Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
We're working on a guest literally right before the show started.
Oh it's in the show DM. Okay, no, I didn't
see I must have. That is so weird, man, I
mean I appreciate. Oh it's on a Facebook never mind. Okay.
(00:22):
I hate trying to schedule things via dms, especially with Facebook.
If you guys send me stuff on Facebook and it's
uh messages, I don't look at it because I don't
really go on Facebook that much, and when I do,
there's a gazillion of those and I'm not fishing through.
It's nothing personal. But if you do want, you can
always email. I generally see those unless you attach some
(00:45):
crazy thing. But if you're trying to share a video
or something, your bet, you know, go on Twitter. That's
probably your best bet. You can tag or we'll generally
see it. People do it. If I just saw like
three or four tags from overnight. So anyway, so you know,
we'll see, we'll see if we can get the dude.
(01:05):
Uh this what is this guy's name? Gallet Odd Gallet,
Adam Gallett? All right, so uh he he did he?
I don't know this. I don't really know. I did
do a little research on this. Guy's organization and all that,
and they kind of do what Veritas does right and
for them, their big thing is these uh, you know,
(01:28):
these uh, these DEI positions at universities and cities and
government entities of you know, maybe at the county level
or state level or whatever. And you know how they've
they've kind of gone into hiding or they've changed their
name because of the position that the current administration has
(01:50):
taken where we're not gonna do We're not going to
have outwardly racist employees on staff and departments. We're not
going to do it. And that DEI at its core
is outwardly racist. And I'm sorry if you disagree, and
you're all caught up in that it is you cannot
(02:12):
deny that it takes one one individual group of people
based on their race, demonizes them, and then elevates another one.
Even if you think that's fair and it's you know,
turn about its fair player or anything, you can't deny
that rather than leveling the field, it's and and and
we've played audit too much audio over the years. So
(02:33):
I have no problem with people going in and figuring
out who these who these frauds are. And I don't
know this a Brianna Scurry or whatever her name is,
who works for the city of Raleigh, who is essentially
a DEI person. We'll hear the audio, but I do
know that the way that she's talking about it with
the undercover individual, she knows they're talking about it like
(02:56):
they're secret agents, because that's how people go. Well, she
Trump didn't mean, you know, with at the city level,
blah blah blah. I'm pretty sure he did. If he's
doing schools and and some of this other city stuff.
I'm sure he did. And if you didn't think that's
a problem, then why in the video and we'll play
the audio for you here in just a moment, why
would she be so like the whole video is just
(03:19):
explaining how to not let the public know that you're
the DEI person. You don't do that unless you know
you're doing something wrong. Sorry, that's that's that that's captain
obvious stuff. Man, It's it's the way that it's addressed.
So anyway, so this guy then he is, he's not
the undercover. He then goes back after and he's you know,
(03:43):
with the microphone and just like finds her in the
hall and immediately she's like no comment, runs into her office. Uh,
and then some security person for the City of Raleigh
or wherever that office building is that she's in. I
don't know if that's at city Hall or where that is, Like, march,
is this dude out of the building? What are we
(04:04):
doing here? All right, let's get into this.
Speaker 2 (04:06):
We'll imagine being a taxpayer in Raleigh, North Carolina. You
think that your taxes locally are going for law enforcement, schools, roads,
maybe ambulance services. Instead, you find that they're being used
to fund radical dei principles in several facets of their
city government. And yet, even though they're so proud of
their radical dei ideas, they have to hide them. I
guess because they know the taxpayers don't want it, and
(04:29):
I guess because they know there are federal executive orders
prohibiting their work.
Speaker 1 (04:33):
All right, So that's one side of it. There's the
federal orders. But there's another point he's making there, and
that is that the citizens don't want it. And I
don't know, maybe in the city of Raleigh there's enough
duped people, but you're dealing with taxpayer dollars. You know,
the Feds are doing that out, but maybe also the
citizens don't. I mean, it is a possibility, even though
(04:55):
Raleigh has distinctly changed in their voting patterns. But you'll
never know that because you're hiding it from them. So
even if even if you think that in the city
of Raleigh, if you ever held a vote on this position,
it would probably you know, would stay, which again it
probably would. I don't know, but you feel it necessary
(05:16):
to hide it. That's problematic. Own it or if or don't, right,
and then have some undercover guy go in there and
blow up your whole thing. Cut too, Briann, I don't
know how much stands.
Speaker 3 (05:33):
This is beautiful, my goodness, plan, Oh my gosh, I
love them.
Speaker 4 (05:39):
The fans are so cute.
Speaker 1 (05:41):
Thank you.
Speaker 3 (05:44):
Yeah, Hi, I'm Brianna. And this is in director of
Correquity Inclusion. Oh okay, okay, great you what care? Who's doing?
Speaker 5 (05:51):
All?
Speaker 4 (05:51):
Right?
Speaker 1 (05:51):
So an equity and inclusion. It's the DEI component and
it's the equity part, not equality equity part. And Breonna
also likes plants. That's what we know so far. But
let's talk about what it is you're doing. I mean,
you got a title. You're talking to this person. I
don't fully understand the context, but like guts are a spilling,
(06:14):
so let's get into it.
Speaker 3 (06:15):
There are certainly being strategic in the way is that
we you don't want to draw attention to ourselves number one, right,
but certainly also want to make sure that.
Speaker 1 (06:29):
This work is as.
Speaker 3 (06:30):
Protected as possible.
Speaker 1 (06:32):
This work is protected as possible. We don't want to
draw attention to ourselves. That's when you know you're doing
something you shouldn't be doing. That's when you know you're
doing something that you shouldn't be doing. And I don't
care what excuses people want to make for this. I
don't want to pay for this. And then the audacity
(06:53):
to fun stuff like this, and then every single election
they're like, we just need a few hundred million more
for this to this, and then every one of those
bonds passes because you just got willing dupes. You're like, oh, well,
they must really need the money, must really need the money.
You know, that'd be that money might be more useful
(07:14):
for I don't know a thousand other things. How about
using that money so that the entirety of Fayetteville Street
in downtown Raleigh, every block from the convention center or
from you know about them, where the Marriott is up
to where the old Capital is. Every corner doesn't smell
like pot, and I don't necessarily have an objection to pot.
(07:37):
I'm on that thing where I wonder if the amount
of money that we spend to enforce it is worth
the amount of money that you know it could be used.
I don't know, but if people want to do that there,
how I really don't care. But I mean, they're openly
on the street. Hell, do you know where the old
person's home is? I'm pretty sure some of those little
old ladies got glock homea they're treating. I just happened
(07:59):
to stroll from Raleigh to Times down to Jimmy V's
here a few weeks ago, and it was like every
single corner, I'm like, what is going on? Man?
Speaker 4 (08:08):
Ah?
Speaker 1 (08:09):
But no, we got we got the diversity and equity. Uh,
Brionna here all right? So all right, we've got to
keep it on the down low. We've got to fly
under the radar. We don't want people to know what
we're doing. That doesn't sound like somebody is proud of,
you know, what they're doing and knows that they shouldn't
be doing it. What happens when they're confronted them.
Speaker 3 (08:32):
We do partner oftentimes with Community Engage they programs that align.
Speaker 1 (08:36):
Well, I'm sorry, talk, We do.
Speaker 3 (08:38):
Partner oftentimes with Community Engagement if they have programs that
align kind of our goals are aligned. They'll bring in
again our community relations team to see where there's some
partnership that could happen. But I would say to community
Engagement is another department that's a really good involvement because
they they really do out there also a champion for
(08:59):
d so they're.
Speaker 6 (09:00):
Good, they're.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
There, you go so and I think through their investigation
they claim to have identified three different departments where they're
doing this. So hopefully we get a chance to talk
to the guy you heard at the beginning.
Speaker 2 (09:15):
So imagine being a taxpayer, because.
Speaker 1 (09:17):
He's actually president of this organization. At least that's what
it says on the bio here. So we will see.
We will see. Trying to coordinate stuff late at night
is not always easy. But I didn't see it until
a little later. Ah. Of course, of course, all right,
(09:43):
people are sending me a little spy report stuff. I
will dig through that. Let's go ahead and do this.
We'll go ahead and take a break. You know, we
got a little airport thing we got to talk about.
Uh oh, yesterday we were speculating on the Alec Baldwin
slamming his wife's range trover or whatever into that tree.
(10:06):
Now Ross's theory was he was he had just found
out about the peace agreement and spassed out because Trump
did it well. He released I don't want to he
released a statement, he posted a video online and you're
not gonna believe this. He lied. He's a he's a liar,
(10:28):
he's an habitual liar. He's not a good person. Because
then video was produced literally showing that he was, at
the very least he was obfuscating. He was trying to
make it sound slightly different because he knew he'd done wrong.
But it does track with Ross's theory yesterday that he
spassed out because he had his brother in the car.
(10:49):
And so we'll try to put the pieces together. So
all that more coming up here on the KCO Day
radio program. Oh dude, I love to get this un
thing too. I was reading. I spent about a half
hour reading up on this thing yesterday. Holy cow, good
luck with this. I know there's one hundred I actually
I know how to deal with this, So let me
(11:11):
not let me not ruin any of this deliciousness, and
we'll just we'll get to it, because I already have
a solution, and I think that, you know, that's the
best way to deal with stuff. You're gonna complain, at
least have a solution. That's the way I see it,
all right. So the Alec Baldwin insanity, this thing would
(11:31):
have gone away too if this idiot wouldn't have posted
a video, it would have been done because people just
assume he was angry and hit a tree. But since
nobody was killed the he wrecked his own vehicle and
nobody else, people would have just been on like the
next thing. But you know, if you're Alec Baldwin and
(11:53):
your ego was bruised, probably more so than your body
in this accident, you can't just let it be. So
you gotta go on social media and you gotta uh, oh, ross,
which one is just Baldwin? The second cut or the
first cut? It's just him, all right. So let's let
(12:15):
me put this in order in case I do it later.
So here is what Alec Baldwin posted about the accident.
Speaker 4 (12:23):
But this morning I was in this car accident.
Speaker 1 (12:25):
Guy cut me off in a truck.
Speaker 6 (12:26):
Big garbage truck.
Speaker 1 (12:28):
I mean a garbage truck the size of a whale.
Should never seen a garbage truck. It must have been
something commercial for like, by the way, he sounds like Trump,
I don't know if he's trying to, but they're a
little vibe there anyway, So your whale sized garbage truck, okay,
taking away material from construction or something.
Speaker 3 (12:46):
Was the biggest garbage truck I've ever seen any Anyway,
I won't go into the details now I'm bore you.
Speaker 1 (12:51):
But to avoid hitting him, I.
Speaker 4 (12:54):
Hit a tree.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
I had a big fat tree, crushed my car, my
wife's car. I crushed my wife's car. I feel bad
about that.
Speaker 3 (13:02):
That's all fine, and I'm fine, and my brother's fine
and puppy pot.
Speaker 1 (13:05):
Congratulations to everybody on the film festival.
Speaker 3 (13:08):
Thank you to the East Hampton Police Department, the Town
Police Department for coming to my aid.
Speaker 1 (13:12):
They came in to be filed to report with them.
Speaker 2 (13:15):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (13:16):
Officer Gurkin is his name, g E r k E.
I'm a lovely guy.
Speaker 7 (13:21):
And there was another gentleman that I didn't get his name,
but Officer Gurk from the East Hampton Police Department as
nice as can be, and his puasant this can.
Speaker 1 (13:28):
Be by the way, I think, yeah, to talk about
that ross. Was that his smoke detector at the end?
Speaker 8 (13:36):
I think so, And that's why I kept it in there. Yeah, yeah,
that's why I specifically cut it off at that point,
because I could have cut it off thirty seconds or
twenty seconds.
Speaker 1 (13:43):
PREI no, no, no, no, no, the smoke detective.
Speaker 8 (13:45):
But I'm hearing the smoke, the smoke detector, and I'm like,
I'm keeping that in because that's yeah.
Speaker 1 (13:50):
Huh, what do you mean?
Speaker 3 (13:52):
Huh?
Speaker 1 (13:53):
I don't know. Just get up on the ladder and
fix that thing, man, change the dollars. Very busy slamming
trees and stuff. So now this is important. He said
it was a very big truck, okay, and that's gonna
I know exactly what happened now well also cause I've
seen the other piece that I'm about to play you.
But I know exactly what happened and why this guy's
(14:14):
an idiot, and why I think he was distracted, probably
screaming about Trump to his brothers, probably you know, screaming
back at him, but because they both hate him. But yeah,
man one hundred pright, So here we go. Here is
some reporting on this that he is kind of important.
Speaker 7 (14:29):
Just obtained exclusive dash cam video showing the moment at
the tray Alec Baldwin crashed his SUV on the East
end of New York's Long Island. The video is from
the front facing camera on a commercial truck. You're seeing
the truck here making what's believed to be a legal
right turn, and then it slows down.
Speaker 9 (14:48):
Seconds later, Baldwin's SCV is seen hitting a mailbox and
a tree off to the right side of the truck.
The actor and outspoken Trump hater claimed on social media
that he was driving his wife's reign with his brother,
Stephen Baldwin in the passenger seat. He said he was
trying to avoid hitting this truck, so he veered off
the road into the tree. Does not appear, though, that
(15:10):
anyone was injured in the crash, but obviously not Baldwin's
first encounter with police. Now the questions was he trying
to squeeze around the truck, was not paying attention and
didn't see the truck until the last second.
Speaker 1 (15:22):
But great video there to show at least the moment
that all Wednesday morning coming up on the show. Like
I said, we're hoping to chat with the uh uh,
the dude who was Adam Gilett who was down there
with the little undercover Veritas kind of thing with the
City of Raleigh for their DEI stuff where they're all
she's talking to one of the dee they're undercovers, talking
(15:42):
to the Rihanna. I guess it's her name Scurry, who's
like the VP of DEI or deputy director. And but
she's like, you know, we don't talk about what we do,
trying to fly under the radar, and like everyone knows
they're doing something wrong here and and the taxpayers prob
have to pay for that. The problem is, and here's
where it becomes injurious, okay, is not just the fact
(16:06):
that collectively we got to fund her salary and her
department and those who work in her department. The bigger
problem is by playing this game, the City of Raleigh
and its leaders are putting us in a position where
federal dollars might not flow in that are substantial and
(16:29):
are already allocated to the city. And then that creates
a problem where you don't have money for this thing
and you either have to move money or you have
to not do the thing just so you can feel
good and have your little DEI office. It's the most
wildly irresponsible thing, and you need to fix it. You
are opening the city up to a substantial liability that
(16:52):
could very greatly negatively impact all of us, everyone who
has a toe in the water for the city of Raleigh,
let alone those of us who have paid taxes for years, years,
and in some case lifetimes. So I don't want to
hear it. Do you want your little pet project is
(17:15):
putting us all in financial danger? Fix it. So that's
what we got to talk about.
Speaker 4 (17:21):
Now.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
At eight oh five, we're going to chat with Brad
not the congressman who I don't know if any of
his district touches Raleigh proper, Ross, will you look up
Brad Nott's congressional district and see if he has any
piece of Raleigh? Is it? Well, if he doesn't have any,
peace we I may just mention it. But if he's
(17:41):
got a piece of it, I may try to get
him to do something to shine a little light on this.
All right, So Russell looked that up here? I yes,
I could look it up, but I gotta you know,
I got to do this right now. So yeah, so
clearly we'll talk to about shutdowns and uh, you know
(18:02):
the Hamas is real thing, which by the way, there's
already been some problems because here's the here's the thing
that Hamas is not that I knew it was going
to be a problem for Hamas. He is Wake County.
But does he have any of the city of Raleigh.
This is what I'm asking. Yeah, wait, because she works
for the city and not wait, county, and I don't
(18:25):
think so. I think maybe you know, because you use
you use when you're putting districts together, you use existing lines.
They can be geographic features. They could be city you know,
parts of or wherever the cities meet, where the county
line is the city, you know, any of those. So
I'll I can just ask him. It's not a big deal. Uh.
(18:48):
Sometimes it be hard to look at congressional maps online.
We just do a crap job of those. So anyway,
uh oh, going back to this, Uh Hamas the problem
is and they're figuring it out now, is Hamas still
thinks or people who are they they think that they're
going to get this that you know, this is going
to stop, and it's going to allow them still to
(19:10):
remain in positions of power, which would then allow them
to regrow their their terrorist organization slash political party. Uh.
And that is absolutely not gonna happen. That is that's
the thing that can happen the least. You cannot allow
Hamas to remain empowered because they could regroup outside of power,
(19:32):
but it's a lot easier inside because then you can
steal all the money and the supplies and the food
and subjugate people and hold public executions like they did yesterday.
They were publicly executing other Palestinians. That was the thing
going on. And then you have this other group as
opposed to Hamas, who kind of gives me the vibes
(19:53):
of they their kind of Hamasi. So I don't know,
man Like, the whole thing is, like I said, I'm
really happy to see it. I'm cautiously optimistic, but I
just don't trust Tomas. And I think that the more
that they learn that they're going to have no power,
they're not going to have the ability to steal or
(20:13):
influence in any rate. Manner, You're dealing with a bunch
of people willing to literally murder everybody. So I don't
think you're gonna deal with it. Well, so we'll see
and we'll talk to the congressman about that coming up
in about an hour and twenty minutes, twenty five minutes.
So oh, they this is great. So several other of
(20:39):
these protest groups have come out. They also are joining
with the Democrats Socialists of America and they've decided that
they're going to formally oppose the peace plan. And it's
just like, it's so it's so obvious what's going on. Man,
Like this is just like with Hammas losing their identity
(21:02):
and losing their power, it's the same for these guys.
And at least they're being honest. I saw some are
saying that until they eradicate the Israeli threat, which you
could read that is Israel, that they're not going to stop.
And then they chanted from the river to the CS
all that yesterday. So they're super pumped. The question will
be they have another No King's rally this weekend, because
(21:25):
of course they do, because the first nine or whatever
I guess, really didn't get them where they want. And
don't worry, the media will salivate over it unless it
doesn't go well, Like there's a possibility that people just
don't show up in the numbers that they did. Now
I don't know that I believe that, because it's a
bunch of old people showing up and what else do
(21:45):
they have to do. They're still going to go out.
They hate Trump just as much. But I don't know.
Maybe it will cut down on some of it, Like
maybe there's a few people who were genuine in what
they were protesting, and now that they kind of got it,
they might stay home, maybe you know, whine on the internet,
but not worth going out, you know, spending a Saturday
(22:08):
doing it. So it'll be very interesting to see what
that looks like as as we cruise through the weekend. Okay,
let's go ahead and address this. And I've given this.
I've given this a lot of thought last night as
I was putting prep together. And that is this Politico article.
(22:29):
And if you're living under a rock and you don't
know what that is, basically Politico, here we go. Here's
the headline. I love Hitler leaked mess Oh I shouldn't
have said that. Now any losers are gonna clip that
leaked messages expose young Republicans racist chat. So I'll read
(22:53):
some of these, you can read others. Everyone that votes
know is going to the gas chamber. They just throw
a bunch right up here. When do we start bullying? Dude?
They love they love the watermelon people. Yeah, you get
you get the you get the gist here now deciding
(23:15):
because they're individually clipped when there's one here that says, great,
I love Hitler. I don't know if they mean that
or if that's sarcasm. But the problem is there's a
lot of really gross stuff in here. But then there's
the other problem this to me, and then what happened
in Virginia. And I know this sounds like what about isn't?
(23:36):
But hear me out what happened in Virginia with the
absolute inability to say or or or demand that that
dude drop out of the race who is not a
college kid on a telegram chat list or whatever?
Speaker 6 (23:49):
This is?
Speaker 1 (23:50):
Okay, I'm not I'm not making excuses for any of
these idiots, right, even if it not only is is
the language abhorrent, just like you know, wanting your opponent's
kids to die in their mom's arms so she could
watch that. I don't even have to make equations here.
These are college kids. They're clearly stupid putty Like, here's
(24:14):
the deal. I don't chet crap like this, but I
also don't want to be in your group because some
you may have some person in your group who does
put something like this, and then the it gets leaked
to the media like this did. And it sounds like
this was leaked by other Republicans, which I know is
something that keeps getting left out here. But every single
(24:38):
every single Republican was was tripping over themselves to excoriate
and demand that. Essentially, there's penalties for these for these
people participating in this chat. And look, if you're so
dumb that you're going to do this and and hamstring
your your your career opportunities going forward, then I don't
(24:59):
know that I want you working for me anyway. That
being said, I have That's what Republicans were doing yesterday,
saying these people got to go. I can't find one
Democrat of record who thinks that the AG candidate Virginia
should go, So I'm not going to care. I'm going
(25:23):
to think all this is gross and I don't want
to be around any of these people.
Speaker 8 (25:26):
And that's it, you know, I had the same exact
thought on it. Yeah, the same exact one. I'm like,
this story, you know, as horrific as what they're saying,
you know, if you know it is, Yeah, it holds
no weight unless the AG candidate drops out or those
in Virginia condemn it completely.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
And I got to drop out. I need his colleagues, No,
you need to drop right. Whatever he does is what
he does. I already think he's a scumback.
Speaker 8 (25:49):
He's talking about like executing children or whatever it is.
And meanwhile, you're like, oh, but look at these college
Republicans saying these things. Okay, so which one is that?
Are you a hypocrite?
Speaker 1 (26:00):
It's and again it's Republicans who put him in. Now
with with him, I think it was a Democrat colleague
to put him in. So like, there's people with scruples
out there. That's great. Sometimes I get very hopeful, hopeless
in the in the world of politics. But and also,
and and and also how dumb do you have to
(26:21):
be to text your colleague that you want your opponent's
children to die in their mother's arms and to put
two bullets in their father's head. And how dumb do
you have to be to be on a giant chat,
in a giant chat with people from like five different
states I think are in this, I mean, and it's
you know, it's uh. I don't know exactly how many
(26:44):
people are in the chat list, but it's in the
triple digits, I think, And then to just like, you
don't know everybody in this.
Speaker 8 (26:51):
So group chats are absolutely horrible, and I recently had
an experience with one. Yeah, So I check my DMS
on X like a few weeks ago, and there's a
rather big account who's a pretty funny account on Twitter,
and he sent me a message. We know each other
through Twitch actually yeah, yeah, yeah, and he's just like
(27:13):
and the message said something like, hey man, there's a
bunch of us, you know, right wing twitch streamers or
x you know, people who have a GC and I
wanted you to invite you into it or I wanted.
Speaker 1 (27:26):
You to be a part of it. Would that be cool?
Speaker 8 (27:28):
And I'm reading this and I don't know what a
GC is, right, So I'm making a joke. I'm trying
to say that I don't know what a GC is
without saying that because I don't want to look dumb, right,
So I go GC, question mark Grand Conspiracy, what the
heck right? And he writes back, loll and I'm like,
put me in. I'm ready to conspire, right, And before
(27:52):
I know it, this thing shows up on my DMS
and as you know, I'm not I don't even like
a reply. I'll email at work, let alone this thing.
So suddenly I'm in this group which I didn't even
know group chats were a thing on X. I had
no idea but added to one to the list. I've
never been added to one, so.
Speaker 1 (28:11):
Yeah, the list are one thing. But no, you get
a group chat.
Speaker 8 (28:15):
And you know, I'm like a huge introvert and shy anyway,
So he's going, hey, everybody, this is Ross. You're really
gonna like him. You know, he's really funny, and I
think you guys will enjoy it. And before you know,
and all these people and there's like forty or fifty
people in this thing, and they also are going back
and forth. And it was fine, and they were friendly
and they were funny and there wasn't anything crazy like
(28:36):
in this story about that for you. No, but the
thing is they never shut up. It was all day,
twenty four hours. And you know how I am with
clearing up my text threads I send him my email
inbox is like, you know, people post pictures of their
email inbox and they're like, I got a ten thousand messages.
(28:56):
I have four emails in my inbox right now. I
keep that stuff super clean. My threads on my phone,
my text threads, I have one from Lincoln, two from Marquee,
and one from my mother. Everything else I clear out immediately.
It's an OCD thing. I don't like it when the
when the blue bubble pops up, especially on Twitter, because
I'm on Twitter and suddenly I see a blue message
in my DM and I check it and the thing
(29:17):
would never go away. It was always blue. And they're
talking about everything. They're like, I got a haircut today.
Here's my haircut. And I'm like, cares dude, Like, what
do we even do?
Speaker 4 (29:26):
What do we talk?
Speaker 1 (29:26):
What are we doing here? I have things to do.
I have a kid talking about putting people in gas chambers.
So I lasted, no, no, no, But they were funny,
dark jokes. Sure like dude, send but nothing like in
this story. But the thing is, so I'm like, I
didn't even last twenty four hours. So I'm like, I
have to leave this thing because it's drive me insane
and these people never shut up. So I'm I delete
(29:48):
the thread, not knowing that when you do that, apparently
it sends a notification to every one in the chat
that you have left the chat, which caused a firestorm
because then I get a mess from the original guy
that invited me in, and he's like, did we say
something to offend you? Why did you leave? Is everything fine?
Is everything cool? Are we still friends? What's going on?
(30:08):
And I'm like, dude, it's an OCD thing.
Speaker 8 (30:10):
You guys just would not shut up and I just
can't take that blue bubble notification all the time, so
I had to leave. It's nothing personal and very busy.
It bothers me and it's nothing, it's nothing but your
personal You're y'all are fine, but it was like something
I was like, I'm never agreeing to do anything like
if anybody says, hey join my GC, no, I am
very busy.
Speaker 1 (30:28):
I just I'm gonna put everyone on notice if you
add if you add my Twitter account and to show
Twitter account twig, I will dip out before you see
what's in there there offen And it's nothing personal. It's
probably you know, most likely it's just people sitting around
and it's fine, don't want to do it. And on Facebook,
same deal. That's why I generally your Facebook because people
add it. All they do, they add you to groups.
Speaker 8 (30:48):
Yeah, you're like, suddenly you're part of this, you know,
blah blah blah Republicans of blah blah blah County or
whatever the niche group is. And I'm like, I didn't
want to be a part of this. Nothing against your group, but.
Speaker 1 (30:59):
I don't want to. I think I think it should
be a faux pas, a like a serious social faux
pad to add somebody to one of those without their permission.
They did ask me, that's the thing, but I no, no,
I know what I'm talking about. With like Facebook. Agree.
I never understood why it wasn't a like a bad thing,
because there's no other scenario where you would just be
like like, you wouldn't be like, hey, I want you
(31:20):
to come to our house party and then when you
walk by the house.
Speaker 8 (31:21):
Somebody would grab you like a CIA snatch group. They're
like you're at the party. The party now, buddy, Yeah.
Speaker 1 (31:27):
Like that we wouldn't allow that, So why would we
allow that? You know the e version of that, so
I don't know.
Speaker 8 (31:32):
It was so funny because I didn't know this thing,
this community, or this sort of thing existed. On accident.
I'm like, will you guys just talk to each other
all day, every day, seven days a week, three sixty five.
That's crazy to me? Yeah, nuts.
Speaker 1 (31:46):
This is why I hate texting. I hate phone calls
more probably, but I also hate texting.
Speaker 8 (31:53):
I mean, I have best friends where sometimes I'm not
in the I mean like best friends. I've known them
for twenty years. It's in my rent. I do it
to you, you'll send me to I'm busy. I don't
feel like texting at.
Speaker 1 (32:02):
The moment, and I don't take any offense to it.
If I said this someth and you don't answer me,
unless it's something that like I need an answer for
the show or whatever. Let alone, then I'm just like,
all right, he'll he'll see it or he won't. Who cares?
Let alone?
Speaker 8 (32:11):
A group of fifty seven people and I don't know
who the hell they are except like one dude, it's
so weird.
Speaker 1 (32:17):
I had tacos for breakfast. Here they are like, oh
I had tacos for breakfast. The other day. Oh yeah,
those are I'm sorry, man, that's just it's just the
it's just the worst. But it's not anything personal. I
just want you guys because I have had a couple
of people flip out when I dipped out of their
groups and I just ended up blocking.
Speaker 8 (32:39):
I know, I'm crazy about it. I had no idea
would tell it like people would would show people.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
Because there was an next only like, well, you're on
the radio talking about this, How dare you don't want
to be in our group? And I'm like, dude, it's
it's nothing even against you. It's just like it's like
when we do the candidates. You have to understand, we
cover like a gazillion counties and I would be in
a hundred of these group things and I can't do
it anyway. These people saying this stuff in this group
chat dumb. Yeah. So yeah, all right, uh oh, look
(33:08):
at that. Our potential interview just got back to us Ross,
So you'll have to deal with that while we take
a quick break here on the CaCO Day Radio program
PCO Day Radio Program. Sorry to sew this headline here.
Ah now, we'll load, come on, come on, you can
do it, all right, We'll come back to that. All right,
(33:30):
here's the headline, authorities worn of illegal massage parlor activity.
Oh no, yeah, this is uh, where's this? Denver law
enforcement is alerting the public to red flags after an
undercover investigation led to spot owners being arrested for allegedly
after a sixth month invested. And they won't even tell
you the ones where they arrested, just the people. Oh no,
(33:57):
I'm sorry, it was a seventh month investigation. Wow, good, good, good,
good glad. You guys are cracking down there. Much appreciated.
So sorry, we just get distracted by those because they're
always very long investigations, which is super weird, right, all right,
speaking of super weird, Actually, this is really this is
(34:19):
really troubling once you start processing this information I'm about
to give you, because then you realize why it was happening.
Probably students identifying as non BINARYA or on the decline
according to a new study. And decline is not a
(34:40):
strong enough word. It's absolutely cratering in a report. Let's
see here, a study down a fifty thousand US undergrad students.
So this involves high school students as well as entry
level college students. So okay, let's see here they're finding
(35:04):
pointed out that only three point six percent of young
adults identified as a gender other than male or female.
Do you know what that number used to be? Last
year was five point two percent. Into twenty twenty three,
it was six point eight percent, seven percent, down to
three point six You cut the number in half. Now,
(35:26):
did God just stop making trans people all of a
sudden or something else going on? And if something else
is going on, what is it? But again, the age
group you're studying, you know, wasn't just born in the
last two years. These are clearly people that were going
through the same educational systems that you know other students.
(35:47):
Did you just did you just have a big batch
of students that then aged out? No? No, it's because
the theory of social contagion, which was always part of this,
is very real. It's very real, especially the younger you
get in this group that they study when you're in
(36:07):
high school and you're trying to fit in and figure
it out and maybe you don't, and now you're trying
to figure out what does that mean for you? And
every one of the people at the school is running
around going you know what, you're probably transgender or you're
probably non binary, you're probably one of the other fifty things.
(36:27):
And you're like, okay, because an adult's telling you that,
because I don't know, it affirms whatever their belief is,
and because there's no other explanation for how the number
just cuts in half within two years. Ironically, they do
(36:47):
this study annually, so there is I don't know if
they if they stop for doing I know, why would they.
There's fifty thousand and fifty thousand people. There's probably people
in this study that identified two years ago and that
now don't and that are still within the you know,
(37:09):
the acceptable age range you know of junior senior in
high school to four years of college. You know, that's
a six year window there just evaporated. Eric Kaufman, professor
of Politics at the University of Buckingham, released a report
the Decline of trans and Queer Identity among young Americans
(37:32):
and which he suggested the percentage is has declined. Well, yes,
I clearly, we just gave you the numbers. Yeah, the
graph looks like a damn pyramid right where he just
goes from twenty nineteen up through the Biden era. The
number was it went from two percent up to almost
ten percent, among which one is this is that Brown University. Anyway,
(38:02):
that's one of the groups. There's three different that they're
tracking here. So so and that number is down to
two percent again. So actually in some instances, in some
portions of this, you had it go up nearly eight
percentage points, drop down the eight once again. Explain that
(38:25):
to me, like I'm five, let's see, all right, survey,
all right, yeah, this is okay. So here's the one.
The data from Andover University shows three percent of students
twenty twenty five. That's not what it shows. I'm looking
at it. It shows clearly shows two percent on here whatever,
(38:47):
down from the nearly ten percent at Brown University. It
went from six percent back to two point six percent. Yeah,
so in every instance, it's more than half, more than
half that just evaporated in two years. And it's just
so weird. Man, all right eight eight eight nine three
(39:08):
four seven eight seven four. You want to wait in
on that? Feel free? Because I am now all in
on the social contagion coupled with the because the the
response that I saw for people, they're like, that's because
people are scared to identify now because Trump will I
don't know. Haven't you know, fired into the moon or
(39:29):
the sun or something which is which is b especially
out of college campus. No, there's something else going on here,
and that ain't it. That ain't it at all. Oh man,
all right, let's go ahead, let's go ahead and get
into this. I yeah, I love I love that they're
(39:50):
leaning into the South Park stuff and the SNL stuff.
So over the weekend on SNL they did two things.
One one of the cast members did us sit that
basically was just a political ad for Mondami and she
has been apparently a volunteer for his campaign and been
doing all his stuff. So like the fact that NBC
(40:12):
didn't recognize or care about that conflict of interest and
it was so blatant is pretty ugly. But then they
had another skit because one of their favorite people to
parody is Christy Nome and Pam Bondi for that matter,
pretty much anyone in the Trump administration with Christy Nome.
And you know it's really lazy, is they Basically the
(40:33):
way they play Christy Nome is the way that Tina
Fey used to play Plan right, where they're just say,
all right, we're just gonna make her dumb but also evil, right,
So they did a thing where she was they parodied her,
you know, doing recruitment for the agency. And then of
course it's all sorts of horribleness. Well, instead of getting
(40:57):
mad or pushing back or doing any of that, Apartment
of Homeland Security looked literally took the first few seconds
of the skit and then made it into a recruitment
ad where it then cuts to people just running around
doing badass stuff, shooting stuff. You're in tactical gear. Here's
some helicopters, you know, very very machism kind of stuff.
(41:18):
But you know, and then and then put it up
on the internet, just embracing it. Our government agents are
working without pay.
Speaker 10 (41:25):
Luckily, my boys at ICE don't mind.
Speaker 1 (41:27):
They're in it for the love of the game. And
how did I find them? By running ads like this?
Now SNL will clearly cut into mocking run around with guns,
jumping stuff, kicking doors. You know, you get the gist, right, So, uh,
(41:50):
well played there, man, And if SNL wants to keep
uh serving it, they'll probably complain. That'll be the irony
of this. SNL does that they kind of want know
them probably to complain. And then it's probably gonna be
them who are composing a copyright thing. You can't do that.
Are they using it to profit? I don't know that
they can't do that. I guess we'll see seven fifteen.
(42:14):
Hang on the interesting little story. I mean, in a way,
I want to see who's gonna fight for me the most.
But you know where this happened in Atlanta. I am shocked.
Oh my goodness, this thing is so much better. Oh
check ross check this out. Man, a heavily armed Amazon
(42:37):
delivery driver, claimed he shot a US Postal Service employee
in the face because he thought he was a mafia assassin,
because you know, the mafia assassin's like to dress up
as postal workers. That's how they get you. Also, it's
like how the postal service guy lose? I mean, aren't
(42:59):
aren't these guys like gun nuts? Or was that just
a thing from my childhood? The guy lived by the way.
So twenty six year old Blake Coleman was arrested and
charged with felony first degree assault in connection with the
deadly shooting. Oh no, it was deadli I'm sorry. Why
(43:19):
was he charged with only first degree assault? I made
an assumption based on the charge authority say the victim
will survive his injuries but lose an eye. So why
do you call it deadly? Shooting? In the thing?
Speaker 4 (43:34):
Here?
Speaker 1 (43:37):
Wit A I write this now, A, I wouldn't have
screwed that up, all right? Please say that. Coleman admitted
to shooting the mail carrier in the head, but insisted
he opened fire and self defense. Coleman indicated that this
was self defense because the US Postal Service worker was
trying to charge at him while he was cornered. That
(43:59):
according to the police report here, Coleman recounted how the
worker had smiled at him before lunging forward with both
arms behind him in a charging motion. He also explained
that the worker didn't have any packages or mail in
his arms at the time, and he felt he was
about to be tackled. Now, according to a witness, they
(44:21):
tell a very different story. I want to know how
the mafia part of this got in here. Witness told
police a different version, saying, quote, I saw the mailroom
door close in an argument between the postal guy and
the Amazon guy. The postman shoved the Amazon driver and shouted,
(44:41):
why the ef are you shoving me? The Amazon driver
then pulled out a pistol and shot him in the head.
At the time of the altercation, Coleman reportedly armed with
two firearms, a bulletproof plate carrier, a large like a
large honey knife, pistol magazine, and all of it concealed
(45:02):
under his Amazon uniform. Coleman told detectives he wore the
vest and all right, dude, this thing is this is nuts.
Coleman told detectives he wore the bulletproof vests and carried
the weapons because he had been repeatedly shot by rifles
(45:23):
and crossbows while on the job. Is that what's happening
to Amazon drivers? Are people shooting you with crossbows and
rifles while you're just trying to deliver. Coleman also said
he was being cyber stalked by the mafia and had
(45:43):
suspicions that the postal worker may have been a mafia assassin. Uh.
In a statement, Amazons, did you really have to get
a statement? In a statement Amazons that their policy prohibits
drivers delivering Amazon packages from carrying weapons that the company
(46:05):
adheres to state and local laws. Well, Amazon, if your
drivers are getting literally shot with crossb I don't know
that I believe that, but I mean, I'm sure there's
maybe might have been a one off, but I don't
think it's not a regular. I think dogs are probably
a bigger issue for him to the amount of people,
(46:26):
by the way, who have dogs that are not trained
or are not put in a place so that a
delivery can take place if you're expecting one. I've never
understood it. Here's one thing to have a dog that's
willing to eat anyone who touches your property, that's fine,
as long as they understand the property line, which can
(46:47):
be accomplished a number of ways. But that being said,
if you want your package delivered and you let your
your demon hound out in the front, you're an awful person.
There's a guy just trying to do his job and
he's might get chomped on. I don't cover whether it's Amazon,
post Office, FedEx ups, whatever, but this guy's going out
(47:09):
dressed like Rambo. I think you might want to do
a little mental health check on this dude, just saying okay,
all right, and he's got a million dollar bond. Finally
somebody got bond, So just being left back out on
the street. Oh, we had another incident down in Charlotte
(47:32):
by the way. This time it's a woman with fifteen
prior arrest who was just released on bond after stabbing
somebody right up front through the chest, going for the heart.
Two stab wounds, allegedly eight inch knife, only charged with
assault with a deadly weapon, not attempted murder, and they
already put her back out on the street. And she
(47:54):
was right. This happened like two days ago. So Charlotte's
gonna keep charlotting. Nothing we can do about it. I
live down in Charlotte, but I can I worry about Pete.
I don't want Pete getting murdered by some quite you know,
T three thirty time repeat offender. So that's all. And
(48:18):
maybe maybe you know people down in Charlotte, but it's
I don't know if it's summer of the Shark reporting.
But I don't think you could pay me to go
bar hopping and Charlotte right now. And I like bar hopping.
I mean not as much as I used to, but uh,
because I'm too old for the club clubs. But yeah, man,
I don't I don't think you could talk me into
walking around downtown tonight, and I I like downtown Charlotte.
(48:42):
We're gonna go to phone calls here. But let me
just explain to you what's coming up real quick. One
a half hour from now, at eight oh five, we
are going to chat with Congressman Brad not So he
does have a piece of the City of Raleigh's according
to his comms guy there. So we got that confirmed,
(49:03):
which means one of the things I want to talk
to him about is this undercover video. So you had
this group led by the guy who's the president of
His name is Adam Gallett. You'll hear him in the
opening real quick here.
Speaker 2 (49:20):
And so imagine being a taxpayer in Raleigh, North Carolina.
You think that your taxes locally are going for law
enforcement schools, roads, maybe ambulance services. Instead, you find that
they're being used to fund radical DEI principles in several
facets of their city government.
Speaker 1 (49:36):
And yet all right, so Gallet's group sends an undercover
it's a woman in to talk to this woman named Scurry,
who is one of the de I people for the
city of Raleigh. And she's all cagy and she's like,
we don't talk about what we do to keep it
on the down low, and you know, very secretive. I'll
play some of the audio here before we in the
(49:56):
next segment to set up for it, and then we're
going to talk to Gallett at the guy who then
confronts Scurry and then is thrown out of the building.
We're gonna talk to him at eight thirty five. So
you got the congressman at eight oh five, and then
this Adam Gillett from the undercover video thing at eight
thirty five. So busy next hour. Okay, let's grab some calls. Now,
(50:20):
let's start with Daniel. What's up, Daniel?
Speaker 5 (50:23):
What's up?
Speaker 1 (50:23):
KC that much?
Speaker 5 (50:26):
I was just calling what you guys were talking about
yesterday about MTV. I thought about it all day long
and I just wanted to call in.
Speaker 1 (50:33):
This morning, so real quick, hang on, so real quick.
The story he's talking about is, if you didn't hear yesterday,
MTV is doing away. They have five music video channels,
music channels. They're gonna start rolling those back. They're gonna
cut them off in Europe and eventually get rid of
them everywhere. So MTV will not play music videos on
(50:54):
any of their stations in the very near future. Anyway,
Go ahead, sir.
Speaker 5 (50:58):
Yeah, it just it brought up a different kind of
a different perspective. I was telling Ross. I grew up
a super conservative Christian family. My dad was the preacher Baptist,
you know, uh Country Mountain Baptists, and we weren't allowed
to watch in TV.
Speaker 4 (51:11):
It was the Devil. Okay.
Speaker 1 (51:13):
We would speak to friends out supposed to be like
a super black sheep, rebellious youth.
Speaker 5 (51:18):
Oh yeah, I'm just that's that's what happened.
Speaker 1 (51:21):
Many they did.
Speaker 5 (51:23):
I joined the Marine Corps, ran off and party partier
than most, and yeah, happening. But anyways, and that's that's
part of what I was. I heard sermons from preachers
that studied the music videos, and there are supplemental messages.
The devil is if we continue to listen to this music.
Now I'm forty two, that was thirty years ago, you know,
(51:44):
and they're you know, all of your sons are going
to be wearing dresses all the and I just was
thinking about it. It's not really on what you guys
are talking about, but I was just thinking about dude,
those preachers were they were pretty spot off about the
woketology and the immorality that I mean. I don't know
that it was the music necessarily.
Speaker 1 (52:04):
But but well, no, i'll meet me, I'll meet you halfway.
Is were there shocking things that were put into music
videos for the purpose of being shocking? Of course, it
happens all day every day in music an MTV was
a vehicle for that. And you know, if you go
through most of the rock stars and we're at the
(52:26):
very least people playing that, you know, playing up that
portion of it it is. It definitely does not comport
with a religious conservative background. That means we're just we're
just cential they are versus others. I don't know.
Speaker 6 (52:42):
Yeah, and it wasn't.
Speaker 5 (52:42):
I think it was the entertainment industry on a whole.
I think it was, you know, they perfect And now
we're actually seeing the woke, the like the fruition of
all the wokeness that was kind of hit at first
when when we were kid.
Speaker 1 (52:55):
Yeah, it's like remember remember the video of the Disney
woman who's like, I'm going to put gay things into everything.
She said that that's her called it her her LGBT
agenda or something.
Speaker 5 (53:05):
So I just remember roll in my eyes as a
kid and thinking, oh, this is way off. You know,
this is they're overreacting.
Speaker 1 (53:11):
And it depends whether it gets you. So I don't know.
Oh I thought Ive said it on the air. My
mom didn't let me watch Smurfs anything with witchcraft in it.
I was allowed to watch.
Speaker 5 (53:21):
Same thing. We struggled with watching teenage mutant Ninja Turtles
because they were.
Speaker 1 (53:26):
Oh no, I couldn't if I would have hated to
miss out on that. But let's face it, I was
the kid who would then go over to my buddy's
house and his parents didn't care, and then we just
watch all the stuff.
Speaker 5 (53:36):
So yeah, that's what I did.
Speaker 1 (53:37):
Yeah, all right, all right, have it go in there.
Daniel appreciate the call this morning. See solved. Except occasionally
I go watch stuff for my mom. She didn't want
me watching because it was really scary, and then I
go watch it, and then I couldn't complain about why
I was scared, like not just get in trouble man. H.
Then the large Marge scene hit me and it was
(53:59):
all over all over, Joanne, what's up.
Speaker 5 (54:05):
Good morning.
Speaker 11 (54:07):
I am the transgender. I remember when it first started
coming out as a thing, and there were several places
that were still honest media sources that cited a studied
by the American Pediatrics association that said that if most
children who you know said I'm not a little boy,
(54:28):
I'm a little girl, vice versa, if they were just
left alone, if that idea in their head was not supported,
that by the age of eighteen, they would revert back
to their sexuality at birth. And they tried to quash
you know, just just squashed that whole report. But I'm
(54:49):
going to tell you something else. If you look at
like Jazz, the reality show about the girl the boy
who became you know, he's a boy. I don't care
what you say, but became a girl, y'all. The a
lot of these parents have Munchausen bipoxy.
Speaker 1 (55:05):
Yes, I was thinking this with HBO has a thing
on right now where they have a little boy. Maybe
we're talking about the same thing where the kid is
literally at a church. It's like a utilitarian, you know,
super woke church, and his mom is doing the coming
out in front of the congregation. And the boy does
not he a little boy. He don't want a part
of it. You can tell mom is incredibly excited. This
(55:27):
kid's just yeah, and then they cut like that kid,
in my opinion, is being abused. He's like four and
uh and but you can see that this is the
greatest thing that's ever happened to mom. And then all
of a sudden there's weird chanting by the there's an affirmation
that the church people do. And it's just as somebody
who grow up Catholic. Uh, you know, a responsive chance
(55:49):
or a thing I'm familiar with. But these creeped me up.
Speaker 5 (55:51):
Yeah, I don't.
Speaker 11 (55:53):
Yeah, well, chas is that that's notas Jess s.
Speaker 5 (55:56):
That's the reality show on PLC.
Speaker 1 (55:58):
Okay, and that girl, that boy.
Speaker 11 (56:01):
I'm sorry, has been mutilated, I mean mutilated when they
tied that when they tried to build the private parts.
It was a complete disaster. And it's yeah, the parents
have been called out. The mother has been called out
time after time after time. And when the Pediatric Association
(56:22):
released that report, they said that anybody that did that
to a child was guilty of selling the child abuse.
Speaker 1 (56:30):
The show. The show on HBO, by the way, is
called trans Hood. So that's not the show.
Speaker 4 (56:35):
Okay, Yeah, I haven't.
Speaker 5 (56:37):
I haven't watched that one. I don't.
Speaker 11 (56:39):
I don't. I don't even want to watch it. It's
frank in my heart.
Speaker 1 (56:42):
Well, yeah, Jane, I'm sorry, but what's crazy about that.
Why why I think people should watch it is HBO
and the people who produced this documentary which they follow
over for five years. They follow four kids, transgender kids
to see, you know, how it played out. They but
(57:02):
you have to understand, the people who made this are
all in on this. They're doing this to promote a
show and glorify this. And it's really it becomes really
clear really quickly that, especially the little boy I just
talked about at the church, they're not in on this
and the mom is one hundred percent in on this.
That's so horrible for that kid. So it's a tough watch.
(57:23):
But it's out there. It's called transhood, like childhood, but
trans in the front. You can check that out. Okay,
all right, Joanne, Okay call this morning. I gotta I
gotta go do work.
Speaker 11 (57:32):
Thank you. You have a boss.
Speaker 4 (57:33):
Say y'all.
Speaker 11 (57:34):
Okay, I love you guys today.
Speaker 1 (57:36):
Oh well, thank you very much. We do appreciate. We
love you guys out there. Most of you like Joe
Anne very nice. Some of you all right, I want to.
Speaker 12 (57:45):
Get on your bad side, So I don't want to
get on your bad side.
Speaker 1 (57:49):
Ah man. It's just like sometimes people send me emails.
It's just one guy, and then I just do I
just don't understand people sometimes. How you doing that? You know,
living a dream Wednesday. It's just all going too quickly, and.
Speaker 12 (58:03):
It's it's kind of easy when you've got forecasts like this.
I mean, there's gonna be a little cool down coming
low to mid seventies today. Tomorrow you wake up near fifty,
and then Thursday and Friday we stay in the sixties,
probably mid upper sixties, but the morning lows by Friday
morning could be talking about low forties, maybe some upper
thirties in spots, So that's a bit of a change.
But we should have a good weekend in the mid
(58:23):
seventies and lots of sunshine. If we do get showers,
it'll be Sunday night, you know, we'll really get to
that point where we could use some rainfall. Been abnormally
dry of late, and I really don't see anything significant.
Oh boy, before everybody gets going on the interwebs with
something tropically developing in the Caribbean, yes, late in the month.
(58:43):
The guidance the models are showing something that's around the
twenty seventh or twenty eighth of October, so everybody started
to screw it high, bro, I know, gonna mess with Halloween.
But listen, it's I'll always say it. It's two weeks away,
all right, So don't get caught thinking that, Hey, this
(59:04):
is what I get. Hey, I heard that there's a
hurricane coming. Okay, No, you're looking at two weeks though.
Speaker 1 (59:13):
That is you could be a slutty hurricane. You could.
Speaker 12 (59:17):
You could be that, or you could be like the
the internet weather weather guy called the armchair meteorologists.
Speaker 1 (59:24):
Right, slutty weather meteorologist. Sure, right, So it's you know,
they just put it.
Speaker 12 (59:28):
No, they preface it with you shouldn't look at this
because people are showing this on online and it's two
weeks away, and meanwhile you're the one that's showing it.
Speaker 1 (59:38):
Been a weird taboos stuff is going on in the
weather community, man, it is.
Speaker 12 (59:43):
It's a strange. It's a strange, strange business, that's for sure.
See they say don't post this and look at it
if you see it, But yet again they post it
and they say this could happen, like well, so it
forces me to jump into the conversation. I really don't
want to, but everybody asks me anyway, So the hurric
Kane is Voldemort, right right, so it's coming. Yeah, it's
(01:00:04):
and the next hurricane on the list, because Lorenzo's out
there lonely as a tropical storm right now and you're
gonna stay over the Atlantic, it would be Melissa. So
don't be surprised if we get a Melissa. You know,
just to me, it just says, you know, we're not
done with the tropics, just because it's been kind of
a it's a weird year. No landfalling systems in the
eastern Carolinas, but they've had some big impacts some systems
(01:00:25):
that have been close, so you know, it doesn't always
mean landfall to cause damage and flooding, which they did
have and still having in some spots along the East
coast from the not even name storm.
Speaker 1 (01:00:37):
So okay, yeah, for nothing going on, that was a
lot of weather. So that was a lot. I was
gonna say, that was three minutes with sorry about that
for nothing. It's okay, we're good. We'll talk in an hour. Okay, Okay,
there you go. Rased Agic from the Weather Channel. All right,
I'm gonna we're gonna get in when we come back
to the rest of this little undercover video. So you're
(01:00:57):
just a prize because I played the beginning of the show.
But if you just joined us this group outing what
they were hoping to keep secret, I guess DEI programs
within and whole divisions within the city of Raleigh. And
my question is, so that people can have their little
DEI pet project woke garbage, are we imperiling the city
(01:01:20):
of Raleigh where potentially a bunch of federal dollars won't
flow through, Because if that's what leadership is doing, that's
wildly irresponsible. But we'll find out more. We'll talk to
Congressman Brad Not about it. He's coming up at eight
oh five. And then literally the guy from the organization's
doing the undercover videos, name's Adam Gallette. He'll join us
(01:01:42):
at eight thirty five and we'll get the audio from
what they uncovered in the next segment, So stick around
that in just a few minutes. We'll talk partially of
the congressman. We got a bunch of stuff with him,
and then also we'll actually interview one of the people
in this video. So one of these Project Veritas style videos,
undercover woman goes to meet with DEI person within the
(01:02:05):
city of Raleigh. They have this conversation where the DI
person is, you know, we got to keep it secret.
We can't tell anyone. You'll hear the exact wording. I'm
not even paraphrasing that much. And like you, she knows
that it's a problem. And it's not just a problem
because all the DEI programs are inherently racist that we
(01:02:27):
have covered here on this show, super racist, and arguably
that should have no place within our city government. But
it could also imperil federal dollars or programs or other things.
So it could be wildly injurious to the residents of
(01:02:47):
Raleigh and the taxpayers of which I am one. So AnyWho,
All right, so here, here, here we go.
Speaker 2 (01:02:55):
Fair in Raleigh, North Carolina. You think that your taxes
locally are going for law enforce with schools, roads, maybe
ambulance services. Instead, you find that they're being used to
fund radical DEI principles in several facets of their city government.
And yet, even though they're so proud of their radical
DEI ideas, they have to hide them. I guess because
they know the taxpayers don't want it, and I guess
(01:03:17):
because they know there are federal executive orders prohibiting their work.
Speaker 1 (01:03:21):
Yeah. Yeah, so again that's why this is really problematic
because it could mean dollars don't flow it.
Speaker 3 (01:03:29):
Briann, I don't know, I understand.
Speaker 4 (01:03:32):
This is beautiful, my goodness plan.
Speaker 3 (01:03:35):
Oh my gosh, I love them.
Speaker 4 (01:03:37):
The plans are so cute.
Speaker 3 (01:03:39):
Thank you.
Speaker 1 (01:03:41):
Our plans are Hi.
Speaker 3 (01:03:43):
I'm Brianna, and this isn't director correct? Oh okay, okay, great?
Speaker 1 (01:03:47):
You what are you who are doing? What can I
help you with?
Speaker 3 (01:03:51):
They are certainly being strategic, and the way is that
we don't want to draw attention to ourselves number one.
But yeah, certainly also want to make sure that this
or is as protected as possible.
Speaker 1 (01:04:08):
Yeah yeah, so, I mean you hear the language around it.
She knows that she should, that they shouldn't be doing this,
and that this is all that. And we've how many
of these videos we've seen with college people or they
just changed the name like oh, and then they just
spill the whole story to some random person they just
met or that they think wants to sleep with them.
(01:04:28):
I don't know if that was the angle here, but
it's clear by the way that she's talking about in
her actions, she understands that this is a problem. And
I also understand why she want to protect her job.
It's probably a pretty cushy one. You just get to
run around and get up in people's business and harass
employees that aren't really doing anything because somebody feels microaggressed. Ah,
(01:04:51):
that makes somebody probably like missus Curry. They're very excited
because it's a level of power that can be very satisfied,
very addicting, but also very financially ruinous for the super
do partner.
Speaker 3 (01:05:04):
Oftentimes, with Community Engagement, if they have programs that align
kind of our goals are aligned, see, they'll bring in
again our community relations team to see where there's some
partnership that could happen. But I would say to community
Engagement is another department to really get involvement because they
they really do out. They're also a champion for DEI,
(01:05:25):
so they're good.
Speaker 4 (01:05:26):
They're a good.
Speaker 7 (01:05:26):
Resource as well.
Speaker 1 (01:05:28):
Good. All right, then we have a full list of
departments within the city that need to go or or
or do we elevate I'm going to ask the Congressman
to elevate this. You know, I don't know what how
exactly it works. I mean, that's why we're gonna have
two guests here so they can explain it to me today.
Congressman brad Not. How you doing this morning, sir, Kathie.
Speaker 6 (01:05:51):
I'm doing well. I hope you are.
Speaker 1 (01:05:53):
I am and uh. I was going to start clearly
with the you know, the the piece stuff and the
shut down stuff, but we had a little issue arise
yesterday that I want to run by you. And I
don't know if you've seen this, but clearly you're familiar
with like the Project Veritas style undercover things, right where somebody,
(01:06:13):
somebody just for whatever reason, wants to explain all the
horrible stuff they're doing to some random person they're on
a date with. Seems to work. We had our own
situation in Raleigh. I don't think it was a date setup,
but an undercover reporter kind of infiltrated the city of
Raleigh and specifically the DEI offices and the folks working
(01:06:34):
in DEI. Yes, Yes, which I was told that we're
not supposed to do anymore because it could impact federal funding.
We'll get to that here in a moment, but I
just want to play an audio cut for you, sir,
because I want you to clearly this person understands that
they shouldn't be talking about it. Listen to the language
they use.
Speaker 3 (01:06:53):
They are certainly being strategic, and the way is that
we you don't want to drop tension to ourselves number one, right,
but I certainly also want to make sure that this
or is as protected as possible.
Speaker 1 (01:07:09):
All right, So hold on one market.
Speaker 3 (01:07:11):
We do partner oftentimes with Community Engagement if they have
programs that align kind of our goals are aligned, they'll
bring in again our community relations team to see where
there's some partnership that could happen. But I would say
to Community Engagement is another department that's a really get
involvement because they they really do out. They're also a
(01:07:31):
champion for DEI, so they're good. They're a good resources.
Speaker 1 (01:07:35):
Said, look, here's the deal. I find the DEI stuff
racist at face value. I think it's problematic because it's
it's racist in the way that a lot of it
is taught. This is not about equality, which is a
different thing than equity. That being said, this is also
potentially financially injurious to the city of Raleigh, part of
(01:07:56):
which you represent. Right, you've touched it in Raleigh. That's
why we checked I do so. Your thoughts on this well.
Speaker 6 (01:08:05):
I had seen a headline casey, I have not seen
the video, but that's deeply disappointing, to say the least,
and you hit the nail on the head. It is
potentially even illegal. I don't know the facts of the case,
but DEI is inherently discriminatory on a very basic level,
and it undermines the most damaging thing about DEI is
(01:08:26):
and undermines any objective adherence to standards, and it does
away with merit. I mean, the only question when you
were utilizing tax dollars should be who is best able
to do the job at hand? And we need to
root this stuff out. We need to make that person famous.
Anybody in Raleigh should be outraged at this sort of
effort to conceal some objective. I don't know what that
(01:08:50):
objective may be, but that person needs to be made famous,
and the motivation behind her conduct needs to be needs
to be made known. And whether it's the city council
or mayor's office, I hope that there will be an answer.
Speaker 1 (01:09:03):
Will you're allowed choir? Will your office in choir on this?
I mean, they don't care if I ask, but if
you send them if you're if you send them a
letter going what the heck's going on? I mean, watch
it evaluated, talk to who you need to talk to,
and and but I just want to know you guys
will follow up on this because I don't want the
city to lose a bunch of money. And then they
start slashingly they did, they do the angry slashing or
(01:09:27):
like we're not going to pick up trash anymore because
we can't have our dee. I I'm not going to
put up with it. So I'm asking you guys to
do something in your capacity.
Speaker 6 (01:09:34):
And I'm born and raised in Raleigh, Kathie, and Raleigh
has its fair share of needs, and it's a growing city,
and candidly, the only the only question should be how
can we as the city government best serve the community?
And that kind of nonsense undermines the mission business of
the city government. And you can't you can't have these
sort of closeted DEI officials pushing their own personal objectives
(01:09:59):
when there is at mounting up, when there is a
crime issue, when the police, you know, are being stretched.
We need to be we need to get back into
business of actually serving the public and not serving some
you know, peripheral political objective.
Speaker 1 (01:10:13):
Yeah, well, we're going to interview the guy who's uh
who did the undercover thing coming up at eight thirty five,
So you knows as you talk to your staff about this,
there may be some more info there. But I'd be
very curious to see what a follow up yields. But
I need to pivot to a couple other things with you,
do you it's is it kind of fun watching people
(01:10:37):
have to react to the peace agreement, people who just
seethingly hate Trump. I don't know why that's brought me
so much joy this week, Congressman. But here's the thing
I do appreciate. In most cases, people go and look,
I don't like the guy, but this is inherently a
good thing because I was more than willing to do
that with Osama bin Laden and Barack Obama, much to
(01:10:58):
my peril. So my listener's got very mad at me
for being happy about it. But credit where credit is due.
Do you think this holds? Because already Hamas is realizing
they're probably not going to be in power, and there's
been a few little things already. So where are you at?
Speaker 6 (01:11:15):
Well, I'll say this in order there there are there
are some some Democrats that, to their credit, I'll say,
in this charge environment have given the President his due
because this is a singular effort and a singular directive
from President Trump. Without President Trump, this would not.
Speaker 1 (01:11:31):
Have been done.
Speaker 6 (01:11:32):
I mean, he has been relentlessly determined to land this plane,
and he has done so without any adherence to the
traditional norms of the State Department, of the Internal governmental
operations and you know, backchannds and so forth. And he's
even gone against the the Israeli government on many occasions
(01:11:52):
in order to achieve this. And so I think that
he does deserve great credit. He has He has always
been in uh this singular focus end conflicts, and this
is not only the ninth serious conflict around the world
that he's ended, the Ninth War. And in terms of
whether or not it holds, I certainly pray so, I
(01:12:13):
really do. I mean, he was very strategic and bringing
a lot of the regional partners and neighbors of Israel
to the table. They're in agreement if they uphold their
end of the bargain, if they work towards security and
really disarming Hamas and making sure that Hamas does not
come back in any type of authoritarian posture. That's going
(01:12:35):
to be the key any to solve any problem, you
have to identify the real issue. The real issue here
was not Israel. The real issue is Hamas. Hamas, that
is the actual genocidal barbarians in this area. They want
to get rid of the Jewish state. They want to
get rid of as many Jews as they can. They
(01:12:56):
celebrated October seventh, and they want to repeat October seventh,
so getting rid of Hamas and their their treacherous gains.
That is sort of the underlying UH necessity here, and
so far it seems to be holding.
Speaker 4 (01:13:10):
UH.
Speaker 6 (01:13:10):
We need to we need to finish the job. We
need to make sure they are they are banned from
ever returning to power, and that's gonna take a lot
of work. But so far, so good, and I certainly
again hope and pray that the peace will hold.
Speaker 1 (01:13:22):
We are in the middle. We continue to be in
the middle of a shutdown. I saw some of your
colleagues try to store Mike Johnson's office. He wasn't there,
he essay, so they could get this Arizona woman sworn in, right.
I gotta be honest other than that and like one
other thing, I haven't noticed you guys aren't at work.
I don't mean like I haven't noticed, man, And I
know that everybody's mileage may vary, but for the majority
(01:13:47):
of Americans, I think they probably really haven't noticed, which
tells me you guys should be cutting some more. And
Trump's been taking some opportunities. Are you comfortable with some
of the uh, the trimmings like uh like he did
with would about a thousand people last Friday?
Speaker 6 (01:14:02):
I believe you did have closer to closer to five thousand,
if if not five, it's around five. But I agree
with you, Casey, there needs to be a continued effort
to eradicate waste, for aug abuse, to get rid of
some of the fat and these bureaucracies. The Department of
Education still has people there. We could you know, that's
a good place to start. But I would say the
(01:14:22):
most the most disappointing thing about this entire episode is
how fundamentally performative and dishonest the other side has been.
On September nineteenth, Republicans passed a bill to keep the
government open to facilitate negotiations on a myriad of issues,
and every Democrat voted against it, meaning they voted to
(01:14:43):
close the government, and they have done so nine times.
I believe in the Senate voted to shut down the government.
And this this you know, dog and pony show about
marking to Mike Johnson's office demand that the government be
opened up. This, it's it's the most dishonest thing I've
ever seen. They voted to close it. And it's do.
Speaker 1 (01:15:03):
They think they're winning?
Speaker 6 (01:15:04):
Striking?
Speaker 1 (01:15:05):
Do they think they're winning the pr side of this,
because I could be pretty honest about it. I think
the Republicans last few times didn't win it. I think
the Democrats are losing it badly. Do they not realize well?
Speaker 6 (01:15:17):
I think I think the American people see how superficial
these videos and efforts are. It is one hundred percent political.
There's no principles here, There's no honesty involved. It is
in a large part because of the growing share of
the radical left, the growing share of the party that
the radical left controls. You've got two Democrats from New
(01:15:37):
York who run the Senate and then run the House,
Hakim Jeffries and Chuck Schumer. Chuck Schumer would lose by
thirty points to AOC if she decides to primary him,
I don't think she will. I think she's onf for Senate.
But that's a troubling poll for him and Hakim Jefferies.
It's fifteen points less popular than so Ron Bondami and
avowed status communist, anti Semitic, whatever you want to call him.
(01:16:01):
The Democratic Party has a real problem and this is
a complete effort politically to show the left that they
are standing up to Donald Trump, and Chuck Schumer has
let the cat out of the bag numerous times. There's
no way that they're going to they're going to open
the government back up before this no King's rally. He
has said that it's getting better for the Democrats every day.
(01:16:24):
You know, it's it's a real problem when you're dealing
with that type of political calculus and you're trying to
appease uh lunacy. But Republicans passed a bill to keep
the government open. It was a compromise with a clean
cr and when when the counter proposal would increase spending
by one point five trillion, that's laughable.
Speaker 4 (01:16:46):
It's laughable.
Speaker 6 (01:16:47):
It's so it's so outrageous, you can't you can't really
be offended.
Speaker 1 (01:16:52):
Stuff again, some of it's just crazy.
Speaker 4 (01:16:55):
You.
Speaker 1 (01:16:55):
This is what people need to understand. There's like they
want to put money back in for de stuff and
like Uruguay and and and like we're going back to
the same stuff that they want. Is that just because
there's one hundred percent among their coat Yeah? Okay, yeah.
Speaker 6 (01:17:10):
And they say that they don't want illegals to get
health care, that is an absolute lie. The worst thing
that they ever did was to put it in writing.
And again the Speaker has made its famous section twenty
one for one their counterproposal in writing to our clean
cr it undoes every protection to open up the floodgates,
uh for illegals to regain access to Medicaid, Social Security,
(01:17:32):
Medicare benefits that they were receiving before Trump got back
in office. So it's silly, it's it's very upsetting.
Speaker 1 (01:17:39):
I will say.
Speaker 6 (01:17:40):
The one part that gives me the greatest heartburn and
the greatest you know, consternation, casey, is law enforcement and
military are not going to get paid because of this
charade that the Democrats are engaging.
Speaker 1 (01:17:51):
Okay, this is to ask you next. Because Trump's saying
He's got a buddy who's going to pay it. Then
he said he found the money for something else. I mean,
what is there truth to that?
Speaker 4 (01:17:59):
Is?
Speaker 1 (01:18:00):
Are not truth? What's going on?
Speaker 6 (01:18:02):
Well, there's there is limited flexibility on the executive uh
with the executive to reallocate funds that he deems sort
of the most essential in terms of a hierarchy, but
that funding will ultimately run out. And again, this is
a this is a pure political play that the American
people are paying the price for, especially those in law
(01:18:24):
enforcement and the military. Again, I maintain relationships with many
of the agents that I used to work with Border Patrol,
atf FBI, DEA Task Force officers, whatever it may be.
They're not getting paid, you know, prosecutors, they're not getting paid.
And you know, for a little while that's tenable. But
you start dragging this thing on like it very well,
(01:18:45):
may that becomes very costly. And I again it is
it is all performative nonsense from the Democrat side, And
that's upsetting to me.
Speaker 1 (01:18:54):
You know, I'm there's a theory out there. You're chatting
with Congressman brad Not by the way, who's a former prosecutor.
Just in case you didn't know what he was referencing. There,
there's a. So somebody ran this theory by me and
I thought it was interesting and that this is a
This is the Democrat strategy to essentially so that no
(01:19:15):
money goes to federal law enforcement officers, so they all
quit and then they stop deporting people. Right, So, with
some like four D chess thing to make it so
nobody wants to come to work, nobody wants to deport anybody,
and then they win the issue. I think that's lunacy
because it's just injurious all around. That being said, then
(01:19:38):
I see things like yesterday a judge in Chicago ruled
that they have to take down the fence around the
Broadview Ice Facility outside of Chicago, which is a detainment facility,
that they have to remove the fencing around it. So
the lunatics who have been attacking officers ramming them with cars,
I guess, have an open line of sight for their
(01:20:00):
hunting scopes or whatever. This judges continue to be a problem.
This is a problem. J. D. Pritzker said this, the
tables will turn someday.
Speaker 2 (01:20:09):
These people should recognize that maybe they're not going to
get prosecuted today, although we're looking at doing that.
Speaker 1 (01:20:15):
He's talking about federal agents. This is untenable with states
like Illinois, California and others. Like I'm a states rights guy,
but like this is this is almost criminal what they're doing.
I have about a minute and a half.
Speaker 6 (01:20:30):
Yeah, it really is an immigration enforcement case. He goes
against the gospel of the Democratic Party today. And JB.
Pritsker should be ashamed of himself threatening prosecution for federal
agents who are getting with of some of the worst
people in the world, who are harming his communities. Is
it is a disgrace. It's a disgrace. Chicago has been
(01:20:51):
a war zone for a decade and a half because
people like Pritzker will not enforce the law. And I
found what happened yesterday just to be outrageous. What he said,
what the judge did again outrageous. And I wouldn't put
that theory too far down on the implausible list because again,
immigration enforcement, it goes against every tenant of the Democratic
(01:21:13):
Party today. And again these are people who are here
illegally with criminal records. Yeah, criminal records with illegal aliens.
It's it's astounding to me. But again I applaud our
law enforcement and I hope that they can get paid.
Speaker 1 (01:21:28):
Soent Yeah, well, well do you know what the number is,
what we paid military, what the monthly payroll is for
one point three million troops. I'm gonna look at it.
Speaker 4 (01:21:37):
I do not.
Speaker 6 (01:21:38):
I did not. We can we can get that for sure,
but I do not talk of that.
Speaker 1 (01:21:42):
I'm sure it's floating around. Well, we'll hit your guy up.
If not, all right, I gotta let you go. Oh
Ross wants you to fire the Bills head coach too, So.
Speaker 6 (01:21:49):
If you could do that, we'll have a hearing about it.
Speaker 1 (01:21:51):
Ross or talk to Stephonic maybe should you know somebody
up there? All right, thank you, Kott, just want to
do appreciate.
Speaker 6 (01:21:56):
It all, Katie.
Speaker 1 (01:21:57):
All right, there you go. Listen to that. Ross. You're
gonna put a blue room panel together to fire your coach.
So they should have him fired in like three years.
It'll be amazing. All right, we'll be back. Hang Out
is eight thirty five and absolutely perfect. So we played
you the audio and here a few segments ago, and
then we talked to the congressman in the last segment.
(01:22:18):
And this all pertains to DEI where it's happening within
the city of Raleigh. This undercover video with this this
scurry woman. And the guy's voice you hear at the
end is who we're going to talk to next. And
his name is Adam and I'm gonna butcher this maybe
maybe not Gallette? Is that the proper pronuncer?
Speaker 4 (01:22:39):
Oh man, I'll take it.
Speaker 1 (01:22:41):
Also, heard you say in the video, So I cheated there.
So tell me before we get into this, tell me
about the organization real quick. Okay.
Speaker 4 (01:22:50):
Here, we were founded way back in nineteen sixty nine.
We do keating camera, investigative journalism and cultural activism to
hold a bad public policy actors accountable.
Speaker 1 (01:23:01):
Okay, I mean that's clear, concise and probably very necessary.
So what prompted you? Because you don't live in Raleigh?
You live in Florida. I think that's what I was
able to ascertain, so or at least we're from there.
So what how did you guys hone in on Raleigh?
Speaker 4 (01:23:17):
You know, it's funny. We did a series of hidden
camera investigations throughout North Carolina earlier this year and investigated
higher education, and we found university after university administrator after administrator,
whether we were at unc Asheville or Western Carolina, all
of them bragged to us about continuing the push DEI
in defiance of the Board of Regions ban. And when
(01:23:40):
we released these videos the comments people were shocked and said, well,
I thought PEI was panned everywhere there's a federal executive order.
I thought PEI was gone everywhere. Now we having been
in these school districts and having been in these universities,
we know firsthand, gosh, no, it's not. But we figured
we would go and see what is it like in
local governments, because opposedly the executive order of bands DEDI,
(01:24:02):
any federally funded institutional like a local government can't have DEI.
And naturally we popped in there in As you'll see,
because this is the first of many investigations from your
a lot of local governments, they are more than happy
to brag to us about how they continue to push
DEI regardless of any law. These are radicals, true blue.
Speaker 1 (01:24:24):
I gotta tell you, man, this is the thing that
your videos and like what Veritas was doing and James
and all that stuff. The thing that kills me about
all these videos is everyone who's in Washington, or in
government for that matter, if somebody much hotter than you
wants to go on a date with you, and it's
a trap, especially if they just want to talk about
(01:24:46):
the weirdness of your job. And yet this seems like
you guys are able to get a hold of these
on the regular. So what was the premise in which
this scurry woman brought your undercover person in. What was
the setup so to speak, because she then spoke very
freely about keeping it a secret, and I that's wild
(01:25:06):
to me.
Speaker 4 (01:25:08):
And to your point, I was previously the vice president
of development for Project Veritas. Some of our investigators and
some of our staffers came from Project Verratas. But in
these investigations, these were no dates. These people were at
their places of employment and they thought they were speaking
with a like minded radical. I don't want to give
too many details because it's an ongoing investigation across the country,
(01:25:29):
but they were more than acty to tell us, oh, yes,
we've simply rebranded it. But the work continues. We're simply
not trying to call you call attention doors elves, but
the work continues. And it speaks to how out of
touch and unaccountable these local government bureaucrats are. And you
look at these job descriptions that we see, you would
think that a local government would be focused on law enforcement, roads, schools,
(01:25:53):
the fire department. Instead, these are basically activist jobs. You
had taxpayer funded activists in the local governments across the state.
Why if you want to push far left activism, knock
yourself out, but do it as a private, nonprofit organization.
Do it as a political action committee, not as a
taxpayer funded city government.
Speaker 1 (01:26:15):
What has been the consequences? Because I remember the with
the Western Carolina stuff and all of that. Have you
guys had because I you know, I did ask. We
just chatted with Congressman Brad Not We do a regular
thing with him at eight oh five, and he touches
the city of Raleigh as part of his district. And
I said, look, I want you guys need to send
a letter and and follow up on this. And I
(01:26:35):
think he will do that, But like, what are the
consequences unless somebody high up in the Trump administration. Here's
about it. It almost has to go excuse me, go viral,
and then maybe the city will feel the pain. And
my problem is I'm a taxpayer in the city of Raleigh.
I don't want the city to feel the pain because
some idiots in government don't want to get rid of
(01:26:57):
their little pet project. So what has been the after
math for some of.
Speaker 4 (01:27:00):
These You know you makes such a great point with
our higher education videos. Many of those people lost their jobs.
The dean of students at Western Carolina University lost her
job after we released our investigation. And your point is
excellent in that you don't want your city to have
to deal with financial consequences for law breaking. You know,
(01:27:22):
the federal government created the Civil Rights Initiative to investigate
this sort of thing and to pull federal funds. Well,
this pushs the city of Raleigh at risk of losing
federal funds if the Feds get involved, and I'll be
honest with you, they get involved under stuff regularly. The
Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Harmy Dyllan, often
(01:27:42):
shares and posts and responds to our hidden camera investigations.
Speaker 6 (01:27:47):
So if you want your city to.
Speaker 4 (01:27:48):
Lose funds, this is a great way to do it.
We actually created an action alert at Save Carolinacities dot
com where you could send one message that goes directly
to city officials and basically tells them, Hey, we're gonna
lose federal funds if you don't cut this nonsense out. Plus,
I don't want to be funding for left activism. You
could send that message or write your own at Save
(01:28:11):
Carolinacities dot com. But to do what they're doing at
a time like this is incredibly risky for all of
the residents of your community.
Speaker 1 (01:28:20):
And then you mentioned other communities. Obviously, you know you're
still holding on to those What would you like, what
are we talking about here? Are we talking about like
a bunch of other cities or a bunch of other
things in North Carolina? Without giving too much away, I mean,
how pervasive is the problem where people are still trying
to hide this.
Speaker 4 (01:28:40):
Well, if we went to every single city in the state,
I imagine we'd probably find something to varying degree. You know,
I got to tell you when we go to these universities,
when we go to these school districts, when we go
to these city governments, the greatest challenge is merely getting
past the gatekeeper. You know, they have those receptionists that
they hire to make sure that no parent can ever
actually talk to an administrator, to make sure that no
city resident can ever actually talk to anybody whose salaries
(01:29:03):
they're paying. You know, that's the greatest struggle in our work.
These people who are paid to make sure that the
government employees never actually have to talk to anybody right
when we get pass the gatekeeper. More often than not,
the people we speak with brag about breaking laws, to
fine laws, circumventing laws. We've released investigations I think, from
four North Carolina universities earlier this year. We have several
(01:29:26):
morecoming and as I said, this is the first of gosh,
I think at least a half dozen universities in the
state of or cities in the state of North Carolina
where we have people in local government bragging about pushing DEEI,
regardless of the executive order.
Speaker 1 (01:29:40):
Last question, how often when you go in there do
you find that they're not doing that right? Because I
know we dwell obviously on where the problem is, but
I'm assuming there has to be situations or do you
just I guess you have some information before you do
it that leads you to think that it's probably happening.
But has there been times went in there and it's like,
(01:30:01):
oh no, look look at that they did get rid
of it.
Speaker 4 (01:30:04):
You know, we don't necessarily have any information ahead of time.
When we go in. We just kind of cast a
wide net and find whatever we find and I'll tell
you for this city government thing, I'm not sure that
we've had too many people thus far who've said no, no, no,
we were doing this, but we stopped it because all
of them were doing it ahead of time. All of
them had taxpayer funded equity officers, taxpayer funded political activists.
(01:30:27):
All of these communities had that sort of thing. They
gave it different job titles, perhaps, but all of them
had that. So the question is, and were they never
doing it and they still aren't doing it? The question
is they were definitely doing it, are they still doing it?
And I don't think we found one yet or conclusively
they stopped that sort of work. What we find more
than anything is that they nearly print new business cards
(01:30:49):
and continue doing the same work, perhaps the most lucrative
job one could have in the state of North Carolina
and twenty twenty five business card salesmen.
Speaker 1 (01:30:56):
Yeah, well, no, I would say that the equity officers
is you can't visually do anything, so you probably play
a lot of you know, Match four games on your
phone or something. So all right, hey, I appreciate it
very much. The website one more time, if people want
to reach out to the city, would you give that,
Adam sure receive.
Speaker 4 (01:31:15):
Carolina Cities dot Com thank.
Speaker 1 (01:31:17):
You, okay, and then I retweeted your video. People can
scroll down and you're tagged in that as well as
your organization, So if people want to follow you, they
should do that. Adam Gallett, thank you for the time
this morning. Appreciate it.
Speaker 4 (01:31:28):
Hey, thank you so much for having me.
Speaker 1 (01:31:30):
Yeah, absolutely, all right, let's get raced agic from the
weather Channel in here. We'll do an undercover Doppler inspection
on him. So up.
Speaker 12 (01:31:38):
Yeah, Well, Doppler's kind of put to the side for
quite a few days. I don't know if we'll get
anything on it until maybe Sunday night. That doesn't even
look all that impressive, so yeah, kind of boring. Looks
good all across the southeast, big arey of high pressure.
Pleasant temperatures that time of year, right, mid six or
mid seventies today, upper sixties tomorrow, maybe in the mid
sixties for the triad. What you see, what you get,
(01:32:00):
lots of sunshine. Now the change will really start coming
in as we get on through, maybe not so much
tomorrow morning, when we're in the upper forties to low fifties.
This morning, we're seeing a lot of mid and upper fifties,
but it's going to be on Friday morning when we're
down maybe to the upper thirties for some to low
forties for everybody else. So a little bit chillier by
Friday morning than mid upper sixties in the afternoon, and
(01:32:22):
then we're back into the mid seventies for highs over
the weekend. Looks like it's gonna be another beautiful weekend,
so make your plans now. Even I do get a
shower to be Saturday night or Sunday night, and it
really doesn't click much. So a lot of dry out
there case seeing lots of sunshine the next several days.
Speaker 1 (01:32:35):
Okay, all right, we'll enjoy the rest of your Wednesday. Well, yeah,
we'll do tomorrow, and who knows, maybe something will break
out so you can get excited. Okay, and we maybe
I'm back with Yeah, thanks man. Denise Pellegrini from Bloomberg
News hang on your Bloomberg Update now with Denise Pelligreney
and Denise. I did have to laugh because your very
first story is I'm from Wyoming originally, okay, and my
(01:32:56):
friends back home have been making fun of these people
for months now, for because it's usually some hipster dude
who lives in one of those vans that's built like
a tiny home that's now a prospector and they think
it's hilarious. But anyway, not to steal your thunder, go
right ahead.
Speaker 10 (01:33:15):
I think cold rush is back, that's what you're talking about.
I am some of those people, you know, they may
have picked up those metal detectors and other things they're
using just from the thrift shop. And apparently the whole thing,
this whole gold rush thing, of course, is ignited by
gold prices right which if I checked today are at
four two hundred and two dollars a troy ounce. That's
(01:33:38):
up sixty percent this year. And we had CEO of
JP Morgan Chase Jamie Diamond tell us yesterday that gold
could more than double in price from here. He said,
quote if things keep going on this way, whatever that means.
So that's got people all fired up social media, people
with strainers, pans, picks and even vintage equipment. All those
(01:34:00):
old maps in Wyoming, California, the Dakota is all those
other place that's trying to figure out where they can
find gold.
Speaker 1 (01:34:07):
Uh.
Speaker 10 (01:34:08):
Wall Street Journal says the big thunder gold mine in
Celtic Cutta is flooded with people looking for advice. I
was thinking about Wyoming too. I mean, there's the Carissa Mine,
right and people.
Speaker 1 (01:34:22):
But here's the problem with gold and Wyoming, and I
hope these kids don't get themselves in trouble some of
them doing it. We have a lot of uranium in Wyoming,
and it's a problem. I grew up on a cattle
ranch where we if we sunk drilling wells for green
oil or something, they literally would come out and inspect them.
And part of it was making sure you weren't getting
into that stuff for obvious reasons. But Kojima is called
(01:34:44):
the is the uranium mine out there's huge. It's right
between Buffalo and Gillette, and so you know, hopefully they
know what they're doing. It's all that I'm saying, or
they could make themselves very sick.
Speaker 10 (01:34:54):
So yikes. I don't mean to make light of this,
but I guess you know, gold not only sparkling, but
you could have a gold chain that might be kind
of glowing right there. That's kind of a scary prospect.
And also the Carissa mine, they have that annual gold
rush day, right, so all this stuff is just getting
people so fired up. And now there are rare earths
there too, which are going to be maybe even more
(01:35:16):
valuable than gold. All gets your hand on some of those,
but also potentially toxic.
Speaker 1 (01:35:21):
Yeah, so if.
Speaker 10 (01:35:25):
You're looking for a job and you're not striking gold,
you might try the submarine business or the military related
submarine business because the US Submarine Industrial base case he
wants to recruit more skilled workers. There's growing demand for
vessels because you know of the US controversy and competition
with China, right, and we have a Navy Secretary, John
(01:35:48):
Fhalan warning that the US is getting behind and risks
actually being behind China if we don't step it up.
So there are now a lot of websites catering to
the dream of working for the submarine business, like ww
dot build submarines dot com, where you can look for jobs.
Virginia has a major sub business with military and power,
cable manufacturing, and many others, as you will well know.
(01:36:11):
And I was going to say, I know Wilmington is
not that close, but they're building that submarine museum there.
They educate the public about careers and submarines. Yeah, so
it's a growing industry, believe it or not, and if
you have any kind of expertise, you can probably get
ten job offers in that field. Right now, stock futures
(01:36:33):
are pointing to a higher open. There's some optimism in
the banking industry. Casey, Bank of America out with an
earnings meeet Morgan Stanley shares also getting some positive attention.
Crude oil futures are higher this morning, but crude prices
are pretty much sitting at a five month low, so
we could see lower prices at the pump. Some crude
oil experts say a glut is coming that could be
(01:36:54):
good news for drivers. And stock futures right now are higher.
As I mentioned, Dow futures up two thirty seven s
and HE futures up fifty two, Nasdaq futures skyrocketing more
than one percent, up two hundred and fifty seven.
Speaker 1 (01:37:05):
Casey, all right, thank you very much. I do appreciate
it so And you know one part of your story too,
is while they are making fun of them, to your point,
they're also selling them all the crap they want from
the stores. So yes, and that's how it was in
California in eighteen forty nine.
Speaker 10 (01:37:22):
Yeah, and Wall Street Journal says this morning, that's so
far the biggest money makers amid those looking for gold
appear to be those selling the equipment.
Speaker 1 (01:37:32):
Yeah for others, boys for gold. That's my boys. So yeah, right,
you're fair. All right, thanks man, or thanks to Denise.
I appreciate you. Okay, all right, there you go, Denise
Pelagreney Bloomberg News Ross. You're thinking of becoming an old
timey prospector the cost of gold there.
Speaker 8 (01:37:49):
I mean, I mean, if you're going to go all
old prospector, you got to have the look right like
the lanterne.
Speaker 4 (01:37:55):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (01:37:55):
Like, yeah, I got address the d the right way
because you had you used to be a prospector and.
Speaker 8 (01:37:59):
You have a run in right with the coyotes. Yeah yeah,
the big issue when you prospect is the coyotes.
Speaker 1 (01:38:06):
Everyone knows this. Yeah absolutely. Uh and evil businessman who
higher gangs of thugs to beat you.
Speaker 8 (01:38:14):
Oh yeah, no, yeah, I found the gold. And then
the hood came out. Oh no, that hood man, he's
the worst. Did he come himself or did he send
like goons? No, he had goons of course. Yeah. But
then this strange preacher guy came along. Oh okay, and
help defend the entire group.
Speaker 1 (01:38:30):
Wait, he's a preacher. Yeah, just a preacher.
Speaker 8 (01:38:33):
And then my daughter got really what, really into and
things got weird.
Speaker 1 (01:38:37):
Man, I guess they got weird. Yeah. Yeah, she was
really into the Preacher.
Speaker 8 (01:38:43):
I remember seeing that movie and that part of the
movie was super weird, like that creepy.
Speaker 1 (01:38:47):
Yeah it really is it? So the two things? Can
I just watch that movie again the other day Pale
Rider For those of you wondered, it's because it's a
great movie. I put An Eastwood on when I don't
know what I want to watch. It's perfect. Is that
part and then the part where the dude, the main
dude is the guy from Law and Order, which I
don't know why that's so weird, but
We're working on a guest literally right before the show started.
Oh it's in the show DM. Okay, no, I didn't
see I must have. That is so weird, man, I
mean I appreciate. Oh it's on a Facebook never mind. Okay.
(00:22):
I hate trying to schedule things via dms, especially with Facebook.
If you guys send me stuff on Facebook and it's
uh messages, I don't look at it because I don't
really go on Facebook that much, and when I do,
there's a gazillion of those and I'm not fishing through.
It's nothing personal. But if you do want, you can
always email. I generally see those unless you attach some
(00:45):
crazy thing. But if you're trying to share a video
or something, your bet, you know, go on Twitter. That's
probably your best bet. You can tag or we'll generally
see it. People do it. If I just saw like
three or four tags from overnight. So anyway, so you know,
we'll see, we'll see if we can get the dude.
(01:05):
Uh this what is this guy's name? Gallet Odd Gallet,
Adam Gallett? All right, so uh he he did he?
I don't know this. I don't really know. I did
do a little research on this. Guy's organization and all that,
and they kind of do what Veritas does right and
for them, their big thing is these uh, you know,
(01:28):
these uh, these DEI positions at universities and cities and
government entities of you know, maybe at the county level
or state level or whatever. And you know how they've
they've kind of gone into hiding or they've changed their
name because of the position that the current administration has
(01:50):
taken where we're not gonna do We're not going to
have outwardly racist employees on staff and departments. We're not
going to do it. And that DEI at its core
is outwardly racist. And I'm sorry if you disagree, and
you're all caught up in that it is you cannot
(02:12):
deny that it takes one one individual group of people
based on their race, demonizes them, and then elevates another one.
Even if you think that's fair and it's you know,
turn about its fair player or anything, you can't deny
that rather than leveling the field, it's and and and
we've played audit too much audio over the years. So
(02:33):
I have no problem with people going in and figuring
out who these who these frauds are. And I don't
know this a Brianna Scurry or whatever her name is,
who works for the city of Raleigh, who is essentially
a DEI person. We'll hear the audio, but I do
know that the way that she's talking about it with
the undercover individual, she knows they're talking about it like
(02:56):
they're secret agents, because that's how people go. Well, she
Trump didn't mean, you know, with at the city level,
blah blah blah. I'm pretty sure he did. If he's
doing schools and and some of this other city stuff.
I'm sure he did. And if you didn't think that's
a problem, then why in the video and we'll play
the audio for you here in just a moment, why
would she be so like the whole video is just
(03:19):
explaining how to not let the public know that you're
the DEI person. You don't do that unless you know
you're doing something wrong. Sorry, that's that's that that's captain
obvious stuff. Man, It's it's the way that it's addressed.
So anyway, so this guy then he is, he's not
the undercover. He then goes back after and he's you know,
(03:43):
with the microphone and just like finds her in the
hall and immediately she's like no comment, runs into her office. Uh,
and then some security person for the City of Raleigh
or wherever that office building is that she's in. I
don't know if that's at city Hall or where that is, Like, march,
is this dude out of the building? What are we
(04:04):
doing here? All right, let's get into this.
Speaker 2 (04:06):
We'll imagine being a taxpayer in Raleigh, North Carolina. You
think that your taxes locally are going for law enforcement, schools, roads,
maybe ambulance services. Instead, you find that they're being used
to fund radical dei principles in several facets of their
city government. And yet, even though they're so proud of
their radical dei ideas, they have to hide them. I
guess because they know the taxpayers don't want it, and
(04:29):
I guess because they know there are federal executive orders
prohibiting their work.
Speaker 1 (04:33):
All right, So that's one side of it. There's the
federal orders. But there's another point he's making there, and
that is that the citizens don't want it. And I
don't know, maybe in the city of Raleigh there's enough
duped people, but you're dealing with taxpayer dollars. You know,
the Feds are doing that out, but maybe also the
citizens don't. I mean, it is a possibility, even though
(04:55):
Raleigh has distinctly changed in their voting patterns. But you'll
never know that because you're hiding it from them. So
even if even if you think that in the city
of Raleigh, if you ever held a vote on this position,
it would probably you know, would stay, which again it
probably would. I don't know, but you feel it necessary
(05:16):
to hide it. That's problematic. Own it or if or don't, right,
and then have some undercover guy go in there and
blow up your whole thing. Cut too, Briann, I don't
know how much stands.
Speaker 3 (05:33):
This is beautiful, my goodness, plan, Oh my gosh, I
love them.
Speaker 4 (05:39):
The fans are so cute.
Speaker 1 (05:41):
Thank you.
Speaker 3 (05:44):
Yeah, Hi, I'm Brianna. And this is in director of
Correquity Inclusion. Oh okay, okay, great you what care? Who's doing?
Speaker 5 (05:51):
All?
Speaker 4 (05:51):
Right?
Speaker 1 (05:51):
So an equity and inclusion. It's the DEI component and
it's the equity part, not equality equity part. And Breonna
also likes plants. That's what we know so far. But
let's talk about what it is you're doing. I mean,
you got a title. You're talking to this person. I
don't fully understand the context, but like guts are a spilling,
(06:14):
so let's get into it.
Speaker 3 (06:15):
There are certainly being strategic in the way is that
we you don't want to draw attention to ourselves number one, right,
but certainly also want to make sure that.
Speaker 1 (06:29):
This work is as.
Speaker 3 (06:30):
Protected as possible.
Speaker 1 (06:32):
This work is protected as possible. We don't want to
draw attention to ourselves. That's when you know you're doing
something you shouldn't be doing. That's when you know you're
doing something that you shouldn't be doing. And I don't
care what excuses people want to make for this. I
don't want to pay for this. And then the audacity
(06:53):
to fun stuff like this, and then every single election
they're like, we just need a few hundred million more
for this to this, and then every one of those
bonds passes because you just got willing dupes. You're like, oh, well,
they must really need the money, must really need the money.
You know, that'd be that money might be more useful
(07:14):
for I don't know a thousand other things. How about
using that money so that the entirety of Fayetteville Street
in downtown Raleigh, every block from the convention center or
from you know about them, where the Marriott is up
to where the old Capital is. Every corner doesn't smell
like pot, and I don't necessarily have an objection to pot.
(07:37):
I'm on that thing where I wonder if the amount
of money that we spend to enforce it is worth
the amount of money that you know it could be used.
I don't know, but if people want to do that there,
how I really don't care. But I mean, they're openly
on the street. Hell, do you know where the old
person's home is? I'm pretty sure some of those little
old ladies got glock homea they're treating. I just happened
(07:59):
to stroll from Raleigh to Times down to Jimmy V's
here a few weeks ago, and it was like every
single corner, I'm like, what is going on? Man?
Speaker 4 (08:08):
Ah?
Speaker 1 (08:09):
But no, we got we got the diversity and equity. Uh,
Brionna here all right? So all right, we've got to
keep it on the down low. We've got to fly
under the radar. We don't want people to know what
we're doing. That doesn't sound like somebody is proud of,
you know, what they're doing and knows that they shouldn't
be doing it. What happens when they're confronted them.
Speaker 3 (08:32):
We do partner oftentimes with Community Engage they programs that align.
Speaker 1 (08:36):
Well, I'm sorry, talk, We do.
Speaker 3 (08:38):
Partner oftentimes with Community Engagement if they have programs that
align kind of our goals are aligned. They'll bring in
again our community relations team to see where there's some
partnership that could happen. But I would say to community
Engagement is another department that's a really good involvement because
they they really do out there also a champion for
(08:59):
d so they're.
Speaker 6 (09:00):
Good, they're.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
There, you go so and I think through their investigation
they claim to have identified three different departments where they're
doing this. So hopefully we get a chance to talk
to the guy you heard at the beginning.
Speaker 2 (09:15):
So imagine being a taxpayer, because.
Speaker 1 (09:17):
He's actually president of this organization. At least that's what
it says on the bio here. So we will see.
We will see. Trying to coordinate stuff late at night
is not always easy. But I didn't see it until
a little later. Ah. Of course, of course, all right,
(09:43):
people are sending me a little spy report stuff. I
will dig through that. Let's go ahead and do this.
We'll go ahead and take a break. You know, we
got a little airport thing we got to talk about.
Uh oh, yesterday we were speculating on the Alec Baldwin
slamming his wife's range trover or whatever into that tree.
(10:06):
Now Ross's theory was he was he had just found
out about the peace agreement and spassed out because Trump
did it well. He released I don't want to he
released a statement, he posted a video online and you're
not gonna believe this. He lied. He's a he's a liar,
(10:28):
he's an habitual liar. He's not a good person. Because
then video was produced literally showing that he was, at
the very least he was obfuscating. He was trying to
make it sound slightly different because he knew he'd done wrong.
But it does track with Ross's theory yesterday that he
spassed out because he had his brother in the car.
(10:49):
And so we'll try to put the pieces together. So
all that more coming up here on the KCO Day
radio program. Oh dude, I love to get this un
thing too. I was reading. I spent about a half
hour reading up on this thing yesterday. Holy cow, good
luck with this. I know there's one hundred I actually
I know how to deal with this, So let me
(11:11):
not let me not ruin any of this deliciousness, and
we'll just we'll get to it, because I already have
a solution, and I think that, you know, that's the
best way to deal with stuff. You're gonna complain, at
least have a solution. That's the way I see it,
all right. So the Alec Baldwin insanity, this thing would
(11:31):
have gone away too if this idiot wouldn't have posted
a video, it would have been done because people just
assume he was angry and hit a tree. But since
nobody was killed the he wrecked his own vehicle and
nobody else, people would have just been on like the
next thing. But you know, if you're Alec Baldwin and
(11:53):
your ego was bruised, probably more so than your body
in this accident, you can't just let it be. So
you gotta go on social media and you gotta uh, oh, ross,
which one is just Baldwin? The second cut or the
first cut? It's just him, all right. So let's let
(12:15):
me put this in order in case I do it later.
So here is what Alec Baldwin posted about the accident.
Speaker 4 (12:23):
But this morning I was in this car accident.
Speaker 1 (12:25):
Guy cut me off in a truck.
Speaker 6 (12:26):
Big garbage truck.
Speaker 1 (12:28):
I mean a garbage truck the size of a whale.
Should never seen a garbage truck. It must have been
something commercial for like, by the way, he sounds like Trump,
I don't know if he's trying to, but they're a
little vibe there anyway, So your whale sized garbage truck, okay,
taking away material from construction or something.
Speaker 3 (12:46):
Was the biggest garbage truck I've ever seen any Anyway,
I won't go into the details now I'm bore you.
Speaker 1 (12:51):
But to avoid hitting him, I.
Speaker 4 (12:54):
Hit a tree.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
I had a big fat tree, crushed my car, my
wife's car. I crushed my wife's car. I feel bad
about that.
Speaker 3 (13:02):
That's all fine, and I'm fine, and my brother's fine
and puppy pot.
Speaker 1 (13:05):
Congratulations to everybody on the film festival.
Speaker 3 (13:08):
Thank you to the East Hampton Police Department, the Town
Police Department for coming to my aid.
Speaker 1 (13:12):
They came in to be filed to report with them.
Speaker 2 (13:15):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (13:16):
Officer Gurkin is his name, g E r k E.
I'm a lovely guy.
Speaker 7 (13:21):
And there was another gentleman that I didn't get his name,
but Officer Gurk from the East Hampton Police Department as
nice as can be, and his puasant this can.
Speaker 1 (13:28):
Be by the way, I think, yeah, to talk about
that ross. Was that his smoke detector at the end?
Speaker 8 (13:36):
I think so, And that's why I kept it in there. Yeah, yeah,
that's why I specifically cut it off at that point,
because I could have cut it off thirty seconds or
twenty seconds.
Speaker 1 (13:43):
PREI no, no, no, no, no, the smoke detective.
Speaker 8 (13:45):
But I'm hearing the smoke, the smoke detector, and I'm like,
I'm keeping that in because that's yeah.
Speaker 1 (13:50):
Huh, what do you mean?
Speaker 3 (13:52):
Huh?
Speaker 1 (13:53):
I don't know. Just get up on the ladder and
fix that thing, man, change the dollars. Very busy slamming
trees and stuff. So now this is important. He said
it was a very big truck, okay, and that's gonna
I know exactly what happened now well also cause I've
seen the other piece that I'm about to play you.
But I know exactly what happened and why this guy's
(14:14):
an idiot, and why I think he was distracted, probably
screaming about Trump to his brothers, probably you know, screaming
back at him, but because they both hate him. But yeah,
man one hundred pright, So here we go. Here is
some reporting on this that he is kind of important.
Speaker 7 (14:29):
Just obtained exclusive dash cam video showing the moment at
the tray Alec Baldwin crashed his SUV on the East
end of New York's Long Island. The video is from
the front facing camera on a commercial truck. You're seeing
the truck here making what's believed to be a legal
right turn, and then it slows down.
Speaker 9 (14:48):
Seconds later, Baldwin's SCV is seen hitting a mailbox and
a tree off to the right side of the truck.
The actor and outspoken Trump hater claimed on social media
that he was driving his wife's reign with his brother,
Stephen Baldwin in the passenger seat. He said he was
trying to avoid hitting this truck, so he veered off
the road into the tree. Does not appear, though, that
(15:10):
anyone was injured in the crash, but obviously not Baldwin's
first encounter with police. Now the questions was he trying
to squeeze around the truck, was not paying attention and
didn't see the truck until the last second.
Speaker 1 (15:22):
But great video there to show at least the moment
that all Wednesday morning coming up on the show. Like
I said, we're hoping to chat with the uh uh,
the dude who was Adam Gilett who was down there
with the little undercover Veritas kind of thing with the
City of Raleigh for their DEI stuff where they're all
she's talking to one of the dee they're undercovers, talking
(15:42):
to the Rihanna. I guess it's her name Scurry, who's
like the VP of DEI or deputy director. And but
she's like, you know, we don't talk about what we do,
trying to fly under the radar, and like everyone knows
they're doing something wrong here and and the taxpayers prob
have to pay for that. The problem is, and here's
where it becomes injurious, okay, is not just the fact
(16:06):
that collectively we got to fund her salary and her
department and those who work in her department. The bigger
problem is by playing this game, the City of Raleigh
and its leaders are putting us in a position where
federal dollars might not flow in that are substantial and
(16:29):
are already allocated to the city. And then that creates
a problem where you don't have money for this thing
and you either have to move money or you have
to not do the thing just so you can feel
good and have your little DEI office. It's the most
wildly irresponsible thing, and you need to fix it. You
are opening the city up to a substantial liability that
(16:52):
could very greatly negatively impact all of us, everyone who
has a toe in the water for the city of Raleigh,
let alone those of us who have paid taxes for years, years,
and in some case lifetimes. So I don't want to
hear it. Do you want your little pet project is
(17:15):
putting us all in financial danger? Fix it. So that's
what we got to talk about.
Speaker 4 (17:21):
Now.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
At eight oh five, we're going to chat with Brad
not the congressman who I don't know if any of
his district touches Raleigh proper, Ross, will you look up
Brad Nott's congressional district and see if he has any
piece of Raleigh? Is it? Well, if he doesn't have any,
peace we I may just mention it. But if he's
(17:41):
got a piece of it, I may try to get
him to do something to shine a little light on this.
All right, So Russell looked that up here? I yes,
I could look it up, but I gotta you know,
I got to do this right now. So yeah, so
clearly we'll talk to about shutdowns and uh, you know
(18:02):
the Hamas is real thing, which by the way, there's
already been some problems because here's the here's the thing
that Hamas is not that I knew it was going
to be a problem for Hamas. He is Wake County.
But does he have any of the city of Raleigh.
This is what I'm asking. Yeah, wait, because she works
for the city and not wait, county, and I don't
(18:25):
think so. I think maybe you know, because you use
you use when you're putting districts together, you use existing lines.
They can be geographic features. They could be city you know,
parts of or wherever the cities meet, where the county
line is the city, you know, any of those. So
I'll I can just ask him. It's not a big deal. Uh.
(18:48):
Sometimes it be hard to look at congressional maps online.
We just do a crap job of those. So anyway,
uh oh, going back to this, Uh Hamas the problem
is and they're figuring it out now, is Hamas still
thinks or people who are they they think that they're
going to get this that you know, this is going
to stop, and it's going to allow them still to
(19:10):
remain in positions of power, which would then allow them
to regrow their their terrorist organization slash political party. Uh.
And that is absolutely not gonna happen. That is that's
the thing that can happen the least. You cannot allow
Hamas to remain empowered because they could regroup outside of power,
(19:32):
but it's a lot easier inside because then you can
steal all the money and the supplies and the food
and subjugate people and hold public executions like they did yesterday.
They were publicly executing other Palestinians. That was the thing
going on. And then you have this other group as
opposed to Hamas, who kind of gives me the vibes
(19:53):
of they their kind of Hamasi. So I don't know,
man Like, the whole thing is, like I said, I'm
really happy to see it. I'm cautiously optimistic, but I
just don't trust Tomas. And I think that the more
that they learn that they're going to have no power,
they're not going to have the ability to steal or
(20:13):
influence in any rate. Manner, You're dealing with a bunch
of people willing to literally murder everybody. So I don't
think you're gonna deal with it. Well, so we'll see
and we'll talk to the congressman about that coming up
in about an hour and twenty minutes, twenty five minutes.
So oh, they this is great. So several other of
(20:39):
these protest groups have come out. They also are joining
with the Democrats Socialists of America and they've decided that
they're going to formally oppose the peace plan. And it's
just like, it's so it's so obvious what's going on. Man,
Like this is just like with Hammas losing their identity
(21:02):
and losing their power, it's the same for these guys.
And at least they're being honest. I saw some are
saying that until they eradicate the Israeli threat, which you
could read that is Israel, that they're not going to stop.
And then they chanted from the river to the CS
all that yesterday. So they're super pumped. The question will
be they have another No King's rally this weekend, because
(21:25):
of course they do, because the first nine or whatever
I guess, really didn't get them where they want. And
don't worry, the media will salivate over it unless it
doesn't go well, Like there's a possibility that people just
don't show up in the numbers that they did. Now
I don't know that I believe that, because it's a
bunch of old people showing up and what else do
(21:45):
they have to do. They're still going to go out.
They hate Trump just as much. But I don't know.
Maybe it will cut down on some of it, Like
maybe there's a few people who were genuine in what
they were protesting, and now that they kind of got it,
they might stay home, maybe you know, whine on the internet,
but not worth going out, you know, spending a Saturday
(22:08):
doing it. So it'll be very interesting to see what
that looks like as as we cruise through the weekend. Okay,
let's go ahead and address this. And I've given this.
I've given this a lot of thought last night as
I was putting prep together. And that is this Politico article.
(22:29):
And if you're living under a rock and you don't
know what that is, basically Politico, here we go. Here's
the headline. I love Hitler leaked mess Oh I shouldn't
have said that. Now any losers are gonna clip that
leaked messages expose young Republicans racist chat. So I'll read
(22:53):
some of these, you can read others. Everyone that votes
know is going to the gas chamber. They just throw
a bunch right up here. When do we start bullying? Dude?
They love they love the watermelon people. Yeah, you get
you get the you get the gist here now deciding
(23:15):
because they're individually clipped when there's one here that says, great,
I love Hitler. I don't know if they mean that
or if that's sarcasm. But the problem is there's a
lot of really gross stuff in here. But then there's
the other problem this to me, and then what happened
in Virginia. And I know this sounds like what about isn't?
(23:36):
But hear me out what happened in Virginia with the
absolute inability to say or or or demand that that
dude drop out of the race who is not a
college kid on a telegram chat list or whatever?
Speaker 6 (23:49):
This is?
Speaker 1 (23:50):
Okay, I'm not I'm not making excuses for any of
these idiots, right, even if it not only is is
the language abhorrent, just like you know, wanting your opponent's
kids to die in their mom's arms so she could
watch that. I don't even have to make equations here.
These are college kids. They're clearly stupid putty Like, here's
(24:14):
the deal. I don't chet crap like this, but I
also don't want to be in your group because some
you may have some person in your group who does
put something like this, and then the it gets leaked
to the media like this did. And it sounds like
this was leaked by other Republicans, which I know is
something that keeps getting left out here. But every single
(24:38):
every single Republican was was tripping over themselves to excoriate
and demand that. Essentially, there's penalties for these for these
people participating in this chat. And look, if you're so
dumb that you're going to do this and and hamstring
your your your career opportunities going forward, then I don't
(24:59):
know that I want you working for me anyway. That
being said, I have That's what Republicans were doing yesterday,
saying these people got to go. I can't find one
Democrat of record who thinks that the AG candidate Virginia
should go, So I'm not going to care. I'm going
(25:23):
to think all this is gross and I don't want
to be around any of these people.
Speaker 8 (25:26):
And that's it, you know, I had the same exact
thought on it. Yeah, the same exact one. I'm like,
this story, you know, as horrific as what they're saying,
you know, if you know it is, Yeah, it holds
no weight unless the AG candidate drops out or those
in Virginia condemn it completely.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
And I got to drop out. I need his colleagues, No,
you need to drop right. Whatever he does is what
he does. I already think he's a scumback.
Speaker 8 (25:49):
He's talking about like executing children or whatever it is.
And meanwhile, you're like, oh, but look at these college
Republicans saying these things. Okay, so which one is that?
Are you a hypocrite?
Speaker 1 (26:00):
It's and again it's Republicans who put him in. Now
with with him, I think it was a Democrat colleague
to put him in. So like, there's people with scruples
out there. That's great. Sometimes I get very hopeful, hopeless
in the in the world of politics. But and also,
and and and also how dumb do you have to
(26:21):
be to text your colleague that you want your opponent's
children to die in their mother's arms and to put
two bullets in their father's head. And how dumb do
you have to be to be on a giant chat,
in a giant chat with people from like five different
states I think are in this, I mean, and it's
you know, it's uh. I don't know exactly how many
(26:44):
people are in the chat list, but it's in the
triple digits, I think, And then to just like, you
don't know everybody in this.
Speaker 8 (26:51):
So group chats are absolutely horrible, and I recently had
an experience with one. Yeah, So I check my DMS
on X like a few weeks ago, and there's a
rather big account who's a pretty funny account on Twitter,
and he sent me a message. We know each other
through Twitch actually yeah, yeah, yeah, and he's just like
(27:13):
and the message said something like, hey man, there's a
bunch of us, you know, right wing twitch streamers or
x you know, people who have a GC and I
wanted you to invite you into it or I wanted.
Speaker 1 (27:26):
You to be a part of it. Would that be cool?
Speaker 8 (27:28):
And I'm reading this and I don't know what a
GC is, right, So I'm making a joke. I'm trying
to say that I don't know what a GC is
without saying that because I don't want to look dumb, right,
So I go GC, question mark Grand Conspiracy, what the
heck right? And he writes back, loll and I'm like,
put me in. I'm ready to conspire, right, And before
(27:52):
I know it, this thing shows up on my DMS
and as you know, I'm not I don't even like
a reply. I'll email at work, let alone this thing.
So suddenly I'm in this group which I didn't even
know group chats were a thing on X. I had
no idea but added to one to the list. I've
never been added to one, so.
Speaker 1 (28:11):
Yeah, the list are one thing. But no, you get
a group chat.
Speaker 8 (28:15):
And you know, I'm like a huge introvert and shy anyway,
So he's going, hey, everybody, this is Ross. You're really
gonna like him. You know, he's really funny, and I
think you guys will enjoy it. And before you know,
and all these people and there's like forty or fifty
people in this thing, and they also are going back
and forth. And it was fine, and they were friendly
and they were funny and there wasn't anything crazy like
(28:36):
in this story about that for you. No, but the
thing is they never shut up. It was all day,
twenty four hours. And you know how I am with
clearing up my text threads I send him my email
inbox is like, you know, people post pictures of their
email inbox and they're like, I got a ten thousand messages.
(28:56):
I have four emails in my inbox right now. I
keep that stuff super clean. My threads on my phone,
my text threads, I have one from Lincoln, two from Marquee,
and one from my mother. Everything else I clear out immediately.
It's an OCD thing. I don't like it when the
when the blue bubble pops up, especially on Twitter, because
I'm on Twitter and suddenly I see a blue message
in my DM and I check it and the thing
(29:17):
would never go away. It was always blue. And they're
talking about everything. They're like, I got a haircut today.
Here's my haircut. And I'm like, cares dude, Like, what
do we even do?
Speaker 4 (29:26):
What do we talk?
Speaker 1 (29:26):
What are we doing here? I have things to do.
I have a kid talking about putting people in gas chambers.
So I lasted, no, no, no, But they were funny,
dark jokes. Sure like dude, send but nothing like in
this story. But the thing is, so I'm like, I
didn't even last twenty four hours. So I'm like, I
have to leave this thing because it's drive me insane
and these people never shut up. So I'm I delete
(29:48):
the thread, not knowing that when you do that, apparently
it sends a notification to every one in the chat
that you have left the chat, which caused a firestorm
because then I get a mess from the original guy
that invited me in, and he's like, did we say
something to offend you? Why did you leave? Is everything fine?
Is everything cool? Are we still friends? What's going on?
(30:08):
And I'm like, dude, it's an OCD thing.
Speaker 8 (30:10):
You guys just would not shut up and I just
can't take that blue bubble notification all the time, so
I had to leave. It's nothing personal and very busy.
It bothers me and it's nothing, it's nothing but your
personal You're y'all are fine, but it was like something
I was like, I'm never agreeing to do anything like
if anybody says, hey join my GC, no, I am
very busy.
Speaker 1 (30:28):
I just I'm gonna put everyone on notice if you
add if you add my Twitter account and to show
Twitter account twig, I will dip out before you see
what's in there there offen And it's nothing personal. It's
probably you know, most likely it's just people sitting around
and it's fine, don't want to do it. And on Facebook,
same deal. That's why I generally your Facebook because people
add it. All they do, they add you to groups.
Speaker 8 (30:48):
Yeah, you're like, suddenly you're part of this, you know,
blah blah blah Republicans of blah blah blah County or
whatever the niche group is. And I'm like, I didn't
want to be a part of this. Nothing against your group, but.
Speaker 1 (30:59):
I don't want to. I think I think it should
be a faux pas, a like a serious social faux
pad to add somebody to one of those without their permission.
They did ask me, that's the thing, but I no, no,
I know what I'm talking about. With like Facebook. Agree.
I never understood why it wasn't a like a bad thing,
because there's no other scenario where you would just be
like like, you wouldn't be like, hey, I want you
(31:20):
to come to our house party and then when you
walk by the house.
Speaker 8 (31:21):
Somebody would grab you like a CIA snatch group. They're
like you're at the party. The party now, buddy, Yeah.
Speaker 1 (31:27):
Like that we wouldn't allow that, So why would we
allow that? You know the e version of that, so
I don't know.
Speaker 8 (31:32):
It was so funny because I didn't know this thing,
this community, or this sort of thing existed. On accident.
I'm like, will you guys just talk to each other
all day, every day, seven days a week, three sixty five.
That's crazy to me? Yeah, nuts.
Speaker 1 (31:46):
This is why I hate texting. I hate phone calls
more probably, but I also hate texting.
Speaker 8 (31:53):
I mean, I have best friends where sometimes I'm not
in the I mean like best friends. I've known them
for twenty years. It's in my rent. I do it
to you, you'll send me to I'm busy. I don't
feel like texting at.
Speaker 1 (32:02):
The moment, and I don't take any offense to it.
If I said this someth and you don't answer me,
unless it's something that like I need an answer for
the show or whatever. Let alone, then I'm just like,
all right, he'll he'll see it or he won't. Who cares?
Let alone?
Speaker 8 (32:11):
A group of fifty seven people and I don't know
who the hell they are except like one dude, it's
so weird.
Speaker 1 (32:17):
I had tacos for breakfast. Here they are like, oh
I had tacos for breakfast. The other day. Oh yeah,
those are I'm sorry, man, that's just it's just the
it's just the worst. But it's not anything personal. I
just want you guys because I have had a couple
of people flip out when I dipped out of their
groups and I just ended up blocking.
Speaker 8 (32:39):
I know, I'm crazy about it. I had no idea
would tell it like people would would show people.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
Because there was an next only like, well, you're on
the radio talking about this, How dare you don't want
to be in our group? And I'm like, dude, it's
it's nothing even against you. It's just like it's like
when we do the candidates. You have to understand, we
cover like a gazillion counties and I would be in
a hundred of these group things and I can't do
it anyway. These people saying this stuff in this group
chat dumb. Yeah. So yeah, all right, uh oh, look
(33:08):
at that. Our potential interview just got back to us Ross,
So you'll have to deal with that while we take
a quick break here on the CaCO Day Radio program
PCO Day Radio Program. Sorry to sew this headline here.
Ah now, we'll load, come on, come on, you can
do it, all right, We'll come back to that. All right,
(33:30):
here's the headline, authorities worn of illegal massage parlor activity.
Oh no, yeah, this is uh, where's this? Denver law
enforcement is alerting the public to red flags after an
undercover investigation led to spot owners being arrested for allegedly
after a sixth month invested. And they won't even tell
you the ones where they arrested, just the people. Oh no,
(33:57):
I'm sorry, it was a seventh month investigation. Wow, good, good, good,
good glad. You guys are cracking down there. Much appreciated.
So sorry, we just get distracted by those because they're
always very long investigations, which is super weird, right, all right,
speaking of super weird, Actually, this is really this is
(34:19):
really troubling once you start processing this information I'm about
to give you, because then you realize why it was happening.
Probably students identifying as non BINARYA or on the decline
according to a new study. And decline is not a
(34:40):
strong enough word. It's absolutely cratering in a report. Let's
see here, a study down a fifty thousand US undergrad students.
So this involves high school students as well as entry
level college students. So okay, let's see here they're finding
(35:04):
pointed out that only three point six percent of young
adults identified as a gender other than male or female.
Do you know what that number used to be? Last
year was five point two percent. Into twenty twenty three,
it was six point eight percent, seven percent, down to
three point six You cut the number in half. Now,
(35:26):
did God just stop making trans people all of a
sudden or something else going on? And if something else
is going on, what is it? But again, the age
group you're studying, you know, wasn't just born in the
last two years. These are clearly people that were going
through the same educational systems that you know other students.
(35:47):
Did you just did you just have a big batch
of students that then aged out? No? No, it's because
the theory of social contagion, which was always part of this,
is very real. It's very real, especially the younger you
get in this group that they study when you're in
(36:07):
high school and you're trying to fit in and figure
it out and maybe you don't, and now you're trying
to figure out what does that mean for you? And
every one of the people at the school is running
around going you know what, you're probably transgender or you're
probably non binary, you're probably one of the other fifty things.
(36:27):
And you're like, okay, because an adult's telling you that,
because I don't know, it affirms whatever their belief is,
and because there's no other explanation for how the number
just cuts in half within two years. Ironically, they do
(36:47):
this study annually, so there is I don't know if
they if they stop for doing I know, why would they.
There's fifty thousand and fifty thousand people. There's probably people
in this study that identified two years ago and that
now don't and that are still within the you know,
(37:09):
the acceptable age range you know of junior senior in
high school to four years of college. You know, that's
a six year window there just evaporated. Eric Kaufman, professor
of Politics at the University of Buckingham, released a report
the Decline of trans and Queer Identity among young Americans
(37:32):
and which he suggested the percentage is has declined. Well, yes,
I clearly, we just gave you the numbers. Yeah, the
graph looks like a damn pyramid right where he just
goes from twenty nineteen up through the Biden era. The
number was it went from two percent up to almost
ten percent, among which one is this is that Brown University. Anyway,
(38:02):
that's one of the groups. There's three different that they're
tracking here. So so and that number is down to
two percent again. So actually in some instances, in some
portions of this, you had it go up nearly eight
percentage points, drop down the eight once again. Explain that
(38:25):
to me, like I'm five, let's see, all right, survey,
all right, yeah, this is okay. So here's the one.
The data from Andover University shows three percent of students
twenty twenty five. That's not what it shows. I'm looking
at it. It shows clearly shows two percent on here whatever,
(38:47):
down from the nearly ten percent at Brown University. It
went from six percent back to two point six percent. Yeah,
so in every instance, it's more than half, more than
half that just evaporated in two years. And it's just
so weird. Man, all right eight eight eight nine three
(39:08):
four seven eight seven four. You want to wait in
on that? Feel free? Because I am now all in
on the social contagion coupled with the because the the
response that I saw for people, they're like, that's because
people are scared to identify now because Trump will I
don't know. Haven't you know, fired into the moon or
(39:29):
the sun or something which is which is b especially
out of college campus. No, there's something else going on here,
and that ain't it. That ain't it at all. Oh man,
all right, let's go ahead, let's go ahead and get
into this. I yeah, I love I love that they're
(39:50):
leaning into the South Park stuff and the SNL stuff.
So over the weekend on SNL they did two things.
One one of the cast members did us sit that
basically was just a political ad for Mondami and she
has been apparently a volunteer for his campaign and been
doing all his stuff. So like the fact that NBC
(40:12):
didn't recognize or care about that conflict of interest and
it was so blatant is pretty ugly. But then they
had another skit because one of their favorite people to
parody is Christy Nome and Pam Bondi for that matter,
pretty much anyone in the Trump administration with Christy Nome.
And you know it's really lazy, is they Basically the
(40:33):
way they play Christy Nome is the way that Tina
Fey used to play Plan right, where they're just say,
all right, we're just gonna make her dumb but also evil, right,
So they did a thing where she was they parodied her,
you know, doing recruitment for the agency. And then of
course it's all sorts of horribleness. Well, instead of getting
(40:57):
mad or pushing back or doing any of that, Apartment
of Homeland Security looked literally took the first few seconds
of the skit and then made it into a recruitment
ad where it then cuts to people just running around
doing badass stuff, shooting stuff. You're in tactical gear. Here's
some helicopters, you know, very very machism kind of stuff.
(41:18):
But you know, and then and then put it up
on the internet, just embracing it. Our government agents are
working without pay.
Speaker 10 (41:25):
Luckily, my boys at ICE don't mind.
Speaker 1 (41:27):
They're in it for the love of the game. And
how did I find them? By running ads like this?
Now SNL will clearly cut into mocking run around with guns,
jumping stuff, kicking doors. You know, you get the gist, right, So, uh,
(41:50):
well played there, man, And if SNL wants to keep
uh serving it, they'll probably complain. That'll be the irony
of this. SNL does that they kind of want know
them probably to complain. And then it's probably gonna be
them who are composing a copyright thing. You can't do that.
Are they using it to profit? I don't know that
they can't do that. I guess we'll see seven fifteen.
(42:14):
Hang on the interesting little story. I mean, in a way,
I want to see who's gonna fight for me the most.
But you know where this happened in Atlanta. I am shocked.
Oh my goodness, this thing is so much better. Oh
check ross check this out. Man, a heavily armed Amazon
(42:37):
delivery driver, claimed he shot a US Postal Service employee
in the face because he thought he was a mafia assassin,
because you know, the mafia assassin's like to dress up
as postal workers. That's how they get you. Also, it's
like how the postal service guy lose? I mean, aren't
(42:59):
aren't these guys like gun nuts? Or was that just
a thing from my childhood? The guy lived by the way.
So twenty six year old Blake Coleman was arrested and
charged with felony first degree assault in connection with the
deadly shooting. Oh no, it was deadli I'm sorry. Why
(43:19):
was he charged with only first degree assault? I made
an assumption based on the charge authority say the victim
will survive his injuries but lose an eye. So why
do you call it deadly? Shooting? In the thing?
Speaker 4 (43:34):
Here?
Speaker 1 (43:37):
Wit A I write this now, A, I wouldn't have
screwed that up, all right? Please say that. Coleman admitted
to shooting the mail carrier in the head, but insisted
he opened fire and self defense. Coleman indicated that this
was self defense because the US Postal Service worker was
trying to charge at him while he was cornered. That
(43:59):
according to the police report here, Coleman recounted how the
worker had smiled at him before lunging forward with both
arms behind him in a charging motion. He also explained
that the worker didn't have any packages or mail in
his arms at the time, and he felt he was
about to be tackled. Now, according to a witness, they
(44:21):
tell a very different story. I want to know how
the mafia part of this got in here. Witness told
police a different version, saying, quote, I saw the mailroom
door close in an argument between the postal guy and
the Amazon guy. The postman shoved the Amazon driver and shouted,
(44:41):
why the ef are you shoving me? The Amazon driver
then pulled out a pistol and shot him in the head.
At the time of the altercation, Coleman reportedly armed with
two firearms, a bulletproof plate carrier, a large like a
large honey knife, pistol magazine, and all of it concealed
(45:02):
under his Amazon uniform. Coleman told detectives he wore the
vest and all right, dude, this thing is this is nuts.
Coleman told detectives he wore the bulletproof vests and carried
the weapons because he had been repeatedly shot by rifles
(45:23):
and crossbows while on the job. Is that what's happening
to Amazon drivers? Are people shooting you with crossbows and
rifles while you're just trying to deliver. Coleman also said
he was being cyber stalked by the mafia and had
(45:43):
suspicions that the postal worker may have been a mafia assassin. Uh.
In a statement, Amazons, did you really have to get
a statement? In a statement Amazons that their policy prohibits
drivers delivering Amazon packages from carrying weapons that the company
(46:05):
adheres to state and local laws. Well, Amazon, if your
drivers are getting literally shot with crossb I don't know
that I believe that, but I mean, I'm sure there's
maybe might have been a one off, but I don't
think it's not a regular. I think dogs are probably
a bigger issue for him to the amount of people,
(46:26):
by the way, who have dogs that are not trained
or are not put in a place so that a
delivery can take place if you're expecting one. I've never
understood it. Here's one thing to have a dog that's
willing to eat anyone who touches your property, that's fine,
as long as they understand the property line, which can
(46:47):
be accomplished a number of ways. But that being said,
if you want your package delivered and you let your
your demon hound out in the front, you're an awful person.
There's a guy just trying to do his job and
he's might get chomped on. I don't cover whether it's Amazon,
post Office, FedEx ups, whatever, but this guy's going out
(47:09):
dressed like Rambo. I think you might want to do
a little mental health check on this dude, just saying okay,
all right, and he's got a million dollar bond. Finally
somebody got bond, So just being left back out on
the street. Oh, we had another incident down in Charlotte
(47:32):
by the way. This time it's a woman with fifteen
prior arrest who was just released on bond after stabbing
somebody right up front through the chest, going for the heart.
Two stab wounds, allegedly eight inch knife, only charged with
assault with a deadly weapon, not attempted murder, and they
already put her back out on the street. And she
(47:54):
was right. This happened like two days ago. So Charlotte's
gonna keep charlotting. Nothing we can do about it. I
live down in Charlotte, but I can I worry about Pete.
I don't want Pete getting murdered by some quite you know,
T three thirty time repeat offender. So that's all. And
(48:18):
maybe maybe you know people down in Charlotte, but it's
I don't know if it's summer of the Shark reporting.
But I don't think you could pay me to go
bar hopping and Charlotte right now. And I like bar hopping.
I mean not as much as I used to, but uh,
because I'm too old for the club clubs. But yeah, man,
I don't I don't think you could talk me into
walking around downtown tonight, and I I like downtown Charlotte.
(48:42):
We're gonna go to phone calls here. But let me
just explain to you what's coming up real quick. One
a half hour from now, at eight oh five, we
are going to chat with Congressman Brad not So he
does have a piece of the City of Raleigh's according
to his comms guy there. So we got that confirmed,
(49:03):
which means one of the things I want to talk
to him about is this undercover video. So you had
this group led by the guy who's the president of
His name is Adam Gallett. You'll hear him in the
opening real quick here.
Speaker 2 (49:20):
And so imagine being a taxpayer in Raleigh, North Carolina.
You think that your taxes locally are going for law
enforcement schools, roads, maybe ambulance services. Instead, you find that
they're being used to fund radical DEI principles in several
facets of their city government.
Speaker 1 (49:36):
And yet all right, so Gallet's group sends an undercover
it's a woman in to talk to this woman named Scurry,
who is one of the de I people for the
city of Raleigh. And she's all cagy and she's like,
we don't talk about what we do to keep it
on the down low, and you know, very secretive. I'll
play some of the audio here before we in the
(49:56):
next segment to set up for it, and then we're
going to talk to Gallett at the guy who then
confronts Scurry and then is thrown out of the building.
We're gonna talk to him at eight thirty five. So
you got the congressman at eight oh five, and then
this Adam Gillett from the undercover video thing at eight
thirty five. So busy next hour. Okay, let's grab some calls. Now,
(50:20):
let's start with Daniel. What's up, Daniel?
Speaker 5 (50:23):
What's up?
Speaker 1 (50:23):
KC that much?
Speaker 5 (50:26):
I was just calling what you guys were talking about
yesterday about MTV. I thought about it all day long
and I just wanted to call in.
Speaker 1 (50:33):
This morning, so real quick, hang on, so real quick.
The story he's talking about is, if you didn't hear yesterday,
MTV is doing away. They have five music video channels,
music channels. They're gonna start rolling those back. They're gonna
cut them off in Europe and eventually get rid of
them everywhere. So MTV will not play music videos on
(50:54):
any of their stations in the very near future. Anyway,
Go ahead, sir.
Speaker 5 (50:58):
Yeah, it just it brought up a different kind of
a different perspective. I was telling Ross. I grew up
a super conservative Christian family. My dad was the preacher Baptist,
you know, uh Country Mountain Baptists, and we weren't allowed
to watch in TV.
Speaker 4 (51:11):
It was the Devil. Okay.
Speaker 1 (51:13):
We would speak to friends out supposed to be like
a super black sheep, rebellious youth.
Speaker 5 (51:18):
Oh yeah, I'm just that's that's what happened.
Speaker 1 (51:21):
Many they did.
Speaker 5 (51:23):
I joined the Marine Corps, ran off and party partier
than most, and yeah, happening. But anyways, and that's that's
part of what I was. I heard sermons from preachers
that studied the music videos, and there are supplemental messages.
The devil is if we continue to listen to this music.
Now I'm forty two, that was thirty years ago, you know,
(51:44):
and they're you know, all of your sons are going
to be wearing dresses all the and I just was
thinking about it. It's not really on what you guys
are talking about, but I was just thinking about dude,
those preachers were they were pretty spot off about the
woketology and the immorality that I mean. I don't know
that it was the music necessarily.
Speaker 1 (52:04):
But but well, no, i'll meet me, I'll meet you halfway.
Is were there shocking things that were put into music
videos for the purpose of being shocking? Of course, it
happens all day every day in music an MTV was
a vehicle for that. And you know, if you go
through most of the rock stars and we're at the
(52:26):
very least people playing that, you know, playing up that
portion of it it is. It definitely does not comport
with a religious conservative background. That means we're just we're
just cential they are versus others. I don't know.
Speaker 6 (52:42):
Yeah, and it wasn't.
Speaker 5 (52:42):
I think it was the entertainment industry on a whole.
I think it was, you know, they perfect And now
we're actually seeing the woke, the like the fruition of
all the wokeness that was kind of hit at first
when when we were kid.
Speaker 1 (52:55):
Yeah, it's like remember remember the video of the Disney
woman who's like, I'm going to put gay things into everything.
She said that that's her called it her her LGBT
agenda or something.
Speaker 5 (53:05):
So I just remember roll in my eyes as a
kid and thinking, oh, this is way off. You know,
this is they're overreacting.
Speaker 1 (53:11):
And it depends whether it gets you. So I don't know.
Oh I thought Ive said it on the air. My
mom didn't let me watch Smurfs anything with witchcraft in it.
I was allowed to watch.
Speaker 5 (53:21):
Same thing. We struggled with watching teenage mutant Ninja Turtles
because they were.
Speaker 1 (53:26):
Oh no, I couldn't if I would have hated to
miss out on that. But let's face it, I was
the kid who would then go over to my buddy's
house and his parents didn't care, and then we just
watch all the stuff.
Speaker 5 (53:36):
So yeah, that's what I did.
Speaker 1 (53:37):
Yeah, all right, all right, have it go in there.
Daniel appreciate the call this morning. See solved. Except occasionally
I go watch stuff for my mom. She didn't want
me watching because it was really scary, and then I
go watch it, and then I couldn't complain about why
I was scared, like not just get in trouble man. H.
Then the large Marge scene hit me and it was
(53:59):
all over all over, Joanne, what's up.
Speaker 5 (54:05):
Good morning.
Speaker 11 (54:07):
I am the transgender. I remember when it first started
coming out as a thing, and there were several places
that were still honest media sources that cited a studied
by the American Pediatrics association that said that if most
children who you know said I'm not a little boy,
(54:28):
I'm a little girl, vice versa, if they were just
left alone, if that idea in their head was not supported,
that by the age of eighteen, they would revert back
to their sexuality at birth. And they tried to quash
you know, just just squashed that whole report. But I'm
(54:49):
going to tell you something else. If you look at
like Jazz, the reality show about the girl the boy
who became you know, he's a boy. I don't care
what you say, but became a girl, y'all. The a
lot of these parents have Munchausen bipoxy.
Speaker 1 (55:05):
Yes, I was thinking this with HBO has a thing
on right now where they have a little boy. Maybe
we're talking about the same thing where the kid is
literally at a church. It's like a utilitarian, you know,
super woke church, and his mom is doing the coming
out in front of the congregation. And the boy does
not he a little boy. He don't want a part
of it. You can tell mom is incredibly excited. This
(55:27):
kid's just yeah, and then they cut like that kid,
in my opinion, is being abused. He's like four and
uh and but you can see that this is the
greatest thing that's ever happened to mom. And then all
of a sudden there's weird chanting by the there's an affirmation
that the church people do. And it's just as somebody
who grow up Catholic. Uh, you know, a responsive chance
(55:49):
or a thing I'm familiar with. But these creeped me up.
Speaker 5 (55:51):
Yeah, I don't.
Speaker 11 (55:53):
Yeah, well, chas is that that's notas Jess s.
Speaker 5 (55:56):
That's the reality show on PLC.
Speaker 1 (55:58):
Okay, and that girl, that boy.
Speaker 11 (56:01):
I'm sorry, has been mutilated, I mean mutilated when they
tied that when they tried to build the private parts.
It was a complete disaster. And it's yeah, the parents
have been called out. The mother has been called out
time after time after time. And when the Pediatric Association
(56:22):
released that report, they said that anybody that did that
to a child was guilty of selling the child abuse.
Speaker 1 (56:30):
The show. The show on HBO, by the way, is
called trans Hood. So that's not the show.
Speaker 4 (56:35):
Okay, Yeah, I haven't.
Speaker 5 (56:37):
I haven't watched that one. I don't.
Speaker 11 (56:39):
I don't. I don't even want to watch it. It's
frank in my heart.
Speaker 1 (56:42):
Well, yeah, Jane, I'm sorry, but what's crazy about that.
Why why I think people should watch it is HBO
and the people who produced this documentary which they follow
over for five years. They follow four kids, transgender kids
to see, you know, how it played out. They but
(57:02):
you have to understand, the people who made this are
all in on this. They're doing this to promote a
show and glorify this. And it's really it becomes really
clear really quickly that, especially the little boy I just
talked about at the church, they're not in on this
and the mom is one hundred percent in on this.
That's so horrible for that kid. So it's a tough watch.
(57:23):
But it's out there. It's called transhood, like childhood, but
trans in the front. You can check that out. Okay,
all right, Joanne, Okay call this morning. I gotta I
gotta go do work.
Speaker 11 (57:32):
Thank you. You have a boss.
Speaker 4 (57:33):
Say y'all.
Speaker 11 (57:34):
Okay, I love you guys today.
Speaker 1 (57:36):
Oh well, thank you very much. We do appreciate. We
love you guys out there. Most of you like Joe
Anne very nice. Some of you all right, I want to.
Speaker 12 (57:45):
Get on your bad side, So I don't want to
get on your bad side.
Speaker 1 (57:49):
Ah man. It's just like sometimes people send me emails.
It's just one guy, and then I just do I
just don't understand people sometimes. How you doing that? You know,
living a dream Wednesday. It's just all going too quickly, and.
Speaker 12 (58:03):
It's it's kind of easy when you've got forecasts like this.
I mean, there's gonna be a little cool down coming
low to mid seventies today. Tomorrow you wake up near fifty,
and then Thursday and Friday we stay in the sixties,
probably mid upper sixties, but the morning lows by Friday
morning could be talking about low forties, maybe some upper
thirties in spots, So that's a bit of a change.
But we should have a good weekend in the mid
(58:23):
seventies and lots of sunshine. If we do get showers,
it'll be Sunday night, you know, we'll really get to
that point where we could use some rainfall. Been abnormally
dry of late, and I really don't see anything significant.
Oh boy, before everybody gets going on the interwebs with
something tropically developing in the Caribbean, yes, late in the month.
(58:43):
The guidance the models are showing something that's around the
twenty seventh or twenty eighth of October, so everybody started
to screw it high, bro, I know, gonna mess with Halloween.
But listen, it's I'll always say it. It's two weeks away,
all right, So don't get caught thinking that, Hey, this
(59:04):
is what I get. Hey, I heard that there's a
hurricane coming. Okay, No, you're looking at two weeks though.
Speaker 1 (59:13):
That is you could be a slutty hurricane. You could.
Speaker 12 (59:17):
You could be that, or you could be like the
the internet weather weather guy called the armchair meteorologists.
Speaker 1 (59:24):
Right, slutty weather meteorologist. Sure, right, So it's you know,
they just put it.
Speaker 12 (59:28):
No, they preface it with you shouldn't look at this
because people are showing this on online and it's two
weeks away, and meanwhile you're the one that's showing it.
Speaker 1 (59:38):
Been a weird taboos stuff is going on in the
weather community, man, it is.
Speaker 12 (59:43):
It's a strange. It's a strange, strange business, that's for sure.
See they say don't post this and look at it
if you see it, But yet again they post it
and they say this could happen, like well, so it
forces me to jump into the conversation. I really don't
want to, but everybody asks me anyway, So the hurric
Kane is Voldemort, right right, so it's coming. Yeah, it's
(01:00:04):
and the next hurricane on the list, because Lorenzo's out
there lonely as a tropical storm right now and you're
gonna stay over the Atlantic, it would be Melissa. So
don't be surprised if we get a Melissa. You know,
just to me, it just says, you know, we're not
done with the tropics, just because it's been kind of
a it's a weird year. No landfalling systems in the
eastern Carolinas, but they've had some big impacts some systems
(01:00:25):
that have been close, so you know, it doesn't always
mean landfall to cause damage and flooding, which they did
have and still having in some spots along the East
coast from the not even name storm.
Speaker 1 (01:00:37):
So okay, yeah, for nothing going on, that was a
lot of weather. So that was a lot. I was
gonna say, that was three minutes with sorry about that
for nothing. It's okay, we're good. We'll talk in an hour. Okay, Okay,
there you go. Rased Agic from the Weather Channel. All right,
I'm gonna we're gonna get in when we come back
to the rest of this little undercover video. So you're
(01:00:57):
just a prize because I played the beginning of the show.
But if you just joined us this group outing what
they were hoping to keep secret, I guess DEI programs
within and whole divisions within the city of Raleigh. And
my question is, so that people can have their little
DEI pet project woke garbage, are we imperiling the city
(01:01:20):
of Raleigh where potentially a bunch of federal dollars won't
flow through, Because if that's what leadership is doing, that's
wildly irresponsible. But we'll find out more. We'll talk to
Congressman Brad Not about it. He's coming up at eight
oh five. And then literally the guy from the organization's
doing the undercover videos, name's Adam Gallette. He'll join us
(01:01:42):
at eight thirty five and we'll get the audio from
what they uncovered in the next segment, So stick around
that in just a few minutes. We'll talk partially of
the congressman. We got a bunch of stuff with him,
and then also we'll actually interview one of the people
in this video. So one of these Project Veritas style videos,
undercover woman goes to meet with DEI person within the
(01:02:05):
city of Raleigh. They have this conversation where the DI
person is, you know, we got to keep it secret.
We can't tell anyone. You'll hear the exact wording. I'm
not even paraphrasing that much. And like you, she knows
that it's a problem. And it's not just a problem
because all the DEI programs are inherently racist that we
(01:02:27):
have covered here on this show, super racist, and arguably
that should have no place within our city government. But
it could also imperil federal dollars or programs or other things.
So it could be wildly injurious to the residents of
(01:02:47):
Raleigh and the taxpayers of which I am one. So AnyWho,
All right, so here, here, here we go.
Speaker 2 (01:02:55):
Fair in Raleigh, North Carolina. You think that your taxes
locally are going for law enforce with schools, roads, maybe
ambulance services. Instead, you find that they're being used to
fund radical DEI principles in several facets of their city government.
And yet, even though they're so proud of their radical
DEI ideas, they have to hide them. I guess because
they know the taxpayers don't want it, and I guess
(01:03:17):
because they know there are federal executive orders prohibiting their work.
Speaker 1 (01:03:21):
Yeah. Yeah, so again that's why this is really problematic
because it could mean dollars don't flow it.
Speaker 3 (01:03:29):
Briann, I don't know, I understand.
Speaker 4 (01:03:32):
This is beautiful, my goodness plan.
Speaker 3 (01:03:35):
Oh my gosh, I love them.
Speaker 4 (01:03:37):
The plans are so cute.
Speaker 3 (01:03:39):
Thank you.
Speaker 1 (01:03:41):
Our plans are Hi.
Speaker 3 (01:03:43):
I'm Brianna, and this isn't director correct? Oh okay, okay, great?
Speaker 1 (01:03:47):
You what are you who are doing? What can I
help you with?
Speaker 3 (01:03:51):
They are certainly being strategic, and the way is that
we don't want to draw attention to ourselves number one.
But yeah, certainly also want to make sure that this
or is as protected as possible.
Speaker 1 (01:04:08):
Yeah yeah, so, I mean you hear the language around it.
She knows that she should, that they shouldn't be doing this,
and that this is all that. And we've how many
of these videos we've seen with college people or they
just changed the name like oh, and then they just
spill the whole story to some random person they just
met or that they think wants to sleep with them.
(01:04:28):
I don't know if that was the angle here, but
it's clear by the way that she's talking about in
her actions, she understands that this is a problem. And
I also understand why she want to protect her job.
It's probably a pretty cushy one. You just get to
run around and get up in people's business and harass
employees that aren't really doing anything because somebody feels microaggressed. Ah,
(01:04:51):
that makes somebody probably like missus Curry. They're very excited
because it's a level of power that can be very satisfied,
very addicting, but also very financially ruinous for the super
do partner.
Speaker 3 (01:05:04):
Oftentimes, with Community Engagement, if they have programs that align
kind of our goals are aligned, see, they'll bring in
again our community relations team to see where there's some
partnership that could happen. But I would say to community
Engagement is another department to really get involvement because they
they really do out. They're also a champion for DEI,
(01:05:25):
so they're good.
Speaker 4 (01:05:26):
They're a good.
Speaker 7 (01:05:26):
Resource as well.
Speaker 1 (01:05:28):
Good. All right, then we have a full list of
departments within the city that need to go or or
or do we elevate I'm going to ask the Congressman
to elevate this. You know, I don't know what how
exactly it works. I mean, that's why we're gonna have
two guests here so they can explain it to me today.
Congressman brad Not. How you doing this morning, sir, Kathie.
Speaker 6 (01:05:51):
I'm doing well. I hope you are.
Speaker 1 (01:05:53):
I am and uh. I was going to start clearly
with the you know, the the piece stuff and the
shut down stuff, but we had a little issue arise
yesterday that I want to run by you. And I
don't know if you've seen this, but clearly you're familiar
with like the Project Veritas style undercover things, right where somebody,
(01:06:13):
somebody just for whatever reason, wants to explain all the
horrible stuff they're doing to some random person they're on
a date with. Seems to work. We had our own
situation in Raleigh. I don't think it was a date setup,
but an undercover reporter kind of infiltrated the city of
Raleigh and specifically the DEI offices and the folks working
(01:06:34):
in DEI. Yes, Yes, which I was told that we're
not supposed to do anymore because it could impact federal funding.
We'll get to that here in a moment, but I
just want to play an audio cut for you, sir,
because I want you to clearly this person understands that
they shouldn't be talking about it. Listen to the language
they use.
Speaker 3 (01:06:53):
They are certainly being strategic, and the way is that
we you don't want to drop tension to ourselves number one, right,
but I certainly also want to make sure that this
or is as protected as possible.
Speaker 1 (01:07:09):
All right, So hold on one market.
Speaker 3 (01:07:11):
We do partner oftentimes with Community Engagement if they have
programs that align kind of our goals are aligned, they'll
bring in again our community relations team to see where
there's some partnership that could happen. But I would say
to Community Engagement is another department that's a really get
involvement because they they really do out. They're also a
(01:07:31):
champion for DEI, so they're good. They're a good resources.
Speaker 1 (01:07:35):
Said, look, here's the deal. I find the DEI stuff
racist at face value. I think it's problematic because it's
it's racist in the way that a lot of it
is taught. This is not about equality, which is a
different thing than equity. That being said, this is also
potentially financially injurious to the city of Raleigh, part of
(01:07:56):
which you represent. Right, you've touched it in Raleigh. That's
why we checked I do so. Your thoughts on this well.
Speaker 6 (01:08:05):
I had seen a headline casey, I have not seen
the video, but that's deeply disappointing, to say the least,
and you hit the nail on the head. It is
potentially even illegal. I don't know the facts of the case,
but DEI is inherently discriminatory on a very basic level,
and it undermines the most damaging thing about DEI is
(01:08:26):
and undermines any objective adherence to standards, and it does
away with merit. I mean, the only question when you
were utilizing tax dollars should be who is best able
to do the job at hand? And we need to
root this stuff out. We need to make that person famous.
Anybody in Raleigh should be outraged at this sort of
effort to conceal some objective. I don't know what that
(01:08:50):
objective may be, but that person needs to be made famous,
and the motivation behind her conduct needs to be needs
to be made known. And whether it's the city council
or mayor's office, I hope that there will be an answer.
Speaker 1 (01:09:03):
Will you're allowed choir? Will your office in choir on this?
I mean, they don't care if I ask, but if
you send them if you're if you send them a
letter going what the heck's going on? I mean, watch
it evaluated, talk to who you need to talk to,
and and but I just want to know you guys
will follow up on this because I don't want the
city to lose a bunch of money. And then they
start slashingly they did, they do the angry slashing or
(01:09:27):
like we're not going to pick up trash anymore because
we can't have our dee. I I'm not going to
put up with it. So I'm asking you guys to
do something in your capacity.
Speaker 6 (01:09:34):
And I'm born and raised in Raleigh, Kathie, and Raleigh
has its fair share of needs, and it's a growing city,
and candidly, the only the only question should be how
can we as the city government best serve the community?
And that kind of nonsense undermines the mission business of
the city government. And you can't you can't have these
sort of closeted DEI officials pushing their own personal objectives
(01:09:59):
when there is at mounting up, when there is a
crime issue, when the police, you know, are being stretched.
We need to be we need to get back into
business of actually serving the public and not serving some
you know, peripheral political objective.
Speaker 1 (01:10:13):
Yeah, well, we're going to interview the guy who's uh
who did the undercover thing coming up at eight thirty five,
So you knows as you talk to your staff about this,
there may be some more info there. But I'd be
very curious to see what a follow up yields. But
I need to pivot to a couple other things with you,
do you it's is it kind of fun watching people
(01:10:37):
have to react to the peace agreement, people who just
seethingly hate Trump. I don't know why that's brought me
so much joy this week, Congressman. But here's the thing
I do appreciate. In most cases, people go and look,
I don't like the guy, but this is inherently a
good thing because I was more than willing to do
that with Osama bin Laden and Barack Obama, much to
(01:10:58):
my peril. So my listener's got very mad at me
for being happy about it. But credit where credit is due.
Do you think this holds? Because already Hamas is realizing
they're probably not going to be in power, and there's
been a few little things already. So where are you at?
Speaker 6 (01:11:15):
Well, I'll say this in order there there are there
are some some Democrats that, to their credit, I'll say,
in this charge environment have given the President his due
because this is a singular effort and a singular directive
from President Trump. Without President Trump, this would not.
Speaker 1 (01:11:31):
Have been done.
Speaker 6 (01:11:32):
I mean, he has been relentlessly determined to land this plane,
and he has done so without any adherence to the
traditional norms of the State Department, of the Internal governmental
operations and you know, backchannds and so forth. And he's
even gone against the the Israeli government on many occasions
(01:11:52):
in order to achieve this. And so I think that
he does deserve great credit. He has He has always
been in uh this singular focus end conflicts, and this
is not only the ninth serious conflict around the world
that he's ended, the Ninth War. And in terms of
whether or not it holds, I certainly pray so, I
(01:12:13):
really do. I mean, he was very strategic and bringing
a lot of the regional partners and neighbors of Israel
to the table. They're in agreement if they uphold their
end of the bargain, if they work towards security and
really disarming Hamas and making sure that Hamas does not
come back in any type of authoritarian posture. That's going
(01:12:35):
to be the key any to solve any problem, you
have to identify the real issue. The real issue here
was not Israel. The real issue is Hamas. Hamas, that
is the actual genocidal barbarians in this area. They want
to get rid of the Jewish state. They want to
get rid of as many Jews as they can. They
(01:12:56):
celebrated October seventh, and they want to repeat October seventh,
so getting rid of Hamas and their their treacherous gains.
That is sort of the underlying UH necessity here, and
so far it seems to be holding.
Speaker 4 (01:13:10):
UH.
Speaker 6 (01:13:10):
We need to we need to finish the job. We
need to make sure they are they are banned from
ever returning to power, and that's gonna take a lot
of work. But so far, so good, and I certainly
again hope and pray that the peace will hold.
Speaker 1 (01:13:22):
We are in the middle. We continue to be in
the middle of a shutdown. I saw some of your
colleagues try to store Mike Johnson's office. He wasn't there,
he essay, so they could get this Arizona woman sworn in, right.
I gotta be honest other than that and like one
other thing, I haven't noticed you guys aren't at work.
I don't mean like I haven't noticed, man, And I
know that everybody's mileage may vary, but for the majority
(01:13:47):
of Americans, I think they probably really haven't noticed, which
tells me you guys should be cutting some more. And
Trump's been taking some opportunities. Are you comfortable with some
of the uh, the trimmings like uh like he did
with would about a thousand people last Friday?
Speaker 6 (01:14:02):
I believe you did have closer to closer to five thousand,
if if not five, it's around five. But I agree
with you, Casey, there needs to be a continued effort
to eradicate waste, for aug abuse, to get rid of
some of the fat and these bureaucracies. The Department of
Education still has people there. We could you know, that's
a good place to start. But I would say the
(01:14:22):
most the most disappointing thing about this entire episode is
how fundamentally performative and dishonest the other side has been.
On September nineteenth, Republicans passed a bill to keep the
government open to facilitate negotiations on a myriad of issues,
and every Democrat voted against it, meaning they voted to
(01:14:43):
close the government, and they have done so nine times.
I believe in the Senate voted to shut down the government.
And this this you know, dog and pony show about
marking to Mike Johnson's office demand that the government be
opened up. This, it's it's the most dishonest thing I've
ever seen. They voted to close it. And it's do.
Speaker 1 (01:15:03):
They think they're winning?
Speaker 6 (01:15:04):
Striking?
Speaker 1 (01:15:05):
Do they think they're winning the pr side of this,
because I could be pretty honest about it. I think
the Republicans last few times didn't win it. I think
the Democrats are losing it badly. Do they not realize well?
Speaker 6 (01:15:17):
I think I think the American people see how superficial
these videos and efforts are. It is one hundred percent political.
There's no principles here, There's no honesty involved. It is
in a large part because of the growing share of
the radical left, the growing share of the party that
the radical left controls. You've got two Democrats from New
(01:15:37):
York who run the Senate and then run the House,
Hakim Jeffries and Chuck Schumer. Chuck Schumer would lose by
thirty points to AOC if she decides to primary him,
I don't think she will. I think she's onf for Senate.
But that's a troubling poll for him and Hakim Jefferies.
It's fifteen points less popular than so Ron Bondami and
avowed status communist, anti Semitic, whatever you want to call him.
(01:16:01):
The Democratic Party has a real problem and this is
a complete effort politically to show the left that they
are standing up to Donald Trump, and Chuck Schumer has
let the cat out of the bag numerous times. There's
no way that they're going to they're going to open
the government back up before this no King's rally. He
has said that it's getting better for the Democrats every day.
(01:16:24):
You know, it's it's a real problem when you're dealing
with that type of political calculus and you're trying to
appease uh lunacy. But Republicans passed a bill to keep
the government open. It was a compromise with a clean
cr and when when the counter proposal would increase spending
by one point five trillion, that's laughable.
Speaker 4 (01:16:46):
It's laughable.
Speaker 6 (01:16:47):
It's so it's so outrageous, you can't you can't really
be offended.
Speaker 1 (01:16:52):
Stuff again, some of it's just crazy.
Speaker 4 (01:16:55):
You.
Speaker 1 (01:16:55):
This is what people need to understand. There's like they
want to put money back in for de stuff and
like Uruguay and and and like we're going back to
the same stuff that they want. Is that just because
there's one hundred percent among their coat Yeah? Okay, yeah.
Speaker 6 (01:17:10):
And they say that they don't want illegals to get
health care, that is an absolute lie. The worst thing
that they ever did was to put it in writing.
And again the Speaker has made its famous section twenty
one for one their counterproposal in writing to our clean
cr it undoes every protection to open up the floodgates,
uh for illegals to regain access to Medicaid, Social Security,
(01:17:32):
Medicare benefits that they were receiving before Trump got back
in office. So it's silly, it's it's very upsetting.
Speaker 1 (01:17:39):
I will say.
Speaker 6 (01:17:40):
The one part that gives me the greatest heartburn and
the greatest you know, consternation, casey, is law enforcement and
military are not going to get paid because of this
charade that the Democrats are engaging.
Speaker 1 (01:17:51):
Okay, this is to ask you next. Because Trump's saying
He's got a buddy who's going to pay it. Then
he said he found the money for something else. I mean,
what is there truth to that?
Speaker 4 (01:17:59):
Is?
Speaker 1 (01:18:00):
Are not truth? What's going on?
Speaker 6 (01:18:02):
Well, there's there is limited flexibility on the executive uh
with the executive to reallocate funds that he deems sort
of the most essential in terms of a hierarchy, but
that funding will ultimately run out. And again, this is
a this is a pure political play that the American
people are paying the price for, especially those in law
(01:18:24):
enforcement and the military. Again, I maintain relationships with many
of the agents that I used to work with Border Patrol,
atf FBI, DEA Task Force officers, whatever it may be.
They're not getting paid, you know, prosecutors, they're not getting paid.
And you know, for a little while that's tenable. But
you start dragging this thing on like it very well,
(01:18:45):
may that becomes very costly. And I again it is
it is all performative nonsense from the Democrat side, And
that's upsetting to me.
Speaker 1 (01:18:54):
You know, I'm there's a theory out there. You're chatting
with Congressman brad Not by the way, who's a former prosecutor.
Just in case you didn't know what he was referencing. There,
there's a. So somebody ran this theory by me and
I thought it was interesting and that this is a
This is the Democrat strategy to essentially so that no
(01:19:15):
money goes to federal law enforcement officers, so they all
quit and then they stop deporting people. Right, So, with
some like four D chess thing to make it so
nobody wants to come to work, nobody wants to deport anybody,
and then they win the issue. I think that's lunacy
because it's just injurious all around. That being said, then
(01:19:38):
I see things like yesterday a judge in Chicago ruled
that they have to take down the fence around the
Broadview Ice Facility outside of Chicago, which is a detainment facility,
that they have to remove the fencing around it. So
the lunatics who have been attacking officers ramming them with cars,
I guess, have an open line of sight for their
(01:20:00):
hunting scopes or whatever. This judges continue to be a problem.
This is a problem. J. D. Pritzker said this, the
tables will turn someday.
Speaker 2 (01:20:09):
These people should recognize that maybe they're not going to
get prosecuted today, although we're looking at doing that.
Speaker 1 (01:20:15):
He's talking about federal agents. This is untenable with states
like Illinois, California and others. Like I'm a states rights guy,
but like this is this is almost criminal what they're doing.
I have about a minute and a half.
Speaker 6 (01:20:30):
Yeah, it really is an immigration enforcement case. He goes
against the gospel of the Democratic Party today. And JB.
Pritsker should be ashamed of himself threatening prosecution for federal
agents who are getting with of some of the worst
people in the world, who are harming his communities. Is
it is a disgrace. It's a disgrace. Chicago has been
(01:20:51):
a war zone for a decade and a half because
people like Pritzker will not enforce the law. And I
found what happened yesterday just to be outrageous. What he said,
what the judge did again outrageous. And I wouldn't put
that theory too far down on the implausible list because again,
immigration enforcement, it goes against every tenant of the Democratic
(01:21:13):
Party today. And again these are people who are here
illegally with criminal records. Yeah, criminal records with illegal aliens.
It's it's astounding to me. But again I applaud our
law enforcement and I hope that they can get paid.
Speaker 1 (01:21:28):
Soent Yeah, well, well do you know what the number is,
what we paid military, what the monthly payroll is for
one point three million troops. I'm gonna look at it.
Speaker 4 (01:21:37):
I do not.
Speaker 6 (01:21:38):
I did not. We can we can get that for sure,
but I do not talk of that.
Speaker 1 (01:21:42):
I'm sure it's floating around. Well, we'll hit your guy up.
If not, all right, I gotta let you go. Oh
Ross wants you to fire the Bills head coach too, So.
Speaker 6 (01:21:49):
If you could do that, we'll have a hearing about it.
Speaker 1 (01:21:51):
Ross or talk to Stephonic maybe should you know somebody
up there? All right, thank you, Kott, just want to
do appreciate.
Speaker 6 (01:21:56):
It all, Katie.
Speaker 1 (01:21:57):
All right, there you go. Listen to that. Ross. You're
gonna put a blue room panel together to fire your coach.
So they should have him fired in like three years.
It'll be amazing. All right, we'll be back. Hang Out
is eight thirty five and absolutely perfect. So we played
you the audio and here a few segments ago, and
then we talked to the congressman in the last segment.
(01:22:18):
And this all pertains to DEI where it's happening within
the city of Raleigh. This undercover video with this this
scurry woman. And the guy's voice you hear at the
end is who we're going to talk to next. And
his name is Adam and I'm gonna butcher this maybe
maybe not Gallette? Is that the proper pronuncer?
Speaker 4 (01:22:39):
Oh man, I'll take it.
Speaker 1 (01:22:41):
Also, heard you say in the video, So I cheated there.
So tell me before we get into this, tell me
about the organization real quick. Okay.
Speaker 4 (01:22:50):
Here, we were founded way back in nineteen sixty nine.
We do keating camera, investigative journalism and cultural activism to
hold a bad public policy actors accountable.
Speaker 1 (01:23:01):
Okay, I mean that's clear, concise and probably very necessary.
So what prompted you? Because you don't live in Raleigh?
You live in Florida. I think that's what I was
able to ascertain, so or at least we're from there.
So what how did you guys hone in on Raleigh?
Speaker 4 (01:23:17):
You know, it's funny. We did a series of hidden
camera investigations throughout North Carolina earlier this year and investigated
higher education, and we found university after university administrator after administrator,
whether we were at unc Asheville or Western Carolina, all
of them bragged to us about continuing the push DEI
in defiance of the Board of Regions ban. And when
(01:23:40):
we released these videos the comments people were shocked and said, well,
I thought PEI was panned everywhere there's a federal executive order.
I thought PEI was gone everywhere. Now we having been
in these school districts and having been in these universities,
we know firsthand, gosh, no, it's not. But we figured
we would go and see what is it like in
local governments, because opposedly the executive order of bands DEDI,
(01:24:02):
any federally funded institutional like a local government can't have DEI.
And naturally we popped in there in As you'll see,
because this is the first of many investigations from your
a lot of local governments, they are more than happy
to brag to us about how they continue to push
DEI regardless of any law. These are radicals, true blue.
Speaker 1 (01:24:24):
I gotta tell you, man, this is the thing that
your videos and like what Veritas was doing and James
and all that stuff. The thing that kills me about
all these videos is everyone who's in Washington, or in
government for that matter, if somebody much hotter than you
wants to go on a date with you, and it's
a trap, especially if they just want to talk about
(01:24:46):
the weirdness of your job. And yet this seems like
you guys are able to get a hold of these
on the regular. So what was the premise in which
this scurry woman brought your undercover person in. What was
the setup so to speak, because she then spoke very
freely about keeping it a secret, and I that's wild
(01:25:06):
to me.
Speaker 4 (01:25:08):
And to your point, I was previously the vice president
of development for Project Veritas. Some of our investigators and
some of our staffers came from Project Verratas. But in
these investigations, these were no dates. These people were at
their places of employment and they thought they were speaking
with a like minded radical. I don't want to give
too many details because it's an ongoing investigation across the country,
(01:25:29):
but they were more than acty to tell us, oh, yes,
we've simply rebranded it. But the work continues. We're simply
not trying to call you call attention doors elves, but
the work continues. And it speaks to how out of
touch and unaccountable these local government bureaucrats are. And you
look at these job descriptions that we see, you would
think that a local government would be focused on law enforcement, roads, schools,
(01:25:53):
the fire department. Instead, these are basically activist jobs. You
had taxpayer funded activists in the local governments across the state.
Why if you want to push far left activism, knock
yourself out, but do it as a private, nonprofit organization.
Do it as a political action committee, not as a
taxpayer funded city government.
Speaker 1 (01:26:15):
What has been the consequences? Because I remember the with
the Western Carolina stuff and all of that. Have you
guys had because I you know, I did ask. We
just chatted with Congressman Brad Not We do a regular
thing with him at eight oh five, and he touches
the city of Raleigh as part of his district. And
I said, look, I want you guys need to send
a letter and and follow up on this. And I
(01:26:35):
think he will do that, But like, what are the
consequences unless somebody high up in the Trump administration. Here's
about it. It almost has to go excuse me, go viral,
and then maybe the city will feel the pain. And
my problem is I'm a taxpayer in the city of Raleigh.
I don't want the city to feel the pain because
some idiots in government don't want to get rid of
(01:26:57):
their little pet project. So what has been the after
math for some of.
Speaker 4 (01:27:00):
These You know you makes such a great point with
our higher education videos. Many of those people lost their jobs.
The dean of students at Western Carolina University lost her
job after we released our investigation. And your point is
excellent in that you don't want your city to have
to deal with financial consequences for law breaking. You know,
(01:27:22):
the federal government created the Civil Rights Initiative to investigate
this sort of thing and to pull federal funds. Well,
this pushs the city of Raleigh at risk of losing
federal funds if the Feds get involved, and I'll be
honest with you, they get involved under stuff regularly. The
Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Harmy Dyllan, often
(01:27:42):
shares and posts and responds to our hidden camera investigations.
Speaker 6 (01:27:47):
So if you want your city to.
Speaker 4 (01:27:48):
Lose funds, this is a great way to do it.
We actually created an action alert at Save Carolinacities dot
com where you could send one message that goes directly
to city officials and basically tells them, Hey, we're gonna
lose federal funds if you don't cut this nonsense out. Plus,
I don't want to be funding for left activism. You
could send that message or write your own at Save
(01:28:11):
Carolinacities dot com. But to do what they're doing at
a time like this is incredibly risky for all of
the residents of your community.
Speaker 1 (01:28:20):
And then you mentioned other communities. Obviously, you know you're
still holding on to those What would you like, what
are we talking about here? Are we talking about like
a bunch of other cities or a bunch of other
things in North Carolina? Without giving too much away, I mean,
how pervasive is the problem where people are still trying
to hide this.
Speaker 4 (01:28:40):
Well, if we went to every single city in the state,
I imagine we'd probably find something to varying degree. You know,
I got to tell you when we go to these universities,
when we go to these school districts, when we go
to these city governments, the greatest challenge is merely getting
past the gatekeeper. You know, they have those receptionists that
they hire to make sure that no parent can ever
actually talk to an administrator, to make sure that no
city resident can ever actually talk to anybody whose salaries
(01:29:03):
they're paying. You know, that's the greatest struggle in our work.
These people who are paid to make sure that the
government employees never actually have to talk to anybody right
when we get pass the gatekeeper. More often than not,
the people we speak with brag about breaking laws, to
fine laws, circumventing laws. We've released investigations I think, from
four North Carolina universities earlier this year. We have several
(01:29:26):
morecoming and as I said, this is the first of gosh,
I think at least a half dozen universities in the
state of or cities in the state of North Carolina
where we have people in local government bragging about pushing DEEI,
regardless of the executive order.
Speaker 1 (01:29:40):
Last question, how often when you go in there do
you find that they're not doing that right? Because I
know we dwell obviously on where the problem is, but
I'm assuming there has to be situations or do you
just I guess you have some information before you do
it that leads you to think that it's probably happening.
But has there been times went in there and it's like,
(01:30:01):
oh no, look look at that they did get rid
of it.
Speaker 4 (01:30:04):
You know, we don't necessarily have any information ahead of time.
When we go in. We just kind of cast a
wide net and find whatever we find and I'll tell
you for this city government thing, I'm not sure that
we've had too many people thus far who've said no, no, no,
we were doing this, but we stopped it because all
of them were doing it ahead of time. All of
them had taxpayer funded equity officers, taxpayer funded political activists.
(01:30:27):
All of these communities had that sort of thing. They
gave it different job titles, perhaps, but all of them
had that. So the question is, and were they never
doing it and they still aren't doing it? The question
is they were definitely doing it, are they still doing it?
And I don't think we found one yet or conclusively
they stopped that sort of work. What we find more
than anything is that they nearly print new business cards
(01:30:49):
and continue doing the same work, perhaps the most lucrative
job one could have in the state of North Carolina
and twenty twenty five business card salesmen.
Speaker 1 (01:30:56):
Yeah, well, no, I would say that the equity officers
is you can't visually do anything, so you probably play
a lot of you know, Match four games on your
phone or something. So all right, hey, I appreciate it
very much. The website one more time, if people want
to reach out to the city, would you give that,
Adam sure receive.
Speaker 4 (01:31:15):
Carolina Cities dot Com thank.
Speaker 1 (01:31:17):
You, okay, and then I retweeted your video. People can
scroll down and you're tagged in that as well as
your organization, So if people want to follow you, they
should do that. Adam Gallett, thank you for the time
this morning. Appreciate it.
Speaker 4 (01:31:28):
Hey, thank you so much for having me.
Speaker 1 (01:31:30):
Yeah, absolutely, all right, let's get raced agic from the
weather Channel in here. We'll do an undercover Doppler inspection
on him. So up.
Speaker 12 (01:31:38):
Yeah, Well, Doppler's kind of put to the side for
quite a few days. I don't know if we'll get
anything on it until maybe Sunday night. That doesn't even
look all that impressive, so yeah, kind of boring. Looks
good all across the southeast, big arey of high pressure.
Pleasant temperatures that time of year, right, mid six or
mid seventies today, upper sixties tomorrow, maybe in the mid
sixties for the triad. What you see, what you get,
(01:32:00):
lots of sunshine. Now the change will really start coming
in as we get on through, maybe not so much
tomorrow morning, when we're in the upper forties to low fifties.
This morning, we're seeing a lot of mid and upper fifties,
but it's going to be on Friday morning when we're
down maybe to the upper thirties for some to low
forties for everybody else. So a little bit chillier by
Friday morning than mid upper sixties in the afternoon, and
(01:32:22):
then we're back into the mid seventies for highs over
the weekend. Looks like it's gonna be another beautiful weekend,
so make your plans now. Even I do get a
shower to be Saturday night or Sunday night, and it
really doesn't click much. So a lot of dry out
there case seeing lots of sunshine the next several days.
Speaker 1 (01:32:35):
Okay, all right, we'll enjoy the rest of your Wednesday. Well, yeah,
we'll do tomorrow, and who knows, maybe something will break
out so you can get excited. Okay, and we maybe
I'm back with Yeah, thanks man. Denise Pellegrini from Bloomberg
News hang on your Bloomberg Update now with Denise Pelligreney
and Denise. I did have to laugh because your very
first story is I'm from Wyoming originally, okay, and my
(01:32:56):
friends back home have been making fun of these people
for months now, for because it's usually some hipster dude
who lives in one of those vans that's built like
a tiny home that's now a prospector and they think
it's hilarious. But anyway, not to steal your thunder, go
right ahead.
Speaker 10 (01:33:15):
I think cold rush is back, that's what you're talking about.
I am some of those people, you know, they may
have picked up those metal detectors and other things they're
using just from the thrift shop. And apparently the whole thing,
this whole gold rush thing, of course, is ignited by
gold prices right which if I checked today are at
four two hundred and two dollars a troy ounce. That's
(01:33:38):
up sixty percent this year. And we had CEO of
JP Morgan Chase Jamie Diamond tell us yesterday that gold
could more than double in price from here. He said,
quote if things keep going on this way, whatever that means.
So that's got people all fired up social media, people
with strainers, pans, picks and even vintage equipment. All those
(01:34:00):
old maps in Wyoming, California, the Dakota is all those
other place that's trying to figure out where they can
find gold.
Speaker 1 (01:34:07):
Uh.
Speaker 10 (01:34:08):
Wall Street Journal says the big thunder gold mine in
Celtic Cutta is flooded with people looking for advice. I
was thinking about Wyoming too. I mean, there's the Carissa Mine,
right and people.
Speaker 1 (01:34:22):
But here's the problem with gold and Wyoming, and I
hope these kids don't get themselves in trouble some of
them doing it. We have a lot of uranium in Wyoming,
and it's a problem. I grew up on a cattle
ranch where we if we sunk drilling wells for green
oil or something, they literally would come out and inspect them.
And part of it was making sure you weren't getting
into that stuff for obvious reasons. But Kojima is called
(01:34:44):
the is the uranium mine out there's huge. It's right
between Buffalo and Gillette, and so you know, hopefully they
know what they're doing. It's all that I'm saying, or
they could make themselves very sick.
Speaker 10 (01:34:54):
So yikes. I don't mean to make light of this,
but I guess you know, gold not only sparkling, but
you could have a gold chain that might be kind
of glowing right there. That's kind of a scary prospect.
And also the Carissa mine, they have that annual gold
rush day, right, so all this stuff is just getting
people so fired up. And now there are rare earths
there too, which are going to be maybe even more
(01:35:16):
valuable than gold. All gets your hand on some of those,
but also potentially toxic.
Speaker 1 (01:35:21):
Yeah, so if.
Speaker 10 (01:35:25):
You're looking for a job and you're not striking gold,
you might try the submarine business or the military related
submarine business because the US Submarine Industrial base case he
wants to recruit more skilled workers. There's growing demand for
vessels because you know of the US controversy and competition
with China, right, and we have a Navy Secretary, John
(01:35:48):
Fhalan warning that the US is getting behind and risks
actually being behind China if we don't step it up.
So there are now a lot of websites catering to
the dream of working for the submarine business, like ww
dot build submarines dot com, where you can look for jobs.
Virginia has a major sub business with military and power,
cable manufacturing, and many others, as you will well know.
(01:36:11):
And I was going to say, I know Wilmington is
not that close, but they're building that submarine museum there.
They educate the public about careers and submarines. Yeah, so
it's a growing industry, believe it or not, and if
you have any kind of expertise, you can probably get
ten job offers in that field. Right now, stock futures
(01:36:33):
are pointing to a higher open. There's some optimism in
the banking industry. Casey, Bank of America out with an
earnings meeet Morgan Stanley shares also getting some positive attention.
Crude oil futures are higher this morning, but crude prices
are pretty much sitting at a five month low, so
we could see lower prices at the pump. Some crude
oil experts say a glut is coming that could be
(01:36:54):
good news for drivers. And stock futures right now are higher.
As I mentioned, Dow futures up two thirty seven s
and HE futures up fifty two, Nasdaq futures skyrocketing more
than one percent, up two hundred and fifty seven.
Speaker 1 (01:37:05):
Casey, all right, thank you very much. I do appreciate
it so And you know one part of your story too,
is while they are making fun of them, to your point,
they're also selling them all the crap they want from
the stores. So yes, and that's how it was in
California in eighteen forty nine.
Speaker 10 (01:37:22):
Yeah, and Wall Street Journal says this morning, that's so
far the biggest money makers amid those looking for gold
appear to be those selling the equipment.
Speaker 1 (01:37:32):
Yeah for others, boys for gold. That's my boys. So yeah, right,
you're fair. All right, thanks man, or thanks to Denise.
I appreciate you. Okay, all right, there you go, Denise
Pelagreney Bloomberg News Ross. You're thinking of becoming an old
timey prospector the cost of gold there.
Speaker 8 (01:37:49):
I mean, I mean, if you're going to go all
old prospector, you got to have the look right like
the lanterne.
Speaker 4 (01:37:55):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (01:37:55):
Like, yeah, I got address the d the right way
because you had you used to be a prospector and.
Speaker 8 (01:37:59):
You have a run in right with the coyotes. Yeah yeah,
the big issue when you prospect is the coyotes.
Speaker 1 (01:38:06):
Everyone knows this. Yeah absolutely. Uh and evil businessman who
higher gangs of thugs to beat you.
Speaker 8 (01:38:14):
Oh yeah, no, yeah, I found the gold. And then
the hood came out. Oh no, that hood man, he's
the worst. Did he come himself or did he send
like goons? No, he had goons of course. Yeah. But
then this strange preacher guy came along. Oh okay, and
help defend the entire group.
Speaker 1 (01:38:30):
Wait, he's a preacher. Yeah, just a preacher.
Speaker 8 (01:38:33):
And then my daughter got really what, really into and
things got weird.
Speaker 1 (01:38:37):
Man, I guess they got weird. Yeah. Yeah, she was
really into the Preacher.
Speaker 8 (01:38:43):
I remember seeing that movie and that part of the
movie was super weird, like that creepy.
Speaker 1 (01:38:47):
Yeah it really is it? So the two things? Can
I just watch that movie again the other day Pale
Rider For those of you wondered, it's because it's a
great movie. I put An Eastwood on when I don't
know what I want to watch. It's perfect. Is that
part and then the part where the dude, the main
dude is the guy from Law and Order, which I
don't know why that's so weird, but
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist
It’s 1996 in rural North Carolina, and an oddball crew makes history when they pull off America’s third largest cash heist. But it’s all downhill from there. Join host Johnny Knoxville as he unspools a wild and woolly tale about a group of regular ‘ol folks who risked it all for a chance at a better life. CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist answers the question: what would you do with 17.3 million dollars? The answer includes diamond rings, mansions, velvet Elvis paintings, plus a run for the border, murder-for-hire-plots, and FBI busts.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com