Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I have noticed looking at me.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Yeah, I'm looking at you, looking at me, look at me?
Who you think I'm funny?
Speaker 1 (00:04):
What are you observating?
Speaker 3 (00:05):
I have noticed that we're in this weird little news
cycle right now, where on both sides of the American
political spectrum, the thing people are most interested in right
now is not necessarily the top news story, but stuff
that was going on before.
Speaker 1 (00:24):
Okay, I'll give you an example.
Speaker 3 (00:25):
A lot of Republicans, a lot of conservatives right now
are very interested in how on Friday the White House
finally published a bunch of COVID nineteen documents to explain
how Fauci was not the great guy we thought he was. Sure,
Conservatives equally interested in things like the Epstein files RFK,
JFK MLK.
Speaker 1 (00:46):
All the case.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
The liberal media wants you to care that someone at
the Pentagon didn't put up a photo of Donald Trump
and Pete Hegseth had to suspend that person, and that's
not what anyone cares about. Nobody cares that yesterday there
was a new story Pete Hegseth had another private chat
where he talked about Yemen bombings with his brother in law.
No one cares, right, didn't seem to on the opposite
(01:08):
end of the political spectrum. While liberals in the media
would like us to care about some of like these
low grade quote unquote scandals, they don't care.
Speaker 2 (01:18):
Nobody cares at this moment in time.
Speaker 3 (01:21):
It seems like liberals are kind of most obsessed with
the fact that their own political party really screwed them
over over the.
Speaker 1 (01:27):
Last few years. It's fun to watch and to listen to,
as the liberals don't usually do this sort of thing
where they seem to be wanting to attack their own kind.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
Sometime between now and last weekend, like just the last
couple of days here, Elizabeth Warren participated in a podcast
with like in a public access TV studio in between
two fake plastic ferns in front of a sheet of fabric.
Like not a real big high tech production. I don't
I never heard of the podcast. The guy doing the
(01:59):
podcast looks like a they them with a man bun, and.
Speaker 2 (02:03):
He looks like he'd be a barista.
Speaker 3 (02:04):
You'd roll your eyes at when he spells his name
Skyler with two rs W.
Speaker 2 (02:10):
What the hell is this guy? But I have nothing
but respect for this guy.
Speaker 3 (02:14):
Okay, because I just listened to this SoundBite of him
interviewing Senator Elizabeth Warren and frankly, after watching it, a
I couldn't breathe for.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
A couple of minutes. I had to walk around.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
It was laughing so much.
Speaker 4 (02:26):
Do you regret saying that President Biden had a mental acuity,
He had a sharpness to him. You said that up
until July of last year.
Speaker 5 (02:35):
I said what I believe to be true.
Speaker 4 (02:37):
And you think he was as sharp as you.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
That's a great question.
Speaker 2 (02:45):
Let's see was he as sharp as you, Elizabeth?
Speaker 3 (02:48):
Because you're a narcissist and you want to say you
were smarter, but you can't make it sound like he sucked.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
So how do you? Okay?
Speaker 5 (02:53):
Hang on, I said, I had not seem to climb,
and I hadn't at that point.
Speaker 4 (03:03):
You did not see any decline from twenty twenty four
Joe Biden to twenty twenty one Joe Biden.
Speaker 5 (03:08):
When I said that he knows, the thing is yeah.
Speaker 1 (03:13):
He look, he.
Speaker 5 (03:15):
Was sharp, he was on his feet. I saw him
live event, I had meetings with him a couple of times.
Speaker 4 (03:23):
Senator on his feet is not praise. He can speak
in sentences is not praise.
Speaker 6 (03:31):
Thank you fair enough, fair enough, fair enough, dude, this guy, man, bro,
I don't know where you buy your gender neutral clothing,
but I'd like to the next rounds on me, buddy,
or they them?
Speaker 1 (03:42):
Or do this guy is hilarious. That was such a
great way to ask the question. Was he sharp? Oh?
Speaker 2 (03:49):
Yeah, he was sharp?
Speaker 7 (03:50):
As sharp as you? Oh well, uh, well, you know
she's a narcissist, but also she knows. Sure she wants
to say, well, look, no one's as smart as me.
That's what she wants to say.
Speaker 1 (04:03):
But also is she going to lower herself to his
level of sharpness?
Speaker 3 (04:07):
Which was clearly we're out there and we're allowed to
say this word again.
Speaker 1 (04:12):
Retarded?
Speaker 3 (04:13):
Thank you absolutely the most dementia. Dem tarted. Dem Tarted's good. Yeah,
like a dim tard because it works on different levels.
Speaker 1 (04:22):
Dim tard. You know they already got that one.
Speaker 3 (04:24):
How this if they didn't know he was in decline? Right,
and they're still upset about this? How did Steve and
I know in twenty nineteen.
Speaker 1 (04:32):
We're not the only one.
Speaker 2 (04:33):
Do you think we had special access to him?
Speaker 3 (04:36):
Do you think we spent hours a day watching Joe
Biden do town halls and interviews like you guys, he
didn't leave his house the entire twenty twenty presidential news
political cycle.
Speaker 2 (04:47):
Didn't you find that a little odd thing?
Speaker 1 (04:49):
That was great?
Speaker 3 (04:50):
That was the first time a lot of us saw
AI generated video and audio because they used Do you
remember there was a political ad I could go back
and find it the twenty twenty election. Before the actual
day of the election, an ad came out where Joe
Biden was narrating.
Speaker 2 (05:06):
He was talking about what was going on.
Speaker 3 (05:07):
You just heard his voice, but it was his voice
from twenty twenty five years ago.
Speaker 1 (05:12):
Yeah, he was a young firebrand.
Speaker 3 (05:14):
And listen to it, and a handful of us pointed
that out where, like is this AI? And nobody, no,
it's not AI. Well, how did he suddenly sound like
he was thirty years younger?
Speaker 1 (05:24):
Yesterday? I was.
Speaker 3 (05:26):
I was on a date and I started bragging about,
you know, because I was trying to get trying to
get laid, and the young woman asked me, so, what
you used to do, and I explained to her how
I used to be the voice of a TV cartoon
I was back in the day. I know that's hard
to believe because I don't weird to think I was
a Cartoon Cat. She said, let me see a clip
of it. So I pulled up an old clip of
(05:46):
the show. It used to air late at night. They
were little vignettes on Cartoon Network and I played the
clip for and she's like, your voice has changed. I
was like, well, yeah, I'm not twenty seven anymore. I'm
forty two. Now if a clip of me from twelve
or fifteen years ago is different, like, well, Joe Biden's
voice doesn't sound the same as it did ten years ago,
five years ago, not now, for sure. At the end
(06:08):
of his presidency, his voice sounded different than it did
at the beginning of his presidency, and at the beginning
of his presidency it sounded different.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
Than it did at the end of his time as veep.
Speaker 1 (06:18):
If you're trying to convince me that there was a
slippage that he went downhill, uh, you know, I'm already there.
Speaker 5 (06:27):
I know.
Speaker 3 (06:27):
I'm saying though, like when that video came out and
it was the first time we'd seen Washington DC political staffers,
and that's try to use AI generated content to convince
us a politician was sharp and it was never a
news it was never a news story. But now if
that happened today instead of four years ago, five years ago.
(06:49):
At this point, I got to think journalists would have
been smart enough to know.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
That it was fake.
Speaker 1 (06:53):
Well, you'd like to think now, would they have told
you the mainstream media along with whatever the Democrats dole them?
Speaker 3 (07:02):
Yeah, anyway, that's why they lost the election. In fact,
I have a lot of soundbites we can sprinkle into
the show today that will explain how Trump won the election,
and none of them involved anything Republicans did.
Speaker 2 (07:13):
It's just nothing.
Speaker 3 (07:14):
But it's just nothing but cat ladies telling you that
we need to add fourth bathrooms to public schools.
Speaker 1 (07:20):
They've got a losing formula, and yet the Democrats continue
to double down on that same formula.
Speaker 2 (07:26):
Incredible.
Speaker 1 (07:27):
It's Tuesday, Tuesday.
Speaker 7 (07:29):
It's Tuesday, Tuesday, Tuesday, any bird.
Speaker 2 (07:37):
This is the Walton and Johnson Show.
Speaker 3 (07:40):
Fort McCoy is not one of the more controversial military basis,
probably because it wasn't named after a Confederate or you know,
someone the Liberals can't agree on whether or not we
should name a Ford after.
Speaker 1 (07:52):
Then that'll change, you know, every few years, apparently.
Speaker 3 (07:54):
Totally any minute now they'll come up with a thing.
They're like, you know in a eighty two he watched
a John Wayne movie and he said, there's too many
colored boys in this what.
Speaker 2 (08:06):
How do you know?
Speaker 3 (08:07):
Well, his cousin wrote about in his personal diary. We're
gonna have to change the name of the Fort. Fort
McCoy is in Wisconsin.
Speaker 1 (08:14):
Did you know that?
Speaker 3 (08:15):
I mean either it's the eighty eighth Regional Support Command,
the one hundred and eighty first Infantry Brigade, and the
Fort McCoy Non Commissioned Officer Academy and Regional Training Center.
I understand it's right down the street from a Culver's
and they enjoy frozen custard there with the butterburgers.
Speaker 1 (08:31):
Who wouldn't.
Speaker 3 (08:32):
Culvers is the what a Burger of Wisconsin for those
that don't know, And that has nothing to do with
what we're talking about.
Speaker 1 (08:37):
I'm just hungry right now. Okay.
Speaker 3 (08:40):
Anyway, Pete Hagsath is, as you know, basically the top
dog at the Pentagon right now, and he just suspended
the commander of Fort McCoy. The commander of Fort McCoy
appears to be a woke liberal named Sheila Baiez Ramiroz.
And we're assuming that we don't really know she chose
(09:00):
not to put up photos of Donald Trump, JD. Vance,
and Pete Hagsath on a wall displaying their chain of
command in the military.
Speaker 1 (09:08):
SAT as you are required to do. Yes.
Speaker 3 (09:11):
So Pete found out about this, and you know, he
was one of the people that was disrespected obviously because
she didn't want to put his picture up. The liberal
media reports it like this, Why won't Donald Trump suspend
Pete Hagsath over the Fort McCoy controversy. Shouldn't Pete Hagsath
be getting suspended? No, it's not his job to put
up pictures on.
Speaker 1 (09:30):
A like I didn't get over there with my uh
picture hanging hooks.
Speaker 3 (09:35):
Yet they they're so desperate they need something right now.
No one cared that there was another chat room conversation, Like,
no one cares that news story broke yesterday and everyone
was too hungover from Easter to even notice. You guys,
he had he told his brother in law that they
were good at bomb Yemen. We've been bombing Yemen for
(09:55):
years to it would have been news if we stopped
bombing Yemen.
Speaker 1 (09:59):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (10:00):
You know my favorite thing about that signal chat signal
Gate they call it because that's the name of the
app is that it forced a lot of people to
learn that we're at war in Yemen. What I mean,
you guys that's been going on this whole time, you
just found out about it.
Speaker 1 (10:13):
For miss even the old Pope in and out of
a coma knew we were in a war with Yemen
because on Easter is last spoken words to the group,
he called for a ceasefire in Yemen. Nothing about Russian
and Ukraine, though apparently he's cool with that.
Speaker 2 (10:32):
I know it's hard to believe.
Speaker 3 (10:33):
But the thing right now that's really screwing over liberal Democrats,
with their platform, with their brand, if you will, it's Obama. Ironically,
it's something hypocritical Obama did over a decade ago. If
you went back twenty years, back to the early two thousands,
which might seem like a long time ago to our
young listeners, but it wasn't. It was a short time ago.
All those people are still basically in power for the
(10:55):
most part, Pelosi Schumer, the Democrats were an anti war party.
Barack Obama in two thousand and eight campaigned on a promise,
you know, you.
Speaker 2 (11:04):
Know, we're gonna bring the troops home. We're gonna get
out of Afghanistan, Iraq. We're gonna you know, we got
troops in Niger.
Speaker 3 (11:10):
That's how you pronounce that, he would know, but yeah,
we're gonna hit That was their platform. And now today,
in twenty fifteen, twenty twenty five, second, we have the
most anti war president of our lifetime. Donald Trump is
trying to end a war in almost every continent in
the world. If you with the exception of Australia and Antarctica,
(11:31):
I consider what's happening at the border to be a
war right now. It involves cartels, and they've got foreignen governments, yeah,
China and Mexico. He's trying to end war all over
the world, and they hate him. But this was their
entire platform a couple of decades ago. It's the reason
why all these people rose to power. You can go
back and find a video a clip of any one
(11:51):
of these people, Pelosi, Schumer, any one of the people
in charge right now that's over the age fifty, probably
talking about how.
Speaker 2 (12:00):
Desperately we need to bring the troops home in en war.
Speaker 3 (12:02):
And now we have a guy that's actually trying to
do that, and they hate him.
Speaker 1 (12:06):
They'll hate him for whatever. There's no excuse, no reasoning.
If they love something and then he decides to love it,
they have to hate it. Trump derangement syndrome is a
real thing, and it's not getting better. Right. I think
they're they're, like I said earlier, they're doubling down on
all the things that are already not working for them. Right.
They just don't have any other way to go. Trump's
(12:28):
boxed them in as far as the things they have
to hate now, they've they've been assigned to that hate
by him. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (12:35):
If Pete Hagseth had the exact same political beliefs, exact
same political beliefs, looked the way he does carry the
same guy, but he was a Democrat fifteen twenty years ago,
they would have made him president.
Speaker 1 (12:46):
Right.
Speaker 3 (12:47):
This is the guy, a military insider that's against the
military industrial complex, primetime TV, good looks and charisma, young
hip charismat Instead, they have to tell you he's a Nazi.
Speaker 2 (12:58):
Well, why is he a Nazi? He's got a Catholic
tattoo on his chest. WHOA, You've just lost every.
Speaker 3 (13:04):
Hispanic vote, not to mention all the white people in Louisiana. Yeah,
just by by telling them a Catholic equals Nazi. And
now the same group of people want to like gush
over the pope dying. You just spent months telling us
Pete Hegseath can't be Secretary of Defense because of his
Catholic tattoo, and now you're all flying off to the
Vatican to go to the pope's funeral.
Speaker 1 (13:24):
Yeah, it's a little confusing, but remember they're all mostly
all hypocrites. Yeah, I mean to the extreme level.
Speaker 2 (13:33):
Yeah, and ugly too.
Speaker 1 (13:35):
I think you pretty ugly.
Speaker 2 (13:36):
Yeah, I mean, if you had to Schumer or Pelosi.
Speaker 1 (13:39):
Please the Greatest Show.
Speaker 2 (13:44):
I've got a great two for Tuesday.
Speaker 4 (13:46):
It must be.
Speaker 3 (13:46):
Two for Tuesday.
Speaker 4 (13:48):
Yeah, that two for Tooday Special.
Speaker 1 (13:50):
Wolton M. Johnson