Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Make us your number one precent for instance, access to
your world.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
Couldn't live without it.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
Fifty five KRS the talk station. It's seven six at
(00:26):
five PRCG Talk station. Very happy Monday, Election Day eve.
Everybody has at least one issue to vote on, although
you may have a school, lovey to vote on or
some other local issue. Here to join the fifty five
KRC Morning Show, and we thank you very much for
doing so. State Representative Jennifer Gross representing District forty five
and she's with me. I'm a hard strong no on
issue too, Jennifer, welcome to the program.
Speaker 3 (00:49):
Thank you. Brian, good morning.
Speaker 2 (00:51):
Now. First off, this is a constitutional amendment my correct.
Speaker 3 (00:55):
Correct, based on the ballot by your legislature.
Speaker 2 (00:59):
Yeah, I don't know what what to deal with that.
I have read.
Speaker 1 (01:02):
This enjoys bipartisan support and business organizations many organizations say
the behind this Before we dive into the why we
should vote no on it? What is it supposed to accomplish?
Issue too?
Speaker 3 (01:14):
Well, let's go back, if you don't mind, Brian, a
little bit to the history. In nineteen eighty seven, this
was started by Democrat Governor Celeste and it was supposedly
started because our roads were in such disrepair, and back
then our gas tax was fourteen cents now it's thirty
eight point five since per gallon. It was to fund
(01:37):
local projects because our highways were in great disrepair. The
highway system had been utilized more often for manufacturing, and
we had lots and lots of projects, largely local, a
lot of those too. But the transportation budget is also
another revenue stream that we use. So we already had
(01:59):
the transportation budget and they said, well, we need a
bump of money, so Celeste put it on the ballot
for five hundred million dollars. Now it's they're asking for
two point five billion. And the projects were supposed to
be basically, you know, we had a backlog of local
infrastructure needs back then in nineteen eighty seven, and yet
(02:20):
every ten years we keep renewing this. So just a
little bit of the history.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
So this takes away the tenure renewal and ensurance. It
in the constitution, so it's always funded, Yes.
Speaker 2 (02:32):
It's always been.
Speaker 3 (02:33):
So it was placed in the constitution every ten years, yes, sir, all.
Speaker 1 (02:37):
Right, So question first thought out of the gate here, Jennifer,
why do we need this separate pool of money you
mentioned specifically something I was going to ask about. The
gas tax is supposed to fund road improvements and maintain infrastructure.
I don't know how much you take in in Ohio
annually in the gas tax, but is it is that
an insufficient revenue source? And if so, doesn't that require
(02:58):
elected officials to allocate additional funds for the roads, maybe
to the exclusion of some other fun new stuff and
things the state might take on.
Speaker 3 (03:08):
Very good thinking, Brian, That's exactly my thought process. The
transportation budget was just passed, and it passed with at
eleven point five billion dollars, and that is supposed to
cover you guessed it, roads and bridges. Federal vehicle registration
helps safe for that as well, you know, the highways,
(03:31):
local projects. The transportation budget covers all the things, or
the majority of the things they're asking for in this
bond issue, which is fascinating. So if the people choose
not to pass this, it would send it back to us.
The legislature require us to use your money more fiscally sound.
Speaker 1 (03:53):
So by allowing the bonds to be issued, that just
means the money's being borrowed and then we've got to
pay it back.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
With interest.
Speaker 3 (04:00):
Correct, correct, And you're absolutely right. I'm sorry I didn't
answer your question quite fully before about another funding source.
We have five budgets already, you know, we have BTWC
and the General Revenue Fund, and the Transportation budget, and
the capital budget and another budget called the IC budget.
Speaker 2 (04:20):
This is a sixth.
Speaker 3 (04:21):
Revenue stream, and we're asking the people for more money.
We're already spending eleven point five on the transportation budget.
We're asking for another funding stream. And you know, I
just but it's debt.
Speaker 2 (04:39):
I mean, the funding stream is borrowing that money.
Speaker 1 (04:42):
So you've got to do You got to do financial
obligation every and every counter of year in the budget,
which is servicing the debt that you borrowed to fund
this particular fund.
Speaker 2 (04:53):
That's right, that's.
Speaker 3 (04:54):
Right, and it's that bonds have debt and an interest
to be paid back.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
All right now, Now, going to this is just layers
as stupid from my perspective, Jennifer, I apologize to spoil it. No, no, no,
I just it. Really it bothers me. You would think
that the Columbus, we've got a bunch of Republicans dominating
the House and the Senate and the governor, you would
think there would be more fiscal responsibility and more willingness
to manage dollars rather than do something like this. So
(05:21):
I'm frustrated by this happening in Ohio, but I'm used
to it by now with Columbus the way it operates now. Allegedly,
the grants that are dealt with in this cover roads, bridges,
water supply, wastewater treatments, stormwater collection, and solid waste disposal. Now,
since I live in the Greater Cincinnati area, if city
council had control over any one of these given projects
with the money that are coming from these bonds being issued,
(05:41):
it will be some outrageously outlandish green focused projects. So
we're gonna deal with wastewater, but we're not going to
do it in the most energy, for most efficient way,
mining the taxpayer dollars. We're going to do something really
crazy and far more expensive in the name of I
don't know, climate change or something. And on by the way,
it's going to be mandated. All all this is being
done by union scale wage and all the extra do
(06:04):
deads and so I'm just looking at it.
Speaker 3 (06:06):
Yes, Brian, did you see the vote yes on issue too?
Signs who does that. Does your legislature pay money to
tell you to vote yet? No, So if someone's spending
money to get you to vote yes on issue too,
but your legislature put it on the ballot, which I
(06:26):
voted against putting it on the ballot. By the way,
let's be clear, there were four of us who voted
against putting it on the ballot. But if someone's paying
money for signs to get you to vote yes on
issue too, why do you think they'd be doing that.
Speaker 1 (06:41):
They're going to be the recipients of the project money
because they're going to get the contract.
Speaker 3 (06:46):
I believe you hit that on the nose. And look,
I have no you know, personal problem with and I
don't even know actually the people directly behind the signs.
But here's what I do know. If you're going to
spend money to try to get us to vote yet,
there's some benefit to you to spend that money. And
so you're absolutely right the people that are going to
(07:07):
get the contracts and all of that. The other thing
that's a concern to me is this, there's no clear
direction as to who would get those projects. Is the
biggest project, because I had someone not in my district
but I had someone call me and say, you know,
it's been two decades and we have this bridge that
we'd have we've had to lower load on because we
can't get it fixed. So even though we keep approving
(07:28):
all this money, we're not getting the project. And they're
in a small rural county in Ohio. So how are
the projects being spent, how are they divvied out? How
do we determine? And it is my understanding that once again,
when we spend this money, we also then draw down
additional funds from the federal government. I don't know if
(07:49):
everybody understands what that means. What does draw down from
the federal government mean? It means that if you're telling
me that you think the federal government has blowed and
bloated and overgrown and Ohio has to stop spending money
locally just to get more money from the federal government. So,
for instance, for every dollar we spend, four dollars comes
back from the federal government. In some of these projects,
(08:12):
we have federal highway funds and things like that that
we then when we spend the money, the federal government
matches us a certain amount. So the federal government has
to spend more money at the federal level when we
spend money, and that's an agreement that we've made which
makes Ohio dependent on federal funds.
Speaker 1 (08:31):
And going back to my climate change focused projects, if
money comes from the Feds, it's going to come with
strings attached.
Speaker 2 (08:38):
That always does.
Speaker 3 (08:38):
Exactly, exactly, just like our money did to the state,
requiring us to keep anybody who lost their jobs on
Medicaid for three years even if they got their job back.
Absolutely absolutely well.
Speaker 1 (08:52):
Obviously made some wonderful reasons and explained why we should
vote know on this now. In final conclusion, I kind
of alluded to it. Who decides ultimately which projects get funded.
There's probably a million projects and this money would in
no way, shape or form cover every project that every
municipality wants done. So who determines where the money goes?
Speaker 3 (09:15):
I would be mistaken to tell you for sure, But
obviously with this amount of money there needs to be
a type of controlling board that would determine it. The
challenge is what are those What are those determinants?
Speaker 2 (09:29):
How do we know.
Speaker 3 (09:30):
Who gets prioritized? So is the larger city like Cincinnati,
when they have a project, do they get do they
get higher priority because somebody in Giaga, Giaga County needs
something and they can't you know, they're so small that
they don't have the same voice. Perhaps we need to
require an audit, you know, from the auditor on this,
(09:50):
just to be clear.
Speaker 2 (09:51):
I think that's a great idea of money going well.
Speaker 1 (09:54):
And you know, wherever there's more money, higher concentration of people,
you know, you know, Franklin County or Cuyahoga County or
here in Hamilton County, that's where the campaign contributions come from,
which is probably why they'd be more likely to get
the project done than someone out in Yaga County just
throwing it out there.
Speaker 3 (10:12):
Unfortunately. Unfortunately, Yes, that can be the case. An influential
for sure.
Speaker 1 (10:17):
So I've been boiling down as a it's a slush fund,
which is a bad thing. So that's what I've been
calling it. So it sounds to me like I can
continue to label at a slush fund.
Speaker 3 (10:26):
I think so, because Brian, really, if it's not approved,
then we need to come up with the money. You know,
I was told then we're going to have to increase taxes.
Why is that the case? Our revenue is I voted
against the general operating budget that we just voted on
at the six hundred million to the stadium. I'm sure
you don't want to get into that today, but I
get tired of hearing. I'll give you a You know,
(10:49):
if you give me a cheeseburger today, I'll give you
a dollar tomorrow. I'm tired of of us. Our revenue
stream is very, very strong, and yet we keep spending
the people's money with no property tax relief. We sow
have an income tax and so to me, yes, if
this is not passed, it requires your legislature to make
(11:09):
some hard choices on how we're spending our dollars.
Speaker 2 (11:13):
Yes, and that's their job.
Speaker 1 (11:16):
Jack Jennifer Gross, proudly representing and wonderfully representing District forty five.
Thank you so much for coming on the program and
explaining this to my listeners and me. I will look
forward to having you on the show again real soon.
Speaker 3 (11:27):
Thank you, Brian, have a great day you too.
Speaker 1 (11:29):
Seven seventeen Christopher smithment with the Smith Event up next. First,
you can save up to fifteen hundred and fifty dollars.
I know nobody wants to have to replace their HVAC system,
but you know what with fifteen hundred and fifty dollars savings.
Turn to my friends at Zimmer Heating and Cooling, who've
been making Cincinnati's homes safe, efficient and comfortable for more
than seventy five years. Third generation Zimmer family, still representing
(11:50):
the company that invented air conditioning, and that's Carrier. It
is air conditioning season. So you get a new Carrier
comfort system from Zimmer Heating and Cooling and you'll save
up to fifteen hundred and fifty genuine dollars. And they
can also service your edition, your your your your currently
existing system, the repairs. It doesn't have to be care.
You can still confidently call Zimmer. They do a wide
(12:11):
variety of HVAC work, so if you want to learn
more about what they do, you are working with the best.
So go to go Zimmer dot com up right hand corner.
You can book the appointment, very easy to do there
go Zimmer dot com. Please tell them, Brian said, how
when you give them a call? Five one three five
two one ninety eight ninety three. That's five one three,
five two one ninety eight ninety three.
Speaker 3 (12:28):
This is fifty five krc an iHeartRadio station.
Speaker 2 (12:32):
Guys, are you tired of being