Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Take It Down Act basically says you're not allowed to
make a deep fake porn with underage girls photos.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Or revenge porn too. That's a that's the bad. Have
revenge porn.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
Oh, that's nasty, you know, it's it's probably it's probably
for the best.
Speaker 3 (00:15):
Some have argued that it's, uh, you do that because
of duty.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
No oh no, I think it was because there was
a girl in Texas who was a victim of a
deep fake. Yeah, I and some will argue that this
is a violation of your First Amendment rights. To that,
I just say, okay, so what don't make don't make
revenge porn of little kids. Don't use AI to generate
porno of children. That probably should be illegal. I don't
see how that makes think. But they got to disagree
(00:41):
with it because it's Trump. Sure, it can't help themselves.
It's cold derangement syndrome. It means they're crazy, they're cuckoo.
I think society will be okay without you being able
to have the video, the the ability to take content,
make make porno content with underage kids against the well
or participation.
Speaker 3 (01:01):
I think it'll be fine. Feels good, Yeah, I think.
Speaker 1 (01:04):
But he also spoke yesterday about Biden's doctors concealing the
cancer diagnosis.
Speaker 4 (01:09):
Everybody, but it's given just about and it takes a
long time to get to that situation. Now, I think
to get to a stage nine. I think that if
you take a look, it's the same doctor that said
that Joe was cognitively fine, there was nothing wrong with him. Well,
he said, if it's the same doctor he said there
was nothing wrong there. That's being proven to be a
(01:32):
sad situation, and the autopen is becoming a very big deal.
Speaker 3 (01:37):
You know, the autopen is becoming.
Speaker 4 (01:38):
A big deal because it seems like that maybe was
the president who ever operated the autopen. But when they
say that that was not good, they also you know,
you have to look and you have to say that.
Speaker 3 (01:49):
The test was done so good either.
Speaker 4 (01:50):
In other words, there are things going on that the
public wasn't informed.
Speaker 3 (01:54):
And I think, so let's talk about the autopen thing
for a minute.
Speaker 1 (01:57):
Does anybody wonder where we're at on that, because apparently
there's an investigation taking place and people are not pleased
about this. Here's James Comer, not to beused with the
former FBI director.
Speaker 3 (02:09):
This is the Republican lawmaker I wouldn't want to be
confused with Komie.
Speaker 1 (02:13):
Yeah, I just want to make sure we know and
he is part of the House Oversight Committee. He's the
chairman as a matter of fact, and right now they're
investigating whether or not those auto pen signatures are legitimate.
Speaker 5 (02:22):
You are going and looking at who was controlling this
auto pen because Joe Biden, I mean, he's demonstrating that
he doesn't have all the cognitive capabilities they had. That
interview was from twenty twenty three.
Speaker 6 (02:36):
Yeah, that's hard evidence early in the President Biden's term
as president. It clearly shows that he was in a
significant midtal decline. It questions who was actually making the decisions.
So what we found is not just with the pardons
he issued, but many of the executive orders that the
(02:57):
courts are now using to trump proof, many of the
executive orders that President Trump is trying to implement to
make government more efficient. Many of these executive orders, as
well as the pardons of Biden's entire family, as a
result of our investigation, these were all signed with the
auto pen and clearly from that interview, which was many
(03:18):
many months prior to the heavy use of the autopen
Joe Biden wasn't capable of making decisions. He wasn't coherent.
We think we've identified who the staffers are. Jason, you
all have done great work with that over at Heritage Oversight.
We're going to bring everyone that we believe was involved
in any role in the use of the auto pen.
(03:40):
We're going to invite them to come in for a
transcribed interview. If they want, then they will receive a
subpoena and they will have a full blown deposition. But
we want to find out who was actually making the
decisions in the White House.
Speaker 1 (03:53):
I mean, I'd like to know too.
Speaker 2 (03:54):
Well, Yeah, we don't know who was president for four years.
We know who is now though. Don't we ever had
anything like this before? This is what you would call
a constitutional crisis. The constitutionality of the executive order. It's
already a little sketchy because, as a.
Speaker 1 (04:09):
Lot of people would probably agree, Congress is supposed to
pass laws. It's not supposed to be up to the
executive branch. But years ago we started changed how that works,
so the president can impose temporary policies while they're in office.
That's what an executive order is. Can be undone by
the next administration.
Speaker 2 (04:24):
That's so interesting to watch the next administration come on
and complain about the executive orders of the past administration
and then start flying right into their own executive orders
until they've probably doubled the amount that the previous administration
had done.
Speaker 3 (04:43):
And one thing it's true, you're exactly right about that.
Speaker 1 (04:45):
And one thing that is certainly true is that whether
or not there's any constitutionality to the president signing an
executive order, there's certainly no constitutions. There's nothing constitutional about
a White House aid signing an executive order. There's nothing
constitutional about Karine Jean Pierre signing an executive order. Nobody
voted for her. Nobody voted for Kamala Sorry they didn't.
(05:07):
I mean, I whoever was signing that stuff, doctor Joe Hunter,
who was signing it? What if it was Obama? They
voted for him. Yeah, but he was no longer in
office when this happened.
Speaker 2 (05:19):
But you know, he was willing like a substitute teacher.
He was willing to show up when the president was sick,
you know, So he got a substitute president, a guy
who's already done the job, obviously voted for twice let's
get that guy in there and take care of bisness.
Speaker 1 (05:33):
I mean, that's adorable, and you know so cue for
the black community. I'm sure they'd love that. But for
the rest of us, I think that's completely illegal and
it doesn't stand in a courtroom. So it wouldn't it
be interesting if, after all is said and done, the
people on the January sixth Committee who obviously broke the law,
Hunter Biden, who obviously broke the law, Joe Biden's brother
obviously broke the law, And after all this, what if
(05:55):
they were still susceptible too. I mean, it could happen.
We're very close here on this one, guys. If we
could prove, if we can nullify those auto pen signatures,
it is going to be the wrath of God.
Speaker 3 (06:10):
It is going to be a firestorm of gateway of.
Speaker 1 (06:13):
Justice and legal retribution against the very people who tried
to destroy this country. Right. They didn't hate Trump. They
hated you, Billy d Oh. They hated your no good
redneck friends drinking coffee at a McDonald's on a Saturday
morning talking about the news. They hated those guys. You
were the ones standing in the way. You were the
ones standing in the way for the communist revolution. And
(06:35):
now that after all was said and done, what if
we could actually go back and erase the damage that
they did.
Speaker 3 (06:42):
I'm staying in a way right now. They'll come.
Speaker 1 (06:44):
You need them up. You'll appreciate it. Yeah, no, I do, Billy,
And you're doing a good job there. Thank you very much.
You backed up your truck on communism anyway.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
Uh, that Komigah, the one we were saying we wouldn't
want to be confused by the.
Speaker 1 (06:59):
FBI that said eighty six forty seven, last.
Speaker 2 (07:02):
Yea, he wrote eighty six forty seven on with some
seashells on the beach or something like that.
Speaker 3 (07:07):
They took a picture of it, he posted it.
Speaker 2 (07:09):
And so it's supposedly his way of saying it's time
to take out the current president, which probably ought not
to do.
Speaker 3 (07:16):
I guess he's promoting a book. This was promoting the book.
Speaker 1 (07:20):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
He was interrogated by the Secret Service after this threat
on the president's life, and so he decided the best
way to deal with this would be to blame his wife.
Speaker 3 (07:36):
Yeah, that's what he said. Does that work? It's never
worked for me.
Speaker 2 (07:40):
I know, we were walking on the beach preparing for
the launch of my book, think about the book, prepare
for it. So he likes to bring up the book
while he's talking about all this is about.
Speaker 3 (07:51):
And his wife noticed the shells.
Speaker 1 (07:56):
Huh, guys, nobody wrote out eighty six forty seven on
the beach. They did that.
Speaker 3 (08:00):
That was there just saying nobody did, but they did.
I'm sorry. They tried to make it sound like they
stumbled across. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (08:06):
No, the wife, Oh, we just walked along and look
there's shells that just accidentally that it's just magically formed
a message. If they had walked a little further down,
there were other messages formed by the shells that just
washed up on the shore and when the water pulled back,
it said James Comy is a retard and.
Speaker 3 (08:28):
You know, these things happen. It comes up like that.
Speaker 2 (08:30):
And the other one a little further down the beach
said James Comy should be in jail. Yeah, you know,
I don't know why they didn't snap some pictures of those.
Speaker 1 (08:39):
You know, we're inspired about all this is all Those
shell scribblings on the beach were written with an autopen signature.
Speaker 3 (08:44):
Really, yeah, apparently there's a boy.
Speaker 1 (08:46):
Yeah, I know, I guess they could have blamed Joe
Biden for this or Hunter whoever it was that at
the Auto pen.
Speaker 2 (08:52):
Hell a little earlier, you'll was confused about who Jennifer
Hoodson is, And I would just like to say that,
for me personally, one of the most accomplished R and
B vocalist ever. Sure, and by the way, she does
seem to be a Republican. No, I don't know if
she be registered for that or not, but she does
seem to be a conservative in nature. Her entire family
(09:14):
was murdered a few years ago. I don't know if
y'all heard about that or not, and she all about
the death penalty, so I think she probably something you
might be interested in.
Speaker 1 (09:24):
Okay, I didn't know she was a Republican, but that
would explain why she doesn't talk about politics.
Speaker 2 (09:28):
As it would that probably would not get her show advanced.
That probably would hurt her. I mean in the world
of Hollywood. She's a black woman in Hollywood after all.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
So yeah, Jennifer Hudson, absolute you or acknowledge your existence
or or I won't crap on your career.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
Okay, then, now have you experienced her tunnel of joy
or whatever it is spirit tunnel.
Speaker 3 (09:53):
Stay out of her tunnel.
Speaker 1 (09:55):
I'll tell you what. I haven't had any tunnel enjoy
in a while. Right.
Speaker 4 (09:57):
Yeah, they're eating the dogs people that came in. They're
eating the cats, they're eating the pits.
Speaker 3 (10:04):
Stay tuned for more, Waltman Johnson. You know it's not
all bad news today. Oh, of course not.
Speaker 2 (10:10):
It just depends on what you choose to turn towards
and turn away from.
Speaker 1 (10:13):
Have you taken a look at these military recruitment numbers
they are No, I haven't. You probably are a big
fan of Pete hag Seth.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
I don't know if he's doing a good job at
his new job. I think his old job he did well.
Speaker 1 (10:26):
Yeah, but he's better lucky than general matters, right, and
that a thing for you and your people, isn't that
a yes?
Speaker 3 (10:31):
All we care about his looks? Yes, thank you for
stereotyping and an entire group of people.
Speaker 5 (10:37):
Listen.
Speaker 1 (10:37):
Everybody wants to be pushed. They want to challenge purpose.
Speaker 7 (10:41):
They don't want to say, join the military where it's
gona be nice and easy on you. No, how far
can I go? Can I excel? Can I meet the standard?
Can I be excellent? That's what young men and women
of this nation want. If they want some wool garbage,
they can go to college. If they want to train
to be a warrior and be a part of something
bigger than themselves and raise their right hand, seek purpose
and honor and duty, join the US military be a
(11:04):
part of it.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
And that's why we've seen this record breaking surge. I mean,
the numbers don't lie.
Speaker 7 (11:08):
Will It literally starts at election day for President Trump
and the inauguration and what we've been building.
Speaker 1 (11:14):
It's been a surge. We can barely keep up with
the amount of.
Speaker 7 (11:17):
People that want to join the US military, which is
about the biggest vote of confidence I could conceive of.
Speaker 2 (11:24):
Bro Is he trying to be funny? He thinks the
young people today want a challenge.
Speaker 1 (11:31):
I mean I think they do. You know, you young
people today are skewing conservative. They prefer Trump. It's now
the young people in America that are right wing and patriotic,
and the.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
Real young it's that just not quite as young as
they used to be group. That's the lazy, lay about,
do nothing, play video games on the couch all day
and tell Mama to make them another sandwich.
Speaker 1 (11:51):
Well, the latest polling data indicates that millennials and zoomers
prefer Trump. It's the baby boomers who are the far
left progressive comedies.
Speaker 2 (11:59):
Now, ye watch them some beaches updated, No man boom,
I got no room for them.
Speaker 1 (12:04):
Who is it that stands out in the street out
there on a not far away from our radio studio theres.
Speaker 3 (12:10):
Yeah, they'll be doing that today. As a matter of fact,
it's Tuesday.
Speaker 1 (12:13):
Every Tuesday, a bunch of aging geriatric hippies gather together
in front of the office of the biggest Rhino in
Texas politics as if they don't know who John Cornyn is,
and they protest the guy.
Speaker 2 (12:24):
Well I don't care for Cornin either, so shouldn't they
be protesting me?
Speaker 3 (12:30):
I think they don't like him because he's too conservative.
The reasonings are a little different than yours. I wonder
if they know they're gonna help get him reelected. You
know what I mean.
Speaker 1 (12:38):
You're out there, you people, You geriatric, liberal, commie, Marxist
pinko losers, are easy to hate. Everyone hates you. We
drive past you on the street all day, We see
you standing out there. We look at you, and you
represent everything that's wrong with the world. You know, what's
fun And you don't like John Cornyn, so hunk.
Speaker 2 (12:56):
They think you're a supporter if you hunk, and then
they get all excited, they get bouncing, and it's like, oh,
are you cute?
Speaker 1 (13:04):
I wonder if one of us went out and explained
it to them, Because you don't like corn and you're
making them more popular, you're gonna get them reelected.
Speaker 3 (13:11):
I don't think they care.
Speaker 1 (13:12):
I know, I know I'm worried about that.
Speaker 2 (13:15):
Anyway, Oh, is it too soon for the racist report
this morning? We'd like to get a racism report in
once or twice a day. It seems like there's plenty
to go around.
Speaker 1 (13:30):
I don't know if you know now that you mention it,
maybe we even have a jingle for it. We're a
little bit racist. Well you're a little bit I guess
we're both a little bit racists.
Speaker 3 (13:42):
It's the Racism Report. It's probably brought to you by
drag Os.
Speaker 2 (13:46):
No, you know, because of racism, but because about how
everybody loves good food, don't we.
Speaker 1 (13:51):
It's true, racists, civil rights activists, even people who don't
have strong opinions about race, enjoy a good breakfast.
Speaker 2 (13:58):
Drag Go's got bigger excitement coming up in the Baton
Rouge area opening their newest location, uh Perkins Row sometime soon.
We'll give you all the details when it's time.
Speaker 3 (14:08):
But that's gonna be that's gonna be great for Batan.
Speaker 2 (14:10):
There's a bunch of other ones and you can, you know,
do mail order all that kind of good stuff.
Speaker 1 (14:14):
Love it.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
Well, guess what's racist today? Everything trees? And this specifically
has to do with Houston, Texas. I don't know, if
you've been there, it's pretty nice unless it's you know,
too humid. Factors like racism has significantly influenced the distribution
of trees in Houston. Redlining is a practice of cutting
(14:40):
off financial services to communities of color, and that led
to a disinvestment in the mainly black neighborhoods, resulting in
fewer resources for infrastructure, including planting trees. Now, basically what
they're saying is about eighty years ago, a bunch of
(15:03):
people planted oak trees, and then in some neighborhoods they
didn't plant oak trees. And now the fact that they
didn't plant oak trees eighty years ago is they blamed
on racism. Now, oak trees are about thirty six dollars
a pop at home depot. You can probably find them
somewhere else for maybe a little better if you buy
(15:25):
in bulk. But for some reason, the people that didn't
plant the trees now are saying.
Speaker 1 (15:33):
Okay, I will see you evidence of racism by not
planting a tree, and I will raise you evidence of
racism by planting a tree. Oh no, as if there
wasn't enough reasons to defund PBS back in twenty twenty four,
but roughly one year ago, in a few months January
twenty twenty four, PBS published a documentary called Racist Trees,
and it talks about how in Palm Springs, Springs, there
(15:56):
is a black neighborhood that is fighting to remove divisive trees,
where trees intentionally planted to exclude and segregate a black neighborhood.
Racial tensions ignite in this documentary when a historically black
neighborhood in Palm Springs, California, the home of racism, fights
to remove a towering wall of what do they call
them here, tamarisk trees. My favorite part about this is
(16:17):
it shows you who made the documentary, some white ladies,
some Asian lady, and some white lady.
Speaker 3 (16:22):
Are they cute?
Speaker 1 (16:23):
Oh, thank god, you're here to save the black people. Wow,
that's good for you. White ladies spread the word about
racist trees, and as if it wasn't stupid enough, the
documentaries even called racist trees that's the name of the dog.
Speaker 2 (16:36):
Is it possible we could like get them trees up
and move them over to Houston and plant them in
the black neighborhoods that ain't got no shade.
Speaker 1 (16:45):
Well, mister owe As, I'm sure you already know that
would probably cost hundreds of millions of dollars. So clearly
that's the only solution.
Speaker 3 (16:51):
It's got to be the way the government will handle this.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
Nice.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
Rice University's Kinder Institute found that there is a forteen
percent discrepancy in tree canopy cover in the less populated
neighbor well less financially secure neighbor fourteen percent less trees.
(17:19):
That means, you know, it's hotter, there's less shade. It's
it's just a tragedy, and something's got to be done.
Speaker 1 (17:26):
If it wasn't for racism eighty years ago, Houston wouldn't
be hot right now. Yeah, that makes perfect sense. Racism
is the cause of climate change. There you go, I
understand how to be a liberal and earthquakes for some reason,
and eclipses and locusts. Yeah, sorry, cicadas, cicadas, cicadas.
Speaker 2 (17:43):
Yeah, California has experienced multiple earthquakes within the last couple
of minutes, a potential major quake. Apparently, California was rocked
by three earthquakes in a matter of minutes today, which
means the fear of the big one could be anytime.
(18:05):
Last major event seven point nine earthquake hit that area
in eighteen fifty seven. So yeah, it's been a long time,
which means racism. They're overdue for another significant seismic event.
Speaker 1 (18:22):
You know what, I think we're overdue for. What is
a sports report? What sports coming up right after this?
Stick around here? Oh? Really?
Speaker 3 (18:30):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (18:30):
Coming out postgame show is brought to you by christ
I can't find it. The hell with it?
Speaker 3 (18:40):
Walton and Johnson
Take It Down Act basically says you're not allowed to
make a deep fake porn with underage girls photos.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Or revenge porn too. That's a that's the bad. Have
revenge porn.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
Oh, that's nasty, you know, it's it's probably it's probably
for the best.
Speaker 3 (00:15):
Some have argued that it's, uh, you do that because
of duty.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
No oh no, I think it was because there was
a girl in Texas who was a victim of a
deep fake. Yeah, I and some will argue that this
is a violation of your First Amendment rights. To that,
I just say, okay, so what don't make don't make
revenge porn of little kids. Don't use AI to generate
porno of children. That probably should be illegal. I don't
see how that makes think. But they got to disagree
(00:41):
with it because it's Trump. Sure, it can't help themselves.
It's cold derangement syndrome. It means they're crazy, they're cuckoo.
I think society will be okay without you being able
to have the video, the the ability to take content,
make make porno content with underage kids against the well
or participation.
Speaker 3 (01:01):
I think it'll be fine. Feels good, Yeah, I think.
Speaker 1 (01:04):
But he also spoke yesterday about Biden's doctors concealing the
cancer diagnosis.
Speaker 4 (01:09):
Everybody, but it's given just about and it takes a
long time to get to that situation. Now, I think
to get to a stage nine. I think that if
you take a look, it's the same doctor that said
that Joe was cognitively fine, there was nothing wrong with him. Well,
he said, if it's the same doctor he said there
was nothing wrong there. That's being proven to be a
(01:32):
sad situation, and the autopen is becoming a very big deal.
Speaker 3 (01:37):
You know, the autopen is becoming.
Speaker 4 (01:38):
A big deal because it seems like that maybe was
the president who ever operated the autopen. But when they
say that that was not good, they also you know,
you have to look and you have to say that.
Speaker 3 (01:49):
The test was done so good either.
Speaker 4 (01:50):
In other words, there are things going on that the
public wasn't informed.
Speaker 3 (01:54):
And I think, so let's talk about the autopen thing
for a minute.
Speaker 1 (01:57):
Does anybody wonder where we're at on that, because apparently
there's an investigation taking place and people are not pleased
about this. Here's James Comer, not to beused with the
former FBI director.
Speaker 3 (02:09):
This is the Republican lawmaker I wouldn't want to be
confused with Komie.
Speaker 1 (02:13):
Yeah, I just want to make sure we know and
he is part of the House Oversight Committee. He's the
chairman as a matter of fact, and right now they're
investigating whether or not those auto pen signatures are legitimate.
Speaker 5 (02:22):
You are going and looking at who was controlling this
auto pen because Joe Biden, I mean, he's demonstrating that
he doesn't have all the cognitive capabilities they had. That
interview was from twenty twenty three.
Speaker 6 (02:36):
Yeah, that's hard evidence early in the President Biden's term
as president. It clearly shows that he was in a
significant midtal decline. It questions who was actually making the decisions.
So what we found is not just with the pardons
he issued, but many of the executive orders that the
(02:57):
courts are now using to trump proof, many of the
executive orders that President Trump is trying to implement to
make government more efficient. Many of these executive orders, as
well as the pardons of Biden's entire family, as a
result of our investigation, these were all signed with the
auto pen and clearly from that interview, which was many
(03:18):
many months prior to the heavy use of the autopen
Joe Biden wasn't capable of making decisions. He wasn't coherent.
We think we've identified who the staffers are. Jason, you
all have done great work with that over at Heritage Oversight.
We're going to bring everyone that we believe was involved
in any role in the use of the auto pen.
(03:40):
We're going to invite them to come in for a
transcribed interview. If they want, then they will receive a
subpoena and they will have a full blown deposition. But
we want to find out who was actually making the
decisions in the White House.
Speaker 1 (03:53):
I mean, I'd like to know too.
Speaker 2 (03:54):
Well, Yeah, we don't know who was president for four years.
We know who is now though. Don't we ever had
anything like this before? This is what you would call
a constitutional crisis. The constitutionality of the executive order. It's
already a little sketchy because, as a.
Speaker 1 (04:09):
Lot of people would probably agree, Congress is supposed to
pass laws. It's not supposed to be up to the
executive branch. But years ago we started changed how that works,
so the president can impose temporary policies while they're in office.
That's what an executive order is. Can be undone by
the next administration.
Speaker 2 (04:24):
That's so interesting to watch the next administration come on
and complain about the executive orders of the past administration
and then start flying right into their own executive orders
until they've probably doubled the amount that the previous administration
had done.
Speaker 3 (04:43):
And one thing it's true, you're exactly right about that.
Speaker 1 (04:45):
And one thing that is certainly true is that whether
or not there's any constitutionality to the president signing an
executive order, there's certainly no constitutions. There's nothing constitutional about
a White House aid signing an executive order. There's nothing
constitutional about Karine Jean Pierre signing an executive order. Nobody
voted for her. Nobody voted for Kamala Sorry they didn't.
(05:07):
I mean, I whoever was signing that stuff, doctor Joe Hunter,
who was signing it? What if it was Obama? They
voted for him. Yeah, but he was no longer in
office when this happened.
Speaker 2 (05:19):
But you know, he was willing like a substitute teacher.
He was willing to show up when the president was sick,
you know, So he got a substitute president, a guy
who's already done the job, obviously voted for twice let's
get that guy in there and take care of bisness.
Speaker 1 (05:33):
I mean, that's adorable, and you know so cue for
the black community. I'm sure they'd love that. But for
the rest of us, I think that's completely illegal and
it doesn't stand in a courtroom. So it wouldn't it
be interesting if, after all is said and done, the
people on the January sixth Committee who obviously broke the law,
Hunter Biden, who obviously broke the law, Joe Biden's brother
obviously broke the law, And after all this, what if
(05:55):
they were still susceptible too. I mean, it could happen.
We're very close here on this one, guys. If we
could prove, if we can nullify those auto pen signatures,
it is going to be the wrath of God.
Speaker 3 (06:10):
It is going to be a firestorm of gateway of.
Speaker 1 (06:13):
Justice and legal retribution against the very people who tried
to destroy this country. Right. They didn't hate Trump. They
hated you, Billy d Oh. They hated your no good
redneck friends drinking coffee at a McDonald's on a Saturday
morning talking about the news. They hated those guys. You
were the ones standing in the way. You were the
ones standing in the way for the communist revolution. And
(06:35):
now that after all was said and done, what if
we could actually go back and erase the damage that
they did.
Speaker 3 (06:42):
I'm staying in a way right now. They'll come.
Speaker 1 (06:44):
You need them up. You'll appreciate it. Yeah, no, I do, Billy,
And you're doing a good job there. Thank you very much.
You backed up your truck on communism anyway.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
Uh, that Komigah, the one we were saying we wouldn't
want to be confused by the.
Speaker 1 (06:59):
FBI that said eighty six forty seven, last.
Speaker 2 (07:02):
Yea, he wrote eighty six forty seven on with some
seashells on the beach or something like that.
Speaker 3 (07:07):
They took a picture of it, he posted it.
Speaker 2 (07:09):
And so it's supposedly his way of saying it's time
to take out the current president, which probably ought not
to do.
Speaker 3 (07:16):
I guess he's promoting a book. This was promoting the book.
Speaker 1 (07:20):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
He was interrogated by the Secret Service after this threat
on the president's life, and so he decided the best
way to deal with this would be to blame his wife.
Speaker 3 (07:36):
Yeah, that's what he said. Does that work? It's never
worked for me.
Speaker 2 (07:40):
I know, we were walking on the beach preparing for
the launch of my book, think about the book, prepare
for it. So he likes to bring up the book
while he's talking about all this is about.
Speaker 3 (07:51):
And his wife noticed the shells.
Speaker 1 (07:56):
Huh, guys, nobody wrote out eighty six forty seven on
the beach. They did that.
Speaker 3 (08:00):
That was there just saying nobody did, but they did.
I'm sorry. They tried to make it sound like they
stumbled across. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (08:06):
No, the wife, Oh, we just walked along and look
there's shells that just accidentally that it's just magically formed
a message. If they had walked a little further down,
there were other messages formed by the shells that just
washed up on the shore and when the water pulled back,
it said James Comy is a retard and.
Speaker 3 (08:28):
You know, these things happen. It comes up like that.
Speaker 2 (08:30):
And the other one a little further down the beach
said James Comy should be in jail. Yeah, you know,
I don't know why they didn't snap some pictures of those.
Speaker 1 (08:39):
You know, we're inspired about all this is all Those
shell scribblings on the beach were written with an autopen signature.
Speaker 3 (08:44):
Really, yeah, apparently there's a boy.
Speaker 1 (08:46):
Yeah, I know, I guess they could have blamed Joe
Biden for this or Hunter whoever it was that at
the Auto pen.
Speaker 2 (08:52):
Hell a little earlier, you'll was confused about who Jennifer
Hoodson is, And I would just like to say that,
for me personally, one of the most accomplished R and
B vocalist ever. Sure, and by the way, she does
seem to be a Republican. No, I don't know if
she be registered for that or not, but she does
seem to be a conservative in nature. Her entire family
(09:14):
was murdered a few years ago. I don't know if
y'all heard about that or not, and she all about
the death penalty, so I think she probably something you
might be interested in.
Speaker 1 (09:24):
Okay, I didn't know she was a Republican, but that
would explain why she doesn't talk about politics.
Speaker 2 (09:28):
As it would that probably would not get her show advanced.
That probably would hurt her. I mean in the world
of Hollywood. She's a black woman in Hollywood after all.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
So yeah, Jennifer Hudson, absolute you or acknowledge your existence
or or I won't crap on your career.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
Okay, then, now have you experienced her tunnel of joy
or whatever it is spirit tunnel.
Speaker 3 (09:53):
Stay out of her tunnel.
Speaker 1 (09:55):
I'll tell you what. I haven't had any tunnel enjoy
in a while. Right.
Speaker 4 (09:57):
Yeah, they're eating the dogs people that came in. They're
eating the cats, they're eating the pits.
Speaker 3 (10:04):
Stay tuned for more, Waltman Johnson. You know it's not
all bad news today. Oh, of course not.
Speaker 2 (10:10):
It just depends on what you choose to turn towards
and turn away from.
Speaker 1 (10:13):
Have you taken a look at these military recruitment numbers
they are No, I haven't. You probably are a big
fan of Pete hag Seth.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
I don't know if he's doing a good job at
his new job. I think his old job he did well.
Speaker 1 (10:26):
Yeah, but he's better lucky than general matters, right, and
that a thing for you and your people, isn't that
a yes?
Speaker 3 (10:31):
All we care about his looks? Yes, thank you for
stereotyping and an entire group of people.
Speaker 5 (10:37):
Listen.
Speaker 1 (10:37):
Everybody wants to be pushed. They want to challenge purpose.
Speaker 7 (10:41):
They don't want to say, join the military where it's
gona be nice and easy on you. No, how far
can I go? Can I excel? Can I meet the standard?
Can I be excellent? That's what young men and women
of this nation want. If they want some wool garbage,
they can go to college. If they want to train
to be a warrior and be a part of something
bigger than themselves and raise their right hand, seek purpose
and honor and duty, join the US military be a
(11:04):
part of it.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
And that's why we've seen this record breaking surge. I mean,
the numbers don't lie.
Speaker 7 (11:08):
Will It literally starts at election day for President Trump
and the inauguration and what we've been building.
Speaker 1 (11:14):
It's been a surge. We can barely keep up with
the amount of.
Speaker 7 (11:17):
People that want to join the US military, which is
about the biggest vote of confidence I could conceive of.
Speaker 2 (11:24):
Bro Is he trying to be funny? He thinks the
young people today want a challenge.
Speaker 1 (11:31):
I mean I think they do. You know, you young
people today are skewing conservative. They prefer Trump. It's now
the young people in America that are right wing and patriotic,
and the.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
Real young it's that just not quite as young as
they used to be group. That's the lazy, lay about,
do nothing, play video games on the couch all day
and tell Mama to make them another sandwich.
Speaker 1 (11:51):
Well, the latest polling data indicates that millennials and zoomers
prefer Trump. It's the baby boomers who are the far
left progressive comedies.
Speaker 2 (11:59):
Now, ye watch them some beaches updated, No man boom,
I got no room for them.
Speaker 1 (12:04):
Who is it that stands out in the street out
there on a not far away from our radio studio theres.
Speaker 3 (12:10):
Yeah, they'll be doing that today. As a matter of fact,
it's Tuesday.
Speaker 1 (12:13):
Every Tuesday, a bunch of aging geriatric hippies gather together
in front of the office of the biggest Rhino in
Texas politics as if they don't know who John Cornyn is,
and they protest the guy.
Speaker 2 (12:24):
Well I don't care for Cornin either, so shouldn't they
be protesting me?
Speaker 3 (12:30):
I think they don't like him because he's too conservative.
The reasonings are a little different than yours. I wonder
if they know they're gonna help get him reelected. You
know what I mean.
Speaker 1 (12:38):
You're out there, you people, You geriatric, liberal, commie, Marxist
pinko losers, are easy to hate. Everyone hates you. We
drive past you on the street all day, We see
you standing out there. We look at you, and you
represent everything that's wrong with the world. You know, what's
fun And you don't like John Cornyn, so hunk.
Speaker 2 (12:56):
They think you're a supporter if you hunk, and then
they get all excited, they get bouncing, and it's like, oh,
are you cute?
Speaker 1 (13:04):
I wonder if one of us went out and explained
it to them, Because you don't like corn and you're
making them more popular, you're gonna get them reelected.
Speaker 3 (13:11):
I don't think they care.
Speaker 1 (13:12):
I know, I know I'm worried about that.
Speaker 2 (13:15):
Anyway, Oh, is it too soon for the racist report
this morning? We'd like to get a racism report in
once or twice a day. It seems like there's plenty
to go around.
Speaker 1 (13:30):
I don't know if you know now that you mention it,
maybe we even have a jingle for it. We're a
little bit racist. Well you're a little bit I guess
we're both a little bit racists.
Speaker 3 (13:42):
It's the Racism Report. It's probably brought to you by
drag Os.
Speaker 2 (13:46):
No, you know, because of racism, but because about how
everybody loves good food, don't we.
Speaker 1 (13:51):
It's true, racists, civil rights activists, even people who don't
have strong opinions about race, enjoy a good breakfast.
Speaker 2 (13:58):
Drag Go's got bigger excitement coming up in the Baton
Rouge area opening their newest location, uh Perkins Row sometime soon.
We'll give you all the details when it's time.
Speaker 3 (14:08):
But that's gonna be that's gonna be great for Batan.
Speaker 2 (14:10):
There's a bunch of other ones and you can, you know,
do mail order all that kind of good stuff.
Speaker 1 (14:14):
Love it.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
Well, guess what's racist today? Everything trees? And this specifically
has to do with Houston, Texas. I don't know, if
you've been there, it's pretty nice unless it's you know,
too humid. Factors like racism has significantly influenced the distribution
of trees in Houston. Redlining is a practice of cutting
(14:40):
off financial services to communities of color, and that led
to a disinvestment in the mainly black neighborhoods, resulting in
fewer resources for infrastructure, including planting trees. Now, basically what
they're saying is about eighty years ago, a bunch of
(15:03):
people planted oak trees, and then in some neighborhoods they
didn't plant oak trees. And now the fact that they
didn't plant oak trees eighty years ago is they blamed
on racism. Now, oak trees are about thirty six dollars
a pop at home depot. You can probably find them
somewhere else for maybe a little better if you buy
(15:25):
in bulk. But for some reason, the people that didn't
plant the trees now are saying.
Speaker 1 (15:33):
Okay, I will see you evidence of racism by not
planting a tree, and I will raise you evidence of
racism by planting a tree. Oh no, as if there
wasn't enough reasons to defund PBS back in twenty twenty four,
but roughly one year ago, in a few months January
twenty twenty four, PBS published a documentary called Racist Trees,
and it talks about how in Palm Springs, Springs, there
(15:56):
is a black neighborhood that is fighting to remove divisive trees,
where trees intentionally planted to exclude and segregate a black neighborhood.
Racial tensions ignite in this documentary when a historically black
neighborhood in Palm Springs, California, the home of racism, fights
to remove a towering wall of what do they call
them here, tamarisk trees. My favorite part about this is
(16:17):
it shows you who made the documentary, some white ladies,
some Asian lady, and some white lady.
Speaker 3 (16:22):
Are they cute?
Speaker 1 (16:23):
Oh, thank god, you're here to save the black people. Wow,
that's good for you. White ladies spread the word about
racist trees, and as if it wasn't stupid enough, the
documentaries even called racist trees that's the name of the dog.
Speaker 2 (16:36):
Is it possible we could like get them trees up
and move them over to Houston and plant them in
the black neighborhoods that ain't got no shade.
Speaker 1 (16:45):
Well, mister owe As, I'm sure you already know that
would probably cost hundreds of millions of dollars. So clearly
that's the only solution.
Speaker 3 (16:51):
It's got to be the way the government will handle this.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
Nice.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
Rice University's Kinder Institute found that there is a forteen
percent discrepancy in tree canopy cover in the less populated
neighbor well less financially secure neighbor fourteen percent less trees.
(17:19):
That means, you know, it's hotter, there's less shade. It's
it's just a tragedy, and something's got to be done.
Speaker 1 (17:26):
If it wasn't for racism eighty years ago, Houston wouldn't
be hot right now. Yeah, that makes perfect sense. Racism
is the cause of climate change. There you go, I
understand how to be a liberal and earthquakes for some reason,
and eclipses and locusts. Yeah, sorry, cicadas, cicadas, cicadas.
Speaker 2 (17:43):
Yeah, California has experienced multiple earthquakes within the last couple
of minutes, a potential major quake. Apparently, California was rocked
by three earthquakes in a matter of minutes today, which
means the fear of the big one could be anytime.
(18:05):
Last major event seven point nine earthquake hit that area
in eighteen fifty seven. So yeah, it's been a long time,
which means racism. They're overdue for another significant seismic event.
Speaker 1 (18:22):
You know what, I think we're overdue for. What is
a sports report? What sports coming up right after this?
Stick around here? Oh? Really?
Speaker 3 (18:30):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (18:30):
Coming out postgame show is brought to you by christ
I can't find it. The hell with it?
Speaker 3 (18:40):
Walton and Johnson
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!