December 9, 2025 • 18 mins
Scott talks with Hamilton County Commissioner Denise Driehaus about how to help get Hamilton County property owners the rebate they were promised for the stadium fund.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Do want to be an American idiot?
Speaker 2 (00:03):
Hi Scott flown back on seven hundred wals of it,
And so we heard the news that last week Hamilic
County commissioners with four and a half percent Carbert Tech
rebate for next year. Of course, we all remember the
thirty percent promise when voters approved the half scent sales
tax increased back in the mid nineties to fund the
stadiums downtown. Was also finding out that that's the lowest
number we've had as far as their rebate goes. Now,
(00:24):
the vote two to one. Commissioner Alisia Reese was dissenting
supporting it. Of course, we're we're a commissioner's Denise Treehouse,
the Hamlin County commissioned president who joins us now on
the show to talk about it on seven hundred ww
welcome back Denise Hau's life.
Speaker 3 (00:40):
Yeah doing well, Scott.
Speaker 2 (00:42):
How are you?
Speaker 1 (00:42):
I'm good? I'm good.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
I know you've got sexy budget meetings to get to
and everything else because you're a numbers chick. So God
bless you, God speed. You're better than I'm at that stuff.
So let's look at and you know, your contemporary a
Lisha Reese was on the show last week, and I
know we had some things you wanted to get off
your chest relative to that conversation without playing all the
(01:04):
highlights of that. But you know, you've been in county
government and been around long enough to remember the ninety
six stadium campaign and looking back, do you think voters
were given an honest picture of what that thirty percent
property tax reabit it actually mean?
Speaker 1 (01:17):
Or was there some bait and switch happening?
Speaker 2 (01:18):
Because I think if you surveyed, most taxpayers who were
around them feel that there was a bait and switch
and it was intentional.
Speaker 3 (01:24):
Was your thoughts, Well, I'll tell you what I did
want to come on just to correct some things. I mean,
we can all have differences of opinion about what happened
and why it happened, but the fact of the facts,
and so I didn't want to have your listeners come
away with the wrong impression on what has happened in
the past. And so, as you say, starting out, when
this thing was offered to the taxpayers, there was a
(01:48):
sales tax and then this rebate and for the first
fourteen years they did a thirty percent. I mean, they
promised it and they did it. But what happened was
the sales tax that was collected. It didn't keep up.
The revenue did not keep up with making sure that
we meet the obligations of the fund, with the debt
service and the pilot and all the things, maintenance of
(02:10):
the stadiums, all the things, and the PPR. And so
back in twenty eleven you saw a significant dip from
thirty down to seven point eight. And so this ebb
and flow has been going on for a while, depending
on what can be afforded through this fund, right, and
so a number of years ago, probably three four years ago,
the administrator offered a formula that said we need to
(02:33):
keep about eighty five percent in the reserve. Okay, that's responsible,
that's what's been advised by our consultants. That's great. So
let's create a formula where we keep the eighty five
percent and then do the rebate according to that. And
so that's something that would have offered us the ability
to give a rebate. Wouldn't have been the thirty, but
it would have been a starting point. And then each
(02:54):
year try to go up a little bit for the
property tax owners or the property deck players. And we
haven't stepped to the formula, and so when you do
the thirty percent, it blows up the formula and you
can't afford to do that year after year.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
I guess the other way of looking at this too,
then would be, Okay, well we have money for the homeless.
We're going to give deputies a five percent increase. There's
other things in the budget against not just the one thing,
but I guess the taxpa mask Okay, I understand all that.
Then why isn't this a bigger priority or based on
the Matthew just described, it's impossible.
Speaker 3 (03:29):
Well, no, I think the priority is providing relief for
property owners, and we are doing that. This isn't the
only game in town when it comes to how to
provide property tax relief, and so let's not forget about
what's going on in the legislature. I did sit on
Governor Downe's pass forth with Phil Site trying to come
up with some ideas to provide relief. We had twenty
(03:50):
suggestions for the legislature and some for ourselves, and so
we are starting to implement some of that, not the
least of which its House Phil. Three thirty five, which
says that our revenue, the county's revenue will be held
our inside millage will be held to the rate of inflation.
That is a reduction in revenue for the county and
(04:10):
relief to the taxpayers, and so you will not see
the spikes that we have seen in the past for
property tax bills because we're going to be held to
the rate of inflation. We're taking a hit on that.
It's probably about fifteen million a year, but we're willing
to do that as part of the solution. So it's
not as if the county is not working on property
tax relief. We're giving some relief by the way through
(04:32):
the PPR. It's just is not as much as the
thirty percent. So there are other ways to provide this
relief outside the PPR.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
So it would be a messaging kind of thing. Is
that what you're saying is you're going to get the
money back, it just won't be in the thirty percent
property tax rebate.
Speaker 3 (04:49):
Well, we're always trying to look out for the taxpayers
and do as little increase as possible. But as I said,
we've got partners in this fight here right in the state.
I wish the state we're doing more candidly, but we
are doing our part, and we didn't have to support
House Built three thirty five. But we did that knowing
that we were going to take a cut because we
(05:09):
thought it was an important thing to do by way
of the county to provide some relief to people that
are struggling. And let me say one other thing, because
I heard it said that the tax players got written
out of the stadium, fact seal that the opposite is true.
The financial plan actually ensured that the PTR remains in
(05:31):
the formula in the equation. It's a matter of degree,
and that's always what we fight about. But we literally
wrote it into the least negotiations with the Bangles in
the financial stack, and so we didn't write it out.
We literally wrote it in to the financial stack.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
Could the thirty percent rebate have been part of the
new stadium deal the two hundred and eleven nois which
by the way that you're voting.
Speaker 3 (05:53):
On today, Well, it is part of it. As I said,
it's just a matter of degree the PTR is in there.
It's just the thirty percent ebbs and flows given the
amount of revenue that's coming into that fun.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
Okay, So what would then find in subsequent years at
ease three house.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
What can people expect as far as they rebate goes.
Speaker 3 (06:12):
Well, what I would like to do is again go
back to this formula and say we are going to
do as much as we can and hopefully increase it
year after year so people always see that kind of increase.
The other thing it does is structure something where it's
more predictable and so that you should see the chart.
I don't know if you've seen the chart where it
goes up and down and up and down, and they're
dramatic shifts, and so I you know, I'm a packed player.
(06:36):
I would rather see something that is something I can
count on and that I can budget for. And we're
talking about maybe the delta between the four point five
that was voted this year in the thirty is about
seventy bucks, So we're not talking about hundreds of dollars.
I know seventy dollars is a significant amount of money,
but when it comes to your household budget, that's what
(06:57):
we're talking about.
Speaker 2 (06:58):
Well, but if you're a senior fixating people on the margins,
were plenty of those people that are afraid they can't
pay their property taxes because what the state's doing, and
of course the reassessments and the like. You had this
in there as well, and you know eventually it's going
to be a breaking point. I know, it's just seventy dollars.
There's some people that seventy dollars there's a lot of
money though.
Speaker 3 (07:16):
Yeah, I agreed, And so we're trying to provide that
release another way. As I said, the PPR is not
the only way to get this done, and so we're
providing the release through these other mechanisms. And by the way,
that there are longer terms right, House three thirty five
is ongoing. It's not something that's decided year after year.
It's going to be lost, and so we will be
(07:39):
held to the rate of inflation, and so that release
will be ongoing and so we won't have this debate
every year. That will stay in place.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
Commissioner Denise Triethouse, President of commission and talking about the
meeting today, the vote today two hundred and eleven for
pay Corps. We also had word that it's only a
four and a half percent property tax rebate for next
year instead of the thirty percent promise when we approved
the ninety six stadium front buildout. So the truth is
then going to be somewhere between four and a half
(08:08):
and thirty percent with all these ways of finance or
getting that money back to taxpayers, Denise, are we ever
going to get close to thirty Because while the four
and a half percent right now, especially with the new deal,
is bad timing on the part Forer, I think for
a lot of homeowners and taxpayers.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
Do you agree?
Speaker 3 (08:26):
Well, you know, Scott, I have voted for thirty in
the payout, So when we could afford it, I voted
for it, and when I thought it was necessary for
the taxpayers, I did it. The fact of the matter, though,
is that you can't sustain that. You can do it,
but you can't keep doing it because then you bankrupt
the fund. So if we were to do a thirty
(08:47):
percent this year, the vote we just took, we would
have reduced the fund dramatically, and so that that hurts
the fund. By the way we're supposed to keep eighty
five percent, we would have been way way down. The
other piece of that so is that it impacts next year,
and so if you do the thirty percent this year,
then you're in trouble next year. And that's what's happened.
We did thirty percent last year, and I didn't vote
(09:08):
for that because I didn't think it was responsible. And
so now we're in a position this year where we
can't do it again. So you know, year after year
it all plays upon. This is why I'm in favor
of this formula. So we don't have this dynamic where
we've got thirty percent and then we got to go
to four point five. I mean, yeah, do I wish
it was higher, Yes, I do, but you know, we're
looking at the finances as fund and not bankrupting the fund.
(09:31):
So it is what it is. And I also was
listening and heard that this idea that the attack players
didn't get anything through the new lease with the Bengals,
and nothing could be further from the truth. Where we
got the Bengals to pay one hundred and twenty million
dollars into our asset, which is that stadium, we capped
our cost of three hundred and fifty million, which has
(09:52):
never happened, and we got a long term deal with
the Bengals, and we got use of that stadium like
in a way that we never do right. And so
then we get to have high school football games between
Elder and ex played at the stadium. So let's not
forget about the community benefits that came through that lease
in addition to the financial benefits that we got as
(10:13):
the county.
Speaker 2 (10:14):
Well we need to have I mean, that's all nice
for Saint exe and Elder, but why aren't we using
the stadium more? I thought initially when this happened that
we'd see a lot more activity outside the occasional Taylor
Swift show, a lot more of what we're talking about
with football. Why does it take well twenty eight years
into this thing and now we're going, hey, we need
to utilize the stadium more for high school athletics. Why
(10:35):
haven't we been doing that all along?
Speaker 3 (10:37):
Because we didn't have control of the city, because the
county didn't have control. And so through this new lease,
we now have access to that stadium as we should.
It belongs to the tax players, and so we had
seen the first model of how that's going to play
out in the years to come, where we do have
more concerts, we have more events, we have more high
school football games. That was the whole point of the
(10:59):
community benefit disagreement, and so the Bengals signed off on that,
and so this was our first foray into that. I
thought it was a good model. It was beautiful nights,
even it was a little rainy, but yeah, and look
to that in the future. That's exactly what we're trying
to accomplish.
Speaker 1 (11:14):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (11:14):
But but one may look at that and go wow,
that is to not see the availability, because that was
something else was promised people. It was like, hey, yeah,
you know the stadium that we're partners in this single
bit to use the stadium. We haven't been able to
And I think that's just another And I brought that
up to Denise because between that and the thirty percent,
I think there's a huge disconnect between elected officials like yourself,
(11:34):
certainly the Bengals in the front office, and what the
community wants and they you know, I think everyone's looking
at all of these deals and going, Okay, I think
we're just going to get screwed again because the pattern
is there. How do you how do you change that
over the next ten, fifteen, twenty years.
Speaker 3 (11:50):
Well, I wasn't there when this promise was made, by
the way, for this thirty percent. That happened many years ago,
and it wasn't a responsible promise. I mean, they had
no idea, by the way, the reason we're having this
conversation is because the revenue is a flat Right, if
the sales tax revenue was higher, we'd be doing all.
We'd be doing the thirty percent. We could afford it,
we'd do it. I'd support it. That would be great.
(12:12):
That's just not the reality. And so to promise this
so many years ago, for twenty five years is not responsible.
You shouldn't do that. You can't budget like that because
you don't know what the economic reality is going to be.
You don't know what the economy is going to be.
So I try not to make unrealistic promises to people.
I try to honor what I had said I could
(12:33):
do and try to do as much as possible, whether
it's thirty percent or something less than that, we're trying
to do as much as possible. And I know something
else that was raised in your conversation was MFD, which
is another challenge for us because we're under the federal
and you know, it's a mandate from the federal government,
the Consent Decree, but it's not funded. It's an unfunded mandate,
(12:54):
and so we're under that. We've got a very old system,
over one hundred years old. You know, with the pipes
in the ground, and so we're trying to hold those
rates as tight as possible, knowing that our counterparts in
other counties are raising rates higher than what's been suggested
for us. So Franklin County is up eight percent next year,
Akron's going up five percent, Tyahoga is going up fourteen
(13:15):
or four point two percent. So it's not like we're
alone in this. But what we're trying to do is say,
how can we keep these rates as low as possible
and again make it predictable. And so next year you're
going to see because we got rid of the bulk discount.
And I know it's kind of in the weeds, but anyway,
we got rid of the bulk discount. So next year
people will not see residents will not see higher MSc
(13:38):
race and so that's good news, and you don't hear
anybody talking about that, but they were about to pass
that budget too. In years after that, we're hoping to
have a fairly low predictable rate so that people don't
see spikes in those bills either. So you know, it's
not only this one issue. We're trying to play this
out across the board and provide as much relief as
we can, knowing that we're under some of these man
(14:00):
date and we have to respond to those.
Speaker 2 (14:02):
Commissioner Denise's treehouse last week, Alicia Reese. Commissioner Reese said
that the county's rolling in money. She told me, we're
rolling the mud. We got money all over the place
with the banks and stadium revenues. You're saying we can't
fund a full rebate and thirty percent is it can't
be done, It's impossible.
Speaker 1 (14:19):
Are we really rolling in money?
Speaker 3 (14:22):
No, we are not rolling in money. I mean, we
have our budget here, and we have a budget here
in tonight as a matter of fact, and the revenues
are relatively flack. We're doing what we can. But no,
I mean it is it's very tight. Ask the sheriff,
ask the prosecutor, ask the judges. The budget is very
tight this year. I don't know what that refers to,
(14:44):
but it is certainly not reality.
Speaker 1 (14:46):
So not rolling in money. Maybe a little bit of money.
Speaker 3 (14:51):
I thought, I'm wondering what we're talking about now.
Speaker 1 (14:54):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (14:55):
I don't know what that was the reality is this?
What give me a reason? What can you expect you?
What can you tell taxpayers. Now in handling count it's
it can't be four and a half percent. You're saying
it can't be thirty percent. What's the target?
Speaker 3 (15:11):
The target is keeping eighty five percent in the fun
and making sure we meet our dead ol. We have
dead obligations, we have obligations through a pilot payment, we
have construction, we have all these obligations. So meet the obligations,
and then we have built into that formula this PTR.
So we will have a PTR every year and knowing
(15:31):
it depends on the sales tax revenue and what's coming in,
and that will define what we can do by way
of the relief. We can't spend money we don't have.
Speaker 2 (15:40):
Is it is it closer to thirty percent or closer
to four and a half.
Speaker 3 (15:45):
For when next time?
Speaker 2 (15:46):
Oh yeah, next next cycle, and then it's going to
be changed. But you said you want to get to
a steady number and the number will be everyone will
be happy with.
Speaker 1 (15:52):
Would be what I guess to the question, or you just.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
Simply don't know, Well, how would I know? I mean,
I don't know what is going to come in by
way to sales tax.
Speaker 2 (16:00):
Well, I mean you have targets obviously, otherwise we've been
doing this, so there's got to be a number in
your mind.
Speaker 3 (16:05):
Yeah, well sure, And what I'm hoping for is an
increase every year. So as we look at the four
point five, we go up next year, and then we
go up the year after that and go after the
year after that. So it's predictable and we're doing and
I and I anticipate and I hate the prediction because
you know, we just came out of a pandemic not
too long ago, and I get an impact here right
(16:27):
you it's very hard and we had a recession and
that's where you saw another dip, so it's really hard
for me to predict. But the model is set so
that we start out low and we continue to grow
year up to year. So that is certainly my hope.
But to make a prediction gets a little dicey.
Speaker 2 (16:45):
Yeah, fair enough. We'll just say twenty five eight percent.
Speaker 1 (16:49):
How's that?
Speaker 3 (16:51):
Say what you'd like, and we'll try to hit that mark.
Speaker 2 (16:52):
Because I got to have your record, everything's recorded. I
want to bring this back later and then you know,
rub your nose in it to know that's like, please, well,
we will do that.
Speaker 3 (17:04):
I would not do the MC let's get back to MSc,
because that's another one that I hear quite a bit about.
And so that rate, we're trying to do a predictable
rate across the board for the next ten years. We're
trying to hit four point five, which is a pretty
modest increase. Before I got to the Commission, by the way,
those rates were quite a bit higher year after year.
And when I got there, we were able to hold
(17:26):
that flat for a number of years because we had
a reserve, and so we spent down some of that
reserved to keep for US rates flat. But now we're
back to a reserve that's reasonable that we need to
increase the rate modestly year after years. So that is
what I'm shooting for. Right If I can do a
four point five increase for MSc for the next ten years,
(17:50):
I think that's what people are asking me to do.
Give us something predictable, make it as low as you
possibly can, and that's what we're going to do. So
that's what that's what I'm trying to do with the
end next week. Not to be confused with the four
point five PCR. And now I'm just realizing that those
numbers are the same and the increase this year.
Speaker 1 (18:11):
PREMI, I guess, I.
Speaker 2 (18:12):
Guess I've got to get going. We could probably talk
about this for a long time, but you got to go.
You got votes, you got work to do. To d
Streetouse Hamlet County Commission President, setting the record straight from
her perspective, I always enjoy having you back, and thanks
for taking time out to explain. Thanks, got all the
best to you. And we've got a news update happening
now here on seven hundred WLW
Do want to be an American idiot?
Speaker 2 (00:03):
Hi Scott flown back on seven hundred wals of it,
And so we heard the news that last week Hamilic
County commissioners with four and a half percent Carbert Tech
rebate for next year. Of course, we all remember the
thirty percent promise when voters approved the half scent sales
tax increased back in the mid nineties to fund the
stadiums downtown. Was also finding out that that's the lowest
number we've had as far as their rebate goes. Now,
(00:24):
the vote two to one. Commissioner Alisia Reese was dissenting
supporting it. Of course, we're we're a commissioner's Denise Treehouse,
the Hamlin County commissioned president who joins us now on
the show to talk about it on seven hundred ww
welcome back Denise Hau's life.
Speaker 3 (00:40):
Yeah doing well, Scott.
Speaker 2 (00:42):
How are you?
Speaker 1 (00:42):
I'm good? I'm good.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
I know you've got sexy budget meetings to get to
and everything else because you're a numbers chick. So God
bless you, God speed. You're better than I'm at that stuff.
So let's look at and you know, your contemporary a
Lisha Reese was on the show last week, and I
know we had some things you wanted to get off
your chest relative to that conversation without playing all the
(01:04):
highlights of that. But you know, you've been in county
government and been around long enough to remember the ninety
six stadium campaign and looking back, do you think voters
were given an honest picture of what that thirty percent
property tax reabit it actually mean?
Speaker 1 (01:17):
Or was there some bait and switch happening?
Speaker 2 (01:18):
Because I think if you surveyed, most taxpayers who were
around them feel that there was a bait and switch
and it was intentional.
Speaker 3 (01:24):
Was your thoughts, Well, I'll tell you what I did
want to come on just to correct some things. I mean,
we can all have differences of opinion about what happened
and why it happened, but the fact of the facts,
and so I didn't want to have your listeners come
away with the wrong impression on what has happened in
the past. And so, as you say, starting out, when
this thing was offered to the taxpayers, there was a
(01:48):
sales tax and then this rebate and for the first
fourteen years they did a thirty percent. I mean, they
promised it and they did it. But what happened was
the sales tax that was collected. It didn't keep up.
The revenue did not keep up with making sure that
we meet the obligations of the fund, with the debt
service and the pilot and all the things, maintenance of
(02:10):
the stadiums, all the things, and the PPR. And so
back in twenty eleven you saw a significant dip from
thirty down to seven point eight. And so this ebb
and flow has been going on for a while, depending
on what can be afforded through this fund, right, and
so a number of years ago, probably three four years ago,
the administrator offered a formula that said we need to
(02:33):
keep about eighty five percent in the reserve. Okay, that's responsible,
that's what's been advised by our consultants. That's great. So
let's create a formula where we keep the eighty five
percent and then do the rebate according to that. And
so that's something that would have offered us the ability
to give a rebate. Wouldn't have been the thirty, but
it would have been a starting point. And then each
(02:54):
year try to go up a little bit for the
property tax owners or the property deck players. And we
haven't stepped to the formula, and so when you do
the thirty percent, it blows up the formula and you
can't afford to do that year after year.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
I guess the other way of looking at this too,
then would be, Okay, well we have money for the homeless.
We're going to give deputies a five percent increase. There's
other things in the budget against not just the one thing,
but I guess the taxpa mask Okay, I understand all that.
Then why isn't this a bigger priority or based on
the Matthew just described, it's impossible.
Speaker 3 (03:29):
Well, no, I think the priority is providing relief for
property owners, and we are doing that. This isn't the
only game in town when it comes to how to
provide property tax relief, and so let's not forget about
what's going on in the legislature. I did sit on
Governor Downe's pass forth with Phil Site trying to come
up with some ideas to provide relief. We had twenty
(03:50):
suggestions for the legislature and some for ourselves, and so
we are starting to implement some of that, not the
least of which its House Phil. Three thirty five, which
says that our revenue, the county's revenue will be held
our inside millage will be held to the rate of inflation.
That is a reduction in revenue for the county and
(04:10):
relief to the taxpayers, and so you will not see
the spikes that we have seen in the past for
property tax bills because we're going to be held to
the rate of inflation. We're taking a hit on that.
It's probably about fifteen million a year, but we're willing
to do that as part of the solution. So it's
not as if the county is not working on property
tax relief. We're giving some relief by the way through
(04:32):
the PPR. It's just is not as much as the
thirty percent. So there are other ways to provide this
relief outside the PPR.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
So it would be a messaging kind of thing. Is
that what you're saying is you're going to get the
money back, it just won't be in the thirty percent
property tax rebate.
Speaker 3 (04:49):
Well, we're always trying to look out for the taxpayers
and do as little increase as possible. But as I said,
we've got partners in this fight here right in the state.
I wish the state we're doing more candidly, but we
are doing our part, and we didn't have to support
House Built three thirty five. But we did that knowing
that we were going to take a cut because we
(05:09):
thought it was an important thing to do by way
of the county to provide some relief to people that
are struggling. And let me say one other thing, because
I heard it said that the tax players got written
out of the stadium, fact seal that the opposite is true.
The financial plan actually ensured that the PTR remains in
(05:31):
the formula in the equation. It's a matter of degree,
and that's always what we fight about. But we literally
wrote it into the least negotiations with the Bangles in
the financial stack, and so we didn't write it out.
We literally wrote it in to the financial stack.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
Could the thirty percent rebate have been part of the
new stadium deal the two hundred and eleven nois which
by the way that you're voting.
Speaker 3 (05:53):
On today, Well, it is part of it. As I said,
it's just a matter of degree the PTR is in there.
It's just the thirty percent ebbs and flows given the
amount of revenue that's coming into that fun.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
Okay, So what would then find in subsequent years at
ease three house.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
What can people expect as far as they rebate goes.
Speaker 3 (06:12):
Well, what I would like to do is again go
back to this formula and say we are going to
do as much as we can and hopefully increase it
year after year so people always see that kind of increase.
The other thing it does is structure something where it's
more predictable and so that you should see the chart.
I don't know if you've seen the chart where it
goes up and down and up and down, and they're
dramatic shifts, and so I you know, I'm a packed player.
(06:36):
I would rather see something that is something I can
count on and that I can budget for. And we're
talking about maybe the delta between the four point five
that was voted this year in the thirty is about
seventy bucks, So we're not talking about hundreds of dollars.
I know seventy dollars is a significant amount of money,
but when it comes to your household budget, that's what
(06:57):
we're talking about.
Speaker 2 (06:58):
Well, but if you're a senior fixating people on the margins,
were plenty of those people that are afraid they can't
pay their property taxes because what the state's doing, and
of course the reassessments and the like. You had this
in there as well, and you know eventually it's going
to be a breaking point. I know, it's just seventy dollars.
There's some people that seventy dollars there's a lot of
money though.
Speaker 3 (07:16):
Yeah, I agreed, And so we're trying to provide that
release another way. As I said, the PPR is not
the only way to get this done, and so we're
providing the release through these other mechanisms. And by the way,
that there are longer terms right, House three thirty five
is ongoing. It's not something that's decided year after year.
It's going to be lost, and so we will be
(07:39):
held to the rate of inflation, and so that release
will be ongoing and so we won't have this debate
every year. That will stay in place.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
Commissioner Denise Triethouse, President of commission and talking about the
meeting today, the vote today two hundred and eleven for
pay Corps. We also had word that it's only a
four and a half percent property tax rebate for next
year instead of the thirty percent promise when we approved
the ninety six stadium front buildout. So the truth is
then going to be somewhere between four and a half
(08:08):
and thirty percent with all these ways of finance or
getting that money back to taxpayers, Denise, are we ever
going to get close to thirty Because while the four
and a half percent right now, especially with the new deal,
is bad timing on the part Forer, I think for
a lot of homeowners and taxpayers.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
Do you agree?
Speaker 3 (08:26):
Well, you know, Scott, I have voted for thirty in
the payout, So when we could afford it, I voted
for it, and when I thought it was necessary for
the taxpayers, I did it. The fact of the matter, though,
is that you can't sustain that. You can do it,
but you can't keep doing it because then you bankrupt
the fund. So if we were to do a thirty
(08:47):
percent this year, the vote we just took, we would
have reduced the fund dramatically, and so that that hurts
the fund. By the way we're supposed to keep eighty
five percent, we would have been way way down. The
other piece of that so is that it impacts next year,
and so if you do the thirty percent this year,
then you're in trouble next year. And that's what's happened.
We did thirty percent last year, and I didn't vote
(09:08):
for that because I didn't think it was responsible. And
so now we're in a position this year where we
can't do it again. So you know, year after year
it all plays upon. This is why I'm in favor
of this formula. So we don't have this dynamic where
we've got thirty percent and then we got to go
to four point five. I mean, yeah, do I wish
it was higher, Yes, I do, but you know, we're
looking at the finances as fund and not bankrupting the fund.
(09:31):
So it is what it is. And I also was
listening and heard that this idea that the attack players
didn't get anything through the new lease with the Bengals,
and nothing could be further from the truth. Where we
got the Bengals to pay one hundred and twenty million
dollars into our asset, which is that stadium, we capped
our cost of three hundred and fifty million, which has
(09:52):
never happened, and we got a long term deal with
the Bengals, and we got use of that stadium like
in a way that we never do right. And so
then we get to have high school football games between
Elder and ex played at the stadium. So let's not
forget about the community benefits that came through that lease
in addition to the financial benefits that we got as
(10:13):
the county.
Speaker 2 (10:14):
Well we need to have I mean, that's all nice
for Saint exe and Elder, but why aren't we using
the stadium more? I thought initially when this happened that
we'd see a lot more activity outside the occasional Taylor
Swift show, a lot more of what we're talking about
with football. Why does it take well twenty eight years
into this thing and now we're going, hey, we need
to utilize the stadium more for high school athletics. Why
(10:35):
haven't we been doing that all along?
Speaker 3 (10:37):
Because we didn't have control of the city, because the
county didn't have control. And so through this new lease,
we now have access to that stadium as we should.
It belongs to the tax players, and so we had
seen the first model of how that's going to play
out in the years to come, where we do have
more concerts, we have more events, we have more high
school football games. That was the whole point of the
(10:59):
community benefit disagreement, and so the Bengals signed off on that,
and so this was our first foray into that. I
thought it was a good model. It was beautiful nights,
even it was a little rainy, but yeah, and look
to that in the future. That's exactly what we're trying
to accomplish.
Speaker 1 (11:14):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (11:14):
But but one may look at that and go wow,
that is to not see the availability, because that was
something else was promised people. It was like, hey, yeah,
you know the stadium that we're partners in this single
bit to use the stadium. We haven't been able to
And I think that's just another And I brought that
up to Denise because between that and the thirty percent,
I think there's a huge disconnect between elected officials like yourself,
(11:34):
certainly the Bengals in the front office, and what the
community wants and they you know, I think everyone's looking
at all of these deals and going, Okay, I think
we're just going to get screwed again because the pattern
is there. How do you how do you change that
over the next ten, fifteen, twenty years.
Speaker 3 (11:50):
Well, I wasn't there when this promise was made, by
the way, for this thirty percent. That happened many years ago,
and it wasn't a responsible promise. I mean, they had
no idea, by the way, the reason we're having this
conversation is because the revenue is a flat Right, if
the sales tax revenue was higher, we'd be doing all.
We'd be doing the thirty percent. We could afford it,
we'd do it. I'd support it. That would be great.
(12:12):
That's just not the reality. And so to promise this
so many years ago, for twenty five years is not responsible.
You shouldn't do that. You can't budget like that because
you don't know what the economic reality is going to be.
You don't know what the economy is going to be.
So I try not to make unrealistic promises to people.
I try to honor what I had said I could
(12:33):
do and try to do as much as possible, whether
it's thirty percent or something less than that, we're trying
to do as much as possible. And I know something
else that was raised in your conversation was MFD, which
is another challenge for us because we're under the federal
and you know, it's a mandate from the federal government,
the Consent Decree, but it's not funded. It's an unfunded mandate,
(12:54):
and so we're under that. We've got a very old system,
over one hundred years old. You know, with the pipes
in the ground, and so we're trying to hold those
rates as tight as possible, knowing that our counterparts in
other counties are raising rates higher than what's been suggested
for us. So Franklin County is up eight percent next year,
Akron's going up five percent, Tyahoga is going up fourteen
(13:15):
or four point two percent. So it's not like we're
alone in this. But what we're trying to do is say,
how can we keep these rates as low as possible
and again make it predictable. And so next year you're
going to see because we got rid of the bulk discount.
And I know it's kind of in the weeds, but anyway,
we got rid of the bulk discount. So next year
people will not see residents will not see higher MSc
(13:38):
race and so that's good news, and you don't hear
anybody talking about that, but they were about to pass
that budget too. In years after that, we're hoping to
have a fairly low predictable rate so that people don't
see spikes in those bills either. So you know, it's
not only this one issue. We're trying to play this
out across the board and provide as much relief as
we can, knowing that we're under some of these man
(14:00):
date and we have to respond to those.
Speaker 2 (14:02):
Commissioner Denise's treehouse last week, Alicia Reese. Commissioner Reese said
that the county's rolling in money. She told me, we're
rolling the mud. We got money all over the place
with the banks and stadium revenues. You're saying we can't
fund a full rebate and thirty percent is it can't
be done, It's impossible.
Speaker 1 (14:19):
Are we really rolling in money?
Speaker 3 (14:22):
No, we are not rolling in money. I mean, we
have our budget here, and we have a budget here
in tonight as a matter of fact, and the revenues
are relatively flack. We're doing what we can. But no,
I mean it is it's very tight. Ask the sheriff,
ask the prosecutor, ask the judges. The budget is very
tight this year. I don't know what that refers to,
(14:44):
but it is certainly not reality.
Speaker 1 (14:46):
So not rolling in money. Maybe a little bit of money.
Speaker 3 (14:51):
I thought, I'm wondering what we're talking about now.
Speaker 1 (14:54):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (14:55):
I don't know what that was the reality is this?
What give me a reason? What can you expect you?
What can you tell taxpayers. Now in handling count it's
it can't be four and a half percent. You're saying
it can't be thirty percent. What's the target?
Speaker 3 (15:11):
The target is keeping eighty five percent in the fun
and making sure we meet our dead ol. We have
dead obligations, we have obligations through a pilot payment, we
have construction, we have all these obligations. So meet the obligations,
and then we have built into that formula this PTR.
So we will have a PTR every year and knowing
(15:31):
it depends on the sales tax revenue and what's coming in,
and that will define what we can do by way
of the relief. We can't spend money we don't have.
Speaker 2 (15:40):
Is it is it closer to thirty percent or closer
to four and a half.
Speaker 3 (15:45):
For when next time?
Speaker 2 (15:46):
Oh yeah, next next cycle, and then it's going to
be changed. But you said you want to get to
a steady number and the number will be everyone will
be happy with.
Speaker 1 (15:52):
Would be what I guess to the question, or you just.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
Simply don't know, Well, how would I know? I mean,
I don't know what is going to come in by
way to sales tax.
Speaker 2 (16:00):
Well, I mean you have targets obviously, otherwise we've been
doing this, so there's got to be a number in
your mind.
Speaker 3 (16:05):
Yeah, well sure, And what I'm hoping for is an
increase every year. So as we look at the four
point five, we go up next year, and then we
go up the year after that and go after the
year after that. So it's predictable and we're doing and
I and I anticipate and I hate the prediction because
you know, we just came out of a pandemic not
too long ago, and I get an impact here right
(16:27):
you it's very hard and we had a recession and
that's where you saw another dip, so it's really hard
for me to predict. But the model is set so
that we start out low and we continue to grow
year up to year. So that is certainly my hope.
But to make a prediction gets a little dicey.
Speaker 2 (16:45):
Yeah, fair enough. We'll just say twenty five eight percent.
Speaker 1 (16:49):
How's that?
Speaker 3 (16:51):
Say what you'd like, and we'll try to hit that mark.
Speaker 2 (16:52):
Because I got to have your record, everything's recorded. I
want to bring this back later and then you know,
rub your nose in it to know that's like, please, well,
we will do that.
Speaker 3 (17:04):
I would not do the MC let's get back to MSc,
because that's another one that I hear quite a bit about.
And so that rate, we're trying to do a predictable
rate across the board for the next ten years. We're
trying to hit four point five, which is a pretty
modest increase. Before I got to the Commission, by the way,
those rates were quite a bit higher year after year.
And when I got there, we were able to hold
(17:26):
that flat for a number of years because we had
a reserve, and so we spent down some of that
reserved to keep for US rates flat. But now we're
back to a reserve that's reasonable that we need to
increase the rate modestly year after years. So that is
what I'm shooting for. Right If I can do a
four point five increase for MSc for the next ten years,
(17:50):
I think that's what people are asking me to do.
Give us something predictable, make it as low as you
possibly can, and that's what we're going to do. So
that's what that's what I'm trying to do with the
end next week. Not to be confused with the four
point five PCR. And now I'm just realizing that those
numbers are the same and the increase this year.
Speaker 1 (18:11):
PREMI, I guess, I.
Speaker 2 (18:12):
Guess I've got to get going. We could probably talk
about this for a long time, but you got to go.
You got votes, you got work to do. To d
Streetouse Hamlet County Commission President, setting the record straight from
her perspective, I always enjoy having you back, and thanks
for taking time out to explain. Thanks, got all the
best to you. And we've got a news update happening
now here on seven hundred WLW
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com