Tuesday-7-15-2025

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Ross, it's Saint Swithin's Day. I don't know if you
have a Bucky's inflatable for that, but congratulations on another
trip around the sun.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
If you guys don't know, sorry, I'm sorry. What Saint
Swithin's Day? Is that a real thing? The British say
it is.

Speaker 1 (00:16):
So basically, it works like this, if it rains today,
then it's forty more days of damp days and nights
of damp weather.

Speaker 2 (00:25):
So you know, so it's.

Speaker 3 (00:27):
Like their poverty version of Groundhog Day.

Speaker 1 (00:31):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, except if you if you try to
figure out when that start, because Groundhog Day officially became
a thing in the eighteen eighties I don't remember exactly,
I guess say eighteen eighty seven or something. And if
you go and you try to figure out when Saint
Swithin's Day became a thing, they play fast and lose

(00:55):
because that saints from like the eighth century. But that's
not the question I'm asking. So I'm asking what did
they start doing it? And it's really hard to nail
that down. So yeah, I think they totally ripped it all.

Speaker 3 (01:06):
I mean, it doesn't matter either way because we're the superpower, right,
so I mean, if we say it's ours, then they
stole it from us. It's like when you're like a
big Twitter account and somebody steals your your your bit
or your post and o it's their post and.

Speaker 2 (01:17):
It's the Robin Williams joke thing. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Speaker 1 (01:21):
As much as we love Robin Williams here on the show,
h you know, if you ever watch a documentary on
him or anything, one of the things comedians will say is,
don't do a joke in front of Robin Williams, because
then it's his joke because he's Robin Williams. So yeah,
it kind of kind of works like that with Twitter,
and apparently it works like this was Saint Swithin's day.
So so yeah, it rains today and we'll find out

(01:46):
later fully what's going to happen, although I think you
have a pretty good idea at the moment.

Speaker 2 (01:51):
We'll we'll go ahead and uh, we'll put this on Ray.

Speaker 1 (01:55):
I wonder if he knows what Saint Swithin's Day is,
so anyway, Yeah, that's that's the Timu Groundhog Day for
the British. So I wonder if Canada has anything with
like a beaver or something.

Speaker 2 (02:09):
Dude did you see it.

Speaker 1 (02:10):
I see the cover of the New Yorker yesterday. Oh man, wait,
what is this? Oh, Boston Paul's got conspiracies? This morning,
during the Red Sox Washington National Series in DC, the
Red Sox visited the White House, met and shook hands

(02:33):
with President Trump. And haven't lost a game since winning
ten in a row. And let me ask you a question.
So Trump is clearly I'm assumed. What is Trump from
a baseball fan? Probably Yankees, right, I think he's a Yankee.
I think I've seen him in the Yankees cap. So

(02:55):
so did you ever contemplate their Boston Paul? Since now
I got to interrupt the whole show for this, that
maybe what he's doing is he's setting you up to
fail big time. You know, like every time you'd go
to the postseason, except you know, just a couple and
it would be your year and then a ball go
through one of your guys's legs, or the Yankees would

(03:16):
sweep you in four in the AL Championship. You know,
things like that. It's no fun if you just don't
make the playoffs. You have to crush dreams. So be
careful what you wish for. That's all I'm saying, okay,
all right, so anyway back to back to this this

(03:36):
yesterday from the from the New York magazine.

Speaker 4 (03:41):
And.

Speaker 1 (03:43):
It's really weird because I don't think they got the
response that they thought they were gonna get, which is,
you know, pretty much standard issue for a lot of
these outlets because they they they have a pulse on
what's going on in their newsroom and uh yeah, that's
that's about it, all right. So the headline or on
the cover, you have a picture of a beaver holding

(04:04):
a bald eagle by its neck like it's strangling it,
almost cartoonishly, and it says you have no idea how
furious the Canadians are.

Speaker 2 (04:15):
Ross. I know you.

Speaker 1 (04:15):
Mentioned that this keeps you up sleepless at night wondering
how mad the Canadians are. Right, a lot of lost
sleep over Now.

Speaker 3 (04:26):
This goes back to our soccer conversation yesterday where correct, yeah,
like they don't understand Americans at all, like at all,
And it is really that mad men meme we've seen
where he's in the elevator and the guys like I
feel bad for you and right, and he's like, I
don't think about you at all.

Speaker 2 (04:40):
It's just like, yeah, it really is, yeah, man.

Speaker 1 (04:44):
And did I don't know if you saw over the
weekend there was some lady who is actually like a
former French politicians like the Americans better get come correct
on this immigration or we're gonna take FIFA away. You
saw that. You saw that lady just getting beat Oh
and it's just not the soccer game. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
And it was just it was just eighteen hundred responses

(05:06):
of going, oh no, don't do that, don't throw me
in the briar patch. You know that was that was it?
Am I allowed to make that reference? I don't know, man,
see I can make that one reference from it.

Speaker 3 (05:18):
Some of the best posts to see on like YouTube
or social media are people from Europe who have spent
some time in the United States and they'll yeahs like
this and they'll see the response like oh no, the
soccer game or we don't care about you, and they'll
be like, hey, I can confirm for my you know,
my half a decade in the United States.

Speaker 2 (05:35):
They really saw the exact what you're talking about.

Speaker 5 (05:37):
It.

Speaker 3 (05:37):
But there's lots of them and it's sort of like, yeah, no,
those are the best ones to find because then and
they'll like post pictures and like, you know, stories to
go along with their opinion, and they're like, no, for real,
I've been here for like ten years.

Speaker 2 (05:48):
They don't care at all. They don't.

Speaker 3 (05:50):
But then you'll have other people from here going no,
they really do, and they're like, no, they don't, they
really don't.

Speaker 1 (05:54):
Yeah, like like maybe the New Yorker, the people the
New Yorker. Right, So if it's so, if you're a
hoity toity a hole who you know who sees an
American tourist and turns her nose up, and we'll never
have a conversation versus some high falutin like relocated Europeans
who left because Trump got there, And that's who you're
informing yourself with. Most people don't care. And it's not

(06:17):
just say I don't like Canada. This is the thing.
I think Canada for you know, for going up there
and fishing and hunting all those years, is an absolutely
magnificent place for the nature. Spare me the politics of it,
and uh, you know. And and it's funny because if
you go to like I said, I would go to
Western Ontario, and all those people hate their government because

(06:43):
they're more They're more American than anything else because they're
you know, they're very independent. They live out in the
the nether regions, like you know, areas like Lake of
the Woods, Thunder Bay, places where these uh, these guys
don't even go on vacation, right, But the handful of
it of the politics, oh forget about it, as is

(07:06):
a theme here on the show. So I'm sorry New
Yorker Magazine or New York Magazine or whatever. Nobody cares.
They really don't. And also, if I could for just
a moment, Ross, who would you have in a fight
versus a beaver or a bald eagle. I don't think
the editors thought about this either.

Speaker 2 (07:26):
I mean, I'd have to go bald eagle.

Speaker 1 (07:28):
Yeah, not just because you're loyalties. I think it would
have to do with the fact that a beaver is this.
I have seen bald eagle kills of animals larger than beaver's.
Bald eagles are massive and pertinell it's wingspan and it's
not that they're particularly heavy, but that beak and the

(07:50):
talents that they have are two inches and the strength
to tear through and gut stuff.

Speaker 2 (07:56):
I have seen both a medium.

Speaker 1 (07:57):
Sized dog that was killed by a bald eagle. And
I have seen multiple lambs and I'm.

Speaker 2 (08:02):
Not talking you know it's about to say the lamb thing.

Speaker 1 (08:05):
Yeah, I'm not talking just brand new, newborn lambs. I'm
talking a few weeks to a couple months old.

Speaker 2 (08:12):
Yeah, and like the eagles is flying away with it,
like my lamb a lot.

Speaker 1 (08:16):
Well sometimes they will, but they'll also you'll get them
where they come down in a pair and they're not
able to fly away with it per se, but they'll
kill it right where it.

Speaker 2 (08:24):
Is and just eat it like that's a thing.

Speaker 4 (08:27):
Man.

Speaker 1 (08:28):
There was a dude who went to jail. His name
was Joaquin Maya and his brother Silver, That was literally
his brother's name was Silver. Weird family that I grew
up with. They were a couple of Basco boys and
they had they had lambs, as most of the Basque
branchers in Wyoming do. And uh, Joaquin and Silver and

(08:48):
I can't remember who. It's been a while, I can't
remember who got the most time. But they had lambs
that were getting killed and they they shot a couple
of bald eagles. Went to jail for like five year
yours for it.

Speaker 2 (09:00):
Because you don't do that. And and by the way, uh,
you don't do that. But I think they had.

Speaker 1 (09:07):
I think they had killed like four or five lambs
that year. They were particularly aggressive. And this guy's just
flipped out, So I don't I understand that if the
beaver can get those teeth on the eagle, it's not
going to be pretty. But I don't know, man, I'm
going bald eagle in this and uh, clearly, by the way,
the picture on the front of this magazine is not

(09:28):
to size. So unless it's a very juvenile eagle and
a very very bulky beaver. Man, So you guys should
have went with the moose.

Speaker 2 (09:38):
Is all that I'm saying. I'm pretty sure the moose
probably be a draw, just because how the moose has
to get at you. But at least you might stand
a chance, all right.

Speaker 1 (09:49):
Coming up on the show eight oh five, Senator Ted
Budd's gonna join us, and uh, we're gonna I think
you know what we're gonna talk about, obvious obviously we'll
get in to.

Speaker 4 (10:02):
Now.

Speaker 1 (10:03):
Trump is talking about a billions of weapons defensive weapons.

Speaker 2 (10:10):
To Ukraine via NATO.

Speaker 1 (10:13):
Allies, so there'll be a little bit of a pass
through there, and we got to get into this Epstein stuff.
So yesterday, yesterday Hakeem Jeffries and others are down trying
to put a a bill together or a motion together,
or however you want a word it to immediately release
all the Epstein files. And it did not go through.

(10:33):
So the Republican leadership did did not allow it to
move forward with a vote.

Speaker 2 (10:37):
So what the hell is going on?

Speaker 4 (10:40):
Man?

Speaker 1 (10:41):
What is that by? It tells me that there's things
known in Washington that are not being told to the
American people.

Speaker 2 (10:52):
And it sounds like it's on both sides.

Speaker 1 (10:56):
If it's a gamble just to go, he's made He's
clearly made his mind up. So now we're gonna be
the opposition on this thing that we were formerly the
opposition on the other side of. Like everyone's changed places.
That's a good plan until he calls your crap on.

Speaker 3 (11:15):
Yeah, Like I'm not like typically a forty chess guy, right,
but like what if it's a big what what if
he's doing this? So he's like, oh, we're not gonna
want him released.

Speaker 2 (11:24):
I don't want to want him And he knows they
do everything.

Speaker 3 (11:26):
That's the they buy in on that they're like, oh,
we want him release and then he's like, you know,
they passed the bill or whatever, and he's sitting at
his desk with a big smile and he's like, I
got you, bitch, really.

Speaker 4 (11:37):
Well.

Speaker 2 (11:37):
And that's a big reach, right.

Speaker 1 (11:39):
I'll tell you what I will give the forty chess
constant tweeters, like two years of freebies.

Speaker 2 (11:45):
After that, you'll you'll open up the Naberu fold. Yeah.

Speaker 1 (11:49):
Yeah, there'll be some people coming out of that. I'll
a bit I was wrong, you know why, because it
will accomplish what I want to accomplish, and it's all
that I want to accomplish in this. I don't care
about anybody's politics here. I want this thing laid bare.
And if there's there there, I'm telling you it's just

(12:09):
not hidable. When you're talking about terabytes and terabytes of information,
you're talking about, you know, servant class. Let's also remember
that you're talking about servant class. All of these people
who may or may not be involved, as well as Epstein,
they all have staff man, they got pilots, they got chefs,

(12:32):
you know, they would bring they would bring chefs to
that island, which makes sense you and then of course
you have the victims, which some of them are on
the record with names, but there's no corroboration. I saw
yesterday they were saying two judges in New York are
holding up some of the details.

Speaker 2 (12:51):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (12:51):
It's first time I've heard of that. So, like, I
don't trust anybody in this, but yeah, what I love
it to be, like, ah, here you go, you get
what you asked for, and it just cooks a bunch
of gooses. Yes, because those people should be in jail
for raping kids. It's very simple, very simple. Indeed, all

(13:13):
right six point twenty here on the Cacoday radio program,
Hang on, let people know, and I understand it's difficult.

Speaker 3 (13:19):
Now.

Speaker 1 (13:19):
Nobody wants to get involved, right, Everyone wants to mind
their business, depending on what city you're doing it in.
You know, all it takes is you literally trying to
do the right thing. One video that's clipped improperly or intentionally,
I should say, and now you're canceled from everything. People
don't want any of that. They saw what happened with
the subway guy, they saw what happened with so many

(13:40):
different examples, and as a result, they don't involve themselves,
which is, which is tragic.

Speaker 4 (13:47):
Man.

Speaker 1 (13:47):
How many stories have we done where some horrible's happening
and like, where are the everyone's going?

Speaker 2 (13:52):
Where are the men? Where are the men?

Speaker 1 (13:55):
And that's because the men have just checked out, like
they I don't want the hassle and it's it's it's
a really awful thing. But it's not just the men,
it's the women too. Case in point, this couple was
doing themselves a little hiking near Ashville actually, and they
came across two bears.

Speaker 4 (14:14):
Uh uh not.

Speaker 1 (14:16):
These were not getting it on bears. These were fighting bears.
So you got two boars that are fighting, so they can,
you know, go get it on. And what do they
do instead of breaking it up? Right basically Steve from
a Jerry Springer, No, they just film an opine. But
at least the woman raises concern.

Speaker 2 (14:38):
There's the bears going at it.

Speaker 1 (14:43):
Yes, yes you should immediately why even ask yourself if
you want to get in there?

Speaker 2 (14:49):
You want to?

Speaker 1 (14:49):
At first you got a yell world star right as
we know from any fight video. But then yes, get
them between them, talk it out. What is it you said? Yes,
say tell him you're better than this. So come on, man,
you just are gonna let these two go at it? Absolutely, yeah, no, no, no,
you want to jump right in there, man, Yes you should.

(15:19):
So a reminder for all of my dumb listeners. When
you're in the mountains and two bears are fighting, it's
not okay. This is interesting because you know, we normally
get to hear in the mainstream media that all the
people that Trump's rounding up are just kindly grandmothers. So
I was looking at the I was looking at the

(15:41):
hall from the month of June, just in the city
of Houston and where they arrested one than three hundred
and sixty one illegal aliens. It's just in Houston, just
during the month of June, and it is how do
we say, it's it's a colorful bunch.

Speaker 2 (16:03):
Some of the some of the.

Speaker 1 (16:05):
Past crimes here, okay, I haven't even heard of, like
how a person gets into the country with this particular
offense on their record. So you got murderers, you got
child molesters. Of course, I don't understand why we let
those folks in. Sometimes we don't, and they come straight

(16:25):
across and not even just given passage into the interior
like they were under the Biden administration. One of the
dudes is a plane hijacker. And I don't know if
you know how we feel about plane hijackers.

Speaker 2 (16:42):
Here in the United States.

Speaker 1 (16:44):
I know it's it's not necessarily as bad as you know,
like murdering kids, unless you crash the plane that had
a bunch of kids on it. That being said, we
take a dim view of plane hijackers, and you think
that would be an easy one. You're like, look, clearly,
we're running an.

Speaker 2 (17:03):
Open border operation.

Speaker 1 (17:04):
This is from the perspective of the previous administration. Clearly
we're running an open borders operation here. But this is
a bridge too far, mister career plane hijacker. He's identified
as fifty six year old Cuban national are Dermis Wilson Gonzales.

(17:25):
He attempted to what he did. He hijacked a plane
traveling from Cuba to Florida back in two thousand and
three before being Yeah, he was released from prey. I
just want to under I just want you to understand this.
This is how he arrived in the US. He didn't

(17:46):
he didn't hijack a plane in some other country that
had nothing to do with the US. I mean, he
hijacked it there but it was going to the US.
He hijacked a US bound flight, which is which is
a much bigger deal.

Speaker 2 (18:01):
I mean, it's still a big deal.

Speaker 1 (18:02):
I don't want him in the country even if he's
hijacking flights from Chile to Peru.

Speaker 2 (18:07):
But that's not what happened.

Speaker 1 (18:09):
He hijacked a plane coming into the US. He then
was released into the interior of the country. This was
in two thousand and three, and then he was apprehended
last month by because again these are the June numbers

(18:31):
by ICE agents in Houston, Like this is such low hated.
This is what destroys any and all arguments that you know,
there's not a problem here. You got plane hijackers, murderers,
child molesters. By the way, also on that on the
farm there in California, which the number they apprehended is so.

Speaker 2 (18:52):
Like three point fifty. Actually it's much bigger than I thought.

Speaker 1 (18:56):
You have murderers, convicted murderers, child who were working with children.
I would point out ten of the fourteen unaccompanied in
this setting in California at this weed farm. So just craziness, man.
But I hadn't seen plane hijacker. So good on you, sir,

(19:17):
for standing out, even if it's for all the worst reasons.
All right, So Ross referenced earlier to the Epstein files,
maybe we'll get something. Here's what that's based on. So clearly,
clearly there is pressure, and this administration is feeling the

(19:41):
pressure about how irritated many within their base are.

Speaker 2 (19:49):
And so you have to read the room. At that point,
you got to do something right.

Speaker 1 (19:55):
Well, So there's reporting yesterday, and I'll read how some
of it's being report and then I'll let you interpret
what you think. It says the Trump administration will be
releasing more evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein case and
offer greater transparency. That's from Laura Laura Trump, So just
to cite where that came from. So that's one avenue

(20:17):
of it. What that means, I don't know. But here's
the other side of it. So yesterday the Daily Mail,
so take it for what it's worth, had the following report,
Jeffrey Epstein's accomplished Geslaine Maxwell is ready to reveal truth
of the pedophile client lists, say insiders. Why are Republicans

(20:39):
blocking her? That's an interesting headline because now it plays
into Keem Jeffries with his little you know his little
show yesterday about ah, we got to do this bill
here and why would you block it? Like, I don't
know what the hell's going on, but I will say this,
and I want to be on the record if in fact,
and I don't believe the media and the way they're
spinning it, Jefferies, I just don't, because all they do

(21:02):
is lie to me. That being said, if there is
a there, if there are reasons why the Republicans don't
want this out, because I don't know, maybe there's some
high profile Republicans. You can't convince me for a moment
that Trump's on this and anyone who really matters is

(21:23):
on this, because I don't think that the people within
the Biden administration who were really running things could have
helped themselves, do you know what I mean?

Speaker 2 (21:31):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (21:32):
Ross Do you agree with that if Trump was on
this list, there's no way the Biden administration's minions wouldn't
have put it out, I think immediately, right, Yeah, So
I think that that's probably best evidence for me, just
because they're vulgar, vile, underhanded creatures up in Washington, and
that runs the gamut, and they would love to do this,

(21:53):
and so I think if Mitch McConnell or the Speaker
had been on there, or Trump, I think this thing
would have come out in a second.

Speaker 3 (22:01):
They would have released it after the assassination attempt like
that day. Yeah right, oh he's survival. Here's this list
right exactly. So, Ross, did you see what just happened?
So exciting? Check your phone?

Speaker 4 (22:14):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (22:14):
No, I emailed Trevor, So, oh okay, all right, so
that's good.

Speaker 1 (22:18):
Ross isn't feeling real well. I'm sorry I should have
asked you if I could say that. So he's not
feeling real great today.

Speaker 2 (22:22):
So we're just clearing up a meeting after the show.
So anyway, but.

Speaker 1 (22:27):
Yeah, back to back to the Yeah, so at Ross's point, yeah,
he would have been at the hospital and Butler and
they would have been like breaking news.

Speaker 2 (22:35):
Here you go. So I don't believe that.

Speaker 1 (22:38):
That being said, if if there is anybody within the
Republican Party standing in the way of this release, I
guan honestly at this point, and we find out that,
in fact, we can track back a bunch of kids
who were raped, which I don't think is going to
be difficult. G with you, I just don't care or

(23:01):
El Salvador. I'll let you choose. Do you like papoosas
or do you prefer rope of via ropa vieha if
I could pronounce that correctly, go with a Cuban dish
and a Salvadoran classic your choice. You pick which one
you want to eat a really horrible form of in

(23:22):
an awful prison somewhere because I have no use for you,
but also the people that are putting that out I
also don't trust. So this is why transparency and information
is going to be important, and also ways to verify
this information. We live in a world of AI, man,
We live in a world of AI that can do

(23:44):
a whole lot of things that fool a whole lot
of people, even dumb stuff that you should know is
not real. I'm telling you the stuff that I see
posted on Twitter. I think our audience is a little
better than the average audience is, probably because they're just
so scarred like we are, where they just question most

(24:05):
everything that being said. Man, the stuff that people get
hooked on, it doesn't take much, and all you got
to get is a little ground swell going and once
people have seen it and then believe it the first time,
it's really hard to convince them otherwise.

Speaker 3 (24:18):
I mean, some of it is really convincing, Like you
said now too. Remember the video of the the kangaroo
at the airport that was completely everything about it was fake,
like the actional support kangaroo. Yeah, that like was super
viral and it was all fake. Nobody in the video
was real.

Speaker 2 (24:34):
What did I see the other day too? Where I'm like,
are you stupid? That's all?

Speaker 1 (24:38):
That's literally what I said out loud while stared at
my Twitter feed. I'm like, because somebody's like, oh, I
got to see this thing, and I'm like, are you stupid?

Speaker 2 (24:44):
You're stupid, aren't you?

Speaker 1 (24:46):
And I want to And a couple of times i've
I've politely pointed out that that's ai and you get
just people attack you because again, people don't want to
be wrong on stuff. It's fine, I don't want to
be wrong something the other day because I was wrong
on right.

Speaker 2 (25:02):
And it's also embarrassing to be called out right because
then you feel, yeah, yeah, here's how you handle it.

Speaker 1 (25:07):
If somebody calls you out on something and you check
it and you realize that maybe you know you are wrong,
then just delete it. You don't have to put a
whole thread thing together if that makes you uncomfortable, but
you just want to get it right, so go ahead
and delete it.

Speaker 2 (25:22):
It's okay.

Speaker 1 (25:24):
So at the end, I understand you got a lot
of clicks from it or whatever that makes you feel good,
but you're not going to get the dopamine. But just
all you got to do is try. There's too many
people that just they don't care, and those are not
even the ones necessarily doing it intentionally. And then you
have the people doing it intentionally, So who the heck
knows where this goes?

Speaker 2 (25:44):
All right?

Speaker 1 (25:45):
So hey, you know, you ever heard the Democrats or
the media or you know, dark money groups or whatever
the run ads and this is a classic, and it's
every every GOP candidate ever. What do they want to
do to Grandma Ross? What does every GOP candidate want
to do to Grandma?

Speaker 3 (26:06):
They want to find a nice cliff, right, put it
to the edge of it and kick her right off.
Yeah yeah, sorry, Nana, off the cliff, you go. So
uh And and yet I've never seen any member of
the GOP push an actual grandmother off the cliff.

Speaker 2 (26:21):
So if somebody's got that, you should send that to me.

Speaker 3 (26:24):
I mean, I've heard rumors about Tom Tillis, but go ahead.

Speaker 1 (26:28):
Oh that's a good Why don't think uses a cliff?
Is that slender Man's weapon of choice.

Speaker 2 (26:33):
It's more of like a portal, some sort of void,
like a hole in the ground to the upside down
or something. Right, Yeah, it's pretty awesoyway going.

Speaker 1 (26:41):
I'm sorry, dude, I heard the you want to hear
something somebody joked about yesterday and I went, don't even
joke about that. He goes, you know what, Tillis is
probably going to do? Run for governor? Is that the
worst thought ever?

Speaker 2 (26:54):
Well, no, don't.

Speaker 1 (26:58):
I mean, on one hand, then get to go back
and make some new ads. But on the other hand,
oh god help us. So AnyWho, there you go. But
ABC News has come up with a new way. And
now it's not just one grandma, it's like all the
grandma's and it's Donald Trump trying to murder them.

Speaker 2 (27:17):
We'll explain next. Hang on, check this out.

Speaker 1 (27:19):
A new and exciting way that Republican In this case,
the president is being accused of trying to kill grandma,
which you know is the is the standard issue thing
from ABC News. Here's the headline nursing homes struggle with
Trump's immigration crackdown.

Speaker 2 (27:39):
Okay, all right, here we go.

Speaker 1 (27:41):
Nursing homes already struggling to recruit staff, are now grappling
with Donald Trump's attack on one of their few reliable
sources of workers. Immigration. Well, that's weird. You just you
use just the word immigration. Why would they be struggling
with people who are legal immigrants? You ask, I think
you clearly know the answer. Facilities for older adults and

(28:03):
disabled people reporting the sporadic loss of employees who've had
their legal status revoked. Let's call it what it is,
a quasi legal but probably illegal status, right, because you're
operating under the Biden administration coming up with this weird
interpretation and in some cases issuing work eyed numbers, which

(28:24):
much like Social Security numbers, which can be bought and
sold to allow people to work, were also utilized in
a transferred standpoint, because some people would go and get them,
and then they would sell them to other people who
couldn't get them. So I don't know the state of
all of this, but this is one of the industries
where when you looked at research that was done by

(28:46):
some of these think tanks about industries that are rife
for exploitation of false social security or work ey D numbers.
This is one where you see you see a lot
of it. Construction obviously is there, Agriculture is there, but
also things like this, and you know, because they're not
recruiting for r ns necessarily, the recruiting for bodies you know,

(29:10):
to handle handle the more menial tasks and you know,
entered the diaper pans and work with people, you know,
just kind of be in the room, so to speak.
Deck Dick Catao CEO of a g RADS which operates
three dozen nurser three nursing homes in the Atlanta area.
So the third of the staff made up by foreign

(29:32):
born people from about three dozen countries. He says, the
pipeline is getting smaller and smaller.

Speaker 2 (29:39):
Right, here's the deal, dude.

Speaker 1 (29:41):
Yeah, so eight of his workers are expected to be
forced to leave after having TPS. That's these work numbers,
the TPS. This is again the T stands for temporary.
They came from countries, including countries like El Salvador, where
you had tens of thousands that came from El Salvador,
like twenty years ago during a big earthquake. Well, El

(30:04):
Salvador is not the dangerous place that it was, So
on what planet would you not end something that was
called temporary intentionally? So I'm sorry for that, and I
understand that that's the legal side of it, but if
you have a bunch more people that are not there,
I have to question if people have been abusing I'm
not going to accuse this guy of paying him under

(30:25):
the table or something. It's a little harder to do
it in this particular sense, though it is done. But
you know, the middle ground, the gray area on this
stuff is where people look the other way, where you
know there'll be a tax ID number or a Social
Security number and they never really follow through with checking
it because they just need the employees so bad. It's

(30:47):
the same thing when you don't do that.

Speaker 2 (30:49):
I'm sorry.

Speaker 1 (30:53):
And again that's if I'm giving you all the benefit
of the doubt here. There's a lot of these facilities
that will hire PEO people illegally or at least knowing
that the number that they're providing them is probably not
their number.

Speaker 2 (31:07):
It's the same thing, and I got no I have
no you know, I'm sorry.

Speaker 1 (31:13):
With all these restaurants and I've seen some construction guys.
I saw some GC. He was sitting on a job
site by himself. He's like, I gotta get this thing done.
We got up, we got projects for days, and nobody
will show up to work. Well, why don't you ask
yourself why no one will show up to work?

Speaker 2 (31:29):
And I think you know the answer.

Speaker 1 (31:30):
I think you also underbid companies who don't play this game.
So I got no sympathy for you, man, I just don't.
I saw they were interviewing one of the farmer dudes
out there in California. It's like, what am I supposed
to do? And it's like, I don't know. They just
rated your farm for a bunch of illegal immigrants. Maybe
don't hire illegal immigrants.

Speaker 2 (31:50):
What was he?

Speaker 1 (31:50):
He was like picking cherries or something. All right, go ahead,
and you're gonna have to pay people to pick it,
or you're going to And this is what this is
what people also fail to understand. Now, not every crop
is machine pickable in in a in a in a
super efficient manner. There's some crops it's much more efficient

(32:11):
for people. There's some where there's just not a machine
that does the trick. But the dirty little secret is
there are a lot where machines will do it. So
on Saturday, Ross sent me a tweet from Seth Abrahmson.
It says we've now arrived at the Timan Square phase
of the Trump administration, and basically you have a cam

(32:32):
o'ed humvy. Clearly that is I mean, I'm assuming that's
one of the marine vehicles. It's just trying to drive
down the road and some dude in a white shirt
standing in front of it. And I would point out
that somebody on this show may have, Oh, I thought

(32:53):
I had the Oh there it is. Somebody on this
show may have mentioned that this was going to go
all square.

Speaker 2 (32:59):
So you win. You win first prize.

Speaker 3 (33:02):
There, Ross, I told you, man, some idiot's gonna jump
in front of a tank or a medical military vehicle.
Stand there and then I can have a pun. They
be like, oh, it's just like tenement squares. Tank guy, Yeah,
it's trumps. Some guy.

Speaker 2 (33:17):
Would you rather be home V guy or tank guy? Probably?
Hum V guy? Yeah, I think you might survive that tank.
You're probably, But listen, man, I have a gift. No,
it's it's true. It's true, and I'm seeing you what
you are in great peril. Why you're an incredible peril.

Speaker 3 (33:36):
If I don't call the show now, Yeah, yeah, you
should probably just go home now to be safe.

Speaker 2 (33:42):
You'll stay here. No, I'll leave too, But you're in
so much peril. If the perils what if the perils
at my house? No, no, it's not. I can see
that he'd my heed my warning and make haste.

Speaker 1 (33:53):
Because you know, and like you when those time travel
movies where they go back and then they do something
and it just kind of pivots it, or it's them
going back to caused them to do the thing that
then made them in peril. But if they had never
gone back, they never would have been in peril, you
know those things in time travel movie.

Speaker 3 (34:09):
I'm telling you it's not that. And you're you're, you're, you're,
you know, you're you're taunting fate there.

Speaker 1 (34:14):
I'm not figure out where's the least peril, man, Is
it doing the show or crawling back into bed.

Speaker 2 (34:19):
You need to leave, okay, and then you'll leave.

Speaker 1 (34:25):
Just in case the peril was coming to the station,
so it doesn't get you all right, all right.

Speaker 3 (34:29):
I mean it's kind of cloudy, you know, kind of
foggy there, but I can. I can definitely see the peril.

Speaker 2 (34:33):
I see.

Speaker 1 (34:34):
Well, look there is some peril out there. The eas
is going bonkers. So but no, you mean me personally.
So all right, well I may have to make wow,
but we already told the senator we talked to him
at eight oh five, and that would be kind of
be kind of rude, wouldn't it. He calls in, nobody's here.
Oh yeah, we got stuff we need to talk about.

(34:55):
So I guess I'm gonna live with potential peril until then.
But yeah, ROS nailed another one. So and and by
the way, there's two of these now, one in front
of a humbye and one in front of one of
those swat vehicles you know, essentially armored personnel carriers.

Speaker 2 (35:11):
So uh, there's you know, multiple.

Speaker 1 (35:14):
Tim in moments going on, although the dude's not holding
his groceries, so I don't know if that quite counts.
All right, let me get over this. So this is
rather interesting. The loped here. Now it's mother Jones to
take it for what it's worth, it's commy rag. They
are now advocating for the booing of jd Vance's children.

(35:39):
I'm not kidding. I'm assuming they want Trump's kids booed
h with except for all adults now, so, but you
know jd Vance has little kids, and the editor in
chief of the magazine said that the children of Vice
President JD. Vance should be booed so they know what
their father is about. You know, this is more of

(36:00):
the horizon. Remember the first Trump term where they were like,
anywhere you see him in public, make them pay, right?
And and what where was that? Was it Charlottesville where
you had that restaurant.

Speaker 2 (36:11):
That threw who did they throw out?

Speaker 1 (36:14):
They threw out the comms chick right, trying to remember,
I think that's what it was. I think the now
governor of Arkansas or does she still governor anyway? But
Huckaby didn't they throw Sarah Huckabee Sanders and her family
out of a restaurant.

Speaker 2 (36:32):
It was a whole thing. Well, no, this guy.

Speaker 1 (36:35):
And then, by the way, this is predicated because the
Vances went to Disneyland.

Speaker 2 (36:41):
Do you think they have a what kind of fast pass?
Do you think the Vances have ross in Disneyland terms?

Speaker 3 (36:48):
Because you had you had a really good one one
time we did the first time we went. We were
so spoiled because we got like a Press Pass right, yeah,
which was bol was just riding the same ride like
five times in a row. Now you get a look
at those families that you keep bypassed.

Speaker 4 (37:03):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (37:03):
But they were doing some sort of like you know,
like media day or something, and we were invited by
our former program director, my former program director, Randy who's
now where who was in Florida. And it was actually
better because afterwards we ended up going and getting like
the the disability pass right, And oddly the press pass
was a thousand times better than the disability pass, which

(37:24):
doesn't seem.

Speaker 2 (37:25):
Right at all.

Speaker 1 (37:26):
Well maybe morally, but from a marketing standpoint, I guess
it does.

Speaker 3 (37:32):
Right, we're gonna let these people on because they're gonna
have like a platform to talk about it or whatever, right, Yeah.

Speaker 1 (37:36):
I mean, if you just want to get down to
two dollars there, Yeah, But I bet jd Vanceys was
slightly better than yours, just a smidge either way. They
just went there. He wasn't doing anything there, like there
was no political reason for him to be there. They
just for whatever reason. I think his wife was doing
something in La And then they went to Disneyland because

(37:57):
they got little kids, and I don't know if you
know this, little kids like going to Disneyland, even if
they're the vice presidents. So the fact that Sierra Jeffrey
would would literally uh, you know, put pen to paper
or this case a keyboard to uh, to screen and
h and encourage people to quote people who feel bad
for Jade Vance's kids. His families get booed at Disneyland.

(38:20):
I get it, but because there was a bunch of protesters,
they're booing his kids, well booing him, but with his
kids and maybe booing his kids. But this this slug
decided let's just boo kids.

Speaker 2 (38:32):
I get it.

Speaker 1 (38:33):
But better those kids know how what their father is about,
or now know what their father is about. Other kids
are watching their parents get shipped off to goologs. And
I love the wording. Yesterday the New York tear the
La Times ran a peace where they referred to where
they were going as concentration camps. So all this charge

(38:53):
language we were told is bad, they're all over it.
But anyway back to this, So want you want growth
adults to boo little kids? How old are jd Vance's kids?
I know they're little? Hold on, like, would you even
know what's going on or would you start crying because
you're scared? I mean, what age are they? I think

(39:17):
they're young enough that they would just be terrified by
this thing, even though obviously there's a lot going on
around their dad. Let's see here, and this is what
makes this so profoundly evil because they haven't done anything,
all right, Yeah.

Speaker 2 (39:37):
I think it's all right. So hold on seven four
and three?

Speaker 1 (39:41):
Yeah, dude, who do you have to be now if
the kids did something. I'm not opposed to booing children,
but it has to be in correct circumstances where they
themselves have earned it, all right, So like, uh, crying
on me next to the airplane, that's a booing. I'm
at a diner, you're in the booth over, you got
slobbery pink. Now you're throwing them everywhere. That's a booing.

(40:03):
Talking in a movie. Oh, I got a tinkle that
it's a booing. Should have done that before. But no,
just going to Disneyland with their dad. Don't be booing
little kids.

Speaker 2 (40:13):
What are you doing?

Speaker 1 (40:14):
By the way, I'm joking. Don't boo kids on an
airplane either, boo their parents when the kids are not there.
But no, they want to go boo kids to go
ahead and make a point. And by the way, this
is why this is such a slippery slope, man. Like
the last thing is you want are lunatics on the fringe.
The difference is the Democrats let them edit big magazines,

(40:38):
but lunatics on the fringe deciding that all of a sudden,
kids are fair play.

Speaker 4 (40:43):
Man.

Speaker 1 (40:44):
Even the mob had a code, right, Even the mob
had a code you leave the women and children alone.
It's partially what led to the dysfunctionality that allowed them
to fully be taken down in many instances by law
enforcement because there were so many cracks in the uh
in there when uh you know, Gravano and some of

(41:06):
these others broke those codes. We're gonna go boo children.

Speaker 2 (41:14):
I don't know.

Speaker 3 (41:14):
I think you should. I think you shoud leave the
kids alone. But a lot of times the politicians use
their kids as political props. But once again, they should
come back on the parent.

Speaker 1 (41:21):
Right, that should come back on the parent. And there's
and here's where it's different. If you have adult children
and they want to be up in the politics, then
a fair game, man.

Speaker 3 (41:30):
I would say, these same people saying you should boo
jd Vance's young to see the super young kids whatever.
Would have an absolute fit. If you criticized Barack Obama's
adult children, they would call you racist.

Speaker 1 (41:43):
Yeah, oh, absolutely, one hundred percent. But that's also why
we didn't do it here on the show. I didn't
get into the whole credit card with the cocaine stuff
and all, even when they were adults, even when they
were adults, because they're young adults in a college setting.
I'm not condoning it, but you know, it is what
it is.

Speaker 3 (42:03):
Right, These same people then they'd say, well, why are
you going after Hunter Biden? Because I mean that's a
little bit more more complex.

Speaker 1 (42:10):
Right, So if Melia, if Maliah gets ten million dollars
from Ukraine China, Yeah, longsh we're gonna have some Milia.

Speaker 2 (42:17):
We're gonna have a Malia Day.

Speaker 3 (42:19):
That's that's a matter of national security and yet so
horribly illegal.

Speaker 2 (42:23):
Right.

Speaker 1 (42:23):
Also, if Barren all of a sudden got a ten
million dog, because I mean he got a ten million
dollar consultancy fee from some Chinese company, I'd be very
upset as well. Just just so we're all clear on this. However, however, no,
they just want to stray boot children.

Speaker 4 (42:40):
Man.

Speaker 1 (42:40):
And when it's little kids being used as a prop
I mean, how do you you can't still use that exception? Well,
but they're out here being used as I don't care,
don't care. There's he doesn't there's a seven year old.
It's just it's exciting to see a seven year old
do what they're told, let alone a four year old
and a three year old to hold steel long enough

(43:02):
to take the photo for the propaganda they're just doing
mommy and Daddy said. And these kids are just trying
to enjoy Disney. It's just awful.

Speaker 2 (43:12):
Man.

Speaker 1 (43:12):
All right, seven seventeen here on the Cacoday radio program.
We got didn't Oh yeah, I'm sorry. Let me go
ahead and grab that. I apologize, all right, hold on,
hold on, let me grab a call here. Jean's been
holding on, Jean, what's up?

Speaker 4 (43:27):
Good morning, gentlemen. Interesting story along the lines of the
retirement home having right time finding help earlier. My sister
works for a extremely large hotel chain. It's worldwide and
she's worked there for twenty years. And they've always hired
hundreds hundreds of people every year for foreign disa holders,

(43:53):
and they've never really hired Americans. Well, she was walking
by one of the buffet rooms last week and she
found out they were having a giant job fare because
they can no longer hire from these companies, so they're
having to hire the locals.

Speaker 2 (44:12):
Yeah, hotels do have.

Speaker 1 (44:14):
Hotels that are international brands do have this thing that
they can do. And I've noticed it as somebody, and
I don't know, I'm not asking you which hotel chain
your sister works for, but the big ones, internationals like
Marriott's and Hilton's of the world. Especially when you get
into housekeeping status. It's not that they're here illegally, it's
very legal, no, But like you get into bartenders, people

(44:36):
work in the buffets, and they have people because they're
an international brand that transfer in from these other areas
to take a lot of these more menial jobs. There's
a Marriott that I stay out a lot when I travel,
and the bartenders from Dominican Republic. And you know, she's
here legally, and I remember she went back just because

(44:57):
I've stayed there over the years quite a bit. She
had to go back for two years because of the
rotation of it. So that is something that they do.
So that's interesting because are they clamping down on that
because it was my understanding that that was legal because
of their international brand status.

Speaker 4 (45:14):
No, it's it's legal their own work visas that legal.

Speaker 2 (45:17):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (45:18):
A lot of them stay around for a couple of
years and then they disappear into America. But that's that's
the whole nother story.

Speaker 1 (45:25):
Well, that's a different conversation, you know that is. But yeah, no,
it is. Uh, you get a lot of people from
different and I've seen I've seen when I've traveled in
Latin America too, where they actually have job fares for
these companies for if people want to work here. So yeah,
and it's it's considered a pretty good.

Speaker 4 (45:43):
Yeah, countries, these countries are on the band list for
for bringing foreign visa holders.

Speaker 2 (45:52):
In well Dominicans. Not in the case of that one
bar No, no.

Speaker 4 (45:56):
No, the companies that that the country that this particular
hotel Chaine I got, you I got And this area
it's a very depressed area. It's a low income area.
And my sister was actually able to see a girl

(46:16):
that had been trying to get in for years into
the hotel. She actually got a job.

Speaker 2 (46:22):
Good. Yeah.

Speaker 1 (46:23):
Yeah, And I think the other benefit for the hotels,
if I'm not incorrect, it's kind of like cruise ships
where the part of their compensation is the lodging and
the food that they provide, so therefore they can say
less and you just use access space. So look, it
is a bit of a sweetheart deal.

Speaker 2 (46:42):
They'll get me wrong.

Speaker 1 (46:44):
But yeah, so the fact that they're having to then
do a job fair that's very interesting.

Speaker 4 (46:49):
And she's been there over twenty years and they've never
done this.

Speaker 2 (46:54):
Yeah all right.

Speaker 1 (46:55):
Well, hey man, maybe they're just looking ahead of the
future and they're like, this thing may go away and
we don't want to be left with no staff.

Speaker 4 (47:01):
So putting Americans to work, you know.

Speaker 1 (47:04):
That's that's the ancillary side of this. Good I'm glad
to hear it, man, glad to hear it.

Speaker 4 (47:09):
All right, well, real good, thank you guys.

Speaker 2 (47:12):
Yeah, thank you very much for the call there.

Speaker 1 (47:14):
So yeah, yeah, they just I don't know if for
people who travel a lot, you've probably noticed that with
some of the big brands they'll have in the US.
It's funny if you go to a state an international brand,
like one of their internationals, generally people from there, which
you come to the US, A lot of people will
come in from different places on these work pieceas so,
and I know what you're asking, and I asked the

(47:35):
same question. And I like that bartender lady. She's super nice,
you know. It's one of those people if you stay
at a hotel a lot on a regular basis.

Speaker 2 (47:45):
Like hey, remember's your name? Boom boom boom. She's very
good at her job.

Speaker 1 (47:48):
But I remember asking myself, you couldn't find somebody in
the US to work a bartending And it's a nice
lobby bar restaurant there, and there's always business travelers probably
make pretty good money. You tell me you couldn't find
an American to work that. That always kind of made
me wonder. But anyway, that's that is what it is,

(48:08):
all right. So we're gonna take a break. When we
come back, we Elmo went crazy again, or maybe he didn't.
There's some theories, so we'll get into that. And Senator
Ted Budd joins us at eighth five. So stick around.
Are the things that I do in the morning before
the show is I go back and I look at
any any tweets as I sent out from the show

(48:32):
account yesterday from not the ones that excuse me.

Speaker 2 (48:36):
I'm gonna sip the water here. That's good.

Speaker 1 (48:43):
And I don't have one of those exploding Walmart things,
so I'm not gonna go blind. I'll explain what that
is here just a moment. So anyway, I always look
at the tweets that I sent out post show, you know,
just various breaking news, little stories that have come up,
and I always try to figure out, okay, so what
what had a lot of people wanting to.

Speaker 2 (49:02):
Comment or like or whatever.

Speaker 1 (49:05):
I like, I prefer more comments than anything because then
I can kind of figure out how it's going to
go on the air. So, you know, I skulked back
here to see what's Oh, what is this thing fighting me?
What is your problem?

Speaker 2 (49:21):
Really? Well, that's fun?

Speaker 1 (49:25):
Why does it always do that? Right when I'm I'm
literally sitting here and I'm setting up. I'm setting up there,
we go setting up something. I got to play some
audio maybe here in a moment, and then the thing just.

Speaker 2 (49:39):
What a day.

Speaker 1 (49:40):
So yesterday I'm looking to see what got the most interaction,
Like here's one people at Alligator Alcatraz, a tweet from
a woman called Brook talks politics, Who God help Us
has a little political talk show that thankfully not too
many people care about. People at Alligator Alcatraz are being

(50:01):
given wristbands with a number on them that they must
wear for id purposes. I'll say it again. We are
assigning numbers to human beings. It's truly giving nineteen thirty
six vibes that woman does a political show where she
tells people these things, because clearly she has no critical

(50:21):
thinking skills and she's not able to wonder aloud about
her driver's license number and her wallet, her social Security
number at her house. When you go to a hospital,
they put a wristband on you with are you ready
for this? Are you sitting down?

Speaker 2 (50:35):
Your name?

Speaker 1 (50:35):
And a patient number? Usually, what the hell are you
talking about? And I don't know if you know this.
Outside of Alligator Alcatraz, prisoners have a prisoner number. It's
a thing, and it's not a thing they hide either.
It's like almost any piece of entertainment where somebody goes
into prison and they show any part of the welcome two,

(50:58):
which is an important part, right if you're showing a
you know, like a movie or a television show where
somebody has to make that transition into prison. Part of
the way that you build the drama and you set
the scene for both the awkwardness, the fear that they
might feel, or whatever it is is the process, the
strip search, the changing out of your regular clothes, the

(51:21):
scary people around you, the assigning of a numbered You
better know that number.

Speaker 2 (51:25):
Because you're going to need that number. It's they don't
hide this.

Speaker 1 (51:29):
And she tweets that, and so that got like eleven responses.
That's pretty good, But unfortunately that's not the one you
all cared about the most. So I'm going to read
you that one, start that fight, and then pivot to
what I was planning on talking about here in the
first place. And I just wrote, which apparently has triggered
some of you unpopular opinion. Most of the legendary hot

(51:54):
dog places across North Carolina, once the product gets covered
with chili on you, slaw and mustard.

Speaker 2 (52:01):
All kind of tastes the same.

Speaker 4 (52:03):
To me.

Speaker 1 (52:04):
It's a good taste, but a very similar one. I
said what I said that got thousands of interactions or views,
rather thirty six comments and one hundred likes, Okay, and
it started a big fight. I just want to point
out because I was, you know, I kind of like

(52:24):
turned the Twitter off. Later in the evening, watched myself
a movie was just ignoring this. I then had to
put a pole up because people argue that Slaw doesn't
go on a Carolina style hot dog, so whatever, But
that's true. I just want to point that out. I mean,
in some really good hot talk places. And again, if

(52:46):
you have a decent quality of the meat and the
chili and the slaws decent, they all taste the same,
which is good. But let's all pretend. Let's stop pretending
that you could pick them out in a blind taste test,
because you couldn't. All right, so we'll throw that hand
grenade out there. Let me get to this though. So yesterday, yesterday,
a court in France decided that they were gonna.

Speaker 2 (53:11):
Come up with quite a ruling.

Speaker 1 (53:14):
If I'll word it like this, French judges overruled the Crusades.
That's the only way to say this right here. So
a French court has ruled that all citizens of Gaza
are eligible for asylum in France. So the entire population
of Gaza, based on this judge's ruling, if they were

(53:37):
somehow able to get on a boat or a plane
or I guess you could walk technically, if they were
able to somehow get their butts over to France. According
to the French courts are they would have to be
immediately let in because they would be able to get asylum.

(53:57):
So good luck with that. Let me know how that
goes for you. Ross, you were just saying you want
to go over to France, right something something some French
what we weave croissant?

Speaker 2 (54:07):
Right?

Speaker 1 (54:07):
Uh, you better get there soon because all of Goza
might be there and you probably won't to avoid that
like the plague. Man Ah, I'm on sorry, I'm literally
waiting for my next gender reload. I have no idea
why it's tweaking out this one. Ross was having issues
with the call screen earlier, so I don't know what's
going on. Man, you a load, you know, a load

(54:31):
for Casey?

Speaker 2 (54:31):
There you go. Uh, you know what I'm gonna have
to do? Ross?

Speaker 1 (54:37):
You remember the three remember three sixty fives? Did you
ever have one of those or just one of those
the old button bar where it was physical buttons.

Speaker 2 (54:44):
It was just a device, look kind of like a
vox pro. Oh you mean the three sixty yeah.

Speaker 1 (54:48):
Or three sixty yeah, I'm sorry three sixty yeah, yeah, Yeah,
I'm gonna have to get a three sixty man, because
that thing, don't there's no well, I guess it is
computer based, but it's a physical thing you can actually hit.

Speaker 2 (55:00):
I used to have one of.

Speaker 1 (55:01):
Those, all right, So anyway, so yeah, so the French
courts have now said that if your guy, if you're
from Gaza, you essentially can walk into France with asylum.

Speaker 2 (55:11):
So sure that'll and okay.

Speaker 1 (55:14):
Meanwhile, breaking news this morning out of the United Kingdom
on Saint Swisher's Day or Swishings or whatever it is.
If you guys don't know, that is literally the day
that it is over in the UK now because there's
they steal stuff because they got vanquished, and now they're like,
oh that Groundhog Day looks fun. Let's come up with

(55:34):
our own thing. Except their own thing works like this basically,
if it's if it's damp today, if it rains today,
then it's forty more days and nights of damp weather.

Speaker 2 (55:46):
So get some gopher wood. I guess I don't know.

Speaker 1 (55:48):
Saint Swithin's Day, Yeah, Saint Swisher's Day is probably something else.
Let's see here. So over in the UK they got
some breaking news about their own immigration policy, except it's
already been done and the government did it secretly and
now they're just telling people. Tell me if any of

(56:08):
this makes sense to you.

Speaker 2 (56:10):
To bring you now.

Speaker 6 (56:11):
Thousands of people are being relocated to the UK after
personal data leak of Afghan citizens. That thousands will be
relocated to the United Kingdom. It's part of a secret
eight hundred and fifty million pound scheme set up after
a personal data leak. It's of Afghans who supported British forces.

(56:31):
We can report this to you now that the data
set contained the personal information of nearly nineteen thousand people
who had applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy RAP.
It was released in error in February twenty twenty two
by a defense official. The breach resulted in the creation

(56:52):
of a secret Afghan relocation scheme. It's called the Afghanistan
Response Route. It was developed in April twenty twenty four.

Speaker 2 (57:01):
The scheme, it's.

Speaker 6 (57:01):
Understood, has cost around four hundred million pounds so far.
It's projected to cost once it's completed around eight hundred
and fifty million pounds, and of course there'll be the
legal costs and conversations to come to so it's expected
millions of pounds will be paid out in that all right.

Speaker 1 (57:20):
So, and he kind of words it one way and
then words it another because I was having to do
a little research this morning because his story has been
kind of a breaking story for the last two hours. First,
he says people who He makes it sound like it's
people who helped.

Speaker 2 (57:33):
But this is a thing that the US dealt with too.

Speaker 1 (57:36):
We had Afghan interpreters, security people, martyrs that embedded themselves
in there and literally carried out terror strike. But I'm
talking about the ones who did work with US forces.
And I know that this is a big discussion, like
there are people that I've talked to who served who
can't fathom why certain people who aided them during their

(57:58):
time in Afghanistan weren't.

Speaker 2 (58:00):
Able to immigrate to the US. So I understand the debate. UK.

Speaker 1 (58:04):
You're telling me that somebody put a list out. It
was not just that, it was basically anyone who applied
to come thus indicated I guess they don't hate the
US or excuse me, the UK. And then somebody in
the government put that list out and now you just
decided to bring all of them into the country, and
they did, And he says about nineteen thousand.

Speaker 2 (58:26):
It's like nineteen one hundred or something.

Speaker 3 (58:28):
All right, So just to clarify, So there's people there
and they're like, it sucks living here, we want to
live in the UK, and they fill out the application, right,
and those people that those names were now leaked there
in Afghanistan, so those lives are in danger, so they're
relocating them back to the UK.

Speaker 1 (58:44):
Correct, correct, Yes, yes, that's the gist of it. Some
of the people literally worked with British forces like interpreters
and stuff, and some of them just made application because
they had family members. But even making application was not
something that Taliban would want to see. And now the
Taliban's under rule again. The weird thing is they leaked

(59:05):
this list like three years ago and now just now
they're they're doing it where they or they just did it.

Speaker 2 (59:13):
So, I don't know, it's interesting.

Speaker 3 (59:15):
I remember when the Biden administration now hold the Bacle
when we left Afghanistan, we had some people call up
and be in the show and they said, you know,
they worked they were like in special forces or something,
and they worked with interpreters over there and they were
like scared for their lives and they couldn't get back.
Oh yeah, okay, yeah, absolutely.

Speaker 1 (59:29):
So that said, so the UK is unilaterally I'm not
even I'm not criticizing necessarily. I don't I don't know
that I know enough about it. I don't like when
they secretly do stuff. But if you were, if you
were that concerned, why didn't you do this three years ago?
That's the weird thing because the list has been out
for three years. Oh, I'm sorry, I just sleep at
the clarie. Hold on, let me grab Jeff mar here.
I don't mean to make him wait, but we had

(59:50):
a little breaking news over in the UK. And they
use the word scheme, which always throws me when they
mean planned.

Speaker 2 (59:56):
So, uh, it's Saint Swithin's day speaking of the UK. Jeff, Yeah, yeah,
you know what the legend is. Uh, I knew you'd
know this. I yes, weather guys would know this.

Speaker 7 (01:00:05):
So yeah, So he was the bishop over there and
apparently after he had passed away, he requested to be
buried in the church, the church courtyard. Well they moved
him back into the cathedral at some point, and when
that happened, apparently a huge storm came and oh rain
for days on end.

Speaker 2 (01:00:23):
So that's where the.

Speaker 1 (01:00:25):
So vengeance from beyond Yes, and he sound very saintly.
All right, anyway, all right, what's up man?

Speaker 2 (01:00:31):
Weatherwise? Will we see?

Speaker 5 (01:00:32):
What?

Speaker 2 (01:00:33):
Will we see rain?

Speaker 1 (01:00:34):
Thus locking ourselves into forty more days of damp weather.

Speaker 7 (01:00:37):
I think we in fact will and at times during
the afternoon and evening hours. The reason it's going to
be hot in human again ninety one, the high and
the siperatures climbed. Scattered showers and thunderstorms will pop up
front this afternoon at the start of the evening, will
have some clouds over night and drop to seventy four
and really now much of a change in the weather
pattern into windstam Thursday, hot in human with highs in
the loaded mid nineties, and once again there will be
the chance rafting and eating thunderstorms. And that trend continues

(01:00:59):
from fry right on through the weekend, with highs each
day reaching the mid nineties. So hot to human weather
over the next several days as we had through the
rest of the week.

Speaker 1 (01:01:07):
I see, I see, all right, thank you do appreciate.
It's Jeff mart from the Weather Channel. You know what,
ross I should have predicted the weather guys would be
all over the Saint Swithin's because there's not a lot
of holidays for them, you know what I'm saying? So good,
good on, Jeff? There, all right, seven eight meet you
want to meet a wonderful I don't think she's a

(01:01:28):
stay at home wife, but I was not aware this
is how it's supposed to work.

Speaker 2 (01:01:32):
I don't have a stay at.

Speaker 1 (01:01:33):
Home wife, but maybe I don't want one if this
is the policy. So we'll let some moonbat feminist opine.
We'll do it next. Oh why am I dude? I'm
having to reauthorize two ross? What is going on?

Speaker 2 (01:01:47):
Man? Alright? Oh?

Speaker 1 (01:01:51):
Is it instead of two? What is it called dual
factor authentication? It's a quadruple factor at this point. Don't know, man,
don't know what's going on with some of this stuff.

Speaker 2 (01:02:05):
So all right, there we go. All right authenticated? All right.

Speaker 1 (01:02:11):
So with that in mind, let me hit on just
a couple other couple other things. So I saw this
woman ranting yesterday on the social media. Excuse me, yeah,
the hiccups too, ranting on social media. Now, I'm not married,
let alone to a stay at home wife.

Speaker 2 (01:02:27):
Is this how this works?

Speaker 5 (01:02:28):
If you were a stay at home mom, you should
be receiving a salary from your husband. If you are
a stay at home mom, otherwise known as a non
compensated working mom, and you are married to a man,
your husband, the compensated partner, should be paying for the
uncompensated labor. And yeah, there's gonna be a lot of

(01:02:50):
pissed off men in the comments. But try to replace you.
Try to replace a stay at home mom, You're gonna
be paying for a chauffeur, a chef, nanny, a project
manager for the house. In fact, recent data has shown
that stay at home mom's non compensated working parents, if

(01:03:11):
you had to pay them a salary, it would be
at least one hundred and seventy five thousand dollars a year.
So if you are a non compensated working mom, if
you are a stay at home mom, you deserve a
salary from your husband.

Speaker 1 (01:03:23):
I don't I said it, Yeah, you said it. Okay,
good for you. I'm sure your husband's please. Here's the deal.
I've heard that one seventy five number. The problem is,
that's like all those full time jobs cobble together.

Speaker 3 (01:03:35):
Here, going to chat GPT and having it add up
the different professions into one salary.

Speaker 2 (01:03:40):
No, no, no, no, that.

Speaker 1 (01:03:41):
One's seventy five numbers like that. That's one of those
numbers that's been floating around. Somebody did it one time,
and I've heard it like Oprah's used that and another's.
But yeah, that's exactly what it is. It's like, all right,
what does a chef show for? And then blah blah blah.
All right, so here's the thing, and I'm not not
going to but like that seems to me that strikes
me as a horrible way to approach a marriage.

Speaker 2 (01:04:01):
But also she's.

Speaker 3 (01:04:01):
Getting free room for free room and board, right, mortgage, car, food, utilities,
but then you want to salary on the top of them.
But you want a salary on top of all that,
plus all the money is going back into the same pool.

Speaker 2 (01:04:13):
Anyway.

Speaker 1 (01:04:14):
Oh no, I've heard somewhere that's like my money's my
money and your money's our money.

Speaker 2 (01:04:18):
Right, Okay, good luck? Yeah yeah, Oh you don't think
that's a recipe for sex.

Speaker 3 (01:04:21):
Well no, I mean Marky and I we have separate
bank accounts, but like we consider our money Like when
I'm like how much money do I have? I take
the two accounts and add them together. Because we are
a household and we're sharing a life.

Speaker 1 (01:04:32):
Yeah, that seems normal, but if not structure like a
business contract. All right, I'll give you a salary, but
there's a bonus structure, right. I know you said this
is only for my birthday, but I'm going to need
you to average one per month. Oh you're not hitting
your there you get O those uncomfortable you're not hitting
your numbers conversation. I don't think what happens if she
calls out because she has a headache?

Speaker 2 (01:04:52):
Do you hire a temp? I'm sure, I'm sure that
would fly. Yet what we're doing a business.

Speaker 3 (01:04:58):
I don't think she's going to have a hard time
getting with the marriage anyway, because I don't think it's
going to happen for it.

Speaker 2 (01:05:02):
To be completely honest.

Speaker 1 (01:05:03):
And it's a Senator Ted Budd joining us this morning.
How are you doing, sir?

Speaker 8 (01:05:08):
O Katie, not so good after your tweet? Now, my
wife wants a salary for being a stay at home mom.

Speaker 2 (01:05:14):
So what's up with that tweet?

Speaker 1 (01:05:16):
That's not my tweet. That's just one of the many
lunatics that abound on the worldwide Internet. So I just
wonder works.

Speaker 8 (01:05:22):
Well, you know, she probably would not have seen it,
but now that you put it out there. Well, you're
going to have certain demands when I get home from Washington.

Speaker 1 (01:05:29):
You're in Washington, man, just get her a gig as
a consultant or on a board for a global energy company.
I hear that's very lucrative.

Speaker 8 (01:05:38):
So yeah, we are working on that. Not really all right.

Speaker 1 (01:05:43):
Look, before I get to all the Washington malaise, I
want to start a little closer to home. A good
portion of my show this morning people haven't been able
to hear because the as is going bonkers. We've got
flash flood stuff going on. Clearly, you're aware of everything
that has transpired in North Carolina over the last couple
of weeks, especially areas around the Piedmont hit.

Speaker 2 (01:06:04):
Very, very, very hard.

Speaker 1 (01:06:06):
And I know that there's a lot of people people
in Mevin who you know, have water issues. Still, I
know there's a lot of people wondering, and they recognize
that what happened in Texas obviously chewed up a lot
of the news cycle, but they want to make sure
that you and your colleagues haven't forgotten about them.

Speaker 2 (01:06:24):
So give me the give.

Speaker 1 (01:06:27):
Me the overview of what your office is doing and
dealing with some of these floods.

Speaker 2 (01:06:32):
That we're seeing now in North Ferrol.

Speaker 8 (01:06:33):
Yeah, one hundred percent. You know, we have a state director.
He was there immediately updating me on what's going on,
making sure that the federal resources are bringing to bear
what they can. We want to make sure that you
don't bigfoot somebody that's you know, from a municipal government.
You know, if it's Burlington, if it's Durham, you don't
want to get in their way, but you want to

(01:06:54):
be there when they need. Federal assistants that were there
for these these larger than life events, and you know,
it's just heartbreaking. We saw on a massive scale, you know,
one hundred and eight lives lost in western North Carolina,
twenty five counties, and there was it was very different
than what happened in Texas, and our heartbreaks, uh for

(01:07:17):
what happened in Texas, especially since so many young children
were involved. And uh, you know, I watched that last
week when President Trump was there, and I think he
did such a great job. Secretary of Nome, you know,
who was a colleague of mine in the House, doing
a great job. So I've talked with the FEMA folks
even before these things in the middle of North Carolina happened.

Speaker 4 (01:07:39):
Just last week. But we're there.

Speaker 8 (01:07:42):
But you got to make sure that you're not in
the way and they're actually bringing value to people in need.

Speaker 2 (01:07:49):
How does that?

Speaker 1 (01:07:49):
How does that work? So when do they reach out
to you? Do you guys just kind of kick in
if you're feeling that it's uh? I mean as a senator,
obviously the whole state is your your oyster. But I mean,
how does that process normally work? And how did it
get so political?

Speaker 2 (01:08:04):
Man?

Speaker 1 (01:08:05):
Because I think people are probably going to have water.
I don't care who they are. I don't care who
they Well.

Speaker 8 (01:08:10):
Let me let me ask your second question first, how
to get so political? I think there is a growing
trend of distrust and institutions. And you see that. I
see that. It's one of the reasons that I wanted
to run a couple of years ago. I said, Look,
I am I'm an outsider. You know, you can run
one time as an outsider, but you kind of still
go to work every day with that mindset and you're

(01:08:31):
there to bring common sense. You know, for me, Davy
County practices to Washington, d C. And that's what a
lot of my colleagues do. We want to bring some
common sense up here. And remember the folks that were
that actually sent us to Washington to represent them. You know,
even though the title of senator, you're still a representative
of the people for North Carolina.

Speaker 4 (01:08:53):
How does it actually work?

Speaker 8 (01:08:54):
Day one? As soon as these things, as soon as
somebody is not in a crisis rescue mode, we reach
out to county managers, we reach out to city managers
and say we are there. Here are some of the
things that we can do, and as soon as practical,
we'll send people on the ground that's an area represented.
You know, we divide the state up into different areas,

(01:09:15):
and we'll send that representative, We'll send the state director there.
If I'm not in Washington for the votes up here,
I'll be there in person, and you know, and we'll
just try to plug them into every single resource we
can that again doesn't get in their way, but brings
thing to there. If it's National Guard, if it's Army
Corps of Engineers, if it's FEMA, if it's Department of

(01:09:37):
Homeland Security, those are the things that we can do
to assist.

Speaker 1 (01:09:41):
Okay, let me pivot, just because I got about four
other things I want to get into I'm curious your
take on this auto pens thing, because, like I, constitutionally
people argue that there's no real delineated way even if
it is accepted. But when it's this game of red
rover where the president said it to us closest advisors
in a private meeting, who then created what's called a blurb,

(01:10:04):
which was then the documentation that was used by the
actual secretary to the President to auto sign stuff like
is there a there there?

Speaker 8 (01:10:15):
In your opinion, I think Jamie Comer in the House
side has done a great job of questioning Biden's doctor
and seeking truth on this. I think this is a
huge concern that we need to continue to investigate because
it's that kind of thing that goes back to kind
of your earlier question, and it leads to when you
have people that aren't worthy of our trust, it leads

(01:10:36):
to distrust in government. And you saw that a lot
during COVID you started during the Biden administration. You saw
even the remnants of it. As we're now looking at
auto penned, you know, all sorts of documents and we're
going like, was this man even aware of what was
going on? The supposedly elected president it's just that's what
breaks down trust, and so we have to keep pushing

(01:10:59):
on this. I don't know the answer right now, but
I think it's an issue worthy of looking into, and
it's really going to be either the oversight committees or
the judiciary committees that are looking into this. In casey,
I would not doubt if this made it. One of
the great things that President Trump is doing is he's
having fights very early in the administration and he's getting

(01:11:20):
clarification from the Supreme Court. So this is something that
we actually could see clarification on from the Supreme Court
if it becomes the court case and makes it that far.

Speaker 1 (01:11:31):
I think there's two I'm glad you bring that up,
because I think there's two very good points. I'd like
to see the Supreme Court weighing on auto pens. The
second thing is, and I think some of your colleagues
across the isle are playing a dangerous game here. So
Jeff Jackson, along with you know, like I don't know,
a couple dozen other ags are now suing over the

(01:11:52):
education funding which Trump administration is with holding North Carolina
to the tune of one hundred and sixty five million.
It has to do with schools that refusing to do
away with DEI programs and allowing biological men in women's sports.
Of course, it's being framed that you guys up in
Washington are trying to starve and have teachers fired. I

(01:12:13):
would like to see the Court also weigh in on
Title nine because I feel like it is men in
women's sports is outside the bounds of what that was
intended to be, and I feel like Democrats might end
up forcing this issue.

Speaker 8 (01:12:28):
Well, a lot of these surgeries Title nine issues gender
related things. I mean, they're going after this. They realize
this is a seventy eighty percent issue for us, and
you know it doesn't fall along partisan lines. It's much
broader than that. You have independence, you have reasonable, the
remaining reasonable Democrats out there, they're going don't want I

(01:12:48):
don't want guys in my daughter's locker room, and certainly
don't want them on their sports. You're even seeing some
emboldened female athletes now they're not sharing the podium. If
you see, you know, the wrongly awarded male with a
be getting a medal or a trophy, they're like walking off,
and they should. They should because it's completely delegitimizing women's sports.

Speaker 1 (01:13:12):
Yeah, one of the best fencers, who was probably an
Olympic hopeful, is literally just walked away from the sport
here a couple of months ago.

Speaker 8 (01:13:19):
I mean, and they should and they should, but look,
it's just short term pain for these great female athletes
who rightly deserve these medals and awards. But hopefully we'll
have some clarification on this and that will be their
titles and awards will be restored to them as they
rightfully should.

Speaker 1 (01:13:35):
All Right, So here's the million dollar question, and I'll
just let you know that the answer for me is no,
but you answer how you want. Do you think the
Trump administration has handled this Epstein thing?

Speaker 8 (01:13:44):
Well, look, I trust the president the goal. I'm going
to go back to when I first got elected twenty seventeen,
when Trump came in. We looked at what happened under
Obama with child exploitation and human traffic. It was unreal
and under the Biden administration. Fast forward after Trump won,

(01:14:06):
after Trump Administration number one, the Biden administration let five
hundred thousand unaccompanied minders miners into our country, and half
of them didn't even get enrolled in the program. And
we don't even know where they are. So under the
Biden administration there is a huge and the Obama administration,
there is a huge problem of child trafficking and exploitation. Now,

(01:14:29):
what we want is justice for victims, and so I
think on that front, the Trump administration has actually done
a great job. If Biden had some lists or something
like that, he certainly would have exposed it, you know,
if it would have harmed Trump or the administration.

Speaker 2 (01:14:47):
I agree, I agree. That's why this is so confusing.

Speaker 1 (01:14:49):
Senator I don't understand why her team, Jefferies, is screaming
for the list to come out.

Speaker 8 (01:14:54):
Like, well, welcome to to Hakeem, my former colleague across
the house on the other side, welcome to Maga. You know,
this is something that goes back to lack of trust
and institutions, and so look, that's the goal is justice
for victims, and the lack of that is what has

(01:15:15):
caused people to be so mad. But I will say,
while there's head scratchers going on, let's be grateful for
the progress we're having with ending this human trafficking at
the border, helping find these kids, going after these cartels,
and even US stateside human trafficking. A lot of it
runs concurrent with sentinel trafficking and other drug trafficking. But

(01:15:38):
they are going after this and I think cash and
tail Pambini, I think they are actually doing a great job.
So the picture is bigger than what you asked about.
And I think if you look at what's actually happening,
they're doing a heck of a job and we need
to commend them on that, right.

Speaker 1 (01:15:56):
And I agree with you that there is a much
larger amount. Hell, we just kids pulled off a weed farm, right,
that's just And then people try to.

Speaker 8 (01:16:03):
Justify that, Yeah, who was protesting that? It was like
the Californians that were protesting child labor, child exploited labor
at a weed farm in supposedly prosperous California. That's the
Gavin Newsom that we.

Speaker 1 (01:16:17):
Know the problem is and I recognize that the numbers
are far greater when you get into the trafficking. The
problem with the Epstein thing is it's not that they're
putting up the numbers that the cartels are. The problem
is is that I know the cartels are dirt bags.
I know they're criminals. They can be buried under the
prison dropped out in the ocean for the sharks. I
really don't care. The problem is with the Epstein thing.

(01:16:40):
The general consensus is that wasn't just him doing that.
You don't have all those entertaining spaces, you don't have
all this stuff, you don't have terabytes of information, and
you are not dealing with cartels. You're dealing with people
who might take a vote next to you, Senator. That's
the problem. You might you might have shared, you might
have been in a committee me with somebody who may

(01:17:01):
have availed themselves of that the rape branch, the rape Island,
or the rape town home. And not to mention people
up in you know, the world of Wall Street where
this guy swam. That's why people are so upset, because
we know the devil that is cartel. But people want
to know the devil who are making decisions within their life,
who may have taken part in this. So when when

(01:17:23):
Bondi's making those statements and hobb is making those statements,
and then Trump comes out in that presser and goes,
why are we still talking about this? And then puts
a thing out over the weekend saying that you know,
the Democrats came up with the list. It make it
make sense to me and understand why people still separate
and feel that there's justice to be done here.

Speaker 8 (01:17:44):
Well, I'm in agreement with you on this, and I
would just say two things on that. One is a
trust President Trump and the administration that he's hired. So
but I looked through the lenses of President Trump on this.
And secondly, the goal is to get justice for those victims.
I know it's different than the cartels, but the goal
is to get them justice. Unfortunately, some have lost their

(01:18:05):
lives for whatever reason, some to suicide, some tragically, all tragically.
But the goal is to get them justice. And so
I'm for those things, I think, and I don't care
who it takes down. I think President Trump knows what
to do. And I think you wish you could come

(01:18:25):
out and just say everything all the time. But I
think President Trump knows exactly what to do, he knows
who to hire for this, and he wants justice for
the victims, and that is ultimately what we're after.

Speaker 1 (01:18:34):
Yeah, I think if he wouldn't have sounded so dismissive,
it wouldn't be this, we wouldn't be in turmoil.

Speaker 2 (01:18:38):
I just it. It was the worst answer.

Speaker 1 (01:18:41):
I think I've seen him give to something and it
reminded me of Kamala on the View talking about not
changing anything.

Speaker 2 (01:18:47):
I just it was a total unforced air.

Speaker 1 (01:18:49):
I got to pivot to this real quick, and that
is Trump's talking about, well, there's two deals. One to
send more to Ukraine billions of weapons in specifically defensive weapons.

Speaker 2 (01:19:02):
Some people are wondering about that.

Speaker 1 (01:19:04):
And also now we're going to sell NATO guns instead
of giving them.

Speaker 2 (01:19:08):
Explain this to me in two minutes. What is that?

Speaker 8 (01:19:11):
Yeah, well what you're seeing is and this goes back
to the five percent in rush. Okay, so let's go
back to Trump one like we did a few minutes ago.
Trump won, you had just a handful of countries in
Europe that were even that were NATO, that were even
paying their fair share, like two percent of their GD
And now he's not only got more members that are

(01:19:31):
paying the two percent, they're going up to five percent.
Spain is the only one dragging their feet, but you've
got more members in NATO, You've got more members that
are actually paying their fair share, and he's not allowing
freeloading on the US anymore. I think that was something internationally.
That when I go back to North Carolina, when I'm
in David County and they're like, why are we helping

(01:19:52):
these countries that are freeloading on the US. I may
say it a dozen different ways, but that's exactly what
they're asking. President Trump's fed up with it. I'm fed
up with it. He wants them to pay for it.
We'll send Patriot missiles, but doug on one, you know
you're going to get Europe and those next door neighbors
to help pay for this. It's doing the same things
with gun so he is actually causing less free loading
on the US and more strength for other countries. So

(01:20:14):
these countries are actually getting better because of President Trump.
And all of this stems from Joe Biden's weakness, and
I'll pin it on Afghanistan general weakness, but Afghanistan that signaled,
you know, to six months later to putin he could
roll into Ukraine because US wouldn't do anything. So all
of this crap that we're dealing with internationally stems from

(01:20:35):
Joe Biden's in Maine weakness. And that's what breaks my
heart every day. And I see the chaos of the
world that stems from you know, I supposedly elected President
Biden who was just absolutely incompetent, and we're even asking
questions was he mentally there enough to use, you know,
to give authoritative instructions on the auto pen. It's all connected.

Speaker 1 (01:20:56):
Yeah, I don't disagree there. So we'll see how this
pans out, the Russia thing pans out. Maybe we can
talk about it next time. Senator, thank you very much.
I'll let you get back to it. Okay, all right,
there you go, Senator Ted budd here on the Kcoday
radio program back in a few I think Laura recognizes
that maybe her father in law didn't handle that as

(01:21:17):
well as he could have. But so they say they're
going to put some more info out. Meanwhile you got
a keen Jefferies and Democrats screaming for the full release.
And then that makes me wonder why and what the
heck's going on. Maybe they're just doubling, Maybe they're just
betting on the fact that they don't think he wants to.
But as we talked about earlier in the show, wouldn't
it be hilarious if he wrote a doped him and
then he puts a list out and it's all them

(01:21:40):
I mean, oh, can you imagine that news cycle? But
the problem is it's probably something in between, and maybe
there is not a here's the deal. Maybe there is
not a definitive, provable chargeable list, but largely that may
be due to inaction on the part of prosecutors who
didn't dare put it together. You still got to comb

(01:22:01):
through all the information. So I just I, you know,
I don't know what extra stuff's gonna come out, but
something needs to give.

Speaker 4 (01:22:09):
Man.

Speaker 1 (01:22:10):
That's like I told the senator. We all know to
hate on the cartels trafficking kids.

Speaker 2 (01:22:15):
We're all there.

Speaker 1 (01:22:17):
Even people against the death penalty probably wouldn't mind if
they fell in a wood chipper. That being said, I
want it's the people who purport to be our our friends,
or are our political betters or our captains of industry
that if they're pulling this crap, they need to face
the same repercussions. And that's where all b and all

(01:22:39):
of you tweeting well that we need to focus only
on the autopen thing and we don't have time for Epstein.
I'm sorry, you can't walk and chew gum at the
same time. You lose her or we can't do two
things at once. Well, then you know I don't have
any time for you. Let's say that's a poor answer.
You don't have to give fe just for Fueldy's sake.

(01:23:02):
I saw Charlie kirk win onto this. Yes, I can't
imagine like the number of people and I normally, normally
I disagree with I don't disagree with Matt Walsh, but
I find him a little much. I was glad to
see he's sticking with us. The whole thing's messy, and
we'll continue to harp on it for sure. All right,
couple other things here? Oh where did I put this?

Speaker 2 (01:23:26):
Over here? Elmo? There it is? So this is I
actually look this up.

Speaker 1 (01:23:32):
The Elmo count ross has been hacked three times in
the last five years.

Speaker 2 (01:23:37):
So is it a hack or is it just.

Speaker 1 (01:23:40):
Elmo's drunk that day or the guy into Elmo or
plays Elmo or runs his Twitter account or whatever you
want to call it?

Speaker 2 (01:23:48):
Well, I don't know.

Speaker 3 (01:23:49):
The first time, I guess they looked at the password
and was just the alphabet eight through z, and the
second time it was just the numbers one through nine.

Speaker 2 (01:23:57):
Was it okay with zero or not? You have zero?

Speaker 4 (01:24:00):
Oh?

Speaker 2 (01:24:00):
You got it? I believe.

Speaker 1 (01:24:01):
Yeah, okay, so the McDonald's password from yesterday almost.

Speaker 2 (01:24:05):
It's very educational, you know, and you know it's funny too.

Speaker 1 (01:24:09):
Is so yesterday somebody got into Elmo's account and you
started tweeting all this anti semitic crap. And as we know,
there is an anti semitic Elmo that works as one
of these weird puppet people up in uh up in
New York, because like there was an incident where it
was being all anti semitic in the.

Speaker 2 (01:24:27):
In Central Park. Is this it? I think this might
be it? Hang on just a second. I found this cutstand.

Speaker 1 (01:24:42):
Oh no, this is this is when they did the
BLM thing on the show. I thought we had anti
semitic Elmo and the maybe that it's been so long,
so well, you don't have to look for that weirdo
in the suit anymore. You could just yesterday go to
Elmo's Twitter account. What a fun conversation this is, and
once there you would be to such missives as Elmo says,

(01:25:02):
all Jews should die.

Speaker 2 (01:25:05):
F word Jews.

Speaker 1 (01:25:06):
Donald Trump is net and Yahoo's puppet because he's in
the Epstein files. Jews control the world and need to
be exterminated. Not what you're used to hearing from Elmo.
Release the files, Trump, you child, blanker, more juice stuff.

Speaker 2 (01:25:28):
I don't even know what this is.

Speaker 1 (01:25:30):
Something about Australians, all right, get a rib kick in there, dude.
This makes me think the hacker is Australian Hen aka
Henry Moosen hacks Twitter accounts, and his partner Cherry aka
Isaac Pavana, residing in Western Australia, launches and bundles them.

(01:25:50):
Then with the help of his friend Waddles, they shill
to the FNFS.

Speaker 2 (01:25:55):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (01:25:55):
I don't know what any of those things are, and
that's probably for the or.

Speaker 4 (01:26:02):
So. Uh.

Speaker 1 (01:26:03):
Anyway, in a statement to Fox News, says to me,
Workshop confirmed the account was compromised. That's an overstatement or
it's almost unnecessary, uh, saying an unknown hacker posted disgusting messages,
including all this stuff. So yeah, man, it's it's not
a good look for Elmo. But I just don't understand

(01:26:23):
why it keeps happening. That's what's kind of crazy to me,
because it's been multiple times and and on this front,
if you are a little concerned about anti Semitic posts
on Twitter, uh, you know it wasn't.

Speaker 4 (01:26:36):
It wasn't.

Speaker 2 (01:26:36):
But a week ago we were having the Grock discussion.

Speaker 1 (01:26:39):
Well, Elon musk Ai firm which runs Grock the x
AI has been awarded a contract by the Department of Defense.
What are you gonna have GROC pulling pushing missile buttons?

Speaker 2 (01:26:55):
I don't mean.

Speaker 3 (01:26:56):
This just adds to the theory though, that the whole
like you know, feud between Trump and Elon is fake.

Speaker 2 (01:27:02):
It does, I guess it does. But also it's that,
you know, within the do O D.

Speaker 1 (01:27:07):
I don't know that Trump signed off on this, but yeah, yeah,
it is stuff like this that makes me wonder.

Speaker 2 (01:27:14):
I'll give you that.

Speaker 1 (01:27:15):
But also, do you want untethered GROC in charge of
the nukes?

Speaker 2 (01:27:18):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (01:27:19):
I'm sure that's not what it's gonna be. But let's
just go worst case scenario. And if you're will stancel,
this has to be your your nightmare.

Speaker 4 (01:27:26):
Right.

Speaker 1 (01:27:31):
They're called reaper drones, but maybe they'll be called something
else if you don't remember. One of the things Groc did.
Groc did is there's a leftist Twitter dude named Will
Stancil lives in Minneapolis, and somebody asked it had to
put together a plan to rape and murder mister Stancel
and dispose of the body. And Groc built out a

(01:27:52):
whole plan, very in depth, and it was It was kind.

Speaker 2 (01:27:57):
Of funny because I saw him tweet yesterday.

Speaker 1 (01:27:59):
This story quote tweet it and he just he just wrote,
are you effing kidding me? But if you're that dude, man,
I think you might want to go in a bunker somewhere.

Speaker 3 (01:28:10):
No, no, it doesn't even help. We have ways to
get past bunkers.

Speaker 1 (01:28:14):
Oh do we have ways to bust into bunk Oh?

Speaker 4 (01:28:16):
No?

Speaker 1 (01:28:17):
Okay, what if all right, hold on, that's not fair.
What if you build up under a mountain, say in
the Middle East somewhere, you should be fine, right, Maybe
build a big complex under a mountain somewhere. I don't know, Iranish,
you should be safe there, right, I think you're probably
safe there.

Speaker 2 (01:28:34):
So yeah, dude, I can't what a feeling that the guy.

Speaker 1 (01:28:39):
Now, don't get me wrong, Stancil is a piece of
garbage if you read his stuff right, He's one of
these people. Is just it'd be one thing if I
think he believed all of it, But I think he
just gravy trains on it. And he's also if you
bring up a point all of a sudden, he's not
having a conversational just to attack you. That being said,
I don't want to see him get a cruise missile
up the butt. So you know there's Isn't this the

(01:29:01):
second sort of AI version or program that the government
has bought in like the past two weeks, didn't they
buy the Who's buying chat GPT? Well, they're doing contracts
for variety of things. Yeah, and that's not unusual for
government to spread the larges around in some cases. So
so it to be interesting to see exactly what Grock's

(01:29:22):
in charge of.

Speaker 4 (01:29:23):
Now.

Speaker 2 (01:29:24):
Is it like fun mode groc or is it serious groc?

Speaker 1 (01:29:27):
Well, which would you you know, untethered or tethered? Is
that what you're asking? I don't know, man for will stancil?
You better hope it's tethered.

Speaker 2 (01:29:35):
Exact guy.

Speaker 1 (01:29:37):
They're public enemy number one because some other Twitter user
basically caught tagged you.

Speaker 2 (01:29:43):
At the right moment.

Speaker 1 (01:29:45):
That's wild times right there, dude, check this out too?

Speaker 4 (01:29:49):
Uh?

Speaker 1 (01:29:49):
Speaking of AI, so uh, here we go. There is
a brand new AI called Centaur, which they say can
predict human behavior with frightening accuracy. Somewhere in the night
inieth percentile. This is not that impressive. Ross and I
do this every day on the show. Every day we
tell you this thing is going to happen, and then

(01:30:11):
we play the music, right and then Ross asked you
to call him now there you go, which he doesn't
mean because he doesn't feel real well right now. But
and then we tell you what somebody is going to do,
and then they do it. You don't need Centaur, you
need Ross and Casey Tarr or whatever, that's what you need.

(01:30:32):
You know, you don't need big server farms. Just ask
us what somebody's gonna do. We'll tell you. You know why,
because people are dumb and predictable for the most part,
for the most part, especially when you get into the
you know, the people who you actually want to predict
the world of politics. Ross flat out told you that

(01:30:52):
there was going to be a picture with the protesters
standing in front of one of those Marines military vehicles,
and some lunatic would write a TENI men headline, and
he nailed it. On Saturday, they did it. They did
it again too, with another with one of those those APCs.
So there you go. I can't tell you the number
of things we've predicted here on the show that have

(01:31:13):
come true. Like I predict right now that Jeff Marr
from the Weather Channel is going to bring rain to
your future and there's nothing you can do about it.

Speaker 7 (01:31:21):
Yeah, it's that typical July weather pattern that we can
expect here over the next several days, hot and humid,
and when you heat up the temperatures each afternoon, we
will have the stage set for scattered showers and thunderstorms. Otherwise,
the mix of clouds and sun up the ninety four
to today actually load have mid nineties most of the week.
As we head from today right out through the middle
part of the weekend towards the weekend, and these thunderstorms

(01:31:42):
that pop up, we'll produce heavy rain at times. Tonight,
another out of storms down to seventy four, scattered showers
and thunderstorms. Tomorrow again load to mid nineties. And that's
the trend from Thursday right out of the weekend. Expect
after innon evening thunderstorms, high temperatures and the load to
mid nineties. They heat indecks up into the triple digit
so hot and humid with afternoon eating thunderstorms.

Speaker 4 (01:31:59):
For this seeable future.

Speaker 1 (01:32:01):
Okay, all right, Jeff, thank you very much, appreciate it, sir,
and we'll come back with other Jeff, mister Bellinger next,
Hang on, Jeff, what's happening?

Speaker 9 (01:32:09):
Good morning, Casey. Just got new inflation numbers from Washington.
Investors and economists are going over this information. The Consumer
Price Index, which tracks retail prices, rows three tenths percent
in June.

Speaker 2 (01:32:22):
That was as expected, but.

Speaker 9 (01:32:24):
The core CPI, which omits volatile energy and food costs,
was up two tenths percent. Economists thought it would also
be up three tenths percent. Core inflation now has come
in softer than expected for five months in a row.
On Wall Street, s and P and Nasdaq futures are
both higher. Dow futures down thirty seven points. They've been
down most of the morning. Shares have been Vidia and

(01:32:46):
Advanced micro Devices both higher in pre market trading. The
companies are preparing to resume some artificial intelligence chip sales
to China. The chip makers have received assurances from the
Trump administration that the shipments will be approved.

Speaker 2 (01:33:01):
It's assigned.

Speaker 9 (01:33:02):
The trade tensions between Washington and Beijing has begun to ease.
Some middle income Americans still have a dim view of
the nation's economy. Eighty percent of the people responding to
a quarterly survey by Primerica give the economy a negative rating.
Just over sixty percent say they feel stressed about money
and finances. Saving for the future is still a challenge

(01:33:23):
for most people. In nearly forty percent middle income households
report increased use of credit cards. A separate survey was
released by debt dot com today. Nearly seventy percent of
the respondents reported they live paycheck to paycheck. Meta Platforms
intends to build several massive data centers as it prepares
for a big push into artificial intelligence. A posting by

(01:33:46):
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg says the first data center will
be called Prometheus. It will come online next year. In casey,
another popular and famous movie is celebrating an anniversary this summer.
Clueless was released thirty years ago this month, and Mattel
has new share and Dion Barbie dolls.

Speaker 2 (01:34:06):
To mark the occasion.

Speaker 9 (01:34:08):
Wasn't able to release a shark Barbie Casey.

Speaker 1 (01:34:11):
Oh No, which one? Which one is? Which one's the
blonde one? I don't know that I've ever seen the movie.

Speaker 2 (01:34:16):
I have not seen the movie myself so clueless.

Speaker 1 (01:34:22):
Yeah, no, wait, I have seen clue. I'm thinking of
the other one. I'm thinking of the other one that
came out the Okay, all right, then I guess I
kind of know.

Speaker 2 (01:34:29):
Well that makes me feel old. Thank you, Jeff, appreciate you. Okay,
take care.

Speaker 1 (01:34:33):
All right, there you go, Jeff Pellinger, Bloomberg News. Oh
man Ross, you want to hear the You want to
hear a crazy headline I just saw?

Speaker 2 (01:34:41):
Yeah, sure, okay. Do you know who Lamin Jamal is.
I have no idea.

Speaker 1 (01:34:45):
That's good because he's a he's like the he's the
new biggest soccer player in the world. He plays for Barcelona.
I have a passing. I only have a passing knowledge
of who he is. I understand he's very good. But
he was seventeen when he came in the league. He
just turned eighteen, and the guy is already worth more
than any of us are. So he just had his
eighteenth birthday. And now he's under investigation because Remembory plays

(01:35:08):
for Barcelona. He's under investigation by the government of Spain.
All right, so listen to this headline. Spain's government demands investigation.
Although now they're going.

Speaker 2 (01:35:17):
To do it.

Speaker 1 (01:35:17):
So it's a little dated from yesterday into Barcelona WonderBoy
Lamina Mal's eighteenth birthday. After quote, dwarves were exploited and
only women with minimum specific breast dimensions were allowed to attend.
I guess these are the entertainers, so I read that
as strippers, dancers, any of the rest. So they're the

(01:35:40):
federal government of Spain is going to investigate probably the
top athlete in their country because dwarves were exploited and
women had to have a certain size to dance.

Speaker 3 (01:35:51):
So it sounds like from the way you've laid it
out that it was his birthday, yes, and he had
himself a day.

Speaker 1 (01:35:58):
He had himself a big old day, as you do
when you I think he's probably got probably worth like
one hundred mil just off the bat. So, uh, by
the way, the fine, the combined fine for it's the
dwarf thing is interesting to me. So what I'm assuming
they hired like a dwarf toss or something.

Speaker 2 (01:36:15):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (01:36:17):
But the part where you're hiring exotic dancers, are you
not allowed to specify? That's what I don't understand, So
like or do you just have to take whatever they send?
You and if uh uh, what'sh what's that chick's name?
The destroyer on Gorloch Gorloch, and if Gorloch shows up,

(01:36:37):
you just gotta let Gorlock dance?

Speaker 2 (01:36:39):
How does that work? These countries are so busted man.

Speaker 1 (01:36:45):
So what you're saying is he paid twelve women and
an undisclosed number of dwarfs, probably a crap ton of money,
and then they agreed to do it and everyone was happy.

Speaker 3 (01:36:56):
I mean, if did, he can do his parties and
get off, you know, for free like that, This guy
should have now no issue at all, I would think.

Speaker 2 (01:37:03):
Now it's space.

Speaker 1 (01:37:05):
Yeah, Spain, they overturn elections, They do whatever they want.
The fine, by the way, is nine could be nine
hundred thousand because they base finds off how much money
you have.

Speaker 2 (01:37:14):
So, yeah, this guy screwed.

Speaker 1 (01:37:16):
He screwed more than somebody dipped in oil dropped into
a diddy.

Speaker 2 (01:37:19):
They they base Yeah, he's done.

Speaker 4 (01:37:21):
Man.

Speaker 2 (01:37:21):
They base your criminal finds and your income.

Speaker 1 (01:37:24):
Oh they do that in a lot of countries for
traffic citations.

Speaker 2 (01:37:27):
And other things. Yeah, over in Europe. Yeah, if you
grow up to like Norway and whatnot, speeding finds are
based on income.

Speaker 1 (01:37:35):
That's why when a guy gets a speeding ticket is
super wealthy, he can get like it. Some guy got
a ticket for like one hundred and fifty thousand for
speeding because he's just super rich. Oh yeah man, yeah
this guy. But this guy had himself a day, as
you said, and now it's going to cost him an
extra nine hundred thousand. Probably not going to break him though,