Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The quickers that could.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
The last thing I heard was somebody was gonna do
a story about somebody running working with ostriches.
Speaker 1 (00:06):
You are correct, I mean time. Then I am so excited.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
I have a friend of mine who he didn't but
one of his, one of his good long term friends,
opened an ostrich farm somewhere out in west of Austin.
I don't know if you call it a farmer or
a ranch. And you know, he's he's got ostriches running
around out there, and they said it's an investment.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
They're kind of pricey, but he's he's hoping it works out.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
He's really he's really sticking his neck out with these ostriches.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
I see what you did. I like that. I'll allow it.
What do you do? He did an Ostrich joke? It's
Ostrich humor. Billy ed Bill. It's not been very funny.
I means, Billy. What's the difference between a farm and
a ranch?
Speaker 2 (00:48):
I'm seriously asking, seriously asking, hieah, farmer and rancher. Farmers
grow food, Ranchers raise livestop.
Speaker 1 (00:55):
So basic.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
Everybody can disagree, but that's just the basics. If that's
what you're looking for, or I don't want to. I
don't think you want to get involved too much of detail.
Some some guys do both. You know, you have yourself
a garden and consider yourself a farmer.
Speaker 1 (01:09):
Yeah, I was wondering if it was a regional term.
Speaker 3 (01:11):
Like when you're up north, someone will say this is
my cattle farm, and then you'll go down south they'll
be like, this is my cattle ranch.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
It's a rane, and I'll think those seem very similar.
Speaker 2 (01:20):
I'm thinking if you if you plant the cows in
the ground and new cows grow from them, then I
guess that'd be a farm.
Speaker 1 (01:27):
I don't think that's how it works so well in
this case.
Speaker 3 (01:29):
I I'm not sure if they're calling it a farm
or a rank. Where are these it's a farm, they're
calling it this is Canada.
Speaker 2 (01:37):
Oh well then yeah, it's probably a regional thing. The
Universal Ostrich Farm. The owner's name is Karen.
Speaker 3 (01:42):
It's not her fault, mom names, and she's very upset
now that the government showed up and killed her ostriches.
Speaker 1 (01:49):
They don't have the right.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
They had lights on us for a month and now
they're going to.
Speaker 3 (01:53):
Hide of their dark.
Speaker 4 (01:55):
My beautiful babies, healthy babies, and they are committing breaking
the animal.
Speaker 3 (02:02):
Hel that Canadians haven't been this mad since hockey season ended.
Speaker 1 (02:06):
It feels like she had really grown attached to these birds.
Speaker 3 (02:09):
So you're probably wondering what happened? What is Canada and
RFK Junior and ostriches and this woman crying all have.
Speaker 1 (02:15):
To do with each other? Yeah? What's his deal?
Speaker 3 (02:17):
Canada's Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal on the
proposed culling. Billy d the cull and the herd yea
of a British Columbia ostrich herd, is it.
Speaker 1 (02:27):
Has heard? I don't know, but they're birds, right, don't
flock a bird? But do they have to fly to
be a flock? I don't hope that's a curiosity as well.
I don't know. If they run on the ground with
their legs there sounds like they're a herd. Can they
stay impede?
Speaker 3 (02:41):
I'm getting this news from CNN, so it's possible the
lefty that wrote the article doesn't know the difference, and
brilliad raises a good point. Anyway, It's a case that's
attracted the attention of US Health Secretary Robert F.
Speaker 1 (02:54):
Kennedy Junior and his macmerical the Again movement.
Speaker 3 (02:59):
The courts dismissile paves the way for the flock of
around three hundred and thirty ostriches to be cold. The
Canadian Feud and Food Inspection Agency that'd be your SIPHA,
has ordered the birds to be euthanized after detecting pathenogenic
avian influenza on the farm.
Speaker 1 (03:16):
Oh, I've been reading a lot about the the avian flu.
It's really bad on birds. So that's why they named
it that the CFIA.
Speaker 3 (03:23):
That's the Canadian stuff that's decided to murder the birds.
Confirmed that it would move forward with euthanizing the ostriches
under its stamping out policy, in which infected or exposed
animals are killed.
Speaker 2 (03:34):
Why don't they just whip up a vaccine forum then
they'd be fine.
Speaker 3 (03:38):
Well, here's where this gets a little tricky, Billy, It's
funny you bring that up. The Universal ostrich Farm in Edgewood,
British Columbia says it's raising the animals to study their
ability to produce disease fighting anti bodies.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
Well, there you go, so it's a research center, it's
not a farm.
Speaker 3 (03:53):
The farm has been embroiled in a legal battle with
the Canadian government for over a year, and a government
has called the farm's research claims unsubstantiated, saying that the
agency has not received any evidence of research activities.
Speaker 1 (04:07):
So they shut up and started murdering the ostriches. How
do they do they do that? Is that an individual
you know?
Speaker 2 (04:14):
Or do they round them up in a and gas
them or something? There's three hundred Is that like separate
shotgun blasts?
Speaker 1 (04:23):
Or do you know? There you go back it. There's
a lot of neck there. Guy with a sword could
have a payday. You know.
Speaker 3 (04:30):
It's a good point. That's just disgusting. I think it
sounds a little bit like this.
Speaker 2 (04:38):
But if you line them up, you know, like four
or five in a row, one shot might get like
half a dozen of them.
Speaker 1 (04:44):
Yeah, you say polish, Yeah, you save.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
Some money that way. You gotta think like that. Nowadays,
price of everything it's so damn a.
Speaker 3 (04:51):
Yeah, But then again, the ostriches heads they're always like,
you know, moving around. True, they're jerky, swinging, jerky. Yeah,
they're jerky. Yeah, Ostrich jerky. I bet that'd be good.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (05:01):
You ever eat Ostrich steak? I've had an Ostrich burger.
It was good.
Speaker 2 (05:04):
Yeah, it's weird. It's it's red meat. Right, It's not
like a chicken like you might think because it's a bird,
so maybe it is a herd and not a fly.
Speaker 1 (05:12):
May you be? I don't know, Jeff. And does it?
Can it be pink in the middle or will that
kill you? Oh? Good question.
Speaker 2 (05:18):
You want your your chicken, probably go ahead and get
that done unless you're constipated, and then I think that
the medium rare chicken is going to work wonders on
your system.
Speaker 1 (05:28):
You know.
Speaker 3 (05:28):
I can't talk about this too much on the radio,
but my experience, there's a lot.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
Of things that are pink in the middle that'll hurt you.
Is that right?
Speaker 3 (05:34):
Yeah? Golf balls, Let's not talk about it.
Speaker 4 (05:38):
You know.
Speaker 2 (05:38):
I mean, if you cut a golf ball in a half,
you might find that's pink in the middle, and you
know it'll hurt you if it goes upside your head.
Speaker 1 (05:44):
Oops, upside your head? I said, Oops, you did that?
You did that?
Speaker 2 (05:47):
I did. I'm not gonna take it back either.
Speaker 3 (05:50):
A suspicious package is sickening people.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
It has well, you keep your eyes on your own pants.
Speaker 3 (05:58):
Then no, no belly. This happened at military base in Maryland.
It had nothing to do with you.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
Oh.
Speaker 3 (06:03):
Apparently the suspicious package was delivered to a US military
base and it caused multiple people to fall ill and
led to several of them being taken to the hospital.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
Are we talking like a powdery substance in an envelope
or something? What happened? Here's what we know.
Speaker 3 (06:17):
There was a statement from Joint Bass Andrews that's located
in DC, and they said a building on the base
was evacuated after an individual opened a quote suspicious package.
Several people were transported to the nearby medical center there
that'd be the Malcolm Grove Medical Center soon to be
the Mohammed Medical Center, and as a precaution, the building
and connecting building were evacuated. Yeah, apparently the package contained
(06:40):
an unknown white powdery substance. Okay, there, I was right,
and we only know that. Yeah. Well, two people told
CNBC that an initial field test from the hazmat team
did not detect anything hazardous, but the investigation remains ongoing.
Here's what I don't get. If they didn't detect anything hazardous,
but people got sick after being exposed to it, right,
does that mean that the powdery substance like expires it
(07:02):
some quickly after.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
Being exposed to oxygen.
Speaker 2 (07:05):
Yeah, I wonder about those things. How did how did
they get sick? If they if it was benign?
Speaker 3 (07:10):
Yeah, no it wasn't. No, it wasn't benign. It was
a white powdery substance.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
Thank you.
Speaker 4 (07:14):
What you just said is one of the most insanely
idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in
your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything
that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this
room is now dumber for having listened to it. Walton L.
Speaker 1 (07:32):
Johnson, this music on makes me more urban, But I
like it. No, it didn't do anything for it. You
like that?
Speaker 3 (07:38):
No, this is what black music in the eighties sounded like. Right,
Why are you acting me because you were black in
the eighties? Oh all right, Dan, Yeah, what do you mean?
Speaker 1 (07:47):
Yeah? Well, what are you now? You tell me? You're
telling me how it is? Mate? No, who's that singing?
Speaker 3 (07:53):
I'm literally asking you to teach me, Billy, mister Amy,
this is Paul Russell.
Speaker 1 (07:57):
I want to be talked.
Speaker 3 (07:59):
This is this is there's new music that sounds like
old new music. Lately, we've been playing a lot of
newer stuff on the show. You know, you'll fall back
on little Brothers Johnson every now and then. I mean
they had it going on, but that's strawberry litter. Twenty
three sounded way better than that new stuff.
Speaker 1 (08:13):
Steve, You have a brother and you're in a band
with him? Any brothers Johnson? Not the Johnson brothers.
Speaker 3 (08:18):
Oh, the Brothers Johnson and I guess I never heard
of that Brothers Osbourne.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
I heard of Brothers.
Speaker 2 (08:23):
Osbourne that they're not related to me. Brother Cain, No,
you're not taking you know, taking direction?
Speaker 1 (08:30):
Well are you?
Speaker 3 (08:31):
I got Brooks and done. I'm just looking alphabetically here
at what's in our library. I don't see Brothers Johnson.
Or are you sure that's a band?
Speaker 2 (08:37):
No?
Speaker 3 (08:38):
I have no way to know for show? All right,
how about this one? Is this the most explosive headline
of the day or not? Tell me what you think.
Nancy Mace, the congresswoman who's running for governor in the Carolinas.
Speaker 1 (08:48):
No one knows which Carolina is a South Carolina. Dont matter.
Speaker 3 (08:51):
Nancy Mayce concocted rape story and hacked fiance's phone in
bid to seize two million two multimillion dollar homes according
to a bombshell new lawsuit.
Speaker 1 (09:04):
Huh, this is an accusation, not a true fact at
this point. Correct.
Speaker 3 (09:08):
Okay, here's the smoking gun. Tell me what you think
of this. A journalist posts a link to the story
on social media on acts a journalist named Colin Rugg.
Doesn't really matter. He's a small part of the story
and cites the Daily Mail. He just posts it and says,
here's a story in the Daily Mail. Nancy Mace replies
on social media last night with the following words. She
(09:30):
says to the journalist, this is false and you may
want to take it down before you get sued. This
is your warning first and last. Now I could tell
you a little bit about defamation. There's slander, there's libel.
She's accusing him of libel because he wrote it. He
didn't say it out loud. He's telling you that there's
a news story about this in the Daily Mail.
Speaker 1 (09:53):
There's no way that's defamation.
Speaker 3 (09:54):
It's in the Daily Mail, right and the Daily Mail
is telling you that this is part of a lawsuit.
So you can't sue them because it is. I mean,
you could sue, but you'd lose. It is part of
a lawsuit. So Nancy mayce threatening a journalist for telling
you that another journalist is covering a lawsuit which objectively
exists kind of makes it sound like she's guilty because
(10:15):
she wants to sue this guy for talking about it.
Speaker 2 (10:17):
Boy, I want to sue. I want to sue somebody
now for talking about it. Well, I'm so confused. Usually
it's the news, it's story. It either happened or it didn't.
Speaker 1 (10:29):
We don't know.
Speaker 3 (10:30):
Means okay, it's a lawsuit, right, we haven't determined if
it happened yet. But there is a lawsuit in which
her ex fiance is accusing her of tracking his car
and destroying his reputation by falsely.
Speaker 1 (10:40):
Smearing him as a voyeur and a rapist.
Speaker 3 (10:43):
The South Carolina congresswoman went scorched earth on four men
she outed as alleged sex predators back in February in
a house speech, claiming they drugged and molested and filmed
multiple female victims, including herself.
Speaker 1 (10:56):
Uh huh, But one of the accused her a strange lover.
Speaker 3 (10:59):
Patrick Bryant has filed a scathing legal response accusing the
Republican lawmaker of cooking up fake gang rape claims to
blackmail him.
Speaker 2 (11:08):
What would you say if you was accused of gang
rape right now this morning? Would you would probably say?
Uh huh no, didn't do it, you know, and see
it's just that easy. Now now you off the hook, right?
Speaker 1 (11:19):
I was just thinking about this in response to another
news story that's going around right now.
Speaker 3 (11:22):
Do you remember what we learned about our phones during COVID,
when people started getting out in for exposing other people
to things. We all carry these tracking devices everywhere, listening devices,
tracking devices.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
They are your brain. It's everything.
Speaker 3 (11:38):
And unless you've already gone to great lengths to erase
the GEO tag location data in your phone, your phone
is a record of everywhere you been.
Speaker 2 (11:46):
That's why you should keep it inside of an empty
potato chip bag. Why potato chip bag, Billy? You know
they got that foil lining on there. And then what
you can you can get around these kind of things.
Just stick in the potato chip bag before you put
it in your purse or your hocket or whatever.
Speaker 3 (12:00):
You'd be good, mister Kenneth, Is that true? I haven't
the sound well, I don't think so either. I don't
know they don't okay, Well, sound true Okay.
Speaker 2 (12:09):
Well that's what makes it so good. It's just simple.
So you see, everybody wants to be all high tech.
I need to go to jam or I need to
go to you know, just get some laced potato chips.
Not even a big bag, you know, because who can
afford the big bag these days? I mean they are
price yeah dit, the little single serving bag. Eat the chips,
don't waste them, obviously, get the kind you like.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
The scoops.
Speaker 2 (12:29):
I like the skips. Yeah good, you know, the sour
cream and onion. You can't go wrong there neither.
Speaker 3 (12:35):
Sure, well, anyway, scoops and sour cream on your side.
If these guys were in fact innocent, I think there
would be some data on their phone to prove that
they were, weren't in a place when someone did or
didn't get raped, And wouldn't there be a rape kit,
I mean, some kind of DNA evidence. This is America,
after all. This is a pretty scathing allegation.
Speaker 2 (12:51):
Yes it is, and we'll have to just wait and
see what happens with it, especially for somebody that's running
for governor right now, who's already in a position of
some importance.
Speaker 3 (13:01):
And you really got a wonder. I mean, if it's true,
then man, we deserve justice. And if it's not true,
she should be punished for saying this. Yeah, how dare her?
Speaker 1 (13:09):
Anyway?
Speaker 3 (13:11):
This guy's complaint says his explosive feard with Nancy may
stems from a messy breakup in November twenty twenty three.
Do you remember when she gave a speech at the
National Prayer Breakfast.
Speaker 2 (13:21):
You're going to say when she gave a hand job
that day, But that's a different thing.
Speaker 3 (13:24):
That was Lauren Bobert yea Yeah, a different guy that
was at the Beetlejuice Live Musical in Denver.
Speaker 4 (13:29):
No.
Speaker 3 (13:29):
Do you remember when Nancy Mace gave a speech at
the National Prayer Breakfast and she said she was going
to be late because her unmarried boyfriend wanted to have
sex with her before church that morning? I do remember,
and everyone thought that was a weird thing to say
at church. Don't you think it was same guy? I
think I'm pretty sure it was, because that's who she
was with around this time. Anyway, he's accusing the lawmaker
(13:50):
of installing a secret app on his phone to plunder
pictures and data that she hoped to use to pressure
him into relinquishing their jointly owned homes that are worth
about six million dollars a piece. Goodness, and if any
of this is true, I mean whether or not you
had an app on your phone that that's easy to
prove or disprove you either did or didn't have it.
There's something called meta data. Metadata is data about other data,
(14:14):
and it can tell us how long the app's been
on your phone, for how it got there, that sort
of thing.
Speaker 2 (14:19):
Well, is that like you need to get up in
the middle of this and solve this damn thing. It's
a lot of he said, And then she said, and
Kenny can just get right to the point of it
and say that ain't true.
Speaker 1 (14:28):
That is true because I just looked at the data.
Speaker 3 (14:31):
Okay, So I'm actually pretty busy, like with stand up
comedy going on, finding communists in the park and working
on my new punk band, Black Smoke and the Revelation.
You know, so I'm not going to be able to
help out Nancy Mace's fiance right now.
Speaker 1 (14:43):
Plus I don't even know this guy.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
Well, maybe you could help her out proved of things
that he said was a lie, and you just substantiate
her what she said Dancy and then you might get lucky.
Speaker 3 (14:54):
See I would help her out, but again, still busy
with all those things I just mentioned.
Speaker 1 (14:58):
Doesn't change too busy to score what with Nancy Mace?
Speaker 3 (15:01):
Okay, So, one thing I have learned is when you
find that there's a woman with a lot of drama
surrounding her, even if she's on that right away right, No, no, no, no,
what No, those huge naturals are not worth it.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
Well, this is a new refreshing side of the young
Kinney webster that none of us are familiar with.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
Yet. No, you're avoiding confrontation and drama.
Speaker 3 (15:21):
I have decided to distance myself from the world of
romantic interactions and it is really helping out my professional
life and my creative ability to get things done. Yeah
and all, Yeah, and all I had to do was
slice off my penis in a transgender operation center.
Speaker 1 (15:37):
Totally worth it.
Speaker 4 (15:37):
Yeah, Yeah, what you just said is one of the
most insanely idiotic things I've ever heard.
Speaker 3 (15:43):
I know, you know, it's just a liner. But we've
already played that liner this morning. Could we get a
fresh one, please?
Speaker 1 (15:48):
And what exactly are your demands? We need more lemon pledge?
You need more Lemon pledge. Yes, we're not responsible for that.
You should just bring it from your own home. Wolston
and Johnson
The quickers that could.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
The last thing I heard was somebody was gonna do
a story about somebody running working with ostriches.
Speaker 1 (00:06):
You are correct, I mean time. Then I am so excited.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
I have a friend of mine who he didn't but
one of his, one of his good long term friends,
opened an ostrich farm somewhere out in west of Austin.
I don't know if you call it a farmer or
a ranch. And you know, he's he's got ostriches running
around out there, and they said it's an investment.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
They're kind of pricey, but he's he's hoping it works out.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
He's really he's really sticking his neck out with these ostriches.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
I see what you did. I like that. I'll allow it.
What do you do? He did an Ostrich joke? It's
Ostrich humor. Billy ed Bill. It's not been very funny.
I means, Billy. What's the difference between a farm and
a ranch?
Speaker 2 (00:48):
I'm seriously asking, seriously asking, hieah, farmer and rancher. Farmers
grow food, Ranchers raise livestop.
Speaker 1 (00:55):
So basic.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
Everybody can disagree, but that's just the basics. If that's
what you're looking for, or I don't want to. I
don't think you want to get involved too much of detail.
Some some guys do both. You know, you have yourself
a garden and consider yourself a farmer.
Speaker 1 (01:09):
Yeah, I was wondering if it was a regional term.
Speaker 3 (01:11):
Like when you're up north, someone will say this is
my cattle farm, and then you'll go down south they'll
be like, this is my cattle ranch.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
It's a rane, and I'll think those seem very similar.
Speaker 2 (01:20):
I'm thinking if you if you plant the cows in
the ground and new cows grow from them, then I
guess that'd be a farm.
Speaker 1 (01:27):
I don't think that's how it works so well in
this case.
Speaker 3 (01:29):
I I'm not sure if they're calling it a farm
or a rank. Where are these it's a farm, they're
calling it this is Canada.
Speaker 2 (01:37):
Oh well then yeah, it's probably a regional thing. The
Universal Ostrich Farm. The owner's name is Karen.
Speaker 3 (01:42):
It's not her fault, mom names, and she's very upset
now that the government showed up and killed her ostriches.
Speaker 1 (01:49):
They don't have the right.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
They had lights on us for a month and now
they're going to.
Speaker 3 (01:53):
Hide of their dark.
Speaker 4 (01:55):
My beautiful babies, healthy babies, and they are committing breaking
the animal.
Speaker 3 (02:02):
Hel that Canadians haven't been this mad since hockey season ended.
Speaker 1 (02:06):
It feels like she had really grown attached to these birds.
Speaker 3 (02:09):
So you're probably wondering what happened? What is Canada and
RFK Junior and ostriches and this woman crying all have.
Speaker 1 (02:15):
To do with each other? Yeah? What's his deal?
Speaker 3 (02:17):
Canada's Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal on the
proposed culling. Billy d the cull and the herd yea
of a British Columbia ostrich herd, is it.
Speaker 1 (02:27):
Has heard? I don't know, but they're birds, right, don't
flock a bird? But do they have to fly to
be a flock? I don't hope that's a curiosity as well.
I don't know. If they run on the ground with
their legs there sounds like they're a herd. Can they
stay impede?
Speaker 3 (02:41):
I'm getting this news from CNN, so it's possible the
lefty that wrote the article doesn't know the difference, and
brilliad raises a good point. Anyway, It's a case that's
attracted the attention of US Health Secretary Robert F.
Speaker 1 (02:54):
Kennedy Junior and his macmerical the Again movement.
Speaker 3 (02:59):
The courts dismissile paves the way for the flock of
around three hundred and thirty ostriches to be cold. The
Canadian Feud and Food Inspection Agency that'd be your SIPHA,
has ordered the birds to be euthanized after detecting pathenogenic
avian influenza on the farm.
Speaker 1 (03:16):
Oh, I've been reading a lot about the the avian flu.
It's really bad on birds. So that's why they named
it that the CFIA.
Speaker 3 (03:23):
That's the Canadian stuff that's decided to murder the birds.
Confirmed that it would move forward with euthanizing the ostriches
under its stamping out policy, in which infected or exposed
animals are killed.
Speaker 2 (03:34):
Why don't they just whip up a vaccine forum then
they'd be fine.
Speaker 3 (03:38):
Well, here's where this gets a little tricky, Billy, It's
funny you bring that up. The Universal ostrich Farm in Edgewood,
British Columbia says it's raising the animals to study their
ability to produce disease fighting anti bodies.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
Well, there you go, so it's a research center, it's
not a farm.
Speaker 3 (03:53):
The farm has been embroiled in a legal battle with
the Canadian government for over a year, and a government
has called the farm's research claims unsubstantiated, saying that the
agency has not received any evidence of research activities.
Speaker 1 (04:07):
So they shut up and started murdering the ostriches. How
do they do they do that? Is that an individual
you know?
Speaker 2 (04:14):
Or do they round them up in a and gas
them or something? There's three hundred Is that like separate
shotgun blasts?
Speaker 1 (04:23):
Or do you know? There you go back it. There's
a lot of neck there. Guy with a sword could
have a payday. You know.
Speaker 3 (04:30):
It's a good point. That's just disgusting. I think it
sounds a little bit like this.
Speaker 2 (04:38):
But if you line them up, you know, like four
or five in a row, one shot might get like
half a dozen of them.
Speaker 1 (04:44):
Yeah, you say polish, Yeah, you save.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
Some money that way. You gotta think like that. Nowadays,
price of everything it's so damn a.
Speaker 3 (04:51):
Yeah, But then again, the ostriches heads they're always like,
you know, moving around. True, they're jerky, swinging, jerky. Yeah,
they're jerky. Yeah, Ostrich jerky. I bet that'd be good.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (05:01):
You ever eat Ostrich steak? I've had an Ostrich burger.
It was good.
Speaker 2 (05:04):
Yeah, it's weird. It's it's red meat. Right, It's not
like a chicken like you might think because it's a bird,
so maybe it is a herd and not a fly.
Speaker 1 (05:12):
May you be? I don't know, Jeff. And does it?
Can it be pink in the middle or will that
kill you? Oh? Good question.
Speaker 2 (05:18):
You want your your chicken, probably go ahead and get
that done unless you're constipated, and then I think that
the medium rare chicken is going to work wonders on
your system.
Speaker 1 (05:28):
You know.
Speaker 3 (05:28):
I can't talk about this too much on the radio,
but my experience, there's a lot.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
Of things that are pink in the middle that'll hurt you.
Is that right?
Speaker 3 (05:34):
Yeah? Golf balls, Let's not talk about it.
Speaker 4 (05:38):
You know.
Speaker 2 (05:38):
I mean, if you cut a golf ball in a half,
you might find that's pink in the middle, and you
know it'll hurt you if it goes upside your head.
Speaker 1 (05:44):
Oops, upside your head? I said, Oops, you did that?
You did that?
Speaker 2 (05:47):
I did. I'm not gonna take it back either.
Speaker 3 (05:50):
A suspicious package is sickening people.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
It has well, you keep your eyes on your own pants.
Speaker 3 (05:58):
Then no, no belly. This happened at military base in Maryland.
It had nothing to do with you.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
Oh.
Speaker 3 (06:03):
Apparently the suspicious package was delivered to a US military
base and it caused multiple people to fall ill and
led to several of them being taken to the hospital.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
Are we talking like a powdery substance in an envelope
or something? What happened? Here's what we know.
Speaker 3 (06:17):
There was a statement from Joint Bass Andrews that's located
in DC, and they said a building on the base
was evacuated after an individual opened a quote suspicious package.
Several people were transported to the nearby medical center there
that'd be the Malcolm Grove Medical Center soon to be
the Mohammed Medical Center, and as a precaution, the building
and connecting building were evacuated. Yeah, apparently the package contained
(06:40):
an unknown white powdery substance. Okay, there, I was right,
and we only know that. Yeah. Well, two people told
CNBC that an initial field test from the hazmat team
did not detect anything hazardous, but the investigation remains ongoing.
Here's what I don't get. If they didn't detect anything hazardous,
but people got sick after being exposed to it, right,
does that mean that the powdery substance like expires it
(07:02):
some quickly after.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
Being exposed to oxygen.
Speaker 2 (07:05):
Yeah, I wonder about those things. How did how did
they get sick? If they if it was benign?
Speaker 3 (07:10):
Yeah, no it wasn't. No, it wasn't benign. It was
a white powdery substance.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
Thank you.
Speaker 4 (07:14):
What you just said is one of the most insanely
idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in
your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything
that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this
room is now dumber for having listened to it. Walton L.
Speaker 1 (07:32):
Johnson, this music on makes me more urban, But I
like it. No, it didn't do anything for it. You
like that?
Speaker 3 (07:38):
No, this is what black music in the eighties sounded like. Right,
Why are you acting me because you were black in
the eighties? Oh all right, Dan, Yeah, what do you mean?
Speaker 1 (07:47):
Yeah? Well, what are you now? You tell me? You're
telling me how it is? Mate? No, who's that singing?
Speaker 3 (07:53):
I'm literally asking you to teach me, Billy, mister Amy,
this is Paul Russell.
Speaker 1 (07:57):
I want to be talked.
Speaker 3 (07:59):
This is this is there's new music that sounds like
old new music. Lately, we've been playing a lot of
newer stuff on the show. You know, you'll fall back
on little Brothers Johnson every now and then. I mean
they had it going on, but that's strawberry litter. Twenty
three sounded way better than that new stuff.
Speaker 1 (08:13):
Steve, You have a brother and you're in a band
with him? Any brothers Johnson? Not the Johnson brothers.
Speaker 3 (08:18):
Oh, the Brothers Johnson and I guess I never heard
of that Brothers Osbourne.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
I heard of Brothers.
Speaker 2 (08:23):
Osbourne that they're not related to me. Brother Cain, No,
you're not taking you know, taking direction?
Speaker 1 (08:30):
Well are you?
Speaker 3 (08:31):
I got Brooks and done. I'm just looking alphabetically here
at what's in our library. I don't see Brothers Johnson.
Or are you sure that's a band?
Speaker 2 (08:37):
No?
Speaker 3 (08:38):
I have no way to know for show? All right,
how about this one? Is this the most explosive headline
of the day or not? Tell me what you think.
Nancy Mace, the congresswoman who's running for governor in the Carolinas.
Speaker 1 (08:48):
No one knows which Carolina is a South Carolina. Dont matter.
Speaker 3 (08:51):
Nancy Mayce concocted rape story and hacked fiance's phone in
bid to seize two million two multimillion dollar homes according
to a bombshell new lawsuit.
Speaker 1 (09:04):
Huh, this is an accusation, not a true fact at
this point. Correct.
Speaker 3 (09:08):
Okay, here's the smoking gun. Tell me what you think
of this. A journalist posts a link to the story
on social media on acts a journalist named Colin Rugg.
Doesn't really matter. He's a small part of the story
and cites the Daily Mail. He just posts it and says,
here's a story in the Daily Mail. Nancy Mace replies
on social media last night with the following words. She
(09:30):
says to the journalist, this is false and you may
want to take it down before you get sued. This
is your warning first and last. Now I could tell
you a little bit about defamation. There's slander, there's libel.
She's accusing him of libel because he wrote it. He
didn't say it out loud. He's telling you that there's
a news story about this in the Daily Mail.
Speaker 1 (09:53):
There's no way that's defamation.
Speaker 3 (09:54):
It's in the Daily Mail, right and the Daily Mail
is telling you that this is part of a lawsuit.
So you can't sue them because it is. I mean,
you could sue, but you'd lose. It is part of
a lawsuit. So Nancy mayce threatening a journalist for telling
you that another journalist is covering a lawsuit which objectively
exists kind of makes it sound like she's guilty because
(10:15):
she wants to sue this guy for talking about it.
Speaker 2 (10:17):
Boy, I want to sue. I want to sue somebody
now for talking about it. Well, I'm so confused. Usually
it's the news, it's story. It either happened or it didn't.
Speaker 1 (10:29):
We don't know.
Speaker 3 (10:30):
Means okay, it's a lawsuit, right, we haven't determined if
it happened yet. But there is a lawsuit in which
her ex fiance is accusing her of tracking his car
and destroying his reputation by falsely.
Speaker 1 (10:40):
Smearing him as a voyeur and a rapist.
Speaker 3 (10:43):
The South Carolina congresswoman went scorched earth on four men
she outed as alleged sex predators back in February in
a house speech, claiming they drugged and molested and filmed
multiple female victims, including herself.
Speaker 1 (10:56):
Uh huh, But one of the accused her a strange lover.
Speaker 3 (10:59):
Patrick Bryant has filed a scathing legal response accusing the
Republican lawmaker of cooking up fake gang rape claims to
blackmail him.
Speaker 2 (11:08):
What would you say if you was accused of gang
rape right now this morning? Would you would probably say?
Uh huh no, didn't do it, you know, and see
it's just that easy. Now now you off the hook, right?
Speaker 1 (11:19):
I was just thinking about this in response to another
news story that's going around right now.
Speaker 3 (11:22):
Do you remember what we learned about our phones during COVID,
when people started getting out in for exposing other people
to things. We all carry these tracking devices everywhere, listening devices,
tracking devices.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
They are your brain. It's everything.
Speaker 3 (11:38):
And unless you've already gone to great lengths to erase
the GEO tag location data in your phone, your phone
is a record of everywhere you been.
Speaker 2 (11:46):
That's why you should keep it inside of an empty
potato chip bag. Why potato chip bag, Billy? You know
they got that foil lining on there. And then what
you can you can get around these kind of things.
Just stick in the potato chip bag before you put
it in your purse or your hocket or whatever.
Speaker 3 (12:00):
You'd be good, mister Kenneth, Is that true? I haven't
the sound well, I don't think so either. I don't
know they don't okay, Well, sound true Okay.
Speaker 2 (12:09):
Well that's what makes it so good. It's just simple.
So you see, everybody wants to be all high tech.
I need to go to jam or I need to
go to you know, just get some laced potato chips.
Not even a big bag, you know, because who can
afford the big bag these days? I mean they are
price yeah dit, the little single serving bag. Eat the chips,
don't waste them, obviously, get the kind you like.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
The scoops.
Speaker 2 (12:29):
I like the skips. Yeah good, you know, the sour
cream and onion. You can't go wrong there neither.
Speaker 3 (12:35):
Sure, well, anyway, scoops and sour cream on your side.
If these guys were in fact innocent, I think there
would be some data on their phone to prove that
they were, weren't in a place when someone did or
didn't get raped, And wouldn't there be a rape kit,
I mean, some kind of DNA evidence. This is America,
after all. This is a pretty scathing allegation.
Speaker 2 (12:51):
Yes it is, and we'll have to just wait and
see what happens with it, especially for somebody that's running
for governor right now, who's already in a position of
some importance.
Speaker 3 (13:01):
And you really got a wonder. I mean, if it's true,
then man, we deserve justice. And if it's not true,
she should be punished for saying this. Yeah, how dare her?
Speaker 1 (13:09):
Anyway?
Speaker 3 (13:11):
This guy's complaint says his explosive feard with Nancy may
stems from a messy breakup in November twenty twenty three.
Do you remember when she gave a speech at the
National Prayer Breakfast.
Speaker 2 (13:21):
You're going to say when she gave a hand job
that day, But that's a different thing.
Speaker 3 (13:24):
That was Lauren Bobert yea Yeah, a different guy that
was at the Beetlejuice Live Musical in Denver.
Speaker 4 (13:29):
No.
Speaker 3 (13:29):
Do you remember when Nancy Mace gave a speech at
the National Prayer Breakfast and she said she was going
to be late because her unmarried boyfriend wanted to have
sex with her before church that morning? I do remember,
and everyone thought that was a weird thing to say
at church. Don't you think it was same guy? I
think I'm pretty sure it was, because that's who she
was with around this time. Anyway, he's accusing the lawmaker
(13:50):
of installing a secret app on his phone to plunder
pictures and data that she hoped to use to pressure
him into relinquishing their jointly owned homes that are worth
about six million dollars a piece. Goodness, and if any
of this is true, I mean whether or not you
had an app on your phone that that's easy to
prove or disprove you either did or didn't have it.
There's something called meta data. Metadata is data about other data,
(14:14):
and it can tell us how long the app's been
on your phone, for how it got there, that sort
of thing.
Speaker 2 (14:19):
Well, is that like you need to get up in
the middle of this and solve this damn thing. It's
a lot of he said, And then she said, and
Kenny can just get right to the point of it
and say that ain't true.
Speaker 1 (14:28):
That is true because I just looked at the data.
Speaker 3 (14:31):
Okay, So I'm actually pretty busy, like with stand up
comedy going on, finding communists in the park and working
on my new punk band, Black Smoke and the Revelation.
You know, so I'm not going to be able to
help out Nancy Mace's fiance right now.
Speaker 1 (14:43):
Plus I don't even know this guy.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
Well, maybe you could help her out proved of things
that he said was a lie, and you just substantiate
her what she said Dancy and then you might get lucky.
Speaker 3 (14:54):
See I would help her out, but again, still busy
with all those things I just mentioned.
Speaker 1 (14:58):
Doesn't change too busy to score what with Nancy Mace?
Speaker 3 (15:01):
Okay, So, one thing I have learned is when you
find that there's a woman with a lot of drama
surrounding her, even if she's on that right away right, No, no, no, no,
what No, those huge naturals are not worth it.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
Well, this is a new refreshing side of the young
Kinney webster that none of us are familiar with.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
Yet. No, you're avoiding confrontation and drama.
Speaker 3 (15:21):
I have decided to distance myself from the world of
romantic interactions and it is really helping out my professional
life and my creative ability to get things done. Yeah
and all, Yeah, and all I had to do was
slice off my penis in a transgender operation center.
Speaker 1 (15:37):
Totally worth it.
Speaker 4 (15:37):
Yeah, Yeah, what you just said is one of the
most insanely idiotic things I've ever heard.
Speaker 3 (15:43):
I know, you know, it's just a liner. But we've
already played that liner this morning. Could we get a
fresh one, please?
Speaker 1 (15:48):
And what exactly are your demands? We need more lemon pledge?
You need more Lemon pledge. Yes, we're not responsible for that.
You should just bring it from your own home. Wolston
and Johnson
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com