss
plays when Randy Moss wants to play. And it was
very frustrated as a Vikings fan. Then when Randy Moss
wanted to play Unstoppable and Pickens is getting paid a
gaze like forty million dollars or something. He wasn't even
putting his arms out for what was easily a touchdown

(31:12):
there towards the end. So yeah, that was that was
an interesting game to watch. All right, let me flip
over to a few things, shall we. Well, I got
some more audio I want to play for you, and
this is I think, what a lot of you want
to talk about. And I'm really curious what you think
because I've seen so many theories, the the the pipe

(31:35):
bomb person, the pipe bomb individual, which for years and
years and years was the great unsolved mystery of January sixth,
even though I guess it would have been the fifth
when they placed him right before midnight after mine that
it doesn't matter. You had the DNC and the RNC,
and you had these pipe bombs which didn't go off,

(31:57):
that were placed somebody in a hoodie. And even though
clearly the government concentrated on going through and in many
people's opinion, overcharging people who entered a capitol building, in
some cases literally after the door was opened by members

(32:22):
of Capitol police who were sitting there playing Bejeweled on
their phones and then walking around didn't actually destruct anything,
and yet found there even people who didn't even go inside,
and then we're given like ten year sentences and stuff.
It was so hyper political as to discuss so many
in the nation that eventually a series of pardons was

(32:43):
out there. And I look, I was the one who said,
this is the problem is is there are people who
absolutely deserve to be charged as part of what happened
there on January sixth, there were people who engaged with
law enforcement in a violent man, beating them with flagpoles
and various other things. And I understand each individual thing

(33:06):
was different. And whether you think that those were, you know,
provocateurs that were placed into the crowd or not, it
doesn't matter if you found yourself breaking the law. If
you sound yourself smashing windows out, there should be appropriate
charges for that. Smashing a window and getting fifteen years
is absurd when we see what people can literally do

(33:29):
on the streets of major cities that used to get
you twenty years in prison and now doesn't even get
you jail time, like none of it was comparable. And
by going so far above and beyond, you ruin your
credibility on any of these other charges, all self inflicted
right there. However, for whatever reason that fervor just didn't

(33:53):
seem to exist for finding this person. And then we'd
hear like Andy McCabe and others go, well, you know,
it's uh, it's just a really tough case to crack.
And then about a month ago, one of the reporters
over at The Blaze ran a big update on this story,

(34:16):
and we talked about it at the time, and I
talked about in the sense is this is what the
Blaze is reporting because much of what was going on there.
There was two things that bothered me. One was this
gate analysis. And while I recognize that when we actually
had non frame removed videos, do you know what I
mean by that? You ever watched those videos where it's

(34:39):
clearly frames are out of it, so you don't really
see fluid motion, You see kind of that jerky motion.
Well video existed of that person walking as they normally walk,
and they clearly have kind of a strange walk. Then
you have to ask yourself, why would you give us
a low res frame removed video rather than one that

(35:01):
is a fluid video if you had it. So that
was number one. But the analysis that was done by
the reporter at the Blaze relied mostly on this particular
way this person walks. And while gate recognition and analysis
is a thing, it's a tool, it's not something that

(35:22):
if you brought it into a court of law that
you could clearly convict somebody over. It doesn't rise to
that standard. And they went a step further the calling
out by name a former Capitol Police officer who had
transitioned over the CIA, and that brought that brought so
many conspiracies forward. So that was so it was that

(35:50):
being kind of the sole thing that made me say,
all right, the way I'm going to handle this is
I'm going to tell you what the Blaze is reporting,
but we're not going to go down this road yet.
We're gonna wait and see what happens. And then the
thing that actually bothered me more was the discussion by
the reporter and when he was talking to Beck I

(36:13):
listened to the interview, was that they were taking a
wait and see on some of this stuff, initially before
the name came out, and then some other stuff because
they were waiting for the three letter agencies to essentially
sign off on it. And that bothered me immensely because
that's not how it works. But it was identified as

(36:33):
a woman was identified as a white woman. I'm and
there's no reason to bring necessarily race into this, But
when I play the audio from Jake Tapper, You're gonna
understand why I'm clarifying here. And her name was put
out there. Fast forward to yesterday, breaking news, literally right

(36:53):
around the end of the show, the FBI has a suspect.
The FBI conducted a raid at the home of the suspect.
I guess he lived with his parents. Still, it's very
nice house, by the way, very nice house, and there's
quite some history that we'll get into with the father
of this guy. His name is Brian Cole, Brian Cole Junior.
I guess dad runs a bailbon's company. But also it

(37:15):
is kind of like I don't want to say civil
rights associated, because I don't consider Ben Crump an actual
civil rights attorney. I see him as an opportunists. There
are plenty of very good civil rights attorney. Ben Crump
is a media personality. He's the same guy who anywhere

(37:36):
that he thinks there might be a whiff of a
payday or some publicity is Johnny on the spot. And
I really don't have any use for Ben Crump. But
the father of this guy that they arrested yesterday was
once defended by Ben Crump, nationally known attorney loves himself
a camera and a microphone. Crump and Cole Senior. So

(38:02):
this guy's dad claimed that a prosecutor in Rutherford County
by the name John Zimmerman was blocking the sale of
his Tennessee bond business because he was black. Yeah, calling
it a racial discrimination case. The problem was the problem

(38:24):
was it sounds like there was a lot more going
on there, but the county just decided they were not
going to engage in any of this, and they it
says here they dropped it. They didn't actually drop it.
There was a period of time where he was prohibited
from selling it, and if there was no ruling that
he couldn't sell it after the thirty or sixty days

(38:47):
or whatever it was expired, then by law in Tennessee,
he could sell it. So it hit the end of
the thing. They did their investigation, there was no objection
he was able to sell it. Make of that what
you will. It's really not not the most important part
of this. So they go ahead to arrest this guy,
the son, the son who there's a lot of stuff

(39:10):
floating around that he was Antifa style, not necessarily Antifa
or he was like we you know, because a lot
of them wear masks. But at the very least, there's
a lot of really hard left narrative in this guy's background,

(39:31):
almost almost communist of sorts. And I guess that kind
of makes sense because you know, Dad's a little in
that world. Son sees what Dad does. Son involves himself
in it, and we don't know all of his motivations.
But he's not a white dude. And again that part
doesn't matter yet when covering it, Jake Tapper says, this.

Speaker 8 (39:54):
Capital attack Brian Cole Jr. A thirty year old white
man from the DC suburb. His charts with transporting an
explosive device in interstate commerce and with malicious destruction by
means of explosions. Seeing an observed local and federal law
enforcement outside his home in Woodbridge, Virginia this morning.

Speaker 1 (40:13):
Okay, why why would you? I don't understand why you'd
say that you could. The report that he gave is
perfectly appropriate except for throwing in the racial I don't understand.
I don't understand why Jake Tapperfield is necessary to put
in there the problem is the FBI was able to

(40:34):
dig into this stuff and in less than a year
solved this thing that they said was unsolvable. We got
some audio from Senator Mark Warner who thinks he knows
and he's a Democrat, so he's going to feed you
full of crap here in a moment. But who claims
to know why this uh, why this was handled this way?

(40:55):
But I think a lot of people think that the
reason it was handled this way is they had no interest.
There was an assumption or maybe an inkling within the
FBI that this was not somebody who was a Trump
person and they wanted to make j six all about
getting the MAGA people. These are the conspiracy theories that
are out there. We'll dive into him coming up eight
eight eight nine three four seven eight seven four. Hang on,

(41:18):
what do you make of the arrest of this Brian
Cole Junior yesterday? According to the FBI, he is the uh.
He's the guy who put the pipe bombs outside the
the DNC and RNC HQs there in Washington, DC. Adjacent
to everything going on with January sixth. There are conspiracy

(41:40):
theories that are abounding on this thing, and like because
the Blaze was out saying it was this woman, and
according to the FBI, it's not this woman that the
Blaze identified in the article there based on Gate analysis
and whatever other sourcing that they had. But that was

(42:02):
seemingly where most people were hanging their hat on that thing.
So now you got this collective who thinks now they
did get the right guy, or it's a cover up
because it's you know, deep state three letter agency stuff
with the other woman, or this guy's a patsy, and
we'll never know who it was, who it is, who
it was. But I'll tell you this, Senator Mark Warner,

(42:24):
the Democrat, has to come out and he's got a
theory why it was so hard to catch this guy,
and it's just laughable.

Speaker 9 (42:31):
But I got to tell you it kind of makes
me looking at this crowd doing a victory lap when
all the senior FBI officials across all key divisions have
been fired for political purposes.

Speaker 1 (42:45):
All right, let's just hold it here. They've been fired
for political Has there been a lot of people in
the FBI that have been purged or had self purged. Yes, yeah,
a lot of them wanted nothing to do with what
was a significant shakeup, bringing in potent Ellenbongino there. Plus
you know Trump's own philosophy on this stuff. But there's

(43:05):
a lot of people don't necessarily see that as a
bad thing. But Warner wants you to believe that the
reason they weren't able to solve it is because after
four years of not being able to solve it, whether
that was intentional or not, it was the purging that
did it. Some might argue that it was the purging
that allowed it to be solved because these holdovers who

(43:27):
wanted nothing to do with because again, what I think
is a very valid point is if you approach us
from a political standpoint and you want to make January
sixth all about evil Republicans, you can't have one of
the highest profile aspects of it be some Antifa kami

(43:47):
or leftists individual arrested for it. It muddies the waters there,
and they weren't going to have that. So some would
argue that the purge may have actually made it so
that this case was solvable because they didn't have new
evidence or anything. According to Patel, they just basically they
took everything went they went, and they took everything back

(44:08):
and they reanalyzed it with their own team, and they
were able to arrive at this, Well, that's so weird.
And under a year, they're able to arrive at an
answer to something that we had no answers for, even
theories for for four years. Give me a break.

Speaker 9 (44:22):
When in some field offices, up to forty five percent
of the FBI officers who were doing things like counter
tespionage and cyber have been assigned to do integration cases.

Speaker 1 (44:34):
Okay, so those so those weren't purged people. Those are
people who work at you serve at the pleasure of
the president from a management standpoint, that people who work
for them that are still prioritizing different law enforcement activities
that fall under the purview of what they do. Different
presidents have different priorities in all sorts of different aspects

(44:58):
of the you know, the executive branch of the government.
And we've seen this. You saw this with I'll give
you an example, Pete bothaj edge with the dot right,
some of prioritize, let's go back, a certain president many
many many years ago, prioritize the construction of an interstate
system in the United States. That was a priority going

(45:21):
back to the fifties and prior to that really with
the expansion of the ability to more efficiently transport goods
around what is a big, big, big country, as well
as the military benefits post World War Two that we
saw there, that was the priority. Pete Budhajeedge wanted to
talk about racist bridges and walking paths and things like that,

(45:45):
and as he served under the previous president, the previous
president prioritized things differently. Dot is a little less controversial
than the FBI in this sense, but this is not
an unusual thing.

Speaker 9 (45:58):
It's a little rich that they're saying America, say, how
much earlier could we have caught this guy if resources.

Speaker 2 (46:06):
Hadn't been diverted.

Speaker 1 (46:07):
You had four years. There's no new evidence, I mean
there is now probably from raiding the guy's house. It
sounds like they found bomb making materials there. Whatever that means.
I mean, at the end of the day, whenever I
hear bomb making materials, you need an explanation because you
all you probably have bomb making materials in your house.

(46:27):
You got cleaning products, you got pipes, you got a welder.
You get what I'm driving at. You got Tanner right,
because you like to go to the range and make stuff.
Go splowdy, Yeah, you do you have bomb making materials?
That being said this guy implying that somehow the investigation

(46:47):
was hampered. No, no, no, no, the thing was only solved
after we transitioned administrations.

Speaker 9 (46:52):
And I hope it would also remind folks that on
January sixth, I was here at the capital.

Speaker 1 (46:56):
On Joey's Okay, it was an ugly, awful.

Speaker 9 (46:59):
Day, and this administration and this president basically pardoned all
the perpetrators.

Speaker 2 (47:05):
You know, it's very kind.

Speaker 1 (47:07):
After you threw a minute goolag.

Speaker 9 (47:09):
Kicking and choosing a fact from this crowd. That makes
me a little bit crazy.

Speaker 1 (47:13):
Now to the question of yeah, after you went straight
gulag with them, Yeah, yeah, they course corrected is what
a lot of people would argue. And again I would
be agreed with Warner that if you if you committed
violence against law enforcement and you come in you destructed property,
you should be charged. But you should be charged. Remember
in DC, kind of the standard for getting charged with

(47:35):
crimes like that was a slap on the wrist. And
I would have even agreed that it shouldn't be a
slap on the wrist. It should read to the statute.
But no, you guys just started making stuff up. Absolute scumbags.
All right, Jamal, you're up next, go ahead.

Speaker 5 (47:55):
Oh my bomba black.

Speaker 10 (47:57):
And not only is the black daddy a raised off
for but everything we said about it, everything I said
about it, because you know the next day I was
that January sixth, and you asked me on the readion.
You said, Jamal, you didn't go inside. I said no,
But I told you, I said, yay.

Speaker 5 (48:16):
S I saw the opened up the door for people
to come inside. I'm just glad you didn't go inside.
So this is something Jamal is not calling in New Casey,
you know you did. But Casey, I said, the only
reason why I wasn't arrested because I was black. That's
the only reason why I was not arrested. And this
just keeps verifying it because they knew this probably BOM.

(48:39):
They didn't use no no evidence, nothing new, nothing turned over.
It was just the evidence that was sitting right there
because they wanted to paint a narrative that it was
white supremacist. All the white supremacist to do January sixt
and it was black, white, Asians, Latino. Everybody was there
because on the FBI came to talk to me, and

(49:01):
they talked to many other people from the geramtown and
Jop went we I had videos of everybody of the thing.
And they was like, I said, well, do you want
my videos? No, that's okay, that's okay, because it showed
it was more than just white and they didn't want
it because it dismissed their narrative. And this right here,
I'm sorry, Casey, I can take if we can take

(49:22):
a victory lap that you or went to.

Speaker 1 (49:24):
Jick Hello, yeah, no, I'm sorry, go ahead.

Speaker 5 (49:29):
Okay because some said no one on the line okay,
I said, okay, But Casey, this is just gives a
victory lap to everyone who went. And everyone who said
this was told they went out to people strictly because
of politics, because we saw I happened. The Saint George
Floyd of the fect now met a lot Baptist Church riots.
We saw what happened. Nobody cared it was. The mostly

(49:51):
peaceful point was smer love. So when I say the
mostly peaceful protests in January sixth of American citizens, I
had a right and I knew and Casey, I'm gonna
keep saying it.

Speaker 1 (50:02):
Well, okay, well let me ask you a question because
I want to get to the heart of exactly got
about a minute. Do you think do you think that
this is the guy or do you put any credence
in the reporting from the Blaze where they said it's
this woman who used to be a capital officer who's
now with the CIA, because I saw a lot of
people yesterday say no, I still think it's the other

(50:24):
one and they're covering it up with this guy. Do
you have any thoughts on it?

Speaker 5 (50:28):
Yes, Casey, And this is what I believe. And I'm
not saying it's the kisser behind Casey. This the truth, Casey.
I like Glambeck and I like your shows. Well, I
don't believe a lot of these independent journalists networks like
this because they walt to me, they jump too quick
on something that's conspiracy. And when you go to Gateway
funded and all these people who do it, gift froj

(50:51):
Veritos was good, but I just didn't believe, and I
never I said something about it. It could be we
don't know when I talked about it, but JC, that's wow.
I waited to wear the news agency. They could get
really really soon.

Speaker 1 (51:05):
Yeah, well that's going to be the Yeah, well, that's
going to be the interesting side too, like are they
going to be able to avoid a lawsuit based on
the fact And thanks for the caller, Jamal that they
said it was ninety two percent. I don't know the answer.
I'm not a lawyer, but it's going to be interesting.

Speaker 4 (51:21):
All right.

Speaker 1 (51:21):
We can get more of your calls on this topic.
And I got a few other things coming up, but
one of them is a weather with mister Ray Stagic
from the Weather Channel. There we go, yo, yeah, yo,
what's going on?

Speaker 4 (51:34):
Hey? Not not much, but they kept me hanging on
and I stayed up till just about the end.

Speaker 1 (51:40):
Yeah, dude, what is George Pickens problem?

Speaker 4 (51:44):
I have no idea.

Speaker 7 (51:44):
I should have caught it.

Speaker 1 (51:46):
He should have. There's a b I was watching the REA,
but I was watching, especially that touchdown, which should have
been a touchdown at the end. I don't know that
you guys would It would have been a victory after that.
But he you know what he reminded me of. He
reminded me of when Randy Moss would have his little tantrum.
Yeah yeah, so I kind of felt bad, but I
also had the over so yay me. Yeah, yeah, you

(52:06):
know what I almost will.

Speaker 4 (52:08):
Was it seventy two?

Speaker 1 (52:09):
Yeah, well yeah, it was forty four to thirty, so yeah,
excuse me.

Speaker 4 (52:14):
Yeah crazy, you know, they keep you hanging on, but
that's what they do. Another painful one anyway. So let's
get into what everybody wants to hear. Maybe not here.
Some are probably hoping that maybe'd be wrong and we'd
see snow on the ground. We don't. It's up toward
the border of Virginia. Actually a couple of inches in
parts of south central Virginia. But we've seen a little

(52:37):
fleet in, a little snow that's mixed in at times,
especially some of the northern counties from the Triad to
the Triangle, but not here much in the way of problems.
It's damp, leftover, light, rain ersil fog this morning, maybe
a sleep pellet. You're forty later today the try it'll
stay in the mid upper thirties tonight upper twenties to
low thirties, and then tomorrow near forty or near fifty.

(52:57):
Excuse me, same thing on Sunday tomorrow, cloud but sunshine
on Sunday. So once again for tomorrow, clouds and the
rain's not going to get us. The last couple of
days look like maybe there'd be a little rain, but
we'll get another cold shot of air coming in by
Monday in the low forties, so a little bit chillier.
But this one, I would say, you miss. The weekend's

(53:17):
gonna be okay. Sunday will be the better day because
with the clouds are rounded temperatures and they've mid upper
forties tomorrow not gonna feel great or at that sunshine
on Sunday near fifty degree temperatures. Casey, I think we'll
feel pretty good.

Speaker 1 (53:28):
Okay, all right, thank you sir. We'll try again next hour.
I have a good one there. There you go. Race
Agic from the Weather Channel coming up. Apparently your plane
can get attacked by exploding stars. The story's weird. Hang on,
we'll have our Friday discussion with our radio buddy, mister
Pete Calender from down Charlotte Way. That'll be happening eight

(53:52):
oh five. Lots to get into the bomb stuff, the
corruption stuff, the I don't know a bunch of stuff.
I do have a question real quick, because I just
saw this story and I'm trying to figure out. All right,
here's the headline, moped crashes into trucks, spilling chicken parts
on the US one and Aberdeen boy Ross's truck trap

(54:17):
is underperforming while he is gone. A driver is in
the hospital Thursday night after Thorty say they crashed into
a truck carrying chicken parts. It's described as carrying Chicken
buy products.

Speaker 2 (54:32):
Is this.

Speaker 1 (54:35):
Like, this isn't like consumer chicken. I'm assuming this is
stuff is what? It's chicken waist. It's going to be
turned into a pet food. Like what how does a
moped hit a truck so hard a semi truck hauling
something like this that the that it causes it to spill?
Like how does a liquor sickle accomplish that? Also, I'm

(55:00):
envisioning that he hit it and it was kind of
like that scene and all the back to the futures
where Biff Tannan hits the manure truck. What would you
rather hit and have fall onto you? Manure or chicken guts?

Speaker 7 (55:15):
Don't?

Speaker 1 (55:16):
I might go for the manure? Weird? Does that sound?
It depends on how fresh said chicken by product part
gut things are. If I was forced to choose, I mean,
obviously I would opt for neither, but I don't know.
Man saw that I got questions. And again, a moped,

(55:36):
how does that hit a semi truck cause it to spill?
I guess maybe probably the reaction of the driver or something.
I don't know. I you want to hear something crazy
or then you know, stuff like, oh, you're just because
you're trafficking narcotics, does it make you a narcotics trafficker?
You know one of the factors that drive I'm a senator,

(55:57):
listen to me.

Speaker 2 (55:58):
In the United States, those demand and most that's not
wrong on that.

Speaker 6 (56:03):
Knacko traffickers are not in those boats.

Speaker 2 (56:08):
They pay people to do that, and usually people who
are not significantly involved with knocko trading. It's the way
they make money.

Speaker 1 (56:16):
That's that's how it works. Like let's say you're a
mob boss that you want somebody killed. You don't want
to kill him yourself, so you pay a killer, a
hired killer. There's still a hired killer because these are
all profit mode of kinds of things. So dumb, so dumb,
all right, So that's dumb. This I don't even understand.

(56:36):
New Jersey bound plane that suddenly plunged thousands of feet,
likely hit by cosmic rays from an exploding star in
another galaxy. Is that a concern that we have? Now?
Do I have to apologize to Don Lemon.

Speaker 2 (56:55):
With hijacking or terrorism or mechanical failure?

Speaker 8 (56:57):
Or I said I would yesterday something fully that we
don't really understand a lot of people have been asking
about that about black holes?

Speaker 5 (57:05):
Is it paposters?

Speaker 2 (57:05):
You think, Mary, Well, it is a black hole?

Speaker 8 (57:07):
Is about you know, a small black hole would suck
in our entire universe, so we know it's not that.

Speaker 1 (57:12):
Or did Don Lemon hear me making fun of him
and then bribe somebody at the in the news to
go ahead and put this out? And what do you
mean so like? Because what happens The star collapses and
then it creates a black hole, Like we're on the
cusp of this, but now the process of it exploding
before it, you know, is expanding before it contracts and

(57:33):
formulates the singularity. Now I gotta worry about this if
I get on a plane. Or is this just the
best excuse for I dropped my iPhone in the cockpit
and hit the yoke while I was leaning over for it.
Because I can respect that, but also it was Airbus

(57:55):
A three to twenty jet Blue Flight didn't they just
have a problem with the three twenties. I thought they
ground I thought American grounded their three twenties for a
little short period here, like a week ago. So I
don't know what's going on, but I guess now, if
you're already afraid to fly, you might get you might
have another galaxy. He's that cosmic rays come and knock
your plane out of the sky, depending on how far

(58:16):
north of my voice you are white from a snow perspective.
Wasn't a racial comment kind of morning around here. So
you know, if you're still waiting to get a head
out and you don't know what's up, you'd probably do
a little research because I could impact you. But at
least at least in Raleigh, and I'm sure down Charlotte

(58:38):
Way we'll find out. Right now, just kind of some
rain we're dealing with. Our radio buddy to the south,
mister Pete. Callander joins us from the Queen City. How
are you doing this morning, sir?

Speaker 7 (58:49):
I'm doing all right. You got getting some an some feedback.
Oh there there we go.

Speaker 1 (58:54):
Okay, all right. I don't know what's up with that.
So son, you're not racing.

Speaker 7 (59:00):
It's just about snow.

Speaker 1 (59:01):
Well. Look, the problem is is that when there's no
reason to bring up race, people keep bringing it up.

Speaker 8 (59:08):
I'll uh, Jake Tapper, Capital Yeah, Mac Brian a thirty
year old white man from the DC suburbs.

Speaker 1 (59:15):
Right, yeah. So so now I feel like every aspect
has now been encumbered with this. So I have to
be uh, I have to be very very on the spot.
What do you all?

Speaker 7 (59:25):
Right?

Speaker 1 (59:25):
So what do you make of it? Here's the here's
what I've offered the audience this morning because Twitter is
going to Twitter and I was following this most of
the day yesterday. There seems to be a slice who
thinks that the woman who was part of the reporting
by the Blaze, who the former Capitol police officer lady

(59:46):
with the unique gait and eventually over the CIA, that
that's the real story. This guy's a patsy cover up.
Others who say this guy's the real guy, And isn't
it interesting that the FBI couldn't find out for four
years and now we know? And the third option, of course,
is it's all a lie, it's all deep state and
we're in the matrix or whatever. So where does mister p.

(01:00:08):
Calender come down on this.

Speaker 7 (01:00:11):
Me being an Ockham's raiser kind of a guy, I
go with the hoof beats belonging to horses, not zeps.

Speaker 1 (01:00:19):
Yes, yes, and so again.

Speaker 7 (01:00:22):
And maybe I'm too naive on this, but I do
believe the story that I am being told, and we'll
find out I mean for now. I mean that's like
everything is subject to change given new evidence. Right, So
if you are going to charge somebody and go to court,
and you're going to lay out this evidence for all
of us to see that you know, he made the

(01:00:44):
purchases at all these various home depots of all of
the required equipment, and his cell phone pings in the
areas at the precise time, and his car is captured
on a video footage. But okay, that that right now,
that seems to indicate that's the.

Speaker 1 (01:01:03):
Horse, you know, not Zeuse got you right?

Speaker 7 (01:01:07):
And I got to tell you the first the first
time that I saw the Blaze story about the female
did you work for Secret Service? Was that what it was?
Or Capitol Police?

Speaker 1 (01:01:19):
Capital Police? And then transition to CIA, Yeah.

Speaker 7 (01:01:22):
To CIA?

Speaker 4 (01:01:23):
Right?

Speaker 7 (01:01:24):
And so what it seemed like it relied, in my opinion,
it relied a little too heavily on Gate analysis, which
I don't know, like that's that's kind of that's kind
of a stretch. And if that's what you're hanging your
hat on, I would need more corroborating evidence. Again, I
don't know. I'm just going by what's publicly available and

(01:01:46):
what the evidence seems to indicate, and right now more
evidence seems to indicate that it is this white dude
from Virginia. Yeah, so let me ask you, how do
you think Tapper comes to make that statement?

Speaker 1 (01:02:02):
I so, I I really because I really thought about this.
If he'd have said black man from Virginia or African
American man, I would I would see that as him
given a little few to the blaze. Do you know
what I'm saying? Because they said white woman and then
he's he's correcting as to how wrong they were. But

(01:02:22):
to say white man doesn't make any sense to me
other than particularly other than if you see the name
Brian Cole, I don't know, maybe that feels like a
white name. I guess it does. But also I know
I know guys who are black named Brian. So I
don't know.

Speaker 7 (01:02:39):
I don't know, man, right, And what's what's amazing is that,
like first off that stuff that they put all that
stuff on the teleprompter, right, like they give him the
script to read.

Speaker 1 (01:02:51):
He's not out there, so he got ron Bergen Burgundy. Yeah,
I don't know.

Speaker 7 (01:02:57):
I don't know. But so, but there to be some
sort of safeguard in there number one, number two, maybe
he misspoke, I don't know, maybe through that word in there,
through white and there may be possible. But the report
that he then tosses to the live reporter, right who
does the report. But the report is always recorded, you know,
as that we do in the TV world, right, Yes,

(01:03:20):
so it's a live Oh I'm live here in a
parking lot where something happened six hours ago, and now
I'm going to throw it to a recorded package that
was done six hours ago, you know, and then I'm
going to come back live and I'm gonna say I'm
reporting live. You know. It's such a construct. I never
liked it.

Speaker 1 (01:03:35):
But in the.

Speaker 7 (01:03:36):
Report it shows the photo of Brian Cole, who is
clearly black. And so that's what I don't understand is
you had the story. It's in the can the producers
know what the guy looks like. Why would you? And
here's the other thing, why would you even mention race?

Speaker 1 (01:03:53):
There's my point.

Speaker 7 (01:03:55):
Yeah, yeah, that's the biggest part of it is why
do you even mention race? There's no need to because
you have a photo of the guy and it is
irrelevant to the fact that he has been arrested. Right,
I understand. If you're looking for somebody and you have
a subject description, which we.

Speaker 1 (01:04:11):
Don't anymore, don't do that exactly right.

Speaker 7 (01:04:14):
That's the bizarre thing is like, when you're actively looking
for a suspect and you need the public's health, we're
not allowed to disclose race when that is actually a
pretty big important part of trying to identify somebody with
limited information. If all you've got is you know, sex, height, weight, clothing,
and race, like that's all you've got to go on,

(01:04:35):
and you're trying to get some maniac off the street,
you should be saying race. But once they're arrested, there's
no point unless it's somehow pivotal to you know, the
crime or something. But there's no reason to even say it.
That's why I don't understand why he would say it.
Let alone get it wrong.

Speaker 1 (01:04:49):
Let's let me let's jump to the FBI side. Did
you see Senator Mark Warner literally argue against himself yesterday,
so I did not hes so helpful. So he's so
he's talking about why he thinks it took so long
to catch him, And you know what, I almost don't
want to ruin it for you, Pete. So let me
just play Mark Warner explain why for four years the

(01:05:13):
Biden administration couldn't catch him, but within under a year reportedly,
the Trump administration did. Mark Warner has a theory here
we go, but I got to tell you it.

Speaker 9 (01:05:23):
Kind of makes me looking at this crowd doing a
victory lap when all the senior FBI officials across all
key divisions have been fired for political purposes, when in
some field office is up to forty five percent of
the FBI officers who were doing things like counter tespionage
and cyber have been assigned to do immigration cases.

Speaker 1 (01:05:47):
All right, So here he rambles on somewhere, But the
main crux of his argument is that the reason it
took so long is because when Trump came in, he
up ended the Apple cards. Some people resigned, others got reassigned,
and as result, that's what took so long. Thus ignoring
the four.

Speaker 7 (01:06:03):
Years, it doesn't make any sense.

Speaker 1 (01:06:06):
No, it's like the Tapper thing. None of this makes
any sense.

Speaker 4 (01:06:09):
People.

Speaker 1 (01:06:09):
Maybe we're not awake. I don't know, I don't Yeah.

Speaker 7 (01:06:11):
Like, like you're going to get up there and say,
the reason why the new guys who fired all the
old guys were able to do it in a quarter
of the time it took you not to do it
is because the old guys got fired.

Speaker 4 (01:06:25):
YEA.

Speaker 7 (01:06:25):
Not exactly making your case.

Speaker 1 (01:06:27):
It's making new guys somehow, right, you're making case. Yeah,
I'm sorry to go ahead. I don't want to see
you there.

Speaker 7 (01:06:34):
Yeah. Yeah, you're making the case waterers inadvertently making the
case that the previous regime and the people that were
working this case sucked right or.

Speaker 1 (01:06:44):
Were attention some way exactly, and that kind of if
you just look it through the lens of politics, as
we do to do what we do, you wouldn't want
to muddy the waters when the January sixth is about,
you know, hanging MAGA out to draw to have one
of the highest profile parts of it to be attached
to somebody who could be perceived as on the left right.

(01:07:08):
That's so that's where I think you get in the
conspiracy there, which I'm kind of apt to wonder if
it's not inaccurate, knowing that the Peter Struts and the
Andy mccabs of the world are people who've existed, right.

Speaker 7 (01:07:21):
And so is there right? Was there a motivation political
motivation to not track this down? Which is weird because
they the guy planted a bomb at the DNC headquarters too.
You know, unless you're trying to right, unless you're just
trying to sow chaos and confusion, and as long as

(01:07:44):
you don't find the guy, then it's like you can
just everybody can just assume it was mega.

Speaker 1 (01:07:51):
What is the argument? What does the argument have been
of people who are up there January sixth people? What
is the argument that they've made? There's two hundred which
the federal officers there, and there are Jean provocateurs from
Antifa and others, and then that you know, like the
guys were kicking in the window and you know some
and none of it's proven. But if you're making that

(01:08:12):
argument and Democrats are tripping over themselves up to and
including hiring an ABC documentary Tarry documentarian team to produce
the damn thing, and you can't muddy those waters.

Speaker 7 (01:08:27):
Yeah, So I right, So I get I do get that.
But it's also possible that they they diverted resources away
from this investigation so they can go after the you know,
eighty four year old grandma from Iowa that followed a
crowd into the Capitol on an unguided tour, you know,
and drop the hammer on granny. And so they spent

(01:08:49):
all of these resources in personnel to go after all
of the mega people in order to advance the very,
the very you know, narrative that we saw them advance.
So yeah, like I still have I still have a
lot more questions about all this than there are answers.
And I was not happy with the press conference that
the DOJ did yesterday. It was a complete waste of time.

(01:09:11):
They offered no information. It was just you know, Victory
lap and Grammy Awards speeches, but without the music playing
to tell them to get off the stage. They wasted
a half hour showtime.

Speaker 4 (01:09:22):
I was pretty upset.

Speaker 1 (01:09:23):
Oh no, See, sometimes I like jypping. You know what,
you just take it for granted because you're not a
morning guy. Yeah, I lost the presidents in Europe. We
don't get to jip a lot.

Speaker 7 (01:09:34):
Okay, Yeah, Well but that's the thing you can't hit everything, man,
because the president is always speaking, He's always doing something
live during noon to three, and I cannot. I'm not
turning my show over to just be c span.

Speaker 1 (01:09:45):
I appreciate that I saw in your little cheat sheet
here that you were going, what the heck's going on
in Minnesota? Let me tell you what is going on? Yeah,
let me let me let me give you a little boat. Well, one,
people are driving by the governor's mansion on Summit Avenue
and say Paul and screaming the R word, and Tim
Walls is not dealing with it. Well, yeah, yeah, yeah.

(01:10:06):
But the Somali stuff is something for the nearly decade
I spent up there that has been extremely troubled and
extremely well known. And only now are we get into
the national side of this. And I'll give you two things. One,
there was a big scandal there where like teenage boys
were disappearing out of the Somali community. And many of

(01:10:26):
these kids had never lived in Somalia. They were born
and they were US citizens or they were brought here
when they were like one because the other the other side.
I'll get to them just a moment, and then they
would just they're gone, and then they would find out
they'd end up in Somalia fighting for al Shabab and
being killed. And in fact, there was one kid who
got over there as a teenager. He's like, I screwed up,

(01:10:47):
and he called his aunt or whatever, and she actually
went to the media and then he disappeared, and they're
pretty sure that al Shabab killed him, because, yeah, cover
up what was going on. The Other thing was the
amount of immigransation fraud was It's known, like what would
happen in Somalia because family units were given priority. A
man and a woman may be married, maybe not, would

(01:11:10):
go find orphan kids. Now they're a family that'd get
over to they'd get over to Minnesota and when they
got there, they just look at these little kids and go,
all right, you're on your own.

Speaker 5 (01:11:18):
Wow.

Speaker 1 (01:11:18):
And the Somali community was an absolute wall to information
because three of the highest profile moss where they were
recruiting these kids. Yeah, and like this was all known.
This was known twenty plus years ago when I worked there.
So now tim Walls and everyone pretending like they just

(01:11:39):
figured it out. I can't express to you if you
don't have that experience, how much more illogical. This is
how much more dishonest this is?

Speaker 7 (01:11:50):
Well, yeah, I guess I saw what was Keith Ellison, Yes, who.

Speaker 1 (01:11:55):
By the way, used to give Keith Ellison credit. He
used to come every week on the show when he
was a congressman, and then Michelle Bockham would come, and
then it was one day we had him there together
and it was weird. But yeah, well.

Speaker 7 (01:12:09):
But yeah, like he did something. I just saw something. Yes,
I shouldn't have brought it because I don't remember what
it was. I saw the headline on it where he
like he knew about Like was it he took money
or or attended a fundraiser with like one of these
people who was one of the ring leaders of this
whole thing, who had already been facing charges. I mean
they've gotten like they they're up to like seventy indictments

(01:12:32):
or something for the feeding our future, Yeah, fraud ring,
and that's been going on for several years.

Speaker 1 (01:12:39):
One of the restaurants I know, one of the restaurants,
it was one of the few not burned down on
Lake Street during the mostly peaceful protests, and I have
physically been to the little area where it is. That
restaurant is the size of a friggin' waffle house, and
they said they were running millions of meals.

Speaker 7 (01:12:57):
Sure, why not?

Speaker 1 (01:13:01):
I'm like to start an underground cog bunker in this thing.
There's no way, there's no way, all right, last question,
I want ninety nine dollars. I just sue the City
of Charlotte and they give it to me right right, and.

Speaker 7 (01:13:14):
The city council may not even know about it because
it's under the one hundred thousand dollars mark. This is
what our city manager did for a former fire department
Lance or sorry, battalion Commander, Lance Patterson, whose wife just
so happens to now be the new police chief of Stella.

(01:13:35):
Patterson formerly a Raleigh she is now our chief of police,
and while she was being hired going through the hiring process,
the city settled a seven year long discrimination lawsuit for
ninety nine nine nine nine, And that being under one
hundred thousand limit, he can agree by his own self,
just all alone, he can authorize that payment. And we

(01:13:55):
are to believe that this had nothing to do with
bringing her on board. At the same time, that's.

Speaker 1 (01:14:00):
So not believable. I'm simultaneously glad that you guys have
all the corruption. Well we have some, but yeah, I
mean yours are real doozies, but also jealous because boy
content baby for real. Yeah all right, man, we'll stay
warm down there and all that good stuff.

Speaker 7 (01:14:17):
Yeah, we got an event tonight. We're going to be
collecting bicycles for kids for Christmas.

Speaker 1 (01:14:22):
Oh yeah, I'm doing that all weekend for our toys
for Todd's collection.

Speaker 7 (01:14:27):
Nice.

Speaker 1 (01:14:27):
Yeah, so we'll freeze together for the kids. I appreciate Pete.
All right, there you go, Pete Calender joining us here
on the CaCO Day radio program. Hang on. Just Washington
Post has a story this morning, and it's how they're
going to fix the healthcare system in England, the National
Health Services whatever they call it. Over there. They have

(01:14:50):
a new marketing program to brate people from showing up
to receive medical care for what they describe as minor injuries. Now,
don't get me wrong, there are there people who will
go to an emergency room or go to a doctor's
appointment for something arguably they probably should have realized wasn't

(01:15:14):
a high priority. Yet happens happens here, and I'm sure
it happens over there. That being said, the difference is
England signed up for this because they wanted to be
the healthcare provider, so you're got to get all of it. Now.
The English people, you know, back in the day, weren't
such woosbags about it. You know, I'm thinking Black Knight

(01:15:38):
tis but a scratch right that guy was willing to
push through.

Speaker 4 (01:15:43):
That.

Speaker 1 (01:15:43):
Being said, this is just one of the other pitfalls
of universal healthcare right there. You're overwhelmed. You've taxed your
citizenry to the point where they're going to actively revolt,
and you've im ported a lot of individuals who, of
course are mediately having their healthcare, and a lot of
them come with pre existing elements, elements ale mints there

(01:16:05):
we go because they come from places where healthcare isn't
really a priority, and so now they're now they're going
to get there and take advantage of the opportunity there.
And I kind of understand that too. Yeah, I mean,
this is this is all self inflicted stuff.

Speaker 4 (01:16:23):
Man.

Speaker 1 (01:16:24):
But your your your marketing campaign is to shame people. Ah,
what are you doing? You only got that's yeah, I
know you were stabbed, but you're only stabbed once, sir.
Do you over here clogging up our healthcare system that's fun.
That's great. Oh look at this. Okay, so and we'll

(01:16:46):
I get well, we'll have a business report coming up
here in about about fifteen minutes. Oh, Denise is out today.
What is I think it's Erica today. Yeah, Erica Herskowitz.
We like her. She's gonna be filling in today. The
Netflix I apparently has won the bidding war for Warner Brothers.
I'm just curious how that's going to impact my streaming. Hey,

(01:17:11):
how so, because you know, HBO Max has the Superman
and the DC and the Harry Potter and all that stuff,
but that's under the Warner Brothers umbrella. So how does
how does the all of these products and uh and
ips that were associated with HBO and the Discovery Network
and HBO in and of itself through Warner Brothers with

(01:17:32):
the separate apps, because you just you know, it ain't
gonna be as simple as oh, no, now you just
need one app, so you can cut one out. No no, no, no,
they'll find they'll find something. And by the way, I
don't even pay for my HBO Max part. It's part
of my AT and T phone service. I'm sure it
is probably for a lot of you. I just remember

(01:17:53):
it was they gave it to me and they've never
taken it away. So I've had the same AT and
T cell service for like twenty years. Oh uh yeah,
only this update. So the Blaze has now retracted the
January sixth pipe bomb story that we were talking about.
All right, let me read. Let me read what they

(01:18:13):
posted here. Blaze News considers fairness and accuracy to be
the defining goals of any news org. Our report posted
November eighth, Well, the January sixth pipe bombs was based
on sourcing from individuals in a position and know this
type of sensitive law enforcement information. Wow, there's a lot
of words to say that we might have got it wrong,
the type of sensitive law enforcement information who have demonstrated

(01:18:35):
a record of reliability and accuracy. Of note, the sources
continue to stand by the information they provided the Blaze.
Oh this is interesting, So I'm not I let me
retract the word retraction. I don't know that this is
a retraction, even though that's how it's being couched here.

(01:18:59):
This is I we'll call it a recognition of new information,
but they're standing by it. I don't know if that's
a legal thing or what. At all times reporting it
here to professional journalistic standards and was published with a
good faith belief in its truth. Even so, in light
of Thursday's developments and the FBI's arrest of another individual,

(01:19:21):
Virginia resident Brian Cold you and you're in connection with
the incident, we consider the values of fairness and accuracy
to require, okay, retraction, So it is a retraction, all right.
I didn't get a chance to read it all the
way through. I literally read it live with you, so
I was bouncing around emotions there. Yeah, I don't know, man,

(01:19:42):
that's gonna be one of those interesting side stories. I mean, clearly,
the primary story is did this guy do it? Why
did he do it? And you know, the internet's forever,
so more and more information clearly will be coming forward,
but we will we'll follow it for sure here on
this show. King of derelict, a dereliction of media duties.

(01:20:03):
I saw this yesterday, and I lay this clearly at
the feet of the mainstream media. According to the Media
Research Center, only twenty four percent of likely voters okay,
so this was a likely voters sample group know that
Charlie Kirk's alleged assassin is a leftist that's insane me.

(01:20:30):
I mean, good job for all the people who just
basically wanted to ignore that fact did so, and now
you have an ill informed constituency out there, an audience
out there, and for people go, well, what does it matter?
It matters because we want to when people do horrible things,
we want to understand why they do them. Sometimes, you know,

(01:20:52):
some of it's for selfish reason, You're like, oh glad
it wasn't one of my guys. But in reality, when
people do horrible things, you want to know why they
do them for a wide variety of reasons. Is there
an existing problem which could manifest once again? Will it
turn us to look at other individuals who were plotting

(01:21:14):
the same thing, who may or may not know the
individual We care very much about why people do things
until we don't. Apparently with a political assassination, arguably the
most the highest profile political assassination of my lifetime. I mean,

(01:21:36):
we thought about this on the air. I can't think
of a political assassination that has is bigger in my lifetime,
not attempted assassinations, because I technically was alive when they
tried when they shot Reagan, I was a baby, but
he didn't die. Charlie Kirk obviously did die, and so

(01:21:57):
I mean, this was the big one out there, and
you know, going back to like JFK, we had a
whole commission. I mean, we can argue whether all the
conspiracy that's around it, but people clearly care, and so
it is an absolute dereliction of the media's obligation. Then
only twenty four percent of people seem to have any

(01:22:18):
basic understanding of why the highest profile political assassination of
most people's lifetimes easily most people, the majority of Americans
were not alive for the Kennedy assassination. I know a
lot of you were that may be listening to the show,
but the majority of Americans, unless you were, unless you're

(01:22:42):
literally Ross's baby right now, you know, you started at
zero post you know, post Kirk assassination. That was the
biggest one. And only a fourth of people out there
is it because they aren't actively interested. I'm sure some
of them, but in in in an environment where we
can portray or we can you know, put out information

(01:23:05):
instantaneously across multiple platforms, you're telling me that only a
fourth of people know that. That's embarrassing, man, It's beyond embarrassing.
It's a huge problem. Oh good, that's this whole thing
freeze perfect.

Speaker 7 (01:23:25):
All right.

Speaker 1 (01:23:25):
Let me hit you with this story just because it's
that insane. This is like Alex Jones. Alex Jones was right,
kind of stuff. Woke journalists accused by police of being
the leader of a satanic child sex abuse cult told
you we're we're running out of wood chippers this week.

(01:23:47):
LGBTQ plus activist and journalist Landon Mill what is it? Germanada,
Germanata Mills, I know I'm butchering that don't care. Runs
Underground Media Network news site, which apparently is a big
deal in Australia, which is where this is out of
polease in New South Wales, Australia have charged four men
following an investigation into an international satanic child sex abuse

(01:24:12):
material ring. None of these words should be next to
each other unless you're writing a horror movie, and even
then it might be too dark for most viewers. One
of the alleged ringleaders of the group is a woke
journalist and queer activist Landon Mills, who runs the Underground
Media Network news site on substack. The publication claims to

(01:24:37):
expose racism and centers the stories of victims, including child victims.
So you're literally covering this stuff. The super pro Antifa too.
Look at that detectives from the child exploitation. All right,
well I can't read all this. What are they actually
accused of doing? Oh yeah, oh yeah, it's all the

(01:25:02):
stuff you say. I'm not gonna repeat all this other radio.
Thousands and thousands of photos and videos showing graphic content
involving infants. Infants, infant Now in Australia, you don't even
need a wood chip or you just throw them to
the wildlife. Right, get those, Get the the chlamydia koala things.

(01:25:28):
Don't all the don't all the qualas have chlamydia. Look,
we can get creative. This is in Australia, man, just awful.
All right, well there you go. You can google more
of that if your stomach persists. Raced agic from the
Weather Channel. He's here. What's happening, sir?

Speaker 4 (01:25:45):
Well the good news there's not much but damp and cold.
Probably not gonna make too many friends the next couple
of days, and okay, see every once in a while,
look ahead, you know me and all to go beyond
three days. But pabably not gonna see any big warm
up anytime soon. If we do get milder, shots of
cold air will commit occasionally, if you believe in the
long range, right around the sixteenth, seventeen fifteen, sometime in

(01:26:11):
the middle of month, could be a real dump of
cold air coming south. So I will keep an eye
on that at that time of year. But the pre
zipt this morning has been light and spotty. Now the
snow and ice has been north, more like the Virginia
border where there's been a couple of inches, and through
parts of Virginia. Maybe in some of our northern counties,
especially north of Winston, Salem and Greensboro, there could have

(01:26:31):
been a light accumulation, but otherwise no real huge deals
here at clouds and spotty drizzle and might rain this
morning into the afternoon. A lot of it will be
tapering off and we'll struggle, I think today to get
out of the thirties near freezing tonight, clouds tomorrow, mid
upper forties, and then upper forties, low fifties with sunshine
on Sunday. Sunday is certainly looking like the better, the

(01:26:52):
better day of the weekend if you are travelers. We
got interests in Charlotte tomorrow night. ACC Championship going to
be chilly. If you're going it's inside, but travel weather.
If you are going south, if you're a fan, that
weather should be nice too. But if you're tailgating, it
is going to be chilly for both games and in
the stadium and Charlotte, we're looking at temperatures at a fall.

(01:27:12):
Probably you are the thirties as the game continues to
go on. But luckily no precist.

Speaker 1 (01:27:18):
All right, so according to bring the hard liquor for
tailgate to stay warned. Yeah, yeah, that's actually.

Speaker 4 (01:27:23):
Horribulated ball shop fireball shops.

Speaker 2 (01:27:26):
Look at you.

Speaker 1 (01:27:26):
Oh you're a man with a plan. All right, I'll
let you get to it. Thank you, sir. There you go,
professional tailgater right there. All right, we'll come back next
with Bloomberg. Hang on and your Bloomberg update. Now, like
I said, Denise's out, but Erica Herskowitz is in. Good morning, Erica,
and I know you got a whole bunch of stuff,

(01:27:46):
but I want to know, am I still going to
have to pay for an HBO and networks thing?

Speaker 11 (01:27:53):
That's a really good question, and I would be wondering
the same exact thing because I feel like I spend
a bundle on these these services. It's insane. Yeah, while
you're talking about the world's dominant paid streaming service buying
one of Hollywood's oldest and most revered studios. This morning,
Casey Netflix has agreed to purchase Warner Brothers Discovery in

(01:28:13):
a cash and stock deal said to be worth seventy
two billion dollars. Under the deal announced this morning, Warner
Brothers shareholders will receive twenty seven to seventy five a
share in cash and stock in Netflix, and prior to
the closing of this sale, Warner Brothers will complete the
plant spin off of cable channels including CNNTBS and TNT.
Hawaii is the latest state suing TikTok for contributing to

(01:28:37):
the youth mental health crisis. The state's attorney general claims
the platform was deliberately designed to exploit kids under developed brains,
and its features like live streaming and endless scrolling are
meant to be addictive and expose children to inappropriate material.
TikTok denies this claim and says it's implemented a robust
safety measures to support the well being of its community.

(01:28:59):
Copper is rising to a record traders anticipating a shortage
caused by stockpiling in the US, Analysts and City Group
predicted will average thirteen thousand dollars a ton next year,
a key component in pipes, power cables, electric vehicles, the
metal is being hoarded in anticipation of import tariffs next year.
And clouds fare Flair says it's fixtive problem that led

(01:29:19):
to the websites of several banks, Shopify, Zoom, and LinkedIn
to go down this morning, and the major outage at
cloud Flair last month disrupted social media sites and chat
GPT for hours. Shares and cloud Flair dropped as much
as six percent in pre market training. And finally, casey
people are still buying hair and beauty products. All to
Beauty raised its full year outlook after reporting better than

(01:29:41):
expected results in the third quarter. It's a sign that
consumers are overcoming any reluctance to spend and still prioritizing
makeup and hair supplies. The company now expects comparable sales
to be up as much as four point seven percent
for the current fiscal year.

Speaker 1 (01:29:54):
So there's no way if they paid eighty some gazillion
dollars for this, they're going to let me save seventeen.

Speaker 2 (01:30:01):
Okay, it's a tough.

Speaker 1 (01:30:04):
Pill on a Friday. Yeah, thank you so much, though,
have a good weekend. Okay, all right, there you go.
Erica Hurskwitz joining us here on the CaCO Day radio program.
Speaking of media stuff, this is weird. I don't know
what's going on. Do you guys know what call she is?
I'm sure if you're on Twitter you've seen this, so
call she is? You know, they put out all these

(01:30:25):
odds on things. There's sports stuff, there's there's everything. Well,
Trump's hair fall out. I'm sure there's a line on that.
It's actually in a in an environment where online gambling,
not just in the sports thing, but in various other
places is taking off. This is striking while the iron's hot.
The question is how far are you willing to go

(01:30:48):
with your ability to bet on things? And here's why
I'm telling you this. CNN and CNBC have partnered with
calls to us are in what they're call, excuse me,
a new era of media. Yeah, here we go. CNN
partners would call you to integrate prediction markets into their

(01:31:10):
global newsroom. Remember there's a guy over in France who
made eighty million dollars betting that Trump would win the
last election. You look it up. In fact, they had
they had some nickname mocking this guy when the when
he first laid the bet. I'm not sure what he
had to wager for. I don't know what the odds were,

(01:31:31):
but whatever he wager, the take home was eighty million dollars.
It was something with the French connection, some play on
words and that. You know, guys, that obviously worked. So
now you tie it in with news channels if you
want to call CNNA news channel, I don't know what

(01:31:53):
that worked. Like, are we going to be able to
bet on how a news story is going to turn out?
You see the inherent problem with this, right It's the
same thing where I have a problem with ESPN because
they're the largest single contractor with professional sports, which means
they have an immense amount of influence also running a
betting site, especially with everything that we've seen. So now CNN,

(01:32:17):
and then who is the arbiter of whether a particular
prediction came true for the purpose of collecting Because I'll
tell you what, man, If CNN's reporting is all of
a sudden, what verifies that you've either won or lost
a wager and it's based on news. This is right

(01:32:38):
for I guess you always bet left right