Wednesday-10-29-2025

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Ross, you've only seen one of them. I only put
one in the prep packet. There's another one. And now
I think, in the defense of our nation, our science
disease ravaged, science based monkeys, that's our American maid are
gonna have to go toe to toe with Chinese made

(00:21):
disease science monkeys. And I like our odds.

Speaker 2 (00:26):
I feel like, you know, I feel like we may
win this thing.

Speaker 1 (00:30):
But yeah, just so just in general, let me tell
you what happened yesterday. Ross's truck truck trap that we
talked about here on the show. Its scored a banger,
a truck full of research Reese's monkeys, and I've seen Okay,
so initial reporting was they all had hepatitis, COVID, and herpes,

(01:00):
all right, so you know, probably that's probably what you
got if you went to Burning Man during COVID into
the the orgy Dome. So I maybe that's what they're
trying to study, maybe mirror that.

Speaker 2 (01:15):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (01:17):
But so that's that's Team America, all right. So here's
Team China. Because I saw this craziness after at already
sent Ross prep. Team China's monkeys have schizophrenia and autism.

Speaker 2 (01:35):
And probably COVID.

Speaker 1 (01:36):
Let's just be honest, because if they're Chinese research monkeys,
and you know how the Chinese don't want to admit
anything about COVID, Like what COVID?

Speaker 2 (01:45):
Everything's fine.

Speaker 1 (01:47):
And meanwhile eco warriors with you know, air monitoring equipment
or like are.

Speaker 2 (01:52):
You burning thousands of bodies? What's going on?

Speaker 3 (01:56):
All?

Speaker 2 (01:56):
Right? So those are those are the two Those are
the two monkeys you got to think about.

Speaker 1 (02:05):
So is your money on American made freedom monkeys with herpes,
hepatitis and COVID or evil comedy chiny Chinese monkeys with
schizophrenic and autism? I feel well, one, I don't even

(02:25):
know what that combination of within Chinese monkeys.

Speaker 2 (02:28):
I don't even know what that would do.

Speaker 1 (02:33):
Whereas these monkeys, obviously they're alpha monkeys because clearly they're
getting a lot of you know, monkey tale hence the
multiple STDs that they're sporting. So like that that makes
me hopeful. I don't know, man, I don't know what
the answer is, but just know that those two stories
exist today at the same time. Now, officials down in

(02:55):
Mississippi where the actual monkey release happened have indicated that
they've captured or I guess maybe killed. I don't know
all but one. And I'm pretty sure that just one
diseased research monkey isn't like that can't do anything to you, right,
There's never been an instance where a single diseased research

(03:17):
monkey has caused too much of a problem.

Speaker 2 (03:19):
So, hell, we got a whole island in South Carolina?
Was the driver unaware of what he was transporting? Why?

Speaker 1 (03:25):
Why why don't you be super careful? Well, I mean maybe,
I don't know.

Speaker 2 (03:30):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (03:31):
If you've seen lately here we've had some truck driving issues.

Speaker 4 (03:35):
I know, that's what I mean. Like you go and
you're like, hey, what am I holing today? And you're like, yeah,
what is it?

Speaker 2 (03:38):
Mayonnaise or something?

Speaker 4 (03:39):
And they're like no, no, no, COVID monkeys, herpes monkeys, hepatitis,
hepatitis monkeys, Like what is happening here? Like you'd be
super careful?

Speaker 2 (03:48):
Yeah, what do you do?

Speaker 3 (03:49):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (03:49):
He's like you, Well, you don't have it. You don't
have a shit and a dynamite hole for you. Yeah.
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (03:54):
I mean I think as long as if you do
wreck the case, they can't get into the cab, right
because they have to explain to your wife how you
got an STD and she's like, I don't you're cheating. Yes,
you're clearly cheating. And then if Dustin Hoffman shows up,
you know you're ft.

Speaker 4 (04:13):
I think they murdered the other monkeys. I think like
the one to survive is the last I heard, like
was still on the loose.

Speaker 1 (04:19):
I think they murdered the ones that got other cages.
I saw a report because they belong I guess to
Tulane University. Just what New Orleans where that's at? And
I think if they got out, they may have murdered
them because they didn't know. I think they didn't know
initially because then I saw subsequent reports that not all
the monkeys have all the stuff, which I guess would

(04:39):
makes sense, right, so or or whatever. Now the Chinese monkeys,
I don't know much about them. I just know that
Bloomberg literally had a story yesterday talking about how Chinese
scientists have figured out how to give a monkey's schizophreny
and autism.

Speaker 2 (04:55):
How does that manifest? I don't know.

Speaker 4 (04:59):
You know, if bad for blaming the truck driver though,
but the guy was in Mississippi. Have you ever been
on a Mississippi road? The roads away.

Speaker 1 (05:05):
I have driven from Raleigh to New Orleans and a
big chunk of that is in Mississippi.

Speaker 4 (05:09):
And they're bad, like are worse than South Carolina. So
maybe it's just the Mississippi roads.

Speaker 1 (05:15):
Well yeah, but if you're driving to New Orleans, which
again they're going to two lane, uh, and I you know,
a lot of I think we breed a lot of
these monkeys up in what maybe even in South Carolina
they still do. You're gonna have to if you're coming
from the east, you're gonna have to go through Mississippi
at least a little. And if you ross you've been

(05:36):
through Biloxi, right, Have you driven through the coastal part
of Mississippi.

Speaker 2 (05:42):
Down No, I don't think so.

Speaker 1 (05:44):
Oh they have a beautiful wet market, so yeah you
want to stop by there as well, So you know, maybe, uh,
maybe that's what's going on down there. But I you know,
I just I'm just trying to handicap this whole mess.

Speaker 2 (05:57):
Figure out.

Speaker 1 (05:58):
Okay, all right, Well, uh, who would I put my
money on? And I want to go American, but I'm
a little terrified of the the shear insanity of what
the Chinese scientists are.

Speaker 2 (06:08):
Willing to do. Uh, what is.

Speaker 1 (06:16):
You're sending me all sorts of weird stuff? Is everybody
got monkey experience?

Speaker 2 (06:21):
Now?

Speaker 3 (06:23):
He just.

Speaker 1 (06:25):
I've never I've never I've never handled the research monkey.

Speaker 2 (06:29):
I've seen one. I told you.

Speaker 1 (06:31):
When I was in college, I got it. I had
a part time gig basically taking care of some of
the animals but not the monkeys, at a medical outfit
called Miravan Medical Technologies. They did like rabbit testing and uh,
you know, rats and rabbits, but then they had primates
but I wasn't even allowed to where the primates were.

(06:51):
So but yeah, basically like, oh, you're a ranch kid,
you can figure out how to feed these things. So yeah,
but there they were were trying to cure blindness or something,
and I think they kind of did one type of it.
So I was like, ah, I had a no part
in that, but at least it happened while I was
working part time there, so that was cool. All right,

(07:14):
coming up on the show, Well, we'll still figure out
our little monkey octagon. Oh you know what, I ross,
I just figured out the monkey the research monkey to
be both the research monkeys.

Speaker 2 (07:28):
I'm yeah, And it's so obvious, it's so obvious. I
I will.

Speaker 1 (07:34):
Explain this, uh this light bulb moment coming up next
here on the CaCO Day radio program.

Speaker 2 (07:40):
If I at that.

Speaker 1 (07:41):
Point now ross with this third with this extra player
and here this third option, I feel like it upends
the entire thing I was asking.

Speaker 4 (07:49):
Right, Yeah, I'm still like fascinated by the schizophrenic monkey.
That's kind of terrifying from China. The other one, like
the American monkeys. I am on Team USA obviously, but
they're like, right, they've got illnesses and disease, and there's
the other one is just like crazy right.

Speaker 2 (08:03):
Well, no, the other one. But the other monkeys have
blow right right, I mean you had that and now
it's completely different. Yeah, yeah, yeah, it changes the whole dynamic. Man,
Now you.

Speaker 4 (08:11):
Don't want the cocaine monkey to become friends with like
the schizophrenic monkey, Like what if they tag you know,
they teamed up like the Mega Powers of monkeys if
you will, Well no.

Speaker 1 (08:19):
Why wait wait, why are you assuming the Wake Forest
University Cocaine research monkey is a commy trader.

Speaker 2 (08:26):
In fact? Oh look at that? Oh wait, hold on,
hold on, look at that. Look at that. The Chinese
monkey just jumped out of barber shop window. The cowardice. Yeah,
when he saw the cocaine monkey coming.

Speaker 1 (08:40):
So so you're I mean, yes, I also don't want
the cocaine monkey. Are we assuming that he has extra
cocaine to give Schitzo monkey?

Speaker 2 (08:49):
I assume he's more.

Speaker 1 (08:50):
Yeah, yeah, probably because you know, the government's perry. We're
paying for it, so I'm sure they can supply.

Speaker 2 (08:55):
If he didn't, he wouldn't be in this fight. He'd be,
you know, looking for more cocaine. Oh that's a good point. Yeah,
well at least we know.

Speaker 1 (09:03):
But here's here's why this is all just you know,
stupid theory that would never happen. As we know, nobody
in the wrestling community ever did cocaine.

Speaker 2 (09:13):
So that was remoting there. He just you know, it
was not not really a thing there.

Speaker 1 (09:19):
So yeah, big monkey news today to start the show,
and and uh, you know, just in case you're going
this is way too much monkey news, don't worry.

Speaker 2 (09:29):
We're gonna interview like an elected official later. It all
balance out.

Speaker 1 (09:34):
That's what we do here on the show. All right,
coming up on the show, just ragtag bunch of among
the world's favorite people known as the just Stop Oil lunatics.
These would be the glue myself to something ruined, priceless
works of art, standing the roads. You can't get to
work those people Apparently, apparently there's a whole lot of

(10:01):
internal stuff. They're invested. They're getting me tooed, that's right inside.
Just stop oil's toxic culture, sex assault claims and infighting.
So you're telling me a bunch of violent and often
mentally disconnected, Like I don't even think it's diseased. I
just think that like their their head is in such

(10:24):
an other place, and they're just swimming with evil and
vitriol and nastiness and and and you know, they feel
that they're virtuous. Uh, they're they're really among the most
obnoxious of the protesters. I am shocked that in an
environment of people with all of those personality traits, that

(10:44):
everyone's horrible to each other. I mean, I just couldn't
believe that. But sure enough, we got that story, so
we get into it. We got tons of audio for you.
The elected official that we're gonna be interviewing coming up is,
in fact, Congressman Brad Not We'll see which of the
three monkeys he's.

Speaker 2 (11:00):
Got money on.

Speaker 1 (11:02):
But also, you know, I should probably talk about the shutdown,
the absolute train wreck that is every Democrat I've seen
interviewed over the last forty eight hours where they've now
they've come up with this different narrative. And then of
course our own attorney general, you know, ag TikTok there,
mister Jackson has joined a lawsuit with a bunch of

(11:23):
leftists ags and they are suing because they claim that
the US government has an emergency fund that, without reopening
the government can be used to fund the the you know,
the food program. The I mean, I think technically it's
six billions that will only cover a couple of weeks
or something. But the official position of the White House

(11:46):
is that's an emergency fund for a natural disaster. This
is not a natural disaster because it is immensely preventable.
If seven more Senate Democrats would simply vote yes, and.

Speaker 2 (11:57):
Actually is it seven still? He's seven? That's it it need.

Speaker 1 (12:03):
They just need seven seven or maybe even less set
it democrats to vote yes and then boom, it's restored
at the level that.

Speaker 2 (12:12):
Is not a republican level.

Speaker 1 (12:14):
By the way, it is restored to a level that
is the last approved level under when Democrats had control
because we've been in continuing resolution.

Speaker 2 (12:22):
Hell for this stuff.

Speaker 1 (12:24):
Two stories that emerged this morning, one that yesterday a
truckload of Reesei's research monkeys that.

Speaker 2 (12:29):
May or may not have one or more of.

Speaker 1 (12:32):
Herpes, hepatitis or and or covid overturn. And then there
was another story that in China they just made Reeseis
research monkeys with schizophrenia and autism.

Speaker 2 (12:43):
And we're trying to pick our fighter here.

Speaker 1 (12:46):
And then somebody pointed out that they could juice with rabies,
and I think that in the monkey world that would
be the appropriate way to juice, and I might give
the edge to whoever's got rabies on top of everything else.
But the overwhelming thought is the American monkeys sound like
they like to party, so people are throwing in behind them.

Speaker 2 (13:05):
Yeah, I mean sure, why not.

Speaker 1 (13:08):
Oh by the way, Ross, we have a gen Z
invention this morning. You know how much we love our
gen Z inventions around here. Just to recap every now
and then these articles will come out. They'll be like, ah,
look look at this crazy thing gen Z is doing.
They just figured out it's a thing. And then you
go ooh in on, how how how smart of them?

Speaker 3 (13:28):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (13:28):
Such hits this year have included in the last few
years have included roommates, right, living with somebody who is
not a relative, and and micro retirements where you you
don't quit your job, but you leave it for like
a week or two weeks.

Speaker 2 (13:47):
What were they calling that? Ross The name escapes me,
the micro retirements, But what was the thing other people
were calling it? They come up with this cool, cool
v word for it, of vodka vocation. I think it's vocation.
It's vocation. Yeah, yeah.

Speaker 1 (14:05):
So anyway, so all right, you ready for this, super exciting.
This is gonna be useful. You like coffee, right? Do
you like coffee? Do you drink you drink coffee?

Speaker 2 (14:15):
Right? Not really? Now?

Speaker 1 (14:17):
Okay, all right, but for those of you who like coffee,
making coffee at home in a cafe setting. So not
only all right, check this out. Not only do they
buy the coffee, they buy stuff to put in the coffee.

Speaker 2 (14:35):
Some of them are very obnoxiously elaborate. I'm already me.

Speaker 4 (14:40):
And myself as a gen z er, yeah myself at
you know, as a young zoomer. What you're saying, it's
not computing in my really young brain, that is mind.
I when you when you when you get coffee, you
have to get up. You have to go to the
Starbucks and you have to tell them what you want

(15:01):
and they give the coffee to you. You're telling me
the attitude is important.

Speaker 2 (15:05):
Yeah, Or or I can go on my phone and
have someone bring me the coffee for the low low
price of like forty bucks. Yeah, you're telling me there's
a different way.

Speaker 1 (15:15):
Yeah, and ready it's cheaper usually really uh huh uh huh.

Speaker 2 (15:19):
So what you do is you get me?

Speaker 3 (15:21):
No, I don't.

Speaker 2 (15:21):
I imagine I have to go to school. I have
to learn how to make the coffee. O.

Speaker 1 (15:25):
No, No, apparently you all right, So here's what it
kind of mirrors yours. Uh you get up right, remember
you mentioned that at the first part, and you go,
but instead of going to the Starbucks or you know,
whatever local coffee shop or even the one with the
hotties and the trailer on Capitol Boulevard there did Yeah,

(15:47):
I know you purves go to that. Instead of going
down of those, you go to your kitchen. Do you
a kitchen?

Speaker 4 (15:53):
I do, But I'm busy at my remote job being
a gen zer. I don't have time to grind coffee.

Speaker 2 (16:02):
Or okay, no, no, no, no, it's beautiful. But you can
do that.

Speaker 1 (16:05):
You can invest essentially the entire cost of a startup
coffee shop like these idiot TikTokers are. But for most people,
you can buy the coffee at the grocery store and
or have it delivered in subscription service.

Speaker 2 (16:18):
I don't know. It still be remarkably cheaper, and it
will be ground, so it already comes ground.

Speaker 1 (16:24):
Or if you want to be snooty, you can go
you can get the beans and then grind it at
the grocery store.

Speaker 2 (16:29):
You don't have to buy a grinder, but you.

Speaker 1 (16:30):
Got to go to a nice grocery store and then
you take the coffee and you put it in this
machine that makes it for you. Or you can buy
the ground coffee and these little capsules that they just
invented apparently, and then it's super easy.

Speaker 2 (16:47):
Those capsules sound bad for the environment. Mm hm.

Speaker 1 (16:51):
And you know, I guess would be my question versus
the ninety two thousand things are thrown away at the Starbucks.

Speaker 2 (17:01):
Yeah, so I.

Speaker 4 (17:02):
Don't want to I don't want to destroy the environment.
I'd rather have somebody get in their automobile and bring
me the coffee from the place that knows what they're doing.
Amateur like myself who has no education in coffee.

Speaker 1 (17:15):
Should Should you put it in plastics? Then eventually sea
turtles can snore?

Speaker 2 (17:20):
Should or whatever? Okay?

Speaker 1 (17:24):
Gen Z coffee lovers discover new way to combat insane
prices with new home cafe trend.

Speaker 2 (17:31):
That is the headline. Not gonna lie. My generation gen
Z greatest generation inventing everything. Yeah I don't even know.

Speaker 1 (17:37):
I knew this was you guys, because you invented the
Hayes Coffee Ice Coffee Act, right right, so clearly, dude,
I'm telling you, some of these videos are obnoxious. I
watched in this thing because they're like they go and
they they bake a bunch of pastries or they go
buy a bunch, and then other people in their building
because it's all New York stuff, they come over and

(17:59):
then there's like twenty five this is the thing too.
They're doing it to save money, but they have twenty
five flavor syrups.

Speaker 2 (18:05):
They have a five thousand.

Speaker 1 (18:06):
Dollars expresso machine, and they're like, see how easy it
is to save money. And I'm like, I don't think
you're doing it right. Coffee should let me let me explain.
Let me explain something to you. We had an old
boy that worked for his name Conrad Conrad. I want
you to imagine what you think a modern Western cowboy is, right,

(18:27):
and I don't mean the Hollywood pretty boy version. I
mean the grizzled dude who lives in an off cabin
on the ranch that he's worked at since my grandparents
were children. Almost they had just gone. That's how long
Conrad worked for the family. And this boy never went
like he was one of these guys that if he now,

(18:49):
he's passed now. But he was one of these guys
where it was like, if he retires, he's gonna die.
You could tell that, Like the idea of retirement didn't
want so he just did light work and he lived
there till he died. And we love Conrad Conrad. Every
morning I'm out there getting ready to go to school,
he's already out there working man. And he had a
travel mug that you get it like a Conico, and

(19:12):
I'm ross I'm not lying when I tell you the
inside of this mug, A third of it was unavailable
to fill stuff because of coffee stains that had accumulated over,
you know, like a decade or something, so it like it.
The inside of the mug, the bottom third of it
was just rock coffee because he just rinsed the thing

(19:34):
real quick and like a like a cow tank or something,
and then he just folgers instant in the damn thing,
get some hot water, and then just shake it up
and then that's what he do all day. I don't
think he spent more than five dollars on coffee his
entire life. That's coffee man, and he'd make it strong.

(19:55):
So it's probably why I didn't like coffee, because I
think I want to say he was the first one
who ever gave me coffee. I mean, he had the
damn thing so strong, but that cup was the most
disgusting thing I've ever seen. And every morning he's out
there drinking on that thing that's coffee. Meanwhile, this chick
spent two thousand dollars at restoration hardware for a coffee
cart so her neighbors can come over and be impressed.

(20:19):
They also print logos of their own coffee brandy. We
have a made up and stick it on plastic cups
so that they can feel the real barista experience.

Speaker 2 (20:28):
We have a coffee cart as well. It's called the counter,
the kitchen counter. Does it roll? It doesn't know? Oh
well stationary they win, okay, yeah.

Speaker 1 (20:42):
And they have like the I'm just look at these days.
They have like the whole big metal uh you know,
like milk jugs. You'd get the industrial ones that you'd
see at like a you know, an actual coffee shop
or but a but a higher end one.

Speaker 2 (20:55):
Dude, they must have.

Speaker 1 (20:57):
They spent more on just coffee supplies than people spent
on a car in this one video. And I'm not
making it up. And then it's presented as we're saving money. Yeah,
maybe thirty years down the road if everything still works.
But I think you're doing it wrong. So there you go.
We got a nice little invention.

Speaker 2 (21:15):
To kick things off on this beautiful morning before we
got to dive into this stupidity like the opening of
the World Series yesterday, where by the way.

Speaker 1 (21:26):
I don't know, Rossie, you didn't watch any of the
game though the Dodgers lost the stupid Canadians. And what
happened was all of a sudden, Prince Harry and Megan
Markle show up and they showed them fifty friggin times
sitting there. Good, They're like gooey about oh, look royalties here.

Speaker 2 (21:44):
Well, I mean not technically right, I guess maybe once
a princes, always a prince. But what was so.

Speaker 1 (21:52):
Frustrating about it is clearly they jinxed the American team
and they cannot be allowed in sporting events anymore unless
it's like, I don't know, the Chiefs taken on some
team from somewhere, but I'm not going to allow them
to do this. Remember the Canadians still their monarch is
considered his father, so a little bit of biased there.

(22:14):
But what was crazy about it is they kept going
back and being like, ohlways, look, look, how oh it's
Harry and Megan and I don't know if you saw
or heard on Twitter who was sitting right behind him
the whole time, Sandy Kofax. It's a freaking Dodgers World
Series and you're spending your time ignoring the fact that
Sandy Kofax is sitting right there so that you can

(22:37):
show Megan and Harry there.

Speaker 2 (22:39):
Just obnoxious.

Speaker 1 (22:40):
And it was even more obnoxious when because you know
they're gonna sing the American and Canadian national anthem. Pretty
standard when you have a team from another country, and
of course they had to woke afy that here is
the beginning of the anthem.

Speaker 2 (22:56):
See if you can pick up on the word that
was changed.

Speaker 5 (22:58):
Oh are on neighty?

Speaker 1 (23:11):
So he he changed and to on see what he
did there? He did a Land acknowledge. He slipped a
Land acknowledgement up in there, just to just to you know,
politicize the uh the World series, which.

Speaker 2 (23:27):
By the way, what do they have? What do they have?

Speaker 1 (23:30):
One World series? How many world series do just Canada
titles have one?

Speaker 2 (23:36):
Right?

Speaker 1 (23:38):
And then we have running the number ross. Would you
see if America has more World series titles than Canada?

Speaker 2 (23:44):
Yeah, let me check.

Speaker 3 (23:45):
We do? We do? Yes?

Speaker 2 (23:46):
Oh okay by just a little though, right, no, by
a lot? Oh wow?

Speaker 1 (23:51):
Okay, all right, I mean it's not obscene like there's
some teams that have like twenty it's ridiculous. Oh no, okay,
all right, well then shut up and sing it right.
I know it's your anthem, but you're stay out on
American soil and we're not doing Land acknowledgments before America's game. Okay,
all right, we clear on this. But yeah, so now

(24:14):
it's tied to too, which if you're into everything's rigged,
then you would argue that they just want to get
it to seven games to maximize profits. But you know,
it's not like anyone's paranoid about rigged sports right now,
so I'm sure nobody else had.

Speaker 2 (24:29):
That thought crossed their mind yesterday.

Speaker 1 (24:32):
All Right, So remember I mentioned yesterday there was just
there was There's so many bad takes, and it was
really painful to watch any of the Democrats being interviewed
on CNN. I saw like two or three of them
because they, you know, they're running this narrative that Trump
can just magically pull money out. Well ironically, at the
same time, they're like, oh, you know, we can, let's

(24:54):
figure out how to make up the shortfall. They have
a new attack on the the funding of the truth
pay Okay, if this is true, I think we're going to.

Speaker 2 (25:05):
Have to raise some money.

Speaker 1 (25:07):
So remember I told you yesterday that the one hundred
and thirty million that came via private donor was from
this the guy from the Mellon banking family.

Speaker 3 (25:15):
Right.

Speaker 2 (25:15):
He lives in Wyoming, actually.

Speaker 1 (25:17):
And so he pooning up the money's one hundred and
thirty million so the US military wouldn't.

Speaker 2 (25:21):
Miss their last payroll.

Speaker 1 (25:24):
And then the New York Times decided they were going
to do a takedown piece of the guy for doing
nothing more than making sure the troops were paid. Well,
you know, the Atlantic, they got to get in on this.
So here is the new hot take from Anne Applebaum
is one of the Atlantic writers. If he is privately
paying the troops, then they aren't America's troops, is basically

(25:47):
her argument. So you're telling me that if I can,
if I can cobble together one hundred and thirty million dollars,
I get the US military's mind for two weeks ross
you know much stuff we could do two weeks with
the full force in control of the US military, Like

(26:08):
how many countries you won?

Speaker 2 (26:09):
How many rosses stand?

Speaker 4 (26:11):
I'm not thinking about country. I'm thinking about a house,
one specifically around Chapel Hill owned by Michael, my buddy.
Who I'm gonna bold.

Speaker 2 (26:17):
When you're gonna bulldoze? Oh you ain't bulldozing no more?
You got more? Do you go rail gun or I'm
I'm open to all the options.

Speaker 1 (26:27):
I think you got a moabbot, then rail gun. It
just to be sure. So what is what the hell
are you talking about?

Speaker 2 (26:37):
Woman?

Speaker 1 (26:38):
Oh?

Speaker 2 (26:38):
Well that that they aren't. America's true. In fact, you
know what, here's the deal, what's hold on?

Speaker 1 (26:45):
Because it would be ridiculous to think that I could
raise one hundred and thirty million dollars for two weeks
of the I don't need two weeks, Like I think
we can do your buddy's house in a day and
a small country.

Speaker 2 (26:54):
Would you agree? I think so?

Speaker 3 (26:56):
Yes?

Speaker 1 (26:57):
All right, So now so let's take yeah, yeah, let's
go fourteen divided by or excuse me, I'm stupid. Let's
go one hundred and thirty million. Very important stuff going
on here, divided by fourteen for the payroll. So look
for ten million for nine point three million dollars, which

(27:20):
is much more reasonable. We can cut we got the whole,
We had the military for a day. That would be amazing.
Under the theory from this dumb writer from the UH,
I've never seen people so mad that somebody stepped And
you know, the irony of this is what is the
left always complaining about, as as it pertains to rich

(27:41):
people their fair share. Right, this dude stroked a check
for one hundred and thirty million dollars and you're mad
at him for doing the thing you're always saying that
he should do and other billionaires should do. Basically, give
you all their money, as much of their money as
you can squeeze out of him. He just poning it

(28:01):
up and now we're doing multiple hit pe. All well,
then nuts the US not the US military. It's a
blah blah. You know, it's Melon's military, absolute insanity. All right,
six fifty one, hang on, but we will be chatting
with a congressman who apparently everything is shut down. I

(28:22):
was told that they're not working, but he's still going
to do the interview. So that's crazy. Maybe the Democrats
are lying to me. Brad not will join us. That'll
be one hour from now. And yeah, obviously we'll get
into shutdown this new emergency fund strategy. The lawsuits now
by attorney generals, including our own or attorneys general anyway,

(28:46):
that'll be coming up in an hour. I saw this man,
and look again, I am pro not having violence in
our politics. I feel like, for whatever reason, a lot
more people are not having that position, and you know,
the Charlie Kirk thing would be the best example there.

(29:09):
That being said, I did chuckle a little when I
saw this story out of Durham yesterday.

Speaker 2 (29:15):
Now if you guys, they had a U and I
can't remember all of the way in which they acquire
or arrived at this ranking.

Speaker 1 (29:26):
But Durham I saw a lists or the city of Durham.
I think one of the big things was as a
percentage of voters registered Democrat or a left leaning political party.
So I'm sure Democrats, Socialist of America is in there,
maybe Green, I don't know, but Durham was like in
the top five. And if you spend some time in Durham,

(29:47):
you real quick you'll yeah, ad a mass probably right, Okay,
And that's fine. Durham can go ahead and do what
Durham wants to do. However, the problem is mixed into
that ecosystem is a bunch of these far left Antifa
or Antifa want to be violent leftists man, and they

(30:10):
are just they are. They are just as likely to
sit there and you know, roll of fate, guillotine out,
which is a thing that happened in that case. It
was about Trump and I think it was the first
no kings, right or one of I don't know, they
all blend together, right, So you got you got all
that going out there. Well, now, lawmakers in Durham members

(30:33):
of the City Council are getting some of the same
treatment and they're not dealing well with it. Headline dangerous
social media posts sparked concern in Durham ahead of election day.
Leaders in Durham are sounding the alarm about political rhetoric
they believe could incite violence. Social media posts have alluded

(30:53):
to the guillotine and place candidates faces on wanted posters.
Remember these are leftists attacking leftists. Understand what you're getting here, man, How.

Speaker 2 (31:08):
Do I know that? Well?

Speaker 1 (31:11):
They literally they know who's doing the post. Ashley Robbins
is the one behind the post. She manages a community
fridge and ran for office in the primary. She said,
I wasn't calling for anyone to be harmed. On the contrary,
I was pointing out how the things that they sponsor
and support actually cause harmed other people one line at
the end of the post on the Bull City Vanguard Facebook.

(31:32):
So the guillotines ain't being dragged out fast enough for me. So,
you know, people reveling in this and this is look,
this is like you know what it's like. I can't
remember which of the Silence of the Lambs movies it Russ.

Speaker 2 (31:48):
What's the one with the pigs where they eat the dude?
Is that Hannibal?

Speaker 1 (31:52):
I think that's Hannibal. No, maybe it's not hand it's
one of them, but if you remember, it's the guy
who lives in the Biltmore's faces all chewed up because uh,
you know, Lecter got him to carve it off on
drugs one time, and so he wanted revenge. And his
revenge is he wanted to get Hannibal Lecter captured, brought
to his estate, and he had a bunch of pigs

(32:14):
and pigs will eat you man. And spoiler alert, at
the end of the movie, he falls into the pig
pen there in this little arena and and he's in
a wheelchair, so like there's nothing he can do, and
the pigs eat him. That's what's happening in Durham Man. Now, again,
I don't want anybody to get harmed, and I don't

(32:36):
feel that rhetoric like this is particularly helpful, especially in
an era where we've seen people more than willing to
take it beyond the rhetoric up to it, including assassinations.
So like I understand that, but like you guys kept
feeding the pigs. What I mean, what did you think
was gonna happen, especially when there's already infighting within the

(33:00):
Democrat Party, right, That's why that's, you know, part and
parcel of this whole shutdown where you have the Montdamie
and AOC wing and then you got the Chuck Schumer
Nancy Pelosi wing, and it's getting down right nasty. So
maybe you shouldn't have fed the pigs or train the
pigs to eat the people, because that's kind of what's

(33:20):
going on here. It looks like, oh, let's see here.
Robins went on to say, I would not do anything differently.
I didn't call for anyone to be harmed. I'm simply
pointing out y'all are harming people. Then they're calling for
denouncements whatever. Again, it's like super predictable, which is I

(33:45):
think why people think we have psychic powers, because we
can see the obvious.

Speaker 2 (33:49):
What is going on here?

Speaker 3 (33:51):
All right?

Speaker 1 (33:51):
Hold on, somebody sent me something really weird. Oh I
already have that, sir. If it's really weird, I probably
already have it. All right, So let me get back
to the as the audio boy, he boy, Where should
we start here? Oh, let's start right here, Jasmine Crockett.
I told you, like, the interviews are not going well
for the Moonbats yesterday, and it's and it's because this

(34:14):
this last minute position.

Speaker 2 (34:16):
That's that. So here here's how it went down.

Speaker 1 (34:19):
Somebody found a us DA document, uh from just a
few months ago actually, and it's it's one of these
busy work documents.

Speaker 2 (34:30):
It's it's you know, and there's one.

Speaker 1 (34:32):
Page in there where the author of the document arrives
at an opinion that if if it was mid but
if it was mid budgeting cycle and they ran out
of funds for food stamps, then it would be appropriate
to pull from any existing emergency funds, specifically the one

(34:52):
they identified that's got six billion dollars in it. The
a couple problems with that. This is not a mid
budgeting issue.

Speaker 2 (35:01):
We're at the end of.

Speaker 1 (35:02):
This is the continuation to get to the fix because
the current budget cycle had ended. So it's not exactically
the same thing, because they recognized that mid budgeting cycle
is very different where and the reasons for the money
running out, like maybe you had a famine or something
and it overwhelmed the system and then you would draw
from it. That's not what's happening here that is a

(35:25):
fail safe, and it is an opinion of a fail safe.

Speaker 2 (35:27):
Right.

Speaker 1 (35:27):
These are just people rendering some legal opinions, and they
are not necessary. They're just opinions. They're not necessarily the law.
There's somebody interpreting what they think the law would allow.
We're not in mid budgeting cycle, so that's not triggered.
We have the opportunity, should seven Democrats decide to vote
with Republicans in the Senate that this thing's fixed.

Speaker 2 (35:50):
You will.

Speaker 1 (35:51):
You don't raid your rainy day fund when something is
fixable in a very simple manner otherwise, But that's the
argument they've latched onto so that they can try to
flip this and claim it's Republicans. And that's why people
like Jeff Jackson is actually wanting to play his audio
first are AG colluded with eleven of his fellow Democrat

(36:11):
AG buddies and they all filed a lawsuit over this,
not because not for any reason other than to be
part of this plan to flip the blame, which again
I still think a larger part of this shutout too,
is also to manipulate elections that are about to happen.

Speaker 2 (36:30):
To really, especially in Virginia.

Speaker 1 (36:32):
Like, I buy into that theory, or at the very
least it's crossed somebody's mind that that's probably helpful because
you've got a bunch of really angry angry at the GOP.
You know DC area workers right that are ninety some percentile,
Maybe not all the outliers, but they're very, very very.

Speaker 2 (36:51):
To the left.

Speaker 1 (36:53):
That they just want to punish some Republicans and so
win some seers. I guess would be the person publish
you punish there and everybody else.

Speaker 2 (37:00):
So I do buy into that.

Speaker 1 (37:01):
Here's Jeff Jackson, who's part of this almost reco esque
planned to waste your money.

Speaker 6 (37:08):
You are about to see a lot of headlines about
something and it's going to affect millions of people. I'm
the Attorney General for North Carolina, and we, along with
all fifty states, just got a letter from the Department
of Agriculture. This is the department that runs the SNAP program,
which is our country's big food assistance program, and they

(37:28):
are essentially shutting it down next week. The letter tells
us not to provide food assistance to anyone starting November first.

Speaker 1 (37:36):
That okay, And by the way, he's being a little
He's been a lot dishonest here. But what they're saying
is they're not saying that the state of North Carolina
if they felt like it couldn't fund something.

Speaker 2 (37:47):
What he's telling them is that if you do this,
you cannot.

Speaker 1 (37:50):
Then we're not going to transfer the money because the
government's shut down and the money hasn't been allocated because
we're again we're at the end of a budget cycle.
There are no allocated dollars at this point. So if
you do this, you will not be reimbursed. That's what
they're saying, because that is technically accurate.

Speaker 6 (38:06):
Sixteen million kids one in four in our country, six
hundred thousand just in North Carolina. Children make up almost
half the entire SNAP program, the average.

Speaker 1 (38:19):
Have you stopped to wonder why that might be too?
Not to mention the fact that ross were yourshocked to
learn forty two million people are getting free food?

Speaker 2 (38:29):
Forty million? What's that? That sounds like way too many?
Way what are we doing here?

Speaker 1 (38:38):
And I'm not surprised it's a bunch of kids because
a lot of these households will are overwhelmed, they claim,
because they have so many kids. Never mind how they
acquired all those kids. So yeah, you're going to have
a you're going to have an over representation of kids
because there's just more of them when you're dealing with,
you know, like a single parent with four kids or
whatever it may be. Even a struggling couple with multi

(38:59):
you know, with the three kids is now outpacing the
number of adults you get.

Speaker 6 (39:04):
The GIST benefit is about one hundred and eighty dollars
a month, and the Department says it is stopping all
payments because of the government shutdown and a lack of funds.
But the truth is they have the money. They have
a six billion dollar emergency fund.

Speaker 1 (39:19):
Right so, yeah, for if we're attacked or Melissa decides
to be a Cat seven and then devastate something, that's
what that money's for.

Speaker 2 (39:28):
It's not for things that are incredibly fixable.

Speaker 6 (39:30):
And you know, Congress gave them for exactly the situation,
not to make sure that kids don't go hungry. Are
choosing not to use that fund, and I believe the
reason they're doing that is to ratchet up the pain
for the shutdown. This is a political move and that's
too egal when Congress give the.

Speaker 2 (39:49):
Straight face that's a political move on their part.

Speaker 6 (39:52):
A department money to fund a program. The department can't
just refuse to fund it. That would be the same
as the department overriding Congress. And they don't get to
do that, so they.

Speaker 1 (40:03):
But they do because the money has been allocated for
a specific purpose, and that is one that you're right
is somewhat malleable. But it's the part where you can
fix this another way. You can't fix another way a
hurricane that rolls up the entirety of North Carolina, right

(40:24):
or God forbid some other larger emergency. And six billion
dollars isn't even that much money in the grand scheme
of government things. So he knows this, he doesn't care.
He loves doing the TikTok video. So he's right at
home in his element here lying through his teeth. And
I know they're lying because during the entirety of the
government shutdown, nobody ever brought this up. Ever, if this

(40:49):
is clearly a thing that everyone knew was a thing,
and now it's supposed to, let's use it for the thing,
why were Democrats not out calling for it at any
point up to this. No, they put a team of
researchers together said find us any loophole.

Speaker 2 (41:05):
We got to spin this. The pr is going badly
for us.

Speaker 6 (41:07):
Hey, I and a number of ages are taking the
development to court. I've seen the discussion online over the
last week about the SNAP program, and we should be
talking about why so many kids need food assistance, which
to eat by all means, let's get to the root
cause of that, because it's not good. But you know
what else isn't good? Causing a massive hunger crisis among

(41:30):
children starting next week.

Speaker 1 (41:32):
Yeah, what your party is doing, which you and Josh
Stein are firmly on board with based on the rhetoric
I've seen from you guys, because it's all about this
is all about politics, one percent politics, and if you
want to say, the Republicans about politics too, to the
extent that there's politicians involved, all agree with you, but

(41:55):
they're not doing anything other than offering the clean resolution.
Some number in the teens just patently dishonest. And then
you got to send idiots like Reuben Diego out, the
senator from Arizona. There, I saw him getting torched, and

(42:16):
the Jasmine Crockets of the world.

Speaker 7 (42:18):
Do you believe this will be the week that Congress
comes to an agreement?

Speaker 8 (42:21):
Here?

Speaker 9 (42:22):
I have no idea. I mean, you started off talking
about the fact that the president is in Japan. The
president has time to do everything, but what he needs
to focus on. In fact, we heard the Press secretary
say that his main priority is the ballroom.

Speaker 1 (42:36):
The ballroom that no one, by the way, this is
a lie, is one of the sub lies floating around
this week.

Speaker 2 (42:43):
So my top priority is this. That is not what
was saying.

Speaker 9 (42:46):
To ask for the ballroom that requires him to destroy
historic pieces of the White House, and so it doesn't
seem like he's interested.

Speaker 7 (42:56):
And that context of the comment from Caroline Lovett, she
was out if the president was working on any other
renovations when it came to the White House, and she
was saying his focus was the ballroom.

Speaker 2 (43:06):
But but you look at that.

Speaker 1 (43:07):
You just got fact checked by CNN who said exactly
what it was.

Speaker 2 (43:14):
That is that is what it was.

Speaker 1 (43:15):
It was literally talking about renovation projects and probably which
makes sense, right, That's gonna be your biggest rental project
that I'm aware of.

Speaker 2 (43:24):
So, yeah, that you believe this will be the week
excellently clicked that.

Speaker 1 (43:29):
Yeah, I mean, just to share and Sandy, meanwhile, tiktoks
like this one continue to permeate social media, and I
think people are wondering what's gonna happen on Saturday.

Speaker 2 (43:41):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (43:42):
By the way, Uh, this woman has a challenge for you.
I'm curious what you.

Speaker 8 (43:45):
Think if I came in your house with all my bags,
kicking out all your food, deep freezer snacks, your grandmama's
milk and everything.

Speaker 2 (43:55):
What you're gonna do?

Speaker 4 (43:57):
I'm curious.

Speaker 2 (43:58):
I mean, there's not gonna do if I will to.

Speaker 8 (44:01):
Walk in your house and go grocery shopping.

Speaker 1 (44:03):
In your Yeah, I don't know. I feel like I
have some thoughts. I'm not going to share them, I
think to other people. Probably just to be clear, you said,
what would you do if I broke into your house
with bags and started stealing all your stuff? What would
you do?

Speaker 10 (44:21):
Like?

Speaker 1 (44:22):
People are helpless in that situation. I don't think you're
going to like what some people would be willing to do?
And are they recyclable bags, ma'am? Think of the earth
and we'll be back. Cool Jordan yesterday as part of
the NBA on NBC halftime show, and they asked him
about a if you guys know what load management is?

Speaker 2 (44:44):
All right?

Speaker 1 (44:44):
So this is this is a thing in the NBA,
not just the NBA, but the NBA is clearly what
we're talking about. And this is where you have players
who are perfectly healthy, who are just sitting on the bench, right,
and it's like, all right, load management, right, we don't
want to overwork them.

Speaker 2 (45:01):
So they're asking Jordan about this concept.

Speaker 1 (45:03):
And as you can imagine, Jordan is not a fan
of this concept for a few reasons.

Speaker 9 (45:08):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (45:08):
He it was, he said a lot.

Speaker 1 (45:09):
But let me just paraphrase two things he said. Uh,
this is more of a quote. He said, well, you
shouldn't need it. First and foremost, you know, I never
wanted to miss a game because it was an opportunity
to prove something. I want to impress the guy way
up on top, the guy who worked his butt off
to get a ticket, or you know, he gave us
money to buy that ticket. I don't want him to
feel like screwed on that Deal's essentially what Jordan's saying.

(45:32):
And uh, and he also points out that it disrupts synergy.
And he you know, he talks about if you have
the same five guys on the court most of the time,
you develop, you know, the ability more. No look passes
you know where everyone's going to be. Who's going to
pick up the screen, what's good? You know what's going
to be happening out there. And the more repetitive you are,
because now it's in gameplay, the better you're going to.

Speaker 2 (45:53):
Be at that.

Speaker 1 (45:54):
That makes one hundred percent six sense to me. So
that's not the story, because Jordan's said that before. I
read the quote to Ross and he's like, Jordan said
that way. He has said that before. He's got opinions
on this. No, what absolutely burned me is the responses,
generally from younger NBA fans who called him an old head,

(46:15):
which I'm not even sure contextually how you're supposed to
use that. I have heard it, but basically he doesn't
know what he's talking about. Today's NBA is different, telling
Michael Jordan. So if Michael Jordan can't have an opinion,
you who never played NBA, your opinion overrides that even

(46:36):
if you did play NBA for like a year, Michael Jordan,
I'm still going to take his his thoughts because again,
his second point makes sense.

Speaker 2 (46:45):
His first point is exactly the drive that allowed him
to do what he was able to do.

Speaker 1 (46:53):
What are if you watch like a reel of ten,
like Jordan's ten Greatest Moments. They're just overcoming adversity. They're
overcoming you know, simple things, sometimes the flu game right
where normally, even in his era, they'd be like, yeah,
you should go ahead and sit this one out. And
he's like, Nah, that dude probably paid some money. I'm
gonna go in, I'm gonna drop sixty or you know

(47:16):
all the rest of the lore surrounding this guy. But
for young fans to just got he's old and nobody's
talking about I suspect there's not any NBA players who
would sign on to that, just because they are actually
in the biz and they recognize.

Speaker 2 (47:31):
But who knows, man, maybe Lebron constantly picking on him.

Speaker 1 (47:38):
But yeah, man, this what a what a horrible response
to a perfectly reasonable take. And uh and yet here
we are all right back to the audio because like
I said, we got oodles of it today. So uh
oh this is interesting. So Jonathan Carl ebe, she knew
Jonathan Carl. He's got a book out, so of course

(47:58):
he's doing the uh in the rounds. Everyone's got a book.
Everyone's got a book and saw everything but saw nothing.
And but there was a rather interesting little anecdote here
of when Trump won, and again it highlights the difference
inaccessibility between Biden and Trump, where good luck getting a
question and on Biden, these reporters, even the reporters he

(48:21):
calls fake news all day, have his direct They have
his cell phone number.

Speaker 2 (48:29):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (48:29):
Who was was it? Dana Bash who was just talking
about this the other week. She's like, I just call
him any answers, He answers and he talks to me. Well,
Jonathan Carl had that experience. However, it's really funny the
way that Trump played it.

Speaker 2 (48:43):
Check this out.

Speaker 9 (48:44):
You opened the book by writing about a phone call
you made to Trump the morning he won. Can you
tell us about that conversation and what resonated with you.

Speaker 11 (48:52):
So I started to have a series of phone calls
with Donald Trump, beginning right after the attempted assassination in Butler,
where I called him, you know, just to say horrified
about what happened. I'm glad you're okay. So we have
a series of conversations. The election happens, he wins and
wins big, you know election. You know what it's like.
We are on all night on ABC. We're tracking all

(49:14):
the returns. We finally get off at like four in
the morning, but then you have to go and you
have to be there for Good Morning America. And it's
like there's no so there's no sleep. So I get
back into my hotel finally after Good Morning America a
little after seven in the morning, and I do something
kind of silly. I call Donald Trump. I mean, he
just went and then there's.

Speaker 2 (49:31):
No way he's going to pick up. But I figured I.

Speaker 11 (49:33):
Would just leave him a message like after all this,
congratulations you want you got you know you want. And
he picks up and his voice, I mean, he sound
and he hadn't slept at all. I hadn't, I mean,
but he oh, Jonathan and and he and I said,
mister President elect, I just want to say congratulations, and he.

Speaker 12 (50:00):
On what Jonathan on what?

Speaker 2 (50:03):
I was like, say it.

Speaker 11 (50:05):
Have you ever seen Breaking Bad? There's a great scene.
No no, no, I mean it's like there's there's a
famous scene in Breaking Bad, Breaking yeah, wor it's like,
say my name, say my name, And he says, so
I said on the on the greatest comeback victory and
history of American politics. But he wanted to hear me

(50:26):
say the words.

Speaker 2 (50:27):
Wow, I'm sorry.

Speaker 1 (50:29):
I think that's hilarious, and people are like, oh see,
he's a dictator. No, he's a dude screw with another dude.
That's pure, that's that's take it out of the realm
of what it is. That's a dude screw with another
dude with no sleep at damn near eighty and running.

Speaker 2 (50:48):
Sorry, say go ahead, say what it is, say it.
Say it. And by the way, Ross, I also don't
believe one of those chicks knew anything about breaking bad
even though she went yeah, oh yeah, because they weren't
even letting him get to his point. Yeah, no, it was.

Speaker 1 (51:04):
That might be one of the favorite antecdotes I've heard
from one of these book pushers. Also, Jonathan Carl didn't
notice anything about Biden except he did, but then nobody
believed him or something.

Speaker 2 (51:14):
I don't know. I didn't pull that part because I
really don't care for people now trying to profit off
a willful ignorance for political purposes. But you know that's
just me.

Speaker 1 (51:25):
Hey, speaking of chameleons, I got some new some audio.
We're going to get into that in the final segment
of this hour. Then, of course we'll chat with the
Congressman Brad Not. That'll be coming up at eight five,
so we will get to that. We'll chat with Ray
obviously here in just a moment.

Speaker 2 (51:45):
I'm a little early.

Speaker 1 (51:46):
I just wanted real quickly to throw this out there.
So the decimation of our childhood's cabal of wrestlers, unfortunately
may soon have a another another one bit the dust.
Mike Rotunda, who was a w W Hall of Famer.

(52:08):
If you don't know who that is, you know him
as Irwin Sister, Irwin R Schister, I should say I
R S reportedly has been placed in hospice care according
to multiple reports. How old is Rotunda? Sixty seven? Do
we know what?

Speaker 2 (52:26):
What? What is it? Cancer?

Speaker 1 (52:27):
Is it something else? I haven't seen anything Rotunda? What
was what was the what was their original tag team?
Oh us express?

Speaker 2 (52:37):
Right?

Speaker 4 (52:37):
Well yeah, but he's most famous for being I R
S and for tag teaming up with Ted Dbiassi.

Speaker 2 (52:42):
They were money inc Yeah, money in.

Speaker 4 (52:44):
I mean, I was such a good villain. But as
a kid I didn't really understand it. But as an adult,
what an amazing character to have somebody portraying the I
R S in the ring.

Speaker 1 (52:52):
Yeah, dude, Yeah, then to team up with Ted Dbiassi
and you know, billion Dollar Man.

Speaker 4 (52:58):
People have said, and I agree with it. It was
a mistake that they never like teamed him up with
the Undertaker to be Death in Taxes. Oh, that would
have been amazing, right.

Speaker 2 (53:08):
Yeah. How much crossover was there in their careers between
him and Undertaker? Yeah, I mean they wrestled at the
same time, so it could have happened. It just didn't. Okay.

Speaker 1 (53:19):
By the way, Uh, the Money Inc. Won three tag
team titles and faced Hulk Hogan and Brutus Beefcake the
tag team championship in ninety three. Oh that's right. He
did then change to Walt what was it VK wall Street. Yeah,
he had another identity after IRS. I forgot about that. Well,

(53:42):
there you go, and I didn't realize. So it's his
son wrestles too. Bo Dallas. See, I'm so unplugged with
everything that's going on now. You know why, because you'll
never top the era of wrestling the Ross and I
grew up in It's unattainable seven forty four rastagic weather.

Speaker 2 (53:59):
Chail Here, dude, I'm.

Speaker 1 (54:02):
Telling you man, so that I was reading this article
in your post this morning about these stupid social media
influencers who saw that the hurricane was coming to Jamaica,
so they flew to Jamaica. They're hold up in four
star resorts in the grill, and the staff is still
having to come into work, and they're just making TikTok
videos about oh woe is me and my vacation got ruined.

(54:24):
These idiots were posting themselves in the airport in Miami,
go me and my girlies fly into our hurricane vacation.

Speaker 2 (54:31):
I hate these people. I hate them so much.

Speaker 12 (54:35):
I mean, fly into a hurricane. Face the consequences, right.

Speaker 1 (54:40):
Well, their consequences are making a bunch of Jamaicans have
to staff this resort rather than being able to, you know,
be with their families. It's it's really pugnant, man.

Speaker 2 (54:49):
And let me tell you, judging by the stuff, the
video and stuff I saw yesterday, not a good decision
on their part. Now not.

Speaker 12 (54:58):
And you know plenty of superlatives. I'll just go through
a couple of them. Second strongest Atlantic hurricane on record.
Gilbert's Peak was the last major to hit Jamaica, and
this one's only behind one hundred and ninety miles per
hour Hurricane Allen, which did not make landfall at that intensity.
So at one eighty five, second all time strongest in

(55:21):
the Atlantic Basin, strongest storm in the world this year,
and tied for third lowest pressure with a Labor Day
hurricane of nineteen thirty five. So yeah, a lot of things,
and then ripping up the eastern end of Cuba two
and now getting ready to go into the southeastern Bahamas.
So influencers stay home, do not go to the Southeastern Bahamas.

Speaker 2 (55:40):
Or go where all of you go? Yeah, so all
of you go. That's right. What are we doing, Camp hob.

Speaker 12 (55:49):
Yeah, I mean you might want to retreat for the
weather here starting later this afternoon or this afternoon from
west east into tonight and tomorrow. But then after we
get past that, it's going to be great, as we
do have some rain coming in. Why they scattered around
though probably early to bit afternoon try it and spreading
east through the afternoon and tonight that's when most of
it comes. We'll stay in a little bit fifties today. Tonight,

(56:10):
we'll probably stay in the fifties as temperatures hold steady
with occasional rain, maybe even a rumble of thunder and
some showers and fog tomorrow morning. So Tomorrow morning's going
to be a little bit slow, and then by the
afternoon we're going to be looking feeling much better. Upper fifties,
low sixties and a beautiful Halloween upper fifties, low sixties,
but a little bit of a west breeze, so a
little chili for trickor treaters on Friday evening, but sunshine

(56:32):
should prevail over the weekend with highs in the upper
fifties to a little bit sixties. Low's in the upper
thirties to low forties, so more typical weather for this
time of year starting Halloween and for Saturday and Sunday.

Speaker 1 (56:42):
All right, but you can't make it too cold because
then the slutty outfits get less sluty.

Speaker 2 (56:46):
So okay, let me write that down. I'm just thinking
about it, all right too, got it? Okay, knocking his
microphone over. All right, thank you, sir, appreciate it, all right?
From the weather channel.

Speaker 1 (57:00):
All right, seven forty seven, we're all going to learn
a new term in a moment called sexpionage. We'll do
it next hang on, Oh that is right, I forgot.
I apologize, Yeah, I r S's other son was bray White.
I did know that he died a few years ago,
so but I was surprised because I didn't know he.

Speaker 2 (57:20):
Had another son that wrestled. So my bad for leaving
that out.

Speaker 1 (57:23):
All right, So once again our Newsom the shape Shifter.
Let's go ahead and check in on Newsom the shape
Shifter because if you remember, one of the last interviews
that Charlie Kirk did was with Gavin Newsom, and a
lot of people were they were upset with Charlie for,
you know, for giving that guy any press. But you know,

(57:45):
Charlie's whole thing was to talk to people who clearly
was going to disagree with And during the interview, Newsom
said this to Charlie's face.

Speaker 6 (57:52):
Last night, trying to put my son to bed, He's like, no, Dad,
I just what time.

Speaker 2 (57:56):
What time's Charlie gonna be here? What time?

Speaker 12 (57:58):
And I'm like, dude, you're in school to he's thirteen.
He's like, no, no, no, this morning wakes up, it
sticks up, and he's like I'm coming. I'm like he
literally would not leave the house.

Speaker 2 (58:07):
Did you let him take off school? No he did,
of course not. He's not here for a good reason.

Speaker 12 (58:11):
But the point is the canceled school for two years.

Speaker 2 (58:13):
Once the point is the point, which is you are
making a damn dead.

Speaker 1 (58:19):
I'm all right, so you know that it's a compliment,
but not really, as you'll come to find out. And
that's a pretty good line from Charlie. He's like, well,
what do you mean you canceled school for two years?
You can't have a day off? That's funny.

Speaker 2 (58:33):
Well, apparently that probably didn't test well or something, because
Newsom said this yesterday.

Speaker 6 (58:38):
That's your son, obviously a fan of Charlie Kirk.

Speaker 12 (58:42):
What was the conversation like between you and your son?
After Charlie Kirk was assassinate.

Speaker 2 (58:46):
He called me.

Speaker 12 (58:47):
I don't know how he got a phone, but he
called me from school that day, really alarmed, and all
his friends were around the phone that wanted me to
about express or understand what was going on.

Speaker 2 (58:56):
He wanted to know if he was dead.

Speaker 3 (58:57):
He wasn't a.

Speaker 12 (58:58):
Fan of him as much as familiar with them.

Speaker 5 (59:01):
What.

Speaker 1 (59:01):
I'm sorry, So you are you lying now? Because for
whatever reason, people I don't know, people who have madged.
Maybe they got mad at your son, and which I
guess would be a more noble reason to lie about it,
but you still shouldn't lie or were you lying to
Charlie Kirk's face to ease that interview along, because that's

(59:23):
I think that's probably more likely just a smidge. I
have a really hard time with thinking it's the other
way around, just because of what we've seen with Newsome
over the years. Man guy is an absolute snake. But
there you go, so eight eight or actually, and let
me not give the phone number because we're gonna chat

(59:43):
with the congressman here in just a few minutes.

Speaker 2 (59:45):
All right, real quick, have you heard of these.

Speaker 10 (59:48):
Especially in Silicon Valley where men are so easily you know,
they easily targeted because they're very like, you know, Newdish
kind of like maybe they genie in IT and technology,
but definitely not in dating.

Speaker 1 (01:00:04):
So this is a honey trap or a honeypot, I
should say. This is a woman who claims that she
was part of a Russian plan.

Speaker 3 (01:00:13):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (01:00:13):
And the Chinese are also.

Speaker 1 (01:00:15):
On board with this, where they are flooding the zone
in Silicon Valley, right, so you throw a bunch of
Chinese or Russian hobbies in there. They cozy up to
some guy you know who's really really smart, got a
lot going on in you know, intellectually and clearly from
an intellectual property standpoint, and then they steal the information

(01:00:37):
that and they apparently it's a huge problem. They're calling
it sexpionage, which is not new, but targeting people in
Silicon Valley is a unique twist.

Speaker 10 (01:00:45):
They are very easy targets for those female agents who
know how to manipulate they on ego or they on
you know, perception about themselves how to do I.

Speaker 1 (01:00:58):
Will say this, I don't think a woman needs to
be a trained operative to figure out how to stroke ego. Apparently,
especially if you're really really hot and you're there for
the wrong reason.

Speaker 2 (01:01:09):
That's a self learned thing.

Speaker 10 (01:01:10):
Probably guy's lighting how to do like a whole like
love bumping. They're like so many techniques. The Russian male
agents who are very experienced, they would create a fake
account of a female a beautiful, you know, sexy, I
don't know whatever, like wearing bikini. So it's like kind

(01:01:33):
of like Eykatci.

Speaker 2 (01:01:34):
So this is both on a covet there, This is
both online and in person.

Speaker 1 (01:01:39):
It is T minus three days tell apparently, as I
have been reliably informed on TikTok grocery stores and even
people's own home fridges are going to be looted by
forty two MILLI well, I'm sure all of them won't,
but that's the threat over the foodstamp insanity. And to

(01:01:59):
talk about where we are, let's bring on a member
of Congress who was reliably also informed is not actually working.
Congressman Brad Not. How you doing this morning.

Speaker 3 (01:02:09):
Hey, ka, see I'm doing great.

Speaker 1 (01:02:11):
Whope you are, by the way, I'm doing great, And
I feel like I put you in this situation. But
I got to tell you, every week this goes on,
I'm learning about a new lunatic that you have to
work with. And the first district lady from New Mexico
is my new find.

Speaker 2 (01:02:29):
This week she was among.

Speaker 1 (01:02:31):
Three or four people I saw getting fact checked by
CNN over this food stamp of this EBT insanity. So
let's let's talk about this because the clearly they got
in a room and somebody found an old USDA report
and they're trying to flip the blame here. So this

(01:02:52):
is gonna get a little wonky. But what they're claiming is,
according to the USDA's own reporting, there is a six
billion rainy day fund right emergency fund and the even
listed specifically is something.

Speaker 2 (01:03:07):
That is to be used if there is mid budget
cycle needs.

Speaker 1 (01:03:12):
So I'm assuming that would mean like a famine. But
we're not in mid budget cycle, right, So explain this
to us like we're five And why have Democrats decided,
along with the NCAG and eleven others to sue the
Trump administration? Why are we only hearing about this plan now?
And what is its success?

Speaker 2 (01:03:30):
Do you think?

Speaker 3 (01:03:32):
Well, it's it's a good question, casey and consistent with
everything else, and this shut down, all of it is performative.
The unfortunate reality is that first every Democrat that is
complaining right now about a particular program, a particular department,
a particular expenditure voted to shut down the government thirteen times.

(01:03:56):
Thirteen times they voted against Biden era spending levels that
the Republicans put forward to shut down the government. Now,
there is zero legal precedent. Once the government has shut
down and the appropriations have lapsed, the funding has dried up,
which is what we were hoping to prevent. On the
Republican side, there is zero legal precedent to go in

(01:04:20):
and to cajole dollars out of various programs, and various departments.
Did they think that Congress thinks it's hidden away? Now,
the president has the authority to sort of triage national
interests and move dollars around. That's why he's been able
to He has been able to move some money around
to pay the military and to keep some programs up

(01:04:43):
and running for as long as he has. But that
money is running out. And this effort by the Democrat
ags Jeff Jackson and so on is nothing more than
a performative act to play for headlines. It has no basis.
In fact, it has no basis and precedent. They will fail,
and rather than playing these games, they should be encouraging

(01:05:06):
their colleagues and Congress to open the government back up.

Speaker 1 (01:05:10):
So let's say they because let's face it, congressman, they
can find a judge. Right, It's as we've seen, they
can find a judge if you know what I mean,
what if there is some initial success Republicans, because they
want to put you guys in a position where a
judge says, feed the kids. And now mean old Bradnott
and his colleagues want to starve kids again, and so

(01:05:33):
they're going to sue. Essentially back to the Trump administration
will back that's the performative part.

Speaker 2 (01:05:37):
That's the positioning they're going for.

Speaker 3 (01:05:40):
Yes, that's right, there's no question about what they're going for.
But that's that does not get in the way of
the fact that every Democrat in Congress minus seven or
right of them voted to prevent these programs from functioning.
When funding lapses. There truly is an the pot we

(01:06:01):
cannot borrow, We cannot replenish us the coffers, we cannot
go forward. That's why government workers are not getting paid.
That's why the military will not will not be paid.
That's why law enforcement is not getting paid. There is
truly a hold because the money has run out. There
is no funding of the government. And uh, they may
find a judge, but yes, the judge's order, I mean

(01:06:25):
I could I could get a judge to say every
person deserves a brand new car in an hour, Well,
reality will strike and that's going to be impossible, right,
So they may find a judge and it and and
if the opinion is reached that there's gonna be an
order to get these programs up and started, it won't
have any effect. And very soon thereafter they will probably

(01:06:49):
be an appeal just on a procedural level, and and
and it'll be overturned. They'll say, well, so to open
the government back up and the program will start uh immediately.
So that's that's where we are. It's a bunch of nonsense.
The Democrats are still playing games. It's actually interesting. Kapy
even CNN admitted that Republican polling has increased over the

(01:07:11):
last ten days. In Congress, Democrats have decreased, and that's
because the American people are realizing that this is purely
a performative political act. On behalf of the Democrats who
are panicking for two reasons. First, it is obvious to
everyone that their party is being surrendered to the radical

(01:07:34):
Marxist leftist wing of the country. Look at Mandami, look
at the boss in Congress AOC. There is more energy,
more dollars, more focus on that side of the party.
Hakim Jeffries and Chuck Schumer exit stage left. And then secondly,
they are petrified of the President's successes. I mean he

(01:07:54):
has come in, he inherited a dumpster fire at home
and abroad, and bit by bit he checking off huge
priorities with the American people at home and through foreign policy.
And so this is just something to take the narrative
and to try to score a political win. The American
people are seeing right.

Speaker 2 (01:08:11):
Through it the dangerous the dangerous nature of some of
the stuff. Now, look, people make tiktoks for a variety
of reasons. But I absolutely believe because people are able
to morally justify things these days that I thought were
unmorlly justifiable, right i e. Celebrating Charlie Kirk's death or something.

Speaker 1 (01:08:31):
So the idea that somebody would who has this entitlement attitude,
who thinks it is the government's job to feed their kids,
or to feed them, or to provide them these benefits,
The idea that they would go and loot a grocery
store and create the possibility of an interaction that could
lead to somebody getting killed. Man, if an officer thinks

(01:08:52):
somebody's pulling a weapon, it's the height of irresponsibility.

Speaker 2 (01:08:56):
What's your concern?

Speaker 1 (01:08:57):
Do you think that this is a game of and
Democrats will be willing to do a vote on Friday?

Speaker 2 (01:09:04):
Or are we going to do this?

Speaker 3 (01:09:05):
I don't you know. It's a good question, casey, And
I'll say this, there is an arsonist mentality in the
Democratic Party metaphorically where they will truly side with anything
other than the GOP and President Trump. If there is
a law enforcement vehicle that is going to retrieve known
criminals who are in the country illegally, what do we see.

(01:09:28):
We see federal and state officials on the Democratic side
encouraging riotous acts against Ice, throwing rocks, throwing bricks, assaulting
law enforcement officers, docking the ICE agents. Assaults and violent
acts have gone up a thousand percent with the blessing
of the Democratic Party, whether it's the Democratic Party in California,

(01:09:52):
the Northeast Illinois, Pritzker, Hochel, Newsom, the whole gang. And
then there are people that I serve with that truly
on the record, compare Ice to the Gestapo is disgusting.
It is disgusting. And so there is an open fanning
of the flames and a willingness to truly burn the

(01:10:14):
house down if that's the means that they deem most
effective to resisting Trump. And so I am absolutely concerned
that there are constituencies in the country who will be manipulated,
who will be encouraged to embrace lawlessness, as we have
seen time and time again, whether it was George Floyd,
or whether it was election protests from the left throughout

(01:10:36):
the country. And so my hope in Prairie is, honestly,
I mean, it gets a little bit road, it gets
a little bit repetitive, but we must get back to business.
Open the government, let's have the debates, let's try to
provide policy solutions in some of these issues, and let's
move on. And that's sort of where we are. I

(01:10:57):
don't know what else to say about it.

Speaker 2 (01:10:58):
Casey, you guys, you guys don't have to vote again, right,
you're good in the House, like the Senate.

Speaker 3 (01:11:04):
The only the only way that we would have to
vote again. And we're we're on a very short leash
insofar as the Speaker of the House can call us
back at a moment's notice. The original dates that we
sent over to the to the Senate gave us six
weeks from the point of passage to finish the appropriations

(01:11:25):
process that we're working through the House of Representatives again
formalizing a federal budget normal order. That six week time
period is about to lapse. And so whenever the Senate
votes on it and passes it, which I hope they will,
with the help of four or five Democrats, they will
basically have to just strike through the dates and plug
in a new timeframe. So instead of, you know, a

(01:11:48):
six weeks from the point of passage in the House,
they might stay through the end of the year twenty
twenty five or into twenty twenty six, whatever the Senate does,
and then we would go back and vote on that
to accept the change. Okactively, we're finished.

Speaker 2 (01:12:01):
You want that buffer time a minimum of six weeks
is your position?

Speaker 3 (01:12:06):
That's right, Okay, simply because again the appropriations process is
a committee, the Appropriations Committee, and the Democrats are fighting
every syllable in that committee. But they're almost finished their
normal course. They estimated they need six weeks to overcome
the obstruction and to finish the appropriations package.

Speaker 1 (01:12:24):
The amount of the amount of cell phone on all
of these fights that we've seen, especially in this his
second term from the usaid right where it's say, really
you want to get into this, and then we get
into it.

Speaker 2 (01:12:36):
And it's crazy.

Speaker 1 (01:12:37):
I think a lot of people let me ask you
two questions. Okay, let me ask them both to I
think a lot of people heard that forty two million
number and went, why are there forty two million people
getting assistance, and then to push back on that, I've
seen every Democrat pundit say the same thing. Actually they
looked at it, and the food stamp program is the

(01:12:59):
least of you use programs, less than one percent fraud.
And yet everybody seen these videos of people bragging about
how they're manipulating the system, they sell the benefits for
pennies on the dollar, all of these And so, no,
I don't believe that. Do you believe that forty two
million people is too many? And do you really believe

(01:13:22):
that it's the least abuse program in the government.

Speaker 3 (01:13:27):
In older cases? Yes, it's far too many. And there
is an effort to open up the treasury to buy
favor politically. It's the easiest recipe that there is. We
see it with Mondami, we see it with the Democrats
North Carolina, we see it with aac What is their platform.
We will take other people's money and buy your political support.
And of course it's abused. Look at what the Democrats

(01:13:50):
have assured the American people. They have assured the American
people not one federal dollar has gone to illegals for
health care. There is no such thing as voter fraud.
There is no such saying as COVID fraud. Well case,
when I was prosecuting cases, not only did I see
voter fraud with illegals voting in the country, I also
saw prisoners in the Dureau of Prisons working with their

(01:14:11):
networks to receive COVID lons. COVID checks everything that the
government touches, everything that the government touches, everything that the
private sector touches. Inherently there is fraud. So to say
there is no fraud, that is just a blanket lazy
excuse to justify a social welfare program that is a
vehicle to buy votes. If they were honest about it,

(01:14:33):
they would say we want to root out wherever the
fraud is, admitting that it's there. We can all see it.
We've all seen the videos. We know, just human nature,
there will be exploiters here. But yes, I think that
this is this is a great point that you raise.
We should have a more robust economy. If you're an
able bodied young person, you should be in the job market,
not at home, and you know, working towards self self

(01:14:57):
independence away from the government. Pro that should be the goal.
That is the goal of the Republicans. We made those
changes to medicaid. We've made those changes to entitlements. If
you're able bodied, you should aim to get off of
the doll and unfortunately that's not the policy positions of
the Democratic Party.

Speaker 1 (01:15:17):
Oh, by the you know, I was going to open
this interview with a question I completely forgot. Do you
mind if I circle back real quick? As Jen Psaki
would say, not a bit? Do you have the Nazi
tattoos that you've had for twenty years and don't know about?

Speaker 3 (01:15:29):
Not as I'm aware of.

Speaker 2 (01:15:31):
Okay, I don't have any tattoos. I don't all right,
all right.

Speaker 1 (01:15:35):
I just want to make sure you didn't actually get
a Nazi tattoo and then keep it for twenty years.

Speaker 2 (01:15:39):
This is just so much craziness.

Speaker 3 (01:15:40):
Can you imagine? Can you imagine if that candidate were
a Republican he said, I didn't know what I was doing,
and you know, it's no big deal, and look the
other way, and I'm going to get a Mickey mouth
cover just to make you forget about it.

Speaker 2 (01:15:52):
Mickey he would be laughing.

Speaker 3 (01:15:54):
Yeah, he'd be laughed. He'd be laughed out of the
not just the state, but the country. The party.

Speaker 1 (01:16:01):
They went after one of the I thinks it was
Virginia because they claimed she was a witch?

Speaker 2 (01:16:06):
Right remember that? Yeah, So like.

Speaker 1 (01:16:08):
Nothing surprised me, right, last question, It both can't be true.
I've seen accusations that Trump is handling you guys. He calls,
tells you what to do, and you're under his total control. Simultaneously, yesterday,
Jasmine Crockett accused Trump of being in Japan and not
caring or having any say in what's going on with
the shutdown.

Speaker 2 (01:16:27):
So which is it?

Speaker 1 (01:16:28):
Are you being micromanaged or is he wasting time over
over in Asia? Which, by the way, do you think
he's wasting time? I got ninety seconds first, No.

Speaker 3 (01:16:38):
This is one misconception. I want to clarify. He is
not micromanaging. He is leaving and he welcomes dessense, He
welcomes discussion, he welcomes debate. This issue, Miss Crockett, is
only about keeping the lights off the government funded or
giving into a trillion five of new spending that you
have demanded. That's a hard note for me. Get back

(01:17:00):
to work. Secondly, the President is leading tremendously abroad. He's
out maneuvering China, He's protecting American interest, he is boultering
our allies. He's boultering our standing. You know, to be
critical of the president's foreign policy is to be very,
very ignorant. And I couldn't be proud of the job
he's doing overseas right now.

Speaker 2 (01:17:23):
And I will say this, and I think it's a
guy thing, less the president thing.

Speaker 1 (01:17:26):
I think any dude who gets to walk into a
packed room to the Rocky theme, that's a pretty good day.

Speaker 3 (01:17:33):
I mean, it's unreal. He is truly ushering back American
leadership around the world, and we are all better off
because of it.

Speaker 2 (01:17:42):
Cotressman brad Not joining us this morning. All right, so
you guys are ready to do your part.

Speaker 1 (01:17:48):
We'll see what the Senate does, and the time ticks
by and to be a very interesting conversation in a
couple of weeks.

Speaker 2 (01:17:53):
I really appreciate it.

Speaker 3 (01:17:55):
All right, Thanks Kathy, Thank carey, there you go.

Speaker 1 (01:17:57):
Thank you to Congressman brad Not for joining us here
on the kc O Day radio program. Like they're not
even prepared to properly exploit it, but they don't feel
like they have to. It's one thing to say, well,
at least CNN is gonna fact check them. The problem
is most of the people who are whipped up about
this are probably not watching CNN, and so they're not

(01:18:19):
gonna they're not gonna see the moment where the whole
argument gets overthrown because they're you know, it's a big
collection of useful idiots. Republicans have their version of it,
Democrats have their version of it. The I don't know
how to describe, but there's a difference and I'm not

(01:18:39):
even saying a difference in the use there's a different
in the truth to it, but in.

Speaker 2 (01:18:44):
The usefulness of it.

Speaker 1 (01:18:46):
Like Republicans will go and and you know, they'll get
whipped up over something and sometimes it's it's it's clear
that it's not it's not a big thing.

Speaker 2 (01:18:57):
I'm trying to think of a good example here. Recently.

Speaker 1 (01:18:59):
They they've really just been on offense here lately, so
they haven't had to do it in a while. But
it's a defensive mechanism and the Democrats will go out
and do it, but they can do it so much
more boldly because previously they weren't.

Speaker 2 (01:19:12):
Getting fact checked on this stuff.

Speaker 1 (01:19:14):
And so the trickle down to the actual idiots who
don't really consume it is what they're hearing from coworkers
who share their political beliefs. Oh no, yeah, no, this
thing that's happening, they have a slush fund, and they
just won't use the slush fund. That's why when I
have the congressman on, I trust in the fact that
getting down into the details is useful. Like people should
understand this, understand what that fund's for. Under but like

(01:19:37):
that level of Look, these are the types of videos
that the very same people, especially the awfuls of the world,
you know, the average white liberal female or female liberal, like,
these are the kinds of videos they're making. And this
is not a person who is going to even entertain
anything that you're talking about, let alone, probably understand it.

Speaker 2 (01:19:59):
All right, just listen to this woman again.

Speaker 1 (01:20:01):
This is about what would you say, ross mid thirties,
white woman, about thirty Yeah, maybe a little under okay,
all right, just.

Speaker 2 (01:20:10):
Listen to this.

Speaker 5 (01:20:11):
I think one of my favorite things that I've learned
so far as I'm reading the Koran is that technically
I'm a Muslim. She's so oh no, why it makes
you so happy? Technically I'm a Muslim because I believe

(01:20:34):
in God, oh and I strive to be a good person.
The cow freaking cool is that I can't wait to
throw so many people for a loop until I'm Muslim.

Speaker 2 (01:20:47):
Yeah, that's the true thrown for so beautiful.

Speaker 1 (01:20:52):
We're all in this together, right, Yeah, sometimes your mileage
may vary on that ross.

Speaker 2 (01:20:59):
Did you know you were most I know you're been
on this quite you read the Bible and all this stuff,
but like you like God and I haven't gotten that
park yet. Oh I'm sorry spoiler. Oh that's my bad.

Speaker 1 (01:21:11):
Yeah, yeah, I think it's mostly spoiler because it really
comes well after the Bible stuff.

Speaker 2 (01:21:16):
Right, Yeah, I'm I'm currently in Jeremiah, so I haven't
gotten there yet. Oh yeah, I'll let you know if
I ever get there.

Speaker 1 (01:21:22):
All right, But the caveats are only that you love
God and you're what was it, Oh, you try to
be a good person.

Speaker 2 (01:21:29):
So that's it. By the way, how insulting. Let me
just flip.

Speaker 1 (01:21:32):
How insulting for people of the Muslim faith too. Yeah,
it's like that's like going, I'm Catholic, Well why are
you Catholic? I drank some wine today. It was shut up, dude,
I was just remembering. So we So I was raised Catholic, right,
so you know you have the communion, right, And I

(01:21:52):
remember my mom. The only time I ever seen my
mom drink, she would drink one glass of red wine.
And I saw her drink a seven and seven one time.
She just really didn't drink, but she would drink that
one glass of red wine. And Sunday evenings it might happen,
and my little sisters would call it her super communion.
And I remember she was always weirded by that.

Speaker 2 (01:22:12):
She's like, what kind of example are Mim said, I'm like,
you go, when you drink the little than the thing here,
it's okay, it's gonna be okay. But yeah, that doesn't
necessarily mean that is what you are.

Speaker 1 (01:22:22):
There are other tenants there that maybe she has she
herself hasn't gotten to yet. But also they're not going
to let you in the club necessarily just because you
want to make a video let everyone know.

Speaker 2 (01:22:33):
How virtuous you are.

Speaker 1 (01:22:36):
That woman at no point is going to entertain a
discussion about the technical nature of what's going on with
this shutdown. She's going to repost stuff that other, you know,
other people in her circle repost because she cares. All
she cares about is.

Speaker 2 (01:22:52):
Putting that on on a video to let people know
how woke and open minded she is. That's it.

Speaker 1 (01:22:58):
The faces she's making during the whole thing is weird
af But yeah, I don't know that that qualifies yet, man, But.

Speaker 4 (01:23:09):
Hey, you do you It reminds me of those remember
I don't remember when. It was, probably twelve fifteen years ago,
but a story of those teens I believe from England
who uh converted and went to Syria. Oh the girls,
yeah yeah, yeah, like that was gonna be fun. Yeah,
And quickly they were like, hey, can we come home?
And I think it was I don't know if they

(01:23:29):
were allowed back, right, I one of them wasn't allowed back, Yeah,
one of them was. I think the other one was.

Speaker 1 (01:23:35):
But yeah, because they had renounced their citizenship and they
had done they were they went to Isis which.

Speaker 2 (01:23:41):
Right right, right right, So they were considered like terrorists
at that point.

Speaker 1 (01:23:44):
Just like we had the girl in Alabama who did that, remember, yes, yeah, yeah,
we had a woman in Alabama.

Speaker 2 (01:23:51):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (01:23:51):
Shockingly they showed up and they're like, well I thought
this was gonna be fun, right, and wasn't the one?
Essentially they got her over there and then are husband.
I think the deal was her husband because they went
over because they met some boys, her husband was killed,
and then they used her essentially as a pleasure provider.

Speaker 2 (01:24:12):
I think that was the one they let come back.
I can't remember, but yeah, yeah, yeh yeah, I do
remember that story and just how insane, absolutely insane it
was at the time.

Speaker 1 (01:24:24):
Okay, all right, let's uh, let me get in. I
mentioned this real quickly to stagic, but let me tell
you this story. This is so obnoxious. All right, So
here's the headline. Once again, influencer slammed for bragging about
flying to Jamaica during deadly Hurricane Melissa. And so there
is just a series these girls look like they're twenty

(01:24:47):
maybe I don't know, Hannah Grubbs. I don't know if
the other girl's name, it doesn't matter. So they're posting away.
They they and it's not like they went there and
then this all happened.

Speaker 2 (01:24:58):
No, no, no, So this whole adventure starts with pictures.

Speaker 1 (01:25:01):
Of them in what I believe to be the e
concourse of the Miami Airport. It's got to there's a
very unique look to it, and I can see that
play place there. So so and they post just two
girlies headed to Jamaica in a Cat five hurricane and
they're posing with the duck faces and all that stuff.
So then you find out they booked this trip to

(01:25:24):
go down there for content, and so there's pictures of
them at this really nice resort in the grill where
now because they're down there, that's there has to be
staffing because now they're stuck down there. They flew in
right before they essentially went nobody's flying anymore. And it's

(01:25:45):
pictures of them with sad faces standing on their balcony
where you can just see, you know, the stew that
is the hurricane out there. And then one of them
is having some staff member, you know, you know in
the white polo shirts. You're ever been down the resorts,
you know, some Jamaican dude who probably wants to be
home with his family but also wants to make money
for his family. He's and this weird thing and he's

(01:26:07):
having to make you know, pina coladas for them, and
they're just they're holding them and they're sitting on there,
and then they post other stuff like, oh, this ruined
my vacation.

Speaker 2 (01:26:18):
It's just the most obnoxious, attention seeking, awful thing, and
it's thankfully. Yes, she goes.

Speaker 1 (01:26:25):
Hurricane Melissa out here messing with my vacate sad face
in her little designer pajamas, standing there on the patio again,
having people wait hand and foot on them in the
middle of a CAF five storm. And I saw people
defending them and they're like, oh, well, you know they
had paid for it. I don't know exactly when.

Speaker 2 (01:26:43):
They booked it, but it doesn't look like they booked
it long ago. Here's the thing.

Speaker 1 (01:26:52):
If there was a hurricane coming through, and I'm sure
many of you have experienced this. Either you're taking a
trip to Florida or maybe you're going to the Bahamas
or somewhere the Caribbean, the airlines and the resorts, even
if you don't have insurance, a lot of the resorts
will allow you to reschedule the and the airlines will
allow you to rebook and it won't cost you anything.

(01:27:14):
If they can't fly you there, they'll they'll let you.
I've been offered rebooking and still didn't do it before.
You know, you got to make a judgment call. But
it's not it's like you're gonna be out the money.
You're just gonna have to wait and the resorts will
honor that because they want to get tourism back as.

Speaker 2 (01:27:29):
Fast as possible.

Speaker 1 (01:27:30):
It's just obnoxious, and thankfully the Internet, this is the
one thing they do seem aligned on is picking these
girls apart. So I'm I'm okay with that. All right,
We got our boy there to talk about all things
weather related. Yep, all right, what's going on thister staging?

Speaker 12 (01:27:47):
Well, you know, got to hanging in there with the
gloom and doom, which will be the weather in the
southeast next couple of days, and and more discussions on
probably what's going to be a retireired storm. Melissa strongest
to make landfall in Jamaica, second strongest ever in the
Atlantic basin, but Alan didn't make landfalls a one ninety storm,

(01:28:11):
so that was the strongest in terms of wind speed,
So there's plenty of superlatives that go with that. Now
looks like the center's emerging out over water again, coming
off the eastern end of Cuba, getting ready to go
into the southeastern Bahamas as a one O five one
hundred and five mile per hour hurricane. Now continue the
weekend and then they'll head toward Bermuda, So we'll be
seen a lot more pictures of a lot more bad

(01:28:32):
things coming out of not only Jamaica, but also central
and eastern Cuba. So yeah, one likely for the record books.
Our weather here is going to start going downhill as
the clouds will continue to thick it up this morning.
Showers will probably roll in this afternoon from west to
east and continue tonight. Most of our rain probably coming
tonight's as Low pulls through cool day today the little

(01:28:53):
bit fifties. Tonight will be in the little bit fifties,
so temperatures really aren't going to budge much. Showers are
likely with some fog tomorrow morning. We actually start to
see some sun by the afternoon as we get into
the upper fifties to low sixties, and then we kind
of reset and we get into a real nice weather
pattern under high pressure for Halloween and the weekend where
you set the clocks back. Don't forget you gain an

(01:29:14):
hour of sleep Saturday night. I know I won't forget either.
You know, you always forget the one where you where
you jump ahead in the spring. You're like, yeah, I
forgot that one. Temperatures out or above sixty degrees over night,
Low's upper thirties low forties, you know, starting Friday, and
as we get into November. I can't believe I'm saying
that already, you know, some real kind of fall like weather.

(01:29:36):
Temperatures might be a little bit below normal, but uh,
certainly nothing too extreme.

Speaker 2 (01:29:41):
Night, it'll be chilly.

Speaker 12 (01:29:42):
During the day, it'll be okay if the wind stays down,
and the rain coming is going to be you know,
needed rainfall, maybe quarter to half an inch in some
spots before we wrap it up, probably sometime mid or
late morning tomorrow, So expect some rain. Most of it's
second part of today, through tonight and through the first
part tomorrow.

Speaker 1 (01:30:01):
All Right, we'll talk tomorrow, sir, have a good one
and I'll come back with Denise ELLEGRIDI next, Denise, what's happening?

Speaker 13 (01:30:08):
Yeah, the used car industry, casey, is experiencing trouble. Loan
delinquencies skyrocketing, the Repoman busier than ever, apparently, car repossessions
reving to the highest share since the Great Recession, more
than two point two million vehicles already this year, repossessed
forecast to climb to more than three million. That's on
higher prices for cars that people are paying now. But

(01:30:29):
then just can't sustain that monthly payment. Also inflation with
people struggling with other parts of their budgets for sure.
And also some consumers who had a little bit more
money during COVID when they were getting all that extra
government money, they bought cars. Then now they're struggling to
make the payments.

Speaker 2 (01:30:47):
Are you one of those.

Speaker 13 (01:30:48):
People who looks at screens and meetings? Bosses really don't
like it. Workers keep checking their phones and meetings, and
now some bosses are implementing phone bands, some managers going
so far as to hide the Wi Fi password and
set up new fangled versions of the punitive swear jar
for those who check their text during team gatherings. But

(01:31:09):
workers tell the Wall Street Journal that they should be
forgiven for looking at their phones. Casey, the rules have change,
they say. Bosses expect staffers to be connected at all hours,
so of course people look at their phones all hours.
Oh and the workers say the meetings should be more interesting.
Some good news on mortgage rates. They fall into the
lowest in a year six point three percent. That could

(01:31:30):
put people in a buying mood over the Thanksgiving and
Winter holidays. Also, it's FED Day today. The FED widely
expected to cut interest rates that could bring mortgage rates
even lower. Sources say Apple preparing major changes to the
MacBook Air, iPad Mini, and iPad Air, with a plan
to give the devices higher end displays. Surprise though, Apple
could raise prices by as much as one hundred bucks

(01:31:52):
on some of these and Casey's stock futures are higher,
with the Fed widely expected to cut interest rates today
and Vidia shares surging after President Trump said he discussed
the chip maker's Blackwell artificial intelligence processors with China's leader.
Also local buyout to tell you about thermal Fisher Scientific
has agreed to acquire rally based Clario Holdings, it's privately

(01:32:16):
held maker of drug trials software. The deal's worth about
nine billion dollars in cash, so that's a pretty big
one and still some signs of inflation. The company behind
Oreo Cookies and Ritz Crackers says shoppers are cutting back,
they're snacking less. Mandeleys Ceo says company raised chocolate prices
thirty percent over multiple years, and he said maybe they

(01:32:38):
took things too far, too fast, and it's more than
consumers can really accept. So consumers aren't buying as much
of all the snacks. And also they're not offering us
as many discounts, so maybe they're thinking it rethinking it.
Now they're going to cut prices a little bit for us.

Speaker 2 (01:32:54):
Wow, that would be great. We'll see you about that.

Speaker 13 (01:32:57):
So all right, it never happens, right, that's they never
come down.

Speaker 2 (01:33:02):
No, of course not no, it's it's inevitable. All right,
thank you, And he appreciate it this morning that he's
peligreny there from Bloomberg News. Are you guys?

Speaker 1 (01:33:13):
I love this, so you guys get to catch it.
He went to the Steven Miller thing. It looks to
have died down, mostly because I think they figured it out.

Speaker 2 (01:33:21):
But it was really funny.

Speaker 1 (01:33:21):
So yesterday Steven Miller, you know, the the guy who
Trump sends out to attack the media, and I laugh
watching it. He posted a photo of Mount Fuji from
the air and actually, really really it is a great photo.

Speaker 2 (01:33:40):
And people then decided that he meant something by it.

Speaker 1 (01:33:43):
So you had you had people on the right or like,
oh it must be in the Epstein files are coming
because it's going to blow up.

Speaker 2 (01:33:49):
The people are on the left.

Speaker 1 (01:33:50):
It's like it's a dog whistle because what you know,
volcanoes kill people and they're horrible, and so that's what
he's implying.

Speaker 2 (01:33:59):
That you know, they're they're gonna, they're gonna.

Speaker 1 (01:34:00):
I don't know who the hell knows, but you know,
every paranoid thought that you could possibly think of. And
then somebody's, including Steven Miller's. Finally, I just took a
picture of Mount Fuji from Air Force one, and then
I saw Levitt also.

Speaker 2 (01:34:13):
Posted a picture from air Force one of Mount Fuji.

Speaker 1 (01:34:16):
You know why, because you don't get to necessarily fly
over the top of Mount Fuji very often unless you're
Air Force one, and you could pretty much fly wherever
you want.

Speaker 2 (01:34:24):
So they took this low roll over Fuji, took.

Speaker 1 (01:34:26):
These amazing photos, and everyone thought that it was coded
because this is where we are now. Everyone's frigging brains
are broken. And finally, a zoo in California had an
interesting run in after a wild California black bear broke
into the zoo and was chilling outside where the other
bears were, the actual captive bears.

Speaker 2 (01:34:49):
I think at that point that you become a zoo bear,
right